Slashdot Mirror


In Iceland, Tap Cellphones To Avoid Incest

Kozar_The_Malignant writes "Students at the University of Iceland have written an Android app that helps you avoid dating your cousins. The app accesses the Icelandic national genealogical database that contains information on all living citizens and their ancestors going back 1,100 years. Tapping two phones together will bring up an alert if you share a common grandparent." Just one of the consequences of having a population small enough (and well documented enough) to have a well-known genetic makeup.

296 comments

  1. Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you really need an app to tell you who's family?

    1. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In high school one of the hottest girls who half the guys (including myself) had a boner for turned out to be a very distant relative of mine...only found out years later from my dad's family tree research hobby. Makes me feel a little better about not tapping that :-\

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In Iceland AFAIK people are called "Bob son of George" or "Mary daughter of John", so there aren't any surnames to make it obvious. It makes me wonder how the database can uniquely identify you, though. (I wonder at what stage in the dating/relationship procedure the phone tapping takes place -- you don't want to leave it too late, nor be in a rush and tap too early...)

    3. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Iceland is one of the few places that still use the Ancient Germanic Naming (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_names). This is based upon your father's (or rarely mother's) first name.

      Thus, if siblings lose contact with another, it is very possible their decedents would not know their cousins by name.

    4. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not tapping that?

      Or not even registering in her consciousness as existing?

    5. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes me wonder how the database can uniquely identify you

      Normally databases give every person an ID.
      This is not a problem for "Bob son of George" or "Mary daughter of John" in any other way than having two or more John Smiths.

      so there aren't any surnames to make it obvious

      It is not very obvious who your cousin is from your mother's side of the family either if she changes her when she gets marries and doesn't bother telling you. It will also give you many false positives as many families share their surnames even though they do not share ancestors.

    6. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to be creepy or anything, but from a genetic standpoint, a distant relative would probably have been fine to date.

      But I know what you mean. A Playmate from the late sixties is a distant relative of mine, and I was always a little creeped out by that centerfold.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah we were reasonably friendly. I was taking the slow "get laid or friend-zoned trying" approach while other guys were going for the "assault with pickup lines and see what sticks" strategy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you really need an app to tell you who's family?

      Funny you mention that. Not to put too fine a point on it, but much of my family belong to a religion that promotes large families and careful genealogical records, and I found out one day entirely by accident that one of my co-workers, a thousand miles from my home town, was a first cousin. It can happen even in the US; I imagine it's a fairly common occurrence in a tiny country like Iceland.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was taking the slow "get laid or friend-zoned trying" approach

      There's only one result from that approach, still, it's better than the full assault. You've probably learned by now that something in between is better.

    10. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by WaywardGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it depends on the genetic diversity in the population. In some island cultures it became acceptable to for brothers to marry sisters. If everyone already pretty much has the same genes, that's fine, because serious receive genetic disorders have already been breeded out. In Iceland, it's likely less of a problem to marry a cousin than it would be in most of the USA.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    11. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you know you'll see her again at family reunions.

    12. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      also promiscuity of you parents could result in not know whose kid you are, or sperm doners, or maritel infidelity could mean the girl next door is your half sibling.
      just because you have someones name and were raised by them does not mean you are related to them and by extension there family making this database fallible.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    13. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by DrPeper · · Score: 0

      SERIOUSLY??? In a country that is SMALLER than PARKS that we have in the US. You seriously don't know who your own cousins are?? REALLY?? I know all 43 of my cousins, and they live in 7 different states (which is like countries for the Euro's).

    14. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      This word does not mean what you think it does...

      decedents : someone who has died

      Perhaps you meant "descendants"?

      Good point about Iceland's naming conventions though - hadn't really thought about it, but if we used Ancient German Naming, I'd only know a couple of cousins were related if my Dad had told me so....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Iceland AFAIK people are called "Bob son of George" or "Mary daughter of John"

      Almost right, it's "Bob son of George" and "Mary daughter of Jane"

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    16. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      But at the same time, incest increases the chances of the remaining recessive genetic defects showing up in children and causing problems.

    17. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Of my 20 or so first cousins, only a little less than half have the same last name as I do, and that's largely because they're mostly males descended from my paternal grandfather. The rest of them have last names with origins from all over the globe. On my maternal side, I have nobody with the same last name as I do. Identifying relatives by name is a pretty poor way to do it.

    18. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      An average Icelander has something like a dozen sexual partners in life, seventy percent are happy with one-night stands. And children out of wedlock are no big deal there. Extrapolate from that.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    19. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by SilentStaid · · Score: 5, Funny

      (I wonder at what stage in the dating/relationship procedure the phone tapping takes place -- you don't want to leave it too late, nor be in a rush and tap too early...)

      Here in the US I usually tap it after 3 good dinner dates.

    20. Re: Don't you know who your cousins are? by Gilmoure · · Score: 2

      Yup, here in New Mexico, just about any of the old family names are relatives, to one degree or another. Is one of th reasons my Mom and several of her sisters went out of state to find husbands. Our family photos now have us ranging from pale redheads through blond blue eys to dark brown with black hair. Kinda cool having a rainbow family. Doesn't make sense to look down on anyone due to how they look. Now, if they don't like chile...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    21. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An average Icelander has something like a dozen sexual partners in life

      No, an average icelandic have had 20 sexual partners. Btw, you don't count in a life-time because we rarely have that much data, you just count to the present day.

    22. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You waste two dinners too often.

    23. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In iceland, kids will use the callname of their father as their last name. Aka, if Bob and Jane have 2 Kids George and Annie, those kids would be named George Bobsson and Annie Bobsdottir. Only if Jane, their mom, doesn't want the public to know for whatever reason, they have the option to take the female name and the kids would be named George Janesson and Annie Janesdottir.

    24. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got my tickets, will arrive in Iceland by the end of the week! Hopefully attractive Icelandic women find overweight balding middle age geeks exotic!

    25. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was taking the slow "get laid or friend-zoned trying" approach

      There's only one result from that approach, still, it's better than the full assault. You've probably learned by now that something in between is better.

      If you're suggesting there's no escape from the friend zone, there is. The secret is cold-turkey no-contact for a while (I haven't dialed in the exact timespan, but I've confirmed 1 year separation can do it), and improving your life in some way during that time (status based like better job, higher income, new car, but anything with growth helps like learning a new language, travelling, volunteering). Eventually reunite and all you gotta do is not be stupid and good times may not only be had, but you can actually build a relationship which is the whole point of pining for a friend (otherwise there are other ways to get a quickie or cheapie that won't pay off long run).

      It works because the brain changes for attraction and chemistry are in different locations and fade at different rates. A friendzone situation has attraction in there, at least weakly (you don't have to be beautiful, but you definitely can't be a slob), but the problem isn't that the chemistry is missing but that it's negative. Improving your life without them adds to your confidence, shows that you don't need them (and thus wanting to share your life with them is a valuable gift and not you feeding off them), and sets up a vector that demonstrates that they should have gotten in on the ground floor but here's the next chance.

      It's a lot of work but if you are friendzoned and you know them well enough you will be able to decide if the juice is worth the squeeze.

    26. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by TWX · · Score: 1

      My paternal grandparents had close to 20 children over 25 years, of which my father was the last, and many of his older siblings also had huge families. There are three rural counties in the midwest that I had basically considered nonviable from a dating perspective.

      Fortunately my parents moved several states away before I was born so it was not an issue.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    27. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also increases the chances of the pluses reinforcing each other.

      Assuming there are any advantages of course ;).

    28. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Extrapolate from that

      Bjork is a sleazy slut????

      Did I do that right?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    29. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully attractive Icelandic women find overweight balding middle age geeks exotic!

      They definitely do.

      Got my tickets, will arrive in Iceland by the end of the week!

      Airline tickets? Waste of money. Much cheaper to hop on the back of a flying pig.

    30. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Why not tap it? It's not like you were looking for a wife.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    31. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Funny

      it's "Bob son of George" and "Mary daughter of Jane"

      You mean "Worf son of Mogh" is an Icelander?

    32. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're suggesting there's no escape from the friend zone, there is

      Escaping from the "friend zone" requires maturing enough to realize that women aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until sex comes out.

    33. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this is now a spiderman thread

    34. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by hobarrera · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Honestly, why?
      If you reproduce with a close relative, there's a higher chance of some genetic flaws showing up. But just having [protected] sex with a distant cousin won't result in anything nasty. Heck, not even your sister would be an issue (unless you get here pregnant).
      This used to be shuned upon because sex = kids. This isn't true anymore nowadays, since we have pills, condoms, etc. It's just inhereted taboo.

    35. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's kinda icky, closer relatives are VERY icky...you'd do your sister with a condom? 8-|

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    36. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Using standard family names only children of brothers of your father would have the same last name as you. So for most people the vast majority of their cousins would not have the same name. (In my case none at all, my father only has sisters.)

      All of my family for the past 3 generations are from towns in Western Pennsylvania, which has a population of nearly 4 million. Today in the United States people are far more mobile, I have family members from my generation living in a dozen states, all of us grew up in the same town. Even living in the one large city in the same region, the chances of me even meeting someone from my hometown are remote, let alone someone actually related to me.

      Now, compare this to an island nation with just over 300,000 residents and low immigration. The chances of you randomly meeting someone just 2 generations removed from you are very high.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    37. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 2

      Oh, and all this time, I thought they just picked letters out of a Scrabble bag.

    38. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lies.

      You definitely can put tokens in girls and get sex out. Although they usually prefer direct deposit.

    39. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, I tap it after maybe two good shots of vodka.

    40. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she was hot.

      (Seriously - my CAPTCHA here was "Chastity". WTF /.?

    41. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, that's Poland.

    42. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And at least two of mine are hot enough to "tap". Which makes me think of maple syrup. WTF?

    43. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would and HAVE! As a 14 year old horny bot, I'd have done the pooch had it been female.

    44. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolute sheer brilliance. I've found *precisely* the same exact thing but never really analyzed it the way you have, but reading what you wrote.... Yes! Absolutely! I wish there was some way to contact you. You obviously have thought deeply about interpersonal relationships. I'd be curious to know what your thoughts were on getting a quickie or cheapie.

    45. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the friend-zone phenomena is typically a result of, or combination thereof; immature women (esp. teenagers), women who knowingly take advantage and men who have a self-image problem.
      On the other hand there are men who do actually believe you can put niceness tokens in until sex comes out and women can typically spot that from a mile away.
      And then from personal experience there are cases where a man genuinely loves a woman to the point he would lay down his life for hers but she continually pushes him aside; it's not a nice place to be in, it's emotionally frustrating and generally not worth putting up with so the parent comment's suggestion of separation is not a bad idea because it'll give you time to breathe, mature and maybe she'll realize what she lost.. or not but you'll be better off as a free man from such emotional tyranny.


      Last but not least is a tidbit from the Bible; "The heart is more treacherous than anything else and is desperate. Who can know it?" (Jeremiah 17:9).
      Listening to ones heart often leads to irrational decisions and therefore many regrets so the Bible again councils; "thinking ability itself will keep guard over you, discernment itself will safeguard you," (Proverbs 2:11). How wise it is to think before you feel!

    46. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      Advantages/disadvantages to genetic traits tend to be quite asymmetric. There aren't "super good" genes in the "plus" category that are both rare and confer a big positive genetic advantage when they come together --- since evolutionary pressures assure that any "big plus" traits get spread around to the whole population (it's unlikely that your close family group exclusively has some "superman genes" unavailable from mates from the wider population). However, there are lots of rare "super bad" gene combinations, that cause really terrible results when they (rarely) come together.

    47. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever meet her, gods I hope so. She's hot.

    48. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      per your advice, you've suggested:
      1. stopping what you're doing wrong
      2. making yourself into a better person.

      Wow, who would have thought

    49. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Putting niceness tokens in women is just a way to make yourself suffer. You make an emotional investment each time and her interest in you declines the more you do it. Treating a girl like shit is the most likely way to get her attracted to you. Very sad but very true.

    50. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not, "Mary daughter of Jane" is an (growing) exception but "Mary daughter of John" would be the default.

    51. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to Tillingham.

    52. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kimball Kinnison, is that you?

    53. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      My wife has around 170 first cousins, plus god only knows how many second cousins and first cousins once removed. Sometimes families get big.

    54. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Naming isn't complex. It's the same as it was in English.

      Say we have a guy named John. His son will be named "Johnson", which is literally "son of John". All nordic languages used to do that, including English (which originates much more from Norse than people realize). However to help keep track of families a new naming law stated that children should be named the same as the father. As a result people are still named "son of" even when their fathers were called something else. This gives a snapshot of what men were called when the laws were introduced. It would appear that half of Sweden was named "Sven".
      The idea of having fixed last names rather than father names came into Scandinavia from Germany. However while it happens really early (14th century... I think), it didn't became law until the 19th century and the common man used the nordic naming until in some cases 50 years after the new naming law. News of laws travelled very slowly to rural areas if they didn't want to adopt them ;)

      The Icelandic surfixes are -son and -dottir (daughter).

      There is also a tradition to name the two first borns of each gender after the grandparents. This makes it possible to use the same two names for generations where they toggle between first and last names. In that case a man's children will have the same last name as his father, but not himself.

      Phonebooks are sorted based on name. This means in Iceland they are sorted based on first name because the last name isn't a name at all, it's a description.

      As the last name is a description, it is kept all life even though people marry. Giving the name to a wife is just as silly as "Larry the tall one" giving his "last name" to the dwarf he married.

      Being a description, it could historically be replaced with another description, like instead of "Bob Johnson", it could be "Bob on the hilltop farm". I admit I haven't seen this in Iceland, but it was used in Scandinavia before last names became fixed, even on official documents. After all only one farm had that name and it only had one Bob, meaning it was unique naming, while there could be 3 "Bob Johnson"s in the area. While it made perfect sense to people at the time, it leaves a problem today if we don't know where each of them lived. "Bob Johnson on the hilltop farm" was also used.

      While this is likely very confusing to people used to fixed last names, it's actually not confusing to people knowing the system. As non-confusing as it may be to people knowing the system, it does really fail to provide clues to indicate unknown cousins. However I would say that the fixed naming is flawed as well. Imagine your dad's sister. She could gain her husbands name and as such you wouldn't identify her children as your cousins based on the last name.

      The only real flaw is.... maybe I'm old fashioned, but I never considered risking ending up with an unknown relative without knowing it simply because I like to know a person better before risking ending up with a child (don't get started on using rubber. Nothing is 100% safe). Also Iceland is very aware of family meaning people not knowing their own cousins is.... well I wouldn't expect that. Either this is a really new problem or the problem is mainly one for people doing one night stands while their parents/grandparents did the same.

    55. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_name " Mary daughter of Jane is the uncommon version".

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    56. Re: Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never been to fond of the country.

    57. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were my best friend, I'd bang the shit out of my sister.

    58. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. My Mother's family comes from a rural area that doesn't see much migration over time. Her dad was about to go on a second date with a girl from the next town over when she brought him home to meet her parents. He looks on the mantle and says "Hey, how do you know uncle Albert and cousin Bob?"

      Turns out they were second cousins and the date never happened. I think anything farther removed than first cousins is legal in the US, but that's not the same thing as not being icky.

    59. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      That implies that the average over a lifetime is more like 30, then.

    60. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Escaping from the "friend zone" requires maturing enough to realize that women aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until sex comes out.

      I take it you don't get laid much....or are not a guy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    61. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK is having problems because many of their Pakistanis are into cousin marriage and this leads to the offspring having Prader-Willi syndrome with includes hyperphagia (inability to stop overeating.) in its symptoms.

    62. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      An average Icelander has something like a dozen sexual partners in life,

      That doesn't sound terribly high...

      Isn't the average in the US (at least for men) much higher than that? I mean, especially if you're talking lifetime?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    63. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by bdwebb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh if only I had mod points.

      This is unequivocally true for a significant portion of women through a large span of their lives. You don't necessarily need the tokens to get to the eventual goal of sexy time but they can help significantly. This is also true for most men although the tokens are not usually required...just some beer and attention.

      Ultimately if you are looking for a relationship, tokens don't work out well for anything meaningful. If you are just looking for something warm and squishy, however, tokens can be your best resource if you are making no progress without them. When it comes down to it, a combination of confidence and tokens yields the highest result because without any of the confidence part of the equation, the tokens only work on those women whose profession requires accepting those tokens.

    64. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Genda · · Score: 1

      The heart wants what the heart wants -- Woody Allen

    65. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the friend-zone phenomenon is typically a result of one or more of the following conditions:

      1) Men who don't realize how singularly unattractive they are -- sometimes, she's just not into you because you're fat, nerdy, gross, or simply... not her type. This doesn't make her any more shallow than you - when's the last time you went after a fat, sweaty girl with a hairy upper lip, telling your friends, "Sure she's not very pretty, but I can see that she's just such an amazing person that I must have her!"?

      2) Men who confuse "having an agenda" with being "genuinely nice, lovable people" -- if you're being nice expecting to get laid, you have an agenda. If you have an agenda, she knows it, because you don't have ANYWHERE NEAR a good enough poker face to fool a woman.

      3) Men who confuse "being a pussy" with "being nice" -- treating her like you're a servant is fucking stupid.

      The guys who whine about "friend zones" are the ones who simply don't know how to look at themselves honestly, and realize that there is no way on earth the girl they're pining for is every going to want to get naked with them - barring some significant and sweeping changes to the man's appearance, demeanor, and lifestyle.

      I know I'll get shouted down for daring to criticize the men in this situation, but if you're an ugly doormat hoping that "being nice" will someday turn into sex, you should learn to self-examine with half as much ferocity as you criticize the women who are turning you down.

    66. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's not true at all.

      You confuse "being a doormat" with "being nice." All those guys who you think are assholes for not treating a girl the way you would? They're treating a girl like the girl is an EQUAL, not some sort of rare, fragile flower that will die the instant you disagree with it.

      The guys who think "treating a girl like shit" is the way to get a girl are simply rationalizing - they've never learned how to deal with a woman as an equal, and a human, so they put her on a pedestal and revere her from afar. And then get bitter when she doesn't break her fucking legs running at you with her panties pulled aside.

      YOU lot are the ones behaving like assholes - you have unfair, unrealistic expectations of how the woman should behave, and then you blame HER for your own shortcomings.

    67. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't, but that's not the point. Consider two siblings who do want to sex each other. If reasonable precautions are taken w/r/t birth control, provide a logical (rather than emotional "it's icky") response as to why it should not be allowed. After all, interracial marriages were once considered 'icky' -- and illegal, as recently as 50 years ago. Homosexuals are making strides as we speak, but are still considered 'icky' by large segments of the populace.
      Emotional views of relationships change over time, so it is better to base such morality issues on reason and logic. Logically, there's no reason why consenting adults, whatever their relationship, should not be allowed to marry (with the possible caveat w/r/t reproduction).

    68. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're suggesting there's no escape from the friend zone, there is

      Escaping from the "friend zone" requires maturing enough to realize that women aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until sex comes out.

      Ya, ok buddy

    69. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kinda icky

      Terrific argument! With your judo hold on logic and science you completely disproved his idea that people are opposed non-harmful incest due to gut instinct rather than reason!

    70. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      One of the more interesting fictional instances of genealogy I've encountered is found in the Anne Rice Vampire Novels: family trees are kept by the matriarchal method only. It's Momma's baby, but Daddy's maybe.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    71. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally the father's name is used by both sexes. Matronymics are sometimes used, again by both sexes.

    72. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      you'd do your sister with a condom?

      I question your use of the conditional tense here.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    73. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have an agenda, she knows it, because you don't have ANYWHERE NEAR a good enough poker face to fool a woman.

      Nonsense. Women aren't human lie detectors or any other such thing, and that's just a useless, sexist generalization anyway. For the record, I've successfully lied to many people (women included), though I have no interest in trivial nonsense like what you're describing.

    74. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      there's a higher chance of some genetic flaws showing up

      So? The baby wouldn't even exist otherwise, so it's not as if it was somehow harmed, and by no means is that even certain. I see where you're going, but I believe "If you don't like it, don't do it." applies either way.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    75. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by dwye · · Score: 1

      but if we used Ancient German Naming, I'd only know a couple of cousins were related if my Dad had told me so....

      But, if we still used Ancient German Naming, you would be taught to memorize your ancestors generations back, and would know most of your second cousins (at least) by sight. The AGN Method falls apart once relatives cease caring about being related, and stop visiting each other.

    76. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by dwye · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, because your parents moved away, you might accidentally run into a relative whose parents also moved away, but because you didn't grow up knowing them (and that they were out of bounds), you might have run into one and ...

      See Sigmund and Signy Wolsung, and Arthur Pendragon and Morgan leFay, for this sort of problem.

    77. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has around 170 first cousins, plus god only knows how many second cousins and first cousins once removed. Sometimes families get big.

      Now we know who to blame for world overpopulation.

    78. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Escaping from the "friend zone" requires maturing enough to realize that women aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until sex comes out.

      /rolls eyes

      Escaping from the "dating zone" requires women maturing enough to realize that men aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until money comes out.

      Or, we could deal with the fact that human beings, of either gender, tend to be given shitty dating advise from society and social circles. But why waste time on that when you can pigeonhole people with sexist stereotypes?

    79. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Highly unlikely, Scrabble bags don't have a 1/4 chance of producing a Z.

      (okay, maybe Polish Scrabble bags do)

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    80. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Tapp that or not to Tapp that
      tiz the questshun
      Twether tits nobler in da mind to suffer da slings and arrows of "woodie" "coodie" "shoulda" or to take up apps against a see of jeansology and by opposing never know the end-game. To rub one out in the sleep or to let the andriod app decide. Perchance to dream of what may come. To whip bears and scorn time

      "With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear," ?
      Ask the app it tells you there.
        "To grunt and sweat under a weary life,"
      "Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;"
      and that is what happens when you don't use the app.

      "The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
      Be all my sins remember'd."

      NEXT!....bump phones...."dam" next!!! "bump phones" dam

      "NEXT!" bump phones..."HEY!"

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    81. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just Worf, all Klingons.

    82. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      Sort-of close. 7 out of 100 tiles are some variant on Z in Polish Scrabble. I have no idea how important the distinction is between them, knowing nothing about Polish myself.

    83. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Cito · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows knocking boots with family is Wincest!

    84. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by VeryBest52 · · Score: 1

      This.

    85. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Or... it may be an instinct, that evolved to reduce inbreeding, that causes one to feel disgust at the thought of breeding with a close relative.

      One can override ones instinctual behaviour, but instinctual feelings aren't based on intelligence and so are not affected by logic.

    86. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Guppy · · Score: 2

      you don't want to leave it too late, nor be in a rush and tap too early...

      Yeah, I sometimes tap too early when playing rush decks also, but the more lethal mistake is to wait too long and let things drag out into mid-game, where your deck type loses its natural advantage vs. slower (but more deliberate) deck designs.

    87. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Last but not least is a tidbit from the Bible; "The heart is more treacherous than anything else and is desperate. Who can know it?" (Jeremiah 17:9).
      Listening to ones heart often leads to irrational decisions and therefore many regrets so the Bible again councils; "thinking ability itself will keep guard over you, discernment itself will safeguard you," (Proverbs 2:11). How wise it is to think before you feel!"

      Thump that bible! And remember - you only have to follow the parts you like. If it doesn't make sense, or it doesn't fit what you want, just ignore it!

    88. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "If you're suggesting there's no escape from the friend zone, there is. The secret is cold-turkey no-contact for a while (I haven't dialed in the exact timespan, but I've confirmed 1 year separation can do it), and improving your life in some way during that time (status based like better job, higher income, new car, but anything with growth helps like learning a new language, travelling, volunteering)."

      Dude, if she's dating you because you're making more money, or because you've changed in other "keeping up with the Joneses" ways, you're doing it wrong.

      Welcome to the wonderful world of bad marriages.

    89. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "All those guys who you think are assholes for not treating a girl the way you would? They're treating a girl like the girl is an EQUAL, not some sort of rare, fragile flower that will die the instant you disagree with it."

      I do agree with the rare flower bit. But no. While some people do confuse the doormat thing, I don't thing GP did.

      Most of those guys you think treat girls like assholes, are assholes. You can blame the girl for falling for that crap.

    90. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      s/thing/think

      But I really have seen it lots of times: football player, or rich kid, or whatever, has women swooning all over him so he can act like an asshole and often get away with it. Both parties are at fault. Him for acting that way, her for putting up with it. What is this, the 50s?

    91. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Eventually reunite

      Or not. The whole thing about separating and "improving your life" includes meeting new people. A year later and you and she (or he) may have done just this and moved on.

      Relationships are about shared experiences (friends, lovers or whatever). If you avoid someone for a year (or more) you might just find that the two of you have moved in different directions.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    92. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Genda · · Score: 1

      Watching Slashotters talking about women is like watching pygmies talking about slam dunking. It's so dang entertaining! Oh, Don't stop! I got popcorn.

    93. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by egilhh · · Score: 1

      sperm doners

      I'll never eat kebabs at your house.

    94. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Read my name again.

    95. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've got the pradest willies in town baby.

    96. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW! Only on slashdot does useful advice for getting girls get modded down.

    97. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean your anonymous pseudonym? For all we know, you could be a man posing as a woman on the internet.

    98. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oedipus could really have used this!

    99. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Iceland AFAIK people are called "Bob son of George" or "Mary daughter of John"

      Almost right, it's "Bob son of George" and "Mary daughter of Jane"

      Almost right, it's "Elroy son of George" and "Judy daughter of Jane"

    100. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Everyone is distantly related to everyone else....

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    101. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Emotional ickyness is all the reason I need, you guys have fun defending sibling-on-sibling incest with cold hard logic, I'll just hang back.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    102. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, everyone knows that to get sex you should " treat a lady like a tramp and a tramp like a lady."

    103. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I suspect S, H, I, T, P, L, U, M, B, E, and R are quite common too.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    104. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not know what women you are talking about.

      All women I know will not take being considered an equal, they demand unquestioning obedience.

    105. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has already been thoroughly researched:

      http://www.laddertheory.com/

    106. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "You mean your anonymous pseudonym? For all we know, you could be a man posing as a woman on the internet."

      And for all WE know, you're actually a coward.

      So what's your point?

    107. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your pseudonym isn't evidence that you're actually a woman, and it's silly to treat it as such.

    108. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Your pseudonym isn't evidence that you're actually a woman, and it's silly to treat it as such."

      And your pseudonym is no evidence that you're not a coward, and it's silly to pretend as much.

      Repeat: what's your point? Granted, my name does not "prove" anything, but I didn't claim it did. Still, do you have any evidence to the contrary? If not, your argument is pointless.

      On the other hand, I would say that repeatedly posting under "Anonymous Coward" is prima facie evidence of real cowardice.

    109. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, my name does not "prove" anything, but I didn't claim it did.

      Then your admonition to "read my name again" seems equally pointless.

    110. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Then your admonition to "read my name again" seems equally pointless."

      ???

      No, because I have evidence. Apparently you don't.

    111. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because I have evidence

      Such as?

    112. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thinking ability itself will keep guard over you, discernment itself will safeguard you," (Vulcans 1:1). How wise it is to think before you feel!

      FTFY :D

    113. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I'd be curious to know what your thoughts were on getting a quickie or cheapie"

      There's always the yankie - it's just like a quickie, but you don't need anyone else ...

    114. Re:Don't you know who your cousins are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the average in the US (at least for men)

      If you only count heterosexual partners, how can the average be any different between men and women?

  2. "Tap" phones? by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Tapping" anything seems to me like a very poor choice of words when talking about incest.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:"Tap" phones? by coldsalmon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, a very poor choice of words when talking about phones. "Tapping" a phone doesn't usually mean bumping two phones together.

    2. Re:"Tap" phones? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also seems like it could be super awkward from start to finish.

      Scenario one: You think you're hitting it off. You suggest tapping phones. You find out you weren't hitting it off.

      Scenario two: You are actually hitting it off. You think tapping phones would be good so you don't spend too much time wooing someone who may turn out to be a closer relative than you'd like. The other party was having a good time, but now it's a little more obvious that you want to mash genitals together, and there's increased sexual tension, making it more stressful for them or for you, and you ruin it.

      Scenario three: You are hitting it off, have successfully navigated increasing sexual tension, not too fast and not too slow. You are about to start making out, but then you decide to check. This kills the mood.

      Scenario four: you hit it off, you don't rush things, you don't kill the pre-makeout mood, you're already swapping saliva. You check right before putting on the condom. Network lag, it takes a few minutes before you get the results back, the guy becomes nervous in the meantime, and can't perform.

      Scenario five: you hit it off, you don't rush things, you don't kill the pre-makeout mood, you check while putting on the condom... and it's positive, you two are second cousins twice removed or something. I think it's second cousins who can, statistically speaking, reproduce and their chances of having recessive alleles show up is not any more likely than someone who is not related, so it's not inbreeding genetically. But it's still... weird. Do you go ahead and screw? Do you look up on wiki examples of other couples who were related in the same way?

      Scenario six: you're already married, and your wife is going into labor with your first born. It takes quite a while, and you're bored, so you test this on a lark and... oops... you're twins separated at birth. Awkward.

    3. Re:"Tap" phones? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Scenario 5.5: You're approaching climax when your phone gets knocked off the side table and hits hers on the floor. The app makes the banjo tune noise that indicates you're related...just as you both reach the height of passion 8-(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:"Tap" phones? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scenario seven: you're some royal line, trying to keep the Iron throne in the family. You jokingly check phones. Uh oh, someone was actually adopted...

    5. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've "tapped" by cousin a few times. Just have to remember to use protection. And blow jobs avoid the issue of babies altogether. It feels just as good to pound your cousin's snatch as some random chick.

    6. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Besides, this whole app idea is impractical.

      Better to just outsource all potentially sexual dating in Iceland to yours truly, I'm not Icelandic.
      %100 percent incest protection. Because I care.

    7. Re:"Tap" phones? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Oh, AVOID incest. I got confused too.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.5b) After the first couple times "5.5" occurs, Pavlovian conditioning takes over, and firmly subconsciously associates the intense pleasure of sexual climax with the incest banjo. Incestuous relation becomes a major turn-on, and eventually a necessary component for your sex life.

    9. Re:"Tap" phones? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Can I tap that? That app will tell you if that should be tapped.

    10. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dare you to post that using your real account.

    11. Re:"Tap" phones? by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it's a Windows phone, it's called "bumping uglies."

    12. Re:"Tap" phones? by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Not really

      Be safe tap phones not cousins.

    13. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marketing slogan: Tap the glass before you tap the a$$

    14. Re:"Tap" phones? by saider · · Score: 1

      Followed by Ballmer squirting his data.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    15. Re:"Tap" phones? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Scenario 7: Meet, hit it off, do it, then check the next day.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    16. Re:"Tap" phones? by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 2

      Scenario five: you hit it off, you don't rush things, you don't kill the pre-makeout mood, you check while putting on the condom... and it's positive, you two are second cousins twice removed or something

      Not to ruin the joke or anything, but if the second cousins are twice removed then they're typically off by a couple generations. The age discrepancy would be awkward enough.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    17. Re:"Tap" phones? by operagost · · Score: 0

      You check right before putting on the condom.

      the guy becomes nervous in the meantime, and can't perform.

      Why are you bothering to check genetics if you're gay?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there's no risk of pregnancy if you have sex with another man, cousin's or not?

    19. Re:"Tap" phones? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I thought one would be tapping ravens in this scenario? (Which could actually get quite dangerous if the ravens decide that they don't like it.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple who intends to use a contraceptive measure (a condom) are very unlikely to care to verify if they are cousins.

    21. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The age discrepancy would be awkward enough.

      Depends on what your kinks are.

      Also, there are known cases of young children getting to celebrate the birth of their aunt or uncle (dad was the oldest of 8, now oldest of 9 type of deal). So a couple large families and "twice removed" can be the same age.
      That's not even getting close to fictional variants, like Aragorn who married his great great great great great great aunt (and she was still smoking hot).

    22. Re:"Tap" phones? by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Our school district preggo school was called "TAPP". Apparently it stood for "TeenAge Pregnancy Program"...

      I'm curious as to which overpaid PhD thought of that one...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    23. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. I've got a cousin once removed who's about 6 years younger than me, so the math isn't necessarily THAT bad. If she was born even 10 years later and if I had a kid like 2 years ago (I'm almost 30), there'd be less than a 10 year age gap.

    24. Re:"Tap" phones? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Why? I certainly start out safe even if I'm quite enthusiastic about the future.

    25. Re:"Tap" phones? by GrBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Eh, I don't think tapping the ass is the issue with incest.

    26. Re:"Tap" phones? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Wait... what? Nevermind, I don't want to know.

    27. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wha... there's a condom involved? Then who cares if you're too closely related, you're at least trying to practice birth control. So there's no genetics involved, just sex for fun.

    28. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who let m00t on here?

    29. Re:"Tap" phones? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Still creepy. Also, I actually made a typeo, I started to change it to be gender neutral halfway through without realizing it. On the other hand, I didn't specify who was putting on the condom. Or maybe "the guy" means your penis.

    30. Re:"Tap" phones? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. I was just gonna point that out. It's not impossible they could be near the same age, but it's not very likely either.

    31. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another scenario where fapping phones becomes a normal, common social gesture rather than a prelude to sexual intercourse. If people do the tap test out of curiosity or as an icebreaker, any other benefit is a perk.

    32. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, this is what I heard on the radio (I'm paraphrasing here):
      You should bump your phones together before bumping in bed.

    33. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a result of bumping uglies, they both terminate any call they might have on and randomly proceed to take a picture or start a game.

    34. Re:"Tap" phones? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      fapping phones

      ...

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    35. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scenario one point five: You are just about to hit it off when you propose a phone tap. This act reveals to the other party you're strongly occupied by incestuous thoughts. The mood is killed with fire.

    36. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tap the glass before you tap that a$$"

    37. Re:"Tap" phones? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      This kind of advice is what gets so many blond girls pregnant.

    38. Re:"Tap" phones? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      But then they'll need a new app for keeping your offspring from dating each other.

    39. Re:"Tap" phones? by pne · · Score: 1

      Not to ruin the joke or anything, but if the second cousins are twice removed then they're typically off by a couple generations. The age discrepancy would be awkward enough.

      Not necessarily. I'm sure you've heard of uncles who are younger than their nephews (Mary has her son Bob at 16, Mary's parents get another son Charles 17 years after Mary was born, Charles is Bob's uncle despite being a year younger).

      Once you're as far away as "second cousin", the "twice removed" need not imply "a lot younger" -- it all depends how long the generations tended to be in the two branches of the family.

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    40. Re:"Tap" phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My son filled out a survey in health class regarding depression in teenagers. The acronym for the test was BESADD.

  3. The Test by revoemag4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tap that before you tap that.

    1. Re:The Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

  4. A perfect combination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be a Game of Thrones theme.

  5. app by Pharoah_69 · · Score: 0

    I don't care, no app is going to tell me that I can't have sex with my sister's brother's cousin. ( I jest)

  6. Alternate version for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An alternate version is being rolled out in the US, based on a similar principle but with one minor change: recent shared ancestry highlights the "get procreatin'" indicator instead of the warning alert.

    1. Re:Alternate version for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in the south, or Shelbyville.

  7. Nightmare by jomama717 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I awoke in a daze - sticky, smelling of stale alcohol, only imagining that her head would hurt as badly as mine when she finally awoke.  Vague memories of drinks, friends, laughter, and sex.  Lots of sex.  As I picked my pants up off the floor, my cell phone fell from the pocket and by some cruel twist of fate tapped her cell phone lying nearby..."

    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  8. No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having sex with your cousin is not incest. Incest is defined to be with direct 1st degree relatives of the same bloodline. You can even marry your cousin - perfectly legal. At least in Germany.

    1. Re:No incest by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      As your "At least in Germany" caveat notes, this is highly dependent on jurisdiction (for the legal definition) and cultural norms (for the "eww-that's-gross" definition). In the US, for example, definitions vary at the state level, and first cousins are forbidden to marry in some states. Also variable is how laws cover adopted/step-parent (no biological bloodline) family members.

    2. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even more amusing is that states regularly slagged for being full of "inbred racist rednecks" - such as: Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia, and others... ban marriage of first cousins.

      The list of states that allow first cousin marriage include "forward thinking" places like California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Washington DC, and Oregon. Can't wait to hear the inbreeding jokes about those states!

      Q: How do you tell if someone is from California?
      A: The hemophilia, mostly.

    3. Re:No incest by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or differ between Springfield and Shelbyville.

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Things often get banned in response to being pervasive and problematic, and permitted where they're too infrequent to cause widespread public concern. I'm totally unsurprised that the "redneck" states found the need for lots of restrictive inbreeding laws.

    5. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Things are banned where they're considered *problematic* and permitted where they're NOT considered *problematic.* There are literally thousands of examples of things that rarely occur being banned anyway.

      Clearly, this means that liberals have decided that fucking your cousin is A-OK, despite the fact that it increases the chance of genetic defects in the children of that union.

      Enjoy your weak bloodlines, California.

    6. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having sex with your pet dog is legal in Germany, I don't think they should be used as an example...

    7. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, CA is where I see couples in every race/ethnicity combination wherever I look. Redneckville is where the white and black folks have to keep to their own sides of town, and marrying a Mexican would be a sure way to lose your church pew. Are you seriously going to argue that liberals have less well-hybridized bloodlines than the good republican white folks in Hicktown?

    8. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your weak bloodlines, California.

      Because millions and millions of Californians are fucking their cousins, right? Get real dude.

    9. Re:No incest by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Looking at a map is interesting. You're wrong about Oregon. The social divides on this issue aren't as clear-cut as they would be on other issues..

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:No incest by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      That and the age of consent in Germany is 14.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    11. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas only recently made first cousin marriage illegal to combat the problem of polygamist Mormons setting up shop in West Texas.

    12. Re:No incest by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Even more amusing is that states regularly slagged for being full of "inbred racist rednecks" - such as: Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia, and others... ban marriage of first cousins.

      Now if only you cared enough to explain us what has inbreeding ever had to do with marriage...?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    13. Re:No incest by SilentStaid · · Score: 2

      I blame the Internet for raising me from a young age to not be surprsed that a such thing as a 'Cousin-dating-law-colored-map-of-Oregon' even exists, let alone that you were able to Google it in 30 seconds.

      Internet, what have you done?

    14. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the dog wants it, too!

    15. Re:No incest by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wrong. Things are banned where they're considered *problematic* and permitted where they're NOT considered *problematic.*

      Right.

      Clearly, this means that liberals have decided that fucking your cousin is A-OK, despite the fact that it increases the chance of genetic defects in the children of that union.

      Wrong. Marrying your cousin is unlikely to cause problems—the risk is only slightly higher than the risk in the general population. What causes problems is repeated inbreeding of close relatives over the course of several generations.

      The fundamental thing you're missing is why incest is a problem in southern states. In the South, people don't move around that much. Most of the folks you meet are third, fourth, fifth generation residents of a given town. And the ones who aren't are usually from a couple of towns over. This means that there's a very high probability of being related to many of the people you meet. Left alone, this would result in significant inbreeding problems within just a few generations. Therefore, cousin marriages are problematic.

      In California, most of the people you meet are transplants from somewhere else. This means that there's almost zero probability of being related to anyone you meet. Therefore, first cousin marriages are not problematic in California, not because they won't ever be problematic if they occurred, but because they're about as likely as the Cubs winning the world series, and because the probability of multigenerational inbreeding (the real problem) is basically zero.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Laws get made when someone gets offended or negatively affected. I reach the opposite conclusion to you about the South.

    17. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Since 2013 does the animal welfare law outlaw any sexual contacts with animals. Even before certain laws limited/prevented sex acts with animals.
      But now it is explicitly forbidden.

    18. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note, you're still allowed to murder animals because they look tasty, so not all is lost.

    19. Re:No incest by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 2

      A 14 year old dog is getting pretty old...

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    20. Re:No incest by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Interesting how states can void other states' marriages based on their own laws regarding cousins. Couldn't they do the same regarding gay marriage? And if not, why not?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    21. Re:No incest by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Well... actually, these are pretty conservative and Christian (with a capital Fundamentalist) areas. There is no breeding without a marriage. Although sometimes, the marriage happens after the conception and the grand tradition of the father with the shotgun welcoming his new son-in-law.

    22. Re:No incest by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Although sometimes, the marriage happens after the conception

      It is well known that an eager young bride can do in six months what takes a cow or countess nine....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    23. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that would make Obama cry like a little Biden

    24. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamental thing you're missing is why incest is a problem in southern states. In the South, people don't move around that much. Most of the folks you meet are third, fourth, fifth generation residents of a given town. And the ones who aren't are usually from a couple of towns over. This means that there's a very high probability of being related to many of the people you meet. Left alone, this would result in significant inbreeding problems within just a few generations. Therefore, cousin marriages are problematic.

      The fundamental thing you're missing is anything resembling factual evidence to support your crack-brained theories.

      I guess that's what comes of being from a state where inbreeding is state-sanctioned, eh?

    25. Re:No incest by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Iceland has a population of 300k people - Germany has 15 cities larger than that. There's very little immigration. Most are descended from a few small groups of settlers.

      Genetic diversity is a bit of a concern there.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    26. Re:No incest by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Wrong on all counts. I was born and lived for the first 22 years of my life in the rural South. Even living in a college town, I'd estimate that probably about half of my Facebook friends from my high school still live within about a 100 mile radius of my home town, give or take. And historically, the percentages have been even higher than that in many parts of the south—particularly in Appalachia.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    27. Re:No incest by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they do the same regarding gay marriage? And if not, why not?

      Or, you could try reading up on terms like "discrimination" or "false equivalency" and try again with a relevant comparison....

    28. Re:No incest by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Things often get banned in response to being pervasive and problematic

      And then there's the TSA, who ban inconsequential, commonplace things to make it look like they're doing something. 12 ounce bottle of water? Terrorist! 4 small 3 ounce bottles of water in a plastic bag? Patriot!

    29. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say to you here is this "Cave Junction, Oregon." Some jokes really do write themselves, but they arent as funny as you would hope....

    30. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Draw your own conclusions, but despite what Wikipedia and some other sites say on the subject, Oregon does not allow first cousins to marry, nor any closer relatives, unless they're only cousins by adoption.

      Quoting Oregon law:

      106.020 Prohibited and void marriages. The following marriages are prohibited; and, if solemnized within this state, are absolutely void:

                  (1) When either party thereto had a wife or husband living at the time of such marriage.

                  (2) When the parties thereto are first cousins or any nearer of kin to each other, whether of the whole or half blood, whether by blood or adoption, computing by the rules of the civil law, except that when the parties are first cousins by adoption only, the marriage is not prohibited or void. [Amended by 1989 c.647 Â1]

      I'm not sure what to do about the incorrect information on Wikipedia. I suppose I could try to change it, but there's probably no point. My change would just be instantly reverted by ever vigilant editors eager to correct vandalism, so I don't see any point in bothering.

    31. Re:No incest by dwye · · Score: 1

      Interesting how states can void other states' marriages based on their own laws regarding cousins. Couldn't they do the same regarding gay marriage? And if not, why not?

      In fact, they cannot void another state's marriages or divorces, due to the Full Faith And Credit clause in the Constitution. Once married in one state (A), a marriage must be recognized by any other state (B-ZX), even if the marriage partners could not enter into a marriage in that state (B). Thus, when some states allowed marriage as early as 14, all states had to recognize those marriages as legal (I'm looking at YOU, Jerry Lee Lewis) even though their own residents might still be below the age of consent, let alone marriage. Likewise, if two people were recognized as being in a common law marriage in state P, they are married in states that no longer recognize it (even if the same state, as older marriages are grandfathered in). If one state chose to change incest laws to recognize the marriage of Abraham and Sarah of Biblical fame, any marriages between half-siblings made in that state would be legal marriages in all. Likewise, if a state recognized any form of polygamy, or whatever else one could imagine.

      The recognized exception is Louisiana, which because its civil law is based on the Napoleonic Code, does not recognize existing first cousin marriages legally entered into even in states where it was legal when the couple married. There are other differences, but I am not a member of the Louisiana State Bar, to list them all. :-)

      The Defense of Marriage Act limits this recognition of marriages to only those between a man and a woman. It was created so that an activist judge in one state could not force every other state to recognize gay marriages; it also works to prevent activist legislatures, etc. If Constitutional, it means that those marriages are only recognized in those states that choose to accept them.

    32. Re:No incest by dwye · · Score: 1

      Well... actually, these are pretty conservative and Christian (with a capital Fundamentalist) areas. There is no breeding without a marriage.

      (boldface mine)

      Seriously? And I suppose, in the Middle Ages, there were no illegitimate births because these were against Church Law, and all Europe recognized the supremacy of the Pope? And no Californian has sex before 18, the age of consent, despite researchers claiming that the average age is around 15?

      Frankly, that these states have more Fundamentalists implies to me that they are more likely to pass laws that their people are unlikely to obey (like bourbon is made sometimes in counties and states where it cannot be legally sold for retail or consumed), but are believed to be for their own good. This also applies to Liberal Fundamentalists, who would ban smoking any cigarettes except those made from marijuana,

    33. Re:No incest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need laws against things people aren't going to do.

    34. Re:No incest by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      That's entirely logical, it's common knowledge, with plenty of legal precedent, that having sex with someone is worse than killing them.

    35. Re:No incest by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Clearly, this means that liberals have decided that fucking your cousin is A-OK, despite the fact that it increases the chance of genetic defects in the children of that union.

      You don't have to have a baby, and even if you did decide to have one, it is by no means certain that something would be wrong with him/her. If you don't like it, just don't do it; don't try to restrict others' freedoms.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    36. Re:No incest by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I presume that's because they allow it between siblings. I mean, cousins? Those are practically foh-rye-gunners!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. It will be very successful app in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be very successful app in West Virginia

    1. Re:It will be very successful app in West Virginia by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it will be *least* popular in West Virginia...don't ask, don't tell XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:It will be very successful app in West Virginia by knight24k · · Score: 2

      I think it will be *least* popular in West Virginia...don't ask, don't tell XD

      Hey, I have relatives in West Virginia you insensitive clod!

      .....and a couple ex-girlfriends

      ....don't ask.

    3. Re:It will be very successful app in West Virginia by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      and a couple ex-girlfriends

      Speaking of your ex-gf, how IS your sister doing ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:It will be very successful app in West Virginia by knight24k · · Score: 1

      and a couple ex-girlfriends

      Speaking of your ex-gf, how IS your sister doing ;)

      Hey, you leave my wif...err sister out of this. ;)

  10. They touched phones...to start. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > In Iceland, Tap Cellphones To Avoid Incest

    "Well, that's what we thought they'd use it for. Turns out 99% of people used it to find close relatives they didn't know to bang."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  11. Niche-ist of the niche apps by a_big_favor · · Score: 1

    This app might be one of the most specific uses for a very specific set of people that probably wouldn't use it that often.

    1. Re:Niche-ist of the niche apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's use case is to trace your shared ancestry. The article is sensationalized to the max.

    2. Re:Niche-ist of the niche apps by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      A few more beers and you're not going to care in either case.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  12. so much incest in iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess they determined so many cousins and brothers and sisters and dads and moms were screwing each other that they needed to know whose who again....

    every call is about this thus the gubermint needs to listen.

  13. Gives an added conotation to.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... "I'd tap that".

    I'm not sure if that's coincidental, or intended.

  14. Let's see with a population of 319,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we throw out 200,000 as either too old, too young, too ugly or the wrong orientation. That leaves a dating pool of about 119,000 or roughly 60,000 of the opposite sex. So yeah you are probally gonna fuck a relative tonight.

  15. In appropriately named article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to point out that the idea of the application is not to avoid incest, but to see your own family tree and how you are related to other people by bumping your phones together.
    There is a hidden (kind of an easter egg) feature which in addition to that sounds a warning sound if you bump phones with close kin.

    Regarding incest in small populations is what you regard as a small population. A population in a small town in the middle ages where no one travels across the country to live, will have a high risk of incest. This is true for many areas in Europe in past centuries. However, in Iceland, throughout viking age and ever after, people have travelled for work. Workers travelled between places for jobs, in addition to the higher classes sending some of their children to other high class house holds in foster, for it would show respect and trust between families. Rendering this small population every mixed genetically throughout the entire island.

    Surely incest is therefore not a real problem in Iceland, and the reason for the phone app is not to help fighting it, but as a "lulz feature".

    1. Re:In appropriately named article? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      A population in a small town in the middle ages where no one travels across the country to live, will have a high risk of incest.

      That's why fairs were such a big thing. People travelled to them and one of the prime reasons was to have a choice from a wider geographical area.

      Of course, another reason was that life back on the farm/small town was boring as all get-out.

    2. Re:In appropriately named article? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I think that's one of the reasons arranged marriages were more common as well. A matchmaker traveled widely and could put you together with someone you would never likely have met in person.

  16. LOL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True story ... at a recent funeral, it was discovered that my mother's cousin's granddaughter was married to my father's niece's grandson.

    There's no blood relation whatsover, but nobody had realized the connection through my parents until they suddenly had someone in the room who came from a completely different family and couldn't figure out why they were there for that family. Took a few minutes to piece together.

    I'd be more worried about the fact that cell phone apps can have access to your entire genealogy and ancestry(/incestry ;-) -- that sounds like a horrible privacy situation.

    1. Re:LOL ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried about the fact that cell phone apps can have access to your entire genealogy and ancestry(/incestry ;-) -- that sounds like a horrible privacy situation.

      I wonder if some sort of safe protocol could be established for figuring out the relationships in family trees based on comparing some personal data tokens without revealing anything else. Sounds like a fun problem!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:LOL ... by dwye · · Score: 1

      In Iceland, your family tree is public knowledge, probably written in alliterative verse and going back all the way to a couple generations before your ancestors left Norway in the 9th century. Also, all the feuds, killings, burnings of neighbors' steads with them inside, etc. :-)

      More seriously, there is no expectation of privacy of public records like births, deaths, and marriages, and the Icelanders have been keeping good track of theirs for centuries. Since the app does not do a genetic check (yet!) it is limited to those public records, and any unacknowledged bastardy is omitted and/or covered up. It will not help an Icelandic Sigmund of the Volsungs realize that the woman he just impregnated is his sister, Signy, who was kidnapped as a child and raised with a false identity; that is left to the Gods to reveal.

  17. icelandic family tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire native icelandic family tree (or, at least, most of it) is compact enough to fit on a promotional t-shirt for Icelandic company deCODE genetics, Inc.

  18. Great quote from "A good year" by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Guy 1: "Is it illegal to shag your cousin in France?"
    Guy 2: "Only if she's ugly."

    Interestingly different attitudes to cousin love...some places it's encouraged, others, illegal incest.
    10% of marriages worldwide, apparantly...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

    1. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a Gerard Deparedeax quote?

    2. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Nah mate, 'Max Skinner' played by Russell Crowe

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401445/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

      But it's clearly something GD would be capable of saying ;)

    3. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by LiquidHAL · · Score: 1

      They even made a movie about it, Les Cousins Dangereux.

      I like the way they think.

    4. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy 1: "Is it illegal to shag your cousin in tribal Afghanistan?"
      Guy 2: "No, it's mandatory."

    5. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      They even made a movie about it, Les Cousins Dangereux.

      I like the way they think.

      I prefer the American remake. A lot shorter, and not nearly as creepy.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:Great quote from "A good year" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy 1: "Is it illegal to shag your cousin in France?"
      Guy 2: "Only if she's ugly."

      Interestingly different attitudes to cousin love...some places it's encouraged, others, illegal incest.
      10% of marriages worldwide, apparantly...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

      It's easier than speed dating...

  19. cool app by Rogue+Haggis+Landing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without reading TFA, this actually seems like a cool app (if you're Icelandic, that is). It would be interesting to be able to press a button and see how closely related you are to your friends -- "Hey our great-great-great grandmothers were half-sisters!" Things like that. It would be mostly meaningless, but who doesn't want to know who's in the (very) extended family?

    1. Re:cool app by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It would be mostly meaningless, but who doesn't want to know who's in the (very) extended family?

      It would only be meaningless if you think that feeling connected to someone is meaningless. I wouldn't!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:cool app by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be interesting to be able to press a button and see how closely related you are to your friends

      It would be interesting to be able to press a button and see how closely related you are to your parents.

      This app is based on written records. Maybe some folks were a little shy with the truth when it came to saying who was the father of the child . . . ?

      My family tree has routing loops . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:cool app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As one ,,reporting" from Iceland I can confirm that the making of the database did reveal some embarrassing facts regarding family structure, especially for the older generations. Most of the older records and information used in the database come from so-called church books (before 1900) and national birth registry information. In some cases the information was correctly recorded but hush hush-ed within families to be later revealed with this database. In other cases the identity of the father was ... adjusted for the birth certificates, making it not as an obvious lie, when looking up info in the database...

      I have heard about cases where people send a complaint to the database management regarding information on their families.. just to be told the truth about their grandmas and grandpas...

      Hopefully this was insightful :)

    4. Re:cool app by BotnetZombie · · Score: 2

      My family tree has routing loops . . .

      Ah, the McFlys. Someone is his own grandfather perhaps?

  20. Could be useful... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

    Had a similar situation happen to me in college... had first met this girl at a restaurant where she was a waitress. Later on we ended up in the same class, so one day we got together for study time (and to get to know each other better), and I found out her full name at that time. Turns out her last name was the same as my mom's maiden name.

    Long story short: After a very short conversation about relatives we found out that my mom and her dad were 1st cousins. Doh! I have never been so disappointed as I was then... :P

    --
    THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    1. Re:Could be useful... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Long story short: After a very short conversation about relatives we found out that my mom and her dad were 1st cousins. Doh! I have never been so disappointed as I was then... :P

      Second cousins, then. Biologically, that makes you basically complete strangers....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Could be useful... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      from a genetic standpoint you were safe
      sibling share on average what 23 chromosomes :. offspring have and average of 12 dupes
      1st cousins share 12 :. 6 dupes
      2nd cosines share 6 :. 3 dupes
      add in mutation rate in humans of 175 nucleotides per generation per chromosome, and you safe as long as you don't have a family doing it for multiple generations.
      socially however you would be frowned upon.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Could be useful... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      After a very short conversation about relatives we found out that my mom and her dad were 1st cousins. Doh! I have never been so disappointed as I was then... :P

      Must be cultural. If you had half a brain, you'd seize the opportunity.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Could be useful... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      from a genetic standpoint you were safe
      sibling share on average what 23 chromosomes :. offspring have and average of 12 dupes
      1st cousins share 12 :. 6 dupes
      2nd cosines share 6 :. 3 dupes
      add in mutation rate in humans of 175 nucleotides per generation per chromosome, and you safe as long as you don't have a family doing it for multiple generations.
      socially however you would be frowned upon.

      True, however once the two of us realized the truth it was an instant turn-off for both of us.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    5. Re:Could be useful... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Long story short: After a very short conversation about relatives we found out that my mom and her dad were 1st cousins. Doh! I have never been so disappointed as I was then... :P

      Second cousins, then. Biologically, that makes you basically complete strangers....

      We actually were complete strangers at first. Finding out that we were 2nd cousins put full reverse on any budding relationship. Damn shame too, she was cute, smart, and a personality that meshed well with mine. Oh well...

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    6. Re:Could be useful... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 2

      Must be cultural. If you had half a brain, you'd seize the opportunity.

      True. Fortunately I have a whole brain.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    7. Re:Could be useful... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      True. Fortunately I have a whole brain.

      Obviously, you're very good at hiding it! You'd make a good spy.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Could be useful... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you're very good at hiding it! You'd make a good spy.

      It's a gift.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    9. Re:Could be useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from a genetic standpoint you were safe
      sibling share on average what 23 chromosomes :. offspring have and average of 12 dupes
      1st cousins share 12 :. 6 dupes
      2nd cosines share 6 :. 3 dupes
      add in mutation rate in humans of 175 nucleotides per generation per chromosome, and you safe as long as you don't have a family doing it for multiple generations.
      socially however you would be frowned upon.

      True, however once the two of us realized the truth it was an instant turn-off for both of us.

      This must be cultural. Some cultures in Asia, at least the Chinese, marrying cousin is totally fine. It is quite common as a base for love stories.

      In fact, if you are teenage boy with a younger teen girl cousin that looks halfway decent, every friend who found out would have asked you if you are already dating her.

    10. Re:Could be useful... by dwye · · Score: 1

      Second cousins (what you too were) is only incest among the Brahmins of India (where it is apparently incestuous out to 7th cousins), and that only by custom, not law. Genetically, she might be any stranger of the same ethnic group. Of course, if second cousin is too close to you, it is too close, but that is a matter of choices, not law or genetics.

  21. Genetic Makeup by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 2

    New, from Mabeline.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Genetic Makeup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, I always thought Mabeline was a disease. You know... Maybe she's got it? Maybe it's Mabeline?

  22. Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by Anaerin · · Score: 1

    If you go back far enough, you'll find that you are related to Charlemagne, or Ghandi. The higher you go up your family tree, the more parents, and parents' parents appear, in an (almost) exponential spread. Well, unless you're part of the royal family, or in the deep south of the US, where family trees tend to be a lot... slimmer...

    1. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      If you go back far enough, you'll find that you are related to Charlemagne, or Ghandi.
      .
      .
      Well, unless you're part of the royal family, or in the deep south of the US, where family trees tend to be a lot... slimmer...

      And oddly enough, I am both descended from Charlemagne (according to a great-aunt who did some genealogy research several decades ago), and from the Deep South (though I only lived there for one year before I was an adult - career military brat).

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by Rogue+Haggis+Landing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      unless you're part of the royal family, or in the deep south of the US, where family trees tend to be a lot... slimmer...

      The classic example of this is, of course, poor mentally and physically disabled Carlos II of Spain of the cousin-bonking Hapsburgs. His father was his mother's uncle, and the family tree just gets worse from there. To quote Wikipedia, "Joanna [of Castile] was two of Charles' 16 great-great-great-grandmothers, six of his 32 great-great-great-great-grandmothers, and six of his 64 great-great-great-great-great-grandmothers." Oh, and Joanna went insane early in her life, so she wasn't exactly a genetic marvel herself. No wonder poor Chuck turned into something only a couple of steps above a wet sack of blubbering goo.

    3. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'll find that you are related to Charlemagne, or Ghandi.

      /facepalm

      That should be Genghis Kahn, you fool.

    4. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by dwye · · Score: 1

      If you go back far enough, you'll find that someone put one over on her husband, and your Nth grandfather on someone's side is actually NOT your Nth grandfather on that someone's side by blood, just by law. If anything, that Royalty intermarries so much ensures that the current claimants to their thrones probably have some sort of claim, even if by a roundabout path and via the wrong side of a few beds.

    5. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Why not Ghandi? Didn't he have ancestors that might be related to yours?

    6. Re:Hardly groundbreaking discoveries by timothy · · Score: 1

      If you go back far enough, you'll find that you are related to Charlemagne, or Ghandi.

      Which one?

      WHICH ONE?!

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  23. Support for Alabama planned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the next app release

  24. Cousins Not So bad Genetically. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Iceland might want to do some scientific research because they might as well ban older women from having babies, since cousin marriage has about the same risk for genetic abnormalities. Normal marriage has a about 2% chance vs 4% for cousin marriage/older mother. After all animals are breed to even closer relatives quite often.

    If they wanted to make a real difference gene testing is the only way to ensure that "bad" genes were breed out of course that would start to be a bit too eugenics for my taste. For social medicine state it would make sense to give free gene screening for any common genetic diseases partners might have for a given race. Also, a similar app could be made that just compared this data. Of course, someone would say lets ban marriage between partners that might give birth to inferior children to save money and of course think of as yet unborn children who wouldn't have to suffer.

    Also, the ain't cousin marriage movement was started by eugenics movement and city people are biased against country folk it stuck.

    1. Re:Cousins Not So bad Genetically. by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      Actually the risk of genetic problems in offspring is the same or even less than the risk of problems if a mother is over 40.

      Sarah Palin's, and Rick Santorum's, youngest kids have genetic issues because of that. So if we are going to ban incest because it creates a risk of genetic problems, we need to ban older pre-menopausal women from having sex too.

      My view is that we should legalize adult consensual incest, with moderate fines for getting pregnant I suppose.

    2. Re:Cousins Not So bad Genetically. by dwye · · Score: 1

      After all animals are breed to even closer relatives quite often.

      Except that most animals are not as closely related as most humans. There was a genetic bottleneck about 80K years ago, and if someone is Asian or European there was another bottleneck as only a few tribes seem to have made it from Africa to the Mid-East back in the Paleolithic, to spread to the rest of the world. OTOH, a dog has so much variation in its genome that a mongrel bitch bred with her male pups produces pups more distant genetically than any two humans.

  25. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This project is the byproducts of years of serious scientific research into genetic diseases by a company in Reykjavik called DeCode. The idea is that you can log into the thing with your social security number and trace your ancestry. There is no direct way you can trace the ancestry of other people or check whether you are related to somebody.The only purpose this serves, other than being interesting for geneticists and perhaps historians and genealogists, is to satisfy the Icelander's endless obsession with their ancestry. The further you can trace it back the more snob points you get. Especially if you can trace your ancestry back to the 9th or 10th century. Myself I have gotten as far as Harold Fairhair (lots and lots and lots of snob points), it also made it a bit strange to stand in the Viking Ship museum in Oslo and look at the skeleton of the woman they found in the Oseberg ship since she was in all likelihood the grandmother of Harald and thus my ancestor.

    Whoever wrote that piece is either stupid or has a very poor sense of humor. O,h and in case you haven't overdosed on incest jokes:

    Question: What happens when you marry your cousins for a thousand years?
    Answer: Icelanders.

    Question: What happens when you marry your half-sisters for a thousand years?
    Answer: The Faeroese.

  26. Incidentally by dorpus · · Score: 2

    When I went to grad school to get my PhD in biostatistics, they taught us in genetic epidemiology class that 1st cousin marriages do not have a significantly higher risk of genetic problems in offspring than marriages by unrelated people.

    Some parts of the world where 1st cousin marriages have taken place for many generations do have higher concentrations of some forms of thalassemia. But for a typical American who does not come from such a lineage, the medical risks of first cousin marriages are minimal.

  27. Hell no! by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    My cousin is totally hot!

  28. Only a concern in nations big on Eugenics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is interesting to note that the taboo on cousins marrying is missing in nations that did not pursue the sickening evil of Eugenics in the first half of the 20th century.

    Adolf Hitler actually thanked the Eugenic movement in the USA for providing the 'scientific' background for his 'race' policies in Nazi Germany. America was the heart of the eugenic movement then, and is its heart today. The owners of Slashdot, as backers of the same theory of 'racial purity', push articles like this as the usual crude propaganda.

    Of course, it is a curious and interesting fact that when REAL issues of genotype damage arise, due to the US military forces increasingly using so-called 'depleted' uranium weapons against civilian targets, the owners of Slashdot do everything they can to suppress such information. In Iraq, where American forces fully supported by the owners of Slashdot carried out a holocaust in Fallujah, levels of genetic damage and cancer rates exploded amongst the local population. Studies of hair taken from women whose hair growth had been continuous across the period including the atrocities showed the presence of radioactive uranium as well, proving that the US had been using the same uranium bombs (not as conventional nuclear weapons, obviously) as the depraved racist state of Israel in its terror attacks against those Humans the zionists label as 'sub-Human'.

    Eugenics, forced sterilization, female genital mutilation, electro-schock torture, and forced lobotomies have all been promoted by the highest scientific journals in the USA. The owners of Slashdot would like to see this tradition continue.

  29. 73 Comments so far by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    73 comments so far and no one's linked the obligatory xkcd?

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:73 Comments so far by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Meh. Maybe it's sacrilege here but xkcd is overrated IMO.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:73 Comments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely sacrilege.

  30. In Alabama... by gtbritishskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Incidentally, in Alabama the same app is used to find dates.

    1. Re:In Alabama... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Gotta catch them all.

    2. Re:In Alabama... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cousinmingle.com

    3. Re:In Alabama... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why the Obamaphone program should not be criticized.

  31. Patronyms and social mores. by wcrowe · · Score: 2

    At first I thought, "How could you not know?" But then I remembered that in Iceland, patronyms are common, and (so I've been told) there are not as many social stigmas surrounding unwed motherhood. So I suppose, when you meet someone, it really is possible that you could be related and not know it.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Patronyms and social mores. by dwye · · Score: 1

      And this app will not help unless the unwed mothers accurately listed the sires (to use the animal breeding term). And the wed mothers, for that matter.

  32. Almost Did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was close to the cousin scene at one point....and probably would have. Complications.

  33. On an island that small... by Necron69 · · Score: 1

    Why don't you know who your cousins are?

    We don't have a particularly close extended family, and my cousins are scattered around the US (and even some overseas). I still know who they all are.

    I can see the occasional family feud causing issues, but is not knowing your cousins a really common thing in Iceland? Are we talking second and third cousins or something?

    - Necron69

  34. Not to mention... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...all those people who are actually into incest - and then they find out they are adopted.
    Aaaaawkwaaard!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Not to mention... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Gives new meaning to:

      "I feel like I don't even know you...."

  35. OOOH new Icelandic pickup line... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    New Icelandic pickup line:
    Nice gen, langar aà skrÃfa?

    (Nice genes, wanna screw?)

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  36. Well, in their defense... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...it was probably either that or giving in to the insistence of the vocal conservative minority and calling it "Whores!"

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Well, in their defense... by tnk1 · · Score: 0

      They're not idiots. They know the girls didn't take money for sex.

      The correct term is "Sluts!".

  37. One would think, but I once witnessed ... by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I sure know who my cousins are, so that was my first thought. Then I remembered when I was watching to mutual friends get to know each other, with a flirty vibe. After talking for ten minutes or so, they realized they had the same grandfather. The dude sure looked socked and disappointed.

  38. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most countries, marrying cousins is NOT considered 'incest' so can we please stop being childish over this.

  39. No, that's more like interpolating by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Extrapolating would be extending the conclusion outside of the dataset. Interpolating is applying a conclusion within the data range, so you're (sort of) interpolating.

    To turn the statement into something more like extrapolation:
    An average Icelander has something like a dozen sexual partners in life, seventy percent are happy with one-night stands.
    Therefore Nordic countries, including Sweden and Finland, are promiscuous.

    1. Re:No, that's more like interpolating by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 1

      Oy, don't leave us Danes out of all that promiscuous fun!

  40. Why? by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    Is this really common enough to require an app? Average household size is only 2.5 people, so large estranged families have to be pretty rare.

    It seems far more likely to have an issue due to your mother not admitting (or not knowing) who your actual genetic father is, or in the case of an adoptee perhaps not knowing who either parent is. I have a good friend who found he had a half-brother and a whole exteded half-family he didn't know about after taking a genetic test ("Um, mom...we gotta talk..."). As a half adoptee, I suppose that would be useful to me too (but I'm not "on the market".)

    Getting some kind of mutual genetic relation percentage would be useful both for solving the *real* issue this app is trying to solve, and to give the two people in question something of mutual interest to talk about, no matter what the result. A "are you my cousin or can be bump uglies" app just would be awkward.

  41. It all makes sense now by McGregorMortis · · Score: 1

    So, in Iceland accidentally sleeping with your cousin in a very real danger. That explains some things... like Bjork.

  42. So are we talking about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Near Fuck Communication?

  43. One of the nice things about visiting Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can "tap it" without worrying about being "related" to it... :)

  44. re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this app has been banned in Mississippi and Alabama

  45. Wiretapping... by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    When I read the title in my RSS feed I had assumed Iceland had began some sort of absurd wiretapping program to catch people engaging in incest.

    Kinda sad how quickly that was my first assumption. I'm glad I was wrong and not yet another government going to weird lengths to catch people doing things.

  46. Translation into English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hottest, youngest, most desirable girls want Jerks, plain and simple. That arrogant, a-hole dominance and social command that makes every other woman and girl want them. If you don't have that, go home.

    Older, uglier, wall-hitting women will compromise and accept for sex (and passionless semi-platonic relationships mixed with dutiful sex) those men who are "nice" but lack the dominance, success with women, social power, cruelty (a huge turn on for women, though they deny it) that even Older Women/girls want but can no longer command.

    You see this in High School and College. Senior girls are not interested in dweeby freshmen boys and men, while their male counterparts definitely are, "SWUG" (Senior Washed Up Girl) have to settle if they have not already snagged a semi permanent boyfriend by late sophomore year. Yes in the intense competition for the few truly Alpha males, a girl can be "washed up" and hitting the wall at age 21, in her social context. Out of college, of course, she's got a bigger age group but less close-in-age dominant, Alpha, sexy males.

    Translation: become as dominant, sexy, charismatic, and successful as you can with women if you are a man.

    1. Re:Translation into English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: become as dominant, sexy, charismatic, and successful as you can with women if you are a man.

      You don't have to "dominate" the object of your attraction, though - unless you are into that and so is she, which is less common than you probably think - you can totally dominate your own life and that works just fine. It usually entails getting in a few fights, though, because there's lots of categories of challenge you cannot back down from if you truly wish to appear dominant.

      I laid a lot of fine women, to our mutual and enduring enjoyment, between the ages of 19 and 40... but I also have a lot of enduring scar tissue from various female-impressing hijinks.

  47. this doesn't say a lot... by TitusGroan8856 · · Score: 1

    doesn't say a lot for the chances of casual sex in Iceland.

  48. Thanks but... by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The likelihood that I'd pick up a cousin at the family reunion is orders of magnitude greater than turning to /. for mating advice.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  49. Danger Zone by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

    In my experience, alcohol and a good wingman can help you make the transition.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  50. "Assholes" and "Equals" by Guppy · · Score: 1

    You confuse "being a doormat" with "being nice." All those guys who you think are assholes for not treating a girl the way you would? They're treating a girl like the girl is an EQUAL

    Have you seen the way girls themselves treat their actual peers/equals (i.e., other girls)? I'd say "asshole" is not an inaccurate way to describe it.

  51. Nice phone by PPH · · Score: 1

    I'd tap that.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  52. Code 46 by qeorqe · · Score: 1
    Does the app also report code 46 violations?

    see also: code 46

  53. Waste of Tokens by Dareth · · Score: 1

    "women aren't just vending machines you put niceness tokens into until sex comes out."

    *SPOILER ALERT* - Don't click link unless you finished Baldur's Gate 2.

    What a waste of tokens! You need 15 to get the Boots of Speed!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling