Slashdot Mirror


Bloomberg To HS Grads: Be a Plumber

An anonymous reader writes "This being college graduation season, the insights provided by commencement speakers should be familiar by now: find work in a field you're passionate about, don't underestimate your own abilities, aim high, learn to communicate and collaborate with others, give something back to your community. Billionaire Mike Bloomberg, whose current job is Mayor of New York City, evidently decided to break the mold by advising less academically adept youngsters to consider a career in plumbing. High wages, constant demand, no offshore competition. 'Compare a plumber to going to Harvard College — being a plumber, actually for the average person, probably would be a better deal'. Ouch! And hey, like a lawyer, a plumber can always dabble in politics."

253 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. Also by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plumbers don't have to put up with as much shit as most IT workers

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd suggest being an electrician over a plumber. No matter where technology goes, we're going to need electricity. And with electric cars booming, someone's going to have to build that electric infrastructure.

    2. Re:Also by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try being a politician, it seems to have worked for Bloomberg. Funny he didn't offer it as an alternative.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:Also by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

          Ummm.. I worked with a plumbing company for a while.. There was a whole lot of shit, literally. I was lucky, I just did their IT work. I could talk to the techs who had done messier jobs from a distance. If their blue uniform is now brown, don't get too close. :)

          It was entertaining, and absolutely disgusting, watching them clean out of of the tank trucks. It registered something like 10k pounds overweight, because of the sewage sludge that had built up in the bottom of the tank. At least the guy who went in to clean it got to wear a biohazard suit and respirator.

          I only had to deal with the trucks while I was wiring up their GPS tracking. It was the first chance I had to drive a 10 speed truck. (private property, CDL be damned). The drivers were gone for the day, and the other staff present were afraid to try to drive it up to the shop. The work/cargo vans were harder to drive. Their blind spot is anything but in front of them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Also by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      IT isn't a trade? Yeah, actually you're right.

      My father always said, "computers are a tool, not a trade".

      But with most trades, it's useful to be able to apply your tools well. So most IT/CS geeks would do well for themselves to "diversify" somewhat into a specific trade, and not limit their knowledge/education solely to kicking computer HW/SW. Focus on what you do with it, not the tool itself.

    5. Re:Also by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Risk question, "how many plumbers fall through ceilings versus electricians?"

    6. Re:Also by dcollins · · Score: 4, Informative

      The primary thing that worked for Bloomberg is making billions of dollars on Wall Street. (For example, he was laid off from his first job at Solomon Brothers with a $10 million severance package for starters.) With that money he's been able to bend and break a lot of the rules about becoming and staying NYC mayor -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    7. Re:Also by motorsabbath · · Score: 1

      It will probably be several thousand years before home sapiens no linger needs plumbers. Or at least plumbing robots.

      --
      The heat from below can burn your eyes out
    8. Re:Also by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Other question: Hoe many electricians have become President versus plumbers. ;-)

      ( At least in countries that still have upward mobility, for hard-working folks, unlike the US)

    9. Re:Also by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      and you very rarely have to deal with human feces.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    10. Re:Also by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      seeing as I risk hilarious levels of accidental death driving down the street, I'm thinking the trade-off between feces and risk of death is a pretty easy one. Also, awful diseases in human waste.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Also by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      a surprisingly large amount I suppose, what with high rise buildings having floors that are also ceilings, which have plumbing for the floor above in them.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    12. Re:Also by mikeiver1 · · Score: 1

      Hard to argue. My GF works IT and it is a crap job that is thankless, stressful, and has a performance target that is always moving up unlike her pay. My being in the trades it is hard to argue with Bloomberg. I have never wanted for work. I can literally make one phone call and have a good paying job in just about any medium to large city. The down side is that I deal with weather and messy work conditions at times. The plus is that I can look at my self in the mirror and know that I contribute to my community in a positive and worthwhile way. Unlike say a lawyer...

    13. Re:Also by fisted · · Score: 1

      One more reason to become a plumber.

    14. Re:Also by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      But the internet is a series of tubes.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obviously he's having trouble finding a plumber

    16. Re:Also by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd suggest being an electrician over a plumber.

      Being realistic? There's a glut of electricians right now--though there is a massive shortage of lineworkers(guys who work on utilities, can be much more dangerous but pay is better), lot of people started picking up that trade during the housing boom and are still out of work. I've heard anywhere between 10% and 55% depending where you live(either in Canada or the US and particular states/provinces) are unemployed. I'd suggest looking at what trades need the most hands, and consider it. Metal workers, CNC operators, mechanic(did this myself off and on for a decade), pipefitters and so on. The real problem is that kids aren't given the suggestion to look at trades these days, they got the same spiel that we were getting in the 80's and 90's, that going into technology is the way to go. But everyone needs someone to lay and fit pipe, fix their car, and so on.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re:Also by Solandri · · Score: 1

      How many times have you called an electrician? How many times have you called a plumber?

      The number of each profession needed is directly proportional to how often an average person needs their services in a year times the length of the average visit. I've only needed an electrician about once every 5 years (air conditioning circuit blows, or I'm installing a new appliance and need things rewired). I call a plumber about once a year. So outside of new construction (I'm not sure if plumbers work those or if general contracts install the pipes), I imagine there's much more demand for plumbers.

      Same thing goes for barbers and hair stylists. If a barber takes on average 20 minutes to cut someone's hair and they work 6 hours/day (figure some slow times), 5 days/week, 50 weeks/year, that's 4500 haircuts in a year. If you figure the average person gets their hair cut once a month, that's one barber needed for every 375 people. That's 3x the demand of a plumber (figure 2 hours per visit, 1 visit per year = 2 hours per person, or one plumber needed per 1000 people).

    18. Re:Also by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking as someone who has a Class A CDL and has driven everything from a motorcycle to a semi, including cargo vans and step vans, if a van has a blind spot that "is anything but in front of them" then you haven't adjusted the mirrors correctly.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    19. Re:Also by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      heckout Alberta, Canada. There is an extreme shortage of trades,

      And in some places in Alberta, $41/hr or even $50/hr puts you at the "below min. wage in take-home" due to taxes. Enjoy that, especially considering you can clear on $90-110k or more, and walk out with $5-9k if you're lucky after the cost of living.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    20. Re:Also by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1

      Also, awful diseases in human waste.

      Very true. In the UK you have to get immunisations for most of them, but you also build up an amazing immune system. Doing sewer surveys I never got ill in 5 years.

    21. Re:Also by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 3, Funny

      He should offer a big time reward. $2000 in gold coins, if he's got a serious plumbing problem.

    22. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am contemplating the same thing again as I have done it before.

      I was in nuclear power and radiological controls. It just was not fun anymore and the challenge was gone. I went from about $100K year in the late 1990's doing that to roughly $32K in a starting job in IT. My wife has bounced around doing different things as well. Long story short, we are now up to about $175K/year. 12 years into IT and I am up a network manager at a large international company and my wife is an insurance agent.

      Guess what, doing IT is starting to not be fun either. It is time to move on again. I've gone as far as I think I want to go with it.

      We STILL live in the same house (paid for now) and still drive old POS cars just like when we were making $40K/year. Most of my clothes comes from Target, Wal-Mart or the clearance rack at some department store. The average income in my neighborhood is about $75K per household and we fit right in.

      Do not compete with the Jones, keep your recurring expenses low and you will not be a slave to where you work and a specific income level. I tell myself this once a week... If I HAVE to commute to the big city and HAVE to be in IT when I get to my upper 50's (I'm 42 now) to make ends meet, I have FAILED.

      Once my 20 something kids finally move out, Home Depot, here I come.

    23. Re:Also by NIK282000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As an electrician I would highly suggest becoming a plumber. No matter what the real problem with any building or equipment the first guy called is an electrician and no amount of argument will ever convince the client that water in the breaker panel is NOT the electrician's fault or that the only way to stop the breaker from tripping is to unplug one of the 12 computers on one circuit.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    24. Re:Also by sanman2 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Elon Musk would tell highschoolers to go into, if he did a commencement speech.

      "Forget space - not enough jobs in that. Forget solar - too much competition. Forget electric cars - not enough demand."

    25. Re:Also by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      I have come to the same conclusion. I'm just starting mid-life and I've decided I don't give a rat's rear end anymore about "getting ahead" as society defines it (I see it as becoming tied down).

      I am going back to school to become an Electrical Engineer (B.Eng). The time is right and I've discovered that I wanted more than I had in the last 15 years of my profession.

      And when I'm out, I'm going to do what I love and hopefully make some decent coin at the same time.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
    26. Re:Also by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Van drivers don't know what mirrors are.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:Also by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Maybe I exaggerated a little bit. :)

          They were cargo vans without side windows. The rear window was obscured by gear in the back. The mirrors were (hopefully) adjusted for the tech who drove them, but not for me moving it to where I was installing gear.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:Also by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Someone making $90k in Alberta would pay $16,866 in federal taxes and $9,000 in provincial taxes, so they'd have $64,134 left after taxes. That's $30.84 per hour for a full time job.

      Below minimum wage my ass.

      The average house price in Calgary, one of the more expensive markets, is about $315k. After financing, insurance, property tax and everything else, you'd have a mortgage payment of about $1800 a month (assuming you don't get a better than average deal on any of that stuff), so your housing cost takes $21,600 of the $64,134, leaving you with $41,534.

      If you can't live on $40k after paying taxes and mortgage payments, you need to pay someone else to manage your money and give you an allowance because you're too goddamn incompetent to survive on your own in the real world.

    29. Re: Also by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      CNC operator is all well and good, but it's the manufacturing equivalent of the help desk. Strictly dead end unless you're willing to apply yourself.

      You realize that this applies to all jobs out there right? If you're not willing to apply yourself and expand your knowledge, you're just looking at a dead end. Whether it be in a skilled labor job, or in IT.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Also by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest being an electrician over a plumber.

      Being realistic? There's a glut of electricians right now--though there is a massive shortage of lineworkers(guys who work on utilities, can be much more dangerous but pay is better), lot of people started picking up that trade during the housing boom and are still out of work. I've heard anywhere between 10% and 55% depending where you live(either in Canada or the US and particular states/provinces) are unemployed. I'd suggest looking at what trades need the most hands, and consider it. Metal workers, CNC operators, mechanic(did this myself off and on for a decade), pipefitters and so on. The real problem is that kids aren't given the suggestion to look at trades these days, they got the same spiel that we were getting in the 80's and 90's, that going into technology is the way to go. But everyone needs someone to lay and fit pipe, fix their car, and so on.

      I know someone who is certified as both plumber and electrician. Works for a city and has good secure job. No job loss and job searching for months between contracts. Not the highest pay, but when you consider overtime and steady wages, it is a good way to raise a family.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    31. Re:Also by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Just a useful tip: The job's aren't in calgary or even edmonton, they're in other places. Your house may go for as cheaply as $500k, and once you start adding in the $9/gal of milk, and $8/loaf of bread it very quickly adds up to you having no money. Especially when two people are spending upwards of $1200/mo on groceries alone. Unless you're lucky and there's a costco within a few hours drive, and you can cut your food bill in half by freezing everything. Perhaps you should look at the realities of living where the jobs are in Alberta, that $41k quickly dwindles to about $9k if you're lucky.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    32. Re:Also by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      "well, the world needs ditch diggers too Danny." - Judge Smails "CaddyShack 1980"

       

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    33. Re:Also by Tamerlin · · Score: 1

      Plumbers don't have to put up with as much shit as most IT workers

      That's very true. Plumbers don't have to sit in a box day in and day out, and they get to charge extra for working in off hours.

    34. Re:Also by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to debate idiotic claims like "yeah, the houses are more expensive than anywhere else but that makes the cost of living lower than everywhere else!" It's an idiotic claim. Almost as idiotic as the claim that $30/hour is below minimum wage.

    35. Re:Also by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Other question: Hoe many electricians have become President versus plumbers. ;-)

      ( At least in countries that still have upward mobility, for hard-working folks, unlike the US)

      Doh... I find following the teachings of the great Archibald "Harry" Tuttle more satisfying:

      Well, that's a pipe of a different color.
      ...
      Go anywhere, travel light, get in, get out, wherever there's trouble, a man alone. Now they got the whole country sectioned off, you can't make a move without a form.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    36. Re:Also by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Moreover, plumbers don't need to take any shit from an IT nerdo. They're physically stronger and tougher, any weakling IT abhuman who tries to play smarty-pants with them will end up with the shit tube forced down his throat and his skull bashed in with a monkey wrench.

      However, they can easily get owned by any smartass parrot.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    37. Re:Also by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Van drivers don't know what mirrors are.

      That's the past. I was there before. i want to see new stuff, like the stuff in front of me.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    38. Re:Also by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Try being a politician, it seems to have worked for Bloomberg. Funny he didn't offer it as an alternative.

      That's like telling someone they should be a professional athlete. Millions will try, but a bare handful will succeed, everyone else will their time.

  2. Not actually a bad idea. by GlennC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as we need competent programmers, DBAs, network administrators, etc., we also need plumbers, carpenters and electricians. Not everyone has the talent or desire for college, and I think we as a society ought to recognize that. Of course, that means less income for colleges and bankers providing student loans, so I'm not surprised that this is being billed as a radical idea.

    --
    Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    1. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not everyone has the talent or desire for college

      This right here is what needs to stop: just because you're a plumber, or a carpenter, or an electrician, doesn't mean you're dumb. Likewise, going to college doesn't mean you're smart.

      People need to stop looking down on blue collar jobs, and stop treating "going to college" as the highest honor they can bestow upon on themselves. There are way, way, way too many people going to college and doing pointless and ultimately useless degrees. Hell, there are way too many people going to college and doing things like CS degrees who couldn't code their way out of a paper bag.

      We need to get back to the idea that learning blue collar work is just as socially acceptable as white collar. We need to get away from the idea that you must go to college and get a degree or you're a "failure". We should bring back real apprenticeships; for blue and white collar workers.

    2. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      As much as we need competent programmers, DBAs, network administrators, etc., we also need plumbers, carpenters and electricians. Not everyone has the talent or desire for college, and I think we as a society ought to recognize that. Of course, that means less income for colleges and bankers providing student loans, so I'm not surprised that this is being billed as a radical idea.

      One of the worst things that happened to the UK back in the day was the stigmatisation of "trades" and the new idea that to be worth anything you had to get a degree. This had a twofold effect - a lack of people who saw a skilled trade job as a viable option, and a devaluation of the degree as everyone scrambled to offer one that would be suitable for all levels of academic achievement.

      It's something we're still suffering from, and we need to get away from this idea that everyone can have every opportunity if they want - some people are not cut out for academia, and there is nothing wrong with that, but they might make an extraordinary skilled tradesman. Until we re-level that playing field and take the stigma away from jobs where you get your hands dirty, we'll be stuck with the fallout.

    3. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1, Redundant

      A thousand times this. I've a great deal of respect for tradesmen, and if it's money you're after you could do a lot worse than the trades.

    4. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Cenan · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. The only yardstick worth measuring with is the "are you happy with what you do".

      On a side note: CS degrees arent supposed to be able to program, which is why they mostly can't - you need to go to a trade school for that. If you happen to bump into a CS grad who do know how to program, and not in the sense that they know C++ syntax, but can actually construct and document a system from scratch, they sure as hell didn't learn that in college.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    5. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      CS degrees arent supposed to be able to program

      Exactly, but the majority of kids going into CS degrees don't understand this. They've been sold on the lie that they have to go to college, and they're going to college to learn CS and become a developer.

      A good 80% or so of people entering CS courses should instead be going to trade schools, or an apprenticeship with perhaps one or two days a week spent in the class room covering the theory they need.

      Instead they spend four years racking up debt and come out the other side not much better off for actual skills than if they'd not bothered in the first place.

    6. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by gstovall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      :) With only a few exceptions, the best software designers I've worked have degrees in engineering, physics, or mathematics. It drives the people with C.S. degrees nuts. :)

    7. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by gstovall · · Score: 2

      Sorry to reply to my own post.

      I personally don't think holding a degree should even be the primary criteris...

      Am friends with a couple of high ranking software architects at a major (world-wide) package delivery service. One of them has a degree in physics. The other worked his way up from a manual labor job in the shipping department -- he showed a willingness to self teach on computers so he could fix a problem in the shipping department process, and his aptitude, inclination, and hard work propelled him along to his position of authority/influence.

    8. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of service jobs which require local talent. Add HVAC, and CDL licensed truck drivers to your list.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by hedwards · · Score: 2

      It's just as socially acceptable, but you're deluding yourself if you think that trade school or an apprenticeship are equivalent to what you're getting in college. College itself is about teaching people how to think and right now they aren't doing such a good job of that.

    10. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 2

      just because you're a plumber, or a carpenter, or an electrician, doesn't mean you're dumb. Likewise, going to college doesn't mean you're smart.

      Some of the smartest people I know are tradesman. I don't know a lot of plumbers, but I know electricians, carpenters, and mechanics who are absolute geniuses.

      And some of the biggest morons I know have PHDs. They may know a whole lot about their field of study, but that's ALL they know. College professors, in particular, seem to be very unaware of reality and completely lacking in common sense.

    11. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by fermion · · Score: 1
      We need technicians that want are good at the job. It really does no good to try to push people to careers that they have no interest in, be it coding, plumbing, driving a bus, or becoming a professional engineer. Obviously the one contraint here is that becoming some of these requires much more training, and specialized skill, than others.

      And the difference in skill is really what guarantees long term income. For instance, suppose you were going into construction. One could start as a framer, or go directly into the crane operator union, take the classes, and wait for seniority to get you regular gigs. Of course the risk with the crane is that you may not be good at it, and you won't make a lot of money initially, but the reward is if you are good then you can probably find work, and do the work even with a bad back.

      So yes the idea of plumbing as an honorable trade that is as reasonable a path to employment as college is correct. OTOH, the idea that just anyone can be plumber or an electrician or whatever is really an insult. College is not the top tier of achievement, and tradespeople are not the lowest. Each requires a different skill, and while the supply of skilled people for one may be less than the other, the two are not interchangeable. Both require people who have an ability to educate themselves in their craft.

      And, to be clear, a less academically adept student is not automatically going to be a plumber, and a more academically adept student is not automatically going to be employed as a fantastically high wages doing little or nothing. There are plenty of students out there with more than perfect GPAs who have no marketable skills, but do have hope with training to attain them. But instead they will go to college, build up student debt, and then have no way to pay that money back. On the other hand there are students with low GPAs that could go to college in a subject that interests them, muddle through, and because they have mad skills leverage that education in a profitable carrer.

      The fact that we try to pigeon hole students based on superficial markers is the whole reason we might have a tech deficit. The question to ask Bloomberg, whose kids presumable have the freedom to follow their dreams, is if he would ask another parent whose child wanted to play with horses to tell their kids to a plumber instead.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by GlennC · · Score: 1

      This right here is what needs to stop: just because you're a plumber, or a carpenter, or an electrician, doesn't mean you're dumb. Likewise, going to college doesn't mean you're smart

      I'm not sure where anyone got the idea that I said tradespeople were dumb. I did not mean that at all. My father, who is one of the smartest people I know, is a retired machinist and a high school dropout.

      We need to get back to the idea that learning blue collar work is just as socially acceptable as white collar.

      I agree wholeheartedly, and THIS is what I thought I had said.

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    13. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heh... I spent 3 1/2 years at a 2 year business school studying programming. Yeah, I partied a bit more than I probably should have. Never did bother to finish up those last 3 classes and get my degree, since I found a good job, which was the goal I had in mind in the first place.

      Since then I've had a mostly successful career in IT. I say "mostly" because things got pretty rough these past few years during the recession, but I'm back on track now and making more than I ever have. During my career, I haven't used *one single thing* that I learned in college. Everything I've done that I actually got paid for has been self-taught. In fact, in my current role as a Linux sysadmin for a very large ISP, I spend all day working with things that didn't even exist until I had been out of college for a good 7 years. Even the coding I do, and I do plenty, doesn't benefit much from my programming classes. Aside from bash scripts, everything I write is OO, and that was only just starting to be talked about when I was in school. C++ didn't start getting taken seriously until several years after I was done.

      Never, not even once, in over 25 years, has my lack of a college degree even been mentioned in a job interview.

      College is valuable (potentially) in only 3 ways:
          1.) To get your foot in the door for that first job. IMHO, getting that first job without a degree may be a lot of work, but far less work (and far cheaper) than a degree.
          2.) To prove to people of a certain mindset that you "can play the game". It's proof that you can jump through hoops, even when they're ridiculous.
          3.) The social aspect. This is the most valuable part. You have 4 years to start building your "network".

      It has nothing to do with showing that you can do a job, because college does NOT prepare you to do "real world" work. For the most part, it doesn't even teach you useful skills. Maybe a few "general concepts" that you can apply, but that's about it.

    14. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by hjf · · Score: 1

      I have a friend, he sells networking gear. He has his own company (himself, because he's a control freak). He considers himself better than the technicians. He doesn't keep techs in payroll, but recommends techs in a case-by-case basis. He calls me sometimes (for the really difficult jobs because I'm better skilled than them. That is: i can do anything they can do AND i can do more).

      The difference between him and me: I don't consider myself a better PERSON than the other techs. I know how to wire a RJ45 connector, but that doesn't mean I want to do it (unless it's for my own house...). So for those cases, I'm happy to work with other techs who are happy to do that. I deal with the routing and network design, they deal with the cabling.

      The problem is my friend: he sees himself in an upper position. Techs are shit, they are mostly idiots. If he makes $X, there's no reason they should be making $X too. They ARE lower than him, so they should be making $X/4 tops.

      I'm his friend and I've tried to reason with him. He calls me from time to time but he knows the only way I will take a job is that if I set the price and not him. For example: sometimes he sells a $20 router and wants me to drive over to the customer's house to set it up for him but "don't charge him too much, I told him you're charging him $10". I don't take that kind of shit.

      I think this guy is an example of how people see any kind of "tech" work. Plumber, electrician, gardener, networking tech, computer repair guy... it's all the same for them. We techs are "lower beings", and we should earn minimum wage, live in a ghetto, drive a shitty truck, and be on call 24/7. My friend? Oh he only works mon-fri 9-5 and the rest of the time he turns off his cell phone.

      Needless to say: he's having a hard time finding people willing to work for him. One of his employees left "and stole all of his customers". Now, I know that guy. He didn't "steal" any of his customers. They just went with him. A company doesn't need to buy "a switch" from you and call someone else to install it. A company needs "to connect all these computers and put them online". And that's what my friend doesn't understand: value added. His only customer? Government. Because the government here has their own IT staff, so they buy "raw materials" (cable, routers, fiber, etc) and install themselves.

    15. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by nametaken · · Score: 2

      Amen.

      My dad was a plumber for 30 years. That just happened to be after getting his masters. Most of the programmers and tech drones I've known couldn't hold a candle to him.

      Somewhere along the line we decided that any programmer, IT guy, etc. are somehow smarter than anyone else. We're generally not. Learning to Google a solution to a problem is no more brilliant than anyone else working out how to do their profession.

    16. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are thinking. But there a few that are better at it. For example, to agree to a contract where no human can understand it; that is a work of art.

    17. Re: Not actually a bad idea. by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      That's not really true. CS students program, and a lot of them are very good at it. But it's a means to and end, not an end in and of itself. You can do a lot of things on paper in CSâ"and you shouldâ"but there's a practical value to the actual hands on work. Every doctor of chemistry has physically done the lab work themselves at some point, even if most of the work they do as a researcher is simulated.

      The programming that you do in the industry teaches you that good enough is sometimes the best. Algorithmic purity is secondary. And if you have to sit and contemplate algorithmic complexity, you've probably done it wrong (barring some highly mathematical work, like high-frequency trading; I'm just a video game programmer).

    18. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not having the talent for something doesn't make you categorically stupid. I don't have the talent to be a good accountant. That in no way implies that accountants are this super-human breed of rarified ability or that I'm an inadequate person who will never accomplish anything with my life. In fact, I'm an extremely successful architect. It just means that different people are good at different things, with natural talents, interests, and inherent capacity.

      You are the one perpetuating the myth that trades are for dumb people who can't get into an ivory tower academic institution on their merits by assuming that the lack of the interest or ability to excel at university is because they are "dumb".

    19. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has the talent or desire for college, and I think we as a society ought to recognize that.

      You presume that college requires talent and desire and plumbing does not. Having done both, and having worked with people that have gone through one or the other, if I needed a complex task done and was give the option of choosing a plumber or a "college graduate" I'd pick the plumber every time. College means you're good at taking tests. That's it. You might be good at other things but really, there's no way to tell based on your degree. You don't get to be a plumber until you do an apprenticeship and someone personally certifies that you're not an idiot. If colleges had such things maybe my building wouldn't have MBA's floating in and out like god damned dust mites all day.

      Also, plumbers get paid a lot more than most college graduates.

    20. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. The only yardstick worth measuring with is the "are you happy with what you do".

      Where did you get that hippie bullshit? It's a job, if you were happy doing it they wouldn't pay you. I can code all day at home... or install a toilet (I, in fact, did bother last weekend ironically) I don't need my job to fulfill me, I can do the same work without others involved. This kind of thinking is what gets people trapped in Jobs or "Careers" where they think they can't leave or shouldn't leave. Fuck that, you should go wherever pays the most or you have the most potential to get paid more. No, you shouldn't take a job in an abusive environment. If the people there are jerks or the processes setup crush your soul, move on. But otherwise, if you can tolerate it for 8hrs and it pays the most, take it. Make your money, stick it into a broad index fund (S&P or whatever) and retire early. Retirement is happiness... plan for it.

    21. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by plopez · · Score: 1

      You took my comment. I just want to add that not everyone wants to work in a cubicle, I don't. What we need is an economy that has room for people like me.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    22. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU. I went to college, got my bachelors in Industrial Technology (shop class), minor in Computer Science. graduated well, realized my degree was mainly designed to go and teach shop class, and promptly spent the next 7 years working construction. I learned more useful skills in the first year after college than I did in the four years I was there. I've framed houses, poured concrete, installed flagstone and tile, hung sheet-rock, built cabinets, installed windows, trimmed doors, painted miles of walls, and installed metal roofing, just to start. Why? hell, when it comes right down to it, It was more interesting. Lots of my friends from college are now working in fields that have nothing to do with their major field of study. I have a english major friend with a masters that worked for Microsoft, I have another that studied biology that ended up doing chemical cleanup. The point is, College was useful, mainly in that it taught us to knuckle down, get work done, and turn it in on time. If you already know how to do that, just go get a job in something that interests you, and work your way up the old fashioned way.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    23. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Yes when I left school in the UK there was still just a vocational track - now with the emphasis in degrees the cohort that woudl have done Apprenticeships and Technicians now go to university - leaving a much less bright group to recruit from.

    24. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      College is valuable (potentially) in only 3 ways

      There's a 4th... that you actually do learn useful skills. I've taken classes in computer modeling & simulation, operations research, data mining, and machine learning. I use quite a bit of this all the time at work and I find it's been helpful to have been given a solid foundation in the subjects - this makes it much easier to explore and learn more on my own.

      But, I've been taking these classes for fun and out of interest - I already have a masters degree, so the possibility of an additional degree doesn't help me much.

    25. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I've been saying this in one way or another for decades. We need it all for things to work, and too often the parts carry distinctions of caste and regard, and from that also a skewed market evaluation of pay.

      Quick reality check, how many of us even say "Hello" or "Thank you" to a restaurant server or garbage collector. (And stop already with the inflated titles and such. The person dumping garbage cans into a truck is not a sanitation engineer. The removal of the inflated title in no way detracts from the essential task or its respectability.

    26. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      There's a 4th... that you actually do learn useful skills. I've taken classes in computer modeling & simulation, operations research, data mining, and machine learning. I use quite a bit of this all the time at work and I find it's been helpful to have been given a solid foundation in the subjects - this makes it much easier to explore and learn more on my own.

      But, I've been taking these classes for fun and out of interest - I already have a masters degree, so the possibility of an additional degree doesn't help me much.

      Yeah, of course you can learn things in college. Once you graduate and spend 10 years in the workforce, especially in a technology related field, everything you spent those ridiculous sums of money to learn will be outdated, obsolete knowledge. You'll have to keep learning on your own to keep up with the evolution of the technology in your field.

      And if you can do that, you can probably spend $1000 at Barnes & Noble and learn every bit as much of the *important* stuff as you'll get from a $75,000 trip through a university.

    27. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I'd add a yardstick, or at least a ruler: is what you are doing useful or necessary.

    28. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      why is showing up to a daycare like a community college a talent?

    29. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has the talent or desire for college...

      Not every college grad has the talent to be a plumber, carpenter, or electrician, either. Doesn't anyone ever stop to think that 4 years of apprenticeship is pretty much the same as 4 years of college? In fact most trades require some college courses as part of the apprenticeship these days. That is why a journeyman plumber, carpenter, millwright, electrician, etc can do their job competently, if not well from the beginning of most any job they show up to. Intelligence and how it is used is manifest differently in different people.

      Sure an IT worker (or other college grad) might do 'OK' with carpentry or electrical if shown what to do; and after a few years of constant work or practice can approach what a journeyman can do. But attitudes that college grads are superior intellects compared to a tradesman help explain the scads of 'Home Improvement Gone Wrong' 'reality' shows (not to be confused with the shows where guys fix contractor's mistakes... mostly the bad contractors aren't journeymen either). Don't mistake people not being interested in science or accounting as a lack of intelligence. While not across the board, I would warrant that many journeymen tradespeople could learn how to do IT work if given a few years instruction too. Maybe like if they had taken 4 years of college in IT if they had been interested in the first place.

      No I'm not a tradesman. But I have worked with many when I used to work in chemical/process engineering. Most I worked with were very smart and talented. As much as we think of different sciences as being specialized, requiring years of college training, tradesmen specialize as much. The only difference is how and where those learned skills and knowledge is applied. And yes, there are people who may not have the intelligence or critical thinking skills required to go to college... but often people who lack that level of intelligence wouldn't make a good tradesman either.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    30. Re: Not actually a bad idea. by Cenan · · Score: 1

      CS students program

      Yes of course they do. The distinction I make is between design and implementation. Out in the real world, the tiny programs you create as a means to an end during your CS degree are completely worthless, and anyone who does programming for a living will tell you this. There is a very big difference between knowing C++ (or whatever other language you happen to be using) syntax and being able to design and document a system.

      I'm by no means disbuting that some CS grads can program, they're just not taught very much design during the course of their education. If they're smart they pick it up from experience and realise that certain practises within programming produce far more maintainable code. But the tiny one-offs you create with each paper you turn in won't teach you this.

      This has the unfortunate consequence that CS grads think they can program, when in reality they can't. Because there is so much more to producing a working system than typing code into an editor.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    31. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Cenan · · Score: 1

      Point taken, you don't feel wasting 8 hours a day doing something you loathe is a waste of time, I do (8 hours work, 8 hours sleep, 8 hours for the rest. I don't want to waste a third of my life like that, but I guess that's up to you). I guess we should agree to disagree.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    32. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Cenan · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    33. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      I know a few. Not many, but a few. I don't see them as exceptionally intelligent, they've just spent a lot of time and hard work getting educated about their field. I'll admit, the stuff they know, they know very well, and a great deal of it baffles me.

      But to me "intelligence" is not measured by how well you know what you've had training for, it's measured by how well you can solve problems in areas where you've had no training at all. And based on that criteria, I have to give carpenters and mechanics very high scores.

    34. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by danomac · · Score: 1

      This right here is what needs to stop: just because you're a plumber, or a carpenter, or an electrician, doesn't mean you're dumb.

      I know for electricians, at least, there is a fair bit of math and physics involved. Not understanding it can literally be the difference between life and death. When my brother went through getting his electricians ticket he was surprised about that part. While he didn't have any problems with the math and physics he said classes were held up several times due to people not understanding. About a third of the class dropped out due to the math and physics content. Not sure how many passed, but there were likely several borderline pass marks, at least in the class he was in.

    35. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you hate your job so much that you think retirement=happiness, that's your issue, but that thinking doesn't apply to everyone. Some of us would prefer working a job we enjoy our entire lives over spending years at a job we hate in hopes of retiring early. No one ever promised you that you'd live long enough to retire, did they?

    36. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 2

      Since most employers don't care about a degree once you have a couple decades of experience, there's no reason to bother lying about it.

    37. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit split on what you've said. On the one hand, I find it a bit disingenuous that someone who dropped out of business school can generalize their experience to apply to college as a whole, particularly for people who work in engineering disciplines. I can think of several people I know who simply could not even work in the professions they're in without having gone to school, since there's no way to either gain that knowledge or to get licensed in that field without having done so. Even so, I do believe what you've said holds some truth to it, even if it isn't universally applicable.

      To provide some examples from my own life, there are three of us at the software company I work at now who are roughly the same age (mid-to-late 20s) and have roughly similar positions in the company who were comparing their experience up to this point a few days ago. We realized that one of us never attended college, one of us did an undergrad, and one of us dropped out of grad school, yet we all landed in more or less the same location.

      The one who never attended college, had to endure working for several years as tech support in a call center at an Office Space-esque company before finally picking up enough to move into IT, then into development, and then switching over to the development company we're at now, getting hired on during the recession. The one who did his undergrad did well in school, worked part-time at the company we're at while in school, and then started immediately with them once he graduated, prior to the recession and without looking elsewhere for a job. The one who went to grad school did some internships during his undergrad, spent four years in grad school, talked to a handful of companies at a campus career fair, and had offers coming in from all around the country, also getting hired on during the middle of the recession despite his dropping out.

      Our stories back up your points, it would seem.

    38. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by dasunt · · Score: 1

      People need to stop looking down on blue collar jobs, and stop treating "going to college" as the highest honor they can bestow upon on themselves.

      The average student loan debt is around $23k. Like other purchases, the more you pay for it, the more you will value it (regardless of its true value). It's easier to look down on blue-collar jobs than it is to admit that you just spent $23k on a basket weaving degree.

    39. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Out of the three of you, I think the main point is this:

      What do each of you still owe on your student loans?

      Given that you landed in pretty much the same career position, at pretty similar ages (based on your own telling....), it seems to me that would be a pretty good guage of the value of a degree....

    40. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      I find it a bit disingenuous that someone who dropped out of business school can generalize their experience to apply to college as a whole, particularly for people who work in engineering disciplines. I can think of several people I know who simply could not even work in the professions they're in without having gone to school, since there's no way to either gain that knowledge or to get licensed in that field without having done so.

      Yes, those professions certainly do exist. I apologize for my lack of clarity in my comments.

      Given that this is slashdot, and that I'm in IT, and have been for almost 30 years, and over that time have come to expect that most of the people I communicate with on slashdot are in a similar line of work, my comments have been focussed toward that audience.

      Obviously, you can't become an doctor or a dentist without jumping through the academic hoops. There is no "self taught" path into certain professions.

      But the truth is that IT work is pretty much nothing more than a trade these days. Whether your a sysadmin, a developer, or a networking guy, it's perfectly reasonable to "self-teach" all of that stuff. And in my experience, which is extensive, the self taught people are always, always, better than the people who "took a class". Or "have a degree".

      The most skilled, smartest, most talented guy I've ever worked with spent 20 years as the manager of a lumber yard while he did this stuff as a hobby. The things he knows would humble anyone reading this.

    41. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      To be the best of my knowledge, none of us have any student loans.

      As for the value, my only gripe with your original comment is that you've overgeneralized, and you've done so again here. For instance, rather than being a good gauge of the value of a degree, at best, we can only say that it'd be a good gauge for the value of a CS degree for people pursuing the work we're in. Saying anything more than that would be to engage in poor reasoning. For instance, if the grad school attendee had ended up going into a research position, which was apparently his initial plan, he would clearly be getting more value out of his degree than he is now. Similarly, if one of the college graduates had accepted a worse position at a different company for reasons other than financial ones (e.g. location), then measuring the value of the degree based on their financial state would be improper, since they would be benefiting from non-financial rewards.

    42. Re: Not actually a bad idea. by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      If trades were favored we could turn your comment on its head and it would be equally adept. I can do theoretical physics calculations easily but ask me to draw or cut a straight line and I fail. So I do have an incredible talent at college and my field but none in many of the trades (though I can use a plunger just fine). Don't be so sensitive.

      At the end of the day the big advances in society come mainly from those with higher education, whether that be a full college degree or not. So society puts a high value on those skills and commensurately pays for it. Now we are at a point though that we assume college graduation implies you have gained these skills, when in fact college never implied any skills what so ever. A college degree is not required for most work done today, especially not just an undergrad degree. Anything worth doing requires years of specialization and if it to be in an academic pursuit the same applies.

    43. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by CycleMan · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has the talent or desire for college

      This right here is what needs to stop: just because you're a plumber, or a carpenter, or an electrician, doesn't mean you're dumb. Likewise, going to college doesn't mean you're smart.

      Please read GlennC's statement again. He never said anybody was dumb or smart. You projected that onto his words. He talked about talent and desire. I have no art talent and no desire for art school or music school, landscape design, or interior decorating. Does that make me an idiot? No. It makes me a guy. A guy who understands his strengths and weaknesses, and makes a living off his strengths.

      I agree with you and Glenn that college isn't right for everyone, and we shouldn't look down on someone who maximizes what he has, be it book smarts or hands-on smarts. With good career counseling, we might help more people understand their talents and desires, and find greater happiness and fulfilment as a result.

    44. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Next time you call a plumber or electrician, take some time to chat with them. They're usually pretty eager to talk about their trade. It's fascinating how much more complicated their jobs really are than simply unclogging pipes and stringing up wire. And you may learn a thing or two about how everyday stuff you take for granted really works. Unlike CompSci, there's centuries of accumulated human knowledge, trial and error, and experimentation that's gone into making our water, sewage, and power infrastructure what it is today.

    45. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 1

      "Retirement is happiness... plan for it."

      Oh. My. God.

      It's too bad I can't get full retirement until I'm 72, then. Right? I'll only get to "be happy" for a few years until it's estimated I kick the bucket. I'm 46 now, and if I'm happy doing what I like NOW, then I'll get an estimated extra 26 years of "happiness". I'm sorry, but your point of view is just so depressing that I had to respond. It honestly sounds like you hate your life, and could go suicidal/homicidal at the drop of a hat. If you're equating not having to perform your career anymore as "happiness", then you may be in the wrong career.

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    46. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has the talent or desire for college, and I think we as a society ought to recognize that.

      You presume that college requires talent and desire and plumbing does not.

      Actually, he doesn't. He's talking about "talent or desire for college".

    47. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      People need to stop looking down on blue collar jobs, and stop treating "going to college" as the highest honor they can bestow upon on themselves. There are way, way, way too many people going to college and doing pointless and ultimately useless degrees. ...

      You're completely right. It's one fundamental failure of our society: not only is our primary educational system broken because it is adjusted so that everyone can be successful, it is broken because success is defined as sending everyone to college. The colleges and universities are broken because everyone is expected to get at least a B.A. in psychology—and Institutions of Higher Learning can only continue to collect their exorbitant tuition if most students are successful, at least in this limited sense. The result is a general failure to educate, a tremendous waste of time and resources. Students aren't taught what they need to know, they are guided around an obstacle course that will get them certified as...well, someone who has navigated the obstacle course.

      Yes, there are students who have a serious purpose for attending college (and it's not just getting a paper that says "MBA: Pay me lots of money" on it). In the past, one such purpose was to study one of the traditional "humanities" fields, such as philosophy, history, or literature. I don't know if anybody goes to college any more for such a reason—that is, because they recognize learning as having a value all its own. I don't think universities or our society even pretend to believe this anymore. That's a pity; for there are a few, a very few, people who are born to be scholars. A healthy culture values scholars almost as much as plumbers. Our present culture values neither. Maybe it values nothing of worth.

      Today, the few exceptions to the general practice of just navigating the four year academic obstacle course are people who go to college to study physics or another science, or a branch of engineering. If they succeed, it is because they understood that they learning involves work, and that because a B.A. or B.S. is worthless, they must get an advanced degree in their specialty, maybe even a Ph.D. On the other hand, there are also community colleges that have programs that teach a trade—such as electrician, beautician, welder, or auto mechanic. Some students buck the "four year degree" pressure, and learn something useful—useful both to them and to society. But all these are exceptions: in most cases, "going to college" is all about having been to college. It's about being able to say you've gone through the correct motions, and now you deserve a prestigious job.

      I had a wonderful handyman who can do just about anything, but has a terrible self-image partly because he never went to college. He thinks he's an idiot. Due to his low self estimation, he made some serious errors in judgment in his life. (He just got sent to jail for something he did in 2004. Long story.) While he was working for me, he opened up to me and told me about how he felt. I told him that there are many different kinds of intelligence; one man is good at academic study, another has smart hands. "Your brain controls your hands", I told him. "You have smart hands, so your brain is smart too." It seemed to help. And I didn't just say it to make him feel better; I said it because it's true.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    48. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with your first sentence, and completely disagree with your second.

      At most *decent* universities, CS degrees ARE supposed to be able to program. Are they experts in the field on graduation at age ~22? Rarely. But they have the tools they need to start their new career (whether it goes anywhere is a different story, of course). I took CS 20 years ago and spent 100's of hours writing software as a part of various projects and homework assignments, as did all of my peers. In fact, one of my required classes was designing, documenting, and implementing a fairly large software project in a team of 5 from scratch.

      Of course, I learned a lot more in various jobs over the years, as well - but that's no different from most other careers, whether it's medicine (residency) or plumbing (apprenticeship). You learn the basic techniques in a classroom with some amount of practical exercises, and you become an expert in the field from doing it on the job.

    49. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      It's a job, if you were happy doing it they wouldn't pay you.

      So, no one who is getting paid for their work can be happy doing it? Yeah, *brilliant* insight there...

    50. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Man, you must have had some *horrible* educational experiences...

      For me (and I assume many others) there is (at least) a 4. which could be more important than the other 3 combined: to allow you to explore new ideas, develop skills to write, analyze, criticize, debate, research, etc, to get a chance to study other fields from experts who you may never have the same level of access to again, and basically to broaden your perspective for *life* more than your *career*. Though I may not be explicitly using what I learned in my creative writing, psychology, archaeology, classical history, physics, organic chemistry, etc classes in my daily work, I found them fascinating and I'm sure subconsciously use what I learned in them all the time.

      I know many colleges these days have thrown much of that experience out the window trying to "prepare" students for "their careers" after they graduate (which I suppose if part of your point!) and IMO that is a tragedy. It actually does go back to Bloomberg's original point, as well - colleges are becoming factories to give everyone the same basic "education" in topics students could have just learned on their own from a book, rather than actually teaching them what they traditionally did - how to think *creatively* - if you can't *add* to the body of human knowledge why bother spending 4+ years rehashing what everyone else already knows...

    51. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      If all you want is to make a living then even college education may be optional. However if you are passionate about a science subject, gone are the days when you can pursue it as a career (and not just as a hobby). For having science and research as a career, it is good to have a graduate school stint. May be not required but highly recommended.

    52. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Obviously, an uneducated person such as yourself, would marvel at the solutions to trivial problems (that you do understand) by people you see around you. This is not however all that there is in the world.

      I'm kind of laughing at that, as will my coworkers when I pass this along to them on Monday morning.... Suggesting that someone who has the job title "Engineer" is actually smarter than we are? That's laughable, and provably so. In the last 3 jobs I've had, the "engineers" called up my department when they were stumped and needed help. And they were always really silly (stupid) questions.

      Yeah, engineers are smart guys, right up until they have to deal with something that requires a little thinking.... That's where people like me come in....

    53. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Well, after Smith's and Ricardo's Labor Theory of Value, we now have Charliemopps' Misery Theory of Value.

      By the way, what makes you so sure you'll live to retirement age?

    54. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Just to be clear, also, I meant it to add to, not to detract from, what you were saying.

      It's a tough thing, a difficult place to be, when fresh out of school or training, especially if in an area which is in demand; one is confident yet nervous, even a bit scared. You're excited and maybe a bit burnt out, hitting the interviews, all that. Making plans, daydreams, seduced by a lifetime of the weirdness of television where the 'good' people live in luxury as their due, being simply human to want those good things, honest enough to want a mate, a fellow traveller on life's journey, hundreds of often competing criteria of what makes that good companion, a good job, ditto place to live, car to drive, the whole shebang. It all makes it so very hard to try to keep in mind what really pleases and rewards the inner self, that place where you really live.

      Finding a bit or two of useful advice, and being able to pay attention early enough.... yeah.

    55. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by gutnor · · Score: 3, Informative

      College is not trade school. You learn theory, not practice. And theory stay useful for a very very long time. And when it starts getting useless, it is because there is a new theory, but generally the new theory build on top of the old one, so you get a significant headstart.

      When you start working, you start learning skills and little time building in-depth knowledge. Understanding the theory being the skills can help keeping up with technology better or adapt better.

      Now, that does not mean I do not agree with you. It is difficult to find a benefit that would offset 4 years of experience and 75K in debt in the IT sector. That said, the deal is not the same everywhere in the world. In Europe, you can get college for free or something like $500 a year.

    56. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by gstovall · · Score: 1

      :) The senior architect on the product I work on (multimedia communications system) is a C.S. grad, and he is truly brilliant.

      I work with some really great people, and quite a number of them have C.S. degrees.

      The work we do is multi-processing, multi-threaded, multi-server, across multiple different operating systems, and I have the privilege of working with a group of people with varying educational backgrounds, but all of them are extremely competent, and all of them, C.S. or not, know their way around creating and using shared libraries on Windows and Linux. It's kind of strange to say just those two now. I remember when we used to routinely do work on AIX, HPUX, Solaris...

      The point I was trying to make was that a C.S. degree does not make someone a successful software designer -- skill, talent, and an eagerness to learn do.

    57. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Where did you get that hippie bullshit? It's a job,

      It's not 1870 anymore. There's no need to suffer like a victorian or guilded age factory worker or miner. Your daily grind doesn't have to be pure torture. You can take control of your own destiny. And why do that if it's not to make much of the time you have to live on this earth more pleasant and suitable.

      You don't have to end up like the guy from Office Space or Fight Club.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    58. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't matter if you are making more money than him or not. If you more content then that also has it's own value.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    59. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A big part of any mature engineering disicipline is applying a process that's already well established. You're following a recipe more than learning something new or adapting. The fact that it is an interesting recipe doesn't alter the fact that merely applying the algorithm doesn't demonstrate a great deal of intelligence.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    60. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      When you start working, you start learning skills and little time building in-depth knowledge. Understanding the theory being the skills can help keeping up with technology better or adapt better.

      While I agree with you about the usefulness of "theory," I'm not sure packing it into 4 years with an audience of inexperienced people makes much sense. You can spend 4 years studying all sorts of "theory" about how to ride a bike -- physics, anatomy of the body and its relationship to bike-riding, social and cultural norms that could affect types of bikes and riding style... whatever. But you're still going to fall down the first few times you try.

      OR -- you could spend a couple days reading theory AND doing practice and you'll be able to ride. And that theory you read will make a heck of a lot more sense.

      Studying extensive theory without and before practical experience is rather dumb. Traditional "liberal arts" taught in college wasn't about practical things, and it wasn't even about detailed theory that would be relevant to your profession. It was more like encounters with various types of knowledge and ways of thinking, the vast majority of which had no direct relevance to your profession. College should be about training you think in general, not a glorified trade school nor 4 years being forced to read technical manuals of the theory for your field... you should read that theory anyway, but only after and while gaining experience -- when there's some chance you might understand it or get something out of it.

    61. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I'm over here making more money than you, working the hours I want, [...] Your ideas are pathetic and worthless, just like your life.

      Wow, definitely sounds like you've got a case of the Nirvanas,

      yikes!

    62. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by mpfife · · Score: 1

      Retirement is happiness... plan for it.

      Wrong, wrong, wrong my friend. Life is what happens while you're making plans. Your tomorrow is never guaranteed, nor your investments, nor your health. It's the great American lie that you should bust your b*lls doing stuff you hate for 30-40 years just so you can maximize earning for the HOPE that you can enjoy 20+ of in in retirement. Doesn't that sound stupid to you? It does to me. I'm sorry - but one of my life goals was to climb a mountain or two. I can't do that at 70. I can do it now at 30. So I do it - and have experienced something great by climbing a few of them already. It's opened doors to my life that I never would have known about.

      You are taking a HUGE risk that your health, investments, happiness and stamina will last until you're 65 and then 'magically' start living life. Have you not listened to all the people in serious accidents or those that get cancer/etc? They all wish they had lived more each day and not wasted so many days. Live your life NOW; don't wait and make the ultimate gamble you'll actually be able to live life later when you're old.

    63. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Visserau · · Score: 1

      Your ignorance is showing. The fact you can't recognise that there are different types of intelligence and that there are both good and bad individuals in ALL professions, means you're someone I hope I never have to deal with. Your stance on asking for help confirms it.

      Maybe those engineers were dumb. Or maybe a few "stupid" questions to confirm some things outside of their sphere of expertise can save a lot of time and effort down the road. I'm sure you'd be the first to start pointing fingers if some aspect of their plans didn't account for something.

    64. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Of course they'll pay you if you're happy to do it.

      Just so long as you don't tell them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    65. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      At most *decent* universities, CS degrees ARE supposed to be able to program.

      Do you define decent as not being able to distinguish between CS and SE?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    66. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      if I needed a complex task done and was give the option of choosing a plumber or a "college graduate" I'd pick the plumber every time.

      If you wanted to [conduct a trial on fertiliser efficiency | translate a user manual | analyse numerical info] you'd get a plumber to do it rather than a [botany | languages | stats] graduate? Rly?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    67. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      As much as we need competent programmers, DBAs, network administrators, etc., we also need plumbers, carpenters and electricians. Not everyone has the talent or desire for college, and I think we as a society ought to recognize that.

      Why does it have to be an either-or choice? (I'm seriously considering enrolling in some courses for driving earth-moving equipment).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    68. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I spent 3 1/2 years at a 2 year business school studying programming.

      Yeah? Well I spent 4 years at medical school studying law, and I still can't play the piano.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    69. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And before you get those couple decades[sic] experience...?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    70. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Sigh, the usual pseudo-elitist nonsense.

      Computers are a tool, and programming languages are a way to experiment with that tool. Computer Science teaches the theory and practice of both (go look up the charter/goals/etc of almost any of the top 10+ Computer Science programs and they usually include terms like "practical", "technology", "interdisciplinary ", "applied", etc.

      *Decent* universities (actually, even crappy ones, really) combine education in theoretical and practical aspects of their fields. Decent (well, again, any) physics, chemistry, or biology programs also require practical laboratory experience, even though they may not be studying applied physics or chemical/biological engineering.

      Go look up the recipients of the major computing awards like the Turing or IEEE/von Neumann - you'll see they are an interesting mix of academics and engineers, with many of them perfectly comfortable in both areas. Computer Science as a recognized field is only about 50 years old, and its history has always been one of both theoretical and practical application - lucky those actually DOING useful things in the field rarely have your opinion of it.

    71. Re:Not actually a bad idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Crap example. The only worse one I can think of is walking. They're both something you do largely instinctively; you can do them fairly well without even thinking about it, as can monkeys.

      Building a bridge or designing an OS are entirely different types of task. Monkeys don't do those.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Could be true by Mitreya · · Score: 1

    Billionaire Mike Bloomberg, whose current job is Mayor of New York City, evidently decided to break the mold by advising less academically adept youngsters to consider a career in plumbing

    Without reading TFA, the key part is "less academically adept". Not everyone is well suited for a CS degree or an MBA

    Perhaps not as plumber specifically, but if someone have no talent or interest for their current degree, they should switch to something else instead of just pushing on (as everyone in CS seems to do)

    1. Re:Could be true by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      Guys who went to business school are running most companies.

      Are they? I don't know any business owners who went to business school. I do know a lot of successful business owners from diverse backgrounds who are tough, resourceful, resilient, charming, lucky, and upon occasion ruthless, which are not qualities you are taught in school.

  4. Skils || Trades == Jobs by DeionXxX · · Score: 3

    People with skills and trades will almost always find work even in shitty economies. If you know how to make something, build something, or fix something that everyone uses, then someone is probably going to pay you to do that.

    My advice to kids, whether family or kids I mentor, is to finish school with a skill. Doesn't matter if it's programming or plumbing.

    1. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      I think that has to do a lot with education too. Just because you're a plumber doesn't mean you don't read or have interesting hobbies that can help you relate to those with PhD's.

      I think your family would prefer you being with someone you love that is also financially stable, than with someone who has a degree but no real job opportunities in this economy (see poli sci, etc)

    2. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by KernelMuncher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A friend of the family was somewhat distraught when her son skipped college after HS and took a welding job. He was living the redneck life with a big pickup, wore a hardhat to work every day, etc. The years go by and this man goes from being an apprentice to a master welder. Then he decided to form his own welding crew with some coworkers from jobs he'd had from various jobs. Now the guy who everybody said was taking the wrong path owns his own business and makes absolutely gobs of $$. True story.

    3. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1
      I imagine it is similar in the US... If he were in Canada, the next step for the successful welder would be to start recruiting tradesmen from India or China.
      1. 1. advertise for higher skilled jobs at below local labour rates for a month or two
      2. 2. claim an inability to hire in a few months, bring in the temporary foreign workers (TFW)
      3. 3. Profit!!

      http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/jobs/foreign_workers/higher_skilled/trades/index.shtml

      While I think the advice to go into trades is fine (there is likely more demand right now.) what Bloomberg says about no foreign competition is likely b.s. I don't know how long it will take, but there are donut shops and gardening centres here with TFW's. There is no low skill job that is not routinely farmed out already. Trades are not immune either:

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/12/07/bc-chinese-miners-new-documents.html

    4. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by drunk_punk · · Score: 2

      A good welder is worth his wieght in gold... Having been a plumber for a number of years, you can make a pile of money in trades, because at some point in your life you will be presented with the situation that you will need somebody in the middle of the night to come to you to fix something. And that individual will cost hundreds of dollars an hour. And you will pay the bill gladly.

    5. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty much how it works in the US, too....

      You post an ad that requires:

      1.) 25 years experience administering Windows Server 2012.
      2.) 35 years experience administering RedHat Enterprise.
      3.) 15 years experience performing open heart surgery.
      4.) 20 years experience as an Air Force fighter pilot.

      Once that ad fails to attract any "local talent", an Indian agency will send over a resume that magically satisfies all of the requirements, even the impossible ones, and "Bingo!", now you have your H1B indentured servant.

    6. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by styrotech · · Score: 1

      People with skills and trades will almost always find work even in shitty economies. If you know how to make something, build something, or fix something that everyone uses, then someone is probably going to pay you to do that.

      Not necessarily. The construction industry (at least in my country) has traditionally suffered from a nasty boom-bust cycle. A few years of flat out work struggling to find/attract/train talent, then a few years of struggling to find work and having to lay off that same talent. Who then move overseas and then the cycle starts again.

    7. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by Mandrel · · Score: 1

      Because there's less competition, there's plenty of money to be made in jobs that are dirty, boring, or low in social prestige. The money can buy you an interesting life outside work, plus, like the welding guy, you can make your job more interesting by continually trying to improve, or by building a business around it.

      Others will make the different choice of fulfillment at work in exchange for low pay. The jackpot is a fulfilling well-paid job, while the reverse is still the most common situation (which as long as the unemployment problem is properly dealt with, is being improved by automation technologies).

    8. Re:Skils || Trades == Jobs by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Also, people forget you need experts when dismantling old buildings. You have to remove the plumbing and old electrical wiring first, and that requires specialized expertise.

  5. For once, I agree by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    Bloomberg is a pompous, gun grabbing, authoritarian, elitist, fucktard 99.99% of the time. However, he was able to accumulate a fortune, so I guess he knows about money.
    On this point, he's right. As of now, trade schools are probably some of the best deals around in terms of ROI for education. I'd rather be a plumber or an electrician than have a sociology, political science or ethnic studies degree (and the associated debt) from a prestigious university.
    If anyone asks my advice, I tell them to look in the medical field. Going for MD is a long, hard, debt-laden road of course. Many jobs can be had with only a 2 or 4 year degree however.

    1. Re:For once, I agree by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      On this point, he's right.

      Sure, as long as demand, relative to supply, holds up. What are the odds? With the influence of unions (which have artifically propped-up trade wages) beginning to go by the wayside and theoretical increased attendance in trade schools (as per Bloomberg's advice), I'd say those odds were slim.

      No, this is yet another case of "do as I say, not as I do" which is the M.O. of successful mouthpieces like Bloomberg. After all, it's not as if he and his ilk are going to actually give the peasants advice that might threaten to put them on a more level playing field... :p

    2. Re:For once, I agree by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      and degree in the medical field (even the cheaper ones) can lead the more technically minded to work in healthcare IT....That does not mean medical field persons can't get in (I am one that fits that) but there is a lot of desire for people who know how to work in the environment and who can work in IT.

    3. Re:For once, I agree by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      That is where things like building codes help out because most states require new construction to have licensed trades doing the plumbing and electrical.

    4. Re:For once, I agree by couchslug · · Score: 1

      There are many millionaires running businesses such as used car dealerships and vehicle salvage yards who started as mechanics.

      There are many structural and pipeline welders who moved into owning their own contracting businesses or into inspection or who are making a very nice living in the nuke power station world.

      There are many machinists who moved into owning their own successful machine shops.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:For once, I agree by Znork · · Score: 1

      Frankly I'd be a bit iffy about the medical field. It has advantages with the guild like features keeping wages high in some positions and there are some obstacles to off-shoring, but it's also a field that will likely come under increasing pressure from AI and robotics in the not too far future. The gains to be made are simply so compelling and anything from diagnostics to surgery is potentially better done by machines (which in turn, due to the nature of the field, means that having an actual human doing either will basically be malpractice.)

      Trade jobs that are hard to offshore and difficult to cost-effectively automate are probably a good choice. I'd stay away from the transportation sector as that too is likely to get automated to a significant degree within our life time.

    6. Re:For once, I agree by bonehead · · Score: 1

      My suggestion would be that tradesmen not have licensing requirements at all. If I want to hire someone to wire up my kitchen when I remodel it, and I'm satisfied that he knows what he's doing, and I'm satisfied with the price that he's asking.... It's none of the state's goddamn business what sort of agreement we come to.

    7. Re:For once, I agree by bonehead · · Score: 1

      First, an admission: I'm getting old....

      Over the years, I've had the opportunity to know many, many people who would qualify as "rich". By that I mean having 5 or 10 million in the bank....

      Not a single one of them accumulated that money through technology. It was all through mundane crap like payphones, video game machines, soda machines, condom machines in truck stop bathrooms, etc....

      Point is that there are a LOT of rich people out there. But only the ones like Gates and Zuckerberg ever make the news. The vast majority of wealthy people got right doing things that no "smart" person would ever even consider, simply because it was just such a dumb idea.

      At my advanced age, I've come to the conclusion that the key to getting rich is simply being too dumb to realize that your idea is stupid, and going for it anyway....

  6. Kinda the same route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I usually work with IT support, but took a sidejump as a construction worker for 6 months years ago.
    It was good because:
    -You can leave your work when you go home
    -You feel less like a cog in a machine and more like a decision maker (if you're in a small team)
    -You can see the work you do, and you can see the difference between good work and bad work
    -It's fun to work fast, easy to take pride in a good job
    -It trains your body (bye bye back problems)
    -You learn to work with different people. Construction workers, carpenters, plumbers etc are a lot about social networking and less about skirting around the issue. You will gain more can-do attitude and learn to work with people who are that way
    -Pay is actually decent compared to working at a grocery store etc. 30-50% more.
    -Less jabbering with customers, more plain work.

    The downsides:
    -Have to get up early.
    -It's hard work.
    -Bosses in these workfields are usually very temperantal. They're either very happy and fun to work with, or very angry and irrational.
    -Possibly dangerous, both short term and long term (but don't let that deter you).

    I recommend it!
    There's always jobs for people who aren't afraid to do physical work. Just view at as getting paid to do excercise.

  7. Know what you want to do, and plan accordingly by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you love working on cars and want to be a mechanic, you don't go to college for engineering, you go to trade school and get certified. If you want to work on planes, you go get your A&P, you don't get a degree in aeronautical engineering. We need people to fix our cars, unclog our pipes, weld stuff, etc. These jobs aren't glamorous, but they are stable, pay much better than you think, and can be obtained by attending a much cheaper trade school than going to a university. I currently work part-time doing unskilled labor, and one guy I work with, after only being there 7 years, makes over 70k a year working no more overtime than many salaried employees. When he tops out in 3 more years he will probably be making close to, if not more than $100k. And this is in a job that requires no more than a high school diploma.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Know what you want to do, and plan accordingly by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      . I currently work part-time doing unskilled labor, and one guy I work with, after only being there 7 years, makes over 70k a year working no more overtime than many salaried employees. When he tops out in 3 more years he will probably be making close to, if not more than $100k. And this is in a job that requires no more than a high school diploma.

      Where the hell do you live and what kind of job pays an unskilled laborer $100k/yr? (I'm presuming in USD.) More to the point, what the tax rate and cost of living where you are?
       
      These questions may sound facetious, but they're serious - someone in a big city may make impressive sounding money, but actually be just treading water because of the local cost of living. (That's one of the reasons people endure hellish commutes - to get out of the city to where land and living is cheaper.) That, and I find it exceedingly hard to buy unskilled labor making anything anywhere near $70k except where labor is scarce - so why aren't people flocking there and driving down the labor rates?

    2. Re:Know what you want to do, and plan accordingly by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Where the hell do you live and what kind of job pays an unskilled laborer $100k/yr? (I'm presuming in USD.) More to the point, what the tax rate and cost of living where you are?

      Atlanta airport, working on the ramp. A single person can easily live here for 30k a year, if not less. And remember, that 100k is with OT of time and a half. He has 7 years, pay scale tops out at 10 years. First year is about 1800 a month, 10 years gets you mid 4k a month. And that is base.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  8. Nothing wrong with the Trades by dakohli · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is nothing wrong with becoming a Tradesman. Plumber, Electrician, Welder or Mechanic, etc

    Just as we need Engineers, Nurses and Lawyers (I can't believe I'm including Lawyers!), we need the folks that keep our machines running. Just as not everyone has the money, or the aptitude to become a Doctor, I know many people who do not have the abilities to become a carpenter or metal worker.

    I don't much care for the way some look down on the tradesmen that keep things running. Where I live there is a shortage of plumbers and electricians. Out west there is a shortage of carpenters. As a resul the ones that do exist command high wages, and are busy with lots of work. All this without the debilitating school loans that many University Graduates have.

    From my perspective, it sounds like good advice

    1. Re:Nothing wrong with the Trades by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      I look down on them because of their widespread bad business practices: the majority of the time you can expect price gouging and poor workmanship. They'd be better off working for Microsoft with that attitude.

    2. Re:Nothing wrong with the Trades by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      Just as we need [...] Lawyers (I can't believe I'm including Lawyers!),

      Explain to me why we need lawyers again?

    3. Re:Nothing wrong with the Trades by dakohli · · Score: 1

      I look down on them because of their widespread bad business practices: the majority of the time you can expect price gouging and poor workmanship. They'd be better off working for Microsoft with that attitude.

      OUCH!

      I'm sorry that you have experienced the worst side of the human experience. It has certainly not been mine. Yes, I have encountered the occasional scammer, but by and large the tradesmen I have had direct contact with have been honest. I have heard people complain about the $50/hr plumber or mechanic, so they hire the $20/hr guy who comes in and does a crappy job, then they end up paying a competent worker the 50 bucks an hour anyways to make it right.

      If you hire someone who takes you to the cleaners, you have a right to be upset, but if you failed to get references, and do your research, you have to accept some of the blame as well

    4. Re:Nothing wrong with the Trades by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      I don't much care for the way some look down on the tradesmen that keep things running.

      Around where I live I wouldn't say people look down on tradesmen per se, but rather the industry generally. Trades have a low barrier for entry and little regulation, as a result there is a large proportion who are frankly a bunch of charlatans. True craftsmen however are like gold dust, contact details are kept in a safe place and making recommendations that turn out good earns you favours.

    5. Re:Nothing wrong with the Trades by Lt_Kernal · · Score: 1

      My father is, and was a plumber for as long as I can remember. I started out helping him on jobs before I was ten. I've been shit on, dug ditches, been under houses, etc. It was the _hardest_ work I have ever done in my life. I left it when I was 18, and because of several life decisions which had nothing to do with college...

      I work for Microsoft now.

      And for the first time in years, I've logged on to tell you one more thing: You're a fucking idiot, and have no idea what you're talking about.

      That is all.

      --
      My posts don't reflect the opinion of my employer, and my employer's opinion doesn't influence the content of my posts.
  9. Why just for less academically adept folks? by capedgirardeau · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The most insulting part of his statement is that a hands on trades type job is just for the less academically adept.

    While I am partial to electrician work, a trades type job is great for just about anyone.

    I am actually getting out of software development full time and working toward becoming a professional electrician because I am very into renewable energy and would love to work outside installing solar and wind equipment.

    Electrician, plumber, carpenter, mechanic, heavy equipment operator, landscaper, etc are all great jobs for a person who wants to do them, academically adept or not. Suggesting they are only for "less"er people is insulting, stigmatizing and shameful.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:Why just for less academically adept folks? by cnaumann · · Score: 2

      Because it is unrealistic to expect the less academically adept folk to go onto college, get a degree and a job that requires one. It is exactly the same thing as advising the less athletically adept folks to look at jobs that do not require them to be professional athletes. This does not mean that Engineering is only for non-athletes.

      The statement should be obvious, but it really is not. In the last several decades we seem to have fallen into the belief that college is for everyone. It really isn't. People need to be told this.

    2. Re:Why just for less academically adept folks? by minsk · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see "more practically adept" going into trades than "less academically adept". But while there's a social stigma attached, it is going to be the people who aren't capable of doing a white-collar job (plus the few who want to do a trade anyway). So the average contractor stays expensive, overworked, and incompetent.

      If folks are neither practically adept nor academically adept? No clue. Retail? Unskilled labor until they lose a limb?

    3. Re:Why just for less academically adept folks? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      While I am partial to electrician work, a trades type job is great for just about anyone.

      No. A trades job is great for anyone who has the interest and aptitude for the work. You may as well say any job is great for just about anyone. If you have no interest in a field, working in it is torture. If you have no aptitude for it, you won't succeed.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  10. If it can be automated, it will be automated by blarkon · · Score: 1

    If your job can be automated, it will be automated. Most jobs that involve sitting in front of a desk at a computer will be automated as AI improves. AI won't get rid of *all* the jobs, but it does allow one person to do the work that at one stage would have required many people. Plumber is bloody hard to automate and it's pretty difficult to come up with software that allows one plumber to do the work that five plumbers did a couple of years ago.

    1. Re:If it can be automated, it will be automated by mlookaba · · Score: 1

      Most jobs that involve sitting in front of a desk at a computer will be automated as AI improves.

      Building an AI that can understand and implement business logic might be possible if the people making up that logic were somewhat logical. Or could even string together coherent thoughts.

      I suspect that once we invent that AI, the 500th revision of the inconsistent and illogical "business rules" by some random jackass son of the owner will be the cause of skynet taking over.

  11. He's right by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    But doesn't address how we could reshape our educational system to fit that new model. Perhaps make high school six years, with the last two intensive training in trade specialties, for those going that route, and college core courses for those going on.

    That would change college from 4 years to 2 and let them focus on specialties, almost like a finishing school.

    Everyone goes to school until they're 20, with an option to learn a trade, then you're on your own.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:He's right by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In European countries where people go to school until the age of 19 or 20, and where trade school pupils have their own track, a university degree programme still lasts five or six years (because an M.A. is considered the basic degree, not a B.A. like in the US). So, longer high school wouldn't necessary lead to shorter university studies.

    2. Re:He's right by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually I think that the first 2 years of high school should focus on things you will need to survive: money management, how financing works and why revolving credit is not a good thing; reading and writing.
      The second 2 years should allow either continued academic *or* tradescraft. fo you go the tradescraft route you'll get two years focused on only the stuff you need for a particular field. Plumbing: math and geometry (drain slopes), chemistry (solvents and glues, interaction with metals), and of course hands on.
      -nbr

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:He's right by r2kordmaa · · Score: 1

      Atleast here in Estonia trade schools give high school equivalent education + trade, so after trade school you can easily go to univercity(I did). And the little thing about univercities - they are absolutely free. Exceptions being private unis(not worth your time, let alone money) and when you fail a subject and need to retake it you need to pay a modest sum(about 100€ per subject). You have 1.5years to complete a subject you have started, and if you cant manage it in this time you need to pay the fee to retake it. BA is considered a basic degree, but its also considered completely useless, its not really possible to learn a speciality in 3 years. Its a stepping stone to MA, little more

    4. Re:He's right by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      And it can be hard to get of the vocational track in some European countries in the past it was almost impossible to start on the vocational track and end up as a CENG or PE.

  12. Union Plumber by AlleyTrotte · · Score: 1

    As a retired contractor I have dealt with union plumbers most of my life. When I retired (2007) a journeyman made about $35/hour with $18/hour in benefits (Health & Welfare). That comes to about $110,000.00/year, but most took the winter off and collected unemployment about $600.00/week. Not bad for 5 year apprenticeship. JUST SAYIN' John

  13. It's a question of incentive and respect by dzoey · · Score: 2

    When I hear people complaining that they can't find skilled people, the part they usually leave off is "I can't find skilled people....for the amount of money I want to pay."
    If there's a shortage in the market, then the value goes up, attracting more people, so there shouldn't be a problem in the long term.
    The mayor did have a valid point that there's nothing that makes a lawyer worth more respect than a plumber, other than class behaviors.
    I'm not sure how much respect of a profession matters in attracting people. Lawyers don't get a lot of respect but many people want to become lawyers for the money. No reason that shouldn't work for plumbers.

    --
    -- Everything is wonderful until you know something about it.
  14. Really? by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2

    Funny, that's not what I was thinking when I had to hire a plumber because my main line out of the house got clogged with "flushable" wipes. (I was so glad that I wasn't the one dealing with that literal shit. I was totally happy to pay him for his work.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which highlights another good reason to be a plumber. Everyone understands why the job is necessary but nobody wants to do it. Which is pretty much the exact opposite of IT.

    2. Re:Really? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, what you're basically saying is that a code plumber is the sweet spot of employment in the current job market?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Really? by kermidge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For a time years ago I made my living by pumping out septic tanks and cleaning sewers. This is a distinct field from plumbing, but we (a partnership of five) often as not had to do the whole trip from a clogged sink or toilet to unblocking a drain field.

      Done well and honestly it's an honorable if shitty profession. I say profession in the sense that to do it well required gaining a fair amount of knowledge of various physical and biological processes or gotchas as well as all the relevant ordinances and laws. We also had to carry a number of bonds, and some of the permits entailed inspections and certifications.

    4. Re:Really? by danomac · · Score: 1

      Yep, he can use the plunger to get rid of cruft sitting in current code.

    5. Re:Really? by Pecisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Which highlights another good reason to be a plumber. Everyone understands why the job is necessary but nobody wants to do it. Which is pretty much the exact opposite of IT."

      Not exactly true. I am about to finish my very late (in age of 33) BSc in CS. Guess how many students (in percentage) choose to learn high level sysadmining or hardware engineering? Yeah, maybe 10% to each (or even less). Sysadmins sometimes have it worst than plumbers. In result, there are very few of them. Hardware engineering is fun, but also much harder than software engineering.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    6. Re:Really? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Is your name Winston Rothschild?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZmQGAgboBU

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    7. Re:Really? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      "Is your name Winston Rothschild?"

      Not hardly. Nice find, tho. Nice sig, too.

  15. And the rest of you... by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Get paying on those loans... the Dept. of Education needs more money to roll in.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/obama-student-loans-policy-profit_n_3276428.html

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  16. Re:Hey, if it was almost good enough for Einstein. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    You may be laughing, but the behavior of plumbing at relativistic speeds is actually quite difficult to predict. Plumbing around black holes is even worse, although the upside is that at least EPA won't nag you if you happen to be releasing toxic chemicals into the black hole: it all ends up as mere mass, charge, and angular momentum anyway. (Bilingual bonus: in my native tongue, "illegal dump" translates as "black dump".)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  17. True by lennier1 · · Score: 2

    Bloomberg made his money off the finance industry and he's in politics.
    Trust him when he says that the world will never run out of assholes.

  18. Of course it is when you compare it to Harvard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Go to a community college, transfer to a university for the last 2 years, and save potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars. A few years after college (aka experience), they are worth the same. Unless you plan to be President of the US, there is no real reason to go to these top schools.

  19. Marine Engineering Degree != Marine Engineer by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I teach engineering at a maritime academy and it dazzles me that so many students pay through the nose and suffer through 4+ years of regimented academics for a license that they could get by just sailing as a paid vessel assistant for a few years after high school and taking a Coast Guard examination. This is a practice called hawsepiping and used to be the norm for the profession. Marine engineers are really (for the most part) mechanics, and much simpler vocational school would be more than adequate for these jobs.

    Admittedly the students also get a "marine engineering degree" over and above the training for the license that is transferrable to a lot of shore-side professions, but most of that is lost on the students. All they care about is getting the license and many whine and cry about having to read, write, do math, and take engineering coursework. I do think that degree is worth what they pay, but it really a form of insurance so they can remain employed after they come ashore, and getting 20 year old boys who aspire to be sailors to think about what they are going to do later in life (hell, later in the *day*) is hard.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Marine Engineering Degree != Marine Engineer by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I teach engineering at a maritime academy and it dazzles me that so many students pay through the nose and suffer through 4+ years of regimented academics for a license that they could get by just sailing as a paid vessel assistant for a few years after high school and taking a Coast Guard examination. This is a practice called hawsepiping and used to be the norm for the profession. Marine engineers are really (for the most part) mechanics, and much simpler vocational school would be more than adequate for these jobs. Admittedly the students also get a "marine engineering degree" over and above the training for the license that is transferrable to a lot of shore-side professions, but most of that is lost on the students. All they care about is getting the license and many whine and cry about having to read, write, do math, and take engineering coursework. I do think that degree is worth what they pay, but it really a form of insurance so they can remain employed after they come ashore, and getting 20 year old boys who aspire to be sailors to think about what they are going to do later in life (hell, later in the *day*) is hard.

      Better tighten that onion on your belt. Meeting the STCW-95 requirements would be really tough without a dedicated educational/hand-on program. Working your way up from AB or wiper is for masochists. It could be done, but it is a far harder path for the same result. It is a throwback to the time when people had careers and pensions. Now people have jobs and need to change companies frequently. The marine industry is no different than any other industry today- no company wants to pay to train anybody, they want to hire someone who has all the certifications and experience already, and they don't want to pay a dime more than they have to in salary.

      I do think that the standard 3rd mate/3rd engineer track could be shortened to 3 or even 2 years, but at that point it becomes Training rather than an Education (and as an instructor, you should appreciate the difference). In-state Maritime Academy is one of the best purchases I ever made. It is truly a bargain when you look at all the idiots spending $40k a year to become English majors.

      I really disagree with your statement that " Admittedly the students also get a "marine engineering degree" over and above the training for the license that is transferrable to a lot of shore-side professions, but most of that is lost on the students. All they care about is getting the license...". It wasn't that long ago that I was in school. 2/3 of my classmates wanted to graduate, get their license, start jobs, and get on with their lives. The license is just a tool for them to get there. Only about half of my license-bearing classmates were still shipping out after 5 years. Everybody knows that shipping out is a marriage-killer and a poor way to raise kids. The degree is not a fallback plan if the license doesn't pan out for some reason. The coast guard license opens only a handful of doors (albeit important ones). The degree is a piece of paper that opens many kinds of doors.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    2. Re:Marine Engineering Degree != Marine Engineer by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      That's exactly right - most engineers that initially go to see will be landside in 5 years or less. I do agree that the majority of our students know this and are happy to do the degree work. The Coast Guard definitely wants to promote higher engineering skills and knowledge and is stacking the deck in favor of the 4-year academy route to licensure. Hawsepiping is still possible, but you need to be very pro-active about getting your time and endorsements.

      But we also have a significant number of students (usually the ones doing poorly academically) that like swinging the wrenches and don't see the need for the math and writing skills. It's shortsighted, but I am afraid that some of the older marine engineering faculty who did hawsepipe ages ago share this view and pass it on to these students. Hopefully with time these attitudes will pass on.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  20. College isn't a "good investment for most people" by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Because for most people, college is trade school for people "too good" to go to trade school. That's putting it charitably since for the majority, it's probably just a 4 year extended vacation with some academics.

    The reality is that most people would be substantially better off if they had parents that actually stayed together by that age in their lives and would let them work full time while living at home to build a really large amount of savings. In terms of material prosperity they'd have little to no debt, 4 years work experience toward their future and a massive pile of cash even if they were making minimum wage for the whole time.

  21. Dabble In Politics by janovsk2 · · Score: 1

    Or maybe go into theoretical physics.

  22. You need to work with a plumber by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    You need to work with a plumber for 5 years before you can become a plumber. And then you must pass a test Looking at the help wanted ads there no plumber apprentice jobs out there

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  23. Becuase of the alternative by mha · · Score: 1

    Hiring price fighters to aid you in arguments with your !"$%# neighbor is more expensive, and if the neighbor hires their own fraught with high risks for YOU.

    I think I prefer lawyers, after thinking about this for a few seconds.

  24. I was wondering if anyone would mention unions by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The San Francisco plumbers' union was (is?) famously a Mafia operation. What's it like out there? Is he getting any kickbacks? Etc.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. Is the end goal of life a high salary? by tlambert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is the end goal of life a high salary?

    I understand his advice, if followed, and if you work your way, either through trade school or apprenticeship, to journeyman, and then to master, you can expect a $80K+ a year income.

    Is this the end-all, be-all of human existence?

    A high salary is not why I went into the sciences - I went in with a passion for knowledge and knowing how things work, and why, and how to build things that, because they were barely within the boundaries of the rules, did amazing and astonishing things. A high salary resulted because I was successful at pursuing this passion.

    I would instead advise people to try to find three things for which they feel passion, and are good at, and then find someone willing to pay you to do one of them.

    If you can only find one thing for which you have passion, if you can still find someone to pay you to do it, then you are ahead of the game, compared to what Bloomberg suggest, if it happens that none of your objects of passion include plumbing.

    There are plenty of people who look at the top end paychecks available in a profession, and choose a profession on that basis. Those who do will never reach the top end of that pay range if they do not posses a passion for the profession; they will always be middle tier, and they will watch the clock until it is time to check out from their job, and "get back to their 'real' life". This is where a lot of unemployed IT "professionals" come from.

    For those clock watching 8 hours of their day, they will be miserable, working at something for which they have no passion, having intentionally turned their soul off for those eight hours in exchange for money. They will sell half their waking life into misery to benefit the other half of their waking life. And at the end of the day in their "real life", they will find they can not take joy in their "real life", as they anticipate, after sleeping, returning to their job for the next 8 soulless hours of work.

    Do something you love, and for which you have passion; reclaim your soul for those lost 8 hours of your life.

    1. Re:Is the end goal of life a high salary? by Shados · · Score: 1

      No, but a LOT of people go to college without any interest in it, and then just pick a random degree because its what everyone is doing. Then hate it, they do poorly, then they can't find a job, and their life sucks.

      They went to college not because they wanted to, but because there is a social stigma that you HAVE to.

      I was in highschool back when IT wasn't all that big. My grades in every honor classes were off the chart (ok, not in english obviously), and decided to go in IT...not computer science, IT. I went to tech college, not even university.

      Everyone around me were like "WTF! You should be a doctor!!"

      Fast forward to today, and googling numbers around, as a lead software engineer at a well known company, I make about as much as a family practitioner. Well under what an average doctor makes overall, but since I do no overtime at all and the atmosphere is really laid back, if I divided yearly salaries per hour worked (doctors are generally overworked), i probably easily beat many doctor's salaries.

      And I'm happier than if I had gone into a field I didn't like that everyone was pushing me into doing, just because it "looked better"

      This is basically what the article is saying. Do go to college just because thats what everyone is doing.

      Flipping burgers with a liberal art degree sucks.

    2. Re:Is the end goal of life a high salary? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Is the end goal of life a high salary?

      I understand his advice, if followed, and if you work your way, either through trade school or apprenticeship, to journeyman, and then to master, you can expect a $80K+ a year income.

      Is this the end-all, be-all of human existence?

      A high salary is not why I went into the sciences - I went in with a passion for knowledge and knowing how things work, and why, and how to build things that, because they were barely within the boundaries of the rules, did amazing and astonishing things. A high salary resulted because I was successful at pursuing this passion.

      I would instead advise people to try to find three things for which they feel passion, and are good at, and then find someone willing to pay you to do one of them.

      If you can only find one thing for which you have passion, if you can still find someone to pay you to do it, then you are ahead of the game, compared to what Bloomberg suggest, if it happens that none of your objects of passion include plumbing.

      There are plenty of people who look at the top end paychecks available in a profession, and choose a profession on that basis. Those who do will never reach the top end of that pay range if they do not posses a passion for the profession; they will always be middle tier, and they will watch the clock until it is time to check out from their job, and "get back to their 'real' life". This is where a lot of unemployed IT "professionals" come from.

      For those clock watching 8 hours of their day, they will be miserable, working at something for which they have no passion, having intentionally turned their soul off for those eight hours in exchange for money. They will sell half their waking life into misery to benefit the other half of their waking life. And at the end of the day in their "real life", they will find they can not take joy in their "real life", as they anticipate, after sleeping, returning to their job for the next 8 soulless hours of work.

      Do something you love, and for which you have passion; reclaim your soul for those lost 8 hours of your life.

      I have done different things in my career, some of which interests me, and some which did not. Doing "something I love" has not really helped me live a pleasant life and sleep well at night. The main drivers for me are more like:

      1. Job is important and has an impact on someone or some thing. There is a purpose which makes me feel needed.
      2. Job has progress milestones which are achievable with some work. A job with no noticeable progress is miserable monotony. Likewise, a job with unachievable goals is frustrating.
      3. Job has the right mix of travel, hands-on work, desk work, etc for ME.
      4. Boss who is fair, sets clear expectations, and is interested in having a "rising tide lift all boats".
      5. Being financially secure. This includes good health insurance. I sleep a lot better at night now that my income is significantly more than my needs. I can worry about the things that matter and not the fluctuations in my bank account.

      The first 4 have been proven over and over in psychology studies to make people happier. Doing "something you love" means that I make my hobbies into a job. It is a good way to become sick of both and then be miserable.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    3. Re:Is the end goal of life a high salary? by ethanms · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I don't want a plumber who is plumbing because he makes a good amount of money at it. I want one that actually enjoys it... the ones who get excited about the idea of troubleshooting a problem, stepping back and looking a the completed job and taking pride in it.

      I've met tradesman of both type. You can always tells the ones who are doing the job because of the pay.

      I had a rough carpenter whose final result was work of beauty... this is stuff that is getting covered up... but he took so much pride in doing things just right to make easier... from adding bracing for future grab bars in the bathroom, to not wasting space, and minimizing scraps. The plumber who installed the boiler in my last apartment created a veritable work of art in copper, black pipe and PEX.

      Everyone needs to pick a job that pays... but I'd take lower pay for doing something I enjoyed over not. I could have been a dentist, or a lawyer, and been paid more... but I simply would not being enjoying my life as much as I do now.

  26. If I could have I would have by davydagger · · Score: 1

    If there was a local hiring apprentice plumbers near me, I would not think twice about ditching IT forever.

    1. Re:If I could have I would have by koan · · Score: 1

      Why don't you move? Or try electricians as that's just as useful as plumbers and can't be shipped overseas either. (unless you want to work overseas)

      Good luck with the unions =)

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:If I could have I would have by davydagger · · Score: 1

      move where?

      how am I supposed to move to a new area where I don't know anyone, just to get a job with a union where again, I don't know anyone.

      and I still don't know where I'd move.

      Truth is since the recession hit getting a job in being either a plumber or an electrician has become really hard, because everyone has had the same idea, and everyone wants those jobs. I really don't blame them.

      Still waiting for the local IBEW to get back to me, its been 2 years. You basicly need to know someone. I don't know anyone.

  27. Art and Science by Gim+Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even 40+ years ago, when I got my BS in engineering, any sort of hands on experience was disappearing from the requirements. Even the lab instructors often didn't know how to use some of the instruments (Oscilloscopes, signal generators, etc.) or how to troubleshoot a circuit that wasn't doing what the design said it should.

    Engineering is really a combination of Art and Science and no one can learn to be an Artist from a book. Technology needs both and both are required to keep the modern world working. I am in awe and have utmost respect for a skilled craftsman/artisan and our world needs more of them.

    I am a third generation engineer, and many decades ago my Father often told me that I should be a plumber or an auto mechanic and there were many times during my working career that I realized just how right he probably was.

    1. Re:Art and Science by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 1

      You don't learn to use th equipment in the University course. Those are taught in the Technology courses at the Community College level.

      As far as the article goes, I strongly agree. I wen to a community college and studied electronic technology. I then went to work repairing copiers, faxes, and networked printers. Then, after over ten years of being a repairman, I got the stupid idea of moving up the ladder. i went back to college and got my BA, and eventually an MBA.

      The result is that I am, essentially, unemployed and unemployable. No one wants a repairman for a professional position and no one wants someone with a professional degree for a repairman. Faced with the choice between being a security guard or dishwasher in America (really the only offers I got after getting my MBA at a State University) or teaching in China, I chose teaching in China.

      I would have been better off 1. staying in copier repair; or, 2. becoming a truck driver. I suspect that when I return to the US I probably will become a truck driver.

  28. I am a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Plumbing has been very hard work. But the fact I can work anywhere in the country( and I have )it's quite liberating to just get up and leave.
    I literally have made quite a lot of money from plumbing and my service calls rival or exceed that if doctors or lawyers. It's actually a great trade but its tough.

    1. Re:I am a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As I already said, in a post right after yours, my wife is a doctor, she makes good money, but with Insurance Companies always screwing with your money and with the information on the internet about medical problems that her patience bring up, malpractice insurance, et all, it's a tough racket.
      I love plumbing.... compared to what my wife has to deal with, and the education levels, years in college, post grad, internship, weird sleeping hours, and general lack of respect from layman and administrators.

       

  29. As a plumber.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am a plumber, that's how I feed my Family and take trips to Europe, build a new home server (24 TB zfs ), and generally make as much as my doctor/wife.
    I don't see the downside to working with your hands, and seem to remember that the maker concept is fueling a new attitude to working building/creating/rigging stuff.
    It's a win-win.
    That and I really like being able to be an asshole if you piss me off, on a construction site it's a man's world.
    Try that shit in IT........

  30. for once I agree with nanny bloomberg by night_flyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    there has been too much of an emphasis in the last 10-20 years for EVERYONE to go to college, whether they were really qualified or not, that the technical trades have been neglected.

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:for once I agree with nanny bloomberg by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      many of the trades require more brains and training than typical college curriculum too

  31. Also known as ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... fontanero.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. from Someone living in NYC, thoughts on Bloomberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He means well, he realized everyone is not smart enough to think for themselves. He realized the masses have to be encouraged and herded. That is an elitest point of view and I agree with him.

    However he shouldn't start trying to make laws that prevent the adept from having a choice. His attitudes towards restriction (Tobacco, Salt, Large Sodas) infringe upon my freedom. That noted, he's not a bad guy, just don't be the piece of shit trying to force an ideology on someone.

  33. You might think your plumber makes big bucks by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This argument starts up every time somebody had to pay their plumber 80 bucks an hour to fix the toilet, their fility stinking filled with shit toilet. They then think the plumber doing a job they never ever want to do themselves, is rolling in it and the IT being their shit but piles of money.

    As if that 80 bucks is pure profit. Meanwhile the daddy plumber knows just how much of that costs goes to cover unpaid hours, taxes, insurance, tool costs etc etc. And he also knows how much Mr Doctor and Mr Lawyer charged him for his children's delivery and to deal with that frivolous lawsuit.

    So... what is he going to want for his kids? The same as himself in a world where just getting by is the same as being a loser OR to aim for the top?

    And don't for a second think that Bloomberg is interested in the fortunes of the public. He just wants more plumbers so he can pay less, same reason his kind wants immigrants to bust unions and high wages. Sure kids, all become plumbers and wave bye bye to 80 bucks as the competition sky rockets. And then you look longingly at IT graduates making high wages because nobody learned how to code anymore.

    Simple piece of advice for live: NEVER listen to a billionaire, they didn't get rich by looking out for other peoples interest.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And then you look longingly at IT graduates making high wages because nobody learned how to code anymore.

      That work is sent overseas.

      NEVER listen to a billionaire, they didn't get rich by looking out for other peoples interest.

      Agreed.

      Although, what happens these days is that middle class parents just think that college is the only way to go. Growing up in a blue collar family, my parents saw all the college boys get the big bucks, the office jobs, and were still working when the blue collar peasants were laid off - or the jobs were sent down South. That was the big bogyman in my childhood- jobs going down to the Southern States.

      Most people are under this impression that their kids can do better than they did. Those days are gone for most folks in the middle class. Living standards are going down for the bulk of us. While we have our cheap big screen TV for out reality shows, the important stuff like food, health care, education, energy is increasing while our wages are flat or declining. Much of that has to do with the billions of people who have become part of the international economy: globalization.

      The trend will continue and I don't see an end because we have over 7 billion people in this World with over a 150 million more being popped out every year.

      If your job is sitting behind a computer then it can be sent anywhere in the World for virtually no extra cost.

      Your plumbing cannot be fixed by a guy in Elbonia but your computer code can.

    2. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Since about the year 2000, approximately 30 million engineers and medical types flooded into the U.S.. Businesses routinely outsource administrative duties to other country's businesses, with those other businesses not accountable for their actions.

      There's only one other major industry left relatively untouched, the Trades. And Walmart is looking at it.

    3. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure Bloomberg wants everyone to become a plumber so he could lower his plumbing costs. That's the ticket.

      My brother used to work for Bloomberg the financial company as a programmer and he was getting paid a shitload of money for it right out of school. If Bloomberg was speaking purely in his own self interest, he would be telling everybody to be a programmer so he could lower those costs.

      Being a plumber is more secure than anything in IT. It's not a job that can be outsourced and it requires some training, so not anybody can do it right off the bat.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    4. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you read his comments? He was not saying that everybody becomes a plumber, but that those who are not as academically adept should. I think he is right. If you don't have the grades and you seek a higher education job then most likely you will get a crap job with a big loan, with bs money. However, you could become an awesome plumber and that work cannot be outsourced. It is not a bad idea IMO! The trades are rated too low in America. Guess where trade skills are rately highely? Oh yeah GERMANY! Guess which economy is doing really well? Oh yeah GERMANY...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    5. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Everybody charges $80 an hour. I was remarking to my co-workers about this. This is the reason why it's not economical to get a PC repaired anymore. You might as well just buy a new one if you don't know how to do the work yourself. The bike shop charges $80 an hour for labour, but luckily they will charge fractions of an hour, so a 15 minute job will only cost you $20. I do a lot of that kind of work myself also, but also realize that sometimes it's worth paying them when the alternative is to buy a tool I would use exactly once.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      No, it can't be outsourced, but it can be designed better such that

      A) It doesn't break so often
      B) It can be repaired without tools.

      This would really reduce the need for a large number of plumbers. The only ones who would be needed are those that can install large plumbing systems in new buildings. People don't have that many problems with plumbing in their own house. As long as you aren't stupid about trying to put things down the drain that shouldn't be there. Then again, many people don't even know how to use a plunger properly, which if they learned how could probably cut out a sizable percentage of work for a plumber.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by mariox19 · · Score: 1

      He was not saying that everybody becomes a plumber, but that those who are not as academically adept should.

      Perhaps those who aren't adept at, say, reading comprehension should.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    8. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Reading skills on Slashdot? You have got to be kidding!

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    9. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      ah, but your plumbing can be fixed by an Elbonian who has immigrated to your country.

      That said, many corporates are looking at increasing the number of H1B visas for this very reason - so they can keep the bosses in nice offices in the US, whilst still getting the cheap workers too.

    10. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the Bay Area (where many of the "rich engineers" in the US live) it's more like $100-120 an hour. And people pay it. Why? Because they are mostly *software* engineers and are scared shitless (possibly literally) of doing it themselves. Sure, the plumbers are not making as much as a doctor but they are making a solid middle class income in a part of the country where that can be pretty damn difficult without a degree.

      I'm not saying you don't have a point in there somewhere, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the number of high school grads considering med school vs. plumbing school is pretty near ZERO. Bloomberg specifically said he wasn't talking about the honors students who excelled in high school, he was talking about the poor students who were going to limp their way through community college with nothing much to show for it when they finished.

      And plumbing is just an example - though a fairly good one - of a career with fairly good compensation and excellent job security. There are plenty of other similar skilled trade jobs. But the key word there is *skilled* - it's the GOOD tradespeople making the good money, and it takes a lot of hard work and common sense to be good at these things.

    11. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Well... may be not everything a politician says should be interpreted so cynically.

    12. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by gutnor · · Score: 1

      You didn't listen to what he said, just what he told you to do.

      What he said is that he thinks the "IP" type work that require higher education are following manufacturing job outside the country and they are not coming back.

      Unlike the crowd on /. they have the mean to shape the world to their vision, so it is definitively worth listening to the guy and his friends.

    13. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by proto · · Score: 1

      This argument starts up every time somebody had to pay their plumber 80 bucks an hour to fix the toilet, their fility stinking filled with shit toilet. They then think the plumber doing a job they never ever want to do themselves, is rolling in it and the IT being their shit but piles of money.

      As if that 80 bucks is pure profit. Meanwhile the daddy plumber knows just how much of that costs goes to cover unpaid hours, taxes, insurance, tool costs etc etc. And he also knows how much Mr Doctor and Mr Lawyer charged him for his children's delivery and to deal with that frivolous lawsuit.

      So... what is he going to want for his kids? The same as himself in a world where just getting by is the same as being a loser OR to aim for the top?

      And don't for a second think that Bloomberg is interested in the fortunes of the public. He just wants more plumbers so he can pay less, same reason his kind wants immigrants to bust unions and high wages. Sure kids, all become plumbers and wave bye bye to 80 bucks as the competition sky rockets. And then you look longingly at IT graduates making high wages because nobody learned how to code anymore.

      Simple piece of advice for live: NEVER listen to a billionaire, they didn't get rich by looking out for other peoples interest.

      If I had mod points I would give it all to SmallFurryCreature (593017)

    14. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's the stupid special tools that kill me. They build things so that an adjustable wrench won't fit. You have to have an open-ended wrench with a 30degree bend at the head to get to that nut on the underside of whatever. I paid a plumber to change a sink faucet because it was cheaper than me doing it myself, because I'd have had to buy special tools I never needed before, and will never need again (unless I'm changing the same thing again). Rather than waste money colelcting useless tools, I just paid for someone to do what I could. It was more like a tool rental to me, but they came with a person to work the tools. That kind of crap bugs me. That, and in plumbing, it seems 50% of the time things are threaded the opposite way. Why? So that a hose won't loosen on one end when you tighten it on the other. But which is which is something you can't know without some training or a good guess. But then, one pedal on a bicycle is regular and the other opposite-thread, but that's so you won't pedal one out under use, so that's deducible if you know one's reversed. And someone who's worked as a bike mechanic would remember anyway, but without being a plumber, it's easy to not know such tricks until you've screwed up something to the point you did more damage than the cost of having a pro do it. Which is why it's almost always better to just call a plumber.

    15. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Either plumbers are cheap where you live or tools are very expensive.

      And have you thought what a sink/bath would have to be like to allow you to get a normal wrench to bear? A bezel a foot wide would look like arse and waste a lot of space to boot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then a socket set with a straight socket. Another common tool mostly useless for plumbing.

      Are you honestly saying that tools a regular person bought to, say, work on a car, would work for replacing a toilet or faucet?

    17. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, it can't be outsourced, but it can be designed better such that

      A) It doesn't break so often
      B) It can be repaired without tools.

      If it doesn't exist then invent it. You'll make a million dollars.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Then a socket set with a straight socket. Another common tool mostly useless for plumbing.

      Do you mean something like the thing for replacing spark plugs? It would be fine for attaching a faucet - if there was no pipe attached.

      Are you honestly saying that tools a regular person bought to, say, work on a car, would work for replacing a toilet or faucet?

      Did I write anything remotely like that?

      http://www.homedepot.com/p/BrassCraft-12-in-Steel-Basin-Wrench-T151/100006605#.UZmqOSJ9sYV

      Eleven bucks. A plumber's going to charge four times that for turning up.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Reminds me of an old joke by MLBs · · Score: 5, Funny

    A plumber goes to a doctor's house to fix a leak.
    He works for 15 minutes and then asks the doctor for $200
    The doctor says "I don't even make close to that!!"
    The plumber replies: "When I was a doctor, I didn't either"

  35. He's Right by nebular · · Score: 2

    The Trades have been overlooked as a viable career choice for quite awhile. And there's great money in it. My mechanic, being one of the few truly honest ones in the area, is turning business away he's so booked (Yes he is expanding to meet demand).

    The trouble with trades these days is you often get the bottom of the barrel guys without many other options available (One could say the same for police, but that's a whole other story). So your mechanics, plumbers, electricians often won't give a crap about the client and only the pay-cheque. When you find an honest trades person you are loyal to a fault and become their greatest advertisement.

    So yeah push those who might not the top of the heap academically but aren't the bottom by any means into trades.

  36. Plumbers can't be offshored by johnjaydk · · Score: 1

    The key question today is to chose a job that can't be offshored and pays a decent salary. Medicine is the sweet spot but the rest of us have to be creative.

    --
    TCAP-Abort
  37. What has become of /... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Over 100 posts and not a single Super Mario reference...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:What has become of /... by David_W · · Score: 1
  38. Bloomberg is simply being honest. by I_am_Jack · · Score: 3, Informative

    Being a plumber is the only reliable way of getting the benefits of trickle down from a plutocrat.

  39. But more felds do need a trade school setting or a by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    But more felds do need a trade school setting or at least more on the job trading.

    IT needs to move to more of a tech school / trade school setting and less college.

  40. It's a trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seek not the advice of successful people; they do not wish your company.

  41. Missed the boat by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    Here's where he misses the boat: Nobody should do a job they don't enjoy if it is avoidable.

    I'd much rather work for less money and enjoy my job than hate my job and have more money. This of course assumes both paths are fully available and that I don't have an enormous money problem.

    Jobs you enjoy lead to passion, and passionate work often leads to promotions, business opportunities, other interesting work, side projects, etc.

    I'm an engineer. I recently moved to a job where I get paid less and the cost of living is enormously higher. But I LOVE the work. And that, my friends, is priceless.

  42. need to move to a badges system. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    And the tech / trades schools need to freed from being part of the collgle system.

  43. Too bad by meglon · · Score: 2

    Too bad for the summary that "Joe the plumber" wasn't actually "Joe," but Sam; wasn't actually a plumber, but an apprentice plumber (not licensed); and at the time of the question that made him a conservative darling, was outright lying (the business wasn't up for sale, he couldn't have afforded it even if it was, nor could he have run it because he wasn't a plumber).

    All that aside, we should be reforming out high schools and advanced learning to be more similar to Germany, where people who want to pursue academic careers can get to college, and people who want to pursue vocational careers can get into technical schools. High school is where that really begins, where people start building interests that will stick with them for life.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  44. Re:Joe the Plumber wasn't a plumber by vovin · · Score: 2

    In most parts of the USA you have to be a master plumber (~5 yrs on the job and pass your exams) to be a licensed plumber.

  45. The trouble with being a plumber by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    The trouble with being a plumber is that most of the work is in building and remodeling. With housing construction way down, most of the people in the building trades are hurting. It's great during a building boom, though.

    A related trade is HVAC - heating, ventilating, and air conditioning. There's more electronics and control involved than in plumbing.

  46. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by bonehead · · Score: 2

    Yeah.... I do know those differences.

    You talk like someone who's been immersed in academia for too long.

    Had you spent some time in the real world, perhaps you would have learned why, in many cases, real world examples are the most accurate predictor of what your experience will be.

    Data and analysis are fine, right up to the point where they collide with reality. At that point, I'll take "anecdotal evidence" from someone who has been there and done it over predictions made by someone who knows a lot of fancy math any day of the week.

    And THAT is a piece of wisdom that they won't teach you in college. You only pick that one up after a few decades of actually dealing with reality and noticing how little the world cares about what the data, analysis, and models say should happen.

    Yes, you can go to college and become successful. What I'm saying is that it's not the college education that made you successful, as much as certain groups would like everyone to believe that. Success comes from skill. Either skill at a particular vocation, or skill at playing corporate politics. Neither of those skills can be mastered in a university setting, mastery comes from actually doing it in the real world.

  47. Re:Joe the Plumber wasn't a plumber by bonehead · · Score: 1

    I love it when liberals get butt hurt. They get SO catty.

    It's fun, isn't it? This probably makes me an asshole, but sometimes when I'm bored I provoke them just so I can sit back and laugh at their response....

  48. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can go to college and become successful. What I'm saying is that it's not the college education that made you successful, as much as certain groups would like everyone to believe that. Success comes from skill. Either skill at a particular vocation, or skill at playing corporate politics. Neither of those skills can be mastered in a university setting, mastery comes from actually doing it in the real world.

    Well I have spent quite some time in the 'real world' as you describe it (as if universities were not part of the real world). I think you should bear in mind that your experience involved a relaxed attitude to what was a fairly vocational course at a two-year business school, and yet you feel you can generalise your observations to make dismissive (and implicitly self-congratulatory) comments about tertiary education in general. There is a big difference between your experience and a rigorous academic degree course from one of the leading universities. If you think the benefits of university centre solely around networking opportunities and 'jump[ing] through hoops' perhaps that says more about your approach to education than about education itself.

  49. Bloomberg has a point by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    'Compare a plumber to going to Harvard College — being a plumber, actually for the average person, probably would be a better deal'

    Bloomberg has a point. For the longest time, and while the majority of the world was mired in poverty, the US, with its highest rate of HS graduates, was well equipped to be the predominant manufacturing/economic engine of the world. Now that world poverty has been cut in half, and with increased literacy rates world wide, stuff simply moved overseas.

    And the country, all of the sudden, had an emergency need to re-educate its masses. The solution? College!!!!

    We treat/treated college as if it were a silver bullet, while all this time we have been treating vocational education like a pariah concept, a joke. Part of a good solution would have included a revamping of vocational education at the HS and community college level. We need that, we desperately need that.

    So, Bloomberg is right. For many people, plumbing or any vocational skill set would be a much better deal. We have a shortage of vocational workers, and we have an excess of college graduates (many who graduate in degrees for which there is no economic demand.)

    So, it is not a matter of who is intelligent and who is not (having a STEM degree doesn't necessarily indicate practical intelligence, nor lacking one indicates stupidity.) It is a matter of economics, plain good old supply and demand.

    It is ridiculous to contemplate a nation with HS graduates and college graduates, and nothing in between. Alas, that's what we have been collectively aiming for the last 20 years, as if that is going to solve the challenges of globalization.

  50. Being a plumber is good honest work by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Unlike being an investment banker.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  51. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by bonehead · · Score: 2

    Based on your defensive posture, I can only draw two possible conclusions.

    1.) You are currently a student enrolled in one of those ridiculously priced "leading universities"
    or....
    2.) You are a professor who either works for one of them, or earned your degree there.

    After nearly 3 decades in this line of work, I have never met a coworker or colleague who considered their time in college to be anything other than a gigantic waste of huge sums of money. And that includes colleagues with Masters and Doctorates from "leading universities".

  52. From me to Bloomberg by houbou · · Score: 1

    Stop being a dumb old fart. You can be educated even when you are working a trade. Learn to express yourself correctly. More importantly, being a plumber or anything else does NOT mean lacking in education. And, further more, education is way much more than what you learn in any school. One has to wonder how he ever got to be Mayor of New York. Certainly wasn't because of education.

  53. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Based on your defensive posture, I can only draw two possible conclusions.

    1.) You are currently a student enrolled in one of those ridiculously priced "leading universities"
    or....
    2.) You are a professor who either works for one of them, or earned your degree there.

    After nearly 3 decades in this line of work, I have never met a coworker or colleague who considered their time in college to be anything other than a gigantic waste of huge sums of money. And that includes colleagues with Masters and Doctorates from "leading universities".

    Neither of those things are true. In fact, I'm not American, so my university course was not 'ridiculously priced' at all and did not involve 'huge sums of money'. Maybe your line of work doesn't benefit from anything you could learn on a degree course, and all the skills needed can be picked up by spending a few hundred bucks on books from Amazon.com. I'm sure there are plenty of software development jobs that meet that description. That doesn't mean that nobody benefits from university. Your excessive confidence in your conclusions about why people go to university, why people might defend university education or what people might gain from it are just based on wild generalisations from your experiences and those of the people immediately around you. It's an example of the limitations of 'anecdotal evidence'.

    As for 'defensive posture'... You didn't finish your degree and it just so happens that your considered position on universities is that they are worthless. At the first sign of criticism your assumption is that I must have a vested interest. Hmmm...

  54. Re:Know This... by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

    It's always better to be a Morlock than an Eloi.

    Also the Eloi are... mmm... deliciousss!

  55. Re:Not always! by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

    Plumbing used to be great in the UK £50-60K was possible. Then Europe opened up and Eastern Europeans started cutting into the wages considerably, it still pays better than the median wage, just a lot less than before.

    Damn! You stole all the good ones! I have to do all the plumbing and electric works in my house myself because all the "professionals" are full of shit (pun intended).

  56. Grads to Bloomberg by maxsthekat · · Score: 1

    Go fuck yourself.

  57. Re:from Someone living in NYC, thoughts on Bloombe by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    He means well, he realized everyone is not smart enough to think for themselves.

    Probably why he decided to make himself Mayor-for-Life, since not everyone is smart enough to select a well-meaning mayor.

  58. Yes, higher education is useless... by ndykman · · Score: 2

    That's a great plan for society. Leave knowledge to the elite; they are they only ones that can afford it. You don't learn anything useful in college, so why bother. Heck, high school is kind of pointless. Why not start a trade at sixteen, that's more money is your pocket. Why not fourteen? That's the ticket. Leave that higher education to those elite know-it-alls.

    We don't need to value teachers, educators at all; the internet will fix that with some YouTube videos. After all, you don't understand that stuff, so how can it possibly be worth anything? Let's be honest, not everyone can be educated. You know deep down that you aren't smart Best not to try.

    That's a world worth living in. Call it the New Dark Ages. College prices are a concern because they are pricing out people from becoming educated, from having choices. College is not the problem; the cost is. Cheaper loans, more grants and scholarships, more public support all need to be considered alongside cost controls. Sure, it's not for everyone, but it should be a choice for everyone. Everyone can benefit from a higher education, from learning. Smart has nothing to do with it.

    An uneducated populous is ripe for exploitation. History (one of those "useless" subjects) teaches us this. Look to the source of this advice, the value of controlling knowledge and the media in this age. Why bother thinking for yourself when you can have somebody do it for you?

    There is value in culture, in art, in science that goes beyond money. It is crazy that we are so focused on what it takes to survive these days, not thrive and grow. We don't have to embrace a gold-paved road to a new Dark Age. We can do better.

  59. Re:Joe the Plumber wasn't a plumber by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Actually, in most of the States we've worked in, the plumbing trade is licensed in stages. Baby plumbers get apprentice cards for four to eight thousand working hours, the hours are signed off on by the responsible Master plumber before State testing for a Journeyman license, and then a given number of work hours are required as a Journeyman to test at the State for a Master's license. Normally, there is but one Master per plumbing company, and he's generally not the fellow crawling under your sink. In fact, he's often the owner of the Plumbing Company. Various other licensing levels exist (tradesman, irrigation specialist, fire protection, water well, etc.) and each State has it's own Plumbing Board and unique licensing requirements.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  60. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by CycleMan · · Score: 1

    I think you should bear in mind that your experience involved a relaxed attitude to what was a fairly vocational course at a two-year business school, and yet you feel you can generalise your observations to make dismissive (and implicitly self-congratulatory) comments about tertiary education in general. There is a big difference between your experience and a rigorous academic degree course from one of the leading universities.

    Then I will speak as someone who graduated with honors with a rigorous academic degree from a US News & World Reports top-10 school. College is not a trade school; it is meant to teach you how to think, and to expose you to a lot of ideas. Most of the material in most of my classes has not mattered an inch in my years since graduation, and it doesn't need to, because if you know how to research, how to learn, and how to engage ideas, you can learn the fine details of the job as you go. The degree shows perseverance and is used to thin the stack of resumes in the HR department. But unless you're in a semi-trade-school major (engineering of the non-software type), don't expect to crack open your textbooks at the office.

  61. Obligatory Automotive Analogy by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Paying a licensed tradesman to work on your home is no more guarantee of proficiency than a driver's license is a guarantee to responsibly operate a motor vehicle. That said, the State is in the business of protecting citizens, often the most vulnerable, from unscrupulous contractors. Licensing and insurance requirements are two ways they attempt to do this. There are also issues involving public safety with some of the trades, particularly plumbing and electrical.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  62. Three things by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    3) Don't chew your fingernails.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  63. Yes: Money is the goal in life: Swim in the shit by tyrione · · Score: 1

    ...and refuse of your fellow waste expellers. There be gold in that crack. Thanks Bloomberg! We needed a report on what people have known for 50 years: Plumbers, Electricians and other Industrial Service industries jack up the consumer on their pricing.

    Wait for the mad rush into those careers. Perhaps we can get rid of a lot of incompetent IT staffers who rushed to the Dot.com era to make a quick buck and finally get back to quality solutions, products and services. I doubt it, but one can dream. Fortunately, the traditional hard sciences have real barriers to entry that a pretty face, a young eager and motivated stooge has to have: scientific accredited crudentials and brains to back it up. Any half-wit can learn to program. Very few are really excellent at it.

    Glad I did Mechanical Engineering before Computer Science.

  64. Re:Great! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Just like Mario and Luigi.

  65. Quite the Nixonian slipup by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    Ouch! And hey, like a lawyer, a plumber can always dabble in politics."

    Unfortunately it didnt go well the first time around, since the unstoppable leaks gave us Watergate.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  66. This after insisting the USA needs more H1Bs by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    After insisting, for years, that the US needs more H1Bs, because of a desperate shortage of trained Americans. Bloomberg now recommends that Americans become plumbers, to avoid offshore competition.

  67. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    If you needed college to teach you those things then you were an idiot and probably still are. So the whole "it teaches you how to learn" idea is highly overrated. If anything, it's really nothing more than an excuse that University staff can use to ignore you and make you fend for yourself.

    You should already know how to think before you even apply to college and things like research and exposure to diverse ideas are things that you can totally do on your own. It was this way even before web and is even more true now.

    Universities have lost touch with their Renaissance roots. Too many people are drinking the kool-aid and believing their own propaganda.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  68. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 1

    Data mining is overrated for anything more than exploratory analyses though. If your data collection process is so canned that you can accumulate the troves of data necessary for mining, you can't really make much more than the most general of statements. This is why I am besieged by ads in Norweigan on a daily basis. I have a vague interest in foreign cultures, yes, but do I care much for Norway? Not really (it's not a bad place; I'm just ambivalent about it).

  69. Re:Had you gone to a real College... by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 1

    This isn't to decry data mining completely- it did, after all, uncover my interest in foreign cultures. But not in quite the right way... I feel like the advertising that is informed by data mining is like that party guest that no one invited. He seems like he belongs, he could be fun but there's still something a bit off and nobody really knows where he came from.

  70. Highest paid persons UK circa 200AD to 1750AD by eionmac · · Score: 1

    Referring to the post from idle tank/septic tank cleaner this job cleaning the night privies and disposal was the highest paid job in UK circa 200AD to 1750AD outside 'politics' (Crown /diplomats court layers etc). The families concerned laid off cash as loans to aspiring politicians. Muck pays. Just make sure you have an other 'job' for status e.g. church lay officer / treasurer etc

    --
    Regards Eion MacDonald
  71. Fixing cars by pne · · Score: 1

    The real problem is that kids aren't given the suggestion to look at trades these days, they got the same spiel that we were getting in the 80's and 90's, that going into technology is the way to go. But everyone needs someone to lay and fit pipe, fix their car, and so on.

    Unfortunately, to fix someone's car these days, you need to get into technology as well :(

    It used to be that you could fix a car or a television set if you were a reasonable tech.

    But now it's all electronic and you basically swap the entire component (logic board, control device, what have you) - and you essentially need the diagnostic equipment from the original manufacturer to plug into the on-board circuit to read out the fault codes.

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    1. Re:Fixing cars by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, to fix someone's car these days, you need to get into technology as well :(

      Actually you don't. You need to have a basic understanding of how to read wiring diagrams, and flow charts. When I first started my apprenticeship they were just starting the big push into "electronic everything" as it were. Shop manuals make it pretty easy to diagnose most problem, anything else it usually falls to a wiring harness issue. And that happens a hell of a lot more often then people think.

      And who needs to buy the equipment from the OEM? When I was down at my buddy's garage his snap-on code reader supported 2014 models, with the appropriate modules. What problem a lot of garages have is not having anyone specialized in purely electronic issues, and there are quite a few small shops that specialize just in that who get called in to deal with those.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Fixing cars by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, to fix someone's car these days, you need to get into technology as well :(

      Just comfortable enough to use a computer. You're not installing an OS, compiling kernels, or other crap. Just as long as you poke the right keys on the keyboard for it to do what you want.

      If the diagnostic machine breaks - you don't fix it - it could be a seriously expensive piece of kit - you call the service technician to fix it (who may be you, the IT worker). And they generally know if your kit is broken they need to fix it pronto because if it breaks too often, you may not buy it again, or doesn't make money, or other issue. Especially since it's not "on the clock" and no money can be made while it's broken.

  72. I'll come in again by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    College is valuable (potentially) in only 3 ways

    There's a 4th...

    An almost fanatical devotion to the pope?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  73. One Other Benefit by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    He forgot to mention one other benefit. If you become skilled enough as a plumber, you may get selected to perform in your union's annual holiday production, The Buttcracker Suite.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  74. I've thought of it. by hateflyy · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I have thought of doing this. I don't see anything wrong with it either. Although plumbers might have those times where it's an extra dirty job. Makes you wonder if the extra pay is worth it though, lol.

  75. They don't look in fron either! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    i want to see new stuff, like the latest on facebook & twitter.

    FTFY,

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."