Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Set To Debut 'Something New' At PAX East

skade88 writes "Ars is reporting that Blizzard will announce a new game on March 22, 2013 at PAX East. They say the new game is not a sequel or expansion. Blizzard is also saying the new game is not the long rumored MMO named Titan. Considering that every game Blizzard released since 1998 has had the name StarCraft, Warcraft or Diablo in it, this is big news. Ars speculates in the article that the new game could be Blizzard's version of a DOTA game. They showed off Blizzard All-Stars at BlizzCon 2010 as a SC2 custom map. It could be ready for launch as its own standalone game. I guess we will have to wait and see!"

150 comments

  1. WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

    No...let me guess, more micro-transaction shit, right?

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Citizen, you enjoy microtransactions.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Watch, probably moving to the annoying mobile IAP method.

      Player, you have run out of Mana! You may disconnect from battlenet for 1 hour to regenerate or pay $1 to regenerate now.

    3. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      If you're right, just put a bullet in my head right now.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    4. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Andrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, this sucks. I remember when I loved Blizzard, but now I can't even get excited about this news, not even a little bit.

      I know that this new project, no matter what, will (1) Be always online and require an account and (2) Will have its gameplay heavily influenced, driven, or impacted by a means to make money after the initial ($60!) sale, via micro transactions or a monthly fee or whatever.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    5. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, because #2 is obviously the case with StarCraft 2. Don't get me wrong, I dislike the way Blizzard has been doing their games since they became ActiBliz, but they didn't really put any gimmicks for extra money into SC2 (yet). In case you don't recall, Brood War was a separate, pay for game. Although each did include a campaign for each race, SC2 Wings of Liberty did have a lot more Terran content than either SC1x campaign had.

    6. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEAH, SC2 has micro transactions and monthly fees, AMIRITE?!

    7. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      YEAH, SC2 has micro transactions and monthly fees, AMIRITE?!

      That's not to say they didn't want them.

      Blizzard's next big property will have some after-purchase revenue involved. Guaranteed. Because Blizzard has never shown particular willingness to do something different than other developers and that's what other developers are doing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      In Application Programming?

    9. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Yes. The player is programmed to accept that they must make in-application payments by frustrating obstacles and essentially bad game design.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    10. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      YEAH, SC2 has micro transactions and monthly fees, AMIRITE?!

      You do realize that "impacted by a means to make money after the initial ($60!) sale" also includes expansion packs? One of which is coming out for $40 in two weeks?

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    11. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Yep, because #2 is obviously the case with StarCraft 2.

      Wasn't that the game where the storyline was broken apart into three separate installments?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    12. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that "impacted by a means to make money after the initial ($60!) sale" also includes expansion packs? One of which is coming out for $40 in two weeks?

      While that is true, Bliz has been doing expansion packs since like Warcraft 2. The industry itself has been doing expansion packs for a long time, along with sequels.

      The Industry has always wanted to make money. Instead of some sort of slow decent into the Dark Side, I think we are just more conscious of it (a disadvantage of being older and more paranoid^H wiser)

    13. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by GodInHell · · Score: 2

      Dude already addressed that in the line after the one you quoted.

    14. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sc2 has some of the best value out there. Basically she'll out 40-60 dollars every couple years for infinite multiplayer with constant stream of patches and updates. Blizzard actually follows the meta game and makes changes accordingly. Not too many games without subscriptions get that sort of love.

    15. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, this sucks. I remember when I loved Blizzard, but now I can't even get excited about this news, not even a little bit.

      I know that this new project, no matter what, will (1) Be always online and require an account and (2) Will have its gameplay heavily influenced, driven, or impacted by a means to make money after the initial ($60!) sale, via micro transactions or a monthly fee or whatever.

      Diablo 3 on the ps3 and ps4 has been stated by blizzard as not being required to be online all the time.

      Diablo3 dont require any microtransactions that involves actual game content or accessibility. And neither is it based around that concept and even the parts you can use real money to buy things can still be done so by playing the game and using in game gold. WOW has microtransactions but they are just for fluff vanity items and do not limit the game in anyway. Starcraft 2 has no transactions that hide game content or accesibility.

      World of warcraft is paid monthly like its always been and they give constant free content updates to players that others would charge for.

      Blizzard really isnt a good target for your mindless hatred and completely wrong accusations. Go look at EA games if you want to complain.

    16. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      They are looking into it and hard. They were supposed to add "pay for more maps" functionality in WoL. It's still in coming, but will most likely make a debut some time after HoS release.

      I haven't played a single player of actual SC2 multiplayer, but I enjoy playing an occasional multiplayer custom map game and it appears there's a lot of people like me as blizzard added "starcraft arcade" which is the umbrella for all those custom maps in SC2. I fully expect it to become either monthly or pay per map soon enough, in true spirit of "this is popular, monetize it to death" activision style.

    17. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not a bad game design. I mean, some people could do it poorly. but the idea that creating that is and of itself bad design is incorrect.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I think you've misunderstood; I'm saying bad game design is a technique used by scalpers like Zynga to force people to pay up. Microtransactions follow bad game design, they don't cause it (except perhaps by choice, at a business model planning level.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    19. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by Vaphell · · Score: 1

      Although each did include a campaign for each race, SC2 Wings of Liberty did have a lot more Terran content than either SC1x campaign had.

      yes, they sold it as some kind of groundbreaking storytelling and whatnot, in reality it was 1/3 meat tops, the rest was filler where you do completely unrelated things only to jump into the main storyline 3 missions before ending. And the story sucked ass too.
      Sc1 offered you a complete balanced package with equal attention to all races, in case of sc2 zerg was clearly undercooked, heart of the swarm is still not out, and when will legacy of the void be released, in 2015? I admit that stretching the game to five years is an epic achievement.

    20. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      There are a handful of what I consider to be pretty good games that use microtransactions. I think in those cases they adapt the microtransactions to what is inherently a pretty decent game - I don't mind when it's used for custom character graphics or to give players moderately faster access to higher level "stuff."

      Of course, you're absolutely right about companies using bad game design as a technique to generate microtransaction income. It really depends on how the game was developed: "We have this cool game, how can we get some money for it?" vs "We need money, how can we make a game to do that for us?"

      --
      +1 Disagree
    21. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by r0xtarninja · · Score: 1

      And I don't buy it. Expansions have always been a Blizzard thing, and they have worked because they added on to an already complete product. SC2 could have had 10 games worth of Terran content, and it still would have been incomplete because there were no other campaigns.

    22. Re:WoW for PS4 and Xbox Durango?!?!? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Part #1 came out in July 2010 and the other two parts are yet to arrive... how much longer is it going to take?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  2. Clealry by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    they've done away with the pretense of a game and just have an auction house.

    Or it could be truly shocking and they are going to produce a fun game again.
    I would love to see a new Warcraft RTS. preferable without some lame story shoved into it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Clealry by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

      Avoiding RTS stories (most are bad) is as easy as multiplayer and skirmish.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Clealry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the Warcraft 3 story was great. It was grand enough to work as the fundamentals of WoW lore.

    3. Re:Clealry by dywolf · · Score: 1

      What games have they released that haven't been fun? Even Diablo 3 was fun the first time through.

      and if you just want a competent RTS without any backstory, there's already 1000's of those. half the attraction of the warcraft and starcraft games are the stories that provide the motivation/reason for the missions

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    4. Re:Clealry by a1cypher · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would LOVE a new Warcraft RTS.

      But not like warcraft 3 where they put too much emphasis on "legends" which were single irreplacable units with super powers that the game revolves around. Too much like a pre-cursor to WoW.

         

    5. Re:Clealry by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

      I kinda liked the hero; especially the dwarf. The sound effects in that game are classic. Can't remember tghe last time I played it and I still find myself imitating them in context:

      "Woooooork complete!"

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:Clealry by Vaphell · · Score: 1

      too bad sc2 pissed all over the motivations/reasons from sc1.

    7. Re:Clealry by TimCook7314 · · Score: 1

      What games have they released that haven't been fun? Even Diablo 3 was fun the first time through.

      and if you just want a competent RTS without any backstory, there's already 1000's of those. half the attraction of the warcraft and starcraft games are the stories that provide the motivation/reason for the missions

      No way. I played D3 and I was bored out of my mind. It was nothing like it's predecessor.

    8. Re:Clealry by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      A new Warcraft RTS, set 5-600 years after current WoW content would be a great lead-in to Warcraft 2. It could be used to set the scene for the next MMO, start development on a story and characters and future bosses. And it wouldn't be too hard to create make it so that your previous character could be part of your prologue as the great hero who slew whatever. If you see how your character generation in GW2 goes, the ability to pick a previous character and it will look up some feats of strength, be them PvE or PvP and let you pick something major you did to add to your characters backstory etc...

    9. Re:Clealry by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      And get rid of hero units. I want epic battles of hundreds of units.

      That "upkeep" preventing you from building big armies infuriated me. You only get 70% of mined gold above a certain population, and only 40% abobe a higher level pop. It felt like some out-of-control socialism, a society I had a hard time wanting to save.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  3. PORTAL 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spoiler

    1. Re:PORTAL 3 by pezpunk · · Score: 2

      that would be a neat trick, considering .... anything.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    2. Re:PORTAL 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that crazy, we've seen that Blizzard can count to 3 (it just takes a decade).

      However, the press release claims the "new" game won't be a sequel or expansion. Which leaves one real option: Crossover!

      Imagine if you will, a RTS with a deeply ingraned hero system (like in Warcraft 3, but almost as fully detailed as Diablo 3 characters) where Diablo is found chasing the renegade Burning Legion across realities, the chase only slowed when the Burning Legion convinces the UED to help them in exchange for magical enhancements to their technology. When the preview movie ends, 18 factions from Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo, and hybridized forces are entangled in a massive struggle for power with alliances that barely last long enough for the toner to fuse to the arcane scrolls it was printed on.

    3. Re:PORTAL 3 by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but I think the joke may have been the fact that Portal isn't owned by Blizzard.

    4. Re:PORTAL 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly, it only took 8 years for Warcraft 1-3 to come out. And it took 16 years for Diablo 1-3, not just 10.

    5. Re:PORTAL 3 by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Wartal?

    6. Re:PORTAL 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me crazy, but I think the joke may have been the fact that Portal isn't owned by Blizzard.

      Right, because game franchise ownership never changes hands...

      If Valve were actually doing something more with their portal guns than watching them get modded into Minecraft (which Blizzard might have attempted to sue for daring to end a game's name with 'craft'), then you could argue that they would not contemplate leasing rights for another development group to make another game built on some of the same principles.

    7. Re:PORTAL 3 by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      You should have the doctor look at that....

      --
      +1 Disagree
  4. Yawn... by ArtOverlord · · Score: 1

    I wish I could say this was interesting but expect "Blizzard announces facebook game" or "Blizzard announces Warcraft DOTA"

    1. Re:Yawn... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Blizzard announces Facebook Warcraft DOTA only available on XBLA and PSN. Sold.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  5. Or a Quake-type game... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    "Ars speculates in the article that the new game could be Blizzard's version of a DOTA game."

    Well, there are a half dozen of those already, too. So: Nothing new still.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Or a Quake-type game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ars speculates in the article that the new game could be Blizzard's version of a DOTA game."

      Well, there are a half dozen of those already, too. So: Nothing new still.

      LOL Ars.

      "Ars speculates in the article that the new game could be Blizzard's version of an old Blizzard's game mod."

      FTFY

  6. a blizzard version of call of duty by alen · · Score: 1

    can't wait
    3d isometric top down view and you have to spend money to buy every upgrade

    1. Re:a blizzard version of call of duty by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      A proper RTS or turn based game would be great to have again. If we could forgo having to buy each bullet.

      I am pretty excited about the new wasteland.

    2. Re:a blizzard version of call of duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the bullets will be for free. What you'll have to buy, is the bronze, silver and gold triggers to use them.

  7. Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microtransaction Hero!

    Spend real money to buy things to wave your dick around on the forums. Complete with full public profiles so others can see how much money you actually spent.

    Cool features like:
    - Call people noobs for not spending as much money as you have
    - Spend money instead of actually playing the game
    - Spend money to acquire virtual currency that Blizzard owns
    - Spend money to super-inflate the in-game economy so if you want something later, you have to spend more money

    1. Re:Let me guess by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

      That sounds a lot like EVE General Discussion to me.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Let me guess by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      That sounds a lot like EVE General Discussion to me.

      My understanding of Eve was that the microtransactions were just for avatar appearance. Has this changed?

    3. Re:Let me guess by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like any MMO that has an issue with real money being used to advance gameplay vs actually playing.

      Whether the company allows in game transactions or not, it still happens.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:Let me guess by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Microtransaction Hero!

      Spend real money to buy things to wave your dick around on the forums. Complete with full public profiles so others can see how much money you actually spent.

      Cool features like:
      - Call people noobs for not spending as much money as you have
      - Spend money instead of actually playing the game
      - Spend money to acquire virtual currency that Blizzard owns
      - Spend money to super-inflate the in-game economy so if you want something later, you have to spend more money

      It will be microtransaction based MMO and, in order to get a good initial population, the will offer existing WoW players an opportunity to SELL their WoW accounts for a head start in the microtransaction economy of the new game. The net worth of your WoW account will be based on things like how many achievements, what item level, how many alts and what level they are. Thus 'end game' players in WoW will be able to effectively start playing the new game at 'end game'.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  8. I hope it's not a DOTA-clone by Gaygirlie · · Score: 0

    As the title implies, I can't stand all these DOTA/LoL-clones. They're fine if you're a pimple-faced teenager with raging hormones and the need to yell at someone, but it sure won't attract me.

    1. Re:I hope it's not a DOTA-clone by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I also hope it's not a DOTA clone. The only tower defense game I can remember liking much recently was Dungeon Defenders, which i enjoyed because it had character progression.

  9. Original IP from Blizzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, you're serious, let me laugh even harder.

    They're going to keep flogging Warcraft and Starcraft until they die.

    1. Re:Original IP from Blizzard? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Incorrect sir!
      They are actually showing off two games WarStar and CraftCraft. In the first one the two famous IPs have been combined into one single RTS, in the later the SAME DAMN THING!

    2. Re:Original IP from Blizzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a custom map for Starcraft 2 that is called CraftCraft...it's kinda fun.

  10. Definitions, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And what exactly is a DOTA game?

    1. Re:Definitions, please by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I can gather you have two or more teams, each with their own base, all trying to capture points from the other teams all the while your own teammates keep yelling obscenities at you because you're not doing this or that exactly how they want, and it ends with one or the other team capturing enough points, wiping the other one out, or the players getting fed up with the constant abuse by own teammates and logging out. But really, the constant raging, belittling and abusing of own teammates is seemingly the most important thing in these games.

    2. Re:Definitions, please by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      DOTA = Defense of the Ancients, the most popular custom map in Warcraft III. It spawned the MOBA (multiplayer online battle arena) genre in which players control a single hero unit from a third-person perspective while leveling/gearing up in an attempt to destroy the opponent team's base, and which now has a number of entries in it, the most notable being League of Legends. DOTA is so well known and popular that Valve even hired IceFrog, one of DOTA's lead developers, to create "DOTA 2" as a standalone game that is currently in beta (and is already the second most popular eSport title, behind only StarCraft II).

    3. Re:Definitions, please by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Correction: not the second most popular. It's the second highest-paying to its contenders, behind only SC2.

    4. Re:Definitions, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOTA was the first "MOBA":

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplayer_online_battle_arena

      That explains the gist. RTS controls in a half-tower-defense, half-action-RPG type of 5v5 pvp game.

    5. Re:Definitions, please by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0

      Good guess but I heard it will consist of a slot machine. You earn slot tokens by moving a cursor around the screen for 1 hr per token. Each token has a tiny chance of increasing your power rating by 1 point. You can then walk around the game with your rating flashing over your head.

      You can do group tasks where you all work together to move the cursor for 2 tokens per hour but then they scream "retard!!!" at you while you do it.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Definitions, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely true, you dirty smelly dyke bitch.

    7. Re:Definitions, please by tippe · · Score: 1

      I saw DOTA but thought DOTT (Day of the Tentacle). Man, that was a good game back in the day. I'm not sure how I would feel about a remake, but I'd probably still buy it though. I have no interest in DOTA, though, so Blizzard won't be getting my money if that's what they'll be announcing...

      </ramblings_of_an_old_man>

    8. Re:Definitions, please by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      You will be confused to know that Day of the Tentacle is now a Disney property.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    9. Re:Definitions, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Day of the Tentacle + Tinkerbell.

      All we need to do is wait for a Japanese company to buy Disney and let the porn flow naturally.

    10. Re:Definitions, please by edcalaban · · Score: 1

      Not the first, just the first to get super popular. Check your own wiki link - Aeon of Strife was the first, and they used to be called AOSs.

    11. Re:Definitions, please by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Nice and informative, but a bit confusing. LoL, an eSport title, is about four times larger (# of players) than Dota 2. Can you explain why you count Starcraft 2 and Dota 2 as the top two e-Sport titles, yet do not include the 'most notable' Leage of Legends?

      (Disclaimer: I play Dota 2, and not LoL; I am not a LoL fanboy, just curious about the appearant contradiction)

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    12. Re:Definitions, please by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      It was a mistaken statement on my part. See the first response to my last post. I corrected it with the correct info.

  11. Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too little, too late.

    They should have joined that bandwagon a long time ago. Even DOTA2 can't touch League of Legends now.

    1. Re:Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      Yeah, There is a lot of hype around DOTA 2 but I figured it wasn't meeting Valve's expectation when they started handing out multiple copies to anybody who had ever shown an interest. I had already purchased a copy and they gave me and my son's account 4 more each to hand out to friends.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was planned as a free-to-play game with cosmetic microtransactions. The whole point is to get as many people interested in it and playing as possible. The $30 you can spend for it is "early-access" for anyone that somehow can't get an invite. Look at the number of people playing it on a typical day - it usually peaks at over 200k simultaneous players.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    3. Re:Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      Dota 2 and LoL are very different games within the same genre. LoL is a much simpler and more streamlined version of the genre, which of course appeals to a wider audience. Dota 2 is primarily for players of the original and Heroes of Newerth. The mechanics are more robust and the learning curve is much steeper.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    4. Re:Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "Heroes of Newerth" you mean "the original DOTA", right?

    5. Re:Assuming the MOBA rumor is true... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      I phrased it poorly; what I meant was "the original DotA, and Heroes of Newerth."

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  12. Wasteland2 - I'm with you. by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for that to hit.

    That Kickstarter was exciting. "If we get this much money, we'll do this in Linux".

    Ok, we just hit that number.

    "If we get"

    Ok, we just got that while I was typing the description.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
    1. Re:Wasteland2 - I'm with you. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I was surprised how fast that went too, especially since the genre is pretty much dead. Maybe we can eventually have another "Jagged Alliance".

    2. Re:Wasteland2 - I'm with you. by jittles · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah Jag was a great game. I guess Jagged Alliance Back in Action was published in the not too distant past but it was a terribly executed remake of Jag 2.

    3. Re:Wasteland2 - I'm with you. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I only found out about that now.
      I was excited, then sad to see it had no fog of war and basically was a terrible game.

      This should be easy. Make old game again, updates graphics and story line. Change nothing else.

    4. Re:Wasteland2 - I'm with you. by tenco · · Score: 1

      ITYM XCOM:EU

  13. YOU ARE NOT by etash · · Score: 2

    PREPARED for what blizzard is bringing forth!

    /me runs away

    1. Re:YOU ARE NOT by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2

      is blizzard going to make me its bitch?

    2. Re:YOU ARE NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daikatana!

  14. make a TBS game as good as HOMM 2 or 3! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make a TBS game as good as HOMM 2 or 3!

  15. Aha by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I will show "some reaction" when I know what it is.

    Seriously, I mean, I'm used to vaporware and whatnot, but this is getting ridiculous. Are we now supposed to get excited over the announcement of getting "something", they can't even be assed anymore to at least announce it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was just the announcement that they are going to make an announcement oh they joy and excitement

  16. d3 on xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are probably being pressured by Microsoft to announce Diablo3 on the Xbox since they already announced Diablo3 on the PS4.

  17. World of Hobbitcraft by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    It's exactly the same as WoW just with Hobbits added. Just think hairless Pandas that need to be fed constantly.

    1. Re:World of Hobbitcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's exactly the same as WoW just with Hobbits added.

      So it's LOTRO?

    2. Re:World of Hobbitcraft by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't have to imagine that; I have children.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:World of Hobbitcraft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Having children is like running an Inn full of drunk crazy midgets who won't pay their bills.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:World of Hobbitcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've played Dwarf Fortress, then?

  18. DOTA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried DOTA multiple times. It's simply boring. Not a fun genre. Like any genre, it has its depth. But it's not an interesting depth. It bores me. I don't like that there's no long term progression. And yet I don't mind that in pure RTS. But in the case of DOTA, that lack is genre-killing.

    And the headline had me excited for Titan or something interesting and new.

    But if it's not Titan, it is absolutely a DOTA.

    And EA-Blizzard has completely lost my interest for awhile because of it.

  19. What genres are new to them? by stewsters · · Score: 2

    I am kind of curious. They cover there fantasy and dark fantasy bases with Warcraft and Diablo, they cover their distant future with Starcraft.
    What does that leave that's significantly different?

    A contemporary hyper-realistic fps war game? Where you can trade real world money to drop tanks and get airstrikes?

    An mmo where you play as a minimum wage worker at a large box store? You can have to make up the difference in your rent with micro-transactions?

    A pirate simulator? Where you need to use micro-transactions to buy fruit so you don't get scurvy?

    1. Re:What genres are new to them? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      How 'bout an ARG where you use micro-transactions to learn WTF Blizz intends to announce, so you don't have to masturbate yourself up to the frenzy of anticipation and excitement their marketing department clearly expects you to have.

      Seriously, has Vivendi's ownership of Blizz yielded ONE positive result?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:What genres are new to them? by bane2571 · · Score: 1

      Positive results? It got me to stop playing WoW. Probably saved me a boatload of money on Diablo 3 micro transaction because of how trash that game is long term.

  20. Screw Blizzard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They lost me as a customer when they introduced Kung fu pandas to WOW, that was the last straw. The only game of theirs I play now is Diablo2 when the ladder is reset.

    They will never see anymore money from me.

    1. Re:Screw Blizzard... by JonJ · · Score: 1

      Yes. The game with overgrown cows, wolfmen, dragons, elves and spacesquids clearly went over the top with pandas.

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
  21. If it's not a sequel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it's going to be a prequel, obviously.

  22. Why do you care? by B5_geek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Have you forgotten how poorly they treated the community and the whole bnetd fiasco?

    I don't give a flying fuck what they make, they will never get a dime from me.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  23. WOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Blizzard is owned by Activision nowadays I'd go with "World of Duty" .. Another cash-cow coming in!

  24. More well polished mediocrity. by Ziggitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blizzard has become the J.J. Abrams of game developers in the last couple years. Nothing they do is risky or ambitious. As a result Diablo 3 turned into a snoozefest with no new mechanics and a loot system that was less exciting than its predecessor. They showed they can't break away from core mechanics in Starcraft 2 that were terrible for the multiplayer scene. If they were to make a DotA style game at this point, I would give an absolute vote of no confidence in their ability to turn it into a quality competitive game. Sure it'll look pretty and it'll run smooth. It'll either be well balanced and boring as hell or broken beyond all belief. They'll ignore player feedback and commit themselves to horrible design decisions.

    The thing I dislike most about Blizzard right now is that they seem to think that they have bottled the formula for fun. They think that they have a perfect statistical method for determining balance while completely ignoring how their games are actually being played. What they've actually bottled is the perfect formula for average clones of prior success. So not really all that excited.

    --
    There is no memory shortage. yes I have heard of XFCE. Go away.
    1. Re:More well polished mediocrity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I dislike most about Blizzard right now is that they seem to think that they have bottled the formula for fun. They think that they have a perfect statistical method for determining balance while completely ignoring how their games are actually being played. What they've actually bottled is the perfect formula for average clones of prior success. So not really all that excited.

      Interesting you say that, I introduced a psychologist, who does consulting with the gaming industry (gambling), to WoW a few years ago and she commented that the risk/effort/reward mechanisms reminded her of the same techniques developed in gaming machines to draw people onward into longer sessions chasing after rewards.

  25. World of Starcraft! by S810 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe this will be World of Starcraft! I have long thought that it was the next evolution of that franchise.

    --
    "I think you know what I'm talkin' about, Mr. President; We're gonna kill us a mummy!" - Bruce Campbell as Elvis Presley
    1. Re:World of Starcraft! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Eve should hire Blizzard developers to come in and revamp the UI. Maybe it's because Eve has a lot of information to present, but as fun as the game is the UI sucks. Far too menu driven especially when you're combat.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:World of Starcraft! by Tharkkun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe this will be World of Starcraft! I have long thought that it was the next evolution of that franchise.

      It will probably be the Bungie and Blizzard collaboration that has yet to be announced. The signed on to develop a game together a couple years back.

    3. Re:World of Starcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eve is better without Blizzard devs.

    4. Re:World of Starcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After comparing the WoW auction house to the Eve market, I can't imagine a single Eve player who would welcome a "wowification" of the Eve UI.

    5. Re:World of Starcraft! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      WoW's auction house is probably the weakest part of their UI and it's still infinitely better the Eve's tiny menus and their crappy filtering options. The information icon scheme sucks as does their comparison UI. You spend tons of time trying to find information in Eve.

      I know it's popular to slam a game that probably still has 10 million subscribers, but let's not rewrite history.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:World of Starcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World of Halo?

  26. Probably will screw it up again by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 1

    They take a good game and mess it up. Wonder what they will be doing this time

    1. Re:Probably will screw it up again by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      They take a good game and mess it up. Wonder what they will be doing this time

      I'm not sure which game you're referring to? 10 million subscribers still for World of Warcraft. Diablo 3 top selling game of the year sold 12 million copies. You may not appreciate their work but obviously someone does.

    2. Re:Probably will screw it up again by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Diablo 3 had a pretty sharp drop off.
      Most people weren't happy with it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Probably will screw it up again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't a lot of WoW subscribers get Diablo 3 for free? That would drop Diablo 3 down the rankings quite a bit.

  27. I say this now. by Westwood0720 · · Score: 2

    I'll say now that I'm not buying it. Then again, I say I'm cancelling my WoW account and never returning. Only, in four months I renew, level to 45, get bored, and quit again. I do this three times a year. Diablo 3, told myself I wasn't going to bother. Week after release, I bought it. Blizzard always seems to sucker me into their games. No matter how often I tell myself I'm not playing, I come back. >.
    Certainly has my attention as to what the game could be though.

  28. Just So It Has Kung Fu Pandas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blizzard will be out of business before it releases whatever this is in 2019.

  29. Blizzard Games by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2

    WoW has seriously turned me off to Blizzard games. Seven years in that did have it's good times but that was from the people I met and not from the game I played.

    Loved Diablo 1 and 2, haven't even touched Diablo 3. I'll be cracking away at the next cavern in Minecraft when they release this new one.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:Blizzard Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Diablo 3 was a rip off anyway. I threw the DVD in the garbage.

      They cashed in on their entire reputation for a quick buck.

      Never again.

  30. Maybe it's just the Diablo III console port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're supposed to be demoing that at PAX East.

  31. Maybe by AshFan · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's the REAL Diablo 3.

  32. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really care what it is, it's going to suck. Look at WoW. Waste hours on end to get gear, so that when the next release comes you need to grind again and that gear you already have that you worked so hard for? Worthless. Then you get the jerks that want to kick anybody that hasn't been playing for over a year running the same raid day after day so that they don't have to waste time waiting for anyone new. Add to that the constant manipulation of stats to make one class or another better or worse after you've spent months playing that class, and now you're getting slapped everytime you get into a PvP scenario. Oh please sign me up. Not. F U Blizz. Seriously. F U.

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that it seems like one *has* to grind the FoTM class/spec, or they will be HKs by that class/spec.

      Glad I moved to Rift. Takes an actual brain to actually play that game (both PvE and PvP.)

  33. A little alliteration by GreatM31 · · Score: 1

    World of Warcraft --> Slurpy of Starcraft? (great for cross promotion)

  34. Meh. Who cares? by runeghost · · Score: 2

    Blizzard jumped the shark years ago. The only people who might be legitimately excited by this news are stockholders, at the prospect of yet another franchise to milk cash from.

    1. Re:Meh. Who cares? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I just checked for articles and they've still got 10 million subscribers as of a year ago. Wasn't the peak 12 million or so?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Meh. Who cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Which would happen if customers weren't excited. You can't have milk cash from no one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Meh. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no cash cow level.

    4. Re:Meh. Who cares? by TimCook7314 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the recent numbers so I'll have to take what you're saying for fact. Granted Blizzard does know how to please the masses, but since when are the masses able to define what is "good". (i.e. Taylor Swift)

    5. Re:Meh. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard doesn't have customers, it has addicts. XD

  35. Here's my guess by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Eastern Kingdom and Kalimdor Xtreme Beach Volleyball.

    Which will be followed in about five years by
    Leisure Suit Larry in the land of the night elves.

  36. As a Mac user, let me be the first to say by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally, another game available for the Mac! We almost have a dozen good games now!

    1. Re:As a Mac user, let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, another game available for the Mac! We almost have a dozen good games now!

      That would have been funny a couple of years ago. there's tonnes of games on mac http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/

    2. Re:As a Mac user, let me be the first to say by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Go back to playing Escape Velocity and let the grownups have their discussion...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    3. Re:As a Mac user, let me be the first to say by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but without Steam we would only have Blizzard games and Cider-wrapped Windows games from EA.

  37. Release Date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing Blizzard, they will take their time to release a product. By which time I would probably be having my soul sucked out of me by Elder Scrolls Online.

  38. A cross over by cHiphead · · Score: 1

    Warcraft/Starcraft MMO Cross Over, WoW + Eve Online.

    I jest.

    Maybe a new Blackthorne? ;)

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  39. Think outside the box! by Wormsign · · Score: 1

    A Diablo RTS with MACRO transactions! You can buy more games from them within the game!

    1. Re:Think outside the box! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo Dawg, I heard you like playing games...

  40. Linux and Blizzard by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

    Nobody mentioned that Blizz said they had a new Linux game for 2013, or at least Linux compatible. Could it be it?

  41. I hope by VzXzV · · Score: 1

    I hope its a Lost Vikings themed bubble shooter.

  42. Rock n' Roll Racing? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    cause surely they aren't lame enough to showcase Diablo 3 for PS4 again

  43. Dead by Vladius · · Score: 1

    I'm finished with Blizzard. After the giant pile of diarrhea that was Cataclysm they decide to fix it with Pandas and Pokemon. Then we get a Starcraft sequel we waited years for that played the same as the first while being split into 3 games to make more money for Activision. Then there was Diablo 3 which was a worse game than it's predecessors and now we find out that they were blowing smoke up our asses by being a PC only company then cripple a flagship IP with a game that was killed by consolitis. Any semblance of the old guard has no more power anymore and they are nothing more than a cash register for Activision. It's a sad story: game company makes good games then gets bought by beancounters then turns into a shit factory over time. I don't care what Blizzard does anymore. Blizzard is dead.

  44. who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter what they show, it will be a decade before it arrives so who the fuck cares?

  45. Dean and Dammed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blizzard was dead for me the day they rained on bnetd.
    http://games.slashdot.org/story/02/02/21/0136256/blizzard-rains-on-bnetd-project
    Now they are just dammed.

  46. Blackstone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could just be that they will announce the "Project Blackstone" project which is probably only a different type of custom game or mod for Starcraft 2.

    http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blackstone/

  47. Pax Imperia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blizzard owns the rights, and remaking the game as a server-side would be awesome.