Slashdot Mirror


New Hampshire Cops Use Taser On Woman Buying Too Many iPhones

turbosaab writes "A woman who said she was asked to leave New Hampshire's Pheasant Lane Mall because she wanted to buy too many iPhones was pinned down by Nashua police and zapped by a Taser (video) as she shrieked in front of crowds of shoppers Tuesday. The Chinese woman from Newton, Mass blamed a language barrier for the confrontation outside the Apple Store in the Pheasant Lane Mall Tuesday afternoon. Police say Li knew exactly what they were telling her and simply refused to comply. Police said Li had $16,000 in cash in her purse at the time of her arrest and may have been purchasing the phones for unauthorized export resale."

144 of 936 comments (clear)

  1. Unauthorized export resale? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean selling her own property for a profit? God forbid.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really relevant. A store doesn't have to sell you multiple copies of something. You can't take the store hostage to force them to sell you more.

    2. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they mean violating US law by purchasing export-restricted devices within the US for the sole purpose of taking them outside the US to resell.

      Certain cryptography software is legally blocked from export, and as a result any software that includes those crypto features is also restricted. PuTTY is a great example.

    3. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the reality is that the law is obsolete - cryptography isn't best just because it's built in the US.

      What this proves is that Apple is jacking up the price and availability more on some markets than other.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Vintermann · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is totally irrelevant here. Only a few nations are on the list of "rogue states" that you can't export cryptography tools to, and China is obviously not one of them.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    5. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Damn right! Who needs stupid things like laws, anyway? Keep raging against the machine, brah!

      Yes. Joining "subversives" like John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by alen · · Score: 2

      JOhn Adams

      the president who gave us the Sedition Act of 1798, one of the repressive attacks on free speech in US history

    7. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Wansu · · Score: 4, Informative

      "What this proves is that Apple is jacking up the price and availability more on some markets than other."

      Exactly. Whenever something doesn't make sense, ask who benefits.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    8. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Calling the police/security is reasonable. Using physical/electrical violence isn't.

      No matter how little English she speaks she must understand a repeated "no" combined with a gesture towards the door.

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by netscan · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is totally irrelevant here. Only a few nations are on the list of "rogue states" that you can't export cryptography tools to, and China is obviously not one of them

      Which isn't exactly true. While the iPhone is classified 5A992 and OK to export to CN, 5A00* items are restricted from export to CN without a license or exception.

    10. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by PTBarnum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The police don't care how many iphones she wanted to buy. The store owner didn't like it, and ordered her out of the store. The police were enforcing the store's right to remove someone from the store's property.

    11. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really relevant. A store doesn't have to sell you multiple copies of something. You can't take the store hostage to force them to sell you more.

      And the proper response to this is to taser her.

    12. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by slew · · Score: 2

      No, they didn't. Not until the law changed. Encryption no longer counts as munitions.

      That's not true. Encryption for DRM purposes no longer counts as munitions. In general, devices that enable custom encryption applications are still considered munitions (e.g., cryptoanalysis libraries and devices that have hardware encryption accellerators that make them easy to use in password cracking farms).

      You can thank hollywood and the computer software folks for the DRM exemption, though... ;^)

    13. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is totally irrelevant here. Only a few nations are on the list of "rogue states" that you can't export cryptography tools to, and China is obviously not one of them

      Which isn't exactly true. While the iPhone is classified 5A992 and OK to export to CN, 5A00* items are restricted from export to CN without a license or exception.

      What if China were to, I don't know, just not export the 5A00* to the US in the first place? It was built there.

    14. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And so they decided to use a weapon on her instead of simply handcuffing her and removing her LIKE NORMAL.

    15. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by sribe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're missing the point. The police tastered this person because she did something perfectly legal, which is to say, buy iPhones. She may or may not have had an intent to later export them, which would be illegal-- but this is no excuse for their actions.

      No, they tasered her because she did something perfectly illegal--refusing to leave private property when asked to do so. They didn't give a damn about (indeed, probably do not even know about) the arcana of encryption export controls.

    16. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by netscan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What if China were to, I don't know, just not export the 5A00* to the US in the first place? It was built there.

      Nobody ever said laws had to be sane :)

    17. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Calling the police/security is reasonable. Using physical/electrical violence isn't.

      Its only going to get worse. With measures like this being put into place without congressional over site how far can we be from a total police state?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    18. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might be shocked to learn this is the new normal

    19. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Chrisje · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Typically you don't need to taser the hell out of someone to escort them from the premises.

      Specifically when it's a woman. You might call me old fashioned or sexist here, but where I'm from we get taught not to use violence against women.

    20. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by LMariachi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure Apple was on the phone with the Nashua police commisioner.

    21. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, your views are sexist. Women today are fully equal, and equally as deserving (undeserving) of having violence used against them as men.

    22. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by assertation · · Score: 2

      No, but the police can zap you with electricity for peacefully spending your own money.

    23. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it was my house and I was threatened, sure.

      This was a public store in a shopping mall and nobody's life was in danger.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by jackbird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, that's not what the cops are supposed to do when someone does that. They're supposed to arrest them for trespassing. The taser is supposed to be a last resort before/instead of using a firearm.

    25. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by mikael · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gray market seeks way around iPhone 5 restrictions

      http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/2012-09/20/content_15770744.htm

      It's really a battle for unlocked mobile phones that don't have registered users. Locked-in phones have your government ID registered.

      Same think happened to someone Iranian:

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/06/21/does-apple-actually-understand-the-export-restriction-laws/

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    26. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by jason.sweet · · Score: 2

      Right. It was better in the old days when they used billy clubs and bullets to subdue people.

    27. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Qwavel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Specifically when it's a woman. You might call me old fashioned or sexist here, but where I'm from we get taught not to use violence against women."

      Where I'm from we get taught not use violence against people.

      You should only used violence when faced with someone who is going to do physical harm to you or others, whether male or female.

    28. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "If someone was trespassing on your property and refused to leave, you'd be justified in tasering them too."

      Someone who wants to give me 16000$ ? Hell no! I'd open some Champagne!

      It's idiotic. The bitch just has to go to Chinatown and come back with a dozen cousins doing the buying. It's just some air-pollution added, the result is the same.

    29. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by fredprado · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not on the phone, on the iPhone.

    30. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by fredprado · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, because a single woman can't be easily dominated by a group of cops without resorting to electric shocks or clubs.

    31. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by jittles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guarantee there are plenty of women out there who could beat the crap out of you and me both. I am not saying this Chinese woman was one of them, and I am not saying that taser should have been used, but I would not use the sex of a person to determine their level of threat. Certainly they could have overpowered her given enough people. I would wait to see the video surveillance before I decide whether excessive force was used.

    32. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by RearNakedChoke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing the point. The police tastered this person because she did something perfectly legal, which is to say, buy iPhones. She may or may not have had an intent to later export them, which would be illegal-- but this is no excuse for their actions.

      No, they tasered her because she did something perfectly illegal--refusing to leave private property when asked to do so. They didn't give a damn about (indeed, probably do not even know about) the arcana of encryption export controls.

      I have to admit I'm a bit divided on this. On the one hand, I do believe she was probably intentionally being obtuse and refusing to comply. On the other hand, tasering for every mildly difficult or confrontational situation is ridiculous.

      I think every time an officer uses a taser on someone, the officer should receive a taser shot 2x - just to make him evaluate whether the taser is really necessary in a situation.

    33. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      She certainly was!

    34. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Dirty little secret: This year's revolutionary is next year's tyrant.

      Oh, maybe not so secret. There've even been...

      <sunglasses>

      songs about it.

      YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

      Meet the new boss
      Same as the old boss

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    35. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's actually illegal for them to sell them to her if they think she's going to export them

    36. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FTFY: Selling all your stock to one woman who obviously doesn't need $16,000.00 worth of phones and turning away all other customers who want to buy an iPhone (and will slag your store as useless to their friends because, 'what kind of iPhone store doesn't have iPhones?') and possibly a bunch of accessories AND any return business they might provide IS bad for business.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    37. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by tattood · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right. But then they should stop selling her phones lol that seems much easier than chasing her with a taser.

      They did try to stop selling her phones. She would not leave, so they called the police. She refused to leave, so they tried to arrest her, and she resisted.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    38. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by tone711 · · Score: 5, Informative

      They handcuffed one of her hands and she resisted moving her other hand to be handcuffed in the back, so they tased her. Of course, she was actually already outside of the store when they tased her.

      She was taking video of people buying multiple phones because she didn't understand why she couldn't also buy multiple phones.

      --
      yous a penguin looking mother-@#%$! - Dre
    39. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by uniquename72 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the battery was replaceable, she wouldn't have had to buy so many phones at once.

    40. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Someone who wants to give me 16000$ ? Hell no! I'd open some Champagne!

      No kidding, I used to work retail and a day like this would be fucking spectacular. We'd talk about it for months. "Hey, remember when that lady came in and bought every family member an iPhone?"

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    41. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Yeah but come on, how often do the cops get to play with tazers? Can't let the golden opportunity of someone who can't speak English and is thus unable to comply with your verbal commands get away. For the purposes of tazering people that's called "violent behaviour and resisting arrest".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    42. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 4, Informative

      Local police officers being qualified to deal with international export laws? Not likely. There's a whole government branch set up for this, the ITA I believe.

      The cops were not doing that. They were called in because a person would not leave a store after being asked to leave. This is something they do every day of the year. The whole export thing was a private dispute between Apple and the woman.

    43. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it becomes trespassing past that point

      Nitpicking over the interpretation of 'trespass' aside, don't you think common sense could have prevailed? I'm sure two big policemen could have made the store managers intentions clear then managed to frog-march her out of the store without resorting to this.

      --
      No sig today...
    44. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One time a woman gets tasered and you go with the assumption that it wasn't a proper response. I have to ask, did you even RTFA and do any basic research or are you just reacting to the ridiculously sensationalist headline?

      Well, when they already have her pinned to the ground - Damn straight "it wasn't a proper response"!

      Cuff her and drag her to the car if she won't walk, but at the point they already have their suspect subdued, tazing someone amounts to nothing less than torturing them out of petty vindictiveness.

    45. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but the police can zap you with electricity for peacefully spending your own money.

      Don't argue like a child.

      1) She wanted to purchase multiple iPhones. There is a limit of two iPhones per person. When the staff recognised that she'd already purchased at least 2, they refused to serve her.

      2) She then behaved inappropriately inside the store, including but not limited to videoing other customers purtchasing iPhones. She was asked to leave as is the right of a store.

      3) She refused to leave. At which point the police were called.

      4) She refused to co-operate with the police officer asking her to leave for a further 15 minutes. At some point the request to leave the store had escalated to a request to leave the mall as a result of the non-cooperation.

      5) A second police officer arrived, and still not cooperating, she was arrested. She actively resisted arrest, and was tazered as a result to get her to comply.

      I don't think 2 male policemen should be tazering an unarmed middle aged woman that is resisting arrest. However on every other point it was the woman behaving unreasonably and forcing the escalation.

      But she certainly wasn't tazered for spending her own money.

    46. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > If someone was trespassing on your property and refused to leave, you'd be justified in tasering
      > them too.

      Actually, I live in a state where I would be required to escape, if able. I would have no justification of tasering them.

      Now personally, i think thats silly, but, I still think the police went overboard. Tasers were developed and issued as an alternative to shooting and killing, not talking and persueding. Unless they were in danger to the point of being justified using lethal force, then I don't see how they were justified in using less lethal force (which can be lethal or do serious harm, depending on the circumstances) by her refusal to leave when they would like her to.

      Annoyance and disrespect for authority are not physically threatening to anyone. These abusers should be stripped of their badges and given the opportunity to go work in a field where they can afford to be less professional without endangering the public.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    47. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't believe for one second it was lack of understanding. There was on policeman dealing with her for 15 minutes before the second arrived and the resisting arrest/tazering incident happened.

      You don't have to understand the language to know when a policeman guides you to the door, you have to leave. To resist for 15 minutes, she was being more than stubborn.

      I still don't think she should have been tazered though.

    48. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course she could. And I think she should be restrained without tasers.

      However, lets not pretend it's without risk of injury to the policemen. Policemen are kicked and bitten by women resisting arrest every day.

    49. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, if she adamantly refuses to leave.

      If someone was trespassing on your property and refused to leave, you'd be justified in tasering them too.

      Taser is meant to be a last resort weapon, not a first restort. It's a milder alternative to shooting, not a high tech replacement for subduing with less severe means.
      People die from being tasered. Even a nightstick is less severe. And nets. Not to mention all the other options, like just, you know, holding the lady, which two trained policemen should be perfectly capable of doing.

      When people think it's ok to use a last resort weapon as a primary response, there's something seriously wrong with the society.

    50. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Apple switched to non-rechargeable batteries? No wonder they're selling so many of those things!

    51. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the proper response to this is to taser her.

      No, the proper response is to call the cops, which the store did. The police then proceeded to taze her, which may or may not have been excessive but is not the store's or Apple's fault either way. Or at least that's what I got from the summary.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    52. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      And the proper response to this is to taser her.

      Maybe. All I saw was a video of her being tasered and not the events leading up to it. She refused arrest and the cops contend that they followed procedure. I see nothing to doubt their version of the story. As for her only speaking Chinese and not understanding their instructions, I can see that being a possibility but I am very doubtful.

      Of course I'm jaded from past experience. I used to work as a marine transportation operations representative and had to be the intermediary between immigrations and the crew (I would represent the vessel owners/charterers). Many times, I have experienced bilingual people feign not knowing english as a form of passive aggression or in their eyes gain some tactical advantage in the situation (Despite speaking perfect english just moments before). Unfortunately for them they didn't get their crew VISA and spent the weekend detained on the cargo ship.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    53. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If two cops can't subdue a small Asian woman without tasering her, then the department should consider firing them. They're not worthy of the title "police officer".

      God forbid they ever have to go up against a grown man.

    54. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      MA. In general here you can't even claim self defense in your own home unless you either couldn't escape or others were in danger. Personally, I would advocate for full on stand your ground. I am about as close to a pascifist as it gets with the exception of self defense, repulsing invasions of homeland, or overthrowing ones own government.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    55. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Comparing a nightstick used incorrectly with a taser used correctly is not a good argument. You can easily increase the risks when using a taser too, e.g. by aiming for the chest or face, and when a nightstick is used for its intended purpose, i.e. not for beating, it's not that dangerous.
      Nightsticks don't maim people. Cops maim people.

      Anyhow, look at death statistics. Good luck finding any deaths for nightsticks where they have been properly used. But it's not hard finding deaths by taser where they were used properly.
      (Not counting the REASON for using them in "properly", just the method).

    56. Re:Unauthorized export resale? by cavebison · · Score: 2

      If someone was trespassing on your property and refused to leave, you'd be justified in tasering them too.

      The willingness to excuse violence with utterly mindless generalisations and absolutism is the most disturbing facet of that comment.

  2. This just in... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Police are now so badly trained and so out of shape they can't even handle a 44 year-old, 80 pound Chinese woman, they have to resort to high tech weaponry.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:This just in... by Sprouticus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This.

      Seriously, I dont care how irritate she was, how on earth could she be a risk. I do love the export comment, like it mitigates their actions...I mean tasering an illegal exporter is totally justified, right?

    2. Re:This just in... by hjf · · Score: 2

      Why is it illegal to "export" iphones anyway?

    3. Re:This just in... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh.. I don't think it's because the police were out of shape. They sure could have tackled and pinned her to the ground, which likely would have caused a hell of a lot more long-term injury to her than simply getting tazed would.

      They did; for fuck's sake, man, it says so right in the damn summary!

      I mean, shit! I see why nobody RTFA's anymore, it seems some folks can't even make it through the

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:This just in... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Police are now so badly trained and so out of shape they can't even handle a 44 year-old, 80 pound Chinese woman, they have to resort to high tech weaponry.

      You seem to be operating under the assumption that using 'pain compliance' tools on people weaker than they are, with minimal chances of any significant personal consequences, is something that cops are trying to avoid...

    5. Re:This just in... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uh.. I don't think it's because the police were out of shape. They sure could have tackled and pinned her to the ground, which likely would have caused a hell of a lot more long-term injury to her than simply getting tazed would.

      Perhaps you should try observing the police in more civilised places. The solution to an unruly 44 year old 80lb woman does not genreally require police brutality like you suggest (which was actually done as well).

      If two fit policemen can't cope with a situation like that without a taser or excessive force, then they should be stripped of their badge.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:This just in... by dsmann · · Score: 2

      I am sure they were under the impression that like all people who look vaguely Asian she was secretly a Kung Fu master turned rogue.

    7. Re:This just in... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember when tasers were first deployed. They assured us they would only be used for self defense and would absolutely never be used as any sort of 'compliance tool'.

      I guess that slope was too slippery for them.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:This just in... by fche · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "[manhandling] would have caused a hell of a lot more long-term injury to her than simply getting tazed would."

      It's not as though anyone has died from being tazed before.

      Oh wait.

    9. Re:This just in... by abigsmurf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem isn't that they can't handle a small woman, it's that they can't subdue her in a way that doesn't risk injuring her. Couldn't hear the video but it looks like she was thrashing around even when held on the floor. Very easy for her to slam her head against the floor when struggling or to twist around in a way that puts her arm at risk of dislocating or breaking.

    10. Re:This just in... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      They sure could have tackled and pinned her to the ground

      The only options that occur to you are violent ones...?

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:This just in... by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is it illegal to export iphones that you pay for while legal for corporations to export profits so that they don't pay tax?

      Because the corporations make more money that way that's why.

      --
    12. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I dont care how irritate she was, how on earth could she be a risk.

      It doesn't matter with cops (with tasers). Me being 5.11 and upset will simply get me pinned to the floor hit with a nightstick, ZAPPED and handcuffed just for being emotional about an issue in front of them. I.E I'm upset therefore it's justification to assault me. Being tall and athletic means gives grounds for 5 bouncers in a nightclub to attack me even if I'm not irate but cheerful and drunk (they legally classify it as disorderly and label me a potential threat).

      There is a serious problem with how enforcement works these days and they get away with assaulting people without justification all the freaking time whether it be bouncers, police or any other form of crowd control and they do it because they are usually just a bunch of low lives themselves. When it involves tasers it changes enforcement from "deal with the situation with your brain and apply a more measured approach" to simply "ZAP ZAP ... ZAP ZAP ZAP ... problem solved".

      Further to this cops are usually just thugs as it is, give them a set of toys to assist with their thuggery (such as tasers) they'll use them. It doesn't matter if you're the front-line on the NFL or a 45kg Asian woman they'll take you down just the same. So the difference between and NFL player and this small woman is it just looks bad on camera and poses as evidence, if say it were me there and I took it further I'd get laughed at but she takes it further she could have their badges for breakfast.

      But lets look at it this way, without the gadgets, 2 lazy ass cops do that to me over an iPhone they'd better be good otherwise I'd be pinning the fuckers to the floor and really that is the precedence they then blanket over everyone else and allows them to justify it.

      Couple that with the fact they carry guns which can easily be disarmed by anyone quick enough and what happens is the concept that "cops always have to be on top" falls apart, so he potential of them getting fucked by their own tools of protection means they give them more toys (tasers) which now has given them that luxury of ZAPPING people.

      I hope she gets them fired and takes taser banning one step further, god awful things.

    13. Re:This just in... by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      This. I think a good solution here would be for police to just tase anyone attempting to buy an iPhone in an Apple store.

      It's an elegant, simple, user-oriented solution to an age-old problem. It could be augmented by intelligent choices among typefaces, and skeumorphisms to make the analogy clearer. And you have to admit, it has a certain Steve-Jobs-flair (tm) to it, don't you? The policeman could come right up to your face, and with a breath wreaking of donuts and stale coffee, shriek "OH AND JUST ONE MORE THING!!" right before pulling the trigger.

      Android simply couldn't compete with this. Apple's vertically-integrated retail channels offer "marketing leverage". Apple would be lifting something that was previously a simple transaction and transforming it into an integrated, social experience. Again, Apple is setting the pace.

    14. Re:This just in... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have some police training from when I was in the military, and with it, training on the use of force. Use of a taser or pepper spray should be limited to subduing threatening individuals where lethal force is not necessary. The question you should ask yourself first is "Is this person going to harm myself or someone else without much risk of fatality?". If you can answer "yes" to that, then it's permissible to use a taser. These cops are assholes and should be held responsible for their abuse, and anyone in their chain of command who is covering for them should receive at least the same punishment. As long as we allow cops the indiscriminate use of weapons like tasers and pepper spray to subdue non-threatening citizens, this is only going to get worse.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    15. Re:This just in... by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Right, they are sold as "nonlethal," as in, an alternative in situations that would otherwise require lethal means. And then used as a cattle prod.

    16. Re:This just in... by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If she won't leave, and either doesn't (or pretends not to) understand commands, what else are you supposed to do? Spend 4 days developing some kind of rudimentary language bridge and debate the finer points?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:This just in... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

      high tech weaponry.

      They were tasers, not phasers. Sheesh.

      Woman: I just wanted some phones.
      MallCop: You bought too many, ma'am.
      Woman: They're Christmas presents.
      MallCop: Ma'am. Your agonizer, please.

    18. Re:This just in... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      The police did the most economical thing,

      If that's your measure then they should just shoot her with a 2c bullet and be done with it.

      Also when was the last time someone sued for sexual harrassment successfully after being arrested the usual way?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    19. Re:This just in... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is something wrong when a police officer cannot wrap an 85 lb woman in a bear hug and just hold her until she realizes that continuing to struggle is going to get her nowhere. The key thing is a lack of patience and the mistaken belief that tasers are non-lethal. A taser should only be used in a situation where an officer would use a gun if necessary but would rather not. If shooting the suspect is not justified, then neither is using a taser. So, would the officers have been justified in shooting this woman?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    20. Re:This just in... by unkiereamus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter with cops (with tasers). Me being 5.11 and upset will simply get me pinned to the floor hit with a nightstick, ZAPPED and handcuffed just for being emotional about an issue in front of them. I.E I'm upset therefore it's justification to assault me. Being tall and athletic means gives grounds for 5 bouncers in a nightclub to attack me even if I'm not irate but cheerful and drunk (they legally classify it as disorderly and label me a potential threat).

      I'm 6'8 and weigh in at about 300lbs, of which probably about 40lbs of it is fat. I've never been asked to leave a bar, let alone been approached by a bouncer or five. In the times that I've been confronted with cops, I've never had one draw his handcuffs, nightstick or taser, let alone try to use one of them on me. If you have, perhaps the problem here isn't your size, it's your attitude.

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    21. Re:This just in... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iPhones are MADE in China for fucks sake. So they made them there, shipped them all the way here, and then we say "don't export these Chinese made gadgets back to the country where they were made?!?" Any export restrictions involved here are about pricing things differently in different markets. By being their own store, Apple can maximize profits but choosing where and for how much they sell their product without fear of competition... unless people start buying iPhones in one market and moving them to another... so they lobby congress to ban exports of their own product, even though they sell the same product in both markets. I for one hope buying apple products continues this trend of Tazzering, they get what they deserve.

    22. Re:This just in... by grenadeh · · Score: 2

      Yea you do realize tasers are more lethal than a handgun right? At least if you get shot there is a plethora of places you can be hit where you don't die. A taser will stop your heart and kill you, the risk increasing with voltage and frequency of shock.

  3. Probably Would Have Been Better off in China by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These sorts of events are similar to what I would have expected in countries like China, not the United States. LEOs do not need to taser most people, especially a female who appears much less powerful than the officers holding her down in the video. The tool is used as a second-to-last resort, not as as way to make an arrest easier on the officers.

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:Probably Would Have Been Better off in China by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't taze me, iBro!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Probably Would Have Been Better off in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      especially a female who appears much less powerful than the officers holding her down in the video.

      I take offense to that remark. I am a feminist. She deserves to be treated to the same brutality as any man.

  4. Won't someone think of the poor corporations! by CodeheadUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    How are they supposed to make obscene profits if people 'illegally export' things?

  5. Excessive use of force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's an app for that.

  6. $16,000 dollars in cash ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... you mean she had enough to buy a few iPhones ?

    Oh my god, arrest her, she has money, she must be doing something illegal !

  7. Cue the apologists by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are times to use painful, potentially fatal, means of coercion. This isn't one of them.

    Unfortunately, we're going to get a lot of people posting here claiming that simply because the police demanded she do something, and she didn't, that they were justified. The simple truth is, no, they weren't. You don't get to do anything you like to someone simply because you have a badge and they didn't do what you told them to.

    We do not live in a police state.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Cue the apologists by marcello_dl · · Score: 5, Funny

      >We do not live in a police state.

      Let me guess...
      We live in a police planet?

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:Cue the apologists by jtnix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm, we DO live in a police state as evidenced by this and thousands of other civil rights violations that happen daily in this country.

      No one seems to want to acknowledge this, though.

      --
      She blinded me with science, she tricked me with technology. ~ Thomas Dolby
    3. Re:Cue the apologists by gig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only in a police state like the US could people be in such denial about being in a police state.

      Something like 25% of the world's cops and soldiers are in the US. And 50% of the weapons. The US is the ultimate police state.

    4. Re:Cue the apologists by runeghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "a woman that doesn't under stand how to act in a civilized society"

      By which you mean what, exactly? Failing to obey her corporate masters instantly and without question?

    5. Re:Cue the apologists by runeghost · · Score: 2

      Acknowledging it is deeply uncomfortable. And doing so publicly (instead of pseudonymously) may place you in an unpleasant position, should your employer or local law enforcement agency find out about it.

  8. Title Is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She wasn't Tazed for buying too many iphones, she was tazed for failure to comply with authorities... Whoever made the title is a simpleton. What an Idiot..

    1. Re:Title Is stupid by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "authorities"? I thought the police department's motto was "to protect and to serve". They are not authorities. They are certainly not judge, jury and executioner. Visiting multi-volt torture on someone already under their control who hasn't even committed any criminal act is just not cricket....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:Title Is stupid by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      Because now we live in a totalitarian regime, where the "authorities" must be obeyed?

    3. Re:Title Is stupid by operagost · · Score: 2

      That's not every police department's motto. It's the LAPD's. You watch too many movies.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Title Is stupid by Stickerboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because now we live in a totalitarian regime, where the "authorities" must be obeyed?

      The authorities should be obeyed, in most general situations, unless they are asking you to do something unlawful. If you're an idiot that is refusing to leave a place of private business when the business owner's representative asks you to leave, and then calls the cops when you refuse to leave, everything else that happens after that is a simple preventable fact.

      There is a way of handling the police or other law enforcement officials. Be polite. Be courteous. Follow simple directions, with the above limits. Have a plan to contact an attorney with full details, names, and badge numbers at the soonest available opportunity if the need arises.

      You are not going to out-argue a police officer. You are not going to outfight a police officer. You are not going to kill more police officers than there are willing to kill you. Physical or verbal confrontations with a police officer are pointless; they will all end in the same result. The way to fight police injustices is through the courts and media, not through sparring of any kind.

      Keep in mind: police officers in any individual incident, above all else, are trained to MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE SITUATION, using any necessary means. If you're the idiot trying to take control of the situation away from the police officer (rightly or wrongly), guess who's going to end up next on the target list?

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    5. Re:Title Is stupid by greenlead · · Score: 2

      If she's alive, she wasn't electrocuted. Thousands of police officers have been tazed; none have died from it. Nearly every police officer who carries a Taser has been hit with it. They know what it feels like; they know it isn't fun; but they care enough to try to minimize your injuries.

  9. Increasingly typical police behavior by Hagaric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems the concept that violence is a last resort has disappeared from policing.. Increasingly, even quiet, cooperative people are pinned down, handcuffed and manhandled as a matter of course. Violence has become one of the "perks" of policework, and the evil cycle of abuse and intimidation means fewer and fewer people object. Can anyone see any reason whatsoever for the violent treatment of this woman, who at worst is guilty of conspiracy to illegally export some telephones?

    1. Re:Increasingly typical police behavior by jedidiah · · Score: 3

      No. He's merely a civilized person and you are a fascist.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Increasingly typical police behavior by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      Increasingly, even quiet, cooperative people are pinned down

      Who says she was cooperative?

      Police, however, say the incident isn't that clear cut.

      Oh, but of course they would, wouldn't they? Obviously this woman, on the other hand, wouldn't have any reason to bend the truth in her favour.

      There are two sides to every story, and, next to word-of-mouth, reading about an incident on the internet is probably the worst way of coming to a safe conclusion on what happened.

      who at worst is guilty of conspiracy to illegally export some telephones?

      What about trespass (she refused to leave private property on request), refusing to follow the instruction of a police officer with regard to said request, and subsequently resisting arrest?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  10. Taser mania by Lucas123 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Something needs to change in police training. Too often cops resort to BBQing people with 50,000 volts at the least sign of resistance, and, in some instances, no resistance at all. Yet, too often when you see a mall shooting or hostage situation, you don't see the police putting their lives on the line to save people. They often seem far too concerned with their own safety than the public's, and all these taser incidents seem like a part of that mentality. That's just my observation. I'm sure there are also plenty of good cops out there too, but the bad ones seem to make the headlines far too often.

  11. Re:The taser was excessive by bondsbw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, I take that back. I didn't notice there were more pages to the story.

    The taser wasn't excessive. She clearly resisted arrest for several minutes, and she had been told not to come back to the store on a previous occasion. Department policy allowed for the taser in that situation.

    But of course:

    "She was scared, she didn't understand," said John Hugo, who said he was Li's fiance'. "I was outraged. You go into a store, and you end up getting brutalized by the police.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  12. Inflammatory Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She wasn't tased for trying to buy too many iPhones. She was tased for resisting arrest after refusing to leave private property. I'm pretty sure "get out!" with a finger pointed to the door is near universal language. When it's suggested by men in uniforms carrying badges and guns, you'd have to be a full-on nitwit to miss the picture.

    You can claim it was the result of "failure to communicate", but you can't expect officers in Nashua, NH to speak Mandarin. If you can't figure out that resisting arrest isn't a good idea, that's on you. Tasing her likely prevented further serious injury of the woman and/or the officers.

  13. $16,000 dollars in cash ...must be DRUG MONEY! by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cash transactions at banks over $10,000 are subject to special reporting requirements, thanks largely to the War on Drugs. It wouldn't surprise me if trying to make any kind of cash transaction for $16K draws unwanted attention in the current police state environment.

    Obviously, she was taking the money she earned selling drugs, and laundering it by buying iPhones for cash, then reselling them. Makes perfect sense to a cop, who has been trained to assume that EVERYBODY is a criminal....

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:$16,000 dollars in cash ...must be DRUG MONEY! by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      buying iPhones for cash, then reselling them.

      Hmmm.. makes perfect sense. Addiction to iThings very similar to addiction to drugs. Both are equally craved; largely empty and useless... they give you a 'kick' for a while, and then you feel wistful and want something slightly better for which you are ready to part with loads of cash for no reason in particular.She must be sent to a de-addiction center to help recover from the fruity company craze.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:$16,000 dollars in cash ...must be DRUG MONEY! by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cash transactions at banks over $10,000 are subject to special reporting requirements, thanks largely to the War on Drugs. It wouldn't surprise me if trying to make any kind of cash transaction for $16K draws unwanted attention in the current police state environment.

      Obviously, she was taking the money she earned selling drugs, and laundering it by buying iPhones for cash, then reselling them. Makes perfect sense to a cop, who has been trained to assume that EVERYBODY is a criminal....

      You need to come up for air more often. The war on drugs is so 1990's. It's all about terrorists now. We all know she was buying the phones for Al-Qaida. They probably figured out that taping an iPhone to a string attached to a trigger is a 99% reliable way to detonate a bomb. After all, what American could resist picking up a shiny new iPhone.

      I think it's more likely that if you get enough of them close together you can achieve critical mass. It's obviously another attempt by Iran to build a boomer.

  14. Don't jump to violence, Apple by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's a crazy idea: instead of starting to shout "private property" and having the hired guns tackle a woman and break out their weapons - just ignore her. Don't take her money, don't ring up her sale. She'll either give up and go away or try to steal the phones and then it's cut-and-dry. Plus no news stories with bad publicity during the Christmas shopping season.This would also save two Nashua cops from the public humiliation of not being able to handcuff a middle-aged asian woman (I saw the video - there's no fear that she's a kung-fu master).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. Re:The taser was excessive by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She clearly resisted arrest for several minutes,

    So a small, middle aged woman managed to resist arrest for several minutes? Wow. Those cops should be ashamed of themselves. Really, how did cops survive 10 years ago? Did they all get sound ass kickings from tiny middle aged women?

    Seriously, if you can't arrest someone like that without a taser, then you're so badly trained that you should not be allowed out on the street.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  16. Live Free or Die! by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3

    Didn't some state have that as their motto?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  17. Re:The taser was excessive by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

    But the lady clearly knew what was going on:

    Jay said her mother bought two iPhones last Friday, and was told that was the limit. When she took video of others she claimed were buying more, the store manager asked her to leave.

    And she was asked to leave and refused:

    "The management of the store asked us to have her removed. The officer approached her, told her she wasn't welcome in the store, and she refused to leave," Nashua Police Capt. Bruce Hansen said.

    Important part you left out:

    The confrontation involving the Taser happened when Li went to the store on Monday to pick up two iPhones she ordered online.

    So, here's how it appears the situation played out (Cliff's Notes for those too dumb or lazy to RTFA):
    Incident 1 - Chinese lady goes to the store, tries to buy more than 2 iPhones, is told 2 is the limit. She pre-orders 2 iPhones, and begins to video the other customers, as she is convinced that the store has sold/is selling more than 2 iPhones to other people. Store manager asks her to leave, presumably for filming other customers. No charges files.

    Incident 2 - Chinese lady goes back to the store to pick up the 2 iPhones she paid for. Store management tells her she must leave (no mention as to whether or not she had picked up the items she paid for, or if there was a new incident that prompted the request for removal). Confrontation ensues, cops attempt to confiscate the woman's cell phone and purse, then pin down and taze the 80 lb Chinese lady; some kid films it and posts on Youtube. Cops claim she was "resisting," because they always do.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  18. Re:The taser was excessive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Disagree.

    The article describes how, in effect, if there were less people around they would have pepper sprayed her. Police are increasingly using violence as "compliance tools". It is the equivalent of beating someone with a club, but because it is less visual, people don't catch on to how brutal it is.

    I don't care if she was surly or not. It's trespassing at best, some federal offense that local townie cops have no business enforcing at worst. When did we go from being a country that asked "who the F are you to tell me to do X" of cops, to kowtowing to their every demand.

  19. iPhone IS MADE in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's dumb, the iPhone is MADE in China, it's also SOLD in China. There's no such export restriction and no such law (just think how dumb what you said is, in effect a product made in China can't be inside China... the mind boggles).

    The rule is an Apple arbitrary sale limit rule. The article mentions Apple uses police officers to enforce it because they've had trouble in the past with people buying too many for unauthorized export. As if they get to tazer customers based on some EULA or something!

    ALL SHE WANTED TO DO WAS BUY A LOT OF IPHONES AT FULL PRICE! (BTW they're the same price in China).

    Right now I'm going to go to an Apple store and diss the products in front of other customers, complain they're overpriced, underpowered, not as good as the Android ones, maybe bring my Android quad core tablet and do visual compares. Until they ask me to leave. Then I'm not going to leave, I'm going to kick up one hell of a stink. Maybe do a bit of shouting about how they tazered a woman in an Apple store. f*** Apple. Really f*** em, corporate scum.

    1. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      That's dumb, the iPhone is MADE in China, it's also SOLD in China. There's no such export restriction and no such law (just think how dumb what you said is, in effect a product made in China can't be inside China... the mind boggles).

      The rule is an Apple arbitrary sale limit rule. The article mentions Apple uses police officers to enforce it because they've had trouble in the past with people buying too many for unauthorized export. As if they get to tazer customers based on some EULA or something!

      ALL SHE WANTED TO DO WAS BUY A LOT OF IPHONES AT FULL PRICE! (BTW they're the same price in China).

      Right now I'm going to go to an Apple store and diss the products in front of other customers, complain they're overpriced, underpowered, not as good as the Android ones, maybe bring my Android quad core tablet and do visual compares. Until they ask me to leave. Then I'm not going to leave, I'm going to kick up one hell of a stink. Maybe do a bit of shouting about how they tazered a woman in an Apple store. f*** Apple. Really f*** em, corporate scum.

      I'm sure the police are checking that their tasers are charged at this very moment...

    2. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The store is private property. You're not entitled to stand in there and disrupt their business in such a manner, any more than if someone stood by you at your workplace and shouted at you, or went to your house and shouted at you in your living room.

      You've set up a straw man, because it's reasonable to deduce from the evidence that the Apple store called police to get her to leave, not to "enforce" an "arbitrary sale limit rule". You don't know whether it's arbitrary, for one. I can think of several specific reasons for such a rule: scalping, hoarding, and the aforementioned export regulations. If someone doesn't want to do business with you-- save for obvious violations of the Civil Rights Act-- they don't have to. And you don't have to shop there. And you can picket the store while standing on public property, but not while on private property.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 2

      The iPhone 5 received the necessary network access licenses from the regulatory groups in China at the end of November and have only recently gone on sale there. The sales restriction didn't come from Apple.

    4. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by 1s44c · · Score: 2

      Right now I'm going to go to an Apple store and diss the products in front of other customers, complain they're overpriced, underpowered, not as good as the Android ones, maybe bring my Android quad core tablet and do visual compares. Until they ask me to leave. Then I'm not going to leave, I'm going to kick up one hell of a stink. Maybe do a bit of shouting about how they tazered a woman in an Apple store. f*** Apple. Really f*** em, corporate scum.

      Good luck and please film this and put it on youtube so we can all enjoy it. However remember that Apple didn't use a tazer on this women, the police did.

    5. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure the police are checking that their tasers are charged at this very moment...

      I wonder if the tasers are made in China too?

    6. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      the iZap 2000 is made in china.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:iPhone IS MADE in China by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      You can't. The police can.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  20. Re:The taser was excessive by SleazyRidr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Giving tasers to the police was supposed to be a way for them to protect themselves from violent people without using guns. If this old lady was really threatening them then they need to be kicked off the force for being too unfit to serve as a police officer.

  21. Tasering for passive resistance? Really? by dirk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The policy continues, "The weapon is a level of force normally required to overcome passive, defensive, or offensive resistance that is intended as an act of overt aggression toward the officer where an individual refuses to comply with verbal instructions."

    How exactly can "passive resistance" be an act of overt aggression? So basically, do whatever the cops say, or they will tase you. If you do not follow their orders, you are being "overtly aggressive" , the same as if you were throwing punches at them. Tasers being being overused in this country.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  22. Statements like this piss me off.... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    âoeIt was very clear to the officers that she knew exactly what was going onâ

    I absolutely abhor it when somebody, *ANYBODY* can somehow claim to know what another person is thinking when they have absolutely no real evidence to back up their claim beyond personal supposition.

    Yeah, it's plausible that the language barrier was just a ploy, but I didn't see any obvious indication that such an issue was actually not really plausible. Just because she understood one sentence somehow means she's fluent enough in english to understand anything said to her once, without explanation?

    The followup line also got me a bit hot under the collar:

    âoeThe officer didnâ(TM)t think for a second that she was having difficulty understanding what she was being asked to do.â

    No... what happened is that the officer didn't think for a second.

    Tasers should not *EVER* be used by the police as a means of forcing compliance unless the police officer has some real cause to assume that the situation is about to escalate to physical violence. What indication did the officer have that she was going to assault anyone? Hmmm?

  23. Re:Buy what you want by omnichad · · Score: 2

    If it's being bought to resell, that leaves consumers unhappy. They're just trying to make more consumers happy with their brand - an immediate shortage and outrageous prices on eBay would make that happen pretty quickly. Although I agree that one should only limit quantities when there is a very limited supply - such as a manufacturing shortage or it's a sale item that will sell out quickly. And that's exactly what this case is.

  24. Tasing Is An Improvement by cmholm · · Score: 2

    It may come as a surprise to some, but the introduction of tasers in US police inventories has offered officers a humane alternative to previous practice, which often involved a baton chokehold, or a firearm. It may or may not be double-plus-bad that US officers aren't as sweet as they are in Canada or the UK, preferring compliance with orders now, discussion later, but it is what it is, and it may be a bit naive to be unaware of that.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Tasing Is An Improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You sir are either an idiot or willfully ignorant. Tasing is not an improvement, previous practice in these types of situations was to firmly and gentley restrain and I'm freaking sorry that you don't understand how easy it is for a healthy police officer to restrain an 80 pound 44 year old woman. Baton chokeholds and other similar measures were and still are used for violent resisters.

  25. Re:The taser was excessive by bjourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check the video. They did indeed sit on her. It wasn't before she was laying face down to the ground that they tasered her. It looks more like the tasering was used to get her to shutup than to pin her down.

  26. Re:iPhones being rationed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    disclaimer: I am I cell phone salesman.

    No, the PATRIOT Act has caused the rationing. Buying phones without a contract is limited to two per customer because of "potential terror uses".

    Seriously, go walk into a Walmart or a Costco, grab three ten dollar Tracfones, put them on the belt, the cash register will not let you buy them. Take one of them away and the transaction will work fine. Alternately, call a local Walmart, ask for electronics, ask them how many non-contract phones you can buy. If you're in the US, the limit is two.

  27. Re:Yes, Unauthorized export IS a crime by Revotron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whether or not Ms. Li knew enough English to know what her situation was will without a doubt become clear.

    It's already clear in this case. She had gone to the exact same store the preceding Friday attempting to buy dozens of iPhones, and on that particular day understood quite well what the manager meant when he said "Please leave and do not return to this store." Yet we're to believe that the following Monday, when faced with the same situation and the same "Please leave and do not return", she's now a poor Chinese immigrant fresh off the boat, struggling to break through the language barrier.

    Huh. Apparently, you can unlearn a language over the course of a weekend.

  28. Re:Yes, Unauthorized export IS a crime by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    You don't even need to know english.

    A group of armed people in a uniform (that other people are deferring to) pointing to the door and shouting... you'd have to me a moron to miss the intention...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  29. Nothing legal about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The police tastered this person because she did something perfectly legal, which is to say, buy iPhones. She may or may not have had an intent to later export them, which would be illegal-- but this is no excuse for their actions.

    Having intent to export is illegal. Having a plausible reason to believe that someone is disturbing the peace (which she did) or having a plausible reason to believe she intended to export (which she admitted) are both illegal and subjects you to arrest. Furthermore not calling the police when you have a suspicion that someone is purchasing a regulated item for export makes you an accomplice in the crime itself should it be committed. The Apple personnel did exactly what the law requires them to. The police did exactly as the law requires them to.

    As far as resisting arrest- I am a man, if I made it out without broken bones and several felonies tacked on I would be grateful.

    1. Re:Nothing legal about it by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The police did NOT do exactly as they were supposed to do. The teaser is a replacement for shooting someone. It should never be used unless the alternative is to shoot them with a bullet. There is nothing in this story that indicates the threat to life and limb had risen to that level. The police used massivley excessive force in this case.

    2. Re:Nothing legal about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A tazer is not a replacement for shooting someone. A tazer is a replacement for clubbing someone with a nightstick or baton. Shooting someone with a firearm is deadly force, the intention is to definitively stop the subject - killing them if necessary. The purpose of a tazer or baton is to subdue an aggressive individual that will not comply with verbal instructions. Tasers are (in theory, some exceptions) non-lethal. And unlike the traditional nightstick, they won't generally break your bones or cause skull injuries when they are used on you. Personally, I'd much rather be tazed than beaten with a stick. But then, I'd have also left the store when refused service.

    3. Re:Nothing legal about it by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And unlike the traditional nightstick, they won't generally break your bones or cause skull injuries when they are used on you.

      Try dropping your skull 5.5ft onto concrete and get back to me on that. Tasers do not give you a chance to break your fall. I'd rather get a couple broken bones than risk ventricular fibrillation or a grand mal seizure. VF will kill you out right, and one grand-mal seizure significantly increases your risk of future seizures.

      Tasers aren't safe just because Taser International says so.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  30. If you watch every season of Cops by rabtech · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you watch every season of Cops within a reasonably short period of time (say over a month or two) you can clearly see the shift in police procedures and attitudes spreading across the country. (It started before Tasers by the way.)

    The earliest seasons have old-fashioned policing, where cops talk to irate people and calm them down, as long as the person doesn't get violent. If the suspects put their hands up, the cops just handcuff them standing up, no degrading "get on the ground" treatment, no crushing the suspect's neck with their knees, no body-slamming people to the ground, then while resting on top of them screaming "stop resisting!"

    By the mid-90s seasons you see this wave of assaults and violence spread across the police forces. People put their hands up, the cops have no reason to suspect any violence, but they body-slam them to the ground anyway. Many times you see 5-9 cops on top of one person, often standing on the person's arms while multiple people scream "put your hands behind your back!" (Which they physically cannot do) and "stop resisting!" In other cases they demand people get down on the ground, just to humiliate them.

    The Taser is just another in a line of police battery tactics, designed to humiliate, degrade, and torture suspects, but without leaving any permanent marks that you can sue over.

    It bears repeating: don't talk to these thugs for any reason. Never answer their questions and comply with all orders, no matter how degrading. Never consent to a search of your person or car if asked. If they search anyway, say nothing and talk to your lawyer. Don't bring up video evidence or violations or they'll destroy evidence to cover their tracks, do not rely on honesty - police will always cover for themselves, no matter how heinous the crime, and the police union will get them reinstated with back pay after the public stops caring about the story. You can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride.

    We live in a police state, same as China or Soviet Russia. Deal with it.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  31. No, no... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

    ...they were filming a movie.

    Coming in 2013, Judge Dredd: Mall Cop.

  32. Taser = Punishment by twmcneil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To anyone that still believes all that "Protect and Serve" shit, tasers are primarily and overwhelmingly used by LEOs as punishment. They are not used to protect anyone. If you do not do exactly as the officer says, no matter how unfair it may seem, you will be tasered. It is immediate punishment administered without judicial review. Plus, it relieves a lot of frustration for the cop.

    So let's all stop pretending now that use of a taser is anything legal or moral, it's a circumvention of judicial review, denial of individual rights and a travesty of justice. Tasers should be outlawed or their use outside of life threatening situations should be cause for immediate dismissal of the offending officer. Any other course of action is merely inviting a Judge Dredd type of future.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  33. Re:So it is now ok.... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

    Look what happened in Fullerton, CA. Mentally ill homeless guy sitting on the curb, subdued according to witnesses. Four cops stand around him, one putting on gloves saying "We're going to fuck you up", then proceed to beat him to death as he screamed for his mother. It is impossible to listen to the audio all the way through. Oh, these cops used a taser, too. One bashed the homeless guy repeatedly with the handle.

    All on video, fortunately, with two of the cops pending trial and possible charges against the others.

  34. How scary and timely.. worried about tazing by mattr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before I knew about this story, in a cab this evening I was asked by a European what I thought about the U.S. I said there is something wrong with it, something fundamentally morally wrong. I mentioned how strident and militaristic the country has become over the past 20 years, how the media is complicit, how nobody ever mentions what seem to be huge numbers of civilians killed in the Iraq war, which in another country would be grounds for a war crimes trial.. and how students get tazed.

    I said I thought something has gone wrong, that there is a big moral dilemma. I see this being an American who has lived outside the U.S. for a while. He seemed relieved saying he totally agreed. Then I come home and read about a tasing in an Apple Store.

    Casual tazing and ultra-cynical liars in office and on the TV really worries me, the more I think about it the more it worries me. It isn't about export or not. Listen. There is a deep disease in the moral fiber or psychological constitution or socialized norms, whatever you call it, that reflects a ruinous self-negation in the U.S.A., that counterbalances all the wonderful things like slashdot and makers and late night comedians exposing hypocrisy, and summer barbecues and bookstores, oh lots of things. If people had their heads screwed on right the extreme prejudice of cops like this would cause them to be immediately kicked out and hounded mercilessly by the masses who are reading about it online right now. This does not happen because the actions of these officers is an organic result of a major imbalance that is unchecked.

    My first idea is that the imbalance is fueled by a power-hungry elite, by a cynical military-industrial-financial complex but to tell you the truth that is bullshit. It is because everyone, all of you, and me, and your families and friends, are all self satisfied consumers of information who, once satisfied in an ADHD kind of sense with having taken in the information, ignores it and will not act on it, because of being media saturated and socialized. People often joke about how far off the conservative edge are both conservatives and liberals in the U.S. but that is because THE NORM IS OFF-BALANCE AND SLIDING. I do not have an answer but I urge you to think about what you can do to find one.

  35. Re:Yes, Unauthorized export IS a crime by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since when is two "dozens"? She was tazered by rent-a-cops[*] for buying two phones and attempting to buy another two, having seen Suzi Whitebread being sold more than that in store.

    Good job on jumping to the same assumption as the "geniuses" in the Apple store though. Looks a bit foreign, probably buying for export, TAZZZER HERRRRR.

    [*] Yes, literal rent-a-cops. These were actual cops taking a second salary for acting as Apple store security.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  36. Re:Yes, Unauthorized export IS a crime by 1s44c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the record: Yes, failing to follow the orders of police in the US is a good way to come in close contact with a taser or baton, fact of life.

    So you have these rulers who wander around giving out arbitrary commands to the proles. The rulers pretend to be following some 'law' but really they are above most laws and only have to follow their own loose interpretation of some written law. They meet any perceived challenge to their authority with mild to extreme violence often involving electrical torture devices.

    Is that the kind of society you want to live in?

  37. Re:Tasering for passive resistance? Really? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Just be glad they didn't have pepper spray. They might have bathed her in it while she lay on the ground. It's apparently a popular compliance technique with the overweight law enforcement crowd.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. Re:The taser was excessive by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the day, in mental hospitals they often used violence to enforce compliance by mental patients who got unruly. Then the Korean War came along and they assigned a bunch of farm boys who refused to serve in the military no matter what form of coercion was used to work as orderlies at the mental hospitals. Now these farm boys weren't going to use violence here anymore than they were going to join the military. So, what did they do? Well, they did what they did when they had a stallion or a bull that would not do what was wanted. They restrained the patient. Two, or more, if they thought that was necessary, would go into the patient's room and approach calmly and carefully despite what the patient would do to resist their approach. When they got close enough, they would take hold of the patient and prevent the patient from moving. The thing about it was that it rarely took more than two of them, even if the patient was large and the two farm boys were not so large. That's because they had learned their techniques against animals that were larger than them, animals that were valuable so you didn't do anything that might damage them. There was one other factor that was very important. They were patient. They were willing to wait until the animal or the patient gave up. The thing was it rarely took that long because there is something very "calming" about dealing with someone who will continue to move towards their goals no matter what you do.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  39. Sexist nonsense by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You might call me old fashioned or sexist here, but where I'm from we get taught not to use violence against women.

    Ok, you are old fashioned and sexist. How about not using violence against anyone? You're basically implying that it is acceptable to use violence against men but not women. Gender should play NO role in this discussion whatsoever. Men are no more deserving of violence than women.