Slashdot Mirror


Immigration Bill Passes the Senate, Includes More H-1B Visas

An anonymous reader writes "While the landmark immigration bill (full text PDF), which recently passed the U.S. Senate, is being hailed as bringing crucial reforms that will vastly improve the state of immigration in this country, there is a provision in it that is seeing relatively little discussion: section 4101, a 'market-based' increase in the amount of H-1B visas for skilled workers. 'The pitched arguments of both sides, which are likely to resurface in the House when it takes up its version of an immigration overhaul, cloud a complicated reality. There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole. If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers — more of them are hired and at higher-paying jobs — but has no noticeable consequences, good or bad, on older workers.'"

274 comments

  1. There are three kinds of lies. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.

    1. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by hedwards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Precisely, I'm curious as to how they explain all the people that give up on the IT sector because they can't get a job due to the ridiculously narrow job requirements that even entry level positions have.

      I'd be fine with a lift on the H-1B visa limits if it required them to actually demonstrate that they had made real efforts to hire Americans first. And that the requirements they were posting were reasonable for the job they were hiring for.

      As it is, the job requirements seem more there to show that they're "trying" to hire Americans while ensuring that as few Americans as possible are actually qualified for the job.

    2. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 0

      Precisely, I'm curious as to how they explain all the people that give up on the IT sector because they can't get a job due to the ridiculously narrow job requirements that even entry level positions have.

      Well, they'll give up and go work in a grocery store or something. At that point, it will no longer affect them.

    3. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ridiculously narrow job requirements are specifically designed so they *don't* find Americans to fill their jobs. They want an excuse to hire H1-B indentured servants, and to go to Congress claiming that there are no Americans to fill them.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are 3 kinds of liers, HR, Congress and corporate heads. Since Congress doesn't do shit we could cut budget by out sourcing them and use the money to do something useful.

    5. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by frinsore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My issues with the H-1B visa program is that it doesn't fix any of the problems that it tries to address and probably creates new issues.

      The basic problem H-1B visa tries to address: "There are not enough mediocre engineers for our current business needs." The H-1B visa brings in some temporary employees to fix the short term shortage. But when the visa expires they go home and the company has to hire a new H-1B employee to replace him (remember there is a shortage of qualified applicants) and probably has increased their need of mediocre engineers during the past few years. There is no incentive for the company to fix the problem but instead to just apply the H-1B bandaid to it.

      If the company hiring a H-1B visa holder was forced to train workers that would take over the position then the H-1B visa program would probably be rarely used and only when there was an actual need. Or if the company could only use H-1B visa employees/contractors every 2 years out of 5 so that they knew that they were ineligible for the H-1B bandaid when the current employees leave. Or even make the visa permanent, the visa holder isn't forced to leave the country and is free to find other employers whenever they wish; broader immigration issues this would fix the short term problem by just importing more people.

    6. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Watch How not to hire an American to see how the whole H1-B system has become a scam, they rig the requirements of the job so its impossible for ANY American to meet the requirement (such as demanding 10 years exp on a tech that has only been around 5 years) so that they can hire more indentured servants through H1-B.

      For those that beat the globalization drum all you are doing is killing our future, these guys will go back to their own countries and come up with the next new things while we will be left a husk. in my own area the local college is getting ready to pull the plug on their entire IT program, why? Because students have found they can't compete with a guy that paid less than we pay for a new car for a master's degree so are no longer even attempting to go into tech fields, they know it will just leave them buried in debt in a dead end job.

      I wish i could take all those that constant scream "free trade" and "free markets" and drag their sorry asses through middle America to see the seeds they have sown, where there is more boarded up businesses than open ones and the business districts look like Escape From New York thanks to all the abandoned factories. there is NO SUCH THING as free trade, all you are doing is exporting misery and pollution, and all you are importing is more indentured servants.

      They won't stop until the highest paid IT jobs are less than the manager at a Mickey D's, and when the day comes that countries stop taking our overprinted money they will all leave and we'll be left with another dead sector. Of course it won't phase them as they'll just move, as Thomas Jefferson wisely pointed out :"Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains."

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the stupid party and the evil party "reach across the aisle" they're usually trying to get to your wallet.

    8. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by goruka · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You should look at it from the other side, It's not a matter of not finding americans to fill their jobs, it's a matter that Americans easily become too costly to fill the jobs, and a cheaper alternative is requiered for business to happen.

      I have friends who worked on H1Bs at plenty of Silicon Valley companies, where a lot of the workforce were not Americans. Their salaries were not that of slave workforce at all, but still allowed the companies to reduce cost a lot in their intial stages, then they grew and hired more Americans.

      Americans have to understand that they are easily becoming too costly, with unheard of salaries anywhere else in the world, you are choking your own business, which would rather outsource or hire H1Bs than hiring you.

    9. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      A system with too many H1-B's will implode onto itself when communication becomes unmanageable. Same thing as outsourcing being brought back on shore after a massive exodus and a plethora of unmanageable code.

      Want job security? Support that code, the $5 an hour savings translate into a $40-$50 support person later.

      Also, managing Mickey D's sounds pretty easy... if it paid more... hmmm.

    10. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      "trying" to hire Americans sounds unenforceable, thus it got removed.

      Here's my view on the disconnect in skills though... we're trying to hire an ERP person, we had a home grown person who's gone. We've been unable to do so... why? ERP systems are popular and common at large organizations, but who thinks of listing ERP on their resume? SAP sure, ERP no. There is so much crap floating around that after a job I've gone back to my notes to figure out all the little things I've done that can land me somewhere else (who would've thought sitefinity would be one).

      So, people are qualified, they don't know it, and the org doesn't know it... nor do I know how to fix it, just an observation.

    11. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by istartedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      drag their sorry asses through middle America to see the seeds they have sown

      It is really, Really, REALLY hard to convince the people who believe in Free Trade. They were taught the theory in school. Often they were taught it or had it reinforced in Comm school while getting an MBA. I had an argument about this with somebody taking Comm school while I was an undergrad. This was back in the 90s, when Perot was running. It was all "why should I listen to an undergrad. What do you know?" and I was like, "our grandchildren are going to hate us". It looks more like our children will hate us. I had no idea how fast it would happen.

      Finally, a lot of these guys are doing well for themselves. Even if they see other people doing badly, they still buy into the "they're just not working hard enough and smart enough" meme. It's waaaay too easy to believe something when you're paid to believe it. The people who are doing well are often paid to believe in Free Trade.

      Finally, the middle class can indeed get a temporary boost from Free Trade. It's the macro economic version of selling your house and using the money to take trips and throw parties. We sell our production capability, the middle class gets $20 microwaves at Wal Mart for a few years, while ignoring the relatively small number of people who used to work at the microwave factory. Then, we cut another trade deal.

      Eventually we run out of new trade deals to cut, just as you run out of possessions to sell. Then the party is over.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, managing Mickey D's sounds pretty easy

      That is an *awful* job. Think of people wanting 5 star service for 2 bucks. All day every day. Then you have a set of employees that you are lucky will show to work today. You dont dare fire them as you have to have *someone* to call when the previous 3 guys said they are 'sick'. You think IT guys have it bad with overtime and crazy requirements? Go work for a mc'ds for a few months as salary.

      The real issue is the gov has created an artificial scarcity. Thus driving up wages for who are not H1B (yeah americans). Then stagnating the H1B guy (still wildly better pay than they get in their home country). Creating a market where only H1B can get in. The gov has moved in and said how you can hire people. It is law of unintended consequences at its best.

      Also if there really is a shortage wouldnt you want to make it easy for those people to become a citizen? Thus creating a long term employee? Instead we keep upping the limits and creating a large market distortion.

      Actual true immigration is better long term for our country. Instead we kick them out just as they are learning the ropes...

      I can hire 4 guys for the price of 1 american. Will it be 'good' maybe, maybe not. Depends on if I get lucky on the outsourcing merry-go-round.

    13. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look at it from the other side, It's not a matter of not finding americans to fill their jobs, it's a matter that Americans easily become too costly to fill the jobs, and a cheaper alternative is requiered for business to happen at the profit margins the suits/Wall Street are looking for.

      FTFY

      Americans have to understand that they are easily becoming too costly, with unheard of salaries anywhere else in the world, you are choking your own business, which would rather outsource or hire H1Bs than hiring you.

      I assume you have an idea of what the cost of living is in a major coastal American city. Seriously, the American people have been told that if they work hard and are industrious their standard of living will rise. Now that we have a decent living standard we are told we're just too expensive and we'll have to learn to do with less. Fuck that. The American worker has been sold out by the whores in Congress and their pimps in the Chamber of Commerce.

    14. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That video is not for H1-B hirings but for green card perm processing. Two totally different animals. I am going to try to defend the unjustifiable, am I am sure this will be voted down.

      A perm application is made before a green card application is filed. A green card application under the old system was filed if the guy on H1-B was super-skilled and someone wanted him so bad they would hire him away from a competitor with a green card offer or the company which already has him will file one for him within a year or a couple of years of hiring him. In the alternative, the green card is filed at the end of 5 years of H1-B. After six years without a green card the guy has to go back home.

      Firstly, if the worker has worked for five years for a corporation. The present green card perm rules prohibit the employee from using his 5 year experience to apply for the green card. Let's say he worked in Ajax for 5 years, the advert has to state the company sponsoring the green card needs someone with 0 - 1 year experience in Ajax. If this is the law, whom does the corporation want? This guy with 5 years of experience and who knows the code or a green horn? I think that's where the video originates. If you think this 5 year old guy should go home and the corporation should hire a green-horn to replace him, then the system you are looking for is not best of the best, but nationalistic. Not bad, but all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants, and it does not seem fair.

      Secondly, if the worker has just come here on a H1-B and in the second year a different company sponsors the green card at an added cost of $10,000 in addition to the normal salary of the worker to attract him from a competitor or retain him, the free market is working as it should. The person or skills are in demand. In this case, again do you want to find a 0-1 year experienced guy? Would it be fair to this person who is obviously attracting employers like flies who are ready to hike his pay? If it not the guy they want and the skill set they want they might hire the other guy during the perm processing. The guy who will replace him has to be equally brilliant or demonstrably better as you have inertia. I am not too sure what is the right answer in this case, hire with nationalism or hire someone at least as good or better.

      Thirdly, if the worker has a masters or a phd degree. Green cards may be filed for him in a year or two. Why? Because he is skilled, American educated, but he is the national of a different country. The other competitor again came walk in with a masters degree and no work experience and still take the job of the American educated foreign national. What if this foreign national is very good at his job and has a great masters degree and profile? Do we not want to retain the best of the best?

      I do concede that we need to throw out a lot of people who are here merely because of some body-shops. They have gamed the system, but the system itself and what they show in the video has some rationale behind it. Without what these guys do, all three of the above categories, including the best of the best will not get green cards in America. So it's a strage reality on how we keep the best of the best. If the best of the best with experience is equal to an american best of the best who might with five years of experience equal the non american best of the best, the company has to hire him today .... Then do we really intend to keep the best of the best here or throw them out?

      Difficult questions... I don't have answers to.

    15. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      We should reform immigration law so that for every additional requirement that they put on that is not part of the core job, they have to pay the H1b an additional $20,000. Then suddenly they will find it is cheaper to just hire the local people they have been passing over.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    16. Re: There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think the consequences are unintended? That's exactly the kind of thing the Chamber wants. Why we still allow these people to do business here astounds me. If we threw all the greedy transnationals out and the 1 pct with them, people would still need goids and services. People would start businesses to supply those. They will hire people, they will need accountants and lawyers and IT people and computers and office furniture and all that. Being smaller, they have an incentive to do well and being local they wouldn't have to compete against third world wages.

      That's actual competition and markets at work, and it's a dirty concept to Corporate America.

    17. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      When CEO's of failing companies are nailing down in excess of 7 digits of income no one wants to hear about how the IT guys making 100 grand are paid too much. All the money they save by hiring H1B's goes into the salaries of the high execs at the company.

    18. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by curunir · · Score: 2

      My company just underwent some major changes. We had open positions before, but we recently had a number of people hit their 1-year cliffs and leave, so we now have a lot of open positions and I'm one of the people that's been designated as a hiring manager. I can tell you that we have zero intention of hiring H1-Bs. If someone already has the paperwork from a previous job, we'll consider them, but we need people now and aren't willing to sponsor.

      And yet HR still insists on writing the overly-narrow job descriptions that everyone I know loves to hate. I've tried, on multiple occasions now, to get the descriptions changed to more of a "We use x, y and z and are looking for someone smart that either knows them or can learn them fairly quickly," but every time we test it out, they find ways to sabotage it (I was told, verbatim, "Github is too expensive for an experimental job posting, so we only posted it to Dice").

      People on /. bitch all the time about how few jobs there are and how large companies are using H1-Bs to drive down wages. But I also get upwards of ~10 touches from recruiters (the few that mention salary usually say around $200k) on LinkedIn and we've had multiple openings go unfilled for the past 4-6 months because we simply can't find qualified candidates.

      This exposure to the HR recruiting process has left me convinced that the majority of the problem isn't H1-Bs or disingenuous companies but, instead, HR that's out of touch with the way that talent looks for jobs these days. Because it's clear that there are people who want jobs and don't have them and jobs that want talent and can't find it.

      Shameless plug: If you're in San Francisco and looking for a job, see here: (and don't worry if you don't meet the exact skill set requested)
      UI Engineer
      Java Engineer

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    19. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? In the US there is a massive shortage of IT people willing to work for what the companies are willing to pay hence the H1B program.
      Then you get the big outsourcing shops gobbling up all available H1B's (see reports about congress and H1B questions).

      Perhaps if you could find a way to disconnect Immigration from the control of corps things might improve?

      Which other country allows their immigration to be managed by companies the way the US does? If the H1B's could apply directly (without sponsorship) the "indentured servitude" would be gone. Not going to fix all the issues but a start.

    20. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ya know I USED to make fun of the survival nuts, but after driving through the south and seeing scene after scene that could have been taken straight out of 1934? i really can't anymore.

      And I have met the type you are talking about, fifth and sixth gen money who live in their little bubbles with other bubble living people that parrot the same and all I have to say is they better "Get to teh choppa!" when the shit finally does hit the fan because i don't see the peasants going gently off to starve like they did in the 30s, I really don't. look at NO after Katrina to see what will be more likely to happen, it was total "welcome to the jungle" and in a survival situation where its survival of the fittest? they ain't looking very fit from where I'm sitting.

      But anybody who believes their little 'recovery" bullshit really needs to take a trip through the flyover states, you'll find reality FAR different from the BS they are spewing. More and more scrambling to get on the dole just to keep a roof over their head, boarded up homes and businesses, its getting pretty damned bad here folks. I see all this shit like H1-Bs and all I can think of is some rich guy drinking wine while the boat sinks, sooner or later reality is gonna bitchslap them and when it does its not gonna be pretty. the shit they have done in the last 20 years will probably take a century to fix and all the BS in the world isn't gonna make that reality go away.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Your solution perpetuates the problem. If you force them to demonstrate that there are no Americans which meet the requirement, just raise the requirements.

      Personally, I think we have a cultural problem. We need to compete with talent from India, etc., anyone who wants to come to our shores. But we Americans suffer from a stereotype that is the opposite of the hardworking reputation we once had. Now the import workers form Asia carry the reputation that their work ethic is stronger.

      We seem to be more inclined to seek out a different field or try to get laws written to protect the status quo rather than to compete and i think that is troubling.

    22. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      "There are not enough mediocre engineers for our current business needs." The H-1B visa brings in some temporary employees to fix the short term shortage. But when the visa expires they go in hiding somewhere in the country and the company has to hire a new H-1B employee to replace him

      FTFY - if they didnt we wouldnt have some 10 million illegals, that the government keeps telling me are all here on visas that expired

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    23. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      Yea, gotta say, those are pretty awful job postings. I'm not surprised you'd have trouble filling those positions. They basically just include lists of ways HR will try to disqualify me. They tell almost nothing about what I'd be doing, why I'd want to do it, what makes the opportunity so special or distinct. I mean, as written, minus company names, those job descriptions could apply to half the companies in the valley.

      Nobody cares that a company combines and* award winning communications platform with best-in-class reputation and networking tools into one powerful web-based application that seamlessly integrates with existing workflow systems to help businesses build oh my god my brain is leaking out onto the floor out of boredom already

      *LOL typo

    24. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      If you have even a little experience or you are just out of school and can't find a decent paying IT job then you are not looking very hard. I have been on the industry for 27 years and every single year I have increased my income. Of course the increases were bigger at the beginning of my career but even now it grows a couple thousand dollars a year. Ihave hired a lot of people over the years and they have all ran from people with no experience in the particular skillset I was looking for but came across as willing to learn new things. I have also had to search for new hires at the top end IT experience and salary levels. Your free trade and over printed money rant is evidence you have bought into all naysayers bullshit about anything related to the US being bad. Sure the US has lost manufacturing jobs but is it is still the #1 manufacturer in the world. Some jobs were lost over seas but most of them were lost to advances in automation and better manufacturing processes. The US manufacturing sector got a huge head start on the rest of the world after WW2. It's taking awhile but as other countries start getting their economies going it is only natural that some US manufacturing jobs are lost in an attempt to balance the worlds economies when possible. Unless you are a supporter of trade and tariffs that penalize goods manufactured outside of the US. They tried that back in the 1920's and things didn't quite work out now did they? And now there are European and Japanese companies who have actually been building new plants in the US. Lower energy costs in the US will continue to attract manufacturers to setting up shop in the US. The benefits of overseas manufacturing are shrinking. China's main pillar in their economic policy has been low prices not quality or innovation. China's strategy of lowering the cost of their exports by under paying it's workers and manipulating it's currency is disappearing. China has built up a growing middle class due to their growing economy and this newly empowered sector of society is raising internal consumer spending which has led to increased inflation rates which the government is trying to paper over. Economic trends go up and down. People have been projecting China's economic growth using only best case scenarios and assuming that the Chinese have figured out something no other country on the planet has thought of to keep their economy in a perpetual upward spiral. So if you are unhappy with your lot in life why don't you go out and put a little more effort into bettering your personal situation instead of standing around complaining and waiting for some magical government initiative to set everything right.

    25. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      I realize that this is Slashdot and that it tends to cater more to those in the IT field, but the H1B process does work. While definitely problematic in the IT field (with jackasses like WiPro muddying the waters), I don't seem to see much of an issue in a lot of other fields (eg. engineering). None of my numerous colleagues are paid below par or unfairly taken advantage of due to their immigration status. Most of them have advanced training right here in the US (masters and a couple of PhDs).

    26. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by theskipper · · Score: 1

      Interesting post, definitely food for thought.

    27. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Don't blame your government for the shit that lobby groups push them to do - go after the lobby groups and better still remove what looks pretty close to bribery in their interactions with elected officials.
      Remember your government is the only thing in the way of someone that wants a 100% indentured servant workforce. Guess what will happen when you weaken their ability to stop it?

      Actual true immigration is better long term for our country. Instead we kick them out just as they are learning the ropes...

      That's a very good point. Intel and a pile of other companies were built by immigrants that couldn't get the banks in their own country to lend them the money to start a business, but Silicon Valley had the funding and a variety of other things that made it succeed.

    28. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans have to understand that they are easily becoming too costly, with unheard of salaries anywhere else in the world, you are choking your own business, which would rather outsource or hire H1Bs than hiring you.

      This.

      It's not about a shortage of local talent, but a desire to import cheap workers, who have no choice but to say "yes" to everything. ..also -- captcha word: "patriot".. lol

    29. Re: There are three kinds of lies. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You'll get a few hits on this one, no doubt. Well, one for sure.
      Any chance I could ping you directly with a few questions?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    30. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which other country allows their immigration to be managed by companies the way the US does?"

      Canada.

    31. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by sodul · · Score: 2

      I've personally switched jobs twice while under H1-B, getting something like 10%+ raise each time. The visa is transferable under 2 weeks for an extra fee, and transfers are not subjected to quotas. There is a theoretical limit of 6 years (3 years times 2) with H1-B but it definitely does not mean you have to be tied to any specific company. At least that's how it was for me 6 years ago. While a H1-B is tied to employment, you have 'reasonable time' to leave the country, or get an other job. I've seen someone out of a job on H1-B, stay in the area for a few months (reasonable time) and get an other job with the visa being transferred. All legal. Also note that after my first H1-B job, which was actually my first job out of college, I did get paid much above the legal base salary which was about $60k/y in 2001.

      The real problem is when the employees that are on extended H1-B past the 6 years while waiting on a green card application. Because the extension is tied to the green card application and hence that company which is applying for you, this mean that you are literally stuck or have to leave the country.

    32. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

      Some of the information presented in the following links will shock most Americans, because American corporate leaders don't want us to know the truth, and they are paying off policy makers with contributions to keep the truth from us. Bill Gates, John Chambers, Eric Schmidt, and many, many others - including the principals of the most prominent immigration law firms, who profit from this outrage, are lying through their teeth. There is NO shortage of STEM workers in the US!!

      The H-1B fiasco has cost Americans **$10TRILLION** dollars, since 1975. For anyone who wants to know the truth, read on.

      One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley: http://www.cringely.com/2012/10/23/what-americans-dont-know-about-h-1b-visas-could-hurt-us-all/

      Watch this attorney and his consultants teach corporations how to manipulate the law to replace qualified American workers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU

      Here's more abuse of the L-1 Visa (H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg http://economyincrisis.org/content/l-visa-programs-brimming-abuses

      Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies: http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/h1b.html

      Also, little known is the tactic of creating many different kinds of sub-visa categories to "fool the system". There are almost TWENTY different kinds of work visas. The whole thing is a sham and a lie, designed to drag down wages and keep from having to re-train Americans. Never thought I would see this day!

    33. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      look at NO after Katrina to see what will be more likely to happen, it was total "welcome to the jungle" and in a survival situation where its survival of the fittest? they ain't looking very fit from where I'm sitting.

      I'll make one minor observation. Having seen my friends and family go through Katrina and the aftermath afterward, I can honestly say it was brutal. It still is brutal for some of them. (My friend's parents in my old neighborhood have small arms fire shutters on their windows and they bar the door at night. That wasn't there when I was living there.) Consider this: New Orleans had tremendous national support after the disaster -- money, military, etc. What will happen when the nation cannot afford to do that? What looked like ugly in New Orleans with Katrina will like a walk in the park compared to the future of our cities.

      Gads. I'm just a load of cheer this morning, aren't I? Sorry for being so pessimistic.

    34. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Strong understanding of existing and emerging web standards, accessibility (WCAG1/2) and usability.
      Familiarity with several JavaScript libraries, including Backbone and JQuery

      lolwut, familiarity with some random JavaScript library is required? Dude, start writing your own job ads. It's clear that whoever is churning these out has no clue.

    35. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hey facing reality isn't pessimistic its being SMART. Why am I not worried? I'm the guy that can fix stuff and am good at picking things up, in a "shit goes to hell" sitch you're gonna need a guy that can fix things and I'm easy to get along with. I'm also kin to many country folks with enough land we can go old school and live just fine, they'll set me up a little workbench in the back and I'm good.

      Its the ones in the mega-cities that are gonna be royally screwed, that is where the food will run out and the law will break down first. Hell look at Detroit, it ALREADY has huge sections that don't even have streetlights after dark, not enough cops, its already turning into old Detroit from Robocop even as we speak. Anybody who thinks you can send all the jobs overseas, allow uncontrolled mass immigration with a border so open entire cartels and gangs can just walk across, and just keep on printing that money like its monopoly? Is gonna be in for a RUDE awakening.

      I urge you to watch this video because while I don't agree with his beliefs (I believe libertarians can be divided in 2 camps, one that wants a gov to whip the peasants, the other wants to hire a goon squad to do the whipping) one thing I can't argue with is his math,and he shows the math for why the stock market MUST crash. In a nutshell Reagan pumped up a huge bubble with 401K and 403B and then the corps sent all the jobs overseas so that money ran dry so to keep the gravy train rolling the gov just started throwing money directly into the market.

      Anyone with a brain can see there is ONLY one way that can end, you can't keep printing without workers paying in and you already have nearly half the country getting aid in some form from the gov. The bubble HAS to burst, and when it does the depression is gonna look like a bad weekend, we are talking a good century of dead economy and hardship and as i said I REALLY can't see the peasants going off to starve, not gonna happen. it WILL get ugly and realizing that and being ready isn't pessimistic its just smart.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    36. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by sjames · · Score: 1

      The real issue is the gov has created an artificial scarcity.

      yeah, those less than zero unemployment stats are really killing...HEY! What shortage is that again?

      The only shortage is workers willing to live on the park bench and absorb sunlight instead of eating so they can work for the peanuts on offer.

      In a REAL shortage you'd see training programs being offered, relaxation of degree requirements, older workers being lured back in to the field, etc. All those things that aren't happening.

      Unless/until that sort of thing starts happening, we need to suspend the H1-B program.

      We should also threaten a fully reciprocal situation. Look at how publishers squeeled like pigs at the prospect of American students offshoring THEm by buying cheap international edition text books and importing them. Perhaps we need to see more such consumer actions. As a side benefit, once people here can live cheaper they won't be forced to demand as much money.

      What corporations want is to charge us 1st world prices but only pay us 3rd world wages and that simply cannot work long term.

    37. Re: There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. My work email is: tblair@demandforce.com

      (posted anon so that it doesn't show up in my posting history :-)

    38. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely, I'm curious as to how they explain all the people that give up on the IT sector because they can't get a job due to the ridiculously narrow job requirements that even entry level positions have.

      What, you mean fresh out of college you don't have 12 years of Windows 2008 experience? I'd LOL, but it's sadly too real.

      Meanwhile, they hire an H1B that apparently is "qualified" for that position (really? was Win 2008 released in India in 2001 for beta testing?)

    39. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      In this case, the manager is being pressured by execs to find a guy specifically with ERP experience.

      The company uses just recruiters never direct hires and there's 2 tiers of those, a recruiter hub, and then all the individual recruiters. Oh, and I work for one of the big ones, so I'd imagine things are similar in other places as well.

      Not so easy now is it? Esp. when you don't even know who's going to be doing the screening or preliminary interview.

    40. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by causality · · Score: 1

      You should look at it from the other side, It's not a matter of not finding americans to fill their jobs, it's a matter that Americans easily become too costly to fill the jobs, and a cheaper alternative is requiered for business to happen. I have friends who worked on H1Bs at plenty of Silicon Valley companies, where a lot of the workforce were not Americans. Their salaries were not that of slave workforce at all, but still allowed the companies to reduce cost a lot in their intial stages, then they grew and hired more Americans. Americans have to understand that they are easily becoming too costly, with unheard of salaries anywhere else in the world, you are choking your own business, which would rather outsource or hire H1Bs than hiring you.

      That fails to explain why the productivity of American workers has steadily increased for half a century while wages have remained stagnant. This fact is simple and easy to understand -- we are producing more and earning less. Somebody's getting screwed and it's us. Don't let this become obfuscated in all the phoney controversy.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    41. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

      This. You are exactly right. It's funny how CEOs always whine about cost-cutting measures, the cost of labor, cost of health care, and so on. But you know what cost never gets cut? CEO salaries. Anything that benefits the bigwigs and the shareholders. It's always the workers who suffer.

    42. Re:There are three kinds of lies. by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

      Yup. They make us run faster and faster on the treadmill and produictivity skyrockets, but do we see any of the extra cash? No way, Jose. We're supposed to fall down on our knees and kiss the hands of the sockholders because they deign to allow us to still have ANY jobs. Who gives a damn oif peopel spend tehir lives in feature;ess cubes with crushed hopes and dreams? Gotta hit the projections The Street is forcasting or the stock might go down a half a percent! So skip that kid's soccer game! Put aside that novel you were writing! The stiockholers need vacation homes!

  2. H-1B have much lower school cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they are not loaded down student loands

    1. Re:H-1B have much lower school cost by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and they are not loaded down student loands

      And therefore what? Shun foreigners to help perpetuate wildly excessive education cost growth? Or ...and here comes a new thought... change domestic education to stop the relentless growth of costs.

      We flail about trying to pin the costs of healthcare and education on each other while the costs of these products annually balloon to record breaking levels. Educated people somehow elide any thought about why the costs of these things compound themselves while honing ever more hate filled arguments about who is supposed to pay to a fine point.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:H-1B have much lower school cost by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or ...and here comes a new thought... change domestic education to stop the relentless growth of costs.

      But that's communism!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by helixcode123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers

    Of course. Isn't that a basic law of economic theory? As the supply of labor increases so do salaries.

    I have some doubts.

    --

    In a band? Use WheresTheGig for free.

  4. Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffing f by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffing firms that seem to only do keywords or say take down a list of things that IT does even if it's a one off or just helping out and put it on the need 5 years list.

  5. WHAT?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The increase of H1B visa has absolutely.... affected pay rates. Which in itself....affects jobs.
    Why pay an American ENG more than what you will pay a H1B visa?
    It's all about profits and does affect american jobs. Salary surveys should prove that point, given the fact we are getting paid less to do more....
    What is different now...versus 5 years ago...more h1B visas every year...the same skills are still required....you're just worth less in america and there is also inflation.

    All the politicians have vested interests in increasing the H1B visa's....they get more $$$ in profits/kickback....while existing american's lose opportunities...and jobs to feed their family with.

    How can increasing the amount of immigrant workers ACTUALLY solve the job crisis with AMERICANS?
    Increasing the immigrant workers....only allows companies to pay them less...and lay existing older employee off...who currently make more the h1B visas

    1. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      I used to tell people computers, tech, programing were the way to go when they told me they were starting college now if they ask I tell them to find something that can't be outsourced.

    2. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Plumbing. Except they can always bring in cheaper plumbers on H-1B Visas and name them sanitation engineers.

    3. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are required to pay the H-1B visa holders the prevailing wages, the real advantage is that they don't have to give them raises or as many perks to get them into the job. And can use those workers to then hold back the prevailing wage, since they're unlikely to demand a raise, even if they would normally have earned a raise for their work.

    4. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      My father did plumbing/heating and air conditioning and made good money but I went into computers because he told me every day "Don't be like me, work smarter not harder".

    5. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, they are required to pay the H-1B visa holders the prevailing wages

      Laws are meaningless if they're not enforced, and that one isn't.

    6. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by zlives · · Score: 1

      i wonder if there is a degree to get unemployment benefits. you won't get a job after graduating might as well use the tax dollars the h1b will generate to sit on your ass and get unemployment. /facetious

    7. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also do fun stuff like have a body-shop open an office in say NJ, but yet place their people in NYC.

      Prevailing wages are where? The office in NJ, or the current work location in NYC?

    8. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbing. Except they can always bring in cheaper plumbers on H-1B Visas and name them sanitation engineers.

      Boy are you living in a bubble. I know professional plumbers and if you want to get hired as a plumber you better be able to speak Spanish ... so, no, H-1B's would be waaay too expensive.

    9. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by tsotha · · Score: 1

      The problem with the skilled trades is it's difficult to keep on keepin' on when you reach late middle age. There are a lot of guys who just can't work anymore by their mid 50s.

      Not like your job prospects are great as an old IT guy, but at least you can still do the work if you can find a job.

    10. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are required to pay the H-1B visa holders the prevailing wages

      Sure, but the prevailing wages are lower if you flood the market with qualified people.

    11. Re:WHAT?!?!?! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      An Australian airline is pulling that crap - hiring cabin staff in South East Asia, paying them local rates for Thailand or wherever, but they work on Australian domestic routes. They've done the same at the pilot level with New Zealanders because the wages for pilots are lower there.

  6. HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

    Written by someone that obviously has never worked in the tech industry.

    Fact: H1-Bs are abused to artificially suppress wages in sponsoring countries. There's nothing inherently wrong with having a program to help immigration, but the way it has been implemented, enforced, and maintained is causing serious harm to the U.S. economy.

    If you need citations for this, you're at least as clueless as the bought and paid for government approving expansion of this legitimized abuse.

    1. Re:HAH by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, if you need citations for this, you're thinking critically. Are you suggesting we should believe every unsupported opinion by every AC on Slashdot, or just you?

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    2. Re:HAH by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you need citations for this, you're thinking critically.

      If you don't think many citations have been posted here in the past, you're being deliberately obtuse. For starters Google "Norman Matloff" - hours of fun reading. I used to post specific links and quotes, but at this point it's ridiculous. "Prove it" is a zombie line, killed a thousand times and still coming back.

    3. Re:HAH by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot alone has been collecting anecdotal evidence for... 15 years now...? I think it's been 15 anyways...

      There have also been videos of presentations by firms who work in this area that teach companies how not to hire americans (You can google that). If their really was no advantage to hiring H1-B over a US worker, then why would companies go out of their way to disqualify US workers...?

      I think they real factor in "recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers" is that the few who do get in as US workers are the top of the crop and the rest simply are left to pick there way through other fields after getting their expensive degrees.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    4. Re:HAH by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      The summary alleges that there is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

      Perhaps if you wish to argue agains that statement you could provide some empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

    5. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole." Can I cite myself? Rather than hire Americans, my prior Fortune-100 company brought in IBM-oid subcontractors from India. Obvious to everyone with a pulse they were indentured servants who would get their H1-B's yanked if they wanted first world working conditions. Anyone worked with Tata? "Little empirical evidence" statement is absurd.

    6. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for Nerds: Denial is Insightful!

    7. Re:HAH by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Redundant. See responses to above SirGarlon above.

    8. Re:HAH by Maudib · · Score: 0

      I've been working in Tech in the US since 1997.

      I can say with certainty that the H1Bs are not displacing anyone in NYC. We are all desperately trying to hire competent engineers. There is an acute shortage. The larger firms that have good lawyers (Bloomberg, AppNexus) can afford to fill the gaps by brining in H1Bs. Almost all are very very good.For the smaller firms this is often out of reach.

      Also all of the H1Bs I know are paid the same or more then their native equivalents. The Bloomberg one's are paid considerably more, but thats just the way Bloomberg is.

    9. Re:HAH by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      I can say with certainty that the H1Bs are not displacing anyone in NYC. We are all desperately trying to hire competent engineers.

      Throw more dead presidents at them - people will do almost anything for enough money. Surely a city full of self-described capitalists should understand that concept, or does that only apply when the market favors them? Like the bankers who were all for capitalism and rugged individualism until they asked the government to bail their sorry asses out, employers facing rising tech salaries go running to nanny government to help them. Wah, we don't wanna pay more for the hired help, it might cut into our multi-million dollar bonuses! Quick, we need to import more cheap labor.

    10. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's my problem. I'm trying to balance your unsupported claim that H1-Bs are having this detrimental effect with my reality of having multiple unfilled positions for the past 6 months. We'll take citizens or H1-Bs at this point (originally, we didn't want to go through the hassle of H1-Bs, but we're desperate now)...we just need someone who's qualified. All would get paid 6-figure salaries that don't necessarily start with a 1. If this is your idea of a suppressed wage, please let me know, but that seems pretty reasonable to me. I have friends with at least 10 companies in SF and the valley that are having similar difficulties hiring.

      So how do I resolve my cognitive dissonance without concluding that you're full of shit?

    11. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. What "empirical evidence" does the article offer, other than just saying so? Everyone that argues against that statement is doing so because there IS evidence that foreign workers are displacing American workers as a whole. If they are going to make that statement, then they should provide a reference for it, or get rightly scrutinized.

    12. Re:HAH by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I have friends with at least 10 companies in SF and the valley that are having similar difficulties hiring.

      Arguendo I'll accept your anecdotal evidence that the employment situation in the Bay Area is good for employees. I'll even assume that, contrary to common practice, you and your buddies don't discriminate based on age, etc. In so far as US guest worker policy is concerned, my response is "so what". Contrary to the provincialism so common in SV and SF, they are but one small part of the United States. The US should not change guest worker policy based on the desires of some people in one small area. If companies cannot find enough employees at a price they're willing to pay in SV and SF, they can start up or branch out to other parts of the country, where applicants are more plentiful and salaries are lower. There are many smaller tech enclaves in the country.

    13. Re:HAH by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The idea the laws of supply and demand have been repealed in just this one industry is a rather difficult proposition to swallow.

    14. Re:HAH by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Anyone worked with Tata?

      The H1-B Tata folks I've encountered seem pretty competent and happy. Except for the one whose last H1-B re-up is over, and now his kids, having grown up in the US, have to go back to India. Yes, he's pissed, but they'll send a new H1-B guy to replace him, so we just are throwing out a capable person and his family for stupid bureaucratic reasons, while my great-grandparents just got off a boat and got citizenship in a few years.

      I've seen things work best with Tata project managers in the US, with the real work being done in India. But they are best at doing "more simple" coding such as Web GUIs and such rather than back-end coding that is performance-sensitive.

    15. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the government considered clueless in your analysis if they're bought and paid for? By your own statement, they're willfully expanding this quota due to corporate lobbying. Governments are not clueless, they're evil.

      "Nine-tenths of the activities of a modern Government are harmful; therefore the worse they are performed, the better."

      - Bertrand Russell

      It is the general populace that is clueless and blinded to what their governments are doing due to constant distractions from mainstream media and news outlets. A noticeable inability to critically reason and contribute to societal discourse is the result. The biggest weapon that governments have is propaganda, delivered through TV and Internet.

    16. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's clear how much experience you have hiring people for tech positions (e.g. software development). I interview such candidates almost daily, and we often wish the skilled ones end up being americans or at least permanent residents so we don't have to wait for months until they can join us - but we're often unlucky. The reality is that there simply aren't enough skilled candidates, and having to wait "until october 1st" when H1B visas kick in for them to start is yet another obstacle. Heck, we almost lost an excellent data analyst with a PhD in economics earlier this year when the H1B hit the cap in less than a month.

      Immigration does need an overhaul with the goal of helping businesses hire the people they need. Skilled workers who are sponsored for H1B visas are compensating for the lack of skilled american workers - not taking their jobs. I know this to be true at least for the software industry.

    17. Re:HAH by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Except for the one whose last H1-B re-up is over, and now his kids, having grown up in the US, have to go back to India. Yes, he's pissed, but they'll send a new H1-B guy to replace him, so we just are throwing out a capable person and his family for stupid bureaucratic reasons

      I have zero sympathy for that guy. He came here on a guest worker visa that he knew perfectly well was good for a maximum of six years. Now he's upset because the visa actually meant what it said? As for "throwing out a capable person", if they'd hired an American (LOL, Tata hire an American!) then there would be no reason for that person to leave. Finally what you call "stupid bureaucratic reasons" are better known as visa conditions (clearly stated before he ever came here).

    18. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, immigration attorneys and corporate HR groups COOPERATE to skirt the law. Want proof?

      Watch this attorney and his consultants teach corporations how to manipulate the law to replace qualified American workers:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU

      This happens ALL THE TIME! What really irks me is that this portion of the immigration bill is slipping through with little criticism, because prominent liars like Bill Gates and Eric Schmidt have been bamboozling politicians with inaccurate statistics, speeches and political contributions.

      Go talk to people like Zoe Lofgren, one of the Congressional reps in the Bay Area. She's been bought off, as have most of the others around here.

      This bill is a SHAM!

    19. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dual-intent visa that can turn into a green card hypothetically, but isn't going to because holy shit is there a backlog.

    20. Re:HAH by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      There have also been videos of presentations by firms who work in this area that teach companies how not to hire americans (You can google that). If their really was no advantage to hiring H1-B over a US worker, then why would companies go out of their way to disqualify US workers...?

      Seriously? Have you ever actually been in a hiring position?

      Hiring people is hard, and risky. Even in jobs where the skill set required is very precise and easily measured, as in engineering, there are all kinds of other random factors that can make or break a new hire (personality, lazyness, ability to co-operate, etc). Companies use every trick in the book to try and reduce this risk, most commonly by tapping employees networks to try and find other people who are known quantities, instead of the random walk-ins you get via normal hiring.

      So now you have an open position. Maybe it requires specialised skills. Maybe it doesn't exactly require specialised skills, but there's someone who you just know would be the perfect fit for that position. You know they're capable, creative, etc. Only problem - not an American (and for "American" you can also read "European" for an EU based company, etc).

      So what do you do? Obviously the "cannot hire an American to do the same work" standard is absurd, you can always hire an American to do any job, they just won't do it as well as the guy you actually want would. But you have to prove you tried. Hence - gaming of the system. The goal of this process is often not to hire just any H1-B because they're cheaper (they have to be paid the same salary or higher, right?), it's often to hire a specific person and this is especially true at the higher job levels.

      The simplest solution would be to eliminate the "cannot hire an X" standard which is unenforceable, unmeasurable garbage anyway. Just ensure the salaries are the same, and, longer term, try and convince people that they don't have some kind of right to a well paid job just because they got lucky in the birth lottery. That other guy who is more qualified but has the wrong coloured skin should have a chance too.

    21. Re:HAH by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Oh please...

      First, yes I have been in a position to hire people. Second if you actually did search for the video I mentioned, done at a presentation of a Pittsburgh law firm that specializes in visa hires, you would have seen how the ENTIRE point of what they were 'selling' companies on was how to make it impossible to hire an american. It wasn't about qualifications. It wasn't about 'capable, creative, etc.'. It was about specifically excluding anyone from the US for jobs in the US.

      If you don't find that absurd then I guess It's unlikely we can ever agree.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    22. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you come in crying for citations you're just a fucking troll. Do some research and bring something to the table. Stop whining every time something comes up that you don't want to believe.

    23. Re:HAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers"

      "... find their true calling flipping burgers part time at McD's for minimum wage with no benefits".

      I think they left out the last part.

  7. Here are the rules by The+Cat · · Score: 0, Troll

    There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

    This is blatant propaganda.

    If you use the word "empirical" in a sentence for no reason, or start a sentence with "actually" you are a dickbag.

    Thank you.

  8. what a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no apparent impact on older workers, as I've been out of a job for over 8 months. somebody needs to get punched in the mouth.

    1. Re:what a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang in there. After my last company went out of business, it took me 3 years to get back to work in my field.

  9. ban some stuff like by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    need any degree
    degree that is only called that that way at 1 or 2 schools
    need very off topic stuff / skills

    as an starting point.

    1. Re:ban some stuff like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How's that BA in English working out for you?

    2. Re:ban some stuff like by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I have a BA in Psychology and my Sys Admin career is going fine so far.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re:ban some stuff like by desertfool · · Score: 1

      And my 19 years in IT I owe to my BA in Portuguese.

      --
      Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
    4. Re:ban some stuff like by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

      Quite well, actually. A degree in English is fifty times more useful than a degree in "business". At ANY job you can make the argument that effective communication skills are important. The world is filled with little preppiebots and jockbots that got "Business" degrees because they weren't smart enough for anything else or just couldn't decide. And now tons of people with business degrees work ffor me, the English major. Why? because I know how to coimmunicate effectively anmd not make basic errors of grammar, usage and spelling.

      So mock away, dumbass. If I had kids I'd practically force them to get English degrees, or maybe philosophy or one of the sciences, economics, or sociology. Any of those things has interdisciplinary possibilities. If they metioned business degrees or MBAs I'd laugh them out of the house and say "pay for it yourself, then." The only degree more worthless than a business degree is Theatre, or possibly Art History.

    5. Re:ban some stuff like by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

      And yes, rereading my post now I see I made some amusing typos. They are typographical errors, not errors in spelling, usage, or grammar. All they mean is that my fingers are klutzy and I never learned touch typing.

  10. Discrimination... by Rockoon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Did the Senate pass another bill that would discriminate against specific countries where many people desperately want to come from, particularly Mexico and China?

    The "Diversity Visa Program" passed in 1990 does exactly that, as it forbids people from particular countries from qualifying for 50000 Visa's annually.

    ..of course when the GOP tried to end this program, the Democrats called the Republicans trying to end it racists.

    Notice how nobody turned around and called the Democrats racist for supporting the obviously racist program.. but hey.. its got "diversity" in the name.. and diversity is good, even if you have to discriminate based on shit like skin color.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
    1. Re:Discrimination... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IT's not racist by any reasonable stretch of the imagination. Stop forcing things to fit into you narrow, preconceived, notions.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Discrimination... by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      IT's not racist by any reasonable stretch of the imagination.

      The U.S. government runs a lottery that gives out an additional 50,000 VISA's per year beyond the level playing field of normal immigration, but people from Mexico arent allowed to win any of them, and you are there claiming its not racist by any stretch of the imagination?

      Really?

      What fucking distortion field do you live in?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Discrimination... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think Mexico has only people of one race in it. I am pretty sure there are Mexican citizens of many races.

      I oppose that program as well, but I am not sure it is racist. I think those who implemented it were trying to be racist, but were too racist to know that Mexico has other races.

    4. Re:Discrimination... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      It's not 'racist' to try and diversify your immigration policy. If 90% of your immigrants are from one or two countries it's not racist to put a cap on any one country's applications in order to give others a chance as well.

      "Racist" would be negatively discriminating against a race. Mexico and China aren't being discriminated against in the slightest, if anything they are getting preferential treatment. In exchange for the status quo which is preferential, they save a few spots for everyone else.

    5. Re:Discrimination... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      "Positive discrimination" is just regular discrimination by another name, when you reverse the labels on who is discriminated against and who is not to present it as palatable.

    6. Re:Discrimination... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Mexico and China aren't being discriminated against in the slightest, if anything they are getting preferential treatment.

      What preferential treatment is that?

      Surely you dont mean how these same people are also limited by the 7% cap?

      When did treating each personal equally start being called preferential treatment?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:Discrimination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have enough Mexicans.

    8. Re:Discrimination... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That's okay, we're making them Americans. Problem solved. In fact, I think we should make everyone in Mexico American citizens then we can tax them and hunt down the drug cartel people without silly things like Mexican laws getting in the way. No more need for a stupid fence along the Southern border, we can tax the fuck out of all the US corps that have built factories there, not to mention sicking OSHA, the EPA, the FLRA and a few other Federal agencies on them. The new border at the Southern end of Mexico is much shorter and more easily guarded. The only problem I see is how to configure the flag for a 51st state.

    9. Re:Discrimination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you best stop there We Belizeians don't want to be invaded. We especially don't want your taxes. Your tax dollars we will take gladly come visit our natural beauty and support our economy hell immigrate if you want.

    10. Re:Discrimination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexico:

      mestizo (Amerindian-Spanish) 60%, Amerindian or predominantly Amerindian 30%, white 9%, other 1%

      CIA's World Factbook

      You were saying?

    11. Re:Discrimination... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I'm just figuring so many Mexicans want to be Americans we could just accommodate them by annexing Mexico then they wont have to make the dangerous trip over the border into the US. We'll just bring citizenship to them!

    12. Re:Discrimination... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      That idea was rejected in 1847.

    13. Re:Discrimination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Racist" would be negatively discriminating against a race.

      By definition, being racist covers positive and negative actions or ideas -- a racist person might mistreat members of a particular race, but alternatively they might be totally neutral towards that group and strongly favor a different one. Wikipedia's "racism" article states:

      Racism is usually defined as views, practices and actions reflecting the belief that humanity is divided into distinct biological groups called races and that members of a certain race share certain attributes which make that group as a whole less desirable, more desirable, inferior, or superior.

      So racist hiring decisions can include favoring a group over all others whenever hiring decisions have to be made. (The classic example would be white supremacists, but there have been plenty of people that favor a particular race other than their own; my father's longtime GF is that sort.)

    14. Re:Discrimination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could this mean that perhaps all africans are not black?

    15. Re:Discrimination... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time to revisit the idea. When over 10 million have immigrated illegally then something is obviously bad wrong.

    16. Re:Discrimination... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the program is that after one country receives in excess of a certain number of visas it is ineligible for the bonus allotment lottery. For numerous reasons many countries have an easier path to citizenship in the US. It's not a zero sum game to also try and expand the pool of applicants to countries which for a variety of reasons have fewer immigrants. It's not "racist" to say that we have plenty of Canadians and therefore they are ineligible. Canadian isn't even a race.

    17. Re:Discrimination... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Let's keep this conversation going...

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  11. have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    have an H-1B min wage and or open job switching aka the (worker owns the H-1B).

    The min wage can be like 50k+ forced overtime pay maybe at the 100k+ level no forced OT pay.

    Some H-1B are abused with low pay and or lots of foreced OT.

    1. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I agree if you double or triple those numbers.

      For type H1B tech jobs $50k is basically a pittance.

    2. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Well at least 50K + ot is an min and under that it opens room for US workers to have a good starting wage.

    3. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Depends on the job. It might quickly mean lots of jobs now only pay $50k when they used to pay more.

      Simply make them pay some multiple of the current labor board numbers for that job avoid this. Index it to inflation and compare 5 years down the road. Any slip in wage would mean reducing the number of H1Bs.

    4. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      just saying 50K + forced OT pay as a base line some areas may need cost of living add ones and inflation add ons. Maybe even move the base line to 75K.

      But that will stop the H-1B's working for say $11-$13 hr under the staffing firms.

    5. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by BigDaveyL · · Score: 2

      This. I think that if finding a worker for a hard to find job is really worth that much to you, then you need to put up the cash or GTFO. It's simple economics really, if you can't find people their wages should go up. As such, you need to pay them 3-4x some current index.

    6. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier than that.

      Make the visa permanent. Allow the worker to work for any employer.

      If there really is an IT shortage and we need to import labor, we should actually import labor instead of renting it.

    7. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then the immigrants would get comfy here. They'd start asking for raises, benefits, unions. They'd start getting... uppity! Big Money can't be having any of that now, so it's back to the third world for you, just to remind you where your place is and who's in power.

      H1B is about getting cheap pseudo-slave labor that is easy to dispose of. That is all.

    8. Re:have an H-1B min wage and or open job swtiching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $25.00/hour? Many don't realize the wage requirements do NOT apply to the worker,
      but to the firm that imports the Hr-1B workers. The workers themselves receive between
      $15-20.00/hour (I've seen pay stubs). It's a bad system.

  12. High Unemployment Levels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I, for one, am glad that the Senate has finally agreed on a solution to our immigration problem and that it includes more skilled foreign labor. We really need people to fill all of these available jobs!

    Since that's taken care of, maybe they can focus on fixing the economy, and creating jobs for all of the unemployed?

    1. Re:High Unemployment Levels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... more skilled foreign labor...huh? I thought this was AMERICA.....where are all the american jobs? Given to India?...or other immigrants?

  13. Shortage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ah, if there's a shortage of skilled workers requiring an increase in H-1Bs, we must be seeing huge increases in salaries to fill all the openings.

    1. Re:Shortage? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Ah, if there's a shortage of skilled workers requiring an increase in H-1Bs, we must be seeing huge increases in salaries to fill all the openings.

      Shhh, economic principles should only be applied when they benefit the top 0.01%. In all other cases they may be ignored.

  14. Evidence cuts both ways by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole

    There is no evidence that there is a general "shortage" of tech workers either. Sure, there are spot shortages, but those are necessary to give the flooded niches room to move. If you plug the spot shortages with "guest" workers, then citizens in flooded niches can't get them.

    1. Re:Evidence cuts both ways by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      And there's no way to grow your workforce, either. Which has to be bad for the country as a whole.

    2. Re:Evidence cuts both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you worked in bay area tech, you'd realize that it's far more than a "spot shortage." It's been over 18 months that talent hase been nearly impossible to find.

  15. No Worries by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

    Boner, er, I mean Boehner has already declared that he won't introduce the bill in the House.

    Combine that with the 33 seat advantage that Repubs have... not gonna happen.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:No Worries by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean there's an opposition party? Wow. Normally I side more with the D's than the R's (not that I have much faith in either), but this time I'm damn glad there's an R majority in the House.

    2. Re:No Worries by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You mean there's an opposition party

      When it comes to 'hot-button' issues like immigration and gun control, yes.

      I know, I find it surprising as well.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:No Worries by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I find Gridlock to be a good thing. The best Congress is the one that doesn't do a fucking thing.

    4. Re:No Worries by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      You have a good point. Instead of a protest sign or a bumper sticker that demands congress do something, I should get one that demands they do nothing. I'd probably be able to sell a lot of them too.

    5. Re:No Worries by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Normally I side more with the D's than the R's (not that I have much faith in either), but this time I'm damn glad there's an R majority in the House.

      Why the HELL do you usually side with the Ds? They consistently do the opposite of what they promise. It's the Ds that bring you war, censorship, racisim, and a whole host of other junk that they promise to be fixing: Like government in general they're a problem masquerading as its own solution.

      The Rs have their own pathologies. But compared to the Ds they're pikers.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    6. Re:No Worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like here in Canada when we have a minority government. It's the only time those assholes can't do any real damage.

  16. Care to mention which study? by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

    Apparently the author is unfamiliar with Internet search engines and/or the name Norman Matloff. You'll find plenty of empirical evidence.

    If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers — more of them are hired and at higher-paying jobs — but has no noticeable consequences, good or bad, on older workers.

    Would the author care to mention the name of the study, who it was performed by, or even (*gasp*) provide a link? Otherwise a reference to "one recent study" has no credibility whatsoever.

    If you're going to shove a line of bull at people, at least have the respect to make it seem a little credible. Propaganda like this is just plain insulting. I'd rather have somebody be honest enough to say "Screw you, the tech billionaires won, courtesy of the propaganda they pay for and the bribes they give their sycophants in congress. If you don't like it you can eat sh*t."

    1. Re:Care to mention which study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If anything, one recent study suggests"

      This makes it sound like they had to dig through a lot of studies to find one that supported their belief.

    2. Re:Care to mention which study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submitters fails the "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" test.

      Or even any evidence at all...

    3. Re:Care to mention which study? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      "If anything, one recent study suggests"

      This makes it sound like they had to dig through a lot of studies to find one that supported their belief.

      I doubt they bother. It's so much easier to pull a study from one's posterior, or call up your favorite lobbyists paid by tech billionaires. 2+2=5? No problem. How many studies and experts do you want?

    4. Re:Care to mention which study? by mrheckman · · Score: 2

      Would the author care to mention the name of the study, who it was performed by, or even (*gasp*) provide a link? Otherwise a reference to "one recent study" has no credibility whatsoever.

      The OP was quoting from the NY Times article that was linked to in the post. There are even quote marks in the post to indicate that. The times article gives a link to the study: http://www.people.hbs.edu/wkerr/Kerr_Kerr_Lincoln%20Feb2013.pdf .

      One could blame the OP for not providing some personal commentary on the article that he or she quoted, but you can't blame the OP for not citing the study. On the other hand, one can and should blame the reporter who wrote the Times article for not summarizing the study better.

      The study says that hiring of "young skilled immigrant employment, where young workers are defined as those under 40 years old" is correlated with "expansions in other parts of the firm's skilled workforce". And "a 10% increase in a firm's young skilled immigrant employment correlates with a 6% increase in the total skilled workforce of the firm." That seems logical -- a firm on a hiring spree will look for engineers from many sources. But it doesn't say anything one way or another about why the companies are hiring the immigrant workers. Is it because there's a shortage or because the immigrant workers will work for less money? The study does not say. Moreover, the study does not seem to consider that hiring of foreign workers means that fewer native workers are hired who would otherwise be hired, even if there is an overall increase in the number of native workers hired.

      And I wonder how the researchers who published the study would deal with companies who lay off much of their IT staffs and replace them with contractors through Cognizant and the other large consumers of H1-B visas. The company who laid off their staff does not directly hire the H1-B visa holders, but Cognizant does. Naturally, Cognizant hires support staff and some native engineers to support the buildup of the H1-B staff. This conforms to the study's conclusions, but the net effect is that many native engineers have lost their jobs.

    5. Re:Care to mention which study? by mrheckman · · Score: 2

      One more thing,

      The study says that "there is a higher departure rate of older workers in STEM occupations with greater young skilled immigration into the firm. This heightened old/young differential is especially pronounced for workers earning over $75,000 a year."

      Why didn't the NY Times reporter mention that?

    6. Re:Care to mention which study? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      He did mention it - he just got it wrong. FTA:

      If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers — more of them are hired and at higher-paying jobs — but has no noticeable consequences, good or bad, on older workers.

      I doubt reporters read these studies they cite in any detail, probably just getting a brief summary from somebody who supposedly has. In all fairness though the article does begin and end with a discussion of age discrimination, albeit in that anecdotal human interest style beloved of most reporters. All in all it's not a bad article. There are certainly many points I'd refute, but it's hardly mindless cheerleading for H-1B's.

    7. Re:Care to mention which study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We find that H1B-driven increases in STEM workers in a city were associated with significant increases in wages of college educated natives, (in general as well as STEM)"

      "STEM workers, H1B Visas and Productivity in US Cities", Giovanni Peri (UC, Davis) Kevin Shih (UC, Davis) Chad Sparber (Colgate University)

      http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/webfac/card/laborlunch/peri.pdf

    8. Re:Care to mention which study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct.

  17. H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by anlashok · · Score: 1

    There are qualified people looking for work that are ignored, because of age or length of time unemployed. There are plenty of people out in the employment pool, but this is a way to keep salaries down and not to do any spending on training. Where has all the spending for training gone? No company is willing to invest time and money into existing employees. Plenty of recruiters have told me that companies want a 20 out of 20 in their wish list.

    1. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by Shados · · Score: 2

      What field and what location are we talking about? Lack of willingness (or simply not being able to for various reason) to relocate is definitely the only reason a qualified IT worker would have trouble getting a job.

      Even if you were out of the market for 10+ years (I had a male friend who decided to raise his daughters at home instead of the stereotypical mother doing it...and he was able to come straight back in. It took a few months to get back into the interviewing groove, but not all that long compared to people generally complaining about having a hard time getting a job).

      In the big tech centers, the qualification required to get a high paying job is "being able to breath". And sometimes they'll waive that one too, or so it feels.

      Even factory workers and whatsnot will generally have an easy time if they can relocate, but that's the kicker: relocating for a low paying job is rarely an option.

      Thats the main issue. There's plenty of jobs. They're just not always at the right places. In the IT sector, that can be solved by pushing telecommuting more. Other sectors are harder (you may be able to do a surgery remotely with modern tech, but doing nurse work remotely is probably a lot harder...).

    2. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Even if you were out of the market for 10+ years (I had a male friend who decided to raise his daughters at home instead of the stereotypical mother doing it...and he was able to come straight back in.

      What year was that?

      In the big tech centers

      Specifically which big tech centers are you talking about?

    3. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      One should be able to telecommute for IT-type work, especially for jobs that don't need hands on work.

      I passed on a job in NYC because once I crunched the numbers, I wouldn't be much better off in the long run. Plus, I am getting married in 3 months so my fiance would have to quit and find a new job as well. So, that makes it a little less cut and dry.

      If telecommuting was an option, I would have happily taken a significant raise, but still would have been way under their budget - everybody wins.

    4. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by Shados · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any. The ones I have first hand experience with and where my anecdotes come from are Montreal (the average developer is so bad, anyone who can write a for loop can get a job), and Cambridge/Boston (much much higher standard, but the demand is ridiculous....so as long as you remember how to boot your computer, you can find a job).

      In both cases I've seen people quite a few times, including very recently (a few months ago) who got fired for negligence/gross incompetence, no references, no CS or IT degree of any kind (in one case, no degree at all), very little experience (it was their first job), find another job in IT paying quite well for the region, within 2-3 weeks.

      Even more recently in Boston, some dude I worked with who also got fired for being terrible, who had a criminal record, if you googled his name the first link was his mug shot for a crime he actually did commit (a relatively serious one too), and who got in trouble for sexual harassement, and has very obvious/noticable mental disorders... and he got hired in the financial sector for a relatively well known company. Not a terrible job either.

      So again: if you're willing to relocate, and you know how to breath, you can get a job. H1-Bs in IT are for shitty jobs no one want to know, a last resort, or to save money in low demand areas where employers have the upper hand. Thats it.

    5. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Nice fantasy world but the rest of us live elsewhere. There are plenty of people on an IT mailing list I'm on that have been looking for work for some time.

    6. Re:H-1B are a tool to keep salaries down by Shados · · Score: 1

      Thats my point. People have trouble getting hired because they're at the wrong place at the wrong time.

      A lot of the problem is simply a symptom of that. People in the US and Canada are too spread apart. That's a big chunk of the problem.

      The other part, is a lot of people thinking they're awesome, when they really are not.

  18. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Like the HR person after confirming more than five years of experience with C# asking if I have any .net experience...

  19. More H1B Directly Translates to More Unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headline says it all.

    H1B visas mean importing talent that is willing to work for rates at or below the going market rate, which is already artificially depressed do to the number of current H1B visa's in the USA today.

    Putting more water in the boat is not the proper way to bail.

  20. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Of course salaries increase when immigration increase - in their countries of origin...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  21. Slave labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is about greed and slave labor. Anyone who claims otherwise is a liar.

    And they aren't displacing Americans because no one is hiring Americans in the first fucking place.

  22. They Took by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They took our JOOOOBBBBBBSSSSSSSS!

    Back to the pile!

  23. That's right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How's that BA in English working out for you?

    You tell 'em!

    There's only 3 degrees universities should offer:

    1.Engineering - ONLY Electrical, chemical and petroleum.

    2. Computer science.

    3. Nursing.

    And there's only 3 universities worth going to: Harvard, Yale and MIT. Everyone else should just close down.

    Other than that, college is just a waste of time and money.

    We need a society of technologists and people to clean the bedpans of the old people.

    For all the stupid people who couldn't get into those programs, well, there's always Walmart. And if you speak Spanish, McDonalds.

    The World needs ditch diggers too, ya know!

  24. Re:Not going to pass the House by darury · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason it shouldn't pass is it rewards those who broke the rules instead of those who actually try to follow the process. I'm not saying we shouldn't have immigration, but I don't see how rewarding someone for bad behavior won't increase the amount of it. This isn't the first time the "amnesty" idea has come up and each time I was going to address the issue of illegal immigration. And each time, it just makes it worse.

  25. Call Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call your congressperson, not email but phone, and tell them to junk this when it comes to the House.

  26. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by Ryanrule · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people that companies REALLY want to hire talk to the group who needs the help, THEN they get sent to HR for a nice rubber stamp. HR is for the cattle.

  27. hire americans first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any House GOP member voting for this abortion is going to get skewered

    1. Re:hire americans first by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      any House GOP member voting for this abortion is going to get skewered

      And while we're at it, let's mount primary challenges against all the ones in the senate that turned coat.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  28. What difference does it make? by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 2

    The number of CS undergraduates closely mirrors the demand for workers. Hiring H1-Bs just reduces the number of young Americans who study CS. In the end, it doesn't really effect people already working in the field.

    1. Re:What difference does it make? by goruka · · Score: 1

      That is absolute bullshit, your country does enormous amounts of outsourcing, H1Bs are not even a single digit percent of the American jobs lost to outsourcing.
      It is *very* clear that there aren't enough American workers to supply demand, which is why they quickly become too expensive.
      H1B solves this for companies, because talented foreign workers will do their jobs for less money, but in the end that only helps a little and the rest goes to outsourcing.

    2. Re:What difference does it make? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      It is *very* clear that there aren't enough American workers to supply demand

      How is it clear? What is your evidence?

    3. Re:What difference does it make? by BigDaveyL · · Score: 2

      Then, put your money where your mouth is. Hire me (have a degree in CS and a masters in a related field). Don't give me some BS how I'm not "qualified" - because most anyone with half a brain could probably do the run of the mill job.

    4. Re:What difference does it make? by TheEyes · · Score: 1

      To be clear, the "demand" is on the business side, and it's for IT workers that only make $8-10 an hour so the CEO can shave a few million off the personnel budget and buy himself another yacht. The evidence for that is crystal clear: wages are down, unemployment is up, and companies are still importing cheap labor because they "can't find qualified people".

  29. Re:Not going to pass the House by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    America is a nation built by immigrants.

    If you had any understanding of what's being discussed here, you'd know that people are complaining about guest worker programs, not immigration programs.

    I guess Canada will lead the way

    Lead the way in what, Ph.D.'s driving cabs?

    America devolves into a cesspool of stupid white inbreds

    News flash: America is not a "white" country. The fastest growing "racial" group is Hispanics. Even without any immigration it won't be long before "white" people are not a majority in this country, and anybody with half a brain doesn't give a damn one way or the other.

    I also find this obsession with artificial constructs like "race" to be offensive. Roll back the effects of Bacon's Rebellion. The whole concept of race was always a bunch of bull used in a divide and conquer strategy to keep the peasants from revolting. It has no other significance or meaning.

  30. IT needs apprenticeships / trades schools as CS by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    CS is not IT and going to school for Computer science will give you skill gaps.

    It has lot's of hands on stuff that is a good fit for an apprenticeships.

  31. Sorry, but you're wrong about discrimination. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Informative

    The U.S. government runs a lottery that gives out an additional 50,000 VISA's per year beyond the level playing field of normal immigration, but people from Mexico arent allowed to win any of them, and you are there claiming its not racist by any stretch of the imagination?

    Really?

    What fucking distortion field do you live in?

    He's probably living in the distortion field perpetuated by both the CIA World Fact Book and Wikipedia, in which it is well known that Mexico isn't comprised of a single race any more than Los Angeles is comprised of a single race, thus making it impossible to discriminate against a particular, single race by discriminating against all of Mexico.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_people#Today

    Or maybe it was the one where, under NAFTA, there's already an economic agreement in place for non-professional workers, and professional workers get TN-1 visa rather than H-1B visa?

    http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/types/types_1274.html

    You know what? Those TN-1 visas discriminate against Europeans, who are require to return to their own countries after a period of time, whereas a TN-1 can be renewed again and again, indefinitely, without ever actually leaving the US. Those bastards! Favoring Mexico and Canada over Germany and New Zealand!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TN_status

  32. Re:Not going to pass the House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh. You sir are a super-genius. By the way, how are all the native Canadian people treating you up there?

    Do you know what party in the US pushed the civil rights act to protect minority rights? I won't tell you and spoil your day.

    Oh, get yourself some Browndo, it's got electrolytes.

  33. OK, man, You got me ranting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    CS is not IT and going to school for Computer science will give you skill gaps.

    It has lot's of hands on stuff that is a good fit for an apprenticeships.

    Ok, I posed the GP and it was meant to be satire.

    You're right, Actually, back in the old days, college WASN'T for career training. It was for an education to better and refine oneself.

    Engineer? You apprenticed or went to a TRADE school because engineering is a trade.

    So is medicine.

    Law? Read about the founding fathers. If they went to college, they would get some liberal arts degree and then apprentice with a lawyer and "read law" - no law school. See. Bio of John Q. Adams.

    CS? I'm on the fence on that one. On one hand it's a branch of math on the other, let's face it, it's almost an engineering discipline - apprenticeship career.

    Business school? Please! Apprentice.

    And also, our colleges and universities have become High School prt 2.
    Freshman English?! WTF is that? That shit should have been taught in high school! Same for Bio, Chem, Physics I&II.

    It's a symptom of how our schools have failed and how corporate America has turned our education system into one big trade school to benefit them at tax payer's cost.

    1. Re:OK, man, You got me ranting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's how they (businesses and government) can solve everything and everyone would be more or less happy:
      1. All jobs must be apprenticeship style, eg you must learn on the job
        via going to a school to support that job.

        So to enter that job you must either go to the supporting school, as stated by that job. Pass all the exams/experience tests, and then you get to entry level on that job.
      2. H1B/Foreigners can do the same. In their home country they must apply, at their own cost, to go to that school.
      3. The number of positions at the school must directly correspond to the employers supporting them.

      So the end result is the the H1B process is passed to the schools, and if there is a LACK OF AMERICANS applying for the program, they are free to let in as many H1B's as the employer states they will take.

      Now what about retraining? Yes Americans who have older versions of the skills can simply go back and take the exams, and automatically qualify, as long as it's taken at the school for which that job is supported by. No tuition costs apply if only the exam is taken.

      What about new companies? That's solved too, they can support whatever existing program from another employer (eg Microsoft certification is an example) exists that also applies to them, but bump up the urgency to "exam passed by (date)"

    2. Re:OK, man, You got me ranting! by rnturn · · Score: 2

      ``You're right, Actually, back in the old days, college WASN'T for career training. It was for an education to better and refine oneself.

      Hear, hear. One of my college professors told me that of of the purposes of a college education -- perhaps the task -- was to teach you to learn on your own, i.e., to embrace life-long learning. Nowadays... nobody in HR believes that you were actually able to learn something without attending an expensive class -- more and more on your dime -- and taking a test to get and maintain that oh-so-valuable "certification" (again, on your dime).

      ``Engineer? You apprenticed or went to a TRADE school because engineering is a trade.''

      When I started my first job as an engineer, your college experience was where you learned all the theory and got some hands-on experience in the labs. Once at a company, you moved between several different groups/teams for about the first six months. The team that you worked best in would adopt you and you were off to the races. Those six months were your apprenticeship and while you moved around with those different teams you were being trained in all the processes, tools, etc. that the company used. Anyone with more than two working brain cells knows that each company runs their business differently than pretty much every other company. Why does business management believe that there's a large population of people outside the company that are going "hit the ground running", especially someone just out of college? (But I digress...)

      ``Business school? Please! Apprentice.

      Right. The basics of business were taught during high school as part of what was called the "Diversified Occupations" curriculum for the non-college bound students.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:OK, man, You got me ranting! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Engineers have been going to college for their formal educations since the mid-late 1800s. Before that, there wasn't much industrialization.

      However, there is a place where engineers still learn as apprentices, and don't bother with college: Mexico. And that country has a great reputation for engineering prowess...

  34. Companies are already taking this into account!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accenture, for example, announced a sharply downward revised forecast!

    you know what this means right?

    Lay off even more US 'employees'. WHY? because we had to lower our forecast, we are in bad shape, boo hoo....

    Why worry!? H1 limit has increased, we can get their replacements from India/Philippines/ whatnot..!

    So the effects are already being felt!!

  35. Wait, what? by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers — more of them are hired and at higher-paying jobs — but has no noticeable consequences, good or bad, on older workers.'"

    Those same people seem to think that NAFTA really helps American's as well, but our economy in shambles for well over a decade seems to prove them wrong. And no, I will not bend logic to suit their purposes as they do to suit themselves.

    Providing lower paying jobs for non citizens while taking away jobs from US Citizens does not increase pay for US Citizens. The fact is that it reduces US jobs and harms the economy. The Henry Ford model was right and we have Detroit and Flint's economy and collapses to show he was correct. These people are just idiots, and it's too bad that so many suckers actually believe their bullspit.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NAFTA helped my US company afford to purchase satellite equipment manufactured in Mexico (but designed in the US).

  36. Karma, it hurts. by Inka22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad there aren't even more (unlimited) H1-Bs.

    Then all the left wing techies who are all happy and gang-ho about a bunch of low-skilled immigrants flooding USA (because they don't hurt their precious white collar jobs) would suddenly realize that Yes, People Get Hurt when you import a bunch of cheap workforce in a bad economy.

    1. Re:Karma, it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Too bad there aren't even more (unlimited) H1-Bs.

      Then all the left wing techies who are all happy and gang-ho about a bunch of low-skilled immigrants flooding USA (because they don't hurt their precious white collar jobs) would suddenly realize that Yes, People Get Hurt when you import a bunch of cheap workforce in a bad economy.

      Where did you get that idea? Overgeneralizing, techies are against hypocrisy. Lefties say "punish the companies hiring illegals, not the poor, starving illegals", right wingers say "punish the illegals, not the poor, starving companies". The companies create the demand for the illegal workers, not the other way around, ergo techies say punish the companies. That coincides with left views, but doesn't make them leftists. There's no hypocrisy involved at all. Similarly, on the H1B front, most techies are fine with importing advanced workers, w e just don't want them to be second class visa holders. If we truly need 600,000 them, then grant 600,000 of them permanent resident status, don't just "sharecrop" 600,000 a year or whatever made up number is bandied about in 12 different 50k segments...

    2. Re:Karma, it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible to in favor of humane immigration laws and also against exploiting workers.

    3. Re:Karma, it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've got the ideals of what most liberals are for skewed. I consider myself a liberal and support stronger border protections, however the issue facing jobs is exactly the same. It's a demand side issue not a supply side issue. Companies don't want to pay for American workers to have a wage livable in America. They've actually had crops rot on the plant in multiple states https://www.google.com/search?q=crops+rot+due+to+lack+of+workers The first page has at least 4 different states where it's an issue. I also highly doubt the Republican controlled House would let anything pass that wasn't in the best interest of their business sponsors and conservative voters. President G. W. Bush also supported to enthusiastic support a guest worker program. Keep on believing Obama's anything other than a center right candidate though, that's your right.

      You also tend to forget that most Union jobs are blue collar jobs, Unions tend to vote liberally. The 99% movement is mostly liberal based against the white collar bankers. Liberals also tend to support fair trade, where workers in other countries are paid a fair wage and in turn stay in their home country where there is a natural economic advantage.

      Let's just call this what it is, a giveaway to business and voter appeasement of a large portion of the southern voting base. This is the exact same issue as the H1-B issue except this time it's liberal politicians who are for bringing a load of extra workers.

      I think you'd also find that as a liberal I support stronger civil liberties, such as keeping the government out of everyone's bedroom and personal effects, whether they be digital or paper. Then again I don't relate to Democrats by and large, since they tend to be too pro business at the expense of civil liberties and with no monopoly protections.

  37. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "If anything, one recent study suggests, the growth of immigrant workers in American companies helps younger American technical workers"

    Not only do I find that claim dubious, it's completely beside the point. At least one recent study discussed here on Slashdot, possibly more, said THEIR IS NO SHORTAGE of qualified technical workers in the United States. Some corporations just want more H1-Bs because they're cheaper.

  38. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1Bs eliminate jobs in the US.
    The issue is "the US" is being lead by corporation figure heads(false or real) who are not interested in american jobs...american workers...or ANY employee/contractor/ICE rights, they are interested in profits.

    Tell me how H1B visa create american jobs?

    The only thing that would prevent this from NOT happening is to restrict H1B visa's...instead of increasing them.

  39. At a time when we need it most, we're sold out by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This isn't even so much about "individual" needs of individuals. This is about the health of a nation's economy. People who understand that money is more about flow than about hoarding (accumulating wealth) also understand that when people are not working and are not making enough money, they aren't spending money. This causes a reactive affect which radiates out everywhere in every direction.

    Now we're opening the doors even wider to bring in more people which will put more locals out of work, raising unemployment and underemployment and those people reacting with the rest of the economy. Additionally, this brings a much larger number of people who will require social/government programs to survive.

    This feels "intentional" and if feels planned. But one part isn't planned -- it's corporate greed and short-sightedness. They have no sense of responsibiity for what they are doing to the economy -- an economy in which those very businesses cannot exist for long without. That's a kind of given natural law. The real decision makers, the same ones who spend orders of magnitude more money than they collect in taxes on weapons we don't need, have decided they would rather help a small few at the expense of the nation's economy.

    Meanwhile? The people who are the most affected? They're bitching about what's on "reality TV" and the news of the latest xbox. Sheeple.

    It can't be stopped because not enough people are going to actually do anything about it. A person writes "shame on [the banks]" in chalk and getting charged with a crime that could end up with years in prison. We're in a real problem situation and the leadership of the country is unable to stop the train wreck that is happening all around us.

    Have a nice weekend.

    1. Re:At a time when we need it most, we're sold out by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This isn't even so much about "individual" needs of individuals. This is about the health of a nation's economy.

      There's no difference. If the individuals are broke, they can't buy shit, and the economy goes in the toilet. Also, they tend towards crime.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:At a time when we need it most, we're sold out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't even so much about "individual" needs of individuals. This is about the health of a nation's economy.

      Which is why we should not limit the ability for people to engage in voluntary commerce (such as hiring who you want, regardless of nationality), because that always causes deadweight loss to the economy from its potential.

    3. Re:At a time when we need it most, we're sold out by snadrus · · Score: 1

      That's why I think citizens need to strike at something so foundational in the problem that no-one's going to defend it. For example:
      - Right now the obligations for short-term profits at public corporations are by a court decision. Overturn that and allow not-profit-motivated decisions to be legal (possibly in line with a charter, or optionally not).
      - I'm sure other things would work. This one is the first that came to mind.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    4. Re:At a time when we need it most, we're sold out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, there is at least one Canadian couple that I can pretty much guarantee isn't going to be coming to the US to shop and help our 70% consumer economy.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-i5sDOdoFqg

  40. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by goruka · · Score: 1

    answer: read my post again.

  41. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by Shados · · Score: 1

    At least they didn't ask you for 10 years of hands on .NET experience in 2005....

  42. There are law firms by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    that exist for the sole purpose of teaching businesses how to do an end run around every rule regarding hiring H1-Bs.

    Saying "I'd be fine with a lift on the H-1B visa limits if it required them to actually demonstrate that they had made real efforts to hire Americans first." is pointless. It's not just wishful thinking, its fundamentally ignoring the purpose of the system...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  43. No it won't by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not what happens. It's just wishful thinking. Outsourcing isn't being brought back on shore because of communication problems, it's because a few of the outsourcing firms got greedy and cut corners a little too thin. They'll learn.

    Plus code written by slaves is cheap. So Cheap I can throw out your old code and start from scratch and still come out ahead. The last piece to the puzzle is to remember that for the top 1% who are pushing these things through they own a piece of just about every major company. So if company A overcharges company B the 1% still make gobs of money.

    And Managing a Mickey D's is incredibly hard. First it's brutally difficult work. 50 to 60 hours a week. Next, you're constantly jockeying to keep your employees because you don't pay them enough to have anything near a stable lifestyle (and no, they're not all kids. That workforce is graying too).

    Basically, the world doesn't work the way you think it does. I'd be OK if you were only hurting yourself, but when you go and vote you hurt me too...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  44. That relentless growth by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    is because we started letting private businesses run schools for profit. You want to curb that? Turn them back into real public institutions instead of quasi-private ones where the costs are paid by you and me and the profits go to 1%.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That relentless growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try making the schools competitive in the first place where they actually care about the students and and make the student the bottom line and put the teachers on a performance base pay instead of "well you tried to teach the students but that's alright here's your pay and your bonus"

    2. Re:That relentless growth by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. The most egregious gougers are nonprofit institutions. The whole "private college" thing is a PR smoke screen for colleges administrators who hire their friends for $400k diversity jobs.

  45. If you need citations for this by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    you're too lazy to google.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If you need citations for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are clowns around here that will demand citations if you claim the sky is blue.

    2. Re:If you need citations for this by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  46. Green Card by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they still don't make it easier for people who go there LEGALLY to work to eventually get a green card (no tons of money, no company sponsorship or getting married, no years of waiting) then fuck it, it still isn't worth going there to work. I worked there for six years and moved back to Canada because it would have taken forever to get a green card and being indentured to a company for the duration. Fuck that. If they can give green cards to illegal immigrants and not those there legally, fuck them.

    Most countries will give you a landed immigrant status (same as a green card) if you work there LEGALLY more than a set time (usually four or five years), keep your nose clean, and don't mooch off the government for anything. If that isn't the case, even though I get recruiters calling me from there regularly because of my good reputation in the city I worked in, I won't go back there to work ever. The odd vacation maybe but that's it. Not worth the stress of worrying about having to relocate your family out of the country within a month if the contract ends suddenly. Nor the stress of companies feeling like the fuck you because they think you are captive for the same reason. A big three letter telecom convinced me of all this because of the last statement.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:Green Card by Shados · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats kind of the issue I have with these bills. You have millions of people who fully ignored laws they knew existed, in many cases living underground or at least off the map to some extent...but then they make friends, build a family, then everyone starts crying if you threaten to kick them out for what they did once they're caught.

      During that time, people who did everything right, go through the appropriate processes and so on and so forth, have to dish out enormous amount of money and wait wait wait wait wait.

      I do have a green card, but I "married" into it. And even with that, its taking forever and the process is annoying and expensive.

      I know these people don't have it nearly as good as I do, and smuggling yourself in the country is far from fun, but they're basically being rewarded for having done it. And what about all the foreign people who stayed in their countries because they KNEW it was illegal to come here without appropriate visa? You're basically sending them a clear message: "You followed our laws. Thank you and screw you!"

    2. Re:Green Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relocate within a month? I guess Canadians are somehow lucky. For what I heard from many lawyers, seems like this time is more like 2 weeks. Seriously, two weeks to leave the country in case you lose your H1B job!?

      But yes, if getting the green card as a foreign with a PhD from an American university still means going through hoops and medical exams (to check if I have a third world country disease), I guess I agree that this sucks.

    3. Re:Green Card by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I worked for 4 years with an H1b. I was in NYC and there was no way to go for a green card in any sort of logical time frame (the solutions proposed were either marry or move to somewhere like Maine). What's worse, my wife was finishing her degree and she would also have to get her own H1b sponsorship, since H1b does not allow your dependents to work, with all the trouble that H1b applications entail (considerable). So, instead of drawing talent, H1bs end up only used for entry-level positions.
      Not to brag, but if you are very talented like myself, you will probably get pissed at how the US immigration system is treating you (waiting long lines every time at the airport, dependents not allowed to work, difficulty changing job etc). So, one day I told my boss that I'm going back to Europe and he was very pleased that I accepted to work remotely. And I left one more H1b available for those want to train their call center guys ;)

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    4. Re:Green Card by TheSync · · Score: 1

      You have millions of people who fully ignored laws they knew existed

      But we should be honest that for millions of illegal aliens in the US, there is no legal way for them to enter the country to work. If you are an unskilled worker from Mexico or Central America and have no family in the US, there is no visa program for you to come to the US to be a citizen, and there are very few visas available for guest workers as well.

      My (unskilled) great grandparents pretty much just walked off the boat, and they were citizens in a few years.

    5. Re:Green Card by Shados · · Score: 2

      And why exactly should immigration be available to everyone? if you are unskilled and don't have family, what exactly are you bringing? And its not cultural diversity, because there are plenty of people with in demand skills that quality for visas, and even more that have (legal) families here. Same for a lot of other countries.

      So what else?

    6. Re:Green Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      useless on call drone wants the world just for showing up

      not to brag but you are a douche, go away

  47. bs by superwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is little empirical evidence to suggest that foreign engineers displace American engineers as a whole.

    If this were true, they'd be given green cards instead H1B. With H1B, they are indentured servants. Getting fired means getting deported for them. Stop forcing Americans to compete with indentured servants in technology and then you'll see more Americans going into those fields. Even if you accept that they don't compete on salary, they still compete on work conditions.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  48. Nothing to see here. Move along... move along... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    And in other news, the bill has been declared DOA on arrival at the House of Representatives, where the Speaker of the House has announced that they intend to do their own thing, perhaps later this year, or possibly next year where a bill can be used as fodder for the 2014 campaigns.

    Meh.

  49. Multiply by 3 by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    That's the number of actual H1-B workers in this country. E.g. take the legal limit and multiply it by 3. We don't send them home when their Visas expire, so lots of them stay. The estimates are around 3 times the limit. 180,000 today. Once we raise the limit to 300,000 we'll have a million new tech workers hitting the economy within 3 years. Forget the tech economy, that'll depress _everyone's_ wages.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  50. still talking about Visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    interesting to see that Senate is still talking about H-1B visa. I thought slashdot ran an article about a month ago regarding a similar issue.

  51. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    given the fact you state...
      "This is why your government is pushing for this, so stop being paranoid." ...may mean you have an H1B? Or do you profit from hiring them :)

  52. Re:Not going to pass the House by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

    This shows a poor understanding of the problem.

    The issue is that we have >7.5% unemployment and it's worse if you consider other factors like labor force participation, number of people on food stamps, underemployment and wages have remained flat. It also has been said that the student loan business might be the next bubble that pops.

    Because of the raw data, why do we need to let millions of more people into the country, while we already have millions of people on the sidelines ready to work that are already here? It is one thing to let immigration happen when we are at full employment.

  53. Tech workers need lobbying organization by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

    Many industries have a lobbying group:

    1) Doctors have the American Medical Association
    2) Teachers have the National Education Association
    3) Realtors have the National Association of Realtors
    4) Senior citizens have the AARP

    And so on and so forth.

    The employing companies certainly are represented in Washington DC. Which is why we get the system we have. There's the IEEE which gave a whopping 70-80 thousand dollars a year to politicians. The ACM - I couldn't even find them as a lobbying organization at all.

    We can whine about it. But tech workers need a lobbying organization. Politicians do what's in their own personal best interests. And you can't expect them to vote against big donors. They won't even talk to you if you're not a sizable contributor or don't have some block of votes to present to them.

    1. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, the IEEE opposes the expansion of H-1B visas.

      http://www.deccanherald.com/content/332303/us-engineers-ask-senate-reject.html

    2. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a Union. Still interested? Start organizing. It'll be a hard sell, unfortunately.

    3. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      1) Not a "Union" any more than the AMA or the AAJ (trial lawyers association) is.

      2) It is not an intermediary between the worker and management.

      3) It is an intermediary between the worker and the POLITICIANS.

      Management lobbies politicians to get favorable laws written. The workers need to do the same.

    4. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Perfect example of how lobbying works. In this case, it was multiple unions with Washington DC lobbying presences who stopped the construction industry from bringing in more foreign workers:

      "Construction lobbyists fall short in push for more foreign workers
      By Peter Wallsten, Friday, June 28, 8:27
      Washington Post

      The sprawling Senate immigration legislation now headed to the House is packed with provisions designed to help businesses hire foreign workers, whether for computer labs in Silicon Valley, cruise ships docked in Florida and other U.S. ports, or seafood-processing centers in Alaska.

      Yet in the frenetic push by K Street to cram in as many new guest-worker visas as possible, lobbyists for one industry came up short: construction..."

    5. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      To give you some context regarding the size of the IEEE's political spending in 2012 (ACM spent precisely 0 dollars):

      1) IEEE spent 70,000 dollars on lobbying politicians in 2012.

      2) The National Association of Realtors spent 41 million dollars on politicians.

      3) The American Hospital Association spent 19 million on politicians.

      Source.

    6. Re:Tech workers need lobbying organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think we could hire the NRAs lobbyists? They seem to be extremely adept at keeping on message and witheringly punishing those who don't toe the line. I ahppen to disagree with them on policy but it's hard not to admire their ability to be so effective for so long.

  54. The other side of the coin... by yathaid · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I am an Indian, completed my MS in CS a year back, been working at a small e-commerce firm named after a large river for over a year now.
    There is a lot of hate that seems to be directed at companies hiring H-1Bs at a much lower than average salary rate. This hate is well deserved, it is nothing but exploitation. On the flip side, did you ever think about what makes people agree to those "lower" salaries? The Indian Rupee's exchange rate is at a historical low. That is the downside of having an artificially strong dollar (which gives you some other benefits, but hey, those benefits might not affect you, so who cares, right?)
    There also seems to be a lot of hate directed at Facebook and Microsoft. You people are definitely trolling. Most of the top ten software firms start the green card and naturalization process ASAP when you join. MS is specially regarded for this. And most of the H-1Bs they hire are students who came here for undergrad or (more likely) grad school. So hate on Facebook as much as you want, just not in this.
    The problem is that, all the IT firms who "import" cheap labor, coagulate the H-1B system. So those who would actually gain from this (and America would also gain from them) essentially go into a lottery for the H-1B slots. These are usually your giant IT (big difference when it comes to software and IT, especially with relation to job market in India) firms like Accenture.
    I have not read the full bill yet, saving that for the weekend. But if it has some provision to split these two types of H-1Bs, this would be a big win-win.

    P.S. America does really not have enough Electrical, Mechanical and Civil (maybe more disciplines, but these are the ones I have close friends in) engineers. Please do not conflate software with tech.

    1. Re:The other side of the coin... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      America does really not have enough Electrical, Mechanical and Civil (maybe more disciplines, but these are the ones I have close friends in) engineers.

      Evidence?

    2. Re:The other side of the coin... by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Many of us realize limited, legal immigration is a good thing. New ideas, smart people, genetic diversity, global perspective - all good things.

      HOWEVER - when we have the system we have now - nearly unlimited illegal immigration plus skilled labor being imported primarily to suppress wages, then the citizens being affected have an interest in trying to stop it.

  55. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HR is for the cattle.

    Indeed. Most of our people were hired either through referrals, or through our internship program. Less than 10% were hired by submitting a resume to HR. Instead of shotgunning resumes, you should be using your network. If you don't have a network, you need to start building one: go to meetups, volunteer for a FOSS project, etc.

  56. Establish an H-1B Job Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real leverage point is the 65 hour work week ("we must deliver on time!"). High tech workers are "salaried professionals" under labor law and so are exempt from being paid overtime. H-1B holders work the long weeks without complaint because they are not at liberty to change employers; American workers would seek new employment when continually abused. Even if paid prevailing wage (based on 40-hour equivalent salary), the H-1B holders are relatively less expensive due to the number of hours they work without additional compensation. One solution would be to have all H-1Bs job shop directly from the Department of Labor. They should be non-exempt and able to change employers at will via the job shop office at the DoL.

  57. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Here's how you know you're a moron:

    The H-1B visa lasts for 3 or 6 years. And you have to leave the country when it's done.

    Your story might make sense if it was a permanent visa. But it's not.

  58. The whole idea is to "displace American engineers" by hessian · · Score: 1

    Think about it.

    If American engineers are good enough, why import anyone?

    If they're not good enough, what are they saying -- foreign engineers are better? For what reason?

    The point is that other nations have less developed economies and so it's cheaper to import these people and then drop them when they hit 40.

    Either way however, an American job is displaced and you're worth less as a result.

  59. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by Stonefish · · Score: 1

    H1Bs are not good for the US, they are good for a segment of the US population at least in the short term, those who own companies. H1Bs are used because they're cheaper and work longer hours and hence cut my company's overheads. I should no longer have to pay the overheads associated with training them so I pay fewer taxes to support training institutions such as Universities as most are trained overseas anyway. It really depends upon your perspective.

  60. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    H1-B visa is a dual-intent visa - you're allowed to use it as a path to residency.

  61. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It confuses me; I swear the people that post all this anti-H1-B crap are just the dregs who didn't try hard enough to get hired or something.

    I work in a company that takes on lots of H1-Bs. They take on even more locals. Hell they take on anyone qualified they can find because there isn't enough and I can tell you that the H1-Bs are paid on par or better than the local hires.

  62. I sure do hope it passes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want to have to actually GET a job, with my experience and certifications....

    I would much rather lose my house and so on since I can't get a frigging JOB.

    Posted by one of the older, experienced, certified tech workers who is, in fact, willing to work for somewhat less than "top dollar."

    I just need a damn job.
    And McDonald's isn't hiring (and seems about the only other option around here.)

  63. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by rnturn · · Score: 1

    HR folks have always been this clueless. Years ago I was applying for a job as a VMS system manager and they wanted to know if I knew anything about DCL. About on par with the recent job ads I've seen for Sr. UNIX administrators that need to know shell.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  64. White people have the right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... to have their own countries.

    Don't think so? Please explain why.

    Just imagine- if white people had their OWN countries, and all the insane whites who actually want to live as a white minority surrounded by hate-filled non-whites were free to do so - in non-white countries, none of these problems would be occurring. No TSA, because no muslims, no war in Iraq, because no Jews running your Congress for you. Oh no! We can't make the poor Jews LIVE AMONG THEIR OWN KIND, that would be just awful, wouldn't it. LOL.

  65. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    This is why your government is pushing for this, so stop being paranoid.

    Our government is pushing for this because our corporations (which control our government) are pushing for this, because it will help them make money. It wouldn't help them make money unless they could pay the employees less, because there's no shortage of potential employees who are already citizens, unless you refuse to pay them decently. Who needs to be paranoid? It's not a secret that legislation is written and then sponsored (economically) by corporations in the USA.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  66. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no shortage of qualified technical workers in the US who are unwilling to relocate to where the jobs are. Meanwhile, in the ares where there are jobs, I have 10 open recs right now and haven't been able to find anyone even remotely qualified. The budget for fiscal '14 hasn't been finalized, but I'll probably have another 6 heads in Q1. Which is all just on paper anyways because I doubt I'll find more than 2-3 qualified candidates and I'll be lucky to have 1-2 accept our offer. I've got numerous friends at other companies who are experiencing the same thing. If you can't get hired in San Francisco right now you either aren't qualified, have wildly outlandish salary demands (moderately outlandish salary demands are considered reasonable these days) or simply don't know how to look for jobs.

    Companies want H1-Bs because they don't have an attachment to any geographical area and are willing to move to where the jobs are. To anyone that's bitching about H1-Bs or lack of jobs...consider moving to the bay area...it costs a shit ton to live here, but you'll get paid a shit ton plus to work here.

  67. the problem with indian and paki tech workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have no individual initiative

    they do just fine when you give them perfectly detailed requirements but they will not do a single smidgeon of work outside of their specific field of proficiency

    this is a huge issue when a problem occurs and you dont know which part of the system isn't working, and the subcontinentals refuse make any effort to test their own code before everyone else spends the resources to isolate the problems

    and as a software vendor when I have to deal with an indian or paki "technical leads" they refuse to make a basic effort of reading a straightforward API document, intead they expect a continuous stream of "examples" in escalating levels of specificity and should you push back they immediately complain to their manager that you aren't being cooperative

    also they are fine to communicate over email but gods help you if you have to be in on a conference call with them, you can't undertand a damn thing they say

    and if you are stuck working next to them they sweat curry and stink up the whole room, and depending on how FOB they are that might be a good thing because it masks their irregularly bathing body odor

  68. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

    There is no shortage of qualified technical workers in the US who are unwilling to relocate to where the jobs are. Meanwhile, in the ares where there are jobs, I have 10 open recs right now and haven't been able to find anyone even remotely qualified. The budget for fiscal '14 hasn't been finalized, but I'll probably have another 6 heads in Q1. Which is all just on paper anyways because I doubt I'll find more than 2-3 qualified candidates and I'll be lucky to have 1-2 accept our offer. I've got numerous friends at other companies who are experiencing the same thing. If you can't get hired in San Francisco right now you either aren't qualified, have wildly outlandish salary demands (moderately outlandish salary demands are considered reasonable these days) or simply don't know how to look for jobs.

    Companies want H1-Bs because they don't have an attachment to any geographical area and are willing to move to where the jobs are. To anyone that's bitching about H1-Bs or lack of jobs...consider moving to the bay area...it costs a shit ton to live here, but you'll get paid a shit ton plus to work here.

    Move your HQ a few hundred miles up to Portland and you'll find no trouble filling those spots. People don't always mind relocating, but they want to move somewhere that they can one day buy a house, and that is not the case in the bay area.

  69. Write to Order by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, I worked in an immigration law firm. It is a minor art form to write the adverts you need to run to justify a foreign hire. You write them so only your proposed applicant can pass. If you see a want ad that is highly specific and almost impossible, you can bet it is a dummy ad so that an employer can justify to INS that "there is no one who fits my job description". Oh, and yes, as nice as individuals may be, the employer does OWN the foreign hire. You tech guys just got royally done by Congress. Sorry. The same folks who thought it a great idea to do fabrication off shore also think importing the low wage scale economy here is a good idea.

  70. Re:Not going to pass the House by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    while we already have millions of people on the sidelines ready to work that are already here? It is one thing to let immigration happen when we are at full employment.

    What skills do those millions have? Presumably not the ones that are in high demand.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  71. H1-Bs lower wages by evilviper · · Score: 1

    The justification for H1-Bs always sounds like lying with statistics... No, you're not having a harder time finding a job, the wages are just stuck where they were a decade ago, and despite the huge industry growth, there aren't any more jobs available than before.

    The workers are often paid âoehome-country wagesâ in America. âoeThatâ(TM)s as low as $8,000 a yearâ with housing allowances, he says. The employers own the visas â" so the workers canâ(TM)t bargain for wages, and if they lose their job they have to leave the country.
    http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-05-20/business/35232356_1_aegis-communications-indian-workers-customer-service/2

    And though slightly different than H1-Bs:

    The number of IT jobs at large corporations is decreasing significantly, and the decline can be largely attributed to offshoring
    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9225376/Offshoring_shrinks_number_of_IT_jobs_study_says_

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  72. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does congress hate my country so?

  73. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the money i spent on my Spanish lessons wasn't wasted!

  74. COMPLETE AND UTTER BETRAYAL of this nation and c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a look at the numbers:

    The current H-1B cap is 65,000. However, this is deceiving as it's a multi-year visa with numerous exemptions. Thus actual number of H-1Bs working in the US is ~700,000.

    The Senate legislation TRIPLES the cap to 180,000 which would yield ~1.9 million H-1B workers in the US. There's an escalating cap tied to visa requests and 4.5% unemployment -- triple full employment and including only layoffs within 3 months. Corporations no longer have requirements to consider citizens and have free rein to fill US jobs directly overseas.

    As a bonus, spouses of H-1Bs automatically qualify for a work visa not counted in the cap. Foreign tech couples will soon be in high demand. But wait, there's more.

    Then the new E-4/5 visa was added. This H-1B-style visa extends an additional 155,000 annual work visas to countries with free trade agreements. This alone is over twice the current H-1B program.

    The Senate also awarded unlimited green cards to foreign STEM graduates with advanced degrees accepting US jobs. Citizens can expect escalation of educational costs and children crowded out of school under demand by the world elite.

    As a final bonus, corporations are exempted from health insurance on visa workers placing $3,000 penalty on citizens already disadvantaged by corporate cost for worker compensation, unemployment insurance, severance and retirements, plus higher US costs for education.

    The number of foreign visas now approaches the size of the entire US job market at 4.5 million. There is no way to view this other than as a COMPLETE AND UTTER BETRAYAL of this nation and citizens.

  75. Short version by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    You can come here and take our money and others' jobs just as long as you've giving us tax money, but you just plain can't live here. No hard feelings.

  76. Re:Take HR out of the loop as well some of staffin by dbIII · · Score: 2

    In many large places HR have far too much power in office politics and insist that everyone plays by their rules. The answer is to go to a place small enough that HR has less power than the department head that wants to hire people (and CAN ask for a rubber stamp), or start collecting those keywords.

  77. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    If something costs more than the market will pay and nobody will supply it at a fair market rate there is, by definition, a shortage.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  78. Re:The whole idea is to "displace American enginee by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I work in a niche technology field. There are only about 3000 engineers worldwide in this field, and of those maybe only a few hundred have several years of operational experience (which is a major issue, as minor screw-ups in operation can cost $100,000 or more). Pretty much all the qualified American engineers are in a job already.

    I know several folks in the industry who came to the US from other countries (mainly Europe) on H1-B. Also some of those folks got messed up in the bureaucracy and then had to spend less productive time outside the US while the government got its act together.

  79. Re:Not going to pass the House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You underestimate the power of the dark side.

    If it doesn't pass the house, the bill will be stripped of everything except the H-1B increases, and then passed separately, or another bill containg just the H-1B increases will be written and passed separately. The whole point of a comprehensive immigration bill was to "hide" the H-1B increase within it. If the bill fails because the republicans don't want 10 million democrats added to the voter rolls, they will just pass the H-1B increase.

    I wrote a letter to Diane Feinstein to express my concerns, and the words in the response were carefully chosen to be soothing, and leave out several probems
    with the bill (Hatch's modifications in particular). I've come to the concusion that the fhe Federal government is broken. We need a new con-con or an article V convention to fix it so that corporations can't control the operation of the federal government.

  80. Freedom - I'm a believer by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I believe in FREE SOFTWARE and FREE MOVEMENT OF LABOR!

  81. Re:Not going to pass the House by dbIII · · Score: 2

    There's no point ignoring what's already happened. You've got a huge shadow economy of "illegal" workers and keeping it in the shadows doesn't help your country. They are there and there are not enough jails to put them in (not that such a thing would be anything other than a stupid and expensive idea) so why have a law that a country has no intention to enforce on the books at all? It's not a "reward", it is instead just a consequence of deciding to stop a pointless effort to endlessly push shit uphill.

  82. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    You understand nothing about free markets. "Fair market rate" is meaningless. If you don't see an increase in prices, then there is no shortage.

  83. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America does NOT need more STEM immigrants! Want to see some good data?
    Some of the information presented in the following links will shock most Americans, because American corporate leaders don't want us to know the truth, and they are paying off policy makers with contributions to keep the truth from us. Bill Gates, John Chambers, Eric Schmidt, and many, many others - including the principals of the most prominent immigration law firms, who profit from this outrage, are lying through their teeth. There is NO shortage of STEM workers in the US!!

    The H-1B fiasco has cost Americans **$10TRILLION** dollars, since 1975. For anyone who wants to know the truth, read on.

    One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley:
    http://www.cringely.com/2012/10/23/what-americans-dont-know-about-h-1b-visas-could-hurt-us-all/

    Watch this attorney and his consultants teach corporations how to manipulate the law to replace qualified American workers:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU

    Here's more abuse of the L-1 Visa (H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg
    http://economyincrisis.org/content/l-visa-programs-brimming-abuses

    Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies:
    http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/h1b.html

    Also, little known is the tactic of creating many different kinds of sub-visa categories to "fool the system". There are almost TWENTY different kinds of work visas. The whole thing is a sham and a lie, designed to drag down wages and keep from having to re-train Americans. Never thought I would see this day!

    Come on down to Silicon Valley, where the bulk of tech recuiters are South Asian Indians who came here on H1-B's or one of more than a DOZEN other work visas. Come on down to see these recruiters "hire their own"!!

    I have seen with my own eyes, completely UNQUALIFIED Indian engineers win out tech staffing jobs at places like Google because...you guessed it; they were Indian! They were networked to other Indians.

    Go look at GE's new Global Software Center, where something like 90% of all new hires are from India! Are you telling me that that center could not find even 50% of its hires from qualified Americans who are here.

    Also note that H1-Bs from India and China (especially) bring with them their 19th century attitudes about treating subordinates and women like garbage. I never thought I would see the day when AMERICAN intellectual capital was hollowed out to this degree, in the tech and a few other sectors.

    What's even more infuriating is that this is a well-funded lobbying effort by the "do no harm" folks. They make me sick, as they are TRAITORS to the American worker.

    This bill is a SHAM, and a LIE. Like I said, come out to Silicon Valley and talk to some unemployed tech workers. Ask them who the recruiters are. Ask them why the RFP's for positions like basic QA require a deep working knowledge of advanced code that will NEVER be used on the job. Go look at the resumes from Indian H1-B candidates who have (except for IIT) been to crap universities where teachers don't even show up, but these students "pass" their courses, get their "degrees", and put their "qualifications" out there in a way that meshes with bogus RFP's.

    BIll Gates, and the rest of the phoney creeps who are asking for more immigrant STEM talent are TRAITORS to the American worker. Screw them!

  84. goto 1 by eviljav · · Score: 1

    1. "Oh no, salaries in technical fields are not high enough to attract enough people to major in them"

    2. "Lets import lots of people from outside the country to lower wages of workers in technical fields"

    3. goto 1

  85. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another thing about this bill is that it would - for the first time - even as STEM-based H1-B quotas would increase, permit the spouses of H1-Bs to almost immediately go to work in the US. Are you kidding me? In this economy? I can't believe that this part of the immigration bill has been allowed to see the light of day. It's a sham, and a bribed piece of legislation. Eric Schmidt, Bill Gates, and the rest of the liars who support this bill have made their billions on the backs of American tech workers, and now want to betray them. Those men and others like them should be called the traitors to American labor and liars that that they are!

  86. Re:Not going to pass the House by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

    A shame your business is now going to have to pay higher wages to attract talent instead of sending the Amistad for another pickup run.

  87. Re:Stop being stupid, H1Bs are good for the US. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Still have to leave the country for a time, even if you do use it towards residency.

  88. skilled workers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    like the guy who recently interviewed, knew only horridly broken english, and went on for 20 min over kickball?

    worries!

  89. Are you slow? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Nice fantasy world but the rest of us live elsewhere

    The problem, as should be obvious from a line like that, is not location but reality or otherwise. Should I have been less subtle and just called you a liar instead? I'm not sure what sort of liar - whether you are pretending to have a clue and just making stuff up or it is deliberate and agenda driven, but either way reality does not match the line you are pushing. There's plenty of people willing to move anywhere that are having trouble finding work, and people advertising jobs in remote area are not having trouble finding people to fill them.

  90. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > THEIR IS NO SHORTAGE of qualified technical workers in the United States
    > THEIR IS NO SHORTAGE
    > THEIR

    Yyyyyyyeah. They took jer jerb?

  91. It's about cheap labor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The H-1B work visa is fundamentally about cheap, de facto indentured labor." - Dr. Norman Matloff http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/h1b.html

  92. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lot more details here: http://blog.mygcvisa.com/

  93. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Some corporations just want more H1-Bs because they're cheaper.

    Same reason we have this lovely immigration reform bill, instead of just enforcing existing law to crack down on businesses that cause illegal immigration in the first place.

  94. H1B/Immigrants from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans should be concerned about the creeping Caste system in USA due to H1B/Immigrants from India.

    Caste system is worse than terrorism. It's a hidden apartheid and a slow poison that will destroy your economy.

    Google "Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians".
    http://pastebin.com/Uk7Y2dnZ

  95. H1B/Immigrants from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans should be concerned about the creeping Caste system in USA due to H1B/Immigrants from India.

    Caste system is worse than terrorism.
    It's a hidden apartheid and a slow poison that will destroy your economy.

    Google "Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians".
    http://pastebin.com/Uk7Y2dnZ

  96. Re:Oh Sure. More Supply == More Demand by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    But that's what we're arguing about is an increase in the price of labor above what the market will bare. Because there was a shortage of good US workers their price went up to the point it is above their value. So people are looking to be able to shop around and find a lower price.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  97. PROBLEM is nation vs population by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The system is built around quotas by nation; which is idiotic. Mexico has a huge population and should get more slots open for legal immigration than some tiny nation.

  98. Emperical skilled workers from abroad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is absolutey no empirical evidence that shows that American, and especially American college kids can't feel all the necessary high skilled, and low skilled jobs in this country. For some reason empolyers don't want to hire American College students, they want mindless, cheap slave labor in all capacities.

  99. Keep H-1B levels the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The goal is to obtain higher level engineers and PhD resources. But in reality the large Indian firms are given a green light to displace American workers. I have been to India. I have witnessed first hand on what's going on and some of these Indian companies have hired US Lobbyists to push our politicians. Block IT workers but allow PhD, Master degree candidates in. Not Infosys, TCS, etc. Scab labor, pure and simple.

  100. Fines for hiring U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the part of the bill that fines companies for hiring U.S. citizens over H-1B workers. More filthy liberal "social justice." I'm tired of being punished for being a U.S. citizen.