Slashdot Mirror


No, Oreos Aren't As Addictive As Cocaine

Daniel_Stuckey writes "If you give a mouse a cookie, you can spend all day following it around the house while it wants to do a bunch of tedious activities. Or, you can trap it in a box, keep feeding it cookies, and then make the outrageous claim that Oreos are as addictive as cocaine. Students at Connecticut College opted for the second option, and the consequences that ensued were much more annoying than making some arts and crafts with a darn mouse. Fox News reported that a 'College study finds Oreo cookies are as addictive as drugs,' Forbes explained 'Why Your Brain Treats Oreos Like a Drug,' and a ton of other sites ran with the story as well. Here's how the experiment, which has not been peer reviewed and has not been presented yet, went down. Mice were placed in a maze, with one end holding an Oreo and the other end holding a rice cake. The mice, without fail, decided to eat the Oreo over the rice cake, proving once and for all that mice like cookies better than tasteless discs with a styrofoamy texture."

285 comments

  1. Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    If you apply your favorite peanut butter, then the it holds the notoriously fractious cake together better.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Or you can use Nutella!

    2. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you can throw that Nutella in the garbage where it fucking belongs and use something good!

    3. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by tibman · · Score: 2

      Biscoff Spread!

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    4. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Churches!

    5. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Nutella is disgusting. I won't claim that it doesn't taste good, but have you ever read the ingredients? It's basically a sugar spread with some hazelnuts and cocoa added in. I prefer getting Dark Chocolate peanut butter, especially from Peanut Butter & Co. Tastes much better and is better for you. (Though I'd still hold off on the rice cake and just eat the dark chocolate peanut butter.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Cookie Butter.

    7. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't say you like rice cakes if that's the way you eat them. Once you apply PB, the rice cake ceases to be food, and instead becomes a peanut butter delivery device.

    8. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Blah, blah, blah. Most people don't give a shit what the ingredients are. It tastes good, or else Nutella wouldn't be raking in the cash that it obviously is.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:Rice cakes ain't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you apply your favorite peanut butter, then the it holds the notoriously fractious cake together better.

      I actually scrape the filling from the oreos, spread it between the rice cakes and have the cookie parts on the side

  2. obviously by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 2

    there's nothing worse than having little bits of cookie up your nose.

    1. Re:obviously by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is why smart addicts choose to freebase 'em.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. This experiment was already done years ago by themushroom · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Give_a_Mouse_a_Cookie

    1. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down with the patriarchy!

    2. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Give_a_Mouse_a_Cookie

      But if you teach a mouse to make cookies...

    3. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Just remember that cookies are a sometimes food.

    4. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do not... I repeat, do not... Eat a raisin oatmeal cookie made by mice.

    5. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yes, good old right-wing early childhood indoctrination. Murrica!

      Beloved by such right-wing icons as Charles Schulz, Oprah Winfrey, and Michele Obama.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      When you posted that, was the reference not already in the summary? Because it is now, and it makes you look incredibly lame :P

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't remind me Sesame Street raped my childhood.

    8. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by sjames · · Score: 1

      The mouse is the rich dude.

      It's just an introduction to the adult classic "if you give a fat cat a tax break".

      Or perhaps it's just something to help the kids relax before bed.

    9. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Give_a_Mouse_a_Cookie

      But if you teach a mouse to make cookies...

      I don't know about mice, but rats are apparently capable of cooking gourmet French food.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    10. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by tepples · · Score: 1

      But if you teach a mouse to make cookies

      Then it'll keep clicking and clicking and clicking...

    11. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      This is not a recipe for a cookie as any reasonable person would accept - Sugar(?), unbleached enriched (niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mono nitrate, ribiflavin, folic aced, high oleic canola and or palm oil and or soy bean oil, cocoa processed with alkali(?), high fructose corn syrup, cornstarch, baking soda or calcium phosphate, salt, soy lecithin, natural and artificial flavour, dextrose. Now that is the recipe for a chemical product.

      Especially when sugar no longer means surgar (cane sugar extract) but can be any type of sugar, natural and artificial flavour can of course mean anything at all, especially when natural means anything extracted from nature not matter how it is processed, so soybeans boiled in high temperature sulphuric acid is still natural as for artificial flavour exactly what is that anyhow. You can taste it, it's artificial but that's all we are going to tell you.

      So cookies are not drugs but unknown chemicals inserted in foods under blasé labels most certainly could be highly addictive chemicals and knowing that cigarette manufacturers when they can under heavy fiscal pressure jumped to the junk food market and at around the time, the quality of junk food took a nose dive whilst you just have to eat one more came onto the scene.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:This experiment was already done years ago by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Everything is made of chemicals.

      Cocoa processed with alkali is known as dutch-processed cocoa and has been around for almost 200 years.

      Cane sugar actually requires more refinement ("chemicals"), btw.

  4. Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by mayko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems reasonable that when you lock an animal (including humans) in a shitty little box it's going to over indulge in activities that work on the pleasure centers of the brain. However, given freedom and a wide range of stimuli it might be less susceptible to addiction as we have defined it. See the controversial Rat Park study (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park) which showed evidence that when researchers gave lab rats a suitable and pleasurable living environment opiates were no longer addictive.

    1. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if you wire a rats pleasure center up to a lever it can pull to give itself pleasure, the sucker will hang on to that lever until it dies of exhaustion.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      No longer AS addictive. Environment isn't the only factor, otherwise rich people wouldn't become addicts and alcoholics.

      If environment were the main factor you could just put people in high priced treatment centers full of waterfalls and back rubs resulting in 100% recovery.

      I agree that Rat Park was an interesting experiment but some people tend to take its results and run away with them. Oversimplifying to support their politics.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    3. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      you could just put people in high priced treatment centers full of waterfalls and back rubs resulting in 100% recovery.

      That sounds so great

      They should build one of those for recovering programmers.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by sjames · · Score: 1

      That might actually work better than current treatment if they didn't have to go back to a crappy job, crappier apartment and not enough food after treatment.

      i sincerely doubt it would eliminate addiction, but it would likely help. It would certainly be more helpful than jail.

    5. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      There's nothing scientifically controversial about the rat park study. The only controversy is why we still do drug research when all the models point towards society as the cause of drug abuse.

      N.B. I had to quit drug research because I treated animals too good and they refused to become addicted! Only time I was proud to be a failure!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    6. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      No, not true. No study shows that. And for the most part you have to get the animal addicted first against it's better judgement.

      Nothing will ever make up for all those animals I've tried to addict and sacrificed just because the human animal is so lazy and adverse of responsibility that it needs a pill to control its behaviour instead of will power and societal change..

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      You obviously have a very wrong impression of the environment rich people live in!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      No longer AS addictive. Environment isn't the only factor, otherwise rich people wouldn't become addicts and alcoholics.

      If environment were the main factor you could just put people in high priced treatment centers full of waterfalls and back rubs resulting in 100% recovery.

      I agree that Rat Park was an interesting experiment but some people tend to take its results and run away with them. Oversimplifying to support their politics.

      I submit Lindsey Lohan as evidence, She's quit drugs a bunch of times thanks to the high-priced rehab centers!

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    9. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Larry Niven, Death by Ecstasy

    10. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I agree totally. I've got friends who work in the treatment field, and they all agree; with a good enough treatment facility and daily attention, you can keep most of the people clean. But it is always temporary; they have to go back out in the world. And then they relapse. If they just stayed in treatment forever, they would be much happier.

    11. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      As a very obviously non-rich person I imagine the main difference is a lack of day to day "how will I pay the rent??" and being able to afford comfortable living arrangements.

      Then there's vacations, spa visits, constant entertainment and overall boredom.

      Sounds like Rat Park to me. If they have nice environments and still get addicted then like I said Rat Park is missing the emotional or human element to it. Perhaps daddy is holding back the trust fund or threatening it if I marry the wrong person.

      You can't make people happy, to some extent it comes from inside.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    12. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      So her environment outside of the treatment centers differs how? She lives in a crappy apartment and works at McD's all day crushing her soul?

      She can afford nice digs, plenty of food and a comfortable life. There's more to it than physical environment. Is it her family? Her choice of friends and entertainment? Bad relationships? A lack of someone controlling her every decision?

      I don't know but she and many like her can afford a life most only dream of, what causes their addiction? Rat Park is not the whole picture, people are more complicated than rats.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    13. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people are in boxes; you can decide if they how good a box it is.

    14. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      is there an actual study on it besides scifi stories?

      of course if you position the starting argument for it that if you could make a machine that made it irresistible for the mouse to press the button... but that's a story. wiring up a pleasure center not being so simple.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So having a reasonably pleasant life helps break the cycle of addiction, and yet our justice system's response to a drug addicts is to lock him up in a shitty little box and destroy his future.

    16. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by mayko · · Score: 1

      Well I don't think drug abuse is equal to addiction. Getting excessively drunk from time to time doesn't necessarily mean you're an alcoholic... but it can have life destroying consequences. Same goes for recreational drug abuse.

      To your earlier point about rich people getting addicted... Of course you're not going to completely eradicate addiction, but I'd be interested to see a comparison of drug addiction (say to something like crack) and socioeconomic status. I'm betting there will be some differences between rich and poor. Also I think human happiness is a fairly complicated thing to define. I think a rat park gets closer to an ideal life for a rat than a stereotypical wealthy person's life in our society of consumption, absent parents and compromised values.

    17. Re:Sounds kinda like the Rat Park study by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Money doesn't help you have positive fulfilling social interactions.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  5. Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you can't even be mad at this one since it is done by undergrads.

    1. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you can't even be mad at this one since it is done by undergrads.

      Yes, actually you can, this "study" isn't acceptable even by High School standards. For someone pursuing a Major course of study to make such obvious, fundamental procedural errors it's downright shameful.

      They never ran any kind of control on the maze. They should have put rice cakes at BOTH exits and ran the mice through a large number of times to prove that the design of the maze isn't leading the mice to the "drugs" exit more frequently.
      They never ran any direct comparison between the Oreos and the Cocaine. Just because mice chose Cocaine over Rice, and chose Oreos over Rice, DOES NOT lead to the conclusion that Oreos are the same as Cocaine. That's basic, fundamental logic they should have learned in GRADE SCHOOL.

      There are only TWO possible explanation for this "study". Either these undergrads are a pack of completely incompetent fucking morons.... or they snorted all the Coke they were supposed to be using for the experiment and faked the data.

    2. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair you also learn in grade school to try to falsify your hypothesis, most scientists fail to do this and instead try to falsify the opposite of their hypothesis (the null hypothesis). You also learn to describe your material and methods in detail. This is actively discouraged by higher tier journals.

      So I can see why college students would be confused about following the scientific method they learned earlier.

    3. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you can't even be mad at this one since it is done by undergrads.

      Yes, actually you can....

      Seriously, a press beat up about a bunch of collage kids screwing up their class science project makes you "mad"? - And who are you mad at? - Strangely it's not the "journalist" who manufactured the beat up, it's the kids!! Little wonder the American public are so easily manipulated via their own media outlets.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you haven't met many current undergrads. It's likely both possible explanations are true.

    5. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Conclusion: rats don't like rice cakes either. Can't say that I blame them, it's like eating Styrofoam.

    6. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse the media with the study. for example:
      "Our research supports the theory that high-fat/ high-sugar foods stimulate the brain in the same way that drugs do,"

      and if you read the actual link you will find they did use controls, for the drug; the control you talk about wouldn't work as an actual control for the actual test.

      I'm not defending the study, but lets at least read the link and not fall in to the journals hyperbole.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      a bunch of collage kids

      Frankenstein's monster-kids? ;-)

    8. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because mice chose Cocaine over Rice, and chose Oreos over Rice, DOES NOT lead to the conclusion that Oreos are the same as Cocaine.

      Saying that one thing is just as X as another isn't saying that the two things are the same. "The outside of an oreo is just as brown as the turd from a /. poster" doesn't mean that oreos are the same as your steaming pile. That's basic, fundamental logic you should have learned in GRADE SCHOOL.

      There are only TWO possible explanation for this "study".

      Or the third, most probable explanation. It was an undergrad science project intended to promote interest in STEM education. And GIRLS in STEM. Did you fail to notice in your haste to rip them a new one that, except for the professor involved, all the people listed in the article were WOMEN?

      Hey, here's a novel concept. Not every lab experiment has to be publication quality research for the people involved to learn something, or for it to motivate them to continue their education so they can learn more. Every term there is a lab class that meets outside my office window that drops pop bottles containing dry ice into a large container of water, to demonstrate the physics behind geysers. Boom! Splash! My God! They aren't using controls! They didn't test the effects of just dropping the pop bottle into the water! And the water doesn't have all the dissolved mineral content that geyser water has! The water isn't boiling hot! There aren't any Park Rangers around keeping them on the boardwalks! They can't learn anything from this! It's bad science! Fire everyone involved! Cancel the journal that would publish such nonsense!

    9. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought women wanted to be treated equally.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying that one thing is just as X as another isn't saying that the two things are the same. "The outside of an oreo is just as brown as the turd from a /. poster" doesn't mean that oreos are the same as your steaming pile. That's basic, fundamental logic you should have learned in GRADE SCHOOL.

      That's not the point though -- you still can't say that oreos are as brown as turds without making a direct comparison. So unless you have an objective and reliable way of measuring an absolute level of addictiveness (I'm pretty certain no such method has been devised) only direct comparisons are valid. And you'd better be certain that your proposed test measures addiction and not just preference, which is obviously the case here.

      Or the third, most probable explanation. It was an undergrad science project intended to promote interest in STEM education. And GIRLS in STEM. Did you fail to notice in your haste to rip them a new one that, except for the professor involved, all the people listed in the article were WOMEN?

      While I'm all for encouraging more women in scientific roles, that's not to the extent that I'll condone giving someone a free pass on such basic errors just because they are one.

    11. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your defense seems a bit paternal and chauvanistic. Did it occur to you that all of the women are in this lab because they are qualified and are pursuing careers in biology, and did you notice that the work is being presented at a conference

    12. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Did it occur to you that all of the women are in this lab because they are qualified

      Considering the utter ridiculousness of their methodology and conclusions, I can safely say 'no, that never occurred to me.'

    13. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part about this is that this is a liberal arts college.

      A professor from Connecticut college was quoted (unbelievably) as stating that because it chose the oreo over the rice cake, obviously the same number of brain cells were involved as with cocaine. What a hoot! You cannot make this stuff up.

    14. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      You realize they got a strip end of tax payer money to perform this "research"?

    15. Re:Press release from a not even published poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't do research do you?

  6. Grandmapocalypse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know what IS as addictive as cocaine?!!

    1. Re:Grandmapocalypse! by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Eh it's fun for a day or two, like most things on the Internet that follow the same formula.

    2. Re:Grandmapocalypse! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1
      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    3. Re:Grandmapocalypse! by TWiTfan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cookie Monster wish he could agree. Cookie Monster have serious long-term problem with cookies. Cookie Monster blow man behind dumpster yesterday for cookies.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:Grandmapocalypse! by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      CM only eat cookies. Swedish Chef & al. bake them.

  7. Who Moved My Cookies? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Also Who Moved My Cookies? If the cookies in a particular cookie depot get stale, mice will seek new cookies. Lilliputians, on the other hand, will pout and piss and moan about cookies losing their taste, rationalizing their lack of action based on imagined dangers out in the maze.

    1. Re:Who Moved My Cookies? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Be warned, if you work for big blue and they show you the "who stole my cheese" video, it generally means your whole department is about to be axed.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Who Moved My Cookies? by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Funny

      "All employees in Department X working on Project Y are invited to a special mandatory screening of 'Old Yeller', followed by an announcement about Project Y."

    3. Re:Who Moved My Cookies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Randroid Alert!

  8. Someone actually read past the headlines!? by neverwhere9 · · Score: 1

    I saw this on Reddit a while ago, and most people either believed it or thought it was bullshit for other reasons. Reading how an experiment is conducted is usually the first thing I do. It's like a crap detector built right into the study.

    1. Re:Someone actually read past the headlines!? by BillyBuzz · · Score: 0

      Heh, you said Reddit....

    2. Re:Someone actually read past the headlines!? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned that Soulskill killed a fun potential application of Betteridge's law of headlines. Curses!
      It's supposed to pose a question for me answer in nerdrage!

  9. Media Reporting is as addictive as cocaine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Proof? They both seem to result in crazy people making stupid decision.

    My reasoning is unassailable.

  10. Hmm.. by girlintraining · · Score: 2

    The mice, without fail, decided to eat the Oreo over the rice cake, proving once and for all that mice like cookies better than tasteless discs with a styrofoamy texture.

    Of course, amongst women, the opposite behavior is seen. At least the ones I know. Does this mean that the tasteless discs with a styrofoam-like texture are actually highly addictive? No. Which means it's easier to get addicted to an abstract ideal about beauty than it is an Oreo cookie. Surprised, I am not. In other news, find me a picture of this professor so I can photoshop him into a new meme along the lines of "I don't want to live on this planet anymore." I'd be ashamed if my students arrived at such a far-fetched and obviously wrong solution, and I allowed them to publish it... it would make me wonder if I'd managed to teach them anything at all...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound fat...

    2. Re:Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any press is good press.

      Captcha: floppy

    3. Re:Hmm.. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I suspect two things: first, that the only thing that the instructor managed to teach was how important it is to your career to publish as much as you can. Second, that the instructor doesn't really give a flip of the fingertip that that's all that was learned.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Hmm.. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I'd be ashamed if my students arrived at such a far-fetched and obviously wrong solution, and I allowed them to publish it... it would make me wonder if I'd managed to teach them anything at all...

      Ummm ... The story seems to make it clear that this "study" hasn't been published at all. But it did get leaked to the mass media, who did their usual scientifically-illiterate hack job on it, and used it to support their own favorite beliefs.

      The only story here is the usual one about how the media finds ways to radically distort both the best and the worst "scientific" work into social propaganda. This includes routinely presenting work that can't even vaguely qualify for the term "scientific" as a "Science says ..." news story.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  11. Mice = Calorie Hunters by PortHaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly, what they demonstrated was that the mice would go for the item with the highest density of calories & fat.

    Duh...

    Now make it really interesting, replace rice patty with a peanut butter cup. And it's an all out rat race.

    1. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      There was an interesting study from 30 years ago where they fed people whipped concoctions woth varying amounts of sugar and fat.

      The thinner you were, the more you preferred the sweeter ones, and the fatter, the fatter ones. As fat contains more calories per unit than sugar, it could be enlightening...

      If anyone actually paid attention, which they don't. Basically fat people are fat more because of cheeseburgers and pizza than cakes and donuts.
      Actually, it correlates with diet soda. Actually, it correlates with emphasis on low salt and low fat. Actually, it correlates with longer haircuts for men keeping the head warmer and cutting energy loss by 25%. Actually it correlates with far more bread and pasta per meal, upping calories by 2/5ths. Actually...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      No, they should have put cocaine at the other end. Then we'd know for sure if Oreos are as addictive as cocaine. A simple test made complex by lack of the right resources.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And something about pirates. Definitely pirates.

    4. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're a Connecticut College alumnus.

    5. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Arker · · Score: 1

      "Clearly, what they demonstrated was that the mice would go for the item with the highest density of calories & fat."

      Yes, indeed. "Researchers" have "proven" that food is addictive.

      So is oxygen, btw. Just say no. Think of the children.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      Was this study conducted by Coke or merely funded by it?

    7. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They did use cocaine. They used cocaine, a saline solution and Oreos. The brain chemistry in eating Oreos and the drugs they used, morphine and cocaine, had the same results.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      So, water is not addictive?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      You seriously have no idea what you're talking about.
      Watch this and get back to us.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

    10. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it correlates with longer haircuts for men keeping the head warmer and cutting energy loss by 25%.

      Most of your post is bullshit, but this one takes the cake.

    11. Re:Mice = Calorie Hunters by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      To further your thoughts, the oreo is far more nutritious than the rice cake. Rice cakes are not "health food", they're a big piece of starch that will be instantly turned to sugar by your liver thus spiking your blood sugar and insulin levels. Rice doesn't contain a substantial amount of other nutrients. Nutritionally, it's the equivalent of eating a pile of sugar, but it doesn't taste as good.

      Whoever designed this "experiment" doesn't understand basic nutrition.

  12. Stopped reading at by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..Fox News

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Stopped reading at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had it been MSNBC you'd believe every word and accuse Big Junk Food of killing people for profits.

    2. Re:Stopped reading at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..Fox News

      --
      Ignorance is a choice

      At least from your sig (quoted to preserve in case of future changes) you realize that your myopia is a decision you're making. Bravo!

  13. Oreos found 0% addictive by flug · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's developed his own measure for it: The percentage of people who will develop the disease of dependency, based on the DSM-IV guidelines, if they use a drug. . . .

    "According to that, the most chemically addictive is nicotine because one third of people who use it during their lifetime will develop dependency," he said. "For cocaine, it's 20 percent. For heroin, it's 23 percent."

    So by that standard, Oreos = 0% addictive.

    Oh, well.

  14. Feynman said "we know better now" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in his "cargo cult science" address, referring to dealing with subtleties invalidating results from having rats run through mazes.

    I'd always though he wasn't quite right about that. This should shed some light on the issue, no?

  15. But.... by bradgoodman · · Score: 0

    I read on the Internet that they are....

  16. if food is as addictive as drugs.... by wbr1 · · Score: 2

    ...the either have a war on food, or legalize drugs.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:if food is as addictive as drugs.... by JeanCroix · · Score: 2

      Bloomberg is way ahead of you.

  17. Future Psychologists/Psychiatrists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So...they have the requisite skills to be Phd. wielding Psychologists/Psychiatrists then.
    Watch the ADHD/ADD diagnosis rates climb even higher in the coming years.

  18. Here's how you know it's bs by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 0

    "Fox News reported that a..."

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
    1. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by operagost · · Score: 2

      Apparently, Forbes, the Washington Times, the NY Post, et al are also summarily dismissed, right?

      New flash: idiots abound in the media. See: Blair, Jayson.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Washington Times certainly is. It's owned by who? Oh yeah, the Reverend Moon. Who formed it to advance his own agenda.

      The New York Post is owned by News Corp.

      Forbes is different from Forbes.com which is:

      "In contrast to the Forbes magazine, the website Forbes.com uses a "contributor model" in which a wide network of "Contributors" writes and publishes articles directly on the website.[15] The Forbes staff does not assign stories, fact check, or edit contributions, and Contributors write stories about any topic they choose."

      So...yes, they are.

    3. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      They abound everywhere, but they congregate, centralize, and thrive at Fox. The times, post and forbes don't approach the level of idiocy at fox. Saying they all suck is really a poor excuse.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    4. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here:

      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/53293963/ns/local_news-indianapolis_in/

      Exact same fucking story.

      Now, can we please start acting like grown ups, and stop pretending that there's any notable difference between the Corporate Media Networks?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B-but...Faux News. I'm witty, smart, edgy, and original now, right?

    6. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      mmmm bacon.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    7. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Conservatives say MSNBC is biased, but liberals say Fox News is evil."

    8. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a strong difference between Fox News, and other news. Well documented, strong and direct link to the Pubs and tea party.

      Grow up and stop thinking everything is equal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Ever wonder WHY?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and both NBC news and Fox News are reporting on the government shutdown. And English newspapers are also reporting on this mouse - Oreos- cocaine story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2462624/Oreos-addictive-cocaine-Connecticut-College-scientists.html

      News is news, not every single website is expected to have unique content.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    11. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, things are different. There are other major networks with well documented, strong, and direct links to other political parties. See if you are grown up enough to admit a truth that doesn't make you feel superior.

    12. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here:

      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/53293963/ns/local_news-indianapolis_in/

      Exact same fucking story.

      Now, can we please start acting like grown ups, and stop pretending that there's any notable difference between the Corporate Media Networks?

      Either that's a huge mouse in their picture, or they've found a stock of very small oreos.

    13. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because cunts like yourself think that political parties are no different than sports teams.

    14. Re:Here's how you know it's bs by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      News is news, not every single website is expected to have unique content.

      My point exactly; people like OP who say, 'oh, it's not believable because it was reported by News Agency X' are merely expressing their personal biases, as opposed to actually saying anything worth paying attention to.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  19. Key is read the data... by Steve_Ussler · · Score: 0

    Not the headlines!

  20. "As addictive as drugs" by bradgoodman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I pushed the "stupid" button as soon as I read that. You can't just compare something to "drugs" - because different drugs work differently - and have differing levels of addictive qualities for very different reasons. For example, diploids (like Heroin) jack with your dopamine levels and are highly addictive, whereas stimulants (like cocaine) or depressants (like alcohol) can have very different affects in different people due to things like genetic factors, and mechanisms for ADD (which affect how stimulants affect you) - but in general are less addictive. Then there are things like tobacco that aren't "drugs" - but are also highly addictive.

    So in other words...WTF??

    (P.S. I'm not really educated in any of this kind of stuff and don't really know what I'm talking about - so don't bother correcting me)

    1. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Mod up.

      I think WTF is, the kids doing the "study" knew exactly what kind of phrases to use to make it highly likely that news sources would run with the story. It's kinda like a news outlet version of a "mail forward".

      In fact, this could be an entertaining game, if it isn't already. Produce some bogus datum, wrap it in the kind of buzzwords news outlets find irresistible, and see what national news agencies fall for it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they dont correct you, how are you gonna learn?

    3. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      (P.S. I'm not really educated in any of this kind of stuff and don't really know what I'm talking about - so don't bother correcting me)

      Actually, your assessment is pretty much spot on - "drugs" describes an uncountable number of substances, many of which are legal and some which are not.

      Even if we assumed the writer was specifically referring to illicit/illegal drugs, there's still a few thousand different kinds, each with its own properties and addiction rates.

      Stupid hardly even begins to describe what's going on here, both with the "researcher's" study and the "journalists" reporting it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You can't just compare something to "drugs" - because different drugs work differently -

      The fact that they have differing mechanisms of action doesn't mean you can't compare something to them. And the fact that something isn't technically a drug (tobacco) doesn't mean it can't be addictive and doesn't mean it doesn't in fact contain a drug (nicotine).

      and have differing levels of addictive qualities

      Here's where the sensationalism of this /. submission can be addressed. The "Motherboard" article goes to great length to disparage this experiment, but also admits that "addiction" isn't mentioned in the DSM-IV. That is a good indication that the term "addiction" can only be used in a common meaning, not some specific psychological diagnosis sense. In common parlance "addiction" means a strong urge to do something, not a pure clinical dependence such as you'd refer to "heroin dependence" as. Common parlance, such as the language a press release for CT College would be written in, for example.

      Somewhere there was a comment about being addicted to food. As in, you can't be. Well, yes, you can, in the pure dependence meaning of the term, too. If you don't eat food you suffer extreme withdrawal symptoms. Death can be a final symptom. And you can be addicted to foods in the common language meaning of addiction. Mmmm, I love mint chocolate chip ice cream. I have a strong urge to eat it. If it is anywhere close, I will. Sorry, that was your scoop? You shouldn't leave it on the table.

      And, OMG, this isn't a peer reviewed publication. It sounds like it was an advanced undergrad lab experience. You know, undergrads who are there to learn techniques and maybe get excited about, you know, STEM education? You don't peer review independent study or undergrad teaching labs.

      I deal with REU where I work. Research Experiences for Undergrads. Yes, sometimes their work is part of a larger project that is published in peer reviewed journals. Most of the time they produce a report and maybe a seminar about what they did and that's as far as it goes. So, no, the fact that it isn't peer reviewed in this case, well, yawn.

    5. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Jack with a technical term? /. has really gone down hill over the years.

    6. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by maird · · Score: 1

      Somewhere there was a comment about being addicted to food. As in, you can't be. Well, yes, you can, in the pure dependence meaning of the term, too. If you don't eat food you suffer extreme withdrawal symptoms. Death can be a final symptom. And you can be addicted to foods in the common language meaning of addiction. Mmmm, I love mint chocolate chip ice cream. I have a strong urge to eat it...

      In which case water is even more addictive than even food (the mean number of person-days water is taken is bound to be higher than the mean number of person-days food is taken). Better still, food is not only addictive, it is the most overdosed on substance in the world with food pusher's selling as much as multiple daily overdoses to anyone who can afford a fix.

    7. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Always amazing how those that THINK they know post authoritative statements. There are absolutely categorizations of 'addiction' in the DSM-IV, which just proves you don't know what you are talking about.

      Perhaps in the same manner that a dmv worker isn't a specialist in driving. Nice try at self-importance though.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this was the actual experiment. "Postulate the different take-up rates of a poorly configured fake science experiment. Measure the difference in the overall takeup rate between media classed as "Left Wing" and media classed as "Right Wing".

      --
      Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
      "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
    9. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Always amazing how those that THINK they know post authoritative statements. There are absolutely categorizations of 'addiction' in the DSM-IV, which just proves you don't know what you are talking about.

      So you are saying that the linked reference in the summary doesn't know what it is talking about, since I referred to the statements from there about the DSM. Not surprising. I'd say that article says a lot of things they know nothing about.

      The only online references to the DSM-IV I can find refer only to dependencies and don't call them addictions. In any case, a PRESS RELEASE from a college website is going to use the colloquial terminology, which is exactly as I put it. Oreos can, indeed, be addictive in terms a normal human being would use. The tempest in the teapot has been identified and should be ignored.

      Perhaps in the same manner that a dmv worker isn't a specialist in driving.

      Oooh, an attempt at a car analogy. You mean in the same manner that a journalist isn't a psychologist writing a diagnostic report? And that undergrad college students may not limit their vocabulary to only the strict definition of medical terms?

      Nice try at self-importance though.

      Thanks. Since you seem to agree with me, I'll take that as a compliment.

    10. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pushed the "stupid" button as soon as I read that. You can't just compare something to "drugs" - because different drugs work differently - and have differing levels of addictive qualities for very different reasons. For example, diploids (like Heroin) jack with your dopamine levels and are highly addictive, whereas stimulants (like cocaine) or depressants (like alcohol) can have very different affects in different people due to things like genetic factors, and mechanisms for ADD (which affect how stimulants affect you) - but in general are less addictive. Then there are things like tobacco that aren't "drugs" - but are also highly addictive.


      So in other words...WTF??


      (P.S. I'm not really educated in any of this kind of stuff and don't really know what I'm talking about - so don't bother correcting me)

      You don't need a correction, you are spot on. Just for reference, take a look at this. To put it briefly, addiction is a change in chemistry within your brain. If you think of your brain as a precision instrument that requires a chemical balance to function properly, drugs change that balance and your brain adjusts to compensate. This is the reason why we get people addicted to alcohol, cocaine, tobacco and even caffiene. Even worse, some of those changes are so drastic it makes the withdrawal symptoms so severe that many people just cannot take it.
        Looking at this study, the only word that comes to mind is "Bullshit". For oreos to truly be addictive, they have to fundamentally change our neural chemistry. Add something like MSG or THC to it if you want an addiction, otherwise it's simply the better reward (calories/fat/sweet). Given the options available, and since rice cakes are made of famine and sorrow, who wouldn't pick the oreo?

    11. Re:"As addictive as drugs" by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the authors of the study were very specific about what drugs they compared to: cocaine and morphine. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Some journalist wrote a headline using a non-specific word to describe a study, therefore the study must be nonsense?

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  21. 11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    What's the white stuff in an Oreo, Alex?

    1. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It cannot be lard as Oreo cookies are one of the very rare commercially-made treat that also happens to be vegan except maybe the white sugar in it, if you're an extreme vegan.

    2. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corn-oil based imitation lard.

    3. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It cannot be lard as Oreo cookies are one of the very rare commercially-made treat that also happens to be vegan except maybe the white sugar in it, if you're an extreme vegan.

      Recipe changed over time. For nearly 40 years the filling did include lard, then back in the health-crazed 90's they switched to partially hydrogenated vegetable oil and more recently they switched to non hydrogenated vegetable oil to drop the trans fats.

      There's a reason Oreos started getting chocolate coated and coming in a variety of flavors starting in the 90's and its got a lot to do with distracting consumers from the downgrade in taste caused by the lack of lard.

    4. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If refined sugar isn't vegan does it mean that tofu isn't as well?

    5. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      that also happens to be vegan except maybe the white sugar in it

      What extremes of veganism has white sugar coming from animals? There aren't any sugar cows. Sugar comes from cane or beets, not an animal. Or have we just slouching into equating vegan with "hobby farm diet" now?

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    6. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Half of "white sugar" in the USA is cane sugar which has to go through a filtering step (beet sugar does not) where it goes through activated charcoal. Half the time that charcoal is made from animal bone instead of plant matter. So there is 25% your bag of sugar was filtered through the carbon that came from bones. But quite frankly I'd argue to vegan that the plant itself grew from soil with animal matter in it anyway

    7. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      See reply from rubycodez, above.

    8. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Many things use animal parts in the production process. In this case, bone char is used to whiten the sugar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_char

      I don't think it's particularly extreme for vegans to avoid those that are straightforward to avoid. I've easily met 10 people who have chosen one beer over another because it isn't filtered with isinglass (fish bladder extract). So far, no one has made a big deal about it.

    9. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      ah to see your face once you realize your stupidity.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    10. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      But quite frankly I'd argue to vegan that the plant itself grew from soil with animal matter in it anyway

      Simpler and more direct than that. Grains can contain by FDA regulation up to certain percentages of insect parts. I've found the little green inchworms in bags of frozen raspberries. Can you really avoid "animal products" even if you're going to be so picky that you'll eschew sugar because it might have been filtered through charcoal made from bones? This puts it rather succintly.

      To avoid all unsavory food components, it seems, would be to stop eating all together.

      And when they say "unsavory food components", they're referring to insect and rodent contamination. I.e., animal parts.

    11. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by vux984 · · Score: 1

      But quite frankly I'd argue to vegan that the plant itself grew from soil with animal matter in it anyway

      Fertilized with shit from captive animals.
      Grown in farms that displaced natural wildlife (and surely killed a few)
      Wrapped in paper made from trees that were cut down destroying bird nests, insect habitats.
      Transported to the store using a truck driven by a guy who thinks an entire ham is "breakfast"...

    12. Re:11 parts sugar, 89 parts lard by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      My bet is it is some form for petroleum distillate or it sure seems to taste like it the last time I had one.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  22. Science News Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, it's basically an example of the "science news cycle:"
    http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174

  23. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can go without Oreos but not coke.

  24. So cocaine must not be that bad then, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know more than a few people must have thought that when this piece of shit excuse for a "study" made its way into the headlines. Just how many years now will I - or the great minds of /. - have to go around correcting morons who will repeat this shit, having never bothered to read the article, learn about the source, to critically analyze the source, to think about the study, to see what, if any, corroborating evidence was subsequently discovered or not, and checked for any retractions or clear refutations? Beyond that, what the fuck ever happened to journalism?

    Damn it all to hell, I need an Oreo. (1.86 Stuf please)

    1. Re:So cocaine must not be that bad then, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it all to hell, I need an Oreo. (1.86 Stuf please)

      Now that you mention it, I've noticed that the double stufs don't seem to have as much stuf as they used to.

  25. Mom sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you give a mouse a cookie, he'll want a glass milk.
    If you give him some milk, he'll want more. If you give a mouse more milk, he'll develop a taste for human blood.
      If he develops a taste for human blood, he'll become a vampire. If he becomes a vampire, he'll have to make followers.
    Now, if he makes some followers, they'll need to feed. If they feed too much, the national guard will be called out.
    If the national gaurd is called out, they, too, will become fodder for the vampires. If the national guard fails, the President will call in a nuclear strike.
    If a nuke is dropped, hundreds of thousands of people will die. America will become a nuclear wasteland and collapse.
    With no one to keep the rest of the world's nukes in check, every crackpot nation will launch their own.
    Eventually the entire earth will be destroyed. And that's why I had to kill Daddy.
    He was giving a mouse a cookie. Sleep well, sweetie.

    1. Re:Mom sez... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the laugh.

    2. Re:Mom sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if it's one of those other kinds of vampire mice, you know, the ones that run around with eye shadow and glitter, and fight weremice (who also wear eye shadow and glitter), you don't have as much to worry about. Not nukes, just lots of angsty drama queen type stuff. Dramamice.

    3. Re:Mom sez... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      ...so you don't just wanna nuke 'em, you wanna nuke 'em from orbit.

    4. Re:Mom sez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's from Robot Chicken, but not everyone knows that. You may want to mention that in the future.

  26. Michelle chose the second option by raymorris · · Score: 2

    and Michelle Obama chose "have a war on food".
    This while her husband was mandating the mass burning of vegetables.

    1. Re:Michelle chose the second option by bobbied · · Score: 1

      They are nothing if not consistent.... Er... Wait...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  27. rice cakes by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    > The mice, without fail, decided to eat the Oreo over the rice cake, proving once and for all that mice like cookies better than tasteless discs with a styrofoamy texture."

    Hey, I happen to like rice cakes. They're nice and crunchy, and they taste good. With a little cinnamon. And powdered sugar. And peanut butter. And then drenched with maple syrup.

    Yes, the diet is coming along fine, why do you ask?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:rice cakes by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      there are also good with cheese, jelly, tuna, other meat....not altogether at once. conclusion: rice cakes are making me fat

    2. Re:rice cakes by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So, a more valid test would be to smear the rice cakes with lard-based vanilla-frosting-like substance, dump chocolate syrup on it, and put *that* on one side of the maze.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:rice cakes by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Do the bookend cylinders in an oreo taste any different from rice cakes?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:rice cakes by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if they don't you might want to get your moonshine habit checked out.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:rice cakes by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I find that a better test would be to feed the rats with only rice cakes and the other group with only oreos and see which group is still alive later..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  28. Well, here's a more nuanced view. by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

    Which seems to indicate that there is some basis for comparability between the two, even if they are different, and further research is needed.

    "the articles from this symposium provide evidence that neurological similarities exist in the response of humans (6) and rats (7,9) to foods and to drugs. Two of the reports (6,7), as well as our own work (14–16), suggest that even highly palatable food is not addictive in and of itself. Rather, it is the manner in which the food is presented (i.e., intermittently) and consumed (i.e., repeated, intermittent “gorging”) that appears to entrain the addiction-like process. Such consummatory patterns are associated with increased risk for comorbid complications as well as relapse and make treatment particularly challenging. The topic of food addiction bears study, therefore, to develop fresh approaches to clinical intervention and to advance our understanding of basic mechanisms involved in loss of control."

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714380/

    --
    "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
    1. Re:Well, here's a more nuanced view. by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

      (Note, I'm not responding to the criticism of the not-peer-reviewed study in the article which I agree is a useless study, but rather its later assertion).

      --
      "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
  29. Obamacare by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Not peer reviewed, but it won't matter. Moochele Obama will latch onto this like a (well you know), and will start proclaiming that this is "proof" we need to restrict sugar, carbs bla bla bla. Stuff like this, with the 30 second attention span of the average person, makes it easier to control them.

  30. Network Programming by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone has truly considered the ramifications of superintelligent pandimensional projections appearing as mice and influencing our experiments... How else would you program a global scale quantum supercomputer made up of sentient neural network applications? Consider that to us, any observable differentiation between themselves normal laboratory mice would directly collapse the delicate superposition of science and fiction...

    Ergo: The more important question is: WHY do the mice want you to think they like Oreos as much as cocaine? Could it be to lessen the stigma against consuming mind altering stimulants to that of a biscuit? Clearly, we are being overclocked.

  31. Withdrawal symptoms? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    IDK about you, but you don't want to be anywhere near me when my Oreo supply runs out...I'll cut you, bitch! I'll cut you deep! :)

    Seriously, though, at first I thought this was a legit test, but it's pure BS. A better* test would be three groups of mice in three mazes: Cookie vs Cocaine, Cookie vs Rice Cake and Cocaine vs Rice Cake. Guess what? Bet'cha rice cakes would be considered more addictive than cocaine as well, allowing us to draw the conclusion that...mice like food, the more calorie-rich, the better.

    *but not very much better

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  32. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I must have some weird genetic disorder, because I think Oreos are bloody awful. Positively vile. In fact, the only ostensibly sweet confection I've had that was worse was a Hershey bar, which seemed like eating solidified excrement mixed with sand. With all due respect, Americans really need some lessons in how to make chocolate; even cooking chocolate (the kind that's basically 50% vegetable oil) tastes better than anything I've eaten from that side of the Atlantic.

  33. Hyperbole? Perhaps... perhaps not by erroneus · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of "addictive" qualities of many of the food products we ingest. Many of them are engineered to delay the "satisfy button" in our systems so that we eat more. (The common response to this problem is people asserting "eat more slowly" and "drink more water") and to that I say... uh, no. In a busy life, one doesn't always have time to pause and "enjoy" food. Eating is sometimes an interruption of whatever it is we are doing... fun, work, whatever. We are not always at leisure to determine how much time we have to eat. And of course my experience in the military didn't help forming bad habits did it? (But here's a mystery -- military food seems a lot more satisfying and healthy than civilian food... could also be the exercise regimen... I dunno. But some foods are easier to get fat on that others. It's not only about carbs and calories it's about the source of them and the way they are prepared... if you eat raw wheat, you will get less "stuff" than from processed wheat right?)

    Anyway, back to addictive food qualities. I there are some well documented secrets of food that people should be made aware of. Among these is the fifth flavor sense. So after "sweet" "sour" "bitter" and "salty" there is a "new one" that the Chinese have known about for centuries if not millennia. It's called "savory" but the Chinese have another name for it... we also know it as "MSG."

    And there's lots lots more to know about food and eating and how it all works.

  34. Bunch of smug "Rice-Cakers"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole "rice cake" argument doesn't negate the whole study. They didn't just monitor the behavior of the rats, they measured the chemical release in the brain and compared it to the release of the same chemicals in the brain after ingestion of cocaine.

    From TFA ( http://www.conncoll.edu/news/news-archive/2013/student-faculty-research-shows-oreos-are-just-as-addictive-as-drugs-in-lab-rats-.htm )

    "They used immunohistochemistry to measure the expression of a protein called c-Fos, a marker of neuronal activation, in the nucleus accumbens, or the brain’s “pleasure center.”

    “It basically tells us how many cells were turned on in a specific region of the brain in response to the drugs or Oreos,” said Schroeder.

    They found that the Oreos activated significantly more neurons than cocaine or morphine."

    1. Re:Bunch of smug "Rice-Cakers"... by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Also from TFA:

      On one side of a maze, they would give hungry rats Oreos and on the other, they would give them a control – in this case, rice cakes. (“Just like humans, rats don’t seem to get much pleasure out of eating them,” Schroeder said.) Then, they would give the rats the option of spending time on either side of the maze and measure how long they would spend on the side where they were typically fed Oreos.
      ...
      They compared the results of the Oreo and rice cake test with results from rats that were given an injection of cocaine or morphine, known addictive substances, on one side of the maze and a shot of saline on the other. Professor Schroeder is licensed by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to purchase and use controlled substances for research.

      The research showed the rats conditioned with Oreos spent as much time on the “drug” side of the maze as the rats conditioned with cocaine or morphine.

      There's more to addiction than addictivating the "pleasure center" of the brain. That's a lot of it yes, but not all. They've shown that rats like Oreos more than rice cakes as much as they like cocaine or morphine more than saline. Liking drugs and being addicted to drugs are two very different things.

      --
      ><));>
    2. Re:Bunch of smug "Rice-Cakers"... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      This is just evidence that cocaine and morphine aren't much fun. You can get more pleasure from eating an oreo than from doing drugs, according to their evidence -- at least more immediate concentrated pleasure. That says nothing about addiction, but if anything could be an indication that people do those drugs more because of being addicted since they don't have the obvious pleasure explanation like oreos have.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Bunch of smug "Rice-Cakers"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not simply the "pleasure center" it's a specific protein that has been previously linked with drugs and addiction in rats.

      This research article is not bunk. What's bunk is the huge number of armchair 'scientists' that failed to read and comprehend the whole article because they got distracted by "Oreos taste better than rice cakes, duh!"

      Relevant literature (thanks Wikipedia!):

      Graybiel AM, Moratalla R, Robertson HA (September 1990). "Amphetamine and cocaine induce drug-specific activation of the c-fos gene in striosome-matrix compartments and limbic subdivisions of the striatum". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87 (17): 6912–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.17.6912. PMC 54648. PMID 2118661.

      Curran EJ, Akil H, Watson SJ (November 1996). "Psychomotor stimulant- and opiate-induced c-fos mRNA expression patterns in the rat forebrain: comparisons between acute drug treatment and a drug challenge in sensitized animals". Neurochem. Res. 21 (11): 1425–35. doi:10.1007/BF02532384. PMID 8947933

      Nichols CD, Sanders-Bush E (May 2002). "A single dose of lysergic acid diethylamide influences gene expression patterns within the mammalian brain". Neuropsychopharmacology 26 (5): 634–42. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00405-5. PMID 11927188.

      Singewald N, Salchner P, Sharp T (February 2003). "Induction of c-Fos expression in specific areas of the fear circuitry in rat forebrain by anxiogenic drugs". Biol. Psychiatry 53 (4): 275–83. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01574-3. PMID 12586446.

  35. Re:Cookies by interval1066 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes. treacle, blood pudding, and clotted cream biscuits are much better than anything over here. We eat pure shit compared to the delicacies to be had in your dusty corner for the world.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  36. Re:Cookies by Quasimodem · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a good thing Oreos aren't as addictive as a drug.

    Imaging if you took a hit of Oreos, got high, then got the munchies, ate Oreos, got high, then got the munchies, ate Oreos.... etc.

  37. The Process by The+Cat · · Score: 0

    1. Scientist does science.
    2. Scientist opens his mouth about the science he did.
    3. All other scientists call him a worthless cunt.
    4. Science suppressed. Scientist exiled.
    5. Start from one again.

    Proving once and for all that science is both politics and religion.

    1. Re:The Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science is a social project, and things get judged within that social context. It is unavoidable, and in a way a necessity,

      Plus you are a worthless cunt.

  38. Re:Oreo addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extrapolating.... three > two goto theweathergirlsitsrainingmen.com. Next day delivery.

  39. Sounds to me like by overshoot · · Score: 1

    the ones with a serious interest in cookies were the students. Anyone care to guess the relative risk of a mouse vs. a human, as seen by an Oreo in the study?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Sounds to me like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed it!

      The tested with cocaine too. Classic head fake.

  40. Two meanings of 'addiction' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Addiction" has two meanings.

    1) A PHYSICAL addiction where removal of access to the substance has clear PRIMARY effects on the chemistry of the patient.
    2) PSYCHOLOGICAL addiction, where the patient craves and needs regular access to the substance in ways that can be measured statistically with a group of such people, but cannot be directly linked to a biochemical process.

    One might assume that 2 is the same as 1, if only our scientific understanding were better, but this ignores the fact that Humans have complicated mental processes as well, and that there is no good reason addiction cannot also result from how we think, feel and perceive.

    Anyway, the word 'addiction' is misused, especially in the USA. Most people can give up using most soft and hard drugs will no ill effects. Fat Americans are fat because they are addicted to the pleasures of eating certain foods. How many people get fat because they each too much wholegrain bread?

    Most Humans like reliable sources of pleasure, and will frequently return to those sources if they are cheap and convenient. Is it an addiction because you do 'it' a lot, or because doing 'it' seems to interfere with other things in life?

    If a food item is 'nice', and many people will not get bored eating that item over and over, do you want to label it as 'addictive'.

    And do NOT turn to animal experimentation for a 'better' answer. Anyone with a cat will tell you they quickly learn to "live to eat", NOT "eat to live", just like most of their owners.

  41. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'll have to be more specific about the treacle as it goes from clear to near-black. Blood pudding? If you meant black pudding, that's a savoury item. As for clotted cream biscuits, they're not biscuits even by the American use of the word and clotted cream is basically just thick whipped cream. They're usually served warm with jam and a cup of tea.

    Spray-on cheese. Now the ball's in your court.

  42. Science. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these kids retarded? You would expect better from a 3rd grade science project.

  43. One bright side by sjames · · Score: 1

    The only useful information from that experiment is that rodents also like to eat the cream filling first, then the cookie.

  44. Cookie Monster by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 0

    Now what starts with the letter C?
    Cookie starts with C
    Let's think of other things
    That starts with C
    Oh, Cocaine start with C, too.
    And other things that start with C?
    Oh, who cares about the other things?

    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me.
    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me.
    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me
    Oh, cocaine, cocaine, cocaine starts with C.

    Me thinks Oreo is delicious cookie.
    And Oreo's white addictive stuff
    Between two chocolate wafer
    Make me think of of cocaine
    Oh and big white moon also look like giant Scarface plate of Cocaine
    But you can't snort that, so....

    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me, yeah!
    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me
    C is for cocaine, that's good enough for me
    Oh, cocaine, cocaine, cocaine starts with C, yeah!
    Cocaine, cocaine, cocaine starts with C, oh boy!
    Cocaine, cocaine, cocaine starts with C!

  45. Shouldn't the researchers... by Bartles · · Score: 2

    ...have put an Oreo at one side of the maze and a line of cocaine at the other if they really wanted to see which was more addictive?

    1. Re:Shouldn't the researchers... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I'm not into uppers/stimulants. I'd rather do a line of oreos off a hookers ass any day of the week. but then, I'd rather do the hooker than the oreos. proving women are more addictive than cocaine or oreos

    2. Re:Shouldn't the researchers... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed that you chose not to post this anonymously.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Shouldn't the researchers... by hibji · · Score: 1

      I think that would have actually been interesting. They could of course vary the amount of cookie on one side and the cocaine on the other. Would have produced some nice graphs at least. Really, why didn't they do this? The PI had access to the drug after all.

    4. Re:Shouldn't the researchers... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      my birth certificate doesn't say "rubycodez" on it

  46. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're absolutely right.

    You do have some weird genetic disorder.

  47. Really, I think there is more to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From
    Not conclusive, but not as trivial as its being made out to be

    http://www.conncoll.edu/

    Neuroscience major and Science Leader Lauren Cameron ’14 was awarded a Keck Grant, which provides summer research stipends in the sciences to qualified students, to work with Schroeder to continue the research over the summer. They used immunohistochemistry to measure the expression of a protein called c-Fos, a marker of neuronal activation, in the nucleus accumbens, or the brain’s “pleasure center.”

    “It basically tells us how many cells were turned on in a specific region of the brain in response to the drugs or Oreos,” said Schroeder.

    They found that the Oreos activated significantly more neurons than cocaine or morphine.

  48. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 2

    worse was a Hershey bar, which seemed like eating solidified excrement mixed with sand.

    That's unfair.

    Hershey's chocolate tastes of sick, not shit, because the milk is lipolyzed, producing butyric acid -- also found in vomit.

  49. American Zombies want.... braaaaaaaiiiiiins by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    treacle, blood pudding, and clotted cream biscuits are much better than anything over here. We eat pure shit compared to the delicacies to be had in your dusty corner for the world.

    Seriously, if you mean black treacle- it has a stronger taste than the golden variety, and I wasn't a big fan as a kid, but it's quite nice as an ingredient. Black pudding? Haven't eaten it for years, but I'd put it in my mouth. Clotted cream? Method of thickening cream by slightly cooking it- never tried it, but can't be that bad.

    So what have the Americans got? Skip this if you're eating lunch... One of the most genuinely unpleasant sounding- and looking- "delicacies" I've ever heard of, but fortunately never tasted. Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you... canned pork brains in milk gravy.

    Yeah... I think it's going to take a lot to "improve" upon that. :'-(

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:American Zombies want.... braaaaaaaiiiiiins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Surely pork brains in milk gravy aren't intended to be eaten. They're just an elaborate anti-semitic joke.

    2. Re:American Zombies want.... braaaaaaaiiiiiins by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      So what have the Americans got? Skip this if you're eating lunch... One of the most genuinely unpleasant sounding- and looking- "delicacies" I've ever heard of, but fortunately never tasted. Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you... canned pork brains in milk gravy.

      If you came to any random American city and asked people if that was an American food, they would all agree that no it is not. If you asked if they had heard of it, no, they have not. If you asked if it is probably sold in the US somewhere, they would probably speculate that it is, somewhere.

    3. Re:American Zombies want.... braaaaaaaiiiiiins by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      For a second I thought you were referring to a real American food the tinned spiced ham product.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:American Zombies want.... braaaaaaaiiiiiins by fatphil · · Score: 1

      ITYM "potted meat food product":
      http://www.thesneeze.com/steve-dont-eat-it/

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  50. Re:Cookies by bobbied · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As an American, I'm going to have to agree with you... That "processed cheese spread" stuff is pretty vile stuff, but it keeps without refrigeration. Most of us on this side of the pond don't quite "get" that European food thing. Especially English food. Some of it sounds pretty bad to us.

    I tried a lot of different stuff when on a trip to Manchester and while some of it was not appealing to me, I did find much to like in my week's stay. I found some incredible Indian food that I've never been able to match here in the states and one Oriental place we ate at was great too. The traditional "fish and chips" with the malt vinegar was worth eating more than once too. Some of the beef dishes I tried left me disappointed, but I figured that was more about farming practices and less about the dish itself. The only real problem was the tea habit I started. I've found that good tea is simply not available at restaurants here and buying it for home can get expensive, but I'm hooked on the stuff so I pay though the nose for it. Makes me understand the "Boston Tea Party" thing that started the rebellion a bit better.

    So... I'm going to apologize for the AC who has obviously no sense of adventure and likely has no culinary experience with much more than macaroni and cheese from a box and bologna sandwiches...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  51. Re:Cookies by bobbied · · Score: 1

    That explains what happened.... Dr, I don't need to go on a diet, I need addiction treatment for my Oreo habit.. Wonder if it's covered by my insurance?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  52. I have conclusive proof by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    ...that chocolate is addictive. Lacking mice, I used my dog as a test subject. I put my closed fist in front of him with a few chocolate chips inside, and he drooled all over it. Now, everyone knows that chocolate makes dogs sick. (Methylxanthine poisoning.) So the fact that he really really wanted to eat it is observable proof that chocolate is addicting. I mean hello -- highly attractive, bad for you, quod ita sit. Stay. Heel. Stop slobbering.

    All I need to do is couch this in flamboyant, headline-ready terms, and the networks will eat it up. So to speak.

    "woof".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:I have conclusive proof by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's proof that dogs will eat anything regardless of whether it will make them sick or not. Or whether it is edible or not.

      My parents once got a chocolate cake and thought it was safe sealed in plastic wrap (from in the store) and put in a plastic bag. Our dog got into the bag, ripped open the plastic wrap, and ate half of the chocolate cake before we found her. Needless to say, she suffered from severe chocolate poisoning, had to go to the animal hospital, and needed charcoal treatment for awhile. She was lucky and survived. That cake could have easily killed her. Yet, put the same exact cake in front of her again and she likely would have eaten it again.

      And before anyone makes a crack about how dumb dogs are, I'll note that plenty of humans do the same thing: ingest something, get sick, recover, and ingest the thing that made them sick in the first place.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:I have conclusive proof by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > It's proof that dogs will eat anything regardless of whether it will make them sick or not. Or whether it is edible or not.

      Yes. We've often said that this particular dog will eat something just on the off chance it might be food.

      > And before anyone makes a crack about how dumb dogs are, I'll note that plenty of humans do the same thing: ingest something, get sick, recover, and ingest the thing that made them sick in the first place.

      ....else why would fast food places still exist?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:I have conclusive proof by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      It's proof that dogs will eat anything regardless of whether it will make them sick or not. Or whether it is edible or not.

      Yes. We've often said that this particular dog will eat something just on the off chance it might be food.

      Hell one of my sister's dog will eat a paper towel on the off chance that it is food. It can be clean right off the roll and the dog will eat it. This dog has also eaten an iPod because someone interrupted it sniffing it and has also eaten rocks from time to time (I didn't know dogs had gizzards).

      --
      Time to offend someone
  53. Re:Cookies by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Fried bread? Lets take some nasty bacon grease, and soak bread in it and fry it.

  54. Re:Cookies by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

    I knew it! I always thought Hershey's tasted like vomit, but people just thought I was trying to be disgusting. I was even convinced that maybe I had once eaten a bar and then got sick, so the taste pairing was esoteric for me. Also, Hershey's bars contain wax, but no cocoa butter.

    --
    You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  55. I went around the net calling BS on this one. by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

    Only to have retards down vote and foxtard you off the map.

  56. Re:Cookies by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do I have to be specific about treacle? You did a good job of generalizing a bunch of American crap, I'm having just as much fun generalizing British crap. You make a broad claim, get a broad retort. I'm not gonna drill it down for ya, you can do the hard work. Blood pudding is a gross item, anyway you look at it. I'm tossing it in because it exists, weather or not if fits in your "category". And the package of ccb's I had once said just that; "Clotted Cream Biscuits". Now step off ya limey bastard.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  57. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OMG! I've been using butter to grease up my bread for grilled cheese sandwiches. You've opened up a whole new world to me (and closed off a whole artery)!

  58. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I've only had it once, since I live in Britain (whose cheap chocolate is made by Cadbury, but with standards maintained by what the rest of the EU is willing to label "chocolate"*). Someone brought some back from a work trip to the US, and -- unusually for chocolate -- it hung around for weeks. This prompted us to work out why no-one really liked it. We decided it was an acquired taste that most Americans learn when they're children.

    * I looked this up. British/Irish "milk chocolate" must be labelled "family milk chocolate" in the rest of the EU, as it's not good enough.

  59. Courtesy of Weird Al and EMI by Chas · · Score: 1

    The white stuff, The white stuff

    The first one was a sweet one
    Second one was a blast
    Soon I finished off the bag, ate 'em up real fast
    You can see 'em in my teeth
    Tell it when I talk
    Had so many my pancreas just went into shock

    I love the white stuff, baby
    In the middle of an Oreo
    I love the white stuff, baby
    It's the most delicious thing I know

    I've had a zillion or two
    In my life, they're so right
    My teeth are all rotted clear through
    But who cares? What else am I supposed to do?

    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, Oh Oreo
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, the white stuff
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, Oh Oreo
    What's in the middle? The white stuff

    The first time that I tried it
    Got a big sugar buzz
    Nothing gets me high as that sandwhich cookie does
    But I love the filling most
    I rub it on my roast
    Mix it in with my coffee and spread it on my toast

    I love the white stuff, baby
    In the middle of an Oreo
    I love the white stuff, baby
    Take some with me everywhere I go

    Might get a pimple or two
    Well, so what? It's all right
    Now Twinkies and Ding Dongs won't do
    All I need... You know what it is

    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, Oh Oreo
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, the white stuff
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, Oh Oreo
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, the white stuff
    Oh OH OH-OH-Oh, Oh Oreo
    What's in the middle? The white stuff

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  60. Re:Cookies by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but bread fried in bacon grease is awesome.
    Sure, it's got to be fresh grease, not something that's been in the pan for a week, and I wouldn't try it if you're prone to cholesterol problems....

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  61. Re:Cookies by geekoid · · Score: 1

    No, an it depends.

    Hershey Bars don contain Wax, and some bars are still made with cocoa butter.
    For example, Hershey's Special Dark still contain Cocoa butter

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  62. Wrong conclusion by linear+a · · Score: 1

    Wrong conclusion there. Proper conclusion is that rice cakes cure cocaine addiction.

  63. If you give a meme cat a gif by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If you give a meme cat a GIF, it will keep repeating the same motions in the animated GIF.

    More than it will climb Mount Everest.

    WARNING: Meme cats are addicted to the Internet and hate mountain climbing!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. Re:Cookies by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Your mistake was thinking that oreos are supposed to taste like chocolate, or be a form of chocolate dessert. They're not; they're a pair of sugar cookies, with a small amount of chocolate, with sugar creme in the middle.

    They're also not supposed to be good sugar cookies as is. They're supposed to hold their form when dipped in milk, or at least eaten with milk.

    Hershey bars are not supposed to be good chocolate either. They're supposed to last a long time and not get stale. They stay equally mediocre forever. And since most Americans don't eat very much chocolate, even in the desserts labeled as "chocolate," it tastes just fine.

    Americans aren't just idiots. Many just don't value good food above convenience. OTOH, people who like high quality desserts can also find the best stuff from all over the world in the stores here. ;) Pretty much every store has Dutch, Belgian, German, Swiss chocolate bars, and these days those sell a lot more than a Hershey's chocolate bar, even though they cost over twice as much.

  65. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 1

    As an American, I'm going to have to agree with you... That "processed cheese spread" stuff is pretty vile stuff, but it keeps without refrigeration.

    But your country is famous for having gargantuan refrigerators!

    I tried a lot of different stuff when on a trip to Manchester and while some of it was not appealing to me, I did find much to like in my week's stay.

    Britain is the most challenging European country to find good food in as a visitor, especially in the larger cities. I despair slightly when I walk through the more touristy parts of central London early in the evening -- there are several huge, expensive franchise restaurants selling average to poor steak for the price of very good steak. They're always busy, they look "safe", wasn't it in the guide book...? Wetherspoons is a cheap example -- most of what they sell are microwave meals! Here is a company that does wholesale ready meals (microwave meals) for pubs etc.

    So, I think you did quite well to find some decent places.

  66. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I looked up clotted cream biscuits -- they're not very common, they look like the kind of thing sold in an airport. Shortbread is much more common: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortbread

    The most common use for clotted cream is on a scone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scone

    (I'm not sure if the point was my country was healthier or unhealthier, tastier or not -- you decide!)

    Making shortbread is one of my earliest memories from school, I must have been about 5. It can't be too difficult:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/recipes/shortbread_1290
    http://www.bbcgoodfood.com/recipes/4622/classic-scones-with-jam-and-clotted-cream

  67. Fox News, is Neither by LifesABeach · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...Fox News reported that a..."
    That's when you know it's a goof.

  68. Re:Cookies by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    Britain is the most challenging European country to find good food in as a visitor, especially in the larger cities.

    I'm sorry, wot? The place is littered with chip shops, you almost can't swing a dead haggis without hitting one. And pub grub? Yummmm. A nice shepherd's pie, a Cornish pasty ... a pint of Strongbow ... oh, man.

    there are several huge, expensive franchise restaurants selling average to poor steak for the price of very good steak.

    The fact that chains are an ever-present hazard doesn't mean it's hard to find good stuff, just that it is easier than it should be to find crap. Ever since my horrible experience with MickeyD in Japan (teryaki burgers, yuk!) I don't go to any chains when I travel abroad, and certainly not US ones.

    Here is a company that does wholesale ready meals (microwave meals) for pubs etc.

    Yeah, we're all familiar with Tom Archer and his Ready Meals. I hear they're pretty good. They're almost organic, aren't they?

  69. Why are we still using mice? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of homeless or otherwise under-employed people who could be used in real mazes to do real human testing.

  70. Maybe not oreos but... by Moppusan · · Score: 1

    ...what about Nutella? You can't say Nutella isn't like crack. Excuse me while I inject my veins with Nutella flavored Nutella on Nutella cookie with Nutella sprinkles. What were we talking about?

    --
    You can dance if you want to.
  71. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After about 15 of them, you get pretty sick of oreos for about a week or so.

  72. Re:Cookies by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Hershey bars are not supposed to be good chocolate either. They're supposed to last a long time and not get stale.

    Hershey built its brand during one of the world wars (WWII, I think) based on creating a chocolate bar that GIs could carry with them and it wouldn't melt in their pockets. The EU locale, being the place that was local to said GIs (even if not called the EU at the time) didn't have to worry about adulterating the chocolate because the GIs could get it fresh. (The latter part is hypothetical and perhaps a bit fictional, but the Hershey part is true.)

  73. Fox Nuuz by Eugriped3z · · Score: 1

    I am 50+ and remember my 4th grade science teacher telling me that that the theory of plate tectonics was so new that it wasn't taught when she was in school. She brought it up because she wanted us little school kiddies to understand that scientific theory evolves with the adoption of new, peer reviewed, debated, experimentally validated hypotheses that depend upon specific and consistent use of language and method. All of this together is supposed to advance the state of human knowledge and hopefully the human condition. It's plain as the nose on Rupert Murdoch's ugly puss that Fox has no respect for anything but revenue and their editorial staff can't distinguish a science from a seance or a fact from a fascist, so why does anyone waste other people's time posting the stupid crap that spews forth from this maw of mediocrity? Is it really that addictive, or is revenue the least common denominator for the Nuu Slashdot as well? An Oreo from Cowboy Neal's chuck wagon for the first cogent response?

  74. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there. The food is not good. The "fish and chips" places mostly cook at the wrong temperature or something because the stuff is soft and soggy and not crispy. The pubs serve something called "bangers and mash" which has about zero flavor. Worst. sausage. ever. The Indian food though is quite good. But the native British stuff - well, there is a reason they went out in search of spices and (temporarily) conquered a huge empire. Their food sucks and they wanted something better.

  75. Re:Cookies by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    I find Oreos uninspiring. I really don't understand what the fuss is about. American chocolate I have tasted was terrible, it was complete crap. Maybe I have just got used to the higher levels of sugar and real cream in the local varieties. Although, 'local' seems more and more to mean anything not from the US. Hershey bars were particularly disappointing. On the other hand I hear that their ice cream is really something amazing.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  76. Gee... to a rat, oreo's SMELL better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also give off more smell overall than a rice cake.

    You're presented with a maze... one path smells like high grade cannabis, the other doesn't smell like much at all, which do you choose?

    Keep it Clean! :D

  77. Re:Cookies by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2

    You have to be specific, because they're right. North American chocolate is crap. Yes, 'excrement mixed with sand' is an exaggeration, but any chocolate made in North America is mediocre at best. The only decent chocolate here is shipped from Europe, and is exhorbitantly priced as a result.
      This is coming from a Canadian, from my experiences of what's available here and in the north eastern US. Maybe Florida and Texas have better chocolate, but nothing I've found from here comes anywhere close to anything from Europe.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  78. Re:Cookies by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    Troll? WTF? How, using even the loosest possible definition of "troll" does this qualify?

    It's reasoned, civil, and makes some very good points.

    Yet again, mods: troll != I disagree.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  79. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    English food is probably the worst example of european food (even the english will agree i here :) That said, pretty much every country or culture will have food that most others find wrong/disgusting for some reason. "fish and chips" is fastfood, you wouldnt want your local kitchens judged based on McDonalds would you? :)

  80. Re:Cookies by itchybrain · · Score: 1

    "Imaging if you took a hit of Oreos, got high, then got the munchies, ate Oreos, got high, then got the munchies, ate Oreos.... etc."

    You should learn how to use recursion :).

  81. The real shocker here... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    The real shocker here is that there's a "If You Give A Mouse A Cookie" reference on Slashdot! Proof that not all us Slashdot readers are unmarried single guys. Some of us are married with kids. I'm proud to have read all of the "If You Give A _____ A _____" books to my kids. Not high literature by any stretch of the imagination, but little kids like them and reading to your kids is a very good thing.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:The real shocker here... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      But have you read the Pigeon series or the Elephant and Piggy series. I am getting rather sick of those ones at the moment and wouldn't mind going back to the "If You Give A _____ A _____" books for a while. Add in that my wife is a teacher so we get books a discount and I have read far too many children's books to my kids in the last 4 years.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:The real shocker here... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My youngest loves Mo Williams books and is constantly asking if there are new Elephant and Piggy books to read. At one point, my boys would shout out random quotes from Elephant and Piggie books as private jokes and laugh to themselves.

      Of course, my oldest is now 10 and prefers fact-based books. His latest obsession is a Doctor Who encyclopedia he got for his birthday. He reads and re-reads every entry and then, after seeing an episode, reads the relevant pages again.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:The real shocker here... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I hope for the same but with the oldest one who recently just turned 5 it will be a while. I did see that there is an updated version of "The Way Things Works" out that I will probably be getting at some point. I loved my copy as a child and with how curious both of my kids are they will probably like it as well.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  82. Re:Cookies by captainlavender · · Score: 1
    This has happened to me with special brownies.

    Not bad, if you don't have anything left to do for the day.

  83. Based on my study... by russotto · · Score: 1

    ... of three mice in the subway tunnel, mice prefer scavenging trash on the tracks to preservation of their own life. This makes them a poor choice for a model of anything but a crazed homeless person. Rats, on the other hand, tend to duck into a hole when the train comes, so repeating the study with them might provide some insight into human behavior.

  84. Re:Cookies by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    If we take Oreos like a suppository, do we still get the addictive qualities? Include milk or almond/soy milk for better lubrication.

    --
    The G
  85. Incomplete Misrepresentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a total misrepresentation of the study. This from the full story at Connecticut College:

    " associate professor of psychology and director of the behavioral neuroscience program, and his students found rats formed an equally strong association between the pleasurable effects of eating Oreos and a specific environment as they did between cocaine or morphine and a specific environment. They also found that eating cookies activated more neurons in the brain’s “pleasure center” than exposure to drugs of abuse. "

    "They compared the results of the Oreo and rice cake test with results from rats that were given an injection of cocaine or morphine, known addictive substances, on one side of the maze and a shot of saline on the other. "

    "The research showed the rats conditioned with Oreos spent as much time on the “drug” side of the maze as the rats conditioned with cocaine or morphine."

    That doesn't mean the research is great, can't be criticized or by any means definitive. But the research has a lot more to support it than most of the criticism of the research here.

  86. That's what they say . . . but by approachingZero+ · · Score: 0

    My wife has informed me if I am caught grinding up one more and inhaling it using a rolled up Franklin I'm divorced. God I pray I can stop. Crap, I need to do another line, the chunks kind of hurt but I need a fix.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  87. Re:Cookies by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    oxtail soup? bangers and mash? fried fish and "chips? we can't make fun of British cuisine, there is none to be found. just like British architecture. the other side of the channel they have gourmet food and beautiful buildings.

  88. Enjoy Koch-a-Cola by tepples · · Score: 1

    More likely, a partnership between Coke and Koch.

  89. Not addictive eh? by MavicGirardi · · Score: 1

    Tell that to my 6-year-old self.

  90. Re:Cookies by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I tried a lot of different stuff when on a trip to Manchester and while some of it was not appealing to me, I did find much to like in my week's stay. I found some incredible Indian food that I've never been able to match here in the states

    They say that's why they let India stay in the commonwealth.....otherwise there would be no good food in England.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  91. Re:Cookies by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    "As an American, I'm going to have to agree with you... That "processed cheese spread" stuff is pretty vile stuff, but it keeps without refrigeration."

    As a European who spent much of his childhood in the US, I have to disagree with you. It may not be labeled correctly ("Cheese" as such is completely wrong), but that stuff has its uses... hell, I still mix in a bit of it when I can - in grilled cheese or on nachos, for instance.

  92. Tried this with my cat by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Wanted to see what brand my old cat liked best. So I placed two bowls of cat food next to each other and then observed which one was emptied.

    Answer: Both.

    Twist: Mice hate Oreos so they eat it first and reserve the rice cake as dessert and to wash the taste away.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  93. Me too, they LIE! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    http://dearblankpleaseblank.com/permalink.php?viewid=121526 Dear Fox News, So far, no news about foxes. Sincerely, Unimpressed

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  94. Tea?? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Brewing tea is quite easy. Go to an Indian store and buy a 1kg pack. We get 1KG pack for your 300 INR in India for excellent tea. Thats less than 5$. With markup and all 1KG tea of good quality(eg. Taj Mahal) should be around 10-20$ in Indian stores in any big city.
    That 1KG pack will brew around 500 150ml cups of tea for you.
    Add milk and sugar to taste.

    Here is the recipe. Remember this is how tea is made in India, which is kind of like the home of Tea. British just borrowed it and consider those silly tea bags as tea.

    Lets say you want to make 300ml of tea(2 cups)

    Take 300ml water.
    Add sugar to taste. If you have a sweet tooth you would need around 4 teaspoons, otherwise most people do fine with 1 teaspoon each or 2 for 300ml. Use cane sugar.

    Start boiling the water, and as you start seeing the steam coming, put in the tea leaves. Add 1.5 tea spoons
    This figure is relative. Some like tea bitter, so you would need 2 tea spoons

    Keep boiling the water with tea leaves. Once it starts boiling, i.e reaches around 100 degree C(violent water) keep boiling it for 1 minute or so.
    By the end of a minute or so you would have 250ml water left. Add 50ml milk. Or add 70ml if you want it whiter.

    Bring it to a boil(the mixture would start rising) and turn off the gas, and cover it for couple of minutes, sitting there.
    Now pour the mixture from a sieve and throw away the spend leaves.

    Drink and enjoy. Not expensive.

    Some further tips. If you like a strong spicy flavor, add 1/4th teaspoon of cinnamon powder along with tea leaves.
    If you like to have gingery flavor(excellent sore through remedy), put around 1 table spoon of crushed fresh ginger
    If you like aromatic, add 3 small crushed cardamom cloves((a pack of 100 cloves costs around 3-4$ at Indian stores.

    Some links
    Tea -> http://shop.khanapakana.com/brooke-bond-taj-mahal-tea-15-8-oz-450-grams/ 6$ for half kg. you may find cheaper
    Cardamon pods -> http://nhastore.com/Cardamon-Pods-Whole-Green-1-Pound-Bulk--P884492.aspx?utm_source=google&utm_medium=Product_Search&utm_campaign=google_base

    Remember one cup tea needs 1 clove of cardamom so even a 30$/1lb pack will last you for 500 cups or so or even more.
    If you ever make a vacation to India, buy 5kg tea and store in air tight container(it will not spoil). Will cost 15$ or so. Cardamom will be 5-6$ for 1kg pack.

    Once again, lemme tell you, british do not know tea. That is not tea.
    When british first discovered tea, they used to bew tea, throw away the water and eat the bitter spent leaves, and then complain that Indians eat such vile stuff
    Tea has to be brewed, and the first 10-15 cups will not taste very good.
    Slowly you will realize how much milk, or how much sugar, or how much tea leaves you need to add.

    Watch some Indian youtube videos for tea making. You will find some where 300ml water + 70ml milk and mixed and then boiled. After the boil the burner is kept on slow and tea leaves are added which are then brewed on slow flame for 5 minutes.;
    These are all variations. Experiment, and you will find what you really want.
    And its a cheap cheap way to prepare tea.

    In India we often make 10 cups, keep in a thermos, and for the next 5 hours we can keep microwaving and having. However after 4-5 hours, the taste starts going bad.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Tea?? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Brewing tea is quite easy. Go to an Indian store and buy a 1kg pack. We get 1KG pack for your 300 INR in India for excellent tea. Thats less than 5$. With markup and all 1KG tea of good quality(eg. Taj Mahal) should be around 10-20$ in Indian stores in any big city.

      Sorry, I'm pretty well stuck on mostly black tea. The flavored ones favored by the English. English Breakfast, Earl Grey and such. I've not found a good source of quality tea of this type for under about $40/kg. My favorite is a tea called Kamba which is from Kenya. Brewed strong, this stuff looks darker than drip coffee and goes great with milk. I'll have to give your idea a try though. It might be cheaper way to service the habit..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  95. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expecting to find good food in Britain is like expecting to find atheists in the Vatican -- I'm sure they're there, but you have to look really hard.

    On the subject of steaks though, you'll probably be disappointed anywhere in Europe. The (north and south) american prairies are probably much better for raising cattle.
    Europe is much more densely populated, and there are a lot of mountain ranges in between, so cows have less space, and probably a crappier climate to grow in.

    If you want to find good food in Europe, try to stick to the local cuisine, which will rarely be a simple steak.
    Except for England. When you're there, just go to McDonald's.

  96. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "good tea is simply not available at restaurants here"

    I have found that poor tea in the USA is not so much due to the quality of the tea, but to a complete and pervasive inability to make it properly.

    If anyone reading this runs a cafe or restaurant and can do something about it, here is what you need to know:

    DO NOT BRING THE HOT WATER TO THE TABLE WITH A TRAY OF TEA BAGS

    This is tea making 101, not even about making tea truly properly. It's just about getting the basics right. Would you bring hot water to the table and attempt to make coffee with it? Of course not.

    So this is how you do it.

    Either ask the customer what kind of tea they want, or, if you want to be all fancy, take the tea selection to the table and allow them to choose it themselves. Once you know what tea they want, you simply go back to the hot water source (kitchen, coffee bar, etc...) and scald their teacup with a little hot water. Pour that out. Then put in the tea bag and then fill up the cup with hot water. Carry the cup back to the table. That's it.

    This method will make a drinkable cup of tea. You can do much better.

    But the way it's done nearly everywhere in the US, by bringing the hot water to the table, is completely useless.

  97. Re:Cookies by Inda · · Score: 1

    Tea bags??? In a cup??? What sort of evil world do you live in??? You'll be telling us that the milk goes in first next!!!

    Tea is made with boiling water in a teapot. Every other method is not cricket.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  98. Maze by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Not that it serves any purpose. But an experiment with mice is not complete unless it also includes a maze.

    (In this case, of course, it served the purpose of forcing the mice to find their food by smell. I wonder what smells more strongly; a chocolate cookie or a rice cracker.)

  99. Re:Cookies by guyniraxn · · Score: 2

    You're mostly right. The major brands in North America are crap; but there are some good smaller brands. Taza is great, Trader Joes has some good stuff too, I know there are others I'm forgetting. Fortunately we can get Ritter Sport here too. Unfortunately, most would rather eat terrible quality milk chocolate.

  100. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well aren't you just a superior douchebag with your cultured tastes.

  101. Wrong DSM, folks. by The+WTF+Department · · Score: 0

    It should be noted that the article cited states that the DSM-IV is the most used publication for dealing with disorders. In fact, the DSM-IV-TR is, despite the release of the DSM-V which is still being transitioned to. Furthermore, substance dependence is addressed within the DSM. Whether or not dependence = addiction is another matter entirely.

  102. Re:Cookies by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Ever since my horrible experience with MickeyD in Japan (teryaki burgers, yuk!) I don't go to any chains when I travel abroad, and certainly not US ones.

    I usually steer clear of chains when I travel but I do like going to foreign McDonald's since it usually makes for a good story since so many people just love them. Besides I did have the royal with cheese and some Kronenbourg 1664 at the one on the Champs de Elysee and at it outside, I mean if you are going to go for the bastardized experience just go whole hog and be done. That was the only time I ate at McDonald's in the 3 months I lived in France and I did it on my first day there. I have done the same in Ireland, Israel, Austria, Belgium, and India. Once that is out of the way then I go for the local fare and just try random stuff I haven't had before and usually am not disappointed.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  103. Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a study pointless without looking at, just state the obvious points of the research, ignore the details, belittle the researchers, and call it a day.

  104. Re:Cookies by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    It only has one proper use and that is on a philly cheese steak and to order it properly request "wit wiz" not provolone like the fancy restaurants do it. The greasier the place the better it the sandwich.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  105. Re:Cookies by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    It could be worse, it could be poutine

    --
    Time to offend someone
  106. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once went on a werk trip to the US with a couple of French people. We went to a baseball game, which I think we universally thought was pretty boring. One French guy braved the food stalls and got some nachos. He sat down and asked me what the sort of orange/yellow stuff in the little container was. It took several times for me to repeat "it's cheese" (and then to eat a bit) before he believed it was actually cheese.

    As a European, I have to say, what we think of as food, the Americans have an amazing skill of taking it and making it into something else entirely. I doubt it improves for doing this, because it gets a bit further away from being organic, but in some cases, it does taste pretty good (in a dirty secret sort of way). Oreos are no exception - it's a biscuit (as we'd call it), but somehow it's got more saturated fat, sugar and E numbers than any biscuit that came before it (even the ones your mum refused to buy because they were "just made of rubbish"). They're tasty, I grant you, but man they're evil!

  107. Re:Cookies by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

    Close. "Whiz Wit" or "Whiz Witout"... with or without fried onions. Personally, I go with prov wit almost exclusively unless visitors are in town and we head to Pat's or Geno's. And now I know exactly what I'm getting for lunch.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  108. iRan, iRack? Ran-drooooooid by tepples · · Score: 1

    Who Moved My Cheese? (or cookies in this case)

    Randroid Alert!

    Randroid as opposed to the iRan?

  109. I eat food every day.... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    In fact, I would say I can't live without food. I must be addicted to it.

    Also I prefer tasty cookies over cardboard-tasting rice cakes.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  110. Re:Cookies by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    You also forgot about quantity being a driving force of the general American cuisine. So much of it is fillers, flavor additives, and compounds to give it reasonable texture all while being incredibly cheap and huge portions. Now add in the amount of salt, sugar, or fat that is added so it doesn't taste like crap and like you say the vast majority of US food is awful. Granted I like quick meals but I use good quality ingredients and make it at home. A perfect example of this was last night we had burgers and fries (chips for some of you), The only thing added to the meat was a little bit of salt and black pepper before getting tossed on the grill. The meat isn't the factory farm meat but came from a farmer who is a friend of the family and is better quality than anything I have seen in a store. The buns were made fresh last weekend when I made bread for the week, and the lettuces and tomatoes came from the garden. I have a fry cutter so I just put 6 potatoes through it and then put the fries in a plastic bag with some olive oil black pepper, and salt, shook well, and then baked them in the oven on a cookie sheet. It took about 40 minutes to make everything and that includes starting and getting the BBQ ready (I use charcoal). This is about the same about of time it takes to go and get fast food or take out cost a lot less and wasn't full of crap.

    It gets even easier if you freeze or can whole meals. I recently spent a day canning up several gallons of beef stew and chili which will keep on shelves in the pantry without issue also I made and froze about 10lbs of home made ravioli. In doing that I disposed of the remaining meat from last year before new meat from the farmer and upcoming hunting seasons arrives. Plus now I have a bunch of meals that basically only need to be warmed up or put into a pot of boiling water to be ready. This weekend it looks like I will be making and canning tomato sauce to deal with all of the remaining tomatoes from the garden since we will probably be getting a hard frost in the next few days.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  111. Re:Cookies by bobbied · · Score: 1

    So, I think you did quite well to find some decent places.

    We had local help. ALWAYS get local help because sometimes the best places to eat are decidedly not well advertised. I've found some really great places by offering to buy a meal for a local. Just ask them where they usually go, then offer to take them there. Ask them for menu advice and take it. This has worked for me in a lot of countries. I've tried things that I NEVER would have on my own and found that I like many of them. Who knows when you might find something you like, and if you don't like the food enjoy the company.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  112. Re:Cookies by Politburo · · Score: 1

    Hershey's Ice Cream is not related to Hershey's Chocolate.

  113. Re:Cookies by Politburo · · Score: 1

    "The greasier the place the better it the sandwich."

    Common mistake. Next you're going to tell us to go to Pat's or Geno's.

  114. Re:Hyperbole? Perhaps... perhaps not by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    The military wants to make sure they have a functional fighting force so they will ensure that the food has a high nutritional standard so it doesn't surprise me that would be more healthy than civilian food. Civilian food they want you to buy and consume more of so the companies make more money so you are dealing with 2 very different philosophies. I do hear that the preparation quality of military food leaves something to be desired but all institutional food seems to be that way.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  115. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're thinking of the same Trader Joe's chocolate I am, then that is actually imported from Switzerland (I'm wondering if it isn't Migros "Budget" line). While it's certainly good by our standards, it's still not quite as good as the Coop brand or Frey (also Migros), and those are simply super-market brands (my favorite is Frey Noixana), and at a cost of between $1 and $1.5 per 100g (at the time of our most recent visit), it's really hard to beat Switzerland. God, I miss it.

  116. Re:Cookies by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    Ever since my horrible experience with MickeyD in Japan (teryaki burgers, yuk!) I don't go to any chains when I travel abroad, and certainly not US ones.

    I usually steer clear of chains when I travel but I do like going to foreign McDonald's since it usually makes for a good story since so many people just love them. Besides I did have the royal with cheese and some Kronenbourg 1664 at the one on the Champs de Elysee and at it outside, I mean if you are going to go for the bastardized experience just go whole hog and be done. That was the only time I ate at McDonald's in the 3 months I lived in France and I did it on my first day there. I have done the same in Ireland, Israel, Austria, Belgium, and India. Once that is out of the way then I go for the local fare and just try random stuff I haven't had before and usually am not disappointed.

    Korean McD's serve a delicious bulgogi burger...and in Nova Scotia (it's in Eastern Canada, for the geographically challenged), you can get a McLobster burger (at least you could when I was there). In the Philippines you can get a Longanisa meal for breakfast (yum!) and in Australia you can get vegemite for your english muffin (yeah, definitely an acquired taste...wish they'd gone with kangaroo nuggets instead...).

    People laugh, but I do make it a point to visit a McDonalds at least once in every country I visit that has one (the only McD in Cuba is at Guantanamo Bay, apparently, and is only available to base personnel...a pity)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  117. Re:Cookies by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Americans aren't just idiots.

    Stereotype much? Jackass.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  118. How the hell are they defining "Addicitve"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Through my studies, I've always had to distinguish between "positive addiction" and "negative addiction", with the difference being how does the 2nd "hit" make one feel relative to the first "hit"?

    Positive addiction: Each successive consumption results in a greater effect. E.g. I go to church on a weekly basis. The first time I go to church, I feel "fine" as mass concludes. After a year of going to church, I feel "great" as mass concludes.

    Negative addiction: Each successive consumption results in a smaller effect. E.g. I run regularly. As I first begin to run regularly, I feel a "runner's high" after running 10 miles. After a year of running, I now need to run 26.2 miles to achieve the same "high."

    Note that positive & negative are morality-neutral and are more of a mathematical construct. Similar to positive/negative reinforcement where a stimulus is added (e.g. child is given a toy; child receives a spanking) or removed (child's toy is taken away from him; child is ignored.)

  119. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Remember Europe has crap chocolate too -- but it's clearly not worth exporting.

    (America's crap chocolate is still worse than Europe's crap chocolate.)

  120. Re:Cookies by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Taza is Mexican style stone ground chocolate made in Somerville MA. Delicious, but a different experience from what most of us think of as chocolate bars. Definitely something to seek out and try if you haven't had it.

    There are some excellent artisan chocolate makers here in the US. You can find their products in natural/health food stores including Whole Foods, in local food coops, and sometimes in gift shops and independent bookstores. Some of the chocolate makers also have their own shops.

    The good chocolate at Trader Joe's is all imported. Excellent value though.

  121. Re:Hyperbole? Perhaps... perhaps not by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Taste? When I was in, it was your basic "school cafeteria" level. On a ship at sea, it was a bit better actually... in some cases, exceptionally better. (I think that is mostly because the guys making it also have to eat it... on land, it's usually "cafeteria ladies" who serve but do not eat.)

    I can't speak to the other branches of the service. Navy's at least passable.

  122. Poster is a clueless troll by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    The mice, without fail, decided to eat the Oreo over the rice cake, proving once and for all that mice like cookies better than tasteless discs with a styrofoamy texture.

    Did this person even bother to read the story? No, they didn't reach their conclusion based on mice preferring Oreos to rice cakes. They looked for specific signs of addiction, both behavioral and physiological. And they repeated the experiment replacing the Oreos by cocaine or morphine, and found that all measures of addiction were just as high for the cookies as for the drugs.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  123. Yes They Are! by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

    If you don't think that Oreos are just as addictive as cocaine, then you clearly aren't snorting/freebasing/mainlining them properly.

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  124. Re:Cookies by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    You also forgot about quantity being a driving force of the general American cuisine.

    No, I just know that it isn't true. Portions may be larger here, but that has nothing to do with ingredient choices. People who choose smaller portions are not choosing different food that people choosing larger portions. Portions are generally of a standard size.

    You might be surprised to learn that "American food" doesn't mean fast food, and farm fresh meats are produce are also "American food."

    The foods you describe would sound exactly like regular "American food" to most Americans.

  125. Re:Hyperbole? Perhaps... perhaps not by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    I have heard similar things with the submariners having the best food but my cousin who is in the Army National Guard (Minnesota Red Bulls) regularly complained about the food quality while in Kuwait and has stated it is comparable to dorm food.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  126. Re:Cookies by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    That is why I do the same thing. It is a fun cheap little adventure and gives a great little story. How often can you state you have had the McCurry, actual name is the McCurry Pan.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  127. Re:Cookies by nobodie · · Score: 1

    My British friends (and I had quite a few when I was living in Asia) all insisted that REAL British food was really wonderful and that what they had in the tourist centers of Europe and Asia that was sold as British cuisine (HAHAHAHAHAHA) was crap. OKay, so then they invited me to dinner. They served Indian food, French food, Italian food, Spanish food (depending on where they liked to vacation) rather than British food. The closest I have come to "homecooking" was a verbal description of how to cook a "Sunday roast" which was bland and boring until I took the recipe and kicked it up a notch or two with, like, some flavour stuff (misspelling intentional).

    My sister in law is an Anglophile and claims to have some real British holiday recipes that she brings to holidays for us. They are commonly called: hockey pucks, nasty pudding and (the only one people will eat) fruitcake cocktail (fruitcake soaked in rum for years so that one piece is the equal of a rum and coke).

    --
    Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  128. Re:Cookies by xaxa · · Score: 1

    How do you define a country's cuisine? South & South East Asian cuisine was very different before European traders took chillies and tomatoes. Potato is common in Europe, but also comes from South America.

    Curry made in Britain is different to what's known in India (see here). Wikipedia suggests curry was here before fish and chips.

    "Sunday Roast", as cooked by most people, is crap. Not so much because of the meat, but because most people serve it with boiled vegetables. I put up with this for 18 years, as my dad insisted on cooking on Sundays, and that's all he would cook. Sometimes my mum would make leeks in cheese sauce as a side dish, which is a good improvement to an otherwise bland meal.

    I think if I had to make something particularly British, it should be a meat or fish pie, maybe something like this chicken and leek pie (I like leeks). There's plenty of opportunity for flavour.

    I don't know what "nasty pudding" is. "Hocky pucks" sound Canadian. I've not heard of "fruitcake cocktail" either.
    Dundee cake is good -- although very heavy. If you have space, make it in autumn, leave it in the kitchen, and pour a spoonful of brandy over it every time you walk past. Serve at Christmas. If iced with marzipan and royal icing it's called a Christmas cake. Trifle is the other good opportunity to get all the children tipsy.

  129. Black is just fine by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Indian premium brands like Taj Mahal are excellent for black tea too.
    In India, few people use flavoured tea. However, they do flavor their tea.
    If you want a lemony flavor - Just add a few drops of lemon juice(Fresh squeezed)
    If you want aroma - Cardamon
    If you want Spice - Cinnamon

    Flavoring tea like this has better results than pre flavored tea. When you refer to Earl grey and such , I figure you are buying Twinnings?

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Black is just fine by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I figure you are buying Twinnings?

      Oh no! That stuff is really expensive and awful tasting. They have some good herbal teas, but their black teas are usually horrid. I buy a bulk tea imported by Metropolitan Tea Company from various retail outlets. It's the best Earl Grey I've found and most of their other varieties are great too.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101