Slashdot Mirror


Google Glass Integration For Cars Is Coming: Neat Idea Or Crazy Town?

cartechboy writes "Americans have enough trouble keeping from texting their way to dangerous — or worse — situations in cars. But now car makers, looking to differentiate with tech integrations and after jamming iPhone everywhere, are working hard at integrating Google Glass into vehicles. Consider this quote: 'Within seconds, I've got step-by-step directions to a coffee shop down the street beamed directly to my eyeballs.' Aside from being a little Jetsons, sounds potentially problematic. (Note, Mercedes had been doing R&D since July.) It goes without saying that someone is working on an integration of their own with a Tesla Model S. There is a coolness factor, there may be some utility — but not sure this is a great idea."

68 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. great idea1.0 by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    yeah right

    1. Re:great idea1.0 by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      They are gung-ho about this super idea.

      Until the lawsuits start rolling in.

      I mean, people already have trouble driving when the sun is somewhere in front of them....

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  2. Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Car, I'm bored, take me to somewhere interesting. I'll take a nap while you drive.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by istartedi · · Score: 1

      You wake up in the garage at 2 AM.

      "Car, was it interesting?"

      (in Siri-like voice) "Yes. It. Was. Interesting".

      "Car, why does it smell like 10W 40 in here?"

      "I do not know. What. You are talking. About".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Nor do I.

      What is interesting to a car is probably not interesting to a human.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I still don't have any idea what a "10W 40" is.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by slash.jit · · Score: 1

      Car.. switch off the lights and take us for a long drive.. i'm going to have sex with my GF.

    5. Re:Couple it with Google Self-Driving Car by fivethreeo · · Score: 1

      10W-40 mineral oil. Cars like having their oil changed aswell.

  3. AD's by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what is the top and bottom quarter of my windshield now going to have banner AD's beaming me garbage I either A) already bought, or B) have zero interest, in as I drive down the road?

    I can see the potential of such a heads up system, but I also know how Google makes its money, its not by charity.

    1. Re:AD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what is the top and bottom quarter of my windshield now going to have banner AD's beaming me garbage I either A) already bought, or B) have zero interest, in as I drive down the road?

      I can see the potential of such a heads up system, but I also know how Google makes its money, its not by charity.

      Rooting and Adblock are your friend. Or, just roll your own based on the source they release.

      Either way, it's a huge distraction while driving. I wouldn't recommend it.

    2. Re:AD's by C18H27NO3+ · · Score: 1

      Instead of the ads being intrusive they'll probably just project them as a 3D hologram on the roof of your car so everyone can see them.

    3. Re:AD's by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Punch the Monkey! Punch the Monkey! O'kay, I'll run that god damn monkey over.

      Why did you run the Mayor over?

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    4. Re:AD's by fast+turtle · · Score: 2

      What's this "Wife" you speak of? Is it related to a gerbil?

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    5. Re:AD's by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google has said it's not going to allow advertising on Glass. I think the business model for Glass is just profit on hardware sales. I don't actually know the plan, that's just a guess.

      Oh, and regarding the other likely assumption of evil that I know someone is going to post: Google is also not going to be streaming everything your Glass sees to their servers. Privacy issues aside, it'd destroy the battery life and blow through your mobile data plan in no time.

      (Disclaimer: I work for Google but have no inside knowledge of Glass.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:AD's by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      that would be stupid at best, and google as a company has not done many stupid things. having people get in wrecks reading ads while driving is a litigious affair at best.

    7. Re:AD's by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      Google has said it's not going to allow advertising on Glass.

      They also said 'no porn'.
      That won't work either. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/google-glass-porn_n_3644321.html

    8. Re:AD's by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      there is no such thing as profit on hardware sales

    9. Re: AD's by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Of course, google never introduces a product with no ads and then adds ads later. Nope. Maps.

    10. Re:AD's by swillden · · Score: 1

      there is no such thing as profit on hardware sales

      Apple disagrees.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:AD's by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      only for the last 7-10 years of their 36 year lifespan

    12. Re:AD's by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      It's another possible distraction when driving.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:AD's by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Hardware sales and getting more people to use their services. If you use Google services like Maps on Glass you will probably also use them on your phone and computer where there are ads.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:AD's by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They obviously meant no pornographic apps, not "you can't make porn with it". Anything with a camera can be used to make porn.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:AD's by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Tell that to manufacturers of TVs, fridges, washing machines, computer mice, keyboards, cars, desk lamps and inflatable sheep.

  4. google glass hack-vision by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    oooh....pretty colors....State Farm is There.

  5. Why now? by s.petry · · Score: 2

    I'm really stumped on this one. New cars are coming out with all kinds of distractions, like web browsing and now this. If we all had cars that drove themselves I would not mind. I can't see how this will result in anything different than people texting and driving. A few will use it as suggested (step by step GPS), but a few will crash into innocent people while updating Facebook or browsing the web.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Why now? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Oh, officer, we haven't seen him for days and we're so worried about him. We don't know were he could be."

      "OK, please try to calm down and think. Did you have a fight or was he upset about anything?"

      "No. Well ... the last thing I remember, the neighbor boy, Dennis Mitchell and his dog Ruff, came over. Dennis was asking George why he was so old and such little boy questions. George stated he wanted to go to the store to pick up some more pipe tobacco. The last thing I remember, as he was getting into the car George said to Dennis 'Get lost!'"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Why now? by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      the first problem is that the law is not clear.

      i can't hold the phone to my ear, but i can talk hands free ... because driving with one hand is impossible? why isn't one-handed driving in general illegal?

      i can use my stand alone GPS system, but not my phone that's running a navigation?

      why can i mess with an overly complicated in-dash entertainment system, but not my phone? if i mount my phone, is it now legal to interact w/ it while driving?

    3. Re:Why now? by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      nothing has changed, stupid drivers will continue to be stupid, responsible drivers aren't suddenly going to start browsing or updating facebook while driving.

    4. Re:Why now? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      That was funny! Thanks for making my Friday!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:Why now? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      " New cars are coming out with all kinds of distractions, like web browsing"

      I sincerely hope that this isn't available whilst the car is running, otherwise if it could be proven that someone was using it whilst driving and causing accidental death, then the car manufacturer should jointly be charged with vehicular manslaughter.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  6. Feature by puddingebola · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now you can launch yourself through the windshield directly into the virtual world of Google Glass. My first adware app for Google Glass will simulate a Mac truck approaching your car, right on your windshield. The driver's instinct will be to swerve off the road, right into the gas stations that pay me for this amazing new form of advertising.

    1. Re:Feature by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      My first adware app for Google Glass will simulate a Mac truck approaching your car[...]

      Why not a Window truck? Wouldn't they be easier to find?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  7. Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    YES! Spend hundreds of thousands of dollars creating all these car integration apps, then watch as cities all over the country ban google glass use while driving because its too distracting.

  8. Not sure it's the best way to go by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Although car integration for Glass makes a lot more practical sense for me than other uses, I think there are a lot of other options that give you better and richer feedback. In car screens would have more detail than Glass, HUD displays projected on your lower windshield would be better yet as they could provide a ton of useful info.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not sure it's the best way to go by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Infrared cameras at night and in fog, anyone?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Not sure it's the best way to go by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Infrared cameras at night and in fog, anyone?

      This may also be a video recording of policy enforcers who do not like to be recorded.
      "You have the right to remain silent"
      "You have the right to stop recording your iCar, in the event you do not, your car will be impounded while a search warrent is processed"

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    3. Re:Not sure it's the best way to go by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      I could go with a commercially available HUD in a car, on one condition -- any manufacturer who knowingly includes advertisements in a vehicle HUD will have their CEO summarily executed.

      We'd probably lose a few before word got around.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. Even then glass not great by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Infrared cameras at night and in fog, anyone?

    I would LOVE to see that.

    But, as a projection overlaid on my windshield, or at least a pretty large projection on the bottom of the windshield. Or even in the large screen embedded in my dashboard that highlights heat sources.

    Having a small floating screen that kind of messes with your peripheral vision is NOT the best way to deliver IR video feeds from the front of your car.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Even then glass not great by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      I thought I already saw that in a car commercial about a decade ago, and it was a real option. What is everybody getting all worked up over a head-up display (HUD) for anyway? They have been in use in military aircraft for decades.

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:Even then glass not great by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      Rain-X Anti-Fog works wonders to prevent that.

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    3. Re:Even then glass not great by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you flew a military aircraft down a crowded street? Not too many pedestrians, cyclists, dogs, parked vehicles up there in the skies.

    4. Re:Even then glass not great by Cederic · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you tried to dogfight in your Chevy? Not too many enemy aircraft, AA guns and threats coming in vertically on the street.

      HUDs help you avoid looking down. It's in the name: "Head Up"

      Maybe you're safer looking at the speedometer or the satnav or the gear stick instead of looking at the road?

  10. Glass while driving is extremely dangerous by cmay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a terrible idea. Trying to read Glass while driving is VERY difficult, and you get the false sense of security that you are still "looking" at the road, when really you are not at all focused on anything in front of you. I tried it for a bit and was amazed how hard it was and how dangerous it felt. I would never use it like that. I think I'd be safer taking quick glances down at my phone with the maps app than trying to use Glass.

    1. Re:Glass while driving is extremely dangerous by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Depends on how it is done. A simple icon for the next turn and a colour coded distance readout would not be that distracting. Maybe the icon could get bigger as the distance got smaller. There is a big difference between trying to read words and dealing with icons.

    2. Re:Glass while driving is extremely dangerous by westlake · · Score: 1

      A simple icon for the next turn and a colour coded distance readout would not be that distracting

      That could be done simply and cheaply by projecting the data on the windshield.

    3. Re:Glass while driving is extremely dangerous by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Try a car with a good heads up display. They can show current speed, map directions, and/or music selection on the windscreen, at a focal length almost the same as the road. Much quicker to look at the HUD than the speedometer, and it's not obtrusive enough that you're always paying attention to it.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  11. Reduces visibility by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    After some thought I think Glass is a really bad idea for driving. Having the screen floating in your vision reduces what you can see in the same way a really badly place side pillar in the car can... I guess we can call it the G-Pillar.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Now I can get rid of my steering wheel worksurface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Finally!

    I was wondering when I could get my old steering wheel laptop attachment.

    Google Glass will allow me to pay even more attention to my e-mails on my way to work!

  13. Reminds me of HP's Cooltown Car by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember this? http://youtu.be/U2AkkuIVV-I

  14. brakes.sys has cases a system error by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    brakes.sys has cases a system error please hold down start to restart your car.

    1. Re:brakes.sys has cases a system error by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Indeed - and now imagine that conversation while doing 75mph towards a junction :)

  15. HUD First Please by matthew_t_west · · Score: 1

    I think a true heads-up display on a windshield would be much more useful than Glass. Plus it could be ensured on a true HUD, you are only seeing what you want to see (i.e. - car stats, speed, highlighted roadway/signs, etc.). I've been thinking of making one myself since there doesn't seem to be a good DIY version out on the webs. Please correct me if I'm wrong!

    --
    Browse at 1. You'll thank me later.
  16. Plain Ass Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good grief. What a stupid idea.

  17. Bears by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

    I keep hoping for an augmented reality navigation system. Not only would it make sure I don't have to listen to some automated voice that can't pronounce street names, but it'd make sure my son stops complaining about how he can't see any bears to our left or right, no matter what the navigation system says.

    Now that I think of it, instead of an arrow, the system could display a very realistic grizzly bear in whichever lane I am supposed to use to get to the highway's exit.

  18. Brilliant by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

    It will go well with my HD TV windshield and the Beats by Dre headphones I wear whenever I drive.

  19. Why is it a bad idea? by swillden · · Score: 1

    Turn-by-turn directions that appear to be floating in the air 8 feet in front of you, a little up and to the right so they're out of your central field of vision, seem like a safer option than putting the same directions on a screen in the center of the console and much safer than on a little handheld screen.

    Short of an actual HUD, Glass seems like the ideal way to display driving-related information. In theory, at least. I've read that the current generation isn't quite bright enough, so directions are hard to see. That may be fixed in the public release model, dunno.

    Of course, people can (and some will) use Glass for other, distracting, purposes while driving. But that's hardly the fault of the technology.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:Why is it a bad idea? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      "I've read that the current generation isn't quite bright enough"

      the current generation apparently cant make it 2 blocks without a babysitter giving them step by step directions

  20. Glassholes by billrp · · Score: 1

    (yes I saw it somewhere else)

  21. Except that... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    Except that if someone is going to be a crappy driver, they're going to do it with or without technology. Technology is simply the boogeyman that the media uses rather than simply admitting that there are some poor drivers on the road. A crying child in the backseat is infinitely more distracting than a radio/cell phone/Google Glass

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Except that... by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I don't agree that it's a boogeyman. I'd agree that there are many distractions to deal with driving, all of which should be manageable. Some things are simply not manageable and should not be put where the driver can be distracted. To me, it's kind of like when the larger vehicles came out with TVs in the back seat. The noise may be distracting to the driver, but the visual distraction was out of the way. The HUD features would be more like putting the TV in view of the driver.

      Distracting visuals are very different from audible distractions when it comes to a task that requires hand to eye coordination.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re: Except that... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Except that crappy drivers are even crappier when they have phones or kids. Crappy drivers make crappy choices. The problem with glass is that it's an exceptionally crappy choice when you're driving because it's in your vision and you can't really do anything to get rid of the distraction in an emergency. Kind of like a kid, except most people are smart enough not to drive with their kids between themselves and the windshield.

    3. Re:Except that... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Distracting visuals are very different from audible distractions when it comes to a task that requires hand to eye coordination.

      Yet we put distracting visuals in the streets, in the form of electronic, animated advertising displays. Mostly at crowded places where you need your concentration most.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Except that... by s.petry · · Score: 1

      A billboard is not exactly in the drivers face, which differs from HUD and TV displays.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  22. Projector Screen by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What if the windshield fogs over at a critical moment during your trip???

    Well being a white surface on which the projection would be even more visible I'd be pretty damn happy I had an IR view of the road ahead instead of nothing at all!!

    I would of course run the defroster rather than rely on the video for long...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. One thing... by libtek · · Score: 1

    Even wearing headphones is prohibited in IL (and I expect many other states).

    How would this Glass distraction, in front of your eye at all times, help you be a better driver? As far as I'm concerned this is even worse that texting on the road. It would be a great solution if we were concerned that taking our eyes off the road is the problem. Changing focus and distraction seems to be the issue, and I'm not sure how being bombarded with the location-aware reality overlay that is Google Glass will contribute to a decline in automotive accidents.

    --
    Unequivocally the realest of the realz...
  24. Re:Hit me while you're distracted and I will OWN y by Cederic · · Score: 1

    They'll be covered by their car insurance.

    Anyway, what makes you think your attorney is any better than theirs? And why would you think a prospective distracted idiot will know about your attorney before they hit you, especially when you're posting anonymously?

    Plus, if I were planning to hit you, and did know you had an attorney (the only situation in which your ridiculous threat has any relevance) you're merely making me realise that injuring you would be foolish, and I'd better make sure I finish the job properly.

    I'm not sure you've thought this through.

  25. This is brilliant by ruir · · Score: 1

    I have dreaming about having a display in my car for decades now. It is wonderful to see some of this technologies come to life.