Slashdot Mirror


Letter to "Extended Family" Assures That NSA Will "Weather This Storm"

An anonymous reader writes "The National Security Agency sent a letter to its employees, affiliates and contractors to reassure them that the NSA is not really an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity." Whatever you think of the commentary, you can read the original, attached to the linked story.

286 comments

  1. And I have a 3 foot long penis by ameyer17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, though, just because you say it doesn't make it true.

    1. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This sounds more like they're saying "Don't worry, everything is fine. The US people are too spineless to jeopardize and of our business arrangements."

    2. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by tysonedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course they aren't an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity.
      What is all this attention that they are under now if not being checked upon?

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    3. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. And you'll find that all prisons are filled with innocent people, just ask them!

    5. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually a lot of what they do IS illegal, and not really debatable. When the Congress people who voted on the Patriot act and supported its renewal say what the NSA doing isn't allowed in the bill they passed that would be your first indication. The lying to judges to be allowed to continue should be your second clue. Then there is every time Obama or his people come out and say "what you are not seeing is abuse of power by the NSA" and the next day Snowden releases thousands of examples of illegal abueses should be the final nail in showing its illegal.

      What you are attempting to do is spin it that this was all perfectly legal started under Bush, because for some reason we shouldn't hold a black man accountable for his actions. What appears to really have happened is the LARGE majority of what has been shown to be illegal has happened in the last 5 years, ignoring Congress and the written laws.

      What the NSA letter SHOULD have said is:
      The media outlets will continue to call anyone who holds us responsible racist or they will shift the blame to the previous administration to allow us to continune what we are doing uninterrupted. Hopefully we will be able to rig the election so that Hillary wins the next presidency so any calls of what we are doing is illegal will be met with a "War on Women". Because in reality we can't justify what we are doing, all we can do is attack the character of the people pointing it out and about half of our citizens are so fucking stupid they will jump in on our side.

    6. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Checked implies the oversight actually has teeth for enforcing policy/law. The token oversight given to the NSA reports to... the NSA.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    7. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah but if you just sent a letter to some girl saying that you don't have a 3 foot penis she might just start believing that you have a 3 foot penis.. or the very least a 1.5 foot penis.*

      their stance is that because they're not getting prosecuted they're legit. because fuck, that's all it's down to...

      *)this does not constitute as legal advice on how to get laid.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hitler's minions thought they were okay because they were just doing their job, also.

      That didn't help them much when it came time to hand out the war-crimes awards.

      Just something the NSA folks might want to think about. They also might want to take a gander at the Constitution and, in particular, the Bill of Rights. Read them all, including Amendment X. Unless they are too stupid to live, comprehending the meaning isn't particularly difficult - assume the words mean what they say they mean, no matter how many corrupt and pompous judges and bureaucrats there are trying to "reinterpret" words to make all the criminality okay.

      There may be an accounting, eventually. Eventually may come sooner than later.

    9. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From your comment, I would assume that perhaps you own a horse that is attached to this penis.

    10. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else notice the letter was dated Friday the 13th?

    11. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are worse! Mu hah aha !!!

    12. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey go biggest Badass or go home. It's the American way!

    13. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      You have completely missed the point.

      This is an encoded message. The NSA are good at this.

      What the message ACTUALLY says is:

      MSG
      Don't worry about this rubbish with the plebs - its business as usual.
      EOM

      Very simple really.

    14. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bartles · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm really getting sick of this. All it would take to stop all of this is a phone call from the President, who has sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. People need to start blaming the person responsible, not some stupid bureaucracy.

    15. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Desler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why ask them? Just look at, for example, the list of people exonerated from death row.

    16. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Just like how all the Jews and mentally Ill were gassed to stop their suffering in WW-II by Hitler.

      And yes it IS the exact same thing.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I have nothing personal against the NSA; but I'll verify the letter with the one posted on Wiki Leaks.

    18. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They also might want to take a gander at the Constitution"

      The constitution has been ignored since america's founding, ask all the native's driven from their lands.

    19. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Spineless? I take great offense to that! We have PLENTY of spine! It's ATTENTION SPAN that we... oh my gosh! Did you hear about the navy yard shootings? Was I saying something? I think it was about Syria and NASA...

    20. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People have plenty of attention span, the media on the otherhand has none. Heard much of anything about the majority of the democrats walking out of the Benghazi hearings because they refused to listen to witness testimony?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Constitution? What's that? Oh you mean that banned document that you can't hand out on some university campuses anymore?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I'd argue it's results that count. If action is only taken based on what the media is reporting on, and the media reports only on things for a few days no matter how important they are, then the nation has an attention span even if people remember the NSA thing.

    23. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by kav2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And all it takes is a phone call from the NSA to leak some juicy blackmail on the President into the media.
      This is all interconnected pretty nicely, I'm afraid.

    24. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be an accounting, eventually. Eventually may come sooner than later.

      Pay attention to Article II and how the courts have applied it to national security areas like this. That's where people like you keep going wrong.

      If there is an "accounting," it is pretty unlikely that it will be under the actual government authorized by the Constitution. Know-nothing vigilantes ignorant of the actual law, and ignoring inconvenient facts and legal rulings, on the other hand....

    25. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by artor3 · · Score: 2

      And what should he say on that phone call? "Don't be evil"?

      This is not a binary issue. There's a whole lot of ground between the status quo and "DISBAND EVERYTHING!!!" What, exactly, should he say on that phone call? I guarantee, that whatever your answer, there will be a hundred million outraged people demanding that he do less, and another hundred million demanding he do more.

      You can disagree with his policies, and voice your disagreement, and vote accordingly, and encourage others to do the same. But don't pretend that this, or any other choice, is some simple choice between "be a good guy" and "tie ladies to railroad tracks". That sort of oversimplification does no one any favors.

    26. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many critiques of the war crimes tribunals after WWII, including the chief prosecutor who was a judge but never had a law degree, claim the prosecutions were ex post facto law (law after the fact) and the trials constituted a victors justice.

      I'm not saying they didn't deserve what they got, but lets not pretend it was all on the up and up when comparing it to other things we find horrible too.

      As for the reinterpretations of the US constitution, it is an artifact of the liberal agenda (Roosevelt fought for it to preserve a lot of his unconstitutional new deal programs). They first attempted to amend the US constitution by interpreting wordings out of context and extending government reach and powers by construing meaning beyond what was traditionally present in it. This is because there was no support for legitimately amending the constitution to their favor. Unfortunately, their short sightedness has missed the problem of "if they can do it, others can too" so now it is a common thing to do by any political ideology and it seems to have no bounds as long as it can advance someone's cause.

      It is a sad day when the US constituion is reinterpreted in order to get around the limitations it imposes on government. This is true whether you like one, some or all of the reinterpretations or none of them at all.

    27. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Liar, liar pants around your ankles, on fire.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    28. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The prez, like any politician, first and foremost wants to stay in office. Something that's kinda hard to do if you try to control the entity that has the highest chance to have any and all kind of dirt on you.

      Do the math...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know what he should say, but I'm pretty sure the reply would be something along the lines of "You want that, do you? Well, of course, you have the power to do that, but wouldn't it be a shame if $dirty_secret was leaked to the media because we cannot ensure security when you cut our freedom to do whatever we damn well want to do?"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China's industry also doesn't violate any of their environmental standards. And as soon as they do, the standards get lowered.

      Same with the NSA. They don't break the law. And if they do, it's not them, it's the laws that change.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, though, just because you say it doesn't make it true.

      The simple fact that they felt it necessary, despite how self-incriminating it appears, for them to send out such a letter to their own people in essence, says many volumes about how much trust one should put in the NSA's "assurances".

      The NSA is going to have to engage heavily in blackmailing politicians, because nearly everyone...(D), (R), conservatives, liberals, politicians, journalists, progressives, capitalists, socialists, and communists...have realized that the NSA doesn't make any distinctions whatsoever concerning whose data they slurp up and whether or not it might be used for blackmail or for setting them up for a lengthy prison sentence if it becomes expedient for the government to make someone "go away", short of outright State-ordered murder.

      Pay no attention to anything the NSA or the politicians say. Watch what they do, instead.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    32. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They also don't have the intelligence to realise that the NSA is just the tech guy. They do the hacking but they are not the ones issuing the instructions for what to go for or the ones doing the data storage and consolidation. They do not call it the 'Central' intelligence agency for nothing. Right now in the foreground exposed for what is was doing is the NSA but make no mistake this is all the CIA's doing and they were the ones doing the nasty with all the private data they go from the NSA, the tech guy.

      Still not one political demand to uncover where the data went and what was done with it. The CIA has had deep control of the US government for decades and has been deeply political both within the US and overseas. Want to look at why the NSA went so far off the rails, look no further than the CIA.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    33. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll bite... Which universities prohibit handing out copies of the Constitution?

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    34. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he literally CAN'T stay in office any longer than he's in for, so he now has the freedom to push legislature unpopular with the powers that be in government. Of course, the last president that did that got a bullet in the head, so that may be a factor as well.

    35. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hope you realize how much a point is ruined by including the term "liberal agenda". It paints you as an utter imbecile, and thus everything you say, no matter it's merit, will likely be disregarded by all but the most mentally insufficient readers.

    36. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have perfectly demonstrated the "Cartman Defense", illustrated so wonderfully in the comedic satire cartoon South Park.

      In your attempt to cover up "your side's" problems, you throw the blame wholly at the easiest targets, namely a black president. That is a huge target (as you know), and deflects a lot of blame away (as you have practiced), but it does not change any facts or history. Obama should be held accountable for his actions, just as Bush should be (but won't, he's far too rich to suffer consequences, and you know that). The next president elected should be held accountable for the actions of the previous administrations as well, and not let off the hook until things are fixed. I don't care if it's a woman, a black person, a dog, or a fucking lolcat that serves as the next president: the ONLY criteria that ANYONE should care about in 2016 is how much the candidate will work against the corporate interests that encroach upon the citizenry.

    37. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm a racist for calling out a black man for breaking the law?

      Fuck you.

    38. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by antdude · · Score: 1

      I have a 3' (feet!) long penis. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    39. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      This just in: "Computer security will weather the storm of NSA rendering it conceptually, a joke".

    40. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hitler's minions thought they were okay because they were just doing their job, also.

      That didn't help them much when it came time to hand out the war-crimes awards.

      Just something the NSA folks might want to think about. They also might want to take a gander at the Constitution and, in particular, the Bill of Rights. Read them all, including Amendment X.

      Bear in mind that there are two different things NSA does/did, with very different implications.

      1) They weakened cryptographic standards. This deserves all the criticism you're dishing out.

      2) They researched how to break crypto. This is completely within their (and anyone else's) right to do. The alternative viewpoint - that merely trying to break crypto should be illegal - is exactly what the MPAA and RIAA have been trying to foist upon us with the draconian provisions in the DMCA prohibiting breaking DRM.

    41. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Various parts of the government and many politicians have been spewing forth on unbelievable number of lies recently. Is there anyone stupid enough to still trust anything the government says these days? How many lies does someone have bring forth in order to be deemed a liar? Is our government even still capable of telling the truth?

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    42. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I hope you realize how much a point is ruined by including the term "liberal agenda". It paints you as an utter imbecile, and thus everything you say, no matter it's merit, will likely be disregarded by all but the most mentally insufficient readers.

      I hope you realize how true the term "liberal agenda" actually is. Roosevelt's New Deal legislation was a liberal agenda supported and created by most of the liberal groups of the time. Most of it was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court. The democrat congress threatened to increase the number of justices on the supreme court and stack it with liberal judges while Roosevelt more or less said make me stop knowing they controlled the executive powers and any means of enforcing the ruling. The Supreme court then ruled some of the New Deal legislation constitutional by expanding the interstate commerce clause to include anything that could possibly influence interstate commerce even if it wasn't interstate commerce itself.

      I would say the "utter imbecile" in this picture would be the ones who attempt to use modern politics to define an era of the past. Roosevelt worked well with the socialist and their liberal agenda despite the Communist uprising in 1919 and most of the remaining communist joining the socialist in the US after they refused to cooperate. The socialist of the time were not seen as being bad because they actually abstained from the revolt and left the communist hanging. The communist after WWII changed into socialist after WWII when communism got a bad name and was largely shunned by western cultures. That creates a different look on liberal and socialist in today's politics that weren't part of the past politics. It is entirely accurate and competent to say liberal agenda as used in my post.

      I strongly suggest opening a couple of history books, perhaps an encyclopedia and maybe learn something before trying to "paint" something you obviously know nothing about. Then perhaps you won't appear so "mentally insufficient". I can see why you posted AC.

    43. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see AC. Do you feel the need to always inform the public that you will remain willfully stupid because of some political ideology or are you making a special case this time?

    44. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP was trying to tell you that if you want to have a chance of winning anyone over to your point of view, you don't want to be using terms like "liberal agenda". Now, the GP happened (extremely ironically) to also use inflammatory language, so it's understandable that you weren't won over to their point of view (like I said, extreme irony), but they were making a very important point.

    45. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sad society that doesn't realize all documents are products of their times, and inevitably subject to subsequent reinterpretations and ammendments, and cling overstrongly to the past -- which ironically often is a distorted interpretation of the past. And this goes regardless of how good and solid the original document was, and how many principles it contains that one would do well to continue to respect.

    46. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The problem is that "liberal agenda" in this context is completely different then any modern assumption of it. This all happened before liberal was a 4 letter word and that should be common knowledge to anyone with a cursory understanding of US history.

      I understand what you are saying though and the point is taken. However, I'm not sure how I could have explained that bastardization of the constitution as the start of modern warping of the constitution without the term as it specifically is what happened. Terms like left and right would have the same political objectionable connotations just the same and be less accurate (as we well know there are right liberals too). If history is off limits because some ignorant people refuse to understand it due to political ideology, then we have lost all hope. We might as well sit on the couch and watch TV to keep up with the celebrities of the day.

    47. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Modesto Junior College in California.

      http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3954954

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    48. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The constitution has several mechanism built into it to amend it. There are only two ways it could be unconstitutional to amend it and those were based on time spans that have long passed.

      Now, if your bank decided that after 29 years, just one payment from your mortgage being paid in full and the house being yours, to reinterpret the contract so as you have another 30 years to pay or somehow have a balloon payment or they can repossess the house, you would be outraged. Even if it wasn't happening to you but others because the contract was a document of it's time and inevitably subject to subsequent reinterpretations, the vast majority of people would be outraged.

      That is what the US constitution is- a contract between the states and the people within them that forgo certain amounts of sovereignty to a federal government and if something needs changed, then it needs to be amended and changed. It really is that simple.

      I'm not against changing the US constitution, in fact, I would like to see several changes myself. I just think that we owe history the honesty of following the rules to do so. This means amending the constitution instead of all the sudden deciding the word "one" means two or three or something similar to make something constitutional that otherwise wouldn't be. Its a smoke and mirror game right now with what actually means something and what doesn't. When we ignore it, we have given license to ignore all of it. That does mean that when something you don't want ignored is, they can use the exact same justifications to ignore the search and seizure or due process clauses or free speech guarantees as they use to ignore the second amendment or rules to how legislation is made or war is waged.

    49. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sjames · · Score: 2

      He could start with "immediately delete all metadata for calls inside the United States unless you have actual evidence that one party is not a U.S. Citizen".

      Next step, "Do not share any information you gather with any other agency unless at least one party is a foreign national.

      There are plenty who will argue that the above is not enough, but it is at least a move in the right direction while the less clear cases are weighed carefully.

    50. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if a terrorist attack occurs under his watch who gets blamed for it? "Oh see I told you Obama was a terrorists supporter/sympathizer". That's if you actually believe this "terrorism threat".

      And again how many other unknown agencies are doing far worse, and the NSA is just a decoy, or the one Uncle Sam is willing to use as a sacrificial lamb to detract from the other agencies? Any President is a hand puppet, they really do not have much power, because the federal government has done whatever it wants, when it wants, even the Supreme Courts refuse time and time again to eliminate the federals laws, and or rule, a body that is suppose to be the final battle grounds for upholding the constitution.

      I would like to see someone (and they may have tried this already) file charges against Bush, and Obama or even file a massive lawsuit against them, for failing to stay within the bounds of there authority, or in the case of the Patriot Act for failing to stay within constitutional law.

    51. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      ...which is most definitely not a university.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    52. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A bullet tends to send the message too, unfortunately.

    53. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have no idea if what you suggest is true, that NSA is just the go-to bunch of nerds for CIA. Actually more likely there would be several puppet masters. Some military intelligence outfits, certainly. And FBI and DEA came up recently as well. Big US Corporations? It would seem so.

      But regardless, I don't agree, if that is even what you were implying, that we should therefore not criticize said nerds for facilitating so willingly. Some of whom surely frequent /. ... Not cool, guys.

      Of course every bit of understanding about who really calls the shots is welcome. But don't underestimate the extent to which a colossal bureaucracies can go off the rails by their own self sustained momentum.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    54. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Out and about, I've heard no one mention anything even remotely related to any of this stuff. It's been, what, three, four days since a story in the mainstream media. In the same period, nothing in the way of news as to what may be happening in Congress about any of this. Last story I recall seeing was about one of the secret court judges, which got very little space in most newspapers. It's a dead issue.

      The populace never glommed onto it; they flat out don't care, they are unable to care, about things they don't pay any attention to.

    55. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but considering that other prezzes got into trouble for as much as getting a blow job, I'd be very surprised if that one doesn't have any skeletons in his closet that could haunt him even after he resigned.

      It's the times when former presidents are locked up and jailed for their crimes, just because the Italian sleazebag got off easy doesn't mean much, especially since he only screwed the population, not the powers that are.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    56. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... some stupid bureaucracy ...

      Some stupid bureaucracy is why Guantanamo is still operating. The US president has the power to pardon terrorist sympathizers but not move them to another prison. He also has the power to stop the force-feeding of Guantanamo inmates but he offers sound-bites about their dignity and well-being. Where's that 'hope and change' he promised? If can't deliver the basic stuff, he certainly won't change entrenched power blocs in the government.

    57. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol, and then foreign chumps intake our media and they think Americans think like media clowns. No wonder popular impressions of U.S. people are so cliche' and seem like they came off a television show. So I guess it's easy to assume that Chinese are generally too stupid to rise above communism and like their yoke, Australians are Dundee hicks with corks hanging off their hats and no balls to stand up to their government, English are uptight and full of themselves, Dutch are stoners,Arabs screw and mutilate children, South Americans will stab you in the back for a dollar and Mexicans only want to live in the U.S. Because I READ THE NEWS so I know whats really going on in the world.

    58. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by flyneye · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's just another member of the 3 letter club, like the bands from the 80s. GBH, DRI, FOD, SOD which eventually gave way to SNFU and even KMFDM.

      If you work for one of these government agencies, it's obvious you are a sellout to the people, their freedom and our way of life and it's obvious to us that you know it. Now you know we know it. Don't bother coming home for Thanksgiving, fucking traitors.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    59. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by flyneye · · Score: 2

      I picture Bart Simpson with pie all over his face saying " I didn't do it man".

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    60. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by flyneye · · Score: 1

      hehe, so they took a leak in his ear...

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    61. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many critiques of the war crimes tribunals after WWII, including the chief prosecutor who was a judge but never had a law degree, claim the prosecutions were ex post facto law (law after the fact) and the trials constituted a victors justice.

      Regardless of what one thinks about the WWII tribunals the actual point that "following orders" shouldn't be a valid defense has a pretty wide support and have been added to the Geneva Conventions.
      As part of this my military training included being taught the circumstances of when one shouldn't follow orders and instead remove the commanding officer from his/her position.
      Failing to follow orders is usually a crime, but when the orders are illegal then following them is a crime. These are things that determines the life or death of people, if you are unable to make that call then you are unfit to be a soldier and can't be trusted with a gun.

    62. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3 foot long penis"

      Do you mean to say that you don't really have a 3 foot long penis, and neither does the NSA have a shit-ton of our data? Or do you mean that the NSA isn't a lying bastard? Because to me, they're the same.

      I don't believe that the NSA has the data, much less the ability to process that data. I also feel that your 3 foot long penis is a lie.

    63. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by cusco · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why the first black president came out of Chicago, the dirtiest political machine left in the US. He would never have made it into the Senate in the first place if he hadn't already proved he was sufficiently corruptible to the PTB in Illinois.

      A number of years ago there was a politician in Peru who was bravely standing up to some of the excesses of the military in their anti-terrorism campaign. He retired from politics when he received a photo of his daughter leaving her school, taken through a rifle scope. There are a lot of players in the game, not all of them play nice.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    64. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by cusco · · Score: 1

      Bush should be (but won't, he's far too rich to suffer consequences

      Obama will be too by the time he leaves office, the same as Reagan was. In 1979 Reagan was wealthy, but not tremendously rich. By 1989 he was worth over $100 million and had received a ranch and other property gifted to him worth several tens of millions more. This is in addition to inflated book deals and speaking engagements that pay upwards of six figures for a few minutes of reading someone else's text.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    65. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      Have you been watching too much television? The NSA is signals intelligence. They are tasked with "go find anything interesting, and let me know if you find something interesting."

      The NSA is not following orders, because they don't know what they are looking for, or where. No one is telling the NSA to log this or look there, because no one knows what is important.

      That's the entire reason behind the "log everything" strategy. That is the NSA solution to "go find anything". Look at everything, log everything, throw it away once you recognize it is useless (or illegal).

      So just what is it exactly that makes you say the CIA is directing things? If you are asked to be the signals intelligence arm of a large government, without CIA direction, wouldn't the logical conclusion be exactly what the NSA is doing right now?

    66. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by cusco · · Score: 2

      despite the Communist uprising in 1919

      I'm sorry, but WTF does a minor political clash in Germany have to do with events in the US over a decade later?

      The democrat congress

      Ah. You're a Rush Limbaugh listener. Logic isn't really your strong point then.

      The socialist (sic) of the time were not seen as being bad

      They're still not seen as being bad. All of the most stable economies of today are run by socialist-leaning governments, who also tend to have the highest standard of living. I don't see either of those two things as having negative connotations.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    67. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is an institution of higher education, so it quite literally is merely a difference of degree rather than of kind.

    68. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean that banned document that you can't hand out on some university campuses anymore?

      There is a HUGE world of difference between banning distribution of the Constitution, and small-minded bureaucrats enforcing stupidly designed policies.

      There is nothing even suggesting that the Constitution was singled out, or even a consideration of what was being distributed in that case.

      I appreciate the link, and rhodium_mir for asking, but if that is the basis for Mashiki's comment, then Mashiki is an idiot. Probably not a troll, but there is no moderation for "spews incoherent nonsense on the internet."

      Information gets stored according to what you know, so this isn't surprising. The extent of the over-generalization, however, is astonishing, and I am embarrassed to be in the same species.

    69. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "Tanks are rolling into Chicago... but first, Kim Kardashian wiggles her ass at the camera again."

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    70. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 1

      Many critiques of the war crimes tribunals after WWII, including the chief prosecutor who was a judge but never had a law degree, claim the prosecutions were ex post facto law (law after the fact) and the trials constituted a victors justice.

      I'm not saying they didn't deserve what they got, but lets not pretend it was all on the up and up when comparing it to other things we find horrible too.

      What absolute rubbish to dump on Slashdot. I think the only one seriously criticizing the allied criminal tribunals for being "victors justice" was from people sympathetic to the nazi cause, often perpetrators of the worst kind. Unlike you, I have actually seen a lot of archival material from eg. the British "War Crimes Group (NW Europe)". And I can assure you, that unless the evidence against the German perpetrators could hold up in a normal criminal court, they didn't prosecute.

      The sad fact is, that the vast majority of nazi war criminals never was prosecuted. It wasn't enough to be an officer in a unit whose whole purpose was mass slaughter of civilians like the SS Police battalions, and the officer's unit a proven record of murdering tens of thousands civilians in a 6 month period. If it couldn't be proved by witness account that the officer personally had shot specific victims, he wouldn't be persecuted.

      The nazi mass murderers below the absolute top ranks, usually never got prosecuted, and those few that was, often got mild sentences, and by mass pardons, usually was released after a few years.

    71. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just skipped everything you wrote contard .

      Are you really this ignorant? EVERYTHING sumdumass wrote is true. Read up on roosvelt, and while you're at it wilson as well.

    72. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are attempting to do is spin it that this was all perfectly legal started under Bush, because for some reason we shouldn't hold a black man accountable for his actions.

      Riiiight.

      The media outlets will continue to call anyone who holds us responsible racist

      Maybe it's because every time I listen to conservatives the are talking about Obama's race and trying to paint him as "other". You know, using and emphasizing his middle name, saying he was born in Kenya, saying he's Muslim. If conservatives don't want to be thought of as racist and bigots, they need to stop acting like them.

    73. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Pay attention to Article II and how the courts have applied it to national security areas like this. That's where people like you keep going wrong.

      The Bill of Rights supersedes Article II (and all the other Articles). Two states refused outright to sign on without a Bill of Rights. Others only did so after promises were made (by men of honor, who were trusted) that one would be added (and these state knew full well it was neither militarily nor legally feasible -- at that time -- to coerce them to stay in should things not work out to their satisfaction).

      Study history. Learn from it.

      Since the Bill of Rights is open-ended (James Madison made it that way to address objections raised by the anti-Federalists that any Bill of Rights would necessarily fail to include lots of important rights by being finite: both the 9th and 10th Amendment create this by retaining unspecified rights to the people, and reserving unspecified rights to the people), rights such as the right to privacy and the right to not be spied upon by one's government can be asserted as arising under the Bill of Rights. NOTHING said in Article II has ANY relevance when fundamental rights are at stake.

      Another right that can be asserted as arising under the 9th Amendment is the application of the Nuremberg Principle to US Law. Just as military officers are expected to refuse to obey illegal orders that require them to commit war crimes, so to are civil officers and legal professions required to refuse to obey illegal court orders, or enforce illegal precedents that require them to infringe fundamental rights, even if those come from higher in the legal chain of command.

      In short, decisions by any courts that the "Articles" supersede fundamental rights are illegal decisions involving violations of the oaths those judges have sworn to uphold the Bill of Rights. Those oaths being preconditions for holding office, they immediately and permanently cease to be judges, and the rulings have no validity.

      Personnel in organizations such as the NSA who engage in illegal spying upon the people of the United States, contrary to fundamental rights, are acting entirely as private citizens, not as authorized members of the government. Further, the government has no authority to grant either pardon or immunity for these violations of fundamental rights - this, also, is removed by rights retained by the people under the 9th Amendment.

    74. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      what happened is that

      1 this college has a Free Speech Zone smaller than some large pizzas

      2 and it has to be reserved weeks in advance

      3 this is similar to the policies of several colleges (one of the fights that FIRE has)

      i would bet that there are several US colleges/universities that have policies just as loony

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    75. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It's not clear that they ever throw ANYTHING away, no matter how illegal it is. For that matter, I don't know how a secret agency could even attempt to prove that, but that they can't prove it doesn't make it true.

      If they claim to have been acting legally, I won't believe them. There's too much evidence to the contrary. If they claim to have been "just doing my job", then not only are they (unindicted) criminals, they are being directed by (unindicetd, probably) criminals.

      If what they claim is that "we can get away with this", then I sorrowfully admit that they're probably telling the truth.

      The problem is, not only can't they prove me wrong, but it would be illegal for them to do so. Which doesn't mean that I'm right or wrong, in and of itself, but combined with human nature the odds favor my being correct. When illegal acts don't have consequences, people tend to ignore the laws. Combining that with various pieces of information that have been made public (some of which, admittedly, is on the level of mere assertion, but some of which isn't) the odds are pretty high that my assment is correct.

      It's pretty certain that I would never trust an assertion that a US hosted carrier was secure, or that a US endorsed encryption was secure. Fortunately, I'm not personally worried about that. I'm much more worried about indirect effects. E.g., other countries will no longer trust US standards, protocols, or communications. This will have an extremely negative effect over the long term. (Never mind that they aren't any better. That's irrelevant to how much trust they should place in US sponsored, hosted, or endorsed companies or technologies.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    76. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but WTF does a minor political clash in Germany have to do with events in the US over a decade later?

      You should be sorry. I'm talking about the one in the US not Germany. This used to be part of history books and I think still is if you care to pay attention.

      Ah. You're a Rush Limbaugh listener. Logic isn't really your strong point then.

      Stating a pure fact has nothing to do with who or what I listen to. However, you not knowing facts or trying to purposely ignore them means truth and logic is really at a loss in you. Please stop jerking your knee so hard and find out a bit about what is being discussed before spewing more ignorance.

      They're still not seen as being bad. All of the most stable economies of today are run by socialist-leaning governments, who also tend to have the highest standard of living. I don't see either of those two things as having negative connotations.

      You are a complete illiterate monkey. You cannot ignore the current political hatred for socialism and socialist policies in the US by some political ideologies and pretend to be intellectually honest. Please crawl back into whatever cave you have been hiding in and keep your ignorance to yourself.

    77. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what one thinks about the WWII tribunals the actual point that "following orders" shouldn't be a valid defense has a pretty wide support and have been added to the Geneva Conventions.

      You are missing the point, right or wrong, it is only enforceable if the side that wins wished to pursue it. If the evil side wins, it is meaningless which was the point of presenting the ex post fact argument and the claim of victors justice.

    78. Re: And I have a 3 foot long penis by HiThere · · Score: 1

      He's probably gotten it confused with attempts to get people to sign the Declaration of Independence, which are frequently harassed and shut down. Occasionally there are news reports about it. (It's a *much* more subversive document than is the Constitution.)

      P.S.: This has occasionally been ruled illegal even in public spaces (as opposed to private areas, which most college and university campuses are). I don't believe, however, than any conviction has ever been obtained except for something like trespass or "creating a public nuisance".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    79. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teabaggers can now sprinkle this paranoid truth among their many delusional ideas to get their entire self-defeating agenda enacted. Brilliant. This whole situation is made of FAIL.

      Bush: murderer in chief, instigator of the grandest of all lies
      Obama: inept idiot in chief, beneficiary of a government filled with vile corruption

      Which one do you think deserves the most scorn? Why, Obama, of course! And if you dare to point out that Teabaggers are motivated by racism, that makes YOU the racist.

    80. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What absolute rubbish to dump on Slashdot. I think the only one seriously criticizing the allied criminal tribunals for being "victors justice" was from people sympathetic to the nazi cause, often perpetrators of the worst kind. Unlike you, I have actually seen a lot of archival material from eg. the British "War Crimes Group (NW Europe)". And I can assure you, that unless the evidence against the German perpetrators could hold up in a normal criminal court, they didn't prosecute.

      The Chief prosecutor who was from the United States of America said this. The US supreme Court said it. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it didn't happen or that it is rubbish or even product of Nazi sympathizers. BTW, the Japanese were not Nazi's and the same arguments were made of the International Military Tribunals for the Far East by the exact same people and then some. Some complaints of victors justice were lodged by the judges overseeing the IMTFA trials themselves. Please get your history from something other then a movie.

      The sad fact is, that the vast majority of nazi war criminals never was prosecuted. It wasn't enough to be an officer in a unit whose whole purpose was mass slaughter of civilians like the SS Police battalions, and the officer's unit a proven record of murdering tens of thousands civilians in a 6 month period. If it couldn't be proved by witness account that the officer personally had shot specific victims, he wouldn't be persecuted.

      Persecuted is about right. The laws where almost all ex post facto (after the fact laws). This is why only select people were PROSECUTED and probably why you think it is a sad thing.

      Listen, I never said they didn't deserve what they got. In fact, if you would have paid attention, you would have seen where I specifically said something to that very effect. But it is largely no different them me killing you because you killed my brother because he tried to kill your sister. The difference is that the victors were in control and declared what was right and wrong and despite objections and outcry (even by those participating), it is only considered moral because our side won.

    81. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      To chime in (and join the choir), I definitely agree with what is said. But, honestly, I think we're at the point that the US Constitution needs to be rewritten. I state this for a number of reasons. The largest one is that after 200 years, it has become very clear that a combination of select interpretation or reinterpretation by those both for an "originalist", "modern language", or a "living document" view all fail very badly at providing the sort of protections of rights the people that people want/expect while also failing pretty badly at actually providing for the duties the people want/expect. One could argue that the current political environment is so corrosive to the point that any major rewrite would, even it were to be ratified, be so warped to the point of what is desired or good.

      But, I'd argue that the original Constitution was written under similar circumstances--this is one reason why "origianlists" are so often full of it, ignoring how you begin to interpret it when layered on with each amendment--by a relatively small committee based upon a much larger set of resolutions from a collection of representatives from various facets of governance and that a similar approach could be taken today if so desired. I think you can look no further than National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform to show an act is possible--the laundry list of opponents is some of the best evidence, IMHO, on just how good it is. At the same time, the very fact that no part of the federal government today seems interested in passing any functional part of it* is a good indication that if such a reform would pass, it'd be by an act of the states. It seems fitting since the only state ratified amendment to date was repealing prohibition. What better place than to be "drunk" again in the open instead of the false sobriety? :)

      *Spend more? Sure. Cut taxes? Sure. Tax increases, but only to cover more spending and even then rarely enough to actually cover the spending? Sure. *sigh*

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    82. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      No, it was about those slutty Kardashians!

    83. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the most stable economies? Like Greece, for example? Mexico, perhaps? How about Venezuela? Across the planet the worst economies are being run by socialist governments of some flavor.

    84. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 0

      There has never been a more appropriate user name than "sumdumass".

    85. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      To chime in (and join the choir), I definitely agree with what is said. But, honestly, I think we're at the point that the US Constitution needs to be rewritten. I state this for a number of reasons. The largest one is that after 200 years, it has become very clear that a combination of select interpretation or reinterpretation by those both for an "originalist", "modern language", or a "living document" view all fail very badly at providing the sort of protections of rights the people that people want/expect while also failing pretty badly at actually providing for the duties the people want/expect. One could argue that the current political environment is so corrosive to the point that any major rewrite would, even it were to be ratified, be so warped to the point of what is desired or good.

      Here is the problem with that. Most of what people want the government to do is supposed to be done at the state and local levels where the politicians are more accountable to the people they serve. For some reason, and probably the same as why the interstate commerce clause was expanded, people think the federal government is supposed to be over the entire country. This was never the intention of it, it was supposed to be only over the interactions between the states and foreign entities with a few other specific things involved. IF you doubt this, look at federal jurisdiction in crimes, it only comes into play if the crime crosses state lines, happens on federal government property, or if the crime violate a law the constitution and/or it's amendments specifically authorize congress to pass. For instance look at murder, the federal government can't do a damn thing about it if it doesn't cross a state line or happened on federal property, but they can come after you for civil rights violations because the 14th amendment section 5 gives congress the power to create law enforcing the 14th amendment.

      The 9th and tenth amendments make this specifically clear. Those are the bill of rights that everyone thinks is so great until it gets in the way of their political ideology. The 9th amendment says "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.". This means that if I have a right to free speech, neither you nor the government can take that way by using their right to free speech. If I have the right to the free exercise of my religion, I cannot stop you from your free exercise of religion even if that means you have no religion at all. The tenth amendment goes even further and shows that the constitution specifically allows the federal government to do a limited amount of things as long as those things do not equate to what the constitution specifically forbids the government from doing. It reads, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." This specifically says unless the constitution authorizes it, the states and the people are to do it if it is wished to be done and not otherwise prohibited by the constitution.

      Now don't think I just made this up. Most of this is discussed in the federalist papers which was a public debate trying to convince states to join accept the constitution and ratify it at the time of adoption. You can say it doesn't mean that any more, and I would say that is the reason we are having this discussion. You are right, we have twisted the constitution and the amendments into meaning things it was never intended to mean in order to advance someone's political agenda.

      The Constitution doesn't need to be rewritten. It needs to be followed and if changes are necessary, it needs to be changed by the process outlined within it. But the majority of what people expect from government needs to come from their state and local governments or they need to accept that they can't always get what they want.

      But, I'd argue that the original Co

    86. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Is our government even still capable of telling the truth?

      As someone once said, "You can't handle the truth."

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    87. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by cusco · · Score: 1

      A communist uprising in the US in 1919 not only isn't in the history books, it isn't even in the first six pages of a Google search. The liberal mind control machine must be at work. I didn't bother searching further, since there wasn't even a Communist Party in the US until the second half of the year anyway.

      BTW, a "pure fact" would have said "Democratic Party", rather than the wingnut "democrat party".

      You cannot ignore the current political hatred for socialism and socialist policies in the US by some political ideologies

      The US isn't the only country in the world.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    88. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      A communist uprising in the US in 1919 not only isn't in the history books, it isn't even in the first six pages of a Google search. The liberal mind control machine must be at work. I didn't bother searching further, since there wasn't even a Communist Party in the US until the second half of the year anyway.

      Interesting. Look under the first red scare. This sugar coats it enormously but it was a real event. Also, the communist party came to America in 1915, so I'm not sure where you are getting your information from, but you better look at other sources.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_scare#First_Red_Scare_.281919.E2.80.931921.29

      BTW, a "pure fact" would have said "Democratic Party", rather than the wingnut "democrat party".

      You are one to talk about facts. I never said "democrat party", I said democrat congress. And yes, it is proper to call a congress occupied by democrats a democrat congress. The democratic party has nothing to do with this conversation. Please just stop and learn a little before you go on to further humiliate yourself.

      The US isn't the only country in the world.

      And your point is what exactly? I mean we are talking about the US constitution, the president of the US, actions taken by the highest court of the US, actions taken by the US government, why are you confused by other countries?

      Please stop and take a deep breath- wait a few minutes before pushing reply, then check to see if what you are wanting to say actually makes sense or if it is some blind political ideological belief that you have never questioned and really want to be true regardless of facts. Seriously, you seem to be offended by the truth as if it hurt your feelings or something. Don't misdirect that anger at me, place it squarely where it belongs at yourself for not knowing what you follow.

    89. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      China's industry also doesn't violate any of their environmental standards. And as soon as they do, the standards get lowered.

      That is a lie. When Chinese companies violate their environmental standards, they choose a manager to charge with a crime, and execute him. Cutting corners in a way that causes negative attention is more harshly punished in China than any other major country.

    90. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Did those other president's lose their licences to practice law because they got a bj?

    91. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bartles · · Score: 1

      If he orders them to get moved, they get moved. He's not willing to expend the political capital it would take to issue that order. That makes him the opposite of a leader, and frankly a coward.

    92. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by sjames · · Score: 1

      Note that I suggested it only as a starting point and then mostly because the NSA's charter and mission most explicitly forbid collection of data on citizens. It is the least controversial and sets the momentum in the right direction.

    93. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      lol, spying is a war crime now? Interesting.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    94. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      He could start with "immediately delete all metadata for calls inside the United States unless you have actual evidence that one party is not a U.S. Citizen".

      No problem with that.

      That's what partnerships with other international intelligence agencies are for. They usually are also barred from spying on their own citizens, but are free to spy on foreigners (in this case: US citizens)

      Win-Win situation. And a completly legal way to get rid of that nasty limitation that you shouldn't spy on your own citizens.

      --
      bickerdyke
    95. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... you know, the legal system in China suddenly looks quite favorable. Executing managers that cut corners and poison the world... wonder why we don't get to hear THAT kind of news from there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    96. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by rioki · · Score: 1

      Remind me, in what war the US is currently engaged?

    97. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Probably you're relying on US media. If you add a bit of European news, like the BBC, then you'll get more balanced coverage. Especially on specific areas of propaganda-blindness, such as China.

    98. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess the President can't be blamed then. After all, he's just protecting his reputation from an agency he controls.

    99. Re:And I have a 3 foot long penis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Think they're afraid some people might start to like the idea?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. These are just words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actions speak much, much louder.

    1. Re: These are just words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a contractor with them I'd have more trust in their words if the letter hadn't been waiting for me on my favorite table at the coffee shop I frequent on my days off...

    2. Re: These are just words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a contractor with them I'd have more trust in their words if the letter hadn't been waiting for me on my favorite table at the coffee shop I frequent on my days off...

      Don't you appreciate the personal attention paid to you by your client? After all, at the coffee shop is where you feel most comfortable, almost like when you are at home maybe moreso than at home.

  3. Extended Family? by wjcofkc · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that makes them Big Brother in law.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Extended Family? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw "family" in the letter, I thought of "Mafia Family".

      And this:

      “The NSA/CSS Memorial Wall lists the names of 171 cryptologists who have died in the line of duty since the Agency’s inception in 1952,” according to the letter.

      What? From thrombosis from sitting on their asses all day?

      They hemorrhaged from a paper cut?

      Complications from alcohol abuse?

      Racing desk chairs in the hall?

      Got caught by the husband of that hot chick they were monitoring? That hot chick turned out to be a guy?

    2. Re:Extended Family? by Geirzinho · · Score: 1

      USS Pueblo?
      USS Liberty?
      Vietnam listening posts?
      And many other places they have gathered intelligence...

    3. Re:Extended Family? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's more like a Mafia Family, in the Tony Soprano sense of the word.

      Actually, the tone of "Weather This Storm" letter sounds more like a radio broadcast, live, from the Führer's Bunker in Berlin, in late April 1945.

      Maybe the NSA has some Wunderwaffen in their pockets, like V-3s and V-4s that will ensure their victory in their quest to destroy Americans' trust in their government, and rid the land of the yoke of that pesky Constitution and Bill of Rights.

      . . . and they would have succeeded, if it wasn't for you meddling kids of Slashdot . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Extended Family? by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess that makes them Big Brother in law.

      I prefer the term "Big Sister" -- Think about it: Who's more likely to keep a bunch of detailed records of all goings on, then get pissed off and throw a fit when someone leaks her diary?

    5. Re:Extended Family? by Garridan · · Score: 2

      Shot for preparing to leak documents, actually.

    6. Re:Extended Family? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe the NSA has some Wunderwaffen in their pockets, like V-3s and V-4s

      Nah, they're just happy to see you.

  4. So, they lie to their own staff, too? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not surprised. Not surprised at all.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:So, they lie to their own staff, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse, they believe it. Further making it appropriate to borrow this from Chrisitanity: "The road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions."

    2. Re:So, they lie to their own staff, too? by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      That statement is found nowhere in the Bible. It has nothing to do with Christianity.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    3. Re:So, they lie to their own staff, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing about pathological liars, they have trouble not lying.

  5. I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even a corrupt, militarised state like the united states, this is just too nasty, visible, and public a scandal, for prosecutions of NSA staff, and any political leadership, with knowledge, to be avoided. I can't believe that Americans, the worlds greatest talkers of democracy, will tolerate such an uttlerly despicible act of totalitarianism, within their own country.

    1. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      We're already getting molested at airports, among other things. People might (temporarily, and in small numbers) complain about it, but it seems unlikely that much will change.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
    2. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't believe that Americans, the worlds greatest talkers of democracy, will tolerate such an uttlerly despicible act of totalitarianism, within their own country.

      Well, sure, in theory the people won't stand for this egregious violation of our rights, and come November, you can bet that... Omigawd, did you see what Miley did at the VMAs? And that new video of hers - That girl seems headed for trouble, mark my words! Hey, can you stop and McD's on the way over and get me two Big Macs, a large fry, and a large strawberry shake? No, wait... I need to lose a few pounds, make it a small fry. So, who do you think will win the big game tonight?

    3. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy.

      The NSA have got files on everyone.

      Which politician is going to take them on and see all their dirty laundry thrown to the media?

    4. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Garridan · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It'll change. The terror may be unimaginable before it changes... but much will change. Who can stand up to the US? It'll take the alliance of China and Russia. We can't stand against their combined force. And so, in a fit of desperation, we'll use the bomb. In a world without humans, there will be peace. Does that mean Obama will deserve the peace prize after all?

    5. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      worse everyone knows the NSA has a big file on everyone and is willing to display all the details, which means even if they don't have anything on the first politician to speak up they can make shit up and people will buy it.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    6. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by bmo · · Score: 2

      Someone recently told me that the "capture everything" was done because it's "technically" not a search of everyone's communications on the Internet in human readable form. That is until they use search algorithms to build an "instant dossier" on whoever they don't like from the huge pile of data they've collected.

      That... is plausible. It's probably even correct.

      --
      BMO

    7. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by chihowa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Blackmail only works on criminals and sleazebags. If you're doing shit so bad that you're willing to sell out your entire country to keep it quiet you deserve to be strung up by an angry mob.

      Ordinary people do stupid and embarrassing stuff, but most people don't have histories that they couldn't come clean about if forced to. Only sociopathic assholes whose lives are entirely built on deception (eg politicians) are susceptible to this sort of treatment.

      Blackmail is like Danegeld. Only an idiot would choose to play that game and only a criminal would need to.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Russia, China, and the US/UK are bickering empires that share a common enemy, their citizens. But they will always work as a team to protect authority.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Most under-rated post of the thread.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    10. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Are all the politicians being blackmailed? Every one? Don't you think they talk to each other on occasion? There are hundreds of them, they work together every day. They go out for drinks. They form friendships, just like any other coworkers. Surely one would mention "Hey Bill, I got this threatening phone call from the NSA..." They could disband the entire organization like flipping a light switch if they all wanted to, and if they all were being blackmailed, they'd certainly want to.

      And what would the NSA do? Release documents on every person in Congress? That would just prove them right.

      You're suffering from a group delusion. The only way to cure yourself is by trying to apply some logic to the situation. I know it's tough. But set aside your anger, your hate, your fear, and THINK.

    11. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Blackmail only works on criminals and sleazebags

      To get enough money to get into politics means doing deals with people that are associated with criminals and sleazebags, if not the real deal. A scandal works with Kevin Bacon style weak connections so why not blackmail?

    12. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, just one scrap of proof that the NSA has ever done this to an American politician? Please!

      Till then you are peddling bullshit.
       

    13. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackmail works on people with something that have something to hide which they consider would be unbearable if revealed. The people who don't already have something to hide are people & therefore something to hide can be easily be manufactured by exploiting their most extreme weakness/human frailty. When Elliot Spitzer attempted to prosecute the big banks his activities with high dollar prostitutes became public knowledge. Did these activities precede his intention to prosecute the untouchables? Doen't really matter. He either already had failings, or he was laid low through seduction.

      You have to question the intelligence of anyone who would conspire with someone they didn't have dirt on. When people inevitably decide to grow a conscience, you need to have a means to yank on their leash and remind them they will be fed to the wolves if they come clean. Their credibility will be ruined and they will know at that point to shut up. Because any accusations against their conspirators will be met with skepticism as an attempt to deflect attention, and will inevitably result in the second wave of suffering crashing down upon them.

    14. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey Bill, I've got something to hide and if I get fed to the wolves, your friendship to me will make you appear guilty by association. Can I cry on your shoulder now?"

    15. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians dont want to do the right thing, they just want power.
      They cant agree on anything, they certainly wont agree on this.

      Look the other guy wants to shut the NSA, hes unpatriotic, wave flag, vote for me.
      Who will go first?

      Carrot and stick works best, NSA doesnt have to just threaten them, it can bribe them as well.

      Snowden already proved them right, we already know what they do, and if this letter is true then its likely we will know more soon as well.

      Seems prety convenient that the politicians COULD shut them down with the flick of a switch, but choose not to, even tho its:
      1. the right thing to do
      2. the popular thing to do
      3. the thing they swore an oath to do
      But they dont do it. I wonder why that is?

    16. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recall that from 1928 to 1967 wiretapping was perfectly legal in the US to use in criminal prosecutions. (This was a decision made during the prohibition era, when the phone was a new fangled thing) At the time the Supreme court stated that there was no expectation of privacy on the telephone (which with party lines and folks listening in might have been sort of true). In 1967 the Supreme court discovered that there was an expectation of privacy on a pay phone in a booth, and thus for all phones. Perhaps the NSA believes that the court erred fundamentally in 1967 and harkens back to the good old days when wiretapping was perfectly legal.

    17. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Tell that to Hoover. Or his lieutenant, Mark Felt, Mr. Deep Throat himself.

      Blackmail works. It's worked most of the 20th century. It's probably working even now.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    18. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hold your breath, because most people voted for the chief of this militarized state called the United States.

    19. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, it is not correct. A search is a search, when it is collected, ie. at the time and place it was *collected*.

      Collection of data ALL THE TIME, is equivalent to WARANTLESS SEARCH ALL THE TIME.

      Resist the urge to fall in love with morons and their "safe way out", aka cop-outs.

    20. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stupid thing is that usually you will be blackmailed into doing something that in turn can be used to blackmail you.

    21. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by srichard25 · · Score: 2

      Getting a job in politics is like winning the lottery. The "winners" stand to make millions off the kickbacks and side deals. And all it takes to lose that lottery ticket is a small scandal that the press can run with right before re-election. The story doesn't even need to be completely true. The very insinuation of wrong-doing can be enough to lose a re-election. This is especially true for a Republican politician.

    22. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      If you understand anything at all about "democracy," you shouldn't be surprised when totalitarianism results.

    23. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Endymion · · Score: 1

      Why are you all pre-supposing that the threat has to be about something you actually did? If $ENEMY calls you with threats to reveal that secret child-pornography studio you have hidden away in your house, it doesn't matter if it isn't actually true - they can still ruin your life with just the accusation. Really, blackmail doesn't rely on you on something you did that you try to hide, but instead preys upon people who have something to lose, such as your family or job.

      A traditional way isn't even to go after *YOU*. They just see to it that your parents -or kids start losing their jobs or are subject toother threats. To quote from a particularly well-written reddit post (which everybody should read!)

      With this tech in place, the government doesn't have to put you in jail. .... they can email you a note saying that they can prove your dad is cheating on his taxes. Or they can threaten to get your dad fired. All you have to do is... report back every week [and rat out your friends], or you dad might lose his job. So you do. You turn in your friends and even though they try to keep meetings off grid, you're reporting on them to protect your dad.

      [...]

      Everyone walking around is scared. They can't talk to anyone else because they don't know who is reporting for the government. Hell, at one time YOU were reporting for the government. Maybe they just want their kid to get through school. Maybe they want to keep their job. Maybe they're sick and want to be able to visit the doctor. It's always a simple reason. Good people always do bad things for simple reasons.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    24. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by chihowa · · Score: 1

      This only really works if the people who are extorting you are the authorities, though. Extortion is illegal and the only thing that keeps the victim from involving the police is their secret coming out. If the secret isn't true then there isn't any leverage to use against the victim. The revealed misinformation can still be damaging, but there is great incentive to out the blackmailer and clear your name. Giving in to them only lends credence to the misinformation and gives them leverage.

      [From your example, if some guys threatens to expose your (non-existent) child porn studio if you don't pay him, paying him is the last thing you want to do. There's no assurance that paying will shut him up and if he goes to the press after you've paid him off (maybe more than once), the story is now that you've payed someone to keep quiet about your child porn studio. On the other hand, if you go to the cops, the story is that you were being blackmailed over a child porn studio that the cops verified wasn't real and the blackmailer is being hunted down by law enforcement. True, "child porn studio" and your name still show up together in the news, but this is the best realistic (and controllable) outcome.]

      Of course, in your situation, the law is the blackmailer and so it doesn't matter if the "secret" is true or not. There will be no justice.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    25. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Endymion · · Score: 1

      I think you're probably strongly underestimating just how bad the *accusation* of such a charge can be,; especially with how easy it is to plant any sort of incrimnating file. Really, though, America's panic over that entire topic is a topic for another thread.

      the story is now that you've payed someone to keep quiet

      Of course, THAT obviously-wrong solution to being blackmailed has been know for a long time. As Shakespeare put it:

      It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
      For fear they should succumb and go astray;
      So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
      You will find it better policy to say: --

      "We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
      No matter how trifling the cost;
      For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
      And the nation that plays it is lost!"

      It may have bad consequences, and it may nto even work, but irunning fighting the blackmailer is still a much, much better option than giving in to what they want, which only invites more of the same.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    26. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by Endymion · · Score: 1

      ack; in my hates, didn't notice the other author mentioned on wiki. That poem is atributed to Rudyard Kipling, not Shakespeare, though they both speak similarly on the subject.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    27. Re:I don't see how prosecutions can be avoided by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I realized shortly after my original post that blackmail seems just like Danegeld because it is (originally) literally the exact same thing as Danegeld!

      As to your first point, I realize that the mere accusation of some things can be ridiculously damaging, but by the time you're being extorted you're already in damage control mode. If someone's threatening to release damaging misinformation about you, there's no legal way to keep them quiet without also risking their message getting out. Any extralegal attempt to silence them only risks forcing their hand and in the end paints just as poor a picture of you as paying them off does.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  6. When you have to write a letter by The_Star_Child · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Acknowledging the problem doesn't exist, it most certainly does.

    1. Re:When you have to write a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, our handsomest politicians came up with a cheap, last minute way to combat global warming. Ever since 2063, we simply drop a giant ice cube into the ocean now and again. Of course, because the greenhouse gasses are still building up, it takes more and more ice each time, thus solving the problem once and for all.

    2. Re:When you have to write a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This problem certain exists, but I don't agree with your logic. I once had to write a letter to customers after a demonstrably false smeer campaign was waged against us.

    3. Re:When you have to write a letter by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      As has been said many times, nothing will confirm your suspicions better than an official denial.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  7. Yes. Yes they are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    End of discussion.

  8. Snowjob by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >>> It was intended to reassure them that the NSA is not really the abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity that someone reading former NSA contractor Edward Snowdenâ(TM)s disclosures might think...

    Uhh what? Snowden just released existing documents, he didn't create them.
    It stands to reason that the NSA should be judged exactly by their actions, i.e. the content of the documents they themselves created.

    1. Re:Snowjob by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Snowden just released existing documents, he didn't create them. It stands to reason that the NSA should be judged exactly by their actions, i.e. the content of the documents they themselves created.

      Absolutely.

      The NSA have done much to confirm themselves as an inherently evil organisation with their own slimy behaviour since the Snowden leaks.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  9. Of course they're not illegal! by d33tah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course they're not "engaged in illegal activity". They control the law.

    1. Re:Of course they're not illegal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a functioning democracy, laws are made by the people, at least indirectly. Only when people decide not to accept that the law comes from an organization that in practice has no oversight can there be a fix to this problem.

      From this we can also conclude that "what is the law" is up for debate. If I claim the law is everyone must pay me 100 dollars, nobody will follow this "law". If the NSA or another three letter state organization makes up a law it is still apparently being followed. Of course, they are part of the state, I am not, but they are not automatically "the will of the people" just because they are part of the state. And the thing is, it is nearly or completely impossible to fix the current mess if they can just make up new laws as they go along to stop any action from the people that is about to work.

      In short, I suggest that the first step is for the general public to not accept such "laws" at all.

    2. Re:Of course they're not illegal! by d33tah · · Score: 1

      The trick is that if the laws are made in secret, you have no legal way to oppose. Actually, it's a joke at the very beginning. You assumed "a functioning democracy".

  10. I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am sure that the NSA sees itself as the good guy, and I am sure it does serve some useful, protective services. However, if those services come at the expense of civil liberties then the price is too high. And if it comes at a small cost to civil liberty, then it won't be too much longer until the bureaucracy feeds on itself until the small infractions become large ones.

    1. Re:I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't there just a mass shooting in DC this week with TONS of warning signs?

      If the reason to spy on everyone is to prevent terrorist attacks and mass shootings, shouldn't mass shootings not be happening? Looks like they fail on every level.

    2. Re:I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 years ago, this should have been marked as Insightful.

      Nowadays, with the facts that we have now, it's all too clear that this is true. Kind of a captive audience problem, and we can't escape audience status. Everything was set in place decades ago, exacerbated by a certain event, and is now spiralling out of control faster than anyone can even acknowledge the spiral forming.

    3. Re:I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >small cost to civil liberty... small infractions

      I think it's good to keep those two concepts (costs to civil liberty, breaking rules meant to protect civil liberties) separate. If they're given authority, through a reasonably transparent and democratic process, to do things that are not beneficial to civil liberties, then you can't have a problem with them, no matter how much you dislike it - you can only blame/work against society's views on the matter.

      On the other hand, if they're bending/breaking/ignoring rules, then that is a huge problem, and they themselves are what needs fixing.

      Basically, don't conflate laws you don't agree with with laws being broken - it weakens the overall argument.

  11. It's not the NSA who will pay the price by klingens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the NSA will weather it, will continue to exist and will continue to spy. For them it's a (short) embarrassing time after which the news media will forget them and all will be the same for them again.

    The ones who pay for this are the US IT companies which will be distrusted world wide and the US government (politicians, diplomats, secretary of state, etc) who will be distrusted even by their closest allies. US companies will notice it in the long term bottom line e.g. when big foreign companies won't outsource to a US company. The public will forget the scandal soon like they forgot Echelon, the big companies who have actual trade secrets however won't, and if they do they will probably regret it soon when their secrets aren't secret anymore and their US competitors magically know everything they do. These losses are however far in the future: more than a quarter away so they will be denied, at least publically and especially by the ones responsible: the politicians.

    The politicians will have a lot less trust and goodwill from their foreign counterparts, even and especially from allied countries.

    1. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other costs. When the NSA gets caught lying blatantly, and when their powers are used for wholesale, untargeted information gathering, it wastes their time and money and produces data that's more suited for internal political manipulation than for sensible foreign policy.

    2. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European, Russian, Iranian, and Chinese intelligence agencies are also known to spy, including on internet based communications, email and the rest. If you want to avoid that you need to think about only using Elbonian hosting and labor. Otherwise you're kidding yourself that you're going "spy free" by going outside the US.

      You're also confused about the spying that the US government does. It isn't to seal trade secrets. I can understand the confusion on the point though, given certain European practices.

    3. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by 0123456 · · Score: 1, Informative

      it wastes their time and money and produces data that's more suited for internal political manipulation than for sensible foreign policy.

      There's no such thing as 'wasting money' when you work for the government. The more money you spend, the more money you get next year, the more people you get to hire, and the more power you have.

    4. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by green+is+the+enemy · · Score: 1

      the ones responsible: the politicians.

      What I am more worried about is who the politicians are representing? I doubt it is in the general public's best interest to run an extensive, secret internal spying program. Trust in the government is more beneficial than catching a small number of criminals using this method. The secrecy of it facilitates selective enforcement, potentially giving certain people far more power than they should have. Are we seeing the tip of the iceberg of the real power struggle behind the scenes? Could it be that some powerful entities are deliberately sabotaging trust in the US government? Could this be a media circus distracting us from an even larger power grab?

    5. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by chihowa · · Score: 1

      If the data are important to you, you host them in house. Hopefully the practical lesson that everybody learned from this isn't just, "US bad, everywhere else good". That's such a ridiculously superficial and overly specific interpretation of all of this.

      There's no such thing as perfect security, but trusting crucial data with opaque third-parties is about as far from perfect security as you can get.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re: It's not the NSA who will pay the price by guttentag · · Score: 2

      I read somewhere that all NSA restrooms switched their toilet paper to Quilted Northern a couple years ago. Allegedly, the employees had grown so accustomed to wiping their rear ends with "the cloud" they refused to use anything less.

    7. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have described is exactly where they would like the attention to be diverted. Instead of focusing on NSA spying on Americans, it's more than convenient for them if Americans take this as a pride issue of Europeans stealing from them.

      It's also good to take notice of how this has affected the US based technology companies. Billions are estimated to have been lost in sales after the scandal broke out and the trend is continuing.

      While it is good to acknowledge that spying is something every nation does, the scale of the NSA/GHCQ spying mechanism are not out of this world. They simply record *everything* they get their hands on. It's especially sad that the trust in Internet based services has seriously weakened after it was discovered how encryption mechanisms were tampered with by implementing backdoors and conducting MITM attacks.

    8. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by moteyalpha · · Score: 2

      This is an inevitable consequence of conflict in values. This type of document is a reinforcement and no matter what anybody says, it serves its purpose. The government has become a cult in the same way as many other countries. Conditioning to be part of a specific group is a strong tool and always has been. Humans would likely not exist if there were not a natural tendency to operate in packs or troupes.
      You are right that others will pay the cost of this and that is the advantage of their being a member of a power group.
      All of these things are well documented techniques of control. It isn't just here , but it extends to business, advertising, and any social contact.
      The internal operation of something like scientology, the reich, Jonestown, political parties, abusive relationships, bullying, and a million others can seem other worldly to a person is less influenced by the opinion of others as they are by experiment, analysis and observation. The emotional / neural structure of people is pivotal in having society and somewhat paradoxically in the destruction of it also.
      There are many vestigal behaviors that stem from our origins that allow association in family groups or packs and we would not be here except for them. So this letter seems very creepy to me and is hard to look at, very much like listening to the Jonestown tapes, right before they drank the kool-aid. Mob mentality is something that I don't understand personally, but I have taken courses in advertising and I know that I can create situations that move people to do things that are not in their best interest. The creation of Linux, Red Cross, and many others would be examples of the positive side of this.

    9. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by dbIII · · Score: 1

      when their secrets aren't secret anymore and their US competitors magically know everything they do

      Airbus versus Boeing, I'm not sure what year that came up in court. It appears the agents should have stolen a few more details before the Dreamliner went into production though.

      These losses are however far in the future

      I think those losses are already hitting the US bottom line.

    10. Re:It's not the NSA who will pay the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not in the future any more. RSA is already feeling the need for damage control.

    11. Re: It's not the NSA who will pay the price by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Only the highest ranks get to use the Constitution in the executive washroom.

      --
      -DwS
  12. NSA/CSS - approved by W3C ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    I had not heard about this new style sheet standard. Do I need to start to use it on my web sites ? Does it protect my sensitive information from the commies/taliban/mafia/... ? Which browsers support it ?

    1. Re:NSA/CSS - approved by W3C ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the new NSA CSS standard, it allows you to make websites with absolutely No Privacy Included.
      You can use the new display:NSA-frame to automatically make all content MASSIVE so everyone around can see it
      In the case of audio content, there is also an extension to that which increases the volume.
      If that isn't to your liking, there is also the new @share rule, any content in this section automatically gets screenshotted and sent to any accounts you are logged in to from social networking sites. Marvellous.

      The CSS purists were upset that this spec had only some relation to styling but also had some interactivity features, but then someone pointed them to the CSS3 spec and they quickly sat down and cried with head on arms.

  13. NSA kills trees by McGruber · · Score: 1

    Gee, I wonder why NSA employees are handing out printed copies of the letter instead of just emailing (or Facebook sharing) it to their family members?

    (There might be a lesson there for the rest of us.....)

    1. Re:NSA kills trees by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I assumed they'd just send an encrypted copy from the PotUS to the head of the UN via a secured line with the presumption that everyone in the NSA along with any contractors would read it as a matter of course...

      Obviously anyone who didn't get the memo just isn't doing their job.

  14. Today is a good day to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "In the coming weeks and months more stories will appear"

    In other words there's shit storm that's about to rain down on the NSA that will shake the organization to it's knees. And they know it.

    Weather this storm indeed.

    1. Re:Today is a good day to die by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      "In the coming weeks and months more stories will appear"

      In other words there's shit storm that's about to rain down on the NSA that will shake the organization to it's knees. And they know it.

      Weather this storm indeed.

      I hope.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:Today is a good day to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is nothing compared to what they're in the process of doing to themselves. Their "storm" isn't even the first raindrops, it's merely the formation of a few dark clouds but yes a storm, the real storm, is unavoidable.

      Congratulations NSA, the nazis were the last to successfully redefine hell but you're set to top them.

  15. Sound exactly like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. an abusive husband/father. "I hit you because I love you and you deserve it. Now fix dinner/clean your room"

  16. To paraphrase... by NoKaOi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To paraphrase the letter:
    We're family, we love you, so you should love us. Everything said in the media (except for a few pundits who we are paying off) is lies, the leaks didn't really say what they said. Everything we do is legal because we have the power to define the meaning of legal as anything we do.

    1. Re:To paraphrase... by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Now, how many fingers am I holding up?

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  17. But is it genuine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has anybody verified this letter is real? I smell a hoax.

  18. Over 99.9% honest agents! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    It's not about hundreds of honest agents and managers doing the right thing. It's about creating an apparatus where a rogue agent at the behest of some powerful politician can get lost among the many and spy on opponent politicians and their supporters.

    With easy to defeat or ignore technological barriers and just "you should go get approval first before you listen in", i.e. relying on agent honesty to Do The Right Thing, we've already lost. I keep bringing up the Watergate people -- these thugs, most of which would have been agents or that level of clearance, wouldn't think twice about doing this.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Over 99.9% honest agents! by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The mass surveillance apparatus which is unquestionably a violation of 4th amendment protections requires just a few more than 1 in 10,000 agents to carry out. There may very well be a large group of perfectly honest and upstanding agents in the NSA, but the corruption goes much deeper than a few rogue individuals. It goes to the very top, with the head of the NSA perjuring himself to Congress only very shortly before Snowden's documents started trickling out in the news.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:Over 99.9% honest agents! by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      But the 0.1% is the leadership giving the orders to the rest.

  19. I'll tell you what it means ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    "The NSA/CSS Memorial Wall lists the names of 171 cryptologists who have died in the line of duty since the Agency’s inception in 1952,” according to the letter.

    What does that even mean? People die while working for us and put their lives on the line every day so don’t even think about criticizing our role in government? Or, for the families who are questioning whether their loved one is now a forever disgraced government employee, do not worry because they are working on collecting “intelligence” at great risk in some cases?"

    Nope. It is a thinly veiled threat. You, dear family member, could be number 172 ... on second thought make that 173; we'll get Snowden first!"

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:I'll tell you what it means ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does a cryptologist die in the line of duty? Isn't that a desk job? Does that mean they labored long and hard into the night, foreswearing friends, family, personal health and everything other than cracking that code, finally dying of a heart attack with their hands still on the keyboard or crumpling to the ground with whiteboard markers in their hands?

    2. Re:I'll tell you what it means ... by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The NSA/CSS Memorial Wall lists the names of 171 cryptologists who have died in the line of duty since the Agency's inception in 1952," according to the letter.

      This refers to members of the US military doing cryptographic duty who died in the line of duty. Here's the list. Most died during the Cold War or in Vietnam. In recent years, in Afghanistan or Iraq. Only one civilian, Alan M. Blue, who was on the USS Liberty when the Israelis attacked it.

    3. Re:I'll tell you what it means ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Why are you posting this as a follow up to my joke?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:I'll tell you what it means ... by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Why are you posting this as a follow up to my joke?

      Human error. He obviously meant to reply to the AC asking the redundant question.

      Never fear though: in the near future when everything is done by robots (including the submission of Slashdot posts that get modded to +5) these sort of errors will never happen!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    5. Re:I'll tell you what it means ... by Pav · · Score: 1

      $5 wrench poisoning?

  20. Quitting problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the NSA has a quitting problem they are trying to abate.

  21. Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that completely unrelated to this story, or do we expect the US government to prevent similar from happening here on American soil while the NSA and FBI dutifully obey all laws on the books?

    1. Re:Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Great example of a false dichotomy!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that completely unrelated to this story, or do we expect the US government to prevent similar from happening here on American soil while the NSA and FBI dutifully obey all laws on the books?

      The NSA didn't prevent the lunatic from perpetrating the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard.

      The NSA didn't stop those idiots from setting off an IED during the Boston Marathon.

      The NSA & FBI didn't help with the apprehension of the snipers in the D.C. area a few years back either.
      The skippers were caught because they were noticed acting suspiciously in a rest area.

      The FBI and NSA didn't prevent the events of September 11, 2001.

      I'm afraid you will need a few examples of actual successes in order to make your claims stick, but you are going to have a problem with this, because there are no examples of attacks being prevented.

      Oh, and how about that mess in Benghazi ? Yeah, all the NSA spying seems to be really working out
      well with respect to keeping Americans safe.

    3. Re:Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fred: Dan, what the hell are you doing?

      Dan: I'm keeping pink elephants away.

      Fred: What pink elephants?

      Dan: See, it's working.

    4. Re:Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA didn't prevent the lunatic from perpetrating the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard.

      It's very difficult for law enforcement, even assisted by the FBI and CIA/NSA, to stop a lone wolf bent on murder unless they talk about what they're planning to do beforehand, especially when it's as easy to get a hold of guns as it is in the USA. But yeah, "guns don't kill people" etc. Only liberal politicians do.

      The NSA didn't stop those idiots from setting off an IED during the Boston Marathon.

      That was two guys acting on their own, but it's possible that law enforcement could have sniffed that one out by acting on the tip on the older brother.

      The NSA & FBI didn't help with the apprehension of the snipers in the D.C. area a few years back either
      The skippers were caught because they were noticed acting suspiciously in a rest area.

      Again, a two man cell, and the younger one was completely subservient to the older one, not acting independently.

      The FBI and NSA didn't prevent the events of September 11, 2001.

      The White House blew it that time. They were warned, but they were fixated on taking out Saddam Hussein.

    5. Re:Kenyan shopping mall massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA didn't prevent the lunatic from perpetrating the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard.

      It's very difficult for law enforcement, even assisted by the FBI and CIA/NSA, to stop a lone wolf bent on murder unless they talk about what they're planning to do beforehand,

      Apparently you have not read any of the commonly available info on the perp's behavior
      prior to the Naval Yard shooting. Any intel agency worthy of the name would have known this
      character should not be given entrance to ANY government facility.

  22. Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those were all military personal collecting data for the NSA.

    They were NOT NSA people.

    NSA people sit in their little cubes in the Virginia and Maryland areas. They do NOT risk their lives. That's all bullshit that any of those people lost their lives in the line of duty.

    1. Re:Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually uniformed and civilian NSA people do go out into the field as we used to deploy (sail) with them on-board every time we went out for a long cruise. So those people were most likely in the field when they were killed.

      [How do I know this? Whenever their gear broke and they couldn't fix it, I was one of the few people on board with way more than enough clearance to repair it even though I didn't work for the NSA.]

    2. Re:Military by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      yeah so then they are military?
      which is it, military or not military? playing games with the definition to avoid technically having declared war by action on every nation on earth?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Military by Desler · · Score: 2

      This just in: military personnel work as NSA analysts.

    4. Re:Military by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 2

      playing games with the definition to avoid technically having declared war by action on every nation on earth?

      Why not? It's been pretty effective so far.

  23. Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why the NSA is not writing a letter to the American people to explain themselves?

    The reason is that whilst NSA is well protected from normal folk, but they are very scared for more of their employees to leak more information - one more Snowden and the NSA as we know it won't exist.

    1. Re:Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah all the leaks in the world won't matter to the NSA, only to the cannon fodder thinking they're in charge.

      Btw the NSA as you likely know it doesn't exist. Snowden didn't work for the NSA. The NSA is a shell organization functioning as a warehouse of expendables and legal obfuscation and probably has been since they stopped being No Such Agency many decades ago. You could remove all of it and it wouldn't really change anything.

      It is handy to have a name to use though so "NSA" it is.

  24. Cigarette companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This rhetoric is no different than the cigarette companies, which pretended to be standing up for "smokers rights." Their leaked documents proved a very different story and motivations.

  25. These are just woods. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Except in forests... when occurring to trees.

    1. Re:These are just woods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butterfly effect.

      [Off topic: having existed is more than enough, the ripples spread. Cascade never dies and time becomes inconsequential. Call it chaos if you will but it is not.]

  26. Spooky use of the word 'Family'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA are 'family' all right.

    And 'family' members don't let each other down. Even if it does sound a bit like the Mafia.

    What NSA SHOULD have done after the Berlin Wall came down and the Cold War ended was to say:

    "Hey, we aren't needed so much any more. If it can be shown that there is less threat nowadays, we'll just wind down our most expensive facilities and keep a small corps going so that if we're ever needed in the future we can build up rapidly. In the meantime, it's going to be great living in peace..."

    What they ACTUALLY said was:

    "OMG! Our Threat has gone away! Quick, start up a new threat, in the Middle East or somewhere, to keep justifying our existence! Something that we can claim will go on for EVER! We HAVE to keep people frightened, or our budget will start to disappear."

  27. first step in the playbook is deny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact that they wrote the letter is an acknowledgment of everything and pretty much says it all!

  28. I sense desperation by godless+dave · · Score: 1

    Writing to employees' families and referring to his organization as a "national treasure" both give off a sense of defensiveness. As another poster said, they will almost certainly weather the political storm and continue doing what they do, but this letter doesn't make them look any better.

    --
    "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
  29. We Shall Prevail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but think of Apple's 1984 commercial.

  30. Following the process by shadowone · · Score: 1
    1. Ignore their story

    2. Deny their story

    3. ....

    4. They win

    /me waves at the NSA analysist in cubical N42-34

  31. Just admit that you're criminals by elashish14 · · Score: 1

    Just admit that you have no concern for civilian privacy (whether they're American or otherwise), that you have no trepidation when it comes to breaking the rules and inventing your own, that you think you can decide what is right for yourselves when you know very well that it's wrong (and if you don't, that you need to go back to grade school philosophy), that you have no respect for the sovereignty of other groups and nations (many of which want to have nothing to do with you), and that you are a lying, secretive, pragmatic organization with no morals, conscience, values or principles other than feeding your own greed, power and corruption.

    Seriously, denial is the first indication that you have a problem. If anything, this idiotic claptrap is indication that the NSA needs more than ever to be dismantled and banished into the annals of corruption autocracies.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  32. shiny object by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In 6 months we wont remember who the NSA is or what happened.

    Humans today have the attention span of a turnip.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:shiny object by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      "Humans today have the attention span of a politician."

      FTFY.....Turnips are really good listeners for a couple of weeks before the mold sets in........

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  33. Because, ya know, we are SO CREDIBLE! by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

    Obviously all of the rhetoric surrounding our illegal or unconstitutional behavior are extremist lies that jeopardize the safety of your country and families.

    THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    1. Re:Because, ya know, we are SO CREDIBLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock

      1) If you think stripping is in any way an improper activity, you fucked up. 2) Likewise, if you taught your kids that it is improper, you fucked them up. 3) Insofar as you're getting your (cough) "wisdom" from Chris Rock... you're really fucked up.

    2. Re:Because, ya know, we are SO CREDIBLE! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock

      1) If you think stripping is in any way an improper activity, you fucked up. 2) Likewise, if you taught your kids that it is improper, you fucked them up. 3) Insofar as you're getting your (cough) "wisdom" from Chris Rock... you're really fucked up.

      It's a fucking joke, laugh already.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    3. Re:Because, ya know, we are SO CREDIBLE! by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      s/stripper/hooker/

  34. Spin control by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NSA denied the spying flat out, until they were caught.

    The government claimed the court oversight was adequate, until FOI releases proved they're not.

    They said they were only using the surveillance data to catch terrorists, until it was revealed that the DEA was getting a feed.

    Why should anyone, even an NSA employee, believe anything these idiots have to say any more?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Spin control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #48369 report for rehabilitation. That is all.

  35. Letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The National Security Agency sent a letter to its employees, affiliates and contractors to reassure them that the NSA is not really an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity."

    We have always been at war with Oceania.

  36. Thanks for Iraq. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For more than 6 decades, NSA/CSS has been responsible for protecting the United States through its information assurance"

  37. You can never quit "The Family" by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

    If anyone was thinking of breaking up with the NSA family, the letter states, “We want to put the information you are reading and hearing about in the press into context and reassure you that this Agency and its workforce are deserving and appreciative of your support.”

    Family == Mafia [*]

    [*] or used to be until the National Stasi Agency sullied the term ...

    --
    Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  38. Now is the time by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope that there are lots more courageous NSA employees and contractors who will stand up and be whistleblowers.

    They're probably our last best hope to turn back this police state.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Now is the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What NSA sockpuppet modded this "Funny"? This is insightful.

    2. Re:Now is the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment has just been picked up by agent-modelling software at HQ. Appropriate action will be taken to minimize this threat before I hit "Reply" (and indeed, the system has. They're laying off thousands of sysadmins). Without human intervention, the criminal system can go into overload mode.

    3. Re:Now is the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other insiders would probably support Snowden, but they are too well paid to do anything about it.

  39. Yeah, I'll believe all that by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf (the Iraqi Information Minister during the second Gulf War) has snagged himself a new contract. WE ARE NOT SPYING ON ANY AMERICANS, AND THERE IS NO FAILURE OF OVERSIGHT.

    1. Re:Yeah, I'll believe all that by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure al-Sahaf would have a legitimate suit against the NSA for their misappropriation of his trademark.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  40. rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “It has been discouraging to see how our Agency frequently has been portrayed in the news as more of a rogue element than a national treasure."

    The robust and aggressive, effective and highly competent intelligence gathering of the NSA does require oversight. I expect the US Congress to do this job, unfortunately they prove themselves over and over to be political whores loyal to their Party and extreme ideologies rather than their country.

    So there is risk. But think of the NSA as a Bletchley Park on steroids. These are normal, intelligent people trying to solve hard problems. I'm sure there are administrators who might compromise integrity for personal gain here and there, and rogue elements with access to the information could abuse it horribly. That's why effective oversight is required. In my opinion Snowden himself is an example of the damage to national security that can be caused by a rogue element with access to this information.

    The knee-jerk anti-NSA sentiment even among intelligent people here and places like hacker news is so horribly misplaced. How many of these people dump their lives into facebook and let any app from any random developer suck their contacts list from their phones? Get some sensible priorities for directing all of the energy and hate. I direct my anger at the incompetent oversight committee -- the US Congress -- and incompetent controls in hiring and protecting information especially among sys admins.

    1. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I direct my anger at the incompetent oversight committee -- the US Congress -- and incompetent controls in hiring and protecting information especially among sys admins.

      Coldfjord, why don't you go buy a six pack and find yourself a reasonably priced whore for the
      night ( or maybe a teenage boy, that's probably more to your taste ) and shut the fuck up.

      Most of us here are not going to ever believe your bullshit, and it is way past boring reading
      your moronic attempts at persuasion.

      .

    2. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but who is this Coldfjord? I am someone who really does think there is a mismatch between reality and the avalanche of negativity towards the NSA. I say this despite some serious problems with some NSA behaviour such as sharing unfiltered intelligence on US citizens with foreign intelligence partners.

      My attitude is that we should fix the oversight problems so that, for example, intelligence sharing with partners is done responsibly and legally.

      I smell two things that make me a little sick of the anti-NSA crowd. One is the part of your comment referring to "most of us here". I see in that opinions that are bolstered by simply being part of a screaming mob. It looks like weakness and I don't respect it. It might not be entirely fair, but that's what I see.

      The other thing I sense is this issue being an outlet for anti-American sentiment in general. There are reasons to be strongly against individual actions of the US government, but in those cases I say we go after the individuals composing the US government who commit those crimes. For example, it is mind boggling that Bush and Cheney are free men and not being tried for criminal negligence and more serious crimes in selling and conducting the Iraq war.

      But blanket condemning of the US or NSA to me only reveals ulterior motives or venting motivated by other reasons. Mix in the group-think of gullible people, and things spirals out of control.

    3. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell two things that make me a little sick of the anti-NSA crowd. One is the part of your comment referring to "most of us here". I see in that opinions that are bolstered by simply being part of a screaming mob. It looks like weakness and I don't respect it.

      Some Americans are sick and tired of being screwed by their government, and we have
      plenty of evidence to back up that screwing is what the government is doing.

      You can be "sick" of us all you want, but if you are on the side of the NSA which has
      been committing crimes against the American people, you are on the wrong side,
      and the day may well come when that is the side many of us are willing to fight to the death.

      By the way, since you are British, why don't you just shut the fuck up. This discussion
      is about the US and people who are not American citizens don't have a stake in the discussion
      of what the NSA is doing to the American people.

    4. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      "knee-jerk anti-NSA sentiment"? Global encryption is now junk. The brands that sold it are a joke. The gov workers who tested/passed it are presenting unsafe math. Thats not just "sentiment" or 'sensible priorities"
      You dont get to be on an oversight committee without getting a hint of the plain text wonders related to any area of political interest.
      Mil, drugs, banking, trade, crime - just enough to keep the laws flexible and internal reviews been all the oversight ever needed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not British. You read too much into my Bletchley ref followed by a word with an extra 'u'. Born in midwest, living in CA.

      Your enthusiasm to do something about the problem is a good sign. And yes, with how you frame the problem, there is a possibility we could end up on different sides.

      Maybe the difference is between considering it a problem with "the NSA which has been committing crimes against the American people" and considering it a problem with individuals who work in government who commit criminal acts. You seem to be attacking the institutions and agencies, I am interested in removing criminal actors from positions of power and responsibility from US government positions.

      Screwed by your government? No, you are screwed by people do criminal things while working for the government.

      We have the best institutions in the world but it takes constant vigilance to keep bad actors from abusing power. Actually many outside of government are a problem too, mainly lobbyists and people who rotate between positions in government and positions in industries that profit from government work. Dick Cheney is the most famous such offender.

      I've seen so many unbearably misguided attacks on the people who work at the NSA. As if there is some huge criminal conspiracy or that these people are aiding and abetting attacks against Americans. I don't even know what their motive is supposed to be. Their salaries?

    6. Re:rogue element or national treasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many "individual actions" of your government do we have to put up with before it counts as your government in general as being hostile?

      Your sharing of unfiltered inteligence gets thier unfiltered inteligence in return, Im sure both countries inhabitants are unhappy about the situation.

      Seems the one thing you have to claim "moral guardianship of democracy and the world" is your constitution and ideals, but both are being sold out here. So why should anyone be surprised that this self righteousness mixed with a good dose of corruption creates such anit-American sentiment?

  41. SS+50 years = NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the SS did not think of themselves any differently than the NSA.

    1. Re:SS+50 years = NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the SS did not think of themselves any differently than the NSA.

      If the NSA people were as efficient as the SS were in the Third Reich, we would
      all be fucked.

      Fortunately, the NSA are a bunch of semi-competent wannabe spooks, and they
      get it wrong far more often than they get it right. Why is this fortunate ? Because
      anyone who knows what's going on is far more afraid of the government than any
      "terrorist".

  42. Reminds of my Alias series by aralin · · Score: 1

    Working for NSA is like working for SD6 :)

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  43. Bread and circuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure why everyone is so shocked the people don't stand up for their dignity and shut this system down. The answer is the concept of 'bread and circuses' and it's in chapter 4 of the dictator's handbook, and always has been.

    Read it for yourself. http://dictatorshandbook.net/book/node79.html

  44. Just being legal doesn't make it right by Goonie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no legal impediment to the NSA collecting, logging, analyzing, and possibly mischaracterizing *everything* I do online, and sharing the results of that analysis with the relevant local cops. The constitutional protections extended to American citizens do not apply to foreigners, from those living in other Western democracies, to those living in countries controlled by various "our-sonnfabitches" that the USA has supported over the years. It's well documented that the CIA has, on a regular basis, interfered in the domestic politics of other countries around the world, including aiding politically convenient despots in enforcing repression. In the old days, the computational tools to surveil everyone in the world simply didn't exist, so the CIA and NSA were naturally limited in who they could bother. Now, such limits apply to a much lesser extent. In terms of the technical capability (and I'm not implying equality of motives) it's heading in the direction of what the Stasi could do - to every single person on the entire planet. And, sorry, I am *not* happy that the United States government has that kind of reach. And nor should you be.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Just being legal doesn't make it right by Bartles · · Score: 1

      If only there was someone in charge, who had power over the executive branch of government, and could stop this. If there was, maybe we could start blaming that person until they acted.

    2. Re:Just being legal doesn't make it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are only allowed to blame the guy in charge of the executive branch if he is a member of the GOP. If you blame the current guy you are a racist. Your best bet is to wait four years and hope a woman doesn't win or you will be blamed for hating women. Just read ANY of these stories and comments about the NSA. The only person who gets blamed and voted up is Bush. Its almost as if he is still in office running things.

      It is far more important to support liberals in politics than to do the right thing.

    3. Re:Just being legal doesn't make it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd hate to be a Chinese citizen in China who pissed off the US government. Those notorious American lapdogs, the Chinese government, would have them on a plane before you could say "sarcasm".

      (But yes, what you're saying is correct for a large chunk of the world, and I agree that it's a problem.)

    4. Re:Just being legal doesn't make it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The constitutional protections extended to American citizens do not apply to foreigners

      I strongly urge you to go and read your constitution.

      Almost everywhere it refers to “people”, not “citizens”: the rights of the people ... shall not be infringed.

      Some of your founding fathers were statesmen, in the greatest and highest sense of the word. The constitution they brought into being is a marvellous document. It is a shame that your politicians almost immediately began to twist it out of shape.

  45. A family that violates the constitution together by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    stays together. Now let's all gather around the fireplace and take turns throwing copies of the Bill of Rights into the fire to stay warm.

  46. Re:A family that violates the constitution togethe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stays together. Now let's all gather around the fireplace and take turns throwing copies of the Bill of Rights into the fire to stay warm.

    Would that be the original Bill of Rights, the post-slavery Bill of Rights, the post-women's suffrage Bill of Rights, the post-interracial marriage Bill of Rights, or the post-gay marriage Bill of Rights?

    I just want to make sure I know what era we're in before discussing the heinous act of passive eavesdropping, can't have any shades of grey or anything don'tcha know.

  47. Yes, Prime Minister by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Yes, Prime Minister

    watch it. learn something.

  48. I'm anonymous coward even though everyone knows me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA is going down. But that there is still a habitat that it occupies. And another entity will fill it. We should be vigilant.

  49. Between republicans say defunding obama care by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

    is not a none stater that shuts down the government I mean grown men and spying on citizens and every government on earth. It has all just caused me to go from wrapped in flag the first second I was born veteran to absolutely no faith in my fellow man. And have had to change my life to living it as a everyman for them self deal. Exchanged the new deal for the raw deal so the rich can get richer on Billionaire who dont want to be tax fair share say so. How can one have faith in anything ever again. The only thing that trickled down was food stamps. And even that they are trying to take away. And a few billionaires have sold them this is a good thing. And it would be if trickle down had not failed so badly that it all trickled I mean flowed like the colorado river up.

  50. Really? by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    Really? A letter.

    'Cause, you know, I always figured that people could pretty much see for themselves and make up their own minds...

  51. Re:A family that violates the constitution togethe by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The same basic questions about US law would have been placed in the ~1950-60-70-80-90~2000. Any individual would have just been reassured, reassessed and later promoted to a less legally challenging area.
    A few generations later the people doing the hiring and been re hired for contracting would have been more understanding of the role of global communications at a domestic level.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  52. Re:A family that violates the constitution togethe by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Any issues raised about "passive eavesdropping" by protesters in the real world would be surrounded by police, federal agents and domestic mil support if near a base/camp/fort... :)
    Long term surveillance and infiltration would blunt the message.
    Press can be fired, set up, distracted or ensured fame until stories about "eavesdropping" become a distant memory.
    Academics can be ensured fame as they write about other safe topics or are questioned over every 'privacy' 'crypto' or 'rights' paper.
    If all that fails just set up well funded front 'foundations' or present other 'academics' to question the role of the Fourth Amendment at a state and federal level until it becomes just another party political mess.
    Sockpuppets have a great role to play too :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  53. More PR by yusing · · Score: 1

    Every word they've said After Snowden has been public relations. "Our extended family" "sensationalized the leaks" "wrongly cast doubt" "more of a rogue element than a national treasure"

    "Denial, Anger, Acceptance" is the third episode of The Sopranos.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  54. Familly, just like the mob.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have ties to the Calabreses, the Sicilians, the triads ... ?

  55. Thank god by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    reassure them that the NSA is not really an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity.

    I am so reassured now.

  56. Nothing new has been 'reveled' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. There are plenty of articles and assumptions over the past 20 years about what they were doing. It never made this much impact before. Yet another gay guy and some good looking guy running from Obama and the government made it more interesting for the media.

    2. The vast majority of people could care less. They are living paycheck to paycheck. They have more interesting lives. They aren't going to be impacted by the NSA. They aren't paranoid.

    3. The NSA has a job to do in order to protect the US and they didn't use their abilities for evil.

    1. Re:Nothing new has been 'reveled' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. There are plenty of articles and assumptions over the past 20 years about what they were doing. It never made this much impact before.

      The impact which has happened recently is because of the Snowden
      leaks which are from INSIDE the NSA and which reveal what the NSA
      has actually been doing. This is substantively different from speculation.

      If you are unable to discern why the Snowden leaks have had
      a greater impact, you need to think about the situation a bit more
      until the answer becomes clear to you.

    2. Re:Nothing new has been 'reveled' by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re They aren't going to be impacted by the NSA
      If their paycheck to paycheck life is stopped by the loss of that vital next paycheck the "people" might become locally politically active.
      The telco network/internet is perfect for tracking small trends and grassroots efforts like that :)
      The "abilities for evil" where not an issue when looking at distant nations and other nations mil ranks.
      All that skill set is now facing inward ie at the vast majority of people.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Nothing new has been 'reveled' by PPH · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of people could care less. They are living paycheck to paycheck.

      You want to be kept down that way? Fine. But the people who want to accomplish something beyond that aren't going to put up with a rigged system. And these are the people who build the businesses that provide you with your paycheck. Do you really think they are going to invest intellectual capital in businesses when they learn that their work is being taken and handed to people within the 'good old boy' network?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  57. Well, you know how the expression goes... by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    The land of the watched, and home of the scared.

  58. Re:I'm anonymous coward even though everyone knows by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    More a return to the 1990's role of the NSA - limited funded and called on only when really needed outside the tasks of setting the codes.
    The CIA and mil/contractors will take their lost 'share' back from the NSA that just grew too fast in the past ~10 years.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  59. Its been said before by PPH · · Score: 1

    "I am not a crook."

    The NSA should take a lesson from Nixon. Save face and step down before your ass has to get dragged through court and embarrass us all.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  60. Sending all my email as CAPTCHAs. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I'm going to send all my email as Captcha jpgs. To hell with encryption, your recipient has to be savvy enough to install it, and a I can't even figure that out on my end. So let the NSA have it, but I'll make damn sure they can't index it without using human eyeballs. Or at least make them work harder on anti-captcha software first. Most email programs can send jpgs just fine already, and Facebook and Twitter handle them fine, also. I just need to come up with a captcha program that will do an entire paragraph.

    1. Re:Sending all my email as CAPTCHAs. by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 1

      ... I just need to come up with a captcha program that will do an entire paragraph.

      Try one of the 'ransom note' fonts that are available, and save your document as a JPEG. That may be enough obfuscation to make OCR difficult/unreliable. Of course, you can type up your paragraph first, then change the font. Much easier on the eyes (and the mind) while typing!

      --
      When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
  61. No one Will Do Anything ... yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The message is clear,

    The NSA think the majority of internet users are liars, Snowden misconstrued what he stole - and the NSA and the preseident (who ever is in the chair) will not do a damn thing to stop the NSA. There's no guilt, no shame, no remorse.

    The message is clear... The NSA are not going to change based on what they've seen so far. That means there's only one option. Escalate what we've seen over the last two months. If you want the NSA to change ... you better work even harder. Obama and the powers in the NSA are a little hard of hearing.

  62. Not to godwin the whole article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure there were surely "good" german really thinking they were the good guy , saving the world from the evil of the jews/gay/gypsie.

  63. Not surprised at all. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If they can withstand the 1970's, the only surprise is the lack of effort given towards bringing Snowden in to face justice in the US.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  64. methinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    methinks thou dost protest too much!

  65. American Exceptionalism and Moral Superiority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Yes, I do! I find it quite amusing that America was schooled by Putin on exceptionalism.

    For a country one who claims to boast its own national exceptionalism and moral superiority. Yet, forgets to mention they are the holders of the largest national debt known to man. If you ask me. I find this fact hardly exceptional or superior ... heck it's not even moral!

    1. Re:American Exceptionalism and Moral Superiority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are the biggest scammers too.It's only borrowing if you pay it back. When did a brotha ever pay anyone back? Barak done chumped those fools. Probably diddled their sister too....

    2. Re:American Exceptionalism and Moral Superiority by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are only exceptional in the number of their own people they have killed in their history. And with all his bluster about great Russian history, I do very much tie Putin into that part of their history. They’re not fooling anyone with their faux peace blabber. They just one to keep one more client madman on his throne. Unfortunately, as there are no good options in Syria that do not involve

              a) killing the wrong side
              b) staying home and watching the carnage
              c) killing everyone

      Russian’s entertaining stupidity is just one of those three options. Taking away Syrians chemical weapons will just be like holding the bully’s gun while he knifes his victim to death.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  66. Riiiiiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the NSA is not really an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity.

    Nah of course not!

    We all know there is no one responsible for anything, after-all it's been public knowledge for months now and nothing at all has been done thus far. All those documents and of course Mr. Snowden are nothing but lies and liars who should be burned at the steak. All our politicians are true and wholesome people who would never, ever, in a million years betray the people who grant them such power. Now get back in-line with the rest of us peasants of this world, we don't decide who's guilty or not we let the higher-ups decide that for us...

    Afterall we the people have no power and we should not speak unless spoken to.

    Have a think about that next time you sleep in your comfortable warm bed because sooner or later things change, they always fucking change. Always. And by the time you know you won't have that bed or even the house you live in because by the time you realize it you will have no more rights to speak of. Yet humanity grasps to a brighter and blissful future... what fucking future?! You people wouldn't be able to tell reality from reality if it fucked you all up the asses every night for the rest of your lives.

    Enjoy.

  67. I do not blame the NSA for spying on Americans. by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    The American mafia has made money through selling information to foreign countries since 1977.

    Without help from the mafia cops, lawyers and hospital workers to allow Americans to be tortured, the Soviet Union would never have had the concept of super-cavitation, the neutron bomb, active stealth or cermet.

    While the American mafia allows kids/relatives of parents with access to classified data to be tortured, the American government has had it's hands tied, it's about 30 years past time for some crooked cops and their gang members to meet the waterboard for espionage.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  68. Must read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " NSA is not really an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity.""

    I initially read that as " NSA is not *merely* an abusive and unchecked spying agency engaged in illegal activity" and couldn't see the big surprise...

  69. NSA Illegal? by Christopher_T. · · Score: 1

    The problem is, what the NSA does ISN'T illegal.

  70. Re:Thanks for Dual_EC_DRBG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For more than 6 decades, NSA/CSS has been responsible for protecting the United States through its information assurance"

    Iraq, meh. Wars end, we win some, we lose some.

    No, the real bitter pill is "Thanks for Dual_EC_DRBG." Information assurance, my ass. It took decades before we realized they strengthened DES against differential analysis, and those decades of credibility on information assurance have now been thrown away. No budding cryptographer in the academic community who values his career can work for NSA, because it will forever be a blot on his CV. We're fine for the next 10 years, but what the fuck are we going to do when the current generation of cryptographers grows old, retires, and eventually dies of old age?

  71. This is not the beginning, it is closer to the end by mindlessrabble · · Score: 1

    I don't think they realize that they are not starting a trend of things switching away from the U.S, they are helping to accelerate an already existing one. The U.S. has increasingly been viewed as a rogue state. People in other countries have been expressing less confidence in US leadership for decades.

    The dot com boom changed things for a while; but the industries reliance on H-1B increased the switching of tech to outside the US. The dot com bust, followed by 9-11 made the US a much less attractive place. Europeans that came to the US eventually stayed long enough to find out about our healthcare system and ran back home. In my company now has more developers in Europe than in the US.

    The data theft by the NSA will accelerate this trend. It is a tipping point. They act like it all started with Snowdon. The competitive situation has changed dramatically. We have been adding one more straw for decades. Is this the straw that breaks the camels back? Probably not, but it is several steps closer to it.

  72. The system was broken to start with by jbrown.za · · Score: 1

    What amazes me is that the "line" has been communication between US citizens should be untouched, but anything involving foreigners is fair game. Placing the rights of Americans above the rights of everyone else has created the gap. If you have a system that protects everyone’s privacy. Where any access to information or monitoring must be substantiated and require a warrant or something similar, the system is far less open to abuse. Freedom is lost one piece at a time. The failure to stand up for the rights of others means that you are one step closer to giving up your own. “Give to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself - that is my doctrine.” Thomas Paine