Slashdot Mirror


Brain Zapping Improves Math Ability

sciencehabit writes "If you are one of the 20% of healthy adults who struggle with basic arithmetic, simple tasks like splitting the dinner bill can be excruciating. Now, a new study suggests that a gentle, painless electrical current applied to the brain can boost math performance for up to 6 months. Researchers don't fully understand how it works, however, and there could be side effects." We've covered various other potential benefits to having your brain shocked.

202 comments

  1. How it really works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK OK I'll solve your equation. Anything! Please don't shock me again!

    *BZZZZZ*

    ARRRRGH!

    1. Re:How it really works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, Peter Venkman was doing it ok!

    2. Re:How it really works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn, that would have been funny if I hadn't seen an article about this earlier. This method produces no discomfort whatever.

      What I wonder is, could this be used as a treatment for Alzheimer's?

    3. Re:How it really works by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      I know I knew the answer to this one. But I forgot.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    4. Re:How it really works by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Indeed, what was that line from that Denzel Washington movie?

      "Given enough voltage you can get a horse to deal cards."

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  2. huh by WGFCrafty · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you are one of the 20% of healthy adults who struggle with basic arithmetic

    Wow, I never realized the majority of people struggle with this.

    1. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      One in twenty isn't a majority.

    2. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you probably also haven't realized that a majority of people are unintelligent.

    3. Re:huh by MadKeithV · · Score: 3, Funny

      Woosh ;-)

    4. Re:huh by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Woosh ;-)

    5. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One in twenty is 5%, to be precise.

      20% is every fifth.

    6. Re:huh by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you're not from North Korea.

      Although given the fact that you seem to have had a sense-of-humour bypass operation, maybe you are...

    7. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back and read his comment again.

    8. Re:huh by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see you are one of the 40% of healthy adults who struggle with sarcasm. Don't worry, you are in good company.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    9. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh to the Woosh ;-)

    10. Re:huh by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's also a nice practical demonstration that there are, indeed, adults who struggle with understanding humor.

    11. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you are one of the 30% of Slashdotters who reply too far down the thread.

    12. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That number looks made up.

    13. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it's about the majority?

    14. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 out of 3 people struggle with math;-)

    15. Re:huh by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks y'all. I just shot Raisin Bran out of my nose. Approximately .35 servings worth. There may still be a raisin in my sinus cavity.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    16. Re:huh by Laglorden · · Score: 1

      96,57% of all statistics on the Internet is made up.

    17. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, this is the Internet, and I'd just like to say that's flatly untrue. I am a reliable source of consistent and relevant information.

    18. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most numbers are made up

    19. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most numbers are not made up. A finite number of people have had a finite amount of time to make up numbers, so there are finitely many made up numbers. Since we know that there are infinitely many numbers, most numbers have not yet been made up.

    20. Re:huh by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      I see you are one of the 40% of healthy adults who struggle with sarcasm. Don't worry, you are in good company.

      I see you are one of the 102% of basement dwellers who struggles with Poe's Law.

    21. Re:huh by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      I think the only proper response at such a moment from me is..



      Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.....................

    22. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the universe is infinite, it also contains infinitely many people, who have made up about every number one can think of. If nobody can think of a number, one may question if it exists at all.

    23. Re:huh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      So how do you fix reading comprehension? One of the 20% is not one in 20. It's one of the 20 out of 100 people. Sigh.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:huh by rockout · · Score: 2

      So how do you fix sarcasm comprehension?

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    25. Re:huh by fredrated · · Score: 1

      20% isn't one in twenty.

    26. Re:huh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No I got it, and it has nothing to do with the misinterpretation but rather the "1 in 20" being a "majority". Nice try though, claim it was the intent all along.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    27. Re:huh by getmerexkramer · · Score: 2

      I thought the joke was that only a tiny portion of the adult population are "healthy"

    28. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was funnier when the "1 in 20" comment was modded insightful. Made it a little less obvious.

    29. Re: huh by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      But numbers found on the internet were put there by people. There are infinitely many more numbers not found on the internet than can be found on the internet.

    30. Re:huh by verbatim · · Score: 1

      4 out of 3 people struggle with math;-)

      9 out of 10 statisticians cannot count to 10.

      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    31. Re:huh by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Indeed, much more so than math.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    32. Re:huh by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Everybody but you got it, found it funny, and didn't have to be pedantic.

      Well, you and that one other guy. So like half the people.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    33. Re:huh by ukemike · · Score: 2

      There are adults on /. ??!??

      --
      -- QED
    34. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20% is 1 in 5 not 1 in 20.

    35. Re:huh by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      whoosh

    36. Re: huh by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      If nobody can think of a number, one may question if it exists at all.

      How specifically do you have to think of a number for this to count? In vague terms, people have thought of "all" numbers in large classes (described properties of, e.g., real and complex numbers). For "specific" numbers like "a trillion" --- no one ever intuitively understands such a number as they do "four" --- you might know some properties of it, or how to write a symbolic representation of it, but you can never conceptualize "a trillion apples" like you can "four apples". So, where do you draw the line between "thought of in detail" numbers like 1,2,3, or 42, "thought of abstractly" numbers like "a trillion and three", or "thought of very abstractly" numbers like "all complex numbers" to figure out "which ones exist"?

      Also,

      Since the universe is infinite

      is a very iffy assumption. We know it is *big*, but have zero evidence for big=infinite.

    37. Re:huh by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      How did you stablish that the A/C is an adult?

    38. Re:huh by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      That's why I never eat Raisin Brain.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    39. Re:huh by denzacar · · Score: 1

      There are not enough pictures or other shiny material on Slashdot to attract children that far down the comment thread.

      Grown adults with minds of the children on the other hand...

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    40. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you can never conceptualize "a trillion apples" like you can "four apples".

      Sure I can. I can also describe it.

      A trillion apples is a shit load of apples. There, conceived, conceptualized and described.

    41. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But numbers found on the internet were put there by people. There are infinitely many more numbers not found on the internet than can be found on the internet.

      You obviously haven't reached the end of the internet. I got there yesterday and found all the remaining numbers waiting for the rest of us to catch up

    42. Re: huh by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      I think you're just proving my point: how much does your concept of "trillion = shitload" differ from "trillion and three = shitload"? I can conceptualize the difference between "four" and "four and three," but by the time you hit a trillion, all the integers start to seem pretty much the same --- the only way I can "tell the difference" is to symbolically ignore the "trillion" and ponder only the difference between zero and three.

    43. Re: huh by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      A trillion apples is a roughly 4.5-apple-thick layer of large apples covering all of Manhattan.

      Now that I've said that, it's easy to conceptualize it. In fact, you've already visualized it in your mind, and if you're from anywhere other than Manhattan, you're also probably thinking that it sounds like a good idea.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    44. Re: huh by Testudo+Kleinmanni · · Score: 1

      Infinity of universe is debatable

    45. Re: huh by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      Since the universe is infinite

      [citation]

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    46. Re:huh by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Legal adults, yes.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    47. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 % is 1/5, trust me I'm an engineer.

    48. Re:huh by kubernet3s · · Score: 1

      woosh yourself (1 in 20)

    49. Re: huh by Volshebnyj+Molotok · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm pretty sure most numbers are real.
      1... 2... 3... 4...
      See? All real. There are however, imaginary numbers, but let's not get into those, shall we?

    50. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thaat it was 6% poplashan and the zap wil lost fur 20 monts, no?

    51. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, 0ne in 5 = 20%

      Please get zapped !!

    52. Re:huh by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yiou better get it out of there before it grows into a raisin tree.

    53. Re:huh by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Shocking discovery!

      --
      Here be signatures
    54. Re:huh by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Damn! that's more than a quarter!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    55. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is one in five which is equal to 20%.

    56. Re:huh by Occams · · Score: 1

      1 in 20 can be a majority if you are bad at arithmetic.. Arithmetic is not math.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    57. Re: huh by Occams · · Score: 1

      There are also rational and irrational numbers. Transfinite numbers are my favorite. There are many numbers corresponding to infinity. In fact, there are an infinite number of infinite numbers, and they are not all the same size.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
  3. Statistics are fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So math performance is measured in months... Interesting. Any general data about the population available?

  4. Interesting by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    It makes me wonder if there's any correlation between maths ability and epilepsy?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes me wonder if there's any correlation between maths ability and epilepsy?

      Don't ask me, I don't know whether it makes you wonder that or not.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as they can hold the pencil steady long enough, we'll find out.

    3. Re:Interesting by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      It would have to be negative.

    4. Re:Interesting by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      If you havent found a correlation between two things, it means you havent ttried hard enough.

  5. It kills the fashion sense though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and test subjects kept mentioning spherical cows.

    1. Re:It kills the fashion sense though by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't eat meat from a spherical cow (it would be like someone giving you a bit of snot and putting it in a sandwhich) but I would bang on a power line to remove the tension in the lines to avoid the scourge of heavy electricity.

  6. Neuron Massage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think of it as a bit of massage for the neurons. Seems perfectly plausible, just like physical massage for muscles can be relieving.

  7. mod parent funny : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice one!

  8. Welcome to 2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11692799

  9. When I was in school, they had something like this by Bearhouse · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not a "gentle, painless electrical current applied to the brain ", more like a smack round the head.

    Student performance often improved dramatically, and no permanent damage seemed to be done.

  10. Modern Psychology by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 2

    Medical developments are pretty shocking these days.

  11. If your problem is splitting the bill... by gweihir · · Score: 0

    ... then your problem is not math ability, but generally low intelligence. Ever heard of pocket calculators? Or doing division on paper? Everybody has mental weak spots, the question is whether thy can work around them or not.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:If your problem is splitting the bill... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Every body has mentel week spots? Your a dandy to think that. Most of us has no such weekness and as such you should shut you're pie whole. philistine!

    2. Re:If your problem is splitting the bill... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Division of a bill total is arithmetic, not math. A mathematician would provide a proof that his portion of the bill can never be more than 1 in 20 provided that the number of diners is a prime.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
  12. Side effects by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately it makes speaking proper England unpossible.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Side effects by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Then read more. To read makes your speaky English good.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unpossible occurs in earlier versions of The King James Bible.

    3. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately it makes speaking proper England unpossible.

      An may cause urine stains. But, it's totally worth it now that I can split a dinner check.

    4. Re:Side effects by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Hello, chief. Let's talk, why not?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know, "causing urine stains" is a great way to split the dinner check. Right before the bill comes, stand up dripping and announce to everyone at the table "aww, frig, I pissed myself again" and run out of the room. You'll get a 0% split of the check, and no one will think you're skipping out just to avoid paying.

  13. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Not a "gentle, painless electrical current applied to the brain ", more like a smack round the head.

    Student performance often improved dramatically, and no permanent damage seemed to be done.

    That reminds me of three men in a boat, where the narrator reads an advert for liver pills.

    In the present instance, going back to the liver-pill circular, I had the symptoms, beyond all mistake, the chief among them being "a general disinclination to work of any kind."

    What I suffer in that way no tongue can tell. From my earliest infancy I have been a martyr to it. As a boy, the disease hardly ever left me for a day. They did not know, then, that it was my liver. Medical science was in a far less advanced state than now, and they used to put it down to laziness.

    "Why, you skulking little devil, you," they would say, "get up and do something for your living, can't you?" — not knowing, of course, that I was ill.

    I remember reading this as a kit and lamenting that my teachers also had no idea that this was a medical condition. But then he goes on:

    And they didn't give me pills; they gave me clumps on the side of the head. And, strange as it may appear, those clumps on the head often cured me — for the time being. I have known one clump on the head have more effect upon my liver, and make me feel more anxious to go straight away then and there, and do what was wanted to be done, without further loss of time, than a whole box of pills does now.

  14. 4#10=23? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone really know what that means?

    1. Re:4#10=23? by fredrated · · Score: 1

      I don't, and I have a degree in mathematics!

    2. Re:4#10=23? by plover · · Score: 1

      It means "ã]6". At least that's what I got after pasting it into a base 64 converter. But I'm not sure I understand it any better now.

      --
      John
    3. Re:4#10=23? by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Think they made up symbols to test the participants, so as to test new things instead of how well they already knew the usual math operations.

    4. Re:4#10=23? by margeman2k3 · · Score: 1

      They used # as an arbitrary symbol, to represent some operation where 4#10=23.
      Sort of the way that we use + as an arbitrary symbol to represent the operation where 4+10=14.

    5. Re:4#10=23? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. Now, can you tell us what it means?? Not so bright now are you?

  15. mA=volts?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from the article...

    "The electrical current slowly ramped up to about 1 milliamp—a tiny fraction of the voltage of an AA battery—"

    Perhaps the article writer could benefit from this electroshock therapy as well....

    1. Re:mA=volts?? by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      from the article...

      "The electrical current slowly ramped up to about 1 milliamp—a tiny fraction of the voltage of an AA battery—"

      Perhaps the article writer could benefit from this electroshock therapy as well....

      Perhaps they could benefit from this http://blog.xkcd.com/2013/05/15/dictionary-of-numbers/

      "1 milliamp [~ the amount of current applied to the brain to boost math performance for 6 months]"

    2. Re:mA=volts?? by kruach+aum · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, can you rephrase your reply to incorporate a comparison in terms of number of football fields? I'm unsure how to determine the relative benefit this extension would provide me with otherwise.

    3. Re:mA=volts?? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Im not seeing the problem, that IS around the amount of power that an AA battery provides.

    4. Re:mA=volts?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but TFA doesn't say "a tiny fraction of the POWER of an AA battery"

    5. Re:mA=volts?? by cnaumann · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you comment is a joke or not.

      Neither mA nor Volts is a measure of power. A standard AA cell produces about 1.5 Volt of potential across its terminals. Depending on the application, the current draw (Amps) can be anywhere from a fraction of a microamp to around 1 Amp. The power (Watts) that a AA cell delivers is the voltage time the current, and can be anywhere from a fraction of a mircowatt to more than 1 Watt. The energy (Joules) that a AA cell delivers over its lifetime is the power multiplied by time and is around 10,000 Joules (about 2.5 food Calories). The amount of energy (joules) deliverd depends greatly on the amount of power (Watts) demanded from the cell and is significanty diminised in high-power (Watts) applications.

      You can buy special lithium chemistry AA cells for high power (Watts) applications. These deliver the same voltage (Volts) as standard alkaline AA cells and actuall contain about the same amount of energy (Joules). The difference is that they can deliver high amounts of power (Watts) without diminished capacity (Joules).

    6. Re:mA=volts?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author should have said, "a tiny fraction of the current a AA cell can provide." However, that's not really informative for most people. I can't think of a simple explanation for how small 1 mA is.

    7. Re:mA=volts?? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      About half as much power as a low-current LED.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:mA=volts?? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Its maybe 0.5% of the current necessary to run a small 80mm case fan. Its 1/500th of the normal current that a dumb USB device will draw. Its 1/10000th the current that a microwave or toaster oven draws.

    9. Re:mA=volts?? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Neither mA nor Volts is a measure of power

      The joke

  16. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you want to improve student performance, sure, but conditioning people to associate doing complex work with pain isn't going to work so well when those people are done and out in the workforce.

  17. So that's how Stalin .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AH, so that explains all those Russian math genius during the Stalin error!

    While these people were in "reeducation camps" having their testicles electrocuted, he accidentally created math geniuses!

    I for one welcome our Soviet Math Genius creator overlords!

  18. How about for language. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    Because I consistently fail at writing clear and concise grammatically correct monologues.

  19. Extrapolation by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    if 1 milliamp produces a 6 month increase in maths performance, then logically, 1 ampere should produce a 6000 month increase in maths performance. Your genius would be smokin'!

    1. Re:Extrapolation by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Your maths is correct, but that means you have an assumption of linearly incremental performance equation. What if the incremental equation is instead a 1/x? So that the result would opposite!

    2. Re:Extrapolation by fazig · · Score: 1

      Similar to Terry Pratchett's famous: "Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

    3. Re: Extrapolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then it would be called homeopathy..

  20. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, zap their brains instead.

  21. uhh by DragonTHC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    perhaps the subject should just increase their electrolye intake instead of being electrocuted.

    Proper electrolyte balance make the brain run smooth.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brawndo, because why would plants ever want water?

    2. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, it's what plants crave!

    3. Re:uhh by ami.one · · Score: 1

      That is actually quite a sensible suggestion !

    4. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should drink some Brawndo. Brawndo has electrolytes!

    5. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beer is an electrolyte, right?

    6. Re:uhh by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      Researchers "don't fully understand how it works," which means they don't know what the causal mechanism is that provides this benefit, which means you don't either, which means it may have nothing to do with electrolytes (despite the proximity of the word 'electrolyte' to the word 'electricity' in the dictionary). Also, 'to electrocute' means 'to execute with electricity.' While I'm sure there are zombies with mathematical abilities superior to those of some undergrads, I imagine the study's authors went for a different experimental set-up. The ethics committee hearings would be epic.

    7. Re:uhh by turp182 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's what brains crave! And Brawndo has them.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    8. Re:uhh by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      Also, 'to electrocute' means 'to execute with electricity.'

      The word 'electrocute' seems to be undergoing a semantic shift. I am seeing more frequent usage where context suggests a meaning of "giving an electric shock". I suppose eventually the medical and electrotechnical literature will be forced to use something like "fatal electrocution" which will then be criticized as redundant (like "Pilotless Drone").

    9. Re: uhh by Testudo+Kleinmanni · · Score: 1

      DIAEF Die in an electrolytical fire

  22. Practice works by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    You can also just practice math until your good at it.

    1. Re:Practice works by dywolf · · Score: 1

      that's the real reason people are bad at it. lack of practice. the more you practice, the more you retain it. most people studied it once, and then never again, which leads to a very quick very large regression. and most teachers cover math in a one concept a week way, with no tie backs to previous lessons. a reliance on calculators to do the previous stuff you already learned so you can focus ont he current lesson doesnt help either. its helpful on one hand to focus on the current lesson, but when the subject matter builds on previous lessons, it becomes a tradeoff, particularly if you then need to go back and demonstrate every piece of the process 2 and 3 or more years later on a comprehensive professional exam. students who do everything by hand, including the "easy, earlier" stuff retain it better and longer, and in my experience have had far less trouble passing those exams (and required fewer/no cram sessions with things like "the EIT for Dummies").

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    2. Re:Practice works by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      That's because the reality is that most people don't use advanced mathematics (or, these days, hardly any mathematics at all) in their day-to-day lives. Most simple mathematical exercises in the modern world have been automated, and the complex stuff is largely the purview of engineers and other specialized pros. Academia is the only place most people ever encounter it, and very few people spend their whole lives as students (my son being a rare exception).

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    3. Re:Practice works by dywolf · · Score: 1

      tip and change calculation is hardly advanced mathmatics, yet people who's job it is to do such math dont know how to do it without the computer (register) doing it for them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    4. Re:Practice works by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      What works even better is actually UNDERSTANDING math.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    5. Re:Practice works by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      That's because the reality is that most people don't use advanced mathematics (or, these days, hardly any mathematics at all) in their day-to-day lives. Most simple mathematical exercises in the modern world have been automated, and the complex stuff is largely the purview of engineers and other specialized pros. Academia is the only place most people ever encounter it, and very few people spend their whole lives as students (my son being a rare exception).

      The article doesn't refer to advanced math, just basic arithmetic - addition, subtraction, multiplication, division. Of which is such a basic skill it's used daily in many activities, including ones you don't know exist.

      A basic use is shopping - is the 12oz bottle for $4 a better deal than the 16oz bottle for $5? What is the current approximate value of your shopping cart? Including tax? (Do you have enough money?) If you're having a party and they like your cake, how much extra ingredients do you need to buy so you can bake enough for everyone?

      One thing I found that helped were the "brain training" games. They fell out of favor when it turns out they can't increase your general brain health, but the footnotes all noted that they improved significantly on the areas they trained in. So doing 100 basic math problems daily did in general improve basic arithmetic ability.

      Heck, even doing 100 problems shouldn't take more than a couple of minutes (you don't need much - just adding/subtracting/multiplying and dividing involving digits you find on a multiplication table is good enough - i.e. add/sub/mul single digits, and division has a dividend in the double digits while a divisor in the single digits).

    6. Re:Practice works by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      When does the Chinese Room go from addition and multiplication tables to "understanding math"?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:Practice works by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      When there's a genuine mind and not an uncooperative memorizing machine of course.

      The problem with math in the US is that most of the population are unthinking sheep.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:Practice works by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's a different matter entirely. TFA is actually talking about arithmetic, not math.

    9. Re:Practice works by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Don't be colloquially/contextually ignorant.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    10. Re:Practice works by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not. Understanding doesn't make you know that 6 times 5 is 30 any faster, but practice does. Apparently, a zap to the brain does too. That's all TFA is talking about. We have no idea if a zap to the brain will make you better at "word problems" AKA actual math where understanding comes into play.

    11. Re:Practice works by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Nice try at a face save.

      Understanding does help. Perhaps you don't see that because you don't understand?

      I always thought it was really stupid for people to memorize and practice multiplication tables when none of that is necessary with a little simple understanding.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    12. Re:Practice works by sjames · · Score: 1

      No need (for me) to save face. It's not my fault you forgot that math and arithmetic aren't the same thing.

  23. Brain Overclocking by sm177y2300 · · Score: 0

    More voltage!!! :)

    1. Re:Brain Overclocking by rts008 · · Score: 1

      The problem here, is getting the public to adopt heatsinks on their heads as fashionable.

      But then again, I do remember beanie hats with propellers, polyester leisure suits and platform shoes, and disco.....

      Nevermind.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:Brain Overclocking by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The problem here, is getting the public to adopt heatsinks on their heads as fashionable.

      No problem. Tin foil hats can double as heatsinks.

  24. Wonders never cease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great, now electric shocks aren't just for boosting ESP abilities. Dr Venkman first established this fact back in 1984.

  25. Test case by Skiron · · Score: 3, Funny

    Supposing 0.1 amp per 6 volts in 39 minutes increases mathematical ability by 2%, at what rate should the current be applied and for how long before you can work this out?

    1. Re:Test case by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Where did you get 2%? The article cited take-up speeds 2-5 times faster.

  26. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google Math Boost

  27. A shocking future by Jetra · · Score: 1

    Manufacturing, tattoo removal, and eye surgery by lasers so far and now this? I have trouble with Geometry and Trigonometry, but I'd rather have someone teach me instead of paying several grand to have a concentrated beam of energy shot into my brain.

    1. Re:A shocking future by ConaxConax · · Score: 1

      I look forward to the day when I can install the information directly. As they said in The Matrix "I know kung fu" but to use this in the real world, to be able to just install all mathematical knowledge? How great is that?

    2. Re:A shocking future by Jetra · · Score: 1

      I'm not too particularly keen on the idea that you have to have an implant in your cerebellum. Seems like so much can go wrong. That is not to say that's a not a great idea, but it'd sure beat the hell out of trying to learn geometry (my brain refuses to learn it).

    3. Re:A shocking future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can build one of these at home with off the shelf parts for a few hundred dollars.

      http://www.diytdcs.com/

  28. One more time: arithmetic isn't mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being able to do arithmetic doesn't make you good at mathematics; no more so than being able to spell makes you a good writer.

  29. Smart enough to not let them zap you again by Carewolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, you look stupid, would you mind if I zap your brain?
    Uhm...
    It will make you smarter! promise.
    Uh. Okay.

    Ouch
    Muhahaha.
    I don't feel any smarter...
    Would you let me zap you again?
    No!!
    See! You are smarter already

  30. There are three kinds of people. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Those who can count, and those who can't.

    There are 10 kinds of people. Those who think in binary and those who don't.

    There are two kinds of people, those who classify people into two kinds of people and those who don't.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:There are three kinds of people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two kinds of people: those who keep posting the binary 10 joke, and those who do *not* implicitly encourage people to grab them by the shirt collar and stuff ski socks down their throats.

  31. It's Leaches all over again. by VortexCortex · · Score: 0

    Fucking Barbarians. Don't know what the fuck is going on. It's like bloodletting all over again. Brain butchery. I wish they'd Frontally Lobotomize themselves. Just overly energize any cybernetic network, simulate or otherwise, see what happens. Fucking moronic I swear.

    1. Re:It's Leaches all over again. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      How about you over-energize anything with 6 milliamps.

    2. Re:It's Leaches all over again. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      umm, you do know that leaches and bloodletting are useful and still in use today right?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  32. Most people struggle... by MalachiK · · Score: 1
    My favorite news story of all time comes from the Manchester Evening News [http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/cool-cash-card-confusion-1009701].

    People think I'm making stuff up when I repeat this immortal quote from the story...

    "..they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it."

  33. That guy from Real Genius was right!! by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    Electrical shock therapy WILL make you smarter!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  34. Real side effects by Imaman · · Score: 1

    Side effects include slower cognitive functioning.

    TFA mentions that the control group learned to learn the new stuff they all learnt, but the brainfried group only learned the new stuff.
    They boosted the area of the brain that needed to learn, but in doing so the brainfries never "learned to learn", so in effect they didn't become "smarter", as in adapting their brains to new situations. They just learned new stuff.

    It does have really cool applications, like learning a new language quickly or help people recover from brain defects/injuries, but I wouldn't try it in a decade or two.
    We know precious little about the brain.

  35. How much could I have saved ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well, so much for all the tamper proof outlets I installed in the office...

  36. Small sample size by roland_mai · · Score: 1

    The sample size is truly ridiculously small. I would expect some rigor from people before publishing these results.

  37. Brain-On by TechieRefugee · · Score: 1

    Brain-On! Apply directly to the cortex! Brain-On! Apply directly to the cortex! Brain-On! Apply directly to the cortex! Brain-On! Available at Walgreens.

  38. No shortcuts necessary by moeinvt · · Score: 2

    If you're one of the 20% of Americans that struggle with basic arithmetic, buy some of those flash cards, open a Jr. High math textbook or take some remedial education courses. STUDYING and PRACTICE improve math ability. No brain zapping required.

    The idea that there is some physiological impairment which causes 20 freakin' percent of the population to be handicapped in math ability is ridiculous. Brain zap the bureaucratic idiots in charge of our public school system instead.

    1. Re:No shortcuts necessary by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      open a Jr. High math textbook

      For learning the most basic of basic math, a Jr. High math book might be useful. If you want to actually understand what you're doing, though... maybe not.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  39. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "no permanent damage seemed to be done."

    Judging by the amount of political tosh most of the generation last educated when smacks round the head support I think it might have in fact left them severely brain damaged.

  40. Current or voltage? by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1
    "1 milliamp -- a tiny fraction of the voltage of an AA battery"

    Don't they mean, "1 milliamp--a tiny fraction of the CURRENT of an AA battery?" The article never gives the voltage used. 'Course it couldn't be much. High voltage would jump the gaps between neurons and damage them.

    Still, once we have the specs, we can all make one and do what our grade school teachers always asked us to do. "Now class, put on your thinking caps for this one . . . "

    1. Re:Current or voltage? by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

      The current of an AA cell isn't exactly limited.
      With a low enough resistance you might be able to make the cell self-ignite.

      Somehow, any kind of attempt to explain a unit of measurement in a simpler way only serves to make it at the very least moronic and less obvious. But in most cases inaccurate or; entirely wrong.

      1 Mbyte is like 3 bookshelves in a library!!11111 OMFGBBQWTF

    2. Re:Current or voltage? by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1

      Correct. The article is a little vague on the specs for this little project.

    3. Re:Current or voltage? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      batteries have internal resistance. a typical alkaline battery can initially put out about 2 amps. certain rechargables popular with model airplane hobbyists can even get to 10A. The voltage will sag below 1 V under such extreme conditions.

      You can look up the discharge curves on manufacturers sites

    4. Re:Current or voltage? by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

      Btw, we weren't allowed to wear caps in school.
      There goes that idea...

    5. Re:Current or voltage? by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh . . . . Darn!

  41. Frankenstein's monster should have been a genius. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    No shit! Researchers don't understand how it works, we don't understand how it works, 60% of biomedical research results can't be repeated...

    Is this published in the AIR (http://www.improbable.com/magazine/), by the way? It ought to be, because it sounds unethical and crazy on the face of it. Just the kind of thing they like.

    But now that the information is out there, it can't just be ignored. Either there's something weird going on that's useful or there's something weird going on that's not useful. Maybe some day we'll all have little remotely controlled (or consciously controlled) electroshock devices implanted in our heads to improve various abilities on demand.

  42. So that "Don't tase me bro" was able to calculate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or any person tased. :)

  43. So then... by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    If a shock which doesn't hurt you can boost your mathematical skills (twitch!) for a mere six months, then obviously those electrical shocks which did hurt me, when I was fiddling (twitch!) with electronics as a kid must be what made me (twitch! twitch!) such a freaking genius!

  44. About time! by patchouly · · Score: 1

    Zapping the stupid people? I'm all for it! Do we really need to pretend it will help with their math skills though? Can't we just do it because it's fun?

  45. That explains unusual hair of geniuses by sebaluks · · Score: 1

    Having in mind that a mop of hair can induce static charge makes it more understandable that we attribute exceptional intelligence to scientist with hair in mess (i.e. Albert Einstein) :-) Let's grow long hair and make them electrically charged! :-)

    --
    -- "In theory, theory is the same as practice, but not in practice."
  46. Current != Voltage by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    The electrical current slowly ramped up to about 1 milliamp—a tiny fraction of the voltage of an AA battery.

    Looks like somebody doesn't understand the difference between amperage and voltage.

  47. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like it's just the last generation.

    The arrogance of the elderly.
    Or senility to not remember what happened during your own generation.

  48. Re:Frankenstein's monster should have been a geniu by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    The reason it wasn't considered a violation of medical ethics, if I had to guess, is that the voltages and currents involved are ones are brains are naturally exposed to from time to time. Thus if there are side-effects, they are currently widespread and undiagnosed in the population of the first world. It's like how it's not unethical to test(reasonable, non-extraordinary) dietary plans, because people eat anyways.

  49. Liposuction for the Brain by kruhft · · Score: 2

    Doing Math is mental exercise. The only real way to get any real benefits is to just do it:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=the%20secrets%20of%20mental%20arithmetic.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=1001%20math%20problems

  50. Splitting a dinner check... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    those of us who have studied bistromathematics know that it isn't easy.

  51. Science Goose by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    There's something cultural going on here too.

    How many of you have experienced a person (in my experience all women, but surely not exclusively) who, when the conversation turns to something they don't understand, always limited to the STEM realms, they make a stupid face, shake/flap their hands in the air, and say something like, "oh, my, tech geek talk. Beep beep, bloop bloop, blah, blah, blah, hahahahahaha"? I've heard them referred to as a "Science Goose" as that's sort of what the behavior looks like, but there's probably a better term. I've seen it parodied on TV too, so it's not a local thing.

    These people seem otherwise sane, but the behavior is something they must feel is acceptable. I'm sure the psychology is straightforward, about making themselves feel better by mocking that which they do not understand, but it's got to have cultural support or more people would just think that they're rude assholes for conducting such displays. Personally, if I don't understand something I find that intriguing and an opportunity to ask questions, and I was reared in the same culture (I think...).

    Hit me with your thoughts, gentle readers.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Science Goose by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      I believe it's called living in a country with a substandard education system, but it doesn't matter because everybody there just knows they're the greatest thing to happen to earth since oxygen.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:Science Goose by StormyWeatherL33T · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are pretty intimidated by jargon and feel shut out if we go into it, and I think that's the cause of the reaction you're seeing. In my experience people can be self defeatist about it because they're afraid of looking stupid, or being made to feel stupid. If we're talking about the same type of situation, they aren't mocking your knowledge or the area of expertise, but they're dismissing their ability to understand it due to hearing jargon or concepts that they aren't familiar with. Just my two cents (and worth the paper it's printed on).

  52. Motivation by PPH · · Score: 2

    Memorize your multiplication tables or I shalll shock you again!

    Reminds me of a story:

    Little Zachary was doing very badly in math. His parents had tried everything...tutors, mentors, flash cards, special learning centers, and more.

    In short, everything they could think of to help his math.

    Finally, in a last ditch effort, they took Zachary down and enrolled him In the local Catholic school. After the first day, little Zachary came home with a very serious look on his face. He didn't even kiss his mother hello. Instead, he went straight to his room and started studying.

    Books and papers were spread out all over the room and little Zachary was hard at work. His mother was amazed. She called him down to dinner.

    To her shock, the minute he was done, he marched back to his room without a word, and in no time, he was back hitting the books as hard as before. This went on for some time, day after day, while the mother tried to understand what made all the difference.

    Finally, little Zachary brought home his Report Card. He quietly laid it on the table, went up to his room and hit the books. With great trepidation, His Mom looked at it and to her great surprise, Little Zachary got an 'A' in math.

    She could no longer hold her curiosity. She went to his room and said, 'Son, what was it? Was it the nuns?' Little Zachary looked at her and shook his head, no. 'Well, then,' she replied, Was it the books, the discipline, the structure, the uniforms? WHAT WAS IT?'

    Little Zachary looked at her and said, 'Well, on the first day of school when I saw that guy nailed to the plus sign, I knew they took their math seriously.'

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Re:When I was in school, they had something like t by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Swans!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  54. James Burke's Connections: full circle by jphamlore · · Score: 1

    In James Burke's Connections there is a hilarious set of depictions of what was done centuries ago by various charlatans using electricity and magnetism. Let us hope the present researches do not make us centuries from now the subject of similar comedy ...

  55. So only 1 in 5 sane people is hopelessly stupid by Testudo+Kleinmanni · · Score: 1

    Or am I laying too much faith in math?

  56. Documentary by crndg · · Score: 1

    It's true! I saw it in a documentary when I was a kid. It was made by Disney, and starred Kurt Russell as a college kid who got shocked by a computer, and became really smart.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Computer_Wore_Tennis_Shoes

    Interestingly, they also did documentaries about both invisibility and the use of drugs to develop super-strength. Medfield College was vastly ahead of its time in terms of cutting edge research! (But, strangely, they seem to have only a single test subject: one Dexter Reilly.)

  57. Seems legit by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    It worked for Abe Normal

  58. Milgram was Right!!! by perry64 · · Score: 1

    And he blew it by focusing on the stupid moral implications in his publications!!!

  59. Solve US debt crisis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with electroshock therapy for habitual overspenders at every level of government.

  60. reason to lick those nine volt batteries by qtcp · · Score: 1

    Licking nine volt batteries should help with math scores. At the very least it will wake the kid up when he/she gets tired of doing boring math problems.

    --
    1.61803398
  61. for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey - it's May, not April.

  62. Whoa! by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

    I know kung fu! And linear algebra!

    If they install these in the pillows at Holiday Inn Express, it'd be truth in advertising.

  63. I would do it! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Only if I had a brain. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  64. Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better at math, but can't talk to women, damn!

  65. QUICK GET THIS TO WASHINGTON DC! by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    There are 595 politicians, a president, VP, and countless drones who's brains could use a little stimulus to get their heads out of their as*.

  66. Mispeltings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I no ewe taught hat vas funney. It weren't.

    Done ged mad ate mii four sew sawing. Some one kneeded too tell ewe.

  67. Damn, reality catches up with satire by garompeta · · Score: 1
  68. Re:Frankenstein's monster should have been a geniu by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    The reason it wasn't considered a violation of medical ethics, if I had to guess, is that the voltages and currents involved are ones are brains are naturally exposed to from time to time. Thus if there are side-effects, they are currently widespread and undiagnosed in the population of the first world. It's like how it's not unethical to test(reasonable, non-extraordinary) dietary plans, because people eat anyways.

    Suppose the experiment had the opposite result. Would you have considered it ethical then?

  69. Shocking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shocking!

  70. Damaging treatments.. by firecode · · Score: 1

    Sounds like electroshock to me. And many psychiatric patients who are still alive from such treatments are not very happy with the results.

  71. TDCS by Linkreincarnate · · Score: 0

    https://nocko.se/2012/07/30/brain-zapping-is-fun/ A link to build the device that does the zapping. These can be build for as cheap as 12 dollars and they work for a variety of uses.