Slashdot Mirror


'This Is Your Second and Final Notice' Robocallers Revealed

nbauman writes "A New York Times consumer columnist tracked down the people who run a 'This is your second and final notice" robocall operation. The calls came from Account Management Assistance, which promises to negotiate lower credit card rates with banks. One woman paid them $1,000, and all they did was give her a limited-time zero-percent credit card that she could have gotten herself. AMA has a post office box in Orlando, Florida. The Better Business Bureau has a page for Your Financial Ladder, which does business as Account Management Assistance, and as Economic Progress. According to a Florida incorporation filing, Economic Progress is operated by Brenda Helfenstine, with her husband Tony. The Arkansas attorney general has sued Your Financial Ladder for violating the Telemarketing Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services investigated Your Financial Ladder, but the investigator went to 1760 Sundance Drive, St. Cloud, which turned out to be a residence, and gave up. The Times notes that you can type their phone number (855-462-3833) into http://800notes.com/ and get lots of reports on them."

235 comments

  1. Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These fuckers relentless harassed my grandmother in her final days despite my efforts to put her on the do not call list and working with her telephone company to try to identify them.

    Take all their money. All of it. Take it all and put it into something that helps the elderly.

    1. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, man, you wouldn't have anything on your conscious if you left them to die in the everglades? I mean, think of the poor alligators that would have to eat their rotten fucking flesh.

    2. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you've got their address.

      Now would be a fantastic time to pay them a visit.

      You know what we do to spammers.

    3. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kind of extreme.......well, maybe not. My father is elderly and it's like he's under assault by these low life scum. There are so many organizations that live off of these kind of scams. I'd like to see drastic action taken.

    4. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

      1760 Sundance Drive
      St. Cloud, Florida 32771

      http://goo.gl/maps/9P4BX

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by gmack · · Score: 2

      The magic words are "I have power of attorney" (even if it's not true) once they think that the person they are calling cannot legally agree to anything they usually back off. They don't respect the law, their only worry is if they get payed or not.

    6. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agree. But torture them first.

    7. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      1760 Sundance Drive
      St. Cloud, Florida 32771

      http://goo.gl/maps/9P4BX

      Looks like an easy target for a Predator drone ...

    8. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know what we do to spammers.

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    9. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by eksith · · Score: 1

      That's horrible. And it's well within their MO; they always target the infirm and the weakest first since they're more likely to fall pray to this. Modern day vultures

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    10. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too quick, too painless. People like this need to suffer, death isn't a sufficient deterrent. If your life sucked as badly as theirs, you may even welcome it. The only way to discourage this form of bottom feeding is suffering, lots and lots of suffering. Letting them live, visibly scarred, and in full view of the public may demonstrate that while we will dispose of murderers and rapists, trolls will live as a warning to others in what may as well be an eternity of torment.

    11. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Lee_Dailey · · Score: 1

      howdy y'all,

      this is my fave way that telemarketers are dealt with. well, it's science fiction, but the idea is _delightful_! [*grin*] take a look at the 3rd paragraph here ...
      Sluggy Freelance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sluggy_Freelance#Other_guest_strips_and_crossovers
      "Also, the first two novels of Ringo's distant-future Council Wars series have appearances by an irascible, treacherous, switchblade-toting, telemarketer-hating AI in a rabbit-shaped body—created by a long-dead fan of an unnamed 20th-century webcomic."

      yes, kill them all. slowly if possible. with lots of screams, recorded and published on the internet for all to enjoy.

      take care,
      lee

    12. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, because repeated aggravated rape is so a synonym for justice. I imagine that Browning fellow you're so fond of would do something more merciful, like shooting them.

    13. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

      In a perfect world, pervasive rape in jail will not be subject of gleeful jokes (it'd be funny if it weren't a common issue). I would like to see spammers go to jail too, but not like this.

      Even better, maybe we can fine spammers for "whatever the made + X%" and ban them from using computers for a while. This way they can work off their debt to society with some manual labor - outside of jail would be fine too.

    14. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by smartin · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry to say that while the Do No Call List seemed to work well for several years it is now completely being ignored. I guess the telespammers realized that it had no teeth. I really hope that the FCC or who ever runs it takes a company like this and makes a serious fucking example of them.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    15. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Poisoning alligators isn't very nice....

    16. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Perhaps automatic castration for all prisoners found raping anyone? Sounds justified, and might solve that high testosterone level aggression issue at the same time.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by gtall · · Score: 1

      Actually, what you want is "Durable Power of Attorney".

    18. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, extreme is lighting their legs on fire while pumping them full of drugs to suppress the brains natural shock mechanisms. Death is too good for these non-people/non-human ass hats. No one learns while being dead, only extreme agony for days or weeks can do that.

    19. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell"...

      with a telephone which rings randomly, but at least once an hour, for their entire multi-year term. Anytime they fail to answer the phone, their prison term is extended by a month.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    20. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Kind of extreme.......well, maybe not. My father is elderly and it's like he's under assault by these low life scum. There are so many organizations that live off of these kind of scams. I'd like to see drastic action taken.

      If it wasn't for the greedy banksters and their bought dog, in the back pocket politicians as well as all the incompetent bureaucratic minions whose only joy is making others miserable, this would be a really nice place. Then I could stop praying to the deity who would listen and erase this piss-ant planet once and for all.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    21. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      tl;dr - "To the pain."

      --
      John
    22. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good news everyone! It is near Alligator Lake!

    23. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans who care about the elderly should call their congresscritters and tell them not to implement chained CPI

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Chained_Consumer_Price_Index

    24. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real problem is the possibility that they would end up nourishing the invasive pythons that plague the Everglades, further disrupting that delicate ecosystem.

    25. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like karmic justice to me.

    26. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're assuming they have some sort of internal "do not call" list. They don't.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    27. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and the Fair Debt Collections Act are unenforceable in the days of IP telephony. A company can have no presence on US soil but still ring millions of phones. In fact, it is trivial for the phones to ring with any random number.

      I remember dreading the time when the average college goob found the telnet port 25 command ages ago... only a matter of time before the offshore boiler rooms start calling with any random number out there.

    28. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

      In a perfect world, pervasive rape in jail will not be subject of gleeful jokes (it'd be funny if it weren't a common issue). I would like to see spammers go to jail too, but not like this.

      In a perfect world, we wouldn't need prisons, because people would actually obey society's laws and respect the property, dignity, and person of other people.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    29. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail

      Your perfect world contains spammers and jails? You should try to get a refund.

    30. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cruel... and unusual. I like it!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    31. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      In a perfect world, pervasive rape in jail will not be subject of gleeful jokes (it'd be funny if it weren't a common issue). I would like to see spammers go to jail too, but not like this.

      I agree, and furthermore it bugs me that this is one of the few places where rape jokes are still apparently socially acceptable. It's wrong to make jokes about this.

      Having said that, I do concede that the temptation to make a joke about typical spam subjects was overwhelming, and I don't hold it against the GP for giving in.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    32. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That, and the Fair Debt Collections Act are unenforceable in the days of IP telephony.

      Partially true. The FDCPA still has teeth but there are far better ways to wield it than talk to those assholes on the phone. If they start calling over unsecured credit card debt, ignore the calls but wait for them to send something in the mail (it will probably happen really soon once they start calling). What you need to do next is send a certified cease-and-desist letter to their physical brick-and-mortar office. Many of these fuckers are sneaky and work out of various PO boxes around the country but they always have a real office somewhere; spending a bit of time on Google usually helps you find it.

      Your c/d letter should make several claims: disavow all responsibility for the debt; Demand an immediate cessation of all phone and written correspondence; if they are out of state demand to see their proof of license (and license number) to operate in [your home state here]; and threaten to report them to your state attorney general if they ever contact you again without providing the required license info. If they do it again, make good on your threat! Don't threaten to report them to the better business bureau---it's an empty threat because for all its posturing the BBB can't do shit. On the other hand, having to deal with an AG investigation usually makes collectors piss themselves. You need to understand that these are real dickless cowards. If you make it clear you intend to fight they will probably leave you alone since there are lots of other people they can shake down instead (they buy these delinquent accounts in bulk for pennies on the dollar and then try to collect).

      If they actually sue you, it's time to break out the big guns: You need to file a Sworn Denial on Account in the jurisdiction that is handling your case. This the the equivilent of a not guilty plea; you officially deny the debt and require the plaintiff to furnish proof. Never take any settlement offers or deals; they will still try to fuck you with those and the burden of proof is always on them. The important thing to remember is that they are fucked unless they can produce the original signed contract in court since that is the only way to prove that you owe a debt.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    33. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a perfect world, you woldn't need laws because we'd all instantly know what was appropriate and do it.

      That's why there's no such thing as a perfect world.

    34. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by aztracker1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a perfect world there wouldn't for-profit prisons, that have lower standards, higher infraction numbers, and higher rates of 'inmate' crimes leading to longer detention terms. (Not to mention the shear corruption). The US has a higher ratio of prisoners that pretty much the anywhere else.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    35. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

      You have a sense of karmic payback similar to that of the Mikado. Sir, I salute you!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    36. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      Call Peta and tell them that they are actually a cover for Chinese baby alligator meat suppliers, sit back and watch them chew each others head off.

    37. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. I get the same calls. I hang up. Why are the elderly considered "under assault" when these are placed to them? If the individuals in question have Alzheimer or dementia, extra care should be taken with them anyways.

    38. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, that's exactly why I object to the Death Penalty: It's just too easy for the criminal.

      And don't fool yourself, it is MUCH more expensive to prosecute a Death Penalty case through all the appeals to the final needle in the arm, than it is to lock 'em up in a tine cell with no windows for a life of ever increasing insanity.

      Of course my morality objects to that as well, so when people ask me about the Death Penalty, I simply walk around in circles talking to myself...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    39. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by rHBa · · Score: 1

      I agree, and furthermore it bugs me that this is one of the few places where rape jokes are still apparently socially acceptable.

      I don't think he was joking.

    40. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by fazey · · Score: 1

      You know there is an app called blacklist. Their numbers only rotate once every few weeks(at least the one that calls me constantly). It sounds like this may have helped.

    41. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by MacDork · · Score: 1

      You know what we do to spammers

      You do know that spam is defined as unsolicited commericial email, right? What these people are doing is not spam. It is fraud. Its unfortunate, but they would be subject to far greater fines if they were simply annoying people with spam. $15000 per message. With fraud, they'll probably get a slap on the wrist at best. You know, like all those bankers that fraudulently sold bad loans as AAA rated debts and crashed the market in 2008. This story is evidence of it.

    42. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Phrogman · · Score: 2

      Because Prison in the US is like anything else - its been turned into a business so that corporations can profit off it. Its the modern day equivalent of slave labour, or perhaps more accurately indentured servitude.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    43. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      By the time you're 80 years old, you've learned that the one thing that never changes is, the world is always changing. Someone calls you on the phone, and gives you a load of shit about the laws have changed, they can help you get your credit rating back, blah blah blah. You're a sucker for it. Not to mention, most of us face diminished reasoning powers at some point close to 80.

      Yeah, preying on the elderly is no better than preying on children. There's a reason that old age is often referred to as a "second childhood".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    44. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're damn right it is. Prison is not supposed to be a happy place. Satan's reserved a special place in hell for these types of con artists, but here in the temporal realm we mortals can make them as miserable as possible.

    45. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Gee, sounds fun.

      Sign me up!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    46. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we send Robots to destroy the Robo Callers.

    47. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      In some ways my father, who is now 87, is as sharp as ever. In others not so much. He seems to trust complete strangers now where years back he would have been suspicious. It's perplexing. He lives alone since my mother died 3 years ago and washes clothes, cleans house and even drives to the grocery store and shops. Despite that he is as trusting as a child now and buys any sob story he gets. I'm going crazy dealing with it.

    48. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 2

      Oh, it's far from fun. It's a hellish ordeal that may take a year or more to finish (fortunately, it's not an everyday thing and each move may be separated by a month or more). If you do this, you're basically going to war against the collectors but the fight is worth it because you have all the advantages and the law is on your side. The burden of proof is always on the creditor (never on you). Collectors don't want people to know their rights, that's why they are such aggressive and abusive little shits. Their goal is to beat people into submission. Most people declare bankruptcy because it's the easy way out. People don't want to go through this bullshit and that's what these assholes are counting on when they start harassing people. From a victim's point of view, a 50% settlement deal looks pretty good after 6 months of harassment. People are willing to settle to just make the problem go away. Well guess what? The collector paid a pittance for that debt and they never expected to get the whole thing. Even at 50% they're still making a profit, which is what this is all about (it's just another way of financially raping people down on their luck). On the other hand, you have people like me who get pissed off enough to fight back when that happens. It's immensely satisfying to curb-stomp the bastards and beat them at their own game.

      There's all kinds of ways you can fuck with these collectors (even the ones who are allegedly law firms) to retaliate for the shit they put you through. For instance, you can deliberately wait until nearly the last minute to file important paperwork for your court case (they have to pay a paralegal to handle that and a rush job costs them a lot more and increases the chances they will overlook something important you can use against them later). The idea is to cost them as much money as possible (to the point where they wish they never heard of you since you're costing them a lot with a zero rate of return) so they will give up. Since you're handling your case pro se in these situations, you can do all kinds of shit that could get a lawyer in trouble and there's not much the collector can do about it.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    49. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah, because repeated aggravated rape is so a synonym for justice. I imagine that Browning fellow you're so fond of would do something more merciful, like shooting them.

      Thank you for speaking up. The world will be a better place when rape stops being a punchline.

    50. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the face of the fucker behind those calls.

      Tony Helfenstine (age 41, born August 1971) also goes by Antonio M. Helfenstine. He is also related to Daniei J. Helfenstine (age 50)

      Brenda Helfenstine (age 43) is also known as Brenda Torres and Brenda K . Torres. She is also related to Eric Torres (age 54)

      Known contact information:

      This first address is one that has been shared by both Tony Helfenstine and Brenda Helfenstine.
      362 Cello Cir
      Winter Springs, FL 32708
      (407) 696-6315

      These two addresses have been used by Tony Helfenstine/Antonio M. Helfenstine
      113 Hillcrest St
      Altamonte Springs, FL 32714
      (407) 788-8827

      798 Baybreeze Ln
      Altamonte Springs, FL 32714
      (407) 869-8422

      These last two addresses were used by Brenda Helfenstine/Brenda K. Torres
      220 Dublin Dr
      Lake Mary, FL 32746
      (407) 549-3984

      1309 Willow Springs Ct
      Longwood, FL 32750
      (407) 951-7794

    51. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still not appropriate.

    52. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the do not call list!!!
      We need a firewall for phones. Simple. Just a simple little box that requires the calling person to enter a code (last four of social, birthdate, etc.} to make the phone ring. The legit companies will have your last 4 digits of SSN every one else can be given a code. Select ringtones for diffrent people. Oh wait... IT'S CALLED A PBX!!!!

      Cool I want one now.... where's that Asterix CD at???

    53. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'll go 2 for two - automatic castration for those that commit rape in prison seems justified. Mod me flame bait, whatever, but it appears a just penalty.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    54. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.osceola.county-taxes.com/public/real_estate/parcels/R062632-259800011070/bills/2557301

      shows that they paid their real estate taxes just after Thanksgiving. And, they've only owned it for a
      couple of years... Wonder if they're getting ready to move on ?

    55. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world spammers would not exist.

    56. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The humor in the in WWJohnBrowningDo's message is that the spam e-mail is famous for
      - enlarge penis advertisements
      - viagra advertisements
      - dating site advertisements
      A rape is not the point here.

    57. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More data for the sucm according to Florida Voting records.

      http://fl-voters.findthedata.org/l/8545424/Antonio-M-Helfenstine

      http://fl-voters.findthedata.org/l/8638305/Brenda-Kay-Helfenstine

      Linkdin Profile of a probable sister to Brenda listing the same address.
      http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michelle-m-cyr/12/a35/7bb

      Can't find the phone number to the address, but they do have a cable modem.

    58. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the state senator should know who is registered republican and contributed to his campaign.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_S._Bennett ( dummy who was looking a naughty pics while in chamber)

      Hey look someone needs to win an election in his district as well....not sure if this is a phantom page or not.But mike is the current member of the House of representatives for that district.
      http://www.mikelarosa.com/

    59. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by sjames · · Score: 1, Funny

      People like them occasionally make me ponder that age old question, "is it possible to send a fart in the mail?".

      What would it take to properly preserve a fart so that when they open the envelope or package, they can 'enjoy' the full aroma and know without doubt that they have just received a fart. Bonus points if there is a way to allow them to experience the puff of warmth as well.

    60. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.facebook.com/brendakhome

      Ahh, Facebook a bad decision to leave friends open. Why not inform all their friends that they are the scum robo-callers.

    61. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you end up in the wrong demographic, you will start getting 4 or 5 such junk calls daily. If you are also elderly and so it takes some effort to actually get to the phone, it starts feeling like assault. Even moreso when the junk calls outnumber the legitimate calls.

    62. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think this information needs to make its way over to 4chan

    63. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by GNious · · Score: 2

      The US is simply doing it wrong - one of our politicians suggested outsourcing the imprisonment of the hardest criminals to Russia....

      Yes, I kinda support that idea.

    64. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      A predator drone with napalm bombs?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    65. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by gmack · · Score: 1

      No, but they have a list of potential marks that get used, cleaned and then sold again and anything not profitable gets dropped from the list before it gets sold again.

      FYI I did tech support for a company that claimed to be selling anti telemarketing packages. They tried to keep me from finding out what they really did but it didn't take me long to figure out what they were doing and how all of their internal processes worked and it turned out they were mainly ripping off old people by buying lists of people who were ripped off promising them a refund and then ripping them off again. Thankfully I had dropped them as a client and was long gone before the police raided the place.

    66. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by RoboRay · · Score: 2

      Maybe the pythons will get them and be poisoned.

    67. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by dfm3 · · Score: 2

      ...ignore the calls but wait for them to send something in the mail (it will probably happen really soon once they start calling).

      This. If a collector has what they feel is a legitimate claim, they'll be willing to work through the proper channels. If they're afraid to put anything in writing or accept certified mail at a physical address, that should be a huge red flag.

      We've had the misfortune of dealing with the lowest of the low: debt collectors who go after estate settlements. They know that if they put in a claim with the court, they may only be awarded a small fraction of the money they're owed (especially if the deceased had quite a bit of debt and very few assets), so they hassle the executor (usually a surviving relative who is still in mourning) with an offer along the lines of "just send us a check for N% and we'll call it even, or we'll go after you later for the full amount". Of course, they know that what they'll actually get from the court will be much less than their settlement offer, but they make it sound like they're cutting you a deal.

      Our response was always the same: submit your claim properly and the judge will consider it alongside the rest. Some did so, some didn't bother. Some were obviously scammers with no legitimate claim. Others even continued to contact us after the estate was closed rather then file with the court, but since the judge had certified that we had done everything correctly (posted public notice, etc), the debt collectors had missed the boat and no longer had any right to pursue the debt. Eventually they all left us alone.

    68. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the best approach / sites when researching this type of data?

    69. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're pretty hilarious seeing as I don't even have a cc ATM(VISA debit card suffices for now), and haven't had one for years, and was never in need of their "assistance" when I had them...

    70. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      Bit off topic, but I oppose the death penalty because I do not trust a state which cannot effectively manage basic services and which regularly convicts innocent men (plea deals and bad police work) to effectively and correctly administer the death penalty.

      Take for instance the deathrow inmate in Ohio who was too fucking fat to fit on the table. This is a person living in a tightly controlled environment (prison) where the state has complete control of his diet and routine. The state owned his life, they had the power and authority to kill him but not the power, authority, or awareness to put him on a fucking diet. Something they should do for all prisoners anyway, since paying for a diabetic, obese inmate is much more expensive than a regular inmate.

      Source: http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2012/12/17/ohio-kasich-spares-post-too-fat-inmate.html

    71. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can send your dog and cat poop. That's kind of like a fart.

    72. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because their ventromedial prefrontal cortex is not functioning as it should:
      http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/science/120823/old-people-are-really-easy-to-scam-say-scientists

    73. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since you're handling your case pro se in these situations" -- I am not a lawyer, but I have always felt that giving the name of your lawyer to someone who is threatening to sue you is like letting them install a tap into your bank account. By the same token, if I am pro se, I can have looooong rambling conversations with their lawyer EVERY DAY! I never sign anything without my lawyer looking at it, but I'm the only one who knows who my lawyer is. Attempting to sue me or my business can be a very expensive proposition.

    74. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct plural for penis is penes.

    75. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, everytime they fail to answer they either 1) get a progressively larger electric shock, 2) They have a fingernail pulled. 3) They have to listed to the company's recording for 12 hours straight.

    76. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Do you speak from experience of using this technique? Or are you summarizing other online accounts?

      As someone who filed personal BK 15 years ago, I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I am a strong believer of personal responsibility. But on the other hand, I loath the credit and debt collection industry with every fiber of my being, with their many awful tactics.

      What you describe sounds like anyone could default on any old legitimate debt and then with some paperwork and brass balls simply get away without paying it back. Why the fuck shouldn't I max out my credit, stop paying the house, car, and credit car bills, and then reap the benefits of getting in the clear? This seems too easy (court/legal legwork aside).

    77. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

      Society's luck being what it is, they might be dumped near some radioactive waste and become brain eating zombies. I am not sure if that is better or worse than what the were, but it would be bad nonetheless. People who are already up to their eyeballs in credit card debt don't really need to be misled by scam artists on top of that.

    78. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exiling someone only works if:

      -The receiving location accepts the person.

      or

      -The receiving location is not in a position to refuse the person.

      Does Russia actually want our inmates?

    79. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a collection agency and, although we may be the minority, I am proud to say that it is the most ethical company I have ever worked for. We follow all the laws, treat people with respect, don't use robocallers, and never threaten them with false claims. That being said, these people legally owe a debt. Why should they get off when most of us work so hard to pay our bills? Also, if you have incorportated your business, all bets are off because now it is a commercial debt and the FDCPA does not apply.

      Going back to the original topic though...I vote for break their legs and put them in the Everglades!

    80. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've done all this (against several creditors simultaneously) so I speak from experience. I spent a lot of years building up good credit but when the economy got bad a few years ago it hit me really hard. At that point, I had nothing to lose so I had a "fuck it" mentality and just defaulted on my debts. I never planned on it, it's just how life went. I'm lucky that I had a friend teach me how to do all of this; most people get stomped into the ground or fucked over on a settlement deal because they don't know how to fight back.

      There is a huge difference between defaulting on secured (car, house, etc.) and unsecured debt. If you default on your house you will face foreclosure. That is really hard to beat but it can still be done if you can prove corrupted chain of title (i.e. your lender no longer holds your mortgage). If you have a lot of equity in your property and fall behind on payments your lender may deliberately botch a loan mod so they can evict you and steal your equity. The biggest criminals in this country run the banks. Dealing with foreclosure fraud will be the most god-awful fight of your life and makes this other stuff look easy by comparison.

      Beating credit card debt is easy because there's nothing they can really do to you. Until they actually sue (if it gets that far) all they can do is try to intimidate and scare you. Even then, the FDCPA limits what they can do (if they break the FDCPA you can sue them and get a nice default judgement). Their entire case against you is shaky from day one because they have to prove everything. They are not going to repo your stuff and they can't garnish your wages without a court order and that's only if you fail to kick them to the curb by demanding to see the original contract during the hearing. Lots of people get fucked over with garnishments because they panic/do nothing and the collector gets a default judgement against them.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    81. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I definitely feel for you for having to deal with these scumbags at a time like that. They probably only stopped because the statute of limitations in your state ran its course. The fight is not over until the debt is out of statute because if you beat one collector they will just turn around and sell the debt to another collection agency (and the fight starts over again with the new guys). If a debt is out of statute nobody can ever touch it again (at that point, it's time to celebrate). If it ever happens again, send them a C&D letter or file a Sworn Denial if there's already a case number attached to the debt. Demand to see the original signed contract and see how quickly they back down. If they can't produce the contract at the hearing, motion for dismissal.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    82. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      We follow all the laws, treat people with respect, don't use robocallers, and never threaten them with false claims.

      And I'm supposed to take your word for all that? I have yet to meet an "honest" debt collector. If you say that someone owes a debt, the burden is on YOU to prove it! Good luck with that.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    83. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that the US is one of the only places in the world where every prisoner is guaranteed 3 regular meals a day (plus other food available between meals), where the lack of a TV is considered "cruel and unusual punishment", and prisoners eat so well that they can actually gain 50-100 pounds while incarcerated. Hell, our prisoners live better than a lot of the free people in this country. Go look at inner cities and rural areas if you don't believe me.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    84. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

      Actually, gators are cool with that.

      Honestly, they won't mind the snack.

    85. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      All jokes are tasteless. Continuing your thread of logic, eventually all jokes would not be socially acceptable. I believe this is one of the problems with the U.S. right now -- no ability to laugh at bad circumstances. Before you flame me, let me tell you about my best friend. He became a paraplegic less than a year ago. He cracks jokes more often than I do about paraplegia. I can tell you his life has not been easy. You don't understand what it's like to go through something some like that unless it's happened to you or a close friend. There are no words in the English dictionary to describe what he has been through since the accident. Yet, he finds time to make fun of his condition and the best thing I can do is crack jokes right back. I just make sure that I do it with the utmost respect for him and his wife and two young children. Every joke I crack -- even if it is about something horrible like rape or being beaten or paraplegia is said with respect. I didn't see where the original poster was out to disrespect anyone.

    86. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      Except maybe the robo callers. And that's ok my book!

    87. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      By "continuing [my] thread of logic", you apparently mean "stretching my thread of logic beyond its breaking point".

      I firmly believe that nothing is off topic for humour. I also firmly believe that some topics are so hard to do well that most people should not attempt it.

      Louis CK makes rape jokes which are very, very good. His jokes disrespect people who deserve disrespect, or at least being taken down a peg. He is a very talented professional, and he knows what he's doing.

      I don't think that the original poster intended to disrespect people who are sent to prison by the dysfunctional and corrupt US "criminal justice" system, often for non-violent offences, and end up being repeatedly sexually assaulted (and often contracting a life sentence in the form of a disease in the process), and being shrugged off by everyone up the chain of responsibility. However, it was a joke that was almost certainly made without that group of people in mind.

      The most unfortunate thing about privilege is that most people who have it and exercise it don't even know it's there.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  2. Greetings friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away.

    1. Re:Greetings friend by beamdriver · · Score: 1

      I'd be happier with the dollar.

    2. Re:Greetings friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Day Mr. Coward,

      I am George Smith of Xanphia, New Georgia. My company would like to help you expand your happy business to our country's new exclusive economic development zone. Our industrial/business incubator is currently experiencing explosive growth. We have a growing middle class workforce for whom happiness will be in very high demand. Don't miss out on this opportunity to grow your customer base! All it takes is a monthly renewable business licence, which can be issued without delay, for the modest discounted price of TWO dollars. Don't delay, business success is just TWO dollars away.

      graciously yours,
      George Smith

    3. Re:Greetings friend by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered
      me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam.
      I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one
      dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the
      power.

    4. Re:Greetings friend by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      What state?

    5. Re:Greetings friend by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      all of them we just cut out the state so we can reuse the same tape in each one.

  3. FFS by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

    1. Re:FFS by PhamNguyen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would guess that it relates to a certain way of thinking about the world, where everything an individual does on their own is a criminal matter, and everything a person does for a company is a civil matter.

      It probably also relates to the "just doing my job" mentality where something becomes less morally objectionable merely because you're doing it as part of a job.

    2. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

      If you thought a bit about exactly WHO the masters of the AGS are,
      you wouldn't need to ask your question.

      The US government is run for the benefit of corporations, not for the benefit
      of citizens. And the AGs could care less about some poor prole who
      is being harassed by some robocall scum.

    3. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Guy who doesn't know the difference between a state Attorney General and a federal prosecutor)

    4. Re:FFS by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Because prosecuting this crime does not attract big money political campaign donors.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:FFS by Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They do not scam large corporations with deep pockets.

      Basically, a good scammer knows to not scam marks that can cause him trouble. You can scam a million people with no resources to fight you and be fine. But go against one mark who does have the resources and you're toast.

      Humans might be the top of the food chain in the animal kingdom, but we are the bottom of the food chain in the society we have built. Corporations, criminals, politicians - every parasite in existence preys upon the common citizen first and foremost, because we are the easy targets.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:FFS by jcr · · Score: 1

      My guess is the spammers pay bribes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:FFS by eudas · · Score: 1

      Not to Godwin the thread or anything, but "I was just following orders" didn't work well as a defense at the Nuremberg trials. Just sayin'.

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    8. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably also relates to the "just doing my job" mentality where something becomes less morally objectionable merely because you're doing it as part of a job.

      In my mind, it is the exact opposite of that.

    9. Re:FFS by cats-paw · · Score: 1

      just following orders has long been the refuge of scoundels.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    10. Re:FFS by guttentag · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

      Maybe it's because they're supposed to be using cURL? Attorneys General have a tendency to get wrapped up in political nonsense.

      [ducks]

    11. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've never been to Florida. It's a haven for the elderly, the mentally incompetent and criminals fleeing cold weather and competent consumer protection agencies in other states. That's a reason the tea-party is so successful there. Everyone else goes back home when their vaction is over.

    12. Re:FFS by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

      Well, when Florida lumps their "Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services" into one agency, you really can't expect much from them except bullshit.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    13. Re:FFS by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials

      Being that only 23 of the god knows how many soldiers Germany had, I'd say "I was just following orders" worked OK for the survivors.

    14. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is America we are talking about, not Germany. See, we can get away with shit like that.

    15. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that most of these scammers live in Florida. E-mail spammers, fax spammers, telephone robocallers, always seem to trace to Florida. I'm starting to suspect it's an industry. Why would the AG stop something that's bringing jobs and money to Florida? I wouldn't be surprised if they specifically avoid harassing people in Florida.

    16. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not big enough to pay bribes, er, I mean Washington lobbyists. That's why politicians don't care about them either way.

    17. Re:FFS by stretch0611 · · Score: 2

      They do not scam large corporations with deep pockets.

      Basically, a good scammer knows to not scam marks that can cause him trouble. You can scam a million people with no resources to fight you and be fine. But go against one mark who does have the resources and you're toast.

      Exactly. That is also why they try to avoid politicians. The auto-warranty scam was going on for months, than they robo-called a few politicians and the investigation started.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    18. Re:FFS by number11 · · Score: 1

      Not to Godwin the thread or anything, but "I was just following orders" didn't work well as a defense at the Nuremberg trials. Just sayin'.

      I think you'll find that it still works great as a defense, so long as you haven't already lost the game to the people who are putting on the trial.

    19. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because these people didn't help kill SOPA and cost lobbyists millions of dollars in bribes.

    20. Re:FFS by compro01 · · Score: 1

      The International Military Tribunal was not the only trial. There were a lot of other trials held and the list of people convicted is way longer than 23.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Axis_personnel_indicted_for_war_crimes

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    21. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say, to you my friend, is that nothing has to make sense, it only has to make dollars. I really don't understand why it's not as easy as simply fining the companies that are paying the spammers. I tried to understand it so hard, for so long. Finally I gave up. It's simply a matter of money. Viagra makes a lot of money, and they must give some of that money to law-makers, in the form of campaign contributions or something. The people only get to vote with white paper, but corporations get to vote with green paper.

  4. Based in Florida by Huntr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To the absolute surprise of no one.

    I think fraud is simply in Florida's DNA. I mean, what is Florida in the early to mid 20th century, if not "buying swampland for cheap?" Now, it's the height of US insurance fraud, medicare fraud, mortgage fraud, and identity theft, in addition to the drug smuggling and human trafficking that comes along with major ports of entry into the U.S. It's a crazy, crazy place and reality is far removed from the Mickey Mouse and orange juice that Discover Florida is selling.

    And before you blow me up, know that I say all this as a long-time Florida resident...

    1. Re:Based in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, as a nature nut, I'm quite happy with the 40 odd acres swampland I got for cheap.

      The rest of it - dead-nuts-on.

    2. Re:Based in Florida by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've identified one form of selection while missing the even more obvious one: Florida, south Florida in particular, is retirement central. As such, is it any surprise that Florida is a location where this sort of thing is happening, given that the elderly tend to be most susceptible to it and the elderly tend to migrate to Florida for retirement? That fact alone would account for the medicare fraud, mortgage fraud, and identity theft that you cited.

    3. Re:Based in Florida by Animats · · Score: 1

      I think fraud is simply in Florida's DNA.

      South Florida, definitely. It's amazing how many scams come from South Florida. There are whole classes of fraud from there not seen much elsewhere. Timeshare-sales fraud, phony DMV fraud, and phony tax-preparer fraud are examples.

      In terms of dollar volume, though, lower Manhattan is way ahead. The South Floriday operators tend to be rather low rent.

    4. Re:Based in Florida by Nimey · · Score: 2

      You forgot that Scientology has a major base in Florida.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:Based in Florida by Huntr · · Score: 1

      That's definitely a factor. But, it's not like retired folks are the only victims, nor are they the only immigrants. I think it's also influenced by the large population living of poor people, people for whom English is a second language, and the fact that so many Floridians are simply from elsewhere and perhaps don't fully understand local rules and regulations.

      Forgot to mention the prescription drug fraud earlier, too. Oxycontin smuggling in to Appalachia is pretty much because of Florida and our foot-dragging on the prescription drug database these days.

    6. Re:Based in Florida by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      To the absolute surprise of no one.

      I think fraud is simply in Florida's DNA. I mean, what is Florida in the early to mid 20th century, if not "buying swampland for cheap?" Now, it's the height of US insurance fraud, medicare fraud, mortgage fraud, and identity theft, in addition to the drug smuggling and human trafficking that comes along with major ports of entry into the U.S. It's a crazy, crazy place and reality is far removed from the Mickey Mouse and orange juice that Discover Florida is selling.

      And before you blow me up, know that I say all this as a long-time Florida resident...

      We even have a convicted fraudster as Governor!

      (also lifelong FL resident)

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  5. Follow the wires by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but the investigator went to 1760 Sundance Drive, St. Cloud, which turned out to be a residence, and gave up.

    But the telco has to know where they are sending these calls. Either a landline, digital service or IP address. Either give it up to the authorities or become a co-defendant in the fraud case.

    You download one stinkin' Lady Gaga song and they can find you. Why not now?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Follow the wires by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 0

      As pessimistic as this sounds, if you are able to follow the trail, you will find a governer/senator/some high ranking official connected to it

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Follow the wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      But the telco has to know where they are sending these calls. Either a landline, digital service or IP address. Either give it up to the authorities or become a co-defendant in the fraud case.

      The telcos make a killing with these kinds of customers, and wont do anything more than their corporate lawyer says they absolutely have to do not to be held accountable.

      And, if your telco (the one of the customer that gets called) sees the number 202-456-1111 coming in over an interconnection link, they simply cannot tell you where exactly the caller came from (assuming the white house does not make Robocalls), so basically they have to backtrace the whole chain, from interconnection to interconnection, and if just one telco in the chain does not cooperate or is outside the US, you're out of luck.

      The last resort would be ALL provider to have search for an OUTGOING call to the customers number to find the real caller. This is REAL work, because you are looking for a needle (the call) in a haystack, with tousands of haystacks (the telcos). And thats assuming, the call even originates inside the US.

      You download one stinkin' Lady Gaga song and they can find you. Why not now?

      Because a complete, working TCP connection is not spoofable. If you want the packet with the Lady Gaga song to reach you, you have to use your real IP adress. With the phone system, the callerid is worth about the same as a sender emailadress...

    3. Re:Follow the wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a complete, working TCP connection is not spoofable. If you want the packet with the Lady Gaga song to reach you, you have to use your real IP adress. With the phone system, the callerid is worth about the same as a sender emailadress...

      Tor...

    4. Re:Follow the wires by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Their address is in the cloud! How do expect them to be traced?

    5. Re:Follow the wires by PPH · · Score: 1

      The telcos make a killing with these kinds of customers, and wont do anything more than their corporate lawyer says they absolutely have to do not to be held accountable.

      That's the root cause of the trouble right there. But then the telco CEOs aren't protected as members of the press, the clergy or the medical profession. So if a judge tells them to cough up a name and address and they refuse, they can just sit in a cell on a contempt of court charge while their corporate legal staff whines.

      And, if your telco (the one of the customer that gets called) sees the number 202-456-1111 coming in over an interconnection link, they simply cannot tell you where exactly the caller came from

      But my $4.99/min sex line charge seems to make it to the right place reliably. Strange how this happens.

      If the telcos are making said killing with these customers, they must know where to send the bill.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Follow the wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another idiot who can't figure out the difference between "upload" and "download".

    7. Re:Follow the wires by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      It is true that you cannot trace back a number based on its caller ID, that it is easy to spoof (and with good reason, you want your 800 number for support on the call, rather than 'bob's' DID at his desk for megacorp).

      But most calls also contain the "other" number, I believe they call it the ANI number, the one that 911 uses. the one that cannot be spoofed.

      It should be trivial for the phone companies to log and or trace these. When I worked at a school, there was a special number (started with *) you dialed in case of a bomb threat, and it automatically logged your last couple minutes of calls to a file. Then, the police could get a warrant, and go see them. It would not take long to do the same thing for these "untraceable" scammers.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    8. Re:Follow the wires by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That just puts the blame and responsibility for whomever is running the Tor exit node. Individual end users are not common carriers under the legal system, as much as they'd like to be.

    9. Re:Follow the wires by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I believe the ANI number is equivalent to an IP address in the phone world. I think the problem is that it only takes you one hop closer to the source. If the call is bouncing through multiple levels, the ANI number will not give you the source.

  6. Shameful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks as though things in the US are the same as over here in little Britain: it's absolutely impossible to defraud people unless you provide a fake name and address.

    Wouldn't it be nice if at least one of the two countries could manage to pay somebody a living wage to actually check company registrations before they're allowed to trade at all, and at reasonably frequent but irregular intervals afterwards? Maybe between the two we could manage it? I think we've got about sixpence available from the taxpayer, how about you guys?

    All too much to hope for, I suppose. What fuckups we are.

  7. Robocall them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As they publish a new number just hammer their numbers with incoming calls. If they have a 1800 then they will be paying per minute for the call.

  8. Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by david.emery · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sent my Senator (Mark Warner (D) Virginia), who sits on the relevant committee, a constituent request asking if anything ever happened as a result of filing "Do Not Call" violations. They sent me a Privacy Act form (so they could query the registry using my personal data.)

    And that was the end of it. I never heard back.

    On a related note, I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable. (An individual could still choose to not have his Caller ID revealed, and that would be indicated on your Caller ID display.)

    1. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Do Not Call list works very well for what it was intended to do. It stops legal calls from businesses you have no association with. Do you remember the "would you like to change long distance providers" calls? What if Dish Network could call you every week to ask you if you wanted to switch off cable?

      The problem is that the DNC list does *nothing* to stop the following groups:

      • Political organizations - law doesn't apply
      • Charity solicitation - law doesn't apply
      • Surveys - law doesn't apply
      • Scams - they're already breaking the law

      Congress chose to allow the first 3 for their own benefit, and no law can stop the fourth, only really tough enforcement and holding phone companies accountable.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "On a related note, I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable. (An individual could still choose to not have his Caller ID revealed, and that would be indicated on your Caller ID display.)"

      That is how it works in the SS7 layer of the telephony network. But the FCC is only a local authority, it doesn't have the power to enforce this on international telcos, but there is almost no doubt all counterparts of the FCC have rules for operators to identify the caller beyond doubt.

    3. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm all for drone strikes if they're used to enforce Do Not Call, particularly on the scammers.

    4. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Senator is of those: "No government interference", "No regulations or taxes on corporations because it kills business", he probably plays golf with the conspirators.

    5. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable.

      The first would be a good idea (force callcenter to present a correct callerid, with SEVERE punishment if they violate that law, so severe that they are permanently out of business if they get caugt once, not the few thousand bucks like today), the second is a technical impossibility. The way callerid works, if you get a callerid as verified into the pstn, ANYWHERE worldwide, there is no way to detect if it has been faked. So, if there is just ONE bad egg that gives the callcenter-scumm an unrestricted PRI, the whole CallerID is compromised, as it factually is.

      It's like asking to make UDP packages unspoofable, YOUR provider might be able and willing to filter YOUR link so you can only use your assigned ip, but what about the rest of the world...

    6. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If a call is coming from overseas, it should be clear from the caller ID. There is no reason that most of us should get international calls from numbers we don't recognize.

      dom

    7. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note, I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable. (An individual could still choose to not have his Caller ID revealed, and that would be indicated on your Caller ID display.)

      We can have unforgeable caller ID now, by doing it ourselves. The technology has existed for more than 20 years. Let's implement PGP in telephones and have key-signing parties like we did in the good old days.

    8. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by maztuhblastah · · Score: 2

      On a related note, I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable. (An individual could still choose to not have his Caller ID revealed, and that would be indicated on your Caller ID display.)

      Or just nix it, use ANI, and make sure that ANI data's sent for all calls.

    9. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Do Not Call list works very well for what it was intended to do. It stops legal calls from businesses you have no association with. Do you remember the "would you like to change long distance providers" calls? What if Dish Network could call you every week to ask you if you wanted to switch off cable?

      The problem is that the DNC list does *nothing* to stop the following groups:

      • Political organizations - law doesn't apply
      • Charity solicitation - law doesn't apply
      • Surveys - law doesn't apply
      • Scams - they're already breaking the law

      Congress chose to allow the first 3 for their own benefit, and no law can stop the fourth, only really tough enforcement and holding phone companies accountable.

      The reason why you dont get calls asking if you want to change long distance providers is because there is no money in that.

      Go and get a phone from verizon or any cell carrier really and you get to make all the calls you want long distance or not. The concept of long distance calls is dead. So why exactly would people try to sell it to you if they cant make any money? You do realize this is 2013 right and not 1983?

      They simply have been replaced with other kinds of calls doing the exact same thing.

    10. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by CncRobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if Dish Network could call you every week to ask you if you wanted to switch off cable?

      I solved a similar situation, a long distance company kept calling me. One day I had some time to burn, sorry for them. Within 2 minutes the guy knew he wouldn't have a sale. 35 minutes into the call his supervisor came on to make sure everything was ok. I finally let him go at 50 minutes. Every time he attempted to hang up I asked "Are you hanging up on me?" which I guess is illegal according to the FCC. I believe I got put on a special list to never call again because aking to not be called by them the 7 times before didn't work but this trick did work.

    11. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Macgrrl · · Score: 2

      I have a bigger problem with utilities sales staff at the front door. At the third time I have to say not interested in the conversation I actually roll out the old "What part of 'NO!' do you not understand?".

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    12. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Check Missouri. They just about pioneered the No Call law and they did it with real teeth. I think it's something like $5k per violation, and the individual citizens have the option of pursuing their own lawsuits if the AG declines to go after them. But you know what? The AG is VERY aggressive at going after violators, and they've won a whole bunch of multi-million dollar lawsuits against these guys. It was a huge boon to the state budget back before most of these people learned not to fuck with Missouri citizens.

      The no-call laws in almost every other location are all vagina and no dick, which is why those citizens keep getting fucked by these scammers.

    13. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      So, if there is just ONE bad egg that gives the callcenter-scumm an unrestricted PRI, the whole CallerID is compromised, as it factually is.

      It's like asking to make UDP packages unspoofable, YOUR provider might be able and willing to filter YOUR link so you can only use your assigned ip, but what about the rest of the world...

      PRI providers have to provide unrestricted PRIs to voip providers for call termination. Call might originate from US, be handled through VOIP by an Arab Emirates provider, routed through third party voip providers before reaching the termination provider that provide the PRI to terminate the call on PSTN networks.

      The IP to PRI bridge is typically really to close to the switchboard and only sends local call through the PRI to avoid any old PSNT telco style long distance charge.

      Big Picture:
      1) Old PSTN telco style must provide PRIs to voip provider.
      2) Voip providers use them only to terminate calls local to the switchboard the PRI is connected to. Cost is between .1 and 1 cent a minute.
      3) Voip providers have deals together to use each other PRI without knowledge of the PRI provider.

      It is hard in this context to know if the callerid is valid when it reaches the PRI.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    14. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The telcos have a very lucrative business allowing people to spoof their Caller ID. If you forced use of ANI they would lose that business.

    15. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the same kind dumb fuck who thinks that writing to your government to expand "no gun" zones is going to stop shootings too, eh?

    16. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Traditional Telco networks are ancient and wouldn't support it out of the box. Too much cost and the cost is to hard to resell to the end-user.

      Callerid filtering, white/blackllisting, different behavior on the callee side depending on CID would have a better chance to succeed IMHO. Phone service providers can easily forward the costs to the customers.

      Send suspicious calls to an IVR where the caller has to listen to a warning and punch keys to confirm, have this call automatically recorded for future reference etc. You can already do this for a dime with solutions like asterisk and Freeswicth.

      See the parallel here with Spam? Spam assassin and mailscanner like solutions are easier to implement then having every email signed.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    17. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by ls671 · · Score: 1
      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    18. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by macwhiz · · Score: 1

      I had a better solution for long-distance sales calls for a while before Do Not Call. I worked for a telecom company. When the marketer would call and assure me that he could save me money and beat my current rates, I could truthfully reply "Well, I work for XYZ Telecom, and so I get free long distance. So how much are you willing to pay me to use your service?" This would reliably end the call...

    19. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never answer a knock at the door unless I am expecting someone and it's the person that I'm expecting. If you open your door because someone knocked, you are asking for trouble.

  9. Your government $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Means nothing for you.

    If someone hacks something the government cares about then they manage to find that person.

    Call around a couple of times and threaten schools and/or officials and they can find you pretty quickly.

    A Random company robo dials 1/2 of the continental fucking U.S. and all of a sudden these fuckers can't seem to figure out where they are coming from or what the hell can be done about it.

    1. Re:Your government $$$ by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 1

      If someone hacks something the government cares about then they manage to find that person.

      Random, usually broke, teenager, can't fight back, so easy to get a win. Also, national security, national response.

      Call around a couple of times and threaten schools and/or officials and they can find you pretty quickly.

      Criminal, with little hope of skirting that particular law, easy to get an arrest and conviction. Little work, also people's lives are being directly threatened and/or 'think of the children' :P

      A Random company robo dials 1/2 of the continental fucking U.S. and all of a sudden these fuckers can't seem to figure out where they are coming from or what the hell can be done about it.

      Potentially vague civil law, with a defendant that probably has lawyers and enough money to get more. Not much payback in political or financial capital, so no one who cares about those things will make the effort.

      Seriously, great examples of 'the path of least resistance' that most government-types (particularly the elected kind) follow.

      --
      Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    2. Re:Your government $$$ by joelleo · · Score: 1

      These particular scumsuckers reached into Hawaii as well. I received maybe 10 calls from them - I kept hoping the "second and final warning" was true, but alas, 'twas not to be. Finally answered the phone, waded through the crap and started chatting with the actual person on the other end of the line. I kept him dancing for a while, but he disconnected me after I asked for his supervisor. They haven't called back since, so... op success?

      --
      "In the end, there is simply no weapon more devastating than the truth, delivered in just the right way." - tnk1
  10. Not just in Florida by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    I got 2 of these, both from a Washington state area code. Of course the caller ID could be fake...

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    1. Re:Not just in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got called twice as well about some Yaz settlement. I hit ignore for the first call, but less than 20 seconds later the 2nd call came. I listened long enough to hear what it was then hung up.

      Checked the web and the reports of that number all existed on the same date at around the same time as my call, so I tried calling back just to see.. first call a fast busy signal. The second call a message about "If you received a call from this number, our number is being spoofed and it's currently being investigated." and to leave a message with any detailed information you could provide. (I just hit up the FCC website and filled out the forms there instead)

  11. Too much money .... and too little risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a lot of money in violating the telemarketing rules. One illegal voice broadcaster was paid over $6 million by just one customer in only 10 months [1]. Large fines against violators are often uncollectible and ignored by scofflaws [2]. Violators often engage in money laundering and brag about their “bulletproof” broadcasting facilities that can’t be traced [3]. I personally received over 300 prerecorded telemarketing calls in some years, and I was able to track down the people behind only a tiny fraction of those calls, despite my concerted efforts in recording calls, filing lawsuits, subpoenaing phone company records, and hundreds of hours of my own time. Anyone who tries to find the source of these illegal calls will find the vast majority lead back to shadowy, untraceable names such as Transfers Argentina, Asia Pacific Telecom, TeleEurope, and Castle Rock Capital Management. Trying to track down a text message spammer is a similar exercise in futility.

            Many studies have show that massive penalties don't work as a deterrent because perpetrators never plan to get caught. What does work is increasing the likelihood of getting caught.

    [1] See declaration of Roberto C. Menjivar at 30 (totaling the amount paid to Voice Touch by National Auto Warranty during a 10 month period at $6,013,500). Document 42 in FTC v. Network Foundations, LLC., No. 1:09-cv-02929 (N.D. Ill. 2009).

    [2] See Order of Forfeiture, File No. EB-02-TC-120 (released Jan. 5, 2004) (finding Fax.com liable for the maximum fine of $11,000 for each of the 489 fax violations, for a total fine of $5,379,000).

    [3] Menjivar decl. at 20–22.

    1. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      MFW slashdot post with references cited.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      And AC to boot. The hell just happened?

    3. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have found a way that gets me off of these lists. All of the automated calls, sooner or later, connect you to someone whose job it is to take down your information so that they can get your money. I always indicate that I am interested. Then when I start talking to someone, I ask questions indicating that I am interested but don't quite understand what they are offering. If I have time, I keep them on the line as long as possible before telling them I think they are the scum of the earth for being involved with such a scam. If I don't at least have time to talk to a real person, I don't answer the phone. It's interesting that after I talk to someone, it is month's before they call me again. A live person costs them money. They don't like it when you talk to a live person and don't "buy".

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems as though Wikipedia has acquired sentience.

    5. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Many studies have show that massive penalties don't work as a deterrent because perpetrators never plan to get caught.

      Financial penalties don't work.

      If you fine a driver for DUI, he pays the fine and keeps drink driving (in his mind, he doesn't even make the connection between drink driving and punishment. He'll call the fine "revenue raising"). If you take away his license or make him spend a few weeks in jail he now has a real incentive.

      Fraud has no such disincentive. Especially fraud perpetrated by large corporations who can simply write a fine down as a loss.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by FirstOne · · Score: 1

      "There is a lot of money in violating the telemarketing rules. One illegal voice broadcaster was paid over $6 million by just one customer in only 10 months [1]. Large fines against violators are often uncollectible and ignored by scofflaws [2]. Violators often engage in money laundering and brag about their âoebulletproofâ broadcasting facilities that canâ(TM)t be traced [3]. I personally received over 300 prerecorded telemarketing calls in some years, and I was able to track down the people behind only a tiny fraction of those calls,"

      Their can be only one real solution. All non-exempt mass callers, including telecos and voip providers must place a prepaind DNC bond based on call volume per hour.. like one dollar per call per hour.. a $10 bond get's a Mass caller Co 10 calls per hour to DNC listed phone numbers. As the prepaid bond depletes, the spammer losses the ability to call DNC numbers.

      Add a simple mechanism for consumers to report DNC violations, like *999, something..

      Each time the Consumer reports a DNC violation, he/she collects a dollar from the appropriate DNC bond and is credited to his/her Cell/landland/VoIP account. If the Teleco/VoIP provider can't trace the call origin up the food chain to the next level, they loose the dollar from the bond they provided.

      Simple, effective..non-invasive.

    7. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't work. They usually call back the next day, and in retaliation put you on the VERY INTERESTED list. I did this once recently, and got called EVERY DAY FOR A WEEK with the same moronic solicitation.

      The real solution is to whitelist your phone. Always let phone callers that you don't know drop to voicemail. If it is important, they will leave a message. Xfinity has a facility whereby they'll put the phone caller up on your TV. So, if you have the TV on, you can tell who the fuck is invading your space and act accordingly. They also have a facility that enables you to block particular phone numbers, which doesn't usually work because the annoying phone calls typically come from a phone back with lots of different numbers.

    8. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have a game I play with those as well. I give them a fictitious name who claims to be interested. Then when they call for that person, I tell them he just stepped out, but should be back in five minutes. When they call back (always longer then five minutes later), "Oh, you just missed him. He went out for lunch (or some such). He should be back in half an hour." Of course it is always more than half an hour before they call back. When they do call back, I tell them that he went to bed, went out for the evening, or something similar and how disappointed he will be that he missed their call, please try again tomorrow. I have never had somebody call me back again the next day at that point. Basically, I play a game seeing how much of their time I can use up. Time is money to these people, they hate wasting it on someone who doesn't buy (if more people would waste an actual person's time with these companies they would go out of business).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Time is money to these people

      Time is important to me, too. Rather than spend my time talking to some salesperson, I prefer the whitelist approach. I don't get that many unsolicited calls anyways. You could just as well be fooling yourself that your antics are effective.

  12. Where's the Jennifer Lawrence picture thread?!? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ok this is interesting but this is Slashdot, not some consumer forum for ripoff disasterbation hate-ons.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Where's the Jennifer Lawrence picture thread?!? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

      Seriously, people. If enough people thumbs-upping submissions is all it takes to make it to the front page, you're gonna end up a TMZ clone at some point.

      You will suffer "topic wander drift", slowly pulling in non-nerds as the topics change, who will submit different things, getting to the front page, thus pulling in even less deviant, less nerdlike people. >:-(

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  13. Supply-side fraud by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All you dirty hippies who are calling for the heads of these "Second and Final Notice" folks must really hate free-market capitalism.

    These are the Job Creators, after all. And anything that's done to stop them is regulation, which is a dirty word.

    We need to just let the free market work and these problems will go away, right?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Supply-side fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, padawan. This is where Republicans whip out their double-barrelled Second Amendment and cure all the ills the free market can't fix on its own.

      Neither one is a cure-all, but together, they're unstoppable. Guns are frequently the answer.

    2. Re:Supply-side fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly it is obvious that this would be a circumstance where regulation would actually be all but required. Few if any sane conservatives argue that we would be better off with no government at all. If it makes you feel better, keep straw manning your opponents so you can avoid actually confronting challenging opinions though.

    3. Re:Supply-side fraud by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Few if any sane conservatives argue...

      And both of them are too busy dealing with the crazies to pay attention.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Supply-side fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a real free market, you can break the knee-caps, or worse, of the "Job Creators" and justify it as job creation for the baseball bat industry.

    5. Re:Supply-side fraud by vandamme · · Score: 1

      We need to forward their address to every NRA member in central Florida and let the free market work.

    6. Re:Supply-side fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you dirty hippies who are calling for the heads of these "Second and Final Notice" folks must really hate free-market capitalism.

      These are the Job Creators, after all. And anything that's done to stop them is regulation, which is a dirty word.

      We need to just let the free market work and these problems will go away, right?

      Which is why several people have either talked about using existing laws to combat them (successfully) or using violence against them - two things that anyone should be able to understand. Find their buildings, lock the doors from the outside, and firebomb them. Repeat as necessary.

    7. Re:Supply-side fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe too much regulation is discouraging us from hiring somebody to go kick them in the junk until they stop?

  14. Why not base in California? Or Texas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's true but we're talking about telco - they could be anywhere if they wanted to scam old poeple. Why are they in Florida instead of say California? Or Texas? Or Massachusetts? Could it be that Florida law enforcement is lax?

    1. Re:Why not base in California? Or Texas? by feenberg · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it is still true, but in years past the Florida AG had a reputation for ignoring scams where the victim was out of state.

    2. Re:Why not base in California? Or Texas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida is a haven because your home is protected from seizure.

    3. Re:Why not base in California? Or Texas? by icebike · · Score: 1

      That's true but we're talking about telco - they could be anywhere if they wanted to scam old poeple. Why are they in Florida instead of say California? Or Texas? Or Massachusetts? Could it be that Florida law enforcement is lax?

      Maybe they don't want to attract the feds by scamming across a state line?

      Not that it stopped this particular robo-caller, but for scamming the elderly, It might be easier just to start where you customers are.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  15. Blacklists work by zwede · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Android: Create a contact (I call it "Spam"). Click settings->More and add to reject list. Whenever you get a spam call, select "update existing contact", select "Spam" and no more calls from that number. For a home phone, use a VOIP provider (I use and can recommend Galaxy Voice). They should have a web page that lets you add numbers to a blacklist. Also select the "anonymous call rejection" feature which will block all calls where the caller id has been intentionally blocked. By doing the above it is very rare for me to receive a spam call.

    1. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The call control app has a community blacklist. I'm thinking of buying it, but I rarely get spam as it is.

    2. Re:Blacklists work by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      I use google voice for everything, I don't think anyone knows my real #. I created a contact "Telemarketers" (photo is of a pile of poo) that are marked as "Disconnected" whcih means anyone in that group gets the "doo-dahh-dee. I'm sorry, but the number you have dialled is no longer in service. Please hang up or dial your operator" announcement on loop.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    3. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on android: extreme call blocker - block 800* 866* 877* etc.

      best money I ever spent

    4. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my phone I attempted to deal with one particular robocall (the one that starts with the fog horn sound...I never got past it to know what it is for). That same contact now has 10 different numbers in it. Never has the same one been used twice.

    5. Re:Blacklists work by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I installed a whitelist app. If you're in my contacts, your call gets through. Otherwise, you go directly to voice mail. If it's important, I'll call back at my convenience. Most of the time, it's not.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I installed a whitelist app. If you're in my contacts, your call gets through. Otherwise, you go directly to voice mail. If it's important, I'll call back at my convenience. Most of the time, it's not.

      Wow. That seems crazy.

      I hate telemarketers as much as the next guy. But when I get a call from a number not in my contacts sometimes it's very important (such as my grandmother in the hospital and such). I also get business calls on my phone and sometimes those numbers are not in my contacts. So as much as I would like to live in a world where I could do this it seems impractical.

      If only cell phones could do name-based caller ID.

    7. Re:Blacklists work by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      I installed a whitelist app. If you're in my contacts, your call gets through. Otherwise, you go directly to voice mail. If it's important, I'll call back at my convenience. Most of the time, it's not.

      Wow. That seems crazy.

      I hate telemarketers as much as the next guy. But when I get a call from a number not in my contacts sometimes it's very important (such as my grandmother in the hospital and such).

      The hospital will leave a voice mail. Robocallers don't.

    8. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already add them to the Android Auto Reject List (Settings - Call rejection - Auto reject list). I have nearly 50 numbers in there since I found this feature about 6 months ago. I get 1-2 calls per week. It's better than nothing, as before they would just non-stop call me if I answered to fast or not at all.

    9. Re:Blacklists work by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      If I'm expecting a call from someone whose number I don't have, I can disable it. Otherwise yeah, important callers will leave a voice mail, unimportant callers might as well but usually don't. I can check voice mail immediately after the call comes in and call them back if it's important. But no one not on the white list is important enough to interrupt what I'm doing right now. Actually most of the people on the whitelist aren't important enough to interrupt what I'm doing right now, either.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:Blacklists work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hospital will leave a voice mail. Robocallers don't.

      Yes they do, and it's almost as annoying as getting one live. In both cases, you have a recorded voice trying to sell you shit.

  16. The economics of this crap by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The sad thing is that there are enough people buying this shit to keep the robocallers and spammers in business.

    I routinely get robocalls wanting to reduce my credit card debt. A good trick, since I don't have any. I always wonder how the political polling people can possibly pretend their conclusions have any validity, since everybody hangs up on them.

    And so on. A medium that used to be useful has been poisoned by abuse.

    I view Do Not Call as intrinsically self-defeating. Like "opting out" of spam, it provides a list of known-good phone numbers. If the robocalls originate from offshore, there is little the local authorities can do about it anyway.

    ...laura

    1. Re:The economics of this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have gone after the phone companies that "own" the numbers the scammers use. The phone companies promise to contact their "customer" or say the number is not in service or is spoofed. One thing is clear. There is a phone company selling services to the scammers and the phone company is connecting them to the national phone network. The solution is to go after the phone company that is selling service. The FCC should be able to identify them and threaten to cut off the entire phone company from the connecting to the national network. Most of the phone companies involved are not ATT or Verizon. The are the lesser known companies like Pactel West or X O Communications it seems. Do-Not-Call has no teeth. Class lawsuits against the telcos have teeth. Severing the telcos from the national grid means they can only call their own customers not everybody in the country. Spoofing caller IDs should result in immediate termination from interconnecting with other phone netwroks.

    2. Re:The economics of this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I used to do the political surveys. And I can tell you, they do not give a fuck. The questions have limited options for answers, nothing you answer will look bad to them, they will just average it out and make you pick what they want on the next question. Political surveys aren't about getting anyone's opinion, they are about misinformation. You wouldn't believe how many question on the script change based on the previous answer (almost all of them), they will ask if you agree with 1 candidates opinion, if you don't agree, the next question is the same question with stronger wording to force you into agreeing due to limited options. Oh, you want to terminate the survey now? Big fuckin' deal, you don't get counted, next number. They get paid by the hour, so its in their best interest to never get anything done otherwise it's time to clock out.
      They also don't care about being hung-up on, half the time they are calling disconnected lines anyways. They only need a handful of complete surveys to get their spin going.

  17. The secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To find a way for it to be unprofiteable. Take away the money and telemarketers, robocallers and such will dissapear completely overnight.

    But thats the real trick is how does the government make it so they cant profit? Just blocking them, raiding them, fining them and such wont do a bit of good because they will always find a loophole, some phrase they can say to negate the law and take one down another will arise. No you get rid this of this by making it unprofitable across the board.

    1. Re:The secret is... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Enact a tax of $1/call on telemarketing, then sic the IRS on them.

  18. We need more modern telephones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need more modern telephones. It shouldn't be that hard. When I get email on my computer, I have a spam filter that weeds out more than 90% of all the crap. I open my mail client, it connects to my ISP and sucks down mail. As its sucking, its automagically shoving stuff into the garbage can. I can browse, but basically all I have to do is click on empty trash, and its all gone. Now with the phone, I have no filter. I can screen calls with the answering machine, but it still rings. What I really want is a phone that has a list of filter numbers. When they call and I don't want to talk to them, the phone doesn't ring, just a light comes on the phone showing the phone is filtering a call, and 2 seconds later the phone automatically hangs up. If I pick it up, I can't hear them, and they can't hear me. When they call me the first time, I push a button on the phone to add them to the list. I can also add numbers to the filter myself. I understand that there are people who abuse the do not call list. The government also plays the 'unsolicited marketing game', and likewise, they consider charities to be 'fair game'. I want a phone that does what I want. It shouldn't be that hard.

  19. Set Evil against Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure that these guys IP addresses are seen to be the ones seeding "Iron Man 3" and at least a dozen top 40 albums and watch real sharks at work.

  20. DNC Rules Circumvented by Phone Spoofing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that may be part of how they can get away with this practice. I get numerous similar calls by "Rachel", from a variety of phone numbers per the Caller Id. When I tried calling some of those numbers, I got ones that were disconnected, and, in another case, someone who sounded like an ordinary person at home who was totally bewildered by what I was asking about - I think they were genuine, and their number was being spoofed by Rachel's cronies.

    What do the rest of you think of that hypothesis?

    FWIW

  21. My solution by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Where are the predator drones when you need them?

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  22. Rachel at Cardholder Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I doubt its the same people, but Rachel (at Card Holder Services) calls me quite a bit. I'll use a little social engineering, talk to the rep, acting both friendly and desperate. Seems like the people taking on the other end (after you hit a prompt that Rachel gives you) are a bit desperate themselves for work. On a number of occasions I'll have a heart to heart with them, explain their employers are scam artists stealing money from clients under false pretenses and that they should probably start looking for legitimate work right away. Sometimes they're quite complicit with the scam. Frequently I've gotten elevated to their manager, I forget what his name is, but I've spoken to him on a number of occasions. Given my employment background, its partially my job to put a stop to these kinds of abuses. I've frequently reminded their manager to google search my first name, a certain keyword and linkedin, it'll return a career profile of someone who definitely has an interest in seeing them shut down. Ultimately I lose patience or they lose patience, finally they make it clear they have the upper hand as they'll continue to robo call me relentlessly, threatening to have their systems call me multiple times a day. Unfortunately now they do so and I'm stuck screening calls to voicemail from numbers I don't recognize. Of course as many of you are familiar, even if the call goes to voicemail doesn't deter them from keeping my number on their calling list.

    1. Re:Rachel at Cardholder Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeSWITCH, Asterisk, YATE, or another VoIP softswitch and an IVR-from-hell is all you need to screw with them...

    2. Re:Rachel at Cardholder Services by Eugriped3z · · Score: 1

      I used to get calls from Rachel on my cell, so I called AT&T, multiple times, to let them know I was receiving illegal commercial solicitations and ask that they reverse the charges AND block calls from that number. AT&T's response was to offer me the 'opportunity' to upgrade my service that would allow me the option of paying an extra monthly recurring service fee for software that would allow me to maintain my own list of blocked CID's. The nice Indian CSR from AT&T explained 'their' system did not include any means (he knew of) by which the company would/could block such calls for me, their legal customer, from receiving incoming illegally placed calls. I got the same explanation regarding illegal commercial solicitations via text services.

      Apparently, even though these are common, illegal problems, AT&T and other 'service' providers are under absolutely no obligation to do anything whatsoever about providing a solution (for free). I consider their offer an upgrade which will accomplish the task an example of corporate extortion. I say this with all sincerity because the service provider in the U.S. charges both parties, originating and receiving parties, for the privilege of using the system. To me this indicates a certain level of responsibility, to legitimate customers and the law. And if you're profiting from the illegal use of your network, then you have funds to devote to the solution. (You don't really believe the FCC regulators or your elected representatives and staff don't understand this, do you?)

      Unfortunately, it seems to take 3 things for a corporation the size of AT&T to rise to the occasion and do the right thing, a law, an adequately funded, responsible agency and lots of consumer feedback directed at the right ears in government AND the companies executive staff. Otherwise it's too easy for the bloodsuckers and the bean counters to chalk the revenue up to the bottom line and cry poor when the FCC representative happens to mention the problem over drinks at some well funded D.C. junket.

      And lest we forget, there's an entirely under served class of people who suffer disproportionately, the non-contract customer who isn't even given the option of paying for the extortive, web-based call-blocking solution. My bet is that most of these folks fall into at least 1 of 3 categories; poor, fixed income and/or immigrant. The poor can get subsidized service, paid for with tax dollars. Most of those a fixed income don't understand the issue. And the immigrants who buy no-contract phones? Do you really think the people who run AT&T or the FCC really care about such folks? I don't, and I don't see much emphasis on such matters in our illustrious press.

      The reporting piece at NY Times is one of the very few that covers an issue that must generate hundreds of thousands in revenue for carriers and an adequate opportunity for scammers that the scams keep on being marketed via wire fraud.

  23. Fight back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually try to counter sell something to the telemarketer on the other end... Like car insurance. Or sometimes I'll start whispering that I have 10,000$ in debt, then blow a whistle into the phone. I've given up on actually having something done about them, so I've decided to fight back the only way I can... Physical pain by whistle, and wasting their time(ergo money).

  24. We need a standardized Business ID Number by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    In order to track slimeballs easier, businesses should have a publicly listed Business ID Number and be required to use it in all print ads and provide it when requested over the phone.

    1. Re:We need a standardized Business ID Number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already do, it's called google. If they can use a fake company name they can use a fake business id.

    2. Re:We need a standardized Business ID Number by ledow · · Score: 1

      In the UK, every company has a Company Registration Number. It's against the law not to display it at every physical place of business (which case law has also taken to include websites).

      You can demand it on the phone - there's little reason to refuse and I *think* it's illegal to refuse (I'd have to check, but it would certainly be severely frowned upon if they refused).

      But we still get telemarketers. Telemarketing companies are happy to churn their company every year when things catch up with them, sack everyone, declare bankruptcy and then start again with the same staff in the same location under a new business name. They don't really care about the law. Hell, most of them are in the US phoning us and that's hard to do anything about because they aren't subject to the same laws.

      A registration ID is not the solution. The solution is to fine companies that provide telephony service to those people (including back to the individual carriers) until you eliminate them - like ISP's carrying spam eventually find themselves on a spam blocklist even if they didn't send the spam themselves but their customers did.

      Just start refusing them service. But that costs the telcos easy business (they profit from selling phone lines that can spam you, don't forget), so it won't happen until there's a financial incentive not to give these people access to phones unless they behave according to their contracted terms of service. And that means fining companies.

      (The company number thing, though, is very useful. I had a letting agency who refused to send out an emergency plumber - their legal obligation because they were acting on behalf of the house owner to maintain the property for their tenant (i.e. me). Literally, I just kept phoning and demanding they fulfil their legal obligations and tied up all their phone lines until they did - they threatened all sorts at one point, but I'd have been quite interested to hear how they would explain to a police officer that they weren't going to send out a plumber as the law required them to.

      Eventually, they conceded that the phone system available to me was quite a bit more impressive than their own and that they couldn't avoid taking my calls without having every phone in their office ring in succession while they were trying to serve clients. The next day, however, the "plumber" arrived without any plumbing tools and not knowing how to unblock a toilet. Eventually, I sorted it all out with them but in the meantime - while looking for their phone number, and their company registration number to make a complaint, I realised that they didn't publish it on their website. Nor did they have it on their letterheads. Nor displayed on the premises.

      I sent a quick email to Companies House (the UK government entity that regulates companies) to mention this - purely because it HAD got in my way of finding out where their head office was, as there were many companies with very similar names and there was no way to tell which it was. 24 hours later I was informed that not only had they had to pay someone to update their website with the registration number, but they'd had to bin *all* their stationery and reprint it all, and have a sign made for their offices.

      I'm thinking that cost them a little bit more than sending out a plumber, even at "emergency call" rates. It certainly did when the owner of the house was contacted and we found out that the letting company hadn't been passing on our rent to him even though we had proof of payment - always keep paper records! - and he cut off the letting agency, dealt with us direct, and took them to court)

    3. Re:We need a standardized Business ID Number by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Telemarketing companies are happy to churn their company every year when things catch up with them, sack everyone, declare bankruptcy and then start again with the same staff in the same location under a new business name.

      But if one can check the co's history and age (similar to Who-is), then they can spot a newbie company. Further, if it displays "former companies at same address" and perhaps "prior companies with same owners", then a pattern will show up. That won't stop slimeballs, but make life harder for them because they'd have to physically move more often or shuffle harder.

    4. Re:We need a standardized Business ID Number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to track slimeballs easier, businesses should have a publicly listed Business ID Number and be required to use it in all print ads and provide it when requested over the phone.

      We have those already, they're called Dun and Bradstreet numbers.

      But these are criminals. The whole point is that they don't follow laws. If disclosing the DnB number was the law, they'd just ignore it, just like they ignore all the other laws. Or they'd make up a fake DnB, or use someone else's, or register a shell company....

    5. Re:We need a standardized Business ID Number by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      D&B are commercial numbers, which come with I.P. limitations.

      ID numbers are not meant to be a perfect fix, but they make crime more expensive to pull off. You have to lie harder.

  25. This is serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many capital letters here. This must be serious shit.

  26. Let's pull a Ralsky on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First see here: http://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-events/10-biggest-cases-of-revenge.htm#page=1

    If that address is correct, let's all go and sign them up for some free catalogs and the like.

  27. my favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    way to deal with telemarketers came from a friend's father. He acted interested in the product. When (at the end of the long call) he was asked how he would like to pay, his answer was "do ya take food stamps?" They asked if he had a credit or debit card, or a bank account. His reply was "nope, I only got food stamps". They hung up on him after at least a 45 minute long distance call on their dime!

    1. Re:my favorite by ledow · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but 45 minutes of my time, work or leisure, is worth a lot more than whatever it would cost them on a long-distance call (which, let's be honest, you can do over Skype for pennies and I'd be shocked if they weren't using some such system - remote "free" Internet calls to a local number that actually does the dialling - in some way).

      You might feel like you're "getting your own back", but they don't care. It's like tarpitting emails - sure, it slows them down but do you think they are caring from their botnet-controller PC that's sending out millions of emails a day? Not really.

      Brit that I am, I find telling them to just f***-off as soon as I realise that they weren't allowed to call me in the first place works much better. And, for most things, I just have a screening answering machine so they can talk to that all they like and I just click "Delete".

  28. Captcha box to filter robocalls by advid.net · · Score: 1

    I guess someone has already invented a captcha box to get rid of robocalls.

    Is there a problem using this kind of device?
    I can't remember but it seems to me that it has already been discussed here on slashdot, hasn't it?

    We don't have that kind of problems in my country, so I haven't looked for a solution like such.

    1. Re:Captcha box to filter robocalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess someone has already invented a captcha box to get rid of robocalls.

      Is there a problem using this kind of device?

      I can't remember but it seems to me that it has already been discussed here on slashdot, hasn't it?

      We don't have that kind of problems in my country, so I haven't looked for a solution like such.

      So I'm supposed to spend my own time and money to purchase and set up such a device? And everyone else is, too?

  29. She could have got it herself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why didnt she have it? That's like saying my college shouldn't have charged me tuition since I could have found out everything they taught me myself by reading books in the library or something. Nevermind they provided me with a service I requested.

  30. How about by phorm · · Score: 1

    Publish the number in several public places. Start with max sentence, but periodically call to "reduce" their sentence... but only if they make the call.

  31. Un-forgeable by phorm · · Score: 1

    There are legit reasons to "spoof" the caller number. For example, companies that call out from multiple sources but have one main-office line.
    In my case, I have a VOIP line with no incoming #. I previously used my cellphone # for call-display so that people know that it's me calling.

    1. Re:Un-forgeable by david.emery · · Score: 1

      There are legit reasons to "spoof" the caller number. For example, companies that call out from multiple sources but have one main-office line.
      In my case, I have a VOIP line with no incoming #. I previously used my cellphone # for call-display so that people know that it's me calling.

      In that case, there should be a single (authoritative) registered phone number. This is something the Telcos need to work out, my sense is it needs to be implemented at the switch level.

  32. Half the good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A New York Times consumer columnist tracked down the people who run a 'This is your second and final notice" robocall operation.

    That is certainly good news, but have they been arrested yet? They have certainly broken enough laws to "go away" for a very long time.

  33. Follow the fucking money, not the wires by swb · · Score: 1

    Banking regulations, wire transfer regulations, currency regulations and limits, etc etc etc. The money system is highly regulated. Follow that.

    And then cook 'em ALL up in a big RICO pot where all the executives and individuals involved can each be on the hook for $100,000k and 20 years in prison.

    The big problem with Internet fraud is that there's this narrow focus on how easy it is to do tasks "anonymously" on the Internet, without realizing that it takes an entire support system -- ISPs, hosting, money transfers, etc. It's one thing to send stuff out and just be annoying -- you can spam from a coffee shop. But if you want to make money, you have to collect money and that requires some kind of support system.

    If the government started doing this it wouldn't take very many prosecutions of Mercedes-driving executives otherwise engaged in "legitimate" business to start paying closer attention to who they business with.

    It won't make this kind of fraud go away completely, but it would make it much more difficult.

  34. The Phone Cop by msc.buff · · Score: 1
  35. Robo Callers? by Nov8tr · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe no one has said it yet. I FOR ONE WELCOME OUR ROBO OVERLORDS!! /sarcasm off

    --
    I'm old, not dead. Well that's my 2 cents worth, your mileage may vary. I say what I think, not what you want to hear.
  36. Re: obligatory "in Soviet Russia..." joke by almechist · · Score: 1

    The US is simply doing it wrong - one of our politicians suggested outsourcing the imprisonment of the hardest criminals to Russia....

    Yes, I kinda support that idea.

    In Soviet Russia, the jails get sent to you!

  37. Rachel by formfeed · · Score: 1

    It really must suck if your name is Rachel.
    Whenever you call someone, people either hang up or call you some nice names.

  38. You know what we do to spammers in a perfect world by peacefool · · Score: 1

    That's the reason I do not believe in God (the supreme being?) [thus, no hopes for the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything]: in a perfect world, we STILL DO have spammers.