Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Kiosks Coming To 5 Canadian Cities

dreamstateseven writes "Canadian Bitcoin enthusiasts will be able to exchange Canadian cash for the digital currency through a kiosk that's similar to an ATM. Bitcoiniacs says it has ordered five Bitcoin kiosks from a Las Vegas-based company called RoboCoin and intends to roll them out across Canada in the coming months, with the first machine expected to land in Vancouver in early October. The kiosks allow users to select how much money they would like to spend, insert cash into the machine and then scan a QR code on their phone to transfer the Bitcoins to their wallet."

121 comments

  1. BitCoins to cash by Arkiel · · Score: 2

    Wake me up when this happens.

    1. Re:BitCoins to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, these kiosks still make the user have to trade the Canadians fluties* for real money.

      *Or whatever their currency is called.

    2. Re:BitCoins to cash by nonnald8336 · · Score: 1

      *Or whatever their currency is called.

      Their currency is called Dollar, it's okay though, that was a tough one

    3. Re:BitCoins to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flutie sounds more fitting.

    4. Re:BitCoins to cash by Another,+completely · · Score: 4, Funny

      *Or whatever their currency is called.

      Close. You were thinking of the fleury. Following the paper dollar notes being dropped from circulation in 1987, the public backlash led to derisive nick-names like "loony" for the new coins. This was resolved by renaming the currency by a popular vote on 26 May, 1989. Under the new system, 100 fleurys = 1 gretzky.

    5. Re: BitCoins to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian I heartily approve this message :).

      (You neglected to mention that 2 gretzkys = approximately one (double-double) timmie.)

    6. Re:BitCoins to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was thinking of the "loonie," which is slang for a Canadian dollar.

    7. Re:BitCoins to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be 99 to 1? :P

  2. How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This should be blocked by the government until Bitcoin is considered a legitimate currency, and therefore held to the same standards and regulations as an actual bank.

    These guys should be charged with fraud for this crap. These are not "ATM" machines. What they give out is not an officially recognized currency. What they give out is not even a stable currency (I've seen Bitcoin halve, then double, then halve in value over the span of a few days), and there is NO INSURANCE through the government if the entire thing goes belly up (don't tell me that it won't- that's not the point, I'm insured through the Canadian Government who will cover a small amount of money if something happens to my bank).

    The more I think about it, the more I think this is some seriously shady crap. You're basically trying to trick the public into buying into your currency and making them believe it's actually valuable for day-to-day use (it's not for 99% of the consumers). I mean, these machines sure as shit aren't going to have warning labels on the side that say "Hey, the market you're buying into could halve overnight, making your money worth half as much!". How many people actually using these machines are really going to know what they're getting into?

    1. Re:How about no? by iamnobody2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      these aren't going to be mistaken for ATMs, they take CASH. anyone who puts cash into a machine without knowing what they're doing deserves any risk they involved.

      --
      nobody's perfect
    2. Re:How about no? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not fraud at all. They are not making any false promises. They say they will give you bitcoin in exchange for cash, and that is exactly what they do (less a modest commission I'm sure). It's not their fault if you haven't researched Bitcoin at all and get taken out by one of the swings in value.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:How about no? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Ho do you fractionalize a Bitcoin?

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    4. Re:How about no? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Forgot the w. So here it is.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    5. Re:How about no? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Here you go. You should google it while you're still allowed to google stuff.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:How about no? by pla · · Score: 4, Funny

      This should be blocked by the government until Bitcoin is considered a legitimate currency, and therefore held to the same standards and regulations as an actual bank.

      These guys should be charged with fraud for this crap. These are not "ATM" machines. What they give out is not an officially recognized currency. What they give out is not even a stable currency (I've seen Bitcoin halve, then double, then halve in value over the span of a few days), and there is NO INSURANCE through the government if the entire thing goes belly up (don't tell me that it won't- that's not the point, I'm insured through the Canadian Government who will cover a small amount of money if something happens to my bank).

      The more I think about it, the more I think this is some seriously shady crap. You're basically trying to trick the public into buying into your currency and making them believe it's actually valuable for day-to-day use (it's not for 99% of the consumers). I mean, these machines sure as shit aren't going to have warning labels on the side that say "Hey, the market you're buying into could halve overnight, making your money worth half as much!". How many people actually using these machines are really going to know what they're getting into?

      This should be blocked by the government until Bitcoin is considered a legitimate currency, and therefore held to the same standards and regulations as an actual bank.

      You have mixed levels here. The "dollar" (Canadian or otherwise) does not count as a bank, and has no standards and regulations imposed directly on the currency itself.

      Now, if you want to demand that money-handlers/lenders/changers/etc dealing in BTC live up to similar regulations to those dealing in "real" money, hey, I would agree with you in spirit - Aside from the fact that those dealing in BTC will have a great deal of difficulty complying with AML regulations by design.

      But you should at least strive to make a coherent argument, rather than something as absurd as "all cows must get SafeServ certified".

    7. Re:How about no? by pla · · Score: 1

      WTF? On my last preview, I didn't have that entire block quote at the top. New "feature" for those of us who would prefer to manually quote what we want to respond to, or just a glitch?

      Weird.

    8. Re:How about no? by moteyalpha · · Score: 2

      It is an effective model that others have followed sucessfuly. Insert yourself between the consumer and producer ( retail ) and take a share, then you have money for nothing. Is Master Card a currency? It is possible to establish a currency without state support, but that is how they make sure they get their cut. Whether it is fair or not to allow a state to siphon off value by printing money or not, it still remains that they will criminalize any behavior that would reduce that control. PayPal is another example, as well as others who have taken on the task of siphoning off a share of every transaction. I would guess they are stuffing money in the pockets of lobbysist like crazy, while bitcoin is not. It isn''t a dominant strategy, it is very much like an overly complicated barter scheme and companies pay too much to maintain their position at the public trough to allow any freeloaders on their freeloading .

    9. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably pressed the "quote parent" button by mistake. It's next to the preview button. Happens to me all the time, but I usually catch it in preview.

    10. Re:How about no? by QBasicer · · Score: 1

      And we (the bitcoin users) LIKE it that way! No meddling gov't to ruin the fun!

      Granted, I play with bitcoin as a hobby. If my wallet was compromised tomorrow, it wouldn't be all THAT terrible. There's not much there.

      --
      x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
  3. Lacking faith in the currency? by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting that they're willing to sell bitcoins...but not buy them. Sounds to me like they think that bitcoins will lose their value in due course. One could argue that they're only worried about the security implications of an ATM that gives cash in exchange for a digital currency, but if that were the case, then they'd have at least as much to worry about with just handing out bitcoins anyways (which aren't free).

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by edmanet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have to buy bitcoins in order to sell them, right? While I don't see the need for a bitcoin ATM, I do believe bitcoin is useful to the internet economy as a good method for micro payments. If Paypal or Google created this crypto coin idea, people would probably be more accepting and the conversion rate to fiat currency would stabilize. That's my .0002btc

    2. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that they're willing to sell bitcoins...but not buy them.

      Know how I can tell you didn't read the article?

    3. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by cOle2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read the article linked, you will know that these machines will both sell and BUY bitcoins.

    4. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin up or down, there is always money to be made in the transaction fee. What...you thought you were going to get free or going/instant market rate bit coins?!?!

    5. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant they just "make" them and see those?
      "Micropayment" - overused term from the 90's? Isn't anything a payment regardless of how much it is for?

      Why would "bitcoins" not suffer from some of the issues visa/paypal had when they looked at their "micropayment" business (more trouble then its worth)?

    6. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me more like they're interested in tapping into the "Silk Road" market, seeing as they take cash.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    7. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that they're willing to sell bitcoins...but not buy them.

      A grocery store is willing to sell you a bottle of milk. But if you take a bottle of milk into a grocery store, they won't buy it.

    8. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      BitCoins are already fiat currency. In some ways they are more fiat than any other currency on earth.

    9. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is unusable for micropayments (as if anyone cares about those.) The reasons are simple. First, each BTC is very expensive (tens of US Dollars each.) Second, the fee for payment is pretty expensive. Mathematically it is small, 0.5 mBTC, but it is enormous when you want to send 1 mBTC (0.126 USD as of today.) In theory, small transactions (both in bytes and in BTC) shouldn't have the fee, but... the fee is charged anyhow.

      One can rebuild the client without the fee, but then your transaction will take forever to be included into the block. Which means that it's still useless - you paid yer money but you've got nothing in return, until "the check clears."

    10. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Milk is not money. Money is supposed to be universally exchangeable. That's the whole purpose.

    11. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      And because they take cash anonymously, they will probably run into government harassment in the name of money laundering. I noticed bitinstant stopped taking money anonymously citing government pressure.

    12. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Hmmmnmnmnm · · Score: 2

      The word fiat means "by decree". A fiat currency is one that is decreed to have value by a government. Bitcoins derive their value by market consensus. They are the opposite of a fiat currency.

    13. Re: Lacking faith in the currency? by BrianGöss · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is well suited to micropayments. Mike Hearn has a micropayment scheme in his Bitcoinj implementation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=244656.0 It's a rather elegant example of true innovation in this heavily researched topic (note that the NSF and DARPA funded research on digital currency in part to try and solve the massively high volume, low value transactions they anticipated the internet would require...for things like paying a very small amount for a very small but of content). Digital currency (pegged to the US dollar) used to be purchasable in the mid 1990's at a US bank. It flopped mostly because it came before anyone really did much payment via the Internet. The best private industry has come up with is the equivalent of handing over your private encryption keys (cc #) and putting a middle man in to skin off the top and attempt to control the fraud that results from this crazy design. If you want to truly learn something about the open source project called Bitcoin, take a look at btcedproject.org and the udemy course (you'll need an account...or you can login via Facebook like I just did here to post): https://www.udemy.com/bitcoin-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-crypto/

    14. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      A fiat currency is one that is decreed to have value by a government.

      define:government
      - the governing body of a nation, state, or community.
      - the group of people in office at a particular time; administration.

      Bitcoins derive their value by market consensus.

      define:market consensus
      - Market populism is a term coined by Thomas Frank for the concept that the free market is more democratic than any democracy. Frank himself does not believe this premise and sets forth arguments against it in his book One Market Under God.

      Why fools are so quick to disassociate themselves from their fellow citizens that for the moment happen to be governmental agents I'll never understand.
      "Government fiat" and "market consensus" mean the same thing, "WE THE PEOPLE have determined the currency to be valid."
      Enough with the double speak and pretending.

    15. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that they're willing to sell bitcoins...but not buy them.

      Know how I can tell you didn't read the article?

      (emulating snarky tone)

      Know how I can tell you don't know investing or economics?

      I think you're forgetting the concepts of short and long investing, or thinking they are somehow the same. People who think a certain instrument...be it houses, a precious metal, or tulips...will take short positions on it, buying some based on short-term fluctuations and then selling. They will buy *very* little, and only in ways that they control...which would not be the case if they took cash at these machines. If they do that, then all of a sudden, they can become an outlet for dumping that would occur in the event of a crash in the value of bitcoins. This is something you don't allow, if you're convinced that a crash will come. But in the short term, there *is* money to be made, as long as you're willing to limit your position (and risk). And the irony of this way of doing business is that unless you grow (and thus invalidate your own safeguards), you actually become more liquid as you go, thus further improving your safety.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    16. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      First, each BTC is very expensive (tens of US Dollars each.)

      How is that relevant? You can use less than a whole BTC, as you seem to acknowledge in your post. You can just call 1 BTC as 1000 mBTC if you want. Complaining that 1000 mBTC is expensive is like criticizing the US Dollar because hundred dollar bills are expensive.

    17. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      How is this Score:4? Has no one read the article?

      The kiosks allow users to select how much money they would like to spend, insert cash into the machine and then scan a QR code on their phone to transfer the Bitcoins to their wallet. It also allows users to redeem their Bitcoins for cash.

    18. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by tftp · · Score: 1

      It is relevant for micropayments. They are small - from 1 cent to 10 cents, as theorized (they don't exist.) Since each BTC is large (1000 mBTC == USD$ 126) the micropayment in BTC will be between 0.1 and 1 mBTC.

      Now that we established that, the transaction fee is 0.5 mBTC. It is not a percentage of the payment, it's a fixed fee. How much would you like to use a payment system that takes from 50% to 80% of your payment just for the privilege of using it? Most of your money will be spent on BTC network services. This is why BTC, as it is defined today, is not good for small payments. BTC is optimized for large payments that are rare. Billions of small payments will just flood the network, and it will slow down. The decentralized nature of BTC results in huge amount of network traffic, computations, and wasted energy.

    19. Re: Lacking faith in the currency? by tftp · · Score: 1

      you can login via Facebook like I just did here to post

      I'm afraid you have to surrender your geek card immediately :-)

    20. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you take time off of beating your wife to post here today?

    21. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the transaction fee is 0.5 mBTC

      What transaction fee?

      https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees
      "Transaction fees may be included with any transfer of bitcoins from one address to another. ...
      Transaction fees are voluntary on the part of the person making the bitcoin transaction, as the person attempting to make a transaction can include any fee or none at all in the transaction"

    22. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by tftp · · Score: 2

      What transaction fee?

      THAT transaction fee. The one that is in practice necessary for anyone to pay attention to your transaction. Is there anyone in the world that owes you six confirmations of your transaction within ten minutes? Click on the link that I provided. You don't have to add a fee; and the miners don't have to service your request. It's not like they are a bank, with you as a customer. There is no contract. The rose-colored glasses are off; BTC is no longer a network of friends, and the miners are not doing it for fun - they are doing it for profit; why wouldn't they click a checkbox that says "increase my income?"

    23. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by lxs · · Score: 0

      No no no no no. The term "fiat currency" means:

      I am the very model of a Slashdot libertarian
      I post on things I know not of and act quite the contrarian
      I read Any Rand I own bitcoins a human very rare I am
      For I am the very model of a Slashdot libertarian

      Ron Paul is quite by far my favorite octogenarian
      Even though his politics are mostly antiquarian
      He lets me smoke my pot in peace that really is quite cool of him
      Therefore I am the very model of a Slashdot libertarian.

    24. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even close.
      With Bitcoin I may choose to use it while my countries currency is forced on me.

    25. Re: Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he never had one. He has a FB Profile instead.

    26. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And because they take cash anonymously, they will probably run into government harassment in the name of money laundering. I noticed bitinstant stopped taking money anonymously citing government pressure.

      I pretty much assumed the whole point of the machine is money laundering.

    27. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by jimburton618 · · Score: 1

      The fee now for a typical transaction is 0.1 mBTC, currently 1.3 US cent. (This is for up to a 1 KB transaction)

    28. Re:Lacking faith in the currency? by ponraul · · Score: 1

      Nah. Just that people want an anonymous way to buy them for drug deals without having to be turbo nerds.

  4. Then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Insert cash
    2. Scan QR code with phone to add BT to wallet
    3. ???
    4. ???

  5. Much like Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gold, that wonderful investment that will save the world.

    What, say that again? You will take my soon to be worthless cash for GOLD! You must be crazy. You yourself told me cash would soon be worthless and GOLD will save the planet from poverty.

    1. Re:Much like Gold by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gold is a safe haven not an investment.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Much like Gold by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Gold is a safe haven not an investment.

      Those like myself that invested in significant amounts of gold ( > 50,000 US ) disagree.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Much like Gold by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I bought loads of it when it was around $400 an ounce to protect part of my capital. I don't see that as an investment. I also have no plans on selling it. And I sleep very well at night, even with the economy lagging the way it is.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Much like Gold by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Yup, when people are scared of their other options, they pile into gold, then gold goes up, and a profit is to be had for the first group to predict a scare.

      My question is, and this is an open question that I'm not sure if there is an answer to or not is: Is there still a lot of gold in Fort Knox compared to when we were on the gold standard. My guess would be that the nation used that gold for covert ops when we went fiat. Once the money was found solvent, suddenly that was like having a Fort Knox worth of free money! And knowing modern day politicians and the people sponsoring modern day politicians, they all want a bunch of money if they can get to it.

      Does anyone know if there is gold in Fort Knox still? Or is this one of those questions that isn't supposed to be asked or answered? If so, I apologize for asking it, but I'd be enlightened to know anything about this situation.

    5. Re:Much like Gold by egamma · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know if there is gold in Fort Knox still? Or is this one of those questions that isn't supposed to be asked or answered? If so, I apologize for asking it, but I'd be enlightened to know anything about this situation.

      147.3 million troy ounces

      And, if you don't believe the government, the Mint is audited by KPMG

    6. Re:Much like Gold by Kosmatos · · Score: 2

      Help me understand. You bought gold, to protect your capital. But do you have the actual gold? Or do you just have a receipt that you own a certain amount, trusting that this document will be recognized?

      Even if you do have the actual gold, I'm skeptical about how much you can actually use it in times of need.

      --
      I'm your huckleberry
    7. Re:Much like Gold by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Thanks bud for the information. The more you know. I didn't want to google it and run across dozens of conspiracy sites.

      Having a fort full of gold is good in dire emergency. It sounds to be about 200 billion dollars.

    8. Re:Much like Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get out while you can, gold is going to crash under $500 by 2020.

      Gold for jewelry has fallen out of fashion in favor of titanium, carbide, and other durable and flashy metals. Other than jewelry gold has very limited uses, almost exclusively in obscure sensitive electronics. The recent prices of gold have driven most users to find alternatives which, unlike jewelry trends, permanently decreases industrial demand. Highly conductive nanoparticles are a good example of developing technologies that will replace gold usage. Lower demand directly translates to lower price.

      The longer gold stays high the more this generation and the generation to come will seek out alternatives. by 2020 most people and businesses will simply have no need for gold and the price will completely collapse. The devil's metal:Silver does this with frightening regularity and should be seen as a road map for how gold will perform. today at $1,390 the price has already collapsed from the all-time high near $1,924 an ounce reached on September 6, 2011 and the trend shows no signs of slowing down. Down $500 in 2 years, gold will be $800 by 2016 and $400 by 2020.

    9. Re:Much like Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be real soon enough!

    10. Re:Much like Gold by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I have actual, physical, solid gold. I have silver too. Silver is more practical than gold for "everyday" use. But you're right, gold "funds" and gold "certificates" are useless. The only problem with the metal is storing it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Much like Gold by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Other than jewelry gold has very limited uses, almost exclusively in obscure sensitive electronics.

      Like smartphones, PCs and high-quality A/V cables?

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  6. It will be interesting to see if they can do it by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real trick here will be to get a two way system of CASH to bitcoins. From a physical untraceable medium of exchange to a digital one.

    Many governments of course have a problem with it. We'll see what happens.

    I am of two minds about it.

    I think the average person should be able to do this sort of thing. I also want the government to be able to track and trace this stuff if they really need to do it.

    I guess, I want there to be some way to track it but I want it to be complicated, time consuming, and generally not worth it unless they REALLY want to know. If there were some terrorists going to blow up thousands of people... I'd want there to be a way to stop that. But I generally want to be personally left alone to do what I want.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:It will be interesting to see if they can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are asking for is technically impossible and this impossibility will only become more obvious and "real" as technology improves. Today, people have little power and few tools when it comes to storing or transferring wealth. Most of the time, they must ask a big company to do what they need on their behalf. In the future, assuming people continue to have access to near enough cheap, libre communication and information storage, and access to improvements in technology that enables these things, people will have many more options when it comes to storing and transferring wealth.

      To bury one's head in the sand here is akin to the unthinking denial of the media cartels on copyright. Essentially the same mechanic is in play but data sharing requires less sophisticated technology and so seems to be a good 15 years ahead of distributed money management.

    2. Re:It will be interesting to see if they can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What you are asking for is technically impossible..."

      Not even close.

      Zerocoin.
      http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/04/zerocoin-making-bitcoin-anonymous.html

      Coinjoin.
      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0

      Not only is real anonymity possible, it's in the pipeline as we speak.

      "From a physical untraceable medium of exchange to a digital one."

      Yup. On the way...

    3. Re:It will be interesting to see if they can do it by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If there were some terrorists going to blow up thousands of people... I'd want there to be a way to stop that. But I generally want to be personally left alone to do what I want.

      As the last 10+ years have proven beyond any shadow of doubt, that's not possible. You either have the Lidless Eye watching everything you do and occasionally catching bad guys, or you don't. Even if we assume a hypothethical intelligence agent who's absolutely immune to corruption, they still have no magical ability to tell whether you're a terrorist or not until they've already searched you.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:It will be interesting to see if they can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why they would. All they have to do is regulate it and then, as we've been learning from recent news, the NSA will have an even bigger window into everyone's riveting choices of ice cream and ass hair tweezers.

    5. Re:It will be interesting to see if they can do it by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I don't think you appreciate what I'm saying.

      I am saying it is fine if the government can breach the security and get the information.

      It just have to be complicated and labor intensive to such an extent that they don't do it unless they have probable cause.

      I don't see why everything has to be easily searchable by automated computer systems when what we're tracking is a minority of a minority of a minority.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  7. And Slashdot still does not accept Bitcoins. by elucido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Until we can donate with Bitcoins how serious should we take all these pro Bitcoin articles if the site itself doesn't trust the technology?

    1. Re:And Slashdot still does not accept Bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone want to donate to slashdot?

    2. Re:And Slashdot still does not accept Bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to donate to slashdot?

      Because it is a glorious utopia of libertarian disinformation, propaganda, and nerds in their basements whining about things they barely know anything about! Who could want anything more?

    3. Re:And Slashdot still does not accept Bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until we can donate with Bitcoins how serious should we take all these pro Bitcoin articles if the site itself doesn't trust the technology?

      I would say about as serious as Unicode.

  8. already have electronic token currency by rubycodez · · Score: 0

    Most US and Canadian dollars and euros and yen are just numbers in a computer. Why do we need bitcoin, you can only buy trendy overpriced crap from a relatively few places with it. and its value recently is volatile as hell Fuck bitcoins.

    1. Re:already have electronic token currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No middle men. You can move money directly without getting hammered with bank/ATM and PayPal fees.

    2. Re:already have electronic token currency by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      The important part about bitcoin isn't that it's digital. That's been done many times. The revolutionary part is that it's decentralized. There is no government, organization, or corporation controlling it. There is no one who can freeze your account. There is no one who can set limits on your account. There is no one who can control who you can send money to. There is no one who can turn up the mint rate and destabilize the market.

    3. Re:already have electronic token currency by Animats · · Score: 1

      There is no one who can freeze your account. There is no one who can set limits on your account. There is no one who can control who you can send money to. There is no one who can turn up the mint rate and destabilize the market.

      If only that were true. Ask the users with thousands of dollars stuck in Mt. Gox, or worse, one of the "exchange" or "online wallet" companies that went bust. Sure, you can ship Bitcoins around, but there are serious liquidity problems doing anything with them.

    4. Re:already have electronic token currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give that a couple of years. Politicians have this strange habit of writing stuff on a piece of paper (or computer screen) and seeing it magically change reality on a dime depending on who's sober enough to show up in congress to vote yes for it.

      I get the idea behind bitcoin, and it's a hell of a lot of fun to watch, but enter realism: At the end of the day, you have quite an Orwellian, totally fiat thing that only needs the 'swipe of the pen' to turn into the end of all forms of economic privacy if it becomes the primary mode of payment (not likely, but this is hypothetical).

      Imagine what a bitcoin style currency could accomplish in the hands of a despotic government wherever it might be. All dissidents' biometrics are stored in a giant database, and the law states that all Bitcoin ATMs must disallow transactions by anyone on the naughty list. In Nazi Germany, we would have called these people 'Jews'. It's cool to have super high tech controls on who can access your account, but you always run the risk of giving up liberty for security, and really, the only thing that can change bitcoin into that would be a stroke of a politician's pen before he heads to his 7 martini lunch.

      Just because something seems like an alternative to something you dislike, doesn't mean it would be a better solution than the one you've got now. I'm still waiting for better, cause bitcoin doesn't really do it for me: Not that it should be illegal or persecuted.

    5. Re:already have electronic token currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, don't you think entities like the NSA would be salivating at the thought of having all of the 'counter culture' archetypes transacting in digital currencies that they had access to? (read the news stories lately about what kind of stuff they've been up to)

      There are 'alternative currencies out there' on a regional or local basis that I'd think are a better idea. Bit Coin is too vast and intrusive to be a viable alternative to currency as it currently sits. Gold is also problematic for other reasons (as a 'primary currency').

      A lot of the time you have to take utopian 'silver bullets' with a grain of salt. Always a grain of truth in there somewhere, but a heavy dose of ideological fantasy (that usually ends in a nightmare).

    6. Re:already have electronic token currency by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      It's ok people were initially scared of paper money too :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    7. Re:already have electronic token currency by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      might be good for many people, but my bank, which is a national chain, doesn't charge me to use its ATM or those of its affiliates. but having bitcoin value drop a large percentage in a short time is the same as middleman, though if you acquire them at the right time you get super interest.....well, too crazy for me.

    8. Re:already have electronic token currency by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      oh I am scared of paper money/mainstream digital money, but its the only game in town.

  9. Smartphone: 35 USD per month by tepples · · Score: 1

    My dumbphone can't scan QR codes or run a wallet. How would using Bitcoin help me afford the hundreds of dollars per year that it would cost me or someone else in my situation to upgrade to a smartphone?

    1. Re:Smartphone: 35 USD per month by Ancient123 · · Score: 1

      You mean the ~$50 it costs to buy a used phone off craigslist and use it as a portable computing device with no phone service (and therefore no re-occurring cost)... If you can't manage that then bitcoin probably isn't the problem.... Honestly if you are using bitcoin then you probably have friends with an unused android device they could just give you....

    2. Re:Smartphone: 35 USD per month by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      I don't live in Canada. How are these Bitcoin kiosks going to help me or someone else who can't even get to them?

  10. There are 5 Canadian cities? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I thought it was just Vancouver and Montreal, with nothing but polar bears and bleached reindeer skeletons in between.

    1. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by egamma · · Score: 1

      Toronto's the capital. Calgary's a pretty cool city. That's 4...

    2. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lived in Toronto you'd know that there's really only 1 Canadian city. Vancouver and Montreal are just pretending to be cities.

    3. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by tftp · · Score: 2

      I lived in Toronto for a while, but I never knew that it's the capital of Canada.

    4. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      Toronto is the capital of what? Canada? You don't get out much, do you.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    5. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by mirix · · Score: 1

      Ottawa is the capital. If you include the greater area and Gatineau (across the river), they have a population of around 1.2M, rounding out the top 5. (calgary is about a tie in population).

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    6. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Sixth on this list smaller than Calgary by 10%.

      Thinking Toronto is the capital is like thinking New York is the capital of the United States, when it isn't even the capital of New York State.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:There are 5 Canadian cities? by Livius · · Score: 1

      Toronto is the capital of what?

      The Province of Ontario.

      So Toronto is a capital of something.

  11. am i the only one by muphin · · Score: 1

    am i the only one who thinks, hey lets steal this machine, plug it in at home, break it open and then get unlimited amounts of bitcoins?

    --
    It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    1. Re:am i the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am i the only one who thinks ... unlimited amounts of bitcoins?

      no, i'm sure there are thousands more misinformed people too

    2. Re:am i the only one by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      With that logic, why not break it open and then get unlimited amounts of dollars?

      (They don't load it with unlimited bitcoins for the same reason they don't load it with unlimited amounts of dollars. There aren't infinite of either.)

    3. Re:am i the only one by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      be careful, lest your skanky wife crush your head with it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYmA41QJsyg

  12. This sounds a lot like my ideas on cake. by earls · · Score: 2

    Everyone should be able to have it, and eat it too.

    1. Re:This sounds a lot like my ideas on cake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to subscribe to your newsletter on "cake". Thank you.

  13. hmmm by nomadic · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you get the same effect for less money by just setting up paper shredders?

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No not really, I bought 1 bitcoin when it was $15 and now it is worth more than 10 times that amount.

    2. Re:hmmm by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      *cough* buy low sell high....

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  14. transaction fees by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, you just hit on what I think is pretty much "key" here.

    When you look at all of the (often ridiculous) alt-coins out there on the exchanges, you realize developers can create a new one out of thin air, based on the source code used to design a previous coin, give it a new name, and voila - it's out there.

    The truth is though, investors are only buying the things because they're cheap (think "penny stocks" here) and because at least early on, it's possible to buy enough of the sum total of the coins in existence so you can play "pump and dump" schemes -- forcing the price up temporarily with big purchase orders, and cashing in for a tidy little profit when you sell them all off again ASAP.

    The online exchanges are more than happy to list these worthless "joke coins" though because they get a cut of each transaction, no matter what happens. As long as someone is willing to put in buy and sell orders, it's worth offering.

    Of course, bitcoin has established itself far more than these other alt-coins (perhaps simply the privilege of being first with the idea?), and is actually accepted as currency for a number of goods and services -- but the same thing applies. If you're helping the currency change hands, you're always earning a profit off the top, no matter if the coin's value is headed up or down. It's the best "investment position" of all from the standpoint of safely making a steady profit.

  15. Canada's B words.. by fred911 · · Score: 0

    Beer
    Buds
    Bandwidth
    Bitcoin

    You guys Rock!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  16. scan a code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess scanning a QR code is easier than typing in a 30 alpha-numeric public key. anyways, I did not know that Bitcoin is popular.

  17. Buy Gold Coins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then buy like Glenn Beck told you to.

  18. Re: It will be interesting to see if they can do i by tom229 · · Score: 1

    So you want to have your cake and eat it too? Welcome to the general mentality of our generation.

    The simple truth is that social freedom is not free. It comes with a price. And the opposite of freedom, control, comes with consequences. You either need to be willing to pay the price of freedom, or live with the consequences of control. You can't have both. I wish more people understood that.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  19. digital currency? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

    after all the NSA news from last week, how can anybody take a digital currency seriously? Encryption is totally cracked. Whatever "safeguards" have been cracked. Sure, my bank account can be accessed online and presumably owned as well, but my bank account is ensured by the government - digital bits are not.

    1. Re:digital currency? by somersault · · Score: 2

      Encryption is totally cracked

      What the fuck are you talking about? All encryption, ever? Or just Bitcoin encryption? Do you know what "cracked" means in this context?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:digital currency? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he was referring to this. Why he thinks the NSA needs access to his bank account.. I don't know.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:digital currency? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      they don't need to. but their working plan is to vaccuum everything into their dbs in that datacenter in Utah, and keep it on record in case they ever want to inspect it, for example, if they're inspecting somebody else and they want to go three or four hops out from their aquaintances (remember 6 degrees of separation...). So yeah, they're going to grab the data and then look at it later with no notification, warrant, probable cause, or oversight. Maybe my donation to EFF will throw a red flag and get me on the no fly list, so the TSA can grab my junk then eject me from the line. This is how the dominos fall.

      speaking of suspicious, why would anybody need to use bitcoin? surely for nefarious, possibly terrorist purposes. remember, there are two kinds of citizens: terrorists and potential terrorists.

      btdubs everything we learned about NSA applies to GCHQ (the british NSA) as well - they're besties and share all their tricks and secrets.

      Lastly, three months ago I would have said that these ideas were tin foil hat nut job conspiracies. But post-snowden, all bets are off. it's all been published in NYT, WaPo, and Guardian - newspapers of record.

  20. Re: It will be interesting to see if they can do i by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    So I need to accept anarchy or despotism?

    There is no possibility of having reasonable counter measures to hostile forces AND civil rights?

    Give me an f'ing break.

    What are you advocating for here? Mass human enslavement? Or are you advocating for the dissolution of human society itself?

    Reevaluate your argument. Its irrational and politically counter productive.

    In the words of my generation... your comment is retarded. Try again.

    Before you presume to be offended, I'll point out you came off as hostile to me without any provocation from me. So I'd ask you to take this rebuke as fair turnabout.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  21. Sustainability by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1
    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:Sustainability by jimburton618 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to download the whole blockchain to use Bitcoin. You can use clients such as MultiBit (https://multibit.org - I am the lead dev) or Electrum (http://electrum.org). These are only a few megabytes to download and you'll be up and running in minutes.

  22. Minutes between scan and acting by tepples · · Score: 1

    You mean the ~$50 it costs to buy a used phone off craigslist and use it as a portable computing device with no phone service

    I own such a portable computing device: an Archos 43 Internet Tablet. But I thought one needed cellular data service in order to have a data connection with which to act on the information in the scanned QR code. Or is there a procedure that allows scanning the QR code, waiting several minutes to an hour to find a Wi-Fi connection, and then acting on the scan?

    1. Re:Minutes between scan and acting by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Not being familiar with the idea, and steadfastly refusing to read the article, I'd imagine that it wouldn't be hard for them to include a wifi access point in the terminal, as it probably needs access as well. Could cause a potential conflict with both sides of the request coming from the same IP, but it's all things you can work out.

  23. Even once the kiosks do come to your country by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between the situation you describe and the situation I describe. Even once the kiosks do come to your country, they'd be useless to tablet users unless they're in an area with open Wi-Fi.

  24. I thought we already had a digital currency by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    I pay for things with TimBits all the time.

  25. Re: It will be interesting to see if they can do i by tom229 · · Score: 1

    I'm not advocating anything, I'm not an idealist. And I'll apologize for appearing hostile. It wasn't my intent.

    To elaborate, I'm not claiming your only choices are anarchy or despotism, I'm just stating that you can either have real freedom, or you can have governance... you can't have both. Sure, you can try to fumble around with a complicated system of trusts and balances but it will eventually, and always, gradually atrophy into abuse by those in power and apathy by the complacent public.

    If you give the governing powers any control over our medium of trade, any what-so-ever, the best you can hope for is a false sense of security that they are trustworthy. That's what we've had in the past, that's what we have now, and that's what we'd have in the future.

    It's nice to think you can have the best of both worlds, but when it comes to a governing body of humans controlling a product or system that is necessary for civilization, you never can. That's just a simple and unfortunate truth that I feel should be evident to everyone. No insult intended.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  26. anyone? by xuvetyn · · Score: 1

    i still need to know how to INVEST in bitcoins.

    --
    alive to the universe, dead to the world
  27. Re: It will be interesting to see if they can do i by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Your definition of real freedom appears to be anarchy and your definition of governance appears to be unrestrained unlimited government peonage.

    I do not see how you can make the argument that I can only have one of those two options.

    What's more, anarchy is self defeating. So you're really saying I have no choice but peonage. I will resist that.

    What I want is for them to have enough authority to deal with extreme situations but for the power to be awkward enough that it won't be used in anything but extreme circomstances.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.