Slashdot Mirror


Car Dealers vs the Web: GM Shifts Toward Online Purchasing

cartechboy writes "Car dealers may be in for a new battle, and it turns out existing car manufacturers are joining the fun. Tesla Motors began the rebellion by trying to sell electric cars directly to buyers. Car dealers have fought that effort state-by-state and even complained to the DMV about Tesla's website. But things just got a little more interesting. General Motors announced plans to expand its new web-based shopping tool (aka a shopping web site) that allows customers to bypass showrooms when buying new cars. The idea is to use the Web as a giant test platform to see if the automaker can better target people who use the web to buy things. The catch is that the web app, called 'Shop-Click-Drive' will allow users to do almost everything they'd do at a dealer: customize the car, get pricing and financing and even arrange for delivery. But then when you push the button, your "purchase" will be routed to GM's network of 4,300 dealers, so you still have to visit a local dealer to sign on the dotted line. Even with this limitation, the move is still making dealers nervous. GM dealers aren't required to participate in the web-based test, and company officials say they have had some dealers turn it down."

160 comments

  1. This just in... by girlintraining · · Score: 0

    GM is functionally incompetent when it comes to the internet. Tesla is new, small, agile, and responsive to the market. GM is still stuck on the couch with its hand in the chip bag, bitching about how easy kids have it these days.

    Get off the couch GM, lose 50 pounds, and divorce yourself from the idea that you're owed something. Keep it up and this new generation that seems to have little interest in cars, preferring to bike everywhere and sees no particular status in owning a new car will put your fat ass outta business.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:This just in... by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Fat or not, agile or not... it's sure a heck of a lot easier (and cheaper) to buy a GM vehicle than it is a Tesla. GM dealerships are near everywhere (as is their quick fueling options)... not so much with Tesla.

      Don't get me wrong... Tesla has a great bit of tech behind them, they are still the new comer and have a great deal of mindshare to win with regards to 'the big three'.

    2. Re:This just in... by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 2

      GM is functionally incompetent when it comes to the internet. Tesla is new, small, agile, and responsive to the market. GM is still stuck on the couch with its hand in the chip bag, bitching about how easy kids have it these days.

      Get off the couch GM, lose 50 pounds, and divorce yourself from the idea that you're owed something. Keep it up and this new generation that seems to have little interest in cars, preferring to bike everywhere and sees no particular status in owning a new car will put your fat ass outta business.

      GM will continue to survive until it is forced to compete in real capitalism.

      But hey, I'd rather car-shop online, and if that is EVER going to happen, law-makers have a vested interest in the success of GM (an "american" institution). Not so much in Tesla.

      --
      - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    3. Re:This just in... by berashith · · Score: 5, Informative

      the last car i bought, 5 or 6 years ago, i considered a GM car. I had just gone through a great experience buying a honda for my wife, then GM came along to show me how miserable a shopping experience could be. There were a couple of options that made me want this car, but then I couldnt figure out how to get them. The salesman just wanted me to pick one off the lot, but they were over priced with options i didnt want, or didnt have what i came for. We looked at how to order the car, but the items all came in bundles... piles of bundles. One might have a sunroof, a certain radio, upgraded rims, and memory seat adjustments. of these I wanted the sunroof. Then you pick a different engine, and it changes the rims and radio and carpet, and you arent sure which set of overlapping choices would end up on the car. No one could figure that out. This happened for every option i wanted.

      I then tried to configure on a website. again the options were a joke of complexity. At the end, I got to choose which dealership would contact me with a quote. I could choose 1, and only 1. I wanted to see what competing quotes might get me, but I had to start the entire order process over. This was going to take too much time, so I bought a Nissan.

    4. Re:This just in... by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      So forever?

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    5. Re:This just in... by Phoeniyx · · Score: 2

      You were on a roll, until you just said this crazy thing: " Keep it up and this new generation that seems to have little interest in cars, preferring to bike everywhere"

    6. Re:This just in... by emaname · · Score: 1

      I SO badly want to give you a megaton of mod points.

      The earlier comments re how GM is out of shape are spot on, too.

      I won't buy their products.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    7. Re:This just in... by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

      As I go get a new vette.

    8. Re:This just in... by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      Fat or not, agile or not... it's sure a heck of a lot easier (and cheaper) to buy a GM vehicle than it is a Tesla. GM dealerships are near everywhere (as is their quick fueling options)... not so much with Tesla.

      Yeah... that couldn't be because of political pressure to deny them permits, could it? Great argument you got there.

      Tesla has a great bit of tech behind them, they are still the new comer and have a great deal of mindshare to win with regards to 'the big three'.

      You say that like they're all playing the same game, and under the same rules. You couldn't be more wrong.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:This just in... by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      GM is functionally incompetent when it comes to the internet. Tesla is new, small, agile, and responsive to the market.

      Well Tesla has, what, one model, with very few options available. More coming, sure, but today, its pick your color and battery size, and send a check.

      With any of the other big manufacturers, the combinations are almost endless. Engines, transmissions, rear ends, tires, interior trim, exterior trim, across maybe 10 or 30 models. Its a whole level of scale. They have never been set up to do this on a massive scale. Even the dealers need hand holding when ordering cars. Dealers typically order from a pick list of pre-configured models, of what they think will sell in their area.

      When you come kicking tires, if they can't find a car you want on their lot, they might check other dealers, but sooner or later you end up settling for something handy or going for a custom order. And custom orders aren't quick through any of the big dealers. It can take a couple months easily, and if you are near the end of a model year you are SOL. So most people settle for what's on the lot.

      Tesla was set up from the beginning to custom build from a SMALL selection of models. Detroit was set up to pre-build bazillions of standard models with a very few custom orders.

      Still you have to give them credit for trying. You can already "custom build" by picking package options from most manufacturers. (Not with anywhere near a desirable level of granularity.) But you are going to go through a dealer somewhere along the line.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:This just in... by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But hey, I'd rather car-shop online, and if that is EVER going to happen, law-makers have a vested interest in the success of GM (an "american" institution). Not so much in Tesla.

      Everybody car shops on line. They read the specs, pick the model, look at prices, and maybe get a few quotes. Very few people actually order on line. (Women tend to do this more than men, but then women buy more than half the vehicles sold in the US).

      I'm not willing to spend 25 or 50k on a strictly on line purchase. If I bought a Tesla I'd do the same on line shopping but I'd STILL go find a showroom/service center. (I'd have to drive to Seattle). I'm Not dumping that kind of money on the net, and having it show up wrong, dented, or what ever with out a local-ish resource.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Keep it up and this new generation
      It's probably just you.

      >that seems to have little interest in cars, preferring to bike everywhere and sees no particular status in owning a new car will put your fat ass outta business.
      And Tesla too!

    12. Re:This just in... by dead_user · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya. I won't buy shorts on the internet because I loathe wasting money on shipping something back when it's not what I wanted. Wrong size, wrong color, . I can't expect the carrier to cover it. They did their job. I'm asking them to do it again. The seller sold me what I asked for. Now what do I do with them? Any way you slice it I feel like an asshole who should have just gone to the store and tried some on. No one to blame but myself.

      There is no way I'm shipping back a car because the blue finish on my monitor looks nothing like the blue in reality.

      A service center serves a definite purpose. I'm... Old. I've bought 3 cars in my life. My current car will be old enough to get its own learners permit next year. Dropping that kind of money is a big deal to me, especially since last time I did it, I dropped $16,000. Cars are twice that now, I NEED a little hand-holding to make sure I'm not totally doing something stupid. I'm willing to pay a professional to make sure all the correct legal paperwork is handled. I want somewhere I can go to when something happens to my car, my fault or theirs. I also need a place where I can go and be guaranteed to get the part I need for my car, even if I pay a small premium. I've been amazed at some of the obscure bits they have had in stock. That being said, I do prefer a mechanic to a dealer for any repairs I can't do myself. Dealerships have a scorched earth policy to vehicle repair. Two years after I bought it, my car developed a steering fluid leak due to the high and low pressure power steering lines being too close and at cross angles vibrating holes in each other. Ford wanted $600-$800 to replace the power steering system. The mechanic I took it to fixed it with a brazing torch and stopped the vibration with some cut rubber hose and a zip tie for $20. That was 12 years ago and I haven't had a power steering leak since. Sure the for way would have fixed it, but it's just a tube guys. Replace the tube, not the whole engine. /rant

    13. Re:This just in... by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Well Tesla has, what, one model, with very few options available. More coming, sure, but today, its pick your color and battery size, and send a check.

      Consider what they're up against: GM isn't just on the Fortune 500, or even the Fortune 100. They are in the Fortune, uhh... 5. This is a massive corporation, one deemed by our own government as "too big to fail". They have an extensive network of lobbyists. Do you know how many times Tesla has tried to get stores opened only to be denied by state and federal law -- passed very recently and at the behest of GM? Google "Tesla permit" ... then shit a fat brick. You wonder why they only have a website? It's because that's the one thing they don't need approval from these paid off politicians to get going. And... SURPRISE! Guess what the next thing GM wants to do is: Make buying a car online functionally illegal. They're real close to doing it too.

      Now when you're pissing in the wind against that kind of a political power player... how much money do you think they're blowing just to keep their head above water in that department? A fuck ton. They'd love to give you a dozen new models. They could too... except every last dime is dedicated to surviving the regulatory onslaught GM has orchestrated. GM has spent more on campaign contributions this year than Tesla has ever made from all of its sales. Ever.

      Still you have to give them credit for trying. You can already "custom build" by picking package options from most manufacturers. (Not with anywhere near a desirable level of granularity.) But you are going to go through a dealer somewhere along the line.

      GM thanks you for your patriotic opinion, Citizen. Our extensive network of exclusive dealerships really is the only way to shop.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    14. Re:This just in... by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I'm Not dumping that kind of money on the net, and having it show up wrong, dented, or what ever with out a local-ish resource.

      Okay dude, seriously... if you drop 25-50k on a car, do you honestly think the company cares so little for your purchase, when it's so small and desperate for customers, that it's going to just flip you the bird? No. They'll send the goddamned engineers who built that car on the next flight to your house to personally buff and shine that fucker. So please; Don't insult everyone's intelligence here by suggesting that is any kind of a possibility. Amazon provides better customer service than that when I buy a pair of shoes off their website.

      No. This is about convenience, and human psychology. If you're going to be spending an hour or more a day inside that metal can on wheels, you want it to be comfortable. You want it to be easy. Satisfying. And you can't satisfy those emotional needs unless you sit in the damn thing first and drive it around. That's why you go to the dealer -- to test drive. Find out if you find the car... suitable. No other reason. I bet if Tesla had lots in every major city where you could just show up, test drive it, then bring it back... and that was it, no dealers, no pressure, no bullshit... and everything else was done online, you'd pony up the 25-50k. You'd do it because then you'd know what you're getting.

      But don't say it "show up wrong, dented or what ever" is really a serious hinderance in the buying process.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    15. Re:This just in... by pepty · · Score: 1

      Well Tesla has, what, one model, with very few options available. More coming, sure, but today, its pick your color and battery size, and send a check.

      Actually they have quite a few options; a loaded Tesla costs up to $60k more than a base model. Suede headliner anyone?

    16. Re:This just in... by caseih · · Score: 1

      Except that it's true. The stats back it up. More men and women under the age of 25 have no car and no interest in owning a car than ever before. Car ownership statistics in that age category are on a steady decline.

      Whether that's just that mommy and daddy still drive them everywhere and in the future reality will hit them, or not, I cannot say.

    17. Re:This just in... by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh, unless you work for a GM dealership, you have NO idea how bad GM is at IT. Their dealer-side website still does not officially support anything other than IE8. Business reporting relies on ActiveX integration with Excel, and only works properly with Excel 2000 and 2003. It can be made to work under 2007, but they don't support anything higher. Parts of the service-related workbenches still use VBScript. It used to be accessible only over a super-slow satellite link, but they changed that a few years ago, thank god.

      To be fair, though, Toyota's web back-end, Dealer Daily, is even worse. IE-only, accessible only through a dedicated T1 which may not be used for anything else (but which you still pay full price for, of course). Blank page under anything other than IE.

      Come to think of it, a lot of dealership stuff is locked on IE. Dealertrack (intentionally locks out non-IE browsers), Dealersocket CRM (featured-limited under non-IE browsers). ADP is the biggest supplier of dealership management software in the US and most of their stuff is entirely reliant on IE.

      It's a pathetic state of affairs.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    18. Re:This just in... by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      I think I've seen a similar movie before, but it was about MP3's rather than cars. Since we're all still listening to CD's rather than those spandangled music doohickeys, we'll surely still be patronising our local dealer in times to come.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    19. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the same experience trying to buy an FJ Cruiser. Not every dealer though was a tool bag about it. I just called a bunch telling them exactly what I wanted until I got one that said "sure no problem" most lied or were ignorant that such a thing could be done.

      The others all wanted to sell me a automatic, two-wheel drive big-rimmed urban bling cruiser with all the inane extra crap that makes it look "edgy and offroady".

      I wanted the 4x4 manual transmission base package (steel rims, no roof rack, no fog lights, no little $500 dashboard thingy that has a thermometer and a compass, no $1500 navigation package, no special badging and stickers,etc). The funny part was most of the sales personnel took it for a spin around the block because they had never seen one like that before and certainly never a 4x4 or a manual transmission(Tampa Florida). I didn't mind these guys even let me order the complete set of dealer repair manuals for the FJ without any grief. Other deals told me no way.

      Frankly I think Mini and Tesla are the only car companies that get it close to perfect on their websites. Let me go through every option available, show me what the car will look like, (and someday hopefully) have a "buy it now" or "have a rep contact me to finallize the deal" button. I don't mind having a good dealer available, much like a good mechanic, but frankly I don't need that much handholding to make up my mind about what I want to buy.

       

    20. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people under the age of 25 have plenty of interest in owning a car. What they don't have an interest in is 10-15% interest rate (no credit), along with 6-7 years payments on a $30K+ "basic car", with monthly insurance payments that are higher than their car payment, not to mention the $3-4 a gallon price of gas, and finally all the US states increasing their anual taxes and licensing 5-10x as much. I would say used, but most kids (and adults) don't have a clue how to work on theirs at all.

      By being priced out of a car you discover real quick that anything within 1-2 miles is an easy walk and anything within 5-10 miles is an easy bike ride, or go crazy and get an electric assist bike and then your range jumps another 5-10 miles. You just covered 75% of your typical transportation needs with a $200-2000 bicycle, that costs maybe $25-100 a year to maintain. Unless you live somplace with extreme weather you don't need a car, even less so if you don't have regular employment to begin with.

    21. Re: This just in... by roninmagus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that "under the age of 25" basically means the world hasn't kicked them in the balls yet, and biking around their urban area seems a pleasant way to pass the INFINITE amount of time they have left.

    22. Re:This just in... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      You're 100% right. I'm presently driving a Hyundai Sonata (fantastic car, btw), and am considering either a Hyundai Genesis sedan or a Tesla Model S for my next car. The Genesis is a very nice car, but I'm strongly leaning toward the Tesla.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    23. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been to a Tesla showroom, the fit and finish of their cars really is as good as they lead you to believe. Better than a BMW 5 series. The only uncertainty I can see is around the big touch screen in the centre console that has controls for everything interior related. It looks easier to use than i-Drive but I'm not sure how good it is to have everything about the climate control touch operated.

    24. Re:This just in... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      You have the illusion of choice with GM. They have Car X. You can then get a version without alloys, or without sunroof or without AC or without A, B, C. It is advertised to you as a base model Plus extras. When you judge Tesla, you should compare it to a similarly priced GM car, as there's a good possibility that you would be comparing it with one containing all the extras.

    25. Re:This just in... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That is the problem with a lot of manufactures. They all seem to think that we want various packages of crap that have nothing to do with each other. I have been looking into getting a replacement truck/SUV for my current one, now I don't use it much but when I do use it I do truck things that require 4WD, high clearance, ability to tow or haul. Given what I do I want something with either posi or locking differentials but to get that I need get the package that has the premium audio and leather wrapped steering wheel for some stupid reason. What does the premium audio have to do with the front an rear differentials, I could understand getting thing that were related and one depended on others but this makes no sense.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    26. Re:This just in... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That sounds pretty close to what I want, I might have to give that a look. I want a SUV or truck with a manual transmission real 4WD (not the suburban soccer mom style 4WD), posi or locking differentials, granted I would probably want the roof rack since that is where I would put the deer. When not in 4WD is the FJ front or rear wheel drive since it seems that the vehicles that are normally FWD when not in 4WD have really weak 4WD systems.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    27. Re:This just in... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Actually given the legal restraints imposed on GM (and most other large automobile manufacturers) GM is showing it's anything other than "functionally incompetent" by implementing this. It's a hack, but it's one that's absolutely necessary if GM is going to go on-line without being sued into oblivion by current franchise owners and being banned from selling its vehicles in other states.

      Tesla isn't more responsive to the market: it sells cars that cost over $60,000 and the only people buying them are the ultra-rich. If Tesla is "more responsive to the market" then Bentley must be the world's most responsive car company!

      Tesla can, at this point, afford to eschew dealerships despite the problems that imposes upon Tesla's ability to trade in certain states because of the expected low sales and the motivated buyers it targets, but without comprehensive reforms - reforms that would benefit GM and Ford just as much as Tesla and Bentley - it will have to stick to the elite market and avoid selling more popular platforms.

      Note: I've worked in the industry, I'm familiar with the restraints car companies are under. The fact the average Slashdotter doesn't understand that the restraints are there doesn't mean they're not there. Yes, they may be poorly suited for the modern era, but, let me put it this way: the rail companies are still suffering from regulations designed in the early 1900s that worked under the assumption that rail was the only way to travel, and while there's been the occasional reform, the bulk of ludicrous regulations and taxes that afflict that industry are still in place - which is why Amtrak is making massive losses and can't run more trains. Now, that's a situation where it costs the government money to keep the current regulatory framework in place, so you'd have expected them to do more about it.

      By comparison, keeping the laws that force automotive manufacturers that plan to sell large quantities of popular vehicles to do so through dealerships doesn't cost government anything. There are massive lobbies to keep those laws on the books.

      So expect to deal with this for the time being. It's not going to change, and no, Tesla isn't going to change anything - it'll assimilate, or it'll remain a famous niche player. And GM and Ford will continue to have to hack around the edges to get things more consumer friendly than they are at present.

      It's quite an achievement GM has gotten this far.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:This just in... by fropenn · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with what you want. It has everything to do with what they can sell. They make much more money on bundling the various "packages" together because it forces people to buy features they really don't want.

    29. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was a very interesting comment on how the internal lack of commercial pressure has kept the dealers internally technologically backward. I suspect this is true for most "non-public" facing interfaces. I can confirm this is true of a certain European manufacturer...;-)

      There is a subtle thread here regarding buyers and sellers. Initially many items were thought to be unsaleable without trying in person and this has proven to not be true. And it cannot just be the cost, as there are vacation packages that cost as much as a car and punters buy them online!

      The point about inventory is probably the main one. Toyota and BMW I believe have offered a "build your own car" type deal (BMW will let you watch it come of the line for a fee, I think...). If car manufacturers only need to make cars they know they can sell, perhaps the dealer will just become a repair shop...?

      Perhaps car leasing with constant "upgrades" will become a model for the future....this would be ideal for battery based cars!

    30. Re:This just in... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's true but it has nothing to do with whether GM is legally obliged to sell cars through dealerships or not. This generation is less interested in cars than the last one because there's been a substantial improvement in urban conditions over the last few decades.

      Alas, it still remains the case that most people live in areas where they're forced to own cars. But an increasing number are having the option in live in urban areas, and that's a good thing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    31. Re: This just in... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If that were remotely a factor, then the number of people under 25 who prefer not to use cars wouldn't be changing.

      Being forced to drive everywhere sucks. It always has, it always will. What's changed are that there's been enough urban redevelopment over the last few decades focussing on TOD that slightly fewer people are being forced to drive everywhere. And people who grow up in areas that are well served by transit are less likely to drive than people who move to areas well served by transit who are used to driving everywhere.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    32. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you drop 25-50k on a car

      They'll send the goddamned engineers who built that car on the next flight to your house to personally buff and shine that fucker.

      I think you're missing some zeroes...

    33. Re:This just in... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      As someone who worked in the industry, I know that the last thing any of the big three want are the current dealership laws.

      The entire premise of your post is BS. Dealerships exist not because of lobbying by GM, but despite it. Early on in the 20th century, as car companies got started, they needed outlets to have cars sold and didn't have the resources to create their own nationwide networks. Once they had the resources to do so, the privately owned dealerships fought back, and lobbied for laws to protect them - from Ford, GM, et al.

      The difficulty and inflexibilities inherent in managing private, independent, dealership networks contributed to the fall of GM and Chrysler, and very nearly destroyed Ford too.

      They don't want this. They don't have the ability to change it. They're powerful politically, but not that powerful.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    34. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just called a bunch telling them exactly what I wanted until I got one that said "sure no problem"

      And I had to get down to here before I finally found someone who actually knows how to car shop. All this epic whining above is just silly. "I want X, Y, Z, I won't be paying for anything else, what is the lowest price you can offer me?" If there's an option that offends you, e.g. a moonroof, make sure you say, "and definitely no moonroof", because you're likely to get a few extra options if they need to move some old inventory. You just won't have to pay for them.

      Of course, if you have a very specific spec, like the FJ Cruiser mentioned above, you get to do more calling. It never ceases to amaze me how much people will comparison shop for an 80 dollar pair of shoes and will simply roll over and take an awful deal on a 25,000 dollar car.

    35. Re:This just in... by grep_rocks · · Score: 1

      They are not bad at the internet - my Caddilac ATS is pretty well connected to the web, it sends me an email status report every month, I can talk to the car (open the doors etc.) over an iphone app, my wife's 2013 audi can't do that - also, as a car it is a good americanized version of a BMW 3 series - I did order the car from the dealer, I will not take whatever they have sitting on the lot, the dealers are bad news, anything to aviod dealers sounds good to me - but GM did for many years suck, they made horrible cars, unfortunately it took a goverment takeover to clear out the incompetent management of that company - so much for the private sector doing everything better, big private sector companies often get infested with parasitic management who loots the company and run it into bankruptcy.

    36. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "big three" you mean GM, VW, and Toyota right?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_industry#Top_vehicle_manufacturing_groups_by_volume

    37. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - transit/bike/pedestrain-oriented development is actually happening. My area is building paths so that bike riders don't have to take their lives in their hands just to travel a few miles.

      But one of the biggest things that's helping kids stay away from cars: Facebook. With social media, a high-schooler can participate in much of the social scene without driving to it. It starts when they're too young to drive, and continues even when they can get a license.

    38. Re:This just in... by Trimaxion · · Score: 1

      Nothing to add other than that I have a 2010 Genesis with the V8, owned it since new, and I love it. Great power and amenities for the money and the post-sale service has been good.

      The geek in me would rather have a Tesla but I've never regretted buying "Jenny".

    39. Re:This just in... by DaHat · · Score: 0

      Yes, having issues with permits because of the existing dealership industry not liking the sales model is the sole reason they are not able to compete full on.

      The lowest end Tesla Model S will set you back ~$63k... for that price I can buy 4 Ford Fiestas, or 5 Chevy Sparks.

      What's that? You don't want to compare to low end & compact cars? For that same price we are still talking about a pair of his & hers Chevy Imapala's or 2x Subaru Outbacks.

      Tesla's are quite expensive (luxury priced)... and will remain so for a good while, and while you may be willing/able to drop $63k on a car (or finance to a higher #), most people aren't.

      Sure, being able to walk into your local %random_dealer% & test drive a new car makes it easier than having to track down a remote Tesla dealer, know what makes it even easier? Being able to walk out the same day with a car that you can afford... rather than wait 2-3 months for delivery!

      More so, I can drive my Pontiac Aztek from coast to coast along major road ways, stopping only briefly every 300 miles or so for a fuel up... with a Tesla you either wait quite a while at a normal charging station, or be lucky enough to be driving a route with some of their quick charging stations... never mind the fact that you'll be filling up the Tesla twice as often as my Aztek will be.

      If you don't think any of this is a bigger hindrance to Tesla adoption then breaking the back of the existing dealership system... then god help you.

    40. Re:This just in... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I was (very briefly) a salesman at a GM dealership. I was admonished. I sold 4 cars in my first (and only) month. Most seasoned salesmen don't sell that many. What was I admonished for? "If you sell a car and didn't lie to the buyer, you didn't try hard enough." Though, sadly, the reason I quit was for sexual harassment. The nights were slow and we were open until 9. The night receptionist and I chatted to fill the time. She went on maternity leave. Her temporary replacement was a Dallas Cowboy's Cheerleader. I continued to chat with her as I did with the short, fat, ugly receptionist. So I was harassed because nobody else was self confident enough to chat with a minor celebrity as if she was a human. Oh, and they hired back someone who had been fired for sexual harassment, and he wasn't better after the re-hire (he was harassing the male employees).

      It's the worst work environment I've ever seen. The workers were clueless about cars, GM, ordering. They existed to connect people with cars on the lot. If you didn't want a car on the lot, you were a "tire kicker". Where I worked, they'd have taken your "order" and a deposit and looked to see if there was one in the system or pipeline, and if not, they'd return your deposit in 6 months or so. But you wouldn't be buying anything else in that time, or you'd not get your deposit back.

  2. Good riddance ... by MacTO · · Score: 2

    I hope that GM and other manufacturers go all of the way with online sales. Car dealerships consume an absurd amount of commercial realestate, and it is frequently prime commercial realestate.

    1. Re:Good riddance ... by malignant_minded · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just bought a car after driving several. How would online options really help with determining what has good feel/performance for a customer. Some people like to feel the road others like a smooth ride. The terrible blutooth integration with my purchased car (though I dont think many cars support Google commands/Siri) makes me wish I played with it more at the dealership instead of just trying to make a call. Colors look different in daylight. Some plastics feel cheaper than others, the list goes on and on. You must have bought something online, opened the box and went "ugh I thought it looked different" So why would you want to put down so much on a car only seen online?

    2. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Ugly huge lots where you have to worry about getting ripped off. Good riddance. Give me a standardized buying playform...e.g. Amazon should sell cars. GM should partner with them. They have the know how.

    3. Re:Good riddance ... by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am with you. I am 6 foot tall, and all torso, no leg. So some cars I just do not fit in. At all... The only way to know is a test drive, and that does require a lot of some kind.

    4. Re:Good riddance ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      You must have bought something online, opened the box and went "ugh I thought it looked different" So why would you want to put down so much on a car only seen online?

      Agreed.

      I do like to identify a car online - find one of the make and features that I want. My favorite used lot lets me do that on their site, pretty much. But then I do need to go try it out.

    5. Re:Good riddance ... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Oh, and often a prime source of income for the municipality in which they are located (property and sales taxes...)

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    6. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's replace car lots with shopping centers containing another set of PetCo, Jamba Juice, and Gap stores (or whatever your favorite recurring bunch of soulless stores are...)

    7. Re:Good riddance ... by DaHat · · Score: 2

      I'm 6'5" and plenty of both... as currently my wife requested brochures on a number of vehicles and trying to sell me on this feature or that... I remind her that regardless of any other facts or features... my primary deciding fact is which do I fit in comfortably, everything else is secondary.

      I've spent a lovely 10 years with my Pontiac Aztek... and fear the day that it dies (or requires more to keep running than I could buy something new(er) for)... as I've found few things that are not full size SUVs that fit me well.

    8. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So YOU are the one guy that bought it!

    9. Re:Good riddance ... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Car dealers aren't going away anytime soon, they are exceedingly influential in local politics limiting auto manufacturers ability to side step them and earn fat commissions. Were it possible, no doubt around 1,000 apple store like super stores would replace most dealers for test drives/car fitting, warranty work, and help anyone who desires it with ordering.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Good riddance ... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Informative

      How would online options really help with determining what has good feel/performance for a customer.

      Depends on how much the customer cares about feel/performance. There are people out there who want basic transportation and aren't all that concerned with the other stuff. When I had a short commute, I didn't really care. When I had a long commute, I bought a new car because if I was going to spend an hour-and-a-half somewhere, I was going to enjoy it.

      That said, I agree. However, look at Tesla--they have showrooms where you can check out the cars. They do test drives, though you might have to arrange it in advance--I'm not sure you can just walk in and say, "Hey'd I'd like to test drive a roadster!" So they keep a model or two around for the test drive. You don't need acres and acres of land to park a bunch of cars that you hope to sell.

    11. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it is really horrible to have a functional business paying state and local taxes while providing a few jobs in the area. GM and Chrysler closed a number of dealerships in the area a few years ago and the property still lies fallow today.

    12. Re:Good riddance ... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Buy a tractor for your fat body to ride in then?

      So you work for GM? (Based on how poorly some fun GM cars fit me, yet a Suburu fits me well...)

    13. Re:Good riddance ... by icebike · · Score: 1

      I hope that GM and other manufacturers go all of the way with online sales. Car dealerships consume an absurd amount of commercial realestate, and it is frequently prime commercial realestate.

      That's an odd objection, since realestate is one thing we don't really have a shortage of.

      What would you put in those so call prime commercial realestate? More outlets to sell costume jewelry, handbags, and shoes?

      Seriously, most car dealerships take up room, but even in densely populated areas, there is still plenty of space.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Good riddance ... by icebike · · Score: 1

      True, but Tesla hasn't got very many models to sell either.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be more efficient just to charge the state and local taxes directly to the purchaser, rather than requiring a middleman (i.e. car dealership)? As for "functional business" -- what function do they serve that couldn't be met by other businesses (that operate without special legal protections)?

    16. Re:Good riddance ... by MasseKid · · Score: 3, Informative

      You realize apple already does this right? They have a show room, in fact lots of show rooms. Where I can go and see their products, test drive, try, and see if I like. Then I can either buy it there or if I want something that's not quite off the shelf, configure one online either in store or online exactly how I want it.

      Being able to buy it online doesn't mean you can't buy it in person or see it in person.

    17. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 6 foot tall, and all torso, no leg.

      I had no idea that Manute Bol lost his shins in Vietnam.

    18. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am with you. I am 6 foot tall, and all torso, no leg. So some cars I just do not fit in. At all... The only way to know is a test drive, and that does require a lot of some kind.

      Sure, but currently the lots are huge filled with various combinations of models and options. At least with Detroit car companies.

      If I pass by many (e.g.) VW dealerships, I tend to see smaller lots. It seems that they only have a few variants of the various models for test drives, and if you buy a car they'll ship you a pre-built one from another dealer or they'll build it and you'll just have to wait a little while. Usually the latter. (Most Audis are built on-spec as they're ordered AFAICT.)

      No one is saying that dealerships will go away completely (even Tesla has showrooms), but that if you can do the actual ordering online, you won't need huge lots filled with all the variation permutations of models and options sitting there.

    19. Re:Good riddance ... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the manufacturers should just set up some regional test-drive facilities. Or partner with car rental companies to offer such services. You don't need a dealership for a test drive.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    20. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then GM will need to have the law changed in all 50 States since all 50 States require that autos be sold through a dealer independent of the manufacturer within the State.

    21. Re:Good riddance ... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.

      I explain it this way .. "one size fits all" is a lie. And they don't make full size sedans like they used to. I'm currently driving a 94 Mercury Grand Marquis because I cannot fit in most other vehicles comfortably. Any smaller car, and my head is in the ceiling.

      The 2 door Speck that most people can fit in looks like a clown car next to me.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    22. Re:Good riddance ... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      For the feel of the car, you don't need a dealership with hundreds of cars sitting around to make this work. Let GM open a test drive center where they have that same number of cars. You get rid of the dealerships for many miles around this location, and just use this as your "look and feel" test platform. If you want the car, you can get one through this location, but it's mainly for people to see what they're offering.

      For the colors, I've found that dealerships tend not to have available all of the color options for many of their cars anyway. For example, when I went to look at the Scion FR-S I now drive, they had a single color option - black. Every other color is a custom order. They didn't have any coming into stock in any of the other colors, either, and I know because I saw the list of their upcoming inventory - mind you, this is the biggest Toyota dealership within 30 miles of where I live. This is, quite literally, a year-old model that they can't keep on the lot in any color. It's a Subaru/Toyota jointly developed, and Subaru is still has a lead time of months to get your hands one of theirs (the BRZ).

    23. Re:Good riddance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm 6'7", so there! Yes, we need to try on cars the way other people try on clothes. Right now I drive a PT Cruiser. Next car will be a Leaf, even roomier then the PTC and electric!

    24. Re:Good riddance ... by alabri69 · · Score: 1

      Your viewpoint is limited. In 2012, we contributed over $3,000,000 in tax revenue to our local municipality and state. You are correct, dealership do take up valuable real estate. However, with the average dealership consuming 10+ acres, if that same land were sub-divided and sold to smaller retailers, the tax generated from those sales would never come close to the taxes generated by a dealership. Not to mention they would not employee the same number of employees dealerships do. If this tax base is eliminated, the burden would be shifted to the private citizen. Is that what you really want?

  3. government motors by turkeydance · · Score: 1, Funny

    your car and healthcare combined.

  4. Bring it on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I tried to buy a new car at a dealer recently and ended up walking out after being messed about and insulted with bait-and switch. Anything that gets rid of dishonest dealing and shoddy sales practices is a good thing. I say bring on direct purchasing ASAP.

    1. Re:Bring it on by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I have driven to a dealership that did that to me. In my new car that they did not sell. The sales manager still did not care. Until I asked how to contact the ownership...

  5. Dealers: always more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People won't pay more than they have to.

  6. Yep, buy on the web, at full MSRP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great plan for lazy idiots with more dollars than sense.

    1. Re:Yep, buy on the web, at full MSRP. by LandDolphin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole "wheeling and dealing" for a car price needs to go away.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    2. Re:Yep, buy on the web, at full MSRP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy an Honda or Toyota. There is no dealing with them on price for a new vehicle.

  7. This is a GOOD thing by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though you have to buy from a dealer, this new GM website means you get exactly the car you want with the extras you want at a price that is set before you even set foot on the dealer lot. No negotiating and no up-sell.

    Which is exactly why some dealers dont like it.

    1. Re:This is a GOOD thing by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      They have literally millions involved in major businesses and don't want to be cut out of the process, just to run garages with nicely uniformed "technicians". So they have a lot of interest in making Internet sales focused on THEM, which is why they flood Craigslist and other sites, to also do what GM can't do--> deliver today.

      If you can wait and circumvent what's been a tawdry sales process, so much the better. If you need alternate financing, delivered-today variety, someone to guide you without chatting with someone in Nova Scotia (no offense intended to my Canadian Friends), they have value. But car salespeople are highly motivated to add-on or add-in, upsell, and do their best to generate financing revenue spiffs for themselves and their dealership.

      GM faces a formidable problem that they themselves created long ago: a strong dealer network.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:This is a GOOD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No negotiating

      You say that as if you think it is a good thing.

      It means I'll pay thousands more for the same car, an amount that is well in excess of the overhead added by the dealership.

    3. Re:This is a GOOD thing by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      Your sense of history isn't quite correct. The dealer networks were found to sell more cars, and quickly, and shift inventory burdens easily. There was anti-trust concerns at the time, but this was neither legislated in the US or mandated. It was more or less goaded organic growth. I'm not trying to justify dealer networks or argue against them. Value needs to be established in consumer supply stage, and dealers are going to have to work harder than before, because their value proposition to consumers has been usurped by convenience and non-confrontational values on the part of consumers.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:This is a GOOD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...That was done away with to protect the consumer.

      Funny.

    5. Re:This is a GOOD thing by profplump · · Score: 1

      GM currently doesn't do same-day delivery, but that's not a limitation of a central sales model -- they could easily stock cars in warehouses around the country ready for immediate delivery if they thought the sale advantage was worth the overhead.

    6. Re:This is a GOOD thing by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      They could even convince other businesses to form, buy or lease large swaths of land, and warehouse that inventory for them. Heck, these new business may even pay for the privilege But then... maybe someone really does want the feature set that the marketing folks thought 68% of the car buying public would want (or what the marketing folks wanted them to want....). Maybe these storage/delivery/prep businesses would be willing to try and convince someone to buy a particular car in storage, convince them that yes, this is the car for them! They don't want to go home and get on the internet and order one from that other car maker... we have the perfect car for you right here! Oh, and maybe, like just possibly, the person who wants to buy doesn't quite have enough ready cash.... why maybe, this storage place, the folks that work there happen to know of this local bank that will make a loan against the value of this here car....

      I know, this sounds like crazy fantasy right? Well, believe it or not, it is true!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    7. Re:This is a GOOD thing by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >No negotiating and no up-sell.

      Which is why I *won't* use the website.

      Negotiating generally will knock off 10-20% on the price of a new car. The website will undoubtedly use MSRP for a variety of reasons, and maybe allow the nationwide promotions they run to discount the price. But it'll still be quite a bit more than your local dealer.

      It's not hard to say no to the up-selling. "No thanks, I'll pay in cash." "No thanks, I don't need a warranty." And so forth. *Always* negotiate based on the "out the door" price instead of the price of the car, because the dealership will add all sorts of fees and costs on top of the sale price of the car.

      The really amusing thing is that turning down the extras will often result in the often abusively high prices coming down to a reasonable number. My wife got a 7 year bumper-to-bumper warranty for less than a thousand bucks, and I got lifetime oil changes and tire rotations for $400 (which has already paid for itself after 3 years).

    8. Re:This is a GOOD thing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Even though you have to buy from a dealer, this new GM website means you get exactly the car you want with the extras you want at a price that is set before you even set foot on the dealer lot. No negotiating and no up-sell.

      Which is exactly why some dealers dont like it.

      Some dealers might not like it, that is. Selling cars is not a big source of income for a dealer - the dealer markup is often quite low because people know what the dealer paid, so the profit can be just a couple of thousand dollars on a vehicle (which doesn't include overhead like warehousing and staff, etc). Sometimes they'll upsell you to a higher end model because they have it there and are willing to take a cut on margins to move it out the door rather than sitting on the lot.

      Dealers may like this model because it's fixed price - the dealer makes a known amount of profit and you won't haggle it down because the order says what you're going to pay. Plus it's closer to MSRP, and not "dealers may sell for less".

      Most of the revenue from a dealership comes from service. Of course, an electric car like a Tesla needs far less service than a regular vehicle (Tesla recommends a yearly service in general, though it can go far longer).

      Heck, when choosing a car these days, the service schedule is an important factor for me - some cars have you coming in almost monthly or every 3 months, others every year. Add in the general inconvenience (dealer or not)...

    9. Re:This is a GOOD thing by azadrozny · · Score: 2

      I am a bit split on negotiating. In my experience dealers seem to bundle the options on their cars so that the most desirable options come with a lot of extra, unrelated junk. So the DVD system only comes in models with leather seats. Or the hands free calling is only available with high performance tire/wheels. Yes I can talk them down 10%, but we are starting 20% higher than I expected. If I could choose only the options I want, and save the time/hassle of "let me talk to my manager", that could be a win in my book.

    10. Re:This is a GOOD thing by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Bundled options are *far* cheaper than customized options. It's one of the reasons American car companies have been getting their asses kicked.

      We're talking like $2,000 vs $5,000 here.

  8. Sounds great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't miss dealerships at all. Useless middleman money.

    The cost of a car should be exactly the same no matter who you are. It pisses me off that those with relatives who worked at car manufacturers many years ago pay thousands less than me for the same exact product. It makes me not want to buy a new car, period.

    Charging a flat, consistent rate is smart business. Fuck dealerships.

    1. Re:Sounds great! by beatljuice · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never owned a successful business.

      --
      Look for a reason to smile you jaded #*^ *(%$
    2. Re:Sounds great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. In conducting that business, I try to contribute more value than I capture. It's proven to be successful so far.

    3. Re:Sounds great! by profplump · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't define any business that acts as a legally-protected middleman as "successful" -- actually successful business provide their own value and don't need legal protections because customers are happy to pay them for that value.

  9. They do! by Zynder · · Score: 2

    Amazon should sell cars.

    Ask and ye shall receive!

    1. Re:They do! by beatljuice · · Score: 1

      Can I get Prime (2 day shipping) on that order?

      --
      Look for a reason to smile you jaded #*^ *(%$
    2. Re:They do! by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Nope afraid not. Hehe. You actually don't get it from them. It's much like the thing in the article. They get you set up on the Amazon buy, and then you head off to the local dealer to pick it up. It isn't perfect or ideal right now but it's a start.

  10. Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's why by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 0

    Would you buy a house online?

    What if you have a trade-in? How can you do that online?

    How do you know if you want to buy versus lease a car?

    Only 2% of people buy cars online and almost without exception these people are brokers.

    There have been plenty of "no haggle" dealerships in the past, present and future --- but generally it doesn't work because few people are willing to spend $20,000 to $50,000 without trying out the merchandise and there are always a variety of incentives. And this ignores the entire issue of trade-in values for someone's current vehicle.

    No one buys houses online or rents apartments online because it is a major purchase.

    And for most people buying a car is 2nd biggest purchase they will make. Buying a computer or a vacuum cleaner is one thing --- but a major purchase with a 5 year loan or 3 year lease costing 30% of one's annual salary after taxes isn't something anyone will take lightly.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  11. Call me a Luddite... by Daemonik · · Score: 0

    Hilarious that there's another thread today about how increased mechanization is destroying the job market, so let's see.. self driving cars/trucks replacing all the professional drivers, manufacturing robots taking over the factories that haven't already moved to China, car dealerships doomed so there goes the jobs AND the thousands of small businesses and their local taxes.. tell us again how this is all good and the displaced workers will all go into software consulting, robot repair and get engineering degrees and we'll all have well paying middle class lifestyles. Go on, I'm waiting.

  12. houses are next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy your next house on the web! Free delivery to your vacant lot! Need land? We'll sell you some! With free delivery!

  13. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have narrow vision. People will do the exact same thing they do with electronics and appliances. You go to the dealership, use their physical resources to decide which model you want, then go and buy it cheap online. So, people WILL buy cars online, they just won't do it your way.

  14. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by alen · · Score: 1

    most things online you buy with a credit card
    with cars most people have to apply for a loan tied to the specific car. i'm sure banks will love to pay for cars without the verification procedures now in place at lots of dealers

  15. This is the world's smallest violin... by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... playing just for the middlemen.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:This is the world's smallest violin... by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

      Sounds like one of those posts rooting that Microsoft will die.

      Amazon.com and EBay have tried to do this for 15+ years. But very few people are going to make a $20-$50 thousand dollar purchase online.

      Wanting something to be true and successful won't make it so.

      Most people looking for a car end up going to several different dealerships to do research to determine what they want to buy. How can they do that online?

      What you want would be perfect and I agree, but the crappy truth is like Soylent Green: OMG! The world is made out of people! It's people!

      Think of the guy at McDonalds who spends 5 minutes looking at the menu before making a decision. Sad but true, life is like that. Sometimes even for people like you or me.

      Emotionally, your thoughts win. But in reality, 3 years from now --- people are still going to dealerships trying to make up their mind on what to buy and why because cars are a big-ticket item costing tens of thousands of dollars --- it is huge decision.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  16. Not Much Different From Existing Web Buy by Kagato · · Score: 2

    This isn't all that different from existing car buying websites (outside the GM lock-in). Most sites like Edmunds, Autotrader, Cars, etc have features like inventory search, pricing, options, suggested market pricing. These sites connect you with dealers. The dealers pay the web sites to the leads. In return the sites get sales pricing data (which is one of the ways sites like Edmunds figures out TMV). I'm sure GM has a charge for the dealers for the leads. Perhaps slightly less than independent sites.

    All GM is doing is pre-qualifying the financing, which mean the leads are slightly higher quality than Joe Blow internet.

    If you wanted to get a better deal but don't like the art of the sale, Costco Auto is the better route to go.

  17. I was just thinking about this since... by Strudelkugel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought a new car recently. I try to keep my cars as long as possible, but the old one was causing me to wonder how long it would last without another expensive repair. That meant a trip to the dealership, knowing quite well that I was about to have the worst category of retail experience known. It doesn't matter if you are buying a cheap car or an expensive one - dealers treat all customers the same way. Haggle, make you wait while the sales person "I will try to get my manager to accept your price, but he is going to beat me up..." talks fantasy football with his manager as you wait. (If you are trading in a car, they will take your keys to look at your trade-in. You will not be getting them back any time soon, so be sure to bring an extra set of keys you can drive off the lot while they are playing this game to wear you down.) Make them wait while you enjoy a sandwich or read a book in the coffee shop across the street.

    After you endure that nonsense, you get to talk tot he "finance manager" who will try to get you to by an insanely overpriced extended warranty contract. If that doesn't work for the dealership, they will be happy to offer you very high rate auto loan. Think of what is happening: The sales rep is telling you how great the car is while you are looking at it, then the finance person is telling you an extended warranty is really needed because the car will probably have a major repair after the warranty period is over. Be sure to ask the finance person if they think you should tell the sales person you will not be buying the car since he or she just told you it really isn't a very well made car.

    Car dealerships are really parasitic IMHO. They use their intermediary status to extract as much as possible from customers, and in doing so alienate the customers from the manufacturers. The manufacturer spends a huge amount of money establishing a brand, designing cars they hope will appeal to the public, taking capital risk, and managing production. Think of the extended warranty pitch - it totally undermines the manufacturer since it implies the car really isn't very reliable. My previous car was a high end brand, but I detested the sales and service department at the local dealer so much I vowed to never buy another model of that brand, even though I really liked the car. But none of this is new to anyone who has purchased a car from a dealership, new or used.

    Given the above, and manufacturers know all of it, I am surprised that Ford and Chrysler aren't jumping on the direct sales model, too. They probably will though; the dealership model makes far less sense now that consumers can learn more about a car online than most car sales people will ever know, since that is not what they care about. Before the internet, it was necessary to go to a dealership to look at a car, maybe get a brochure and see what the car actually looked like. Of course the buyer still has to test drive the car, but there is no reason manufacturers can't follow the Tesla model. This is a bit of a simplification, since Tesla cars in high demand and people are willing to wait for one. There is also a lot to be said for having inventory on a lot since it simplifies distribution and might help close a deal. But... I think every manufacturer would clamp down on the pathetic treatment of customers their dealers engage in if they were selling directly.

    A friend of mine is thinking about buying a BMW M3, but I told him he should drive a Tesla first given that the two models are similar in price. The BMW might be a good car, but he dislikes the dealership experience as much as anyone. Why support the dealership business model if there is a choice? My thought is that my next car will be a Tesla not only because it is a great car, but also because I know my money won't support the jerks who run auto dealerships.

    Given the intermediary advantage the dealer has when approached by a customer, it is no wonder they are fighting the direct sales model. They have a license to steal, and don't want to give it up. We hav

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    1. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 2

      (If you are trading in a car, they will take your keys to look at your trade-in. You will not be getting them back any time soon, so be sure to bring an extra set of keys you can drive off the lot while they are playing this game to wear you down.)

      I had this happen once. Fortunately for me, it was a fairly busy day, with a dozen other customers in the showroom. I went to the manager's office, and told him to either return my keys, or I'd go out in the showroom and very loudly complain about this particular tactic.

      I got my keys back (and was escorted out of the showroom) in under 2 minutes...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    2. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by jhealy1024 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bought a car a few years ago, and found this non-profit that had a great strategy:

          http://www.checkbook.org/auto/CarBargains_Secrets.pdf

      You can never know what the dealership is getting from the factory in terms of kickback, so it's next to impossible to negotiate a deal all by yourself. The sales rep is never going to lose money on the car (despite what they may tell you); they'll just walk away. So even when they cry and tell you you're keeping them from feeding their family just know that they're making enough to cover their expenses. Your best bet is to put your purchase out to bid to multiple dealerships and let them fight it out. We did this and saved $2500 off the "invoice" price that Consumer Reports said we should be "aiming for" to get a good deal.

      Let me say it again: make them bid; it's the only way to keep them honest.

      As a side bonus, you don't have to deal with crazy add-ons, haggling, or waiting for managers to "approve" your deal. You e-mail the dealerships, tell them what you want, and ask for their final, out-the-door, all-fees-included price. Pick the winning one, print out the e-mail so you have it in writing, and go to the dealership to pick up your car. If they try to add anything on, just point to your e-mail and invite them to throw it in for the included price you've already committed to (we got "free" floor mats and locking wheel nuts, probably because they didn't want to bother to take them off).

      Note that you have to be willing to contact multiple dealers, wait for responses, and follow through. If you want to buy the brand-new 2014 model whatever, in hot pink, and you need it TODAY, then this isn't the strategy for you. If you're willing to be patient to save a couple grand, try it out.

    3. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To put more bite in your tactic, you really need to make sure that the dealerships are not owned by the same person or group. A friend of mine tried that and the bids came in pretty similar and didn't move much. He was driving by a nearby county seat (about 30 minutes away) just to see what they would do, they came back $500 cheaper than the email. He told them he would think about it. All of a sudden, he had a real bidding war in the emails. He ended up getting it for $2000 less than what he was originally going to buy it for. Only later did he find out that all dealerships in our town are owned by the same individual through a complicated corporate scheme thanks to an investigation by the local news.

    4. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1
      While those points are all fair, there are indeed dealers who do it differently. I purchased my GMC Yukon XL from a dealership on the edge of town that is hungry for the business. First price offered? Dealer invoice with nothing added. Extended warranty? Half of list price (turned it down, they didn't push). 0% financing of course. Trade value? $2K over good condition KBB.

      Frankly, I didn't even have to argue with them, I knew my numbers, did my Edmunds research, asked for $200 more off the price just to feel like I won something, they said sure, and off we went. Whole thing took 2 hours start to finish, including F&I paperwork.

      I have no complaints. Yes, I understand that is probably the exception.

    5. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      My experience was a lot different, but then I knew exactly what I wanted...a used Toyota Station Wagon. And I wasn't interested in anything that wasn't a cash down deal. Perhaps that made a difference.

      I went into two dealerships that didn't have what I wanted. The third did. I bought. I didn't haggle for the best price, but I let them know ahead of time that I wouldn't, and if the price they offered wasn't satisfactory, I'd check somewhere else...I'm pretty sure I didn't also indicate what I though would be a reasonable price.

      Since then I've bought a second car there, another used Toyota Station Wagon. When this one gets decrepit, I don't know what I'll pick, as for a number of years Toyota didn't make station wagons, and I doubt that Volkswagen makes them of equivalent quality. Perhaps I'll be able to wait long enough that the new Prius Station Wagons are on the used market.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a side bonus, you don't have to deal with crazy add-ons, haggling, or waiting for managers to "approve" your deal. You e-mail the dealerships, tell them what you want, and ask for their final, out-the-door, all-fees-included price. Pick the winning one, print out the e-mail so you have it in writing, and go to the dealership to pick up your car. If they try to add anything on, just point to your e-mail and invite them to throw it in for the included price you've already committed to (we got "free" floor mats and locking wheel nuts, probably because they didn't want to bother to take them off).

      I did that with Toyota to buy my 2011 FJ Cruiser. It made it real easy to figure out which dealers where scammers and which ones where honest. I had to order what I wanted, and then had to wait 9 months for it to come in, due to an ill timed tsunami that destroyed the first one they built me, as it sat in the shipping lot and shut down the whole area for a while, but I had a very good experience all the same.

    7. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by pesho · · Score: 1

      I have used this tactic to buy three cars over the past 10 years and it works like a charm. There is the added bonus of seeing he dealers try and fail at a series of lies, pressure tactics and bait-and switch moves, which often work when you are in the showroom, but fail miserably when you have the option to check the facts, think things over and delay your response indefinitely. The key is never to get in face-to-face contact with the dealer before they commit to a price in writing. E-mail works best. Phone works too as long as you do it over voice mail (don't pick up their calls and don't call them during business hours), and ensure that they either fax or e-mail the price to which they commit. You need to have either cash or pre-arranged financing to do it. It also takes some patience, especially in an area where the competition is not too hot (another poster rightfully noted that often "competing" dealrships belong to the same owner). Even with fixed price you will still get the runaround, stuff like extended warranty, extra-options and made up fees. If you are not ready to walk away the moment you start getting this crap this tactic is not for you.

    8. Re:I was just thinking about this since... by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Wow. That looks really complicated. So far I've bought 3 used cars after shopping around on eBay and at used car lots. If that's the kind of effort that is needed, I'll stick to used cars...

  18. GM Has been for the most part innovative but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GM has tried time after time to be innovative like the experimental car shell thing where you could go to a GM dealership and get a new car design whenever you like. It didn't workout but it was interesting. They did innovate a lot with safety systems and such but they are very corporate and too scared to try something new when dealerships already work. But people are used to buying stuff online, and nobody likes talking to a car dealer. Innovation means risk and risk means the possibility to lose a lot of money. Just wake me up once I can order cars on Amazon using my prime account for free 2-day shipping. kthnxbye!

  19. the future is bright for Al Bundy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least women can't buy shoes online. No Ma'am!

  20. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    While Tesla has no dealers, they have show rooms. That takes care of half the equation, the whats it look, feel like. Ideally the rental/try before you buy/short term lease is the best next step. I would rather pay $50 to rent a car, for the weekend without pressure than pay thousands to have a person pressuring me to buy (wont be the exact car, but close enough.) Then closing the deal online vs a shake of the hand makes no difference to me. I would love to do that with a house as well (practically what I did do.) Research the houses, load them all in the GPS, go look at them. The last step would be the only change, instead of calling a relator, meating at the hose, filling in paper work, waiting days, then meet up a month later with lots of paperwork without time to comprehend. Been much cheaper, and better all around if I could have just click my offer, get the counter, click a couple times for that last step.

  21. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by berashith · · Score: 2

    i have done nearly this. We decided which car we wanted, but went to a dealer to test drive it and check for comfort , fit , etc. We told the salesman what our plan was, so he just gave us the keys and told us to check it out. A few weeks later we made the decision, had a deal in hand, and went back to the guy that treated us right and told him the deal we had. Let him know that if he could match what we had, or give us reason for something better, then the sale was his, and that we returned only because he had treated us right on the first day.

    Customer service can still win a sale, because as you say, there is a need for the consumers to actually see and touch the car in many cases.

  22. I bought my Mercury via ford.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ford lets you browse the dealer's specific inventory and make you r deal without setting foot on the lot. When I bought the car it was parked out front waiting for me. I took a quick test drive, handed them the check I had ready and drove it home. That was 8 years ago. Now they'd have just delivered the car to my house, that would have been even better!

  23. Earth to GM—time for reality check by mendax · · Score: 1

    I will not—repeat—NOT buy a car unless I have driven it first. So, I will test drive it, then go online and see if I can get it from GM for less. If I and others can, GM will put its dealer network out of business. How are they going to sell cars then? They'll have to open a series of GM stores as the dealers get put out of business, something which will probably get the remaining dealers into Federal court fast. And if GM ultimately wins and you can only buy a GM car from GM, I'm not certain I want to buy a GM car from them. I can guarantee you that it will not be the same as visiting the local Apple Store.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:Earth to GM—time for reality check by Phoeniyx · · Score: 1

      You were making reasonable points, until the last two sentences. Lol wut? "And if GM ultimately wins and you can only buy a GM car from GM, I'm not certain I want to buy a GM car from them.". Elaborate please. What's wrong with buying a GM car if "you can only buy a GM car from GM".. Doesn't compute as to why this is a bad thing...

    2. Re:Earth to GM—time for reality check by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee you that it will not be the same as visiting the local Apple Store.

      You say that like Apple Stores are pleasant. In my experience, they're great if you want to fawn over the products on display, but terrible if you want to actually buy anything or get support. The "geniuses" are unknowledgeable, arrogant twats with condescending attitudes. Staff are always too busy to help you, or assure you that someone will come to look after you then no-one does. Unless you need something on the day, you're better off buying online.

    3. Re:Earth to GM—time for reality check by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..look man, where the effing fuck do you think the dealer buys their GM cars from? think mcfly think!

      aanyhow, how about they bring the car for a test drive over to your house?

      what you would be losing with the dealers(as dealers) out of the picture is HAGGLING. I fucking hate haggling. and the price you're haggling about is the dealers cut, GM has a set price for the car..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  24. Everything else comes from the Internet by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 1

    We're so used at looking at reviews and videos of stuff and ordering on the Internet. We even order clothes on the Internet without having a way of trying them on, so why not cars? Even grocery shopping can be done over the Internet these days.

    --
    Signature intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Everything else comes from the Internet by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      IN most states you have X number of days to return a car before the sale is "final". Buy it, if you don't like, return it.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  25. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company that is branching into online only car sales, we are about to launch our trade in program. It isn't that hard, and the lease/buy stuff is a lot easier when we can show you the difference and let you customize the deal in a way that works for you.

    The test drive is hard to get around, but we have a no questions asked return policy. So we recommend you use that as a test drive.

  26. Military-Industrial by Etherwalk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    GM will continue to survive until it is forced to compete in real capitalism.

    Never. Going. To. Happen.

    GM will compete and be productive, but it will also be propped up by DC for decades beyond its viable life because it is a critical American manufacturer in terms of raw industrial output. And raw industrial output wins almost any prolonged non-WMD war.

    1. Re:Military-Industrial by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      GM's profit last year was $4.53B. What was your company's?

    2. Re:Military-Industrial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took the bailout (the threat of wealthy executives and investors losing money when GM closed) to have GM actually build cars people want to buy.

      Go quit your job and spend your entire paycheck at the casino and have your landlord about to kick you out for missing rent. Then your parents step in and pay your bills for you until you find a new job and learn to budget. This is pretty much what happened with GM the last few years.

    3. Re:Military-Industrial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This analogy only works if your parents are muggers.

    4. Re:Military-Industrial by Bartles · · Score: 1

      No, GM is a critical pension provider, that happens to make cars. The organizations that receive the handouts give massive amounts of money to the people that currently happen to be in power. When that changes GM will lose the handouts.

  27. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone who won't buy a Tesla because there are no nearyby dealerships. When it breaks do you take it to a Prius mechanic, or pay the $500 to ship it where it can be fixed.

    I think Tesla is making a big mistake with their plans. In the long run it won't matter, unless someone else does the same thing and gets dealerships everywhere quicker. Tesla also may not be able to floor plan the inventory for dealerships, where Tesla owns the car for the first 90 days they sit on a lot unsold, which may be one of the major reasons they are not doing it.

  28. Yeah but by jeffgtr · · Score: 1

    I buy a lot of things online. With something as long term and expensive as a car I want to drive it first. In addition I want someplace to have it maintained and repaired. Shop, click, drive - No way. Last time I bought a car and researched online. There were cars I thought I wanted but once I drove them I didn't like them. If my car has a problem I take it to the dealer, they fix it and I can trust them. I drive a Toyota btw not a GM. The experience at the dealership is actually pretty good.

    1. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealers often look at ONLY the mileage indicator for maintenance. 90% of my driving is at constant ~55mph on highway with no stopping/acceleration for hours on end. My car (truck) has 50k miles on it... the tires look ``new''. Yet according to my dealer (toyota one) they need to be replaced. Same with other bits in the car. Their $70 "cabin air filter" that's on amazon for $15? yah.... not going to dealer unless it's something I can't figure out myself.

  29. My ups. by ralphaostrander · · Score: 0

    The 192.168.1.3 on the fast fiber.

  30. Good idea by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Good idea, but isn't Best Buy and other retailers complaining about the "showroom effect?" How's that going to work when car dealers are just giant test drive outlets?

    That said, wow, the ability to drop the stupid haggle dance with your typical slimeball car salesman would be awesome. I'd pay more for the privilege. I can't stand haggling over a few hundred dollars, and actively dislike all salesdroids.

    One factor they have to take into account is that car dealerships actually don't make much money on the cars themselves (unless you pay MSRP.) They make money on the sleazy stuff like:
    - Financing. People who come in and say "I can pay $X/month." OK, here's an 11-year loan at 14% interest...
    - People with bad credit
    - Useless options/warranties/accessories they try to push on you at the last second
    - Leases -- leasing is an awful deal unless you can completely write off the lease payments as a business expense.

    So this new system would just have to funnel your order to a random pick of the Glengarry Glen Ross guys at Joey Barbarino Chevrolet, and they would get a flat fee for processing your paperwork. Not as lucrative as all the other stuff they can push on you...

    1. Re:Good idea by pesho · · Score: 1

      Good idea, but isn't Best Buy and other retailers complaining about the "showroom effect?" How's that going to work when car dealers are just giant test drive outlets?

      They also get payed for servicing the sold vehicles (my local dealership for the brand I drive has excellent service department and absolutely disgusting sales people). The current practice where the dealers are incentivized to gouge the client on the sales price, useless options and on financing, is cutting into the potential profits for the manufacturers and is doing horrible damage to their brands. I am surprised that the car makers together with online merchants have not pushed harder at the dealers. I hope that Tesla will succeed in braking the current sales model.

  31. Recently bought a Nissan... by skogs · · Score: 1

    I would have given anything to accomplish this feat with Nissan last year. I figured out what car my wife and I could settle on (2 year process), and then tried to get one. Alas the last of the 2011's were already sold. So then I waited a few months and tried to get a 2012 vehicle. Alas those were delayed due to the flooding that also hit the nuclear plant and made much news. When I finally got a dealer to ship me one from 1200 miles away, I still didn't get all the exact options that I wanted. Most noticeable is that my wife complains about the lighter interior upholstery.

    Why should I have to spend months trying to order something that should be so simple as: Middle of the road trim level, brown, with dark upholstery. Honestly I don't understand why I couldn't get those three things together in one vehicle after searching 15 some states.

    I had driven several of the vehicles and knew we liked it...just couldn't get it without fancy doodads that we didn't want. I bet straight internet orders wouldn't get jacked up by the dealerships quite as bad.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
    1. Re:Recently bought a Nissan... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I tried shopping for a Honda a year and a half ago, and the dealer didn't even have a model in stock to test drive because of first the Japanese tsunami and then some flooding in Thailand(?). They keep their manufacturing chains so tightly optimized that just a few missing parts derails the entire delivery process, and they were without anything to demonstrate at all.

  32. Not new by mypalmike · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Mini Cooper a la 2006.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  33. Couldn't happen soon enough by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    Recently purchased a new Mustang. I wasn't sure this time what I wanted and had a list of possible choices including the Camero, FR-S and Challenger. Many of the local dealers don't want to order a vehicle. Few had base models on the lot. Anything under 30k wasn't on the lot. Some dealers didn't even have a car I could test drive.

    Step 1 is actually forcing dealers to keep updated inventory. I don't know how many times I went to a dealership or called and a vehicle had been gone for weeks.

    If GM improves this process and it works for them, perhaps we'll see better service from all the automakers. I'm all in favor of that both as a consumer and computer programmer in Detroit.

  34. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    If we could subscribe to cars like how we pay for cable or pay for cell phones, your idea would work.

    And it would be optimal --- why should we buy instead of lease --- ideally! Then again, some people would argue we should all rent instead of own homes. What is the answer? Only the future can know that!

    But you raise great points!

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  35. How to do this right in two steps by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    Step 1.
    Make a simple web site where I build the car that I want to buy and tell me what the MSRP should be. If I want the purchase agreement can be signed digitally on the Internet and I all I have to do is go pick it up.

    Step 2.
    Allow me to have dealers in a range I am willing to travel bid on selling me the car I spec out in step 1. Any participating dealer can submit a bid for what they will sell the car for. Once the bid is accepted I sign digitally on the Internet and all I have to do is go pick it up.

    The entire point is to allow people to purchase a car and sign the contract without ever interact with a dealer. Importantly by signing the contract over the Internet with GM you don't have to worry about the dealership pulling something once you show up or backing out.

    The dealership experience is so bad that most people would rather get a root canal than deal with a salesperson. Allow people to buy a car without worrying about getting ripped off because they are female, black, immigrants or whatever else.

  36. Do you have to pay MSRP? by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I don't like buying from a dealer, but I don't like paying MSRP either. If dealing with the dealer means I save a few thousand dollars and not pay MSRP then I'll gladly sit through the upsell process and constantly say NO for an hour or so to various options they try to sell me. I have done that a few times by now and I think I have mastered it.

    1. Re:Do you have to pay MSRP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather the MSRP be something non-negotiable. I'd rather know what I can actually buy a car for when cross-shopping.

      I just bought a $30,000 Mazda for just under $26,000. A few dealers 1800 miles away have the exact same car, new, for around $22,000 as they have a few 2014 models on their lots now.

      Mini probably has the best website for customizing a car. It's not perfect, however it is close. I should be able to pick *any* paint and interior color scheme & chip that I want as long as I'm willing to sign for the car before it's painted. I don't expect a custom car that I can back out of.

  37. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by BadCoding · · Score: 1

    They are still buying it from a dealer, it is just now GM is the dealer.

  38. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    I bought a car online, and I am not a broker. No big problem.

  39. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2

    I have wondered how to make borrowing/sharing more fluid. IE I need access to a truck a couple days a month. I need access to a 5 passenger vehicle 6 times a year or so. I need a daily driver for 20 miles each way trip. I want a camper 3-4 times a year. So I have a quad cab pickup that takes care of all these roles. Much cheaper than trying to maintain insurance, license, tires, etc for multiple vehicles. Difficult to share something like this because people all expect a different level of care, and you can't rent and expect to have it reliably have a working everything I need. IE above average battery for the camper, or above average tires for pulling a boat from a lake in marhc... But ideally with the right level of trust, I would be willing to have a complete inventory and state of everything I own in a databse ready to share with the community in exchange for access to the same. Save the neighbor I never met from driving to the store for a wheelbarrow, save me from having to buy a planer for that one project...

  40. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Well ... what you can do ... rent a 5 passenger vehicle for $50 a day or rent a camper.

    That is what the rental places are for --- I came to your same conclusion a long time ago. We don't need to own everything we ever use.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  41. Re:Almost Nobody will buy a car online ... here's by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you bought a Zune, a Surface RT and really like the new Blackberry phones too!

    Or maybe you are a market of one.

    By the way, what car did you buy online and what price did you pay --- I mean, why withhold details for a true story if you see what I say?

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  42. Re:This is a already at the dealer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though you have to buy from a dealer, this new GM website means you get exactly the car you want with the extras you want at a price that is set before you even set foot on the dealer lot. No negotiating and no up-sell.

    Which is exactly why some dealers dont like it.

    You can already do this, at a dealer. And it will still take just as long to have your exact or custom vehicle delivered and ready to go. I see this as another attempt by GM to use tracking cookies, or some type of analysis tracking to figure out why people aren't buying certain cars and or why they are not buying brand new models.
    The BBC and NPR have been running stories over the fact that brand new or newer cars aren't selling, and interviewing IT firms, and the makers themselves and they admitted they're trying to figure out why, and employing new tactics as to how or why sales are dropping off among younger drivers.

    And the only real question I have over this, is are you going to still have to haggle with a dealer over the final price. Or is it a "final price" the moment you hit the "buy button". I want to see the "term of service" and "terms of purchase" from the web site directly to see if GM is just doing this to create there own pool of direct analyst?

  43. Toyota was doing this in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the market for a Toyota and I could customize my car online and go to the dealer to finalize things.

    Interestingly, Apple let you do the same thing if you wanted to buy a Macintosh, but of course you could bypass the brick-and-mortar store entirely if you wanted to.

    I assume both companies have these features.

  44. Current Car companies Are Dead Meat. by b4upoo · · Score: 0

    Tesla has won the game at this point. The death knell of GM, Chrysler and Ford rings loudly. Ford will have some life due to the F150 line of pickup trucks until Tesla or some other new outfit comes online. The big three resisted real progress and have effectively committed suicide. Toyota is strong enough to have a chance at survival but most imports will fail. Idea like the new Fiat import are way too late and frankly the quality of former Fiats speaks against any likelihood of current success. The public has had enough of over priced junk that costs a fortune to keep up and running. Tesla got the message and as the prices of Tesla models drop they will dominate the market for decades.

  45. Test drives and other dealer uses by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

    It's going to be interesting, but there are still a few key functions the local dealer provides

    1. A place to test drive the car. I don't know about you, but i'm not spending 30k on a car without test driving it. This is going to require some kind of showroom/test drive area which has to be staffed. Now maybe, the manufacturers like Tesla set these up on their own and get rid of the middle man. Or maybe people get used to not test driving it.

    2. Service. Some people have a higher degree of trust for the dealer when it comes to repairs. They might cost more, but they're probably more reputable than an unknown shop. Sure not better than the rare quality honest mechanic you find. And this has to be local.

    It will be interesting to say the lease\t

  46. As a vendor to GM by gelfling · · Score: 2

    I can tell you that the only reason the company hasn't imploded is because there are physically not enough seconds in the known universe with which to schedule all the conference calls needed to schedule the conference calls needed to round up the list of people needed to hold conference calls about who knows fucking what about anything. It's a company that in reality runs on its own through sheer inertia. There may not even BE anyone in charge and it wouldn't matter anyway.

  47. Duh. by BVis · · Score: 1

    GM dealers aren't required to participate in the web-based test, and company officials say they have had some dealers turn it down.

    Their business model relies on being able to screw over the customer on the price, and if the customer is walking through the door with a price that's guaranteed, then they can't screw them over (as hard, I'm sure they'll find a way).

    The whole dealership paradigm needs to die. Open "service centers" instead of dealerships for the maintenance and sell over the web. Put all those scumbag salespeople/managers right where they belong: either in jail for fraud, or unemployed because they have no useful skills.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  48. Good! More should by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    I have yet to find a dealer that I *want* to visit. Every time I've bought a car (four times in four years) I get *argued* with when I come in for a specific feature set.

    It's been like this since I bought my first car in 1990.

    I want these features offered, some favorite responses.

    You can add AC later (In Kansas, where six of the months of the year are >90 degrees)

    You don't need four wheel drive

    You don't need a high performance option, here, take the four cylinder model.

    GPS? No one needs that

    Adaptive cruise control? on a car with 300 HP? Why would you want that

    You can always upgrade the stereo yourself, AM/FM will be fine.

    You go to Ford.com, Chevy.com, etc, they have tons of cool options. You can build what you want, but good luck getting it from the dealer.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  49. Car dealerships have a legal monopoly by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever wondered why we buy cars the way we do? If you wanted to buy a banana, you wouldn't go to a banana store. You would go to a grocery store and pick from a multitude of different fruits. Yet with (new) cars, there is no grocery store equivalent. Why is that? Well the reason is that in all 50 states dealerships have established a legal monopoly which basically prohibits this.

    Planet Money did a podcast on this very issue.

  50. disintermediation continues, no text in body by asjk · · Score: 1

    nt