Slashdot Mirror


Studying the Slow Decay of a Laptop Battery For an Entire Year

First time accepted submitter jradavenport writes "I've been keeping a log of the health of my MacBook Air battery for the past year, taking samples every minute I use the computer (152,411 readings so far!). This has allowed me to study both my own computing/work habits, but also the fascinating rapid decay of battery capacity. Comparing it to my previous 2009 MacBook Pro, the battery in this 2012 Air is degrading much faster."

363 comments

  1. Ah, I see the problem. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're discharging it wrong, don't do that.

    1. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now.. no more making fun of someone who's dead...

    2. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He does refer to "letting the battery cycle" - I though you weren't supposed to do that with modern Li-po batteries.

    3. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have to do that every once in awhile if you want the battery status indicator to be correct. This is because the voltage curve is so flat there really is no other way to determine level of charge other than to count power out and calibrate what the battery should hold periodically.

    4. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Tukz · · Score: 0

      iWooooosh

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    5. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 0

      Not wrong - "different".

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    6. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you don't care if the battery gauge is inaccurate, you should never cycle the battery completely. Lithiums thrive with frequent top-ups.

      Unfortunately, having a useful gauge is handy so it's useful to cycle the battery occasionally.

      I rarely use battery power deep into a battery's cycle so I don't worry too much about it.

    7. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But then what about all the great Hitler jokes?

    8. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that is only in theory. In my experience topping it up all the time will make sure your battery dies early.
      The best way to take care of a battery is to charge it up and then remove it entirely while it is not in use. That way you can have batteries that can last for a decade. If you are one of those who have the PSU plugged in most of the time you are lucky to have half the capacity after a couple of years.

    9. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Yes, the problem is that using the computer without the battery isn't always very practical.

      I've gotten many years out of cell phone batteries by topping them up constantly, but the phones aren't on the chargers for days at a time.

    10. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are several lithium chemistries, but most places I've read recommend keeping them 40% to 60% charged: both deep discharge and full charge are hard on them. Running a lithium-battery-powered computer at full charge (with the charger active) all the time shortens battery life dramatically.

      If you have access to AC, run the laptop without the battery.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Not very practical on Apples :( You then bump the magsafe jack off, and poof goes your session. It's less of an annoyance if you work mostly in VMs and snapshot them regularly (every 10 minutes or so), but it's still a hassle.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    12. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Top-ups are nearly as hard on lithiums as run-downs. Ideally you should only completely top-up (and run down) the laptop battery once every couple months for a battery calibration. Failure to do that is what killed Li-ion battery longevity in the old days. The laptop would charge the battery to 100%, it would self-discharge to 99%, and the laptop would charge it right back to 100%. Several times a day. Within a year the battery's longevity was down to an hour, and after 2 years it would last 5 minutes. This is why removing the battery from the laptop worked - it prevented the laptop from immediately recharging it the moment it self-discharged below 100%.

      Most new laptops have features to prevent this (so removing the battery is unnecessary). They prevent full charges or full discharges, either in hardware or in software. If it's done at the hardware (firmware) level, the capacity written on the battery or in the specs will be about 20% higher than the capacity reported by the OS. If it's done in software, there should be a setting which limits the max charge you can give the battery, and/or how much the battery can self-discharge before it will be recharged. e.g. On Thinkpads you can set the battery to charge to (say) 90% max, and prevent recharge until the battery drops to (say) 80% charge (both % can be set by the user). My daily use laptop for nearly 3 years has been a Sony which I immediately limited to 80% max charge after buying it. Its battery life has dropped only slightly over those 3 years (from about 2h45m on 80% charge to about 2h30m) despite daily use on and off AC.

      All EV manufacturers adopt the same strategy of preventing a full charge or full discharge. The Volt only uses 10.3 kWh of its 16 kWh capacity. The Leaf only uses about 21 kWh of its 24 kWh capacity, and there are still complaints about losing bars of capacity. Numbers for the Tesla S are a bit hard to come by as they're pretty tight-lipped about the specs, but the mix of numbers I've seen suggest they're limiting the operating range to about 90% of the battery's real capacity.

      So ignoring that a sample of one sucks and assuming this guy's finding is legit, it's possible Apple tweaked the max charge point and when the battery would recharge. They might have raised the max charge % to try to squeeze more life out of the battery, and the cost is that the max capacity is dropping more quickly.

    13. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Actually that's a good point. Usage patterns effect the long term life of a battery. I find notebooks which are primarily used as desktops, - plugged in most of the time - have fewer over all cycles than a moderately used battery. Heavy usage also lowers that cycle count as well. So moderate usage seem to be best for longer life ,from my experience at least. And the worst thing you can do is leave the thing sit around in an uncharged state of long periods. Batteries don't seem to like that.

    14. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the chemistry. For cars (or power tools) that use Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) your statement is true.

      Most laptops use Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO), which has a slope to the curve.

      Link to a LCO discharge curve: http://origin-ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0378775303002453-gr10.jpg

    15. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False, lithium ion batteries live the longest if cold stored at 50% state of charge. "Topping off" a lithium ion battery degrades its life.

      Battery university link on how to improve the life of lithium ion batteries:
      http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries

      Note: That is why lithium ion batteries last longer in HEVs vs PHEVs - they keep the state of charge between 40%-60% of capacity at all times.

    16. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, see battery university link for how to prolong the life of lithium ion batteries:
      http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries

    17. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I have a laptop that spends virtually all of its time in a docking station with AC power available. A few months ago the power went out. The battery went from claiming to be fully charged to shutting down in about a minute or two. When power came back on and the battery recharged, I disconnected it from the outlet and it seemed to hold power just fine (ran on battery for an hour or two before I plugged it back in, and seemed to be discharging at the rate it was predicting). Was that sudden shutdown due to the gauge getting out of whack (thinking it was charged when it really wasn't) because the battery was so rarely used?

    18. Re:Ah, I see the problem. by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1
      Nickel Cadmium batteries were the only ones that required full discharge to keep them healthy. Lithium Ion batteries deteriorate quicker if they are fully discharged.

      Maybe that is the problem

  2. Survey says... by djupedal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see the comparative graph where you did identical tracking over time for both, instead of detailed now against casual before, which seems a bit weak. I'd also like to see how you factor out the constant logging's effect as well.

    1. Re:Survey says... by BoRegardless · · Score: 5, Informative

      We live with what we got now. That is life. But ...

      Within a few years that will change with lithium-sulfur batteries if the lab geeks have anything to say about it.

      http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/157525-new-sulfur-based-battery-is-safer-cheaper-more-powerful-than-lithium-ion

    2. Re:Survey says... by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yea. a change in methodology between test invalidates the results of an experiment. It could very well be that running the battery test every minute is causing his battery to deteriorate.

    3. Re:Survey says... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While hard data would be nice we can reason that his results are unsurprising.

      The older laptop was a more conventional type and thus would almost certainly keep the batteries a bit cooler than the newer, ultrabook style one. Heat accelerates the decline of batteries. I'm not surprised by this result.

      PROTIP: Remove your laptop battery if you are running from the mains most of the time and keep it in a cool drawer somewhere.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a shame that Apples no longer have removable batteries. In fact, the extensive battery life is advertised as the reason you won't need to remove it.

      dom

    5. Re:Survey says... by aclarke · · Score: 4, Informative

      PROTIP: MacBook Air batteries aren't removable (in that sense).

    6. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PROTIP: Remove your laptop battery if you are running from the mains most of the time and keep it in a cool drawer somewhere.

      Also discharge the battery to 30%, check it every month or two, and charge back to 30% as necessary. Batteries degrade faster when stored at 100% charge and if left to self discharge too far (below 0%) a safety mechanism will prevent them from charging.

    7. Re:Survey says... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2

      For devices using Li-Ion, try and adjust your charger settings so that the battery has to drain down to 85-90% (instead of 95-98%) before a charging cycle starts. Fewer charging cycles per year gives you more years out of the battery.

      This trick works best if you spend most of your time hooked up to external power. But is still beneficial for devices that get left plugged in for a few days at a time between bouts of heavy use.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    8. Re:Survey says... by pepty · · Score: 1

      PROTIP: Remove your laptop battery if you are running from the mains most of the time and keep it in a cool drawer somewhere.

      YMMV. Most of the heat a removable battery (i.e., designed to be easily removed by the user) experiences occurs due to charging/discharging, since the battery doesn't overlap the hot parts of the motherboard. I never bothered because it is so easy to dislodge the magsafe connector on macbooks.

    9. Re:Survey says... by gpalyu · · Score: 1

      My old MacBook Pro runs at reduced power/speed when the battery is removed. It was not designed to run off the power from a socket alone. Parent isn't necessarily giving good advice.

    10. Re:Survey says... by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      At the risk of turning this into a macbook battery forum I'm a 13" retina owner. I love the thing, except for the lack of a2dp in the bluetooth adapter (but that's another story), anyway I've been in the habit of running the book on battery until I get to ~10% cap, then plugging it in until fully charged, and repeating the cycle. Am I doing The Right Thing?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    11. Re:Survey says... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      But he's talking about the battery, not the appliance.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    12. Re:Survey says... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Would that be irony of just funny?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Survey says... by sunami · · Score: 1

      I don't charge my batteries (there are 2 in this machine) above 80% unless I know I'm going to be on battery for quite a while. It seems like a good compromise between the optimal 40-60% and having enough charge to last for my commute.

    14. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they smell terrible.

    15. Re:Survey says... by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Informative

      PROTIP: Remove your laptop battery if you are running from the mains most of the time and keep it in a cool drawer somewhere.

      MacTip: DON'T. Your Mac automatically scales back its clock speed to 1 GHz tops. Brownouts can crash your computer immediately because there is no battery to supply power. Magsafe connectors and no battery are an obvious bad combination. And you'll get dust into your computer.

    16. Re:Survey says... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of turning this into a macbook battery forum I'm a 13" retina owner. I love the thing, except for the lack of a2dp in the bluetooth adapter (but that's another story), anyway I've been in the habit of running the book on battery until I get to ~10% cap, then plugging it in until fully charged, and repeating the cycle. Am I doing The Right Thing?

      Plug your MacBook into a charger if you have a charger and power nearby. And obviously don't plug it into a charger if you don't have any power nearby.

      Your MacBook battery can run X hours. Every hour that you are running on battery when you could have plugged in a charger is wasting one of your X hours. So if you go to your desk, remove the charger, use the MacBook - at your desk - until the battery is near empty, plug in the charger, that's about the most stupid thing you could do.

    17. Re:Survey says... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      ...that's about the most stupid thing you could do.

      "X" hours? I don't need to get up to plug the charger in. So why is this the most stupid thing I could do?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    18. Re:Survey says... by pepty · · Score: 1

      For devices using Li-Ion, try and adjust your charger settings so that the battery has to drain down to 85-90% (instead of 95-98%) before a charging cycle starts. Fewer charging cycles per year gives you more years out of the battery. .

      That actually results in more charging cycles, not fewer: a charging cycle doesn't have to include a full discharge to count as a cycle. OTOH more frequent but shallower discharges might still be better for the battery.

    19. Re:Survey says... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What a terrible design. Why on earth would you scale back the clock speed when there is actually less load on the charger? Do they use the battery as some kind of heatsink?

      I've never had an issue with brown-outs either, but then again I live in the UK where we don't have many and even when we do our line voltage is 230V RMS. Most laptops have universal voltage power supplies so dropping to 120V is no problem. In fact I'm surprised it's much of an issue in the US, considering that such PSUs are normally capable of running on Japanese 100V systems down to 90V (-10%). Does every desktop need a UPS as well?

      With the laptop sat stationary on a desk pulling the charger out shouldn't be a big issue. I guess maybe the magsafe magnets need to be a bit stronger. Most laptops don't have gaps where the battery is to let in dust, and if anything would eject it there due to positive pressure created by the cooling fan. The old Macs used to be like that, but I have not taken recent one apart.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Survey says... by Provocateur · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let's see what Jobs has to say about that!

      Oh, wait...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    21. Re:Survey says... by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Yes. The number of cycles a battery can handle varies. A lithium-ion or lithium-polymer battery can take way more short cycles than deep cycles. Different story for NiMH and NiCd cells, of course.

    22. Re:Survey says... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1, Funny

      PROTIP: Remove your laptop battery if you are running from the mains most of the time and keep it in a cool drawer somewhere.

      PROTIP: MacBook Air batteries aren't removable (in that sense).

      I thought MacBooks are some of the coolest things you can have. Unfortunately, I got a Mac (a Powerbook) before they were cool...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    23. Re:Survey says... by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      It's funny how suddenly phrases like 'I have a 13" retina' don't raise an eyebrow anymore... no pun intended.

    24. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason not to buy apple hardware.. Would have thought they learned something since the mac portable of the 80s, but I guess not... What a great design having your computer becoming a brick just because your battery is worn..

    25. Re:Survey says... by julesh · · Score: 1

      ...that's about the most stupid thing you could do.

      "X" hours? I don't need to get up to plug the charger in. So why is this the most stupid thing I could do?

      Because most batteries last much longer if you don't discharge them as far. So charge them whenever you can and they're not nearly full. About 80%-90% is probably the best place to start, not 10%.

    26. Re:Survey says... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Since the point of the test is to determine life, not increase it. Its simply funny. Thats not even hard to understand.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    27. Re:Survey says... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      PROTIP: The charge controller in MacBooks deals with periodic discharge/top-off cycles when running on mains all the time.

      My 2009 macbook pro still gets 4 hours of web browsing easy on its original battery ... because its mostly a desktop machine that I occasionally take with me on trips to ... the couch or Vegas.

      Stop buying shit laptops and you won't worry about pulling your batteries out.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    28. Re:Survey says... by El_Isma · · Score: 1

      I believe the charger is unable to provide the total power required at max cpu speed, so they require the battery to give the rest of the power needed.

    29. Re:Survey says... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no. It's more lithiumy.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    30. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacTip: DON'T. Your Mac automatically scales back its clock speed to 1 GHz tops. Brownouts can crash your computer immediately because there is no battery to supply power. Magsafe connectors and no battery are an obvious bad combination. And you'll get dust into your computer.

      Why would a laptop be clocking down when it is connected to the power grid?

    31. Re:Survey says... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Always plug your MBP Retina in when you can.

      The charge controller in the retina's is intelligent. It is designed to run down the battery a bit (about %20) every couple of months in order to give it the longest possible life even when on mains.

      The laptop will take care of your battery properly. You didn't buy a dell or some other cheapest 'how low can I price this thing' laptop.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    32. Re:Survey says... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      X means some number of hours that it was basically capable of the moment it left the factory. Basically, current lithiums have a limited number of charge cycles. Charging them is one of the worst things you can do to them, actually. The only thing worse you can do is run them past their 'drop dead' point, where the charge controller is designed to cut off for safety reasons to prevent then volatile reactions during deep recharge from ... well blowing up the battery in the most literal sense.

      Also letting your battery NEVER run down at all (constant trickle charge) is less than ideal for it, but it is less damaging than running it down and charging it continually.

      Modern MacBook charge controllers (and older ones running current OSes with firmware updates) will cycle the batteries to about 80% every month or so automatically if you aren't using them occasionally. The charge controller will do this based on the ideal charge cycle for your battery.

      I.E. The charge controller is doing the same thing you are, except your doing it wrong and hurting the battery. Let the charge controller do its job. You aren't smarter than it is.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    33. Re:Survey says... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So shortening life by trying to determine life isn't irony?!?!?!

      Man, I am so jaded. I think I need a pill.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    34. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, in normal usage the laptop will pull more current than the wall outlet will provide, boosted by the battery to 'turbo boost' or whatever marketing are calling it these days. Without the battery if the laptop need to draw more power than the wall outlet provides, you run into the situation of.. undefined behavior...Things stop working right.

    35. Re:Survey says... by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is no such thing as a battery test. Had you referred to the fine code, you'd have noticed that the logger merely trivially logs the data already available and exposed through the iokit registry. About the only thing I can think of is that it'd be a bit more power efficient to code it up in a small ObjC utility so that the effort taken by 'ioreg -l' to enumerate all of the data and format it as text is avoided. I may do that, in fact.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    36. Re:Survey says... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You underestimate how poor our infrastructure is. A "Brownout" in the US isn't minor dimming, it's near or total loss of power for a second or two.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    37. Re:Survey says... by tibit · · Score: 1

      And you bump the magsafe jack and poof goes your session. Yeah, that's one of those "you can't have your cake and eat it too" kinds of decisions, where there's no compromise that would solve both problems. Namely, that of ripping the power receptacles off the boards and keeping the power plugged in at all times unless explicitly removed. They've made, IMHO, the sane choice of assuming that people do keep the batteries in, so inadvertent power removal is of no consequence.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    38. Re:Survey says... by tibit · · Score: 1

      What a terrible design. Why on earth would you scale back the clock speed when there is actually less load on the charger?

      Because there's no way an 85W charger can power a monitor, a hard drive, possibly a DVD drive, a quad core CPU and a GPU, all running at full blast. Never mind all the other "stuff" that's there, like the ethernet adapter, the WiFi adapter, the USB hosts, etc. Just the three USB2 ports need to budget about 8W of power from the magsafe jack, when you include inefficiencies. That's almost 10% of available power!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    39. Re:Survey says... by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's a portable. Your battery is not supposed to be completely worn. The "nonreplaceable" ones are merely not ordinarily user-replaceable. People replace them all the time anyway.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    40. Re:Survey says... by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Why are you telling me to "stop buying shit laptops"? I'm not sure why I'm bothering to respond to this, but in the last decade I have bought six Mac laptops for my family and zero non-Mac laptops. I was just trying to point out a piece of information to the GGP.

    41. Re:Survey says... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      A lot of laptops do this, apparently. The battery picks up the slack when it's drawing especially large currents.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    42. Re:Survey says... by jradavenport · · Score: 1

      If you do make a new version up with ObjC do let me know!

    43. Re:Survey says... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      So... you're saying there's no way your mac could ever be run at full capacity without sourcing power from the battery (thus draining it), even when plugged into the mains?

      Do you actually own a laptop computer?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    44. Re:Survey says... by PapaBoojum · · Score: 0

      The chart seems to bear this out. Once he started taking more rapid samples in his 'casual' test, the degradation slope seems to steepen a bit.

    45. Re:Survey says... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's the downside of the magsafe connector. Besides which I wasn't really talking about the GP's laptop because the Air doesn't have removable batteries anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:Survey says... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So if you run Folding@Home or mine Bitcoins eventually your battery will go flat and your laptop will slow down to sub 1GHz speeds... Doesn't sound like a very good laptop.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Survey says... by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      It could very well be that running the battery test every minute is causing his battery to deteriorate.

      Sounds like something Heisenberg would say.

    48. Re:Survey says... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Five years ago when I bought a MacBook, we left it plugged in most of the time, and the battery basically died within a year. Apple replaced it under warranty, but the tech recommended we unplug it a lot more and let it drain (not all the way, but we tended to go to 20-40%) and refill rather than leave it charged. The second battery lasted pretty well with that technique through four years of life.

      I realize that's an older system and different model, but our results are opposite your advice. Have things changed that much that the technique is now completely different?

    49. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been a douche all day in multiple threads. I think he caught his boss fucking his old lady in the ass again which she always claims she doesn't enjoy so won't let him do it. Evidently not only does she enjoy a good dickin in the ass, but prefers it to be part of double penetration. You can check her videos out on hornbunny.com

    50. Re:Survey says... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Because most batteries last much longer if you don't discharge them as far.

      Why?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    51. Re:Survey says... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      except your doing it wrong and hurting the battery. Let the charge controller do its job. You aren't smarter than it is.

      Really? Why? Earlier manufactuerers of battries used to say the exact opposite. Why the reverse?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    52. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PROTIP: the MacBook Air doesn't actually heat up its battery all that much. The front 3/4 of the machine is filled with battery and next to no electronics (just the trackpad, really). The back 1/4 is where all the major heat sources live: the processor, RAM, SSD (or HDD in old ones). A heatsink/fan vents heat out the rear.

      Much the same is true of ultrabooks from other manufacturers, or at least the ones which mimic the MacBook Air's industrial design. As usual, AmiMoJo is talking out of his ass. Ultrabooks don't fry their batteries.

    53. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About removing the battery: I've seen two Dell XPS laptops treated in two entirely different ways. Both were bought at the same time, and both batteries failed within 6 months of each other. One laptop was used normally with the battery. The other laptop was sitting on a shelf doing nothing (out of warranty and failing video card). The battery was completely discharged. When I attempted to charge it first, the battery LED code started flashing in a pattern that indicated a failed battery.

      According to Wiki: "When stored for long periods the small current draw of the protection circuitry may drain the battery below its shut down voltage; normal chargers are then ineffective. ". I suspect that's what happened when we didn't use the laptop battery for a long time.

    54. Re:Survey says... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      As another poster said, other laptops will use the battery as a temporary "capacitor" (buffer) to take the spike in load upon demand. For example: when you spike all cores of the CPU to 100% usage from idle when kicking off a video transcoding job. Many AC/DC adapters can't buffer the spike in current. That, and my surface mounted components in laptops don't carry enough capacitance to offset the load spike too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    55. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they use the battery as the equivalent of an inverse power sink.

      You know how CPUs have a TDP (thermal design power) rating? It's an average over long time windows, not a guarantee that the graph of power vs. time is flat. In reality, the hierarchy of regulators, decoupling components (capacitors), and PSUs which feed them will often see spikes as high as 2X the nominal TDP, or more. (This is a fundamental behavior for all clocked digital circuits.) If the power supply hierarchy can't handle these spikes, the CPU's core voltage will droop enough to cause timing violations (aka errors, aka crashes).

      In a desktop system this isn't a significant problem. Oversize the PSU and/or provide lots of capacitance to filter the spikes, and you're done. In a laptop things are more constrained. Laptop manufacturers are under a lot of pressure to minimize size and weight. In most cases, they have chosen to size the PSU to match the average (or TDP-like) power of the whole machine when every component is operating at maximum performance. Perhaps with a bit of margin so you can slowly charge the battery while you use the computer, but still well below peak demand. If you're an engineer trying to deal with those peaks, you can go in two different directions. One is to throw in a lot of decoupling capacitance -- but that adds weight and volume and cost. The other is to use the battery. They're good at handling spikes, and it's weight the system has to have anyways. Might as well use it.

      Such a computer is still drawing most of its energy from the wall when you have its PSU plugged in, and from the battery's perspective the time-averaged energy flow is inwards (charging). However, if you remove the battery, the computer could crash since it won't be able to maintain CPU power regulation during spikes. A laptop designed this way absolutely should limit power consumption (by limiting performance) if you do this. The alternative is to just let the computer crash if the user does that, which is not a very good idea.

      Contrary to many of the claims elsewhere, this doesn't mean that when your battery gets old and tired your computer will always be slow. You don't need lots of remaining capacity for it to function as a glorified capacitor; it just needs to be there. It's only when it goes all the way bad (e.g. the machine refuses to recognize or attempt to charge it) that you'll experience performance loss.

      It's not just Apple which designs laptops like this. It's a pretty sensible engineering tradeoff. But Apple is more open about documenting the behavior, if not the engineering logic behind it, which gives haters like you an excuse to bleat about how shitty Apple products are.

      (Also, it's not universal. A MacBook Air probably doesn't do this, for example. Then again, it's not easy to remove a MBA's battery to find out.)

    56. Re:Survey says... by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      ...it's near or total loss of power for a second or two.

      A brown out occurs when the voltage drops. This typically occurs when power demand exceeds supply in a region. With a fixed amount of power being supplied, if the current drawn becomes too high, the voltage will drop. This will also happen if the power being supplied decreases and the load does not.

      With a blackout, lights go out and dark places go black. With a brownout, incandescent lights dim and dark places become brownish-yellow. It used to be that most electric devices could handle a reduced voltage, but modern electronics tends to be less forgiving. AC motors and florescent lighting are two loads that have limited voltage droop tolerance.

    57. Re:Survey says... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      And where I live whenever they call something a "brownout" it's actually the power completely cutting out for a brief period

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    58. Re:Survey says... by tftp · · Score: 1

      I've never had an issue with brown-outs either, but then again I live in the UK where we don't have many

      I don't know how the power grid is physically implemented in the UK, but in the USA the wires and millions of transformers are mounted on wooden poles. Only in densest areas of cities you will find those cables underground. Here are power poles in Santa Clara, CA (Silicon Valley.) Brownouts and blackouts are frequent (several per year.) They are caused primarily by downed wires and by blown transformers. I have about 6 battery backups scattered around the house; they supply power to everything that I don't want to crash and reboot on every power surge.

      The last brownout was about 3 months ago. It lasted for most of the day. The line voltage was hovering around 75V. When the workers found the cause they turned the power off for another couple of hours. You cannot run a datacenter on that quality of power; batteries and diesels are required.

    59. Re:Survey says... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like a very good laptop.

      It's certainly not a good desktop replacement. But as just a laptop it can be pretty good. Few people need 100% performance 100% of the time. If you do, go and buy a server. A laptop cannot even be cooled well enough to maintain 100% load for any extended length of time. Laptops are portable things; the fact that they can speed up temporarily when you are starting a program or doing something CPU-intensive is just an added bonus.

    60. Re:Survey says... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The charger got smarter and they use more data that's just not available to the user.
      If a manufacturer wants to prevent customer dissatisfaction over these sort of things he can't rely on the customer to do the correct thing. Once upon a time it wasn't possible to do this with a decent charge controller. Nowadays a decent charge controller isn't all that expensive anymore.
      A decent one will know the max capacity and measure the energy supplied. That gives it the rest capacity.
      Probably the battery manufacturer loaded the charge controller with a decent algorithm to predict the degradation, because if the battery never reaches 100 % then its difficult to check the max.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    61. Re:Survey says... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I think the throttling is a lot smaller than that.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    62. Re:Survey says... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Ours are mostly buried, seems like the best option. We have poles for telephone wires though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    63. Re:Survey says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ioreg -l is kinda slow
      ioreg -rk BatterySerialNumber is much faster

      Also better formatted log:
      https://github.com/jradavenport/batlog/pull/2

  3. Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by geek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got 10 hours of battery life on my 2011 macbook air when I first got it. I don't just mean 10 hours of it sitting idle either. I could get 7 hours of continuous play of movies. Then Mountain Lion came out and I was lucky to get 3 hours tops. That lasted 6 months until they "fixed" it and I was able to get 5 again. Now in I can consistently get 4 hours with it sitting mostly idle.

    I love the machine but I hate that I cant change the battery myself. I'll have to pay the Apple tax to get this fixed. I am holding out hope for Mavericks though, hopefully the power saving features can breathe some new life into this thing.

    1. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by spamchang · · Score: 2

      Yikes--same format movie played on both laptops = differing battery lives? Definitely sounds like an OS power bug (or several), unless the movie formats differed (lower vs. higher qual). And if not that, the minute possibility remains that someone in the processor architecture team made a tradeoff in the graphics hardware that didn't work as intended.

      Going from 7 hrs active to 4 hrs idle is depressing :(

    2. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      What do you mean you can't change the battery?
      Do you not own a screw driver? And you call yourself a geek.

      http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Installing+MacBook+Air+Models+A1237+and+A1304+Battery/848/1

    3. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Did they change anything in the graphics drivers with the OS update? I wonder if maybe hardware acceleration on video either got knocked offline or became really inefficient.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by samkass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I love the machine but I hate that I cant change the battery myself. I'll have to pay the Apple tax to get this fixed. I am holding out hope for Mavericks though, hopefully the power saving features can breathe some new life into this thing.

      If you are willing to unscrew two dozen little screws, the battery swap-out is actually pretty easy according to iFixit. Of course, the battery itself will cost you over $100 bucks new, and Apple only charges about $120 installed, so the only real reason to do it yourself is if you live far away from an Apple Store and don't trust a carrier service with your laptop.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    5. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The battery swap is cheap at Apple. Cheaper than most people charge for the easily replaceable spare batteries.

    6. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love the machine but I hate that I cant change the battery myself.

      Yes you can, and it's not that hard.

      You know what the hardest part of it is? Going to ifixit, getting the screwdriver, and clicking "checkout now".

      8 screws for the bottom cover, and 3 more securing the battery to the case. OK I take it back, the hardest part is possibly removing the bottom cover - Apple does use rather strong clips.

      The same is true for everything OTHER than the MacBook Pro Retina 15", which has annoyingly-glued in batteries. I think the 13" is on a carrier frame.

      It definitely isn't rocket surgery.

    7. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Informative

      If your battery was great until a software update, then the problem probably isn't the battery but the software, and replacing the battery won't solve your problem.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    8. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Gibgezr · · Score: 1

      This seems like a lot of work. I like laptops that allow me to push a switch and drop out the battery and swap in the spare in about 5 seconds...which would be almost every other laptop in the world other than ones made by Apple?

    9. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I dont want to void my warranty either.

    10. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by geek · · Score: 1

      But it'll void my warranty which isn't cool and why bother with all that when its only an extra 20 bucks to have the genius bar do it for me?

      Besides, the point was that I can't swap it with another one part way through the day like I can with my work HP laptop. I can't even dole out extra bucks to buy an extended battery. I have two for my HP, one that lasts about 3-4 hours and another that will get me about 7-8. I just slap it on and away I go.

      Haven't been able to do that with an Apple in years, not since the MacBook Pro's had it in 2009 I think.

    11. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't want to void a warranty and you call yourself a geek?

      How much did you pay for that UID on ebay?

      Warranty will be expired by the time most batteries will be needing replaced.

    12. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      If you had a warranty you would not need to do this.
      So which is it?

      No, the point is you are changing the argument now that you clearly lost.

    13. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On some other laptops it's even possible to swap the battery while it's running...

    14. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Damn it, now I have a work boner. THANKS.

    15. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He obviously isn't calliing himself a geek, he admitted to using a Mac running OSX.

    16. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawn. Come up with your own jokes. This one is exceedingly lame and always has been.

    17. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youd rather pay someone $20 rather than unscrew 8 fucking screws? What a pathetic lazy piece of shit.

    18. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are especially fun when the switch/clip breaks and the battery won't stay in.
      And I love the fact that they way a ton more.
      And I love that they are generally made from crap black plastic.

    19. Re: Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Duct tape.
      2. Man up.
      3. What are you, some kind of faggot hipster?

    20. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you're doing it the wrong way.

      Who replaces a battery? What is this, el cheapo country? These things are bad for the environment anyway. When the battery in my MacBook Air runs out, I just buy a new one. There are Apple stores everywhere so it's no big deal. That way I also have the latest model with the latest Mac OS, which always has tons of new features I desparately need. And since I only use my MacBook Air in expensive cafes to show off photos (of anuses), I don't even have to use Apple's excellent Migration Assistant to transfer my account settings. I just pull the photos from Apple's iCloud service and pronto, I'm ready to go. Takes 10 minutes max.

    21. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by julesh · · Score: 1

      It definitely isn't rocket surgery.

      But is it brain science?

    22. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly even this is slowly going away. Recently someone at work bought a nice new Dell, doesn't come with a user replaceable battery... it is in the case and it doesn't just drop out.

      Here is a list of laptops that don't have user replace-able batteries:

      http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/08/ultrabooks-batteries-etbc-1-11398135.gif

    23. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those laptops also get hours less battery life. I'd rather have a laptop taht works great for three-four years and then requires a battery change once, than one where I'm swapping out batteries weekly.

      I also had Mac laptops back when you could pres a button and remove the batteries. The batteries generally lasted only a year, then were worthless and had to be replaced.. go back to that world? No thanks.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    24. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Mavericks is awesome for FINDING shitty power usage. You may have to give up something in return.

      Turns out for me, my mistake is using VMware instead of Parallels for virtual machines. VMware AWLAYS uses the nVidia card rather than switching back to the HD4000 for low intensity stuff. Parallels will idle VMs back to the HD4000 and allow the nVidia card to shut down.

      Activity Monitor gives you a nice easy way to see what is currently and recently sucking up battery usage.

      I run on AC 90% of the time now, so I can't say I've experienced longer runtimes because I don't get near a low battery unless I happen to sit the machine down without plugging it in and have sleep disabled, in which case I never really remember how long its been sitting.

      It may not save you any run time if you don't actively monitor what apps are doing what.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    25. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      An intelligent geek would never void his warranty without good reason. Saving $20 isn't a good reason when the potential risk could be thousands. That and the $20 doesn't justify the time I've wasted out of my life doing what some 13 year old in China could be doing so she can eat tonight. Stop being so selfish.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    26. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *recent ones by apple. I have had 3 powerbooks and an ibook that I hot-swapped batteries like crazy for.

    27. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Selfish? You think they ship phones back to China to fix?
      I void warranties with pride, I do it long before those items are old. This is what geeks do.

    28. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by tibit · · Score: 1

      You can change the battery yourself :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    29. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by tibit · · Score: 1

      Even on the glued-in ones, it takes a bit of practice with a heat gun to extract the battery. No big deal.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you downgrade your OS to whatever you had initially to make sure it's a software problem?

    31. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it were $20 more expensive I would prefer to do it myself. I hate other people working on my hardware...

    32. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always 'unvoid' your warranty by replacing the original battery.

    33. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the machine but I hate that I cant change the battery myself.

      Yes you can, and it's not that hard.

      You know what the hardest part of it is? Going to ifixit, getting the screwdriver, and clicking "checkout now".

      8 screws for the bottom cover, and 3 more securing the battery to the case. OK I take it back, the hardest part is possibly removing the bottom cover - Apple does use rather strong clips.

      The same is true for everything OTHER than the MacBook Pro Retina 15", which has annoyingly-glued in batteries. I think the 13" is on a carrier frame.

      It definitely isn't rocket surgery.

      Thanks, but I think I'll just go with any other brand of laptop on the planet, where I can push a button and drop the old one and attach a fully charged spare in like 3 seconds. And NOT void my warranty in the process.

    34. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a removabole battery is not what made those batteries shitty. The new Macs have better life because the battery chemistry is better than it was 10 years ago. I see you're a 5 digit UID. FYI you have to update your anecdotes as time moves on. I know it's hard but you just have to. I bet you still bitch about having to set your points, tweak your valves, and adjust the carb on your car too.

    35. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by antdude · · Score: 1

      That voids the warranty. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    36. Re:Love my MacBook Air, hate the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crock of shit. But keep lying to yourself fanboy.

  4. I really enjoyed this article by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    I seem to be constantly fighting the battle with battery life, and it is a topic that I am acutely worried about, thanks to the newest generation of phones which seem to have settled on non-replaceable batteries. I found this very interesting. Glad someone took the time to take these measurements and write it up.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:I really enjoyed this article by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      I've not yet owned a Samsung smartphone, but this is one reason why my next phone will likely be one: all their phones have user-replaceable batteries. Most new phones from HTC, LG, Motorola and Sony have non-replaceable batteries. I probably would have bought a Moto X, if it had a user-replaceable battery.

      Vote with your dollar.

  5. Two Things by JeanCroix · · Score: 0

    1) It's "without further ado," not adieu.

    2) Is it possible that querying the battery health once per minute actually invokes some mechanism which causes it to degrade at a higher rate?

    1. Re:Two Things by erikkemperman · · Score: 2

      Ha, I actually stopped reading at "Without further adieu". But that says more about me than the author, I suppose...

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    2. Re:Two Things by JeanCroix · · Score: 2

      I almost stopped there, but I admit to proceeding because I was looking for more grammatical mistakes. Oh, and I was interested in the battery life too.

    3. Re:Two Things by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      1) It's "without further ado," not adieu.

      You're making much adieu about nothing.

      Cockadieudledoo!

    4. Re:Two Things by jradavenport · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Oh shit, you're absolutely right. I'm a bit anal about such things as well, changing it now!! 2) I'd wondered that too, that by measuring it i'm actually causing changes. I'd love to conduct a larger study to control for such things.

    5. Re:Two Things by Aguazul2 · · Score: 2

      Ha, I actually stopped reading at "Without further adieu". But that says more about me than the author, I suppose...

      Maybe it is the unconscious suggestion that he had finished what he was saying? An unconscious Alt-F4 -- the adieu button.

    6. Re:Two Things by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      I don't think so. State-of-health measurement can be a subtle art but it all comes down to measuring the cell's voltage and resistance over time*, which at the end of the day you're getting for free when the battery is in use.

      *Looking for voltage sag, rising internal resistance, or simply less area under the curve.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Two Things by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      If you stopped reading at ... "adieu" -- then technically - he got it right. Other than it might have read "with all the adieu" ... ?

    8. Re:Two Things by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      Most likely, but it's still something that should be checked definitively. In going from once a week to once a minute, you're increasing the sample rate by a factor of over 10,000. Even tiny effects could become magnified.

    9. Re:Two Things by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      I guess what I'm saying is that there shouldn't be anything changing from the battery's perspective; the "multimeter" is always plugged in, as long as the computer's on. Unless the battery testing itself was driving up the power demands from the laptop, and thus drawing more current from the battery, it shouldn't make a difference.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    10. Re:Two Things by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      Exactly. That latter part is what should be ruled out. I agree it shouldn't. But what if it does?

    11. Re:Two Things by erikkemperman · · Score: 2

      Alt-F4... Give me a little credit, will ya? I'm running Mint on my MBP, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    12. Re:Two Things by JeanCroix · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was thinking about it more during lunch. It's not just a battery test which occurs every minute, it's the entire script he wrote, including the testing and the subsequent appending of that data to a file. That could amount to a significant number of drive accesses which normally wouldn't have happened, especially at night when it would have otherwise been idle.

    13. Re:Two Things by Aguazul2 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wonder on slashdot if I should add [sarcasm] or [irony] or [humour] regularly just in case -- things can rapidly wander off into the abyss otherwise -- but I think we're more or less on track here ...

    14. Re:Two Things by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      You actually dieu read the articles?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    15. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No Fair! You changed the out come by measuring it" -Professor Farnsworth.

    16. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iu ol ahhr grumier mazzies

  6. brush more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    you should have brushed it at least twice a day.

    1. Re:brush more often by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      you should have brushed it at least twice a day

      We're talking about battery life, not Bluetooth connections.

      Well, someone had to say it.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  7. Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He finds the failure of a product he paid good money for fascinating, rather than infuriating.

    1. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Nothing at first.
      They are typically warranted for 10-15 years.

      Most people will not own them that long.

    2. Re: Here's the real problem by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      Just means depreciation will be worse, and resale value will be lower when the next buyer expects to fork out boatloads for new batteries.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      $2500 is about what they are, not exactly boatloads.

      Most 10-15 year old ICE cars will require extensive maintenance. Go look what a Gen1 Insight with a manual is going for. They seem to retain their value pretty well.

    4. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      A 10 to 15 year old car shouldn't require extensive maintenance (electric, hybrid or straight ICE doesn't matter) unless it has been driven excessive miles and even then it shouldn't require much more than normal if it was taken care of. At that age and mileage the typical things that need more attention and replacement are suspension/steering components and possibly wheel bearings just because they wear out. For stuff like that it wouldn't matter if it were an ICE or electric vehicle since both have those parts. Now an automatic transmission might need to be overhauled (you should have been taking care of it to begin with if you got it new) and you may have to put in a new clutch on a manual (only if you don't know how to drive stick or learned on this vehicle) but other than that a vehicle with 150,000+ miles on it should run fine.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re: Here's the real problem by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 1

      The way they're designed or rather how long they're designed to last assumes some very specific conditions. The biggest problem is that people thrash their cars and dont even realize they're doing it because they assume that a $20k thing should be made to endure a war zone, which they certainly are not. The way I see some people drive makes me think they hate their car, but they probably just don't realize that full acceleration all the time, not slowing for bumps, heavy braking, etc are the biggest keys to reducing the usable lifespan of their car.

      Technically, anything with a bearing can fail pretty much at any time, which includes anything with a pulley - Alternator, water pump, cams and crankshaft, etc. You probably have some kind of warning signs that an issue is coming, but people either don't have time or money to diagnose every little problem or they just assume cars are supposed to make odd squeaks and squeals every once in a while.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    6. Re: Here's the real problem by dk20 · · Score: 2

      I had the original battery in my cheap Plymouth Voyager when i sold it just over 10 years later. Still started the thing up first time in the morning after being left in the freezing cold all night. It was impressive that a relatively cheap car battery can last that long and keep running while every LION battery i've ever owned had a fairly short life (and most electronics seem to come with non-replaceable batteries these days).

    7. Re: Here's the real problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      The point is the really expensive parts of an ICE are the ones that usually need replacement. Engines, transmissions, etc. The moving parts that wear. Full electrics don't have those parts in the first place. The battery will need replacement, but it's a non-mechanical part that literally can be replaced with no issues; plug and play if you will.

      Try that with a transmission and see if you get more than a 12 month warranty. New batteries might not have a massively longer warranty but given that they are still very new technology and the transmissions and engines are a century old, it begs the question of why they still can't provide a replacement product worthy of a better warranty?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    8. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tesla charges $10,000 to replace their battery. It's probably the most expensive component in their cars. No free lunches.

    9. Re: Here's the real problem by PhotoJim · · Score: 2

      If you live in a place that doesn't get extreme heat, car batteries can last a long time. They have their shortest working lives in really hot places like Nevada or Arizona or the Australian outback, and tend to work longest in places that don't get very warm. Here where I live, in Saskatchewan, we're in the middle - but it's not our very cold winters that are the problem (they expose bad batteries but surprisingly aren't that hard on a battery's chemistry), it's the hot brief summers that drag our battery lives down. If I get 5 years I've done well.

    10. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The motor and trans mounts are probably shot too.

      The interior will be ruined etc.

    11. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Lead acids do last a long time, if you never deep cycle them. They suck at all other measures though.

      Pretty much all batteries are replaceable, just takes a little effort.

    12. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Informative

      While a bearing failing out of the blue for something like a cam or crank shaft it is exceedingly rare if they kept oil in the car stuff like water pumps, and alternators are basically consumables and just wear out and aren't too expensive to have replaced. I also get your point about people unnecessarily beating on their vehicles I see the same things. The one that gets me is when the engine first catches it's like they are in a drag race out of their parking spot, let the engine run for a couple of seconds and build oil pressure. My point was that most people should realize that it is much cheaper to maintain your vehicle than it is to replace it and that little problems like little squeaks, rattles, and squeals are a lot cheaper to fix than when what ever was rattling, squealing, or squeaking fails in a catastrophic manner.

      For example if a wheel is making noise have it checked either by a shop or your self if you know what to look for and make the noise go away:
      It might be the pad wear indicator just starting to scrape (replace the brake pads and enjoy your new found stopping power) It might be that you have run the pad backing into the rotor in which case you avoided a very bad problem but you might need you hearing checked since it got this far
      The bearing might just be a little dry in which case greasing it solves the problem
      If the bearing is completely dry you just avoided a very bad problem
      If the needle bearings are gone you just avoid a very bad problem but why did you wait so long as it should have been making nose for a while so go get your hearing checked

      --
      Time to offend someone
    13. Re: Here's the real problem by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Odd, as I had always thought it was the cold that kills them. I'm in Southern Ontario, so the winters are a lot more mild then what you probably deal with.

    14. Re: Here's the real problem by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      My 48 year old truck and 20 year old car both say you're wrong. My wife's 7 year old BMW however...already requires extensive maintenance.

    15. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you do to your interior?
      Anecdotal: I have a 12 to 13 year old F150, there is no reason the interior will be ruined. There has been some steering and wheel bearing work done like gp said, but the interior is great. There is one cigarette burn hole in the seat that did not spread, left there by previous owner and I have owned it for 6 years. Had about a 2" plant start to grow once, due to going hunting and then never vacuuming - but if i were to vacuum/shampoo it'd be in great shape. It is at about 150k and there are certain suspension bushings on the front (2001, ifs) that could maybe be considered but realistically it is in good shape. I am happy to drive it.

    16. Re: Here's the real problem by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      A full electric certainly does have a transmission. It may be a CVT, so you don't feel it actually shifting, but it doesn't have to be; and I'll remind you that the T in CVT stands for Transmission, and the CVTs on the market right now are some of the least reliable transmissions out there. Even if you were right and full electrics didn't have transmissions, there's still a differential transferring power to the wheels. Do you have any idea how often transmission service also (or only) means a differential service? If done right, every single time.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have bought some vehicles that were beat on a lot or that people never cared about. While I have had vehicles with bad interiors I have never had to deal with a bad motor mount or transmission mount. The interior of my Jeep Cherokee and the Bronco II it replaced are shot then again the Jeep has excessive miles on it at 377,??? and the Bronco II had 252,??? miles on it and was 25 years old when I got it and even then the interiors got much worse after I got them since I do and did truck things with them. My daily drivers have all had good to immaculate interiors, even the crap first cars I had when I was in college. The newest vehicle I ever bought was only 8 years old and only had 80,000 miles on it (also lowest miles), and my current daily driver is 11 years old and has 95,??? miles on it and I got it about 6 weeks ago and my co workers all thought it was either brand new or much newer. My previous car had a great interior and was 16 years old and had 275,??? miles on it when the automatic transmission failed but the interior was immaculate, the leather was all nice, soft and clean, the dash was crack free, the trim all looked good, the carpet clean, the roof padding nice and tight.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    18. Re: Here's the real problem by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

      It's not necessarily a failure at all, just different. A 2009 MacBook (especially with the removable battery) used older technology, but did not store nearly as much energy per cm^3.

      A 2012 Air uses a much more compact battery, that holds more power, and gets hit a lot harder by newer processor features. (Cause a new processor uses more juice when running, but then sleeps more often) The overall curve of usage isn't going to be the same with all those tech changes.

    19. Re: Here's the real problem by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought too, but car batteries fare far worse in the hot areas than they do here.

      What cold will do is reveal when a battery is marginal. It may start your car at 20 C in poor condition, but it certainly won't at -20. And won't even try at -40.

    20. Re: Here's the real problem by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      15 years on rubber engine mounts is well past useful life weather you realize it or not. Yes, your engine mounts are rubber, and no matter what you do to them being next to a 212f/100c degree engine for 15 years is pretty much a good way to ensure they will be bad, as well as most other rubber under the hood.

      The newest vehicle I ever bought was only 8 years old and only had 80,000 miles on it

      So you have absolutely no idea what a car is supposed to sound/feel/handle like and you're telling us that your old car is as good as new because you took care of it ... except you didn't own it for the first 8 years or more ...

      You're talking a lot of bullshit that simply doesn't add up. Some of those older cars you speak of most certainly had rebuilt engines in them. You're a liar if you're trying to tell me you have a 25 year old bronco with 250k miles and the original engine with no overhaul. Its not the miles, its the years.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    21. Re: Here's the real problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      It 'can', but it doesn't need to have a transmission. 4 electric motors for each wheel handle that quite nicely. It's much more efficient that way to boot since they are smaller than a bigger single motor connected to a transmission.

      And those 4 motors mean you don't have differentials at all since there aren't connections between the wheels.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    22. Re: Here's the real problem by El+Lobo · · Score: 1

      Did you ever think about the fact that Macbook air doesn't give you the option to replace the battery (yourself) and this might be a nice moneymaker for apple?

      --
      It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    23. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, plenty of cars now have lifetime powertrain warranties, and they cost less than a Tesla.

    24. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      Now an automatic transmission might need to be overhauled (you should have been taking care of it to begin with if you got it new)

      And pray tell, what is it that you'd consider "taking care of it to begin with" on a modern car? FYI, many modern cars come with sealed automatic transmissions without a dipstick. There's a breather element to equalize internal pressure with the outside, and that's about it. A modern automatic transmission is designed to be service-free. You should explicitly NOT do anything to it.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      Given that you now have eight CV joints to take care of, and a whole bunch of coolant piping going under the car, I don't think that's such a good idea at all. Mounting the motors directly at the wheels, as unsprung mass, is crazy as well - the handling would be piss poor, and you're replacing CV shafts and joints with flex hoses for coolant and flexible high voltage, high current electrical wiring. I've had such "genius" ideas as a young teenager, I've since learned enough engineering to know better.

      Alas, I'll gladly take the good old differential and transfer cases. You overdesign those just a little bit and their life becomes essentially infinite. Another good think you take out of machine design :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    26. Re: Here's the real problem by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      If you live in a place that doesn't get extreme heat, car batteries can last a long time. They have their shortest working lives in really hot places like Nevada or Arizona or the Australian outback, and tend to work longest in places that don't get very warm. Here where I live, in Saskatchewan, we're in the middle - but it's not our very cold winters that are the problem (they expose bad batteries but surprisingly aren't that hard on a battery's chemistry), it's the hot brief summers that drag our battery lives down. If I get 5 years I've done well.

      You are 100% correct. I live in Phoenix, Az. and five years is the limit for batteries. We are fortunate, however, that they never really just quit. If you pay attention, they will warn you a day or two ahead that they are dying.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    27. Re: Here's the real problem by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      They have their shortest working lives in really hot places like Nevada or Arizona or the Australian outback, and tend to work longest in places that don't get very warm.

      I couldn't agree more. The other factors that I'm aware of are

      1. Whether you let it fully discharge. If you're going to leave it parked for an extended period (months) get a trickle charger or disconnect the battery altogether. Don't just let it go dead.

      2. The more AMPs on the battery, the shorter it's lifetime. I'm not really sure why that is, but it's always been the case for me.

    28. Re: Here's the real problem by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      It's not the most expensive items in a car that need regular replacing. It's the cheapest of components; engine oil, filters, spark plugs, tires, etc. Those are all wear items. The next step up from there are water pumps and timing belts, but those generally are replaced at 80k miles. In a good, reliable car most other items shouldn't pose any problems for the owner up to and beyond 100k miles. This, of course, isn't accounting for aggressive driving habits and failure to do regular maintenance.

      The fact that some cars are more or less reliable than others comes down to engineering complexity, manufacturing quality and application of new technology. Premature failures are not a normal and expected scenario. Torque converter automakers, for example, routinely outlasts even even second- and third-hand ownership. Components that experience a lot of movement and friction are always over-engineered.

      Because of the significant expense in owning, maintaining and repairing a car there's a certain amount of expectation for reliability. It's not uncommon to be hit with a repair cost equivalent to the price of a Macbook Air. Because of the relatively disposable nature of electronics, however, the same kind of motivation is less prevalent. So they're more willing to take risks on new technology. And if there's an issue the replacement of the offending part is relatively trivial. It's certainly nothing compared to replacing a crankshaft.

    29. Re: Here's the real problem by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Alas, I'll gladly take the good old differential and transfer cases. You overdesign those just a little bit and their life becomes essentially infinite.

      What he said. Unfortunately the people in charge of machine design these days usually don't. I can't think of a single 'modern' transmission that's as bulletproof as the older RWD designs were.

    30. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Drive a new car and tell me that.
      By 10-15 the motor mounts are shot just from dry rot.

    31. Re: Here's the real problem by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The point is the really expensive parts of an ICE are the ones that usually need replacement. Engines, transmissions, etc. The moving parts that wear. Full electrics don't have those parts in the first place. The battery will need replacement, but it's a non-mechanical part that literally can be replaced with no issues; plug and play if you will.

      First the "E" in ICE is engine. So the engine does not fail on an engine. Second, the main failure on a ICE equipped car is not the engine and/or transmission. It's more often electronic components or accessories. Such as alternators, water pumps, and control modules. Power windows A/C and other amenities are more likely to fail. Pistons, cams and transmission gears, etc rarely break or wear in a well maintained vehicle that has not been abused. Even so, wheel bearings, shocks, and brake pads/rotors and tires are probably the most common items needing replacement

      Electric vehicles still have wheel bearings and shocks, etc.. Granted, regenerative brakes do not have pads and rotors to wear our, but I have no idea how much longer they last, and would bet they cost quite a bit more to replace. The electric motors still have bearings and other moving parts that can break too. All of the amenities like power windows and A/C are also on an EV and are just as prone to failure.

      I don't know how much new batteries cost. Someone stated $2500. You can by a new engine for many cars for that price. Considering the size of the batteries, I don't think I'd consider them to be much more plug and play than a new engine.

    32. Re: Here's the real problem by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      They warn you here too, but in the winter, the warning is very, very difficult to notice. :) (Mine died this year, and luckily it died in April, which is a considerably easier time to change them than January.)

    33. Re: Here's the real problem by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Try that with a transmission and see if you get more than a 12 month warranty. New batteries might not have a massively longer warranty but given that they are still very new technology and the transmissions and engines are a century old, it begs the question of why they still can't provide a replacement product worthy of a better warranty?

      In my experience, replacement transmissions typically have lifetime warranties.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    34. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      They've been optimized to hell and back. Adding 10% more mass to them would make their life practically infinite. Alas, those 10% were optimized out, at quite a significant cost, too, since you need some fairly heavyweight modelling tools to pull that off. Heavyweight as $100k per seat, that is. I'd imagine you might pay more for this "infinite" life in gas than in costs of whatever repairs are needed, so it still may be a net win. Well, the companies doing those modeling tools definitely always win :)

      AFAIK, modern automotive transmission and engine design practice models all those "little" things that are routinely overlooked when you design stationary machines with factors of safety above 4. An automotive transmission these days is designed like a helicopter transmission would be, except that the safety factors and nominal overhaul periods are higher, but they are still fairly well modeled. If you do it by an undergrad textbook aided by design codes, or even by an "experienced" engineer, you may get a design where the real factor of safety and real life ranges between 1/4 to 4x of what you intended. You do an automotive or an aerospace design, and you're between 1/1.3 to 1.5/1, and the tools you use to pull that off cost more than the education of yourself and a bunch of your buddies, combined. I don't know if it's a good thing...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    35. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moving parts that wear. Full electrics don't have those parts in the first place.

      Electric vehicles all have bearings, windings, armatures, brushes, etc., that will need to be replaced due to wear or corrosion, don't they?

      Don't most, if not all, have some sort of transmission, too?

    36. Re: Here's the real problem by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      15 years on rubber engine mounts is well past useful life weather you realize it or not. Yes, your engine mounts are rubber, and no matter what you do to them being next to a 212f/100c degree engine for 15 years is pretty much a good way to ensure they will be bad, as well as most other rubber under the hood.

      Bullshit. If the engine isn't transferring vibrations to the car and not rocking around under heavy acceleration or suddenly letting off of the gas, then the mounts are fine and doing their job. It's physical stresses the engine puts on the mounts that wears them out more than anything. Some cars were designed very well and the mounts may never need changed. I had a Cadillac with 360K on the original engine and the mounts were fine. I've also had to replace them on high performance cars so often that I went to neoprene and finally aluminum. Some cars (Fieros come to mind) needed them replaced on a regular basis.

      So you have absolutely no idea what a car is supposed to sound/feel/handle like and you're telling us that your old car is as good as new because you took care of it ... except you didn't own it for the first 8 years or more ...

      So what. I've bought used cars in the past and completely replaced the entire suspension (and stripped some down to the frame and rebuilt from the ground up). I can guarantee you after oversizing sway bars and using new neoprene bushings and even modified transverse leafs they handled a hell of a lot better than new. I've had new cars and used cars that I've done little more than routine maintenance to. It's pretty damn obvious when they are working as they should. Most decent cars these days aren't much different at 100K miles compared to when they are at 2K. If you know who you are purchasing it from you know how it was treated. You can also tell by whether or not they kept maintenance records too.

      You're talking a lot of bullshit that simply doesn't add up. Some of those older cars you speak of most certainly had rebuilt engines in them. You're a liar if you're trying to tell me you have a 25 year old bronco with 250k miles and the original engine with no overhaul. Its not the miles, its the years.

      You know that for a fact do you? Who's taking shit now? I know a few people who have collectable cars that are twice that age with way fewer miles that still have the original tires. Years don't mean a damn thing.

    37. Re: Here's the real problem by bbn · · Score: 1

      Wonder if that happens with electric car batteries - how much do those cost again?

      EV batteries deteriorate just like all other batteries. What you want to ask is how fast? That depends entirely on what car. Just like the batteries lasted much better on his old Mac.

      Because the EV battery is such an expensive part of the car and a car is expected to last much longer than a laptop, they will do more to make it last longer. One trick is to stop charging at 80% and never go below 20%. Laptops will happily go to 100% even knowing this will kill the batteries quickly. And the user might run

      Another is to climate control the battery. More expensive EVs like Tesla has climate control on the battery, so it will always be at optimum temperature. I have never seen a laptop with this feature. Nissan left this out on the first Leaf and got in a lot of trouble when the batteries started to deteriorate too fast in Arizona.

      You should also remember that less capacity is not the same as failed. You probably would not replace the battery in an old EV just because it has shorter range now. Instead you sell it to someone who is fine with the shorter range. You will pay for it by getting a lesser resale value, but this is still cheaper than replacing the battery.

      The 12V battery in an ICE car is something completely different. You can not assume that EV batteries will fail in 5 years, just because your 12V battery is crap. In fact may EVs come with 8 years of warranty on the battery.

      Almost all Toyota Prius all the way back to the 1997 models are still running on their original battery.

    38. Re: Here's the real problem by aliquis · · Score: 1

      My experience was different to.

      It too was a Macbook Pro but I guess it would be from 2007 or 2008 or something such.

      I have no numbers but I guess those 6 hours of battery life was more like 3.5 hours if you had it like.. on.. with the lid open and full brightness. Now if you used it it was likely more like (1-)1.5 hour or something such due to say Flash using up all processing power if you surfed the web and other things if you played a game.

      Now used for a year+ that had likely dropped to 1 hour vs 15 minutes or something such. The MagSafe adapter losed connection (shitty cable) all the time and the hibernate on battery low never functioned so it just died due to no battery after a while. Since the machine was a consistent 70+ degrees celsius due to Apple sucking major arse and having no hardware acceleration for Flash video even though the hardware could do it the battery died quickly.

      As we know ~40% charge and low temperatures are the best storage conditions for the batteries, not whatever an Apple machine had.

      Worst purchase ever. Only Apple product ever. The idea was to get OS X with no fuss and I had said earlier that I would had been willing to pay this and that for an OS which worked / OS X so I put my money where my mouth was but it totally wasn't worth the experience.

      One would had got a Dell machine with less retarded spec and possibility of ordering a higher resolution screen for almost 40% less to.

      Apple fanboys gonna hate.

    39. Re: Here's the real problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Such as alternators, water pumps

      Neither of which will be in an ELECTRIC car.

      My point is LOTS of the parts of ICE cars simply don't exist in electric cars. Thus reducing the maintenance. Amenities simply aren't relevant because they are extras that are nice to have.

      Batteries are currently expensive. Care to answer the question of why replacement engines/trans don't come with multi-year warranties?

      I assure you batteries are the quite literal definition of 'plug and play'. You take a plug and, ahem, plug it in and it's done.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    40. Re: Here's the real problem by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting anything is wrong with their modeling tools, just that they simply don't care if it breaks 10-15 years down the road or is practically impossible to rebuild when it does.

      When you take a large three speed transmission, add three more speeds, add a differential, and shove it all into a box about 1/3 the size of the original, it's not going to last as long. When they decide to reduce costs as well, it's not going to last half as long.

    41. Re: Here's the real problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      water pumps and timing belts

      Things that aren't going to exist in an electric vehicle.

      My point is there are significantly fewer things that need maintenance in electric vehicles compared with ICEs. Never said electrics don't have maintenance. The battery price isn't cheap, but it's easily on par with an engine rebuild/replacement no? And it's significantly less involved to remove a battery and plug in a new one than mate engines to transmissions and such.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    42. Re: Here's the real problem by rotaryexpress · · Score: 1

      What coolant hoses are you talking about?!? The only cooling an electric car needs is for the battery. In automation, electric motors are rated for YEARS of continuous operation. The oldest hybrids on the road today, with hundreds of thousands of miles, don't need electric motor work. It's the gas engine and battery where the issues come from.

      Also, unsprung mass only matters to race cars. Otherwise you'd see aluminum everything in the suspension instead of steel. Most people don't care about "handling", see: SUV's and pickup trucks.

    43. Re: Here's the real problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      They certainly don't have the maintenance and upkeep of the ICE since it isn't there. Transmission is dependent on the design, it can certainly be done with a transmission or differentials.

      There are simply fewer moving parts in electrics than ICEs. I was talking about engines and transmissions when I said no moving parts. Obviously all 'cars' have wheels and the assorted things that make them 'move'.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    44. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong. The three prominent full electrics which have been sold in significant quantity (in the US market at least, and maybe I'm missing one?):

      Tesla Roadster: single speed fixed gear ratio transmission
      Nissan Leaf: single speed fixed gear ratio transmission
      Tesla Model S: single speed fixed gear ratio transmission

      At one point in the Roadster's development, Tesla planned to use a 2-speed transmission (note: not a CVT). But they went with a simpler 1-speed for production.

      As for CVTs, you're pretty much totally wrong about them being inherently unreliable too. Probably the most common CVT on the market is the type found in Toyota/Lexus hybrids (and also hybrids from other brands, some of which are licensing the Toyota CVT). It's a planetary gear transmission with four shafts: one for the wheels, one for the internal combustion engine, and two for the two electric motors. Thanks to the way planetary gear transmissions work, the power coupling between ICE and wheels is composed of non-slipping clutches and meshed gears -- no torque converters or similar mechanisms are needed. The effective gear ratio between ICE and wheels is altered by adjusting electric motor RPM under computer control. This system has a rep for being highly reliable and requires little maintenance.

    45. Re: Here's the real problem by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Such as alternators, water pumps

      Neither of which will be in an ELECTRIC car. My point is LOTS of the parts of ICE cars simply don't exist in electric cars. Thus reducing the maintenance. Amenities simply aren't relevant because they are extras that are nice to have. .

      Yes, but there a are more sealed bearings to go bad. There are also more electronic components, which are in one of the worst environments for them. There's no water pump, so now you have to add some type of electronic heater to the car. There's no alternator, but you need one hell of a AC/DC converter/rectifier that is going to jostled around. There are lots of parts on an electric car that are also not on an ICE equipped one. Don't get me wrong, EV is pretty damn cool, but it's not all rainbows and ponies either.

      Batteries are currently expensive. Care to answer the question of why replacement engines/trans don't come with multi-year warranties?

      Many crate engines come with 3 year/ 36K mile warranties. Some more, so less. A lot of transmissions do too. I guess it's where you get them from.

    46. Re: Here's the real problem by Immerman · · Score: 1

      >A full electric certainly does have a transmission.

      Really, what ever for? A ICE has a transmission because it has a narrow power band at high RPM, with essentially no torque at low RPM. Electric motors generally have an extremely wide power band with maximum torque at low RPM which falls off with the inverse of speed: power = speed * torque = almost constant for an electric motor. Since gears are basically a rotational lever system to trade between speed and torque without altering power the only reason I can think of for a transmission is if your motor is unable to handle low RPM for some reason.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    47. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not how the actual full-electric cars on the market work. They have a single electric motor supplying power to the wheels through a fixed ratio gearbox, aka a transmission.

      One motor per wheel is nice in theory, but as I understand it there are practical considerations working against it.

    48. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, the main failure on a ICE equipped car is not the engine and/or transmission. It's more often electronic components or accessories.

      Do you have data or is this just your intuition?

      Such as alternators, water pumps,

      Electric cars don't have alternators at all. They do sometimes have coolant pumps as part of the battery pack cooling system, but these should be much less likely to break. (The working fluid doesn't get nearly as hot as it does in an ICE, the pumping rate is lower, the system is much easier to completely seal to prevent contamination, there's no danger of gasket or engine block failures allowing lubricant and coolant to mix, etc.)

      Power windows A/C and other amenities are more likely to fail.

      In electric cars, some of these systems may actually be less likely to fail. For example, the A/C compressor is powered by an electric motor rather than a pulley attached to the driveshaft. This coupling to the vehicle's power source is (a) more efficient (b) more controllable (c) less likely to break and (d) permits mounting the compressor anywhere.

      Granted, regenerative brakes do not have pads and rotors to wear our, but I have no idea how much longer they last, and would bet they cost quite a bit more to replace.

      You really need to educate yourself about topics you intend to pontificate on. "Regenerative brakes" aren't an extra mechanical system. Regenerative braking is merely using the main traction drive electric motor in reverse as a generator.

      EVs and hybrids still have ordinary friction brakes, usually off the shelf disc brake systems. However, they tend to wear less rapidly simply because they're not being called on to dissipate as much of the vehicle's kinetic energy during every stop.

      (There are reasons for still having ordinary brakes. One is safety regulations; in many countries the brake pedal is required by law to be passively linked to physical brakes which can stop the car in a reasonable distance no matter how many powered systems fail. Another is that traction motors used as generators can generate energy at a much higher rate than the battery pack can safely accept. While it's certainly possible to shunt the excess power through a bank of huge power resistors, the conventional brakes you're required to have anyways are a perfectly good way of converting kinetic energy to heat, and as a bonus you don't have to size your electrical systems to handle the larger currents that would be involved in panic stops, worry about repeated stops overheating motor/generator windings or the resistor pack, and so forth.)

      The electric motors still have bearings and other moving parts that can break too.

      You're being disingenuous if you won't acknowledge that EVs are dramatically less complex mechanically and that the bearings which do exist in an EV experience significantly less harsh operating conditions. There is absolutely nothing in an electric motor which has to stand up to the pounding which crankshaft bearings take.

      I don't know how much new batteries cost. Someone stated $2500. You can by a new engine for many cars for that price. Considering the size of the batteries, I don't think I'd consider them to be much more plug and play than a new engine.

      You're crazy. How many mechanical, electrical, and fluid couplings do you have to disconnect and connect in the process of swapping an ICE? With a battery pack it's likely just one or two wiring harnesses. Disconnect, unbolt, wrestle it out, wrestle replacement unit in, bolt it down, connect.

      Tesla is claiming they'll be able to do a full battery swap at Tesla service stations (as a substitute for filling up the tank on a long trip) in 90 seconds. Even if they are being optimistic by a factor of 10, there is no fucking way you can tell me that something which can be done in 15 minutes isn't rad

    49. Re:Here's the real problem by smash · · Score: 1

      It hasn't failed - and if the battery drops to 80 percent in 3 years, apple will replace it. Non-story is non-story.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    50. Re: Here's the real problem by hrpuffnstuff7770 · · Score: 1

      I own a Toyota Prius that will be 6 years old with 175k miles and have done most of the regular maintenance. The CVT transmission has been flushed and has shown no strange noises or odd behavior. The only non maintenance issue was replacing a 300 dollar headlight controller. The 100 dollar each headlamp bulbs both went by 65k miles but are considered maintenance items. Yes I am putting money aside in the event I may need a replacement battery pack .

    51. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a second hand Toyota Corolla with around 120,000 KMs on it. Let me list the things that went wrong with it around 15 months after I bought it. (I had driven it for fewer than 20,000ks):

      1) The brakes went. It turned out that the previous owner had taken it to a not-very reputable shop, who had snipped out the little tabs that squeal when the brake pads need replacing. It cost me $400 to get the whole system fixed up, and they didn't do a good job - the brakes kept cutting out, and I've have to pump them up before I could stop.

      2) The power steering. I'd drive on the open road, and occasionally the power steering would just cut out. No idea why or how, it just did.

      3) New battery. The dealer who sold it to me had swapped out the battery for a shit one, so he could sell another car.

      4) New tyre. My car had three tyres of one brand on it, and the same tyre/brand as the spare. One tyre was worn right out, and was a different brand. The dealer had swapped out the tyre to another car, clearly.

      5) The head gasket blew, and allowed oil and water to mix.

      6) The rear suspension needed replacing.

      7) One of the (automatic) gearbox bearings had worn out. Second gear, specifically, had little power for either speeding up or slowing down.

      That's all I can remember at this point, but I'm sure there were a few other things that needed repairing. The mechanic noted that the gasket would have cost almost the value of the car to replace, and the gearbox bearing would have been similar. The power steering, I was later told, would have been a significant cost as well. For some reason, I scrapped the car...

    52. Re: Here's the real problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      There's no particular reason for that though. Rebuild/replacement is not expected to be done frequently so they don't design for that. I have had the transmission out of my car exactly one in its 13 years/230000 miles and that was for a clutch replacement. Having done it myself, I can say that there is exactly nothing that would have prevented it being designed to be an extremely simple process. It would simply have been a waste of time and have been less optimal functionally.

    53. Re: Here's the real problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The most damaging thing to rubber and plastics is the UV.

    54. Re:Here's the real problem by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Take one guess where I got this from "However, the AppleCare Protection Plan for notebook computers does not cover batteries that have failed or are exhibiting diminished capacity except when the failure or diminished capacity is the result of a manufacturing defect.". So Apple analyses consumer complaints over previous product cycles and seeing a chance for profit reduces quality of batteries base upon how often complain and push publicly for failed battery replacement. Will batteries be replaced, NO, because reduced price and increased profits based upon reduced quality is not a manufacturing defect.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    55. Re: Here's the real problem by anubi · · Score: 1

      Speaking of lithium car batteries... according to the following, it looks like the Tesla will be running on about 8,000 18650 cells...

      http://www.teslamotors.com/it_IT/forum/forums/model-s-going-use-new-version-panasonic-18650-series-battery

      This is the same cell that my HP/Compaq CQ56-WalMart uses. My packs use 12 of 'em. I have noted I get a couple of years out ot them before they begin dropping off, then I end up cannibalizing the battery pack for its cells which I then use in projects and flashlights.

      When I buy power tools, which lithium cells they use is of much interest to me. So far, I have bought ONLY tools that incorporate the 18650 cell, as I know that in a pinch, I may have to fabricate a battery pack for them, or cannibalize spent packs for usable cells for other things.

      I have been very irritated that manufacturers make the battery packs in such a manner the cells are not individually serviceable. One cell goes out of balance and the whole pack is rendered inoperable.

      However, the 18650 cells I have experience with are not Panasonics. Apparently many companies manufacture these. They are found in a lot of consumer stuff like power tools.

      10 years? What do they consider end of life? I have to admit I have been using these cells for quite some time now and have yet to toss one because it was completely unusable, however I have noted they do indeed lose capacity as they are cycled, and I have developed charge balancers to help me keep these in service.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    56. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure but then the batteries last longer than most people will keep the computer. And why should Apple care if you plan to sell it.

      Or were you just engaging in typical Slashdot hatred of all things Apple. It's hard to tell.

    57. Re: Here's the real problem by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      The short peaks of power usage that new processors do should be pulled from a few electrolytic capacitors and a few tantalum capacitors (for those pesky ns power drains).
      A Pentium 4 pulled about 70-90 amps peak. No way that came directly from the powersupply. There was a large array of capacitors on each motherboard to buffer for those power draws. Inside the socket was an open space. Usually there were a few high speed capacitors there to buffer for the fast pulses.
      Newer processors will have a similar power requirement.
      If the MBA would draw pulses like that directly from the battery then it wouldn't last a week. Probably not even first boot.
      If they choose to keep the capacitance low (never zero) due to space requirements then that would cost battery durability. With details and testing this can be optimized to 1.5 times the warranty.
      Note: I have no information on the capacitance on the powerlines in an MBA. I have no information on durability of MBA batteries or the projections and calculations done for it by Apple.


      As for the older battery: it is true that there is a balance between rechargabilty and capacity of any battery. A company with custom batteries can set the slide anywhere between "will last 10.000 charges with 80% left but the initial capacity is crap" to "Has a freakishly large capacity but will be at 50% after a hundred charges". The advancement in battery technology is both to make batteries that don't have that trade off as much and to increase either maximum.
      The 2009 battery will have that balance set to more charges. Coupled with the advances in battery technology that means the capacity (per cubic cm of battery) is a lot lower. Probably less than half.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    58. Re: Here's the real problem by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I own a Tesla model S and I'm not terribly worried about the battery. From everything I have been able to learn, the battery should be good for at least 3000 charge/discharge cycles. Assuming 200 miles per charge (I typically get a lot more) that's 600,000 miles. They found that the batteries in their Roadsters are lasting longer than they expected by a fair bit too.

      And with a car that costs $80-100K (for the large battery), $12K isn't all that much. Also, battery prices are falling fairly rapidly and their capacity is increasing.

      Tesla has their own battery chemistry and very good battery management. Their batteries are handled much better than any laptop battery, with active temperature management and careful charge control, plus the chemistry is different.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    59. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      In automation, you'd often use sealed brushless motors that are conduction or convection cooled through the case. Those have artificially low power densities since there's inadequate cooling of the stator. I can have a 2.5kW sealed servo brushless motor, or a 10kW-40kW (RPM-dependent) liquid-coooled motor in the same volume and roughly same mass. In cars, where weight and volume do matter, you need forced cooling for the motor. If your motor is under the car, and especially at the wheels, air cooling is out of the picture. You need liquid cooling.

      I don't know where you got the idea that I imply that electric brushless motors somehow need maintenance. The only things that go bad on them are the bearings, and it doesn't take much to design those to outlast both the car and the owner.

      As for the unsprung mass mattering only to race cars: ha ha ha.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    60. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      Oh, those are definitely possible to rebuild if you've got the right tools and can still get the parts. They are quite amazing to work on - rebuilding even a modern internal combustion engine is a downright boring thing after you've done a modern front wheel drive transmission.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    61. Re: Here's the real problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      Just to give you an idea: a 2kW 40kRPM liquid cooled brushless motor is just a tad bigger than a D-size 1.5V battery. If you wanted it air cooled, it'd not only run hotter due to higher thermal resistances to the fins, but you'd need 4x+ the volume due to the size of the fins, and you'd be wasting another 100W to blow the air through those fins.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    62. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Drive a new car and tell me that.
      By 10-15 the motor mounts are shot just from dry rot.

      Don't you rev the engine on a used vehicle with the hood up to see that it doesn't move much if any. Also there will typically be mroe vibration from the engine if you have ones that are going since part of their purpose is to dampen engine vibration. I have seen vehicles with bad motor mounts but haven't purchased one so maybe other have had them replaced but I haven't.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    63. Re: Here's the real problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sure, but eventually they fail. My spouse's car had functional mounts, until about a year ago.

      Once we replace that I am just not keeping them that long anymore.

    64. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Which they shouldn't see any of since they are under the hood.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    65. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      You really believe that I don't know what a new car is suppose to sound or drive like. I test drive new vehicles all the time, especially when I go vehicle shopping so I have a fresh idea of how vehicles are suppose to be. Before I test drove the car I ended up buying from the dealer I got it from I test drove a new M5 and a new M3 and used those as baselines for the car I ended up buying. I have also drive my fathers new Z06 Vette the day he got it last year, as well as going with my wife (girlfriend at the time) when she got her car new as well as a host of other cars over the years. I have also had more performance tuned suspensions put into some vehicles as I did do SCCA solo racing for a while and would like to get back to it with my project car. The thing I have learned over the years are that vehicles should have tight suspension and steering as in no slop but not race car harsh (I have had this setup on a vehicle and while fun for the track not so much for the street) and that any noise, rattle, squeal, squeak, thud, and vibration should be investigated and resolved since it is cheaper to do now rather than later

      When you buy a vehicle don't you get it checked out before you buy it either by your self or a competent mechanic? In general suspension parts are consumable, especially shocks, struts, ball joints, sway bar links, sway bar bushings, and control arm bushings and all have finite lifetimes and need to be replaced typically every 50 to 100 thousand miles depending on driving conditions and habits. I haven't had a vehicle that hasn't needed most of those replaced during my ownership of them, and some needed them multiple times because of the miles I have put on vehicles

      Why can't a Bronco II 2.9L V6 engine last to 250k miles, it wasn't as strong as it was originally and did burn some oil but it worked up until the one of the fuel pumps failed and it wasn't worth fixing, and no I don't presently own it. I got that vehicle from my uncle who bought it used with less than 100,000 miles on it and drove it to 240,??? when I bought it and he never had the engine overhauled so if it was done it was done before it had 100,000 miles on it and before 1997. That and I have never claimed that the Bronco was anywhere near perfect but it was well worth the $250 I paid for it especially since the 4wd worked. The 96 Jeep I have has the original engine and it hasn't been rebuilt but has 377,??? miles on it since it was dealer maintained and had a car fax that shows the maintenance done. Since the numbers match for the vehicle I know the engine hasn't been replaced but given the regularity of the maintenance it had received from the original dealer it is also a safe bet that it hasn't been overhauled. It was also a one owner vehicle. You might also be shocked by the other vehicles I have owned as well because almost every one of them had more than 200k miles on them and the one that didn't would have otherwise easily made it over 200k. My first vehicle was an '85 Olds Cutlass Supreme with the 3.8 in it had the original engine when it died at 257,??? miles. It was my grandfather's car and he bought it new in 85 and gave it to me since he was going to send it off to the scrap yard and I know that was the original engine and it hadn't been overhauled. My previous daily driver (97 BMW 540i) had 275,??? miles on it and it would still smoke the tires off of a stop if I turned the traction control off without getting on the converter and would squeal them nicely when it would shift into second and squeak them when shifting into 3rd with the automatic transmission. This is probably why I blew the tranny in it, but it was fun while it lasted. The daily driver before that (96 BMW 318ti) was the street and track car before I had kids and that was the low mileage one in the lot. It handled like it was on rails and you could go around a sharp city block right hand turn and stay in the correct lane with ease at 30mph, and freeway cloverleafs were always taken at the freeway speed limit. It got plowed under by a high s

      --
      Time to offend someone
    66. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That car sounds like it was a lemon to start with and the dealer a fairly dodgy one. Some of those problems would have been picked up on by know what to look for when shopping, and a proper vehicle inspection while others could have been avoided by not going to a dodgy dealer and repair shop. The head gasket may have just been a fluke but given the other issues it was probably caused by the vehicle being beaten on and not properly maintained.

      The power steering pump was probably worn out and/or the fluid shot from someone keeping the wheel turned to the max for too long and was probably the original fluid. the pump probably had an audible hum when you turned the steering wheel and possibly a vibration when turning the steering wheel even when stationary. The fluid if it took the clear power steering fluid was probably brown, gray, or black by now or if it took ATF was no longer red but orange or brown. Power steering pumps are fairly robust even if neglected but it sounds like yours was abused and neglected and I have never had one fail on me.

      For brakes you can just look to see how worn they are (I always check that when I get a vehicle) and the shop you took it to sounds like they did a dodgy repair. The $400 for it doesn't sound out of line for labor and part for a 4 wheel brake job with pads, rotors, and flush of old brake fluid. It sounds like the shop didn't know how to bleed brakes properly and I would have brought it back to them and made them redo it until it was right. I typically can go 100,000 miles between doing front brakes and made it to just over 200,000 before having to do rear ones so that pad wear seems excessive given that you only had 60,000 or so miles on it when you got it. If you had to replace calipers then you missed the metal on metal grinding noise of the pad backing being run into the rotor or drum. Also rotors typically need to be replaced with pads on most vehicles since they are designed to wear together and be replaced at the same time.

      I don't like automatics but have driven vehicles with them because I can't be too picky when I need a vehicle right now since the previous one no longer runs. They are a typical weak point in a vehicle unless you really take good care of them and even then they will fail sooner than a manual one. You have the valve bodies that start to leak internally and get out of spec, torque converters that wear out, and clutches that wear out. Yours probably had the original fluid and filter in it and given that it seems like the rest of the car was beat on it was probably in desperate need of replacement. The fluid may have been burned and/or filled with metal and I don't know if Toyota uses sealed automatics or if they still have a dip stick, but if they aren't sealed then checking the fluid right after driving would have revealed how bad it was. Never buy a car with an automatic if the transmission fluid: is iridescent, smells burnt, or is not bright red, in all cases it has been neglected and you will have problems sooner rather than later.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    67. Re: Here's the real problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      They are just a block of rubber or plastic with some bolts in or through it and like all bushings will eventually wear out and need replacement. My point was after 10 years they shouldn't be shot unless the vehicle was really beat on in which case I stay clear. It is just one of the many signs I look for when I buy used vehicles. Like misaligned exterior trim, I can probably easily fix it but it shouldn't be like that so something is wrong with that vehicle.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    68. Re: Here's the real problem by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      Starting a car uses less than 1% of the car's battery capacity (source: go on Youtube and look for videos of people who have replaced their car's lead-acid battery with a much smaller array of supercapacitors). Ergo, a car that only has a small fraction of its battery capacity remaining is OK, but a laptop that only has a small fraction of its battery capacity remaining is not.

    69. Re: Here's the real problem by swalve · · Score: 1

      Except you waste gallons and gallons of gasoline over the life of the vehicle carrying around all that useless mass.

    70. Re: Here's the real problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yup.

    71. Re: Here's the real problem by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      I think we have different definitions of useless.

      Having major components of your vehicle that pretty much can't break is far more appealing to me than saving maybe 60lbs on a 4000lb vehicle. That's going to save you pretty much 0 mpg.

      What does waste gas is the gearing. Having only three speeds (and in some cases no converter lockup) means more drive train losses vs CVT or 7-9 speed transmissions.

    72. Re: Here's the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The miles per charge might decay (like in laptop batteries). It would really stink if the range went from 200 to 20 in two years like my laptop. Does the warranty cover "normal" battery decay? $10,000 hurts! Wish there were some studies on that.

    73. Re: Here's the real problem by bhiestand · · Score: 2

      One would had got a Dell machine with less retarded spec and possibility of ordering a higher resolution screen for almost 40% less to.

      Apple fanboys gonna hate.

      We've all got our anecdotes. From 2004-2008 I went through two higher-end Inspirons. The first one just completely fell apart, the second literally blew up in my lap (smoke and all--I think capacitors popped). It was outside of warranty, and someone talked me into buying an early 2008 MacBook Pro. Worked like a champ for 5 years. I gave it to my niece when I upgraded earlier this year.

      IIRC, battery life sucked pretty badly on most laptops back then. My MBP didn't get significantly better or worse battery life, but it did a better job of sleeping and waking than the PCs. I'd say about 2 hours of normal use for me (light browsing and an office application). I did have to replace the battery once after ~300-500 cycles.

      I have heard a lot of complaints about MagSafe, but I don't have statistics. My connector worked fine from 2008-Present.

      My TCO was higher with Dell than the MBP, and the MBP kept a much higher resale value. I *did* get it on clearance and an education discount, and I upgraded RAM/HDD myself, so that saved a ton of money.

      I suspect the biggest problem with the Air is going to be difficulty of replacing the batteries when they inevitably go out.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  8. Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Nice to have if the power goes out unexpectedly, but shut down ASAP.

    1. Re:Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      That's not really the point of a laptop battery. Also, doesn't leaving it plugged in all the time kill the battery faster than anything?

    2. Re:Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      For a few reasons:

      #1 is because most (all?) Li-Ion batteries can only be charged a few hundred times. Even a partial charge from 95% back up to 100% can count as a "charge cycle". So one tactic is to change your power management settings so that it doesn't start a charge cycle until the battery hits 80-90% levels.

      #2 is heat.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the quality/smartness of the charger.
      It should not trickle charge, just keep the battery off-line, until it drops by 10% before charging, which could take a month or longer.

    4. Re:Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1 is because most (all?) Li-Ion batteries can only be charged a few hundred times. Even a partial charge from 95% back up to 100% can count as a "charge cycle".

      No. Just no. If you actually do see any damage that accrues from many very shallow cycles, beyond the normal aging from the same A*h charge/discharge in fewer moderate-depth cycles, it is due to a bad charger that overcharges the battery each time. Given proper charging (CC/CV with proper current cutoff at the end of the CV stage), fractional charge cycles work almost exactly how you would expect them to, 0.05+0.05+0.05 = 0.15, not 3! (Actually, deeper cycles are worse, but this effect is almost negligible for 10-20% depth of cycle, as we're discussing here.)

      So one tactic is to change your power management settings so that it doesn't start a charge cycle until the battery hits 80-90% levels.

      This actually does work a bit, because heat and age related deterioration of Li-ion batteries is fastest when fully charged -- by bringing the average down to 90 or 95% full, you reduce the aging rate, and it lasts longer. But the nature of the relationship is such that you'll do much more good if you can also bring the finish voltage down -- so charge to 95%, restart at 85% is better than charge to 100%, restart at 80%, but charge to 80% and hold there, even with a small window and frequent short charge cycles to bring it back up to 80%, is better yet.

      #2 is heat.

      Yeah, except that's actually #1.

    5. Re:Treat laptop batteries as risky UPS. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      #1 isn't really true. It's a trade-off between durability and capacity. This trade-off is made by the manufacturer.
      Sadly a high battery capacity looks nicer in the specs. The durability suffers from that.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  9. Re:Laugh by Camembert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - Citation please about Apple's batteries being bad? That would mean statistically worse than other brands? - RAM fixed, ok I see your point, on the other hand I think it is the price to pay when building something as slender as a Macbook Air. - insecure and buggy OS: Is it worse than Windows? There are not so many stories about OSX being hacked into. Not saying that it isn't perfect but it seems to work pretty well. Why paying the premium? Yes, I like many of their products (scorn on me here on /.). Very concisely: I am happy how in general it all works substantially well and simply. I even like the painless app store. Of course I will now be dismissed as a poser and a hipster, but really I don't care. I never speak bad about Windows or Linux fans either, each to his own.

  10. Power storage that doesn't degrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why aren't we filling our laptops, tablets and phones with compressed H2 that we make in our own homes with our new appliances (electrolyzers) that take distilled water? Why isn't this happening yet! Storage that does *not* degrade. The power density isn't great enough for cars but is awesome for portable electronics.

    Duh...

    1. Re:Power storage that doesn't degrade... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because of the whole host of other problems with that suggestion.
      Here is a small set of them, there are many more
      1. expensive fuel cell
      2. low density storage unless you go with expensive metal hydrides
      3. H2 embrittles everything
      4. far cheaper to make H2 via steam reformation of natural gas than electrolysis

    2. Re:Power storage that doesn't degrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't think batteries are inefficient? As hot as they get when charging and when using? Keeping the voltage as close to 2.5V across each electrolyzer cell when performing electrolysis of water with a PEM membrane is pretty efficient. The PEM fuel cell, however, is not as efficient (I know it's basically the same device used in reverse).
      Portable electronics don't use much energy so a tiny cylinder with compressed H2 can last long enough.
      The fuel cell IS expensive and would drive up the cost a bit.

      The other thing I thought of is, unless you store oxygen too, what happens if you have a fuel cell phone in your pocket for a long time? lol, do you need a snorkel? Storing the oxygen too wouldn't be practical. The other big challenge would be using this technology in tiny/thin cellphones. Laptops and tablets wouldn't be as hard.

      You'd be surprised how much energy you can get from a tiny cartridge of hydrogen stored at 100 to 150 PSI. I play around with fuel cell technology all the time. Also, I have a 1200 cc/min PEM-based hydrogen generator.

    3. Re:Power storage that doesn't degrade... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't need to think about it, the numbers are available. Batteries beat fuel cells if you use electrolysis.

      Portable electronics use far more power than any small cylinder will provide. H2 is terrible volumetrically. Compressing it will not be enough, nor will liquefying it. Metal hydrides are the only option.

      Your pockets are airtight? What kind of pants are you wearing?

      I would not be surprised on bit, it is terrible compared to metal hydrides or batteries.

    4. Re:Power storage that doesn't degrade... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about reason 4. I.e., while I agree that it is far cheaper to make H2 via steam reformation of natural gas than electrolysis, I'm not sure that would apply on a small sclae (i.e., home use), and any other choice implies distribution of hydrogen, which isn't cheap.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Power storage that doesn't degrade... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen is great stuff. You just need to store it bonded with carbon. Do it right, and you can make butane for fuel cell usage.

      http://www.gizmag.com/usb-charger-butane-fuel-cell-nectar-lilliputian-systems-brookstone/28281/

      Take it a step further and let me run my laptop off a Bic lighter or two and i'll be happy.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  11. How do you think monitoring works? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Your software is querying the battery, which in turn takes battery power. If you keep asking it to check on itself every minute, you are decreasing its life expectancy in so doing. While it wouldn't produce as rich of a data set, if you really want to know how long your battery lasts at idle, you need to track it with pen and paper.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:How do you think monitoring works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! Apple is flawless, its you who is the problem!

    2. Re:How do you think monitoring works? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The software is not querying the battery any more nor less. It's querying it at a fixed rate, and when you ask, you get the most recent query.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:How do you think monitoring works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's best not to use a battery ever, that way it could exist in one of two states, charged or dead. I like to believe all of my batterys are charged. A battery is like a quantum particle(photon) it exists in a superposition state, if measured then it's state is fucked.

  12. Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So far as I can tell, you're looking at the reported capacity from the intelligent charging circuitry. From my experience, and the reports I've heard, this has only a tenuous connection to reality.

    From what I can see, the author has not actually ever measured the unit's battery life.

  13. Power States by MMerc · · Score: 1

    What the study shows is that logging the battery life every 1 minute prevents the laptop from staying in a low power state for long periods of time. This is like flipping your house lights on and off every 1 minute for a whole year and wondering why your power bill is rising through the roof.

  14. Letting the battery cycle? by spamchang · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most modern lithium batteries should *not* be cycled or discharged "fully"--such a practice degrades the battery capacity quite rapidly. I think the practice of fully discharging the battery comes from the NiMH-type rechargeable AA(A) batteries.

    Yeah, sometimes people recommend fully discharging a lithium battery during operation so that the monitoring software can recalibrate it's battery power meter to adjust for the decline in total capacity, but I'm not sure it's worth it.

    As mentioned earlier, temperature is a big factor as well. Maybe Haswell will save the day...

    1. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      No modern li-ion battery will let you charge or discharge it far enough to cause actual damage. You can treat them however you like cycle-wise and you'll get about the same total lifespan out of them. Using the battery and how long has passed since manufacture are by far the limiting factors.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the practice of fully discharging the battery comes from the NiMH-type rechargeable AA(A) batteries.

      It predates those bit, back in the '80 when we used NiCad batteries they told us to completely discharge them then fully recharge them so they wouldn't develop a "memory" problem.

      No modern li-ion battery will let you charge or discharge it far enough to cause actual damage.

      You're assuming some charge monitoring/protection circuits are in the battery. That may be the case in laptops (not sure), but with simple Li-ion batteries used for something like radio controlled cars and planes there is a serious risk if you aren't using the correct smart charger for the battery.

    3. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by PPH · · Score: 1

      No modern li-ion battery will let you charge or discharge it far enough to cause actual damage.

      Tell that to Boeing.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No modern li-ion battery will let you charge or discharge it far enough to cause actual damage. You can treat them however you like cycle-wise and you'll get about the same total lifespan out of them. Using the battery and how long has passed since manufacture are by far the limiting factors.

      Rubbish. Yes the control electronics place some restrictions on what you can do to prevent catastrophic failure, they do nothing to prevent increased wear and tear on the battery. For example if you never let the battery dishcharge below 50%, it will last for more than double the number of discharge cycles. If you never charge it above 90% capacity this will also increase the life of the battery. Similarly with storing it in lower temperatures.

      So some general tips for Li-ion batteries:
      Never discharge them more than you need to, if there is a charger nearby, plug in your phone/laptop regardless of the charge level.
      If you know you're not going to be long without a charger and won't be doing much with your device, only charge it to 80-90%.
      When storing/not using the battery for long periods, store it somewhere cold, the fridge if possible.
      When playing games or anything that requires lots of power, plug your device in if possible. High current draw from the battery heats it up (as well as the heat from the CPU etc) and sustained high temperatures will shorten the battery's life.

      Source: http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries

    5. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by csumpi · · Score: 2

      batteries should *not* be cycled or discharged "fully"

      It depends on what you mean by "fully discharged".

      Yes, if you discharge a LiIon battery completely to 0V, the battery will be damaged. This is why all LiIon batteries (should) have a battery management system that monitors the battery's voltage and cuts off power once the voltage falls below a certain level, somewhere around 3V per cell for LiIon.

      I use LiIon batteries in RC cars with the cutoff voltage set to 3.2V/cell and the batteries stay within a couple % of their original capacity even after discharged completely to the cutoff several 100 times.

      Maybe Apple set the cutoff voltage too low so they can market very long battery life, which in return destroys the batteries. We are lucky to get two hours out of our 2 year old Macbook Air, and a similar aged iPod Touch is pretty much useless unless hooked up to the charger constantly.

    6. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by csumpi · · Score: 1

      No modern li-ion battery will let you charge or discharge it far enough to cause actual damage.

      Not entirely true. The battery can't protect itself, a battery management system does that (which can be built into the battery pack). But if the battery management system is missing, broken, or not set up correctly, you can over-discharge the battery.

      You can treat them however you like cycle-wise and you'll get about the same total lifespan out of them.

      Not entirely true, again. If you over discharge a LiIon battery, there will be damage. Yes, you can recharge it again, possibly requiring getting around the battery management system, but it will never be the same. And you need to be careful there, charging an over-discharged LiIon battery can cause fire.

    7. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple recommends cycling the battery on their laptops occasionally. Apple Laptop Usage Recomendations.

      I didn't know this and I almost always have my 15" MacBook Pro plugged in. Earlier this summer, on one of the rare occasions that I was using it unplugged, I noticed that on a full charge I had 15 minutes of battery life. I checked the battery stats, and it was reporting 9% health with only 23 cycles. Took the laptop into an Apple store to have them replace the battery. They did that and asked if I left it plugged in all the time. When I said yes, they told me to not do that. Unplug it and let it run down below 50% at least once a week.

    8. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even NiMH nor NiCd get any benefit from deep discharging.

      any type of electrochemical process should be done as slow as possible and with as much smaller cycles as possible. *Anything* quick or violent degrades it.

    9. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by gaiageek · · Score: 2

      If you check batteryuniversity.com, one of the points made is that battery life can be prolonged by not charging the battery to 100%, but instead to lower voltages (i.e. only charging to 90% capacity. The lower the voltage, the more life you get out of the battery. So it could actually be that, if Apple is tweaking the cutoff point of its batteries to get better battery life, it's on the top end -- not the bottom.

      How to Prolong Lithium-based Batteries

      Of note, this is one reason I still love Thinkpads: their Power Manager software allows you to set the maximum charge point, so you can set it to charge only up to 95% (or whatever you want) and it will do this even when rebooting into Linux, though the software must be run under Windows, of course.

    10. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by julesh · · Score: 1

      You can treat them however you like cycle-wise and you'll get about the same total lifespan out of them

      This isn't entirely true. See the graph here (the page is mostly about lead-acids, but as the author states the graph in question is valid for li-ion, just with a different scale). Look at a couple of data points towards either edge of the graph, for example, 20% and 80% depth-of-discharge. At 20%, the battery the author is describing gets 3,300 cycles whereas at 80% it gets 675. Assuming the battery has a 1Ah capacity (for simplicity of calculation) this means that with 20% DOD you get a total battery life of 660Ah but at 80% you only get 540Ah. That's nearly a 20% difference in lifespan.

    11. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Your IFs have one major problem.

      All of them are illegal in the USA now. You can no longer sell a laptop battery without a charge controller built in. So you can do whatever you want to a modern laptop BATTERY PACK without fear ... well, unless you bought a $12 direct from China, then its your own stupid fault for burning yourself up.

      That charge controller will not let you discharge your battery to far. It will not let you charge a battery that has a dead cell. It will not let you charge a battery with the internal cells unbalanced and a whole buttload of other things that tend to cause fires.

      You can't tell an American consumer 'don't run the battery dead on your laptop' and expect that to prevent Li-Po's from bursting into flames, so its illegal to even consider doing so.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by csumpi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing this out. My Sony Vaio has a similar battery saver function, the default is charging to 80%.

    13. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by tibit · · Score: 1

      95% of what?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    14. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep cycling ages the battery faster, hence the parent post saying it's not worth it.

    15. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NiCd can crystalize internally when discharge or charge cycles are not full capacity. This is what causes memory effect.

      Cell voltage * cells for pack capacity.
      Pack capacity - single cell voltage for max discharge level.

      Note that a pack can be just one cell... Now look at the math again...

    16. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I think you did some illegal stuff yourself pointing out where one could get a battery pack that circumvented US law.

      You're being a super dick today. I know your old lady is fucking your boss again which he repeatedly keeps showing pictures of in his powerpoint presentations but seriously dude, log the fuck off today and come back when you can state something not douche-tacular.

    17. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, if you're using bare cells and building your own charging circuit you're on your own.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    18. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      You'd have to bypass the management system to get it to overdischarge in the first place.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    19. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Qualitatively, yes, you do get that effect. (Albeit on a much smaller order of magnitude!) However with the typical usage of a lithium-ion battery, calendar life and cycling are going to completely wash out any differences you get from avoiding deep charge/discharge.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    20. Re:Letting the battery cycle? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If you only let it discharge to 50% you get twice as many cycles, and each of those cycles is going to be half as long, so your total actual usage of the battery is completely unchanged.

      Temperature is by far the most important factor in calendar life. Usage is by far the most important factor in cycle life. I'm not saying that keeping it below 90% won't have an effect on lifespan, but it's such a small one that it'll be swamped by the other aging effects. Certainly it's not worth the inconvenience.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  15. non-replaceable batteries by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They are considered disposable and if you can make it until the next upgrade cycle/treadmill they don't care.

    For those of us who actually buy our phone outright, it sucks.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:non-replaceable batteries by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What do you mean non-replaceable?

      Do you not know how to work a screwdriver?
      Lefty loosy, righty tighty. You can order the battery and driver online if the latter is an oddball shape.

    2. Re:non-replaceable batteries by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      With voided warranty.
      And that's assuming you can find the replacement parts for your model, which isn't straightforward for anything other than iphones.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    3. Re:non-replaceable batteries by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If it was under warranty you could have them do the work for free. So which is it? You are under warranty and don't need to worry or you are not and voiding it does not matter?

      Bullshit, I have found parts for many smartphones, including screens and power ports. No different than getting ebay laptop parts.

    4. Re:non-replaceable batteries by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I would also like to mention that I opened and inspected a Nexus 7. When I found out that unit was still under warranty I returned it and they fixed the issue free of charge. So the warranty clearly was not voided.

    5. Re:non-replaceable batteries by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      If it is still under warranty then the manufacturer gets to replace the battery if it is out of warranty then I pay either way.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    6. Re:non-replaceable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was under warranty you could have them do the work for free.

      Apple only replaces batteries that have lost 50% of their capacity.

    7. Re:non-replaceable batteries by julesh · · Score: 1

      If it was under warranty you could have them do the work for free.

      "the AppleCare Protection Plan for notebook computers does not cover batteries that have failed or are exhibiting diminished capacity except when the failure or diminished capacity is the result of a manufacturing defect" (source).

    8. Re:non-replaceable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your one-year warranty includes replacement coverage for a defective battery - same fucking page.

  16. Sampling frenzy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe polling the battery every minute reduces battery life?

    1. Re:Sampling frenzy by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I don't know... In Linux if you turn on ACPI debugging, you can see that ACPI spouts constantly (maybe twice a minute or something like that) an event from the battery (CMB1 or other name). Maybe when you "poll" the battery, you simply get the most recent values that the ACPI driver stored from the latest report?

  17. Re:Laugh by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bad batteries something Apple is famous for, RAM fixed to the logic board, insecure and buggy OS, and a host of other complaints makes me wonder why anyone pays the premium for Apple any longer.

    Presumably the same reason someone pays big bucks to drink coffee made from coffee beans that have been in a civet's anus.

  18. Then replace the... oh thats right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should replace the battery or have a spare waiting.

    Oh, that's right. Apple doesn't allow you to do that. They expect you to upgrade to the new model every year and everyone obeys gladly.

    1. Re:Then replace the... oh thats right by h4rr4r · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Then replace the... oh thats right by PPH · · Score: 1

      Not something one can do when your battery gets low and you want to swap it out sitting in a coffee shop.

      In my opinion, to be user replaceable, there should be no tools required (perhaps a latch one can turn with a dime would be OK). Certainly not a proprietary Apple 5 point driver bit.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Then replace the... oh thats right by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Really? You can't remove screws in public?

      This user always has his multitool with him. The screws are not Apple proprietary they are available to anyone who wants to use them and you can easily swap it over to whatever you like for screws.

      Could it be easier? Sure, but then rigidity of the case goes down. The dell 6430u is a pretty decent compromise. I personally don't swap batteries much so I am not worried about it.

    4. Re:Then replace the... oh thats right by rgbscan · · Score: 1

      Ummm, if you're in a coffee shop and already carrying around an accessory (this second battery you propose), why not just carry the A/C adapter instead and plug it in?

  19. Re:Laugh by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bad batteries something Apple is famous for, RAM fixed to the logic board, insecure and buggy OS, and a host of other complaints makes me wonder why anyone pays the premium for Apple any longer.

    Maybe because that hasn't been most peoples' experience? I have a MacBook Pro that is almost 3 years old and the battery is still almost as good as the day I bought it. Of course, I make sure to run mine down once a month as recommended.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  20. Re:Laugh by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple get the same batteries from the same places everyone else does. They're as fungible as AAs at this point.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  21. Re:Laugh by samkass · · Score: 2

    Bad batteries something Apple is famous for, RAM fixed to the logic board, insecure and buggy OS, and a host of other complaints makes me wonder why anyone pays the premium for Apple any longer.

    Your point would be an excellent one if reality wasn't exactly opposite to every statement in your post.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  22. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad batteries something Apple is famous for, RAM fixed to the logic board, insecure and buggy OS, and a host of other complaints makes me wonder why anyone paid the premium for Apple ever.
    ...FTFY

  23. Perfectly valid by Russ1642 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I love studies with a sample size of one. No statistics, no variability. Definitive.

    1. Re:Perfectly valid by geek · · Score: 2

      Its not a study. It's just someone monitoring their own laptops battery life. Lighten up.

    2. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are free not to read it. This guy spent time putting the numbers together, and did not put it out as a double blind research study. If you want to compare it to your own results, you are also free to. You are also free to make snarky comments as you just did.

    3. Re:Perfectly valid by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, because the author insisted that it was the definitive study on how all Macbook batteries behave, so we've got to hold him to that standard. I'll go further: this cad didn't even have this published in Physical Review Letters, much less Science or Nature. He didn't even get it peer reviewed, and... my God, there's no conflict of interest statement! Who was his ethics board?!

      Sweet Jesus, I'll bet he isn't even working in a laboratory!

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Perfectly valid by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      It may encourage a more definitive study, especially if many others have reported similarly bad battery life for the air.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    5. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Summon the Apple haters to pile on!

    6. Re:Perfectly valid by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But he published it, and then Slashdot picked it up, and people are actually interpreting the 'data' and making conclusions. This is how crap like thimerisol=autism gets out there.

    7. Re:Perfectly valid by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Its not a study. It's just someone monitoring their own laptops battery life. Lighten up.

      Then why is it being reported on at a news website?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:Perfectly valid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      To be fair it was worth the author doing it because now he has evidence to make a claim under warranty for replacement batteries. I agree though that more research is needed before we can see any kind of general trend with this model.

      I wonder what replacement batteries Apple use for warranty stuff. Could be new, or could be refurbished. I know Lenovo do new ones but Dell do refurbs that usually only last just long enough to get out of the warranty period.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! Let me put another point data, for another machine, not related, in different conditions, and different testing:

      MacBookPro 5,3, 48 months old, current battery capacity 4668 mAh of designed capacity 6500 mAh. Reported by coconut. I follow the macbook's manual guidelines to fully cycle the battery every month. Last week I was at a client and managed to squeeze three hours of the laptop. Not bad, I believe, most of my fiends with crappy cheap laptops get half hour after one year.

      Still, the times I use the battery is minimal, this laptop I use as desktop machine.

    10. Re:Perfectly valid by dbc · · Score: 1

      Some career advice for you:

      An engineer takes 10 data points, carefully computes a regression, and plots a curve that fits the data points.

      A marketing manager takes 3 data points, stands back and squints, and free-hands a line that sort of fits the points.

      A Vice President uses one data point, and his line doesn't have to go through the point.

    11. Re:Perfectly valid by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Sort of like the saying: measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

    12. Re:Perfectly valid by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded informative? This is an individual showing us is personal experience, not an Apple-sanctioned tech audit.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    13. Re:Perfectly valid by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They've reported the opposite actually, thats the problem with this being on slash dots front page.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    14. Re:Perfectly valid by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Whats the claim exactly? When you run a script every minute ... so the machine can never sleep or suspend the disks ... that the battery doesn't last as long?

      Do you have any idea how much shit happens when he runs his little script? The entire machine will constantly state in full active mode, except for the processor which will idle down. SSD? Nope, full power so it can be ready for the next log write ... in one minute.

      As someone who debugs problems for a living, there is nothing useful about this 'study' that I would accept as an indication of a battery issue or problem with the system.

      The problem is the user who thought it would be a good idea to configure his laptops in such a way to essentially prevent EVERY SINGLE possible power saving measure from going into place.

      He deliberately configured his laptop in a worst-case scenario kind of way.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    15. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is it being reported on at a news website?

      News site? You mean Slashdot? That's more like comedy website for shy guys.

    16. Re:Perfectly valid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The script probably just queries the current battery level and logs it. If you are actively using the laptop it will add almost nothing to the load. There is no disk, it's an SSD as you go on to point out, and they don't idle at "full power" because that would be dumb and piss away energy. I don't think you understand how flash memory actually works.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a study. It may not be a scientific study, but who tried to claim it was?

    18. Re:Perfectly valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that deliberate fraud?

  24. every apple product by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Informative

    Almost every iPhone on record has been more likely to shatter its screen than the one before it. Apple went from 1st in lowest malfunction rates to 6th from 2007 to 2011. The new ipad is heavier, runs hotter, and gets worse battery life than the one before it. This isn't exactly a new pattern that the battery in the new air is inferior. Everything Apple is going downhill.

    1. Re:every apple product by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is because each one is more scratch resistant.
      Android phones are the same, I only own those actually. The harder the glass gets the more brittle iy is.

      Their malfunction rate went up with volume, not really surprising. I hate to be defending Apple, but you are being rather unfair.

  25. Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Calculated battery capacity is an estimate, nothing more, used by power management to decide when the computer should be force-slept, then suspended to disk to keep from damaging the battery (ie, it's not useful to wake up too late from sleep to do the suspend-to-disk.)

    The SMC's estimate is just that: an estimate. Errors build up over time, and certain things fake it out a bit. For example, note the capacity, unplug the laptop, use it for 30 minutes, plug it in. Immediately the value will be different. It'll change again when fully charged. Your battery capacity didn't actually change. Even in a perfect world, since batteries have internal resistance, capacity gauges can never be perfect(if you draw at X you'll get less power out than if you draw out at X*0.8), and the battery's capacity varies with temperature. Battery degradation is impacted by temperature as well, so unless you're controlling for temperature of the pack, this was a completely useless endeavor. The only way this would have been useful would've been to cycle several (probably a dozen or more) batteries on lab-grade equipment in a temperature-controlled environment.

    The noise and big upward swings alone should tell you that using the SMC's estimate for the purposes of statistical analysis or trending is virtually useless.

    The stupid shit I see "enthusiasts" of any product obsess over is absurd. The time wasted on such an exercise far outweighs the impact it possibly could have had on the author (and probably even 9-10 other people combined.) The batteries last for well over 6 hours. Most people using a ultrabook with the battery life of a Macbook Air have plenty of opportunities to charge their machines during the course of a day.

    1. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My macbook pro is less than 8 months old and it does NOT last for 6 hours. I'm lucky to get 3 hours.

    2. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, man, why should we like... be interested in the way things work? Eat your laptop and shut the hell up, consumer."

    3. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An apple when it goes to sleep also suspends to disk. That way, even if the SMC's estimates are wrong and the RAM can not be fed enough power, it will be able to resume from disk.

    4. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by ssam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You get around the error in the estimate by looking at a large number of readings. There are plots showing that the style of usage has not changed with time, so I don't see how the downward drift could be caused by something like sampling when the battery is full or when its empty. I am also fairly sure that when you do a full cycle that lets the battery controller recalibrate. The 'study' may not be perfect, but I have never seen a better one (studies on discharging cells at constant currents and temperatures don't tell you all that much about laptops).

      Yes temperature is an issue for batteries. But the temperature of a laptop battery is dominated by the design of the laptop, and how much current is being drawn (or charged) to it. Maybe the previous macbook pro was only used in a aircon'ed office and the macbook air is being used in a steel mill, but i think that would have been mentioned.

      This study only covers 2 laptops (and only one in high detail), but its worth 10 times all the battery anecdotes that you hear around the web because it contains measurements. I hope some more people try his script, and post the results.

    5. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battery degradation is impacted by temperature as well, so unless you're controlling for temperature of the pack, this was a completely useless endeavor.

      On the contrary, a highly controlled lab test would be useless. I use my computer in the real world, with the real world's imperfections, not in a highly controlled lab.

      Of course you can then claim that a whole chain is being tested rather than just the battery, I'm fine with that.

    6. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by randallman · · Score: 1

      I find the most interesting figure to be the rate (in watts) reported by the OS. In Ubuntu, this can be seen with the Power Statistics app as an attribute of the battery. For instance, now with USB peripherals and an external monitor, it reports 9.2 watts. If I use the built in screen dimmed, unplug USB peripherals and turn off wireless, it goes to 4.5 watts. I can't do much about my battery, but I can (to some extent) do something about the OS using power.

    7. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by tibit · · Score: 1

      Install menumeters and make sure you don't have a CPU hog.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    8. Re:Siiiiigh, the SMC provides an ESTIMATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get around the error in the estimate by looking at a large number of readings. There are plots showing that the style of usage has not changed with time, so I don't see how the downward drift could be caused by something like sampling when the battery is full or when its empty. I am also fairly sure that when you do a full cycle that lets the battery controller recalibrate. The 'study' may not be perfect, but I have never seen a better one (studies on discharging cells at constant currents and temperatures don't tell you all that much about laptops).

      Yes temperature is an issue for batteries. But the temperature of a laptop battery is dominated by the design of the laptop, and how much current is being drawn (or charged) to it. Maybe the previous macbook pro was only used in a aircon'ed office and the macbook air is being used in a steel mill, but i think that would have been mentioned.

      This study only covers 2 laptops (and only one in high detail), but its worth 10 times all the battery anecdotes that you hear around the web because it contains measurements. I hope some more people try his script, and post the results.

      There is little point in doing a study this way when there are much more comprehensive studies on these type of batteries.
      http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries

  26. Um, er, about that "battery capacity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid you've been conned by several digital phantoms.

    (1) There is no way to actually know the remaining charge in a battery. The little microprocessor in the battery or the laptop can take a good guess, by integrating the current draw over time, it can measure how many watt-hours have been drawn out, and from integrating how much charge has gone into the battery, and how the battery temperature went up, which signals that it's fully charged (or dying due to high ESR), and from previous discharge cycles, it can roughly compute what the battery capacity used to be, very roughly, but only if you discharged it until the voltage was significantly drooping. And so then the microprocessor can very roughly tell you that there is xx% of charge remaining. Very roughly. Very roughly.

    (2) You probably did not measure the laptop's current draw over time. Perhaps you've been using the CPU more intensively, or you're using apps or web sites that need more processing power. Watching video or playing video games use a whole lot more power than light web site browsing. The Macbook air takes very aggressive steps to minimize power draw, that's good, but that also makes for a big jump when you go from light-duty to heavier-duty power-hungry apps.

    (3) You are just one data point. And people with bad experiences tend to stand out, so we really can't generalize from your possibly bad experience to anything more general.

    While your conclusion might be true, there are also all those other confounding factors that cast substantial doubt.

  27. Re:Laugh by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    RAM fixed to the logic board,

    A requirement of the form factor. If you check, most ultrabooks in a similar formfactor already solder the RAM on board. You can find ones with removable RAM but they typically are pushing the "Ultrabook" definition because Intel couldn't get anyone to make them otherwise (typically they have hard drives, or 15" screens or are heavier and significantly thicker).

    Though, to be honest, I've rarely ever installed additional RAM in any PC I had - given its cost, it's usually cheaper to buy the max up front than in a few years when memory standards change and it's difficult to buy it cheaply (e.g., DDR or DDR2) - especially the larger modules - they either simply stop existing or are still wildly expensive years later.

  28. Re:Laugh by bobbied · · Score: 0

    Of course I will now be dismissed as a poser and a hipster, but really I don't care.

    Nor do I. You can do whatever you want with your money, including sending it to Apple to purchase their overpriced hardware and buggy software... :)

    Seriously, if it works for you, do what you want. I don't hate Apple stuff, I just don't see a good reason to pay that much for it. But I'm a cheap oldie goldie so I end up using 10 year old revamped laptops for work and home. I don't suppose many folks would go to as much trouble, but it's worth it to me.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  29. Continuous charging kills batteries by mybecq · · Score: 1

    My laptop is rarely off AC power. When I had the charger set to stop charging at 100% (and to recharge when 90%), my battery life greatly improved. OId battery dropped 60% in reported capacity in less than 2 yrs; new battery is barely down 30% in the following 4 years.

    I call it Chinese electron torture for your battery -- drip, drip, drip.

    I don't know how OS X controls battery charging, but all OS's should provide an option to stop charging at 100%.

    1. Re:Continuous charging kills batteries by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2

      For new laptops these days, we use 80% or 85% as the threshold before a charge cycle takes place. The default for Lenovo is 96%. Most of our users spend 80% of their time tethered to a power cable, and charging every few days after it trickles down to 96% is just silly (and bad for the battery).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  30. Re:Laugh by notanalien_justgreen · · Score: 1

    Agreed, I've had 3 different apple laptop batteries - and I've never got more than about a 2.5 hour charge on them, even brand new. I don't know where this bullshit about ~8 hour battery life comes from. I don't even use it that heavily, we're talking about 2.5 hours of internet and Word.

  31. Re:Laugh by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Dell 6430u, actually manages this quite well.
    It uses an SSD and a 14" display. Honestly the best Dell I have seen in years as far as build quality goes.

    Typically markup on day of sale on RAM upgrades from the OEM are 100%. We always get them with a lower amount of RAM and order more from newegg to have it arrive the same day.

  32. Re: Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my experience is the exact opposite to yours.

  33. Re: Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for them for 4 years and we replaced every battery and case on those white plastic models.

  34. just use car battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o wait my car is built on laptop batteries
    Tesla Powered

  35. Cycle count is meaningless by bored · · Score: 1

    Without knowing how deep the cycle was. Furthermore, the rate of discharge and temperature during the discharge will also have a fairly significant affect.

    Basically, you will get about 1/10th the charge cycles out of a battery that is nearly completely discharged vs one that is only discharged to 10%.

    Its better to really think of LI as providing a fixed number of watt hours. You can consume them in small bites, or you can consume them in big chunks but once you consume them they are gone.

    The best rule for laptops is carry the charger and use it when at all possible.

    Oh, and don't buy machines without replaceable batteries. If the "average" user can get 3 years out of it, and you decide your going to use all 8 hours of battery life every day, and charge it at night, you will probably be lucky if it lasts a year.

    Plus, if your laptop gets hot (either by being left somewhere hot, or because of poor cooling) then the battery life is going to nose dive even if your plugged in. If your going to be doing a lot of intense gaming, your probably better taking the battery off and placing it somewhere cool (just don't let it discharge).

    See this link http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries

  36. Re:Laugh by geek · · Score: 1

    Nor do I. You can do whatever you want with your money, including sending it to Apple to purchase their overpriced hardware and buggy software... :)

    My macbook air is cheaper than every other ultrabook on the market. You still haven't pointed out this "buggy" software you keep complaining about.

  37. Thank you by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm a bit exaggerating here but, man... Anyone can measure how long the battery of a laptop lasts, but this guy actually put some effort to patiently capture the values long-term and, making the graphs of the battery decay and his computer use times. Good stuff, interesting report!

  38. A battery of battery information by auric_dude · · Score: 2
  39. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For personal machines sure. But the cost savings is so minuscule, it's insane to use 3rd party ram for business PCs.

  40. Re:Laugh by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Informative

    Though, to be honest, I've rarely ever installed additional RAM in any PC I had - given its cost, it's usually cheaper to buy the max up front than in a few years when memory standards change and it's difficult to buy it cheaply (e.g., DDR or DDR2) - especially the larger modules - they either simply stop existing or are still wildly expensive years later.

    I've never bought a Mac with RAM fixed to the logic board; and with pretty much every Mac I've ever bought, I've bought it with the minimum RAM configuration and then gone third party to top it up either immediately or within 2 years -- usually saving a few hundred dollars. The one thing Apple IS known for is overcharging for RAM. They've always done this, even back in the SIMM days. They argue that it's because they have higher standards, and thus you're only getting the best RAM from them. I've NEVER had a problem with using properly sourced cheaper RAM with a Mac.

  41. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you're unluckier than most everyone else using it then.

    Including the real world testers at places like Ars & the Verge.

  42. Decay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People misunderstand rechargeable batteries. Your laptop isn't psychic. It can't really know the current state of its battery. Instead, it has to use a series of tests, measurements, statistics and guesses to try to know what charge is left, and how best to bring the battery back to full charge. THIS IS AN IMPRECISE SCIENCE. The so-called memory effect is frequently nothing more than your computer device losing track of the actual status of its battery.

    Now people want a battery that is light, lasts for a long time, and charges rapidly. They want a battery that doesn't get too hot in use, and is unlikely to explode or catch fire. Each of these aims tends to contradict another. Take the 'explode' one. Rapid placing of electrical energy into a chemical battery would seem to follow a Bell curve, where an actual percentage (hopefully low) of batteries would be destroyed by the rapid charging process. However, we know that if such an eventuality is higher than one in a million, the company is going to have big PR issues. Even below one in a million, such events hit the world wide press.

    Given that phone and tablet companies are thus clearly between a rock and a hard place, they clearly to a wonderful job hitting a technological compromise. Consumers have to accept that the trade-off is their battery will appear to 'fade'. Some devices may offer a battery 'reset' monitor that attempts to recalibrate the computer that monitors the current battery charge, but usually this mitigates the problem only a little bit.

    A modern device uses a dedicated computer to always integrate (monitor) the total power use from the battery across time. Then, because each battery should have the same essential nature (not quite true is one takes into account ambient temperature of different use environments), the computer can estimate with high accuracy the current charge ability of the battery. After a time (n recharge cycles) the effective battery life will be so low, the device or battery should be replaced. However, if a battery, say, gives 10 hours for two years, and five hours for five years after, the device probably remains useful to many. But more will have been broken or thrown away in the meantime.

    Anyway, again, the battery business is complex and ever evolving. One may, for instance, measure minute changes in voltage for loads that vary, and use this to estimate battery capacity far more accurately. The temperature of the battery causes by the chemical reactions within also gives valuable data. Battery science and battery monitoring inside the best mobile devices is infinitely more sophisticated than most people here ever realise. However, companies have to compete on price as well, even Apple, so sometimes crappy cheaper solutions will replace better ones, because market research suggests the more cheaply made product will sell just as well. If you care, you should always demand a user replaceable battery.

  43. Re:Laugh by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    Apple get the same batteries from the same places everyone else does. They're as fungible as AAs at this point.

    Sure. That same place sells cheap batteries, more expensive batteries, and even more expensive batteries. Guess what batteries Apple buys.

    One reason why Apple's laptop batteries are non-removable is because that allows them to pack the cells more tightly together and fit any empty space in the MacBook, that's how they fit more capacity in tighter space. So the batteries that Apple uses are definitely not the same that you get elsewhere.

  44. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't even read the summary?

  45. Re:Laugh by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I intended that statement to be sarcasm... I was actually poking fun at the same folks who want to bash paid for software, simply because it costs money and they think it should be free.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  46. Re:Laugh by mlts · · Score: 1

    Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Apple get a patent 3-4 years ago on batteries that can be shaped differently from "conventional" ones? This enables Apple to have flatter batteries, but still have the ampere-hours available to keep a device going.

  47. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    insecure and buggy OS

    Citation needed. Compared to the major alternatives, OS X is at least as secure as Windows or Linux. There still are no viruses on OS X, but there are now various forms of malware that users can get infected with if they inadvertently install them and supply the malware with their root password. Once you've handed a malicious program your password, there's nothing any OS can do to save you. OS X, like Linux, has never had self replicating worms that MS Windows has suffered from--though admittedly there hasn't been one in some time on Windows. Most security exploits on all platforms these days are 3rd party software like Java, not necessarily a flaw in the OS itself.

  48. Faulty by design by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Hey, we can't help if if Apple makes their power adapters too small to use on a continuous basis.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Faulty by design by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's not about using them continuously, it's just that a bigger power supply will be less efficient when used at a lower power. Apple has IMHO reasonably chosen the 85W power level for their laptop power supplies. Just think what runs off that power supply, and you'll notice that without having the battery as a big honking capacitor to ride you through the peak use there's no way you can have anywhere near peak use. It's IMHO a valid engineering decision. Think about how many tens of millions of magsafe adapters are out there. They'd need to be around twice the power (~150W) in order to have enough capacity to power the following:
      - monitor with backlight at full brightness
      - USB ports at full power (~8W)
      - firewire/thunderbolt ports at full power (up to 20W!)
      - ethernet,
      - WiFi,
      - fans,
      - quad-core CPU,
      - GPU,
      - hard drive,
      - DVD
      - battery charger (~40W for this alone!)

      Yet in normal use (web browsing), the laptop may be consuming about 40W, give or take. You really wouldn't want to have 150W magsafe bricks running at 25% capacity most of the time - they'd probably be only 65-70% efficient, compared to the same load on an 85W brick where it's 80%+ efficient. World-wide, it amounts to a lott of extra wasted watthours :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  49. Re:Laugh by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Nope these are business PCs. On 30 of them you are talking several thousand dollars.

  50. Keep it plugged in! by azav · · Score: 1

    I learned this with my white MacBook.

    Keep it plugged in.

    You will use it sometimes when it's not plugged in, but for the most part, make sure it's plugged in when you're using it.

    I tested my old white MB and the battery only lasted 1 year with one year of daily a "down to 20%" discharge and then a full charge.

    I've been using my early 2011 MBP 17 with the "keep it charging, stupid" approach and the battery is still good for 2+ hours when unplugged, as long as I make sure to put Safari on standby when it's not in the foreground. Safari is a memory and processor pig to the extreme. Make sure to 1) not use it, or 2) use a script to set it and its child processes to be paused when in the background, or at least disable JavaScript when Safari is in the background.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Keep it plugged in! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If you have the firmware update ... your Mac is cycling your battery down to about 80% once every month or two, to increase battery life. Though 2 hours is ridiculously short. My 2009 MBP does better than that (4-5 hours of web browsing without flash), and my 2012 retina does far better.

      Mavericks (OSX 10.9) puts safari (and more importantly Flash crap) to sleep for you when they aren't foregrounded. Other apps as well, but Safari is most important due to Flash and javascript running when you aren't paying attention. They killed all that crap now :)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  51. facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are multiple factors, that dermine the decay of battery:

    1. temperature, the higher it gets, the more decay you have. at 40C you get noticable decay - 10% per year, when you go to 50C you get exponential decay
    2. higher temp can be caused by multiple factors: overloaded battery, dying cell, or just hot cpu too close to it
    3. keeping battery above 80% of charge or bellow 20% of charge for too long (2 weeks) will cause it to decay, that's why when you order a battery or a laptop it's usualy at around 50%
    4. overdischargning is bad, always bad, but packs have protection against it so the theory about full cycling will cause no harm
    5. if you have battery lying at 50% for long time - 1 year - if you cycle it around 2 times you should get it to the nominal range, which can be very often lower than you can expect
    6. lithium batteries from my experience (RC racing, laptops) is about 2 years. On my buggy they last way less due to abuse they take

  52. Quantum Effect - Observation Degrades Battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop checking your battery so often. It's a well known fact. The more you worry about shit, the worse it gets.

  53. Re:Laugh by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Like the flat batteries Polaroid introduced about 40 years ago?

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  54. Re:Laugh by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Ah, but you do care. Thats why you responded.

    If you actually didn't care, you would have had no need to tell us about it.

    As far as old laptops, well, my time is worth far more than the cost of any MacBook Pro or any other laptop, if your time on the machine isn't valuable, then you can go with something 10 years old.

    Of course, if you use it all day long, you're going to end up spending way more on power consumption in a year than if you'd just bought an over priced MBP ... but hey, don't let common sense keep you from doing stupid shit and wasting your money.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  55. Re:Laugh by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    2.5 hours would be probably normal if you were playing flash video for the entire time.

    If you ACTUALLY had this experience, and reported it to Apple, they would have immediately replaced the battery for you.

    Your post wreaks of someone who hasn't owned an Apple laptop in at least 5 years. I have a 2009 with the original battery that still does a solid 4 hours of web browsing, closer to 5 hours from a full charge. And that machine was my everyday use machine until last year.

    Are you still talking about PowerPC runtimes, or are you just a liar in general?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  56. Re:Laugh by Darkinspiration · · Score: 1

    Still apple has nothing on CISCO. they are still chargin over 200$ for 1 gig DDR. Same shit you can buy on ebay for less then 10.... But theyre DDR is made of unicorn.... ;)

  57. On Apple you don't need to remove the battery!!! by tibit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It shows that you don't know the details of Apple's power delivery architecture. Magsafe-equipped Apple laptops are intentionally crippled in that the charger is artificially disabled if you use an unauthorized one. There's a chip in the magsafe plug that connects to the middle pin and is interrogated by the system management on the mainboard. If the interrogation fails, you can still use the power source, but the charger is disabled.

    All it takes not to charge the battery is to cover the middle magsafe pin. I've done it by keeping in use one charger with a bad magsafe plug where the chip had died. Died how? Ah, exposure to the saliva of a 1 year old, he liked to lick those plugs, they admittedly taste "funny" since they are energized :)

    That way you have the best of both worlds: you don't lose your work if the magsafe plug is kicked loose, and you don't charge the battery if you don't want to. Win-Win.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  58. Re:Laugh by tibit · · Score: 1

    I'll feed the troll a bit. The least reliable part of a removable RAM module is the connector (from the POV of data corruption). Lose the connector and your reliability goes up by almost an order of magnitude. I think for at least a decade removable RAM modules have been just a dumb thing to have in a portable computer. They take up lots of volume and are just a pain to deal with, engineering-wise. Normally it becomes cheap enough to max out your RAM within 1-2 years after purchase, so just deal with it and put the max RAM on the board on day one.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  59. Re:Laugh by tibit · · Score: 1

    I've been running a Linux desktop from well before KDE was out, then hopped onto KDE 1 and kept on it till KDE 4 came out. The things on the horizon were becoming progressively worse in KDE-land midway through the 3.x series. As soon as KDE 4 was out, the horizon was here and not there, and I've reluctantly switched to Windows XP at work, and very soon thereafter to a Mac. I've switched to an iMac at home about the time of KDE 3.5.7. Just the fact that I know how to tinker with things to keep them going doesn't mean I should be an overpaid technician working on my computer all the time, so I can't but agree with you. I'd much rather do other, more interesting things, things that actually bring my employer money. I still use a lot of open source software, just that I didn't have to fuck about with my computer since 2007 or so at home, and IIRC since early 2009 at work.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  60. Re: Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't any citations because apparently nobody has bothered the study the problem - hence the interest in the article. It's all unquantified personal experience up and down here.

  61. Re:Laugh by tibit · · Score: 1

    On an early 2008 17" MBP running XP in VMware Fusion at minimum backlight, I'd routinely get 7-8 hours of use on transpacific flights on a new battery. Of course the DVD, Wifi, Ethernet and USB systems were powered down.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  62. Re:Laugh by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    I can confirm this. I saw NAKED LiON cells (1000mah) for sale... At walmart.

    Walmart. Blister pack packaging.
    No charge logic. Not LiPo. LiON. Naked tube cells

    Needless to say, I was flabbergasted. Naked lion cells are quite dangerous. If they get shorted, they turn into little bombs. Even worse, they were in the clearance aisle. Who knows what state the chemistry was in.

    If I ever see them again, i'll take pictures.

  63. Re:Laugh by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Seek balance young grasshopper.... (And lay off the coffee..)

    Shesh...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  64. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had one of the first G4 iBooks, with an 800MHz CPU. The damn thing would keep running forever. I'm talking about 5+ hours of active usage, on WiFi. The battery died after about four years of heavy duty usage, and I could never find a decently priced replacement here in Brazil. So no, Apple's battery time didn't suck back on PPC. That was the best battery life I've ever had (and the only Apple laptop).

  65. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RAM fixed to the logic board ... make me wonder why anyone pays the premium for Apple

    RAM fixed to the logic board is par for the course for PC UltraBooks, which imitate, but generally can't match, the MacBook Air. Funny how you aren't complaining about them.

  66. commercial life span by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    A commercial life span of a car is 10 years or 200000 kms in Europe. In the USA, that's still 10 years or 125000 miles. Your 10 to 15 year old car is worth nothing and if it were to fall apart, that is considered normal according to commercial standards.

    Now that we have established that, I do agree that if a car that was still made when cars weren't as expendable as they are made currently, it should be reasonably expectable that you won't need major overhaul on most of them after 10 years or 125000 miles, if it has been maintained decently. However, most dealerships only do the minimal required to drag the car to it's 10 year commercial life end and hardly will do proper preventative maintenance. They may charge you for it, but that doesn't mean they will actually do what's required to keep your car in the best condition, regardless of it's commercial value or life span left.

    I maintain my own cars, I have been doing this for the last 10 years and my youngest car is 15 years old. All my cars are close to or way over the 200000 km mark. All of them are made by Alfa Romeo. I work on several other brands as well and I can tell you that given to a certain degree, they all are made expendable. I've done practically everything you can do to repair a car on my own cars and/or other peoples cars. once a car is 10 years old, nobody in the professional motor industry is going to consider it economically relevant any more and most cars are made to not last longer than that. Most gasoline engines will have serious wear to piston rings and valve guides, requiring a rebuild to get the power back and the oil consumption reduced. Wheel bearings will have worn. Suspension bearings/bushings will have worn. With the paint technology they had 10 to 15 years ago, your car will most likely be rusting. They had rust proofing pretty well under control, but then the environmental problems of those processes made them illegal and they had to resort to new "cleaner" processes that didn't work very well. There are plenty of other parts that wear out as well. Fans in the car ventilation, door locks and latches, even the car body itself will start showing more flex and metal fatigue. Plastics and such that are responsible for crash absorption will lose strength, seat belt tensioners, the list goes on. It takes a lot of maintenance to keep a car in a "young" condition, especially once you reach the moment that the designed life span for most parts is reached. Making them last longer costs more in production and will result in your vehicle being more expensive than the competition, without a lot of direct benefits that the potential buyer will be aware of. Most car companies choose to produce cheaper and just let the car fall apart after a little over 10 years or 125000 miles as a result.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  67. Re:On Apple you don't need to remove the battery!! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    It's not the charging that is the issue, it's heat from the laptop. If you removed the battery and just stuck it in an oven at say 40C it would degrade. Batteries are chemical devices, they react to temperature.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  68. You mean the built in UPS? by pipedwho · · Score: 1

    My Macbook Pro permanently sits on my desk at work. I always thought the battery was just for the built in UPS that cuts in whenever the power goes out.

    Only last week I sat there peacefully working when I heard desperate screams of 'failing to save' reverberating over my partition wall. At first I assumed they'd experienced a bad throw on their d20. But, out of curiosity I prairie dogged up to see what was going on, and saw that some of my co-workers had succumbed to the dreaded power outage. They mostly just stared blankly at their partition walls murmuring incoherently, but at least one grown man was reduced to tears. It brought back memories of the crash fest that was Windows 95/98.

  69. Apple's Batteries... Good & Bad by longbot · · Score: 1

    I've owned various Apple portables (as well as PCs) since the Powerbook 170. Until I owned a G4 iBook, Apple's battery longevity was nothing different than the PC counterparts. I bought a used G4 powerbook when that model was 1.5-2 years old. When I got it, the battery was good for about 6 hours of solid average use. I had it for five years (only replacing it with this Macbook I have now last year) and in all that time, the battery only ever lost about 30% of it's capacity. I still saw a solid 4 hours of use out of it per charge. It was by far the longest I've ever had a laptop battery last (even keeping the comparison to Li-Ions). Comparatively, this Macbook never got great life (maybe 3hrs tops) but in over a year, I've yet to notice it losing any capacity. And in the past, a year is about all the time it ever took for previous laptops' batteries to hold zero charge at all. I had a Sony Vaio that killed it's battery every nine months, and before I bought the iBook, I was just used to a $50 replacement cost annually or so.

    From this article (as well as what I've heard from others) at some point between this Macbook and the current models, the batteries or charging method Apple's used have significantly shortened the usable lifespans. Which will probably prove annoying when it eventually comes time to replace this machine in another 3-5 years.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  70. Re:Laugh by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    What. The. Eff.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  71. Re:Laugh by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Lifespan is almost completely determined by battery chemistry*. The chemistry is largely fungible and is in the hands of a few major manufacturers. I could imagine in principle that Apple's battery designs might be less safe, but they'd have to go out and find a specialist if they wanted to make batteries that are chemically worse than their competitors.

    *It's possible to produce a short-lifespan battery through poor assembly, but those tend to be the sort of lifespans that end with a loud pop and a jet of flame.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  72. Change VS swap by phorm · · Score: 1

    This is one of the reasons I've avoided iDevices (or others with hardwired batteries).
    Yes, with some work you can change the battery, but being able to drop in a fresh battery on-the-fly is a very useful thing - especially if you travel - and any product which requires disassembly to do so is crippled IMHO.

  73. get out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much?

  74. Re:Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People do that because it tastes good. There was an episode of Pawn Stars where chumlee gives the old man some civet coffee without telling him what it is and how much it cost. He loved it, said it was the best damn coffee he has ever tasted, and to go get some more of it. That was even after he found out where it came from and how much it costs. He is normally a cheap person. He just really likes coffee. Until you have developed a connoisseur appreciation for coffee, and tried those coffee beans, you can't really judge people for drinking them.

  75. WTF? by Optali · · Score: 1

    Fucking hell mate!
    There's people with a lot of free time or no live at all!

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  76. Lithium-Ion batteries shoukd NEVER be drained. by Lenny369 · · Score: 1

    This is not a computer question. This is a battery question. Lithium-Ion batteries should NEVER be completely discharged. I don't care if your battery meter doesn't know how to measure it, that's the computer's problem. NEVER let your laptop battery die and it will last a hell of a lot longer.