Slashdot Mirror


Data Storage That Could Outlast the Human Race

Nerval's Lobster writes "Just in case you haven't been keeping up with the latest in five-dimensional digital data storage using femtocell-laser inscription, here's an update: it works. A team of researchers at the University of Southampton have demonstrated a way to record and retrieve as much as 360 terabytes of digital data onto a single disk of quartz glass in a way that can withstand temperatures of up to 1000 C and should keep the data stable and readable for up to a million years. 'It is thrilling to think that we have created the first document which will likely survive the human race,' said Peter Kazansky, professor of physical optoelectronics at the Univ. of Southampton's Optical Research Centre. 'This technology can secure the last evidence of civilization: all we've learnt will not be forgotten.' Leaving aside the question of how many Twitter posts and Facebook updates really need to be preserved longer than the human species, the technology appears to have tremendous potential for low-cost, long-term, high-volume archiving of enormous databanks. The quartz-glass technique relies on lasers pulsing one quadrillion times per second though a modulator that splits each pulse into 256 beams, generating a holographic image that is recorded on self-assembled nanostructures within a disk of fused-quartz glass. The data are stored in a five-dimensional matrix—the size and directional orientation of each nanostructured dot becomes dimensions four and five, in addition to the usual X, Y and Z axes that describe physical location. Files are written in three layers of dots, separated by five micrometers within a disk of quartz glass nicknamed 'Superman memory crystal' by researchers. (Hitachi has also been researching something similar.)"

231 comments

  1. Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or rather completely irrelevant. Nothing to see here except a few people that want attention. The issue with long-term storage is _not_ how to preserve the bits. It is how to preserve Reading equipment and, even more difficult, software that can read the data stored and transform it into something the user can read.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Wescotte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, did you not read the article?! It's 5D!!!

    2. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. The concept of a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge with femtocell lasers is hilarious.

    3. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, you must be a data storage specialist, Sir. Probably you even have your own research lab doing R & D in exactly the direction these talented people work in, and you know all the relevant literature, went to the important conferences. Otherwise you would not, I trust, have emitted such a peremptory yet wise judgment ?

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    4. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm personally more interested on the fact it's data stored on a crystal.

    5. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      Who could ever need more than 4D?

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    6. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 2

      A post-apocalypse society of autodidactic polymaths with eidetic mentation would make short work of figuring it out.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    7. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by maroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm happy with DD (2D?), but prefer C myself.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    8. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by shia84 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Who cares about a post-apocalypse tribal society on a pre-modern tech stage trying to restore mankinds' knowledge?
      Give them 10k more years and they'll manage to do it with femtocell lasers just fine. Or 50k years, it really doesn't matter, it simply shrinks compared to the idea that some cataclysm just wiped out all books accessible in the world, all professional knowledge, reading skills, parents-teaching-offspring, dozens of other information carrying media types (respectively it's usage knowledge) that would be around anyway etc. which could allow them to get up and running more quickly... but somehow left a few humans alive.

      This storage type is not meant for a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge. But some of us would be happy if the now often unreadable magnetic records from 70 years ago would have been stored on something more durable.

    9. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently, the reading equipment tends to outlast the tapes. As for the reading software, we can back those up too. So no, this invention is indeed useful.

    10. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      The concept of a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge with femtocell lasers is hilarious.

      Femtocell Sharks.

    11. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by DFurno2003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He does have a 5 Digit id.

    12. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame the mods here lack a sense of humor :D

    13. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Alef · · Score: 2

      It is how to preserve Reading equipment and, even more difficult, software that can read the data stored and transform it into something the user can read.

      Oh, really? Well, in that case the equipment part must be trivial. Or what exactly do you think would be so difficult about reverse engineering a file format, in particular one that has been designed to be reverse engineered in the first place?

    14. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Software is no issue, you can just store a description of the algorithms in ASCII. Even if the ASCII standard is lost, a little frequency counting will be enough to rediscover it.

      A greater issue is keeping it readable to humans: In ten thousand years, English will probably be about as commonly-spoken as linear-A.

    15. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Ah, it is so nice to be appreciated and understood! Thank you!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not for tape _archiving_. There the tapes have 30-50 years lifetime, while the drives have 5 years. Also not for MOD. There the disks have >80 years, while the drives again have 5 years.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Or rather completely irrelevant. Nothing to see here except a few people that want attention. The issue with long-term storage is _not_ how to preserve the bits. It is how to preserve Reading equipment and, even more difficult, software that can read the data stored and transform it into something the user can read.

      some data was recorded in quartz glass before this too. data visible by naked eye,too.

      by them going for this angle in their press release makes me think that their method isn't too practical for data storage though...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      some data was recorded in quartz glass before this too. data visible by naked eye,too.

      by them going for this angle in their press release makes me think that their method isn't too practical for data storage though...

      Indeed. Good catch!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fucking A! (or is that illegal these days)

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    20. Re: Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Your kung fu is strong young grasshopper ;).

    21. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Aboroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Researchers are used to overselling their discoveries all the time, to continue or get more funding. While they might be doing boring materials science, they have to come up with lots of pie-in-the-sky ideas about what their research could potentially be used for, if somebody can ever get enough engineers together to figure out the pesky implementation details. Geeks around here have heard promise after promise about revolutionary storage technology that goes nowhere precisely because of this drastic overselling to grab research money. It would be nice if the research system didn't force people to do this, but you can't be surprised by the skeptics of this given the nature of the beast.

      So no, I don't expect that the people who did this research care about the feasibility of the reading technology lasting as long as the data. Well, they probably care a little, but they did something and are going to brag about it as much as possible without focusing on the downsides or unfinished parts too much. It isn't their problem, they just do the research and sell it with hype, to get more money to do more research. The implementation and feasibility studies aren't their problem, that is, unless somebody gives them more money to do those things.

    22. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If storing the data is "completely irrelevant" I wonder what it is you expect to read once you've engineered high-longevity reading equipment. Aren't both kind of important, smartarse?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    23. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but he read a document from such a specialist. :P

      (I'm highlighting that you can't possibly know if said document is from a specialist, unless you're a specialist too, and anything else is a "argument from authority" fallacy.)

    24. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. If something is funny is determined by the following algorithm:

      meme = find_matching_meme(post)
        if (meme == none)
          return not_funny
        else if (meme.category = funny_meme)
          return funny
        else
          return not_funny

    25. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However he raises a good point. Storing data is one thing, but how is it to be read far in the future? I think tapes and VCRs would be a good example of this.

    26. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 2

      I don't think there are any laws against fucking up the ass, but you might want to check with your local government to make sure...

    27. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Slashdot. Please trim the redundant branches from your joke code in future to aid readability:


      meme = find_matching_meme(post)

      if (meme && meme.category == funny_meme)
              return funny
      else
              return not_funny

      --
      which is totally what she said
    28. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by jythie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh no! Not scientific research! How dare it not have immediate marketing applications!

    29. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by pantaril · · Score: 2

      The issue with long-term storage is _not_ how to preserve the bits

      This is wrong. For example with my collection of optical disks my problem is precisly how to preserve the bits. Reading equipment is non-issue.

    30. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your snark and seemingly insight aside, he hits the nail on the head.

      Storing data is a problem, but not the core issue. The core is accessing it, where the interface and encoding (software) was spoken about.

      Let me use a car analogy: We can encode all possible information we want on a couple of bricks (thing gold inlays), put them into a car, and then shoot that car into space. If we pick a region that we consider to be "quite empty", that data on the bricks is going to survive mankind. Maybe even a few tens of million or even billion years.
      What is going to pose a problem is to retrieve that information again, which is what your Parent was talking about. What good is your sugar-cube sized gem worth if it is buried deep within the earth, and no one knows how to read it, even if they found it?

      This all aside: it is a pretty cool idea to assume we'd store our current scientific, cultural state every 10 years on such a thing and left them in a place where "coming races" (I am not even talking about coming generations) might find them. So I'm all for: Let's do it, this is awesome. And if you want, you can also encode a picture of your junk and call it "information about our biology".

    31. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by geirlk · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll steal this and post where slightly relevant.

    32. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

      But some of us would be happy if the now often unreadable magnetic records from 70 years ago would have been stored on something more durable.

      Because those TPS reports will make great reading?

    33. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out the economic issue with long-term data storage. What data is actually worth keeping that long? I'm sure there's a few examples besides the obvious benefit for future historians, but in a lot of cases we're keeping too much data, and we should be thankful that it deteriorates.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    34. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      if (meme) then goto hell

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    35. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by ianare · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the last sentence of the article:

      "The team are now looking for industry partners to commercialise this ground-breaking new technology."

      So they are thinking about finishing the product, and making it accessible outside the research field. I can see a company like IBM showing interest in this.

    36. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, in "consumer" technology (i.e. "sub-standard crap made by the cheapest source"), this is can be an issue. But that issue is solved and does not qualify as a "problem". If you write all your data on tissue and then keep that tissue outside in the rain, it will not survive very long either.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    37. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Nothing to see here except a few people [who] want attention.

      That is his field, and he knows it well.

    38. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      your algo returns not funny if meme==none and funny in all other cases assuming that assignment in second if gives out true.

    39. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The concept of a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge with femtocell lasers is hilarious.

      We are that society. Now that the femtocell readout device is re-invented, we can start decoding the information in what we until now thought was 'imperfect diamonds' ...

    40. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While they might be doing boring materials science, they have to come up with lots of pie-in-the-sky ideas about what their research could potentially be used for, if somebody can ever get enough engineers together to figure out the pesky implementation details. Geeks around here have heard promise after promise about revolutionary storage technology that goes nowhere precisely because of this drastic overselling to grab research money.

      We have gone from having a 3.5" surface that holds on average 1.4 million bytes or at most 2.8 million bytes - to a time where that same 3.5" of surface now holds upwards of 3 trillion bytes.

      That is hardly "goes no where"

      I for one am pretty thankful for our cheap and no less reliable 3 TB drives compared to the floppy disks of days past.

      I remember starting out with 5.25" floppies that were still actually floppy on the outside, holding 80 KB per side (140 KB if you flip the thing over manually), as a technology replacing audio tape cassette with seek times that are in many ways laughable today.
      There are others here who have lived with even older technologies and grew up very familiar with the storage problem on hardware I suspect you might not believe was ever as limited as it was.

      Just because some scientists never realized their ideas does not mean the entire storage field has gone no where over the years or that no scientist ever has.

    41. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I learnt that this researcher hasn't learnt anything. I also learnt I cant take anyone seriously who hasn't learnt the art of storage.

    42. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Femtocell Sharks.

      Oh man I wish I had mod points...

    43. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I just want to know where along the 18-species Last and First Men curve you're talking about. Please be more specific.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    44. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might want to check this out then... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law

    45. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeks around here have heard promise after promise about revolutionary storage technology that goes nowhere precisely because of this drastic overselling to grab research money. It would be nice if the research system didn't force people to do this, but you can't be surprised by the skeptics of this given the nature of the beast.

      And apparently, geeks around here are too fucking stupid to realize that it will probably take a decade or more to actually commercialize a technology, and probably another 5 years after THAT to make it accessible to lower ends of the market.

      Perpendicular recording: First demonstrated in a lab in 1976. Commercially produced in commodity drives: 2006.

      Solid State drives: First developed in a lab in 1994 (Flash based... precursors using different tech went back to the 50's). Commercially produced in commodity drives: 2007-ish, and still took a couple years to become common.

      Many of the advances you're whining about *will* turn into commercially viable products - but it takes time to develop them, build manufacturing processes for them, and get the industry to adopt a new standard. First customers will be: governments and large banks & financial firms (with long & high-capacity data retention regs), and then a few years after that, you'll be able to buy your very own "LifeDrive, the only hard drive you'll ever need for the rest of your life - store all your data from every bit of your life in a convenient, CD-sized format!"

    46. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laugh it up, chucklehead. "learnt" is completely valid in the context it was used outside of the US - learnt and learned may be used interchangeably - it's only in the US that they pretend the word 'learnt' doesn't exist.

      Maybe you should go back to school, become a learned expert in English grammar, and then come out and tell us all about what you've learnt?

    47. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by dywolf · · Score: 2

      Give them 10k more years and they'll manage to do it with femtocell lasers just fine. Or 50k years, it really doesn't matter,

      Assuming they even know to look in the first place, or even want to.
      It's not just the ability to restore the knowledge, it's also the inclination to even do so, and the benefit of doing so.

      First "Benefit": If they have to wait til they have the same tech we do now, then there isn't even any benefit, because they ALREADY have the same tech we do now. Thus there is no gain, there is no "knowledge to restore" becaue they already have the same knowledge. This is a fundamental problem with using the highest of the high tech to store the knowledge of some arbitrary "today". All they "gain" is a history book, and proof we existed, but OUR knowledge provides no actual benefit. Compared to finding a book or computer, or other "old tech", storing our knowledge that would allow leapfrogging of natural technological progress. Note that "they" will decode our knowledge regardless, because of the chance we knight speed their develpoment; but it's up to us to ensure that our recorded knowledge actually allows it to happen.

      Second, Inclination: This ties into the basis of the benefit concept: if they have to wait til they have the same leading edge tech as us, how will they even know that this oddly shaded glass discs are anything more than frisbees, or dinner plates, or art, let alone the sum of our civilization's knowledge? How will they even know to look? (Philisophically, how would we even know to look ourselves, at crystals buried in "rock" hundreds of thousands of years old or more?) This is largely a engineering/design problem, and somewhat easily surmountable, but still something to consider. Superman quartz crystals just look like bigger than average quartz crystals, and we can't garuntee the why or how of such a thing would be found. So it needs to really stick out and scream "I am special".

      So this tech is good (not saying its not): unlike books (exmaple) it doesnt require a lot of special precuations to survive a really long time. But, it's still not the end of the story. And if we keep developing better and better long term storage, always upgrading to the "best of the best" to store our knowledge wont necessarily provide a net benefit to the future society, by allowing the hypotehtical future society to easily leapfrog their natural technological developement.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    48. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Holy shitballs, you fucktard - way to miss the point. The disk holds 360 Terabytes. 360 Terabytes?! Companies ALREADY HAVE THAT MUCH DATA. Lots of places have PETABYTES of data, and I'm sure there's more than a few pushing exabytes of data around.

      The fact that this storage media may be useful a million years in the future doesn't really matter to *us* - what matters is this: will it be readable in 10 years, when you pull an archive disk from Iron Mountain to prove you developed your code internally, and didn't rip someone off, while defending yourself from a lawsuit, or a regulatory action?

      The answer is, YES, it will be. Companies STORING shit in this high-density, stable format will keep a drive around to be able to read this format, and the problem will solve itself. By that point, the original techniques will probaby be out of patent protection too, meaning ANYBODY with sufficient drive and funding could reproduce a drive to read this media themselves - though it would certainly have to be extremely valuable data.

      Why do nerds read these things and say, "OH GOD THE ONLY POSSIBLE USE FOR HIGH VOLUME, LONG TERM DATA STORAGE IS REBUILDING HUMAN CIVILIZATION FROM THE ASHES OF NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION!"? It's fucking retarded.

    49. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the hope that 1 million years from now an extra terrestrial alien race will find our collective works and knowledge? I guess thats a stupid idea right?

    50. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL.... 'nuff said

    51. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is more to back up than technical knowledge. We've bypassed the technology of the mayans and other ancient supercultures (assuming you aren't buying into the ideas that they had alien tech and stuff), but we still have an interest in learning about them. I know slashdot is a crowd obsessed with tech over culture, but cultural knowledge is valuable. TFS jokes about it, but honestly, backing up facebook would probably be incredibly interesting to a future civilization.

    52. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the idea of the information not being lost after humans is silly. 1 million years may be a fair bit in regards to the human species, but the chances of anyone else even finding it within a million years is pretty remote.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    53. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      step 1) create storage platters that can last a million years.
      step 2) label platters "these are NOT frisbees"
      step 3) create readers, for those platters, that can last a million years.

      Low tech storage like books are nice for passing knowledge, but they just don't have very good storage density. and they still have a relatively short lifespan (measured in hundreds of years?) compared to this.

    54. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Sunastar · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I've been programming in 4D (database) for years! Wait, I think I've crossed over into the wrong forum...

    55. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I'll take any letter.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    56. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Ego animus per motum voluntatis.
      Illud est per quod cogitationes sucus sapho acquirere celeritatem,
      Labia acquirere maculas.
      Maculas cedat documentum.
      Ego animus per motum voluntatis.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    57. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This tech reminds of the crystal skulls. When I first learned about them someone suggested that they somehow stored all of mankind's past knowledge.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    58. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by datavirtue · · Score: 1
      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    59. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I would love to see the look on a kid's face as they experience a floppy for the first time. I think it akin to walking up hill in the snow both ways to school. I love the sound.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    60. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Vellem tantum habere me puncta Mod ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    61. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      For anyone thats not an ancient Roman:

      "I am moved by the courage of the will.
      It is the juice that thoughts acquire speed Saph,
      Lips acquire stains.
      Stains become a warning.
      I am moved by the courage of the will."

      Not sure Google Translate got this right but I like it. "Lips acquire Stains" would make a great name for a band.

    62. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The result of that bug can be observed quite regularly on Slashdot: Post a meme and you'll get moderated funny, no matter if it is actually funny or not.

    63. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole lot of good that will do them when they start carving up these gems to put them in their trinkets.

    64. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      For anyone who hasn't seen the film "Dune":

      It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
      It is by the juice of Sapho that thoughts acquire speed,
      the lips acquire stains.
      The stains become a warning.
      It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    65. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Kind of a straw man, right? Because first, we have to assume a world-wide apocalypse rather than a regional disaster or simple political or social upheaval. Second, we have to assume that all technology is lost and that it's not possible to leave recovery instructions in another format, like the record cover on the Voyager probes.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    66. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Opyros · · Score: 1

      And Penguinisto's response means "I wish I had mod points".

    67. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      Read the books, saw the movies (the original and the SF remake), even bought the soundtrack, dont remember the reference. Thanks!

    68. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      "Pound pastrami, can kraut, six bagels" :)

    69. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      And when I read this, I hear it in Brad Dourif's voice LOL

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    70. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Read the books, saw the movies (the original and the SF remake), even bought the soundtrack, dont remember the reference. Thanks!

      It's in the first book, of course, and in the Dino de Laurentis movie, it's what Piter deVries chants on the tram as he's going to meet the Baron for the first time onscreen.

      Sounds like you could use this technology to remember this kind of trivia

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    71. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      and the hope that 1 million years from now an extra terrestrial alien race will find our collective works and knowledge? I guess thats a stupid idea right?

      or a way for DisneyCorp to assure their perpetual copyright?

      Personally, I wonder how they'll collect royalties off of said aliens reading our database long after we're gone. Will the avatar of the Mouse destroy all who look at the records unless paid off first?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    72. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Hell, some of us have petabytes of PORN and could use a good backup solution.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    73. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this is referring to the mantra of the Mentat from Frank Herberts Dune series:

      It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, the stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    74. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't like a nice set of double Ds ?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    75. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not knowledge will be the problem if we fuck up, but resources and energy.

      "It has often been said that, if the human species fails to make a go of it here on the Earth, some other species will take over the running. In the sense of developing intelligence this is not correct. We have or soon will have, exhausted the necessary physical prerequisites so far as this planet is concerned. With coal gone, oil gone, high-grade metallic ores gone, no species however competent can make the long climb from primitive conditions to high-level technology. This is a one-shot affair. If we fail, this planetary system fails so far as intelligence is concerned."

      Fred Hoyle - Of Men and Galaxies 1964

    76. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Ql'kNe[sound-that-cannot-be-produced-by-puny-human-mouths]35 What've you found there? It's kinda pretty.

      zW`[sound-that-cannot-be-heard-by-puny-human-ears]&3Ü12 Don't know, but it picks up the reflections off my scales really well. I might make it into cufflinks.

      Ql'kNe[sound-that-cannot-be-produced-by-puny-human-mouths]35 Bah, don't talk to me about cufflinks. I get a triad from my metaspouse every hatching orbital position commemoration. He-she's got no bloody imagination in either head.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    77. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by grantspassalan · · Score: 2

      You forgot step 4, that is to include the equivalent of a Rosetta Stone to help those in the distant future derive meaning from all that stored data. The Babylonians and ancient Egyptians came up with data storage that is quite durable and does not need any special equipment in order to read it.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    78. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      But some of us would be happy if the now often unreadable magnetic records from 70 years ago would have been stored on something more durable.

      Because those TPS reports will make great reading?

      What, you're having problems with your TPS reports? We'll have to schedule you in for a meeting with The Bobs.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    79. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      carving it in stone may be quite durable but it has very poor data density. what did we really learn from them other than some of their legends and history? it doesn't even tell us a whole lot about their construction techniques, at least not enough to be useful to replicate any of them, and even with our current technology we don't quite know how they could place some of their blocks with such precision. so we could potentially have stuff we could still learn from them even with our current technology.

    80. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we ever graduate to the stars and long-term stellar travel, we might actually want a storage medium with little to no entropy.

    81. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Fucking A! (or is that illegal these days)

      Fuck a B. It has more holes.

      --
      ~X~
    82. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The concept of a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge with femtocell lasers is hilarious.

      Perhaps the Idea is to make them last till the tribal society, or the next intelligent species to inhabit earth, matured enough to actually figure this all out. That seems highly unlikely, and chances are they would all be reused as jewelry to hang from ones ears before anyone realized they had any value.

      On the other hand, if the post-apocalypse society were humans, in all likelihood these things would be condemned by some religious nutjob and destroyed as some blasphemous sign of the devil, or a showing up of God.

      However, setting aside the apocalypse for the moment, you should not disregard the possibility that this might emerge to be the future long-term storage medium, once it is miniaturized to the point where it could be built into small computers. The fact that it could last for millions of years may not even be germane.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    83. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody Uplift this.

    84. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [testing]

      The result of that bug can be observed quite regularly in Soviet Russia: Post a meme and you'll get moderated funny, no matter if it is actually funny or not.

    85. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Drives have 5 years? I've worked for a place with the old reel tape system. The drive was older than many of the people working there. The tapes were legally required to last 7 years, and were disposed of after that. I know of many many real-world examples that don't fit your assertions. That, and backward compatibility also proves you wrong. You give me a good tape from 15 years ago, and I can likely read it (or easily find someone who can).

    86. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather completely irrelevant. Nothing to see here except a few people that want attention. The issue with long-term storage is _not_ how to preserve the bits. It is how to preserve Reading equipment and, even more difficult, software that can read the data stored and transform it into something the user can read.

      Your long term vision is weak. 20 years is not long-term. We're not talking about saving your MP3s for your children here, we're talking about preserving the combined library of human knowledge in a way that won't be destroyed easily. You don't need software, or hardware. If you ever need to actually read these things, it's after a worldwide disaster that destroys a large part of all other methods of storage. In such a situation, people are expected to build the machinery they need to read it from scratch - it won't need to be done while a client waits for a backup to be restored. It will be a few decades before you'll want to read about tupperware and playmobil.

      All it takes is for some clever person to KNOW that the data is on there, which can be accomplished by putting a plaque over it from the same material etched with the words "Here lies the combined knowledge of humanity." And yes, current day English will be fine. They'll figure out the rest, because it will be worth the effort.

    87. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What data is actually worth keeping that long?

      Aristotle, Plato, Shakespeare...

    88. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by hurfy · · Score: 1

      LOL, someone must have really cheaped out on drives. The cheesy little tape drive on this machine is over 13 years old. (the NT 4 driver on HP site is dated 1999) Business machine with no video/audio files and few pictures. I don't even use the whole 2GB it holds ;)

      Already had the tapes/drive/software, I saw no need to buy something current.

      You young-uns and your upgrade cycles.

    89. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You of course have to apply the meme correctly. In Soviet Russia, memes post YOU and moderate YOU funny.

      And now please excuse me, I've got to run Linux on my imaginary Beowulf meme cluster before Netcraft declares the meme dead.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    90. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did this with my 7 year old second cousin the other day.

      Point to the 'Save Icon' and ask them what it is.

      They say "save icon" or something along those lines.

      Then hand them a floppy disk.

      You'll get the same look

    91. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      This.

      For the rest, whatever else might be stored against future contingency, store all known culture - not just Aristotle and Shakespeare, but Asimov, Bacon, Cicero, all the way through to Howdy Doody and Flash Gordon; take good scans of the arts, all of it. Let whomever see all that we did, and let them guess at all that we didn't, and why. It might be instructive, even useful to someone. Meanwhile, if the Louvre got nuked, we'd at least have the happy snaps.

      From the article:

      The research is led by Jingyu Zhang from the University’s Optoelectronics Research Centre (ORC) and conducted under a joint project with Eindhoven University of Technology.

      “We are developing a very stable and safe form of portable memory using glass, which could be highly useful for organisations with big archives. At the moment companies have to back up their archives every five to ten years because hard-drive memory has a relatively short lifespan,” says Jingyu.

      “Museums who want to preserve information or places like the national archives where they have huge numbers of documents, would really benefit.”

    92. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Left out: for the reading of the data

      The self-assembled nanostructures change the way light travels through glass, modifying polarisation of light that can then be read by combination of optical microscope and a polariser, similar to that found in Polaroid sunglasses.

    93. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Gosh, somebody who gets it. The shock... I'm gonna have to lie down for a bit.

    94. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fuck a Q, it has texture.

    95. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      how to preserve Reading equipment

      What's so special about Reading? How about Newbury, or Bracknell equipment?

    96. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      It was intended to be funny, not serious. I'm sure there are laws against practically everything, somewhere in the world.

    97. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      Superman quartz crystals just look like bigger than average quartz crystals, and we can't garuntee the why or how of such a thing would be found. So it needs to really stick out and scream "I am special".

      This is the primary point. We now have this technology, but if I were wandering around and found one of these crystals from an ancient civilisation I wouldn't recognise it. I wouldn't call up these researchers and ask them to access the data. I would go "hmm thats a larger than usual piece of quartz" and walk on. Quartz isn't even rare or valuable. Even making it scream I am special wouldn't help much. You could carve it into the shape of something intricate and recognisable. Then I would pick it up, but it would end up in a museum and never be read. The finder would use the same excuse that we always use, completely without evidence, whenever we discover something interesting from antiquity: "It must have had some religious significance".

    98. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      Where did I say that storage technology never went anywhere? Of course there have been advancements. Duh. However there have been tons of hyped up technologies that never went anywhere.

      However that's a nice strawman there, and you did a good job of knocking it over.

    99. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "640D ought to be enough for anyone."

    100. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      My signup to slashdot was only 3D, the first 2 dimension was username and password, and my email address was in the 3rd dimension. Some forms have much higher dimensions and involve string theory.

    101. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by dissy · · Score: 1

      I would love to see the look on a kid's face as they experience a floppy for the first time. I think it akin to walking up hill in the snow both ways to school. I love the sound.

      This might not quite be what you meant by loving the sound, but...

      Apple// Floppy Disk Sound Simulator :D

    102. Re:Another "magic" storage tech. BS, as usual. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The concept of a post-apocalypse tribal society restoring mankinds' knowledge with femtocell lasers is hilarious.

      Indeed. Which is probably why that's not the argument that they are making for developing this technology.

      Being a heretic, I RTFA'd and found :

      highly useful for organisations with big archives.

      [... such as museums and national archives]

      So, say you are responsible for your country's archive of census data. Obviously you have at least two remote duplicates. Now, in each remote data centre, do you maintain a bank of hard drives with their well-known characteristics of burning out every few years, or a considerably smaller number of these devices with their own (currently unquantified, but hopefully considerably longer) lifetime? Change discs every decade when you finish collating the next census.

      What you need to do is to look at the lifetime figures for the reading (and writing) machines, and then calculate which is the more efficient option for your use case. If the lifetime figures aren't available (yet), then you and some of your sys-admin colleagues need to decide whether to take a punt, then put a budget proposal together. It's called "working through the problem". You might like to try it one day instead of shooting your AC mouth off.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. How to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you can't read the specs of the 5-dimension layer in your cave with axe and fire...

    1. Re:How to read by Cenan · · Score: 1

      No that's true, but that also assumes that cavemen would be the intended audience.

      --
      ... whatever ...
  3. Rosetta Stone by blackicye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They could also deeply engrave rocks and stone tablets and for really important messages mountains and other large surfaces.

    Worked pretty well for the ancients.

    1. Re:Rosetta Stone by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but that only lasts a few thousand years, and it also suffers the same problems that we have now, in that interpreting that data is the job of specialists, not the common person.

    2. Re:Rosetta Stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could also deeply engrave rocks and stone tablets and for really important messages mountains and other large surfaces.

      Worked pretty well for the ancients.

      As with this crystal disk, the problem is in the decoding.

    3. Re:Rosetta Stone by mythix · · Score: 2

      The quartz-glass technique relies on lasers pulsing one quadrillion times per second though a modulator that splits each pulse into 256 beams, generating a holographic image that is recorded on self-assembled nanostructures within a disk of fused-quartz glass.

      now THAT is something the common person will be able to read!

    4. Re:Rosetta Stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A disk of fused-quartz glass basically *is* a stone tablet, and they are deeply engraving it with a laser...

    5. Re:Rosetta Stone by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      We did it too. Although, I'm not really sure what we were trying to say...

    6. Re:Rosetta Stone by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      That sculpture is quite vulnerable by having 3D structures on an exposed face. It's made of granite so it will withstand erosion for thousands of years, and it's in a geologically stable area so it will last a bunch, but I don't see it surviving longer than several tens or at most a few hundred thousand years.

      For some real resilience, make it a bas relief without any jutting out parts.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:Rosetta Stone by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "Come look, give us money."

      It was made as a tourist attraction. An effective one, even though it was never finished.

    8. Re:Rosetta Stone by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      You mean, you can't?

    9. Re:Rosetta Stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the more reason to be really annoyed at the Stone Mountain Confederate Memorial. This is NOT the lasting symbol of American civilization I want, but it's perched high, huge, and virtue of being a relief, not full 3 carving, and being into solid granite, it's presumably going to be even more durable than Mt. Rushmore. Ugh.

    10. Re:Rosetta Stone by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the common denominator that is passed from generation to generation is language. But even then...

    11. Re:Rosetta Stone by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      Heh... Yeah... never finished. Too many politicians are trying to get make their face next on the monument and ultimately no decision gets made. That does sound about right!

  4. I can see the future... by dexotaku · · Score: 1

    Every warning about not having the specific non-obvious [and in its time, patented + proprietary] tech to read the media comes into play here.

  5. Naked and petrified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A naked and petrified Natalie Portman would surely outlast the human race - or maybe Mae Ling Mak if Natalie isn't available. Simply cover her in hot grits, and engrave the entire wisdom of humanity onto her boobs. That way alien visitors from the future will be sure to notice.

    THIS is what our research funding needs to be spent on, not some "1000C quartz disc" crap.

  6. But is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dropbox?

    1. Re:But is it... by lxs · · Score: 2

      They could never keep up their schedule of yearly security breaches for millions of years.

  7. Well... someone should be happy... by c0lo · · Score: 1

    Guess which of the 3-letter-agencies will spend some budget for the tech?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:Well... someone should be happy... by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      AAA? :)

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  8. Oh great, another way for Scientology to suck out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more money from its members, after they already forked out their life savings to pay for those stainless steel plates of his "scripture" Sci-Fi drivel inside those titanium vaults...

  9. In the distant future... by BeerCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Archeologists find one of these pieces of quartz, and then (through a lifetime's study) work out that they are not just pretty baubles, but are actually data storage devices. The excitement builds. Whole teams of researchers devote their life to the task of decoding the message - after all, the Rosetta Stone gave a lot of incite into the ancients - and then finally, the day comes when someone has worked it all out:

    99 crystals contain cat pictures

    1 of them contains the instructions on how to build the reader

    And, tucked into one small segment of one of the crystals, almost as an afterthought, the digitised Bodlean Library, and the Library of Congress. Pity that bit was a bit chipped...

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
    1. Re:In the distant future... by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      Archeologists find one of these pieces of quartz, and then researchers immediately discover their true properties and an enormous treasure-trove of human history is revealed. For the rest of the story, buy the novel.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    2. Re:In the distant future... by Issarlk · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot the crystal containing the FBI warnings about piracy.

    3. Re:In the distant future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As storage becomes cheaper and cheaper (and denser and denser), how long until we can mandat that every HDD, SSD, SD card, etc comes pre-loaded with, say, the entire text-only content of Wikipedia up to the date of manufacture? It's a lot harder to end up with gap in recorded history if almost every data storage device contains a good record of it.

    4. Re:In the distant future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backing up the entirety of human knowledge for future generations... meh.

      Cost > 0
      Monetary benefit = 0
      We won't do it.

    5. Re:In the distant future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, the mummy's curse never goes out of style. Foolish ancients!

  10. outlast humans? who will be able to decode/read it by ardiri · · Score: 1

    ... not like the future "beings" of this planet are going to be able to figure out how to read the damn thing - we've all see planet of the apes and how inferior those beings were.. good use to document everything if it is just a hologram on a piece of rock..

  11. Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if such a thing would be on Mars, left there by some ancient civilization. Now all we have to do is find it. Should be easy, right?

  12. You know it is comming.... by balaband · · Score: 1

    Now we only need kickstarter to put all known port to couple of these babies

    1. Re:You know it is comming.... by balaband · · Score: 1

      porn*

    2. Re:You know it is comming.... by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      I think you just said "somebody set up us the bomb", right?

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  13. One Million Years Later by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It has not been discovered what these disc-shaped glass objects were intended to symbolize, but it is now believed that they served either as ceremonial ornaments or a crude form of currency."

    1. Re:One Million Years Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Other experts opinionated that since it's round it obviously represents a solar symbol or a related deity.
      The disc was probably worn on the priest head or served as a mirror in certain rituals. The carvings on the box in which it was found clearly show a ray of light hitting the surface of the disc and the writings on the same box must also carry some sort of numerologist significance.

      Pseudo-scientists claim that the level of machine work needed to produce such discs is close to our current space-age technology but independent experts have been unable to find proof for this, really fine sand seems to have been used.

    2. Re:One Million Years Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Look honey, pretty coasters". Then, after many years, a deaf man looked more closely at a coaster, and exclaimed "I see structure !". And so they were decoded. But all that the still usable discs yielded were porn flicks and a few Bugs Bunny cartoons ...

    3. Re:One Million Years Later by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

      I'd use them as target practice for my photon gun.

    4. Re:One Million Years Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you shine your flashlight at them?

  14. Storing bits and ways to read them by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 2


    So I don't know about this latest and greatest storage tech but I have a few ideas of my own...Rock. Rock can last a long time. Of course chiseling information into rock is not really a viable option for gigabyte scale information storage, let alone the petabytes required...

    I propose storing the data in whatever medium is most likely to be preserved & the instructions on how to read the media be chiseled into rock. Those same instructions could be used to decompress a small subset of information to give further instructions on how to create a device that can read the rest of the data.

    I suggest rock because it's cheap and durable...of course there are other, more durable materials out there...

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Storing bits and ways to read them by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      I cannot recall where I read about this approach so apologies to the originator for not granting credit where it is due.

      A long piece of rock (or other material) can be used to encode a huge amount of data with just one mark.

      You need a long flat rock and the means of measuring length very accurately. **

      First, encode data as a string of bits.
      Then take that enormous binary string and treat it as a really big number X and put the mark to divide the length of the rock into the ratio 1:X

      The accuracy limits will be governed by the size of the rock, thermal and other causes for expansion/contraction and deformation and (depending on how accurately you make the cut / how much compression you want to achieve) quantum effects on the fine grained positioning.

      Multiple marks on the same rock provide extra "layers" of recording.

      Just imagine - the whole of Slashdot's debates reduced to a single scratch ;-)

      ** Actually you need a means of defining what you mean by length first - take into account surface irregularities... [cf lengths of coastlines - thanks Mandelbrot!!]

    2. Re:Storing bits and ways to read them by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      A long piece of rock (or other material) can be used to encode a huge amount of data with just one mark.

      It's a neat idea, but I don't think it gives very much data. If you have a rock as long as the distance from Earth to the sun (~10^11 meters) and you can measure the length of the mark to within one atom (~10^-10 meters), that gives you 21 significant digits in decimal. In binary, you get log2(10^21) = ~70 bits of information.

      --
      Visit the
  15. Five-dimensional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they not only confirmed the extra dimensions string theory predicts, but even managed to store data in them?

    1. Re:Five-dimensional? by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on almost finishing the summary.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    2. Re:Five-dimensional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facepalm.

    3. Re:Five-dimensional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can simultaneously put two differently sized nanodots at the same position? Or two differently oriented nanodots? Because you'd have to be able do that to justify the term "dimension".

    4. Re:Five-dimensional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or whoosh.

  16. Oblig. Men in Black quote by shikaisi · · Score: 2

    Guess I'll have to buy the White Album again...

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  17. Internet Archive and NSA by stenvar · · Score: 1

    This will be great: intelligent squirrels will be treated to yottabytes of Slashdot flame wars and images of grumpy cat. And they'll conclude that our civilization was inevitably doomed.

    1. Re:Internet Archive and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably doomed anyway; once we get to these volumes of storage we won't be able to find anything. Hal Draper said it first..
      http://home.comcast.net/~bcleere/texts/draper.html

    2. Re:Internet Archive and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very cute, but it must have been written before Google. It doesn't even make sense, to modern eyes who have never seen a physical card catalog.

  18. Halfway there by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now we just need to build a license server that will operate for a million years, so the DRM-encrypted data will still be readable.

  19. Can't even decipher pictures by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    We had enough trouble deciphering pictures of glyphs from ancient civilisation. This is a fancy data storage medium but you have no chance in ever deciphering it in the future.

    The quartz-glass technique relies on lasers pulsing one quadrillion times per second though a modulator that splits each pulse into 256 beams, generating a holographic image that is recorded on self-assembled nanostructures within a disk of fused-quartz glass. The data are stored in a five-dimensional matrix—the size and directional orientation of each nanostructured dot becomes dimensions four and five, in addition to the usual X, Y and Z axes that describe physical location. Files are written in three layers of dots, separated by five micrometers within a disk of quartz glass nicknamed 'Superman memory crystal' by researchers

    So the obvious question is where and how do we store this user manual? The only storage medium I know of that will last that long is a disc of quartz glass.

    1. Re:Can't even decipher pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engraved on tungsten sheets.

  20. Really? by aglider · · Score: 1

    Does this disk withstand a drop or any other mechanical stress?
    How can "someone" coming after the human race has vanished read that disk?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Really? by lxs · · Score: 1

      It doesn't and they can't.

      Roughly 2500 years ago two thinkers, Herakleites in Greece and Gautama Siddartha in India most likely independent of each other came to the conclusion that permanence doesn't exist in the world. Both used their insight to lay the foundations of philosophical traditions that informed Western and Eastern thought to this very day. In the 19th century the laws of thermodynamic more or less confirmed those insights. despite all that many people still stubbornly try to beat the inevitable and dream of their legacy lasting forever.

    2. Re:Really? by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Funny

      came to the conclusion that permanence doesn't exist in the world. [...] informed Western and Eastern thought to this very day

      Yeah, no permanence there.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, Sir or Madam, made my day.

    4. Re:Really? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The NSA disagrees.

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I met a traveller from an antique land
      Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
      Stand in the desart. Near them, on the sand,
      Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
      And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
      Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
      Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
      The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
      And on the pedestal these words appear:
      "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
      Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
      Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
      Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
      The lone and level sands stretch far away.

  21. Size is a dimension? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    The data are stored in a five-dimensional matrix - the size and directional orientation becomes dimensions four and five, in addition to the usual X, Y and Z

    So my cock travels in the 4th dimension when I watch pr0n?

    1. Re:Size is a dimension? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but when it becomes from soft to erect.

    2. Re:Size is a dimension? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data are stored in a five-dimensional matrix - the size and directional orientation becomes dimensions four and five, in addition to the usual X, Y and Z

      So my cock travels in the 4th dimension when I watch pr0n?

      It would, were it not accurately described with just X, Y and Z, as typical for objects that themselves have zero or negligible spatial extent.

    3. Re:Size is a dimension? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are dimensions to things.

      And with respect to a frame of reference, things can have more or less dimensions than we are normally used to.
      Writing Paper, for example, the absolute thinnest useful paper, is 2D for all intents and purposes. It cannot go any smaller without it being useful as writing paper.
      A sheet of atoms exactly aligned in one of the dimensions, that would be considered 2D as well because an atomic structure literally cannot go smaller without crushing the structure, which would require a blackhole of stupid sizes to make sure that the entire structure was crushed evenly.

      Technically your cock is 4D if you put it under this definition system.
      Your penis has 4 main facets to it, it exists in X, Y and Z directions, and it can go from limp to erect. I guess you could probably add more to it with regards to reactions.

      And finally, this device is also technically might not even 5D under this description.
      In any modern storage system, the X, Y and Z coords of a bit in space are worthless for the sake of writing data.
      The only thing that matters is platter, sector and, oh I am forgetting the word, where the bit is finally stored.
      Anyway, unless this system replicates that, it might have less dimensions. Hell, it might have even more if XYZ DOES matter.

  22. In the short term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not interested in a million years.
    I keep seeing warnings that the backup DVDs I burn are only good for a few years and need periodic re-copying.
    I just want storage that'll last longer than I do.

  23. Double your storage capacity! by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently if you chip out a small square of quartz from the top edge, you can flip the disk over and store another 360 Terrabytes on the other side. The manaufacturers don't want you knowing this, of course, as they want to sell 720 TB stroage at a premium price.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Double your storage capacity! by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      +1 LOL, literally

      You sir, have made my day. Best post in a long, long time.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  24. Ah, the scratch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is called "arithmetic coding":

    Here you go

    1. Re:Ah, the scratch... by bryonak · · Score: 1

      You're describing arithmetic coding, a fairly standard entropy based compression method e.g. used in DMC or PPM.
      The problem is, as you point out, that the accuracy required for large amounts of data becomes quite tricky. Measuring would be nontrivial, as direct measurement (whole block compared to some length, or photographing and counting pixels, or anything that gives you the number of atom layers in the block) requires crazy high resolutions, while time based measurement (laser traversal) needs very precise alignment of a slab of rock to atom level accuracy.
      And I imagine natural erosion, material stretching/contraction etc. will become non-negligible factors.

    2. Re:Ah, the scratch... by bryonak · · Score: 1

      Err, meant to reply to your parent and hit refresh&reply to see if anybody else had posted already :)

    3. Re:Ah, the scratch... by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      The points you raise are absolutely correct. When I first read about it [wish I could remember where], it was very much a Gedankenexperiment and was quoted in the form of a very long metal bar in deep space (so no oxidation, constant temperature...) with the sum of human knowledge in one scratch

      Even so, as X becomes larger, the scratch gets closer and closer to the end, so that the loss or movement of individual atoms would significantly alter the value.

      Actually measuring it, without introducing energy (and thus heat, and thus expansion and/or evaporation effects) is left as an exercise for the reader.

      Knowing how to decode the bit string is yet another puzzle.

      The transposition to rocks (and consequent introduction of further real-life error sources) was entirely my own fault ;-)

  25. Check those meterorites! by jamesh · · Score: 1

    We thought we were pretty cool putting a gold plated disc on voyager. Maybe peppering the universe with crystals embedded in rock would be a better way of spreading the word... better start looking inside those meteorites!

  26. Anyone else think this? by LilianDurr · · Score: 1

    I used to imagine us leaving an SSD with all human info for future people to discover. Then it occurred to me that they might not have the means to see what's in the drives in the first place. Well, back to carving on stone.

    1. Re:Anyone else think this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just carve the complete manual for the SSDs and quartz discs in stone, in multiple languages.

    2. Re:Anyone else think this? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      I used to imagine us leaving an SSD with all human info for future people to discover. Then it occurred to me that they might not have the means to see what's in the drives in the first place. Well, back to carving on stone.

      create a rosseta stone of the technical specs, and how to build a reader put it on tungsten plates.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  27. What about bandwidth? Rewritability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That are the real questions.

    Read speed?
    Write speed?
    Could this be used as a hard disc, or is it more like a CDR?

  28. five-dimensional ? by thygate · · Score: 1

    how does that work with only 3 spacial dimensions ?

    1. Re:five-dimensional ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does that work with only 3 spacial dimensions ?

      yep this is stupid....there are only 3 physical dimensions, if you are separating something by 5 mm ....its still only 3 freaking dimensions.

    2. Re:five-dimensional ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way an RGB picture is 5D.

    3. Re:five-dimensional ? by Superdarion · · Score: 2

      It's 3 spatial dimensions + Size and Orientation of the molecules, all of which they can measure. They could have avoided ambiguity by using "Degrees of Freedom" instead of "dimensions" but 5D is quite catchy.

    4. Re:five-dimensional ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way an RGB picture is 5D.

      Which it isn't. It's 3D (x axis, y axis, channel).

  29. Scale problems by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    A team of researchers at the University of Southampton have demonstrated a way to record and retrieve as much as 360 terabytes of digital data onto a single disk of quartz glass

    Unfortunately that single disc is 150ft wide.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  30. Has someone checked crystals in the ground ? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have they tried putting a crystal rock from the ground in the reader to see if someone or something has done this before ? ;-) ( mostly )

  31. aziz, LIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we just need a laser that will last (be functional) for a million years -AND- a repair manual that
    will last just as long and all will be good in the land of english speaking data storages ...

  32. superman's crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this technology like the "crystals" in superman?

  33. Wow, that's amazing! by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A millions years from now, the first new sentient evolutionary forms that discover the fallen towers of we the ancient gods will proudly hold these precious disks up to the light. Holograms dense with data will dance within the crystalline structures before their eyes. In their grasp will be the records of our progress -- all our science and forewarnings of its power, high definition videos of escapades among the stars, and the description of a state machine to decode it. They will have in their possession an invaluable source for goodness guiding a maddening leap from their understanding to ours that they may forge a society greater still than our own...
    And they'll make down right amazing discoveries day after day in necklace design from each and every one.

  34. Rosetta Disk by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Informative
    See also Rosetta Disk:

    The Rosetta Disk is the physical companion of the Rosetta Digital Language Archive, and a prototype of one facet of The Long Now Foundation's 10,000-Year Library. The Rosetta Disk is intended to be a durable archive of human languages, as well as an aesthetic object that suggests a journey of the imagination across culture and history. We have attempted to create a unique physical artifact which evokes the great diversity of human experience as well as the incredible variety of symbolic systems we have constructed to understand and communicate that experience.

    The Disk surface shown here, meant to be a guide to the contents, is etched with a central image of the earth and a message written in eight major world languages: “Languages of the World: This is an archive of over 1,500 human languages assembled in the year 02008 C.E. Magnify 1,000 times to find over 13,000 pages of language documentation.” The text begins at eye-readable scale and spirals down to nano-scale. This tapered ring of languages is intended to maximize the number of people that will be able to read something immediately upon picking up the Disk, as well as implying the directions for using it—‘get a magnifier and there is more.’

    On the reverse side of the disk from the globe graphic are over 13,000 microetched pages of language documentation. Since each page is a physical rather than digital image, there is no platform or format dependency. Reading the Disk requires only optical magnification. Each page is .019 inches, or half a millimeter, across. This is about equal in width to 5 human hairs, and can be read with a 650X microscope (individual pages are clearly visible with 100X magnification).

    The 13,000 pages in the collection contain documentation on over 1500 languages gathered from archives around the world. For each language we have several categories of data—descriptions of the speech community, maps of their location(s), and information on writing systems and literacy. We also collect grammatical information including descriptions of the sounds of the language, how words and larger linguistic structures like sentences are formed, a basic vocabulary list (known as a “Swadesh List”), and whenever possible, texts. Many of our texts are transcribed oral narratives. Others are translations such as the beginning chapters of the Book of Genesis or the UN Declaration of Human Rights.

    Source: The Rosetta Project

    --
    -kgj
  35. Will humanity's knowledge be DRM free? by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    I'd hate for some future sentient species to find these discs and an intact reader but not have the proper subscription keys to authorize decoding.

  36. ReiserFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only supported filesystem will be resierFS... when Reiser get's out of jail in about million years :)

  37. Thinking outside the box... by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 2

    Simple way to achieve this with conventional media. Destroy mankind!

  38. Is that the sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of the NSA collectively creaming their pants?

  39. Now my personal data is preserved forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One drunken night full of pictures I can't escape from!

  40. ummm ... showing your ignorance by fygment · · Score: 1

    A stupid argument. If the method of storage and its retreival are documented, both can be replicated. The current 'problem' is that institutions balk at the cost of replicating the reader technology of yesteryear. It is straightforward and COSTLY to reconstruct say the tape readers NASA used in the sixties ... and that's _all_ it is. The problem is really whether the storage medium has deteriorated making the data irretrievable even with the appropriate reader.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    1. Re:ummm ... showing your ignorance by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose to document the storage and its retrieval? Preferably in such a way that this documentation is still around when somebody tries to read these crystals? Did not think this through, did you?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:ummm ... showing your ignorance by Holi · · Score: 2

      etch it in stone, it worked for the Egyptians.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:ummm ... showing your ignorance by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      etch it in stone, it worked for the Egyptians.

      Clay tablets worked for the Sumerians, once you baked them to get all the water out of them They turned into bricks. We still have Sumer's database laying around in museums all over the planet.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:ummm ... showing your ignorance by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the only thing keeping us from understanding Liber Linteus, Rongorongo, Linear A, or a dozen others is the incredible cost of building reading equipment.

      It's entirely possible that the instructions are very clearly documented... in the DEAD language.

      You need to think more before you post.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    5. Re:ummm ... showing your ignorance by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      Awfully good thing that someone thought to put a translation on a stone before the last person to be able to read hieroglyphics died... And that we decided to dig a canal right where they buried it.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  41. You're too damn dense to understand. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    This technology is great, but at that density it's practically useless for preserving human knowledge beyond our race. We can be fairly certain that beings in our universe will be able to sense some form of electromagnetic radiation (as star light seems to be a common energy source), they will likely have at least two such receptors to achieve depth perception of our universe's three macro scale physical dimensions. I have used interference patterns myself to create mediums capable of conveying four dimensional knowledge directly to any such beings instantaneously -- when I was a teenager, hell they even have cheap starter kits now.

    Using simple techniques available to even basement holographers one can create integral holograms AKA 4D holograms AKA multiplexed holographic movies that animate as the viewing angle changes. More precise setups can encode more movie (requiring slowly turning) or even multiple images with more integration. That is to say we've been making holographic videos for a few decades. So, when we got macro scale 4D holographic representations in the material it's big news... Increasing the density isn't actually revolutionary for long term storage.

    The advantage of the 4D hologram over 3D holograms or 2D images is that it can encode motion directly reproduced without requiring any mechanism but itself a viewer and light. 4D means we can convey causality in our depictions, and thus much more easily describe the process for understanding a denser data store... It's a lot more compact and intuitive than a flip-book, or film reel, for example. Hey, I turn this crystal and the dude in there points between the fire and the silly "FIRE" symbols, Oh! That's their word for it.

    Devising a way to utilize something as stable as these crystals in place of holographic film one could create other such holographic videos depicting activities and literally teaching our symbolic languages and descriptions of manufacturing processes that would survive a million years. It is these even more durable LOW density optical representations that can provide a doorway into our culture from beyond itself. Once those who discover and learn the analog to our teachings we could encode in the simpler 4D holograms would be capable of understanding the technique required to play back the dense 5D data-structures in TFA. The Aliens Won't Need To Decode The TFA's Disks to really know who or what we are, they'll already have learned that.

    We'll have had to encode instructions for simpler systems such as sound playback to encode our speech and eventual understanding about wave propagation via sound vibration, possibly even 3D ultrasonic tactile feedback generators to convey other more complex ideas, long before they could decode these 5D data disks. Yes, even if you assume a super-intelligent race, they would come to understand who we were and what we thought about energy and other such things from the simpler low resolution storage prior to obtaining the data in TFA's disks. We wouldn't risk NOT giving them such things in case our data encoding remained an enigma.

    What remains for you to encode in 5HD other than the much more trivial rambling of our race? Don't get me wrong: Music, books, movies, video games, etc. would be a wealth of knowledge about us to anthropologists of an alien race... However, all the important stuff that any of their equivalent of layperson would know would be the important bits from a lower density data storage.

    Furthermore. If you encode some data on one of these disks, and launch it into space, the data on the voyager disks will have remained in storage still longer. If there's an event to destroy the data from the golden disks we've sent, then it would likely also defunct a crystal. Rise in temperature is rarely, if ever, part of an isolated event.

    Think about it. What good would 5HD data do you without a machi

  42. Re:In the distant future...they'll replay us by fygment · · Score: 1

    Actually they're replaying the whole set of crystals ... it's what we call 'existence'.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  43. Will only play on Earth .... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... DRM prevents them being read on other planets.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  44. Chiseled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bjizzled in stone, Yo!.

    After millions of years it will be deep in some sedimentary or igneous layers thousands of feet down and the cockroaches don't have the technology to dig down that far, or even care, Yo!

  45. Fancy talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 36 and I feel old. This sounds like the fancy stuff Gyro Gearloose talks
    when he's presenting one of his steam driven high-tech machines to a customer.

  46. 3.5D by tom17 · · Score: 2

    I'd still be inclined to call this 2.5D or 3D at a stretch. Use of the terminology 'dimension' usually implies the ability to make use of that dimension an arbitrary amount. So X & Y can be as big as you can make the surface. That is your 2 true dimensions.

    The Z, in this case, is only '3 layers'. Maybe in the future that can be an arbitrary size, but for now it's just 3 layers. Not really a full 'dimension'. Once they can go arbitrarily large in Z, then you can call it 3D.

    As for 4 & 5 (size and orientation), there can only be a certain number of sizes and orientations that each bit could represent. Really this is just changing the storage from Base 2 (Or Base 10 to be /. pedantic) to Base N where N = number of orientations * number of sizes. Certainly a good idea, but it should, in my opinion, not be called a dimension. We could have really big values of N, but then it would be more analogous to analogue storage. I guess you could consider it as a dimension at that point, possibly, maybe.

    Bah it's all just marketing anyway, right?

    I will make one with dot colour as a factor. SIX DEE STORAGE!!!!

  47. How to read it?? by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

    How exactly would some future civilization read a laser encoded crystal?? I've got enough problems trying to watch my dad's old super-8 movies recordings (and I've got the projector). Will a future civilization of geckos or crows really understand the concept of an inode or the Reiser FS let alone trying to physically read the device? The best legacy is huge stone monuments or pictures carved in granite (marble is too soft) as in ancient Egypt.

  48. Longer than the human race? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So at the rate we are destroying our ability to survive on this planet, that would be what, like 50 years?

    1. Re:Longer than the human race? by Teresita · · Score: 2

      A million years from now lawyers for SCO will claim the quartz crystal contains their precious proprietary code from Unix and demand a 700 credit per seat license from the archaologists plus their signature on a non-disclosure agreement.

  49. weird exaltation by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    ... and should keep the data stable and readable for up to a million years. 'It is thrilling to think that we have created the first document which will likely survive the human race,'

    Hmm. Does this guy have plans to bomb/poison the human race out of existence, or is he just superconfident it'll happen by itself? Perhaps more importantly, if the human race is gone, who is the intended audience of the document?

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:weird exaltation by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he figures, like a lot of people, that if human beings stay on this rock for too long, the probability of annihilation approaches certainty. While this may technically be true, given the disbursement of the human race around the globe, the way that so-called "extinction level events" have changed the environment of the earth since life as we know it started evolving, and the fact that human beings use their intellect to adapt to different environments many orders of magnitude faster than evolution can equip creatures to handle them physiologically, it statistically doesn't really approach any appreciable danger levels to the existence of the human race for periods on the order of 10's of millions of years, and doesn't genuinely approach certainty anytime sooner than around 2 billion.

  50. orly? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    "Hitachi has also been researching something similar."
    Well THAT one will probably fail in 2 years or less, given Hitachi's typical quality level.

  51. Expedition to Earth by rossdee · · Score: 1

    A short story by Arthur C Clarke , when the Venusians get here a few millenia after the demise of humanity, they find a flat cylinder containing a series of images which when moved rapidly past a light source reveals a 2d animation. They try to understand it, but they cannot fathom the last image which reads
    A Walt Disney Production.

    1. Re:Expedition to Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bastards - don't they know that they have to wait a few more millennia for the copyright on that film to expire?

  52. One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Domesday

  53. But now, the meta-question by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    How do you store the instructions for using this thing?

  54. Re:outlast humans? who will be able to decode/read by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

    ... not like the future "beings" of this planet are going to be able to figure out how to read the damn thing - we've all see planet of the apes and how inferior those beings were.. good use to document everything if it is just a hologram on a piece of rock..

    They'll probably just use the damn things to encode their own histories and over-write ours!

    ...

    Hang on a second...

  55. historical document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did the first historical document say?

    Hello, World!

  56. Better idea: Cockroach genes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Embed the data in cockroach genes. That ensures they will last as long as this planet supports insect life.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  57. Everyone is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you read that 30 year old CD? That floppy? Even if you still have equipment? Nope, they're impermanent. How's that 150 year old photograph looking? Pretty degraded, isn't it.

    Even books, unless printed on acid-free paper, only last decades. If a fire hits then the books, CDs, floppies, are all gone.

    These withstand temps to 1000 C. Your average building fire doesn't get that hot. Unless these things are fragile they'll be practically indestructable. It's the year 2340 and you can still read Doctorow (but Pratchett's stuff will be gone, thanks to eternal copyrights).

    So you can't read those eight inch floppies any more? Even if you had a drive the floppy itself would be unreadable. You didn't transfer the data to 5 inch then three inch then CD then DVD? That's your own fault. When these "forever" disks become obsolete, just transfer the data.

    The fact that the data will still be readable in a million years means you finally have a reliable backup solution.

    Plus, the huge size of the dataset this is capable of storing is astounding.

    And you guys are all "so what?" I swear, I can't understand how a site about science and engineering and programming can have so many people with such little imaginations. Of course, I can't figure out why people who don't know the difference between they're and their and there come here, either.

  58. it's so rare by tfocker4 · · Score: 1

    That i don't understand half of an article but am still completely blown away. Well done smart research people, well done.

  59. How did they test it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should keep the data stable and readable for up to a million years - I wonder how did they test that?

  60. Quadrillion Hz laser by Karma+Bandit · · Score: 1

    There is no laser in the world that gets anywhere near close to pulsing 1 quadrillion = 10^15 times per second. That's just silly. But, femtosecond pulse length lasers (i.e. 10^-15 seconds wide) are common lab devices. They tend to pulse between 10^1-10^7 times per second. So, the summary is only off by a factor of 10^8... but I can understand his confusion.

  61. Follow the money by anorlunda · · Score: 1

    I'll bet that this research was sponsored by the NSA.

  62. Not the first by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    The voyager spacecraft had a record with a bunch of cool data. Now that it's left the solar system and in interstellar space its got a big head start on any data storage medium that will outlive the human race. Hell if you think of it, the universe itself is a storage medium, and the radio waves from our bygone eras are out there too. You would have to destroy the universe to get rid of that record.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  63. Oh Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10,000 years from now, aliens excavating in Utah will be able to see what you posted on Facebook
    yesterday .

  64. Why? by PPH · · Score: 1

    So the aliens who find this planet in 5 million years can see all of our porn?

    Ewww yech! On the other hand, humans appear to have only three distinct genders: Those that want to have sex with Megan Fox, those that want to be Megan Fox, and those that want to do her hair.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  65. OK, But by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I estimate I need 2 Zetabytes of storage for my porn. Can these folks build a a bigger disk?

  66. 1000 C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think humans cannot create a disaster involving temperatures beyond 1000 C, then you are underestimating (overestimating?) yourselves.

  67. It's all been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are not the first intelligent civilization on earth....the more intelligent species left. Fortunately they left a clue in the pyramids unfortunately a group of idiots now claims to have built them.....they just can't explain how! Someday a group of frogs will claim to have designed these crystals and they will be Holy symbols with great healing power!

  68. Ultimate off-site backup? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    Excellent! Now we can back up everything and send it to Mars for safekeeping!

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  69. Fortunately, we'll be able to use it by romons · · Score: 1

    to read the crystal skulls we already have. They probably contain the accumulated tweets of the ancient aliens.

    --
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain