Slashdot Mirror


France Demands Skype Register As a Telco

jfruh writes "Skype made a name for itself by largely bypassing the infrastucture — and the costs, and the regulations — of the legacy telecommunications industry. But now the French telecom regulator wants to change that, at least in France. At issue is not the service's VoIP offering, but rather the Skype Out service that allows users to dial phones on traditional networks. Regulators say that this service necessitates that Skype face the same regulations as other telecoms."

26 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. As anal as France is.... by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While France has many many funny laws and ideas, many of which I think are bogus. But on this one IMO they are right. If Skype connected directly at the user to a telephone then IMO it would be a different picture. However, SKYPE acts on behalf of the user and hence they are doing the same thing as a telco, albeit not a completely telco.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:As anal as France is.... by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that Skype facilitates incoming calls only, so they are more like a foreign telco than a local one. And because they don't provide POTS to consumers, it is impossible to fulfill France's telco requirements to be able to identifiy the location of an emergency call. At best, France's laws are out of step with the 21st century. Or else, no Skype is like a foreign telco, routing incoming calls, and not a local telco, which provides outgoing calls.

    2. Re:As anal as France is.... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that they never actually had to install any physical telecommunications equipment. They provide an overlay network. It is a network that uses the existing phone and internet networks to provide functionality. They take advantage of the fact that communication over a phone handset is fundamentally no different than sending bits over the internet. An actual telecom company provides access to some public resource that they were granted stewardship over by a government (e.g. phone lines, fiber cables, wireless spectrum, etc). In some cases they actually own those resources. This just seems like another case of a European government trying to shakedown a rich company for money, (e.g. Microsoft, etc).

      If I was skype I would just turn off access to France and let the people fire their politicians then turn it back on.

      It won't be long before Europe declares wikipedia and youtube public utilities and start trying to extort money from them too

    3. Re:As anal as France is.... by xQx · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, we have those regulations in Australia too, and the sky didn't fall.

      IP Telephony providers have had very little problem complying with this archaic regulation.

      The clincher is that it's just as difficult to tell where a call originates when it's on a mobile network. You can, at best, tell what tower it is on. Not much use on a block with a high-rise apartment building.

      With IP, the theory goes:
      1. If the call originates from an IP Address that is fixed (eg. DSL) in location, give that location.
      2. If it's not, but you know the address of the IP, give that location
      3. Otherwise, give the billing address of the customer's service.

      The problem in Australia is that the database isn't at all dynamic. You put the address in and in a few days it's available to emergency services - so, when someone calls from a mobile phone (that's not on the telstra network) or an IP Phone, emergency services get the billing address.

      IMHO - If Skypeout is achieved by making international calls into France, then France can go jump. But if they've got a carrier interface (SS7 gateways and the like) inside the country's borders then they can put up with the same laws that the other Telco's in France (ie. their local competition) do.

    4. Re:As anal as France is.... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely - but I suspect this is in the 8%. And their cheese isn't bad either.

      They make good fries and toast! While many slashdotters have not tried it, their kiss ain't too shabby either.

    5. Re:As anal as France is.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the justification is that telephony is a vital service in the modern world. You need it just to live, otherwise basic stuff like getting a job or dealing with your government is near impossible.

      In exchange for being allowed to provide a vital service everyone needs and which is thus a somewhat captive market you have to meet some basic requirements.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:As anal as France is.... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Informative

      France should turn itself over to England, who seem to be sensible and close enough to babysit these silly pricks.

      The UK? That dead-end backwater. The place that is so sensible that it's planning to institute a tax on poor people who have "too many bedrooms"?

      French GDP/Capita 44,007 USD
      UK GDP/Capita 38,811 USD

      What has the UK done since 1945?

      UK electricity ~ 20% nuclear
      France ~ 80% nuclear

      UK high speed rail lines: 1 (which goes to France)
      France: around 6

      UK space effort - launched one 66Kg satellite in 1971
      France - Arianespace

      UK exports (2011) $479,200,000,000 (10th in world)
      France: $589,700,000,000 (5th in world)

      Current account balance deficit (smaller is better!)

      UK (#2 after USA) 162.973 billion USD
      France (#4) 117.676 billion USD

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:As anal as France is.... by flyneye · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What has the UK done since 1945?"
      Well, their contribution to rock & roll , entertaining dialects, beer and drama still trump anything France has done in that time period.

      "UK electricity ~ 20% nuclear
      France ~ 80% nuclear"
      France generates more Nuclear waste? England generates more wind power. Was there a discernible point?

      "UK space effort - launched one 66Kg satellite in 1971
      France - Arianespace"
      I attend many lavish fireworks displays, but I don't feel obliged to pay for one. So France throws its money around on a space program that could be covered by others.

      "UK exports (2011) $479,200,000,000 (10th in world)
      France: $589,700,000,000 (5th in world)"
      The U.K. seems to specialize in administration, let them administer Frances output for a higher yield. Good point.

      "UK (#2 after USA) 162.973 billion USD
      France (#4) 117.676 billion USD"
      I believe a business deal could be struck where France is leased to China to pay off the U.K. debt.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. I am all for it. by gagol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Especially since Skype out is more expensive than my current voip provider, they have the money for it and interoperate with the POTS.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
    1. Re:I am all for it. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are right - I just checked mine (CallCentric), and their rate is 0.0198 USD to France, while Skype is 0.023 USD.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. Correct by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And they are correct. You tie into the Telco, you need to play by the regulations for Telco.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Correct by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because both ends of the landline call need to be regulated. It has nothing to do with the computer aspect of it.

    2. Re:Correct by ADRA · · Score: 4, Informative

      Skype in this case is taking the place of an inter-exchange carrier as described generally in:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interexchange_carrier

      In the US, these entities are in fact regulated, and I imagine its the same in France. If they're acting in the same fashion (but with slightly different physical characteristics), why wouldn't those same laws apply to them? If you want fully de-regulate the long distance phone providers as being telecommunications entities that's one thing, but applying one set of rules because its half tethered off the internet doesn't change the nature of what these companies do.

      --
      Bye!
    3. Re:Correct by currently_awake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would very much like to see the internet regulated like the phone system. The rule about no tapping phones without a court order sounds wonderful.

  4. Possible response by c0lo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS not offering anymore "Skype Out" in France... Who's going to lose? Well, it's the worst kind of solution, in which everybody loses something and nobody wins (not even the French VoIP providers: the greatest majority of Skype-out calls happens just because the called is not online and the caller would like her/him to join a Skype-to-Skype session. A SMS - direct or via Twitter - would achieve pretty much the same thing).

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  5. I live in France, and see no need for this... by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, they brought us the Minitel. Er, thanks...

    I've been here for more than 20 years, and have really enjoyed being financially fucked in the ass by the France Telecom monopoly, swiftly followed by the FT/SFR duopoly, and then Bouygues came along and, tada!, we had the same old...overpriced, underserviced.

    Fortunately, after years off battling the well-captured 'regulators', Free has finally got things moving somewhat in the right direction.

    My point? Skype buys its out calling service from these fine, regulated companies. It is not a telco in the traditional sense, so leave it alone.

    Btw, not a Skype/MS shill, although I freely admit i have found it incredibly useful over the years, and it has saved me and my family a ton of money. Right now moving to Jitsi...it's getting there. (Waiting for Android and iOs clients, please)

    1. Re:I live in France, and see no need for this... by trainsnpep · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just to clarify for those of you who don't live in France, Free is a local utility with low cost plans. Cheap mobile (I pay about $25/month for unlimited calls within France, unlimited calls to 40 countries, unlimited texts, and 3GB/month at 4G speeds). Cheap at-home triple play.

      --
      --<Mike>--
  6. Re:Then Leave by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "France taxes the crap out of its citizens so we should have seen this coming."
    which has nothing to do with this issue.

    But hay, just jump on your ignorant bandwagon and toot the crazy horn.

    France's person income tax is 0% to 75%..not just 75%. and with Bouclier Fiscal I don't think very many people, if any, pay 75% since it needs to be 1.2million pr more with 2 adults. Not only to the France have a different word for everything, they also have a different tax system.

    Perspective:
    If you were a family of 2 adults and 3 children making 100,000 Euros you tax rate would be 14%

    France taxes, in the real world, are on par, and sometime less then the US taxes..and they have more services.

    And of cours,e saying ;'high taxes' is pretty meaningless.
    What are the service you get? whats the VALUE overall

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Re:2 words by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Music therapy.

    You both need it to take care of your issue and to learn about gov't regulations introduced now to stop competition and keep prices up, prevent (lower income) people from making income in that field.

    But ifÂSB 1437Âpasses, anyone who wants to become a music therapist will face some onerous barriers: an applicant would need a bachelorâ(TM)s degree in music therapy from a program approved by the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA), at least 1,200 hours of clinical training, and 900 hours of internship experience. Practicing or calling oneself a music therapist without a government permission slip would be criminalized, with violators facing up to aÂ$500 fine and/or 30 days imprisonment.

    That's what gov't regulations are all about, that and taking ppl for their money. Providing an innovating service ppl like? Ha, we are gov't, it would really be sad if you didn't pay up and something bad happened to your business.

  8. Call Termination by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    France can always prevent call termination on France's POTs numbers.

  9. Re:Then Leave by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    France doesn'r relly have high taxes.

    I am defensive for several reasons:
    1) the word taxes has become a knee jerk scare word. Being further seperated form services. Meaning peopel talk about cutting taxes, and everyone loves it. A politician saying that the result is loosing servcies, and everyone villifys them.

    2) IT's about value.

    3) France is the US's first and oldest ally. The US would not exist without France. The general anti-france meme in the US is short sight, unfair, and based in complete ignorance.

    Then when people say ignorant shit like "France taxes the crap out of its citizens so we should have seen this coming."
    it just general irritates me. It is used to scare people. "You don't want to be like France, there healthcare means that are taxed really high!"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. Re:Why Silicon Valley did not happen in France by mad+flyer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This comment coming from the land of the porkbarrel project is pathetically laughable...

  11. Re:Why Silicon Valley did not happen in France by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The more people who start bypassing the moldy old POTS network altogether and communicate IP to IP, the better off we'll all be..... Sadly they won't be able to communicate their existence to the rest of the world due to the system's complete lack of interoperability.

    And be replaced by what? The closed-source, proprietary protocol Skype?

    Imagine that POTS is shut down and all that is left is a bunch of proprietary VOIP services, none of which interoperate with each other. Yeah, that's really a step forward!

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  12. Re:Why Silicon Valley did not happen in France by Solozerk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    (disclaimer: I am French)

    Seems to me that France should really be embracing open source with open arms -- I bet the only thing holding them back is that so much open source material has already been created by dirty English speakers ;)

    The entire French police force is slowly but surely switching to Linux and more generally Open Source software, as are all public schools (although Microsoft did and still does try its usually dirty tricks to prevent that). The entire national assembly (main house of parliament) entirely runs on Linux, from Desktop machines for the députés to servers hosting the live feed/on demand videos. Open Source projects (originating from companies as well as universities and such) regularly obtain grants/funds from official bodies (and in fact, creating an Open Source project is a very favorable point to obtain a lot of those innovation funds). Strong recommendations have been emitted to use only open and standard file formats in all administration, and several projects for laws have been proposed to enforce this, as well as the use of Open Source software in all public administration (not sure any of those were actually passed, though). Skype is also officially forbidden in high-level universities and official research organizations, essentially because it is closed source and thus theoretically prone to potential spying/security issues.

    Seems to me that France is *already* embracing Open Source with open arms.

  13. Re:Yeah so they can tax the company to feed the go by femtobyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet, strangely, people aren't dying in the streets from starvation and lack of tyres in France. If the "socialist minded French way" means a reasonably functional country, with happy people enjoying a decently high standard of living while working 3-hour days, why the f*** would I take advice from someone who lives in a country where typical workers grind through 40-hour workweeks (if they are lucky not to need 80 at minimum wage) and still have sucky lives?

  14. Re: Short sighted not to regulate by neutrino38 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    French telecommunication regulator is right to try to impose operator burdends on Skype.

    1/ More and more people are adopting this service a primary phone service because of SkypeIn and SkypeOut feature. This means that there will be more and more case where user will need to make emergency calls. This lack of emergency call support is a shame. So the post above is ... very shortsighted. One day you may need it yourseff.

    2/ VOIP Technology / Skype are more and more displacing regular phones. They play the same role so they need somehow to be regulated in the same manner. There is in France a declarative licence for small telcos, the so called "L33-1". I know a couple of medium sized company operating VoIP service that applied to this without any problem. So it is not like it is unbearable for companies like Microsoft.

    3/ I am so amazed by comment like: Skype should cut skype in/out, or avoid physical presence in France (replace by country xxx if you want) to avoid any form of regulation.

    Damn ! these regulations are non discriminatory and made for the common good. Its like on the road, if you have no rules, you end up with a dysfunctional traffic. I see in all these comment some kind of selfish, short sighted spirit, 'I want the lowest cost regardless the consequences" that is a worrying trend.

    Just because someone sees the work "governement", "regulation" they jump to the roof, say its bad, andy freedom and they try to avoid it without even pondering the consequences or the actual need for regulation. I see this ultimately as some kind of subtul selfishness.

    As much as I agree that freedom and freedom to innovate should be preserved and fostered, it should not be a the cost of forgetting the notion of common good.