Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft CFO Quits

McGruber writes "NBC News is reporting that Microsoft's Chief Financial Officer Peter Klein is leaving the company to spend time with his extended family, as Microsoft 'struggles with sharply declining personal computer sales and a lukewarm reception for its new Windows 8 operating system.' Klein is the latest in a line of top-level executives to leave the company, following Windows head Steven Sinofsky last November."

295 comments

  1. Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    do the right thing.

    1. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, Balmer is definitely the problem.

    2. Re:Come on CEO... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ballmer is not the problem --- that guy is only PART of a very BIG problem

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    3. Re:Come on CEO... by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why? I think Ballmer is doing a fantastic job and he should keep up the hard chair throwing work.

      Because for every chair thrown another bad quarter for MSFT happens.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Come on CEO... by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      he represents the problem, and he's also responsible for the company *as* CEO. So either he fixes the problem or he is the problem.

    5. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever SEEN Ballmer? I have talked to him in person once and have seen a talk (incoherent rant) by him once. He is the bigges problem they have at MS. They have others but he is by far the biggest. He has the same reality distortion field Jobs had, but it affects only him.

    6. Re:Come on CEO... by Ironhandx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fixing a problem as large as the one at microsoft is a top-down job. You absolutely require a new CEO to fix it. Therefore stating that Ballmer is by far their largest problem is entirely accurate.

    7. Re:Come on CEO... by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you ever SEEN Ballmer? I have talked to him in person once and have seen a talk (incoherent rant) by him once. He is the bigges problem they have at MS. They have others but he is by far the biggest. He has the same reality distortion field Jobs had, but it affects only him.

      Hmm, sounds like he's such an ass that instead of a distortion field he's become large and dense enough to collapse into a singularity.

      Interestingly, it seems something like Hawking radiation is occurring at the edge of the singularity's influence: The Chief Officers begin radiating away from the company's event horizon giving one reason to those on the outside, while the actual reasons for departure fall back inward toward the singularity.

      If only there were a name for such phenomena where you become so dense and toxic that no intelligible thoughts escape you and everything within your reach turns to crap -- Sort of like a social version of a blackhole... hmm. Any ideas?

    8. Re:Come on CEO... by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, Balmer is definitely the problem.

      Ever wonder how Steve Ballmer keeps his job. Well, here it is:

      Bill Gates is Chairman of Microsoft's Board of Directors and Microsoft's largest stockholder

      Steve Ballmer was best man at Bill Gates' wedding.

    9. Re:Come on CEO... by Talderas · · Score: 5, Funny

      If only there were a name for such phenomena where you become so dense and toxic that no intelligible thoughts escape you and everything within your reach turns to crap -- Sort of like a social version of a blackhole... hmm. Any ideas?

      Politician.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    10. Re:Come on CEO... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      yes and that PART would be the BIG part.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I saw Ballmer in Nashville a few years back. Someone mentioned Windows Phone and its failing market share. His response was **crickets**. At that dev meeting, he did sign a laptop - a Macbook Pro that had Windows in a VM.

    12. Re:Come on CEO... by gtall · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, Ballmer's doing to MS exactly like some of us would like to do to MS. MS deserves Ballmer.

    13. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's the boss... so he IS the problem.

    14. Re:Come on CEO... by nojayuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steve Ballmer has been in a senior position at MicroSoft for about thirty years now, unlike the typical bungee boss CEOs and board members of various other high-tech corporations such as HP (remember Carly?). During the time he's been working there MS total turnover has been about half a trillion bucks. I'd say US high-tech businesses could use some more chair-throwers like Ballmer and fewer wily super-geniuses like Fiorina.

    15. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blackballmer.

    16. Re:Come on CEO... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      He's the CEO. He leads the company. Unless someone else is calling the shots, he's responsible for the performance of the company.

    17. Re:Come on CEO... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmm, sounds like he's such an ass that instead of a distortion field he's become large and dense enough to collapse into a singularity.

      Interestingly, it seems something like Hawking radiation is occurring at the edge of the singularity's influence: The Chief Officers begin radiating away from the company's event horizon giving one reason to those on the outside, while the actual reasons for departure fall back inward toward the singularity.

      If only there were a name for such phenomena where you become so dense and toxic that no intelligible thoughts escape you and everything within your reach turns to crap -- Sort of like a social version of a blackhole... hmm. Any ideas?

      Ideas? Sure. First idea: you ran with the metaphor WAY too long ;).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    18. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your argument makes no sense. Saying that the Ballmer is no worse than Fiorini is no reason to keep Ballmer - there are far better alternatives around.

      A tech company (eventually, if they actually have a chance) lives and dies by its engineers. Do any of you know a great engineer that WANTS to work for Ballmer, that is inspired by him and his insight? Now... ask the same question about Larry Page, or Steve Jobs, Hell, for big old companies, even include John Chambers or Larry Ellison. Where are the great engineers, who can go anywhere they want to, going to go? Not to Microsoft, and they have not wanted to go to Microsoft for at least 10 years.

      Now, ask the same thing about other professions - sales, CFO. The future is elsewhere at least partly BECAUSE of Ballmer. He is just not a credible leader.

    19. Re:Come on CEO... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The root of the problem is that Gates set the company to run business units like mini-startups... With super-tough managers over each one. Then Gates stepped back and provided the money and cheerleading. The problem is that the culture developed of the business unit managers all stabbing EACH OTHER in the back to get ahead. So Office, servers, IE, and Windows units are all to some extent fighting for turf because Gates gave it to two different groups, or technology changed. Ballmer is just continuing what he was taught.

      Steve Jobs took the opposite approach (but only after he was kicked out and came back). If a product or service wasn't worth SETVE'S time then it was "coasting" or cut. Steve built Apple around its CEO paying attention to every detail of new products... And ATTENTION is limited and expensive.

      The idea to chop Microsoft into thirds is Past time. Microsoft should have done it five to ten years ago when they were fighting breaking up. Now, they are fighting to be interesting at all. They need to cut or spinoff technologies.. But they need a CEO that LOVES THEIR PRODUCTS. If anything THAT is what made Steve-notes so special... The CEO of the company knew the product inside out and was excited and loved it! Microsoft needs to shed and pair down until that is true of their products and CEO.

    20. Re:Come on CEO... by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Saying that the Ballmer is no worse than Fiorini is no reason to keep Ballmer - there are far better alternatives around."

      Such as? Who's available, with the sort of deep knowledge of where MS came from, where it is today and where it is going tomorrow and who can step in and make MS even better than it is today with minimal disruption to the financial bottom line? Hmmm, tricky...

      Some day MS is going to have to cope without Steve B., hopefully not in the same way that Apple is handling the loss of Steve Jobs but that day isn't here yet. I find the idea that Ballmer is some kind of liability to MS quite amusing considering what would/will happen to the business if/when he does leave.

    21. Re:Come on CEO... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interestingly Microsoft is starting to realize, too late, that it has been a "Windows(TM)" company, and not a technology company. The fact that they tried to tie everything to Windows(TM), is the problem. Replace Windows(TM) (with say .. Android or iOS) and all of a sudden, your whole core is gone and all the supporting products are worth less. And that is what is happening. People are realizing that you don't need Windows(TM) to get stuff done. And in fact, you don't need Windows(TM) most of the time.

      And since people are realizing this, they are exploring other options.The days of being able to sell Windows 95 for $150 and have people line up around the block have long since been over. The Windows ship has sailed.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    22. Re:Come on CEO... by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      They could always take back Elop from Nokia. He's basically still working for them anyway.

    23. Re:Come on CEO... by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Well, that is true, the CEO is the ultimate representative in the company. But I think the funky monkey Steve Ballmer is often perceived as the cause of this and that because people simply cannot name many other people inside Microsoft. For example, how many reading this story knew that there was a guy called "Peter Klein" playing the part of CFO?

    24. Re:Come on CEO... by CanEHdian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bill Gates is Chairman of Microsoft's Board of Directors and Microsoft's largest stockholder

      The solution is obvious. Gates needs to retire. I, for one, would say that Steve Ballmer has "Chair-man" written all over him.

      Mark Zuckerberg should be hired as the new CEO. One new project will be Microsoft ofFACE - the ultimate social office experience.

      Peter changed his status to: "Going home sick (wink wink)"
      Janice added "Sales Forecast 2016" to PowerPoint Gallery
      John is writing: "Peter termination letter.docx".

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    25. Re:Come on CEO... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Bring back Bill Gates like Steve Jobs to Apple. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    26. Re:Come on CEO... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry Taco but he really IS the problem. I mean look at their track record under his watch, how many hits have they had? One and a half, Win 7 and X360 (which should only count as a half thanks to the 2.4 billion the RRoD cost) and now lets look at just a PARTIAL list of the failures...Zune, Kin, killing a growing playsforsure market for the DOA Zune market, Sidekick, Vista, 6 billion pissed away for that ad company that went nowhere, more money pissed away for Yahoo Search, 4 billion blown on the Windows 8 launch to get less than 4 million takers (which figures up to $500 for every $40 copy sold,hell he could have just gave everyone $50 for taking it and came out ahead) and WinRT.

      You wanna know the part that REALLY pisses me off? If the rumors are true thanks to Ballmer getting on his knees and begging Intel to save his behind there is a damned good chance Intel can save the Win 8 Vistabomb which will keep his fat ass in the big chair for at least one more release, thanks a fricking lot Intel. For those that haven't heard the rumor is a dual core Atom tablet with Windows 8 for just $225. If they manage to hit that price point you are gonna see a hell of an uptake simply because you won't be able to get anything that will run your Windows software for cheaper and if the new Atom's sub 2w power usage is correct we may actually finally get an all day laptop since they'll most likely sell a keyboard with extra battery ala the transformer.

      But even if Intel manages to save his fat hide it won't change the fact that windows 8 is DOA on desktops and laptops, hell its bad enough all the major hardware sites have "Not ready to switch? We have Windows 7!" ads...the guy is a trainwreck of a CEO, no doubt about it. You could have hired a monkey to throw poo at the stock page and had a better ROI than Ballmer had, he must have blown 20 billion plus these past 6 years and didn't have squat for a ROI.

      Frankly the only positive is if Intel manages to save his fat ass and give him a tablet that sells maybe he will STFU and let Windows 9 be Windows 7.1 but if he sticks to the road he has the company on he can kiss those piles of money they get from X86 desktops and laptops bye bye as all the OEMs are looking at exit strategies. You know that your CEO is made of suck when he actually loses share in a monopoly situation, hell my mom could run the company better than he has.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:Come on CEO... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The solution is obvious. Gates needs to retire.

      I disagree. The comic relief is essential to partially make up for all the damage they did and to some extent are still trying to do. Best is if Bill Gates just carries on besmirching his own place in history and dragging Microsoft through the street filth as it so richly deserves. A little more raping of investors who hoped to cash in on Microsoft's illegal business model won't hurt either.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole?

    29. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon Ballmer's going to run out of people to throw the chair at. It'll be just him. He's going to have to hire people just to fire, hoping *that* will fix the problems.

    30. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark Russinovich

    31. Re: Come on CEO... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    32. Re:Come on CEO... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its not that, its the fact that time and time again he has ignored all the data including their testers, the press, and most importantly their customers, and its cost the company billions.

      I mean why in the fuck even HAVE a beta tester program if you are gonna go "LA LA LA" to every single problem the testers point out? And while you certainly can't always go by the press, as for one thing they all seem enamored so much with smartphones they actually believe people are gonna give up their desktops and laptops for them, but when you have virtually the entire press and blogosphere saying "THIS REALLY SUCKS!" ya know what? it probably DOES really suck and needs to be fixed.

      Yet time and time again he has given the finger to all that aren't drinking the koolaid and its cost them billions.They blew billions of the Vista launch only for it to become the punchline of jokes when all they needed was to fix the more serious issues before launch, blew 8 billion on Skype only to realize they had no damned idea how to monetize it and to make matter worse forced a good chunk of their most loyal users to switch (see the recent uptick in yahoo, I can tell you its the former Hotmail and Windows messenger users jumping ship) because they tried to hamhandedly jam Skype in where it just didn't fit, and of course the billions spent on windows 8 ads when practically every single beta tester and tech blogger was saying its gonna fricking bomb, which what do you know, it did.

      Honestly i don't even know who to compare Ballmer to as i can't think of a CEO that completely ignored everything they were being told, never before have I seen a company so large just whip out a gun and shoot themselves in the head like that. Everyone said Elop was a plant but look at who he learned from folks, Ballmer could be the subject of textbooks dedicated to showing how NOT to run a successful company. When he took over from Gates they were on top of the world, had a monopoly and money to burn, but under Ballmer it became a "lost decade" because he simply didn't know what to do with the company.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    33. Re:Come on CEO... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Allchin or Ozzie or Russinovich. frankly any of those could run the company better, they know the products inside and out (hell Russinovich frankly knows the guts of Windows better than a good chunk of their engineers which is why MSFT bought Sysinternals) and I have NO doubt any of those could do a better job than the Ballminator.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not the Ballmer MS needs, but the Ballmer MS deserves.

    35. Re:Come on CEO... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Some day MS is going to have to cope without Steve B

      They coped well enough without Bill Gates.

      MS has (had?) real bright folks, real talents who are more than capable of putting out decent products that the consumer will continue to lap up. They even have geniuses who have the drive and vision that would take them to the next level.

      But even if they don't go with the genius visionaries, all they need to do to make another solid quarter is put out a decent makeover to an existing product. Do you realize that? While other companies need to struggle and fight to gain marketshare and market dominance, all MS needs to do is not fuck up too badly. And yet, they somehow still managed to do it.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    36. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft already had that moment when bill gates stopped being involved in day to day operations. Bill and Steve Jobs are comparable, not Steve Ballmer. It's like if apple lost tim cook. I think Tim Cook is much better than Ballmer, but he had strengths and weaknesses. jobs and cook were a great TEAM. ballmer and gates were a great team. Individually it's just a whole lot of garfunkel. Everyone knows paul simon was the thing.

    37. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly i don't even know who to compare Ballmer to as i can't think of a CEO that completely ignored everything they were being told, never before have I seen a company so large just whip out a gun and shoot themselves in the head like that. Everyone said Elop was a plant but look at who he learned from folks, Ballmer could be the subject of textbooks dedicated to showing how NOT to run a successful company. When he took over from Gates they were on top of the world, had a monopoly and money to burn, but under Ballmer it became a "lost decade" because he simply didn't know what to do with the company.

      Ballmer and Elop are probably the only two worth comparing, and you're right - Elop probably learned a lot from Ballmer. Yet it's Elop that got the term "Elop Effect" named after him for what he did to Nokia, and who will certainly go down in the text books for it. Ballmer, though, probably won't be far behind with "Lost Decade", but it's not as catchy, nor has what he done been as dramatic to the company as Elop was with Nokia - and there are a lot of other things that could be linked to the demise of Microsoft as well - Ballmer has only been on (albeit large) factor in the equation.

      Removing Ballmer won't be the whole solution for Microsoft. You need to remove numerous layers of management at the company - getting rid of everyone that has grown up there under Ballmer and Gates, everyone that has that same mentality of having "1 Microsoft Way" for the world of software. Then and only then does Microsoft stand a chance of reviving itself to any degree...

      In the mean time they'll continue to ride out their profits from Windows and Office as the two diminish into oblivion over the next decade.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    38. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Interestingly Microsoft is starting to realize, too late, that it has been a "Windows(TM)" company, and not a technology company. The fact that they tried to tie everything to Windows(TM), is the problem. Replace Windows(TM) (with say .. Android or iOS) and all of a sudden, your whole core is gone and all the supporting products are worthless. And that is what is happening. People are realizing that you don't need Windows(TM) to get stuff done. And in fact, you don't need Windows(TM) most of the time.

      And since people are realizing this, they are exploring other options.The days of being able to sell Windows 95 for $150 and have people line up around the block have long since been over. The Windows ship has sailed.

      There, fixed it for you. They're not "worth less"; they're entirely "worthless".

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    39. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Steve Ballmer has been in a senior position at MicroSoft for about thirty years now, unlike the typical bungee boss CEOs and board members of various other high-tech corporations such as HP (remember Carly?). During the time he's been working there MS total turnover has been about half a trillion bucks. I'd say US high-tech businesses could use some more chair-throwers like Ballmer and fewer wily super-geniuses like Fiorina.

      Yes, Ballmer has been part of the senior management team since the early days of Microsoft. But he hasn't really had the reigns until the last 10 years - after Gates stepped aside as part of the resolution to the Antitrust problems, never to be CEO of anything again as a result. Ballmer still has to deal with Gates as Gates is on the Board of Directors (still Chairman of the Board IIRC).

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    40. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 0

      Bring back Bill Gates like Steve Jobs to Apple. :P

      They cannot do so legally. When a company is found to be inviolation of Antitrust laws, the CEO who precided is also required to be removed from the position and not allowed to a member of the company officers for any company ever again. Gates cannot legally be a corporate officer for any company. His Chairmanship of the Board of Directors for Microsoft is about the most he can do.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    41. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this happen in a company I worked for. Bad leadership stood there for years until the investors got tired. I hope they figure it out sooner than later. I would hate to see years of good tech go to waste.

    42. Re:Come on CEO... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      They aren't worthless, someone is willing to pay for them, just not the $399 for Office that MS thinks it is worth. At $25, it is worth it to someone. Problem is, try to get Office for Android ...

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    43. Re:Come on CEO... by nojayuk · · Score: 3, Informative

      In 2002 MicroSoft's gross profits were $24 billion. In 2012 they were $59 billion. Someone somewhere is doing something right.

    44. Re:Come on CEO... by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, Jobs was a marketing genius. (Look at apple now) Balmer... not so much a marketing anything.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    45. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this one do?

    46. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      In 2002 MicroSoft's gross profits were $24 billion. In 2012 they were $59 billion. Someone somewhere is doing something right.

      Investors don't care about gross profits (difference between sale price and cost to make it). They care about net profits (difference between expenses and revenues). I could have gross profits of $100 Trillion, but if my net profits are only $1 then it the company is not doing well financially despite selling high margin products.

      For comparison:

      1. 2002: Microsoft had net profit of $7.83 Billion USD. source
      2. 2012: Microsoft had net profit of $16.978 Billion USD. source

      Now comparing the numbers - 24/7.83 = 3.065; 59/16.978 = 3.475. So Microsoft is doing only marginly better in now than it was a decade ago.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    47. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      They aren't worthless, someone is willing to pay for them, just not the $399 for Office that MS thinks it is worth. At $25, it is worth it to someone. Problem is, try to get Office for Android ...

      They are "worthless" on non-Windows platforms as they are non-existent. They may be "worth less" on Windows platforms; but that was not the argument being made.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    48. Re:Come on CEO... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Realizing too late? MS is a Windows company? I don't think you or Slashdot understand what MS is or what it does.

      MS is a productivity software and services company that happens to make an OS. Just like Apple is a hardware and services company that just happens to make an OS. Both of these companies use their OS as a means, nothing more.

      Google the last MS earnings report. You'll see that even though Windows 8 and surface is being heralded as a huge failure, that division still made 5.9 billion in revenue. This quarter! "See!" you say! It is a Windows company! But no! Not really. That is a small fraction (only 15%) of the total revenue MS gets. The vast majority of it's revenue and profitability comes from Office. Throw in Windows Server and SQL Server for kicks; those also drive more revenue than Windows.

      Their new office line, Office 365, is already a 1 billion dollars a quarter division. And it's basically brand new. And it hasn't rolled out apps to android or iOS yet. Look for that in late 2013. Once that hits your "for fun" iPad becomes a serious productivity contender.

      So no. MS is not a Windows company. It hasn't been for a very long time. No ship is sailing anywhere...except maybe the bank.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    49. Re:Come on CEO... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Office Web may be doable on Android/iOS. Native versions may be on the road, but not before 2014. And since Microsoft doesn't have a viable OS for Mobile market (RT is DOA, and Win 8 isn't "windows" at all), Microsoft is getting further behind every moment.

      If i were MS CEO, I'd put everything I had into getting Office out for Android and iOS, (and linux)., I'd give them to end of 2013 for public beta. By saying Office is "Windows only" (Mac exception of course), they have tied their bread and butter to a dying OS. Problem is, Balmer can't inspire anyone any more. The Flying Chair thing only works once.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    50. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Office Web may be doable on Android/iOS. Native versions may be on the road, but not before 2014. And since Microsoft doesn't have a viable OS for Mobile market (RT is DOA, and Win 8 isn't "windows" at all), Microsoft is getting further behind every moment.

      Agreed.

      If i were MS CEO, I'd put everything I had into getting Office out for Android and iOS, (and linux)., I'd give them to end of 2013 for public beta. By saying Office is "Windows only" (Mac exception of course), they have tied their bread and butter to a dying OS. Problem is, Balmer can't inspire anyone any more. The Flying Chair thing only works once.

      Problem is that Ballmer is still under Gates (Chairman of the Board of Directors, IIRC; at very least on the BoD) and thereby still required to present the "Windows only" world that Gates envisioned and is at the core of Microsoft. There are also too many people at Microsoft that think that way still - having grown up under Gates and Ballmer. You have to get rid of each and every one of them to make a turn around possible.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    51. Re:Come on CEO... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      If you go through my posts and comments enough, you see me say that Microsoft being a "Windows" company is going to kill them. Going back at least 5 years ago, possibly more. Back then, people often made fun of me. It is Microsoft's worse trait, because it is what has made them the most money.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    52. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't inflation grand?

    53. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      If you go through my posts and comments enough, you see me say that Microsoft being a "Windows" company is going to kill them. Going back at least 5 years ago, possibly more. Back then, people often made fun of me.

      I fully agree it's what is going to kill them.

      It is Microsoft's worse trait, because it is what has made them the most money.

      I don't agree it's their worst trait though. Their worst trait is part of what drives them to be a "Windows" only company - and that is the insistence that everything be part of their ecosystem. That was true even under DOS before they had Windows. They have a severe case of NIH syndrome; even to the point of partnering with people only to learn about their partner's product enough to replicate it in-house and eventually put their partner out of business if they couldn't fight back. The "Windows" only view is derived from that, and is something that Gates instilled in the company, which is why I have said for years (more than 5 years) that for Microsoft to turn around everyone that was influenced by Gates at the company - everyone that was there when Gates was still in charge - must go - that you have to turn over the top 7 of 15 layers of the company entirely.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    54. Re:Come on CEO... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The bitch is it wouldn't be hard at all to fix the company if you had a CEO with just a sliver of common sense. make TIFKAM completely optional and give Win 8 and Win 9 a full Win 7 desktop for those that don't want TIFKAM and that would solve the major hurdle for Windows 8, take a page not from Apple but from IBM and sell services to go with the software, and either spin off or isolate mobile and entertainment from Windows and Office so that there won't be any pressure to try to sell Windows and Office where they just don't fit.

      And I did come up with an analogy after thinking of it for awhile...AOL. The former head of Nullsoft talked about how AOL just killed the forward momentum of WinAmp by trying to tie everything to "the service" which was not only stupid as WinAmp users weren't gonna want nor use AOHell dialup but by trying to jam it down their throats caused them to abandon WinAmp en masse.

      We are seeing the same thing with MSFT, they are trying to tie their WinPhone UI to a desktop where it not only isn't wanted but likewise is running off customers en masse but you have them trying to fit everything into that Windows/Office mindset, just look at how they thought bundling Office into WinRT would be a selling point when consumers don't give a rat's ass about MS Office. No matter how you slice it though they had better change direction because the current path has them being RIM in less than 5 years.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    55. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anon to keep my moderation...

      JOEL SPOLSKY!!!

    56. Re:Come on CEO... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      They are "worthless" on non-Windows platforms as they are non-existent.

      Yeah i totally don't run office on my mac...oh wait...

    57. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? I think Ballmer is doing a fantastic job and he should keep up the hard chair throwing work.

      Because for every chair thrown another bad quarter for MSFT happens.

      actually they are posting record fiscal quarter highs.

    58. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The are making more than double the net profit! it doesn't matter that they are spending more to make that increased profit.

    59. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      false, on both counts. the simple fact that the anti-trust settlement occurred over half a decade before gates actually resigned should tell you that immediatly anyway.

    60. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Effective trolling requires that your comments not be *so* outlandish and absurd as to instantly betray their trollishness. Poe's law doesn't even work on this one.

    61. Re:Come on CEO... by gottabeme · · Score: 0

      But would it have been modded down if he's said, "Republican"?

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    62. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      ...it wouldn't be hard at all to fix the company if you had a CEO with just a sliver of common sense.

      It would be a lot harder than you think...mostly because there is a lot of momentum in Microsoft behind their ill business practices and their Windows-only world view. To fix the company you have to change that entire world view, which is not an easy task. Even Gates couldn't stand up and change it; though he'd have the best luck doing so of any of the old guard.

      make TIFKAM completely optional and give Win 8 and Win 9 a full Win 7 desktop for those that don't want TIFKAM and that would solve the major hurdle for Windows 8

      Yes, it would slow the trend away from Windows, but it would not stop it. Companies started looking at alternatives to Windows back around 2000 when Microsoft changed their Volume Licensing program in a way that benefited Microsoft but hurt their enterprise customers. They've been evaluating alterntives since. Vista gave it a big kick up, and Win8 even more so. So expect more large companies to move off of Windows entirely in the year or so; companies like IBM have already paved the way, as well as municipalities like Berlin.

      take a page not from Apple but from IBM and sell services to go with the software, and either spin off or isolate mobile and entertainment from Windows and Office so that there won't be any pressure to try to sell Windows and Office where they just don't fit.

      Again, you're not seeing the picture. Microsoft needs services to survive. But the company is dependent on the income from Windows and Office to operate, instead of services like Bing (Advertising), XBox Live (Games), Windows (App) Store, MSN, etc. The Windows and Office products are over the next decade become less and less important and drive less and less revenue to Microsoft. If they don't figure out how to replace that revenue, then it will eventually cause the company to (i) shrink dramatically, and (ii) impode in on itself under its own weight.

      And I did come up with an analogy after thinking of it for awhile...AOL. The former head of Nullsoft talked about how AOL just killed the forward momentum of WinAmp by trying to tie everything to "the service" which was not only stupid as WinAmp users weren't gonna want nor use AOHell dialup but by trying to jam it down their throats caused them to abandon WinAmp en masse.

      As a former WinAMP user (the late 1990's to 2010) - I stopped using it for one reason: I stopped using Windows and it wasn't available on any other platform. I'd still probably prefer it to Amarok. I never saw any "AOL" tie in or requirement with it.

      We are seeing the same thing with MSFT, they are trying to tie their WinPhone UI to a desktop where it not only isn't wanted but likewise is running off customers en masse

      They finally decided to do something different for mobile, but then instead of just doing it for mobile they pushed it on all their platforms. They still don't understand the markets, and that is as simple as it is. They live in a bubble that is Microsoft, Windows, and Office where Apple will always be viewed as a niche player and Linux will always be viewed a hobby OS, and nothing else exists.

      but you have them trying to fit everything into that Windows/Office mindset

      That has always been Microsoft's mindset. Gates instilled in the company the philosophy that everything must be Windows-centric, that the world must revolve around Microsoft and all else be damned. That is why you saw them fight so hard to make OOXML a standard; and fight so hard to keep ODF from becoming the new dominant standard - though they are failing there as countries outside the US are slowly adopting ODF as their official government standard file formats.

      just look at how they thought bundling Office into WinRT would be a selling point whe

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    63. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      They are "worthless" on non-Windows platforms as they are non-existent.

      Yeah i totally don't run office on my mac...oh wait...

      But it's not the same MS Office that is on Windows. The program sets and features are different.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    64. Re: Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fiorina comes to mind.

    65. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please define "bad quarter"?

      Do you define "bad quarter" as generating over 20 billion in revenue, an increase of 18% over last year?

      Perhaps you mean a net income of over 6 billion, an increase of nearly a billion dollars over last year, is evidence of a "bad quarter".

      Either that or you're entirely full of shit.

    66. Re:Come on CEO... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Its not that, its the fact that time and time again he has ignored all the data including their testers, the press, and most importantly their customers, and its cost the company billions.

      I mean why in the fuck even HAVE a beta tester program if you are gonna go "LA LA LA" to every single problem the testers point out? And while you certainly can't always go by the press, as for one thing they all seem enamored so much with smartphones they actually believe people are gonna give up their desktops and laptops for them, but when you have virtually the entire press and blogosphere saying "THIS REALLY SUCKS!" ya know what? it probably DOES really suck and needs to be fixed.

      Yet time and time again he has given the finger to all that aren't drinking the koolaid and its cost them billions.They blew billions of the Vista launch only for it to become the punchline of jokes when all they needed was to fix the more serious issues before launch, blew 8 billion on Skype only to realize they had no damned idea how to monetize it and to make matter worse forced a good chunk of their most loyal users to switch (see the recent uptick in yahoo, I can tell you its the former Hotmail and Windows messenger users jumping ship) because they tried to hamhandedly jam Skype in where it just didn't fit, and of course the billions spent on windows 8 ads when practically every single beta tester and tech blogger was saying its gonna fricking bomb, which what do you know, it did.

      I am a Linux user and I love Balmer. I think he is doing a fantastic job.

      Honestly i don't even know who to compare Ballmer to as i can't think of a CEO that completely ignored everything they were being told, never before have I seen a company so large just whip out a gun and shoot themselves in the head like that. Everyone said Elop was a plant but look at who he learned from folks, Ballmer could be the subject of textbooks dedicated to showing how NOT to run a successful company. When he took over from Gates they were on top of the world, had a monopoly and money to burn, but under Ballmer it became a "lost decade" because he simply didn't know what to do with the company.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    67. Re:Come on CEO... by techneeks · · Score: 1

      "shite-ass" touch ;)

    68. Re:Come on CEO... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pointing out bias in moderation is flamebait. Thanks for proving my point.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    69. Re:Come on CEO... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      But it's not the same MS Office that is on Windows.

      So the point you're trying to make is that platform-specific software is specific to the platform for which it was written? And actually it's pretty naive to think they would re-write the whole thing for Mac rather than share all the core code.

      The program sets and features are different.

      Really? As far as the major components of office go and the features they have it seems pretty much the same to me, that's why there's interoperability between the Windows and Mac versions.

    70. Re:Come on CEO... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      But it's not the same MS Office that is on Windows.

      So the point you're trying to make is that platform-specific software is specific to the platform for which it was written? And actually it's pretty naive to think they would re-write the whole thing for Mac rather than share all the core code.

      They a generally shared code-base for the same programs. However, Outlook is not availbale on Mac, and its replacement is not available on Windows. In the end, MS Office for Mac != MS Office for Windows.

      The program sets and features are different.

      Really? As far as the major components of office go and the features they have it seems pretty much the same to me, that's why there's interoperability between the Windows and Mac versions.

      Presently, may be. However, MS Office for Mac has historically been known to not be very compatible with MS Office for Windows. Word would do things differently on Mac than Windows; etc. They may be doing better, but there's very likely still interoperability issues between the two.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    71. Re:Come on CEO... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      They a generally shared code-base for the same programs. However, Outlook is not availbale on Mac, and its replacement is not available on Windows. In the end, MS Office for Mac != MS Office for Windows.

      You don't appear to be very knowledgeable about this, Outlook is available on Mac.

      Presently, may be. However, MS Office for Mac has historically been known to not be very compatible with MS Office for Windows. Word would do things differently on Mac than Windows; etc. They may be doing better, but there's very likely still interoperability issues between the two.

      Well assuming you can cite some of those actual problems i'm still not sure what your point is.

  2. hardly cause for concern by Sadsfae · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'd be bigger news if he quit for another company, while Microsoft is on the decline it's going to be a very slow death spread across
    a decade or two. They've still got considerable assets which will take a long time to bleed out.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=msft+balance+sheet&annual

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    1. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not to mention the actual financial news this quarter was actually very good for them as it was an INCREASE not a decline.

    2. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      not to mention the actual financial news prepared by the CFO who just quit this quarter was actually very good for them

      Creative accountants are always wise to move on before the product of their creativity is revealed in all its glory.

    3. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind they'd need to start losing money. While the Windows market is going to start seeing declines soon (it was just flat in last week's report), other sectors are seeing considerable growing - some bringing in nearly as much Revenue as the Windows client itself, never mind other divisions like "The Cloud".

    4. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just moronic. Why would he do that if he is moving on, that just sets himself to go to Jail when the next guys walks in discovers the mess and reports him immediately to the SEC so that he doesn't get the blame himself. What could he possibly hope to gain except a very long jail sentence.

    5. Re:hardly cause for concern by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've still got considerable assets which will take a long time to bleed out.

      They basically get money for every PC sold. How is that an unhealthy situation?

      People haven't rushed out in droves to replace their perfectly good PCs because of Windows 8. Tech mags love to make headlines out of that but it doesn't mean Microsoft is in trouble.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft research is strong, particularly on the topic of making correct software. Driver code is actually analyzed with model checkers. Microsoft's products may not be as sexy as Apple's, but Microsoft is in a much better position to improve their software quality underneath the surface, where it counts long-term.

    7. Re:hardly cause for concern by Raumkraut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IANAA, but there's "creative accounting", and then there's fraud. One is perfectly legal, the other not. It's like the difference between "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion".

      The thing with creative accounting is not that it hides or creates money from nothing (which would be fraud), but that it moves it around from other places/times. If you see a really good quarter now, it's possibly because some income has been moved from elsewhen. So it might be expected for the next few fiscal quarters to be more disappointing.

      The old guy gets to leave on a high, and the new guy gets to "improve" the company's financials after an initial few bad quarters. It's an accountancy win-win.

    8. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They basically get money for every PC sold..

      They get money for every Android device sold!

    9. Re:hardly cause for concern by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How is that an unhealthy situation?

      Because partners who've been closely tied to their success are now looking at alternatives.

      "Vendors in China have revealed the Intel has begun to promote Android based convertible tablet/notebooks. Intel is concerned that Windows 8 has been unable to stimulate global demand for notebooks, and since global sales of Android tablets have been increasing, they are looking at reducing their reliance on the Microsoft OS.

      China-based vendor Lenovo will be first to release Intel driven Android systems in May, while Hewlett-Packard (HP), Toshiba, Acer and Asustek Computer will launch theirs in the third quarter."

      http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20130419PD208.html

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    10. Re:hardly cause for concern by Cenan · · Score: 1

      I doubt that that is the case in this situation. However that sort of "book keeping" happens all the time, and you have to wonder if these people just really are that dumb. Or maybe it's that funneling money out of a corporation simply is that easy and 10+ years in jail is worth it for some jokers (who apparently think they're immortal and have 10+ years to spend being pounded in the ass).

      Of course, being pounded in the ass might also be a step up for some of them. And not every white collar criminal is sent to Sing Sing. Some get to spend it at home with a fashionable bracelet on their ankle, courtesy of the latest douche bag elected representative they bribed. In some cases the creative accountant and the elected representative is one and the same, for even more majestic levels of "what the fuck?".

      --
      ... whatever ...
    11. Re:hardly cause for concern by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Microsoft get paid either way given that they have patents that Android supposedly infringes.

    12. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What could he possibly hope to gain except a very long jail sentence.

      That's funny. A finance guy receiving a long jail sentence. Have you been around the last 5 years?

    13. Re:hardly cause for concern by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2

      I'm sure many people would have said similar things about RIM and Nokia. Look at them now.

    14. Re:hardly cause for concern by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      you'd be surprised how fast a company can go out of business when the decline has been going on for 5 years already.

    15. Re:hardly cause for concern by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, because if there's one thing Chinese companies respect, it's patents.

    16. Re:hardly cause for concern by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      and it's hardly the same as Steven Sinofsky leaving, because he was basically kicked out after windows 8.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    17. Re:hardly cause for concern by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that Lenovo, HP, Toshiba, Acer and Asus all respect patents.

    18. Re:hardly cause for concern by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unhealthy... where to begin?!

      Sure, it's a nice arrangement when the success of the PC industry is the success of Microsoft. But how healthy is it when the failure of Microsoft is the death of the PC industry??? The influence that a software maker has over the hardware industries is VERY unhealthy.

    19. Re:hardly cause for concern by tgd · · Score: 2

      It'd be bigger news if he quit for another company, while Microsoft is on the decline it's going to be a very slow death spread across
      a decade or two. They've still got considerable assets which will take a long time to bleed out.
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=msft+balance+sheet&annual

      Its also a carefully changed edit to the original quote which was either done or ignored by Slashdot's editors deliberately to fan the anti-MS flames here, or their incompetence let through.

      The words of the quote are verbatim from the article, however the quote about Microsoft's market share was *not* quoted in the original article. The Slashdot "edit" of putting quotes around it makes it sound like a quote from Peter Klein or Microsoft, whereas its actually a quote from whoever wrote the article at Yahoo.

    20. Re:hardly cause for concern by am+2k · · Score: 1

      I imagine that it's way less, though.

    21. Re:hardly cause for concern by andydread · · Score: 2

      THey respect the laws of the land that they do business in. That means in China patents laws are not the same as in the US. That means that the feeble patents that MS and Apple are using against open source software may not work in China. Likewise. In the US they respect "we own all your code patents" And so with that, when they do business in the US they have to deal with the MS and the Apple and their "We own all your code" patents. That's just the rules to the road. The patents are invalid in China.

    22. Re:hardly cause for concern by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      I'd imagine that Lenovo, HP, Toshiba, Acer and Asus all respect patents when trying to sell their products in any country where patents are respected i.e. pretty much everywhere they want to sell stuff.

    23. Re:hardly cause for concern by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Patent royalties cannot sustain a company the size of Microsoft. Even if it could, patents DO expire ...

    24. Re:hardly cause for concern by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And his CFO leaving is just another CFO leaving in a chain of them going back decades. But it's an opportunity for people to heap on Microsoft, rail at Ballmer, do the death-watch thing, and so forth.

      Ever exec that leaves Microsoft will twig the same response. Ignore lots of stuff, and hope for the big Redmond ideological crater. People are so predictable. Slashdot must have gotten several pageview spikes out of their past week posts about Microsoft. They learn from ZDNet.

      If you're a CFO and you DON'T push financials to make your stock look good to the Wall Street overlords, you're not doing your job. Decided to take your cash and enjoy life? Then you'd be like thousands of Microsoft employees that became millionaires or more.

      I'm not rationalizing the boorish and illegal things Microsoft has done. Rather, citing that this really isn't much news, but it's a boring period in the tech industry.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    25. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not all players are paying the danegeld there- and for the following reasons.

      If there was any merit to the patents in question, they'd not require you to sign an NDA over the whole deal before you get the licensing. By law, the infringers are to be notified of what one is infringing upon. They're claiming infringements within the Linux kernel and Android framework on top of it. The odds are really good that if there's any infringements they're not in the "gapps" (to coin the Android ROM crowd's term for Google's closed source parts...) and that they're in Linux and the AOSS portions- which means that Microsoft's been rattling that sabre for 5+ years without disclosure to the actual infringers. Courts frown upon that sort of thing in a manner that effectively bars enforcement against individuals or groups so dealt with in that manner- you're supposed to deal with the individuals or lose the right to enforce against their infringements (You don't lose your patents; you just can't enforce against the parties you know are infringing and didn't immediately remediate the issue with because you waited too long... (If they were that big of a deal, you'd have acted immediately ...))

      The companies pretty much should be telling them to take them to court and challenging on Laches terms- Microsoft's gone too long and as long as you're a member of the FOSS communities in question (in good standing...), you're going to be good. This is part of why Barnes and Noble told Microsoft to go pound sand on the NDA and licensing. This game that Microsoft is playing with all of this is running dangerously close to racketeering in a RICO manner.

    26. Re:hardly cause for concern by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really:

      "Q3 2013: the company is reporting $20.49 billion in revenue, lower than what it saw during the holidays, and an equally soft $6.06 billion in profit that dipped below both the previous quarter and the same period last year." http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/18/microsoft-posts-q3-2013-earnings/

      Keep smoking that microsoft crack...

    27. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as Microsoft continues to get away with these patent agreements with Android device manufactures, their future is bright.
      I only wish everyone could see what is going on and banded together to (financially) kill Microsoft once and for all.
      I've seen too many decades of Microsoft's ill practices. They need to be stopped.
      Any convicted monopoly should be barred from initiating patent suits.

    28. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your statement is baseless.

      These are private agreements between companies, there is no notice or anything else required beyond what is agreed upon between the two parties. Courts have no jurisdiction in a private agreement except when there is a legal dispute that involves a civil or criminal complaint FILED in court.

    29. Re:hardly cause for concern by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Office doesn't run on Android.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    30. Re:hardly cause for concern by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Their cash cows are Windows and Office, the patent extortion racket isn't even close.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    31. Re:hardly cause for concern by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As long as Microsoft continues to get away with these patent agreements with Android device manufactures, their future is bright.

      The possibility exists that Microsoft may have to pay all that back and then some if their patent shakedowns are found to be illegal in any way.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    32. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People said IBM was going to die 20 years ago. People are morons.

    33. Re:hardly cause for concern by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It works both ways. One of the big reasons Vista failed (to the general public, not to the informed user like those among us here) was because Intel pushed them to certify their low-end processor for Vista.

      And no matter what your TV says to you, desktop and laptop Macs are still PC's, along with other personal computers that are running Linux and BSD. Those are largely unaffected by the fate of Windows, at least not negatively.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    34. Re:hardly cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Read the actual results and you'll see it's Engadget who is on crack. They seem to be picking totally different numbers and comparing those.

      It's true that this quarter was not quite as good the holiday quarter, but that's not a useful comparison at all and Engadget makes themselves look like fools for implying that it is. If you compare to a year ago, every one of their divisions is doing better now than they were a year ago. Revenues are up and profits have improved by almost 1bn.

    35. Re:hardly cause for concern by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      They basically get money for every PC sold..

      They get money for every Android device sold!

      But we don't really know how much, and it's certainly not enough to replace the Windows+Office income they are slowly losing.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    36. Re:hardly cause for concern by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Ever exec that leaves Microsoft will twig the same response.

      How many C-level execs has Microsoft fired lately, though? It's possible that "is leaving the company to spend time with his extended family" can be taken at face value, this one time, for the first time in the history of press releases, but it seems more likely that he was asked to resign.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    37. Re:hardly cause for concern by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      You speculate. You have no idea if he was sacked or just got tired or is giving grace time between Microsoft and his next gig, do you? There is a chance that he was sacked. The compelling question might be, what for? How many things can you be sacked for? This is a comparatively hierarchical organization, and so a C-level exec gets sacked for not going with the board, or not pleasing the CEO, or a 100 other reasons, maybe more.

      To answer your question directly: not. The question cannot be answered, and especially within this context.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    38. Re:hardly cause for concern by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need even those 5 years. Elop's rule started only half that time ago.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    39. Re:hardly cause for concern by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      You speculate. You have no idea if he was sacked or just got tired or is giving grace time between Microsoft and his next gig, do you?

      Actually, I have a pretty good idea. In PR-speak, "quit to spend time with family" is the standard face-saving euphemism for "was given the choice between resigning or being fired, and chose to leave gracefully". It almost always has that second meaning. It doesn't have to, of course - it's possible that he really did quit to stay home and hang out with his wife and kids. I'd do it in a heartbeat if I got tired of my job and could afford to! Still, "quit to spend time with family" is HR jargon that very rarely means what it actually says.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    40. Re:hardly cause for concern by korgitser · · Score: 1

      It'd be bigger news if he quit for another company

      For which company should Ballmer quit? The guy is utterly unemployable.

      --
      FCKGW 09F9 42
    41. Re:hardly cause for concern by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of PR-speak, and its connotations.

      But you don't know. You speculate. You feed a meme that becomes kerosene on the fire of discontent.

      You could be right. Nice guess. Until then, you're wrong.

      I've resigned to pursue more time with my own interests, as a publicly known item from a public corporation. Why? I'd've gone insane staying where I was. The stock was tanking, the CEO was an idiot, and his management staff made Dilbert's PHB look like Navy Seals.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    42. Re:hardly cause for concern by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      They fund the development of all sorts of research projects, and they now do take security seriously.

      On the other hand, they display a maddening inability to tackle the basics. The file manager still hangs in Windows 7 and Windows 8 when you open a network drive that's slow to respond or a disk directory with lots of files. Most software updates require a system restart. When a program hangs, you are still forced to wait 30 seconds or longer instead of being able to exercise a "nuke immediately" option (unless you use taskkill /f from the command prompt and its PowerShell equivalent, but who outside the power users knows that). Windows Update breaks periodically and can take a lot of research to fix when it happens. On Windows 8, I wanted to buy games on my account and create a second Windows account with access to my games for my kids to use, but not my email or bookmarks. If that could be done, I couldn't figure it out.

      On the business side navigating the product documentation, figuring out which version of what product you need, and understanding the licensing restrictions is a major headache. I don't know about now, but when Windows Azure launched, taking the technology for a spin was a nightmare.

      I think Microsoft's so hated in the tech community for the exact same reason it's not taking the world by storm. They demonstrate an infuriating inability to sweat the little details that really matter. For every step forward that helps (like the excellent search feature in Windows 7) they have a giant step backwards that hurts (removing DVD playback from Windows 8 Home edition).

  3. Microsoft is in deep shit now! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, yes, Microsoft is in deep shit now, what with the record revenue and what not. No wonder the CFO ran away. 2013 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop, all hail RMS!

    1. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah, yes, Microsoft is in deep shit now, what with the record revenue and what not. No wonder the CFO ran away. 2013 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop, all hail RMS!

      And you expected something different here? Microsoft's latest numbers are actually astoundingly good, better than even most of the optimists predicted. They speak of a very healthy company, not one in decline at all.

    2. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      if windows xp wasn't EOL in less than a year.. windows revenue would still be trending down.

      fact: windows xp is being EOL because a stable consistent and popular operating system does not help profits long term... NOT because it's difficult to maintain even after 10+ years.

    3. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Leejjon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah they received more money from licensing Android patents than ever before!

    4. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They report record revenue and then their CFO leaves?

      It doesn't sounds fishy. Not at all.

    5. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by delt0r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They still have more than 80% of the desktop market. Doing poorly is means truckloads of money. I can't see MS going anywhere soon.

      Half the problem is stock market expectations. You can't just do well, you must do better than last year. And not just better but the improvement has to be more than the previous year. Its hard to do that when you have pretty much already sold your product to everyone that has a computer.

      As a good economist once said, "Humans don't understand exponential curves".

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    6. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is usually when CFO's resign. IT is not like he is walking out the door now, he stays on till the end of the 4th quarter. now if he had left BEFORE the numbers then that is something that would be incredibly fishy as it would scream there was something in their he wasn't willing to put his name against.

    7. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 1

      They still have more than 80% of the desktop market. Doing poorly is means truckloads of money. I can't see MS going anywhere soon.

      They actually have more than 90% of the desktop market. The problem is not that someone is threatening them in that market, the problem is that the market as a whole is starting to collapse and Microsoft doesn't have a foot in the door in the booming markets.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    8. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2

      THalf the problem is stock market expectations. You can't just do well, you must do better than last year. And not just better but the improvement has to be more than the previous year. Its hard to do that when you have pretty much already sold your product to everyone that has a computer. .

      The stock market is a BIG part of the problem. Look at Apple. Their products are selling really well. iPads and iPhones and iWhatevers by the millions. And Macs are more popular than ever. And yet, since Tim Cook took over as CEO, Apple's stock price has dropped 50%..

      Several years ago I worked for a company that reported record profits for 6 consecutive quarters. What happened? The stock price went down 25%..

    9. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 2

      Stock prices are a reflection of expectations, not of past results. The fact some company made profit in the past doesn't mean it will do so in the future.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    10. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even though this is modded down, it's really the bottom line: with Windows XP the operating system was basically done. Complete. Finished. No more features are required. Everything that was added later was either cruft or could just as easily have been implemented in Windows XP. The only reason why Microsoft kept certain things from XP (like proper 64-bit support, IE9+ and DirectX 10+) was to artificially create a reason for people to switch to future versions of Windows, not because XP didn't offer a decent platform for these things.

      Same thing applies to Office by the way, the other big part in Microsoft's revenue stream: both Office and Windows are "done" and have been so for years. And since Microsoft hasn't been able to make any profits in markets outside of the Windows/Office ecosystem, the future of the company currently depends on how much longer they can convince people to keep buying new versions of the same old software. How long before the general public realizes they don't need to "upgrade" because they don't get anything they already have now? Looking at Windows 8 sales figures: not very long.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    11. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by div_2n · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Results posted today reflect realities from a bit back in history. The shift away from laptops and desktops is ramping up extremely quickly. I'm not sure I've ever witnessed such a rapid shift in the marketplace. The closest I can think of might be the migration away from IE and that took several years really.

      As an example, within the last week I've had conversations with two family members due new central computing devices. One is looking at a device like the Galaxy Note II as their primary computing device and the other is looking at a tablet. Both female. One 30ish and the other 60ish in age. Neither techies. All family members asking tech questions now are either phone or tablet related. None are asking about laptops or computers. It was exactly reverse a year ago.

      Do my family members make a trend? No. But the sales figures are showing a HUGE shift like I'm seeing.

      There's another trend emerging that is going to hit Microsoft really hard sooner or later that dovetails on the post-PC trend -- BYOD in companies. There are an increasing number of employees for whom tablets are just fine as their primary computing device. Basic productivity software such as Google Apps are just fine for their simple needs.

      It's important to note that Windows 8 was Microsoft's first effort to insulate themselves from this trend. So far, their effort has been mostly a flop. Unless they really right the ship with Windows 9, they will shift from market dominance to just another vendor. And while this will be painful for MS employees and shareholders, it will be great for consumers.

    12. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, XP level security and no UAC and no sandboxing in IE and other windows level engineering changes were not needed.

      How about I just say you seem to have no idea about what you are talking about. And you _deserve_the modding down.

      --
      We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
    13. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I certainly didn't expect anything else. I just wanted to (humorously) highlight the fact that the original post is making MS sound like a sinking ship with struggling product lines and a bailing CFO, while overall their situation is nowhere near as gloomy.

    14. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Woo hoo trading at a $29 per share.....yeah that's some awesome performance there *eye roll*

    15. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      When was Apple's stock trading at $780 per share? Apple's stock did not drop 50%. Nice trolling there.

    16. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, XP level security and no UAC and no sandboxing in IE and other windows level engineering changes were not needed.

      That's exactly what I'm saying. Sandboxing could have been implemented in XP, just as Chrome does in XP. UAC doesn't provide any real level of security, it's just a pop-up box which everybody answers with "OK". It's exactly these types of superficial changes, marketed as major improvements that show that Microsoft really doesn't know what features to add to Windows anymore.

      How about I just say you seem to have no idea about what you are talking about. And you _deserve_the modding down.

      It's a free country, say whatever you like. But the numbers don't lie: *a lot* of people are perfectly happy sticking to XP because later editions simply have no real added value for them. More people are using XP today than Vista ever had at its peak. Windows 7 only has a lot of users because 8 GB of RAM became the norm and XP can't handle that properly, but still I think most people that are using Windows 7 are using it because they either wanted to get rid off Vista or because it came with their PC when they bought it. There is a cycle going on of making a version with serious flaws so they can fix it in the next version and use that artificial mechanism to boost sales. But Microsoft will have a tougher time convincing people to upgrade with every new version of Windows, because their software is simply done as it is and nothing of real value is to be added anymore.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    17. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      > Unless they really right the ship with Windows 9

      (...) So far, their effort has been mostly a flop. Unless they really right the ship with Windows 9 by giving us back Aero Glass, or raise the bar several notches and give us Aero Glass Dynamically-Translucent Rotating Cube, with support for LCD touchpad [which defaults to a normal desktop experience unless you feel like slumming with phone/tablet apps, and simultaneously has sufficiently-high 'wow!' factor that doesn't interfere with usability AND gives consumers a compelling reason to buy new laptops with 3GHz+ quadcore i7 CPUs and discrete GPUs that would have been jaw-dropping on a desktop 2-4 years ago], they will shift from market dominance to just another vendor (...)

      There, fixed that for you.

      The problem isn't that computers are "good enough" now, the problem is that Windows 8 is butt ugly, and offers consumers nothing compelling to take their breath away and say, "Wow, that totally kicks ass!". Nobody is going to go buy a new computer that looks like a dumbed-down beta version of their previous one. If manufacturers want to fight the race to the bottom, they have to give consumers a reason to care about higher-end specs and put them to visibly-compelling good use. MetroModern just isn't going to sell high-end discrete GPUs and i7 CPUs. And frankly, kick-ass eye candy that doesn't impede usability is just about the only high-end hardware frontier left to fight Apple-ization and laminated .7mm slabs with the approximate usability of Ubuntu Unity.

      Seriously. Microsoft needs to give laptop and desktop manufacturers a reason to sell thousand-dollar high-end laptops, and desktops with 3+ displays that will make people with lower-end hardware feel like poor second-class users who can't run the latest software (well) until they upgrade, not cut Windows down to something that can run on an anonymous shit one-gigahertz tablet from Shenzhen with a tiled window or two and soft keyboard.

    18. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      Exactly!

      I have about a dozen machines in my house and most run XP. I don't need any of that damn UAC or the latest version of Office. I upgraded one machine to windows 7 because I didn't want to get stuck with 8. Everything is behind a firewall. I have tons of software that works perfectly well.

      Millions of people have woken up to realize that they don't need a new computer. Replacements will be the only market now. Microsoft will die a very slow death. It might take a decade or more, but they are in decline.

      Business buys volume licenses to give them the ability to install older operating systems.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    19. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason why Microsoft kept certain things from XP (like proper 64-bit support, IE9+ and DirectX 10+) was to artificially create a reason for people to switch to future versions of Windows, not because XP didn't offer a decent platform for these things.

      They released a 64-bit version of XP, and it was no less "proper" than the other 64-bit Windows offerings. The issue was a lack of 3rd party support, but that's not due to technical deficiencies in XP.

    20. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Ksevio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Several years ago I worked for a company that reported record profits for 6 consecutive quarters. What happened? The stock price went down 25%..

      Definitely not hiring you if my stock is going to go down 25%

    21. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it dropped 43%, and doesn't appear to be finished dropping.

    22. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      Not quite $780 but pretty close.

    23. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THe highest I found was 702.10$ on Sept 19, 2012. Not exactly 780$ but relatively close to your 50% remark.

      I have no idea who the person who said 780$ is or where they got that number from...

    24. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      I had something similar to your experience at an airport. I saw 5 computing devices (not counting phones): a Macbook, two iPads, and what looked like an Android tablet, plus my own Linux laptop. Not a machine in sight running Windows. That would have been unimaginable as recently as a year ago.

      According to the stats I have seen, this is the year that the number of Linux systems in use (in the form of Android) will exceed Windows systems. In current sales Android is already blowing out Windows and, for that matter, everything else on Earth. The year of desktop Linux has arrived, but not in the way everyone was expecting. High fives, for now at least.

    25. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      There is plenty of room for improvement from a back end standpoint for both their mature products. For example, they are still grossly inefficient. There are still security holes, even if the holes aren't as deep for Windows because of the new security infrastructure. In fact, the back ends for both products probably could do with a complete overhaul.

      The problem is that any back end improvements have to be coupled with fancy front-ends that nobody wants or can figure out on their own. Otherwise, nobody's going to buy the newest version of the product. Oh wait.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    26. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      The high was well into Tim Cooks tenure. To say he took over and it dropped is misleading.

    27. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      I've been seeing this for a while now. It is rare to see windows and when I do see it, it's on what is obviously a company provided laptop. On the plane last night I could see around me 6-8 iPads, 5-6 MacBooks and 1 windows laptop.

    28. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by div_2n · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point. People don't WANT a reason to buy a laptop or desktop. They want something to carry with them everywhere they go. Microsoft either provides a compelling experience that fits in this paradigm or they don't. If they don't, they'll be stuck with businesses sticking with traditional computing models that never give up their homogenous stack and the few home users that don't want to change. That's not a model that is likely to sustain one of the largest companies in the world.

    29. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Results posted today reflect realities from a bit back in history. The shift away from laptops and desktops is ramping up extremely quickly. I'm not sure I've ever witnessed such a rapid shift in the marketplace. The closest I can think of might be the migration away from IE and that took several years really.

      The shift from desktops to laptops happened rather slowly - until the early 2000s, laptops were considered inferior to desktops in every possible way except one. Sometime in the middle 2000s did laptops overtake desktop sales - being powerful enough that mobility was extremely important. Enough so that even heavy engineering companies see value in using laptops over desktops and stop issuing desktops unless really required. The cost isn't much more and the benefits far outweigh the difference.

      The thing is, though, computers are maintenance heavy - between all the malware and viruses and all that, and people are fed up with stuff like that. A modern PC is like an early generation car that broke down every few miles that required everyone to be their own mechanic and understand how it works. Or even like early generation computers that ran for 30 minutes before something needed fixing. People got fed up and demanded devices that were more "sealed" and required less maintenance - like how a modern vehicle can run for thousands of miles without popping the hood open. Even then you just need to change the oil and top up fluids.

      Hence tablets, smartphones and other devices - stuff that handles 90% of what a user would use a PC for, but with none of the headaches or time consuming maintenance required.

    30. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by devent · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Anyway, a system should be as transparent as possible and just behave like a terminal to start up applications. That why I was laughing really hard why Windows Vista and 7 now got a "benchmark score". Like Windows is some kind of game.

      My guess is also, why Microsoft pushed really hard for OOXML and the IMHO stupid ribbon GUI. So Microsoft can have anything "new" and of "value" to sell a new Office version.

      Btw, I just searched a little bit but I couldn't find: can you put the ribbon on for example Office vertical to the right or left side? IMHO the biggest problem with the ribbon is, that it is to fat, especially with the wide screen monitors that are very common today.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    31. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What everybody misses about UAC is not UAC, but that in order to implement it, Microsoft had to fix the shatter attacks. So guess what? The shatter attack mechanism /got fixed/.

    32. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Also, Microsoft is on top of the heap:
      http://www.appsrumors.com/news-rumors/what-happens-when-google-and-amazon-copy-apple-comic-magazine/

      They're a large and by now fairly traditional computer engineering firm. They are still top dog in many areas (Office, PC gaming & peripherals, and, oh yeah, the OS).

      Yes, they are failing to pick up significant share in "emerging" markets. But their various spinoffs are doing great... for example Valve owns PC online gaming distribution. Which I suppose doesn't contribute to Microsoft's bottom line, but just goes to show that M$ engineers are capable of doing interesting things if they can cast off some of their management constraints.

      So even if they don't always have enough time to do it right, they always seem to be able to have enough money to do it over:
      http://anongallery.org/5442/windows-8
      Maybe the CFO quitting means a blow to that model. But I don't imagine we'll sustain this rapid pace of developing new "emerging" markets that M$ can't keep up with.

    33. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though this is modded down, it's really the bottom line: with Windows XP the operating system was basically done. Complete. Finished. No more features are required. Everything that was added later was either cruft or could just as easily have been implemented in Windows XP. The only reason why Microsoft kept certain things from XP (like proper 64-bit support, IE9+ and DirectX 10+) was to artificially create a reason for people to switch to future versions of Windows, not because XP didn't offer a decent platform for these things.

      How quickly we forget all the shit added to XP in form of service packs years after the fact. Wireless supplicants got back ported into everything up to w2k, huge windows firewall improvements, better USB, DEP,ASLR.etc. Things lots of people are relying on today.

      These days we get shit for new features out of the one service pack MS will ever release.

      While I disagree somewhat with "finished" wording the basic argument you are making can also be said of technology and innovation in general.

      While applicable to a great number of domains people often overlook aggregate effects of small contributions of value into an incresingly complex graph.

      Could I live with windows office 2000? I have for a number of years and it is perfectly capable of getting the job done. However the live previews, direct save to pdf and better templating gives me more value and helps get the job done quicker.

      Windows 7 has some nice UI improvements and technology features that make it better than XP. Nothing earth shattering but still useful shit.

      The low hanging fruit has already been plucked years ago. This does not mean there is no market value left in continuing to provide incremental value.

      The problem today is that innovation has shifted from providing "value" to the consumer to extracting and limiting it for strategic reasons to extract every nickle and dime from the consumer and value chain possible. Essentially the innovation is in the market not the product.

      For this reason I do not consider Windows 8 to be innovation. Metro only works with software obtained from a walled garden. Even if I was of the mind that metro does not suck on the desktop there is no value to the user in locking it down. Playing games trying to shoehorn people into a subscription models where they ultimatly end up paying a lot more than they would otherwise has side effects - ultimatly given the inbalance of value provided vs value witheld at some point companies like MS and Apple who play these games will find themselves on the loosing end of the equation if they continue to insist on artifically locking shit down.

    34. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to /. Microsoft has been in its death throes for many, many years. But strangely, that has yet to become reality.

      Wishful thinking does not a dead enterprise make.

    35. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a free country, say whatever you like. But the numbers don't lie: *a lot* of people are perfectly happy sticking to XP because later editions simply have no real added value for them.

      that's wrong, because the real reason is, like you said:

      but still I think most people that are using Windows 7 are using it because they either wanted to get rid off Vista or because it came with their PC when they bought it

      (emphasis mine, of course)

      "Regular users" (like, mom & dad) rarely install anything so we can't say that they are "keeping" anything really (it isn't conscious choice). They have what they have on their PC and that's it. They get a new OS when they get a new computer, period.

      Enterprises are the ones that "upgrade" sometimes a computer OS but that's also very rare that they upgrade "working computers" (most of the time, new employees get an upgraded OS when they start or current employees get a new OS when their computer get replaced).

      Some changes in the OS are very important ones, like how drivers are isolated now and how permissions are managed (I'm not really talking about UAC here). There were serious improvements in the windows OS series, like it or not. They also made serious mistakes IMHO, but who doesn't (I still can't get kmail and akonadi to talk properly to each other in the new version while it was working quite well in the last...)

    36. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by MBasial · · Score: 2

      Graphing in Excel is by no means "done". Maybe the latest release finally actually gives us WYSIWYG (Office 2007 at work, 2010 at home), but it's been broken since at least 1995. I've long wished for MS to buy up the folks that make Grapher (www.goldensoftware.com) and give us graphs that can be used in technical situations. (I'm also a Grapher customer, and like their product, but if their graphing capabilities were integrated into Office, my life would be easier. My clients own Excel, they don't own Grapher.)

      Trivial examples indicating to me that Excel has not been "done" since 1995:
      1) Make a graph with X and Y axes at the same scale, NOT at "eyeball it to isotropic on-screen, print, check, revise to anisotropic on-screen, print, check, repeat" scales,
      2) add labels to points on a scatterplot from a 3rd data column (Why would I need to post X or Y values? Aren't those, y'know, graphically depicted by the graph? I need to post Z labels!)

      As long-lived and as enthusiastic a love affair I've had with Excel since the 1990s, the graphing has always been weaker than it ought to be.

    37. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Because of these reasons Microsoft is pushing software subscriptions HARD. e.g.: Office 2013: There's the traditional version pay-once-run-forerver and there's Office 365 the free-upgrades-of-office-while-you-pay version. Everywhere I see office ads these days I see them pushing the subcription version hard.
      I guess it won't be long until they try the same with Windows.

    38. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      Which shows a complete lack of understanding in how UAC and other new features were implemented. XP was a tangled mess of shit. That's why it was so hard for them to secure it, and that's why they didn't just continue on with that effort. Did you forget that changing a graphics drive in XP required a reboot? Sound card locks up? BSOD. Etc. etc. etc. To say that XP was complete sounds like someone who knows just enough about computers to think they have a clue without actually bothering to research what changes went into vista and 7. Here's a hint: it wasn't just pretty graphics.

      http://www.osnews.com/story/19793/No_New_Kernel_Builds_on_Vista

    39. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, "the previous version was crap, but we've got everything sorted now". Do you know how often I've heard that in my past 25 years of using Windows? Every single time they released a "radical new version, built from the ground up", which they claim every other version or so. I'm not buying it anymore. It's just the same old stuff over and over again.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    40. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why did people want to buy a dumbed down version of linux?

    41. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except it's not really desktop and it' not really linux. I think linux in The Year of Linux Desktop used to mean a platform — GNU/Linux, not the kernel. No one gives a shit about the kernel.

    42. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't see it that way. Executives leave companies all the time, and not because things are sinking. At some point you realize you have enough money to live comfortably for several life times, so why deal with all the stress at work. Better to get a nice cushy job on board of directors somewhere that doesn't involve any actual work.

    43. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think that Windows Upgrades brought in most money? Most people don't ever upgrade, I've never installed a paid upgrade on any of my computers for ten years or so, be it Windows PCs or Macs. I'm still fine with Mac OS 10.4 on computers that came with it, I even think that recent versions of Mac OS X are worse in some regards as you do with Windows, but that is not the point.
      Computers break. It's a good practice to get a new computer every three years or so even if the old one works just fine because you might end up with a computer for which it'd be difficult and/or expensive to get replacement parts.

    44. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 1

      It's a good practice to get a new computer every three years or so even if the old one works just fine because you might end up with a computer for which it'd be difficult and/or expensive to get replacement parts.

      What? That makes no sense at all. Why would you preemptively purchase a new machine because your current one might break in the future? What do replacement parts have to do with it? Why not simply keep the computer until it breaks and then replace the machine entirely?

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    45. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is wrong with subscription model?
      Web apps are also subscription model but in an even more fucked up, yet some of us here think those are a good.
      It's a miracle some apps like Adobe CS2 still work with recent versions of Windows, but on macs you can to hell with that. Software support is dropped in several years so you are already on kinda subscription.

    46. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, Microsoft is in deep shit now, what with the record revenue and what not. No wonder the CFO ran away. 2013 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop, all hail RMS!

      Wrong. Dead wrong. 2013 will not be the year of Linux on the desktop. At the most, it will be the year of Windows 7 on the desktop.

      The real problem for Microsoft isn't that they are losing market share on the desktop, because they aren't. If Windows 8 sales aren't up to par, the slack will certainly be taken up by Win 7 and even Win XP. The real problem is that the desktop as a whole has been losing ground to other environments (tablets, phones, even smart TV sets). The release of Windows 8, with its not very well veiled attempt to force their own version of the mobile interface on users of every platform, was a misguided attempt to address this issue.

  4. Are you happy, are you satisfied? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another one bites the dust
    Another one bites the dust
    And another one gone, and another one gone
    Another one bites the dust
    Hey, I'm gonna get you too
    Another one bites the dust

    1. Re: Are you happy, are you satisfied? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one bites the crust
      And another goes down, and another goes down
      Another one bites the crust

    2. Re: Are you happy, are you satisfied? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one bites the dust Another one bites the dust And another one gone, and another one gone Another one bites the dust Hey, I'm gonna get you too Another one bites the dust

      That's my primary employer's theme song...don't steal it.

  5. Well then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next up Ballmer?

  6. Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the CFO jumps ship, and the shares went up? Do the people buying those shares under some misguided impression that Windows 8 is Klein's fault, and everything will be OK now? Perhaps they should be asking what the real reason is that he's decided to go...

    1. Re:Shares up? by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I suspect any movements in share price have little to nothing to do with Klein's departure.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    2. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shares went up due to better-than-expected quarterly reports. Especially in non-Windows areas, which still resulted in significant revenue and profit improvements.

    3. Re:Shares up? by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The 2 are unrelated events. The shares went up because of the very good financial growth MS showed this quarter despite the drop in PC sales.

    4. Re:Shares up? by Mike+Frett · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should know by now that the Stock Market isn't a very good medium for judging anything; It's no different than a visit to Las Vegas. But, there use to be a time when you could invest in a Company because you cared about the Company and wanted to be a part in it's growing and have a say in what happened. I seriously doubt, these days, that people even know what Company they put money in; they are in and out so fast. We should take it back to that time, and ban all this lightening trading.

      The truth is, Microsoft is dying. It's going to take a long time, but they will eventually bleed to death. We all knew it was coming, nothing lasts forever. Even if they did manage to put on a good show in the next year or so, It is inevitable that such a thing can't last.

    5. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh yes, tinfoil hat time. the conspiracy theory morons always come out of the woodwork. After all what could accountants possibly hope to lose. It is not like they would go to jail or anything right? retard!

    6. Re:Shares up? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not saying this is the case, but it would fit:

      "Better than expected earnings" reported followed by "CFO leaving Microsoft." What if it turned out he left because someone insisted on filing deceptive or inaccurate numbers? Leaving in protest of such things would make sense of the two events wouldn't it?

    7. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is it ISN'T dying, it is actually increasing in other markets faster than it's consumer desktop market is eroding. It is actually growing very rapidly in just about every area except for desktop. Revenue and profits are at record levels and have only continued to increase barring a few anomalies for charges for assets they have written off.

    8. Re:Shares up? by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As CFO that would still leave him in deep shit as he signed them off as accurate before submitting them, the SEC won't accept an excuse that he was pressured. It would also leave him in a really bad situation where unless the next person in the job is willing to cover up for him (pretty unlikely) then his next job is going to be calculating his very large lawyer bills trying to keep his arse out of jail.

    9. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not saying this is the case,

      Then what are you saying? You sure used a lot of words to say 'nothing'.

      Weasel.

    10. Re:Shares up? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      They never made money from OEM. OEM was all about lock-in. You are wrong, and you look like a jackass with your false and lying "FTFY".

    11. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They "deferred" some Windows license income from last quarter to this.
      Not illegal, not a conspiracy, just accountancy tricks.

    12. Re:Shares up? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Las Vegas is a zero sum game (for any particular playing session, assuming no credits) where the house has the odds in its favor. The Stock market is a zero sum game on a microsecond level (any two trades, but no more), so much less a zero-sum game, and the house has no odds (unless you consider the micro-second traders to be the house). They are similar at a glance, but quite different in practice.

    13. Re:Shares up? by erroneus · · Score: 0

      Moron. It's called a hypothesis. First you propose an idea that might fit the circumstances and then test it. In this case, I would hope to test it in open discussion.

    14. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The increases were not the windows division, it was the gaming, enterprise licenses, SQL, server products and cloud products that were the huge increases. The windows license deferrals are normal and were not unexpected, it was the other massive increases that gave the suprises.

    15. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, they got a new logo.

    16. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "hypothesis" is only based on random speculation. Don't try and pretend you're doing something remotely scientific. You're just a run of the mill troll.

    17. Re:Shares up? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well he may have been asked to do something that is legal but he objected to doing. This last quarter saw MS deferring revenue from previous quarters. Most of them deal with Win 8 upgrades. The way I read it, users who bought computers with Win 7 for a certain period of time before Win 8 was released got a free upgrade to Win 8. When they redeemed this offer, MS counted it in later quarters as Win 8 revenue but not at the time of purchase. Now technically this seems legal because they are getting Win 8 and MS is recording it in the quarter the owner acquired the new OS not the old one. Many companies do this when revenue is to be recognized over time. Apple does it with iPhone revenue as most US users who purchase a new one from their carrier are paying a subsidized price. For a new iPhone that is $600 or so, Apple recognizes the $200 at time of purchase and the subsidized $400 over time.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Shares up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS ALWAYS defer revenue for windows, especially around release windows. It is standard practise for all companies in the field, it is acceptable practise and well documented, it was also already accounted for and expected in the numbers. People keep bringing this up as why the numbers were a surprise, but this had nothing to do with it. The windows numbers did not surprise, they were right on projected target, including the deferrals. What surprised was growth elsewhere.

    19. Re:Shares up? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      They never made money from OEM. OEM was all about lock-in.

      [citation needed]

  7. Seems like the buzz has gone from Microsoft by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess we all wish the guy the best, and hope he enjoys time with his family.
    I assume he has enough cash to do so; lucky for him.

    Whilst a couple of high-level departures are hardly the "beginning of the end", (and financial people are easier to replace than tech gurus), I was thinking on a broader level here. If you were a senior exec, or a young graduate, where would you rather work. Google or Microsoft?

    1. Re:Seems like the buzz has gone from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess we all wish the guy the best, and hope he enjoys time with his family.
      I assume he has enough cash to do so; lucky for him.

      Whilst a couple of high-level departures are hardly the "beginning of the end", (and financial people are easier to replace than tech gurus), I was thinking on a broader level here. If you were a senior exec, or a young graduate, where would you rather work. Google or Microsoft?

      I was thinking on a more basic level here.

      When someone who can afford to retire many times over actually makes the effort to do so, perhaps we could all stop clamoring for the "scoop" to this, and realize that more millionaires should be making this move to prioritize something other than greed in their lives.

      Perhaps after watching the world's wealth become crushed in a global meltdown 5 years ago with basically no remorse or reprimand for those who caused it, more and more people are starting to realize where their true wealth lies. The concept of a stable job or a loyal company have gone out the window, that's for sure. Enjoy life while you can.

    2. Re:Seems like the buzz has gone from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend time with family means: fired/asked to leave.

    3. Re:Seems like the buzz has gone from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is the new MS in many ways. The ones who went with MS some years ago, the MS you now hate didn't think it was that bad.

  8. And this is called "news"? by ras · · Score: 1

    It was news last week. How old does that make it in internet time?

    1. Re:And this is called "news"? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      With a 5 digit UID, I'm surprised you're asking. /. has been recycling old news - often more than once - for the past 15 years. It's not even annoying, it's a feature: this place wouldn't be what it is with fresh news, or without people who complain about the news not being fresh. It's a sort of tradition here, I'd be sad to see it go personally.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:And this is called "news"? by the+order+of+His+Maj · · Score: 1

      aww, give the ol' timer a break, maybe he's having a "senior moment" heh ;)
      __
      ipsa scientia potestas est
      "knowledge itself is power" - Francis Bacon

      --
      __
      ipsa scientia potestas est
      "knowledge itself is power" - Francis Bacon
    3. Re:And this is called "news"? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      You kids and your fancy high UIDs.

  9. Quits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't "leaving the company to spend time with his extended family" a common euphemism for being fired?

    1. Re:Quits? by fitteschleiker · · Score: 0

      I thought it was a euphemism for the company found out he's been fucking an underling.

    2. Re:Quits? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Or running away.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:Quits? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Or that he is burnt out and wants to take a break. He was with the company almost 12 years and probably is quite well off now.

  10. Why? by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

    1. Re:Why? by robnelle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      For some people it's not necessarily about just the money, it's about the power. Controlling one of the biggest and most ubiquitous companies in the world = a lot of power.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot a famous quote: "I have four words to tell ya.... I! love! this! company! yeaaah..."

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      John McAfee tried this. But in the case of Ballmer, I guess you'd have to ask yourself what he would be missing if he 'retired'. My guess is that Ballmer enjoys the feeling of importance and attention that running a top company gives him. Plus, he can still enjoy his yacht during the weekends.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about the power? I'd take the harem of supermodel concubines any day. Now that would be living! Especially if you are already an old guy like Ballmer.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      And you use this power for evil, like changing the UI so that no one in the world likes it! MUAHAHAHAH That'll teach them!

    6. Re:Why? by c · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      Ah, the John McAfee package. Seems to be popular with the techie crowd. We're also having a special this week on the Kim Dotcom plan, if you're interested?

      Ah... anyhow, there's probably a reason that these people are extremely rich and you're not. Luck is obviously a factor, but it takes a certain kind of drive to keep playing the game well after you need to.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:Why? by TheMathemagician · · Score: 2

      Don't you think cruising the world on a mega-yacht filled with every toy imaginable and with a harem of beautiful women would pall after a while? Errr actually no, you're good.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the yacht/supermodel/surface-to-air missile life isn't as great as you'd think.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its not about the power itself. The power is just a form of addiction, sadly.

    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      Ah, the John McAfee package. Seems to be popular with the techie crowd. We're also having a special this week on the Kim Dotcom plan, if you're interested?

      Ah... anyhow, there's probably a reason that these people are extremely rich and you're not. Luck is obviously a factor, but it takes a certain kind of drive to keep playing the game well after you need to.

      Then it's wasted on them.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too - which is why we are not super powerful CEO's: we don't have the drive.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      It is often said that this is the difference between who gets rich and not, so it is sort of chicken and egg question - because you ask you won't get that rich ;-). Some people just have an insane drive to work and succeed more, while others want to enjoy life and cash out if ahead by a big enough amount. It is reported that very early on Mark Zuckerberg was offered 500 million USD cash for Facebook. This was while it still was fairly small and unproven compared to today. He declined. Now, some of us might ask incredulously why on earth would you ever decline more money than you can possibly ever need, and continue to toil away around the clock and also risk losing it all? Others, like Zuckerberg, drives on to create an ever bigger success (regardless of what you think of Facebook, he made a choice that increased his net value multiple times over).

    13. Re:Why? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Should some cool guy like John Carmack quit making games at the point he has secured enough millions to live a life where "quattro stagioni or frutti di mare" is the most important question of the day?

    14. Re:Why? by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      A fair point.

    15. Re:Why? by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      Well, after buying, downloading and playing RAGE, yes, I think he should!

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a supermodel-to-air missile then?

    17. Re:Why? by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

      Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      Ah, the John McAfee package. Seems to be popular with the techie crowd. We're also having a special this week on the Kim Dotcom plan, if you're interested?

      Ah... anyhow, there's probably a reason that these people are extremely rich and you're not. Luck is obviously a factor, but it takes a certain kind of drive to keep playing the game well after you need to.

      Indeed. Still, a shame. Reminds me of George Best:

      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      Ah, the John McAfee package. Seems to be popular with the techie crowd. We're also having a special this week on the Kim Dotcom plan, if you're interested?

      Ah... anyhow, there's probably a reason that these people are extremely rich and you're not. Luck is obviously a factor, but it takes a certain kind of drive to keep playing the game well after you need to.

      Being a psychopath gives you a huge leg-up vs. the others, if you want to become rich and powerful. For instance, being able to lie or manipulate people, swim in murky waters... is a huge advantage.

    19. Re:Why? by devent · · Score: 2

      For the same reason that the whole premise of capitalism is false: humans are not just driven by greed, or that greed is the most important factor for humans. Humans have very diverse ideas of happiness and fulfilment. Some want to have an easy life with a huge yacht (like you?); some want just do what they are good at (like me); and some want to run a big cooperation. That is also why you don't see any correlation in CEO salary and bonuses and company success.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    20. Re:Why? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Don't you think cruising the world on a mega-yacht filled with every toy imaginable and with a harem of beautiful women would pall after a while? Errr actually no, you're good.

      The issue comes up when somebody passes you in an even bigger yacht owned by somebody who is actually attractive.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    21. Re:Why? by angryfirelord · · Score: 1

      Larry Ellison?

    22. Re: Why? by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Because it's their passion, of course. I like a good fuck as any other guy, but a fuck is just a fuck. I have dreams that I want to fulfill, and they relate to work. Apparently your dreams relate to doing nothing.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    23. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."

      Find what you love and let it kill you. --Bukowski

    24. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      You have fallen for the myth that 1% are motivated by money. They are motivated by power and the love of the game. You could tax away 50% or better of these peoples income and they would still do exactly what they do today, maybe even harder.

    25. Re:Why? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If I had the money and the power the last thing I'd want to do is deal with the massive headache of being in charge and having to go into work every day.

    26. Re:Why? by gagol · · Score: 1

      Maybe he actually enjoy running microsoft?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    27. Re:Why? by g8oz · · Score: 1

      And because you *would* do that is why you likely *won't* be in the position to do it.

      That Relentless Dull Predator Workaholic personality type is generally required to get the wealth that can unlock the yacht/missiles/models achievement. But that kind of person doesn't know how to enjoy it like the rest of us would.

  11. Micro$oft by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And you expected something different here? Microsoft's latest numbers are actually astoundingly good, better than even most of the optimists predicted. They speak of a very healthy company, not one in decline at all.

    Microsoft s numbers were *always* very good,, they deserve a $ on their name. 75% Gross profit margin is amazing, but that's not really the news here, because that is consistent. The news is that even with its primary product (Windows) taking a deserved beating they have made the difference up elsewhere (Servers; Gaming...well Live and Cloud...well Office).

    The original poster I suspect was being a little sarcastic, but the Irony is not lost on me. From a financial point of view. Microsoft more diversified product line has saved it in the short term financially, but from where RMS and the rest of us look...Windows has proved to be a trainwreck, and Microsoft is weaker as a monopoly. Its high fives all around.

    1. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows sales numbers were stagnant, that is hardly a train wreck. If anything it should be sulk in the corner time as even windows 8 wasn't enough to bring the numbers tumbling down.

    2. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And only in oem numbers. Volume licensing is way, way up. They're kicking ass everywhere but windows sales, and that's commensurate with the decline in pc sales.

      They're doing fine, and even win8 isn't doing badly.

    3. Re:Micro$oft by tgd · · Score: 2

      And only in oem numbers. Volume licensing is way, way up. They're kicking ass everywhere but windows sales, and that's commensurate with the decline in pc sales.

      They're doing fine, and even win8 isn't doing badly.

      And more significantly, Windows sales are doing very well -- its only new PC sales that aren't. Revenue is flat, because it was being sold for less, but there's no drop in per-seat demand for it.

      The PC slump is a manufacturer problem, not a Microsoft problem ... yet.

    4. Re:Micro$oft by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Volume licensing is way, way up.

      The cynic in me wonders if that is related to companies buying new computers with windows 8 and wanting to run windows XP on them. Afaict the main reason to buy windows volume licenses is that they offer greater downgrade rights than OEM copies.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Micro$oft by devent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can agree to that. I don't really care if Microsoft can create record profits. I do care that I can install Linux now on almost every hardware and it will work. I do care about LibreOffice and open standards so that I can exchange documents freely. I do care about an open web.

      With this for me important aspects of the software industry increasing year after year I couldn't be happier. 15 years ego it was all looking very dim for open source software and free standards. 15 years ego if you didn't used Windows you couldn't do any work and the IE and Microsoft Word and Excel was the "standard".

      So yes, high fives everyone.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    6. Re:Micro$oft by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      And the denial continues...

    7. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volume licensing is way, way up.

      The cynic in me wonders if that is related to companies buying new computers with windows 8 and wanting to run windows XP on them. Afaict the main reason to buy windows volume licenses is that they offer greater downgrade rights than OEM copies.

      No, they'd run 7 on them. No business in their right minds would be downgrading to XP at this point in time.

    8. Re:Micro$oft by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      No, they'd run 7 on them. No business in their right minds would be downgrading to XP at this point in time.

      I can see computers added/replaced right now to an XP shop to still run XP. The "migration project" will take care of them as well when everyone is ported over to linux/Win7/? (I doubt you'd see Win8).

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    9. Re:Micro$oft by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      And hey, let's not forget Steam for Linux. :)

      However it's interesting to see where internet video under Linux will head to. HTML5 playback is somewhat working now, but the CPU usage is still very high. Many sites use Flash, which is unsupported and unaccelerated on Linux platform.

    10. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ looks good because it uses cookie jar accounting:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookie_jar_accounting

    11. Re:Micro$oft by afidel · · Score: 1

      The reason VL is up is that they raised prices pretty much across the board, about 8% above inflation from our last renewal. It won't take too many renewals like that before companies start to seriously look at alternatives.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what's wrong with that? The fact that the did depend on a single product before doesn't mean it's a good thing. In fact, it is a bad thing, thus what they are doing now is right.
      They are well aware the world is changing and Windows isn't going to be everywhere so they are doing a lot about this new Cloud/SaaS/whatever thing with Azure, they are moving into consumer electronics with XBox and Windows Phone which are good product although the latter is not popular for now and they've actually started to make their own "PC"-hardware in form of surface, they are now providing a lot of web services available for any platform. Hell, they've even started working with open source crowd, although it still is a joke, but it's there.
      Maybe they are changing. They are no longer going to be an evil corporation who makes you use Windows, they are going to be something else, but I don't see it as a failure, in fact I like current Microsoft way better than "successful" Microsoft.

    13. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes you can't even make recent hardware work with WIndows XP because there are no drivers.
      And they don't run that special software which woks only in WIndows XP in enterprise all over the place, it usually runs via stuff like Citrix anyway and they even have some virtualized XP (I don't really know how this works, but that is what they say) in more expensive editions of Windows.
      Most PCs run a very limited set of software most of which is by Microsoft anyway, they have stuff like MS Office, Lotus Notes, SAP-client and maybe something else, which already plays nice with Windows 7 (and 8).

    14. Re:Micro$oft by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      The reason VL is up is that they raised prices pretty much across the board, about 8% above inflation from our last renewal. It won't take too many renewals like that before companies start to seriously look at alternatives.

      That and all the vendors keep moving people over to the VLs. Seriously...we renewed our MSDN subscription in 2012, and the vendor put it under the VL program. We ordered a copy of Windows Server 2012 for a computer we're shipping to a client, and the vendor put it under the VL program - for a SINGLE license. They even admitted that it would have been cheaper to give me a single copy with DVD but it was faster to provide the VL when I pressed them after the fact. And we seriously do not do enough business to justify using the VL programs.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    15. Re:Micro$oft by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked recently, but last time I checked Windows XP 64-bit had cruddy driver support. If you want good device drivers for Windows and the ability to use more than 3GB of RAM - and even cheap laptops and desktops from the last few years have more than 3GB of RAM - then you want Windows 7.

  12. RMS would not let you run this desktop, cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called GNU/Linux.

  13. us$ falls account for gains by cheekyboy · · Score: 2

    So profit outside usa remains static.
    USD drops n percent.

    MS profits rise n percent.

    Duhhhhh

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  14. House of cards by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it is actually increasing in other markets faster than it's consumer desktop market is eroding.

    I think we need to have a little look at those markets...because its a big fat failure on mobile.

    Its started to make money on a subscription service for a....end of life console. Ignoring the fact that Microsoft is about to put a *TON* of money down on keeping in the console market, or that suddenly its getting competition from, mobile...the market its a big fat failure in, or steam...or the rise of disposable Android console gaming...Hell Sony might try to compete with a console costing costing less than its weight in gold (not that that is worth as much as it was).

    Ok they are starting to make money from online office....hold the page, does that mean Office without Windows, running in a Web browser...in direct competition with Google, a company it repeatedly lose against...that it can't bribe or bully. Is this new market...or *the same* market that Office is only without the Windows Monopoly to prop it up, and won't this simply cannibalise current sales of Office.

    Ok they are making more money in video/telephony software one of the reasons they are currently a big fat failure in mobile...because that is in direct competition with the carriers they are trying to sell to!? I am not sure if that is not a home goal.

    Lastly Server Software http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240173199/Forrester-Microsoft-licence-hike-makes-no-sense price increases are a double edged sword, profitable in the short term, long term customers may look for low or free cost alternatives.

    There is no way anyone can argue, that Microsoft has a bad quarter, but arguing these are new markets...or that they are more stable than its old monopoly, is simply not the case.

  15. Microsoft Need to compete on Price by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is a failure in the mobile sector, and you cannot help but notice that Microsoft is *Still* making a 75% gross profit margin, you have to think that perhaps Microsoft might be better competing on price. "Microsoft Windows 8 Professional" from Amazon would cost me $175 the same as the new HP slate. I only list Amazon because its pretty hard to find full(not upgrade) editions of Windows OS.

    1. Re:Microsoft Need to compete on Price by ChronoFish · · Score: 2

      IF Microsoft was just Windows and Word/Office then the call of their demise would be appropriate. IF they were only tied to desktop/laptop machines, then they would be in a world of hurt.

      MS will be the King of the desktop all the way down to the time the last desktop is sold. That will be the end of Windows and maybe Office, but it won't be the end of MS.

      MS's monopoly will continue to weaken, but with Billions in the bank and more in assets the Company will persist - barring any illegal activities.

      However it's relevance with concerns of /. will weaken.

      -CF

  16. Metro 2013 by jacekm · · Score: 0

    Should we start calling it Metro 2013 ?

    JAM

  17. Microsoft a Office/Windows company by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    IF Microsoft was just Windows and Word/Office then the call of their demise would be appropriate. IF they were only tied to desktop/laptop machines, then they would be in a world of hurt.

    I'm not sure what relevance is to my post, but I don't predict the demise of Microsoft any time soon..In fact I don't even mention anything like it. Microsoft still takes the vast majority of revenue from Office/Windows, and that is not going to change because they make a few dollars on the side from a dying console, or chat....or Windows compatible server products.. Now your point about Microsoft being the king of Desktops is not true since Windows is now a Tablet OS. It simply has the greatest compatibility to legacy Windows Desktop Applications.

  18. No no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My company supplies office furniture to Microsoft - like chairs - and ...and ...and... Balmer is NOT the problem. No Sir!

  19. Balmer is Robert Mugabe by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Chief psychotic warlord among lesser warlords who, once they're done stealing whatever they can steal, leave under threat of death. Eventually MS will implode.

  20. Orderly succession by MrMickS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's nothing really to see here. He's been CFO for over three years, been at the company for much longer. Why not cash in on his various options and enjoy his life?

    The doom and gloom about Microsoft on here is all wishful thinking. PC Windows is on a decline in the marketplace and has been since the the iPhone/iPad changed the game. Android has accelerated this by making smart touch devices available at a lower price point. Microsoft are aware of this, the speed of change has caught them out and they are going to stumble a little before they make the right move.

    In the long run Office will survive because its a standard, nothing else can claim this. Office 365 gives them the ability to make money from Office without owning the OS. This is the future of Microsoft. Google may have been doing this longer but Office is Office.

    Cloud computing/storage is going to be a big money earner going forward. Microsoft have positioned themselves for this. Going forward they would rather provide Windows servers using Azure than sell the OS. As unit sales of Windows server decline, look to Microsoft aggressively market and price Azure as an alternative. Especially in the SME space. Why run your own servers when you can get a reliable DR capable cloud solution from Microsoft. This is where the market is heading.

    Xbox Live. The next Xbox is going to be a money earner. They are currently making money with the current service. The new one should come in at a reasonable price and allow them to continue this. It will also leverage cloud based services.

    Consumer Windows is the bad news. This will move to become a phone/tablet OS which is where the consumer market is going. The chances are that they will come good, they have a lot of smart people working there.

    Oh, and before the accusations start I'm not a Microsoft shill. I've never bought a computer that runs Windows. I just like to look at things a little more realistically. I still expect to get modded down because that's what happens on Slashdot.

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    1. Re:Orderly succession by Aboroth · · Score: 2

      Well you certainly know the Slashdot crowd well enough to know that when you add a little blurb about expecting to be modded down, it actually gives you a much better chance at being modded up.

      Of course, because of the typical behavior of Slashdot mods, I expect to be modded down for pointing this out.

    2. Re:Orderly succession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Slashdotters should read Microsoft's annual report.
      - Office/Exchange/Sharepoint account for 50% of the revenue.
      - Windows OS income is 75%+ derived from OEMs.
      - Xbox console loses money per unit, but each game/accessory/Xbox live subscription makes it a 1 billion+ source of revenue. This is not uncommon with many forms of hardware (see printers and printer ink).

      Their consumer facing businesses face harsh criticism, and rightly so in most cases. Their business facing divisions try not to screw things up too badly. Their largest mistake in the past several years was the aQuantive acquisition, which the current CFO wasn't around for.

      Cloud and Mobile are their two biggest threats right now in the business space. In the consumer space, they are moving towards a subscription based model to maintain profitability. However, they remain the dominant market leader in many areas for a reason, their products aren't completely sucky. I think Microsoft has a lot of room for improvement, especially if they want to survive longer term, but I give them credit where credit is due.

    3. Re:Orderly succession by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      The doom and gloom about Microsoft on here is all wishful thinking. PC Windows is on a decline in the marketplace and has been since the the iPhone/iPad changed the game.

      See, the thing is, most people here don't really want Microsoft to fail. Well, maybe a little bit, but that's not the point. They want Windows to fail. Windows is the monopoly OS that's created a de facto closed standard. Windows is the reason (especially with OSX and its BSD roots) that programs and games aren't made with Linux compatibility.

      Office? Only care about that insofar as it reinforces the desktop OS monopoly. XBox? Many people here actually like the XBox. Cloud services? Unless you're unfortunate enough to have to work with Windows servers, nobody cares about them either.

      What people here want to see is Windows' stranglehold on the desktop OS market go away.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Orderly succession by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the long run Office will survive because its a standard, nothing else can claim this.

      Once upon a time, Lotus 1-2-3 was the standard spreadsheet and nothing else could claim that. Once upon a time, Wordperfect was the standard word processor and nothing else could claim that. Microsoft Office displaced them because Microsoft controlled the OS that everyone (for all practical purposes) ran them on and Microsoft was able to adapt to new versions of the OS faster because their programmers knew what was going to be in it before anyone else (and because MS programmers wrote the new OS to break something that their competitors used).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:Orderly succession by sdreader · · Score: 1

      See, the thing is, most people here don't really want Microsoft to fail. Well, maybe a little bit, but that's not the point.

      Yes and no.

      I want to see Microsoft suffer some sort of comeuppance for all the disgusting business practices they performed in the past and still do to an extent. At the same time, I don't want the company to fail for reasons of decent people losing their jobs. I would at worst like to see them taken down a peg so that they have less of a stranglehold on the industry. The mere fact I cannot rely on LibreOffice alone for document transfers and assume 100% compatibility with my recipients, shows just how much influence they still have in the world of computers.

      --
      Apparently being anti-Steam is grounds for insults, even if there's basis. I shall learn to keep my mouth shut.
    6. Re:Orderly succession by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Of course, because of the typical behavior of Slashdot mods, I expect to be modded down for pointing this out.

      Hah! I see your strategy!

    7. Re:Orderly succession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if all these people leaving microsoft; set-up windows 8 to fail to bring us freedom :O their heroes!

    8. Re:Orderly succession by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Good points. But Microsoft has a proven track record of not being able to compete in a level playing field. Even if all the revenue streams open up, its competitors, will run circles around it and eat its lunch. List one instance where Microsoft went into a market without a monopoly and dominated. And every time competition showed up, it failed miserably.

      It bundled Microsoft Money for free for ages. Still could not kill Quicken because, Intuit had an equally strong cash cow in the form of TurboTax. Every company it killed, Netscape, Word Perfect, Lotus, Borland, all of them did not have independent revenue stream. Any time the other side had a revenue strem, Intuit, Oracle, Google, Apple, it failed to make any dent.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:Orderly succession by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I expect to be modded down for pointing this out.

      It's funny how often that small trick can be used to make people actually mod you up.

    10. Re:Orderly succession by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      I disagree for many parts. Cash-in and enjoy? Unlikely for people like this in 50s. See robnelle 541339 comment above. They are not in any way leading in the 'big money earner' (aka growth area) you mentioned in cloud or console. Stockholders want stock to rise, and for the most part it requires growth of the company, not just generating steady profit.

    11. Re:Orderly succession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except neither WordPerfect nor Lotus 1-2-3 were the standards for over 20 years. There's a big difference in being the standard for a few years and being the standard for decades.

    12. Re:Orderly succession by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      You only notice the ones that have been modded up.

  21. Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in wind by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can the people who killed the start menu / Metro apps in an window.

    The UI was to big of a jump and to not have some kind of choice is real bad.

    Also get rid of the app store only for metro apps.

  22. They didn't make him the CFO for nothing! by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 0

    Smart guy! Good with money. Knows to cash out on those share options while they are still high. Before that impending PLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNGE...

    Yeah the execs are parachuting out, but does anyone know who in MS is behind the Windows 8 clusterfuck? Like who was the dick who said to get rid of the Start button because *FUCK* those PC users. If there is a series of unsolved murders in Seattle at the moment it is that guy getting rid of everyone else at that meeting.

    1. Re:They didn't make him the CFO for nothing! by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No dick. The start button removal was a collective decision to use the only strategy MS knows: use the desktop monopoly to force their way into a mobile monopoly. If they could get punters to actually like Metro, then they'd like to see it on their mobiles as well...errr....or something....

  23. Re:Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That would be Julie Larson-Green. She also create the much hated "ribbon UI". Fire her? Nope, the just promoted her to head the entire Windows division.

  24. Love the crappy media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "struggles with Windows 8, yadda yadda yadda"

    Funny...MS just beat analysts' expectations for the quarter (by quite a margin too!)

  25. Good by Shaman · · Score: 1

    I wish upon this company all the evils that history can heap on them. They killed innovation in the computer business and it's taken 15 years for them to get to a point where they were mostly as good as what they stifled. Now Windows 8 and Windows XP are their enemies, hung by their own garrotte is suiting.

    --
    ...Steve
  26. more like.... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    More like he's going to spend more time with Windows 7. I'd be ready to shoot Windows 8 on site after almost a year of it. Why oh why won't that stupid lady who design the UI and Steve Balmer who supported it leave the company? This is classic toxic employee-induced mass quitting where in reality the 2 complete assholes should have left instead of all the good employees.

    1. Re:more like.... by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Steven Sinofsky, architect of Windows 8, was already fired. (Officially, he was supposed to have resigned of his own free will, but no one believes that.) And it's now being reported that Windows 8.1 will bring back the Start button and include the ability to boot straight to desktop. They're too embarrassed to backpedal all at once, but in the long run, Metro will go the way of Active Desktop.

    2. Re:more like.... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      I am yet to find a graphics card capable of rendering a desktop over top an active desktop layer at 60FPS, lol. Anyway, who was that one lady who got promoted after Windows 8 was a disaster? I think she was in charge of the Windows OS product or something but not just the UI. She got a big, giant promotion. I would have demoted her to valet parking attendant if it was my company and we also don't actually have valet parking but that would match my confidence in her abilities to manage anything.

    3. Re:more like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's better at her job than you are at yours.

      But then again, so was General Custer.

  27. And so we begin a new Slashdot tradition... by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Every month or so on Slashdot, 1997-2003: Apple is dead!
    Every month or so on Slashdot, 2005-2013: PC Gaming is dead!
    Every month or so on Slashdot, 2008-2013: Console Gaming is dead!
    Every month or so on Slashdot, 2013-?: Microsoft is dead!

    It's been a while since we had a new one.

  28. Re:Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in w by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 1

    Seems they did this.
    But then they are now directing her to put back in the start button and to reverse course somewhat (speculative).

    Assuming the board over-rules the current windows team - and force a change from the disaster that is Win 8 - will she quit? :)

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
  29. All the execs should leave ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... because they allowed the market to shift away from Windows. If this had not been allowed to happen, Microsoft could see sales of over 25,000,000,006 copies of Windows by 2018 (and that's not counting the 14,751,292,051 copies pirated in China).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Cake and eat it too... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Not a lot of sympathy here. If you don't like it, stop doing business with Chinese companies.

    American companies complain about the patents, yet turn around and contract out all their manufacturing needs there due to cheap labour, and want to sell products that because of the huge growth market.

  31. Steve Balmer is doing his job. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He wears a suit, collects big pay check every month and takes home a big bonus, and is seen in his office once in a while. As a CEO he has done all that is expected of him. It is upto rest of the company to make progress and earn enough money to continue to pay him his exalted benefits. What more can he do? The raison d`etre for private companies is to earn money to pay their top executives. What part of that private enterprise you guys dont get?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  32. Re:Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can the people who killed the start menu / Metro apps in an window

    Can they what?

    Put the start menu back? Put Metro apps in a window, or outside of one?

  33. To spend time with... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    So the CFO jumps ship, and the shares went up? Do the people buying those shares under some misguided impression that Windows 8 is Klein's fault, and everything will be OK now? Perhaps they should be asking what the real reason is that he's decided to go...

    Real reason? Didn't you read the summary above? It's to spend time w/ his extended family. In other words, wife & kids are fine, but he need to spend more quality time w/ his parents/siblings/nephews/neices/cousins and other distant relatives.

    It's a perfectly good reason to quit the top finance job @ MS. Boy, are you people cynical!!!

  34. Not even a question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google, of course.

    At least with Google you get to work on things that could make a difference in the world.

    With MS you only get ground down into the lowest common denominator, unless you are willing to stab your boss in the back, stab/sabotage any other project... and not have time to work on your own due to having to defend your own project against all the others...

    Sounds a lot like the common description of Piracy... defend your own ship against all others...

    1. Re:Not even a question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with Google you get to work on things that could make a difference in the world.

      Ah yes... the exciting humanitarian projects inside an advertising company. A category of companies whose sole purpose is to spam people's eyes and ears with enough shit, enough times so that a few of them get tricked into buying shit they don't need. That really makes a difference in the world... ofcource

  35. Perhaps you should have created a better list. by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I loved your list because its all true. Apple did die...it literally had to reinvent itself at the time, OS 9 was perhaps the worst OS imaginable, but it was an incredibly exiting time watching Apple reinvent itself. It actually died in 2007 when it changed its name to Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc. showing its transformation into electronics company.

    PC always had interesting time with many dips due to advances in consoles, as someone who saw its rise. In reality it died for me when Microsoft focused its attention on the Xbox; it is a shadow of its former self, now its all console ports and DRM, DLC...Freemium. News of Microsoft banning grown up games in the European marketplace (quickly revoked) shows how bad they don't understand games...as much as they like to point gaming out on when it comes to selling their OS. In reality Microsoft is abandoning the whole idea of a consumer PC.

    Is console gaming dying!? Its certainly evolving. I regularly argue for Android gaming, but tablets and phones are in many ways new consoles in themselves, and offer many advantages over traditional console gaming. The Wii U has not really proved itself in the market, and Sony/Microsoft have yet to unveil their new consoles, but I wouldn't be surprised if this was the last generation of dedicated under the TV consoles...with Xbox and Playstation becoming brands only. While everything is rolled into smartTV whatever that is.

    ...and then we get to Microsoft, nobody is saying Microsoft is dead...but the days of Microsoft Manners is over. Its still an abusive Monopoly Office/OS on a platform it has dumbed down to a tablet interface, leading to its 3rd consecutive drop...Windows 8 is a home goal, They are still as large...and nasty as they always were...except people are looking at Google and Apple for the future, both too big to be bullied/bribed by Microsoft...There is more news of them paten raping another android company than there is of actually selling Windows Phones (Nokias latest disappointing results did not even make it on Slashdot). As I said not dead just a Loser.

  36. Apple is in its own Shit by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    On the plane last night I could see around me 6-8 iPads, 5-6 MacBooks and 1 windows laptop.

    Except its worth noting that Apple Mac Sales have dropped 22% in this quarter alone, While its iPads are rapidly becoming just another tablet. Apple needs to pay attention.

  37. Re:Eat Cake by thoth · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what innovation comes out of Open Source?

    The biggest innovation out of Open Source, for me, was the bootable "live" CD. The ability to run a modern OS entirely off a CD/DVD and RAM, without installing anything to the harddrive - had all kinds of uses, from emergency recovery disks, to hardware diagnostics, to privacy, etc. And even today, 10 years or more later, Microsoft has some partial solution (Windows to Go, just recently released).

    I can't think of anything else off the top of my head at the moment - which doesn't mean there was anything else, just my memory is bad ;) - but I'd put the live CD open source innovation way up there. It's easily far, far superior than anything innovated in Vista, 7, 8, etc.

  38. Re:Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in w by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

    It's called the Peter Principle. I for one, am glad they promoted her. Maybe the next version of Windows will be worse than Win8.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  39. Re:Can who killed the start menu / Metro apps in w by bazorg · · Score: 1

    My Windows 8 store shows both Metro and Desktop apps, the latter have a different hue on their little tiles. Possibly a way to show a bigger number when someone compares "how many apps in your store?".

  40. It does not matter who their CEO or CFO is - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it matter who the CEO or CFO is if they sell a product designed to fail as a way of increasing repeat sales ?
    Most PC buyers have probably owned 2-3-4 Win 98/Me/XP/etc. PeeCees that have died with unfixable or expensive security issues, taking all their email, work, pictures, and so on to the landfill. Fix MS's security architecture and their market share will fix itself.

  41. pace Larry Niven by hicksw · · Score: 1

    ...sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines....

    and sleep with the sword?

    [Hint: it's supposed to be a "Magic Goes Away" joke]

    --
    The cloud is the new floppy disk.