Slashdot Mirror


Sony Issues Detailed PS4 FAQ Ahead of Launch

Sockatume writes "Sony has released a detailed FAQ for the PS4 system, which launches in coming weeks. Of particular note: although Bluetooth headsets will not be compatible, generic 3.5mm and USB audio devices will work; the console will require activation via the internet or a special disk before it will play Blu-ray or DVDs; media servers, MP3s, and audio CDs are not supported. The console's "suspend/resume" and remote assistance features are listed as unavailable for the North American launch, implying that they will be patched in before the console launches in Europe later in November."

312 comments

  1. hurry up by watcher-rv4 · · Score: 0

    Good one Sony, building an airplane in flight.

  2. I am from Brazil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    R$ 4,000? (aka US$ 1,817)

    Miami here I come!

    1. Re:I am from Brazil... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I flew to Brazil earlier this year... there were a LOT of electronics in the overhead compartments...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  3. No media server support upsets me by CokoBWare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So I was excited to buy a PS4 until they announced no media server support. Same with XBone. I guess I'm just one of those guys who will stay with his PS3 for the forseeable future...

    I know why they made that choice, but it doesn't service the customers who put their media library on a server instead of on disc.

    1. Re:No media server support upsets me by somersault · · Score: 2

      I had a PS4 pre-order for a while. I cancelled it because likely all the games I enjoy will be out on PS3 for a good while anyway. And while AC4 does look very pretty on PS4, it's "good enough" for me on PS3 right now. I'll probably get a PS4 once it comes down to around 250GBP.

      While I rarely do it, I did actually play an audio CD on my PS3 last week too. Alongside my desktop PC, it's the only device in my house that can play them now.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Lots of other low power devices make fine media servers.

      I don't know why they made that choice, so please enlighten me.

    3. Re:No media server support upsets me by DougOtto · · Score: 1

      What is this "audio CD" of which you speak?

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    4. Re:No media server support upsets me by barlevg · · Score: 1

      I'm a firm believer in not getting any new console until you absolutely have to (read: until there's a game you really want to play that's only on that console). If good titles are scarce (::cough:: 3DS ::cough::), it means you get to wait for the price drop / patching / additional features / new version.

    5. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one should be buying this proprietary garbage to begin with. These companies despise openness and users' freedoms.

    6. Re:No media server support upsets me by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is pretty bad. Don't get me wrong, I still intend to get a PS4 soon after launch (probably not launch day this time - the fuss and queues trying to get a 360 and Wii at launch are not something I want to repeat) but this is an irritation. Particularly given that the PS3's media streaming functionality was so much better than the 360's.

      Of course, the lack of backward compatibility on both the PS4 and the Xbox One means that anybody intending to buy either console will need to hang onto its predecessor unless they're willing to discard their entire games library for it (barring whatever titles are selected for "remastering"). Sadly, said lack of backward compatibility was pretty much inevitable from the day the specs of the 360 and PS3 were announced. If the PC-like architecture of the new systems is going to be the way of the future, then hopefully this is the last time we have to suffer that particular irritation.

    7. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because interoperating with and supporting every strange dlna server out there is a bitch.

    8. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Is the standard that poorly defined?
      If that is the case why not select a better one instead of ending all support?

    9. Re:No media server support upsets me by somersault · · Score: 1

      My flatmate got one along with a "book" on teaching yourself Norwegian. It's kind of like Rosetta Stone, but cheaper and with more dead trees.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why I am a PC gamer, nothing like windows freedom. :)

    11. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This is why I have so many consoles still connected. They only get removed when the HTPC can emulate them. I would already have a wii U if it played gamecube games.

      I love a new console coming out, it means the old gen games will get very cheap.

    12. Re:No media server support upsets me by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      What is this "audio CD" of which you speak?

      Something old people like me still use as our primary way of buying music.

      I still trawl through the CDs in the store to buy most of mine. I've discovered more music by looking for specific record labels or just looking through one of several sections to see if there's anything shiny in there. I've discovered a lot of great music that way.

      Every now and then when I'm on a trip I'm lucky enough to find one of the really huge music stores which has just tons of stuff I'm interested in. On those days I'll drop a few hundred bucks on CDs.

      Granted, the CD gets used for the first play and then gets ripped and shelved for storage.

      For some of us, we still like picking out physical CDs in the store and actually owning something tangible.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:No media server support upsets me by Apharmd · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. DLNA support was something that I thought would become a standard moving forward. Now Sony is yanking it to push people back into using its (overpriced) media storefront. Yuck.

    14. Re:No media server support upsets me by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Of course, the lack of backward compatibility on both the PS4 and the Xbox One means that anybody intending to buy either console will need to hang onto its predecessor unless they're willing to discard their entire games library for it

      Which means for some of us, buying a spare last-gen console and ignoring the new ones is a viable option.

      I don't play the latest and greatest games because, well, video games lapped me about 15+ years ago. I also don't play games on-line, so most of the new 'features' don't really interest me.

      Which means if I bought a spare XBox 360 and put it on a shelf, I probably get more value out of it than one of the newest consoles.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:No media server support upsets me by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting they are sustaining the physical disk format as it seems to lend its self to being ripped, while a purely digital format could possibly have "better" drm?

    16. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is almost true. PS4 doesn't have media server support. Xbox One will not have Windows Media Center Extender support. However we don't know if the XBone will or won't have DLNA support.

    17. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      That is more about internet access issues.
      These games are huge, downloading them for many would either take days or put them over their quota.

    18. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It what non-idiots get their music on so they aren't locked into renting their music. Pretentious douches like yourself wouldn't understand.

    19. Re:No media server support upsets me by jddj · · Score: 1

      Couldn't possibly buy one of these. My 3 and 5 year old get their TV from our carefully curated media server full of kids' TV. There's a month's worth of episodes of a number of their favorite shows (not just the 90-second clips the kids apps on the iPad want to show).

      The PS3 is about the best frontend you can get for MythTV - navigates easier, more reliable, plays smoother, integrates into the home theater easier and builds the TV recordings into the rest of their entertainment.

      Sony is doing all it can to get me to take my money and walk away.

    20. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If you just rip them why not buy the songs on amazon as mp3s and back them up yourself? If you wanted to be really hipster you could even back them up to CDs.

    21. Re:No media server support upsets me by omnichad · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the hobbyist way to buy MP3/AAC tracks. They come with their own lossless backup.

    22. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Since you are a time traveler you really should get some news to take back to your decade.

      These days you can buy MP3s without any DRM. No renting at all, just a normal file you can backup or burn or do whatever you like with. Amazon is a big source for those.

    23. Re:No media server support upsets me by tepples · · Score: 1
      From the FAQ:

      If I rent a game disc, and then decide I want to buy it digitally, can I use the installation to avoid downloading it and just activate my license?
      In this example, you would have to delete the disc install data and fully install the digital version of the game.

      This means rural dwellers and mobile-only Internet users are locked into discs for yet another generation.

    24. Re:No media server support upsets me by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you got a fast enough HTPC you could get a Wii U. But Dolphin is almost as slow with GC games as it is with Wii games. I keep going back and trying Dolphin and realizing that it's too early.

    25. Re:No media server support upsets me by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      If the PS4 support is anything like the Xbox 360 support, then you're not missing much. I got tired of all the limitations of my Xbox when it came to playing media files, and so I bought a WD TV Live. It's blows away my Xbox. I can attach a USB hard drive to the WD box which then appears as an SMB mount on my Mac. I then rip a Blu-ray to an 20GB MKV file, and it plays perfectly. No transcoding needed.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    26. Re:No media server support upsets me by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting they are sustaining the physical disk format as it seems to lend its self to being ripped, while a purely digital format could possibly have "better" drm?

      Well, Blu-ray has several protections for that embedded in the disc itself, including identifying marks (what type - factory, BD-R, BD-RE, etc, including ID codes for factory pressed discs identifying the factory and timestamps).

      And the last time digital only was suggested, everyone was up in arms, despite several advantages to the physical-assisted digital only stream (e.g., It offered the ability to actually sell used digital copies, even those purchased completely online without a physical disc. As a unintended benefit, nothing was ever out of print - you could simply torrent a copy and pay the digital license fee to get the game). The disc in that case was purely used only to aid you if you can't download 25/50GB of data.

      But of course, everyone bitched and moaned, and we're back to the old style of game distribution - discs you can resell used, online "digital" purchases you can't.

      Heck, Sony even mocked it.

      As for ripping and all that - expect it after it's hacked. Both next-gens are really like the original Xbox - and likely there are going to be plenty of holes to exploit.

      Then again, Microsoft discovered making it easy to homebrew on the Xbox360 made it less vulnerable to hacking (it was modded to play pirated games, but those had severe limitations), while Sony discovered that while homebrewers were happy on the PS3, the moment they took it away, they started breaking its rather weak security.

    27. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Either way that would have been the case.
      Who would want to rent the game just for installation?
      The disks are typically cheaper than digital sales in the sony store anyway.

      Heck, I rather have the disks so that one day I can rip them and emulate the system. Can't do that with the software from the sony store.

    28. Re:No media server support upsets me by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Can't possibly connect two devices to the same TV? I realize that ease of use is an issue for a 3 year old. I am using Plex via Roku as a MythTV frontend. I use a modified mythlink.pl to create a directory of symlinks with season and episode number in the filename and Plex does a great job grabbing the metadata. It does require running a Plex server - and you may or may not have the spare cycles on the MythTV backend.

    29. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience.
      My current HTPC is a Core 2 Quad. So either dolphin needs to get better or I need to keep waiting.

    30. Re:No media server support upsets me by Jiro · · Score: 1

      nothing was ever out of print - you could simply torrent a copy and pay the digital license fee to get the game

      No you couldn't, since the digital license servers would not be selling licenses forever. For the digital license servers to end would be the equivalent of "going out of print".

      And once the servers die, even disks you bought would no longer be able to run.

    31. Re:No media server support upsets me by DrXym · · Score: 1
      It's always possible they intend to stick it in later (I doubt DLNA support was a launch day priority), but it would definitely put me off preordering if I had. But then again, a good reason not to preorder in the first place is because of things like this.

      If it's a good console then it will still be a good console in 6 months from now when there are some actual worthwhile games to play on it and the firmware has gone through a few feature enhancements. It took several major updates of the PS3 firmware for some things to appear that we take for granted. Including DLNA.

    32. Re:No media server support upsets me by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

      because for decent stereo systems, mp3 is not good enough.

      I prefer to buy a cd (used), rip it to flac and play that.

      when I rip, I know its done right and if there are errors, I send the cd back or re-rip until it comes out right.

      allofmp3 used to sell flac. times were good back then. now, to get flac, you mostly have to rip yourself (or have someone do it, but again, you don't have control over the quality and there's a lot that can go wrong when someone careless does the rip/encode/tag).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    33. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got much more use out of my PS3 as a media server than I did as a games console. It actually reached that mythical 'One Set-Top Box' level for my house. Games? Streamed movies? Music? Blu-Ray player? Did it all.

      Sony is moving backwards in time. At this rate the PS5 isn't even going to have network connectivity.

    34. Re:No media server support upsets me by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      So you can't play the gamecube games on the Wii U under the Wii emulation? Or as wad's under the Wii emulation?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    35. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Lots of websites still sell flac from what I can tell.
      Most CDs are so poorly mastered (loudness wars) that I have trouble imagining it matters if they are ripped to MP3 or not.

      I don't have the hearing for decent sound systems anyway, too many loud concerts and gun fire in my youth.

    36. Re:No media server support upsets me by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it mostly about selling media. Sony did not care that we had a media server on the ps3 when they did not have a video store. I be piss if just about every device in my house did not already support it anyway. The HDTV in my living room to my tablet both have it the laptop and the gaming rig are both running XBMC and if I wanted to have a cheap dongle I could get one for a few bucks.

    37. Re:No media server support upsets me by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And I have a measly AMD FX-6100 (six-core) - very bad for a dual-core game emulator. But a Dolphin 4.0 came out last month - completely rewritten faster OpenGL backend and accurate HLE Audio. So we're getting closer.

      https://dolphin-emu.org/blog/2013/09/22/dolphin-40-release-announcement/

    38. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure you do...

      http://esupport.sony.com/US/p/support-info.pl?info_id=884

      Quite clearly Sony supports DLNA - they just want you to buy something else to access DLNA content, such as one of their BluRay players (BDP-S3100)

      http://products.dlna.org/csv-all.php?getSearchWithPaging=1&categoryID=10&companyID=15&certStartDate=01/01/2013&certEndDate=12/31/2013&sn=1

      Why let you get away with buying one device when they can encourage you to buy two?

    39. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not officially, I believe there are some hacks that allow this.

    40. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a cd as backup and it's higher quality than mp3

      But if your Justin Beiber mp3s get deleted then it's not much of a loss I guess.

    41. Re:No media server support upsets me by Nyder · · Score: 1

      So I was excited to buy a PS4 until they announced no media server support. Same with XBone. I guess I'm just one of those guys who will stay with his PS3 for the forseeable future...

      I know why they made that choice, but it doesn't service the customers who put their media library on a server instead of on disc.

      Well, let's see how the hackers are this generation with getting the machines to run other code then official...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    42. Re:No media server support upsets me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You don't make regular backups of your data?

      The loudness wars and my own poor hearing mean it is unlikely to be a noticeable quality difference.

    43. Re:No media server support upsets me by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      If I could at the least hook up my harddrive and not have to switch disks all the time I'd have replaced my original Wii already.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    44. Re:No media server support upsets me by Bardez · · Score: 1

      Because you can sell them.

      --
      Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
    45. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. 3DS wasn't worth it until the good games came out. Now, it's a treasure trove of good titles.

    46. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, PS4 will support all kinds of media. As long as you buy it from sanctioned Sony store or stream it from Netflix etc. via subscription.

      But can't let you stream off a PC drive because that's obviously going to be pirated content. Of course. This is Sony we're talking about. They want to sell you content rather than allowing you to play it off some external media.

    47. Re:No media server support upsets me by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      DLNA is a standard so dreadful that it's hard to imagine that it wasn't written as some kind of joke, except that you never, ever, hit the punchline, it just keeps hurting.

      However, it should be noted that, with the PS3, Sony didn't let that stop them: They put out a DLNA client and, because their hardware was about the single most common DLNA client that anybody actually used (I think WMP, at least some versions, is nominally a DLNA client; but sharing from computer to computer, when both machines are Windows boxes and you could just use SMB, isn't much of a use case compared to streaming to your TV), people sucked it up and tailored their DLNA server support to the PS3. That's why "http://www.ps3mediaserver.org/" is called what it is. It's a DLNA server, it isn't locked to PS3s only or anything; but wherever something was fucked up or unclear (with DLNA, this is normal) the PS3's behavior was taken into account.

      Either Sony's figures suggested that only .01% of users ever used the feature, and it isn't worth the terrible burden of recompiling it for x86, or they actively wish to de-support streaming of 3rd-party media, for reasons of their own.

    48. Re:No media server support upsets me by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Today is the day a PS4 died to me. Now I have zero reason to not put a fanless PC in my living room.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    49. Re:No media server support upsets me by umafuckit · · Score: 2

      No one should be buying this proprietary garbage to begin with. These companies despise openness and users' freedoms.

      This is such bollocks. It's a fucking games console: it's an optional luxury in life. It plays games and that's why you buy it. If you're not interested in the games then don't buy it. Yes, it's locked it down, and there are obvious reasons for that. I fail to see how it being locked down takes away your freedom. You're still free to buy a general purpose computer and use that instead. You're still free to shove Linux on your PS3 (despite the lack of OtherOS), it's just more of a pain in the arse now: http://www.linux.com/learn/answers/view/490-is-it-possible-to-put-linux-on-my-ps3-without-the-use-of-any-other-pc Yes, it's annoying that they took away the feature and it would have pissed me off if I depended on it. But it's an annoyance, not an assault on freedom.

    50. Re:No media server support upsets me by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting they are sustaining the physical disk format as it seems to lend its self to being ripped, while a purely digital format could possibly have "better" drm?

      BD-ROM is pretty paranoid; plus it's just plain big (especially for video, where there isn't any reason to not fill the entire disk, unless your movie is so short that you'd go over the maximum supported data rate by doing so). Even in areas where ISPs aren't fucking around, 50GB is a big download. Plus, that's only 20 disks/TB, assuming no unpacking of assets for better access times. Storing BD rips is cheaper than it used to be, especially with 3.5 inch disks; but with a single 2.5 in the console, that's actually a pretty low ceiling.

    51. Re:No media server support upsets me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Can't play CDs. Can't play DVDs out the box, update promised. Can't stream music or video over your network. The message is clear: pay us if you want to watch/listen to anything, even if you already own it.

      Sony has this weird idea in its head that people will pay twice for an inferior quality product, just because it is slightly convenient. I guess it is because people paid to upgrade from VHS to DVD to BluRay or from tape to CD. Thing is they didn't pay to downgrade to UMD or streaming if they already had a better quality copy, just because there was a little extra convenience.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    52. Re:No media server support upsets me by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Yup. Won't be getting a PS4 to replace my PS3. Will have to see what apps become available for the XBone.

    53. Re:No media server support upsets me by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      My Samsung TV and blu-ray players work great with a variety of DLNA servers; the iPad, XBMC, WD Media players, Android media players, and LG products also have worked great with a variety of DLNA servers. The problem is entirely Sony's - and I suspect it is more a matter of Sony standing against people who have their own private media servers and the implication of "piracy" rather than anything technical.

      My main server runs TVMobili on Kubuntu Linux as a DLNA server, but I've played with some others.

      As for the PS4, I'm passing on this generation. I'm putting together a nice gaming HTPC to leverage my family's vast Steam libraries. I'd like to dual boot Windows 7 and SteamOS. I'll have the benefits of a hacked console (emus & other activities) and be able to eat in to my large backlog. If I needed to, I could also use it for accessing the media library, but as I said, the TV handles it fine without any problems.

    54. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should explain it.

    55. Re:No media server support upsets me by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      If you just rip them why not buy the songs on amazon as mp3s and back them up yourself?

      Because I still like having something physical, to be perfectly honest.

      Buying MP3s to me feels like I've not bought anything, and the way I buy and find music is usually from sifting through the CD racks in music stores. I don't set out thinking "gee, what I need is what I just heard on the radio" (because I don't listen to the radio), it's more of a "hey, what's this stuff" kind of process. Much more tactile and random, and lets me discover stuff that's in and around the other stuff I like -- I've discovered a whole bunch of punk just from looking through the stacks and at album covers and realizing "this must be psychobilly, I'm buying it".

      And then I just rip the CDs at a bitrate slightly higher than where I've ever been able to tell the difference with the CD, and shelve the CD with all of the other ones. I've gone into music stores and dropped several hundred dollars in one go as I've found a bunch of stuff I recognized as being something I'd be interested in.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    56. Re:No media server support upsets me by synapse7 · · Score: 0

      A CD being 42-44khz I would consider low quality audio source and when encoded to mp3 the loss would be negligible. Now if you were speaking of a source with a 96khz sampling rate I would agree with you.

    57. Re:No media server support upsets me by jsvcycling · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I never even used the media server functionality. A while ago (before the 360 launch), my family invested in an actual home server (which also gets backed up to Carbonite) where we store all our music, videos, shared documents, et cetera. Since the PS3 is incompatible with our setup, we've never actually used the media server support (We don't even use it for Netflix or anything, just games). Instead we just have all our computers (4 laptops & 2 desktops) and phones (4 android phones) synced up with it. We even have it setup as a "web-server" so we can access it outside the home network. Our home server is definitely one of the best things we've ever invested in. It is surprisingly low cost too; initial hardware + upgrades = ~$6,000; yearly cost (Carbonite and web stuff) = ~$100/yr.

    58. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is such bollocks. It's a fucking games console: it's an optional luxury in life.

      User freedoms are not "bollocks"; that is your first mistake. Sony is quite evil (as has been made apparent numerous times), and so are many other companies.

      Yes, it's locked it down, and there are obvious reasons for that.

      Greed. Control. Indeed, that much is obvious. Some things are more important than money.

      I fail to see how it being locked down takes away your freedom.

      You have no freedom when using the console. The fact that there might be alternatives does not mean freedom is not at stake; it is.

      But it's an annoyance, not an assault on freedom.

      Taking away features is very much an assault on users' freedoms, and shows the dangers of proprietary garbage.

      And it is because the PS4 (and its ilk) doesn't give users any freedoms that I highly suggest people not buy such a pile of garbage.

    59. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spent 30 minutes trying to find the original post where h4rr4r details is hatred of chickens. Couldn't find it. It's out there, though...

      There is a reason that AC posted a link to a photo of a chicken.

    60. Re:No media server support upsets me by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      Because I can buy CDs on clearance and I like CDs. Why don't you like the same stuff that I do?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    61. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already have a Mac Mini HTPC, and it's a PITA to get the TV/Stereo/Remote switched over to it and back - even with a Harmony setup. The Harmony works for shit, and the kids can't do it, neither can the wife. If an HDMI switchbox is involved, it'd have to have infrared remote, AND be able to read our minds, AND be housekeeper-proof.

      I'd like fewer devices connected to the theater system, not more.

      Thing is, the PS3 already has DLNA support. All they had to do was not remove it.

    62. Re:No media server support upsets me by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yep. The no media playing is a huge fuck you to the consumers.It has an EIGHT CORE hUMA CPU, it cant play music and movies? WHAT THE FUCK? It changed my Day 1 order to 'ill get it when the hot Sony exclusives come out.'

      --
      Good-bye
    63. Re:No media server support upsets me by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Its an assault on freedom when the entire purpose media playback was removed was to funnel you to their services. Its insulting, demeaning and petty as hell. There is NO REASON other then greed for this decision. Its a huge 'fuck you'.

      --
      Good-bye
    64. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll probably run the official code first, then the other code.

    65. Re:No media server support upsets me by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Is the standard that poorly defined?

      It can be. But the big problem with the Playstation 3 streaming support is that it was....... picky is a very polite term to describe the types of codecs it supported. Which means that either you ripped your media to a PS3-compatible format, or you had your media server transcode, requiring a sometimes-unrealistic amount of processing power when using high-quality HD content. Maybe Sony didn't want to deal with that anymore, or perhaps they just want to keep the BIOS small at launch.

      The problem could be two-fold: supporting every media server and not being interested in supporting all the formats out there as well. When the PS3 came out it was touted as being the centerpiece of your home theater, the box that could do it all. Sony doesn't seem interested in that angle anymore; they've refocused to putting out a gaming machine.

      Could this functionality be provided by an app, the same way Netflix and Youtube released apps for the PS3 that allow for streaming with those services? Does the PS4 allow such apps?

    66. Re:No media server support upsets me by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It's the hobbyist way to buy MP3/AAC tracks. They come with their own lossless backup.

      No to mention a case, cover art, sometimes other artwork, and sometimes lyrics or other inserts.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    67. Re:No media server support upsets me by umafuckit · · Score: 2

      Its an assault on freedom when the entire purpose media playback was removed was to funnel you to their services. Its insulting, demeaning and petty as hell. There is NO REASON other then greed for this decision. Its a huge 'fuck you'.

      You're right that it's likely an unsubtle way of forcing their music service. I can see how it would be fucking annoying if you expected to rely on your PS4 as a music centre. Nonetheless, I have a hard time seeing this as an assault on "freedom." Consoles, iDevices, and their brethren are not multi-purpose computers. They're obviously media-distribution portals designed for the benefit of their manufacturers. You (should) know that when you buy them and you take the risks that come with it. Most manufacturers of these products cripple them as much as possible without actually turning away too many people. We saw this dramatically with the used game policy on the upcoming Bone. If you want the certainty of "freedom", then run your own media server or plug an MP3 player of your choice into your amp. Yes, it means pointless hardware redundancy but that's nothing new.

    68. Re:No media server support upsets me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      What is this "audio CD" of which you speak?

      Its something those of us that appreciate quality music sound reproduction buy to get our music in the best available format that is widely available.

      Some of us have real stereo systems that we want music in a lossy format, unladen by DRM that we can listen directly to from disk medium, or rip ourselves to a lossy format like FLAC , or rip ourselves to a lossy format like mp3 for when listening in a less optimal environment like a car or on an ipod at the gym.

      Not everyone thinks of music as something disposible, nor only listens to mp3's on cheap ear buds where quality doesn't matter.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    69. Re: No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the Sony executives reading this thread are really bummed now. Not only did you want a Playstation 4 but you went out of your way to make an incredible, Herculean effort - putting in a pre-order. And then, you dashed the hopes of Kaz Hirai and all of his underlings! How could you?

      We know you were really serious about getting the machine. We feel your pain at not being able to use it to manage your digital media. One might ask, though - how do you manage your media now? It is all on another console? Did you plan on putting the other console into the wood chipper as soon as you received your PS4? Does our TV have only one input? Don't you have a computer?

      My theory is that you never had your preorder, thus you never canceled it, and your carefully crafted lie about your pre-order was made thinking you cold piss Kaz Hirai (who is undoubtedly reading this thread) off so badly that he would just die of shame. Well, it's not working, I can tell you that!

    70. Re:No media server support upsets me by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      If you just rip them why not buy the songs on amazon as mp3s and back them up yourself? If you wanted to be really hipster you could even back them up to CDs.

      I rip my usually to FLAC, a lossless compression for listening to my good audio system in the living room...and also to mp3 for lessor listening environments like the car or ipod in the gym.

      No DRM and freedom to listen in any format I want.

      Not to mention, it won't disappear if a company or company's service goes out of function.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    71. Re:No media server support upsets me by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      But some folks out here still want better than mp3 fidelity.

      I am looking into buying online, the better stuff I've been finding at the 96khz level, but that's still not as prevalent as the CDs your can find in stores.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    72. Re: No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fairly obvious though. Sony is in the business of making money, and typically it is some time before most consoles even break even on the R&D and manufacturing costs. They are subsidized by the licensing fees for games. Sony is not in the business of subsidizing low-cost media players and pirated game machines just because it gives them a warm fuzzy. If you want a media player or something to play pirated games use your PC.

    73. Re:No media server support upsets me by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Core 2 Quad is 3 generations old already. It sucks down power and puts out heat. Upgrade to Sandy Bridge or above.

      --
      Good-bye
    74. Re: No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that you we're never their market. Their market is people who want to buy games (especially games exclusive to the PS4), people who want to buys music and movies from their approved store, and people who are not interested in building a fanless living room PC. They didn't want you anyway, you can tell because you just said you won't be buying their offered product.

      One of the most valuable lessons I learned when starting my own business was that some customers are not worth having. Too troublesome and they will never be satisfied. So, Sony is probably more than happy to see you build a fanless PC and put Steam on it.

    75. Re:No media server support upsets me by phayes · · Score: 0

      Because, when I buy a CD I want to reward the artists & not the record companies. Due to the way almost all record company contracts are written, buying a CD rewards the artists over 10 times what they get from downloads.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    76. Re:No media server support upsets me by petsounds · · Score: 1

      allofmp3 used to sell flac. times were good back then. now, to get flac, you mostly have to rip yourself (or have someone do it, but again, you don't have control over the quality and there's a lot that can go wrong when someone careless does the rip/encode/tag).

      There's a lot of talented indie artists on bandcamp.com, which allows artists to sell songs and albums, and enables multiple digital format downloads for purchasers, including FLAC. [I have no affiliation with them, other than having some music on there. I just like the service.]

    77. Re:No media server support upsets me by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      it doesn't service the customers who put their media library on a server instead of on disc.

      With the lack of CD support, It also limits those of us who do put it on disc.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    78. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most CDs are so poorly mastered (loudness wars) that I have trouble imagining it matters if they are ripped to MP3 or not.

      Those are two seperate issues. The "loudness wars" refers to dynamic range compression. This is completely different from data compression, which causes audible artifacts.

      If you have a decent stereo you will most certainly be able to tell the difference between lossy and lossless audio, regardless of how over-compressed the track is.

      I don't have the hearing for decent sound systems anyway, too many loud concerts and gun fire in my youth.

      In that case, you probably want heavy dynamic range compression so that you can actually hear everything.

    79. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most CDs are so poorly mastered (loudness wars) that I have trouble imagining it matters if they are ripped to MP3 or not.

      I usually cite TV theme tunes as a good example. Grab a TV rip with MP3 audio, and listen to your favourite theme tune, and then listen to the CD of it. I did this with SG-1 and SGA, and it's just remarkable what a difference there is.

    80. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid? mp3 throws away information. Maybe you can hear it, maybe you can't - but it THROWS AWAY INFORMATION.

      That's the difference. If it's perceptible or not, who cares. it THROWS AWAY INFORMATION.

    81. Re: No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they want you to rent your content instead of owning it.

      If you run your own media server you might be tempted to own files instead of forking over 10 â a month for streaming something you can never possess.

      The stupid restrictions are a dealbreaker for me. No PS4.

    82. Re: No media server support upsets me by somersault · · Score: 1

      Uh, I never said anything about wanting to use it as a media client or server. I specifically said

      I cancelled it because likely all the games I enjoy will be out on PS3 for a good while anyway

      The CD thing was a semi-joke. I know I'm never likely to actually use a CD player again. My flatmate just had a CD she wanted to listen to, and I pointed out that my PS3 could do it.

      I actually get the vast majority of my media via Spotify and Lovefilm.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    83. Re:No media server support upsets me by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      About the backward compatibility thing, since the Xbox One now is basically a specially designed PC, shouldn't it be (in theory at least) possible to make it backward compatible with the first Xbox?

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    84. Re:No media server support upsets me by BigZee · · Score: 1

      I think it's simply because this function is built into modern TVs. When the PS3 was launched, there was no such thing as a smart TV so being able to stream on the PS3 was a useful feature. Sony just decided to remove an unnecessary piece of s/w from the system.

    85. Re:No media server support upsets me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ you talk crap!

      Once you have the PS4 Sony have no control. You are still free to buy whatever games you want, and play them in whatever order you want. The greed is just the marketplace.

      The freedom is the same as control. You do have freedom to buy whatever games and play them in whatever order you want. You can finish the games or quit half way through. You can also lend the games to your friends or sell them. Sony will not deny this to you.

      And as for you comment on assault. That just shows what a complete arsehol you are. Sony and Microsoft commit no assault on you. Maybe you should leave your moms basement and find out what assault actually is!

    86. Re:No media server support upsets me by phayes · · Score: 1

      to the twit moderator who labeled my post overrated: Really? Actually wanting to remunerate the artists better & not the record companies is overrated? Are you a record company exec or do you just DL Miley Cyrus & Selena Gomez from the Pirate bay?

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  4. Anyone else getting sick of crippleware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > media servers, MP3s, and audio CDs are not supported

    Say what? You want us to be forced to do the media upgrade path again, again. Or be forced into your pay services.
    *sigh*

    The more open Steambox is looking better and better. Of course it is vapourware so it could just as easily become just as crippled.

    1. Re:Anyone else getting sick of crippleware? by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Vapourware my ass grab any Gaming pc install XBMCbuntu and Steam for Linux there you go one SteamBox that will play just about every media format you can throw at it.

  5. No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What ever?
    Seems like a backward step to me. If Sony thinks that 1000s and 1000s of its devices are being used solely as media servers, they are right.

    If they think that omitting that feature will mean more games sales, they are mistaken.

    1. Re:No media servers? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      A steambox might be an idea.
      Not sure if they have TV support, heck just adding netflix and amazon would be enough for me.

    2. Re:No media servers? by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Install Plex server (free) on your server and pick up a Roku 2 for $60 and install the Plex client (also free). Works great for videos, music, and pictures. Also, since the Roku isn't a Blu-ray player, it doesn't prevent you from playing Blu-rays that you have ripped to store on your server. This won't meet your game needs, but it's a tiny, lower power device so it doesn't take up a bunch of space or give off a bunch of heat.

    3. Re:No media servers? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      The media center capabilities of the PS3 never worked for me. It can see my media servers but can't see any of the videos. "Sure," you say, "videos are all kinda weird codecs." And you're right, I don't expect Sony to make something that'll play MKV files. click on Music, and go into a directory with thousands of MP3 files, and it can't see THOSE, either. It wants a very, very specific format for those MP3 files which Google has NOT helped me figure out!

      I have a dedicated media center PC. It's small, quiet, is controlled by the same remote as every other media component (which BTW is a pain to do with the PS3!), streams 5.1 audio and 1080p video (sometimes at the same time) and can play just about any format I throw at it. And it's kinda fun (: Now if you'll excuse me, I have another blu-ray to rip.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:No media servers? by Captain+Hook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they think that omitting that feature will mean more games sales, they are mistaken.

      True, if people were buying consoles as media boxes then you are right, they won't sell more games this way, but they might sell less consoles are loss making prices so they would still be better off financially as a result.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    5. Re:No media servers? by JenniP · · Score: 1

      And if you are in the UK its even cheaper, get Plex then pickup a NowTV box for only £10. The NowTV box is just a Roku LT with custom firmware, but it still has the developer mode that allows you to install Plex.

    6. Re:No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasnt the reason I bought a PS3, it was for the games, but it was a feature that made the product more attractive.

    7. Re:No media servers? by tchernik · · Score: 1

      I agree. I only bought an additional PS3 because it is a nice integrated Blu-Ray and media player, and I need that in any home I live.

      I haven't bought any new games since a couple years ago, because I no longer care about iterations of old franchises and the new ones mostly annoy me (that's me getting old, I know). Basically all my entertainment needs are satisfied with those two functions mentioned above.

    8. Re:No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. If you've already got a massive amount of local storage on your network, you most likely have some sort of server to make managing that data easier. This is the next logical step. Also, the Plex client application is available for free for ..at least Windows. I would assume Mac and Linux as well, but I can't recall off hand. So you don't necessarily need to use a Roku box (although that would certainly keep things simple).

    9. Re:No media servers? by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      And it was damn convenient to have one less box sucking juice just to connect my living room HDTV to my NAS.

    10. Re:No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried PS3 Media Server (also called PMS)? It doesn't run on the PS3, it runs on the computer win/mac/linux i believe (I run mine on linux). It will play/stream to just about anything. I haven't tried the PS3 yet, but i stream to android phone/tablets and i was pleasantly surprised to find that the xbox360 would discover and play media from it.

      If whatever you're using now doesn't work give it a shot.

      Further details: I'm using Bubble UPnP to browse from android.
      I forget the menu option i had to select on the xbox. It wasn't the regular MS media center, but something like network media.

      Note: Set the media folder / root folder so you don't have to traverse from your server's root to where your media is.
      Other than that it's really easy to install and go.

    11. Re:No media servers? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I do remember running PMS once to see if it worked, mostly because I was trying to help a friend stream media to his PS3. I'm pretty sure I got my PS3 to see it, but I don't remember if it liked my encoding any better.

      It's not really a big deal, I'm OK with my MythTV setup.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    12. Re:No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS3MediaServer. Download it. Use it.

    13. Re:No media servers? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Eh. I have a media center PC (running an old version of MythTV, when it was still good). I wanted to get the PS3 to do that because, well, it's there.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    14. Re:No media servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also functionality they could add in via a software update when the console is no longer a loss leader.

  6. Licenses purchasable separately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my PS3 as media player for 70% of the time. 30% of the time I play games.

    I would hate to give up that functionality, since the PS3 works so well and I like the interface and the digital sound output.

    I think I can live with $5 - $10 license for my media needs. Just make that available, or I'll start considering Xbox!

    1. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by somersault · · Score: 1

      What's to stop you keeping your PS3 around as a media player? I wonder if the PS3 remotes will work for PS4s too.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Azmodan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the PS3 remotes will work for PS4s too.

      They don't, as seen in the FAQ.

    3. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to get the PS3 to play my remote media (or even the same media off a USB stick). It won't even recognise my MP3 files.

      Getting it to work with my Harmony remote was a pain in the butt, too. This was before Harmony released the bluetooth bridge which I refuse to use on general principle.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I have one of those USB remotes you plug a dongle into the PS3 for. It was way cheaper than their bluetooth remote and I could program my Harmony to emulate it.

      I have a feeling THAT won't work anymore, either... I am starting to dislike the whole PS4 idea just based on the FAQ...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    5. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the idea of PS4 is to upgrade the PS3. I don't really want/need two consoles cluttering under the TV.

    6. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It looks like they're going to patch in much of this functionality later.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by somersault · · Score: 1

      That used to be the idea, but Sony have stopped doing backwards compatibility. So far as I can see, the idea of the PS4 just seems to be updated graphics, controller, and social media integration.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Wait, so only have one at a time?

      My current setup is HTPC for really old stuff, N64, PS2, Gamecube, and PS3. The N64 is just because I have not yet bought N64ish bluetooth controllers for the HTPC.

    9. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Backwards compatibility was pretty much just a ps1-ps2 thing. Only the early PS3s played previous gen games.

      None of the cartridge systems offered this either and even the Wii dropped Gamecube support in later models.

    10. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. The Atari 5200 and 7800 let you play Atari 2600 games, and the Sega Genesis let you play Sega Master System games with an adapter that you could get buy.

      Regardless of how often that feature was used in those consoles, it was available in cartridge based systems in the past.

    11. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I was not aware of those we were a nintendo family.
      The Atari was a couple years to old for me.

    12. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to get the PS3 to play my remote media (or even the same media off a USB stick). It won't even recognise my MP3 files.

      Getting it to work with my Harmony remote was a pain in the butt, too. This was before Harmony released the bluetooth bridge which I refuse to use on general principle.

      strange because I use my PS3 to play off a my Netgear router/media server almost every day. I even used it to play off my Acer tablet. And MP3s are no problem at all.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    13. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I'm told it needs a specific bitrate and may have problems with some encoders.

      Remember, these are the people who once made an MP3 player that could only play ATRAC and not MP3...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    14. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Getting it to work with my Harmony remote was a pain in the butt, too.

      You got it to work with the Harmony? I just assumed it wasn't going to work at all. I always just switch it on myself. But then, when I switch it off, I switch it all the way off, and I don't think the Harmony is able to control rocker switches.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    15. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Can't get it to switch on and off with the Harmony, no. But the rest, yeah. I did this before they had a Harmony->PS3 bluetooth adapter thing - I got a Neko USB remote for the PS3 and had the Harmony learn it's codes.

      With the bluetooth adapter I'm assuming you can turn the thing on, too. Possibly.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    16. Re:Licenses purchasable separately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo fucking sucked then and they suck now. All they do is steal ideas, like they stole the gamepad concept from the Intellivision, they stole the analog stick from the Vectrex and the Sega 3D controller, they stole motion sensing from PC game controllers that had it for decades and then they just rehash the same 3 games 500 fucking times.

      Nintendo is dead. The Wii U will be their final console.

  7. Conflict of interest by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the console will require activation via the internet or a special disk before it will play Blu-ray or DVDs; media servers, MP3s, and audio CDs are not supported

    This is why Sony needs to spin off its media division, as Dan Loeb has proposed.

    As long as Sony is both a consumer electronics company and a major movie/recording studio, the consumer electronics division will always be compromised by the need to serve the overall corporate goals rather than the customer's needs.

    You just know that the "no media server" and "have to activate on the Internet for DVD/Blu-ray" restrictions were added at the insistence of the suits on the studio side. These restrictions do nothing for customers, and a pure consumer electronics company would have no reason to hurt the functionality of their product by inflicting them.

    1. Re:Conflict of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least it keeps them out of the courtrooms.

      Imagine what would happen if the Xbox played CDs, MP3, BluRays, worked as a media server, and then some GeoHot figured out a way to crack the box and run PIRAAT content!!!!!

    2. Re:Conflict of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, the activation would be there regardless. It's so that they only need to pay the per-unit DVD and BluRay licensing fees based on how many units are activated, rather than how many units are manufactured.

      They probably figure that a whole bunch of people won't bother activating it since they already have a BluRay player and at least four different DVD-playing devices attached to their teevee already. Saves some money, and the average consumer doesn't really care about a little one-time annoyance (as long as it actually works after they activate it, of course).

    3. Re:Conflict of interest by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Well, the DVD/Blu-ray activation could theoretically save them couple bucks per console if they don't have to pay licensing for those technologies on consoles that never get activated.

    4. Re:Conflict of interest by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Well, the DVD/Blu-ray activation could theoretically save them couple bucks per console if they don't have to pay licensing for those technologies on consoles that never get activated.

      Who, exactly, does Sony have to pay? Didn't they create the BluRay spec and pretty much own it?

      At which point I should expect some imaginary money to be moved around. Selling you a device which half works sounds like the usual crap I expect from Sony -- which is why I haven't owned anything made by Sony in quite some time.

      This is just their usual "screw the consumer" policies. And I'm not willing to play their game.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Conflict of interest by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think its not activation, its a day-one patch that is required to enable the functionality.

    6. Re:Conflict of interest by omnichad · · Score: 2

      They still have to pay through MPEG-LA and BDA. There's the whole issue of being able to play Dolby or DTS audio or using MPEG codecs that does require royalties outside of Sony.

    7. Re:Conflict of interest by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      Probably the larger issue that drives this is that they can do *some* kind of check on the system before they hand over the BluRay decryption keys. That way they have some leverage over somebody who would⦠I don't know⦠get the master key and use it on their BluRay player binary.

    8. Re:Conflict of interest by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

      You can install the update without connecting to the internet:

      "However, to use the USB method the first time you take the PS4 system out of the box and before installing system software update 1.50, you’ll need to enable safemode. When the PS4 system is powered off, press and hold the Power Button for seven seconds to enter safemode."

    9. Re:Conflict of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DD licensing is going to be required for the games, anyway

      IIRC, there are PS3 games with DTS audio tracks, too

  8. No media servers? by Horshu · · Score: 2

    What's the point of that? As someone who has terabytes dedicated to local media storage rather than counting on the cloud to reliably stream (or even carry) a particular album or movie, this trend is really ticking me off. I'm going to take a guess that XBone won't serve as a Media Center Extender as well. Was hoping for a single device to play games, watch TV, and listen to music, but it looks more and more like I need to get a separate NUC (or equivalent) for the media server access (although that was going to be necessary anyway, since XB360 won't play ripped DVDs)

  9. Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    the console will require activation via the internet or a special disk before it will play Blu-ray or DVDs

    Try as I might, I can't figure that one out. It's not like Sony doesn't sell off-the-shelf blu-ray players every day that don't require this (including the PS3). So why require it for the PS4??

    Maybe they didn't have the software finished on time and it requires a downloaded patch?

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    1. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The 1.50 adds support for features expected day 1 that weren't finalized on the firmware that went gold -- that's pretty much it.

    2. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by gnfnrf · · Score: 2

      It's probably a licensing thing. Sony doesn't want to pay the per-player fee on every device they sell, just every device that is activated.

    3. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Blu-ray players pay $10 in licensing fees, by making you activate it they can defer that cost and only pay it for those who are actually going to use it.

    4. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Sony own that licensing?

    5. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by tepples · · Score: 2

      Doesn't Sony own that licensing?

      Please see replies to gstoddart's comment.

    6. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they don't have any problem licensing it for the PS3 and their stand-alone players. It couldn't be enough to effect the price THAT much.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    7. Re:Why activation for Blu-rays/DVD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no
      blu ray consortium is dozens of companies. everyone pays into it based on device and media sales and that money is spread around

  10. Tax Dodge! Ligitimate reason. by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Give me Linux back or fuck off!

    - Not sent from an iPhone

    Ironically the main reason for Linux on the PS3 (and the PS2) was the fact that Sony paid less tax on it in Europe. It is something I agreed with. Ironically this generation would make a killer desktop machine, or even homework computer for student. If you do care and are not say advocating an alternative console out of some strange fanaticism, contact your local MP or equivalent. Although at last count I see about 8 Linux consoles....I own two.

  11. If you want Linux instead of Sony by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Give me Linux back or f off!

    Now that alternatives have appeared, it's that much easier to tell Sony Computer Entertainment to f off. OUYA runs Android, which uses the Linux kernel. The forthcoming Steam Machine from Valve runs SteamOS, a distribution of GNU/Linux.

    1. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there are people in this world capable of expressing ideas without the use of generic, overused expletives. And regardless of religious background, it is still impolite to use such language.

      Congratulations on showing the internet that you are never going to be a successful business man.

    2. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find funny is that grown up "business men" are afraid of simple words.

    3. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And regardless of religious background, it is still impolite to use such language.

      Impolite? They're mere strings of letters, just like any other words. The only difference is that some people are irrational enough to be offended by these words and expect others to stop using them simply because they don't like to hear them.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
    4. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And it's just a series of muscle movements if I defecate on your porch and sodomize your dog. That doesn't mean that those specific series of muscle movements don't have social meanings, or that they should be acceptable.

      Language has meanings beyond denotation; it has connotative and social meaning as well. A word like "fuck" is generally considered unacceptable in "polite company". Some people expand that, and consider coarse language to be unacceptable in their lives, regardless of social situation. So, yes, "impolite" would be the right word.

    5. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by HerrFlachpfeife · · Score: 1

      OUYA sucks, the hardware isn't really powerful (less powerful than a Galaxy S4) and there aren't really many OUYA-specific games. Steam Machine on the other hand could be a serious contender, especially since Battlefield 4 already looks better on PCs in Ultra settings than on the upcoming generation of consoles.

    6. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Impolite? They're mere strings of letters, just like any other words. The only difference is that some people are irrational enough to be offended by these words and expect others to stop using them simply because they don't like to hear them.

      I'm not even sure where to begin with how wrong this is, so I'll just keep it simple. They're a string of letters that form a meaning. Pretend your boss tells you you can leave for the day. Which statement would you rather hear: "Great work today; take the rest of the day off!" or "Fuck off." ? The strings themselves may be somewhat arbitrary, but their meanings can be incredibly important. You may not like that certain words have negative connotations (which I find odd, if that's the case), but that doesn't mean others feel the same way.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    7. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      They're a string of letters that form a meaning.

      Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

      Which statement would you rather hear: "Great work today; take the rest of the day off!" or "Fuck off." ?

      The first one communicates more, so it's simply a bad example. I am not offended by the mere use of 'swear words.'

      but their meanings can be incredibly important.

      What the person actually means and how easy it is to understand them is far more important than their choice of words. If someone can convey their message by using 'swear words,' then so be it; I'm not offended by it in the least. All I care about is that I can understand what they mean.

      You may not like that certain words have negative connotations (which I find odd, if that's the case), but that doesn't mean others feel the same way.

      It is simply irrational to be offended by the words themselves, much like the anti-sex nonsense.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
    8. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      The first one communicates more, so it's simply a bad example. I am not offended by the mere use of 'swear words.'

      And obviously, the messages are simply different. You could rephrase that second one to "Get out." or something such as that and the example would be just as poor.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
    9. Re: If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ouya doesn't just suck, it really, really sucks. It's hard to know where to start when tearing it apart. A relatively cheap PC running an Android emulator is faster than the Ouya.

      It basically exists to serve two different markets. The first I like to call the Linux Charity Fan Club. These are the people who bought a TiVo because it ran Linux, the people who ran Linux on their Playstations (not for research, just 'cuz), and the people who were early adopters of Android phones because it ran Linux. Die-hard Linux charity donators, who will buy a product even if sucks, is mainly closed-source, and even if it spies on them, as long as it runs Linux.

      The second market for this console are institutionalized welfare families who can not afford a $300 console and $60 games, but these kinds of "unfortunate" folks are a lot more likely to just get a Wii or a PS3 by hook or by crook.

      I dunno, maybe it is ultimately destined to sell in China or India.

    10. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Whether it's impolite or not is subjective, I suppose. Trying to pretend that 'swear words' are somehow objectively different or bad is just silly and irrational, but most people are both of those things, so it's not much of a surprise.

      Language has meanings beyond denotation

      As I explained already, all I care about is that someone gets out the message they want to convey and that I can understand what they wanted to convey; I think anything else is irrational.

      A word like "fuck" is generally considered unacceptable in "polite company".

      Well, I disagree with people who believe that merely using a word is "impolite," which is simply an ambiguous term to begin with.

      If some people want to arbitrarily decide that certain words are 'bad,' then I suppose I can't stop them, but what I can do is think of them as irrational fools.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
    11. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just get an old desktop and run Linux on it. Why again do we need Linux on a game console? Oh that's right, we don't. Sony just stopped it in the past and slashdotters are still upset for unknown reasons.

    12. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what I can do is think of them as irrational fools.

      Or you can think of them as acting in their own self-interest by acting within the expectations of social mores of the people around them. In general, people need other people, and it's easier to interact when you behave in ways that other people are likely to accept.

    13. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by tepples · · Score: 1

      or you could just get an old desktop and run Linux on it.

      "An old desktop" doesn't come with a case designed to look halfway decent next to a large television monitor.

    14. Re:If you want Linux instead of Sony by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      In other words, mindlessly go along with the status quo whether or not it makes any sense. I believe them to be irrational fools, and there's nothing that will change that.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
  12. Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    As I understand it, the majority of the price of a PlayStation 4 console in Brazil is import duty paid to the government of Brazil. What you need to do to get the price reduced in Brazil is elect a legislature that raises the government's operating budget other than through prohibitive import duties.

    1. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, traditionally Sony, Apple etc. have actually opened factories to make the devices in Brazil because it's better for their bottom line than expecting customers to spend the import levy.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Brazil's government (and voters) know damn well what they're doing: the import taxes are there to encourage slash coerce businesses to bring factories (and with them, jobs) into the country. They're smart enough to know that you can't run a whole country's economy on people selling each other junk mortgage bonds.

      If they end up needing to pay a little extra for a video game console, it's the price they're for the most part willing to pay.

    3. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, traditionally Sony, Apple etc. have actually opened factories to make the devices in Brazil because it's better for their bottom line than expecting customers to spend the import levy.

      And this is the primary reason that those tariffs exist. Brazil wants to build up its industrial base, rather than just serve as a cheap source of raw materials. High tariffs are a good way to do this, and that strategy is not at all new or unique. Prior to the 20th century, tariffs provided a majority of the U.S. government's revenue. It was a deliberate choice of industrial policy – Henry Clay's "American System" – to protect the growth of domestic industry by making imported products more expensive in comparison. The South, which primarily exported raw materials, disliked this policy, but they lost, and by the 1880s, the U.S. was the world's dominant industrial power. In Germany, Otto von Bismarck did much the same thing with his "marriage of iron and rye". The result is that a country which was weak and divided until 1871 became powerful enough to take on the rest of Europe and almost win.

      Economists don't like to hear it, but history proves that protectionism works.

    4. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you define "works". If you mean funds the state pretty well and protects some industries at the expense of everyone else, then yes they work great.

    5. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What is there median income again? Per capita GDP? Gini Coefficient?

    6. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted anonymously cause I've previously modded in this thread....

      Been this way for years too. I remember giving my (then) Brazilian gf a $250 camera, then seeing it for R$2000 in a store. (film camera, to date the story some). On one trip i bought her uncle a decent inkjet printer, carefully getting one just under the import duty threshhold. Since i had receipts, i didn't need to hide what it was - it was an inkjet printer box. The customs agent stared at it a few minutes trying to figure out how to screw me on duty before they let me through.

    7. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economists are generally quite happy to acknowledge that protectionism frequently benefits individual countries. They usually argue, however, that the world *collectively* is better off if everyone opens up their markets.

    8. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, traditionally Sony, Apple etc. have actually opened factories to make the devices in Brazil because it's better for their bottom line than expecting customers to spend the import levy.

      And this is the primary reason that those tariffs exist. Brazil wants to build up its industrial base, rather than just serve as a cheap source of raw materials. High tariffs are a good way to do this, and that strategy is not at all new or unique. Prior to the 20th century, tariffs provided a majority of the U.S. government's revenue. It was a deliberate choice of industrial policy â" Henry Clay's "American System" â" to protect the growth of domestic industry by making imported products more expensive in comparison. The South, which primarily exported raw materials, disliked this policy, but they lost, and by the 1880s, the U.S. was the world's dominant industrial power. In Germany, Otto von Bismarck did much the same thing with his "marriage of iron and rye". The result is that a country which was weak and divided until 1871 became powerful enough to take on the rest of Europe and almost win.

      Economists don't like to hear it, but history proves that protectionism works.

      Hmm..sounds like we need to start a bit of this back up *slowly*...and start making it more profitable to make our own stuff in the USA again.

      LIke the recent example of the drug made in Germany, that they might not sell us anymore due to their views on capital punishment...the US is now at the mercy of depending on other countries' manufacturing for us instead of the other way around as it was back in the day.

      That is not only unsettling, but could soon prove a problem for national security.

      The US is large enough and has enough resources for the most part to be MUCH more fully independent than it is, and we need to look at idea such as tariffs, to bring more of this back home to us and allow us to be more fully in charge of our own needs and destiny.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Economists are generally quite happy to acknowledge that protectionism frequently benefits individual countries. They usually argue, however, that the world *collectively* is better off if everyone opens up their markets.

      Our politicians/govt should be more concerned about our individual success rather than the collective world. That's their job, to put our interests over and above any other countries' interests.

      Not so much to actively put other countries down, but always to act in OUR best interest first.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can bring back as much as $500 without taxes, when flying abroad. Buying it while traveling abroad is indeed a neat option.

    11. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was it thirty years ago, and what is it now? Compare that rate against their neighbors -- Argentina's doing great these days, right? No? Oh.

    12. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by DM9290 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on how you define "works". If you mean funds the state pretty well and protects some industries at the expense of everyone else, then yes they work great.

      not at the expense of "everyone else". That is an over simplification.

      For instance, If the price of imported electronics goes up (via an import tariff), this creates an opportunity for local electronics producers to benefit. The local cost of electronics increases, and the profit margins of local electronics producers increase. But the only people who have any increased expense are those who buy electronics.

      If you don't buy electronics then your costs are unaffected. And if you buy electronics your costs are affected only in proportion to that specific item.

      However the local manufacturing of electronics creates jobs, and creates demand in many sectors, not only electronics (for instance a factory requires construction and machines which are not necessarily made exclusively of microchips). the people with those jobs are now going to spend their money throughout the entire local economy, which in turn benefits everybody locally. In turn this creates more incentive for local investment and even greater local prosperity.

      Protectionism has a proven history of working. And every wealthy powerful nation started off as very protectionist. There is not 1 single example of a country becoming wealthy and powerful by starting as a completely open free trade zone.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    13. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by stms · · Score: 2

      The Xbox One is almost half the price of the PS4 in Brazil. So, Brazil's ridiculous Tariff is not the only thing making the PS4 expensive.

    14. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Protectionism is nativism. Nativism is racism.

      Honestly, your example of "Germany became strong due to these tactics and without which couldn't have tried to take over the world" doesn't really help your cause. With a weak, divided Germany there would have been no World Wars and millions of gentiles and Jewish people would be alive today.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if serious.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    16. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is great if you're a big country with a massive internal market (Germany and US for e.g.)

      But a smaller country, once it's satisfied the local market, how you gonna grow? Exports, but everybody
      has massive protections blocking you.

      Even larger countries get bloated on the local protectionism and with no competition happily
      let their products stagnate and coalesce into monopolies.

      In the short term what you're saying might sound great, and for some countries it was certainly a good start,
      but in a mature global economy you'd be crazy to harm your citizens like that.

    17. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      Protectionism is nativism. Nativism is racism.

      Honestly, your example of "Germany became strong due to these tactics and without which couldn't have tried to take over the world" doesn't really help your cause. With a weak, divided Germany there would have been no World Wars and millions of gentiles and Jewish people would be alive today.

      How is protectionism racism? I have to live with the people in my community and they are the ones who are going to cry on my shoulder when they lose their homes. It has nothing to do with their race.

      refusing to allow immigrants into my community might be racism, but that is NOT what an import tariff is about. Import tariffs only refer to products and services, not people.

      refusing to allow cheap imports is just a method of helping my neighbors have a competetive advantage (even if unfair) so they can continue to do something productive rather than sit around being unemployed.

      when they have money in their pockets they are more likely to buy stuff from me. far more likely than somebody on the opposite side of the planet.

      This keeps us both busy and feeling happy about our lives. We feel like we are working together with out immediate neighbors. this is the source of much happiness in the world.

      More over - there are certain labour and environmental practices that I consider to be immoral and should be banned regardless of the cost. Doing business with my neighbors allows me to ensure for myself that they are behaving in a way I consider to be ethical. If products come from mystery factories overseas then I have no clue who is being exploited or how much pollution is being created.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    18. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Protectionism has a proven history of working.

      Sure, if the manufacturer decides your market is worth opening a factory for. Otherwise, you're simply screwed.

    19. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Trikoloko · · Score: 1

      For instance, If the price of imported electronics goes up (via an import tariff), this creates an opportunity for local electronics producers to benefit. The local cost of electronics increases, and the profit margins of local electronics producers increase. But the only people who have any increased expense are those who buy electronics.

      Not working. We are getting the crappiest craps at 2-5x the US price. The Chinese components are only bolted on in Brazil. Almost not technology is developed on the process.

      --
      My cellphone ringtone is a ring tone.
    20. Re:Brazil charges prohibitive import duty by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      In Brazil's case, being Apple's and Sony's manufacturing centre for the entirety of South America in the future doesn't seem like a bad deal for the country.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  13. Playstation 4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, I still have the old "fat" Playstation 2 that has trouble with some games like Rouge Galaxy. I should buy a Playstation 3 soon.

  14. No media server by mythix · · Score: 1

    As if the movies streamed over DLNA were ever watchable on the PS3, they looked abominal...
    Why doesn't this just stream my movies with samba like my current media player? it would sell like hot bread...

    1. Re:No media server by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yes, DLNA streamed files look just fine. If they don't you have either shit quality files or have software doing poor quality reencoding of your files. I watch BluRay remuxes just fine streamed to my PS3 with PS3MediaServer with no video reencoding. They look just as they should.

    2. Re:No media server by mythix · · Score: 1

      The files were fine when I watched them on the PC, I just streamed them from my PC with sharing media...

    3. Re:No media server by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      This "sharing media" is probably a transcoder on the PC that's streaming a reduced quality video to the PS3, rather than just sharing a directory on a file server. The transcode is what severely degrades the video and stopped me from using my 360 as a media player. It seems like it's just better to hook up a media/gaming PC to a large display / projector, rather than use a console for anything but console exclusive games.

  15. No MP3s or audio CDs? Online activation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall people flipping out when Microsoft wanted to allow everything to be digital and, then to do the same. Now that Sony is either blocking content or requiring online activation it's okay?

    This sure reminds me of every prior Sony announcement: all of the good and none of the bad, with every moron in the world forgetting history and lapping it up. As it turn's out, Sony's version of what Microsoft is doing doesn't even make sense and it's purely anti-consumer; the content is purely physical and therefore cannot be shared (unless they're considering copying of discs, which they clearly are, and that amusingly backs up doing the same for games).

    Oh, sorry, I forgot where I was for a second.

  16. CD defined by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Compact Disc Digital Audio is a lossless audio format introduced in the 1980s. Each disc 120 mm in diameter (the size of the later DVD) stored up to 80 minutes of stereo audio at a sample rate and depth that an adult ear cannot distinguish from any higher sample rate or depth. After the introduction of MP3 format in the late 1990s, people would buy CDs, copy them to computers using a CD-ROM drive, and compress the result to MP3 for later listening in a noisy environment that can get away with lower fidelity. And until the late 2000s when Amazon started selling MP3 downloads, CD was the only way to buy popular music for listening on a computer or pocket device without digital restrictions management.

    1. Re:CD defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compact Disc Digital Audio is a lossless audio format...

      WTF are you talking about? You're comparing apples and oranges. PWM, the format in which the audio is stored on the CD, is a digital audio format. Something like ALAC or FLAC are lossless compression algorithms. There is no lossless in CD-DA, it doesn't even make sense.

    2. Re:CD defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there is nothing shameful about being so stupid. After all just like your gender and skin color, you were born this stupid and can't help it. But please keep your mouth shut no matter if you think you understand the topic at hand or not, because you are not and never will be right at anything.

      Tepples has been known to troll plenty in his time, but in this particular case the post is 100% factually accurate, with information taken directly from Philips and Sony - the creators of the CD audio format.

      If you wish to keep claiming blue book formatted CDs use compression (flat stop there - ANY compression - let alone compression that throws away sound data) you'll have to do better than that to prove the claim.
      You might even learn something in the process, such as how CDs don't use compression at all, let alone lossful compression.

    3. Re:CD defined by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      Just to nitpick, but all digital formats are lossy, as you loose data between the samples. You can lessen the "lossyness" by increasing the sample-rate, but it's still not completely loss-less. Only analog is properly loss-less.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    4. Re:CD defined by tepples · · Score: 1

      you loose data between the samples.

      CD mastering applies a low-pass filter with transition band 20-22 kHz before 44.1 kHz sampling. This ensures that the only lost data is data that the human ear has no chance to hear anyway. The advantage of CD is that the loss occurs at one well-defined point.

      Only analog is properly loss-less.

      Analog isn't lossless either. After taking into account vinyl surface noise, there's more usable bit depth on CD than on vinyl.

  17. Disappointed by Jethro · · Score: 1

    Two things about this that worry me. Well, 2 and a half.

    The whole no MP3/audio CDs/DLNA thing, yeah... that COULD potentially be fixed and Sony have addressed peoples' concerns about it. That's my half thing.

    What worries me more is that no current bluetooth headsets nor PS3 controllers will work on the thing. I can see absolutely no reason for that other than Money Grab. Yeah, the PS4 controller has more features, but those things are overpriced half-way to hell and many of us have multiple PS3 controllers. I do not see a reason for the thing not to just go "some features may not be available".

    Even more worrying is the default inclusion of a 5400RPM SATA II harddrive. Yeah, it's user-replaceable, but here's my issue.

    Sony have been claiming that this thing would "ourperform" PCs. Even high-end ones. Most people were sceptical of this but I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. And I still think it could equal a decent PC in /gaming/ performance.... but it's clear that to Sony that means only when you're ACTUALLY playing the game - not when you're booting up, loading a game, loading data, load/saving games... anything that's not actual gameplay.

    And that's one of the most annoying things about the PS3. You can (and I have) replace your HDD with an SSD, and it can throw data at the PS3 extremely fast, but the PS3 just can't process it fast enough, so performance improvements are negligible.

    This extremely outdated tech included in the PS4 by default make me think this will still be the case with the PS4.

    Now naturally I have not tried a PS4 yet, so I might be very wrong. I really hope I am. But right now I've put the PS4 firmly on the "wait a few months" list, and quite likely on the "lets see how the whole steam box does" list... and even possibly on the "Ok lets reevaluate getting a gaming PC in the living room" list.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far from the specs even the 7 year old obsolete machine in the basement would outpreform a ps4.
      it can even play media too.

      I wonder why in the world they think i want a ps4.... Exclusive game? Eh.... Whatever. theres millions of games to take up your time just fine. I will live without the 'ps4 exclusive' ones.

      But then again... It's SONY... Anyone who still believes sony isn't going to screw you over every chance they get... Well.. You can't fix stupid.

      Sony has proved time and again they don't give a fuck about the consumer who pays them money. Yet people still pay them... Stupid.

    2. Re:Disappointed by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I /do/ think actual gaming performance will be fine. There's a lot of voodoo in there.

      As for why someone would want a PS4... well, the alternatives in the console world are an xbox one (which is also crazy) and a steambox (not actually available). In non-console, well, some of us like to throw a game in, sit on the sofa and play. That's not practical with a PC unless you use a gamepad which makes you lose the keyboard/mouse advantage, plus is not supported by many games.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Disappointed by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Many if not all steam games support that input method. You can turn any PC into a steambox very easily. Just install their OS and use big picture mode.

    4. Re:Disappointed by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Yup. Reserving judgement on that until the whole steam thing gets going. I have some reservations about it. One of the main advantages of consoles is standard hardware. If you can just throw Steam on whatever you want, well, it's going to be as horrible to support as Windows...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    5. Re:Disappointed by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      They already do that. Steam has been going for a long time now.

      I think hardware support will be limited to buying premade consoles.

    6. Re:Disappointed by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm curious to see how it'll do.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  18. You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by pla · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Does the PS4 system support analog video or audio output?" "No. the PS4 system's video and audio are transmitted using HDMI"
    "What screen resolutions will PS4 support?" "The PS4 system supports 480p"
    "In PAL Markets, the Vertical Stands for the PS4 system will retail for â19.99 / £16.99."
    [Damnit Slashdot, Unicode! Any year now!]

    Seriously mixed messages here. First, I feel just fine with digital-only, though I expect that will piss off at least a few people. But why does it support 480p? Do HDMI displays actually exist that don't support at least 720p? Not to mention, pretty much anything less than 5 years old will support 1080p.

    But that last line really cinches it... "In PAL markets". WTF? Seriously Sony, what the hell does PAL-vs-NTSC have to do with it, when you only have digital outputs? For that matter, does PAL-vs-NTSC even exist at all anymore? At least in the US, analog OTA has gone dark. Unless you also-vinyl-fans really want to keep using that 30 year old Betamax, that distinction has no more meaning than saying "in former Roman colonies".

    It also surprises me to see them going with an 8 core x86 (I'll presume that means x64) - After pushing the awesome power of the Cell architecture soooo hard with the PS3, they have chosen to go back to basically commodity PC hardware? And not even cutting edge, that makes the PS4 slightly less powerful than my now-two-year-old home desktop PC. And though vague, they say 18CU with 1.84TF for graphics... Which puts it basically on par with the Radeon HD 5830. Consider me unimpressed.

    On the bright side, I look forward to having a full-speed PS4 emulator for PC available about a week after launch. So hey, not all bad, right?

    1. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It says "in PAL markets" because that's the version of the FAQ issued on the European PAL region PlayStation blog.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's changed since you visited, but I see different.

      "What screen resolutions will PS4 support?" "The PS4 system supports 480p"

      It actually says "The PS4 system supports 480p, 720p, 1080i, and 1080p video standards via HDMI output."

      For that matter, does PAL-vs-NTSC even exist at all anymore?

      Yes - it does. The resolutions might be the same, but PAL video is at 25fps vs. our 29.97 (or double for interlaced). Their SD video is 576p.

    3. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After pushing the awesome power of the Cell architecture soooo hard with the PS3, they have chosen to go back to basically commodity PC hardware?

      I saw nothing but developer hate for the Cell architecture. Even assuming that the toolchains and dev hardware were amazing, it's definitely a negative in this gaming ecosystem to have a hard target to port to. I don't think Sony is going to compete with Microsoft for indie titles, but it can't hurt to make your consoles a more attractive hardware platform.

    4. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by pla · · Score: 1

      It actually says "The PS4 system supports 480p, 720p, 1080i, and 1080p video standards via HDMI output."

      Sorry, my bad - I didn't clip that quote to imply that it only supports 480p - Rather, just wondering why they even have support for something that low-end... The implication being that we'll have to suffer through yet another generation of console games that don't allow the devs to make full use of the resolution 90% of their audience has (aka "giant text everywhere, and fine detail only as an afterthought").

      Someone else already answered that adequately, though, apparently AACS requires it as a baseline.

    5. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Probably good to have for portable screens, too. It's true that 720p is common on most of those, but maybe not the cheapest ones.

    6. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in the US, analog OTA has gone dark. Unless you also-vinyl-fans really want to keep using that 30 year old Betamax, that distinction has no more meaning than saying "in former Roman colonies".

      There are still NTSC broadcasts from low-power TV stations. They have until 2015 to go dark. Get mad at Sony for the crap they are offering, but don't get caught up in whether NTSC and PAL are still a thing or not. I think most of us here know what a "PAL market" is even if they don't actually have PAL broadcasts.

    7. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large difference between your two-year-old home desktop PC and the PS4 is that the PS4 is using 8 gigs of GDDR5 as memory for everything. Not just 1 gig of it attached to the gpu. It's likely that very few of us can actually appreciate the difference that can make when applications are coded specifically to utilize that particular hardware set up, which is exactly what console game developers do. Also, why does it matter if it supports lower resolutions than you think are reasonable? It supports up to 1080p. Supporting below that has no effect on the quality of the higher resolutions.

      On the bright side, I look forward to having a full-speed PS4 emulator for PC available about a week after launch. So hey, not all bad, right?

      What you should really look forward to is that all the major developers are going to be developing for PC as well as the consoles (yes, it's "coming back"). PS4 doesn't even have any decent games announced for it that don't explicitly have PC versions in development. (I'm ignoring your cheap attempt at sarcasm because I already invalidated it above.)

    8. Re:You may want to rethink that cunning plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, look forward to a PS4 emulator. The good news? The PS4 uses FreeBSD as the base os, and that already runs under multiple emulators. The main issue, then, is the graphics card, which in this case is an off the shelf AMD integrated into the cpu. Current VM platforms allow you to connect to real graphics cards and other hardware, so you can put together a system that mimics the functionality of the PS4 without having one.

      Yes, I realize there will be proprietary systems in place, and it will be non-trivial, however I believe that a large amount of the work is already done in open source form, such as Qemu and Virtualbox.

  19. OUYA fizzled by tepples · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Coward wrote:

    No one should be buying this proprietary garbage to begin with.

    OUYA, a set-top gaming machine positioned as a less-proprietary alternative to the major consoles, sort of fizzled. We'll have to wait to see how Steam Machine, another set-top gaming machine positioned as a less-proprietary alternative to the major consoles, does.

    1. Re:OUYA fizzled by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Has it been out long enough to say it fizzled?
      It really could never hope to compete in the PS4/Xbone arena anyway. Its hardware is simply not up to the task.

    2. Re:OUYA fizzled by nschubach · · Score: 1

      It depends on who you ask. I use mine almost daily (granted, it's as an XBMC machine... but it does get some game time on the weekend.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  20. The original Xbox was PC-like by tepples · · Score: 1

    If the PC-like architecture of the new systems is going to be the way of the future, then hopefully this is the last time we have to suffer [lack of back-compat].

    The original Xbox was PC-like, with a 733 MHz Celeron and a GeForce 3. Microsoft designed its successor to be less PC-like, using a PowerPC CPU instead of x86, as a cost-cutting measure. Another thing that worries me is reliance on vendors' GPU bugs, something that console games have done for decades and that Mantle is likely to bring to the PC gaming world.

    1. Re:The original Xbox was PC-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not save money by moving away from a bargain-bin no-cache intel chip to a relatively short run more-exotic server-spin-off chip. You could get a better machine by getting away from the x86 Baggage. Too bad the software never thoroughly optimized for it.

  21. Halo 2 ended by tepples · · Score: 1

    buying a spare last-gen console and ignoring the new ones

    Until you can't play the game anymore because the last gen console's multiplayer servers have been shut down for good. Even Halo 2 ended.

    1. Re:Halo 2 ended by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yet another win for PC gaming.

      The GP stated he does not play online anyway though. I don't either. Not all of us want to hear racist and homophobic slurs being yelled by children while being accused of hacking simply because we have the attention span to learn how to properly play the game.

    2. Re:Halo 2 ended by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until you can't play the game anymore because the last gen console's multiplayer servers have been shut down for good.

      Which, if you'd read my entire post where I said I don't play games on-line, you wouldn't be suggesting.

      For some of us, video games are played alone/with friends in our basement or living room, with no networking involved -- the way it was meant to be done. ;-)

      For me (and I realize I'm a relatively smaller minority of gamers), on-line gaming carries absolutely zero appeal. And all of the 'social' aspects (like badges and winning coins and spending real money to get better stuff) is equally meaningless to me.

      To me, when I'm in the mood and have time, I'll fire up the video game, play a while, and then turn it off. Driving games, Tiger Woods, Skyrim, the wife's dancing games for the Kinect ... none of these are the kinds of things I want to play against someone on the internet.

      My video game console doesn't get connected to the network, and is completely air-gapped. And I can't say I've ever felt I was missing out on anything. In fact, the brief period I had it on-line was enough to convince me that I definitely don't want it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Halo 2 ended by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Mine would be if not for Netflix and Amazon prime.

      Video game updates are another reason you might want to connect it. Some games really needed the updates, Bugthesda looking at you here.

    4. Re:Halo 2 ended by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Mine would be if not for Netflix and Amazon prime.

      My internet is metered, and I pay for my bandwidth. So my preference is still to buy the Blu Ray that comes with a Digital Copy (not that evil Ultraviolet) and use that. That way I only download a much smaller amount of files and can watch the disc whenever I want.

      Video game updates are another reason you might want to connect it. Some games really needed the updates, Bugthesda looking at you here.

      When Microsoft started putting ads in my home screen and video games, that was when I disconnected it permanently.

      The only game I've got from Bethesda is Skyrim, and I haven't found it too buggy. Besides, they might fix some of the exploits or cheats I rely on. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Halo 2 ended by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What the heck is Digital Copy? Why not just rip the blu ray? I tend to only watch things once so I don't buy a lot of media.

      I don't think I could cope with metered internet service. I don't have cable or an antenna nor am I willing to watch advertising in my media.
      So far the PS3 seems free of advertising as far as I can tell.

    6. Re:Halo 2 ended by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      What the heck is Digital Copy?

      Licensed digital copy of movies, downloadable from iTunes-- which I was already using anyway (yeah, whatever). At that point, I can watch it on my iPod or my Apple TV -- sadly, I can't watch on my Android tablet, but can still dust off my first gen iPad to watch movies on planes. But you can usually buy the combo pack which has Blu Ray, DVD, and the Digital copy for only slightly more than just the Blu Ray.

      When I discovered I could play movies from my iPod onto the TV in the hotel room when I travel on business, then suddenly business travel didn't suck nearly so bad. Room service and The Avengers is a whole lot more enjoyable than, well, room service and whatever the hell is on TV. I can watch part of a movie on the plane and finish it on the TV in the hotel room. I just usually bring a half dozen or so movies on a business trip, and I'm good to go

      Why not just rip the blu ray?

      Honestly I assume that by now it's exceedingly annoying to try to rip those things, and the one I can download from iTunes is pretty much there and good to go in much less time. And spending too much time on it isn't exactly how I want to spend my time these days.

      I tend to only watch things once so I don't buy a lot of media.

      I tend to watch and re-watch movies quite a bit, so I've historically bought quite a lot of them. I've got some movies which are likely to get re-watched between 2 and 6 times/year.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Halo 2 ended by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I have no devices that can use itunes, other than my macbook air that normally runs linux. I just rip the disks, it is very easy.

      If they don't offer linux and android support I guess I will keep doing it this way.

    8. Re:Halo 2 ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buying a spare last-gen console and ignoring the new ones

      Until you can't play the game anymore because the last gen console's multiplayer servers have been shut down for good. Even Halo 2 ended.

      Unless the shutdown of the Halo 2 servers impacted offline single-player mode, your point is moot.

      I also don't play games on-line, so most of the new 'features' don't really interest me.

    9. Re:Halo 2 ended by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Yet another win for PC gaming.

      (Hi again!)

      PC gaming is subject to the same issues, though lately they've gotten better. I have a number of older games that I can't play even locally because they relied on online services that are now defunct, like Heat.com. Such games now require Hamachi (which is very finicky) or Gamespy (even more finicky and a bit shady). Online retro gaming is possible, but boy can it be tricky. >_>

    10. Re:Halo 2 ended by futuresheep · · Score: 2

      Honestly I assume that by now it's exceedingly annoying to try to rip those things, and the one I can download from iTunes is pretty much there and good to go in much less time. And spending too much time on it isn't exactly how I want to spend my time these days.

      MakeMKV makes it trivial to do a 1:1 rip of your Bluray into an MKV container that has the primary video and audio stream. If you need any conversion after that for tablets etc... Handbrake does the job very well.

      http://makemkv.com/ http://handbrake.fr/

      Both are really as point can click as it gets.

    11. Re:Halo 2 ended by tepples · · Score: 1

      The problem is that publishers are eliminating offline multiplayer mode entirely.

  22. HDMI port limit by tepples · · Score: 1

    What's to stop you keeping your PS3 around as a media player?

    Not wanting to reach behind the TV to switch the HDMI cable whenever switching from games to noninteractive media or vice versa.

    1. Re:HDMI port limit by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      They do make automated HDMI switches, you know. You can get one for about ten bucks.

      The HDMI inputs have priority levels; plug your console into a 'high' priority one and when you switch it on the TV will change from the media box to the console automagically.

    2. Re:HDMI port limit by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      You do realize they sell HDMI switches right?
      They are very cheap.

    3. Re:HDMI port limit by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Your TV only has one HDMI port? This 11 dollar doo-dad will help if that is the case. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA07R0Y81964

    4. Re:HDMI port limit by tepples · · Score: 1

      If each 2 to 1 HDMI switch adds the equivalent of one port, how many such switches can be daisy chained without causing loss of picture?

    5. Re:HDMI port limit by Wookact · · Score: 1

      No idea, my TV has 4 HDMI connectors so I have never used one. I was just trying to be helpful because I figured that there was bound to be an adapter or something for that.

  23. OUYA + PS4 by tepples · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Coward wrote about the PS4's inability to play local media:

    The more open Steambox is looking better and better. Of course it is vapourware so it could just as easily become just as crippled.

    OUYA isn't vapor, and at least U.S. residents can buy an OUYA + PS4 for the price of an Xbox One.

  24. MPEG-LA, for one by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who, exactly, does Sony have to pay?

    Sony would have to pay other BDA members, DVD FLLC, DVD CCA, (Mac)Rovi(sion), AACSLA, MPEG-LA, and anyone else who manages licensing patents or DRM trade secrets associated with BD or DVD video.

  25. Re:Don't be assholes Sony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS4 runs FreeBSD.....

  26. Image Constraint Token; PAL market defined by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    But why does it support 480p?

    It's probably an AACS requirement to support at least one EDTV resolution, given the Image Constraint Token.

    But that last line really cinches it... "In PAL markets". WTF? Seriously Sony, what the hell does PAL-vs-NTSC have to do with it, when you only have digital outputs?

    "PAL market" refers to markets that use 50 Hz alternating current and historically used PAL video: Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. These tend to have fewer people per country than North America. This increases cost of licensing works for adaptation when distributors own exclusive rights in different countries. It increases the cost of localization as UI and games must be dubbed in more languages. It increases censorship as some PAL market countries have less comprehensive protection of speech than the United States, allowing no-swastikas policies and refusal to accept neighboring countries' classification for violent, sexual, or otherwise objectionable materials. Finally, Europe tends toward stronger warranty requirements for consumer products than North America.

    For that matter, does PAL-vs-NTSC even exist at all anymore?

    Yes. It would be cost prohibitive for the PAL market to switch to 60 Hz AC and a single media distribution territory, and it would be politically unpopular to adopt English language, free speech, and U.S.-style minimal warranty.

  27. No DLNA support? Didn't you start DLNA Sony? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I find that particularly odd that Sony wouldn't have support for DLNA on the PS4 considering they started the consortium.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:No DLNA support? Didn't you start DLNA Sony? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      They started SACD, too. What's your point?....

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:No DLNA support? Didn't you start DLNA Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Sony supports DLNA...

      http://products.dlna.org/csv-all.php?getSearchWithPaging=1&categoryID=10&companyID=15&certStartDate=01/01/2013&certEndDate=12/31/2013&sn=1

      just not in the PS4. What they'd like you to do is buy the PS4 *AND* one of their BluRay players.

  28. Fewer games support split screen by tepples · · Score: 1

    For some of us, video games are played alone/with friends in our basement or living room

    And others can't coordinate their schedules to play with friends, so they prefer pickup games with strangers.

    with no networking involved

    Fewer and fewer games for Microsoft and Sony consoles support split screen multiplayer for two reasons. First, time is money, and supporting both split screen and online splits the effort between optimizing for split screen and optimizing for online. Second, publishers want to sell multiple copies to a household.

    1. Re:Fewer games support split screen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      And others can't coordinate their schedules to play with friends, so they prefer pickup games with strangers.

      LOL, when I first started playing video games, there was 1 joystick, two buttons, and you had to put in quarters.

      Somewhere along the way I got bypassed, and don't have the preternatural reflexes required for a lot of games. My nephews started kicking my ass when they were in their mid-teens -- the last thing I want is to play a game with strangers and get my ass handed to me by a 10 year old. I don't need an object lesson in being lousy at video games, I can look at the stack of games that I've gotten stuck on and given up for that.

      Fewer and fewer games for Microsoft and Sony consoles support split screen multiplayer for two reasons

      Well, the only ones I play with other people are essentially turn based, like golf or some of the Kinect stuff -- I'm about as far from an 1337 g4m3r as you're gonna get.

      Second, publishers want to sell multiple copies to a household.

      Ah, but what the publishers want doesn't concern me at all. In fact, what the publishers want is usually an indication that it's the worst possible thing for me. Like buying a second copy of a game.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Fewer games support split screen by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I had some trouble in the PS2 era, but these days games seem to keep getting easier and easier. So many tune their difficulty to the player.

  29. What about power consumption? by wwalker · · Score: 1

    How much power will this thing be sucking? Is it going to be like the original PS3 mini-heater at 300W?

    1. Re:What about power consumption? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      And what is the difference between a 300W PS3/PS4 and the 300W power supply of a high-end gaming PC?

    2. Re:What about power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaming PC don't run a 300Wat psu the majority of Gaming Pcs use at least a 500W

    3. Re:What about power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 300W power supply of a high-end gaming PC is sold to teh hardcore gamerz as a 600W power supply.

    4. Re:What about power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High end gaming PCs are up around 1000W now. 300 won't power even one high-end graphics card, let alone the three at a time that people are rolling these days.

    5. Re:What about power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What high-end gaming PC only has a 300W power supply?

    6. Re:What about power consumption? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Somewhere around 100W, given the hardware inside it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  30. But does harassment discourage the majority? by tepples · · Score: 2

    Not all of us want to hear racist and homophobic slurs being yelled by children

    Major video game consoles are made for the profitable majority, not the less profitable edge case. I understand your concern about racial and sexual harassment in online pickup groups of strangers, but another comment claims that most gamers happen not to share this problem.

    1. Re:But does harassment discourage the majority? by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      Most players are not racist or much of a problem at all.

      It takes one guy on a server of 60+ to cause problems however. So it doesn't matter much.

  31. Internet have-nots by tepples · · Score: 1

    Who would want to rent the game just for installation?

    The same Internet have-not demographic who paid extra for a copy of OS X on USB media. For a lot of these people, Internet access costs $10 per GB.

    1. Re:Internet have-nots by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Those people would be better served just buying the disk.

      The demographic you describe would have to want to spend money to rent the game and again spend money to buy it for more than the cost of buying physical media. Who exactly is that? Someone who lives near a redbox, but far away from a store that sells games and is too impatient to wait for two day delivery from amazon? Seems like a very small group of people.

  32. Reaching behind the TV by tepples · · Score: 1

    Reaching behind the TV repeatedly to switch cables is a pain in the behind. So is having to buy a new TV that has more HDMI inputs.

    1. Re:Reaching behind the TV by omnichad · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Reaching behind the TV by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      $11.50! How will the backwoods dial-up internet using redneck strawman tepples constructs for these arguments ever afford that?

      Once he pays for the gas for his pickup truck that he uses for his 2 hour commute, his trailer park spot rental and chewing tobacco how will he ever afford that?

    3. Re:Reaching behind the TV by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      The point is one shouldn't have to buy MORE GARBAGE to run a media server. It completely defeats the purpose.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    4. Re:Reaching behind the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is one shouldn't have to buy MORE GARBAGE to run a media server. It completely defeats the purpose.

      Then the only winning move is to not play. Console gaming that is.

      The console, as much as it tries, is a specialized device predisposed to gaming. It may be able to do 99.9% of what a generic computing device does, but it just won't be the same thing. If it ever become the same thing, that is the day when the PC vs consoles wars finally end, as they become... the same thing.

    5. Re:Reaching behind the TV by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      If you are competing against a PC in every living room it is nonsensical to drop your competitive features. I'm feeling sony just thinks we should all use our smart tvs for DLNA.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    6. Re:Reaching behind the TV by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Be careful with that. Those cheap Monoprice HDMI boxes can have some real problems managing HDCP through HDMI. I have one (and tried with more than one, so I know it wasn't just a broken box) and have to switch back and forth a few times sometimes before it will 'sync' with the display. I contacted their technical support and after trying a few things the support person admitted that each manufacturer handles HDMI handshaking in their own way, and it was impossible to maintain compatibility with all of then. He said "HDMI" but I'm convinced it was really the HDCP copy-protection that was failing.

      Keep in mind these weren't esoteric devices either, this was an HD Tivo and a Playstation 3. When my HD Tivo died I replaced it with a Tivo Premiere, and most of the problems went away -- the premiere just handled that sort of a setup better.

      Now, this was for an HD matrix, which has several HDMI inputs and two HDMI outputs. A more high-end device would almost certainly have handled this sort of thing better, but when you go cheap, you get what you pay for. :-)

    7. Re:Reaching behind the TV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think some of these devices are probably too advanced and that's why it's failing HDCP. What you really need is one that hard disconnects the pins when you're switched to the other output. I think the problem is that it tries to be a phantom monitor to prevent the device from thinking the screen was disconnected. Might cause the screen to flash a few times when you switch back to the input, but it would be purely mechanical and electrically equivalent to unplugging one cord and plugging in the other.

    8. Re:Reaching behind the TV by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think some of these devices are probably too advanced and that's why it's failing HDCP. What you really need is one that hard disconnects the pins when you're switched to the other output. I think the problem is that it tries to be a phantom monitor to prevent the device from thinking the screen was disconnected. Might cause the screen to flash a few times when you switch back to the input, but it would be purely mechanical and electrically equivalent to unplugging one cord and plugging in the other.

      Mmm, except that's not the way the box works; with the matrix it's quite possible to route the same signal (playstation 3) to both the projector in the home theater room and the television in the other room at the same time. It works -- if the initial handshaking is successful.

    9. Re:Reaching behind the TV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You can't just sneak in "Now, this was for an HD matrix" and change the topic of the whole thread. That's not what anyone was talking about other than your brief mention.

    10. Re:Reaching behind the TV by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The problem is there are too many chefs to make a truly unified media center. You have to pick the features you want and either they fit on one box or you get a switcher.

      --
      Good-bye
  33. DMCA by tepples · · Score: 1

    What the heck is Digital Copy?

    Digital Copy, as I understand it, is an additional copy of the film stored on the disc in a handheld-device-friendly format that can be copied to a device after online activation.

    Why not just rip the blu ray?

    Because of the DMCA and foreign counterparts. Not all of us can afford to move to a country where it's legal to rip BD movies.

    1. Re:DMCA by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't bother to leave the country to rip blu rays.
      I even use libdvdcss to watch DVDs!

      Truly, I am a hardened criminal.

    2. Re:DMCA by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Because of the DMCA and foreign counterparts. Not all of us can afford to move to a country where it's legal to rip BD movies.

      I -believe- (IANAL) that technically it is legal in the United States to rip your BD discs. It is not, however, legal to distribute tools which rip the discs (and of course, it's not legal to distribute your ripped copies or keep said copies if you sell/give away the original disc).

      So it's just as difficult to rip, but the end result is no one is going to arrest or sue you the end user until you start distributing copies.

    3. Re:DMCA by tepples · · Score: 1

      So who would lawfully distribute the tools to someone who wanted to rip discs?

  34. OMG! No media center or CD or bluray??!? by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

    What's the point of a machine that can't play media? What am I supposed to do with it? Play games?

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:OMG! No media center or CD or bluray??!? by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      What's the point of a machine that can't play media? What am I supposed to do with it? Play games?

      I guess you didn't read the FAQ, then:

      Will I be able to watch Blu-ray movies on the PS4 system?
      Yes, you will need to download and install the PS4 system’s day-one system software update 1.50, and then activate your Blu-ray Disc video capability with a one-time activation through the internet in order to play Blu-ray Disc films and DVD video content.

      Very likely you can also access Netflix, or Amazon VOD as with the PS3.

    2. Re:OMG! No media center or CD or bluray??!? by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot the in my post.

      I was just being annoyed at everyone bitching about everything except the very thing it is made for: playing games.

      --
      Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    3. Re:OMG! No media center or CD or bluray??!? by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with that. In particular because, unlike with OtherOs, they've not given you something then taken it away. You know going into it that it won't play your music collection.

  35. Final Fantasy XIV by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Final Fantasy XIV, optimized for PS4.

    Sold!

  36. PS4 launch: time to buy a PS3 by umafuckit · · Score: 2

    I almost pre-ordered the PS4 but in the end I bought a PS3 instead. They're only $250 right now and there's a vast games collection with lots of great older titles at under $20. Didn't seem worth paying a premium for a PS4 given the tiny game selection at launch and the fact that I'd be forking out $60 for each game. If I want great graphics, I'll go to the study and fire up the PC. However, I find myself preferring GT5 or Little Big Planet in the living room whilst hanging out with my girlfriend and the dog. The only problem is that the dog is unsettled by video games for some weird, dog-only-knows, reason.

    1. Re:PS4 launch: time to buy a PS3 by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

      Not to be a downer but I bought a PS3 along with some games and media remote around mid-2012. I was planning to use it for blu-rays and playing netflix but it hasn't turned out that well. It came with Uncharted 3 and I bought a combo pack of 1 and 2. I was going to play the three of them in order to really get the full effect but I never finished the first one. Once I realized I could do comcast on demand as well as netflix on the 360 I bought one of those. Since then the PS3 has been collecting dust.

      Right after purchase I did start a thread in my favorite discussion forum with something to the effect of "I bought a PS3 now what?". Ended up with 10+ pages of discussion around what could be done with the thing. Turns out not a lot. I was amazon trying to figure out what games would be good to get for it but all the top 10s I saw were mostly HD remakes of PS2 games.

      Maybe I didn't give enough of a chance. And I really wish that comcast thing had come to it so I didn't need a 360 (less than a year old and the [new] 360 is already freezing up on me...haven't even used it for games even once!).

      I would at least like to get The Last of Us though I doubt even if it lived up to the hype it would rationalize the cost of the console. At least if I wanted to play a blu-ray some day I'll be able to...

      I will say it found and played all themedia on my WHS instantly with no issues.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    2. Re:PS4 launch: time to buy a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog is reliably annoyed when I look at my phone or tablet. Unless he is sleeping -- then my time is my own.

    3. Re:PS4 launch: time to buy a PS3 by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Not to be a downer but I bought a PS3 along with some games and media remote around mid-2012. I was planning to use it for blu-rays and playing netflix but it hasn't turned out that well. It came with Uncharted 3 and I bought a combo pack of 1 and 2.

      I did much the same but didn't buy the Uncharted 1 & 2 combo. I must say it took me a few hours of play before I started to like Uncharted 3. At first I hated the aiming (I'm a PC gamer). Also, I kept forgetting what button did what and the game comes with no cheat-sheet. About a 1/3 of the way through it I begun to like it but it's not as compelling as, say, Half Life 2. The puzzles are too easy, the climbing bits can be annoying, and the shooting feels dumbed down to cope with the crappy aiming abilities of a gamepad. For those reasons I find Uncharted over-rated, but it's fun enough and I'll probably finish it soon.

      You're right, though, if everything was like Uncharted the PS3 would suck. I played the Two Souls demo and that really did suck (IMO). Where's the game-play? However there are good games that have kept me coming back. Right now these are Journey (although it's short), Little Big Planet 2, and GT5. I bought Metal Gear Solid 4 cheaply but haven't spent time with it yet (finishing Uncharted first). I'm intrigued by Puppeteer and want to give that a shot.

      The thing is, with the exception of GT and possibly LBP, I wouldn't want to pay $60 for many of these games. Uncharted 3 is entertaining in its way, but the game-play feels a little stale and it doesn't have much re-play value (unless for some weird reason I was interested in finding all the treasures). I reckon that, for me at least, the PS4 would be the same experience but with better graphics. So if I want to play Watchdogs next year, it'll probably be on my PC.

    4. Re:PS4 launch: time to buy a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overpaid by $100... according to the listings on craigslist in my area.

  37. Ouya Developers Share Their Experiences by tepples · · Score: 1

    Some developers of games for OUYA claim that game sales aren't so hot.

  38. Intel wouldn't help Microsoft cut Xbox cost by tepples · · Score: 1

    You do not save money by moving away from a bargain-bin no-cache intel chip to a relatively short run more-exotic server-spin-off chip.

    You do when the maker of the more exotic chip offers a design that's cheaper to manufacture because it can be licensed for fabrication at other IC foundries. Late in the life of the original Xbox, Intel wouldn't give Microsoft a good enough deal on CPUs. There's slightly less chance of this happening with the PS4 and Xbox One because AMD has outsourced manufacture to other fabs.

  39. Re:Don't be assholes Sony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS4 runs FreeBSD.....

    Which is a Unix OS! See?!? You're only proving their point!

  40. Heres a hoot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never bought one. Pay out the ass for the box then 49 59 for the game then have to buy points to play.
    No thanks,

  41. no backwards compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can upgrade some games at $10 each? Pbbt. Way to go sony! I should be able to play older games I've purchased on the new console. If I can't do that I'll keep my old console. These media producers have gotten so ridiculous that I think it's about time to just say screw em all and find something else to do. Maybe taking our country back could become the next number one adventure game. FPS and all. The blue helmets are target practice.

  42. Prisoner's dilemma by tepples · · Score: 2

    Our politicians/govt should be more concerned about our individual success rather than the collective world. That's their job, to put our interests over and above any other countries' interests.

    Such selfishness is a prisoner's dilemma that ultimately results in worse outcomes across the board.

    1. Re:Prisoner's dilemma by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      So, poor nations shoud just resign to their "fate" and do nothing to improve? After all, if they try to, those already rich nations "suffer"...

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
  43. I know what happened by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    They didn't finish the software in time and can't afford to let a Christmas launch slip do they're selling a half baked product instead.

  44. Credit cards are region coded by tepples · · Score: 1

    Good luck trying to sign up for PlayStation Plus (required for online play) or buy from the PlayStation Store with a Brazilian credit card and a U.S. console.

    1. Re:Credit cards are region coded by Black+LED · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if that will be a problem.

      Do PS4 games have regional locks?
      In general, neither digital nor disc-based games will be region locked, but PlayStation recommends that all users purchase games at the region of their residence to guarantee the best overall experience and customer service. In certain instances, a software publisher may choose to region lock a game title for specific reasons, but Sony Computer Entertainment expects these instances to be uncommon.

  45. What OUYA was supposed to do by tepples · · Score: 1

    The big advantage of OUYA over the major consoles was supposed to be that hobbyists-turning-professionals can release games designed for a controller, as opposed to being stuck on a PC's mouse and keyboard or a mobile device's touch screen. This would mean that gamers visiting the web sites of these developers would see "Buy Now on OUYA" instead of "We are seeking a publisher".

    1. Re:What OUYA was supposed to do by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      PC and Mac have both supported controllers for as long as I can remember and there have been controllers ranging from $2 to $2000 available for all of that time, as well. What's OUYA bring to the table, again?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re: What OUYA was supposed to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamepads have existed for computers since at least the late 1970s. I have a pair of really nice wireless ones which work great with my Mac, with Windows, and even with Linux.

      Why in the heck would I buy an extra box just so I can get a game controller?

      Ouya really is for Linux Charity Fanboys and generationally poor people.

    3. Re:What OUYA was supposed to do by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that most PC gamers who are interested in indie games on Kickstarter or Greenlight already have a controller for their PC. The Xbox/Dualshock layout is pretty standard now on PC so it's easy for games to support them via xinput.

    4. Re:What OUYA was supposed to do by tepples · · Score: 1

      True, one can use Xbox 360 controllers or USB HID controllers with a PC. But I was under the impression that PCs still tend to be connected to much smaller monitors than game consoles, making it harder to fit two to four people around one screen.

    5. Re:What OUYA was supposed to do by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's ever been easier to hook a computer up to a TV via HDMI. The main problem is no-one wants a big noisy clunking desktop computer with all its peripherals in their living room, and PC games rarely have multiplayer.

    6. Re:What OUYA was supposed to do by tepples · · Score: 1

      PC games rarely have multiplayer.

      Nschubach would disagree, citing this list. Even if it is a problem, I would volunteer to be among the first to fix this problem by having my team develop couch-centered PC games. But naysayers on Slashdot keep telling me that even if someone were to make and sell a PC game focused around couch multiplayer, nobody would buy it because nobody is willing to build a second PC for the living room just for one game.

  46. Remember! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, this is the same company they put a rootkit on Music CDs, and also the same company that hid a serious data breach for months, where customer payment info was pilfered.

    Do not do business with Sony. Don't buy anything they make. They've proven they're completely untrustworthy and irresponsible.

  47. Buy a 20 dollar 'media' box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What cretin would waste time using a mega-expensive next-generation console as a 'media centre' when 2013 is filled with ultra low cost media playing hardware. A dedicated solution can cost as little as a few tens of dollars, and play any possible media content. An Android 'stick' might cost a wee bit more, but its general programmability allows a vast choice in media streaming and decode applications.

    Sony and MS are offering the 2013 equivalent to cable boxes for their media functions, and expect to directly PROFIT when the user chooses to watch something via the console, rather than game. There is no mystery about this business model, and now that streaming/playing any form of media in the home is such a trivial, flexible and cheap task, why on Earth should either MS or Sony worry about offering these functions? Just because users of the PS3 haven't updated their thinking or knowledge in EIGHT years. Too many nerds are proud of their vastly outdated understanding of technical issues.

  48. How to use the thing called "book" by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    How to use the ancient thing called "book" (or "bok" in norwegian): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQHX-SjgQvQ

  49. Fantastic marketing philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy our new console for lots of money, because here's a big list of things it doesn't do compaerd to the previous version.

    Can't wait for the "PS4 sales disappointing headlines" in the new year.

  50. Re:Don't be assholes Sony! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I believe he was making a reference to otherOS, a backhanded way of saying "You would believe a Sony FAQ???"

    Sony has a long history of FAQing its customers over. I'll not be a customer again.

    (mods, I'll agree with the overrated but I don't think the parent was trolling)

  51. PCM != PWM by tepples · · Score: 1

    For one thing, CDDA is PCM not PWM. For another, CDDA is lossless precisely because it isn't compressed. (Notwithstanding volume compression that began in the late 1990s once Sony introduced Discman.)

  52. Bundled controller, 10' UI, small case by tepples · · Score: 1

    PC and Mac have both supported controllers for as long as I can remember and there have been controllers ranging from $2 to $2000 available for all of that time, as well. What's OUYA bring to the table, again?

    A bundled controller, a 10-foot UI enabled from first boot, and a physical form factor that isn't so XBOX HUEG that it sticks out like a proverbial sore thumb next to the big television in the living room. Good luck getting people to buy controllers just to play one controller-oriented PC game, and good luck fitting two to four bodies around a 17-21" desktop monitor.

    1. Re:Bundled controller, 10' UI, small case by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Now that monitors and TVs both have HDMI ports, as to PCs, why the fuck would you try and fit 2-4 people around a 21" monitor?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  53. Cheaper than a full HTPC by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why in the heck would I buy an extra box just so I can get a game controller?

    Because it's a lot cheaper than buying a second PC to put in the living room.

  54. They have changed course on this. by Apharmd · · Score: 1

    http://couchjockeyz.com/mp3-support-dlna-and-more-features-to-follow-on-2nd-ps4-update/ DLNA will be returning to the Playstation 4, if they follow through with what they promised.

  55. (Discount jordan shoes) $42, (Discount Air Max sho by shuuisoy · · Score: 1

    Hello, everybody, the good shoping place, the new season approaching, click in. ( http://www.shoesctv.com/ ) (Discount jordan shoes) $42, (Discount Air Max shoes) $43, (Discount shox shoes) $42, (Discount AF1 shoes) $42, (Discount Dunk shoes) $45, (Discount DG Shoes) $46, (Discount LV Shoes) $45, (Timberland Shoes) $60, (NFL New Cap) $12, (NFL/MLB/NBA/NHL)Jerseys $25, ( http://www.shoesctv.com/ ) ( http://www.shoesctv.com/ )

  56. Moving the PC back and forth by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because the family PC is in the same room as the 21" monitor on the desk, and it is inconvenient for someone to have to move the PC from the room with the 21" monitor to the room with the TV before playing a game and move it back after playing the game.

    1. Re:Moving the PC back and forth by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Why would you do that when there are plenty of PCs available on NewEgg, at or near the price of an Ouya, that are so much more capable? And many, many more between the price of an Ouya and a PS3 or XBox 360 that will play almost any game you throw at them. If you really want a middle of the road console, Nintendo has you covered on that front.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:Moving the PC back and forth by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why would you do that when there are plenty of PCs available on NewEgg, at or near the price of an Ouya, that are so much more capable?

      I must be failing at Newegg because most of these Zotac mini PCs that I'm seeing cost about $220-$300 plus the price of a gamepad. But that's still worth considering, even if it isn't "at or near the price of an Ouya" which is $100 including one gamepad.

      If you really want a middle of the road console, Nintendo has you covered on that front.

      Nintendo hasn't been friendly to copylefted software either, which would sort of conflict with Anonymous Coward's "Give me Linux back or fuck off!" remark that started this whole thread.