Slashdot Mirror


Worldwide Shortage of Barium

New submitter redhat_redneck writes "The U.S. and Canada has been experiencing a shortage of barium sulfate, which is used as contrast for upper and lower GI studies. It has reached the point where doctors are being asked not to order these exams except in emergencies, and some exams are being cancelled. Here's the letter that's been put out by the manufacturer. The longer this drags on, the more serious this issue becomes, eventually impacting patients and healthcare providers in both cost and quality of care. Some sources point to a dramatic drop in Chinese production. In their defense, it seems China is changing safety regulations. Medical use only make a fraction of the uses of barium sulfate, but it's going to be disproportionately affected by this shortage. We can't go back to our old contrast Thorotrast; it causes cancer. Does anyone know of alternatives to barium?"

162 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Alternatives.... by phagstrom · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Use Thorotrast.
    2. People get cancer and die.
    3. Then you Barium...

    1. Re:Alternatives.... by gweihir · · Score: 2

      The thing is, like "rare earths", Barium are not that rare. It is however not that commercially viable to produce it, so China qualifies because of cheap labor and possibly because they may actually have planned to be the major producer in this market. As with many other products, the west is happy to get it cheap and ignores the dependency on the supplier.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Alternatives.... by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny

      Barium?

      They cremated 'im!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Alternatives.... by Talderas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The question to ask is why iodine isn't more commonly used. I know iodine is used when a rupture in the GI is suspected since the barium would cause irritation.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re:Alternatives.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If hospitals all over the world require this substance, how can it not be "commercially viable" to produce it?

      The medical industry is a gigantic cash cow funneling billions of dollars into the pockets of drug corporations, medical technology corporations, and insurance corporations. It's beyond ludicrous to suggest that somehow they can't afford to spend a few million on their barium suppliers (or a few billion on the R&D and capital needed to produce it themselves).

      I realize that YOU aren't suggesting this, but whatever source you drew your information from. But seriously... "not commercially viable" in the context of the medical industry is just a thinly veiled euphemism for "but, I'd rather spend that money on the upgrades to my yacht!"

    5. Re:Alternatives.... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      1. Use Thorotrast.
      2. People get cancer and die.

      This does bring up the question, what rate of cancer are we talking about?

      "It causes cancer" isnt a valid argument for anything considering that damn near everything causes cancer.

      We still give people X-Rays, right?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Alternatives.... by mirix · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's because higher doses of iodine are hard on your thyroid gland? So the barium is preferred, unless it can't be used.
      Just a guess though.

      Interestingly, most (all?) other barium compounds are toxic. I seem to think BaSO4 is benign due to it's insolubility... Not sure if I remember that right.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    7. Re:Alternatives.... by mirix · · Score: 1

      Guess I should have searched first. Looks like iodine compounds are only used in veins, not GI. So I guess that explains why they don't use it for GI.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  2. Why do they not recycle? by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The icky-factor aside, Barium is an element does not vanish and can certainly be sterilized to any degree desired. So, why do they apparently not recycle the stuff?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Why do they not recycle? by retchdog · · Score: 3, Informative

      the icky-factor is it, both aesthetically and practically. barium is excreted in the feces, not urine. so, you have the choice of doing it at the hospital, which will be inefficient (no economy of scale, and unspecialized labor), or you could do it in central locations, which would require the transport and processing of huge shipments of collected human fecal matter, the difficulties of which should be obvious. it's doable of course, but rather unlikely.

      as a side note: several years ago when i went to the hospital at my college town, i noticed the vaulted ceilings and friezes put there to cater to the wealthier residents, and i recalled them quite vividly when i got my bill. i'd rather have modest (but sterile) facilities and pay less, but image is everything i suppose. the point is, not only is there "icky-factor," there's the implicit standard of living which we "must" maintain. asking patients to shit into a jar and bring it back to the hospital would just be unimaginable. for better or worse, quite a few people would literally rather die than shit into a jar for two days.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    2. Re:Why do they not recycle? by GNious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make "Rent of Barium" part of the bill - if you return the Barium, you get your deposit back.

    3. Re:Why do they not recycle? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, first I disagree on the "huge shipments", and no, I do not see the difficulties. Port-a-potty companies do this routinely, if not over longer distances. So collect, dry and sterilize (can be done economically locally) and then ship. As to the patient angle: Tell them they can either buy the stuff (at market rates), or use a chemical toilet for a day or two and bring it back that way. Or give them a laxative and have them use a special toilet in the hospital within a much shorter time. I really do not see the "unimaginable" here or the violation of conventional standards of living. As to indignity, remember that the stuff has to be introduced into the body and that seems likely to cause a lot more indignity. Any MDs here that can comment?

      It seems to me this is really not a resource shortage, but a lack of willingness to adapt at the expense of the people that do need these exams.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Why do they not recycle? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      barium is excreted in the feces, not urine. so, you have the choice of doing it at the hospital, which will be inefficient (no economy of scale, and unspecialized labor), or you could do it in central locations, which would require the transport and processing of huge shipments of collected human fecal matter, the difficulties of which should be obvious. it's doable of course, but rather unlikely.

      We already collect it in a central location, just without the concentration of being only those with barium in it. But if it's so precious, it would be viable to extract it at the large metropolitan waste processing stations.

    5. Re:Why do they not recycle? by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a problem with more than Barium. Tons of nutritionally beneficial trace minerals and other such things are all being flushed into the oceans via sewage treatment & disposal, as our stool doesn't return to local soil.

    6. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      The icky-factor aside, Barium is an element does not vanish and can certainly be sterilized to any degree desired. So, why do they apparently not recycle the stuff?

      Why do I get this image of patients being given diuretics and not being allowed to leave until they cough up the Barium they were given? I'm guessing the bulk of it takes more than a couple of hours to pass through their system and 90% of the tests are outpatients. It's not the ick factor it's the practicality of it. I doubt you'd recover more than 10% for all the extra expense involved. I guess you can require them to sit around for 6 or 8 hours and piss in a bucket but even then at best half the Barium would be lost. You can probably recover it from sewage treatment plants but odds are it's cheaper to mine it.

    7. Re:Why do they not recycle? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Make "Rent of Barium" part of the bill - if you return the Barium, you get your deposit back.

      Eww, no... I get the refund, but they get to keep the barium AND my "deposit".

    8. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Or if you deposit your barium, you get your rent back.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Why do they not recycle? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I don't know offhand whether it's dissolved or suspended, but either way recovering and reprocessing is probably going to be disproportionately expensive. It's not just sterilization either, contaminants of various kinds will have to be removed as well. (And contaminants doesn't just include the obvious stuff - my feces may contain drugs you are sensitive or allergic to, as well as food allergens, etc...)

    10. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This, this is a huge problem that extends far beyond medical waste.

      The human race as a whole likes to think that their waste just vanishes in to the pits of hell. It doesn't, it goes in a landfill or shat out in to the ocean.
      This is a terrible thing when so much of it can be recycled very easily.

      Biomass in particular is extremely precious for farm and in turn food related stuff, it can turn dying land back in to healthy land, various other useful minerals that can be extracted, methane in particular.
      This more than anything should be pushed to be recycled. Throwing it in to the ocean is basically saying goodbye for a good solid 10,000+ years because even the higher swimming fish won't be eating the majority of it.

      And waste food as well.
      Setting up a recycle program to put waste food in a box that gets picked up, or even giving people a free (or cheap) blender for the sake of breaking down food to be flushed down the toilet and treated at a recycling plant that would be in your local sewage treatment.
      Of course, the problem with the latter is some scummy people flush all sorts of non-organic crap down the toilet system daily (including entire diapers!), which should be punishable, but tracking such a thing would be almost impossible. A box, however, is easy to trace at the pick-up level.

      But the problem I mentioned above is only the surface of exactly why such a system would never work in America today. People are wasteful and ignorant asses.
      Even if you were to tell them that barium was cleaned and completely sterile, they would still never want it. Their death, natural selection, etc.

    11. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not the water-solluble minerals. They stay in the water, which flows through the rivers into the ocean.

    12. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 2

      Barium is an element does not vanish and can certainly be sterilized to any degree desired. So, why do they apparently not recycle the stuff?

      Because not much is used in medical practice, so it's not worth it. The main use of Barium is Barite which is a Drilling Fluid for drilling bore holes. You may have heard of white mud?

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    13. Re:Why do they not recycle? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Port-a-potty companies and septic companies use vacuum trucks to remove waste from portable toilets or underground storage tanks. They then truck it to a sewage treatment plant where there are unloading bays with a grate on the floor or a hose to hook to an unloading pipe. So in essence, a port-a-potty is a toilet who's plumbing is truck based instead of pipe based. The sludge is treated at the same sewage plants that serve the local population. Nothing is dried or shipped by them.

      Its the sewage treatment plant that sometimes dries the solids that separates in the sludge tanks. It is used as fertilizer.

      Here is a PDF from the NYC DEP on water treatment: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/wwsystem.pdf Amazing system.

    14. Re:Why do they not recycle? by makomk · · Score: 2

      Also, that wouldn't help much anyway - most the barite mined goes to oil and gas drilling, so sooner or later we'd run into problems getting enough new barium for medical purposes to replenish the stuff lost, and reusing the medical barium wouldn't help delay that by much.

    15. Re:Why do they not recycle? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      retchdog wrote:

      >the hospital at my college town, i noticed the vaulted ceilings and friezes put there to cater to the wealthier residents

      Wrong. The ceilings and friezes are there to attract the hospital's true clients --- doctors.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    16. Re:Why do they not recycle? by rssrss · · Score: 2

      Because it comes out of your rectum.

      Rectum?

      Barium!

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    17. Re:Why do they not recycle? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Make "Rent of Barium" part of the bill - if you return the Barium, you get your deposit back.

      Good plan. The last time I got a hospital bill that was not covered by insurance... I wanted to take a dump on the hospital administrator's desk.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    18. Re:Why do they not recycle? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      So TFA is really about supporting the drilling industry and the medical problem is just a smokescreen? Makes sense to me.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:Why do they not recycle? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      And waste food as well. Setting up a recycle program to put waste food in a box that gets picked up, or even giving people a free (or cheap) blender for the sake of breaking down food to be flushed down the toilet and treated at a recycling plant that would be in your local sewage treatment.

      Many houses already have "garbage disposals" which perform this function. If not, they're not all that expensive to purchase.

    20. Re:Why do they not recycle? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      Good then that Barium Sulfate is one of the least water soluble minerals known to man.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    21. Re:Why do they not recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The next patient was overheard saying, "Man, this Barium tastes like shit!"

    22. Re:Why do they not recycle? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      So in essence, a port-a-potty is a toilet who's plumbing is truck based instead of pipe based.

      So basically, sneakernet?

    23. Re:Why do they not recycle? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else, but the last time I had a CT scan (I think it was a CT, I was pretty out of it), once I got done, I proceeded to puke it all up.

      So yes, I see recycling it as a possibility.

      Of course, they'd probably have released most people before it came out the more natural way, so unless they're holding someone for observation, and have them use a toilet that's specifically diverted, it'll be more difficult. (I doubt it'd be worth diverting *all* septic waste to check it for Barium)

      ps. The bottle said 'pleasantly flavored'. The bottle lied.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    24. Re:Why do they not recycle? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      If we were talking about iridium, that would no doubt be done. Barium, however, isn't as rare as all that. (Barium is roughly as abundant in the Earth's crust as sulfur, give or take a few percentage points.)

      The supply problem discussed in the article is a result of economic factors. Mostly, the commodity price of barium is not very much higher than what it costs to produce it, so people aren't exactly lining up to supply the stuff. This is inherently a temporary situation, because if the shortage continues for very long the commodity price will increase.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    25. Re:Why do they not recycle? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then I don't see what the issue is. If the medical prices increase sufficiently, then production will increase. In the short term, the industrial uses will lose out, someone buying it by the ton(ne) can't win against someone buying it by the gram. They just choose to not increase their bidding price at the moment, turning an economic issue into a political one.

    26. Re:Why do they not recycle? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Barium used for ingestion is quite pure barium sulphate which is quite rare to find naturally and quite hard to refine. The barium used for drilling is not so pure but very common and cheap.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    27. Re:Why do they not recycle? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      fair enough. but it's still better doctors for the wealthier residents. the end result is the same, basic care (such as poor people need) ends up subsidizing the rich stuff.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    28. Re:Why do they not recycle? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      your reasoning is incomplete. the effect of the price increase is relative to the operating cost of the field. even though industry is hit harder, their operating margins may be different. i think the technical term for this is "elasticity."

      i don't see how they are turning this into an economic issue. the article certainly doesn't justify that statement. sounds to me like you're a hysterical libertarian who equates someone saying "this situation X is kind of crappy" with "zomg, they're asking the nanny state to interfere with the market." it's a pretty common phenomenon.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    29. Re:Why do they not recycle? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      As there is no elacticity in medicine (you need the test, or you don't. You don't decide whether you need a test by whether it's $10 or $100), I would have guessed the medical uses would be hit last, not first.

      sounds to me like you're a hysterical libertarian who equates someone saying "this situation X is kind of crappy" with "zomg, they're asking the nanny state to interfere with the market." it's a pretty common phenomenon.

      I never said anyone was asking anyone to do anything. I was just stating that with the inelasticity of medical uses, I don't understand why they didn't just increase prices and buy more.

    30. Re:Why do they not recycle? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      then maybe every hospital should install a specialized toilet for recycling purposes, sounds like there's potential for moneymaking for people who don't mind shitty business there. This is most interesting in fact. I wouldn't mind jumping on it if i had the opportunity and starting cash. If it's that scarce it sounds like a surefire win to start up It is every citizens duty to go into the tanks...

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  3. Alternatives include by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gastrografin and Ultravist. No reason to defer these examinations.

    1. Re:Alternatives include by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless the patient is intolerant of iodine, which many people are. Granted, most are intolerant of *IV* iodinated contrast media rather than PO, but if they have "iodine in contrast" in their allergy list, what radiologist wants to risk getting sued for giving them Gastrografin? Not many I know of, for sure...

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    2. Re:Alternatives include by Stolpskott · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Quoting from the Wikipedia article for Iodine,
      "Iodine sensitivity is rare but has a considerable effect given the extremely widespread use of iodine-based contrast media".

      So I would say that using Diatrizoic acid/diatrizoate as a Barium replacement (Hypaque, Gastrografin and Ultravist are the trade names) in cases where there is no flagged Iodine sensitivity in the patient is viable, with Barium being used in those rare cases (if in doubt, do a quick Iodine test, as far as I can recall the results are pretty quick - a drop of iodine on the inside of the wrist or elbow, a small rash will form if the recipient is sensitive, and the rash can be treated with standard rash creams (if the recipient is REALLY sensitive, anaphylactic shock is a possibility if a large amount of Ioidine is applied - you dip the person's arm in it - but if the sensitivity is that bad, it should already be flagged). This also has a positive effect for most people, who are generally short of the daily Iodine intake levels they should have.

      Disclaimer, my medical knowledge is limited by the fact that I dated and lived with a med student for 7 years, helping her study and revise for exams. Talk to your doctor if you have concerns about your own potential Iodine sensitivity or Gastro-intestinal issues. Do not come to /. and expect sane medical opinions here...

    3. Re:Alternatives include by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Iodine compounds are less satisfactory than barium for gastrointestinal imaging.

      Barium sulfate is used as an aqueous suspension with viscosity modifiers and coating agents. This causes it to stick and coat the internal surface of the organ being examined, as the particles are bound to the thickeners and thence to the organ surface.

      Iodine contrast agents are low viscosity aqueius solutions which don't coat. Attempts to use coating agents has been unsatisfactory because iodine compounds are not sufficiently x-ray opaque to be visible as thin coatings. Instead the organ cavity must be completely filled with the solution.

      a surface coating agent provides much better surface image detail, while iodine only provides a featureless silhouette of the Cross section of the organ cavity. This makes barium a much more useful agent in the gastrointestinal system. Iodine is only suitable where barium cannt be used AND where the information required does nit require the high resolution, high contrast images provided by barium. Barium could showa small tumour or polyp. Iodine would not. A huge tumour causing obstruction of tthe GI tract could not be safely Examined with barium because the barium would not clear and may form solid rock like aggregates prior to surgery where it would pose additional risk. Iodine would be adequate in this scenario as yiu don't need high rezolution to see that a cavity doesn't fill up and as the iodine compound is water soluble, it doesn't interfere with surgery.

  4. Re:What the what what? by aliquis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course Slashdot readers are supposed to get it.

    Contrast is what it says. It's there to make whatever you want investigate stand out from the rest observe it. For instance to make blood vessels easier to see. (Now I don't know whatever this is x-ray, MR, ultra-sound or whatever.) My english isn't good enough to know what GI is (gut-ingestion?) but I guess it's the stuff from the throat to the ass.

  5. Re:Recycling? Where does the barium go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the majority of barium sulfate used world wide is used in drilling fluids for oil well drilling. not exactly a venue for recycling. the medically-used barium sulfate is consumed with food or drink, or is squirted up your ass... also not exactly a venue for recycling... at least not in this day and age. some day, maybe, on that martian colony where *everything* is recycled... but not today.

  6. Re:Recycling? Where does the barium go? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    What about recycling? I mean even if it degrades to something else because of radioactivity, there's no reason not to revert that process and use solar energy to do it.

    Barium sulfate is not radioactive.

    It's very insoluble in water, which is why it's so useful as a contrast agent; it's very heavy (thus, radio opaque) but insoluble so it doesn't have toxic effects.

    Recovering it would be a case of waiting for the patient to shit it out. Perhaps hook all of the hospital toilets to a reclamation system. I figure the cost of reclaiming the amount used in a typical X-ray study is just not a cost effective thing to do.

  7. Supply and demand by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    Other countries will ramp up production. It will just take time.

  8. "Increased safety in Chinese mines" damn commies! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Apparently due to increased safety regulations being adhered to in Chinese mines. Damned commies! they'll have unions next!

  9. B12 by Mike+Frett · · Score: 2

    The last time (Last Month, 19th) I got my B12 Injection I was told there is a Nationwide shortage of B12 used for Injections also. It was confirmed when I tried to refill my prescription at some local Pharmacy's. Thankfully I still have some left in my Vial, but those of you that don't and need this, you can be prescribed a Pill that will do the job, though not as good, until production picks up if it hasn't already.

  10. Re:Recycling? Where does the barium go? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Perhaps hook all of the hospital toilets to a reclamation system.

    . Or just ask the patient to take his next dump in a plastic bag...

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  11. Re:What the what what? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Informative

    what GI is (gut-ingestion?) but I guess it's the stuff from the throat to the ass.

    Gastrointestinal, your guess is correct: mouth-esophagus-stomach-intestines-anus. It's basically one continuous external surface inside the body.

  12. That's an I not an L. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    GI stands for Gastro-Intestinal, as in the eponymous tract. You are not as much of a smartass as you think you are.

  13. Re:Cave Penicillin! by jamesh · · Score: 1

    I think the medical profession is wasteful if they are not reusing barium on-site!

    When penicillin was very new and little of it was available during and immediately after WW2, the urine of penicillin-treated patients was collected and distilled, so the penicillin could be saved and re-used several times over.

    I don't see a problem with doing the same by purifying barium from patients' stool, expect the disgusting aspect. However, medical professionals must have a tolerance for disgust, else they would be not able to do their work.

    It's not the bodies of the medical professionals that the recycled barium has to go in to, so I assume they'll be fine with it.

  14. I smell oil. by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Barium Sulfate is also HUGELY important in oil well drilling mud.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drilling_fluid#Composition_of_drilling_mud

    China putting a crimp on drilling mud could have some interesting effects, I'm sure. What makes little sense is the complaining about a shortage in hospitals, where a dose is less then an ounce, when oil drillers are pumping the stuff into the ground by the ton...daily...all over the world. Unless of course somebody wants us to get excited about China stepping on the hose without us finding out where the real shortage is.

    I wonder who that might be. I also wonder who submitted this story.

    1. Re:I smell oil. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's that the market for medical barium runs through a monopoly, and with the increased cost, but fixed contracts, they make more profit by not delivering than delivering at a loss. I've seen dumber elsewhere, and never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.

    2. Re:I smell oil. by echucker · · Score: 1

      The stuff in drilling mud isn't pharmaceutical grade.

    3. Re:I smell oil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it is just an insoluble mineral that needs a bit of processing to make it suitable, as GP said it is used by the 1000's of tonnes for drilling. One blowout kill that I know of required about 10,000 tones of the stuff.

  15. Re:What the what what? by deniable · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gastro-Intestinal aka the bit between the mouth and the anus. This stuff shows up (contrasts) on x-rays. Upper studies involve drinking it. Lower studies involve insertion from the other end. In other words, it's used for testing gut disorders and if you aren't swallowing it, you can shove it up your arse.

  16. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gl stands for Glycemic load. Barium is a rare earth metal. No idea how the test works exactly.

    GI also stands for Gastro-Intestinal

    Is the submitter seriously asking us to suggest alternatives to barium?

    Why not? Your comments aside, there are some very smart people who read slashdot.

  17. Re:Locally produced Barium by Kergan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is there any other place to get Barium besides China?

    They're called rare earth metals not so much because they're rare, since they're a bit all over the place, but because they're not concentrated enough to mine efficiently. This makes it highly polluting to extract them.

    The US a couple more countries used to extract them, until China came along with no pollution standards, and priced everyone out of the market. Trouble is, you can't "just restart" such a mine. It's a decade long process to do so -- and it's in progress insofar as I've been following, because China decided to keep these strategic minerals for itself so as to keep high tech manufacturing at home.

  18. Maybe Barium White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is known to cause pregnancy though ...

  19. Re:Locally produced Barium by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    " These chinese fcukers are starting to realise how much the West depends on their cheap products and are throwing their weight around..."

    Cheap products like iPhones and iPads? What do you think they make those things out of? Rare Earth metals are used extensively in our modern gadgets, gadgets that we pay them to make for us. Seriously, where the heck do you think they are supposed to get the materials to make this stuff? Sell it to us so we can sell it back to them? Why not use it in the products they make?

    It makes no sense to sell the raw resources when you are the primary consumer of those resources, especially if you're economy is reliant on the products derived from those resources.

  20. Re:"Increased safety in Chinese mines" damn commie by deniable · · Score: 1

    Yeah, when did they start caring about the workers?

  21. Fooium by famebait · · Score: 1

    ... or possibly bazium.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  22. Re:What the what what? by Sique · · Score: 5, Informative

    Barium is a rare earth metal.

    Not exactly, Barium is an alkaline earth metal, related to Magnesium and Calcium. Interestingly though, the U.S. are one of the largest producers of Barium, accounting for about 8% of the world wide barium output. It's mainly mined as barit, or heavy spar.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  23. question by shentino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't anyone recycle this crap?

  24. Re:What the what what? by physburn · · Score: 1
    Barium is not a rare earth metal, its a Group 2 element, in the same column of the periodic table as calcium.

    ---

    Chemistry Feed @ Feed Distiller

  25. Why are you asking us? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of alternatives to barium?

    I hope you're not considering taking any answers you get from Slashdot seriously. Let's leave this one to medical science.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Why are you asking us? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      But that's how crowdsourcing works: you get a throng of people who don't really know anything about the subject, a bunch of people with working knowledge, and one or two experts, get them to all throw their ideas out, and then spend the next few years trying them all, in order of which ones got modded "Funny" the most.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Why are you asking us? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know of alternatives to barium?

      I hope you're not considering taking any answers you get from Slashdot seriously. Let's leave this one to medical science.

      Lo and behold, just a couple of comments below you, there is a medical student who suggests Diatrizoic Acid as a replacement.

  26. It's not a real issue. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    The price of barium metal at the moment is $150/kg or so - in small quantities.
    Some of the 'unavailable' compounds mentioned above had a weight of around 340g, or 150g of barium, about $20.

    Sure, you need processing - which pretty much amounts to dumping it in a tub, along with sulphuric acid.

    Does the manufacturer of the barium compound have a problem sourcing product in a way that will result in a medically approved product without further applications to the FDA - perhaps.
    But it's not shortage of barium.

  27. Re:What the what what? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Layman's explanation: Contrast agent is something that shows up as a bright color on your scan. There are many different kinds of contrast used for many different purposes, too many to list here. Barium contrast is swallowed and shows up as bright white on regular X-rays and CT scans (CTs are a multitude of X-rays taken by a computerized scanner which is then turned into a quasi-3D representation.) The reason somebody would use barium is to look at the shape of the esophagus (food pipe), stomach, intestines, and rectum to see if there are any parts that are too wide, too narrow/pinched off, the wrong shape, if there is a blockage, etc.

    Not so layman's explanation of the tests mentioned:
    - Barium swallow: Barium is swallowed and a real-time series of X-rays (fluoroscopy) of the throat (pharynx) is done to see if the barium is swallowed properly. The resulting video shows where the barium goes. This is ordered if the doctor suspects the person may be having problems swallowing (aspiration or refluxing.)
    - Esophogram: Barium is swallowed and fluoroscopy of the esophagus is performed to see if there are any abnormalities of the size/shape/anatomy of the esophagus. This is also ordered if somebody has trouble swallowing and the doctor suspects some problem like a stricture, widening of the esophagus (achalasia), abnormal anatomy of the esophagus (such as a diverticulum, malignancy, etc.)
    - UGI = Upper gastrointestinal study. This fluoroscopy stufy follows the barium from being swallowed until it goes into the stomach. It shows all of the same things as the esophagram along with the size/shape/anatomy of the stomach as well. Ordered for the same reasons as the esophagram as well as if you suspect some anatomic problem with the stomach (e.g. stomach stapling/bypass not working correctly, etc.)
    - Small bowel follow through: Barium is swallowed and then a series of individual X-rays taken at certain time intervals to track the progress of the barium through the stomach and small intestine. This is done to investigate things like the stomach emptying too slowly and obstructions in the small intestine.
    - Barium enema: Barium is given via enema into the rectum to look at the anatomy of the rectum. This can investigate anatomic abnormalities of the rectum such as masses and fistulas (a hole from the rectum to somewhere else, this is abnormal.) This can also be used to both diagnose and treat intusussception (a disease of infants where part of the large intestine telescopes into itself.)

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  28. Re:What the what what? by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Which opens a whole other can of worms with risks of colon perforation, reactions to the anesthetic, etc...

  29. Re:And I trust you volunteer to be 1st in line by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    In the abstract, this may sound great, but I doubt many average people will want to drink the "recovered" barium....

    It's also not just the "ick" factor: The stuff is often passed-through very sick people. In re-processing it you would need to absolutely guarantee you had eliminated any and all biological "stuff" right down to the cellular level ..... without error. ANY quality control problems == huge lawsuits. We used to re-use syringes and needles in medical facilities, but no more ..... you only do such things when it's so hard and expensive to make new stuff and the lawsuit penalties for error are so low that the risks are "acceptable"; that's just not modern America.

    Well, it melts at around 1300 C, so I assume heating it in a furnace at 1000 C would be suitable for eliminating "any and all biological stuff"?

  30. Re:The invisible hand of the market... by nusuth · · Score: 1

    I don't know where this article is coming from, but worldwide baryte production is in the order of couple million tons. A day's production is enough to give one billion people the procedure. It is not strategically important at all. I can buy it by truckload at about 200$/ton.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  31. Re: And I trust you volunteer to be 1st in line by pmontra · · Score: 1

    Oh, people eat recovered Carbon anotnd other elements all the time, why not Barium? Just think about organic fertilizers.

  32. Diatrizoic Acid by gee_cee0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gastrografin is already being used as a viable alternative to barium in radiological studies as contrast for imaging the Gastro-Intestinal (GI) tract, especially in patients where bowel perforation may be imminent (barium spills into the abdominal cavity as a result, causing barium peritonitis; while rare, it is an incredibly deadly complication), in conditions such as intestinal obstruction, for example. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatrizoic_acid Given that I am but a medical student, this is fairly well known in the medical world. Which makes this an odd question to ask...

    1. Re:Diatrizoic Acid by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Given that almost every "expert" on here seems to be going off on one about "rare earth" issues, I doubt they're even aware of what barium itself is, let alone any alternatives to BaSO4 contrast suspensions.

    2. Re:Diatrizoic Acid by vuo · · Score: 1

      The essential feature of the element is that it has a high X-ray absorbance. But, any heavy metal has a high X-ray absorbance; this is why thorium was used in the first place. The problem is the solubility: barium sulfate is essentially insoluble, but other metals are usually somewhat soluble and thus toxic. In principle you could use any heavy element (iodine, mercury, lead, uranium, thorium, bismuth, etc.). In practice, barium, iodine, bismuth and thorium have been used.

      One alternative that is worth a mention is something that absorbs less that tissue, namely air.

    3. Re:Diatrizoic Acid by Guppy · · Score: 1

      One alternative that is worth a mention is something that absorbs less that tissue, namely air.

      I believe air is the most common "contrast" medium when doing CT virtual colonoscopies. It works well in cases where you can evacuate the entire compartment thoroughly beforehand, and "inflate" it.

      However, a liquid contrast medium has the ability to mingle with fluids and semi-solids, allows you to imagine structures in a native (non-distended) shape, including natural movement (such as following the movement of food over time). Also, the sharp border produced by Barium's coating property is especially important when dealing with 2-D X-ray images.

  33. Re:Locally produced Barium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ouch! Complete chemistry fail!
    Barium is certainly NOT a rare earth. It is an alkaline earth metal. Look at the periodic table for christ's sake.
    And the sad thing is this got modded up. Doesn't anybody know their high school chemistry anymore?
    *weep*

  34. Re:The invisible hand of the market... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    No because the left hand is being sat on by the government, and the right hand was stolen by the oligopolies.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  35. Re:Locally produced Barium by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Sure, blame the Chinese. It's not at all the fault of the wholesalers and dealers for not stocking enough to meet a small and temporary shortfall like this. Also the US has never, ever, thrown its weight around, right?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  36. Re:Sorry, let me clarify by jo_ham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was being brief and assumed the implications were obvious...... guess not

    1. Just because a few geeks are certain re-use is ok and might be willing to do it, the general public would not be

    2. Even if you are a geek, there's no guarantee some minimum-wage flunky at a re-processing company (or some unionized hospital worker who is mad and in the middle of some "labor action") is gonna do a perfect job and the stuff YOU end up drinking will be properly re-processed. A bit like drinking re-cycled urine .... fine if you are a geek and the processing is being done by the rocket scientists at NASA for the space station, but are you still willing if it's being done by the guy who's only other career option included saying "want fries with that?"

    3. A good lawyer will easily convince a typical jury (possibly with members who are anti-science lefties who reject nuclear stuff) that there was some bad thing in the re-processing process (probably done by evil "big hospital" or "big pharma") i.e. it's just another level of "doubt" ....

    Think some more and you can imagine many other reasons that each just make the business case a little bit harder to close. No single cut might kill the patient (in this case: re-use of Barium), but lots of little cuts and he bleeds-out

    You assume, naively, that the hospital does the recycling and just makes up fresh suspensions. Of course, if any recycling was done it would be to recover the pure BaSO4, which would be the domain of a chemical supplier; who then supplies the material to a pharma company, who then makes the thing you drink, who sells it to the hospital.

    Recovering the material from shit is no different to recovering it from the ore it originally came from in the ground. Medical-purity BaSO4 is likely to be a further cut above the lab-grade stuff you can buy from any number of common chemical suppliers - purifying it is trivial - they do it all the time to make the stuff in the first place. What we're discussing here is the economic viability of recovering it from sewage waste. The source is ultimately unimportant. If it ends up in a drug it has to come from a very specific, well monitored source. There's no chance some "flunky" is going to affect the dose of contrast agent you drink. (Oh, and nice, unnecessary jab at union workers and "lefties" there - given your level of discourse and opinion of union labour I'll try and keep my words to fewer than four syllables so you can follow along).

    It seems you live in a world full of conspiracies and hidden enemies in the shadows at every turn trying to get one over on you. You might want to just relax a bit. You can log in too; the government is not tracking your slashdot account.

  37. Re:CaSO4 or SrSO4 by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    Calcium sulfate is water soluble.

    Strontium sulfate is somewhat water soluble.

    The advantage of barium sulfate is that it's not water soluble.

    I say anyone needing a contrast drinks several bottles of Goldschlager before the procedure.

  38. Re:CaSO4 or SrSO4 by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of alternatives to barium?

    Um, how about calcium sulfate or strontium sulfate? All are alkaline earth metals, and have the same or similar basic chemical properties because of having the same valence, electron configuration and so on. Right?

    It's not the chemical properties that are really important (other than the insolubility of BaSO4). The main reason is the density of the Ba atom - it's heavy, so it has a high absorption cross section for X rays. Calcium and strontium are much less large.

  39. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Gastro-Intestinal aka the bit between the mouth and the anus."

    For many people, this is the definition of the brain.

  40. ...eventually impacting patients... by kgkeys · · Score: 1

    I'll say, if they don't get their GI exam, they may very well end up impacted.

  41. Re:What the what what? by Docasman · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  42. There is not a shortage of barium... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...but if you want to know where its being used in large quantities.... Do a google search on Barium and chemtrails.
    No Shit! And for those who do not believe chemtrails exist.... even mainstream news has covered the matter.

    1. Re:There is not a shortage of barium... by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      Mainstream media has covered it, and they have all concluded that they don't exist. There was one media outlet that claimed they found traces of Barium in a bowl where the condensation had collected, but they later retracted the story because they had just misread their testing equipment. They had mistakenly thought it was parts per million, but it was actually reporting parts per billion.

  43. No shortage just expensive by trout007 · · Score: 2

    There is no shortage. The problem is the price is increasing. But most likely the reimbursement rate by Medicare hasn't gone up to keep pace so they can't fill the orders for the price Medicare is covering. Most of this GI stuff is for seniors anyway. This is most likely a political move to get people scared so they can get the lobbyists to jack up the reimbursement rate.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:No shortage just expensive by trout007 · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I was going to include that in the Subject line but it wouldn't fit.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  44. Re:What the what what? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    It's basically one continuous external surface inside the body.

    You make us sound like living, breathing Klein Bottles...

  45. Re:Locally produced Barium by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2

    People seem to think that China is some sort of charity. If people want to talk of global monopolization, then you should consider things like farm subsidies. Cheap rare earth materials may have enabled China to grow its production industry at the expense of certain rich countries in the past (and I'd say that current changes actually represent a *restoration* of the natural order of things) but present agricultural subsidies are basically killing people in poor countries *right now*. I'd be all in favour of a fair, balanced and international system of setting regulations, pricing, and subsidies, but moaning only when it turns against you is just simple whining.

  46. Re:What the what what? by samkass · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's basically one continuous external surface inside the body.

    You make us sound like living, breathing Klein Bottles...

    Not a Klein bottle... We're basically just a living, breathing donut.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  47. Re:What the what what? by Glock27 · · Score: 1

    We're basically just a living, breathing, seriously deformed donut.

    FTFY.

    (At any rate, that reminds me to get some exercise today...)

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  48. Worldwide? by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    FTFA, "National", and from the summary, USA & Canada. What about the 6 billion other people you forgot?

  49. Re:What the what what? by Talderas · · Score: 1

    They only usually give you an enema if they're looking at the rectum. Every other bit of the lower GI has the contrast medium ingested.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  50. alternative by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Barium not an option?
    Then Crematum.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  51. Ingestible Cameras by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The price of the ingestible cameras just needs to become cheaper than the barium and some automated processing of the 'footage' needs to become available. Radiologist consults are likely more expensive than either costs to make.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  52. Re:What the what what? by wren337 · · Score: 1

    Topologically you are homeomorphic to a doughnut

  53. I had extreme urges to make a Pun..... by m.shenhav · · Score: 1

    ....but I decided to Barium.

  54. Alternative by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    "Does anyone know of alternatives to barium?" Lead

  55. Re:What the what what? by Goaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if you were born without a nose.

  56. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The issue with US-mined barite/barium sulfate is that is lacks the high purity required to meet pharmaceutical specifications. US barite tends to be lower grade (having higher impurities) and is more suited as an industrial filler or weighting agent in drilling mud.

  57. It was a cool experience. by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    I had this done about ten years ago. It was disgusting though. Tastes so bad. But they mixed in Crystal Light so it wouldn't taste as bad. My issue was that I ingested too much and they couldn't get a good view. It was awesome though because they had this live-feed video camera xray dealio. So I could see the stuff go down my throat at the moment I ingested it. Then they gave me ice cream and you could clearly see it go into my stomach. Neat stuff.

  58. Re:What the what what? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    We're basically just a living, breathing, seriously deformed donut.

    FTFY.

    (At any rate, that reminds me to get some exercise today...)

    Well if your goal is to look more like a donut... eating more donuts is actually a way to achieve that.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  59. Re:What the what what? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

    Gl stands for Glycemic load. Barium is a rare earth metal. No idea how the test works exactly.

    Basically, barium is a radio-opaque powder that shows up on the xrays, so doctors can see any obstructions or abnormalities throughout your entire digestive system. They give it to you in a disgusting milkshake format which is white, tastes bad, and is extremely thick. As you're forced to drink it over a period of several hours, you periodically go in to the xray room to have pictures taken.

    The first time I went for a barium test they handed me what seemed like a 32 oz bladder buster filled with barium. After I finally finished it off I thought I was done, but to my horror they gave me another one, and then another one, and then another one. It just went on and on for 3-4 hours and I had to keep drinking more and more of it. To make it worse you have to "expunge" all that barium afterwards, and it comes out looking the same it did when it went in...

  60. Alternative by NotFamous · · Score: 1

    No barium, bury 'em.

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  61. Not the only element running low... by CrackerJackz · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see what happens then the global supply of helium runs out in a few years, apparently we have about 25 to 35 years left.

    Its not just used for your kids birthday balloons (in fact that gas is likely second-hand / reused gas in the first place) it used to cool MRI machines.

    Time to buy a couple of tankers and invest in a long term profit :)

  62. Re:What the what what? by emag · · Score: 2

    You poor bastard. My experience was just a single barium milkshake, preceded by a pill-cup full of flavorless pop rocks to inflate my stomach. Considering the after-effects of just one (I foolishly thought I could go to work that afternoon), I can only imagine the effects of multiple barium milkshakes.

    For those who've yet to experience this miracle of modern medicine: when asked what flavor you want added, choose a flavor you won't care if you never taste again, for you'll probably never want to taste it again... Coworker several jobs back can no longer drink strawberry milkshakes for this reason.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  63. welcome to the world of regulation by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    There are good alternatives to barium (such as gold), but you can't use them until the FDA approves them.

  64. Re:I read that as “Worldwide shortage of Bel by bughunter · · Score: 1

    My first reading was "barlum"... what?

    I squinted over my still full first cuppa and then read "barfum." Huh? Is that like stickum I thought?

    Then I expand the article summary and see "barium sulfate" in the first sentence... the brain kicked in to cruising gear about then.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  65. Re:What the what what? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    We're basically just a living, breathing, seriously deformed donut.

    FTFY.

    (At any rate, that reminds me to get some exercise today...)

    Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe they couldn't figure out what donuts were supposed to be shaped like so they just made all the donuts round.

  66. Re:What the what what? by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Which brings up the point - none of this barium has actually left the Earth - it's all around here somewhere. The medical barium all came out in the end, and depending on what's done with solid sludge from the waste treatment plants, we know where it is. However since only a small portion of the population is ever getting this procedure at anyone time, it's probably quite dilute. This of course suggests one possible measure, and that's keeping barium patients around the hospital a day or two longer, and having special bathroom and waste treatment facilities for them.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  67. Re:What the what what? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

    Just as a note, I had an upper GI tract study done with barium sulfate about fifteen years ago to diagnose a hiatal hernia. They showed me a clear X-ray video of my swallowing and the pouch in front of my stomach that was causing my reflux and pain. For such a simple test, it's a great visualizer of stomach problems.

    (The next two bowel movements I had were literally like lead bricks. If you want to mine more barium, I'd say check the sewers.)

    I expect that without barium sulfate, the upper GI study will be replaced by endoscopy, where they put a camera on a tube down your throat to video the stomach from the inside. I've had that procedure done also. It's more invasive, more expensive, and requires general anesthetic.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  68. Well, I'm Sorry - We're LOW on Barium! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    I guess that means "No enema for you!" :-)

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Well, I'm Sorry - We're LOW on Barium! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Funny.

      It's obvious that I'm the one with the job.

      You are clearly not.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  69. Re:Locally produced Barium by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

    That they fail high school chemistry is not surprising, that they can't be bothered googling it is.

    --
    I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  70. Re:What the what what? by sjames · · Score: 1

    Just a bit less powdery and a bit more farty.

  71. Oh shit ... by tgd · · Score: 1

    Oh shit ... it out... and recycle it, duh.

  72. Re:What the what what? by emag · · Score: 1

    That's great, except a lot of time this is an outpatient procedure. I wasn't even _at_ a hospital, just a medical office where the doc worked most of the time. I can't even imagine the increased costs of hospitalizing someone for a couple days for what's essentially just a the preliminary stages of a diagnosis.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  73. Re:What the what what? by SAU! · · Score: 4, Funny

    The word is torus. We are basically homeomorphic to a torus. So are sheep -- apply a mapping such that the interior and exterior of the torus are exchanged, and the result is called a haggis.

  74. Re:Locally produced Barium by ickleberry · · Score: 2

    Charity - far from it, more like milking us for what we're worth and hell bent on taking over the world. See "Chinese century"

  75. Bismuth by DCFusor · · Score: 1

    Is about the least toxic of the heavy metals (High Z atoms stop X rays best for contrast). Surely some compound of Bi would work instead. Heck, pepto-bismol might work. But it's tough to get the medical community to change anything. Look at the issues with Tc-99. Lots of other stuff would work fine, there is a shortage (Chalk river shut down), but no one will even consider anything else because that's what the sinecure chemists in hospitals know how to do, and don't want to earn their pay learning something else. And yes, I know my nukes.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  76. The answer is in the question... by bbsguru · · Score: 1

    Since Barium is useful in the early detection of various serious and potentially fatal afflictions, the answer to the OP is obvious.

    In the absence of Barium, Bury'em!

  77. Re:What the what what? by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

    Wish I had mod points for you man..

  78. Re:Sorry, let me clarify by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    All that makes it sound like recycling the (already purified) barium from shit is very cost-effective compared to mining and purifying more, rather like Aluminum.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  79. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't know. There's that one picture the trolls keep linking to in every thread -- that guy looks like he's well on his way to self-intersection.

  80. Re:What the what what? by rpresser · · Score: 1

    It's more invasive, more expensive, and requires general anesthetic.

    No. It can and usually is done under twilight sedation.

  81. Re:What the what what? by dpilot · · Score: 2

    It really depends upon when the cost of barium becomes greater than the cost of keeping you in some sort of minimal care/cost sh*t-wait facility. Note that no such facility exists today, but if relative costs change...

    I'm also under the impression that antibiotics leave the body in urine and feces. How much antibiotic resistance is because of misuse, and how much is because of uncontrolled introduction into the environment through our wastes? Such a facility mentioned above might also be worthwhile for our antibiotics-of-last-resort, for instance.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  82. Re:What the what what? by maroberts · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's more invasive, more expensive, and requires general anesthetic.

    No. It can and usually is done under twilight sedation.

    I can see that would work; watching the Twilight movies would put anyone to sleep.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  83. Wireless camera pill? by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Surely can't be that expensive to make one, given that most of the components are on virtually every mobile phone on the planet.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  84. Barium by PPH · · Score: 1

    That's what my doctor does when his patients die.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  85. Re:What the what what? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can someone point me to a REAL nerd site where the above aliterate Anonymous Jock who doesn't give two shits about learning doesn't go?

    You wouldn't be welcome on such a site, given your attitude to questions - which, after all, are a prerequisite to learning.

    WE'RE NERDS. We understand most scientific and medical terms. When you say "LEO" we don't think "cop" we think "low Earth orbit."

    First, medicine is a science, thus the expression "most scientific and medical terms" is redundant. Second, no one understands most scientific terms. "Science" refers to the entire body of human knowledge, which not only is far too vast for any one person to know most of, but also grows faster than you can learn it - even if your learning capacity was unlimited, the bandwidth of your senses is simply not enough.

    Finally, "nerd" doesn't necessarily refer to someone interested in either science in general or medicine in specific. People who are enthusiastic about programming, or matemathics, or 19th century French poetry could all be called nerds without necessarily knowing what "GI" refers to in a medical context - assuming it actually refers to just one thing and isn't reused anywhere. On the other hand, "LEO" is usually used with sufficient context to conclude that we are talking about some kind of satellite orbit or at the very least a space trajectory.

    If you don't understand scientific or medical terminology, maybe you should just stay away from slashdot?

    Perhaps you wouldn't have such issues with jocks if you changed your attitude a little? Because I can certainly see why a jock - or, really, anyone - might not like you.

    They don't like you because you're an arrogant twat, just in case you didn't get that already.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  86. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Typical impurities in US barium sulfate (Nevada mines) are silica and strontium sulfate. Silica can be somewhat removed via froth flotation using standard commercially known techniques. The Sr is bound up in the Ba-Sr-SO4 lattice and very difficult to remove. Were they not bound together in the crystalline structure you could likely use an alkaline leach with sodium hydroxide (I saw a patent from the 1930s or 1940s that discussed this very approach), but when they are bound together you do not get selective leaching. Also, because they are bound together gravimetric separation (SrSO4 = ~3.8 SG IIRC, BaSO4 = ~4.45 SG) doesn't work.

    Sr and Ba are very similar chemically, but to meet the USP requirement of 97.5% min BaSO4 you have to be able to get the purity up (or start with a high purity ore). The USP assay test differentiates between the two because of the difference in solubility as chromates - the Sr chromate is much more soluble but you have to convert everything to chromates to get the Sr to drop out, then you'd have to convert the Ba chromate back to BaSO4 and not leave any chromate in there, as it is very toxic. At that point you are no longer dealing with natural purified barium sulfate but are instead making a precipitated barium sulfate, in which case you could just start with pretty much any barium compound and fully react it with sulfuric acid. The problem here is that any soluble barium left behind is very toxic (for a real life example of what could go wrong see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celobar_incident).

    By the time you do all of the processing above the cost is nowhere near what could be achieved with natural, high-purity barium sulfate ore that undergoes a simple acid leach.

  87. Cartersville Georgia by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    I don't know if there is a difference between the Barium Sulfate used in medical imaging and that used to drill oil wells, but I know that one of the largest mines in the world for that mineral was near Cartersville, (no relation to a former president) Georgia. At least that was true back in the late 1960's when I took some geology courses at Georgia Tech in Atlanta. Is this another case of the US having closed mines in favor of imports from China? I seem to remember reading that this may have been partially responsible for the "shortages" of rare earth elements.

  88. You can't just pull some out of your ass? by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait...

  89. Barite production 8M Metric Tons Per year by daverk · · Score: 2

    With the production of Barite at 8,000,000 metric tons per year (http://www.indexmundi.com/en/commodities/minerals/barite/barite_t7.html) the real shortage is caused by the fixed price medicare pays for a procedure involving a barium swallow.

  90. Re:What the what what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are not. Even considering only the nostrils, you're already more complex than a doughnut -- there's no continuous transformation that would get rid of the extra two holes.

  91. Re:Locally produced Barium by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    In other words, capitalism. If there's an opportunity to make money, and you don't put into place methods to stop it, why on earth would you expect them not to take advantage? The goodness of their heart?

  92. Re:What the what what? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

    Not sure what 'twilight sedation' is. I was given a chemical that the doctor said would not put me to sleep but I wouldn't feel nor remember anything...and I didn't. That probably doesn't meet the technical definition of 'general anesthesia', but from my perspective I was out like a light.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  93. What it is, where it is found, andthe big question by agrisea · · Score: 1

    Baryte, or barite, (BaSO4) is a mineral consisting of barium sulfate. Baryte itself is generally white or colorless, and is the main source of barium.

    The major baryte producers (in thousand tonnes, data for 2010) are as follows: China (3,600), India (1,000), United States (670), Morocco (460), Iran (250), Turkey (150) and Kazakhstan (100). In just the USA, It is mined in Arkansas, Connecticut, Virginia, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Nevada & Missouri. [Source]

    Now that you know where it comes from and where it is found in the USA, why aren't those mines increasing their production? Has everyone become so lazy that it makes sense to import everything?

    --
    Agrisea Tsunami - Epyc Servers... https://agrisea.net/products
  94. Re:What the what what? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Your GI tract tubes are like the internet...

  95. Re:The invisible hand of the market... by nusuth · · Score: 1

    Barium is not in short supply, although medical grade barium sulphate may be. I guess the mined baryte is never used in medical procedures, regardless of its purity when it came from the ground. Making pure barium sulphate from baryte is straightforward though. Coke, dissolve in sulfuric acid, precipitate. Rinse and repeat if higher purity is desired. Of course this adds a certain cost (precipitated barium sulphate was around 700 $/ton last I checked, in 2007) but that is peanuts for medical applications. One is using a couple hundred grams for the contrast procedure.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  96. Really?!! by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    The use of barium for radiological studies is such a small fraction of the whole barium sulfate market. This shortage is a complete fabrication!

  97. Re:What the what what? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

    Gotcha. But note that I was fully awake during the barium sulfate procedure, and walked out of the doctor's office under my own power.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  98. Re:What the what what? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    So, topologically speaking, a human is isomorphic to a coffee cup?

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  99. Re:Locally produced Barium by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Barium is much more abundant than any of the rare earth elements. (It's about as common in the earth's crust as sulfur, give or take a few percentage points.)

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  100. Re:Sorry, let me clarify by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    I don't eat aluminum.

  101. Re:What the what what? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2

    "Twilight sedation" is when you are given a drug to make you sedated but not actually to the point of unconsciousness as with general anesthesia. The big advantages of it is that you do not need an anesthesiologist around or quite the same level of monitoring, plus patients tend to come out of it quicker. Usually it is done with midazolam (Versed) which as a useful side effect generally makes people forget the procedure. Sometimes fentanyl is used as well, it also is a pain medication. Kids tend to get ketamine, adults less so because adults can be very agitated (dysphoric) when they come out of ketamine.

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  102. Re:The invisible hand of the market... by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    The problem seems to be a fragile single sourced supply chain, both by the doctors and the manufacturer.

  103. Re:What the what what? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    A five-hole donut (assuming your anatomy is normal - including intact eardrums).

    Mouth-to-anus gastrointestinal tract, two nostrils (into throat), two ducts from corners of eyes (into nasal passages).

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  104. Iodine is now restricted by federal law. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Iodine is used in the illegal manufacture of Methamphetamine. As a resule, Iodine has recently been reclassified as a List I chemical under federal law. Those handling or selling iodine and its compounds must now go through a bunch of bureaucratic red tape with the DEA.

    I found this out right after the Fukushima disaster (when I tried to find some potassium iodide supplement {or other potable iodine compound, such as water purification tablets or tincture of iodine} to take to bump my iodine level before the fallout arrived). Guess what: None to be found. Not just because it had been sold out by those who responded faster. But because most retailers (including large drug store chains and sporting goods stores) had stopped carrying it, rather than deal with the drug warriors.

    I suspect that, even if some iodine compound is suitable for a gastrointestinal contrast medium, the drug industry has not been interested in developing it and seeking approval, at least until now. While barium was in cheap supply why should they spend money developing a replacement whose distribution would involve expensive federal red tape?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Iodine is now restricted by federal law. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Eat seaweed for your iodine. Personally I regularly eat dulse, kelp is also common and used like salt by some.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  105. Re:Sorry, let me clarify by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Medical-purity BaSO4 is likely to be a further cut above the lab-grade stuff you can buy from any number of common chemical suppliers - purifying it is trivial - they do it all the time to make the stuff in the first place.

    Purifying it of hepatitis virus is NOT trivial (and I won't even go into what's necessary to denature prions).

    Once it's been through the intestinal tract of one patient, making it pure enough to be inserted to another's is likely to be far more expensive than purifying something that came out of a mine.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  106. As was pointed out elsewhere in this article... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    What makes little sense is the complaining about a shortage in hospitals, where a dose is less then an ounce, when oil drillers are pumping the stuff into the ground by the ton...daily...all over the world.

    As was pointed out elsewhere in this article: The ores used for drilling mud (notably those from US sources) contain far too much hard-to-remove toxic impurities (notably barium-strontium-sulfate) for medical use. Also, chemical processes to refine out the toxic impurities create FAR MORE TOXIC compounds in the intermediate steps, which must in turn be very carefully and completely removed. (And one supplier went belly-up, and earned long prison terms for an exec and a chemist, after killing several patients by attempting to substitute poorly "purified" cheaper ore.)

    While the good stuff from the Chinese ore was cheap and plentiful there's been no reason to try to substitute anything else.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  107. Does anyone know of alternatives to barium? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    For a radiation contrast medium? Radium sulphate should be chemically almost identical to barium sulphate (as the Curies can attest with their strenuous efforts to separate the two). Though radium sulphate may have other, less desirable, properties. The main property that you want is the presence of a large amount of mass per unit volume to provide the X-ray absorption ; that in itself dictates a heavy metal positive ion coupled with as light a negative ion as you can get away with.

    Being slightly more serious, the only other simple heavy metal salt which is sufficiently low solubility to be credible would probably be lead sulphate. But even that is probably too toxic, too cumulative and too likely to get mobilised into the metabolism. Caesium salts would probably be pretty biologically benign, but they're almost all significantly soluble in stomach conditions. And a touch on the expensive side. I don't recall mercury having any salts as insoluble and as refractory as barytes, and otherwise it's got as bad a biochemistry as lead.

    No good options on the sixth row of the periodic table then. Next row up, you're losing significant degree of contrast on the X-rays - scattering is strongly coupled to nuclear mass. (Oh, horrors ; I'm trying to remember how the photoelectric factor "PEF" modifies the interpretation of oil exploration of neutron-porosity and density logs. But yeah, atomic mass is pretty much the biggest component to the correction calculations.) And the obvious candidate to look at here is strontium sulphate. Most of the chemical behaviours of barytes, biologically relatively benign (do not confuse with the effects of the strontium-90 isotope!), should certainly provide significant contrast in X-rays. And I can't see anything that would come close in desirability on row five. So I'd say that your best substitute may well be strontium sulphate.

    Mind you ... some of the tungstate-VI compounts might be worth a look too. But they're liable to chemical erosion followed by acute metal poisoning in the real world, so I'd be very chary of them. Pass me another guinea pig, this one is squeaking loudly and writhing in a good impersonation of agony.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  108. Alternative by HHealthy · · Score: 1

    What about trying to reutilize or recycle barium? If you can't get enough nor find a good alternative. For example, in clinical test, can't they save their patients urine for later quenching? For funding, research and peer finding please refer to the non-profit Aging Portfolio.

  109. health? by axd1967 · · Score: 1

    How about educating people to eat more healthily, and investing in healthy food, so that there will be less GI problems?

    --
    -alex-