Slashdot Mirror


Nobel Winners Illustrate Israel's "Brain Drain"

barlevg writes "Two of the three scientists sharing this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry have Israeli citizenship, with Dr. Arieh Warshel having been born and educated in Israel, yet both are based at universities in the United States. These two scientists are perhaps the highest profile examples of a growing problem in the so-called "start-up nation," which is known for its high-tech tech companies and scientific innovation, and yet which loses more researchers to emigration than any other western nation. The problem? Large salary gaps between US and Israeli institutions. As Daniel Hershkowitz, president of Bar-Ilan University put it, 'I don't see Israel being able to compete with what they offer in the United States.'"

214 comments

  1. American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With all of the $Billions we send to that country every SINGLE YEAR, they still can't manage to pay their own citizens a decent wage?

    1. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      100 billion to be exact.

      Detroit only needed 19 billion to stay afloat.

    2. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 billion a year?
      I think think you're off by about 96 billion.
      nice try though.

    3. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No need to exaggerate, the published figures warrant GP's question already.

      Since 1985, it has provided nearly $3 billion in grants annually to Israel, with Israel being the largest annual recipient of American aid from 1976 to 2004 and the largest cumulative recipient of aid since World War II.

      You have got to wonder why a relatively wealthy and developed nation should be the largest recipient. The same article also answers the question of why this is mostly not being spent on scientists' salaries:

      Almost all U.S. aid to Israel is now in the form of military assistance, while in the past it also received significant economic assistance

      source

      The interesting question is whether this is really in the best interests of the US citizens, or just the senators and congressman who stand to lose their jobs if they get on the wrong side of AIPAC.

      In addition many Individuals in the US are helping finance the bits of Israel which (even) the US government refuses to support officially, viz the illegal settlements (according to international law). They get to do this tax free in many cases though, which the elected government could easily stop if it wanted (and dared) to.

      Of course there are lot of reflexive Israel supporters on /. so critical questions get modded down. But established political scientists are starting to ask the same things, see e.g. this.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    4. Re:American subsidies by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      It is in best interest of US, because they effectively provide extremist islamists with a huge target they hate far more then US and that is close enough to be easily reachable, making it a good lightning rod for most of the violent terrorism and extremism of that kind.

      There are of course other factors in play, such as power of mostly jewish financial lobby, but realpolitik suggests that Israel as lightning rod-approach largely works.

    5. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yours was a reasonable comment, rare for the topic on these forums. Let me fill in a bit:
      The aid to Israel was tied to the 1978 peace treaty with Egypt. Same with the aid to Egypt. We pay them to keep the peace.
      Peace and stability at least on part of the middle east is in our national interest, and many would argue it's worth a few bucks.
      The aid is mostly in the form of American weapons, it acts like a subsidy to our own arms industry. Most of the money stays in the US.
      It also keeps them from buying weapons from the Russians or Chinese. The region has been an arms sales showroom for a half century or more and we want them hooked up to our brand, evolving our technology.
      The crazy thing is the idea of sealing a peace treaty with weapons transfers, but there are numerous social, financial, and geopolitical forces in play to keep it so.
      It's far more complex than just lobbyists, not that they don't play their part.

    6. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it works that way. Much of the resentment felt towards the US throughout the ME is not just because of their one-sided support for Israel, but mostly because of their support for the brutal regimes of their countries (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc).

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    7. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      Yes, sure it is more complex than just lobbyists, but I don't think it could have gone so far out of whack without concerted efforts to make it so. Just my opinion, of course.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    8. Re:American subsidies by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have got to wonder why a relatively wealthy and developed nation should be the largest recipient

      The answer is obvious given the way Washington works. They have a very well run lobby group with good connections to people that set policy. That's the major difference between Israel and any other country with a large US expatriot population.

      helping finance the bits ... the US government refuses to support officially, viz the illegal

      Wind back not very many years and there's all those people, including currently serving Senators, that were sending money to the IRA at a time when it was being used to buy materials for bombs. Morality tends to get ignored in US international relations.

    9. Re:American subsidies by gtall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out that the result of American military aid is that their armed forces are now dependent on the U.S. This gives the U.S. leverage to tell them to knock it the fuck off when they start getting in each other's business. In short, they have to keep the peace or they won't have much to fight with.

    10. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      That they're an ally is not disputed but doesn't explain why they were, for decades on end, the largest recipient of "aid". Israel is not a poor country. Lots of other allies, rich and poor alike, get nothing.

      It's geopolitical strategy, in other words.

      Also you're a bit too quick on the draw with the barbarian rhetoric. Look up "civilization, cradle of". If you are of the persuasion that group A is 100% civilized and group B is 100% barbaric, you're not looking very carefully. In fact it makes me think you're just parroting some talking head with an agenda.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    11. Re:American subsidies by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      It's geopolitical strategy, in other words.

      Well, we can't have that, I guess.

    12. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      It's geopolitical strategy, in other words.

      Well, we can't have that, I guess.

      Not masquerading as "aid", in my opinion, no.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    13. Re:American subsidies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You have got to wonder why a relatively wealthy and developed nation should be the largest recipient.

      You have got to wonder why a relatively wealthy and developed nation such as the US should be the largest international debtor. Same logic?

      Also, you get your newest and fastest Intel CPUs from Israeli labs so if Israel ever goes out of business, there will be a lot of outrage on teh Intertubes. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes sense, but it's not quite that simple. As one israeli military official put it, money is transferable. In other words, the money we give Israel to spend on US made weapons frees up money to spend on other things.

      I was doing research at a major US university a few years ago. There was a resource-intensive (read: needs lots of money) healthcare equipment Israeli start-up that sent people and equipment over to set up essentially a branch research lab because of the equipment available at the university (they have a large MRI research facility,and the company's product is based on MRI). I met one of the researchers, and they are/were employed by the Israeli military, which seemed odd (I know US Vet affairs funds some healthcare research, etc., but this is not like that; this is a pure startup with hopes to be spun off into a successful company). Turns out their military basically is functioning like a large wealthy VC firm.

      And for that, obviously the billions the US gives them helps quite a bit. Without it they would be spending more of their own money on military hardware, and there would be less to function as venture capital.

      Now you know, at least partly, why so many Israeli start-ups originate in the military-- that's where the money is.

    15. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never been to that part of the world (nor I plan to) so I can't really comment much. My position is biased though because I do have many friends from Israel.

      Here is one thing that always made me wonder though. I imagine that most people living in the occupied territories would be perfectly happy if they felt that the country offered them and their children future opportunities. Israel already withdrew from the Sinai, Southern Lebanon, and Gaza. Imagine if the story would have been that the people in these territories did not want the Israelis to live because for the first time they had a taste of real democracy, their kids where receiving a good education, and they could see a future for themselves? It is not as though the competition here is really hard. All they have to do is offer better prospects than the neighbouring countries. Let's face it... that's a pretty low bar. So I don't understand why Israel doesn't do that. Perhaps the strategy should be to win the hearts and minds of the people living in the territories so that they want to integrate into Israel rather than split away and form their own country.

    16. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD card rootkits too! oy vey!

    17. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are/were employed by the Israeli military

      This may be considered pedantic, but there's a huge difference between "are" and "were." Plenty of ex U.S. military people wind up in similar situations, but no one sees some huge conspiracy about that. Why do you reach these conclusions about the Israeli military?

      Another factor is that in Israel almost everyone is drafted, so basically almost all of their civilians are ex-military. You could just as easily claim this crazy ex-military conspiracy theory about doctors, bakers, or random office workers.

    18. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      known for its high-tech tech companies and scientific innovation

      Really? Can anybody name one that's not basically a western subsidiary or a front company for tech of essentially western origin?

      I see absolutely nothing Made in Israel for starters.
      And anything that purports to be Israeli(weapons is the only significant Israeli product) ,is invariably mostly re-badged western tech.

      I see more real productions/innovation from smaller locations such as Hong Kong or Singapore (6 million population each; Israel has about 8 million inhabitants); or even slightly larger Taiwan with about 25 million population.

      Forget about penis waving with Nobel Prizage.
      The Nobel Prize has become/has always been, basically a western propaganda tool to pat itself on the back.
      Barack Obama Nobel Laureate?

    19. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aid is mostly in the form of American weapons, it acts like a subsidy to our own arms industry. Most of the money stays in the US.

      Government subsidy. Right. 'Money stays in the US' is irrelevant, since goods (weapons in this case) flow out of the US and nothing flows back in to compensate for the transferred value. So you, as a citizen, pay for those weapons. And it's a large enough program (in the billions) which is (somehow) good, despite being a government subsidy, because [insert peace, stability, anti-terrorism disingenuous argument here]. Just like bailing out the banking system was a 'good government subsidy'. As opposed stuff like to social programs, which are 'bad subsidies.' Makes one wonder, if the money were to go to Israel social programs, would that turn it into a good subsidy instead of a bad one? From a 'qui podest?' perspective, I suppose it would.

      Cognitive dissonance is strong in you.

    20. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a significant (though much lower) aid goes to Egypt. This could mean that the goal is the peace and not to please AIPAC...

      Some people argue however that this aid is also mainly meant to help Israel, by bribing Egypt leaders to keep them under Israeli command, via the US.

    21. Re:American subsidies by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The catch is that the Israeli military aid is conditional on 70% being exclusively spent on products and services from US defense contractors. It is essentially a backdoor way to provide more money for districts with influential congressmen.

      In the late 90's the economic and military aid was roughly split 50/50 at around $1.8B military, $1.2B economic. A plan was instituted to reduce the economic aid to $0 over time (reached in 2008). Theoretically this would have saved the US taxpayers some money but instead they've just shifted all the economic aid over to the military pile.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    22. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is the only nation in the middle east in dire need of US protection. They are surrounded on all sides by people who want to kill them. In spite of any rhetoric, Israel is also the closest ally of the United States in the middle east (bar none), and this in spite of the fact that Israel has nearly no oil, and most of the rest of the countries in the middle east do.

    23. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True it fosters a dependency and provides us with a carrot to take away for bad behavior.

      However I think, in the case of the Israelis, they're not so dependent as you think, they have a homegrown arms industry, they make their own Merkava tanks, as well as other arms, and they have the financial resources to purchase elsewhere. It's a common Arab myth that without America the Israelis would dry up and blow away, repeated often enough many people believe it. I wouldn't.

      The Egyptians are a different story, a much poorer more populous country with a tourism based economy and little homegrown arms production. They were formerly one of the Russians biggest buyers.
      Recently the US has suspended some of the aid due to the current turmoil. It remains to be seen how this will affect the Egyptians behavior.

      Reducing the aid to Israel might make them less trigger happy in their dealings with the Palestinians, since they would have to consider the financial cost of using the weapons more. It might also signal to the Arab world that now is the time to double down on their efforts to get rid of them, causing more conflict and reducing the prospect for peace treaties. It would signal to the Israelis that they are on their own, increasing their bunker mindset and making them less secure for future peace prospects and the trust and concessions that would be needed.

    24. Re:American subsidies by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I don't think it works that way.

      But it does work that way. You should pay attention to exactly how much money those countries with "brutal regimes" pay various terrorist groups/handlers/etc to target Israel. And not to mention the arab press. If your view held true, then it would be difficult to explain Libya which is now being over run by terrorist groups.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    25. Re:American subsidies by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...either that or a student of history and someone that actually follows the news.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:American subsidies by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The Jews have been the biggest geeks in Europe for 2000 years. Attempting to claim stuff done in Israel is of "western origin" is rather disengenous.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    27. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jewish != Israeli.

    28. Re:American subsidies by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1
      Ally, huh? Remind me, what exactly does the US get out of this relationship? A couple of Nobel prize winners per year? Is it really worth it, I wonder, I wonder....

      Because they are civilization, and not barbarians intent on world domination? Because they are surrounded by barbarians?

      And we should care about this why? Why should we be the police in this context but not the others? Is Israel incapable of solving their own problems?

    29. Re:American subsidies by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Oh shit, they make marginally faster processors for a US company; something that is totally indispensable and could never be done anywhere else in the world. Better sign that vassage agreement pronto!

    30. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel chips are shit in terms of features, absolute shit.

    31. Re:American subsidies by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for notifications I would have missed your late reply... Now I'm guessing you have those enabled as well or you'll miss mine.

      I think most of the groups you might mean, like Hezbollah and Hamas, are backed by Iran, which along with Syria happens to be the exception to the regional rule of US-backed dictatorships. Which explains why they are poorly funded, as Iran is crumbling under the sanctions. So while Iran certainly is in their corner, as it were, these organizations end up being funded mostly by their supporters in their respective power bases, Lebanon and Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

      But I was talking about places like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Jemen, Egypt. Those are, as far as I can tell, not actually doing that much to harm Israel, or for that matter to support the Palestinians. And are you suggesting, by way of the double quotes, that these regimes are not brutal and outrageously oppressive to their own populations, with tacit US support? And that said populations feel zero resentment towards the US for that state of affairs?

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    32. Re:American subsidies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, the Americans on the same company couldn't come up with anything better than Itanium and Pentium 4. And they had *two* labs for that. Morons. :-p

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    33. Re:American subsidies by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      No, it does work that way.

      Although they will not admit it, Israel is very convenient for the leaders of Middle Eastern countries. Why take the blame for your country's problems when you can rally the people around dislike for Israel instead?

    34. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      You may not have noticed but all those $billions don't actually leave the US, they go straight to the military hardware folks, and that's what gets sent. So unless you can convince scholars to get paid with a share in a warplane, they're going to be thinking about greener pastures.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    35. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Anybody murder any KKK members? Guess they're just universally beloved.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    36. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Right. .. the fact that this is another feed of cash to the military industrial complex, and can be disguised as foreign aid rather than even more military expenditure has nothing to do with it.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    37. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The entire nature of military hardware is that goods flow out of the country and the citizens don't get any tangible benefit. It doesn't matter whether the tank is deployed by the US in Europe, blown up inAfghanistan, declared obsolete and scrapped, or donated to Israel, other than the salaries, shareholder income, etc from its manufacture, once it's built it doesn't make the same contribution to the general welfare as, for instance, an automobile does. That's why military hardware is so profitable, there's not a specific demand that gets filled by a specific quantity, it's something that people buy as much as they can afford. Yeah, you can argue that it contributes to our security, but the same argument can be made for tanks sent to Israel (which is why they are sent the tanks rather than Luxembourg or Nepal), and anyway you said "tangible" .

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    38. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      If Israel was the US' proxy in the middle east, which it was, and the Arab "republics" (as distinct from the feudal states) were the Soviet's proxies, which they were, and the stakes were dominance in the world's oil patch; and the secondary purpose was live fire war games between the two to test/rank the two superpowers' weapons without the risk of accidentally escalating into a nuclear conflict, then yeah, the US would be expected to arm the Israelis just as much as they would arm their own troops (or just as much as the USSR would arm Egypt, Syria, Iraq, et al.) Take a look at the map and the statistics; wealthy and well armed as Israel is, the combined resources of their adversaries greatly overmatched them. Israel is pretty damn small; Hell, even just New York city has more resources and possibly more weapons. Looking backwards we cast Israel in the role of military invincibity, but that sure wasn't obvious a priori (or the neighbors might have been less prone to attempt regime change) The US didn't have any military interest in Israel until it displayed some competence in the Suez crisis, it was after that that the American military tap got turned on in exchange for services rendered.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    39. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Fer Crissake..
      The USB flash drive, that familiar to you at all?
      Solar power applications
      Wind turbines
      Drip irrigation
      Desalinization
      Grape tomatoes
      LZW compression algorithm
      Capsule endoscopy
      Numerous pharmaceuticals and medical technologies
      Theoretical and academic research in pretty much every field
      And of course, military stuff ad infinitum, from the Uzi to the Iron Dome.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    40. Re: American subsidies by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Intel 8008 series was never intended to be a general purpose processor. Embedded systems in a dishwasher or something, maybe. Motorola chips were much better suited for developing a PC. First conceptual victory for Apple.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    41. Re: American subsidies by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      The USB flash drive was really obvious : use a general purpose data + power standard for storage. About as impressive as a PCMCIA memory card or a ZIP drive on a parallel port.
      Other stuff on the list is more interesting but other countries do that kind of stuff too, and Israel is basically a western country with lots of foreign support formed in the aftermath of WW2 which was an immense and high tech war. I'm sure you can take other small countries like the Nederlands, Belgium, Austria or one US state and compile a similar list.

    42. Re:American subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American aid does not correlate with political freedom and democracy, it correlates with investment climate.

  2. social/political situation? by j-beda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The problem? Large salary gaps between US and Israeli institutions. "

    Nothing to do with the social/political situation in the middle east? I know the USA social and political situation is kind of crazy, but it seems to be a bit saner at the level of organized groups trying to kick each other off this or that piece of land. I suspect that this has at least SOME effect on people's decisions to emigrate.

    1. Re:social/political situation? by mi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nothing to do with the social/political situation in the middle east?

      Only indirectly — having to spend so much time, money, and effort on national defense is hard economically for a tiny country. Despite all the help from the US, it is still a heavy burden on the economy.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I would say that socially people are much warmer in the Middle-East (the kind of thing the media wouldn't cover) and it's one thing you'd actually lose out by moving to North America.

    3. Re:social/political situation? by Smauler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The middle east is a big place, and the social/political situation is radically different in different places. Israel is currently much safer than it has been for a while.

      I grew up in Oman as a kid, and couldn't ask for a more stable and good place to grow up. Though we lived in housing for us, it ended at the bottom of our road, and I used to leave and run about building sites and play with the locals lots.

    4. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      No surprise: America is full of greedy selfish people because every greedy selfish person from all over the world has moved to America in search of American Money. So thank you, World, for sending all your assholes to America to ruin America for Americans.

    5. Re:social/political situation? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..you mean to say that directly it doesn't affect the motivation of people to stay in a country with instability all around?

      btw it's only hard economically if you need to have walls on every border and expect an attack all the time, while occupying parts of your neighbors..

      (but the US is a great display of how it can be hard on the economy even for a big country so...)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The problem? Large salary gaps between US and Israeli institutions. "

      Nothing to do with the social/political situation in the middle east? I know the USA social and political situation is kind of crazy, but it seems to be a bit saner at the level of organized groups trying to kick each other off this or that piece of land. I suspect that this has at least SOME effect on people's decisions to emigrate.

      They must pay really crappy over there if we can coax them over here with H1B visa pay. :P

    7. Re:social/political situation? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      That's the price of going to war every time there is an election looming. Even with a shooting fish in a barrel approach at Gaza it's still not exactly cheap.

    8. Re:social/political situation? by golodh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Israel's brain drain is serious but it is also one of its life-lines. Whether it appreciates this or not. The constant stream of people traveling between Israel and the West is one of the things that maintain Israel's ties to the US and Europe.

      As everywhere in the world the dominant language of discourse in science and engineering is English, and US universities continue to dominate the lists of best and most influential institutions of learning.

      If you look around at MIT you will note that 50%-60% of the PhD. students are from abroad. And when they get their degree, they see all kinds of attractive job opportunities right where they live. From start-ups to established companies. And yes, it's one of the ways in which the US attracts talent. It out-competes almost everyone else by offering top-notch education, top-notch research, and top-notch jobs. And that isn't about to change (barring short-sighted politics such as de-funding research).

      But perhaps the most important of all: the US really does offer anyone a chance to earn their way solely on personal merit. And that's something very precious that's not available in many other countries where "who you know" counts for more than "what you know".

      So yes, there is a tremendous pull. But before you bemoan the big bad US of A luring away all the talent, please realize that there is also (in the case of Israel) a substantial push.

      Good friends of mine made Aliyah to Israel about 30 years ago. They were well-educated (an economist and a psychologist) learned Hebrew, did their Miluim (military service), one as a private the other as an officer, and found careers in Tel-Aviv.

      What they saw around 15 years ago was a country that increasingly transformed itself from a Western country to a Middle Eastern country. Political polarization, rise of religious ultra-orthodoxy, privileges for religious people (e.g. Torah students exempt from the same military service that takes about a month per year from others), .

      What they also saw was a country that was basically unwilling to reach a sustainable accommodation with the Palestinians despite the demographic, economic, legal, and humanitarian issues. They felt the consequences of that in person when their reserve army duties took them to e.g. the Gaza strip where they, in army uniform and armed, would have to face off against 16-18 year old Palestinian protestors / rioters and wield batons (or worse) against people who had no education to speak of, almost no wealth, no opportunities or prospects worth mentioning, no realistic way out, and no serious hopes for improvement. If that were a transitional phase, it would be bearable, but was it? It didn't look that way and it still doesn't.

      Attempts to persuade the political majority to reach a sustainable settlement did not succeed (if there were any easy and simple solutions they would have been embraced long ago) and indeed a sustainable settlement seemed drifting further away all the time with the (in part religiously motivated) Eretz Israel (Big Israel) idea.

      So they were left with the prospect of staying in an intransigent, polarizing and increasingly besieged country where their children would face the same difficulties, only worse, and without the frictionless alternative of having a double passport.

      So they decided to leave and they are not alone. Obviously that segment of the population with the most portable assets (intellect) has the best prospects of leaving.

      That's the "push" part of the equation.

      So, yes, there's brain-drain but a lively exchange of people and ideas is (as I see it) needed for Israel's mental health. Also there are reasons for the brain-drain that have little to do with big bad US gobbling up all the talent.

    9. Re:social/political situation? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Lol.

      Given that the "West was won" by, when you look at their behaviour, a bunch of raving psychopaths - starting with Columbus - I'm pretty sure "our" assholes fit right in with the already established ones :)

      On a more serious note: you can't expect to keep promoting greed and selfishness forever (Ayn Rand "light" seems to be the mainstream political ideology in the USA) without having everyone become infected to some degree with the meme that "everyone is greedy and selfish (except me)". You're no more immune to consistent propaganda efforts than anyone else is, unless they are using outside controls (like books) on their own thoughts to re-calibrate them.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    10. Re:social/political situation? by nbauman · · Score: 4, Informative

      But perhaps the most important of all: the US really does offer anyone a chance to earn their way solely on personal merit. And that's something very precious that's not available in many other countries where "who you know" counts for more than "what you know".

      I'll disagree with you on that. There's a lot of economic and sociological literature that says that the U.S. has among the worst social mobility of any country in the world, along with the U.K. A son's income correlates more strongly with his father's income in the U.S. and U.K. than any other developed country. Excuse me for not looking up a citation, but I was particularly impressed by a few articles in Science about that.

      This is in contrast, of course, to the myth that we have more opportunity and social mobility in the U.S. There are a few examples like Andrew Carnegie getting off the boat barefoot, but the typical situation is that children follow the family business.

      There are many interesting reasons to perpetuate that myth. A lot of Americans like to say, "I made it on my own," but if you probe a little they say, "Yes, my father helped me out, but I made it on my own."

    11. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or people in america is sinner and is lazy! Brain Drain is a myth! Nobel winners lazy as Detroit!

    12. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to do with the social/political situation in the middle east? I know the USA social and political situation is kind of crazy, but it seems to be a bit saner at the level of organized groups trying to kick each other off this or that piece of land. I suspect that this has at least SOME effect on people's decisions to emigrate.

      Actually, no.

      An Israeli M.Sc. student speaking here. Many Americans have a perception of Israel a barren wasteland checkered by bunkers and crazy homicidal gun-happy fighters.

      The reality: green trees, nice beaches. Very good research institutions and students. Nice nutrition. Nobody is really happy about killing anyone. The youth of most people around me had been wasted mainly on trying to get laid. The weather's too hot though, and research budgets are a bitch.

      The approach you feign is as imprecise as describing Texas a state of drug-using, trigger-happy rednecks. Both Israel and Texas are troubled societies; at least everyday lives here rotate around just anything else except that trouble.

    13. Re:social/political situation? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      The reality: green trees, nice beaches. Very good research institutions and students. Nice nutrition. Nobody is really happy about killing anyone. The youth of most people around me had been wasted mainly on trying to get laid. The weather's too hot though, and research budgets are a bitch.

      The approach you feign is as imprecise as describing Texas a state of drug-using, trigger-happy rednecks. Both Israel and Texas are troubled societies; at least everyday lives here rotate around just anything else except that trouble.

      I don't think I was "feigning" an approach. I would be interested in any reliable data one way or another that would bear on this issue.

      Are you saying that none of the social/political issues has a negative effect on retention? The place does not have to be a wasteland for people to be unhappy with the situation, even if it is fine for the most part. Texas does lose people due to its politics, and it gains people due to its economics. Those are not the only reasons, or probably the main reasons, but they are real.

    14. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I would say that socially people are much warmer in the Middle-East (the kind of thing the media wouldn't cover) and it's one thing you'd actually lose out by moving to North America.

      Been there.

      Arabs? Yes. Wander off into the wrong Arab areas and you might not wander out. But they are polite.

      Israelis? No FUCKING way. Those fuckers will drive on the sidewalk to get around you if they think you're going too slow. Drivers 10 back from a traffic light start honking horns the moment a light turns green. Any queue is an elbow fest of people trying to shove past others. Open the overhead bin in a plane and the moment you bend over to grab your own bag they'll stuff their's in the bin, then tell you, "You'll get over it." (OK, I did get over it - but only after I called over the flight attendant and gate checked HIS bag to MY destination. "Where's my bag?" "Gate checked." "WHAT?!?!?!" "You'll get over it." :-D)

    15. Re:social/political situation? by mi · · Score: 1

      ..you mean to say that directly it doesn't affect the motivation of people to stay in a country with instability all around?

      The two Israelis I personally know, who immigrated to the US, are quite patriotic and eager to defend their country. Both served in the military and one actually participated in live shooting. They were sad to move, but the opportunities offered to them were too enticing (both were scientist-engineers married to lovely scientist ladies)...

      while occupying parts of your neighbors...

      Please... Israel was not "occupying" anyone between 1948 and 1967 — but the neighbors' hatred was the same or worse.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:social/political situation? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please... Israel was not "occupying" anyone between 1948 and 1967

      Please...the entire state of Israel is an occupation of stolen territory. The theft may now be a fait accompli, but until we acknowlege that the Balfour Declaration, and the subsequent actions by the British Empire to build a Jewish state on stolen Arab territory for its own geopolitical purposes, was a crime against humanity, we're not going to make any progress sorting out the mess.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:social/political situation? by mi · · Score: 1

      That's the price of going to war every time there is an election looming.

      Whatever your allegations of special timings (and you don't cite anything to demonstrate the correlation), the actual cost of a flare-up is not that high. What is truly expensive is maintaining readiness for such a flare-up at any moment year after year...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    18. Re:social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that's nonsense.

    19. Re:social/political situation? by femtobyte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For US society as a whole, social mobility is documented to be abysmally low. However, academia in the US is perhaps one exception to that --- places where people are doing the kinds of research likely to win Nobel Prizes are typically not run on the megacorporate model that dominates the rest of US society. Success in research does not generally come from being golfing buddies with some multi-millionaire executive, but from actually being good at what you do. Granted, there has been a move in recent decades to transition universities to "run like a business" models, with high-paid management and disposable research labor, which is likely to result in US academia moving towards the much less meritocratic state of broader US society.

    20. Re:social/political situation? by nbauman · · Score: 3, Informative

      For US society as a whole, social mobility is documented to be abysmally low. However, academia in the US is perhaps one exception to that --- places where people are doing the kinds of research likely to win Nobel Prizes are typically not run on the megacorporate model that dominates the rest of US society. Success in research does not generally come from being golfing buddies with some multi-millionaire executive, but from actually being good at what you do.

      There have been studies of Nobel laureates, and Science had a News & Comments story on how they became Nobel laureates and what kind of background they came from. Unsurprisingly, they overwhelmingly came from wealthy, privileged families who were already accomplished in science. Arthur Kornberg was a Nobel laureate; his son Roger was also a Nobel laureate.

      That just makes sense, and it's not necessarily bad. I had a friend whose father was a professor, and I learned more sitting around their dinner table than I did from his classes.

      OTOH, if you come from a socially and economically deprived background, the barriers are overwhelming. http://www.ronsuskind.com/articles/000034.html http://www.ronsuskind.com/articles/000035.html One of the markers for social mobility is the number of black people I see. I go to medical conferences, and the number of black faces are few and far between. (It seems to be a little better in chemical engineering.)

      Scientists would like to believe that they get ahead on merit, for the same reason that billionaires like to believe they got ahead on merit. But having a father who is a scientist is the strongest determinant of whether a son becomes a scientist.

    21. Re:social/political situation? by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      You're right; I should have specified that access to academic meritocracy only occurs after you've gotten "into the system." Coming from a wealthier, well-educated family lets you get a decent primary and undergraduate education, which is a major obstacle facing a large portion of the population not given that opportunity (in common with all of US society). However, once you're in grad school and above, you're generally considered by the quality of your work, not the wealth/connections/lineage you and your buddies have. For Nobel Laureates, in particular, note that you're also sampling the academic culture from about half a century ago --- Nobel Prizes often go to older career scientists, who established their positions under social conditions different from the current situation. Fifty years from now, I suspect Nobel Prizes will reflect the increased (but imperfect) racial/gender/economic diversity of today's students.

      There is still pervasive gender and racial discrimination, creating higher barriers to advancement for women and people of color. The medical field is perhaps one of the most class-stratified --- the campus med school is where you see students driving BMWs, and six-figure salaries are expected. There's a long way for US academia to go to be entirely meritocratic --- and, unfortunately, it's often heading in the wrong direction. However, I'd say its still notably better than the US private industry culture of power and privilege. There is not a 500:1 pay ratio between top professors and bottom-rung grad students; coming from an academically-oriented family background may bolster your personal academic abilities, but generally no one cares about your lineage when reading your papers; etc.. The adoption of management-centric "business culture" into academia is only pushing it further from meritocracy.

    22. Re:social/political situation? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would say that socially people are much warmer in the Middle-East [...] you lose out by moving to North America.

      "North America" is an awfully big place... Certainly bigger than all of the "Middle-East". Are you suggesting that ALL of the Middle-East is a warm and friendly place, and that ALL of North-America is not?

      Certainly Canada, and most of the northern US is known for being pretty warm and friendly, while New York is... not.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re:social/political situation? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Are you really so lazy that I have to cite major military operations that were mentioned in nearly every major newspaper on the planet? Twice may have been coincidence, after that it was a very obvious election strategy to get people to vote for the sort of people that the founders of Israel set up a country to get away from.

    24. Re: social/political situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of the land lost was due to Palestinian rejection of the '48 UN Partition plan and the subsequent war that followed.

    25. Re: social/political situation? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      And there we have it;
      1) Israel must get out of Palestine
      2 ) Palestine extends from the Mediterranean to Jordan and from Sinai to Syria.

      See, the first part gets said before the general public because it seems reasonable, but the second one, not so much. More of a hush hush principle.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    26. Re: social/political situation? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Either you have Native American ancestors, or your post is damn ironic.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    27. Re:social/political situation? by golodh · · Score: 1
      Allow me to respond to that.

      First off, I'll have to acknowledge that you have a point. Social mobility in the US and the UK is relatively low when compared with other Western countries (see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_mobility ). I should have looked at this before I wrote what I did, but I didn't.

      However ... and this is a really major "however" for many if not most students who are from India, Pakistan, Bangla-Desh, Malaysia, and parts of Afrika. In the US nobody asks you what tribe you're part of when interviewing you for a job. And not many firms refuse to hire you because you're from the South or from the North-East or from the swamps of from the corn belt. Nor (unless you apply to the FBI or the NSA or suchlike) do they ask you about your religion or political affiliation. And they don't usually bar you from entering because you're a woman either.

      You're just a "human resource" being considered from a cost-benefit point of view, and that brutal simplicity can be enormously liberating compared to the background that many students are used to.

      And yes, my focus is a bit narrow. I was talking about a foreign student who successfully completes her/his master degree or even a PhD at a US university in engineering, maths, or science. And I'm not talking about entering Boston's political in-crowd. I'm talking about joining an engineering firm, a consultancy, a car maker, and oil company, or a chemical company as an engineer / scientist. That's what I meant. And from what I've seen for a long time such firms select mostly on merit and not on who you know or who your daddy is.

  3. Con-science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe they don't want to participate in the ongoing Judaization of Palestine.

  4. Re:Stereotypes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't be ridiculous. Fields that are in high demand always lose workers overseas when the pay is better there.

  5. Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And stop calling them "settlers." They aren't "settlers" they are land grabbers stealing land from Palestinians.

    1. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      And stop calling them "settlers." They aren't "settlers" they are land grabbers stealing land from Palestinians.

      One could say the same thing of the palestinians:
      Stop calling them "palestinians", historically there is no such thing as "palestinians".
      They are egyptian and jordanian refugees trying to grab land from Israel, which claim to this land (and more) predates them by 5 millenia.
      These people turned into palestinians the day the state of Israel was declared.

    2. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Americans don't care because it reminds them of cowboys and indians.

    3. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who do you think palestinians are? They're the descendents of ancient Israel who never left. The fact that they changed religion in the intervening centuries does not invalidate their claim to their own land they've been living on for millennia.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by gtall · · Score: 1

      And the Jews were carted off by by the Babylonians and forced out by the Romans, they weren't given a choice. And when Islam took over, that peaceful religion, all other religions were persecuted to varying degrees that changed over time. Go ask Saudi Arabia to set up a Christian church and see how far you get. So yeah, the Palestinians are the ones who were left standing after helping to chase out the others.

    5. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      islam-bashing again? isnt that so 2009?

    6. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't care because it reminds them of cowboys and indians.

      Nothing reminds us of cowboys and Indians except cowboys and Indians. We really do not care about it that much. It is one of those odd foreign views like all Brits like medieval knights, all Japanese like Samurai and so on. Yes it happened in the past. Yes it is interesting. No it isn't a big part of our worldview...unless you are from Texas or Washington during football season.

    7. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, religious bigotry is timeless.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's kind of silly to worry about who 'owns' the land by historical right, when all of us live on land that was stolen from someone else, and all of us maintain our claim by force.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It's kind of silly to worry about who 'owns' the land by historical right, when all of us live on land that was stolen from someone else, and all of us maintain our claim by force.

      On a wholly separate topic, Monday is Columbus Day in the US...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the israelites are the same descendents. In fact, IIRC there's research that shows genetically those two "groups" of people are actually the same group of people. You've got an imaginary line, to what end I don't know. From here it looks like the entire point of that crap is that it gives people like us something to talk about in our free time without having to leave the house, because any time I talk to anyone in person they never like to talk about this sort of thing. Oddly enough they're very interested in what's actually happening in their physical space though. I'd talk to you about those things here, but you probably don't live where I do, and anyway I don't know who you are. Also I'm leaving now. Goodbye.

    11. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      islam-bashing again? isnt that so 2009?

      Uh well... Islam didn't go anywhere, and it hasn't really changed in the four years since, so.. no?

    12. Re:Israel? Oh, you mean occupied Palestine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, what the hell do you know

  6. Re:Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not a western nation, but the summary tries to imply that it is.

  7. TFS seems confused... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TFA mentioned 'large salary gaps' as a problem in certain areas (like finance); but other factors in areas like the sciences (a successful academic career isn't penury; but the cash per unit effort and talent is kind of mediocre).

    Particularly for the scientists and other less-likely-to-be-salary-motivated types, I have to wonder if it suggests that the quality of life, at least for people of the class who have options, that a small country in a mostly-hostile neighborhood can offer just isn't that high.

    In the US, for instance, there is a lot of migration, from state to state, or even within the larger states, that would count as 'brain drain' except that the US is huge so both the origin and the destination are American for accounting purposes.

    By area, Israel is just slightly larger than Massachusetts, which isn't exactly a big state(and, although it scores pretty well on academic opportunities, quality of life, etc. is hardly retains all the people born there, nor is it even imaginable how it could be world-class at enough things to do so, you can only fit so much, and there is plenty of competition with other virtues).

    1. Re:TFS seems confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are plenty of good reasons to live here. Competition for academic jobs here is strong, despite the compensation. But the competition probably helps keep salaries low (although that's true everywhere).

      Whatever the reason, low academic compensation helps keep the risk costs low of doing something crazy like founding a startup. So it cuts both ways.

      In the meantime, all those drained brains keep contacts with home, meaning Israeli science keeps a higher level of contact with international academia, no bad thing in itself.

    2. Re:TFS seems confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exemplification of grandeur may imply bank-robbery..braindrain is not applicable to israel, its tactical.
      Stop Yellen` Wolf! err. for crying out loud

      Compare the CIA station in Johannesburg, South Africa to the mossad station; CIA has ten times as many agents, but mossad gathers more data from its 50 or so agents; "how does that make sense?", one might ask, well, it works because in Jewish communities abroad, there are usually strong links to the "holocaust" (not the African Holocaust, the ashkenaz/sephard won), and many community members perceive mossad to the protector. mossad gets direct input from many community members voluntarily, others may be paid in cash, goods, contraband. Yet others may be given favourable business-OPORTOtunities. Others may be coerced or intimidated until they cooperate.

      This has proven extremely effective at gathering information, and if you were to ask jonathan pollard if he feels he did wrong, you will see the mindset at play. The usnavy must run a tightship. immigrant and marginalised peoples usually have loyalties beyond that of their host-nation. That is what mossad relies on.

      The so-called braindrain is not applicable to israelis; compare for example the Indian brain-drain.....what is the car-ownership-to-household-ratio?

      It is true that these "enterprising young israelis" will get great jobs in the west, they come equipped with resumes (CV`S) showing "highly disciplined team player" from their army Kernel, ample references from well-respected players in the target industry. Upon arrival, they enjoy the benefits of a social-support-network going right over the capitol building.
      These promis ing young israelis inevitably trample a labour-force, deceive investors, fraudulently float at IPO, make billions off the backs of the host country, then they hightail it back to their tax-haven-wmd-cache/stockpile in the Easternmost Meditterrannean, juST LIKE MEYER LANSKY AFTER HE RIPPED OFF THE MOB!

      something certains smells, sniff, sniff, Fishman

    3. Re:TFS seems confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Particularly for the scientists and other less-likely-to-be-salary-motivated types

      I'm not sure that you understand the amount of variation between countries. The US pays about twice as much as France does for academics, for example. Maybe when you're earning 6 figures a doubling doesn't sound like so much anymore, but for someone that works for a university, it is a hard thing to ignore.

      Have some data. You can be the worst in your field in Canada and live nearly as well as an Israeli professor who's the best in the world.

    4. Re:TFS seems confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To second this, an interesting question I discover when talking to people from various countries these days is -- in your culture, who gets more respect? Engineers, farmers, or government administrators?

      I have a pretty international background, but I was fairly shocked to hear some of the answers from people whose cultures I thought I understood. The answers also explain some of the day-to-day behaviors I've seen.

      To put it another way, just because a country does economically well, doesn't mean that it is economically a good place for people of all fields of work to be.

    5. Re:TFS seems confused... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      The US pays about twice as much as France does for academics, for example

      Salaries are usually higher in US that in France, but you have less expenses in France, thanks to socialized services. Healthcare or kids' education costs much less, for instance

  8. The amount of Socialism... by mi · · Score: 1, Troll

    When we get as much Socialism here, as Israel has, we will not be able to offer as big salaries either... Maybe, another 10-20 years? One more Obama and we are done.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, President Kang will continue the trend. American idiot voters love their tyrants.

    2. Re:The amount of Socialism... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, because Europe doesn't have any prestigious academic institutions doing prize winning research. And I'm sure being in a perpetual state of war on their own soil just does wonders for the Israeli economy and ability to fund fripperies like science and technology.

      We could do with some real socialism here, instead of the crony-capitalist half-measures we get from our system of compromises.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nationalized health care is good for startups, though.

      OTOH, Israel has among the strongest protections for investors in the world. Maybe too strong. So it's a strange sort of Socialism...

    4. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Smauler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do know the red threat basically ended almost a quarter a century ago? The only thing socialism threatens you with now is better healthcare, and welfare (at a price, admittedly).

      Socialism =/= Big government.

    5. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only way for socialism to work is via big government because it requires that the government take-to-give. Heck, the two largest budget items are Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security, which are both insolvent. And yes, both are even larger than Defense spending (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2011.png).

      What you meant was Socialism =/= Communism, which is just socialism enforced by a government that controls all of the businesses.

      What the US needs is less government, which includes a smaller defense budget, as well as less interference through social programming (intentionally not "programs"). The idea that we cannot go back to even 2008 levels of spending--before the supposedly one-time bailouts and otherwise huge deficits--is ludicrous. Socialism will break the back of an already weakened economy that cannot support the government that does not even bother trying to support itself by avoiding disgustingly high deficits.

    6. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That depends on how you define big government. There are a lot of people, and indeed even a whole party, who believe that they should be able to leech from society by collecting the benefits of the infrastructure, institutions, and legal framework which makes their businesses and those in which they invest possible, but without being compelled to pay taxes to maintain that society. Having a way to force them to pay taxes is "big government" in their eyes. In short, big government is anything they can't buy shares of with the power to make them do something they don't want to do.

    7. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only way for socialism to work is via big government because it requires that the government take-to-give. Heck, the two largest budget items are Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security, which are both insolvent. And yes, both are even larger than Defense spending (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2011.png).

      What you meant was Socialism =/= Communism, which is just socialism enforced by a government that controls all of the businesses.

      What the US needs is less government, which includes a smaller defense budget, as well as less interference through social programming (intentionally not "programs"). The idea that we cannot go back to even 2008 levels of spending--before the supposedly one-time bailouts and otherwise huge deficits--is ludicrous. Socialism will break the back of an already weakened economy that cannot support the government that does not even bother trying to support itself by avoiding disgustingly high deficits.

      To tell you the truth all of this conservative right-think vs. liberal wrong-think you Americans have got going is something I'll never understand. I don't really see the difference between parties like your Democrats who adopt many Social Democrat ideas and Conservatives who profess to favor free market capitalism. They both practice socialism, they just do it differently. With the Soc. Dems. it's is usually vote fishing by handing entitlements to groups that didn't earn them, i.e. schemes like "lets take all those fat private pensions and nationalize them, then lets pay out equally to everybody regardless of how much they paid into the system or whether they contributed at all". Another favorite with the Soc. Dems. is taxing the middle classes and businesses to death and levying ridiculous taxes on property that forces people to move out of houses that have been in the family for generations and that have become quite valuable due to real estate prices rising sharply over the decades (in city centers for example) because they can't afford the property taxes. WIth the conservatives it's usually corporate socialism. They deregulate the financial industry, cause a recession, the banks have to write off massive amounts of debt to companies and subprime lenders and it is Joe/Jane Suburbanite (and eventually their kids) plus smaller businesses that end up footing the bill to bail out banks and big byzantine corporations because they are job-providers and not bailing them out would put people out of work and that's not worth many votes in the next election. Mind you, much as they profess to hate things like Medicare, Bush Jr. didn't seem to have any problems fishing for votes by handing out $8.4 trillion in unfunded obligations with Medicare D so it's not as if right thinking Conservatives are above borrowing ideas from evil Socialists.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    8. Re:The amount of Socialism... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      And neither is socialism. The kind of closest thing to socialism that actually exists are employee stock ownership plans. Well, actually worker cooperatives are even closer, almost the real deal, but they are few and far inbetween.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    9. Re:The amount of Socialism... by fritsd · · Score: 1

      When we get as much Socialism here, as Israel has, we will not be able to offer as big salaries either... Maybe, another 10-20 years? One more Obama and we are done.

      WOW... that's amazing...
      A Slashdotter who calls the Likud - Yisrael Beitenu coalition government "socialist". Now I have seen everything.. I bet Avigdor Lieberman would not be impressed if you called him a pussy-footed Socialist to his face.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    10. Re:The amount of Socialism... by mi · · Score: 0

      A Slashdotter who calls the Likud - Yisrael Beitenu coalition government "socialist".

      I didn't call a particular party "Socialist", you dimwit. I said, the entire country — whoever is currently at the helm — has a lot more Socialism in it, than is good for anybody. Their taxes — and "social" programs are very high. There is no private ownership of land (except for deeds predating the country itself). Labor unions are massive and enjoy legal protections not found in the US.

      That Likud is currently a dominant force, is a good sign, that maybe, just maybe, the healing has begun over there — much as Obama's ongoing successes with electorate (no other successes, sadly), are a grim sign of our progressive sickness. Whereas Israel stopped encouraging kibutzes decades ago, I would not be surprised, Michelle Obama's next "program" will be about collective farms...

      If the current trends — of Israel improving and us deteriorating — continue, I said, in 10-20 years the pay gap lamented in TFA may disappear. And not only because Israel will be able to offer more...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    11. Re:The amount of Socialism... by mi · · Score: 2

      Right, because Europe doesn't have any prestigious academic institutions doing prize winning research.

      Prestigious — maybe. Higher-paying — no. Europeans live a little richer than Israelis, because they — as you rightly point out — don't have to spend so much on defense. But only the US, thanks to its still strong Capitalism, can afford both — top military and scientific research.

      We could do with some real socialism here, instead of the crony-capitalist half-measures we get from our system of compromises.

      Though I join your disdain for half-measures of crony-capitalism, having personally lived half of my life under "real Socialism" (also known as Communism-lite), I will fight against its setting here with teeth, nails, knives, and guns. And I will start with the morons yipping about how USSR was not "real" Socialism...

      Now, take this threat of violence against your precious person and dial 911 to make a complaint...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:The amount of Socialism... by mi · · Score: 0

      The only thing socialism threatens you with now is better healthcare, and welfare (at a price, admittedly).

      "Better"? As in Cuba? Where is this idea, that government can do something (be it manufacturing of goods, provision of services, or even charitable help to the unlucky) better than competing private entities coming from, when there is no evidence of such success anywhere in history?

      Where are the welfare success stories? All I see are crime-infested neighborhoods populated by people born there to parents born there — a perpetuated misery.

      Education, perhaps? Per-pupil costs of public schools quadrupled since 1962 (inflation-adjusted) — has anyone noticed improvement in quality? No — mere 30% of today's 8th-graders nation-wide are proficient in reading! And that nation-wide average is not helped, but dragged-down by those mighty pillars of Socialism like Chicago (21%) or Detroit (7%).

      Maybe, the good old Postal Service? The program, that is, despite government-enforced monopoly on cheap ("First Class") letters, is usually in the red and in need of bailout every few years?

      What, just what, makes you think, government-provided healthcare (and that is, where we are going as Obamacare-2.0 will be urgently needed, when the current version falls on its face in the mud) will fair better?

      Socialism =/= Big government.

      Right, Socialism does not equal Big Government. It is worse — big government not merely charging big taxes, but doing things with them, that no government should be doing at all.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    13. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      The only way for socialism to work is via big government because it requires that the government take-to-give.

      No, it doesn't. Anarchists are socialists. Forget the red scare bullshit you've been fed by the American right and go read about Proudhon and Goldman and Kropotkin and Bakunin.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:The amount of Socialism... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      For Cuba socialism was a big improvement over the previous regime. I know, one of my friends in college was a refuge.

      The inner cities were crime-infested neighborhoods populated by people born there to parents born there before welfare. All welfare is and ever will be is an effort to relieve some of the pressure. Go read about living conditions during the Guilded Age.

      Unfortunately some of your links regarding education don't work because the Teahadists have the government shut down. Really, though it has always been broken in the US. Back in the 1960's it was ineffective too. It isn't a matter money. It's a matter of too much local control. Places like Massachusetts which have a relatively enlightened citizenry do far better than the Red States in terms of the education. In terms of human development and well being it just sucks to live in a Red State.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/06/19/red-states-rank-low-on-u-s-human-development-index/

      Cherry picking data by city also doesn't change the fact the blue states do better overall when it comes to education.

      http://www.topalli.com/blue/

      The Postal Service worked better before it was privatized, if you hadn't noticed.

      No nation on earth has a working private healthcare system. Even in the US the part of the healthcare system that works best is Medicare.

    15. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anarchy requires either the purist isolationism (family/small group in the woods) or socialism (at a community level), which by definition is not anarchy.

      Anarchy is stupidity. Bye-bye internet, bye-bye electricity and bye-bye every major invention of the last century. But most importantly, bye-bye laws because, by definition, it's up to you to respect them or not without any binding way to enforce them (beyond setting up non-anarchist structures).

    16. Re:The amount of Socialism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans, as they stand today, are not conservative. As you pointed out, under Bush, they grew the government and increased funding even to things that they profess to hate.

      Bush was then-massively deficit spending before Obama ever took office (granted, there were two wars going on). It wasn't until Obama took office that "massive" took on a different meaning.

      I will say though that Bush is at least documented stating the the home loans were rapidly approaching a bursting bubble, and the Democrats completely stopped him. It's his fault because, unlike Obama, he proved unwilling to stonewall the other side until he gets his way, and the Republicans (who controlled both the House and Senate) refused to fix the problem without Democrats. Political correctness killed the Bush-led effort that would have regulated and saved us from the housing crisis.

      ''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''

      Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

      ''I don't see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,'' Mr. Watt said.

      On the other hand, not only did Bush add Medicare obligations, but he also wasted billions on farming subsidies (which, scarily, Democrats have increased substantially).

      It would sure be nice if Republicans were conservatives. That's why I hope the party collapses because the current choice is a Republican that claims small government priorities, but then throws them away or completely lacks a backbone. Or, you get the Democrat that wants to grow the government to take care of us, or claims some middle-right leaning dribble to get into office.

      It's pretty obvious that no one in Congress gives a crap given that they aren't feeling any of the pain of the government shutdown. Their own internal tram system and gym (of all things) is still completely operational. But, it's a good thing that the government side of the parks, Amber Alert system and border control were shutdown. They have to make us feel it.

    17. Re:The amount of Socialism... by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      when the system collapses (and it will)

      Something is definitely collapsing.

      Gold Price Performance USD
      Today -27.50 -2.12%
      30 Days -95.60 -7.01%
      6 Months -296.10 -18.92%
      1 Year -500.60 -28.30%

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  9. Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't we over due for another "US losing its lead in science stories?" You'd think we had a future in science given all the Noble moving here.

  10. Re:Israel by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll second that with my userid visible despite the ramifications.

  11. Rocket science isn't required for this one, folks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a barren desert like Las Vegas, but instead of showgirls and casinos
    you have martial law and suicide bombers, along with various neighboring
    countries which would like to wipe the place off the map.

    The question is not why anyone would leave, the question is why anyone
    would stay. I don't pretend to have an answer for that.

  12. Re:Stereotypes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your stereotypes are just Yellin` out TROLLLLLLOP!
    The article is intentionally misleading (as many "journalishtick" works are these days).
    Take the CIA and brain-drain for example; the CIA has over 500 agents working in Paris, France, but the ACTUAL data gathered by the CIA Paris offices is slightly less than what mossad gathers, with its 100 agents. The reason for this is because the mossad works within the community, co-opting many people. Heres how it works, most of French-Jewry have some link in the holocaust, and their perception of mossad is as a sort of protector; other people are paid, either in cash, goods, or business opportunities; yet other people are coerced into cooperating with mossad, and yet others are intimidated.

    Despite their having a smaller station (and less staff), the data they gather usually surpasses that of the CIA, MI6 or the FSB (and the three big boys usually get most of their data stolen by mossad).
    Ask jonathan pollard if he feels he was wrong to do what he did.... the usnavy should run a tightship, but enevitably immigrant and marginalised peoples have greater loyalties elsewhere than to their host nation; that is how mossad works.

    Now, israeli brain drain is much, much different from, say, India. The ratio of car-owners-to-households can tell you that.
    So these "enterprising young israelis", often with impressive CV`s (resumee) citing "highly disciplined team-player" from their army Kernel, some references from well-respected figure in the target industry, these young israelis get great jobs in the west, they have intricate and infallible social-support-networks.

    As the English say (and Sacha Baron Cohen is an israeli, not English), "at the end of the day,"

    These perps lie and decieve labour-forces and investors, fraudulently float in IPO`s, make billions off the backs of the aforementioned, and then "retire" or hightail it back to their little tax-haven-offshore-stolen-data-safehouse in the Eastern Medditerranean, juST LIKE MEYER LANSKY AFTER HE RIPPED OFF THE MOB.

    Go figure, and stop Yellen "race"!

    well fished, Fishman!

  13. Simple Solution by pitchpipe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Simple solution: pay your scientists/researchers more. It's only complicated when you have a Republican mindset that idealizes entrepreneurship and denigrates science.

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:Simple Solution by gtall · · Score: 1

      Well, cut Republicans some slack. They cannot simply support science because it stops them from just making shit up...well, it doesn't stop them but it does hold up a competing standard.

  14. if they can't earn enough in Israel.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know of a few Islamic countries that would pay them handsomely for their nuclear experience.

  15. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an actual Israeli, I assure you that it is not a barren desert. There are 2 "major" deserts in the South of the country, and even in the desert there are huge green spots. A lot of the country is greener than almost any place you will find. Even some of the drier parts have been made green. For an American, I'd describe it more as the greener parts of Northern and Southern California depending on which part of the country. For a small country, there's a lot of variation.

    Why would someone want to stay? As someone who grew up in Israel, left, and came back, I can answer that vs. the USA.

    1. A different, more relaxing in certain senses lifestyles. Families in Israel tend to be closer I find, and there's more of a sense of community in most places. Even non-religious people for example tend to get together for Shabbat (Sabbath) dinner every week and eat great food, drink wine, chat, etc.

    2. Different pace of life. Faster in some ways, slower in others. I feel people tend to value personal connections more as well. So much so, the entire country works on connections which can also be a problem.

    3. Despite the racist and ridiculous posts in this article, Israelis have a deep connection to the land that dates back very far in most cases. It's hard to explain to an outsider, but it's always been our home. You can argue who owns what, but I can tell that a lot of land and other things have been usurped from my own family in the past. Our people have been massacred in Israel as well as obviously abroad, and we have a long memory. We have a tie to our land and for a lot of us, it is the only place we can feel safe. I feel safer in Israel than America, both in terms of crime and in general. No, there aren't suicide bombers and missiles landing everywhere, but on the other hand some places can be rather unsafe at times depending on political conditions. Even so, people fight on.

    4. National Health Care and arguably better retirement options. This is just a disaster in America, sorry.

    5. More freedoms in many ways. In Israel, you can start a campfire without a strike force of park rangers descending on you asking for permits and other nonsense.For better or worse, many day-to-day laws are treated more as a suggestion. Things get resolve, people get fined or even arrested, but it's a middle-eastern culture with democracy, which encourages a lot of "I'll do whatever I want." Take it or leave it.

    6. Great food. I eat better at Cafes and Coffee shops in Israel than in many "fine" restaurants in America.

    7. A mix of old world and new. It's comforting to me at least to be able to get things without chemicals, packaged 100 times, and that are actually fresh and homemade. At the same time, it's modern enough I can get most of everything

    8. Culture. Israeli culture is very rich, and people don't really realize it until they're gone. This is why you see a lot of Israelis abroad hanging out with other Israelis, going to synagogues when before they were not religious, etc.

    9. A belief in ourselves. The nasty things people say about Israel (ex: this thread) bring us closer together and sometimes make us realize it's the only place we can call home. It's amazing so many people care about such a tiny country and makeup such nonsense. You could at least read our history and visit a few times (better yet live here) before you make unfounded ridiculous comments.

    10. Hot people. There's a lot of hot people. Really, there are. Good place to find a husband or wife.

    Why leave?

    1. Everything is very very expensive.

    2. Did I mention everything is expensive? Well, maybe not street food.

    3. Israeli universities are not be funded well. In fact, they are in many cases funded less than 40 years ago.

    4. Children. It's a great place to raise them, but some parents just don't want to send their kids to the army. I view this as a sign of weakness and disloyalty, but on the other hand I can understand parents protecting their children. Mostly the army is not so heroi

  16. More like a nose drain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever see the nose on a Jew? Oy vey! And have you ever noticed how they all look alike? Inbreeding!

  17. Most Countries Have Trouble Matching US Salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and face the exact same problems. It also helps that the US education system is an utter joke, making it easier to get trained elsewhere, and then move to the US for their high salaries.

  18. Load of nonsense (Israeli) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I actually want to immigrate because of the social issue but financially it would be worse in the states.
    Salary gross are higher but if you add to that insurance, kindergarten, rent etc. the differences are effectively eliminated.

    Yes the taxes here are ridiculously high but that's because of the army not the social safety net.

  19. I agree (Israeli) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tend to agree, this is one of the biggest issues for me personally. There are quite a few other issues such as orthodocs Jews political influence and the fact that there are limited opportunities due to the small size of the country.

    But overall the tech industry is pretty much entirely in Tel Aviv/Hertzelia areas (with limited niches in Haifa and even less in Jerusalem). If you look at the voting record the Tel Aviv/Hertzelia area is remarkably left wing liberal (against occupation) while the rest of the country is the exact polar opposite. This generally means the brains (and financial growth) are most likely liberals.

    I wanted to immigrate myself but without a foreign nationality starting from scratch is really hard, plus my aging mother is also an anchor. I plan to do it immediately when opportunity presents itself.

    1. Re:I agree (Israeli) by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > plus my aging mother is also an anchor. I plan to do it immediately when opportunity presents itself.

      (Michael York in Austin Powers voice) She's your mother, man! Let her expire naturally!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  20. Well, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where else you gonna get a brain drain from? Africa? Ho ho ho!!!

  21. "any other western nation" by Hypotensive · · Score: 2

    Israel is not a Western nation. It's in the Middle East.

    1. Re:"any other western nation" by top_down · · Score: 1

      Western refers to culture, not to geography.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western

      --
      Anyone who generalizes about slashdotters is a typical slashdotter.
    2. Re:"any other western nation" by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's "Western". They are moving the Indians to the reservations and then taking over the best parts of the reservations by force without even handing over a fistfull of dollars.

    3. Re:"any other western nation" by PPH · · Score: 1

      The only thing that is missing is a sound bite from Netanyahu, telling the Palestinians to "continue to endeavor to persevere."

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:"any other western nation" by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      Like I said.

  22. It's about funding and staff positions by iceco2 · · Score: 1

    a lot more then it is about salary, at least for university professors.
    For engeneirs it's more about cost of living and specifically cost of housing

  23. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Missiles landing in one's backyard is the other.

    I'm an Israeli and I've had missiles falling near my house and that's usually not the reason.
    The pay gap usually isn't either. Senior professors make $75k and above and it goes a long way in Israel.

    Unfortunately, the budget of Harvard at $3.7B is higher than the budget of the entire Israeli academia and they only support 21,000 students. Tel Aviv university alone is nearly 30,000. Giving a scientist $5m for a lab is nearly impossible in Israel. That's why they don't come back after the post-doc.

  24. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

    That is an equally accurate description of both Israel and USA. Only for USA, the neighbours are farther away, and the terrorists seem to prefer automatic rifles.

    The same question applies, though. And unlike you, I do know the answer.

  25. Aggressiveness by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It may have to do with the aggressiveness that this tiny country keeps using to conquer all the prime farming and building land at it's border for the pas 60 years. People kind of resent it if you do that and tend to attack you to take the land back. They'll stop that after a few dozen years if you stop taking land, usually, if we may believe history. However, if you do it again and again, you just keep adding enemies to replace the ones that have died from old age. Maybe that's a practice Israel should consider, if it has to spend so much money on "defence".

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Aggressiveness by mi · · Score: 1

      conquer all the prime farming and building land

      Have you seen Israel on the map? You can't — not without looking hard — it is so small. To assert, that the troubles are due to "land grab" is to show ignorance or dishonesty...

      People kind of resent it if you do that and tend to attack you to take the land back.

      Nice theory, but contradicted by facts: there was no "conquering" until 1967, but the hatred was just the same, if not worse.

      They'll stop that after a few dozen years if you stop taking land, usually, if we may believe history.

      They'll also stop if you kill them, you know... And not just "usually", but always. How about that? Or, less bloodily, how about the rest of the world stops treating descendants of Arab refugees as refugees in their own right (only the first generation is considered refugees in all other cases)? That, too, should do wonders in a generation or two — there are no Germans today shooting rockets at Russia over their (grand)parents being kicked out from Königsberg as a result of their country losing an unjust war.

      Maybe that's a practice Israel should consider

      Or, maybe, Israel — and the rest of the "civilized" world — should just consider ending the economic help to the barbarians surrounding Israel? As things currently stand, Gaza has a higher standard of living, than Egypt. Perhaps, when their government (be it Hamas or whoever) has to concentrate on the actual governing — schools, sewers, roads, electricity — instead of relying on foreigners (including, inhumanely, Israelis themselves), they'll be forced to bury their murderous hatchets?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re: Aggressiveness by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      All the aggressiveness over the past 60 years? I'm coming up blank with examples of Israelis aggressively grabbing prime agriculture land at their borders during the 50s, for instance. I won't bring up the 67 war because I know defending against attack is way aggressive (Israel having publicly told Jordan that if they stayed out they would not be attacked; Jordan attacks anyway and loses the West Bank) except to point out that the general principle after a war is to sign a peace treaty which involves returning seized territory and it wasn't the Israelis who refused. When Egypt finally signed they got Sinai back, no problem. Trouble is that Jordan doesn't want the West Bank any more. The Palestinians are still trying to decide whether they will settle for the West Bank or do they want Palestine. Sounds like the same thing to the layman, but see the enlightening post somewhat above regarding the more optimistic borders assigned to Palestine by some.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  26. Western? by Antonovich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure everyone would agree that Israel is a Western nation (not that there is anything wrong with not being Western!!!) but the brain drain in many, many places makes Israel's look pretty meagre. I once read that some of the top Indian publicly funded institutions had 90%+ emigration rates a few years after graduation. Coming from another brain-drain country (New Zealand), these facts ended up changing my view on publicly funded tertiary education - why should a plumber, who started working and paying taxes at 18, pay for me to get a high quality 6-year tertiary education if he is not going to see any benefit from that? Sure, were I to contribute back to society through higher (absolute) taxes, providing employment, leadership or even just being culturally more aware from my education, there is real justification... But I, like many others, simply left straight after 6 years at university to somewhere with more people, closer to "the action" (Europe/US/East Asia). Israel is certainly closer to Europe than NZ but political reasons make it even more isolated...

    1. Re:Western? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on how much the brain drain is permanent, right after their degree I know many, many of my fellow students that were free as a bird and would jump at the opportunity to work abroad, international work experience, culture, language, seeing the world and so on. Then they think about starting a family and homesickness sets in like a homing beacon. It's one thing to travel around as a hired gun to the highest bidder, it's another to raise kids in a foreign culture. Grandparents want to see their grandchildren and so on. Of course there are two parents, maybe the compromise is neither or they both want to stay but if a fair percentage return home with foreign work experience it might pay off well. It shouldn't be ignored that if you have made decent money in the US you're a rich man in India if you choose to return there.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Western? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I once read that some of the top Indian publicly funded institutions had 90%+ emigration rates a few years after graduation.

      India has serious cultural problems contributing to this. "Doctor" is just about the only respected & successful title there, so an inordinate portion of the population becomes MDs... FAR more doctors than could ever be needed in India. So instead they spread out all over the world, looking for work. That's the cause of the predominance of Indian doctors in the US and parts of Europe.

      I'm not so sure it's a bad thing, even with the "publicly funded" angle. It's likely that most of those emigrants earn FAR more than they could at home, and send back to family in India a significant chunk of money. Whatever the result, the cultural issues are the problem that need to be addressed.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  27. Feel the love by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they are much warmer. They invite their neighbours over for some rockets, or a helicopter attack. Or they assume they can build on their neighbours land. the USA may be not the warmest place socially, but the Middle East isn't that friendly either.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  28. which claim to this land (and more) predates them by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    " which claim to this land (and more) predates them by 5 millenia." Woah wait a minute. "them"? Who owns what here.

  29. Re: Stereotypes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In what sense is Sacha Baron Cohen not English? Ok he's arguably Israeli too (just as he's arguably Welsh). But why not English?

  30. Re:Stereotypes? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "Is this an allusion to the cheap Jew thing?"

    Not at all. It's not only Israel, most of the US Nobel price winners cannot become president of the United States.

  31. They are also importing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel may be exporting a lot of brains to USA, but they are also importing a lot from elsewhere. A previous employer participated in a joint project with IBM research lab in Haifa. Of the four persons I personally worked with, three were originally born in Soviet Union and the fourth had immigrated form Australia. When I asked, they said their group is not really exceptional, there are many with similar composition in research institutions in Israel.

    1. Re:They are also importing by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Israel may be exporting a lot of brains to USA, but they are also importing a lot from elsewhere. [...] Of the four persons I personally worked with, three were originally born in Soviet Union and the fourth had immigrated form Australia.

      I certainly heard more Russian being spoken in Herzilya than Hebrew. Then again, I can understand some Russian, unlike Hebrew, so maybe there was a perception bias too.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  32. This is just stupid. by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 2

    Where's the statistics that show this "brain drain"? Sure Israel has a high rate of emmigration, but that's because it also has a high rate of immigration, and a large fraction of dual citizenship holders. One of the Nobel Prize winners from TFS actually illustrates this perfectly. Dr. Levitt was born and raised outside of Israel, but is now a citizen and spends six months a year there (according to Wikipedia.) Counting people like him as "emmigrants" is very missledaing.

  33. capitalistic bullshit by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has very little to do with salary. Nobel-level researchers could earn a hundred times as much by going into banking, if that's what they wanted.

    It's about living environment, resources provided to academics, political outlook, and any number of things which normal people not simplifying humans to cogs in a machine use when deciding where to settle. America's response to technically brilliant (though rarely to socially brilliant) people has always been, "Sure, come here and we'll let you do your shit. What do you need? No problem."

    1. Re:capitalistic bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works both ways, too. All the fetal stem cell researchers left the US years ago, mot moving to France, where their research didn't get the weird and confusing political ramifications of America's anti-abortion crowd.

    2. Re:capitalistic bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, as an Israeli, it most definitely is a question of salary and as you point out, also resources. Politics have little if anything to do with it. There have been many articles each year in every Israeli newspaper about all of this including investigations, opinions, surveys, and more. Every time economics are the #1 factor - salary + research funding. Research institutions are not receiving the funding they once did, which is pathetic that you are getting access to less money now than 40+ years ago when things were far more unstable and the economy was a lot worse in Israel.

      Stop sensationalizing; the way western media covers Israel, you'd think there is daily fire fights in the streets of every city in some kind of sandy desert and there's some kind of mass genocide. None of it is true and it is not in the mind of these academics at all because it would be contrary to what it means to be an Israeli and grow up Israeli.

      Also, America's response has not always been as you describe. America was isolationist for various periods, and even now, it is still not easy to get citizenship or a proper visa legally unless you have a sponsor. It's not so hard at the university level to come as a guest, but it is definitely not easy to ensure you can stay long-term unless you have an employer that cares enough to help you. I have American citizenship, but my Canadian wife who is a professor with 3 degrees could barely get a work visa and would have had to wait many years to get something more permanent. You would think for Canada it would be easy, but without various technicalities, it was annoying to just get anything other than a temporary visa for her because she was in a less attractive field.

    3. Re:capitalistic bullshit by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      1) Of course research funding is an issue - being part of "resources". Evidence that salary's a concern, please?

      2) Highlight my sensationalism pls, and do something about your sweeping "what it means to be an Israeli and grow up Israeli" generalisation, plz. Although a friend who has just finished her compulsory service in the IDF would beg to differ, and she's a first rate geek who rarely has to pick up a gun.

      3) Re your Canadian professor wife, why would she expect to begin with a permanent visa? That's rarely how employment-based immigration works.

  34. When jews export terrorism get back to us by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    In the meantime I'll be worrying more about the extremist trend in Islam which - surprise surprise - tends to come from the arab countries and their patsies in the backwards *stan nations. Unfortunately this intolerant dim witted view of morality has now spread to africa.

    1. Re:When jews export terrorism get back to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I see a problem with your racist logic... obligatory xkcd.

    2. Re:When jews export terrorism get back to us by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes , "racist", the playground insult of last resort for idiot liberals who have no counter argument.

      Oh and FYI I'm not even american so your cartoon misses its target by a long way.

    3. Re:When jews export terrorism get back to us by evilviper · · Score: 1

      In the meantime I'll be worrying more about the extremist trend in Islam which - surprise surprise - tends to come from the arab countries and their patsies in the backwards *stan nations.

      There it far more of an "extremist trend" in Judaism... It wasn't Arabs or Muslims that assassinated Yitzhak Rabin, it was Jews. And Jews are lucky on the "terrorism" angle because they have a powerful state military to do their bidding rather than needing to resort to terrorist tactics.

      The US support of the Jewish state of Israel is a very significant reason why there are Muslim attacks on the US. If the US supported Arabs instead of Jews, things would be going in the opposite direction and you would see Jewish terrorist attacks on the US. After all, you don't attack your allies... you attack your enemy's allies.

      Such anti-Muslim propaganda is quite useful, though... Throughout history, people have always tried to portray their current enemies as detestable and inhuman. Though the problem is that those same efforts makes it harder to re-establish peaceful relations once hostilities have ended.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re: When jews export terrorism get back to us by greyparrot · · Score: 1

      This discussion doesn't really belong in /.,but Muslims have been slaughtering, maiming, and raping each other all over Asia and Africa with no encouragement from the US. The only reason there are so many Muslim countries is that there was an endless war of conquest starting in the 7th century. At this moment, Muslim countries and freelance gangsters are exporting terrorism all over the world. And they would be doing so if Israel did not exist.

  35. Re:Israel by gtall · · Score: 1

    All the states in the mid-east are illegitimate, their boundaries were drawn by the colonial powers. They aren't really countries so much, except for Israel, as they are containers for tribes and sects. Oh, and by the way, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem became a gruppen-fuhrer in Hilter's Nazi Germany. He had his own squad of SS in Balkans rounding up Jews for extermination and hoped to export that little policy gem to the Mid-East.

  36. Re:Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why AC? Are you confused and believe hate filled anti-Semites are persecuted anywhere? Use your log-in. Collect your karma.

  37. Smokscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The US is and has been trashing it's learning and culture - and bankrupting it's students - for most of a decade, or two. It has now decided to leech and destroy the rest of the world's, too.

    US and UK universities are now actively campaigning abroad, intensely, with lots of advertising, theatrics and events, to bring in foreign students - and cash. Some UK universities are said to be kept economically afloat on "Chinese" (oriental) students alone. The same is probably true elsewhere. Local enrollment isn't what it used to be. And mostly young women?

    There's more at work than the 3 phrases US businessen needed in the last century : "What's the best? How much does it cost? Buy!".

    Getting those world brains together would be a good thing, if the whole patent-taboo orwellian big brother thing didn't keep them apart and isolated. Even if it is already rather paleo-orwellian in their own homelands.

  38. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this marked troll? If you disagree, it's hardly a troll. It seems informative and on point to me, vs. the grandparent which is an obvious troll.

  39. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post makes no sense. How does most of this apply to the US? I'm sorry, you're more likely to be mugged, shot, raped, stabbed, etc. in a major US city than a victim of a terrorist attack. Even then, there's a difference between safer day to day life vs. random violence on the street. Both are frightening, but in much different ways.

  40. Re:Stereotypes? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Don't be ridiculous.

    Check the URL atop your browser.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  41. Re:Stereotypes? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's because the vast bulk of NPP winners don't know how to wage war and then blame their predecessor.
    Tricky art, requiring copious support from the codpiece media.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  42. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Missiles landing in one's backyard is the other.

    I'm an Israeli and I've had missiles falling near my house and that's usually not the reason.
    The pay gap usually isn't either. Senior professors make $75k and above and it goes a long way in Israel.

    $75k is starting salary for a first-year assistant professor in America. Senior professors make two or three times that.

  43. Intellectual resources by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 1

    This has been the U.S game for a long time, importing and collecting the intellectual resources of the world. And god knows they need it, we all know the sad state of U.S public education, and how colleges and universities to a significant degree seem to revolve around "getting wasted, bro", not to mention how American culture is excellent at keeping many Americans young, dumb, aggressive and ignorant. It would be interesting to know how the U.S would have fared had they not been fighting to attract the intellectual elite of the world. This pooling of intellectual wealth in the U.S just furthers an already poor global balance, and countries need to invest in motivating their educated people to stay to work and contribute to better their own country, rather than the U.S.

    --
    Signature intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Intellectual resources by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Nobody is making them come to the US. It is and has been since WWII the best place to live and work in technology and the sciences.

      By far.

      While the public schools have below average results as a whole, schools in affluent suburban areas, especially university towns are as good as any in the world. America is far more diverse than most nations, and that diversity accounts for a lot when it comes time to look at rankings in the education system.

      US research universities are absolutely world leading. Cal Tech was recently rated #1 in the world by the Times University rankings, and 7 of the top 10 are US universities.

      The Academic Ranking of World Universities done by Shanghai Jiao Tong University gives 17 of the 20 rankings to US universities.

      In reality it is incredibly one sided. Something like 80% of Nobel Prizes are won by people working in the US.

      It is true other countries do need to improve their support for world class research, but getting torqued off because the US is doing something important very well is just being an ass.

  44. Re:Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is he anti-semitic? Palestinians are semites, whereas the people who moved there in the 50s were Poles, Germans, Russians, British, French and American.

  45. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by Weezul · · Score: 3, Informative

    In most sciences, professors only make between $60k and $120k, although obviously faculty managing really really big labs could make more.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  46. not just the salaries by mrvan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm an academic and just returned from a sabattical in Jerusalem. I can imagine a lot more reasons for a bright scientist to emigrate than just salary:

    - Israel is still a very religious state, with e.g. no civil marriage (you marry before either the rabbi, the imam, the priest, etc, but no religion = no marriage and a mixed marriage means someone must convert). There is a minister of religious affairs and the state in waist-deep in a number of religious issues. Jewish religious schooling is mandatory in most schools. Citizenship is linked to religious/ethnic heritage.

    - Israel is a segragationist state, with a large part of its citizens treated as second class (palestinians, bedouin) and there are extremist groups that physically attack people and institutions who strive for more integration and dialogue (see: price tag attacks).

    - Israel is an occupying country, its army occupying a territory with over 4M people living in it. You cannot travel through Israel (much less live in it) without seeing the effects of this, in terms of checkpoints, barriers, and a general siege mentality in the population.

    - Israel is surrounded by countries that are either hostile, in a civil war, or both. Jordan is an exception but if you go through Jordan you come to Iraq (hostile, civil war), Syira (hostile, civil war), or Saudi Arabia (just hostile). This contributes to the siege mentality in the population.

    tl;dr: If you live in Israel, you live in country based on a tight coupling of church and state; you cannot go on holiday except by airplane; your children will face 2/3 years of military service with a good probability of serving in actual combat and occupation duties; whenever you drive over 100 miles you hit a wall (often quite literally); and almost half the people living in the area controlled by Israel are treated as second class at best. It is a bit like moving to 1950's South Carolina but with closed borders so the only way out is by flying through Europe. No, thanks.

    1. Re:not just the salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, Israel is everything to Jews for Jews that Jews refuse to allow America or any other white western nation to be for white Gentiles. Gotcha.

      http://t.co/CMFWOi9RfB

    2. Re:not just the salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to make things straight:

      1) Israel is a very religious state: wrong, have you visited Tel Aviv or Haifa?

      2) Israel is a segregationist state: wrong again, I am sure you took the bus and you saw by yourself that Arabs are boarding as well.

      3) Israel is an occupying country: wrong again, Israel does not occupy other countries, just its land.

      4) Israel is surrounded by hostility: right, Israel is surrounded by ignorance, racism, colonialism in the Middle East as well as in Western countries such as in the USA. You are a living example.

      "No, thanks" yes no thanks indeed. Noseha Tova and don't come back even you will be discriminated against because you are a Jew.

    3. Re:not just the salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) anti-immigrant and "african neigbhourhood"

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/9287715/Israeli-anti-immigration-riots-hit-African-neighbourhood-of-Tel-Aviv.html

      There are a lot more on Tel Aviv and assults on immigrants and other non-jewish, murders and attacks.

      2) Arab children attacked for boarding an israeli bus.

      http://www.imemc.org/article/64947

      There are a lot more reports and news coverage on drivers refusing taking arabs and other non-jews and immigrants.

      3) Israel is an occupier according to international law and geneve convention. Who the fuck cares what israelis call it.

      4) Israel itself is a great producer of hostility, racism, ignorance and is actually a colonizer (the states around israel doesn't colonize anything).

      http://www.imemc.org/article/66022

      Price tag attacks where even israeli government call it "jewish terrorism".

      Arabs who have consensual sexual relation with jewish women will be jailed for RAPE if they do not inform the woman beforehand they are ARAB.

      http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=180588.0
      www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11329429

      There are many more example, such as

      coteret.com/2009/11/09/settler-rabbi-publishes-the-complete-guide-to-killing-non-jews/

      www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/964/186.html?hp=1&loc=1&tmp=3416

      just google israeli racism, ignorance and colonialism and why not occupation. Try youtube with keywords as settler attacks on christians, muslims, arabs, beduin, immigrants, non-jews and you get video evidence from words, spitting, throwing feces to using assult weapons against civilians.

  47. Re: Stereotypes? by Sun · · Score: 1

    Since when does spending a year in Israel make you Israeli?

    I guess it's a matter of how you define yourself, but to the best of my knowledge, Sacha does not define himself as Israeli.

    Shachar

  48. Re:Israel by Sun · · Score: 1

    And I was wondering what took the hot heads so long...

    What is the relevance of this to the post at hand?

    Shachar
    (at the time I am writing this, the "consequences" are +2 insightful, so you're doing fine so far. As is obvious from my reply, I think "off topic" would have been more appropriate).

  49. Re:Israel by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

    The pervasive influence of the State of Israel on the Western world is germane to nearly every topic.

  50. Warmer? by Phoenix666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess you haven't heard the joke:

    A journalist asked a Russian, American, and Israeli, "Can you please give us your opinion on the food shortage?"

    The Russian replied, "What is an 'opinion'?"

    The American replied, "What is a 'shortage'?"

    The Israeli replied, "What is 'please'?"

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  51. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    $75k is starting salary for a first-year assistant professor in America. Senior professors make two or three times that.

    No it isn't

    There are a couple of big reasons for this:
    1. Most first-year faculty are adjuncts rather than assistant professors. Adjuncts make about $58K if they manage to work full time (most don't).

    2. Colleges have been cutting faculty salaries aggressively for faculty who are not yet full tenured professors. What's driving the increase in college costs is actually administration, buildings, and sports, because that's what actually attracts students to a lot of colleges rather than the actual education part.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  52. Re:Stereotypes? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

    I'm reluctant to respond, since WTF does this Nobel Prize story have to do with Obama... but nice, idiotic cherry-picked simplification of the Obama presidency and the media.

    How about the codpiece media that helped the predecessor launch one of those wars based on lies - to the detriment of maybe winning the other one? How about the codpiece media that repeats and amplifies today's Republican talking points about the need to pay down the deficit, and also repeated the 2001 talking points about how the surplus was going to pay down the deficit, and then what will we do... Better to cut taxes in 2001 and stop running that immoral surplus...

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  53. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by j-beda · · Score: 1

    What's driving the increase in college costs is actually administration, buildings, and sports, because that's what actually attracts students to a lot of colleges rather than the actual education part.

    I know I chose my undergraduate institution based on the size of the administration...... :-)

    OK, buildings and sports maybe, but the growth of the bureaucracy is an unfortunate byproduct of the system rather than a recruitment tool.

  54. Re:Stereotypes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reluctant to respond, since WTF does this Nobel Prize story have to do with Obama...

    Well, for one instance, Arieh Warshel and Obama Barrack their first names are equally long.
    Second instance, their family names are ALSO equally long.

  55. Re:Stereotypes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Being too intelligent has always been a handicap in politics, you start asking things like:
    Where did this money come from?
    and
    Why are you giving me this money?

  56. Israeli brain drain is nothing new by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Gershom Gorenberg has brought it up on several occasions. In his view, electoral considerations in the Knesset mean that Israel has a less than sane approach to educating the next generation.

  57. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Re:Stereotypes? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > I'm reluctant to respond, since WTF does this Nobel Prize story have to do with Obama...

    This is about the US sucking talent out of other nations. That means that people who are NOT BORN HERE work here.

    As one of the key legal requirements for the US President is be that he is BORN HERE. That's how this relates to Obama. Schwarzenegger can be governor but not President.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  59. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spot on. I moved here about 10 years ago, served in army, do reserves, work as an electrical engineer doing chip design. Everything you said is correct.

  60. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by Alomex · · Score: 1

    Senior professors make $75k and above and it goes a long way in Israel.

    I call BS. Cost of living in Israel is substantially higher than in the USA.

    http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=Israel&country2=United+States

    Additionally senior professors make $150k in the USA, so the wage difference is 3-4x in favor of the USA.

  61. Not just a pay thing by skaag · · Score: 1

    It's not just a matter of salaries. Israel is a difficult place. It's essentially a banana republic, with archaic government bodies that still behave as if the country is soviet russia. Natural resources are distributed to "oligarch" style tycoons who basically take the money and spend it abroad on real estate, yachts, and pay little to no taxes in Israel. There's a large number of people who are poor, all the while, the middle class is being milked dry by corporations who jack up prices. Food is cheaper in Manhattan than in Tel-Aviv, as ridiculous as it sounds. And it does not help that the country is surrounded by hostile countries seeking the destruction of Israel and the death of all Jews, despite what they had to endure in the holocaust. So yah, there is that. An Israeli leaving to the US suddenly realizes how relatively relaxed life is. For a typical Israeli, life in the US is like a constant holiday.

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  62. US cutting down on military aid by kbahey · · Score: 1

    That aid to Egypt's army caused it to build an economic empire that controls (by some estimates) up to 40% of Egypt's economy.

    Just in the past few days, there is talk about winding down the aid to Egypt's military, and this is welcomed there by both ultranationalists who see the US meddling with Egypt for too long, and the revolutionaries who see the above empire as something to rein in.

    In all cases, cutting that aid means the USA loses leverage with the most populous Arab nation, one with a peace treaty and border with Israel.

    There will be a long struggle to bring this business empire under civilian oversight. The now suspended 2012 constitution said that the miltiary's budget is not subject to parliamentary oversight, and only a military council with a majority of military people can see the details. The constitution being drafted now seems to be heading that way too after refusal of the army to be under normal civilian elected oversight (public or in private hearing in committees).

    So, as usual, foreign policies that worked in the past has had side effects, and we are now seeing them, and it will impact geopolitical future of a country and perhaps the region too.

  63. Israeli Brain Drain - The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason why some good Israeli scientists emigrate has nothing to do with salary, cost of living, stress (i.e. war, missiles, suicide attacks), or moral judgements on the states character (i.e. too religious, too socialist, too land-grabish...)

    A real "brain-drain" would lead to a shortage of highly qualified people to fill the open slots in Israeli university staff. The situation is actually just the opposite - there are too few open slots for those seeking academic careers.

    The simple reality is that Israel produces way too many top level scientists and the local academic institutions can not absorb all of them, so some seek to get appointments at foreign institutions. The common Israeli requirement for an academic appointment is a post-doc at preferably a top-level western university, so unless these postdocs can get an appointment before they return, they usually just stay abroad and let their careers take off from there. ...and there is a positive side to it too - having Israelis doing world-class research at western universities makes it easier for those who remain in Israel to collaborate with them, offsetting some of the issues with access to very pricey equipment, without all the hassles of capital expense and maintenance.

     

  64. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mrvan above you has some points you did not address at all. Let's face it: besides an interesting vacation spot, what incentive do I have to stay there if I'm not Jewish? I mean that honestly. All of western europe has most of the features you listed there, minus the down side of being a religious run state. As a non-denominational christian how would you feel about me pursuing a Jewish woman in Israel? I don't want her to convert, but I'm not gonna convert either. Also I don't believe in the concept of "nations", but honor the rules busybodies make because crazy assholes won't leave me alone if I don't play along. Are you sure you want to sell me on the worthiness of your homeland? Oh, and what about starting a business? I'd like to see actual sources in your answers, otherwise your words, like the ones you made before, are baseless propaganda.

    Please answer in the spirit of giving 'outsiders' a clearer picture, as I won't be here to read your response. Good luck :)

  65. Re:No amount of rationalizing will change the map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To assert, that the troubles are due to "land grab" is to show ignorance or dishonesty...

    Either you haven't seen the actual progression or it's you who's dishonest: http://thebilzerianreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/four-panel-map.jpg

    Let me draw your particular attention to the second panel ("partition plan") vs. panels 3 and 4.

  66. Zero sum by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Unlike capitalism, globalization is zero-sum.

  67. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    $75k is starting salary for a first-year assistant professor in America. Senior professors make two or three times that.

    Meh, starting salary numbers aren't terribly useful unless you factor in cost-of-living numbers at the same time.
    That being said, I can't believe that Israel wouldn't have a fairly high cost of living.

  68. Re: Stereotypes? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Might have something there; I couldn't help but notice that Scotland's major export seems to be engineers. Same principle I guess.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  69. Re: No amount of rationalizing will change the map by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    http://thebilzerianreport.com/
    Yeah, there's an objective, unbiased, reliable source. The first two articles now are how Jewish bankers destroyed the economy and how you need to claim to be Jewish to get into an Ivy League school.

    More of that "antizionism is not antisemitism" we keep hearing about, I guess. The fact that you would quote this bucket of turds automatically disqualifies your posts from serious consideration. Hell, the fact that you know it exists doesn't help your credibility any. I plan to take several showers in hopes of forgetting I ever saw it.

    But hey, all you antizionists check it out, I wouldn't want to spoil your peculiar fun.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  70. Re:Rocket science isn't required for this one, fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps because the picture is not as rosy as the parent AC makes it out to be:

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/
    http://www.jpost.com/National-News/Racism-violence-against-Africans-soars-in-2012
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israeli-ethiopians-suffer-from-racism-directed-at-african-migrants-1.458247
    http://972mag.com/a-year-in-review-anti-african-racism-and-asylum-seekers-in-israel/72381/

  71. obvious by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

    You mean successful workers in a centralised economy don't think they're getting paid enough?

  72. Re:Lawn darts / Pay Gap by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    I know I chose my undergraduate institution based on the size of the administration...

    Actually, some people do. For example, those who want individualized attention from the Dean of Students office, tutoring centers, counselors and psychologists on staff, etc. There are also those who look heavily at alumni giving, and the fact is that schools that have a lot of that tend to also have an army of fundraisers hitting up alumni on a regular basis (also, they need to have rich alumni).

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  73. Re: No amount of rationalizing will change the map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site hosts but didn't author the image.

    Do you doubt the accuracy of this visualization? I don't know the site and have never read anything on it. I just went to Google Images with "map israel expansion" and picked one of several options that all showed the same thing.

    But hey, don't let me keep you. I assume there's other places you need to enrich with knee-jerk accusations.