Slashdot Mirror


Are Booth Babes Going Away? (Video)

Michael Steinhart, Editor in Chief of The Enterprise Cloud Site, went to this year's New York Cloud Expo, and saw only one booth with beguiling, scantily-dressed females trying to attract people to their employers' display. But Michael says one booth with babes was one more than last year, when the same show had no booth babes at all. So we wondered: Are booth babes going away? And if they are, is it because of political consciousness or tight budgets? Since Michael has put more time than we have into thinking about these questions, we fired up our webcam and had a little conversation with him about the future of booth babes at IT conferences and trade shows.

334 comments

  1. Babes may not be what's wanted... by cianduffy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Based on the IT industry here (Ireland) at least, there's been a huge increase in the number of gay men in IT, or out gay men at least. Not much use in having a booth babe if the guy buying the product doesn't like boobs.

    1. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      still the percentage of gay IT dudes has to be somewhere between 5 and 15 percent. so it seems to me the reasonable solution would be having "booth babes" and "booth beefcakes" at least.

    2. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Applekid · · Score: 2

      Based on the IT industry here (Ireland) at least, there's been a huge increase in the number of gay men in IT, or out gay men at least. Not much use in having a booth babe if the guy buying the product doesn't like boobs.

      I've never met a gay man that didn't like boobs. He may not want to have sex with the person they're attached to, but I wouldn't necessarily call that a dislike.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by crakbone · · Score: 1

      I would have to second that. I have a buxom friend that most gay men have to at least comment or try to squeeze her breasts all the time.

    4. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe a booth model who is 85% female and 15% male?

    5. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny way of getting around their ineptitude with women.

    6. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > still the percentage of gay IT dudes has to be somewhere between 5 and 15 percent. so it seems to me the reasonable
      > solution would be having "booth babes" and "booth beefcakes" at least.

      That reminds me of COMDEX in 1999. The vendors from Taiwan all had women in thongs humping beige mini-tower cases, mice, and cheap keyboards. Sony & Microsoft (plus a few others) clearly did their demographic homework... I swear to god, THEIR booths looked like they had a bidding war to hire every publicly-presentable gay porn star west of the Mississippi. Oh, they had plenty of blondes with big boobs, too... but I'd put the boob-to-beef beef ratio at dead-near 50/50.

      The population as a whole might only be 3-10% gay, but it's not a huge exaggeration to say that the percentage of gay guys involved with computers is AT LEAST double the percentage in the general population.

      As for aspie geek guys not getting laid... that only applies to straight ones. Thanks to apps like Grindr (and several dozen others as of last count), finding a cute guy to have sex with for an hour or two (before getting back to videogames, programming, engineering projects, or whatever you're normally into) takes about as much time and effort as ordering a pizza online from Dominos.

      Extroverted non-geek gay guys are always bitching about apps like Grindr, because it means the rest of us don't have to waste the whole night pretending to be social at a bar somewhere just so we can have sex for 47 minutes. When we DO go out to bars, we get a drink, find somewhere to hang out, and start iterating through all the guys within 800 feet who meet the minimum requirements and look interesting ;-)

    7. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      15% of 180 lbs. = 25 lbs. that's one heavy schlong.

    8. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicks with NICs.

    9. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No such animal. The problem is that political correctors are now demanding that the rest of us play ball with those who have fetishes and think that their 'gender' is whatever they feel like at a given moment. Those who are actually physically deformed are a vanishingly small percentage of the population.

    10. Re:Babes may not be what's wanted... by SanitaryFather · · Score: 1

      I thought all Irish IT guys were gay... http://theitcrowd.wikia.com/wiki/The_Work_Outing

  2. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, the only people who really give two craps about booth babes are a) hypersensitive gender warriors and b) tech writers on a slow news day.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget c) Feminists coming fresh out of college, thinking that they're the first person to ever bring the issue up.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Spritzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget c) Feminists coming fresh out of college, thinking that they're the first person to ever bring the issue up.

      See a

    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I prefer fat chicks in bikinis.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was covered by "a) hypersensitive gender warriors".

    5. Re:Who cares? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      C)*

      *who don't protest the degrading objectification of women in much of the porn industry.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0

      Political correctness, is killing all the blatant misogynistic pandering for profit in life for straight guys.

      Honestly, I want good games out of the damned games industry, not pandering to an imagined infantile version of myself. The fact that the industry appeals to the lowest common denominator and goes for unrelated sex appeal isn't "the fun things" in life. It's intellectually insulting.

    7. Re:Who cares? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Think of an egg with two rubber bands around it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Who cares? by Applekid · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that the only reason why those feminists graduated college is because they led suckers like you on so you'd do their homework and papers for them. As if women could do math on their own, ha.

      They got a degree. You got the blue-balls while they had sex with me. Believe it or not, they enjoy being dominated by men they consider worthy.

      Anonymous Coward is a bit of an counterpoint to a Worthy Dominator, wouldn't you say?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    9. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Next thing you know, you won't be able to get all the good seats in the front of the bus without the negroes getting all uppity about it. Check your privilege.

      Does this phrase ever work? All it ever seems to do is turn a debate personal.

    10. Re:Who cares? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You graduated college a _long_ time ago.

      They removed all math from liberal arts programs decades ago. It was hetero-normative or something.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:Who cares? by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Okay, someone needs to make a game titled "Hypersensitive Gender Warrior."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    12. Re:Who cares? by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, you won't be able to get all the good seats in the front of the bus without the negroes getting all uppity about it. Check your privilege.

      0754, why?

    13. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it pisses the hell out of me for two entirely different reasons:
      a) Because the only pretty girls around are the ones who're paid to stand there. I find it degrading to be part of a crowd that needs to pay for that.
      b) Because this promotes bimbos instead of encouraging young women to become useful individuals. And it bothers me because there's real dearth of girls worth meeting.

    14. Re:Who cares? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Since when?
      You do know that they have not closed the strip clubs right?

    15. Re:Who cares? by Quila · · Score: 1

      c) Local college girls who are out of a great source of income if the booth babe practice ends

    16. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your sense of humor.

    17. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is that not what it's supposed to do?

    18. Re:Who cares? by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Interesting

      well the people complaining about them aren't into the tech or what the booths are about anyways - or what the show is about. but with games, if you have babes and hunks _in_ the games why not at the booth. so people who had nothing to say about the shows just degenerated to writing about boobs because boobs sell. I mean, this video. it's a fucking(not literally) expo and what do we get? some analyzing about fucking(again) props - that's actually totally irrelevant because NYC isn't exactly the boob-babe capital of the world - but it gave this guy an excuse for his video. I mean, writing about the boobs if they're at the show and then when there aren't many boobboobbooobs then writing about how there wasn't boobs. I mean, what the fuck, is it the XXX expo or Hooters he went to -what about all the tech?

      This one time.. and I've been to trade shows just handful of times.. there were body painted topless women at the industry show. with tickets at 1000+ euros a pop to the show, that's one expensive body paint show.

      nobody ever mentioned them in any press(that I saw) and it was the biggest tradeshow of mobile industry that year. no scandal, no nothing.

      plenty of stories about the tech that was on display though, and there were some techies at a few booths relevant to what was my niche field in mobile during that time too. however usually the point with companies doing these dance shows with babes etc at these things is just to show that they have money. when the money is down the showing off goes down - and the booth babes are just a tiny portion of the budget these companies have for these things, the floorspace itself can be extremely expensive and the parties they throw even more so - so if they're using the floorspace strictly for advertisement type pr then sure, they're going to hire boothbabes - it's either that or hire booth-dimwits. the babes win every time, at least they don't try to talk to you about shit they don't know anything about in a fashion like they knew, they don't try to bullshit you by a script.

      because the techies and execs usually have better things to do at the industry gathering if their business is going good enough for them to be able to afford the floorspace and booth babes. if you were filming an advertisement, would you hire ugly dimwits? fuck no. now smaller, newer, companies usually don't have boothbabes because they can't afford them and might even have relevant techies at the booth - now that's much better. but hired pr guys who clearly no have no idea at all and have been hired only for the show are the worst, you could just as well pick up the brochure and walk away.

      but at the usual pricing to these events, if you go there for boobs and not to reno(or whatever, reperbahn what have you) you're a fucking dimwit. you could hire your own nude model for the evening for the usual pricing.

      (boobs were covered a little bit on the second day though so I guess it was actually going too far even by spanish standards)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    19. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the "Unshorn Sisters of the Acopolypse" from an old Bloom County strip

    20. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booth babes probably care. A lot of them can't get "real" modeling jobs and it is a good part time job for them.

    21. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well the people complaining about them aren't into the tech or what the booths are about anyways

      Bullshit. I complain about them. You can't really be more into tech than I am -- it's my career. I, for one, am disgusted by the sexism prevalent in my field. And I can only imagine how much worse it'd be if I was female.

      - or what the show is about. but with games, if you have babes and hunks _in_ the games why not at the booth.

      Why not remove the grotesque sexist pandering from both the games and the booths?

      so people who had nothing to say about the shows just degenerated to writing about boobs because boobs sell.

      HURR HURR FEMINISM IS JUST ATTENTION SEEKING

      (snip of giant rant about how it's only logical to hire boothbabes if you're hiring anybody at all)

      You are really terrible.

    22. Re:Who cares? by bbcisdabomb · · Score: 1

      You're missing the only group who actually care about booth babes: 14-year-old males.

      --
      Please put some pants on before you post again.
    23. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'm really bothered that this post of mine got modded up, and another that doesn't appear to accidentally endorse sexism got modded down. I'd have a much higher opinion of /. moderators if both got modded down. Then at lease the cause would appear to be me, and not the fact that I don't think of women as pieces of meat.

      I hate internet communities so damned much. I don't like "check your privilege" because it takes focus away from the sexism itself, but it's seemingly pretty damn apparent that that's not what's important about the people who agree with me.

      Ugh. I'm filled with such a visceral loathing I don't have the words to describe it.

    24. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the proponents of the phrase are to be believed, it's supposed to highlight that the disagreement in question contains implicit assumptions that invalidate it.

      All it actually does is give an obvious point of disagreement that feels intensely personal, and, in the end, drags down the debate.

    25. Re:Who cares? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Well this Robin Miller guy says they make him sick, so perhaps they can trigger milk allergies.

    26. Re:Who cares? by DrGamez · · Score: 2

      I care because having shit sold to me by the way of sex-appeal just means you think of me like an idiot who is unable to not think with my dick for a few hours at a time. I'd rather not do business with a company that thinks I'm unable to turn off the lizard brain for a bit.

    27. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am against the institutionalized objectification of women, but I am for women having the option to present themselves as objects, if that's what they want to do. If she takes a job as a model or porn star, it's not sexist to see her as an object; she's packaged herself that way, and she should be allowed to. It's only sexist to assume that all women are objects merely because of their sex.

    28. Re:Who cares? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I'm filled with such a visceral loathing I don't have the words to describe it.

      Check your privilege. If the "visceral loathing" box is checked, then go crazy with it. Else you need to stop doing that.

    29. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a real double standard against computer nerds and inherent bias against them.

      When pop vulture parades around women in next to nothing and sells sex, the women are hailed as being "strong women". Think I'm lying, find me a person who thinks Britney Spears has musical talent.

      Someone else needs to check their privledge.

      captcha: matrix

    30. Re:Who cares? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Maybe things would get better if 'girls worth meeting' weren't solely contained within the sub set of 'pretty girls'. Women can be judged on more than just their appearance. If you are wanting them to make that assessment about you guys, maybe turnabout is fair play.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or pop culture football, etc....

      Heck, there are more rapes from football players than nerds, but you won't see them make a peep. in fact they defend women who stick with their rapist boyfriends.

      your after nerds because they look like easy targets, low social standing and full of self hatred.

      Does anyone know what this stops? When you start standing your ground, refuse to allow yourself to be pushed around, by anyone. When you convince everyone to stand united. Its been happening more recently, and I am starting to get real proud of the nerds in general.

      Take a lesson in life from punk rock, and how they still exist.

    32. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know, you won't be able to get all the good seats in the front of the bus without the negroes getting all uppity about it. Check your privilege.

      Yeah, exactly. Because in exactly the same way there was a law in the books which said that all blacks must get up and move to the back of the bus when a white passenger was present, there's a law that forces attractive women to dress scantily clad and serve as booth babes.

      Comparisons such as your are extremely offensive to people who are actually being oppressed. Booth babes are not only paid for standing there dressed like that, they saw the opening for the job, and voluntarily filled out an application. If we're going to make the analogy, it's like a black person taking the bus, having the option to either sit in the front or in the back, and choosing to sit in the back. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and it happens every day.

    33. Re:Who cares? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      What does that even mean?

    34. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the few comments on the internet that has made me truly laugh out loud in a long time. Bravo, I wish I had mod points or could remember my login.

    35. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I go to a convention related either to tech or gaming I expect to get information.

      If there is a booth babe and she have a basic understanding of the product she is marketing, then fine. Otherwise she is just a time-wasting obstacle that serves no other purpose than to piss off sensitive people.

      If I want to look at naked ladies there are better places.

    36. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably doesn't. Partly because if the person in question had the faculties to actually "check their privilege", they probably would have done it already. And partly because it makes the speaker sound like a condescending asshole. Which they probably are, even if they're right.

    37. Re:Who cares? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So your answer to accusations of misogyny is to dismiss women as irrational, stupid or unimportant. I think you just defeated your own argument.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:Who cares? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Women can be judged on more than just their appearance.

      Not from afar too easily. Problem with this method is you have to get to know them before you can decide whether you want to get to know them. Judging a book by its cover isn't the best way to do things, but if all you have is a cover its still better than nothing.

      If you are wanting them to make that assessment about you guys, maybe turnabout is fair play.

      Pretty sure they do. Judging by first appearances isn't a trait limited to the spear half of our species as far as I know. It might not be as obvious thanks to various social norms but I'd be very suspicious of any claims that say its not happening without some serious research to back up the claim that women somehow override (or don't have) the instinct in a way that men are incapable of.

    39. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they have. In Iceland, strip clubs are now illegal. They're working on banning pornography altogether.

    40. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moralizing new-puritan spotted.

      Nobody forces these boot-babes to do the work.
      Nobody forces anyone to look at or interact with them.

      Only moralists wishes to force their views on others, so they can be saved from the same perverted, dirty wishes/fantasies the puritan have him/herself.

    41. Re:Who cares? by ultranova · · Score: 1
      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    42. Re:Who cares? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      So your answer to accusations of misogyny is to dismiss women as irrational, stupid or unimportant. I think you just defeated your own argument.

      If the accusations are irrational, stupid or unimportant, the accusers should rightfully be dismissed as irrational, stupid or unimportant.

      I find myself in a world where every accusation of sexism must automatically be escalated to in-depth investigation, regardless of the primacie facie evidence (or lack thereof)...

      Dear God, I would like to file a bug report...

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    43. Re:Who cares? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      well the people complaining about them aren't into the tech or what the booths are about anyways

      Bullshit. I complain about them. You can't really be more into tech than I am -- it's my career. I, for one, am disgusted by the sexism prevalent in my field. And I can only imagine how much worse it'd be if I was female.

      Perhaps your mating strategy of grovelling before the collective body of women on the planet in a public and humiliating manner works for you - I certainly don't know how, but lets say it does ... the ugly fact is that dominant and powerful men are the most desirable to the majority of women. Grovelers like yourself are attractive to only a very small minority. A few facts you perhaps aren't aware of:

      1. You aren't disgusted - you're trying to impress women, and since you don't have any power or influence, you're try to be the kind of guy they say they want (who they won't stay with anyway - when they get the kind of guy they say they want they realise they don't find that kind attractive at all.)

      You practically are already female; you just don't have the balls to snip your balls.

      (And no, I don't want to hear your story about some women who happens to be an outlier - the majority (two sigmas within median) of men and women fit the profiles I typed above. Besides, who cares what the outliers want in a partner as long as they get it?)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    44. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Since when?
      You do know that they have not closed the strip clubs right?

      I'm sorry. Since when are strip clubs fun?

      I hate strip clubs. Does anyone seriously enjoy going into a loud, uncomfortable environment to pay gobs of money to be teased by naked chicks and leave frustrated?

      Oh please, sign me up.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    45. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, you won't be able to get all the good seats in the front of the bus without the negroes getting all uppity about it. Check your privilege.

      Does this phrase ever work? All it ever seems to do is turn a debate personal.

      Heh. You know, I've been reading so much Leftist claptrap on facebook over the last few years that I don't even notice that type of phrase anymore.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    46. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      What does that even mean?

      "Check your privilege" means "I have lost this debate, but I can't admit that you are smarter than me so I am going to attack you personally."

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    47. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I'm going to explain something I don't particularly believe in. Be aware of the potential bias that incorporates.

      Privilege theory describes racial bias as a frequently unconscious problem driven by statistics and unspoken assumptions. It says that most(some? I dunno) of the remaining obstacles for true equality between races/sexes/LGBT/oppressed people are implicit rather than explicit. The most commonly cited example is that your hiring manager for a middle class job is something like 90% likely to be white and 75% likely to be male(those are not the correct statistics, I'm explaining the concept, not validating it), and so that gives white males an implicitly higher chance of getting the job due to natural familiarity. That core concept of naturally accepted white/male/straight as a default is called "privilege". "Check your privilege" is a statement intended to get people to be introspective about the white/male/straight assumptions they might have made in what they're saying.

      I'm pretty sure if you googled it, you'd find people who could explain better. Regardless, I don't buy that everyone raising objections does so from a privileged perspective, and the assumption that they did is not helpful to anyone.

    48. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Maybe things would get better if 'girls worth meeting' weren't solely contained within the sub set of 'pretty girls'.

      Guys are more than happy to meet girls who are not pretty, but we're not going to attempt a romantic relationship with someone that we don't find attractive. Every girl I've ever asked out or hooked up with I've found attractive on some level.

      Good news is that there is no single standard for "attractive". Sure, we have "conventional attractiveness", but most people aren't really constrained by that. By way of example, there are men who are most attracted to extremely fat women. They call them Big Beautiful Women (or BBW, for short). To me, they look totally unhealthy, like they could have a heart attack at any moment (I like strong, athletic women), but different people like different things. So there is no reason for anyone to feel like a pariah due to not being conventionally attractive.

      If you are wanting them to make that assessment about you guys, maybe turnabout is fair play.

      Oh, please.

      You know what? I'm glad that our society has finally decided to ditch this idiotic charade that women don't care about men's looks, that they are attracted to deeper qualities because they are so much more mature and enlightened.

      So you can just admit the truth at this point.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    49. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I don't consider the idea of privilege, itself "claptrap"; it's just the throw-away phrase "check your privilege" that is basically just noise.

    50. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      What does that even mean?

      "Check your privilege" means "I have lost this debate, but I can't admit that you are smarter than me so I am going to attack you personally."

      Cause if there's one thing this debate needs, it's another strawman argument. Thanks for pointing out how horribly stupid those people you don't like are.

    51. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      What does that even mean?

      "Check your privilege" means "I have lost this debate, but I can't admit that you are smarter than me so I am going to attack you personally."

      Cause if there's one thing this debate needs, it's another strawman argument. Thanks for pointing out how horribly stupid those people you don't like are.

      I'm sorry, but are you proposing an alternative definition? Because as far as I can tell, my definition is correct.

      When people lob substanceless platitudes like "check your privilege", they have no intention of raising a valid argument and instead want to impeach their opponent's credibility. Did the original "check your privilege" poster offer any substantive argument? Not as I remember.

      I'm allowed to point this out without it being a strawman argument.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    52. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I don't consider the idea of privilege, itself "claptrap"; it's just the throw-away phrase "check your privilege" that is basically just noise.

      I apologize if my sentence was unclear, but I consider the facebook rants to be claptrap.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    53. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      If you'll recall this thread, I raised an objection to using the phrase, for exactly the reason that it does one's argument no favors. That doesn't mean I consider the people using it to expect it to shut down all debate and make them autowin through credibility smashing. It's perfectly legitimate for people to be bothered by the fact that in their discussions with someone, they just start making assumptions about what life is like for members of whatever minority group is being targeted.

      The fact that they lash out with a phrase that is not very helpful doesn't make the rest of what they're saying wrong.

    54. Re:Who cares? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I know plenty of liberals who are wrong all the time. I'm happy they managed to stumble their way into a few good opinions. I understand what you mean.

    55. Re:Who cares? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean I consider the people using it to expect it to shut down all debate and make them autowin through credibility smashing.

      Well, let's test your theory. Here's how the discussion in this thread progressed:

      cayenne8: Political correctness, is killing all the fun things in life for straight guys.
      Rude Turnip: Next thing you know, you won't be able to get all the good seats in the front of the bus without the negroes getting all uppity about it. Check your privilege.

      Perhaps there is a valid point hidden in Rude Turnip's bile, but he certainly couldn't be bothered to state it explicitly. Instead, he not-so-implicitly called cayenne8 a racist, sexist, white male. He followed that by writing "Check your privilege" which communicates that cayenne8 isn't allowed to have a view or comment anymore because he is too clueless to participate.

      So yes, I think that your description of "shut down all debate and make them autowin through credibility smashing" applies 100%. Do you see it differently? Do you think that Rude Turnip was trying to engage in honest discourse here?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    56. Re:Who cares? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the only people who really give two craps about booth babes are a) hypersensitive gender warriors and b) tech writers on a slow news day.

      c) Female geeks at tech conferences.

      To anyone still wondering why there's so few women in IT I'd like to offer this thread as evidence.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    57. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And heterosexual men.

  3. I'm confused. by BenFenner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This year the expo had more booth babes than last year, which raises the question "Are Booth Babes going away?".

    Say what now?

    1. Re:I'm confused. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I join you in your confusion.

      There actually is some backlash against booth babes, but this is evidence of the opposite.

      I'm guessing that the editor started with one thought, and skipped over to a completely different train of thought in the middle of writing that summary. And that's why you're supposed to proofread what you post.

    2. Re:I'm confused. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

      Say what now?

      That was my initial thought, as well. Upon reflection, however, I suspected that he had modeled the probability of any given booth coming equipped with a booth babe as $ I = I_0\epsilon{-kt}. $ For large $t,$ and assuming $k>0,$ we shouldn't be surprised to find that any given flock of booths have fewer than two equipped booths. That being the case, discovering that $I(t+1)>I(t)$ for some $t$ is insufficient to invalidate the model.

      ~Loyal

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    3. Re:I'm confused. by Richard+M+Stalman · · Score: 1

      The thing to understand is that computer nerds generally don't have actual genital-to-genital sexual experiences. The so-called "booth babe" is there to provide mental stimulation for masturbation.

    4. Re:I'm confused. by Richard+M+Stalman · · Score: 1

      And right now, I have to pay a visit to the Men's Room.

    5. Re:I'm confused. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      This year the expo had more booth babes than last year, which raises the question "Are Booth Babes going away?".

      Say what now?

      Exactly. What I got out of this was that booth babes are returning. I see this as a sign that the economy is improving.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:I'm confused. by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      We played a game with the photos of the booth babes from E3, which we called "staff or actress?" Female employees of the company wearing costumes were usually pretty easy to tell - they didn't have model perfect figures, although they were usually fit and attractive AND looked like they could hold their own in a conversation regarding the product in question. The actresses, too, were easy to tell. Did their thighs under the shorty shorts touch? Was their hair bleach blonde and down in loose waves? Did they have on twenty layers of makeup? Did they look bored out of their skulls beneath the costume? Yep, it's a booth babe.

      I think the booth babe phenomenon isn't dying, I think it's evolving.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  4. Not anymore, possible resurgence thanks to Conan by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Booth Babes in general seemed to be on the decline. However after Conan 'O Brian brings the practice new respect, they may be on the rise again...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. Is this the best you can do Michael? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Thank you captain obvious.

  6. Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did booth babes become sexist? And why is some man with chin ripples wider than his head and - what the fuck - kittens in the background trying to tell me about people taking pride in their bodies?

    Go to hell puritans, you know you'll be happier there.

    1. Re:Eh by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      They probably became sexist about the time that they're trying to sell video games with unrelated tits. Not that I care if they want to do that, but I'd say that if you wanted to meet an example of "blatantly using sex to sell unrelated stuff," this would be one of those times.

      So, yeah, if you're selling the latest hentai-based video game, they're right on topic. When you are selling Call of Duty? Not so much.

    2. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah looks to me like admiral neckbeard is advertising his eligibility as an Enlightened Male in some sort of slow, fucked up peacock dance, complete with bingo wings a'flap. Going to have to do better than that if you want the love, jabba.

    3. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably the best post Slashdot has had in at least 6 months. It's the most honest, if nothing else.

    4. Re:Eh by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, that was pretty funny. Hilariously inaccurate, but funny.

  7. really, does anyone care? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They will probably be a fixture at car shows for all time, and in Korean gadget reveals, but they seem so out of place at a software conference.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:really, does anyone care? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      They will probably be a fixture at car shows for all time, and in Korean gadget reveals, but they seem so out of place at a software conference.

      Yup; the real question is, what will the next generation of Booth Babes be whoring themselves out for?

      Here's hoping for pull-start prosthetics, a la Space Truckers

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:really, does anyone care? by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Speaking of "out of place", they are very much NOT going away at oil industry trade shows. Skimpy bikinis, formal gowns, power suits, they're all there and they all want to sell you heavy machinery. It's almost comical.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    3. Re:really, does anyone care? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not sure I agree. There's always room for booth babes.

      ...ok did I say that out loud? Anyway, the market will decide. If booths with a couple of local models on deck do better business than booths without, they'd be crazy not to do it. On the other hand, if booth babes are neutral or a liability, they'll (eventually) disappear.

      The last trade show I worked, (which was some time ago) the large company with whom I was employed at the time hired two local talent (show was in las vegas) to accompany us during the show. They didn't dress overly provocatively (safari getup, in keeping with the booth theme, no excessive cleavage or leg showing) and they did a good job managing the crowd, making sure we weren't overwhelmed, and taking prospective customer information. Don't get me wrong, they were drop dead gorgeous, but they also knew what they were doing and helped out a lot. "Booth Babe" is a somewhat disparaging term for what can be a difficult job. It's not all about standing in the aisle and doing the "vanna wave" towards the booth.

      During a rare slow moment I got to talk to one of the girls, and asked her if she was an employee of our company. (There being a group in the company tasked with handling logistics for these shows, and I at first thought she might be with that group.) She looked shocked, and said no, she was from a local agency, and makes most of her living working booths at trade shows. (Which explains why she was good at it.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:really, does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had to work at some conferences years ago. When it wasn't busy those girls took care of us, getting us hydrated and something to eat. This is rather important since you will be standing for 10-14 hours on such a day, and talking will also get you dehydrated rather quickly, and you forget to drink and eat.

      Even more important one of the girls thought me how to stand up, so that your legs and feet tolerate standing for such a long time. Most people have their weight back, straight above their heels and balance on them, while you should have your weight distributed equally over your whole foot.

    5. Re:really, does anyone care? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I had to work at some conferences years ago. When it wasn't busy those girls took care of us, getting us hydrated and something to eat. This is rather important since you will be standing for 10-14 hours on such a day, and talking will also get you dehydrated rather quickly, and you forget to drink and eat.

      Even more important one of the girls thought me how to stand up, so that your legs and feet tolerate standing for such a long time. Most people have their weight back, straight above their heels and balance on them, while you should have your weight distributed equally over your whole foot.

      Good points. Yes, and your knees slightly bent.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:really, does anyone care? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      They will probably be a fixture at car shows for all time, and in Korean gadget reveals, but they seem so out of place at a software conference.

      To be fair, this was a cloud expo, not a software conference, and they had 7000 attendees and 104 vendors, 37 of which paid the bucks for the larger booth in order to be counted a sponsor. It's definitely not a CES or an E3, and clouds hardly shout "sexy technology!" from the rooftops. Google I/O and Apple's WWDC are both significantly more impressive conferences, and they intentionally cap at 5,500 and 5000, respectively. I'm guessing this cloud expo didn't sell out in literally seconds.

      To put this in perspective, the old UniForum conference did double that attendee count in 1997, and fielded about double the vendor sales staff because they had about double the vendors.

    7. Re:really, does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for a startup that hired a couple of women for a gig like you mention. The industry term for this role is "trade show model." There are agencies for staffing trade show models, but our CEO hired off of Craigslist. (There were plenty of ads that advertised for this role specifically and included resumes that listed previous trade show experience.)

      Hiring trade show models made a lot of sense for our situations, actually. At the time, the company only had five employees, and there was no way they could all fly out to just stand around a booth for a week. The two models and I stood at the booth and answered questions while the CEO spent most of his time meeting with potential partners.

  8. Not really sexist, just good psychology by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even women are more likely to want to talk to a well-dressed, attractive woman than the pushy marketdroid or worse, the obese engineer wearing a t-shirt and ripped jeans who smells like he hasn't bathed in a week. It's not just about appearance; it's also about appearance. Know what I mean?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      But I wouldn't be surprised if straight women and gay men are more likely to talk to well-dressed attractive men than well-dressed attractive women, which is the real question here. Well that and whether somebody should be making purchasing decisions based on whether the booth person is hot.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      1. I'm not obese {5ft 11in, 170lb}
      2. I haven't worn ripped jeans since the 80s
      3. I shower daily.

      However a booth babe would probably still attract more attention than a scrawny nerd.

    3. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      the obese engineer wearing a t-shirt and ripped jeans who smells like he hasn't bathed in a week.

      Yeah, but this dude is going to know where the best Taco joint is. That convention food sucks!

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    4. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been to a show? The women in scanty clothing are there to bring you over, they know almost nothing about the products and will have you wait for the rep if you have questions.

      It's also worth mentioning that they are people too, and may accept offers to meet for a drink when they change over. You'll be damn lucky to get a proper date though!

    5. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Having been to numerous expos & conferences - "well dressed" does not describe most "booth babes" I've ever seen.

      While they're usually at least reasonably attractive if you're into women, they DO seem out of place at IT conferences. What relevance, exactly, does a girl in a bikini have to data storage & dedupe appliances, switches, and cloud services?

    6. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the reason for attractive females (or even males) is because it works. Hence why so many of the sales people for whatever industry are charismatic and attractive.

      I went to a (somewhat) nearby Ford dealer 2 years ago to start buying a car. I pretty much decided which one I wanted and the specs, I was just seeing how this dealer compared to the other Ford nearby since both were rated well for their repairs/maintenance/etc.

      I walk in there are 2 guys and 1 sales woman; the women was a dream. She was hotter than most of the TV actresses out there that are known for their looks: she was bordering on model-class. She was dressed classy but still incredibly gorgeous. I heard her say she'd just come back from break and found out she was the only sales person free at the moment.

      I LEFT.

      Why? Because she was at the level that, I'm sorry to say, I wouldn't be thinking 100% clearly. I'm not saying she would have talked me into buying the most expensive car or anything sitcom-oriented, but chances I wouldn't have held my own as much as I should have. Had she been just been your average looking girl I wouldn't have cared.

      So I left; ultimately bought the car from a 55yo guy at the other Ford and got a good deal.

    7. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      "Well dressed" doesn't really describe booth babes. Actually, "dressed" doesn't really describe booth babes.

    8. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "As you can tell by our booth babes. Our software is designed to be barely there. No overhead. It's also mostly open source so you get to see everything."

    9. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the obese engineer wearing a t-shirt and ripped jeans who smells like he hasn't bathed in a week.

      What does Richard Stallman have to do do with any of this?

    10. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised. For better or worse, a pretty woman is often seen as less threatening and more approachable than the stereotypical salesperson or "sales engineer" (booth geek) by all genders and sexual orientations. Not just straight men.

      But it depends on the context. For instance, if the woman is wearing something appropriate for a trade show, or is merely there to show a lot of skin. Also how she carries herself -- is she really there to help, or merely there as eye candy.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    11. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "Well dressed" doesn't really describe booth babes. Actually, "dressed" doesn't really describe booth babes.

      Sometimes true, but it depends on the booth.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    12. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a chick ticking 1, 2, and 3... I'd hit it.

    13. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're so hard up that you feel that you'll lose control over when making a major purchase because of the looks of the sales person? Sorry dude but buying the expensive booze when the bartender is hot is one thing, spending thousands of dollars more when you already decided on a car is another. It makes you look like you have some kind of problem.

    14. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to one convention which was about marketing, they actually served food which was expensive, but probably not as good as what we, the grunts, were getting. The TV construction crew had their own catering firm and everyone working on the convention was allowed to take from that catering, it was pure magic, the best lasagne I have ever had.

      I've eaten at many restaurants, even a few with Michelin stars, none won't even compare with the quality of that lasagna.

      In full disclosure; my taste may have been a bit biased since I had been setting up our booth, moving computers around, at the conference for 5 hours.

    15. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I realize it's not exactly the same thing, but I remember this showing up in the news a few years ago. Women prefer female voices too:

      http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/21/tech/innovation/female-computer-voices

      (yes, as the article mentions, in the U.K., Siri has a male voice.. and iOS 7 will have new voices and user choice of the gender of the voice.)

    16. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      So you're so hard up that you feel that you'll lose control over when making a major purchase because of the looks of the sales person? Sorry dude but buying the expensive booze when the bartender is hot is one thing, spending thousands of dollars more when you already decided on a car is another. It makes you look like you have some kind of problem.

      No, they sound like the same thing, except in quantity of "extra money" spent.

    17. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      My definition of well dressed and what booth babes are typically attired in do not overlap in any well designed venn diagram.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    18. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except in quantity of "extra money" spent.
       
      Exactly! Perspective by virtue of proportion. I know keeping things in proportion isn't a popular concept around here but it should be.
       
      Or are you one of those hard ass ideologues who doesn't have a clue how stupid he sounds when he raves like a retard about minor issues?
       
      That's fine. I'll continue to live in the real world while you suffer like a bitch.

    19. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      well, if he had bought it from her, he would've taken money out of the pocket of that 55yo male salesman at the other dealer. How is that any better? While I think he lacks a bit of self control if a woman as described could affect his judgment to such a degree, at least he had the self awareness to realize the situation and back out of it. Most people have neither the former or the latter.

    20. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how wrong you are. I you did, you'd be a woman..

    21. Re:Not really sexist, just good psychology by billstewart · · Score: 1

      Last time I bought a car there was one sales woman who was really attractive, but much more importantly she could talk about engines. Unfortunately for her, I didn't like the way the car handled (and next year's engine was going to be better, but I needed a car right then.) The dealer across the street had another car I was considering, basic fast-talking stereotype car sales guy, and while they didn't have the one I wanted in stock (they were trickling in randomly to dealers at that time of year), he gave me a price. Unfortunately for them, the next week when the one I wanted came in, the manager tried to jack up the price $500; I bought it from a different dealer.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  9. NOOOOOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (cries to heavens in crane shot)

  10. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a gay guy, women who pretend...

    Except that women aren't gay guys. Or did you intend to use a different syntactic construct?

    (Also, if I'm a non-gay guy, does that mean that men who pretend to have any sort of self worth by prettying themselves up are worthless whores?)

  11. T-Shirts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In what world is a full coverage t-shirt "scantily-dressed"?

    1. Re:T-Shirts? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      In what world is a full coverage t-shirt "scantily-dressed"?

      When it's wet?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:T-Shirts? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      When you're $100k in debt with only a degree in Women's Studies to show for it.

    3. Re:T-Shirts? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      When you're $100k in debt with only a degree in Women's Studies to show for it.

      Nod. And in that case, what makes her "scantily dressed" is not what she's actually wearing, but that she's there at all.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  12. Re:Not anymore, possible resurgence thanks to Cona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, good luck boothbabing Call of Duty.

  13. I resent them by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I resent that some business is attempting to grab me by the balls rather than by my rational self.

    1. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce,

      The fact that you are a homosexual probably has a lot to do with how you respond to the ladies. But Bruce, some of us still masturbate to liberally licensed thoughts and images of FEMALES.

      - Richard

    2. Re:I resent them by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I resent that some business is attempting to grab me by the balls

      I resent that they're not!

      Someone's gotta mind the ol' stepchildren...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a seething cauldron of resentment then, since everyone does it.

    4. Re:I resent them by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that people who already regularly get pussy don't need to take charity from corporations in order to have a nice pair of tits in their face?

      Yes, that's exactly right.

      I appreciate a pretty woman (and, fortunately, am married to one), but I'd rather not have that appreciation manipulated for someone else's commercial gain.

    5. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK, just tell them you don't care for what they're offering and send them my way. I'll take care of them for you.

    6. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I appreciate a pretty woman (and, fortunately, am married to one)

      lol I've seen your wife, congrats on being a white knight and saying the BS online

    7. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lols, keep telling yourself that. if you don't have sexual urges every time you see tits you are clearly going through the motions with said pussy.

    8. Re:I resent them by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      sad news, Bruce, actually that's why we the open source fans have had you as our spokesperson for all these years, you handsome studmuffin you. I mean, just look at Stallman and all those other neckbearded slobs, who are they going to win over? no one, that's who.

    9. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a colossal beta male it isn't funny.

    10. Re:I resent them by rs79 · · Score: 1

      I remember the BSD daemonette. I guess I don't mind having my balls grabbed as much as you do Bruce.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    11. Re:I resent them by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you might have been confused as the Bondage, Sadism and Domination expo was in the next hall over

    12. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know who you are, Bruce, so we know you don't have a rational self.

    13. Re:I resent them by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. If they had a product, they wouldn't need sex to sell it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:I resent them by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Get some self control? Even the amount a typical 14yo boy would have would be sufficient.

    15. Re:I resent them by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I resent that some business is attempting to grab me by the balls

      You are right - that's taking work away from the TSA!

    16. Re:I resent them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      My balls resent my brain interfering with their primary business.

    17. Re:I resent them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Have you considered testosterone replacement therapy?

      Here is a concise explanation for the curious:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-afMybGWGsE
       

    18. Re:I resent them by aeoo · · Score: 1

      LOL, anonalpha.

    19. Re:I resent them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I resent that some business is attempting to grab me by the balls rather than by my rational self.

      You're just joking, right? The mere presence of a good-looking woman will draw you to a booth and cause you to listen to a bullshit sales-pitch for something that you otherwise wouldn't give a flying fuck about? That's all that it will take? Really? Then, you're pussy-whipped, my man.

  14. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got it you want worthless man-whores.

  15. Darn it, I was hoping for videos of booth babes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darn it, I was hoping for videos of booth babes!

  16. One less reason to go to Expos by manoweb · · Score: 3

    Many times those events are not even that informative!

    1. Re:One less reason to go to Expos by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. The better question is, "Are pointless, expensive marketing booth conventions which provide middle management a convenient excuse to get shitfaced and hook up out of town going away?"

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  17. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And those "studs" wound't be men who pretend to have any sort of self worth by prettying themselves up and are thus worthless whores?

    Just because you're a protected class doesn't give you license for hypocrisy or crappy logic.

    haha capcha redwood.

  18. No. They just dress more conservatively. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at a recent tech conference and the booth babes were not the ones from Comdex of yesteryear in bikinis. They were hired women who were very attractive but were wearing acceptable clothing. Mostly business casual, slacks and a button down blouse.

    IT folks they were not, pretty faces yes. As someone has to scan your badge or hand out a trinket.

    1. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the question. If you meet one of these women in the elevator and happen to remember which booth she was working, would you feel confident that you could ask her a question about that company/product and get an informative answer? If yes, they're not booth babes, they're marketing people who happen to be attractive (which certainly helps their career, don't get me wrong). The problem isn't attractive women manning the booths, the problem is when the women are there solely to be attractive (in a very literal sense).

    2. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      The more knowledgeable they are about the product the more they are going to lie to you. I suggest hula hoops instead.

    3. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      For some reason I find well dressed business looking women more attractive than the same girl in say a bikini. Not that I don't like bikinis!

    4. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      There are more roles in booth work than merely technical. In my experience, the babes (wish there was a better term) were there to manage the crowd, take business cards, hand out literature, funnel people to the sales crew in the right order, and keep them occupied until we were ready to talk to them. These tasks don't require knowledge of the product, they require knowledge of how to handle a crowd.

      If you ask a booth babe a technical question, you should get something like "I can take you to someone who can answer that for you". ...which is in her job description.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, the more someone knows about the product, the less they lie about it. Engineers are usually dead-honest, technical marketers are pretty honest, and everything from there is hit-or-miss, or just downright fabrication.

    6. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by oursland · · Score: 1

      You're being rather sexist. You assume that the women you spoke to are hired booth workers, but my experience (having worked the booths, myself has been that the attractive, professionally dressed woman is actually the technically competent person is sales and marketing for the company. Times have changed, women can have real jobs, too!

      BTW, IT folks don't work the booths. Booths and shows are for establishing contact with potential businesses. They're where the meeting and greeting, and the wheeling and dealing of business takes place. The people the booths want are the C-levels and the VPs who can bring in contracts; not Joe User who is wasting their time asking whether or not this widget is backwards compatible with their DB9 system from 1983.

    7. Re:No. They just dress more conservatively. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bikinis are appropriate for the beach, among other places... Not for a professional trade show.

      I mean, it's one thing I suppose at CES or E3, given that your trying to get coverage from the wider media, and bikini babes are great for that. But for a trade show like this one? Sorry, I don't really want to go to the Microsoft, VMWare, or Cisco booths and see a bunch of bikini clad chicks at a trade show like this.

      It should be noted that the girls in the OP weren't in bikini's, at least not in the picture shown. But it still doesn't seem appropriate for this event.

  19. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about both?.. :D

  20. It's About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The whole presence of scantily-clad women as a way of attracting attention to your booth assumes that the people whose attention you want to attract are heterosexual males who are inclined to pay attention to your exhibit because there's a scantily-clad woman there. It implicitly assumes that you're not trying to get the interest of/don't care about the opinions of, among others: women, homosexual men, the devoutly religious, etc. In the same way that an ad campaign that includes a of, say, racist caricatures of Asians effectively writes off the Asian population as potential customers (at the very least), this sort of thing writes off whole groups of people who are, you know, actually present in the tech industry. Funny how an industry that supposedly prides itself on evaluating results and actual ability so often tacitly assumes that it is the exclusive domain of straight, white males. It's almost as if cluelessly ignoring the reality of privilege, racism, sexism, and heteronormativity leads to cluelessly privileged, racist, sexist, heteronormative behavior.

    1. Re:It's About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well put but I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Just as much as any atypical black male thinks he has what it takes to be a rap star there are even more atypical white males that think they can manage a software company. It seems there are common goals in mind like flashy cars and scantily clad women. People get in where they fit in. Much of what people are saying here sounds as equally ridiculous as, "I went to this Hip-Hop video shoot and the women there were mostly dressed in slacks and button down shirts. Since Hip-Hop has hit the mainstream its good to see this. People need to sell more albums by relating to a more realistic image." In the minds of these software execs they are Lil' Wayne (or John Mcafee) so their ridiculous dreams will never die and neither will hired booth professionals that make them look like a Las Vegas pimp. It has nothing to do with how we all perceive them they know the image they are portraying this has more to do with vanity, ego, and pride than anything else. Money don't sleep so software can't rest Intel and AMD is their hardware address uuuhhhh!!

    2. Re:It's About Time by arisboch · · Score: 1

      Gooodness, if the "others" are such crybabies like you, then nobody needs anyways. Everything they'll do is not buy games, but probably pester the people there into censoring the games (less sex, gore and stuff) like some PC Taliban. Or start a fight, cause during a fight scene in a mosque was hit.

  21. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL!!! Booth Studs -- Guys who pretend to have any self worth by "prettying" themselves up are worthless whores.
    One man's treasure is another man's junk,
    How funny "a gay guy" is -- and hypocritically missing the point.

  22. Re:Not anymore, possible resurgence thanks to Cona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    DO NOT clicky on the linky unless you get your kicks seeing Conan 'O Brian in fishnets and a really tight package. Jesus. Christ. Shit. My eyes.

  23. Marketing by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Booth babes are pretty.

    Pretty is attractive.

    Attractive is good marketing.

    Its not just about sex. Its about hiring some attractive people to represent your company. Because your engineers are probably unshaved smelly cave dwellers that probably don't make a good impression at conventions. So how do you make your engineer or software developer seem credible? Put a 21 year old aspiring model next to him that smiles and makes eyes at everyone that gets near the booth.

    Is it dumb? No more dumb then the people buying your products. Which isn't an insult against them... people are just like that. Get over it. We're not robots. We're semi intelligent social opportunistic primates. And even women like having attractive women around.

    Open a women's magazine. What do you see? Is it lots of half naked men? Nope... half naked women.

    As to getting the attention of gay men... All respect, but they're by definition a minority. Were they not the species itself would be in some trouble. So while it might make some sense to reach out to any demographic, the reality is that its probably a marginal issue at best.

    All of that said, possibly there is something to be said for not having such aggressive marketing at conventions. Rather, put your unshaved cave dweller out there sans smiling boobs... and just see what happens.

    It will either be fine or it won't. And we'll learn something either way.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Marketing by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With respect, I'm no feminist, but the question here isn't whether sex is effective at selling. It certainly is. The question is the residual effects of using women's bodies in that way. Does it contribute to certain attitudes that could be negative for women?

      I'm not really going to go farther down that path, because again, I begin rolling my eyes as some of the more insane feminist bullshit out there, but like any good thing, I wonder if using sex in that manner can have negative consequences, if done outside of moderation.

    2. Re:Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its not just about sex. Its about hiring some attractive people to represent your company.

      It's about exploiting basic instinct of your customer base to improve your bottom line. Not exactly a trustworthy sign in my book.
      And if you have a scantly-dressed airhead "representing" your company - that's exactly how much competence I'll allot you.

    3. Re:Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Feminism is more varied than the insane bullshit. If you're asking these questions, well, you might just be a feminist. You know, moderately.

    4. Re:Marketing by swb · · Score: 1

      Any time women decide they don't want to leverage their appearance they are welcome to stop doing it, but I suspect that there are several truisms that will make this unlikely.

      1) The benefit is short term, while the negative is long term. In that situation, most people give in to the short-term benefit and ignore the long-term consequences (smoking, drinking, drugs, etc).

      2) Women, I think, are inherently image-conscious (reproductive advantages) and usually it takes a repressive, male-dominated religious movement to suppress this. It's not something they do on their own.

      3) Contemporary cultural values -- despite how much simpler it would be as a woman to have a plain, shorter haircut, not wear makeup and not wear a lot of clumsy girl clothes (pantyhose, high heels, elaborate undergarments), most women do not want to be a "tomboy". In fact, I think most women do not dress to consciously appeal to men but instead to out-compete with other women.

      You can blame men for objectifying women with porno mags and videos, but nobody's putting a gun to women's heads to make them read Glamour, Cosmopolitan or other magazines that "tell" women how to behave. It's a self-imposed system, not something men tell them.

    5. Re:Marketing by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      As a woman, it's friday at down here and for work today I am wearing dark jeans, high top sneakers, a Dr Who T-shirt, I had short (though coloured) hair and am wearing no make up. I don't consider myself a tom boy and get flirted with plenty. I'm also on the cuddly side as far as size goes.

      Not all of us buy into the whole "I must out-glamour my sisters-in -arms or I am a failure as a woman" concept. I also don't read women's magazines unless I forget to take a book when waiting in dentist or doctor's offices, and I don't watch commercial TV.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    6. Re:Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because your engineers are probably unshaved smelly cave dwellers that probably don't make a good impression at conventions.

      You know, this statement is just as fictitious as the bimbo booth babe airhead sentiment that's floating around. I don't know a trade show where a single person with a clue brings out the "unshav(en) smelly cave dwellers" to seal the deal. Stop building straw men, and maybe we can get to the bottom of the real argument.

    7. Re:Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The question is the residual effects of using women's bodies in that way. Does it contribute to certain attitudes that could be negative for women?

      That's not the question. Attitudes per se are not a general public good. The question is why you believe anyone would have the right to suppress individual people and firms from the population at large to achieve arbitrary macro goals with respect to subjective preference.

    8. Re:Marketing by Raenex · · Score: 2

      As a woman, it's friday at down here and for work today I am wearing dark jeans, high top sneakers, a Dr Who T-shirt, I had short (though coloured) hair and am wearing no make up. I don't consider myself a tom boy and get flirted with plenty. I'm also on the cuddly side as far as size goes.

      And you're also reading and commenting on Slashdot. In other words, you're not the typical woman.

    9. Re:Marketing by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      We're human beings. We're going to use sex to sell. We've been doing it for tens of thousands of years. Best get over that.

      Think only women's bodies are used? Men's bodies are used as well. And not just men's bodies but the masculine mystique. The whole tough guy, macho man... thing. And do you see men complain about that even though its easily as exploitive of male psychology as female swimsuit issue? No.

      Because men understand that's just reality. Women like it. And men therefore want to be it. It gains them status in our primate monkey society and since we're social creatures we like status.

      This might sound sexist... but a price women must pay for equality with men is not playing the victim all the time.

      Sitting at the big boy table means you don't cry and you don't whine. You take what is yours and deal with what you cannot change without getting dramatic about it.

      You will be sexualized. We do see you as sexual objects. Hey, its how my ape brain sees you. I could for the sake of political correctness pretend otherwise which is all any man does that claims otherwise. But in the back of his mind the ape will maintain that judgment and he really doesn't give an f'ing damn what anyone else thinks about that. Its evolution baby. Deal with it.

      All you will accomplish by demanding the impossible will be to get people to lie to you skillfully and wrap you in a fantasy.

      Why do that to yourself? Accept what is going to happen and make the best of it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Marketing by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The dr who t-shirt comment made me laugh. There are probably more men wearing dresses and high heels right now then women wearing dr who t-shirts.

      No really.

      Actually think about that in the context of gender relations.

      I'd go into this deeper but it gets complicated.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re:Marketing by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      We're semi intelligent

      Then fully intelligent being is?

    12. Re:Marketing by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Whatever you are, it's the minority. You're an outlier. I've no idea why you even replied with that comment about being opposite to the norm - how does it make you feel?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    13. Re:Marketing by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      While there are many misogynist myths about women that have a basis in truth, I find it highly unlikely that women exist as a single, collective, shared intelligence, as would be required to accept the logic above. That's assuming you didn't make the mistake of believing the GP was claiming that while women-as-sex-objects might cause long term harm to women generally, it would only cause harm to women who themselves engage in such marketing and no other women.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:Marketing by swb · · Score: 1

      Women don't exist as a single, collective shared intelligence, and that's not required to accept my logic, either. I'm describing the broader behavior of the entire group, not predicting the behavior of any specific woman.

      I could describe the behavior of a flock of birds and never describe the behavior of the sparrow in your yard, but it doesn't mean that the flocks of sparrows don't exhibit the behavior I've described.

      It's funny how people want to reject demonstrably believable, if not factually true, group descriptions because they are not perfect predictors of any single individual or don't explain the behavior of an outlier (in this case, the Dr. Who t-shirt wearing poster above).

      The overwhelming statistical reality is that women ARE image conscious and as a group actively seek to enhance their appearance and leverage it for benefit (social, reproductive, mate-seeking, professional even). The magazines, the clothing lines, the people you meet on the street reinforce this time and again.

      It does not mean that *some* women don't reject this for all kinds of reasons -- belonging to a religious group, being a lesbian, lack of social integration, or other specific internal variables not understood.

    15. Re:Marketing by arisboch · · Score: 1

      "Airhead"? You sure about that? Or is it jealousy speaking?

    16. Re:Marketing by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Oh, forget relativity... Just pointing out we're not perfectly rational.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  24. incremental effect and biology by RichMan · · Score: 2

    Men are men. Our attention is drawn to curves. We can act respectful, but can't deny biology.

    "But Michael says one booth with babes was one more than last year"

    If everyone has booth babes then the incremental effect of one company adding booth babes is about ZERO. You can be at booth A and still see B, C, D, E ....
    If no one has booth babes then the incremental effect of one company adding booth babes is significant.

    1. Re:incremental effect and biology by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      If no one has booth babes then the incremental effect of one company adding booth babes is significant.

      Perhaps, but one booth is still only one booth. Its significance to me would be more likely to be shown if that booth had them next year, and then one or two more exhibitors joined them.

      One booth at the beginning of a trend is groundbreaking. One booth of something that never gets any traction is just some doofus who brought girls in tight clothes and got nothing out of it. In other words, the value of being that one booth only has historical value.

    2. Re:incremental effect and biology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are men. Our attention is drawn to curves. We can act respectful, but can't deny biology.

      That sounds like a successful booth should have a toilet stall you are not actually supposed to use. Biology accounts for only so much: orang-utans are not going to close business deals.

      The most important thing for me is that booth personnel is polite, professional, and knowledgeable. In a former company of mine, we had a business major serving as assistant to the directorate who also did sideline modeling.

      Pure marketing gold, but nobody in his right mind would have expected her to run around in a state of half-undress. That's just unprofessional and stupid. Actually, the (male) marketing director she was usually doing trade shows with could also pass as eye-candy.

      It's probably unfair that smart business dress/suits are designed so much more eye-friendly for female wearers but that's still a far cry from boothbabishness.

  25. Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most geeks learned early on that babes aren't interested. The more attractive a female was, the more likely she was to snub any geeks that approached.

    So, geeks associate hotness with unattainability (and, in some cases cruelty), and as such their feminine wiles don't have the same effect as they might on a grown-up football player.

    Geeks respond better to fellow geeks with a common cultural background and a solid technical understanding of whatever is being advertised.

    The market is simply adjusting to what actually works for this demographic.

    1. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The thing is, booth babes aren't there for geeks, they're there for non-geek distributors who are salesmen that probably had a much better relationship with hot girls in school.

      That point aside, I think you underestimate how male geeks can be, despite the possibly bad experiences they have had with attractive women. Put enough boobs in the room and even the bitterest of male, heterosexual geeks is going to notice a lot more than they might even let on.

      Of course, the world is nothing like it used to be. Geeks used to be outcasts, and now attractive girls whose greatest technological achievement is working their Twitter account and watching Anime regularly call themselves "nerds". You can still be an outcast as a geek, but being a geek no longer makes you an outcast by definition.

    2. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, geeks associate hotness with unattainability

      As a geek, I've always associated hotness (which is almost always partly synthetic) with misplaced priorities.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...attractive girls whose greatest technological achievement is working their Twitter account and watching Anime regularly call themselves "nerds". You can still be an outcast as a geek, but being a geek no longer makes you an outcast by definition.

      Attractive women can call themselves anything they like. Men will still want to fuck them.

    4. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, which makes the point even more telling. Girls don't need to adopt a trend to get laid, so if they are doing something like that, they are legitimately enamored with the "nerd"/"geek" label of their own accord. In other words, being a geek doesn't strongly imply virginity any more.

    5. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Richard+M+Stalman · · Score: 4, Funny

      I disagree. My sex life - such that it is - revolved entirely around females I meet at conferences and shows. I have certain expectations in that I can not actually have genital-on-genital sex, and instead require stimulation via mammary-genital contact, thus I require large breasted females.

    6. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      being a geek doesn't strongly imply virginity any more.

      One step further - most of the geeks I grew up with and went to college with (and a great number of the older geeks here at work) have some sort of active recreation or gym regimen and are now dating or married to intelligent and beautiful women. I'd say that except for the most introverted of the subtype, geeks really do end up on top.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    7. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      well if this misplacing of priorities was all consciously done and pointless then you would be right. For girls and for men - being pretty brings rewards like higher salary and other measures of success. I find it unjust but that is the world we live in. I am also like this: I come to help a nice lady with her luggage much faster than an old crumpy man. So the priorities would not be misplaced even for your. Unless of course we talk about the overdone, shallow and in this quite superficial care of one's own looks.

    8. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      +1 good troll, would read again!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    9. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Richard+M+Stalman · · Score: 0

      Well, I certainly don't mean to be rude, but may I cum on your face?

    10. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I come to help a nice lady with her luggage much faster than an old crumpy man.

      I'm not sure if "crumpy" means "physically decrepit" or something else, but if the former, you're just being cruel.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Are these really geeks though? I know the terms are changing, but it should still mean more than technologically skilled or a collector of gadgets. A geek should be someone who is socially inept, or does not care at all that people are laughing and will wear glasses that are taped anyway. Sure many geeks are not introverted but what makes them geeks anyway is that their extroversion is not considered cool (trying to show everyone in the school cafeteria the new graphic calculator). Ie the word "geek" comes from side show performers where the audience were expected to be grossed out or squicked, and there is some vestige of that which needs to remain.

      Geek doesn't even have to be technology related. Any sort of strange culturally unacceptable obsession would suffice. A model train geek,
      an anime geek, a civil war reenactment geek, etc.

    12. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a geek, I've always associated properly placed priorities with hotness. Beauty pagent contestants? Not hot at all. Jeri Ellsworth, Amy Mainzer, or Bettany Hughes, now that's hot.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Oh, my! Amen to all three, brother.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I'll just leave this here. It's come in handy in the past, and does much to clear up the nerd/geek/dork debates.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You help the nice lady with her luggage because of evolution. Subconsciously, you think she might "do it" with you, thus (until modern birth control) furthering your DNA.

      Helping the old dude helps no one (so to speak).

    16. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a geek, I've always associated hotness (which is almost always partly synthetic) with misplaced priorities.

      I agree. If I spent as much time as they do on looking good, I'd be attractive. If they spent as much time learning tech I have, they'd be a tech like me. Personally, I think all this talk of sexism and crap doesn't actually take their (Booth Babes and the like) side into consideration. They actually want to be paid to look good, they like spending the time to look good, and if we outlaw the Booth Babe, then they will have no work and the generally prettiness of the women of the world would decline and that would suck. I say, let there be Booth Babes, so girls have a money earning reason to look good.

    17. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself, my wife's a pageant winner; maybe not nationally, but still more than most of the booth babes.

    18. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also like this: I come to help a nice lady with her luggage much faster than an old crumpy man.

      knowing this, you should do extra effort to ignore the self absorbed bitches and help everyone else in priority. They call that affirmative actions and bitches hate it when it doesn't go their way.

    19. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a geek, I've always associated hotness (which is almost always partly synthetic) with misplaced priorities.

      You mean you never give hotness the priority it deserves?

    20. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Geeks rule the world. Literally.

      Extremely rich guys rule the world. Geeks do tend to get some money, but very little power.

      And one more thing: statistically, going from zero one year to one the next is actually an increase of infinity %. That hardly seems "going away" to me.

      Statistically, there aren't enough samples to conclude that going from 0 to 1 is growth.

    21. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah.. let me know in Z+10 years when she's divorced you and taken most of your paycheck with her..

    22. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Geeks do tend to get some money, but very little power."

      Hahahahahahaha!

      "Statistically, there aren't enough samples to conclude that going from 0 to 1 is growth."

      I didn't say it was showing growth. My point was that it isn't an INDICATION that they were "going away".

    23. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So, geeks associate hotness with unattainability

      Which makes them even more hot which makes them even more unattainable which makes them even more hot which makes them even more unattainable which makes them even more hot which makes them even more unattainable which culminates in, well, jizz.

    24. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by icebraining · · Score: 2

      Nobody actually wants to outlaw them, though. If tech conferences don't have them anymore, it was their choice (even if possibly influenced by criticism).

    25. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The point being....?

      There is no need for them, how does this sell product? You walked over to the booth to check out the babe, you didn't walk over to check out the product (technically you could call the babe product as well ;() ) ANd after you walk over and she is trying to sell you on something, what do most guys or gay women think "wow what I would or could do with her" and as she is talking you are fantasizing what those things are.

      Now the person who likes good looking half naked women will notice her, but people that go to these conventions will be interested in the product, so again no reason for them. The same at car/boat/gun shows, having half naked women is great but your there to look or buy something, probably worse at those shows because dudes think they are attractive and hardcore because they like cars/boats/guns, and the chick must really like them from the way she is glancing at him, (really she could careless, she is eying the crowd).

      The comments I have read seem to be from people that question there own sexual preference, and they seem to be trying to prove something about there sexuality. Have had a hard time trying to get with a women they find "attractive", and or they do but find out she is a headcase. Shit man that is every women I ever went out with, but that is just bad luck, or like my grandfather said welcome to life, do not ever get married..

    26. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      The thing is, booth babes aren't there for geeks, they're there for non-geek distributors who are salesmen that probably had a much better relationship with hot girls in school.

      Those guys often ended up in shitty marriages with kids by the time they were 19. The ones that didn't get cheap thrills by talking to booth babes while looking at their cleavage, wishing their wives had it. It's pretty lame.

      The hot girls are often not that interested in the guys they go out with. They use their looks as a means to get what they want, and when it comes to relationships just go through the motions to keep the boyfriend happy. I'm sure some are really nice people but a lot just see men as something to exploit, which is ironic because that's how many men see them too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      None of the definitions are very clear.

      But, yeah, dork is strictly a social term.
      Nerd is mostly about obsession in a, to the common man, uninteresting thing.
      Geek is a usually about the same.

      But those definitions would be fine to me.

    28. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Most geeks learned early on that babes aren't interested. The more attractive a female was, the more likely she was to snub any geeks that approached.

      My personal experience contradicts this completely. I'm a geek back from when being a geek actually meant something. In other words, I learned to program on an Apple ][ back when it was state of the art and carried it through college and on to my career.

      Anyway, in high school, I made the novel decision to ignore the fact that I was a completely awkward little dork and start talking to hot chicks. Just cleared my throat, took a deep breath, and did it. And how did that turn out? Well, I dated 2 cheerleaders, a triathlete, a leggy blonde-haired blue-eyed (and seriously annoying) band geek, a ski racer, and a few other chicks who weren't really all that hot.

      Seems chicks read geeks' being scared of them as their being aloof and elitist and they react poorly to being looked down upon (or at least perceiving that they are being looked down upon). Who knew?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    29. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Anyway, in high school, I made the novel decision to ignore the fact that I was a completely awkward little dork and start talking to hot chicks. Just cleared my throat, took a deep breath, and did it. And how did that turn out? Well, I dated 2 cheerleaders, a triathlete, a leggy blonde-haired blue-eyed (and seriously annoying) band geek, a ski racer, and a few other chicks who weren't really all that hot.

      Which brings to mind a great line from " Ball Four," in which a fellow says to a teammate, "I see you with a different girl every night. you must be a really lousy lay."

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    30. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Which brings to mind a great line from " Ball Four," in which a fellow says to a teammate, "I see you with a different girl every night. you must be a really lousy lay."

      Well, how else to get better than lots and lots of practice?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    31. Re:Booth babes don't work well on straight geeks. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Granted, the people I talk about aren't at the far end of social ineptitude, but none of us are anything like a social butterfly. I suppose most of us grew up as the weirdo who programmed their graphic calculator in middle school, played magic cards or D&D with the other weirdos in high school, then went off to college and our weirdoness slowly mellowed into an endearing quirkiness. At least that's my story and I'm sticking to it. Also, no self unrespecting geek wears taped glasses since the god damn hipsters took that away from us in a desperate attempt to be ironic.

      Does that mean we turned our backs on being geeks? It's possible, but I don't really want to make this a "geek vs dork vs whatever" debate. Fact is, I still get to play with computers all day at work and get paid for it. There's no way I'd give up the life I have now to have been a bit more accepted by my peers when I was younger.

      But, it seems we've digressed from the topic at hand.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  26. sales bunnies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that our euphemism for them...

  27. i usually find them offputting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though, one time, I was in Thailand at an industrial automation exhibition. Siemens hired girls from a local broadcasting/public relations university as hostesses for their huge display. Those girls were sharp and gorgeous. Siemens must have given them some technical-ish training beforehand, and it showed. I still regret not getting that one's phone number...

  28. Unprofessional by Scutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like looking at booth babes as much as the next guy, but c'mon. It's just unprofessional. And frankly, I don't want to talk to a hired salesmodel at an IT conference, either. I want to talk to a technical person who knows the freaking product and can answer detailed technical questions about it. If I wanted a brochure, I'd go to the website. It's a waste of my time and your money to have anyone in your booth that doesn't know the product inside and out.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Unprofessional by Scutter · · Score: 1

      >Is it that you don't want to talk to an attractive salesmodel or you have trouble talking to women in general? It's an important question.

      Neither. I don't want to waste my time talking to someone in a booth who doesn't know anything about the product being sold. Their level of attractiveness and their gender are both irrelevant.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:Unprofessional by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The marketing droids never know any more then the hotties. I fact, because the marketing droids lie and the booth babes just smile, the booth babes are better sources for true information.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >a technical person who knows the freaking product

      A technical person would tell you to RTFM and make fun of you for not having the chops to instantly comprehend why his product is vastly superior to the silly toy products manufactured by competitors. ;)

    4. Re:Unprofessional by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I like looking at booth babes as much as the next guy, but c'mon. It's just unprofessional. And frankly, I don't want to talk to a hired salesmodel at an IT conference, either. I want to talk to a technical person who knows the freaking product and can answer detailed technical questions about it. If I wanted a brochure, I'd go to the website. It's a waste of my time and your money to have anyone in your booth that doesn't know the product inside and out.

      look man, it's useless.

      talking to an attractive salesmodel is a lot better than talking to some dude who a) doesn't know shit about the product of the company and b) feels like he's hitting on you due to his script. the techies rarely are at the booths, they're either having a good time or in meetings - occupying the booth is a bottom of the barrel job for techies. the booths are actually just a sideshow to the actual show of having the industry people in one place at one time. the booths are meaningless for most, only serving as a meeting point and as a stationary advertisement.

      brochures aren't all bad, since going to the website is kinda hard if you didn't know the company exists in the first place. but receiving a sales pitch from a marketdroid who doesn't know jack shit is just shitty, it's like a telemarketer but live. it's much better to just have some booth babes around dispensing candy and a demo running on some machine.

      for many companies loaded with some money but not relevant personnel to man the booth the alternative is either man the booth with those marketdroids or with booth babes. why have a booth in the first place then? well, that depends. sometimes you get cheaper tickets that way or maybe you want to show some presence and just have the stationary advertisement.

      now straight up "shows" are another story alltogether. like dance acts every half an hour or whatever - that does happen.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Unprofessional by Scutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why I don't want to talk to them, either. I just wanna talk tech with the techs.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    6. Re:Unprofessional by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I like looking at booth babes as much as the next guy, but c'mon. It's just unprofessional. And frankly, I don't want to talk to a hired salesmodel at an IT conference, either. I want to talk to a technical person who knows the freaking product and can answer detailed technical questions about it. If I wanted a brochure, I'd go to the website. It's a waste of my time and your money to have anyone in your booth that doesn't know the product inside and out.

      ...but there's generally only one or two of those, and they may be occupied. The babe can hand out literature, swag, or do smalltalk until the salescreature can see you. This is a valuable resource.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Unprofessional by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      It is an IT conference, it is not supposed to be professional. Professional is for offices and meetings, this is just a cluster-fuck advertising event.
      Who is going to talk business in front of all of your competitors and 10 thousand other people, on the spur of the moment, in a room louder than a circus, when the person you are trying to talk to needs to look after 100 other interested onlookers?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unprofessional? Did you watch the video? I could have done a better video with my cellphone... and with better audio quality... and a fucking cat backdrop? Huh?
       
      This is nothing but an attempt to get mister 15-chins some recognition in the industry. He's just another loser in the game of life. It's about a public hair short of being an outright Slashvertisement.

    9. Re:Unprofessional by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why I don't want to talk to them, either. I just wanna talk tech with the techs.

      The techs aren't manning the booth. I'd rather talk to the booth babes.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  29. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    One man's treasure is another man's junk,

    And conversely, one man's junk is another man's treasure.

    Just ask the gays.

  30. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    And those "studs" wound't be men who pretend to have any sort of self worth by prettying themselves up and are thus worthless whores?

    I gather OP's main concern is that he has no desire to bang female whores.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  31. 'Not Sure Those Are Booth Babes by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

    Ok, yes they are. But they certainly are not scantily clad. The one on the right might be attempting a provocative stance. Or she just stands that way.

    'Wonder what the funky eye makeup is supposed to mean?

    I may as well fess up: I've never really liked trade shows. I don't "get" them. I haven't been to one in several years. Maybe it's because my Live-In Booth Babe for the last 22 years is also my best friend and I'd rather go for a hike with her.

    So, any takers on the eye makeup?

  32. Re:NOOOOOO... ? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    (see comment subject)

    FTFY, Calculon style

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  33. NO!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need booths with naked babes and big boobs.

  34. Has cucumber time begun, again ? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    That is what we, in Dutch, call the summer time when cucumbers are everywhere in the supermarkets, and news is scant....

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  35. Maybe Booth Babes Are Just Not Effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I enjoy looking attractive women - a lot. However a well dressed and appropriately dressed attractive woman will get my attention better than than one dressed as bait. If she actually knows something about the product she, and the product, will probably hold my attention much longer. However in the end I will only smile and chat with the woman unless the product actually delivers value to me. The product actually delivering value and making me aware of how it does is what drives sales and profits - at least for me as a customer. Paying for Booth Babes is generally a poor return on investment for vendors if there are many other customers like me.

  36. Probably even more reasonable. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    As the Gay Population is probably between 3%-10% I doubt that make it a major factor.

    But I expect the real reason is simpler. Booth Babes attract people however it may not equate in increased sales. While booths with people who know the technical details, or are good sales people, do.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      As the Gay Population is probably between 3%-10% I doubt that make it a major factor.

      Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are

      In surveys conducted in 2002 and 2011, pollsters at Gallup found that members of the American public massively overestimated how many people are gay or lesbian. In 2002, a quarter of those surveyed guessed upwards of a quarter of Americans were gay or lesbian (or "homosexual," the third option given). By 2011, that misperception had only grown, with more than a third of those surveyed now guessing that more than 25 percent of Americans are gay or lesbian. Women and young adults were most likely to provide high estimates, approximating that 30 percent of the population is gay. Overall, "U.S. adults, on average, estimate that 25 percent of Americans are gay or lesbian," Gallup found. Only 4 percent of all those surveyed in 2011 and about 8 percent of those surveyed in 2002 correctly guessed that fewer than 5 percent of Americans identify as gay or lesbian.

      Gallup survey claims 3.4 percent in U.S. are LGBT
      Study sees gays as 1.7 percent of population (US)
      1.5% of Britons say they are gay or bisexual, ONS survey finds

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I have always guessed as gays being around 1% of the population. however 1% of the population of the USA is 3.5 million or roughly the population of San Francisco, Boston, etc.

      The thing people don't understand is that a "minority" today isn't a couple of thousand people but millions and tens of millions.

      As a nation we really need to teach statistics better in high school. So many people fail to understand it.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Bad idea. If we taught statistics properly in school, people would start driving more carefully, stop insisting that the government take their freedoms to protect them from terrorists, not arm themselves "for home protection," and never play the lottery.

    4. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they taught statistics properly? Drive better - maybe, but doubtful. The danger of bad driving is certainly addressed now. And "stop insisting that the government take their freedoms to protect them from terrorists?" That isn't happening now. Never play the lottery - maybe.

      As far as "not arm themselves "for home protection,"" why would you do that? It would put people at risk.

      Rethinking Gun Control

      7. Guns are used for self-defense often and effectively. “Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008,” says the report. The three million figure is probably high, “based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys.” But a much lower estimate of 108,000 also seems fishy, “because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use.” Furthermore, “Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was 'used' by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.”

    5. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by arisboch · · Score: 1

      If they'd read the statistics made up by you, they probably would.

    6. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      You must be a republican then? I'd say those are all good things... But they won't give the state any extra money

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    7. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    8. Re:Probably even more reasonable. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I didn't post any statistics, I referred to activities in which people engage. You can infer some things I think about those activities, but no more.

      I have no idea what you may believe, because your post was just a non sequitur, and I don't assume facts not presented.

  37. obligatory I.T. Crowd Reference by mbaGeek · · Score: 1

    my first thought was of Jen in the I.T. crowd getting the task of "entertaining" the visiting executives ...

    Second thought is that "good marketing" is also a great way to quickly kill a bad product - if your product doesn't "perform" (choose a metric any metric) then "good marketing" will have the unintended consequence of letting a lot of people find out that your product is worthless. These people will "get the word out" and ipso facto - yadda yadda yadda - good bye product/company

    example: the whole dot com boom and bust

    of course large amounts of money have been made by "good marketing" and mediocre/"good enough" products - (depending on your preference) Microsoft and/or Apple are great examples

    as far as "booth babes" go - my guess is that this is a cyclical phenomenon (they aren't going to go away - because they generate "booth visits" - which is the point of going to an expo). It is possible that the whole convention/expo thing is becoming obsolete but that is another subject...

    --
    It ain't what they call you. It's what you answer to. http://mylyceum.us/
  38. Agree by BButlerNWW9564 · · Score: 1

    Interop had way fewer booth babes this year too compared to last year

  39. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As a {self-important description}" sentences are a fad so strong now, most people do not understand how they work. He/It probably meant to put that as the beginning of the second sentence.

  40. Both babes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were only two?

  41. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Hey, who let Archie Bunker use their computer?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  42. Unprofessional reverse-sexism by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually, I would say that it's equally unprofessional and sexist to assume that somebody who's physically attractive can't be intelligent and/or knowledgeable about your product. While it's often true that supermodels tend to not be software engineers, it's equally true that many software engineers tend to not be good public speakers, etc.

    What you want is somebody who *presents* good in public. This includes knowledge of product, personal appearance, and ability to speak to a customer or crowd. Being good-looking doesn't preclude you from being a good rep, it just enhances the other skills in various ways.

    1. Re:Unprofessional reverse-sexism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I would say that it's equally unprofessional and sexist to assume that somebody who's physically attractive can't be intelligent and/or knowledgeable about your product.

      A blatant parade of mammaries suggests that this is the main boxed offering to be had from that individual, yes. There are a lot of professional attires that are still far from being sackcloth without being an anatomy exhibition.

      That's not a matter of sexism. If I got a salesman in thongs and navel-free glitter shirt, I am not expecting a thorough level of product knowledge either.

    2. Re:Unprofessional reverse-sexism by billstewart · · Score: 1

      It's not whether they're physically attractive, it's whether they're dressed to be professional or attention-getting. The person in the booth-babe dress doesn't know your product, though neither does the guy doing the magic-show shill and giving out yet another iPod to the person who picks the card with the correct three buzzwords on it. (And neither does the restaurant worker running the espresso machine, but after dragging all over a trade-show floor I'll still appreciate your company for giving out coffee instead of making me go out and wait in line at the snack bar.)

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  43. Obligatory Dilbert Reference by starburst · · Score: 1

    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1996-10-16/

    Booths need:
    Magic tricks
    Special effects
    Raffles
    Booth babes

  44. WTF is this shit? by Bender_ · · Score: 0

    WTF is this shit? I don't even know where to start...

    1) Bad audio quality
    2) Bad video quality
    3) Cat background?
    4) Some guy who never in his life got close to a woman who would qualify as a "booth babe" talking about "booth babes"?

    This is just pathetic.

    Know your limits. Know your audience. Even if Slashdot is dieing, please do it with dignity!

    Man I really wish for Slashdot going down with a story about how 2017 is finally the year of Linux on the Desktop.

    1. Re:WTF is this shit? by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      Holy shit! I hadn't even started the video until reading your comment, but I am shocked and appalled that there is a background of cats behind this douche in the video. I didn't watch the whole thing, but skipped through enough to see that there were no booth babes in the video! Why would I want to watch this video about booth babes, when there are none in the video?

    2. Re:WTF is this shit? by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      Right, I was so appalled that I even overlooked this basic fact:

      Why are the no booth babes in the video?

    3. Re:WTF is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey all you wanted to see was pussy! you should have been more precise in your request.

  45. Re:Not anymore, possible resurgence thanks to Cona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you're somebody who's not aware there exists a whole class of gun porn involving attractive women, scantily clad or not, juxtaposed next to various firearms.

  46. The essential problem is this: by tekrat · · Score: 2

    #1) Booth babes are offensive to the larger population of women, even in the tech industry, there are more and more women present compared to say... the 1990's where it was almost 100% male dominated. In fact, there was a recent story about a female journalist harassed at E3 because it was just assumed by some that any woman at a gaming convention must be 'meat'.

    #2) They are as clueless as their looks would lead you to believe. I remember being at a Motorcycle convention, and while that was once a male dominated event, the new market for motorcycles is now women -- but I digress... at the "Vespa" booth (Vespa, of all places, scooters appeal to women!), we had a question about some seriously radical Vespa merchandise (I think I was a cool looking leather bag, or a jacket), and I go to ask what I thought was a saleswoman, but she didn't know anything about what it was or how to buy it, even though she was dressed in Vespa branded attire. Point is; I was interested; but they lost a sale because the lady was apparently hired as decoration, but wasn't trained to even point me to a real salesperson!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:The essential problem is this: by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Booth babes are offensive to the larger population of women

      ...snip...

      I go to ask what I thought was a saleswoman, but she didn't know anything about what it was or how to buy it, even though she was dressed in Vespa branded attire. Point is; I was interested; but they lost a sale because the lady was apparently hired as decoration, but wasn't trained to even point me to a real salesperson!

      If she had pointed to a salesperson, would having her there no longer been offensive?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:The essential problem is this: by strstr · · Score: 1

      women are meat regardless. I can think and feel what I want about them. and I do, and they need to get used to it. take it in and move on women. we think what we want, duh.

    3. Re:The essential problem is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1) Booth babes are offensive to the larger population of women, even in the tech industry, there are more and more women present compared to say... the 1990's where it was almost 100% male dominated.

      So your argument is that women are increasingly influential in IT, booth babes are women, women don't want to be seen as meat, unless they are using it to their advantage at that particular time (or are professional booth babes), and an individual criminal action happened. Oh, and you were at a conference once.

      Not sure what you're suggesting that "the patriarchy" do.

  47. Re:Not anymore, possible resurgence thanks to Cona by yurtinus · · Score: 2

    Oh now I *have* to click it!

    --
    +1 Disagree
  48. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by binarylarry · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how huge Booth Hermaphrodites would go over.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  49. Red flags by buss_error · · Score: 1

    Booth babes (of either sex and orientation) are a red flag that the company you are dealing with would like to grab your attention using the nether regions of your body rather than engaging your mind with a fantastic product. Easy tip off that they are more interested in flash over substance that will leave one looking foolish for having selected their product.

    Look - don't buy.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:Red flags by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      Booth babes (of either sex and orientation) are a red flag that the company you are dealing with would like to grab your attention using the nether regions of your body rather than engaging your mind with a fantastic product. Easy tip off that they are more interested in flash over substance that will leave one looking foolish for having selected their product.

      Look - don't buy.

      I totally agree. When I went to CES back in January, there was a definite inverse correlation between how blatantly-sexual the booth babes at a given vendor were dressed, and how good that vendor's product was.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    2. Re:Red flags by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      some companies do both.

      I liked flying much better when the stewardesses were HOT. in asia, they still are.

    3. Re:Red flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right.

      By a single observation on shallowness, you are accurately able to judge the quality of that company's global products and employees.

  50. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure how huge Booth Hermaphrodites would go over.

    Both ways?

  51. Booth babes by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Most times I would end up walking the floor its because I am interested in the technology or possibly talking with engineering folks much smarter than myself who sometimes get let out of their cages and are able to attend.

    When I see a booth filled with babes and well dressed sales guys picking their noses it is a huge turn off when I go to their booth I can always expect to find extraneous people with no domain knowledge and sales goons knowing less about their own product than I.

    There are plenty of booths with attractive women who actually work for the company and know their shit. Much more of a turn on to me than supermodels standing around looking pretty.

    Have not attended mass market consumer oriented shows. Something like E3 I can see being a different matter entirely where more chicks always make things better.

  52. Bummer by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    I feel bad for these so to be former booth babes. Now they will have no work and not get paid. This means they may have to do even worse jobs. I remember back in the Comdex days we had to hire one and it cost us quite a bit of money. I talked with her and I found out the girl made a good living being a pro booth babe. For her it was better than turning tricks.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  53. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by durrr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read an anecdotal story about a girl that used to be hired as a booth babe and got neat money from it. Used to, because the feminazis destroyed her job opporuntities.

    What happened with womens rights really, It's a voluntary job after all and it apparently pays well?

  54. Soap by sepiroth · · Score: 1

    The booth babes aren't going anywhere only the nerds have discovered soap. I'd rather speak to a guy who knows what he's talking about only if he didn't smell. I don't mean Italian but just taking a shower more often works -- that's what the marketing have found out.

  55. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    both

    Check your privilege, cis scum.

  56. Gays Rare in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gay men are attracted to things like fabulous Broadway shows, fashion, and other ultra fabulous stuff with other gay men. Gay men abhor: baseball stats, programming, Linux, IT, and engineering. Sure there are a few, outlier examples. But they are as non-representative as Verne Troyer is of most men. Or WWE's "Great Kali."

    Gay men are heavily over-represented in the fabulous professions: interior designers, broadway, hairdressers, acting, etc. Gay men are roughly 2-4% of the male population. There are not very many. They tend to be drawn heavily to places and workplaces where emotion, flamboyance, and expression are rewarded and not penalized. Think Siegfried and Roy, and Liberace.

    Now visualize the typical, neckbeard, IT workplace. Where what counts mostly is productivity, quality code and the amount of time it takes. Or keeping systems up with as few problems as possible. That sort of workplace does not attract those intent on emotional expression, flamboyance, and exhibitionism. Few Liberaces and Siegfrieds there. IT is overwhelming the province of straight, nerdy, White/Asian/Indian men. If we are realistic and not PC driven, we will recognize that fact.

    Attractive women draw that type of guy in like free beer during Octoberfest.

    1. Re:Gays Rare in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a gay and an engineer in the auto industry (fabulous enough for you?). If you think gay people aren't well represented in professional technical careers, then you sir, are an idiot. Just because we aren't flamboyant (and most of us aren't) doesn't mean we aren't there.

      I also use Linux, program, and love baseball.

    2. Re:Gays Rare in IT by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If only.

      Until you work with a social retarded aspie fag you will not understand what women complain about r.e. sexual harassment. He's was lucky. In my youth, being hit on by a fag would have required me to kick his ass.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  57. Geeks and Republicans by jbolden · · Score: 1

    You ask hookers, strippers.... there are 2 types of conventions they love: IT and Republicans. Geeks love hot girls who are getting paid to be nice to them.

  58. Nothing but a sensationalist article... by BurstElement · · Score: 1

    So... He attended the show and all he took home from it was an article about gimmicks and the freebies he scored and this sensationalist piece of junk about booth babes... Sounds like he was just there scabbing freebies on a company funded junket in Vegas.

    This guy is clearly just an attention seeker trying to fire up the feminists... the girls shown are hardly your typical "booth babes" and his claim that the "Solar VPS" booth was bro-centric (I assume he is talking about the "spacemen") shows he hasn't even bothered to look at the companies marketing materials or website to see the space / solar system theme of all their products and services.

    And yes a lot of trade-show organisers in certain regions and industries have cracked down / set guidelines on booth babes, but this wasn't due to changing sensibilities but rather a response to vendors who were really pushing the limits of existing ones with things like body painted models and models wearing miniskirts that should probably be classified as belts.

  59. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Them boo'bes are expensive.

  60. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Pseudonym · · Score: 3, Funny

    Won't someone please think of the poor out-of-work blackface minstrels?

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  61. What a great week. by jacekm · · Score: 0

    Another win for LGBT crowd.

  62. Simple question for feminists by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    Is it sexist that male strippers exist?

    If the answer is no, then it isn't sexist that booth babes exist either.

    1. Re:Simple question for feminists by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      haven't seen any strippers in the booths at tech expo, male or female

  63. Correlation between cup size and server uptime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, nothing inspires confidence in technology like a bunch of young girls in heavy make-up who were, apparently, hired for their looks. I mean, that practically shouts "Quality In Engineering!", doesn't it?

    1. Re:Correlation between cup size and server uptime by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      CPU, memory, SSD storage, lots of silicon. big boobs, lots of silicon polymer. yes, I can see a correlation there

  64. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't someone please think of the poor out-of-work blackface minstrels?

    Yes, because everyone knows that booth babes are one step away from horrendous racial stereotyping. [/sarcasm]

    Here's why your analogy is ridiculous: open any magazine, and look at the ads. What do you see? Attractive women, often dressed in sexy poses and sometimes unnecessarily wearing revealing clothing. Even if this particular magazine doesn't allow "that kind" of ad, when you do see a woman, you can bet she'll be a smartly dressed professional who is of above-average attractiveness.

    This is true whether the magazine is targeted at women, men, whatever audience. It is completely acceptable to hire high-paid models to sell your product... almost everywhere. Watch commercials on tv. Look at movie advertisements.

    Okay, now that we've evaluated this, let me ask you: how many of these ads make use of minstrels, blackface, etc.? What's that?? NONE???

    Oops. I guess your analogy fails.

    Using models to sell products appears to be completely acceptable as long as they are highly-paid supermodels for high-circulation ads. But hiring less well-known but mildly attractive women who may want to earn some extra money on the side and paying them well is immoral and the equivalent of the worst kind of racism. Got it.

  65. This can mean only one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iFembot is finally in stores.

  66. yes. They are all project managers now - $120k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes. They are all project managers now - $120k

  67. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by DexterIsADog · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...the feminazis..."

    Rush, is that you?

  68. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Lots of things are completely acceptable. According to almost half of the population of the US, widespread surveillance on citizens is completely acceptable.

    Blackface had its day, and then its day went. It appears that the same is true of booth babes. I don't weep for the loss of either job. We technologists are, after all, in the business of making old jobs obsolete. I certainly hope that former booth babes find decent jobs in a new environment; perhaps something in green energy?

    Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  69. !sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't sexist to have scantily-clad women promoting your product. Sexism is when you say all women are good for is to dress scantily and promote your product.

  70. is the problem.. really just this particular place by strstr · · Score: 1

    this convention.. does it have a history of booth babes? because last year there were none. now this year, there is one, and does he by chance think they just don't do it at this particular show?

    E3 was as loaded as ever with booth babes. so he might be looking in the wrong places for signs of this non-existent phenomena..

    I wager booth babes are pricey entertainment that would only not be present if someone couldn't afford to hire them, or there was no task for them to do. dressing up, or acting, or whatever.

  71. Re:is the problem.. really just this particular pl by strstr · · Score: 1

    IMO the article is useless because there's no other signs that booth babes aren't being used anywhere else. it's just this show.

    and booth babes are pretty useless when it comes to conventions in the first place. its like, they are hired as entertainers, yes, but there usually has to be good reason to do it. like everyone else has them, or they are dressing for a part in some advertisement. if none of this is true, they have no reason to do it.

  72. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, yeah - obviously your opinion is all cool and erudite because you said it in Latin. Fuck you. You know why?

    Denique non omnes eadem mirantur amantque.

    Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's wrong.

    More importantly, just because you don't approve of something, it doesn't mean it's the equivalent of racial stereotypes and a practice that often celebrated "the good ole days" of slavery.

    I find the booth babe concept to be stupid and tasteless too. But I'm not going to judge people who participate in a harmless activity. And I'm certainly not going to insult black people by comparing it to a practice that effectively lauded a culture of oppression and slavery. You owe an apology to African-Americans for such ridiculous comparisons... and I don't give a fuck if it's in English or Latin, you smug holier than thou son of a bitch.

  73. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Just someone who realizes the true implications of modern feminists and feminism, from the "no true feminist would be like that" crowd who author and vote for the policies that the redheaded step children on modern college campuses demand.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80

  74. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read an anecdotal story about a girl that used to be hired as a booth babe and got neat money from it. Used to, because the feminazis destroyed her job opporuntities.

    What happened with womens rights really, It's a voluntary job after all and it apparently pays well?

    It was always more about ugly womens' rights.

  75. Feminism! by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Feminism: letting women be whatever they want to be...unless it contravenes our image of what they should be, then we require that they conform with our idea of what's "right".

    I'm sure they're feeling empowered already!

    --
    -Styopa
  76. Missing the larger point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As comments made at the Xbox One release indicate, sexism is a major problem in the gaming community. Having booth babes further alienates women who attend these events. The presence of booth babes who clearly aren't interested in the products they market enforces the stereotype that women are not gamers (and perhaps more broadly, not tech-savvy). Whether or not the booth babes find this sort of event deprecating, it is also important to consider other women who may be attending the event.

  77. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Won't someone please think of the poor out-of-work blackface minstrels?

    So you think that hiring a woman is equivalent to hiring "blackface minstrels?"

    I don't think you got that quite right.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  78. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by icebraining · · Score: 1

    I find the booth babe concept to be stupid and tasteless too. But I'm not going to judge people who participate in a harmless activity.

    Feminists don't usually judge the people either, they judge the activity and those who promote it (the companies paying for the booths, and in part those who attend the conferences and are OK with it), much like you just did in your first phrase, implicitly.

  79. Some E3 booth babes by blackorzar · · Score: 1

    This site has some nice pics from the E3 event, focused on booth babes: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/2216/

  80. So why the cute 'babes' behind him in the video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, the guy in the video is *shamelessly* using two cute cats behind him to promote his video!
    I wonder how much they got paid for posing for that?

  81. Women have more money than men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game companies now go after women customers because they have more money than men

  82. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by number17 · · Score: 1
  83. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    She would have lost her job fairly quickly anyway. One of the qualifications of being a booth babe is being young.

    Using booth babes objectifies women, although, if you are a woman wh's prepared to put up with that for whatever the money they pay, I guess I'm OK with that. But using booth babes also shows contempt for men. It's saying "my product may be good or bad, but that doesn't matter because I can make you think with your dick".

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  84. Fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to watch booth babes as they go away. When they are coming toward you there is that whole "up here" eye contact thing that gets awkward.

  85. Maybe in the US but the US is no longer the center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so you will always see "booth babes" in Asia where the center actually is now.

  86. damn by arisboch · · Score: 1

    Another rounds goes to these PC Taliban. Funny how these extremists (fringe feminists, Islamists and the Christian Right) have such an aversion against women dressed less than in a goddamn burka. Sex sells, that is a fact and not really a bad thing.

  87. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by Methuseus · · Score: 1

    The first commenter was specifically mentioning booth babes and booth studs. So both is proper. Any would be better, yes, but that's not what he said.

    --
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  88. Re:Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by quantaman · · Score: 1

    It's about respect, imagine you were at a conference, and because some management type decided geeks are too unappealing they hired bodybuilders and male models to stand out in front of the booths. Wouldn't you find that a little insulting, that despite all your knowledge and experience some dude with a six pack is more welcome at a tech conference than you?

    --
    I stole this Sig
  89. Response from Solar VPS + More Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Michael Steinhart - trying not to be anonymous or cowardly. I got a response from the company that featured booth babes in its display, and I spoke to several more event organizers, to get a better sense of the controversy. Here's my follow-up piece: http://www.theenterprisecloudsite.com/author.asp?section_id=2870&doc_id=265136&

  90. Re: Who wants booth babes, I want Booth studs :3 by z0 · · Score: 1

    So it's a compromise, then? Neither men nor women get the full respect they deserve, and some of each are willing to put up with that so that they can have what they want from the other party. It appears to be under continuous negotiation, and neither party is ever getting exactly what they want because each wants something that directly opposes what the other wants. The extremists in each party who refuse to compromise make so much noise that the majority of each party, the rational ones who agree that some kind of compromise is necessary, cannot effectively negotiate what that compromise should be.

  91. I thought I was going to see a booth babes video ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is NOT a booth babe !!!

  92. Re:I thought I was going to see a booth babes vide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, bro!

  93. It's me! I promise. by M_Steinhart · · Score: 1

    First off, apologies to all who thought the video would feature actual babes. There are some interspersed throughout the conversation, but for the most part, you're looking at my ugly mug, sandwiched between two kittens. Rowr. Second, the company that featured booth babes did get back to me, and I wrote about it here. I'd love to continue the conversation!

  94. Why booth babes are counterproductive by billstewart · · Score: 1

    >>Who cares?? > c) Female geeks at tech conferences.
    And their friends and coworkers. And people who don't like being pandered to. And people who might have actually been interested in the product. And people who'd rather deal with companies that made an effort to understand who their customers are (unlike the company who had booth babes at the RSA trade show.) If you want an effective booth babe, have her be the lead developer for the interesting product you brought, not somebody in a tight dress.

    If you want to sell me your product, you'll bring somebody who can tell me why it's interesting, and ideally somebody who can answer my technical questions about it or at least point me at the information. If you aren't doing that that, I may waste your time and seating space trying to win an iPad after I've seen the booths I care about at a show, but otherwise the best you'll do is get me to pick up a tchochke with your name on it.

    I'm fine with booths that have people who are there for entertainment value, as long as you can also get me information, whether that's the noisy shill show or the technical celebrity (it was fun to see Ron Rivest at the RSA show some years ago, and Dan Kaminsky's always broken something important recently.) But if you've got professional booth staff, make sure they know at least a couple of sentences about your products and can point customers to the right people, whether that's the sales rep or the techie, and make sure your display has enough information that I can decide whether to find out more or move on without wasting your time. The kinds of companies that hire booth babes somehow never respect them enough to give them that much training.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. Women who know cars at Car Shows by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Heard a story on NPR a year or two ago about a woman from some car company who worked at car shows. It puzzled some of the attendees to have a woman at the booth who wasn't there for decoration, she was there to talk about engines and design and was dressed in a suit like the other car company people.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  96. Depends on the show by billstewart · · Score: 1

    And sometimes the professionally dressed woman is the lead developer, not just a marketer. And sometimes the professionally dressed man is a professional booth shill, and he's surprisingly good at it.

    I've worked trade shows also (usually when I've been a sales engineer, developer, or sometimes consultant; $DAYJOB's trade show people usually use some local employees, some headquarters marketing people, and some speakers from headquarters.) Some of the marketing people know the products, some are logistics folks who are good at getting the booth to the show, working with the local union to get it assembled, making sure that everybody who's scheduled to work the show knows what we're presenting, etc. There are shows where the target audience is C-levels, and shows where it's the technology people who are going to build your products into their products. I've seen more of the latter, but that's the kind of show I'm more likely to go to.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  97. Dr Who t-shirts are cool, ok? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    (And I won't ask about fezzes.)

    Ok, earlier today there probably were more men wearing dresses and high heels around here than women wearing Dr Who t-shirts. But that's because the gay pride parade was today and "here" is the San Francisco Bay Area. Normally, I'd guess there are more women wearing Dr Who shirts.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Dr Who t-shirts are cool, ok? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Don't count on it. Not many women wear those shirts... the guys playing dress up form whole communities around it.

      Show me any collection of women doing the same thing in such numbers that they can do the same thing.

      Men are more varied. It is their gift and curse. More varied with the pros and cons. Men are the mutants. They succeed or fail but they don't play it safe. They are risk takers even down to their genetics. You see it with the health disorders. Men are much more likely to die in child birth. Much more likely to not survive to adulthood due to genetic disorders.

      Men are expendable. And so they tend to be "different" because they can be different. Women generally are more consistent. Less varied. More reliable.

      Don't get political or ideological about it. Its biology. Arguing about it is like arguing with the Sun.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  98. Re:Marketing, engineers, and trolls by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Trolls are smelly cave dwellers. Most engineers have enough sense to wash ourselves, and if the marketers want us to do multiple shifts they'll provide multiple sets of whatever company-logo shirt they want us to wear this show, or tell us to wear basic blue shirts. (And the last time I was "unshaved" was decades ago; since then I've had a beard.)

    How do you make your engineer or developer seem credible? Have booth staff who make sure that everybody at the booth knows everybody else, so if a visitor wants to talk to a sales person they get the right sales person and if they want an engineer they get the right engineer (either directly or brought over by the sales person.) And, y'know, make sure that the product you're trying to sell is appropriate for the convention you're trying to sell it at.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  99. Interop is still around? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I last went to one of those 20 years ago. It had stopped being an actual interoperability demo a few years earlier, but there were still some techies there as well as marketers in suits. It was the smaller Atlanta version of the show, and I was in town for a class. I ended up having dinner with the folks from a small East Coast software company that I knew a few of from Usenet, and they appreciated being able to refer to something that had happened at Pennsic without having to explain what Pennsic was (I hadn't actually been to it, but SCA was part of common techie culture.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  100. Blackface minstrels by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There are some variants on Morris dancing that are traditionally done in blackface. It's not African blackface, it's English coal-miner blackface.

    On the other hand, I also play old-timey American music. There's a really good group called the Carolina Chocolate Drops who talk about the African-American roots of much of that style of music (obviously banjos, but other aspects as well), and they've said that they're probably the first generation of African-Americans who could play that style of music without their parents smacking them for doing something related to the old minstrel shows. Stephen Foster wrote some really good tunes, but you just have to play many of them as instrumentals and not try to fix the lyrics...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  101. Why not just make it fair and introduce boothstuds by fish_sauce · · Score: 1

    No matter what you do people will complain.
    Why can't they just introduce booth-studs.
    Something for both tastes. Equal and fair.
    Problem solved.

    Now booth studs and bades,amove your asses so i can see the product!