Slashdot Mirror


A New Benefit For Logged-In Readers: Meet Slashdot's ROT13 Initiative

We appreciate all the support we've gotten over the years from Slashdot's logged-in users. They take part actively in discussions, and in exchange for their active interest in the site, we like to give a few perks over and above what our beloved anonymous readers get. But we never want to deprive anonymous readers of the actual features of the site — whether you're a logged-in account holder, anonymous, a subscriber, or have a username but are browsing anonymously at any given moment, Slashdot has always been freely available to read for anyone with a browser and an uncensored Internet connection. It's a balance we try to maintain, too, Sure, we'd like you to login, and we think it has some worthwhile benefits (like tracking comment responses, building karma, and using the Zoo system to keep track of your friends and foes), but we'll never force you to. Today, we're building on this approach, by introducing a feature that benefits every logged-in user, but still leaves the page free to read for all. We'll be phasing in over the next few days a button that logged-in users and subscribers can click to decrypt the text of each Slashdot posting with the trivial transform known as Rot13. Read more, below! Don't panic. You don't have to do anything at all, especially for right now. For the rest of the week at least, though, you'll notice that stories are rendered a bit harder to read, because they've been ROT13'd. "Encrypted" seems too strong a word for it, since ROT13 is about as tough an encryption as Pig Latin is, and more consistent. You'll just need to click once more to read the full, plaintext version of each story. After we complete a few shakedown days, subscribers and other logged-in users will always be able to get through to the plaintext just that simply, and for anonymous readers, it'll be nearly as easy: they'll just need to click one button, and watch one painless interstitial ad, to reach each story's plaintext. For the masses who read anonymously but don't want to suffer through any more ads? (Believe us, we understand.) Not to worry! As we transition away from offering the plaintext along with the ROT13 version, there will be several great options for translating ROT13 text; you'll just need to copy and paste the text, or in some cases the URL for the story you'd like to read, into the engine of your choice. We favor the spartan rot13.com, but there are others. Heck, if you're a CS grad, or even an amateur programmer at all, you've probably written a ROT13 translation program, or you can pipe the text through a built-in function in the language of your choice. (Let us know your favorite translation system in the comments below.) If you have any questions about the transition, please let us know.

Note: You'll notice that comments are still in plaintext for now by default. They will probably stay this way for a while, too, even for anonymous readers. The conversion process itself for the 19.2 million comments in our database is pretty trivial, actually, but there have been some glitches with the way that the transform handles things like code inside of comments, and it would be a shame to break any of that code. And it's a near certainty that only anonymous readers will ever see reader comments encrypted with ROT13, when all those details are worked out.

185 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. svefg cbfg by headcase88-2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    svefg cbfg

    1. Re:svefg cbfg by DKlineburg · · Score: 2

      s=a v=p e=r f=i g=l = c=f b=o f=i g=l ? Wait, why cbfg?

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:svefg cbfg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      svefg = first, cbfg = post

    3. Re:svefg cbfg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gung vf fb onq!

      Naljnlf gur 1980f pnyyrq, naq gurl jnag gurve EBG13 onpx.

      Seriously, this post was below my viewing area yet I (sadly?) recognized ROT13(or some similar scheme) immediately, but first guess was true.

    4. Re:svefg cbfg by agm · · Score: 1

      Can't be, it was posted on April the 2nd (where I am, at least).

    5. Re:svefg cbfg by leenks · · Score: 1

      Regardless, this is fucking annoying now. Noon passed. Enough already.

    6. Re:svefg cbfg by edac2 · · Score: 1

      The pink pony site a few years ago was funnier.

    7. Re:svefg cbfg by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Yet, I didn't crack the code, and I"m still modded insightful. At least your modded informative.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  2. oh timothy... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only person in the world that is so bad that his NORMAL writing looks like Rot13...

  3. Not sure if april fools'... by filmorris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...or actual ad spamming. Naah, april fools'

    --
    "Hello, IT... Have you tried turning it off and on again? Yeah... No problem."
    1. Re:Not sure if april fools'... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you figure that out all by yourself or did somebody help you?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Not sure if april fools'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? Obvious troll is obvious.

    3. Re:Not sure if april fools'... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I think it's brilliant parody. Reminds me of a typical news website from the turn of the century. (This century, not the last one.) First, it was free. Then, it was free but "for your convenience" you had to create an account to participate. Later, it was paywalled "for your additional enjoyment". Extra points for saying "the paywall is so we don't have to put ads on the page" and then later, they put ads up anyway.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Not sure if april fools'... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean like ATMs were supposed to eliminate banking fees because they'd no longer have to pay the tellers...

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Not sure if april fools'... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  4. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lame. This is pretty lame even by Slashdot standards.

    1. Re:Wow by hawkinspeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was my first reaction on seeing this. I thought I'd have a look to see what April Fool jokes are on Slashdot, saw this and thought how pathetic it was.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    2. Re:Wow by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      LOL! I actually felll for this until you mentioned April Fool. I guess I'm low hanging fruit.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    3. Re:Wow by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Luckily you posted here to save everybody else from the cleverness of the joke.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Wow by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What? You were expecting ponies?

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    5. Re:Wow by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Lame. This is pretty lame even by Slashdot standards.

      Not as lame as posting here just to let everybody how you weren't fooled by it (like, duh!)

      (and not posting in ROT13 makes your post double-lame...)

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Wow by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      April Fools on Slashdot is always lame because it's overdone and *every* story is part of it. There's real news today and it's just going to be ignored (Bitcoin just made $100 for example). It's a shame because if Slashdot raised its aim just a little, it could be back to its old glory. Instead, it is happy to ride the inertia into the ground.

    7. Re:Wow by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      The comments on this 'article' are far funnier than the "explanation of our April Fool's joke" summary. Ohgawd.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    8. Re:Wow by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      What? You were expecting ponies?

      Nobody expected the ponies.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:Wow by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      (and not posting in ROT13 makes your post double-lame...)

      ...fnlf gur cbfgre nyfb abg cbfgvat va EBG13.

    10. Re:Wow by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      No one expected the bronies either, until it was too late.

    11. Re:Wow by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      At least a bowl of steaming hot grits.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    12. Re:Wow by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Isn't that on a par with saving them from the ravenous jaws of an attacking hedgehog?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    13. Re:Wow by isorox · · Score: 1

      Lame. This is pretty lame even by Slashdot standards.

      OMG Poinies!

    14. Re:Wow by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      OMG rot13, lame and even smaller than a nomad.

      I guess rot13 is the new troll standard for /. users (even for mods), I don't really think this is funny. Going back to read A.S.R

    15. Re:Wow by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      It's April 2nd here. Does that mean I get to punch the editors in the balls?

    16. Re:Wow by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Just adding my voice to the "this is shit" side of the argument. Okay, so by next week it'll be fine on the website because I'm logged in, but if my RSS reader still shows ROT13ed content then I'm probably not going to bother coming back. Seriously, what muppet came up with this idea and thought it was a good one?

    17. Re:Wow by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Just adding my voice to the "this is shit" side of the argument. Okay, so by next week it'll be fine on the website because I'm logged in, but if my RSS reader still shows ROT13ed content then I'm probably not going to bother coming back. Seriously, what muppet came up with this idea and thought it was a good one?

      You're posting as though you think the idea is (a) serious and (b) permanent.

      It's a crappy April Fool's joke.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Wow by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Anyone who posts in ROT13 to show how clever they are is in fact showing how stupid they are.

      It's as if slashdot had jokingly set a "maths contest" to find the solution to 2 + 1 and every fucker was posting 3 as though it made them Einstein.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Wow by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      ..yeah I realised soon after I posted, but the reason was that I was reading an article on the 2nd of April that was itself posted on the 2nd of April that still had a ROTed summary. And it wasn't funny in the first place!

      If this was Xmas I'd be saying "bah! humbug!" ;)

    20. Re:Wow by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      You do know that hawkinspeter was the one who mentioned April Fool, right?

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
  5. Just going to come right out and say it... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...someone at slashdot has lost their mind.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      um.

      April 1st.

      ok, IHBT. I think.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Your hypothesis erroneously presumes that minds were initially present.

    3. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      What about people who come here to say people come here to say "April 1st". Is that double redundant that? Wait, now I'm triple redundant. Forget it if you reply to me.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by CdBee · · Score: 1

      or even.. April 1st Post ! *i'll get my coat*

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    5. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by baegucb · · Score: 1

      lbh zhfg oe arj urer

    6. Re:Just going to come right out and say it... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      ...someone at slashdot has lost their mind.

      -1 redundant

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  6. date by intertrode · · Score: 1

    Wait, what day is it?

    1. Re:date by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait, what day is it?

      April troll's day. I miss the long dead tradition of April fools day.

    2. Re:date by houghi · · Score: 2

      Instead of having many stoopid ones, what they should do is have one extremely clever one. That would be funny. But then that would require effort and preparation. Not copy and paste.

      Also I see more and more companies doing the Aprils Fools day so they can show how 'real' they are and not at all a serious company. However they are still aware that they do it and are so afraid of their image that they make it extremely obvious and it becomes just another marketing trick.

      So please stop doing that.

      What I did as a kid was NOT fool anybody. At the end of the day everybody was almost killing them selves, because they were waiting for it. Then when asking if they thought I was going to fool them (or already did) and they said yes, I said : Fooled ya!

      Many adults did not understand what I was talking about and why I thought that was extremely funny.

      I admit, I have no friends.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:date by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The tradition has always been for people to come and complain about how lame the jokes are. Everyone knows that actually laughing at a joke is not cool or hip.

    4. Re:date by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      The tradition has always been for people to come and complain about how lame the jokes are. Everyone knows that actually laughing at a joke is not cool or hip.

      I laugh at jokes. This isn't a joke though, it's just more dumb internet trolling.

      The ponies thing was a bit funny, Microsoft moving to Sealands was a little bit funny in a blatantly untrue and obvious troll way. But rot-13? That's just lame.

  7. $10,000 Challenge by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 1

    To anyone brave enough to decode the stories themselves. Would that count as RTFA?

    1. Re:$10,000 Challenge by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, but it would be a violation of the DMCA.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:$10,000 Challenge by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for some mod points... and a horse.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  8. I Got a Better Idea by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about letting logged in users filter out all april fools jokes?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:I Got a Better Idea by 1s44c · · Score: 3

      How about letting logged in users filter out all april fools jokes?

      'Jokes' implies funny. This is just lame trolling.

    2. Re:I Got a Better Idea by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      That would give a blank page. Cause Slashdot is that unfunny guy who thinks he's funny and does a joke to death.

    3. Re:I Got a Better Idea by fermion · · Score: 1

      I really like most on the april fool stuff on /. The OMG Ponies was awesome. But this is just stupid and annoying. I mean if the text rendered when you click through that would be on thing, but to click click click that is just, well, silly.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:I Got a Better Idea by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      oh, yeah, shoot - forgot it is 01/04 - aka the day to stay away from /.

    5. Re:I Got a Better Idea by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      They seriously need to an an "OK, haha, nice joke, I get it. Now let me use Slashdot like normal now please" button. As it stands now I just won't be using the site at all today.

    6. Re:I Got a Better Idea by valadaar · · Score: 2

      I agree. 1 article treated this way would be fine. All of them? No. I've never really liked April Fool's editions of any publication where more then small % was April fools content. Ah well, maybe get a little more work done today.

    7. Re:I Got a Better Idea by antdude · · Score: 1

      Then, therw would be nothing to see on /. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  9. More BS by 1s44c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More April 1 bullshit. Can't they at least come up with one thing that is actually funny?

    Or just rename it April 1 troll day and be done with it.

    1. Re:More BS by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Their best one was OMG PONIES, but they can't do that one ironically anymore because people actually like ponies now.

    2. Re:More BS by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No. There are no April Fools jokes that are "actually funny".

    3. Re:More BS by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Their best one was OMG PONIES, but they can't do that one ironically anymore because people actually like ponies now.

      Not in Tehran they don't.

      http://bronies.meetup.com/members/ir/tehran/

      Granted they probably have to meet in secret if they don't want to end up with their heads on pikes in the name of most merciful Allah.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    4. Re:More BS by Bender_ · · Score: 2

      Oh man, I always hated April fools day on slashdot, because all frontpage articles would be "jokes". It became even worse when slashdot started lagging all the other aggregators in speed. So, today they found a way to even top that with this stupid rot13 shit.

      Is today the day slashdot jumped the shark? Probably not, because i see that this article only got around 160 comments. That used to be different five or ten years ago.

      Slashdot is dead. The founders knew when to leave, but it is a pity the current owners let it rot as the zombie it is.

  10. Huzzah by Waveguide04 · · Score: 1

    I admit to being the anonymous lurker myself sometimes, but this reinforces me to actually login when I hit /. daily and post instead of just read.

  11. Even better! by anonieuweling · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's use DOUBLE Rot-13 encryption to make it even more secure!

  12. this was funny 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now the April Fool's jokes on /. are just tired and worn out. There are days why I wonder why I still come here. I guess old habits die hard. Can we not do this shit next year guys?

    1. Re: this was funny 10 years ago by halivar · · Score: 1

      There are two inviolable traditions on Slashdot: April Fools' articles, and incessant whining about them.

    2. Re: this was funny 10 years ago by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      ...and incessant whining about them.

      Represented in a Venn diagram, everything and whining would be two entirely overlapping circles. This is the way of our people.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:this was funny 10 years ago by epdp14 · · Score: 1

      it's really not a good idea to make reading slashdot obnoxious to readers... it has already been going downhill, and fast, recently. They really shouldn't make it a pain in the ass to read. It isn't funny, it's obnoxious. Now you get to ROT13 unencrypt the latest slashvertisements and 10 day old news!

    4. Re:this was funny 10 years ago by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Written in the margins of one of Galileo's manucripts was the comment "Nostradamus, subsisto eam cum omni his april stulti iocos", proving that this is not a new phenomena.

  13. Oehpr Fpuarvre snpg by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Vs lbh nfxrq Oehpr Fpuarvre gb qrpelcg guvf, ur'q pehfu lbhe fxhyy jvgu uvf ynhtu.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Oehpr Fpuarvre snpg by etnoy · · Score: 2

      Vs lbh nfxrq Oehpr Fpuarvre gb qrpelcg guvf, ur'q pehfu lbhe fxhyy jvgu uvf ynhtu.

      I, for one, use ROT26 to protect my comments. Everybody knows that it offers the level of security that slashdot really needs.

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    2. Re:Oehpr Fpuarvre snpg by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Nyfb, V pna xvyy lbh jvgu zl oenva.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Conversion using APL by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

    Seems like a perfect candidate for a simple one-line APL ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language) ) function. This should be something like {/~{\}, but my keyboard doesn't have the required keys to enter any of the characters needed. Can anyone help?

    --
    No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    1. Re:Conversion using APL by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seems like a perfect candidate for a simple one-line APL ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language) ) function. This should be something like {/~{\}, but my keyboard doesn't have the required keys to enter any of the characters needed. Can anyone help?

      Ok, I've managed to work out a truly marvelous 7-character conversion in APL, but the margin is too small to contain it.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    2. Re:Conversion using APL by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, /. doesn't support Unicode.

      Bravo, you just ruined next year's April fools joke.

      "A new benefit for readers: Unicode support in comments. MÃtley Crüe impressed!"

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  15. This is great! by thomasdz · · Score: 1

    I appreciate this extra security since the Cisco "type 7" encryption was broken earlier this year.

    And as a long-time Usenet reader, I can basically de-crypt ROT13 in my sleep.

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:This is great! by WoOS · · Score: 1

      Yes and I think this will put slashdot back at the forefront of securely readable (well, after some conversion) news sites.
      Although soon we will see an arms race between bookmarklets for decoding and increasingly complex encoding schemes. XOR $ff, anyone?

  16. Re:This is one of those deals by 1s44c · · Score: 2

    Where it would be quicker to write a perl script to do ROT13 translation, than to read the editors' description of what the site did with it.

    Assuming it's not an April 1 joke, and it might be (an unusually ponderous one at that).

    I can't resist an excuse to do this in tr.

    tr 'a-z' 'n-za-m' HERE
    Put your message here
    HERE

    Trivial I know. I'll bet half to slashdot could not resist immediately coding ROT-13 in their favorite language.

  17. Re:This is one of those deals by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    tr 'a-z' 'n-za-m' HERE

    And slashdot mashes up the double less thans.

  18. What I'd really like to see... by blahplusplus · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is 'super members' of the community that have proven their knowledge, there is too much bullshit getting modded insightful when it is outright incorrect. I'd like to see slashdot select logged in moderators get the ability to mark false insightful posts as 'false/incorrect' and turn that posters post a different color.

    The amount of disinformation from either youth, the uninformed, trolls, or paid hacks to disrupt intelligent discussion on the internet is something I've grown increasingly weary of. It seems increasingly difficult to have intelligent discussions online. There are people who DO KNOW and understand the world at a higher level then most posters on slashdot and these people could help guide discussions when these forces of stupid / distortion appear.

    http://consciouslifenews.com/paid-internet-shill-shadowy-groups-manipulate-internet-opinion-debate/1147073/

    1. Re:What I'd really like to see... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It's called "meta-moderating", and we already have it. I presume from your rant that you make use of this frequently?

    2. Re:What I'd really like to see... by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

      Aw man. That was hilarious. I wish I had mod points for funny. Thanks, got such a chuckle out of it.

    3. Re:What I'd really like to see... by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      How about people with super high karma can give an "expert point" every other day to posts with essential insights about certain topics. People can then weight posts from people based on the number of points they have received. Maybe choose experts in their field at the beginning to meta-moderate the assigned points.

    4. Re:What I'd really like to see... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Meta-moderating isn't enough since it is unreliable, especially dealing with youth cohorts (i.e. teens have more free time then adults). You see this especially on politically based posts. Meta-moderating relies on whoever has the energy/time to meta-moderate. There is no guarantee informed people exist in sufficient enough numbers to counter the uninformed because of simple laws of the universe - i.e. the more complex and nuanced you need to be to judge something, the rarer you are in a given population.

    5. Re:What I'd really like to see... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      No. It's not. If you read what he wrote and thought about it at all you would realize that.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:What I'd really like to see... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      That's my snarky point. Whatever method you use to meta-moderate (either the current method, or the fantasy from the GP) you need people to put the time into it. Mature adults could moderate now, but they probably don't. Mature adults could volunteer to "mark posts as disinformation", but they probably wouldn't.

      If he or you care to do it, you have a method to do so now. I'm guessing you don't. Do you think you'd spend much time doing it in the future if they tweaked the mechanism? I'm guessing not.

    7. Re:What I'd really like to see... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Yeah- meta-moderation is better. He's suggesting unilaterally letting random members to mark posts as "incorrect". How do you think that will pan out on any topic even remotely controversial? Political discussions (including open-source project politics), or any complex subject with a lot of misunderstandings or debate?

      Our system has random members imbued with the ability to mark something as a good or a bad post (moderation). It then imbues other people to say if that moderation was correct, and undo false ones (such as "informative" ratings for factually incorrect statements). Far more nuanced, and it would take users exactly the same amount of time to do as the other one.

    8. Re:What I'd really like to see... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "That's my snarky point."

      It wasn't a point at all. I wouldn't have made the comment if I hadn't felt the urge but do the thing in question a million times but to the lack of feature to flag 'insightful' posts as false. The point is NOT to metamod, it's to have expert members flag false "insight". You have meta moderation + expert members flagging badly modded posts to warn other members of its low quality.

      Say you have +5 insightful bullshit post, but you being 1 mod do not want to get into a war with the ignorant masses, so you being an expert member are capable of flagging the post as 'incorrect/false/likelybullshit', this is the whole point of color coding the post.

    9. Re:What I'd really like to see... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Yeah- meta-moderation is better. He's suggesting unilaterally letting random members to mark posts as "incorrect"."

      He suggests no such thing, but on the plus side this is a great opportunity for you to go back and improve your reading comprehension. Pay special attention to the very first sentence in his post.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  19. My favorite day of the year by halivar · · Score: 1

    I love reading the impotent rage in the comments. Keep whining; the April 1st articles will just keep rolling in.

    1. Re:My favorite day of the year by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And the advertising revenue will just keep rolling out...

  20. Ooookay.... by vomviersen · · Score: 1

    Well, it's no "OMG!!! Ponies!!!" but I guess it's the thought that counts. Happy April Fool's Day to you, too!

  21. If I was a CS grad.. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

    If I was a CS grad.. I'd make an app that blocks Slashdot for me each April 1st....

    Yes I'm getting old.

    --
    ---
  22. Amazing by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen anything in this thread yet about NCX or ubfgf svyrf.

  23. Re:Better idea by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    if you run firefox then you can use leetkey to do all sorts of fun things with/to your text

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  24. Second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The joke is on Slashdot, I for one have been using ROT26 for several years already.

    1. Re:Second post by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      I prefer ROT104, myself. It disorients the text more than ROT26, making it easier to handle.

    2. Re:Second post by rot26 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You owe me a lot of money.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    3. Re:Second post by Quirkz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Totally insecure. That's why I just run a quadruple pass ROT-13. That's three times more secure than regular ROT-13.

    4. Re:Second post by djlemma · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points to spend....

    5. Re:Second post by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Y'all are wusses. ROT-1053 or nothing.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  25. btwrst by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    H cmd n btwrst pr l mñn tmrpn crc d m cs.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    1. Re:btwrst by isorox · · Score: 1

      H cmd n btwrst pr l mñn tmrpn crc d m cs.

      All, a few typos and abbreviations, but I assume you mean
      "High commander bratwurst meant to temporarily run a crc checksum of the dmca"?

  26. Bring it on!!!! by shaitand · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bring on the ponies! I can take it.

    1. Re:Bring it on!!!! by isorox · · Score: 1

      Bring on the ponies! I can take it.

      The one day a year I get lynx out.

  27. He's in trouble now... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    Don't panic. You don't have to do anything at all

    The Adams family's lawyers are sending the takedown notice now... also, reading a slashdot story is now a felony, since the content is cryptographically protected by slashdot's patented Rot-13 DRM technology.

    Gotta love them lawyers!

    1. Re:He's in trouble now... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      The Adams family's lawyers are sending the takedown notice now... also, reading a slashdot story is now a felony, since the content is cryptographically protected by slashdot's patented Rot-13 DRM technology.

      What do Gomez and Morticia have to do with it?

      In the menatime...

      or fher gb qevax lbhe binygvar!

    2. Re:He's in trouble now... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Gomez and Morticia spelled their's with two Ds. (Addams). Maybe he refers to those of the John Q. line?

    3. Re:He's in trouble now... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What do Gomez and Morticia have to do with it?

      Nothing. It's this guy.

      Um, should I add a woosh to that, sir?

    4. Re:He's in trouble now... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes. When you say "Adams family" to describe people related to the late author, it sounds like Addams Family, the creation of another dead author.

      So no need to add a woosh. If you look up, it's right there.

  28. As said last time... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1
    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  29. Jul fhpu n cbbe pubvpr bs rapelcgvba? by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Jul jnf fhpu n cbbe rapelcgvba nytbevguz pubfra? Rirelbar xabjf gevcyr-ebg13 vf orggre.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cryptography experts have proven long ago that ROT-13 is weak against simple brute-force attack. But it turns out that there is also a little-known security hole in ROT-26, which allows a sophisticated eavesdropper to read the message WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING THE PASSWORD.

    Cryptography experts suggest, for robust security, the use of at least ROT-39 encoding should be encouraged. This takes a minimum number of log_2[2^39] tries to decode by brute force.

    Some experts have suggested that ROT-39 shares the same security hole as ROT-13, but I don't believe I've seen that result confirmed in peer-reviewed literature.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by NorbMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, I had never heard about the security hole in ROT-26.

      Personally, I think I'll skip ROT-39 and go straight to the state-of-the-art ROT-52, if for no other reason because the attackers are still trying to break ROT-39!

    2. Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by hoboroadie · · Score: 2

      Wow, I had never heard about the security hole in ROT-26.

      It's not a bug, it's a feature!

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    3. Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      ROT-N is in general subject to a brute force attack. It's a relatively difficult O(N) transformation but computers able to do these calculations quickly have become more affordable over time. Today most adversaries have easy access to the necessary TRS-80 home computers.

      The solution as I see it is to rely on the tried and true security-through-obscurity approach. As an example, I make sure all of my posts are always full of gibberish and incomprehensible ideas. This way when the message is decoded the adversary is left pondering if the decryption actually worked and will often continue searching for in hopes of a more intelligible plaintext result. In the era of increased corporate espionage I have also taken to writing all my projects with a mix of MUMPS and APL in hopes of discouraging would be code copiers.

    4. Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by Harodotus · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that your information is out of date, with the progression of Moore's Law, even ROT-39 now fails to today's botnet based distributed key cracking apps, i recommend using 128-bit ROT keys (or even-256 bit ROT keys for super secure data) despite the performance impact requirements.

      Using just ROT-128bit (aka ROT-3.40282367e38 or ROT-340,282,367,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) should keep your data secure for years.

      --
      Its not users who are broken, it's systems not taking account their likely behaviour and fixing it technically.
    5. Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      To make rot13 stronger, just encrypt it twice.

  31. Re:FUCK by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I hate Anonymous Coward on Slashdot...

    What used to be some witty humor and unusual perspectives has become noise and spamming and just posting too fast everywhere.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  32. oh thank fuck for that! by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    I thought I'd forgotten how to read!

    Bastards.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  33. I wnat my theme back! by santax · · Score: 1

    Can we please have a my little pwny theme in rot13? I really really liked that theme!

  34. 79, 194, 38, 1701, 89, 76, 11, 83, 1629, 48, 94, 6 by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Guvf pbagrag erdhverf n fynfuqbg cyngvahz nppbhag gb ivrj.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  35. Way to piss off your customers by raymansean · · Score: 1

    I usually have a pretty decent sense of humor. However this ROT13 joke, is not funny and shows no creativity. For a website that USED to be about news nerds/ stuff that matters, this is a new low. You are forcing your target audience to do more work, which may temporarily drive up ad clicks, but in the long run you will loose your base and the site will continue to decline.

    --
    insert inflammatory comment here!
  36. Re:ROT47 by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Triple-rot13 FTW!

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  37. funny, cute, or just makes you think. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I don't care. I look forward to it each April 1st. I certainly don't begrudge them not being funny to all people. April 1st is like National Nerd Day.

    Its fun to be a geek, humor is what you make of it, my suggestion, take a step back and enjoy the day.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  38. comedy by committee = non-comedy by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Used to be funnier and well thought out and silly, but now it's just comedy by committee, with all kinds of notes from the network executives.
    .
    Where's the pink pages? Where's the OMG ponies? Where's the cuteness of fvcking with the CSS and some actual intelligence behind an April Fool's day joke?
    :>(
    . It's kind of like letting the pointy-haired bosses write a comedy script by committee, zat's what you get with the new /., eh?

  39. This is a good day by BlindRobin · · Score: 2

    to avoid Slashdot.

  40. (rot13-region (region-beginning) (region-end)) by Lew+Perin · · Score: 2

    Emacs. Can your editor do that?

    (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

    --
    Sorry, I forgot there are ads on the Web; I use Lynx.
    1. Re:(rot13-region (region-beginning) (region-end)) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vim can do it: select your region, and then do g? (for instance, ggg?G to rot13 the whole file)

      Much faster than Emacs. Vim wins.

    2. Re:(rot13-region (region-beginning) (region-end)) by Lew+Perin · · Score: 1

      If you used emacs and if rot13-region were important to you, you'd just bind it to some key sequence you found convenient. How long can we keep this emacs-vi battle going? I'm kinda out of practice but it brings back happy memories...

      --
      Sorry, I forgot there are ads on the Web; I use Lynx.
  41. FREE DOWNLOAD Slashdot Decoder by linebackn · · Score: 1

    Slashdot really doesn't know how to monetize their assets. If they had any common sense the "decoder" would require a "free download" and bundle spyware/adware/malware/shitware.

    -insert SEO blogspam here-

  42. See you tomorrow, folks! by PHPee · · Score: 1

    Closing my browser, because I don't want to deal with the lame April Fool's jokes. I finally started reading /. again after being away for a year, and the quality really has gone downhill... I'll probably be back tomorrow, but we'll see how long it lasts.

  43. This sucks by remarkosmoc · · Score: 2

    Yeah this sucks. I'm probably done with slashdot. I think it is enough to require login to contribute or post is crap. I have slashdot in one of my tabs and take a quick scan at the articles,. I created an account, but I still can't just glance at them. Slashdot advertisers,maybe you should tell them that this idea is shit-tastic.

  44. I hope ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .... the Slashdot editors are aware of the fact that Apple holds the patent on rot13. You folks are going to get your asses sued off.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  45. Bookmarklet decrypter by Zinho · · Score: 1

    I use bookmarklets to handle rot-13 encoding when I find it. Highlight, click bookmark, read as plain text. Simple.

    Enjoy!

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  46. RSS broken by varju · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great, so now my RSS feed is going to be broken for the rest of the day? I like April Fools' as much as the next guy, but not when it effectively breaks the whole site for the day.

    1. Re:RSS broken by sshhhhhh · · Score: 5, Informative

      My biggest gripe as well. All the feeds on my phone through my RSS reader are worthless. I purposely have them update (within the allotted interval) so that I don't have to constantly use the web.

    2. Re:RSS broken by BradClarke · · Score: 2

      Exactly. This is why I don't really pay attention to slashdot anymore.

  47. ponies! by prettything · · Score: 1

    ponies would not use rot13, bring back the ponies!!!! because ponies!!!

    --
    bring bak the ponies!!
  48. bye slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    rot-13's a turn off

  49. Why isn't the logo changed? by shrikel · · Score: 2

    The Slashdot logo should be changed to Fynfuqbg.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  50. Bookmarklet to decode slashdot by dergachev · · Score: 1

    Hey all, since I didn't have an account on slashdot, I created a bookmarklet to decode the rot13 via jQuery. http://bl.ocks.org/dergachev/5285534 Only belatedly did I realize that in order to share it on Slashdot, I'd have to create an account anyhow. Fail!

  51. Simpler solution by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    You can preserve the existing encryption engine by simply using more rounds. The 2-round version has been broken, so cryptographers recommend using the full 16 rounds, as is done in other encryption systems.

  52. ROT13? Just use Google Translate ROT13 to English by LouisKing · · Score: 1

    April Fool right back at you. I just submit Slashdot URL to Google Translate ROT13 to English to get the whole site decrypted.

  53. Re:This is one of those deals by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Where it would be quicker to write a perl script to do ROT13 translation, than to read the editors' description of what the site did with it.

    Assuming it's not an April 1 joke, and it might be (an unusually ponderous one at that).

    You have a problem: Rot13 translation. You write a perl script. Now you have two problems.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  54. Someone spilled soup on the server... by libtek · · Score: 1

    What happened? Me /. is written in Alphabet Soup...

    --
    Unequivocally the realest of the realz...
  55. Ugh by JasoninKS · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope this is just an April Fool's gag. As it is, I won't bother reading anything on Slashdot today due to the hassle. Way to drive away readers!

  56. Bring back Gnome2 by maas15 · · Score: 1

    Dear Slashdot, Please bring back gnome2. Gnome3 isn't as good. Yrs, David Maas

  57. April Fool's Joke by keyblade5 · · Score: 1

    I call it!

  58. Congratulations! by WillgasM · · Score: 1

    You've succeeded in causing me to avoid slashdot for an entire day. I'm all for april fools' jokes, but I'll be damn if I'll click an extra link to read a story.

    1. Re:Congratulations! by Winchestershire · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm all for having a bit of fun and jokes on April Fools Day, but this doesn't come off as funny, just really irritating. :\

  59. Hohagh cnpxntr "ofqtnzrf" by lamber45 · · Score: 1

    ... rnfvre guna qvttvat hc gur pbqr V cebonoyl qvq jevgr ng bar gvzr ...

  60. Funny but annoying by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Now I have to open every article to read it.

    At least I knew they would be worth reading.

    Next year go for funny + !annoying.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  61. RSS? by fwd079 · · Score: 1

    I'm logged in but this steps f'';'d up RSS feed. Do something about it :/

  62. Logged in - Can't Read Site by asimons04 · · Score: 2

    I'm logged in and am still only viewing ROT-13. I don't know if this is just an April Fool's Day joke, but if the whole of the internet decided to go this route, I would stop using it altogether. Period. Might even lose a few lbs :-P If this is the route /.is going to take, then they have just lost a VERY loyal reader.

    1. Re:Logged in - Can't Read Site by asimons04 · · Score: 1

      Hate replying to my own post, but after reading further comments, this appears to be an April Fool's Day prank. [sarcasm]Great job, guys[/sarcasm]. Next time, try to make a funny AFD joke. This was simply annoying, disconcerting, and almost made me rage-quit Slashdot. I'm all for a good April fool's joke, but this was awful. Do better next year, guys!

  63. OK, That's Enough Rotten Stuff by markstrelecki · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it was funny and original for the first story or two. Now it's damned frustrating. Away with Rot13 or whatever you're calling this crud. Happy April Fools Day from Atlanta.

    --
    Computing and Programming Since 1975 The Best Kept Secret in Technical Support Master of the Bare Metal Clean Install
  64. this might actually be useful for a day if it by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

    This might actually be useful for a day if it encouraged people to
    create accounts but why am I still seeing rot13 after I log in?
    I don't mind logging in but I don't like to have to click on every
    article to read the summary even after I do log in.

  65. Your joke is broken.. by SubGhandi · · Score: 2

    Whatever fucking idiot that thought this was funny can't even execute it properly. I'm logged in and still getting the April Fools shit. This is hands down, THE STUPIDEST thing the /. staff have EVER done. Congratulations, you 0wned your own site.

    Asshats.

    1. Re:Your joke is broken.. by vinn · · Score: 2

      Yup. Same here. I think there's a bunch of retards running this site now.

      --
      ----- obSig
  66. It's not a bug... it's a feature? by Drewdad · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I don't see how this adds value to your site. It might increase the number of clicks-per-visit, much the way slideshows do for some websites, but don't tell me this feature is to make my experience better.

  67. why do I need a subject when Im trying to post a j by SpaceGhost · · Score: 1

    JGS!

  68. tr '[a-z][A-Z]' '[n-za-n][N-ZA-N]' by Spilver · · Score: 1

    Nuff said. End of story.

  69. This is obviously an April Fools joke! by DataTracer · · Score: 1

    If it's not an April Fools joke, it's one of the dumbest ideas I've ever seen on Slashdot!

  70. Tried to read Slashdot today... by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

    English motherf*cker, do you speak it?! The speak English in what?!?!

  71. DMCA Violation by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

    And if you undo the rot-13 on your own, you've committed a DMCA violation and Slashdot can sue you. No, I'm not kidding about that. Legally, they could. There are no requirements in the DMCA that a technological measure which control access to a copyrighted work need to be non-trivial to defeat. Even when it's just rot-13, bypassing it is a violation of the DMCA.

  72. Doesnt work by GavanLaird · · Score: 2

    So, I logged in... and its still all scrambled.... bad move slashdot.

  73. Re:This is one of those deals by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    And slashdot mashes up the double less thans.

    And in 2013, the average 5th grader knows about HTML escapes. What year are you posting from?

    I'm not sure, it has ROT-13 in it so I'm guessing late 80's.

  74. Time-disoriented discrimintation! by SinisterRainbow · · Score: 1

    Time-disoriented discrimintation!

    --
    -Ultimate Stickman Game Developer Infinite World Puzzler
  75. I knew I should have... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have taken the day off from reading Slashdot. Worst April Fools' Day prank ever, anywhere. Not funny, just very annoying. Good job whomever came up with it, and whomever allowed it. Congrats, you have erased any shred of a doubt that you are humorless nerds, and not intelligent geeks.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  76. now what? by coffeemonster · · Score: 1

    OK, I logged in for the first time in years.. and stories are still scrambled. It's no longer April 1 where I am. Fail.

    1. Re:now what? by ruadatha · · Score: 1

      This - it's 10.30 april 2nd, not april tools day, and even logged in im still getting this stupid unreadable bullshit, and im NOT getting whatever the hell button you're on about above. I'll check again in a month or so to see if you've gotten back on track with geek/IT news and not deliberately pissing off your readers.

  77. Not funny enough by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    See subject

  78. But what happens when you rot13 the ponies? by Qubit · · Score: 1

    (I feel like this is what a machine made by Dunderbeck's son might do...)

    I'm surprised that there's not a page or at least a reference on Wikipedia for Dunderbeck/Dunderbeck's machine

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:But what happens when you rot13 the ponies? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That's a little perverted...

  79. Thanks Slashdot by MoronGames · · Score: 1

    This made the website almost completely unusable in Lynx today. My employer thanks you.

    --
    hey!
  80. Re:I thought ROT13 was something else by smegfault · · Score: 1

    I'm still on the original release, I think I missed 12 new versions of Rise of the Triad....

  81. Netscape Navigator by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I am going to dig out a copy of Netscape, with built in ROT13!

  82. Nice trolling by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    Today's ROT13 gag generated lots of butthurt, especially from Anonymous Cowards. Even some of the copypasta ninjas steered clear of the stories for a whole day.

    Maybe it wasn't funny, but it was satisfying. Kudos. :)

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  83. It is sad when the joke needs to be explained by technologypot · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of people need the joke explaining to them. The only articles that were encrypted into nonsense were April fools. So for example, the google scent fool. Slashdot have done you a favour, making those pointless April 1st articles gobbledigook, so we can skim past them and pick up the real news without wondering whether it's a ruse. There wasn't much real news, it turns out!

  84. Was that a shark? by Monty+Worm · · Score: 1
    As April Fool plots go, this is one of the stupidest, asking your users to jump through hoops to read your content (and when you lose that, you lose advert revenue as well).

    To add insult to injury, you haven't unscrambled them again, and it's April 2 here (and well inside it, too)

    Does anyone want to buy a 4 digit Slashdot user ID? I don't want to be associated with this once great website any more.

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
  85. Do this again next year! by Cariset · · Score: 1

    This was great! With one odd exception, it told me exactly which stories were April Fools' jokes, and let me ignore them when I wanted, and laugh at them when I wanted. Please do this again every year! (But yes, you may want to triple the encryption strength...)