Slashdot Mirror


Timothy Lord Discovers the Good Night Lamp at CES (Video)

Many reporters go to the CES, AKA Consumer Electronic Show (warning - link landing page plays annoying sound) in Las Vegas to see the newest 42.001" LCD TVs, which are 0.001" bigger than last year's 42" models. And there are many boring Windows 8 devices, many of which both run Windows and can display the number 8. These items, along with keynotes from tech gurus like Bill Clinton (We're not making this up!) may be amazing to some news outlets, but not to Slashdot or to Our Man Timothy, who seeks out the new, the bizarre, and the unusual and -- without taking a dime from them -- lets their instigators talk to him about their wares. But it's got to be good stuff, not run of the mill incremental advances. Like the Good Night Lamp(tm), which was invented by Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino, whose "work has been exhibited," says the goodnightlamp.com/team page, "at the Milan Furniture Fair, London Design Festival, The Victoria & Albert Museum and the Museum of Modern Art in New York." Now the Good Night Lamp people are showing off their product and trying to raise money through Kickstarter. But that's enough from us. We will now hand the microphone to Ms. Deschamps-Sonsino and let her tell you the rest.

236 comments

  1. Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He was a keynote in Chicago in the late 90's on the digital divide.
    (granted he was president then)

    1. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's certainly been bridged at least in America. On to Africa...and beeeeyoooonnnnddd!

    2. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I saw him give a keynote at McAfee's conference.

      He's very charming. That's why he is used by the global elite to make so much horror palatable.

      Two years later, McAfee brought out GW - I guess in the pursuit of "balance".

      My dear God! I was embarrassed for the fellow - blinking under the lights. I cannot believe that this fellow can collect a speaker's fee, for talking about his daughters and painting pictures of dogs, at an InfoSec show!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the only tech that people take seriously if it were promoted/introduced by Billy C, would be computer controlled sex toys.

      They would take interest, and immediately not want one.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is certainly no "guru", not even in the women dept, unless you like heffers (in women and technology)...

    5. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by MrLizard · · Score: 0

      Two words: Clipper Chip.
      Some other words: He eagerly signed the CDA.

      That's about all you need to know about Clinton and the Internet.

    6. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      "That's about all you need to know about Clinton and the Internet."
      Sure, if you are a biased moron and got all your information from /. headlines.

      The Clipper CHip was about creating secure communications. In 1993 he talked about it, and it's a good idea. Then the flaws of it were presented, and concerns rolled in and he stopped prompting. It was dead by 1996.

      And a president singed an Veto proof bill? shocking. I like how you overlook his pressure to add, what became, section 230.

      If you boil any presidency down to a few out of context things, you are being stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? I guess one happy customer of the Slick-Willy-Clitton vibrator was annoyed by my comment.

    8. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by MrLizard · · Score: 2

      "Sure, if you are a biased moron and got all your information from /. headlines."

      A base insult! I ALSO get my information from Fark headlines! So there!

      Anyway;
      a)Clinton tried to get the clipper chip, or its equivalent, through three times, at least accoding to Slashdot headlines. I'd normally use Fark headlines, but I don't think it existed back then.

      b)While the Communications Act, as a whole, was pretty much a done deal, Clinton actually called out the portion of it that contained the CDA during the signing ceremony, taking special pride in that part of it. Granted, the DoJs defense of it was so pathetic that he could have given them orders to throw it -- but as Obama showed with DOMA, the Executive branch is not actually obliged to defend a law it considers unconstitutional at all, and he could have chosen to do that.

    9. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      You just have different taste, some men would greatly enjoy the Simu-Cankle!

      XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Sure, if you are a biased moron and got all your information from /. headlines."

      It might help if you got your own facts straight.

      I was head of an IT department when the Clipper Chip was under proposal. There was a LOT of attention to it among professionals... but the government did not listen.

      The algorithm was "secret" and not available to cryptography experts to evaluate. The chip itself was also "secret", and made to be tamper-proof, so it could also not be evaluated by private parties.

      Under pressure, the government did finally capitulate and allow a few experts to BRIEFLY examine the algorithm. They stated that it was "in a family of known secure algorithms"... hardly a recommendation, and no guarantee that there was no trickery going on.

      After years of development, at the last minute, NIST finally called for public input on the proposal... 30 whole days of it, before the idea was to be implemented.

      During those 30 days, approximately 85,000 input messages were received from the public. By official count, only 3 of them (that is not a typo... 3 as in "three") were positive. The rest were negative.

      The government completely ignored that public input and proceeded with the program anyway... until such public outcry arose that they finally backed off and made it "voluntary". And of course nobody volunteered. The tech and manufacturing industries wanted nothing to do with it, and the public (those who were aware of it) were strictly opposed in almost every case.

      Some time later -- AFTER the government realized that the idea was truly dead and its corpse was rotting beyond redemption -- they released the algorithm to the public. Serious flaws in it (including one that would allow users to bypass the encryption entirely) were found within a month.

      Clipper was an idea that was ill-conceived, unwanted, and executed in an outrageously poor manner.

    11. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      My memory stuttered. The one particular flaw I mentioned did not allow the user to bypass the encryption. What it actually did was block the government "escrowed" key from working. Defeating the whole purpose of the device.

    12. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      âoePerhaps the experience had been so complete that repetition would be vulgarity - like asking to hear the same symphony twice in a day.â

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You react poorly + avoid a direct question. Your reaction says it all. You trolled and now you're being trolled. If you can't take it, don't dish it out stupid. Learn to spell too. Not being able to spell what you allegedly did for work is really bad.

    14. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

    15. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You avoid a direct question: Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but he can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

  2. !good by stokessd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what I need to have a blissful night sleep is a lamp that is controlled by someone else. Next up, let's put control of the toilet flush lever in someone else's hands while I'm showering.

    1. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      That could be fun...

      Your toilet/urinal flush mechanism works... just for a different toilet urinal!

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:!good by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      Next up, let's put control of the toilet flush lever in someone else's hands while I'm showering.

      Offtopic, but I always thought this meme was just something that happened in the movies. Is (American?) plumbing really that bad that when someone else opens a tap or flushes a toilet, you immediately get boiled in a shower? For real?

      It's just that I've never encountered this effect anywhere. Sure, sometimes the hot water would be out due to a malfunctioning heater or something, but never had this effect of scalding hot burns right after someone else touches a tap..

    3. Re:!good by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Stephen Wright:

      In my house there's this light switch that doesn't do anything. Every so often I would flick it on and off just to check. Yesterday, I got a call from a woman in Madagascar. She said, "Cut it out." -- Steven Wright

    4. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in trailer houses and if someone flushed you would be doused with COLD water.

    5. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Yes, it can be.

      I've had houses where it was that bad, and others where it wasn't.

      Comparing it to the plumbing from my stay in Russia.
      In Russia, apartments were set up so the whole building had one hot/old water supply, and a lot of pipes going around to each area. Meaning opening a couple faucets (or flushing toilets) of one type wouldn't drastically reduce that type's pressure. It's cheaper, no toilet flush issue (usually minor anyway), however, if others use up all the hot water, there's none left until the much larger tank reheats (so you have less control over your hot water access).

      In some American style houses/apartments, they solve the issue by having larger cold-water intake pipes that feed the separate fixtures.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:!good by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      It's only a problem for people with small pipes and/or bad water pressure in their homes. Most semi-modern homes don't have a problem.

    7. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you are geographically and how old your pipes are. If you have poor water pressure in the system the toilet flush can create a temporary reduction in cold water. It's not scalding, but you can feel the temp difference. So.. if you're in an area with very little fluctuation in elevation or live in an old house with pipes that are semi-clogged with mineral residue from decades of use, you might have this happen. But no, not scalding, at least not that I've ever heard of.

    8. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the setup. Personally, I have a large reservoir to heat up water and it can support two people taking a shower at once. There is an issue with the normal (cold) water pressure. I can't say I've had someone flush the toilet as I'm showering, but I wouldn't doubt that the toilet would consume a good chunk of the cold water pressure and thus make the shower warmer by changing the ratio of hot:cold. Not by much though. I have lived in places where the change is sharp and jolting though.

      A year ago there wasn't a pressure issue, but since it started the proper authorities on the issue stated that it is "within acceptable range" so they will not touch it. The issue is beyond the house, so nothing I can do about it.

    9. Re:!good by Minwee · · Score: 1

      That could be fun...

      Your toilet/urinal flush mechanism works... just for a different toilet urinal!

      Rumour has it that Peter Molydeux is working on a project based on this idea.

    10. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the joys of listening to repeated flushing three stalls down, while the guy trying to take a peaceful dump screams in discomfort, while you try to send your log on it's way...

      What could be better?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    11. Re:!good by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      It depends on the plumbing but yes if there is no device balancing the hot and cold supply pressures then with a sudden drop in cold water pressure then the proportion of hot to cold can suddenly change.

      Although it is more common for opening a hot tap downstairs to drop the pressure of the hot water upstairs resulting in an icy blast of cold water. It is mostly a drawback of gravity based systems. Where a hotwater storage tank is used along with a header tank to provide the pressure. Mains water usually is at a much higher pressure.

      If your using a basic shower where the feed is basically a y shaped piece of rubber pipe connected to the bath taps. You are likely to be vulnerable to this problem. With a power shower the pump will compensate for the pressure drop.

    12. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if the US/Russia difference you mentions matters more than the house/apartment difference. The vast majority of apartment buildings I've visited or lived in the US, with more than half a dozen units, had large cold and hot supplies, so no single individual could exhaust the supply. Some of them would run short of hot water a little at rush times in the morning before typical work hours, but that seems to be less and less common as larger buildings switch over to on demand heating, instead of tank based heating.

      Houses on the other hand tend to be a different story and much more of a mix. It depends on the water pressure in your area, and what temperature your hot water is set at. If your hot water is set to be really hot, so that you are using like 90% cold water and a little hot water, you will notice any changes in cold water pressure when it is replaced by hot, causing a significant change in the proportions.

      Many local codes are now requiring that fixtures be of a type that doesn't change temperature as the water pressure changes in the two lines though. Even without that code, it is pretty easy to get such fixtures, so that is a lot easier fix than replumbing the whole house.

    13. Re:!good by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that some people don't have pressure balancing valves in their shower, especially in older homes and are too cheep or lazy to get them put in. My house had that problem and it wasn't that hard to fix if you know how to solder copper pipe.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    14. Re:!good by L1mewater · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if the US/Russia difference you mentions matters more than the house/apartment difference. The vast majority of apartment buildings I've visited or lived in the US, with more than half a dozen units, had large cold and hot supplies, so no single individual could exhaust the supply. Some of them would run short of hot water a little at rush times in the morning before typical work hours, but that seems to be less and less common as larger buildings switch over to on demand heating, instead of tank based heating.

      This probably varies a bit more by region or building type within the US. In every apartment building where I've ever lived, each apartment has had individual water heaters. In the dormitories where I lived during undergrad, the hot water was centralized. All of these were below the Mason-Dixon line and east of the Mississippi.

    15. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Similar, except north of the M-D line.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    16. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the previous AC, my experiences were in a few places in the Midwest, California, Florida, Virginia, and Maryland (so in the last case... almost right on the Mason-Dixon line). My job has me moving a lot, and pays well enough that I don't have to live in crappy, run down places, but not enough that I am living in new or particularly nice places. But there is probably still a bias toward newer places, less than 30 years old most of the time.

    17. Re:!good by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      No one gets "scalded" with today's modern hot water heaters, unless they have tampered with the thermostats. From the factory, the thermostat is set to 130 degrees. Someone flushing might cause you to get some uncomfortably warm water, but no scalding showers.

      I do tamper with my thermostats. My water is 150 degrees. It's enough to scald, if you happen to be sensory deprived, incapacitated, and/or retarded. But, everyone in my home has decent reflexes, good sense of touch and feel, and everyone has an IQ of at least 100.

      I guess that if I ever slip in the shower, and knock myself unconscious, then someone flushes repeatedly, I MIGHT get a burn.

      I'll take my chances.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    18. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In older construction (I live in a house built in 1920 for a while, and that's not even that old) soldering is hardly the biggest problem. Getting access to the fixture could require removing tile, removing a chunk of the plaster wall, or even more significant tear-out. And then you might find any number of type of plumbing. In the house I mention it was very old galvanized pipe. Oh, and it was a rental, so I wasn't really about to start screwing with it for any of reasons. Cheap and lazy seems a bit harsh.

    19. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or too stupid. 3rd year homeowner veteran here... That's amazing. Thanks!

    20. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they could waste a lot of water if they wanted to.

    21. Re:!good by hawk · · Score: 1

      It can be much worse than that.

      My father installed balancing valves sometime after I moved out. Not that it ever occurred to me to turn on the cold water at the kitchen sink while my brother set his water temperature, and then flip it to hot once he started . . .

      Anyway, Carver Hall at Iowa State was, among other things, an engineering demonstration project. Had a super-advanced climate control system--one for each floor.

      Once it was built, though, it turned out that changing the thermostat in one office affected the entire rest of the floor. They had to spike all the office thermostats.

      Oh, and did I mention one system per floor, a wonderful advance?

      In a building with east- and west-facing glass windows. Lots of them.

      The poor secretaries have space-heaters in their desk in the Iowa summers, as both the east and west sides are treated the same . . .

      hawk

      Oh, and did I mention

    22. Re:!good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try an old house with unequal hot and cold pressures with modern mixers. Unless the mixers are designed specially for this you have only 1-2 degrees of angle between freezing and scalding. The slightest change in pressure is noticeable.

  3. don't give bad boss any ideas by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    don't give bad boss any ideas and this can be a very bad one.

  4. My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the android-powered butt plug. No shit. It's got wifi and a web server so you can browse your ass and control the vibrations. There's also a web cam but I don't know why... there's no light and the camera will probably be covered with lube. (Hmm... sounds like a new instagram filter).

    1. Re:My favorite CES item by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Funny

      One end toothbrush, the other? Butt plug.

      Use em TOGETHER, with someone you LOVE! :-)

      (This message brought to you by the goatse.cx literary society.)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great news. This means Android is slowly but surely winning over Apple fanbois - one butt-plug at a time.

    3. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This message brought to you by the "man from San Fran", Jeremiah Cornelius is more like it (especially on the butt plug part, as we all know what goes on in that particular town).

    4. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit.

      That was intentional, right?

    5. Re:My favorite CES item by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I would have expected a butt plug to run iOS, but then again, there is already the iPhone.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you say "butt plug", then "no shit" is redundant, at least if the plug is worth its salt.

    7. Re:My favorite CES item by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      What chilled and almost cowed him was the
      union of malice with something nearly childish. For temptation, for blasphemy, for a whole battery of
      horrors, he was in some sort prepared: but hardly for this petty, indefatigable nagging as of a nasty little
      boy at a preparatory school. Indeed no imagined horror could have surpassed the sense which grew
      within him as the slow hours passed, that this creature was, by all human standards, inside outâ"its heart
      on the surface and its shallowness at the heart.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it?

    9. Re:My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You avoid a direct question: Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but he can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

  5. It's nice and everything, but... by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

    That is a *lot* of money for something that pretty limited in its usage.

    1. Re:It's nice and everything, but... by alphatel · · Score: 1

      It's a fascinating product. I for one, am fascinated how they found 100 backers.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    2. Re:It's nice and everything, but... by hey · · Score: 1

      I can see how people like the super easy concept.
      In practice I don't see people pressing the button to change their status.
      So maybe needs to be even simpler - motion/heat sensor - no motion/heat for 10 minutes turn off the remote lights.

    3. Re:It's nice and everything, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect there are lot more potential backers than you realize, albeit significantly fewer in number than fronters.

    4. Re:It's nice and everything, but... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Three words: Browsing While Intoxicated.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  6. Glad to see a product like this by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's like the spirit of the "Jump to Conclusions" mat lives on

  7. Use Instant Messaging instead by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Just set your IM status to "at home" or "asleep" instead.

    1. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There's also twitter, facebook and foursquare.

      "She's probably gone to bed" - because she said so and is actually offline.

      "He must be out" -because he checked in at the mall on foursquare.

      Or even "she's walking around this location" - because she's crazy enough to make her location public on some app: http://www.endomondo.com/login

      --
    2. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by KermodeBear · · Score: 2

      In addition, why on earth do I need to know someone's status all the time? This seems like a product for helicopter parents and stalkers.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    3. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by loufoque · · Score: 1

      I only post to Facebook when I do something significant.
      I don't want to pollute my wall with trivialities.

    4. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In addition, why on earth do I need to know someone's status all the time? This seems like a product for helicopter parents and stalkers.

      No kidding: http://goodnightlamp.com/who/

      Off to college
      It’s hard when your children leave the nest, so give them a Big Lamp and you won’t have to feel like you’re nagging them for news. They’ll want to keep in touch with their school friends too.

      Ugh. When I moved out of the country to go to university, my folks just called me if they wanted to talk, usually on Sunday afternoon. Sometimes we'd talk for a couple of minutes, sometimes for an hour.

      This is a product for people who can't be arsed to make an effort to communicate with people they allegedly love.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    5. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like it's aimed at empty nest parents who want to feel connected to their kids without constantly bugging them. You spend 18 years seeing someone every day, sitting down to meals and talking with them... when they move out it can be hard. You miss them and want to talk to them, but you know that they need their own space in order to move on and grow. I think this is a good way of being psychologically connected in a minimally obtrusive way. Certainly doesn't replace talking to people, but does make it easier to bear living in a suddenly very empty house.

      Captcha: serene

    6. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean people actually love their parents?

  8. "Timothy Lord discovers shrooms at CES" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging from the tone and content of the "article" above, I'd guess that Timothy Lord discovered magic mushrooms at CES.

    1. Re:"Timothy Lord discovers shrooms at CES" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Judging from the tone and content of the "article" above, I'd guess that Timothy Lord discovered magic mushrooms at CES.

      Well they throw it in Vegas, so I'd say it's more likely he went out to the Chicken Ranch with a few bucks and finally lost his virginity.

  9. Re:Wow by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kickstarter seems to be getting seriously diluted. Everybody is using it.

    That's like saying the internet is diluted. The word you're looking for is *popular*.

    Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though...

  10. Its a nifty idea and all.. by Hellbuny · · Score: 1

    But I really doubt she's going to get full funding.

    --

    meep!
  11. (tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by fantomas · · Score: 0

    "Like the Good Night Lamp(tm))"

    Will you be revisiting all articles every time a company name is mentioned that has a trade mark to note "(tm)"?

    1. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good Night Lamp? Go The F*ck To Sleep!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1, Informative

      Trademarks need to be defended. So if the Good Night Lamp is trademarked, and mentioned somewhere without the (tm) note, the company needs to write a letter pointing out that the name is indeed trademarked and needs to be marked as such. Easier to just put the (tm) on it in the first place.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    3. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Albanach · · Score: 1

      What would they be defending it against? It was used in the proper context to refer to the item they are selling.

      If Timothy had talked about a range of lights from multiple manufacturers as all being 'good night lamps ' then there would be devaluation of the trade mark. Similarly if he had turned it into a verb, saying "I'll good-night-lamp when I go to sleep, so don;t call if the light is off" then there might also be devaluation.

      I'm at a loss, however, to see what you think is being devalued here and would therefore need the company to instruct their attorneys to send a letter.

      That said, I'm not a lawyer. If you are, I'd love to know your reasoning based on actual statutes or case histories.

    4. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      well given that the band in question is a bunch of cool folks (assuming you are not in fact a band member or a man of Scottish decent) you may not be getting a letter from the band Albanach discussing why you are using that name (unless you just use it here).

      Xerox Keenex and Band-Aid all used to be trademarks but have suffered from genericide.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no requirement to put the symbol on trademarks (at least in the US), and there is definitely no requirement for them to be used by third parties who are using thing trademarked term in a legal way, such that the owner of the trademark can't make them take it down, conditionally or not. It is optional, purely as a reminder of the trademark status, which is particularly more important for under registered trademarks. It is the same as bothering to list the patents on a physical device.

    6. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most here'd be afraid to sleep with you around (as you're from San Fran's why, and we all know what you 'fellas' like to do)

    7. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      Correct, there's no requirement for the 3rd party to honor the rule. But unlike a patent which stays valid even if I don't do anything with it (so I might lose the right to damages if I delay prosecution), the owner of the trademark needs to be able to demonstrate that they were paying attention to the use by others, or they can lose the trademark for good. Still have a folder here from a trademark we registered, and had to fight with the trademark office over for 3 years when they determined we weren't really using and defending the mark.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    8. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You only need to mark it once, preferably the first time its used in a document. You don't need to do it every time.

      You can also simply put all your trademarks in a single designated place (say ... at the end) and that covers it as well.

      Using it repeatedly in the same document just makes it clear you don't know what the fuck you're doing.

      Trademarks do not need totalitarian defensive measures. Registering it is really the brunt of whats needed and renewing it on time to maintain it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you have to defend a trademark. But if someone claimed you were not defending your trademark because you didn't tell others properly using the term to add a trademark symbol or registered trademark symbol, you either had some bad luck with bureaucratic mistakes or some one was out to screw you. I've been through some messes due to businesses using the a trademarked brand name to refer to a similar device and with a book author insisting it was a generic term for a category of devices, but not with people writing reviews or previews of items, and not with any of those groups because they didn't use the symbol.

    10. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Albanach · · Score: 1

      well given that the band in question is a bunch of cool folks

      Cool as they may be, I was still using the name before they formed the band. If it were not a generic word, I think they'd be the ones with a problem.

      It is, however, generic and besides, I'm an easy going guy who is happy to share. Also, if you'd ever heard me play, you'd understand there's no risk of confusion with the band.

    11. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      He who loves a thing, speaks of it often.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

    13. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

    14. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You avoid a direct question: Why'd ya pull yer resume off LinkedIn Jeremiah Cornelius -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3368135&cid=42529887 Is it since someone spotted you're not only a "San Fran 'Man'" (a fella is more like it) and that you can't even spell what you allegedly used to do for a job? It's correctly spelled PENETRATION, not "pentration" as you misspelled it there in front of 1,000's no doubt (one would think an anal penetration man from San Fran'd know how THAT is spelled at least, lol). Jeremiah Cornelius likes to troll others -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 , but he can't handle it when it's done in return showing he is illiterate, and that much is obvious. You fail troll. How many years did you leave your resume up there with that basic literacy fail on it? Yes you have been trolled. You like? I wager you don't since you removed your faulty resume (on the very thing you took pride in that you can't even spell correctly most likely indicating you weren't any good at it either).

  12. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a solution looking for a problem. Also, holy shit at the price. China will knock this off for $4.99 per remote house and $12.99 for the big one. Hell, I can build them for $20 a piece by hand (although I wouldn't bother with the $1 worth of plastic case).

    Definitely the worst of CES.

  13. Re:Wow by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody uses it anymore - too crowded!

  14. Bubble Tracking by teknopurge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    More than anything I was interested to figure out what the leading indicators of the next industry bubble would be(after being in college during the 90s.com fun). My takeaway from this is while it's a fun gimmick, it's a solution looking for a problem. The fact it's getting traction in conversation is fascinating and provides greater insight than the concept itself.

  15. Dear Muggles, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe implementing the wizard's clock from Harry Potter would be a better, very similar, idea.

    1. Re:Dear Muggles, by MrLizard · · Score: 1

      Ah, someone else made the comment I was going to. ++.

    2. Re:Dear Muggles, by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      If you bring anything from the Harry Potter universe into real life the creativity differential will cause a black hole to open up.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Dear Muggles, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe implementing the wizard's clock from Harry Potter would be a better

      The WhereDial does exactly that: http://blog.mapme.at/wheredial/ in a less copyright infringing manor.

    4. Re:Dear Muggles, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, shouldn't be too hard to cobble together a reasonable simulation using smart phones and ubiquitous connectivity.
      I mean, excuse me while I patent this.

  16. A descriptive summary would be nice by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really give a shit whether or not you're not Bill Clinton, tell me what the lamp does. I'm not going to click a video and turn my sound up at work.

    The hell does this do?

    1. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Internet connected lamp. When someone turns the big lamp on, little lamps turn on too. So to answer your question, it does nothing useful.

    2. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can click on the Show/Hide Transcript link and it will bypass the video and give you a transcript. Was it really easier to write a post complaining about it?

    3. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it really easier to write a post complaining about it?

      This is Slashdot, it's ALWAYS easier to complain.

    4. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Induces buyer's remorse?

    5. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      This summary was perhaps one of the worst I've ever seen in Slashdot history.

      Hint: Summarize whatever the hell it is you are linking to. Don't try to shoehorn in a half-critique of CES, plugs for our very own Timothy(okay...), and OMIGOSH Bill Clinton, can you actually believe that, no I'm not making it up, like wow!

      The major problem, is that I have no clue if you are attempting to poke fun at the lamp, if it really is cool, are you linking to a fake product parody page?

      Yes this is just a rant about a summary, but for some reason its wording really irked me. I'm glad it seems I'm not the only one.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    6. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Flash video, which doesn't work on most portable devices anymore, besides the point that videos are a huge waste of time and bandwidth. The original poster should've included a description. This should be a /. policy.

    7. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      It's a flawless execution of the old wake someone up in the middle of the night prank. They eliminated the slight percentage of failures caused by the person hearing you sneaking in and waking them up. Now you can blast some light straight into their retina at 2:00 AM with the push of a button.

    8. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I swear the people making this are mocking consumers. There was a joke about an Internet-enabled remote-controlled lamp on The Big Bang Theory.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Good point. Unless these innovative network-enabled light fixtures have SOME embedded security, "DDOS" will come to mean "Distributed Denial of Sleep".

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  17. Handy for elderly relatives? by miowpurr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be good for elderly relatives living on their own. When they turn their lamp on in the morning, you know they are ok. If it doesn't turn on by a certain time, have the police (or a trusted neighbor) run a "welfare check" on them.

    1. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give them a call first - they'll appreciate that more than the police barging on their door if there's nothing actually wrong.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Actually, take that idea and put it into elderly care facility. So people in the front office know whose light is on or not, and then check on them.

      Add it to a motion detector.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by chispito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This may be good for elderly relatives living on their own. When they turn their lamp on in the morning, you know they are ok. If it doesn't turn on by a certain time, have the police (or a trusted neighbor) run a "welfare check" on them.

      Good point, unless your elderly relative is a little forgetful and doesn't see the point in turning a lamp on while the sun is up.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  18. Meh. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Meh, and double meh.

  19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean it's not limited to macbook carrying hipster douchebags only? Wow!!

    *goes to fund some non-macbook-carrying-hipster projects*

  20. ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Goodnight Lamp is simultaneously among the creepiest and stupidest things I've ever seen.

  21. CES request by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please stop producing useless garbage in fancy plastic and metal coverings and give us high speed internet. And when I say high speed, I don't mean that watered down swill your ISP sells you. I mean "set my harddrive on fire downloading torrents" speed. I mean multiple 1080p streams of video over one pipe. I do not need an iWhatever, or a remote-controlled lamp... I need a network connection that doesn't suck so hard it's in danger of forming its own event horizon.

    I don't care if it's wireless, or runs over copper or fiber, or if you have to shoot lasers through the sky. Get it done, people. We're about ten years late to the party as it is right now -- our infrastructure is rotten. Shannon's Law is kicking our butts, and we can only re-arrange bits of metal and plastic and input devices in clever new ways for so long before it's just old and busted.

    The future is bandwidth. Get on it.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:CES request by Herr+Brush · · Score: 1

      GP is girl who's into bandwidth. Big, fat tubes of juicy internet goodness. Plus the line "I need a network connection that doesn't suck so hard it's in danger of forming its own event horizon" was a good one. Your troll "hurr durr comcast is teh suxor!" is a wholly different beast.

    2. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had written this I would have been modded down to troll. All of my very similar rants have been. But this guy gets a +4 Insightful ?

      life is not fair. you have to be in the right place at the right time with the right pitch to the right people. obviously luck is involved. also talent

    3. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop producing new products that use a high speed internet connection. I've got plenty of movies I torrented already after being forced to hack and root every one of these useless pieces of shit you make just so I can install torrent clients on each of them so I can torrent more movies at once (128GB of RAM on just one device only goes so far, after all). Seriously, what is so hard to understand about technology? The sole purpose of technology is me torrenting movies, therefore any future developments in useful technology can only be towards me torrenting movies faster, and any technological "advancement" or consumer product that fails to assist me in torrenting movies faster is a waste of taxpayer and shareholder dollars. The only possible thing that can improve this is more high speed internet. And when I say high speed, I don't mean that watered down swill your ISP sells you. I mean "entirely theoretical speeds using methods we haven't even proved are physically possible that I once heard about when I was high and reading badly-made sci-fi comic books". I mean multiple 1080p torrents streamed live over one pipe, all at once, as your sole purpose in business is to appease my rampantly untreated ADD and raving solipsism.

      I don't care if it's imaginary, or runs on dreams, or if I WAS just high, swearing at my cats when I found out I had been lied to and those comics weren't real. Get it done, people. We're about ten years late to the party as it is right now, and since I'll have to saturate the pipe with more torrents and bitch about it later (because if I DON'T saturate it, holy shit it's all going to waste!!!1!), we'll NEVER catch up at this rate.

      The future is me torrenting MORE movies in quantities that no human could ever watch in multiple lifetimes. Get on it. If I slow down, someone else might torrent more than me, and then I'd lose.

    4. Re:CES request by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      If I had written this I would have been modded down to troll. All of my very similar rants have been. But this guy gets a +4 Insightful ?

      It's not so much what you say as who you say it to, and when. Also, with an alias like yours, you shouldn't be surprised if you get whacked with the troll shovel. Try a less angsty teen name and you might find people take you a bit more seriously.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States sold itself to the highest bidder, and got the 80s and 90s. There's nothing left.

    6. Re:CES request by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because you right slow witted, ignorant shit like this:
      "when someone steals our shit and we KNOW they stole it, we confront them ourselves without police involvement. If they don't give it back we smash their teeth in with a baseball bat. That's how I got my bicycle back,.. as the dude was in the middle of painting it over ... I walked up, bat in hand, and dude gave it right back claiming someone sold it to him (yea? then why paint it over?)"

      And reading the rest of your history, you seem to favor strawman.
      and you go out of your way to blow any anti MS post way out of proportion.

      frankly, it's becasue you troll.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:CES request by geekoid · · Score: 1

      These do dads is what will bring you more bandwidth. The more a large percentage of consumers use it, the more ISPs will make available.
      This doesn't me you need to use them.
      If it wasn't for people wanting media, we would all still be using 1 mb connections.

      If you want more bandwidth, it's available. I suspect what you want is more bandwidth for the same price.

      If that's not the case, the get OC-48

      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop producing useless garbage in fancy plastic and metal coverings and give us high speed internet.

      Sure, because if she weren't making those little lights she'd be working on high-speed networking.

    9. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But.. but.. lasers in the sky might cause just a bit of interference with IP over carrier pigeon!

    10. Re:CES request by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      These do dads is what will bring you more bandwidth. The more a large percentage of consumers use it, the more ISPs will make available

      Seriously? Let's do the math. If every single person in America had a lamp, and switched it 5 times a day, and each lamp switch command required (factoring in overheads) 500 bytes, that would generate:

      311,000,000 * 5 * 500 = 777,500,000,000 bytes = less than 1 TB of traffic a day, or ~23 TB a month.

      The amount of trafffic going over US backbones alone is (roughly) over 8 million TB/month right now. So this would increase demand by an absolute maximum of 0.0002875%, and that's an absurd over-estimate (by at least several orders of magnitude).

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    11. Re:CES request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had written this I would have been modded down to troll. All of my very similar rants have been. But this guy gets a +4 Insightful ?

      Your posting history shows that your "rants" lack humour, insight, are often rude, and are not particularly pleasurable to read.

      In other words, the opposite of the post (and the poster) you're responding to.

      tl;dr
      You could have posted the same thoughts but would have likely expressed them in a trollish manner and been moderated accordingly.

      Step up your game a bit when posting - you'll see better results.

    12. Re:CES request by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Dude, she has a female-implying name, what did you expect?

  22. Innovation by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    Innovating new products that you don't need or want. It's a space consuming version of the away button in IM. And the summary? *rolls eyes*

    1. Re:Innovation by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Innovation in consumer electronics died the moment the Average Joe decided they only wanted a toy handheld computer and not the real thing, somewhere in the mid-2000s. That's when technology just got too hard for the average consumer, and instead of harnessing the potential of a handheld computer, the tech industry gave them a tarted-up big-screen version of their old Motorola and began to produce these silly art-school-project doodads to tickle their sense of whimsy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  23. Invention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could we please stop calling everything that's designed around existing technology an invention? Thank you.

  24. Clinton by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Clinton has more smarts in his little finger than the sum of the brains of the 2 presidents who succeeded him.

    1. Re:Clinton by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That may be true, but I bet he really went for the booth babes.

    2. Re:Clinton by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but I bet he really went for the booth babes

      That is probably the most insightful comment here.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Clinton by hawk · · Score: 1

      Also had more dumbs in another part than he had smarts upstairs . . .

      hawk

  25. Can you please just stop? by g051051 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This stuff doesn't belong on the front page of Slashdot. You aren't a news source, you're not reporters, and you never will be. How about you spend more time actually editing and curating decent submissions, instead of the political tripe you've been doling out? Stop with the videos. Just...stop.

    1. Re:Can you please just stop? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Talking about a tech item found at CES doesn't belong on /.? Seriously?

      There have been some article that have exactly nothing to do with tech or science I would argue don't belong on /.
      But this? yes it certainly does.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Can you please just stop? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Not when its anything timothy brings up. He makes concrete blocks look like intelligent creatures.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Can you please just stop? by g051051 · · Score: 1

      If the slashdot crew themselves hadn't created the video, do you think this "article" would have made it out of the submission queue? This is more of the insane slashdot video vanity project. More of the hoodie, more of the slashvertisements. Every time they do this, they drag slashdot farther from being a useful site, and farther toward something like Gawker. They need to start acting like editors, and stop posting their little videos where they have the fantasy that they can be reporters. They need to curate the site and seek out good stories. They need stop posting drivel like these videos, or the garbage that Hugh Pickens spews across the page, or the corporate submission feeds.

  26. Staying Connected by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    When you make a phone call or send an e-mail you're breaking routine to specifically take part in connecting with someone. What's lost are those little, seemingly insignificant (but I think incredibly important) moments where you're just doing your own thing, but doing it around family and friends and there's a kind of passive sharing of that experience happening. That doesn't happen in an e-mail or a phone call.

    This idea feels like a way to engage in that passive sharing that I think is important in relationships. And it does this in a very simple, but familiar way.

    Some kind of services that shares every detail of a person's daily routine is just information overload and becomes annoying (twitter, 4square, facebook). This is just a nice, simple message (I'm home) that is personal, but unobtrusive and "feels right".

  27. Oh good by ddd0004 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone invented the precursor to the IP phone. It's the IP telegraph. Now I just need to polish up on my Morse code.

    1. Re:Oh good by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Wait until you see my Internet-enabled Aldis Lamps! They're sure to be the talk of CES 2014!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  28. Summary makes brain hurt by oraclese · · Score: 0

    My God, this summary is terrible....

    1. Re:Summary makes brain hurt by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 0

      I know. It sounds like something from a TDWTF story intro, than a Slashdot report. I actually had to read it twice to make sure I understood what it was saying, which wasn't anything a simple link couldn't have accomplished.

  29. Absence makes the heart grow fonder by poity · · Score: 1

    The opposite being just as true.
    Now, I love my family, but broadcasting that I'm home with the implication that I want to chat, well, I can imagine getting annoyed and unplugging that thing -- and then the police shows up later because my mom though something bad happened to me and got scared (and said 'You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in Bel Air")

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  30. What where now? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Someone forgot to replace the lorem ipsum text with the real summary.

  31. Well there's a kickstarted by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    That won't be making it's ridiculous finding goal. Not very useful and stupidly expensive to boot.

    1. Re:Well there's a kickstarted by hawguy · · Score: 1

      That won't be making it's ridiculous finding goal. Not very useful and stupidly expensive to boot.

      I was thinking the same thing - £89 (~$150) seems pretty expensive for a simple Wifi enabled lamp.

  32. vulcans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she looks like a vulcan

  33. Improvement Suggestions... by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Instead of selling/producing the large lamp. they should develop a module with embedded WiFi that goes between any lamp and the power circuit. That way you could use any lamp with the system.
    2. Instead of selling separate little home lamps and, presumably, having multiple lamps, what they should do is develop a "Christmas Village" type product with multiple houses, street, etc. Each miniature house would then light up based on the status of the paired module.
    3. Create virtual "Christmas Village" software/web page

    For the "Christmas Village" piece, it could have different scenes: Winter, Suburbs, Big City, Summer cottages, etc. In fact, if they did it right, they could develop the village layout that allows for skins for each of the houses, landscape, etc. which could be changed based on the season, etc... For example, this would allow the user to set up a village with an office building, cottage, house, etc. You could add grass, asphalt, water, snow landscape skins, etc.

    Personally, I think that it would be cool to see a miniature village light up when my sisters, parents, nephews, etc. are home. At least I would then know when to call them to wish them a happy birthday, etc.

    1. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with X10 and a wifi bridge? other than the obvious...

      I really don't see why someone in China hasn't started cranking out some knockoff TRIAC modules and got the price down to where every switch & socket in a house/office/factory can be on this.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is way complicated for her :)

      She is a designer not a software/hardware developer.

      She wanted to design a lamp. You can't get rich by designing a lamp, especially as ugly as that, so she needs a gimmick now.

    3. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you didn't get the job at Apple design...

    4. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by poity · · Score: 1

      Trouble is, an engineer's solution (works, and is versatile) doesn't sell as well as a marketeer's solution (cute and eye-catching)

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    5. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      1. Instead of selling/producing the large lamp. they should develop a module with embedded WiFi that goes between any lamp and the power circuit. That way you could use any lamp with the system.

      Why does it have to be a lamp? How about the light on your desk goes on to inform you that the misses is using the power sander in the bedroom again? vmmMMMMMM!

    6. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem with x10 has always been, modules can't report status.

    7. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      problem with x10 has always been, modules can't report status.

      Two way modules have been available for at least a decade:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X10_(industry_standard)#Physical_layer_details

      Later developments (1997) of hardware are improvements of the native X10 hardware. This is called "Advanced X10" or A10. These devices contain improved hardware with a receiver and transmitter allowing two-way communication between the devices

      Here's an example: http://www.smarthome.com/2001TW/2-Way-X10-Appliance-Modules-with-Status-Request-AM14A-PAM21/p.aspx

      I was using 2 way modules back in 2001.

    8. Re:Improvement Suggestions... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with X10 and a wifi bridge? other than the obvious...

      I really don't see why someone in China hasn't started cranking out some knockoff TRIAC modules and got the price down to where every switch & socket in a house/office/factory can be on this.

      Because most people don't want it and wouldn't use it. You can buy X10 switches for about $15, so if you really want all of your switches to have cheap controllers, you can do it now.

      Whoever wired my house didn't even bother to properly label 10 circuit breakers, do you really think they are going to take the time to map out and label 2 dozen switches and outlets throughout the house?

      And who wants to go downstairs to the home automation panel to enable an outlet just to run the vacuum cleaner.

  34. college is the next bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    college is the next bubble to many people are going and cost is to high.

  35. Dr. Cox by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    "I don't know what to tell you, there, Bobbo. Either this kid has a light bulb up his butt or his colon has a great idea."
    Source

    --
    The G
  36. In the words of George Carlin: by Ken+Hall · · Score: 1

    If you nail together two things that have never been nailed together before, some schmuck will buy it from you.

    How about a left nostril inhaler, that glows in the dark, with your state motto on it?

  37. Re:Wow by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

    Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though...

    It's not for me either, but that will be determined by number of people putting up their own money (or lack thereof).

  38. The Good Night Lamp . . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    has to be one of the top 10 dumbest items to come out this year, and we're only a week and a half in.

    That said, because I consider it such a stupid idea, people will buy it in the millions. Better invest in the company now before it goes public.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:The Good Night Lamp . . . by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Dumb implementation of some useful tech. I'd quite like to be able to turn out all the lights at the same time when I go to bed rather than having to do a big loop. Something like X10 would have this handled if it was that much of an issue though.

  39. Some uses... by MrLizard · · Score: 3

    While it's not exactly the must-have tech toy of the century, I don't think its completely useless. Some suggestions:

    a)Set up bomb triggered by photoelectric sensor.
    b)Place lamp next to bomb.
    c)Press button.

    Someone's already mentioned the morse code use. Sure, the FBI is monitoring your tweets, but are they monitoring your, uhm, blinks?

    It is worth noting that not everyone is always watching their IM, etc. A signal to people who are NOT online that your status has changed is not without its uses.

    Add in some kind of color changing mechanism, so that you can sync colors, and you can send a large number of message. "Two blue blinks means the cops are on their way, clear out!", for example.

    Heck, I HATE it when I am summoned from my home office for dinner by someone shouting down the stairs at me. It breaks my concentration hideously. Having a signaling device like this with no annoying vocal component would actually be useful to me. Others in my family aren't online all the time; they can't/won't just send me an email to let me know dinner is ready.

    We live in the dying days of a great empire. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that can change this -- not by individual or collective action. Thus, we should eat the bread and attend the circuses. Our descendants (well, your descendants, I'm not spawning) will envy us for having the kind of surplus resources that allows the creation of things like this. Enjoy it while you can; refusing to enjoy it won't change anything, except your happiness level.

    1. Re:Some uses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's not exactly the must-have tech toy of the century, I don't think its completely useless. Some suggestions:

      a)Set up bomb triggered by electric signal.
      b)Wire bomb into lamp socket.
      c)Press button.

      There -- fixed that up for you. No more blowing yourself up just because you accidentally let light fall on the PE sensor when you placed the bomb.

    2. Re:Some uses... by MrLizard · · Score: 1

      This assumes you can place the bomb where there is such a socket. Of course, if the lamp requires a socket, there goes THAT plan. Curses, foiled again!

  40. CREEPY. by theNAM666 · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  41. What would happen if... by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    Sometimes my lamp burns out and I don't notice it's been set to "on" for days before I go replace the bulb. This would give the false impression to people that I am home when I am not.

  42. Twitter on steroids by PPH · · Score: 1

    Because everyone wants to watch their relatives, friends, and neighbors comings and goings.

    Gee. My ex-girlfriend just got in at 3:00AM. I wonder who she brought home?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  43. Gift from a stalker by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Give the little lamps to people your stalking. Don't tell them what they do.

  44. OMG THINK OF THE SECURITY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if the house where the BIG LAMP was kept was, somehow, hacked into!! Then people will know when you're home or not!

    Sorry, I had to do this in light of all the recent school RFID card posts.

  45. yes, it does by anyaristow · · Score: 1

    I remember in college having to immediately step out from under the shower as soon as I heard a toilet flush. It was an old dorm.

  46. Re:Wow by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though..."

    I beg to differ.

    Terrorist of the world are waiting for this. Just make bombs out of the sub-lamps and install them where you want the kaboom to happen.

    Then fly home and switch on the master lamp and bathe in the soft, soothing light.

  47. The first online appliance that non-geeks discover by ribuck · · Score: 1

    This product is significant because it will be the first online appliance that most non-geeks will discover.

    After people get used to the Good Night Lamp, they won't bat an eyelid when their car tweets that it has just received a parking ticket (and by the way, the front left tire is half-flat). They'll take it in good stride when their refrigerator emails to say that it is shutting down unless the six-month-old lump of rotting blue cheese is removed by midnight.

    People will expect their toothpaste tube to order the next tube to be delivered just in time, and won't be surprised if the park bench posts a YouTube video of their fat ass sitting on it.

  48. High Kickstarter target by FriendlyStatistician · · Score: 1

    They're asking for £360,000 (~ $580,000) on Kickstarter, a target I very much doubt they'll meet. Feeling a little greedy, are we?

  49. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though..."

    I beg to differ.

    Terrorist of the world are waiting for this. Just make bombs out of the sub-lamps and install them where you want the kaboom to happen.

    Then fly home and switch on the master lamp and bathe in the soft, soothing light.

    >implying this is more economical or straightforward than using a ten dollar prepaid phone as a remote trigger.

  50. The days of giant bandwidth growth are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the mid 2000s, the giant bandwidth growth has slowed down. Long distance fiber optic lasers have been around a single digit gigabit/sec for a decade. A decade ago, gigabit ethernet prices were plumeting. Copper 10 gigabit ethernet is still expensive, after several years of predicted low costs. 100 gigabit ethernet is still new, and it remains to be decided if 400 or 1000 gigabit ethernet will be the next target.

    Besides, except for downloading movies, the average person does not use extra bandwidth.

    1. Re:The days of giant bandwidth growth are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long distance fiber optic lasers have been around a single digit gigabit/sec for a decade.

      Maybe your fibers have been that way, but the ones I've worked with are almost approaching a decade of 10 Gb/s, and now are several 10s of Gb/s. And I know we don't have the fastest setup around. For longer distance stuff, there are options other than ethernet...

  51. Here's why it's a great idea by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Because the night is dark and full of terrors.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  52. KickStarter to JumpSharker by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    If this stupid project manages to raise money, would it mean that Kickstarter has officially jumped the shark?

    1. Re:KickStarter to JumpSharker by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      No. It would, however, prove the old adage, "There's a sucker born every minute."

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  53. Good night lamp .lt. Nabaztag wifi rabbit by hedley · · Score: 1

    The connected rabbit could do this, you move the ears and if so set up via "communing" the ears at the other rabbit moved also. It was better than that
    lamp as you could send a message also and the message would be read out loud, or send a song for that matter with lightshow and choreographed ear motions.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabaztag

    H.

  54. Sign you been in Amsterdam to long by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Sign you have been in Amsterdam to long:

    Is the android-powered butt plug. No shit. It's got wifi and a web server so you can browse your ass and control the vibrations.

    NOTHING in the above line triggers any red flags that someone is trying to be anything but serious/informative.

    Mind so open, my brain has fallen out.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  55. Will it always be ad free? by xanthos · · Score: 1

    I see the shiny white side of the house and think "rear projection screen for ads". Damn, now somebody will do that for real.

    --
    Average Intelligence is a Scary Thing
  56. Wow, online stalking reaches new heights by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    So instead of being kept awake with all the beeps and tweets and flashing lights from your phone or tablet as your friends check in, now your room will never be dark as all these lamps fire up.

    Seriously, I know its great to be social, but we don't have to be so connected as to know when friends and family walk in the door. There is something to be said about having a little privacy these days. Maybe I might start a Kickstarter project for a button that can be pressed that just ejects you out of the social network completely and lets you enjoy a few moments of peace from all your stalkers.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  57. Re:ZOMFG! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    WELCOME to today's consumer electronics! Bask in our amazing locked-in toy computers and comically useless doodads!

    Seriously if we brought a person from just 10 years ago to this year's CES with a time machine, they'd insist they were being pranked.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  58. You prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what?

    Fuck you and lighten up.

    My mother would adore this, sometimes it's nice to be able to 'glance over' and see your loved ones without actually having to 'communicate' with them. I know because she keeps a picture of me by her bed side (as well as all her other children) because they 'remind her of us' and make her smile. She even watches old movies of us because it reminds us of her.

    I expect the last thing my mother wants to do is have me call her at 10:00pm when I am shutting down to sleep, but I can tell she would smile when she saw the lamp go on and off because it would remind her of her child and hey look, they are going to bed now or waking up.

    What about grandmothers and their grand children (who might be toddlers - yeah they're too fucking arsed to text message their grandmother, oh wait, one is 2 years old and the other doesn't even know what text message is).

    It's indirect communication by loved ones who are far away.

    It's nice idea.

    1. Re:You prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mother of a stereotypical slashdotter will just have to "glance over" at her basement ;).

  59. Re:Wow by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Nobody goes there anymore - it's too crowded.

      -- Lawrence "Yogi" Berra.

  60. Re:Wow by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    *goes to fund some non-macbook-carrying-hipster projects*

    No, it's mostly wallets.

  61. Re:The first online appliance that non-geeks disco by teknopurge · · Score: 1

    I don't buy that argument - we've had IP appliances(Fridges, home security systems) for the better part of a decade. We've had alarm clocks that get global time information sync'd for decades. Connected appliances, and recently on-line appliances are not innovative.

  62. This too will pass by raque · · Score: 1

    One of the joys of kickstarter is that lame ideas like this will just go way.

  63. Re:Wow by phaggood · · Score: 1
  64. Re:Wow by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

    Strange, I was just looking at that a little bit ago. It's a fair ways out of my usual price range and suite of services for a prototyping platform, but it's interesting.

  65. I like it! by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    This idea actually strikes me as cool. Sure, it has no practical uses, but so what? A Lamborghini has no practical uses, but it's still cool that somebody actually made it. It only sounds stupid because they're trying to claim that it's useful.

  66. Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good on her for actually making something and taking a chance!