Slashdot Mirror


Is China Wiring Africa For Surveillance?

Daniel_Stuckey writes "Huawei has invested billions of dollars in Africa over the last two decades, providing affordable cell phones, internet access, and telecommunications networks to the continent. Over the last few months Huawei has closed major deals in Africa to get more areas on the grid. The company says it's bridging the digital divide, but others suspect it's wiring the continent for surveillance."

196 comments

  1. Exfiltrate Africa? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I guess if it comes for free, that's one thing, but how much money do you think China wants to invest exfiltrating data from Africa as opposed to their first-world competitors?

    1. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you just wanted an excuse to use the mostly unknown word "exfiltrate." Your post doesn't actually say anything at all.....

    2. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The NSA, facebook, and google seem to demonstrate that spying on everyone requires shockingly little investment and gets good returns even when you don't know exactly what you want to find in your spying.

      Plus, there seem to be a lot of stuff that is worth knowing. There's oil and other natural resources in Africa, right? Seems like intercepting geological reports within western companies, or whoever, about where the oil might be could be very advantageous to China.

    3. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess if it comes for free, that's one thing, but how much money do you think China wants to invest exfiltrating data from Africa as opposed to their first-world competitors?

      Right. Because first-world companies don't do any business in Africa.

      Alternatively, China is investing in Africa for the long haul, because China desperately wants access to Africa's vast natural resources. Many African Governments include infrastructure projects as a requirement for Chinese acquisitions or in trade deals with China.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As an Australian in the Oil&Gas (and previously the mining) industry, the main reason Australia's economy is so big right now is because it's more expensive and dangerous to rip the shit outta Africa and Brazil.

      Once China (the biggest importer of iron by a long way) nail that down, I'll need to expatriate or be out of a job. Providing digital-age tools and infrastructure to Africa is an incredibly smart move for China.

    5. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      dunno.. you could wire up 20% of africa for gratis with the NSA budget.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe Huawei is finding itself shut out of western markets for fear of backdoors and stolen code, that the best market they can find is selling to their own government's aid programs.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by c0lo · · Score: 2

      ...I'll need to expatriate or be out of a job. Providing digital-age tools and infrastructure to Africa is an incredibly smart move for China.

      See? You already know where to apply for immigration (I bet the NBN is going to take longer to build).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by c0lo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      dunno.. you could wire up 20% of africa for gratis with the NSA budget.

      Not going to happen, it wouldn't help a bit the US defence industry.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Camael · · Score: 1

      I guess if it comes for free, that's one thing, but how much money do you think China wants to invest exfiltrating data from Africa as opposed to their first-world competitors?

      Why don't you ask the NSA? They could probably tell you.

    10. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Huawei employee here (non-chinese, btw).

      Huawei is not being shut out of "western" markets, with the exception of the US. Huawei has an extensive deployment of radio, wireless access, packet switching and core systems across Europe and Latinamerica. A good portion of what 3G and LTE networks in both sides of the Atlantic for any operator you care to mention is using Huawei sytems.

      I must recognise, though, that laws and regulations (both in telecom proper and labour areas) make it easier for Huawei in african countries than they do elsewhere.

      Huawei is *not* a multinational company with its headquarters in China, it is a Chinese company with offices all over the world. Big difference. All decision-making is either done from China or by chinese PHBs abroad; and many of them can't seem to get that they are not in China (when in Europe, for instance) and they want to do things in their own way, which is proving to be easier in (some) african countries.

      IMO, yes, Huawei is wiring Africa for its own purposes...and that may involve surveillance.

    11. Re: Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't be that for example there might be money in telecoms. I know it's a radical idea but you know maybe they thought well there might be a market there for telecoms equipment and service, that wasn't being met by western telcos.

      Meh stupid xenophobic bullshit.

    12. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, China are producing goods and, since these goods are more than they personally need, are SELLING THEM TO PEOPLE WHO WANT THEM.

      Shit, is my local farmer trying some nefarious scheme by selling me steaks and apples??? Maybe he just wants to exploit me and make me dependent on him so I don't start my own farm!!!!

      FFS.

    13. Re: Exfiltrate Africa? by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's less money in Africa than elsewhere, but by the same token, there is less entrenched competition there as well.

      Who ever gets there firstest with the mostest has a great chance of owning the continent. It might not be profitable this year or this decade, but sooner or later they will be the entrenched company.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exfiltrate isn't a very uncommon word in computer security. The grandparent's post, however, was largely meaningless. More of a 'hey, I've just learned a new word, now I am going to use it in a sentence' sort of thing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The NSA, facebook, and google seem to demonstrate that spying on everyone requires shockingly little investment and gets good returns even when you don't know exactly what you want to find in your spying.

      The NSA can do it cheaply because of the existence of companies like Google and Facebook that have centralised systems that a lot of people trust. Google and Facebook only exist because of various economic incentives in the US (some resulting from government incentives, some due to historical accidents), which are not exactly cheap - trying to replicate these conditions in another country would be very expensive. If people were using decentralised communication systems, PRISM would have been a lot harder.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Strange that you continue to think that the NSA is beholden to the defense industry.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    17. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      More /. paranoia over a company that has been "suspected" and it seems to be even more so since Obama has been in the white house, but it "seemed", when republicans were in the white house it wasn't as big a deal.

      If Africa cannot get itself together they have an opportunity to grow and become a whole country. [snip]

      You begin with a political rant of some kind (was that anti-Obama or anti-Bush?) , and then prove yourself horribly educated by repeatedly calling Africa a country.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    18. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bastard is exfiltrating the money right out of your wallet!!!!

    19. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Huawei employee here (non-chinese, btw).

      But you speak Chinese, right? It seems they always list that as a job requirement.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    20. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In shocking news AT&ampT has been providing surveillance services to the US Government for decades. The hypocrisy is astounding. Maybe not so astounding after all.

    21. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, China is investing in Africa for the long haul, because China desperately wants access to Africa's vast natural resources.

      I'm guessing that includes natural resources like elephant tusks and rhino horns?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    22. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      (me again)

      Nope. Except for "Ni Hao" (hello) which I hardly ever use...and a couple of other phonemes that I've learned.

      In fact, "they" seem to prefer it that way. In our office (somewhere in Europe) there's 3 lines of communication. One for, as we are called, "local staff" in our "local" language (not English); another one in English which is the crossover language; and Chinese, where all the things that we "locals" can't/don't participate....of course, we get upset and reciprocate by starting our own half of the meeting in a language most of them can't understand; which I think is not easy to do for our colleagues in the UK as they don't have that 3rd language to fall back on (yes, I know there are other languages besides English in the UK. I have friends in Wales).

      When I joined the company I wanted to learn the language and had all this curiosity about chinese culture. They seem to have systematically drained any kind of interest from me.

    23. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Africa is a country...

      Sarah Palin, is that you?

    24. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? I used to work in a branch of an American computer company in Southern Europe and everybody who worked there had to speak some English, it was part of the job requirements. Mind you some spoke English better than others.

      It's pretty standard fair for any company with branches in other countries. If only so that when someone from the head office visits they can say "hello" and "goodbye" to them.

      As far as this article, sounds like more anti-Chinese propaganda. Americans do the same in other parts of the world, so do Russians, Germans, French, English, ... the list goes on. Not to mention the endless stream of Western missionaries who not only provide aid to third world countries but try to influence the population by converting them into Christianity.

    25. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese, having seen what the west did to Japan, have an almost maniacal drive to control the resources in China. World War III is already staged, and it's going to be a lot bloodier than I and II together.

    26. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Strange that you continue to think that the NSA is beholden to the defense industry.

      Strange how you don't see how an altruistic gesture (wire 20% of africa) would lead to less tension thus less business opportunity (aka conflict and fear) for the so called "defense" industry.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    27. Re: Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if it was you who had to learn English, but the term is "standard fare", not "standard fair".

    28. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... China is investing in Africa for the long haul...

      China is quite adept at having a long term view. That's one of the differences a communist government makes; Democratic governments typically to plan from election to election, but China happily makes political decisions based on payoffs decades way.

      When Britain told China it had to give up Hong Kong for 50 years, China said yes without a second thought. 50 years was nothing to them.

      The got back one of the largest ports in the world and a thriving financial hub 50 years later.

    29. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Did you have something intelligent to add to the conversation? If you did, you forgot to include it in your comment.

      In my case, I was assuming that my audience was intelligent enough to pick up my inference. Clearly such assumptions aren't justified on Slashdot, as you illustrated.

      So let me spell it out for you: I think Huawei is investing in Africa because they see it as a place where they can sell equipment and make a profit. There's no need to look for ulterior motives behind everything they do just because they're Chinese.

  2. But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mveloso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody cares enough about Africa to listen in on them. The only thing Africa has is resources, and China already is buying them. Is the infrastructure subject to surveillance? Sure, but every infrastructure is, even heterogeneous ones like the US.

    1. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by buildslave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe their trying to protect their resources. There has been trouble at some of the Chinese run mines. If they had good surveillance maybe they could prevent some of the 'trouble' that they have had.

    2. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.
      They will do the math with the local press - the cost of a university, hospital, roads, new mines, power, rail vs the true long term total export value.
      Such experts and their press contacts need to be found and shown the error of their ways.
      Any African country doing huge deals with a France, UK, USA, Russia knows the part they have to play. Empty ships arrive, full ships depart, the local leadership is looked after and a few locals get jobs.
      You had South Africa, Cuba, East Germany all playing the aid/spy card too.
      Vietnam, China mostly went for long term farm aid and very long term friendship.
      The visions of Moscow, London and Washington have usually been the same, influence, shared mil bases, listening stations, blocking China/France/Japan.
      What can leaders in Africa do?
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by US banks and loans with a few nice people from MI6/CIA to ensure its stays good.
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by Russian loans with a few nice people from FSB/KGB to ensure its all good.
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by China with a lots of nice new experts, workers and useful infrastructure ensure its all good.
      Add in arms dealers, political and faith based groups who feel timber, oil, gems and strategic minerals are much better looked after in Paris, London, Washington.
      So you have a lot of groups who dont want the locals getting too vocal.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody cares enough about Africa to listen in on them.

      Even if you're right, it could be part of a longer-term strategy to insinuate themselves everywhere they can, with the prospect of future spread once established.

      Also... surely you're not suggesting that the NSF isn't listening in on Africa.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody cares enough about Africa to listen in on them. The only thing Africa has is resources, and China already is buying them. Is the infrastructure subject to surveillance? Sure, but every infrastructure is, even heterogeneous ones like the US.

      So, nothing to see in Africa? Just move along? I don't think so.

      Just like Europe, South America, and Asia, Africa is an entire continent of nations, some of which have drawn considerable attention in the last couple of years. I assume you've heard of Libya? Egypt? Algeria? South Africa? There is a lot going on in Africa, and the Chinese are heavily involved. There are plenty of things they might want to listen to.

      Africa has more mobile phone users than the U.S. or E.U.
      How mobile phones are making cash obsolete in Africa
      European Rocket Launches 2 African Satellites

      China and Africa: What the U.S. doesn't understand

      Seven out of the world's 10 fastest growing economies are African. According to a 2010 report by consulting firm McKinsey & Company, the rate of return on foreign investments in Africa was, in the first decade of this century, higher than in any other region. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projected that Africa is now growing faster than Asia.

      Sino-African trade volumes have grown accordingly. Negligible in 2000, trade hit $198.5 billion in 2012. By comparison, U.S.-Africa trade volume was $108.9 billon, and is slated to fall further behind: Research from Standard Chartered estimates that trade between China and Africa will hit $385 billion by 2015

      MAP: Here Are All Of The Big Chinese Investments In Africa Since 2010
      China’s Increasing Interest in Africa: Benign but Hardly Altruistic

      South Africa Could Have a Spaceport

      The Republic of South Africa has considered using Israel's Shavit space booster to send a satellite to orbit. The South Africans have tested the Israeli Jericho 2 intermediate-range ballistic missile which converts to the Shavit space rocket.

      International Effort Seeks to Counter Jihadists in Africa

      China To Establish A Naval Base Around Somalia

      As the threat of piracy continues. And as Somali pirates continue with their awkward trade to kidnap foreign ships, a Chinese Admiral has revealed China’s proposal to establish a naval base in the region in its commitment to thwart piracy and finally end this tragedy in the gulf of Eden. The lazy pirates who have no intentions to pursue an education or employment see piracy as an easy way to make money. About 75% of piracy in the region is being masterminded by terror groups to finance their illegal activities.

      Rear Admiral Yin Zhou’s, a senior Chinese naval officer has suggested that China will establish a permanent base in the Gulf of Aden to aid its anti-piracy operations. The proposal was posted on China’s Defence ministry website. The Admiral went on to say that supplying and maintaining the fleet off Somalia was challenging without such a base, and said other nations were unlikely to object. The Chinese navy curr

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody cares enough about Africa to listen in on them. The only thing Africa has is resources, and China already is buying them. Is the infrastructure subject to surveillance? Sure, but every infrastructure is, even heterogeneous ones like the US.

      Resource deals are better facilitated if you can spy on the other side and listen to what they're holding out on and such. Makes sense for China to learn what the real price the seller wants versus what they negotiate for. If you know the other side is bluffing, it makes exploitation much easier.

      Second, if they become heavily invested in infrastructure, China's planning for the future. They know China won't be the cheap manufacturing base forever, and it will be Africa next. Well, those manufacturing bases need infrastructure, and what better way to spy on competitors than having the entire nation wired with your spy gear?

    6. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Also... surely you're not suggesting that the NSF isn't listening in on Africa.

      For the good of all of us. Except the ones who are dead.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    7. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China is doing nothing the old Colonial powers did not do Cold - just way more smart.
      The difference is China and Vietnam started long along in the 1960's with basic food aid, farming help, infrastructure and reaching out to the local postcolonial leadership.
      The West was very busy with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Africa
      Africa can recall that part of their history, the small wars the US and Soviets played.
      Most in Africa recall the support for Apartheid (until the near end), the death of Patrice Lumumba, NGO's, missionaries, arms deals and endless easy US $ loans.
      China is working long term on its "cooperation ventures", real engineering, medical experts, roads for minerals, oil, gems, timber, food - not just arms deals, faith, more loans and super safe bank accounts.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mitcheli · · Score: 2

      The belief that "nobody cares enough about Africa" would be a mistake. Africa has many developing technological sectors and many developing industries. Furthermore, Africa is poised to have one of the largest population explosions in modern history. As a result, there's a very good chance that Africa will be a much more significant player on the field in the decades to come. ... The entire US fits in the Horn of Africa. You really don't get an idea of how big Africa is until you try to fly across it. And with a pending massive population explosion pending, they'll out populate the US several times over as well.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    9. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mitcheli · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that a bulk of the Arab Spring happened in Northern Africa. As too did the Benghazi attack.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    10. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Music.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    11. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny

      So that's where all the grant money's been going...

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    12. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you're making shit up, since the US is almost 5 times larger than the horn of Africa.

    13. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a long term strategy to extract profit from Africa. Just because people from the US wouldn't go there because 15% profit is too hard, doesn't mean China isn't there making 5% profit and positioning themselves for a bigger profit later

    14. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      South Africa Could Have a Spaceport

      Somalia and Kenya would be better places for a spaceport. More initial velocity. We should also be placing a space elevator there, better weather for it than South America.

    15. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Music.

      Yes

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    16. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -5 Stupid and Ignorant. Africa is basically the future's China; it is the next labor resource. It's also the next frontier.

      Africa is the largest supplier of Europe's natural resources. Even still, most of their resources remain untapped. In the next two decades, a large focus is going to be around Algeria, Mauritania, Mali, and Niger as they are rich in resources and exploitable in labor.

      Having a all-seeing framework and presence in place would give an advantage to China.

    17. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      It's hard to overstate my satisfaction. ;)

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    18. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a long term strategy to extract profit from Africa. Just because people from the US wouldn't go there because 15% profit is too hard, doesn't mean China isn't there making 5% profit and positioning themselves for a bigger profit later

      Bingo, and then turning around and using those profits to buy African resources.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    19. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure Black Mesa won that contract, too. It's back to canned beans for us, folks.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    20. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And they are going to turn the African resources into mind control devices, and take over the world. Pinko commie and the Brain.

    21. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the popular maps of the world, the US looks inordinately large. If you look at a map, like the following, which is drawn based on surface area you'll notice just how large Africa really is:
      * http://odtmaps.com/detail.asp_Q_product_id_E_Pet-Wall-35x50

    22. Re: But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post very informative

    23. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by moronoxyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.

      So why is nobody suspecting surveillance when a US or European company is building communication infrastructure somewhere?
      They have exactly the same interest in knowing about this chatter as China.

    24. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mitcheli · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you're making shit up, since the US is almost 5 times larger than the horn of Africa.

      African Continent: 30.2 million km (11.7 million sq mi)

      United States of America: 3.79 million square miles (9.83 million km2)

      You were saying?

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    25. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.

      So why is nobody suspecting surveillance when a US or European company is building communication infrastructure somewhere?
      They have exactly the same interest in knowing about this chatter as China.

      Because you are reading a Seattle, Washington based author's article, instead of one based in China, so you are getting the U.S./Europe view of who the bad guys must be, rather than the Chinese view?

      Probably the most annoying thing to the U.S. intelligence interests is that the Chinese National Cryptographic Administration Bureau has effectively "Clipper Chipped" a back door due to the use of non-independent constants in the rounds (SM2/SM3/SMS4 standards). They also have their own TCM implementations which don't use the U.S./European standards, and are effectively :Clipper Chipped" as well (Russia, South Korea, and the Ukraine have similar programs, also using their own algorithms).

      So basically it comes down to China having the ability to peek, if they want, but the U.S. and Europe having to do a lot of work to peek if they want. If the shoe was on the other foot - the U.S. and Europe have both been shipping used (read as: outdated) cellular systems to African countries - then everyone would get to peek, because those systems have well known vulnerabilities.

      Basically, we're all pretty damn nosy with the "help" we give to the third world countries who are resource-rich and manufacturing poor.

    26. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound like the scene in good will hunting when will is talking about why he doesnt want to work for the NSA. source. :)

    27. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because then we know it instead of suspecting it.

    28. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      blackraven14250 said:

      I'm pretty sure you're making shit up, since the US is almost 5 times larger than the horn of Africa.

      The Horn of Africa is Eritrea, Djibouti, Ethiopia and Somalia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horn_of_Africa

      It has an area of 1,882,857 km2 The USA has an area of 9,826,675 km2[

      So blackraven14250 is right, the USA is 5 times the size of the Horn of Africa.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    29. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mitcheli · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends on the definition, because the Horn of Africa according to the US Military also includes the countries of Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi, Rwanda, and Uganda, which makes it significantly bigger. So I suppose we're both right on that front.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    30. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      So why is nobody suspecting surveillance when a US or European company is building communication infrastructure somewhere?

      Because both of these parties would end up using Chinese-made hardware / components. China is just cutting out the middle men.

    31. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you were wrong.

    32. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      The US Military is confusing East Africa with the Horn of Africa.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Africa#cite_note-Britannica-5

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    33. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re: So why is nobody suspecting surveillance when a US or European company is building communication infrastructure somewhere?
      US hardware and software needs for telco support under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_For_Law_Enforcement_Act
      Most of the telco kit from the EU/USA is loaded with police 'help' by default from the 1990's.
      Making things like this not too hard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SISMI-Telecom_scandal

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    34. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.

      [rest of comment truncated]

      From TFA: The company says it's bridging the digital divide, but others suspect it's wiring the continent for surveillance.

      What's amazing here is that all of Slashdot missed this false dichotomy, despite the sheer number of recent and timely articles underscoring that these two things aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, it seems they go hand in hand. Every government. Every government, has a vested in interest in keeping watch on its citizens. We have bitched and moaned about the NSA, but only because they had the indecency to get caught out by some punk kid. Not because it was surprising, shocking, or in any way even terribly interesting. "Authority does authoritarian things. Film at 11." Naturally, some people have a problem with this.

      Digital electronics, when attached to a microprocessor, manage to do a few things very well: They store, process, and transmit information. It's the most basic of computational function. Surveillance, to a computer, is just another store and forward operation.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    35. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Continent of Africa != Horn of Africa

    36. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong,

      If you have the oportunity to build it from the ground up with no interference you gain a long term resource that otherwise would have taken years under a fully developed intrastructure.
      Africa does business with the rest of the world, just because it's Africa you think they are still living in the bush and brushing thier teeth with sticks?
      If you put the infrastrcture in place now in 20 years they will have the entire country wired and fully moniotored.

      Maybe you don't care about Africa but other nations will in time.

    37. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Suspect? They know it. No need to suspect. When you're a small country stuck in the middle of many evil empires who want to rob you as efficiently as possible, you know that every deal you sign comes with poison in the envelope.

      This moaning is about getting Western populace prepared for the propaganda of the next Cold War. You won't see too much crying about Chinese spying outside those territories. If anything, it's generally viewed as a good counterbalance to rampant one-sided Western action over last two decades.

      Remember: our system was built to be good for us, and bad for others to be enforced at gun point. That's why we're fabulously wealthy by the world average standards.

    38. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See also: American spying on EU offices during trade negotiations.

    39. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by dosilegecko · · Score: 1

      You said the "Horn of Africa", which is most certainly not the size of the US. Horn of africa: ~2 million km^2, USA ~9.8 km^2. On the map you linked the whole continent of Africa does not look significantly wider than the US either. Flying from Maine to Cali or Maine looks about the same distance as flying coast to coast in the north of Africa.

    40. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure to compare the actual surface of these areas. Some projections really distort areas and make Africa looks smaller that it is.

    41. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      Maybe the infrastructure is a communication network for the upcoming invasion......

    42. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, nothing to see in Africa? Just move along? I don't think so...

      But there's nothing preventing the Americans and the west from participating in African progress...
      Oh wait a minute, I forgot the last time you guys were in there you raped the continent for all its worth, installed colonial governments, invented Apartheid, enslaved millions, and generally behaved badly...
      I guess these ungrateful niggers have good memory...

  3. no. by beckett · · Score: 0

    no.

    1. Re: no. by LocutusOfBorg1 · · Score: 1

      +1 for you You id is too low.

    2. Re: no. by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

      I think GP is referring to Betteridge's law of headlines, which says that "any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no".

  4. The best line in the article by misophist · · Score: 2

    "Hmm, government backdoor access to data through communications technology. Where would the NSA get an idea like that?"

    Talk about throwing rocks in glass houses!

    1. Re:The best line in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DDR: Alpha site. Failed under the weight of its own bureaucracy.
      PRC: Beta site. The Great Firewall was built with CSCO gear back in the day. Demonstrated scalability and practical implementation, but was limited by processing power to censorship/blocking of politically-inappropriate view.
      USA: Production model. Every packet captured from everyone for (short period of time, long enough to scan for interesting things), interesting things kept forever, just in case they come in handy someday. Sufficient processing power and data storage to "let a thousand flowers bloom," and pick the ones that distinguish themselves.

    2. Re:The best line in the article by c0lo · · Score: 1

      "Hmm, government backdoor access to data through communications technology. Where would the NSA get an idea like that?"

      Talk about throwing rocks in glass houses!

      And a powerful throw, come to that. TFA:

      Each time the company [Huawei] has denied the allegations, and government investigations consistently fail to turn up any hard evidence.

      So, NSA would have the technical ability and all the interest in the world to demonstrate it.
      As they didn't, I suspect that the only "rational" explanation is they got sidetracked into... ummm... Of course, the very hypothesis that's nothing to be found in the first place is preposterous, the US govt told us so! As they also told us they're not spying on us... yea, well... spying just a little but for our own good... 'Cause, you see, sucking Africa dry of their precious data is what those chinese want, see? Be afraid, be very afraid of it...

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  5. Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    China is the greatest enemy of the USA, and ALL major US military planning is designed for future conflict between these two powers. So, no surprise then that the owners of Slashdot ensure a constant stream of articles attacking China. Attack Iran, attack China, praise Israel. Is there anyone here so thick that they do not notice this tedious pattern?

    PS do the owners of Slashdot still prevent citizens of Iran from accessing the open-source websites they also control. And NO, there is no US law requiring this.

    1. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      Minor nitpick - China is arguably USAs greatest identifiable "enemy" (perhaps threat or rival is a better term here). The terrorists are probably a bigger threat. Heck, they do a pretty good job of screwing themselves over, who needs enemies?

    2. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      ...do the owners of Slashdot still prevent citizens of Iran from accessing the open-source websites...

      That is truly disgusting!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA's greatest enemy is the London financial centers.

    4. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say the USA is the greatest enemy of the USA. If the madness don't stop soon, the 1% will have sucked the 99% so dry the USA will be a dessicated husk.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    5. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      I'd say the USA is the greatest enemy of the USA. If the madness don't stop soon, the 1% will have sucked the 99% so dry the USA will be a dessicated husk.

      Maybe China is planning ahead for when that 1% discard that husk and move on to Africa.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the US managed to piss off the rest of the world enough that as soon as (not if, not even when) the collapse comes, few will come for a "US aid" but rather breath a sigh of relief. Yes, even and especially the countries that now suck up to it, pretending to be a buddy.

      Think of the school bully getting expelled. Even his lackeys are usually finally happy that he's gone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry moar? Or maybe you could develop an alternative site on a non-US hosted server that is open to those countries, if it make you so upset. Or you could just bitch on /. which is always oh so effective....

    8. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

      Pearl Harbor was attacked by Japanese, not Chinese.

    9. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From China, the USA is toward the East.

    10. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'tis American to confuse past allies and past foes. The Nazis were allied with the US for the great war against the Russians and Native Americans, right?

    11. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 1

      Too late. America is already owned by the top one percent. It surprises me that some people think they still have time to change things when the USA is already nothing more than a dessicated husk of it's formerly great and powerful self.

      I'd say the USA is the greatest enemy of the USA. If the madness don't stop soon, the 1% will have sucked the 99% so dry the USA will be a dessicated husk.

    12. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr.... the article is NOT about the Arabs/israeli thingy.

      Firstly, the Chinese are NOT building a high-speed train from the Cape to Cairo.
      Secondly, There is an African country which already has space-launch and nuclear weapons technology; ZA. (granted the jericho three-stage nuclear missiles were provided by the israeli buddies of Oppenheimer).

      Is Vodacom (African subsidiary of Vodafone) running state-of-the-art Chinese ystems or the obsolete western-intelligence-sponsored GSM?

      Are the Chinese interested in cornering the international diamond trade, or is that traditionally the territory of slave-traders, opium-warriors, and central banker-types?

      Ideologically speaking, the Africans cannot trust the "white" or the "jewish" people, whether they bear gifts or arms....
      Since DengXiaouping adapted communism to include market-forces, some form of socialism is entirely more palatable to Africans than the more "traditional" western decadence.

      Capitalism in Africa is the issue, and take a lesson from De Beers and Anglo-American; theres poor whiteys and poor bleckys in ZA, while GoldmanSachs still swindles at the upper ECHELONS.

      The legacy of Greek colonialism, Archimedes, Pythagoras, and the formerly stable monetary instrument of SILVER DRACHMA, coupled with a "capitalistic" system has not spared future generations of Greeks from debt-slavery. Was it not a few weeks before the WTC demolition that the international community was talking about WRITING OFF THIRD-WORLD DEBT?

      NOT a communist/capitalist issue

      SLAVERY, DEBT SLAVERY, and by the book, the Chinese are against it.
      Mark Thatcher never thatched a hut in his life.

    13. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there anyone here so thick that they do not notice this tedious pattern?

      You're asking that on a site mainly frequented by Americans? Seriously?

      Is there any American NOT so thick as to fall for it? I meant two-fuckin-fake-party-system! Need I even say more??

    14. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pearl Harbor was attacked by Japanese, not Chinese.

      This is /. We don't want facts clouding the discussion. [ /sarcasm ]

    15. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99% in usually a made-up statistics.

    16. Re:Usual Slashdot China bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read the articles on /.? Almost all of them are very anti-American, from detailing Snowden's latest fart (and how it bodes ill for the US), to Pravda's latest claim about Chinese supremacy in the Pacific Rim.

      If not the articles, then the replies.

  6. bridging the digital divide == wiring for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0

  7. Is China Wiring Africa For Surveillance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No they aren't. Just same as they don't do crazy APT shit.

    Just same as US can't even imagine doing legit business without employing coercion or fucking with other countries networks.

    Stop with the FUD.

  8. NSA upset they can't place their own back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cisco, Lucent etc. probably play ball with NSA. Huawei maybe not so much. No wonder NSA is uspset.

    1. Re:NSA upset they can't place their own back doors by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Libya was going to offer cheap, African telco options with its cash help for a Pan-African satellite.
      Less EU cash flow per call and the tracking options via the EU for African calls would have been less easy.
      Now other firms are going to re connect Africa away from the USA and EU.....
      Wont someone think of the need to track the digital generations, they might learn about the market value of their mineral exports.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:NSA upset they can't place their own back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the Huawei scare stories are almost certainly the result of lobbying on the part of Cisco. If the NSA is willing to put out stories about your competitors does that make it more or less likely that you will backdoor your equipment for them to say thank you?

      Meanwhile I see about 5 times more Mikrotik equipment than anything else in the big South African internet exchange point I use. Maybe its those crazy Latvians we need to worry about?

  9. Others suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who, the NSA believes their are losing ground?

  10. it's about time by clovis · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's about time somebody started spying on Africa.
    Everytime they have a TV show about Africa, it's just a bunch of f**king lions and elephants. Where are all the people?
    What the heck's going on there? It's about time somebody found out.

    1. Re:it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of warlords fighting over control of petty amounts of land, cannibalism, rape, starvation, poverty, AIDS, UN forces having sex with children, slaves,.... Not that all of Africa is like that, of course, but if anything needs to be on TV, it's that.

    2. Re:it's about time by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Everytime they have a TV show about Africa, it's just a bunch of f**king lions and elephants. Where are all the people?
      What the heck's going on there? It's about time somebody found out.

      That was then, this is now.

      You forgot to tell people to stay off your veldt.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:it's about time by kcelery · · Score: 1

      commander: "agent A, can you hear anything?"
      agent A: "Loud and clear."
      commander: "What is the message?"
      agent A: "wah ding du boo boo ju."
      commander: "What does that mean?"
      agent A: "Some kind of African language, I guess. How would I know?"

    4. Re:it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many countries are in Africa?
      Oh yes, Lets lump the issue. Just put it on TV and tag it 'Africa'. At least it's one big homogeneous hellhole. If you can't list the problems as it pertains to a particular country or region, it's better to remain silent and not sound stupid. Mexico's druglord problem is not Canada's problems. The US's border problem is not Jamaica's problems. I could go on but you get the message.

  11. Different approaches to aid by stungod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 4 years ago, I took a trip to Ethiopia. One guy I talked to there was the head of an aid organization that helped build infrastructure in the more rural parts of the country. He explained to me that while the Western countries like the US, Germany, the UK, etc donated money to local organizations, the Chinese preferred to come in and do the job themselves. It saves on the corruption and waste, and they get to build a positive impression themselves. So you see lots of Chinese companies there building roads, burying cable, building farms/industry, etc.

    He told me they had the right idea. The Chinese are *investing* in Africa as opposed to donating to it. That's going to have a long-term impact on who has more influence in Africa. So yeah, they're going to build surveillance...they're building the infrastructure. If we wanted to stop them, we'd go start building too.

    1. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the US policy in Africa is permanent destabilization. It knows that China needs Africa's resources, and actively resists any attempts to develop the continent to keep China from gaining much of a foothold.

      Please, China: keep wiring Africa. You're laying the groundwork for a future world superpower beholden to you.

    2. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If we wanted to stop them

      Why? Why would you want to do that?

      Why do you consider you have the right?

      The chinese don't the duty to colonize africa, but the US (read: US plus blackmailed countries) sure as fuck has no right to stop them.

    3. Re:Different approaches to aid by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's Chinese colonialism. They are doing EXACTLY what the Europeans did. Just like the Europeans the Africans will be happy to allow them until they realize none of the jobs are going to them and that the infrastructure is simply to facilitate resource exploitation, just like the Europeans.

    4. Re:Different approaches to aid by guardiangod · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but from what I've heard, Africans much prefer western aids.
       
      Westerners just drop their pile of money on the Africans' door and tell the Africans to save themselves with it.
       
      Chinese on the other hand distributes/build the aids themselves with lots of strings attach (nothing evil, mind you, just enough to make sure that both the Chinese and Africians get their money's worth.)
       
      To the Africans, they see Chinese' policy as an intrusion.

    5. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      My friend from Germany went there and dug wells in the 70s and 80s. What happened to them? They got destroyed by warlords without people even lifting a finger to protect them.

      Africans had over a thousand years of contact with the more advanced muslim world and yet still didn't utilize the wheel or the alphabet at the time of colonization. And now we're trying to give them modern amenities?

      Fuck them. IQ tests show their inferior and they can't even build anything more than a backwards ass "civilization". There is no "right" approach other than to leave it the fuck alone.

    6. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a South African...

      Firstly we will take from whoever gives it. Our politicians whine about western politicians as much as they do about the Chinese. The Chinese typically care about business more than they do about politics which makes them easier to work with. Other than stopping the Dalai Lama from visiting our country I can't think of any other strings they've pulled publicly.

    7. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're right but the politically correct slashdot moron crowd will vote you down for saying the inconvenient truth.

    8. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called tied aid. You allow only your own companies to do the work.

    9. Re:Different approaches to aid by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they probably wont start hacking their arms and legs of with pangas, so they wont get as bad a rap as us.

        http://www.kongo-kinshasa.de/dokumente/lekture/crime_of_congo.pdf

    10. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He told me they had the right idea. The Chinese are *investing* in Africa as opposed to donating to it

      I was shocked on my last vacation to see the Chinese doing this much closer to the US than in Africa. They've basically flown in an army of construction workers, equipment and materials into the Nassau Islands and will fly it all out when they are done building.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/world/americas/us-alert-as-chinas-cash-buys-inroads-in-caribbean.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

      Motivations aside you could tell they are doing something a little bit different here.

    11. Re:Different approaches to aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Chinese colonialism. They are doing EXACTLY what the Europeans did. Just like the Europeans the Africans will be happy to allow them until they realize none of the jobs are going to them and that the infrastructure is simply to facilitate resource exploitation, just like the Europeans.

      I think the key difference is that the Europeans opened up Africa militarily. They conquered and raped, pillaged, enslaved to get their resources. They later stated it was the white man's burden to colonize these places. Don't even get me started as to what happened in India by the British, when the British had millions starving, with Churchhill himself stating racist remarks against the Indians.

      China has never in its long history had oversea colonies, despite having the power to do so. They are simply interested in trade and money, otherwise known as soft power. There's a clear difference between European colonialism and what the Chinese are currently doing.

      We are currently seeing GDPs rising in Africa. We didn't see ANY significant economic development in Africa while under colonization. Just look at historical GDP figures from that time.

      To say that this is neocolonialism is simply dishonest.

    12. Re:Different approaches to aid by Hentes · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are effectively colonising Africa. Probably for the best, Africans are simply incapable of governing themselves. With the Chinese, they will have jobs, food, water and order. A good deal for both of them. Not as good for us though, which is why the West should get off its lazy ass and start to recolonise the place. With multiple parties competing for them, the Africans could get better deals, and we wouldn't hand over the continent to China. But with all the liberals around it's quite hard to get anything done, and I don't think this is a possibility in the current political climate.

  12. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems everyone's spying on everything everyone says anyway the who and where doesn't matter anymore almost

  13. huawei bluez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the Australian broadband network put out tenders, Huawei was not allowed to bid for any contracts. there's a bloody good reason why: the Australian government knows that Huawei are putting in back doors into hardware. there's plenty of proof. for example: buy a Huawei usb dongle modem, watch your firewall and count the amount of times it talks back to chinatelecom. once you see the pattern, it's easy to block the dongle from communicating back to China. I think everyone should be concerned that an arm of the PLR are installing comms equipment anywhere in the world. Huawei haven proven themselves over and over again that they cannot be trusted.

    1. Re:huawei bluez by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Lolwut? If it was a backdoor you wouldn't see that on your computer's firewall because it would be done from withing the HSPA modem itself, on the outboard side of the USB port, beyond the firewall. I hate to break it to you, but something on your computer is connecting to these evil Chinese IP addresses. You should probably work out what it is before it turns your computer Communist.

      (Yes, I do have a Huawei HSPA modem; no it doesn't connect to Chinese IP addresses in any way visible through a firewall on the computer; no I haven't tried tapping the air interface to check for actual hardware backdoors; no I don't believe China is out to get me or the parent.)

    2. Re:huawei bluez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Huawei block was instigated by Cisco. If you can't compete on price find a way to have your competitor excluded.

    3. Re:huawei bluez by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They have only ever put one back door in their hardware. They copied Cisco's IOS so thoroughly that they copied Cisco's backdoor. When notified, they removed it. Cisco just moved it so it was hidden again. Huawei is looked at so closely that if they ship an actual back door, it's found instantly and documented and published. Cisco got away with it for years.

      That you don't know what a driver auto-update looks like in Windows firewall isn't proof of wrongdoing.

  14. It could be worse by obarthelemy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They could be propping up regimes that routinely use torture and abuse human rights, and randomly killing innocents with drones. But then there'd be nothing left for the US to do...

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:It could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAIL Troll is FAIL!

    2. Re:It could be worse by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Spoiler Alert: China does trade with regimes that routinely use torture and abuse human rights.
      Unlike western countries, China doesn't even make better governance (or even a basic accounting of funds) a condition of its loans.

      More often than not, China gives loans and asks for repayment in natural resources, which allows [government] and its cronies to turn the country's natural resources into cash + infrastructure.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:It could be worse by dkf · · Score: 1

      Spoiler Alert: China does trade with regimes that routinely use torture and abuse human rights.

      China trades with everyone. Even the USA.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  15. And again... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...China taking away jobs from the US.

    Dammit, spying on the world is OUR job! They took uuur juuuuubs!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:And again... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      ...China taking away jobs from the US.

      Dammit, spying on the world is OUR job! They took uuur juuuuubs!

      Not really, 'cause we were going to outsource them anyway.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:And again... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they're supposed to work for US, not just cut out the middle man and fill their own intelligence pockets! That wasn't part of the deal!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:And again... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      ...China taking away jobs from the US.

      Dammit, spying on the world is OUR job! They took uuur juuuuubs!

      You don't seem to realize that is a local industry, most countries roll their own. European countries included.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:And again... by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 1

      I know you are trying to be funny, but let's get the facts straight while telling a good joke. Officers of US corporations give jobs to the Chinese by moving manufacturing, intellectual property, and product development (ie: engineering) to the former "low cost region" of the PRC. Yes, the Chinese government put in place big incentives for western companies to come over and do business there. US corporate officers knew a good thing(tm) when they saw it. They got to show an increase in profit at first by paying low wages offshore, claim that they were doing what is natural to them by entering a formerly closed market, and then later, when the salaries rise to nearly match those in the US, forever park significant portions of corporate profits in "tax advantageous" countries.

      Therefore, more properly said, it is greedy people running US corporations who have taken jobs away from the US and given them over to the Chinese.

      OK. Back to the humor...

      ...China taking away jobs from the US...

    5. Re:And again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Officers of US corporations give jobs to the Chinese by moving manufacturing, intellectual property, and product development (ie: engineering) to the former "low cost region" of the PRC.

      Just as CEOs don't get the blame, US companies don't either: Cisco builds the great firewall of China and people in the US say "that's how competition works, they had no choice."

  16. Money buys anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Africans knew what Chinese really think about blacks, they would be shocked.
    Chinese money would paper over the wounds, however.

    1. Re:Money buys anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As compared to American law enforcement?

  17. Grandpa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit Grandpa! How did you get out of the retirement home again? What's with the pith helmet and why are you talking about Wild Kingdom again? We've gotta get your 4 digit UID ass back to the home before we have to go to court AGAIN.

  18. Zero content article by jma05 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly why do we discuss articles like this? There is zero evidence so far that China is doing mass surveillance outside of China.

    The articles acknowledges it, and asks questions that cannot be answered, while providing no new insights.

    1. Re:Zero content article by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Extrapolate.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:Zero content article by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      Exactly why do we discuss articles like this? There is zero evidence so far that China is doing mass surveillance outside of China.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act
      The US Government knows what we're doing, so they just assume the Chinese are doing the exact same thing.

      Don't forget that Huawei is the #1 manufacturer of telecom equipment as is considered one of the most *innovative companies in the world.
      The rest of the world knows Huawei for a lot more than "zomg China".

      *When they're not stealing technology from others.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Zero content article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly why do we discuss articles like this? There is zero evidence so far that China is doing mass surveillance outside of China.

      These kinds of posts are great. If we do get evidence, there'll be the same kind of post saying "Exactly why do we discuss articles like this? Everyone knew this already." There is apparently no proper time to discuss. Or rather, you can discuss whatever you want whenever you want. Trying to stop that is otherwise known as derailing the discussion.

    4. Re:Zero content article by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Blaming corporations, calling them "greedy," is silly and foolish. Its people that are "greedy."

      You can work in the American factory demanding that people buy over-priced products all you want, but consumers of products don't actually give a shit that you sit there making those demands. They don't "feel you" because they have their own problems, such as how to utilize the fruits of their own labors effectively.

      While you sit there being hostile towards business, friendly business environments are eating your lunch. Think about it.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  19. Such a shame by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

    "but others suspect it's wiring the continent for surveillance".
    With todays knowledge: probably yes,
    Thanks again mr. Snowden for revealing the truth.

    Such a shame. It should have been NSA surveillance equipment, but they will find an other way.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:Such a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but others suspect it's wiring the continent for surveillance".

      Such a shame. It should have been NSA surveillance equipment, but they will find an other way.

      Of course they will! Let China spend all their money on building that infrastructure so that the NSA can just cheaply tap their mainlines. Done and done.

    2. Re:Such a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The former NSA head accusing Huawei and/or China of espionage? What he is really saying is: Huawei wants to keep the data to themselves, instead of nicely giving it to those nice folks back at the NSA headquarters. Now how is the NSA going to find all those terrorists in Africa looking for a backpack or a pressure cooker?

    3. Re:Such a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The loudest concerned party is former NSA and CIA head Michael Hayden
      This story is a big stink, and he that smelt it, dealt it.

  20. Would have been news 6 mo ago by beernutmark · · Score: 2

    Now that we know the US Gov. has our country (plus Europe at a min) completely wired up for surveillance who are we to complain about the Chinese.

  21. I for once.. by formfeed · · Score: 1

    ... welcome our new Chinese overlords.

    You see, as the widow of the late Jacob Bugarundi, minister of mining, I have been looking for assistance to kindly help me transfer money from secret diamond sales from my account to yours. But after repeated attempts failed to contact trusted friends in Western countries, I now see new hope with good men Chinese investors.

  22. Double standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when China networks Africa, it is part of an evil plan, when the US ravages and destabilizes oil-rich nations, it is liberation.

  23. Haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haters gonna hate

  24. government grifters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The loudest concerned party is former NSA and CIA head Michael Hayden, who has repeatedly raised warning flags about Huawei's suspected espionage."

    When all you have is a hammer...

    Get rid of the NSA. It's just an overrated govt make-work project, it does not and has never contributed anything that would remotely justify its cost (except maybe plot elements to a few good movies), and the same goes double for the CIA. Seriously, what has either done for you lately, or ever, except divert your money to adult children playing spy vs spy? Here's your opportunity, yanks, to turn conventional wisdom on its head and show the rest of the world how comparatively useless intelligence agencies are today, if not actually detrimental most of time to the national security they profess to uphold.

  25. Pot calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the US is far far far worse than China here.

  26. What are they doing? by kawabago · · Score: 1

    The burgeoning population is stripping the lands and forests of everything that can be eaten.

    1. Re:What are they doing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The burgeoning population is stripping the lands and forests of everything that can be eaten.

      Or burned.

      This is the history of humanity. It's been suggested that europe would be desert today if not for the black plague putting a hitch in human activity. Take a look at the fertile crescent and tell me how fertile it is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Africa is the New China by betterprimate · · Score: 2

    Africa is one of the largest supplier of Europe's natural resources. So much so that France sends out armed forces to procure them (they call the justification "terrorism" too, PR).

    Even still, most of their resources remain untapped. In the next two decades, a large focus is going to be around Algeria, Mauritania, Mali, and Niger as they are rich in untapped resources and exploitable in labor.

    Having an omnipresence would give an advantage to China as a global superpower. Not saying it's right or good...

    1. Re:Africa is the New China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      France got to Mali in response to a request from Mali's government to prevent various criminal (revendicating terrorist status) from taking over authority in the country and applying full blown Sharia.
      France especially heard that request considering Mali's past as a french colony.
      Job was done quick and clean and french forced headed back home withing the following months.

      Yes France gets it's Uranium and many other ressources (mainly Niger) from africa and especially Mali's region, but not from Mali itself.

      Although the best economical interest of France and everyone else is stability amongst african states, the military operation you are referring to is absolutely not comparable to supremacy/terror wars of the US in the middle east.

    2. Re:Africa is the New China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also when France intervened in Libya a few years ago it was indeed economy related: Ex-president Sarkozy had to eliminate Muhamar Kadhafi in order to cover up for the 50 million dollars he had received from him for his electoral campaign. A few close friends from Sarkozy also had the chance to sign juicy contracts outside of any legal context.

      So this was one man's deed for his personal gain, no more (i must add he will go to jail in time for that, judges never stop closing in these days).

  28. Law of the Headlines by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    No.

    Huawei is a company motivated by the desire to do business with people. There's nothing fishy about them trying to sell lots of your products to an emerging market.

    China almost certainly does have espionage interests in Africa, and Huawei equipment might be a vector. But I'm sure they're joined in that noble endeavour by the NSA, GCHQ, etc...

    1. Re:Law of the Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What China does goes way beyond NSA's surveillance.

      Take a look at Dennis Poindexter's book "The Chinese Information War: Espionage, Cyberwar, Communications Control and Related Threats to United States Interests". (http://www.amazon.com/The-Chinese-Information-War-Communications/dp/0786472715) Everything that Chinese companies do is fishy.

  29. The New West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is the new west, for decades, we had UK, Then USA, Now, we have china to deal with. While i

    Write

    , the chinise move in deeper into every city in Africa while USA is making war with the Koreas :(

  30. Is a frog's ass watertight? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Rhetorical question is rhetorical.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  31. Africa is natural resource rich, thats why by Camael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Natural resources is the name of the game. And its not just China eyeing the riches.

    One of the more geographically remote locations was Africa, where Japan and China, and to a growing extent South Korea and India, are in fierce competition to win contracts for energy and mineral rights on the continent.

    Africa’s allure is easy to understand. Libya ranks ninth in world oil reserves, Nigeria 10th and Angola 16th. For natural gas reserves, Nigeria ranks eighth, Algeria ninth and Egypt 15th.

    In addition, Africa holds 95.5 percent of the world’s platinum reserves, 58.3 percent of all diamonds, 49.2 percent of all cobalt, 45.8 percent of the chromium supply and 27.1 percent of the world’s manganese.

  32. From the evil overlord list by voss · · Score: 4, Funny

    100. Finally, to keep my subjects permanently locked in a mindless trance, I will provide each of them with free unlimited Internet access.

    Well played China...well played...

  33. Jesus fucking christ on a stick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Look, if someone else were wiring Africa (who have a better penetration of wireless phone access than many first world countries, since they have no infrastructure that incumbents can squeeze for more free profit, hence delay the move off it), would it be "Is France Wiring Africa for Surveilance"? Murica? Brits? Canadians? Wombles????

    Listen, the problem seems to be that China is selling stuff, and this means others aren't being paid for selling stuff they get china to make and rebadge for them to sell.

    Plus Betteridge.

    NO.

  34. Nothing to do with the regime change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was that there's been a crash and the selling of stuff is being done now in an increasing proportion by China, stalling recovery of the "Western World".

    When China was mostly producing goods for the international conglomerates to rebadge, stick a profitable mark-up and give a stick to beat both workers and governments over (Do as we ask or we'll move abroad), China was fine.

    When it started selling its stuff directly (cheaper, because they don't add on the second set of profits that the rebadging corporation puts on), which happened about the same time as the regime change in the USA, it became a "problem".

  35. Jingoist rhetoric much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it were a USA company providing the 'services' it would be because the USA is just a 'good guy' trying to bring Africa up to standards with the rest of the world, not to mention the potential market. But... China is evil, because... China!

    Christ, can this type of mindset be more pedantic?

    Once again, /. eds miss filtering out the transparent propaganda.

  36. 5 years ago ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Fox News was horrified that China was doing business with Afghanistan. Of course, the US news show failed to mention the US military and other US interests had been in the country for 7 years.

    Before it was "Communism evil; USA good". Now it's "Muslims evil; USA" good. Soon it will be "China evil; USA good".

  37. And this is different exactly how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this in any way different to the US doing the same things?

  38. Headline is a question? The answer is always NO. by Rubinhood · · Score: 1

    When an article title ends with a question mark, the answer is NO.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

  39. China sold surveillance technology to Mugabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is already on record for having sold surveillance tech to Mugabe - who wants to bet that there is either a backdoor or an information sharing agreement - my guess is the former is more likely.

  40. They are the same thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Wiring for communications is the same as wiring for surveillance.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. What have we leanred? by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    That all nations see the digitization of communication as a way to gain leverage over competitive fields in which they're participants People gotta talk and what they talk about and say is everything. So no surprises here. Everything is always an arms race and always will be until such time as 1) everyone has enough of everything 2) the innate jealousies, innate anti-social appetites , the innate urge to be alpha and have more than other people or hurt other people instead of just leaving them alone, are removed from human character.

    Until then, it's going to be like this. People possessed of religious belief needing to kill or convert others. Men and women competing for limited power, prestige, mates and stuff . This is what we evolved to do. This is what had survival value. This is the ground upon which all other considerations are framed and no one even questions it and no one is immune.

    This is what we are and will continue to be until and unless we decide that enough is enough and begin the process of re-working our nature from the genes up.

  42. To be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that's a bit of a nasty spin. The facts are that 1
    . Surveilance is byproduct of technical advancements 2
    . Europe and US have ignored africa apart from ore, oil and gems. China on the other hand is building infrastructure (e.g. most of the recent builing of road network) manufacturing

    We had agesw to get things moving and did little.more than charity work and resource stripping. Now we wallow in scaremongering, jealousy, and a few tantrums. I say well done to chinese

  43. There's money in Africa, still. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares if there's more elsewhere?

    A shopkeeper who leaves customers' money on the table because there's someone with more money over in another shop is an idiot.

    1. Re:There's money in Africa, still. by icebike · · Score: 1

      An a shop keeper who loses money on every sale an expects to make it up on volume is a bigger idiot.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:There's money in Africa, still. by Tim12s · · Score: 1

      Until you are the only shop left in town... then you hike prices.

  44. So you advocate no corporate veil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the point is "corporations aren't X, people are X", then that is the argument that corporation personhood is a fallacy and therefore there should be no corporate veil, the person who is X must be open to prosecution or censure for their having X.

    Except you don't really want that, do you? You want the people protected "because it's the corporation, not that individual", but the corporation held blameless "because it's the people in there, not the corporation".

    1. Re:So you advocate no corporate veil? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Except you don't really want that, do you? You want the people protected "because it's the corporation, not that individual", but the corporation held blameless "because it's the people in there, not the corporation".

      You seem to claim to know what I want, and yet get it wrong.

      How often are you wrong, mr anonymous coward?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  45. Michael Hayden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no evidence here and the only "source" is General Michael Hayden, "the first NSA director to betray the country’s trust by ordering wholesale violation of what was once the First Commandment at NSA: 'Thou Shalt Not Eavesdrop on Americans Without a Court Warrant.'"

    http://consortiumnews.com/2013/07/21/gen-haydens-glass-house/

  46. This is exactly what I was referring to by Tim12s · · Score: 1
  47. Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the US is doing it, it's natural because that's what countries are supposed to do. When China does it, it's shady and evil.

  48. I hope so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That will save us the trouble of doing it ourselves.

  49. US & Military Study the Same Book... by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    China has a VERY long memory & written history.

    Sun Tzu in the Art of War 2500 years ago said (paraphrazing from memory) "I would rather have one good spy than 10,000 good soldiers."

  50. choices by beefoot · · Score: 1

    Africa has two choices in front of them -- they could spend more money contracting US companies and being spied by NSA or they could spend less money contracting to Chinese companies and being spied by Chinese government. The choice is clear when you don't have the money.

  51. It could be worse by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    They could post whiny comments on Slashdot trying to make false equivalences to steer any and all discussions to the US rather than talking about the fact at hand!

    Seriously, quit with this shit. One of the most annoying things about Slashdot these days are the folks like you that just can't deal with any discussion that isn't about the US, in particular how bad the US is. It is a sort of arrogance that if the discussion isn't about something you know and care about, you can't deal with it and thus have to steer it back around.

    Stop it. Discuss the article in question. Stop twisting everything back around to your pet topic.

  52. For US readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just FYI Africa is a continent, below Europe. This is where black people (negroids) come from.

  53. Maybe Chinese can solve the mistery by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Carefully tracking elephants in their natural environment maybe they could figure out how they manage to become invisible in american's rooms.

  54. I was involved by djupedal · · Score: 1

    As someone responsible to approve contracts between African govts. and one if the two major telecoms in China, I can tell you, yes, the country is being (has been since 2005) wired. The Chinese are following the Japanese model, where you build the communications infrastructure so you can know who is doing what logging, mineral and transportation work, etc., thereby providing your countries' vendors and early place in line with the local government when it's time to bid. It doesn't hurt to loan money to those govt. agencies. with strings tied to spending inside your country as part of that process.

  55. China’s Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It’s great that these areas are getting on the grid, but what is Huawei gaining from this? With all the rumors of China’s surveillance programs, I don’t see this idea being too far fetched. It’d be easy for Huawei to gather data on an entire country when they’re the ones providing the technology for it. What happened to the days of spies hiding behind costumes instead of keyboards?

  56. I'd rather be spied upon by Chinese than by the US by Baki · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have the Chinese spy on my internet traffic than the US.
    Reaon: If I would have anything to hide (of course I don't :), being in western europe, I am better in physical reach of the US secret service than of the Chinese secret service. The Chinese knowing things about me affects me less.