Slashdot Mirror


Largest and Most Intense Tropical Cyclone On Record Hits the Philippines

mrspoonsi writes "A monstrous storm has arisen in the Western Pacific. The storm, called 'Supter-Typhoon Haiyan', has become the year's most intense. It bore down on the central Philippines this morning, packing winds up to 195 mph (314 km/h), with gusts up to 235 mph (378 km/h), threatening massive damage and sending over 100,000 people into evacuation centers. (Animation of landfall.) Flood waters went as high as 10 feet. The secretary general of the Philippine National Red Cross said, 'About 90% of the infrastructure and establishments were heavily damaged.'"

160 comments

  1. Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by xmas2003 · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article:

    It's estimated central pressure is 899 mb but it could be lower. The lower the pressure the stronger the storm. Since 1987, there have been only four storms in the western Pacific with a central pressure below 899 mb (Megi in 2010, 885 mb; Flo in 1990 890 mb; Ruth in 1991 895 mb; and Yuri in 1991 895 mb)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a correlation between central pressure and wind speed but there are other factors affecting wind speed, such as the storm's mass (size) and wind mixing depths. This is why the NHC uses dropsondes rather than relying on pressure measurements or satellite estimates.

    2. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's only been ONE hurricane to ever make landfall in the US with that low a pressure, the 1935 labor day hurricane. To put the numbers in perspective Sandy made landfall at 945mb and Katrina at 920mb.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's only been ONE hurricane to ever make landfall in the US with that low a pressure, the 1935 labor day hurricane.

      Hurricanes (and typhoons) lose strength when they move over cooler water, so the strongest storms are those that stay in the tropics as they proceed westward. So the most intense Atlantic storms make landfall in Central America rather than the US coast. Wilma (2005) was the most intense Atlantic storm ever recorded, at 882 mbar, and Gilbert was a close second at 882 mbar. Both made landfall in Central America.

    4. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is this storm powerful enough to cross over into the North Indian ocean basin? coz I think they had one this year which was a little weaker than this fellow, and it crossed over from the Gulf of Thailand into the Andaman Sea. hell, is that even possible for a storm to retain it's strength even after passing over land?

    5. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      And the Pacific basin is larger. More space for the hurricane to develop without hitting land.

    6. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's also be clear that no direct measurements were took. Everything about the storm from its windspeed to minimum pressure is an estimate based on meteorological theory. Only in the Atlantic basin do they fly aircraft into cyclones and actually figure out what the pressure and wind-speed actually are.

    7. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I reckon people care more about sustained wind speeds and gust speeds though...

      it's not like you're going to pop or crush from the pressure itself..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      And the Pacific basin is larger. More space for the hurricane to develop without hitting land.

      True, but that only explains part of it. The South Pacific is even larger than the North Pacific, but fewer big storms occur there. In fact, there are fewer big storms anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere. Oceans in the Southern Hemisphere tend to be cooler because of the Antarctic icebox, and the wind shear is stronger and can tear apart storms before they really get started.

    9. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the 4th largest storm recorded, and the largest ever to make landfall.

      I'd have had a good joke if it were Australia rather than Asia: [Dundee to New Yourk] "You call that a superstorm? THIS is a superstorm!"

    10. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Katrina and Rita grew to such enormous strength and size due to freakishly warm water in the Gulf of Mexico that year. So it's not impossible for powerful storms to hit the U.S. (the 1935 labor day hurricane was measured at 892 mbar at landfall).

    11. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's also be clear that no direct measurements were took.

      For those of you who are ESL students: Don't use the internet for practice! There are far too many people like the AC above. "Took" is incorrect, the proper word is "taken." If you're learning English, ignore messageboards since there are far too many English speakers who are barely literate.

    12. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Stepping back from the min/max recordkeeping for a bit, the size of the storm also makes a huge difference in the amount of damage it causes. Even if a storm is powerful, its impact may be minimal if it's small in size. From what I can tell from news reports, Haiyan is about half the diameter of the largest and strongest typhoon on record - Typhoon Tip. About 2200 km vs about 1200 km.

      The diameter (extent of tropical storm-force winds) of hurricane Katrina was about 600 km, which is rather large for a storm. Hurricane Sandy (largest on record in the Atlantic) was about 1500 km across. I have to remind my European friends about this when they comment about the long recovery time from these storms for a "so-called" first-world nation. These storms were as large or larger than entire European countries - recovery efforts in an area that large are going to be slow even in a first-world country.

      The rate of travel and rainfall amounts matter too. Hurricane Mitch was only a category 1 when it made landfall and a tropical storm or tropical depression most of its time over land, but it's the second deadliest Atlantic hurricane on record because it lingered for almost two weeks dropping torrential rain causing massive flooding and landslides.

    13. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Apparently this one has already passed over the Philippines and at first glance, damage wasn't as bad as they thought it was going to be, because it was moving so fast (25 mph). So it didn't linger over land like other lesser and slower moving hurricanes did; ones that caused far more damage.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    14. Re:Typhoons are ranked my pressure, not winds by antdude · · Score: 1

      Typhoons are ranked your pressure? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  2. Name by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    In the Philippines they call it Yolanda. Why does it have two different names?

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Name by captainpanic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Haiyan is the name given to the super typhoon by the World Meteorological Organization (source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24863480 )

      What I understood is that the Philippines counts the number of storms that hit the country (this is the 25th this year!!), so in their counting, it gets a name with a Y. (Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2013/11/08/from-haiyan-to-yolanda-how-the-philippines-names-its-storms/ )

    2. Re:Name by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      We localize the names to make them easier to remember, at least for us over here.

    3. Re:Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The World Meteorological Organization coordinates storm naming using a list of names contributed by various countries. The Philippines uses its own naming system for any storm that approaches their "area of responsibility" in addition to the international name.

    4. Re:Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WMO's naming chief has an ex wife called Yolanda, and that bitch never blew anything in her life.

    5. Re:Name by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Haiyan is what the International community calls it. The Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration has its own naming scheme

    6. Re:Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit my wife Yolanda blows everything in sight.
      Damn hook..

  3. Not global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Higher ocean temperatures cause stronger storms.

    It's important to the oil companies that pay me to ignore science that I tell you -

    This is not global warming.

    It's a man, or a pig. Or a man-bear-pig.

    This off-the-charts definitely not caused by the coal power plants which power your house, and power the Chinese factories that build your crap.

    1. Re:Not global warming by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1
      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  4. Re:oh noes by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would say that a huge storm that can possibly make millions of people homeless, and kill thousands would definitely fit the description "stuff that matters".

  5. Mobilize the Help Now by b4upoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I imagine the suffering from this storm will be severe and can only hope that the help was mobilized before the storm struck. These storm victims are going to need everything to survive. Food, housing and medical care as well as tools and livestock to start over could save countless lives. Imagine a storm that severe striking Miami or New York.

    1. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Our country is broke. We have thousands of homeless ourselves. Plenty of jobless. And people even starving to death and dying due to lack of proper medical care.

      Other countries are going to have to take care of themselves for awhile. We're broke. After we get places like detroit fixed up again we'll be back to saving the world.
      Until then. Nope. Sorry. We're in no position to help any other nations citizens. We can't even take care of our own. Frankly we're fucked.

    2. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless of course we see another country that needs invading, or another billionaire banker robber baron who needs a handout. In that case, we'll find a way, somehow, to come up with the money. Maybe cutting school lunch programs...

    3. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can send you some bankers. We have lots of those. That should help. Right?

      We can also spare some telephone sanitizers...

    4. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a storm that severe striking Miami or New York.

      I would shovel three feet of snow off my driveway with smugness instead of envy.

    5. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      We're not going to stop helping people internationally in the case of major disasters no matter how much ugly, selfish people want to stop aid. Americans aren't overall so selfish and deeply stupid as to deny help.

      Even if one is selfish but not completely stupid, they'll understand that other nations come running when we need help too.

    6. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...We're broke. After we get places like detroit fixed up again...

      Pssh, like you care about Detroit any more than the Philippines.

    7. Re:Mobilize the Help Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Our country is broke. We have thousands of homeless ourselves. Plenty of jobless. And people even starving to death and dying due to lack of proper medical care.

      Don't forget guns.

      In our spare time we all run around shooting at each other. It keeps our minds off how homeless, jobless and ill we are.

  6. Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Saffir scale tops out Level 5, > 157 mph. But each level increases about 20-25 mph. It is essentially a 500 mile wide tornado.

    1. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      And as the wind power increases as the cube of the wind speed, a level 5 can do substantially more damage than a level 4.

    2. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I saw the number 500, and immediately thought of this. While not quite 500 MPH, this one got up to 378 km/h, which makes me think 500 km/h isn't impossible. Living in Canada, in an area where there fiercest winds we have are 100 km/h, It's hard to imaging how strong a 378 km/h wind is. Especially since E = (m * v^2)/2. which means the Energy of the wind is increases as a function of the square of the speed.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Living in Canada, in an area where there fiercest winds we have are 100 km/h

      Really? Really? Come on man, I'm in Alberta right now and we see 120km/h and 130km/h gusts through the mountains, and we haven't even hit on tornado's, updrafts(favorite in southern ontario), microbursts, and those lovely unpredictable t-storms in the summer that spawn in the lakes, or prairies. We sure do see winds higher than 100km/h.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by lookingglass · · Score: 1

      Yes we see wind gusts well over 100KM/H, but very little sustained like what would would get out of a hurricane. It makes a large difference on structures. Even those storms that pass by the east coats rarely step over that threshold.

    5. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Canada's a big place. I live near in Ottawa. Rarely do we see sustained winds above 100 km/h. No tornados in this area either (although further south in Ontario sees a few small ones).

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Canada, in an area where there fiercest winds we have are 100 km/h

      Really? Really? Come on man, I'm in Alberta

      Did you miss the second 'in'? Read carefully before laying into somebody.

      Also: I'm sorry.

    7. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yes we see wind gusts well over 100KM/H, but very little sustained like what would would get out of a hurricane.

      I see you've never been to the north or south of Alberta. Sustained winds in the 110km/h range are common, in fact they can be bad enough to shut down highways to truck traffic.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Just south of the Canadian border, in Cleveland, we experienced well over 120kph (70mph) winds from Sandy, probably closer to 140kph, although, in fairness, that was a once-in-recorded-history event. 100kph is quite common and all of our structures are designed to handle that, although trees are not, and often fall during storms, sometimes killing people when they do. We also get frequent tornadoes, as do, at least, the Canadian cities closest to us (London, Windsor, Niagara Falls, and Toronto). Most tornadoes are not in populated areas and are category 3 or less, but that is *not* always the case, and, as natural disasters go, they kill more people than any other kind except for heat (#1 by a very large margin) and blizzards (#2). (Blizzards should be no surprise, but heat on the Canada border? Yes; up to 45C/113F, though that's uncommon; the real killer is the much more common 35C/95F plus humidity which can linger, even at night, for days or even weeks, causing death from dehydration and/or heat exhaustion particularly in the older and poorer parts of the population).

    9. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Canada's a big place. I live near in Ottawa. Rarely do we see sustained winds above 100 km/h. No tornados in this area either (although further south in Ontario sees a few small ones).

      Ottawa is the odd man out in the province, rarely do you see much of anything outside of severe thunderstorms. And while you don't see tornado's you do have them up that way, and further south in Ontario, we get into the northern tip of tornado alley. And if you mean "small" as in F4 and EF3's then I guess...that's small. Really even as densely packed as southern ontario is, we miss a few of them and only can guess due to reported damage, further into northern ontario there are plenty as well, the difference is population and reported damage. Recently they've started tracking them by satellite in the far north by looking back with ground mapped data. It helps list tracks, but doesn't really give an idea of strength unless you can get someone in, and in some cases the only way in is by helicopter or plane. And EC won't dump money on that.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      And as the wind power increases as the cube of the wind speed, a level 5 can do substantially more damage than a level 4.

      I think force is a better measure of strength since many structures fail at some threshold amount of force which varies as the square of wind speed. A wall might withstand the force of a 120 mph wind but fail at 130 mph or a shed might handle a 70 mph wind but fail at 80 mph. The amount of damage then varies with the number of structures vulnerable to the maximum force applied to them by the force of the wind.

      Power might be useful in a situation where structures fail after being subjected to forces for some length of time, but most structures don't behave this way. A home for instance usually has a single threshold: the speed of the wind required to rip the roof off. And steel structures are safe below a threshold as the steel will return to its original shape after deflection, but be permanently distorted after being forced beyond its yield strength.

      I'd get rid of the the integer scale all together and use something like Category=(Windspeed^2)/(67^2). This roughly fits the old scale, but gives a better measure of relative strength, IMO. A category 2 is twice as strong as a category 1. A category 4 is twice as strong as a category 2, etc.

      New scale:
        74 1.219870795
        76 1.286700824
        78 1.355312987
        80 1.425707284
        82 1.497883716
        84 1.571842281
        86 1.647582981
        88 1.725105814
        90 1.804410782
        92 1.885497884
        94 1.96836712
        96 2.05301849
        98 2.139451994
      100 2.227667632
      102 2.317665404
      104 2.409445311
      106 2.503007351
      108 2.598351526
      110 2.695477835
      112 2.794386278
      114 2.895076855
      116 2.997549566
      118 3.101804411
      120 3.20784139
      122 3.315660503
      124 3.425261751
      126 3.536645133
      128 3.649810648
      130 3.764758298
      132 3.881488082
      134 4
      136 4.120294052
      138 4.242370238
      140 4.366228559
      142 4.491869013
      144 4.619291602
      146 4.748496324
      148 4.879483181
      150 5.012252172
      152 5.146803297
      154 5.283136556
      156 5.421251949
      158 5.561149476
      160 5.702829138
      162 5.846290933
      164 5.991534863
      166 6.138560927
      168 6.287369125
      170 6.437959456
      172 6.590331922
      174 6.744486523
      176 6.900423257

    11. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension fail.

      He didn't say Canada never sees winds above 100 kph.

      He said he lives in an area of Canada that never sees winds above 100 kph.

      Big difference.

      For the record, the Interior of BC where I live sees gusts above 100 kph. Not very often, though, and rarely for very long.

    12. Re:Level 7 on modified Saffir scale by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension fail.

      Says the person who missed the implied "words between the lines."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  7. Supter-Typhoon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never heard of one of those.. must be new.

    -db

  8. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0, Troll

    I also can't demonstrate my points in reality, and rely on fiction as the entire basis of my perspectives. Let's have an Atlas Shrugged party together(BYOB, parasites).

  9. This proves global warming is a hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Everybody knows wind is cold.

    1. Re:This proves global warming is a hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows wind is cold.

      Never ridden a motorcycle in 43C/110F day? That wind feels like a hair dryer set on Hot/High.

  10. Not Climate Change by hoboroadie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Remember kids, this is weather, not climate, and just natural a oscillation of the normal pattern.
    We sure couldn't afford to have this sort of shit every year.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Not Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Actually climate is just weather over time. This is the largest typhoon to hit land in MEASURED HUMAN HISTORY OF WINDSPEED.

      So you don't actually know enough to say it's a "natural" oscillation. This is why you shouldn't pretend to understand climatology.

    2. Re:Not Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might just have been WHOOSHED by winds of over 195mph.

      We sure couldn't afford to have this sort of shit every year.

      Sounds like ironic sarcasm to me.

    3. Re:Not Climate Change by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to say it's just a natural oscillation. "hurricane frequency and intensity vary naturally over time". There.

      You could make the stronger statement, "hurricane frequency and intensity are strongly influenced by a trace gas in the atmosphere that it is hypothesised strongly influences the Earth's radiative balance", but that would be extremely silly. Please also note that this is almost certainly more related to the PDO than it is to the SUV you almost certainly drive.

    4. Re:Not Climate Change by NotFamous · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is a result of Obamacare.

      --
      Some settling may occur during posting.
    5. Re:Not Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last recorded storm of this magnitude was 1979. What me? Read the article? Phshaw...

      Expect a cooler winter next year. That is a massive heat dump out of the pacific.

    6. Re:Not Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is a result of Obamacare.

      Really? I thought it was happening to foreign people that were un-American and used that new-fangled metric system and didn't have oil, so we didn't care one way or another about them.

    7. Re:Not Climate Change by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I am not a mathematician but I don't think the heat transfer from the phase change actually sends much of that out away from the planet. TFA mentioned ocean temperatures of 30C. That sounds like a catastrophe factory to me.
      BTW, everybody, I'm sorta proud to be thought a troll, but a simple look at my history will clarify that my original post was yet another lame attempt at sarcasm.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  11. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    The preceeding post clearly demonstrates factual points in a real manner.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  12. Re:oh noes by Krojack · · Score: 2

    But what can the /. community do? We're all underpaid tech nerds living off Ramen noodles. =(

  13. Re:oh noes by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The storm isn't killing anyone or making them homeless. Poor planning, over population, and lack of education are.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  14. I blame China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  15. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    Could you pretend to have a point? In the context of the post, I was pretending to not care about facts at all; including a factual argument would have weakened the point.

  16. Largest and most intensive trop system since Charo by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Funny
  17. Re:cue up Kanye by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 0

    That's nice dear!

  18. Re:The fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why "blame" human emissions for being scientifically linked to warming which is also linked to larger storms?

  19. Tornado the size of a hurricane by karchie · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm no meteorologist but those wind speeds would make this an F4 tornado. We get tornadoes here in the middle of North America, but they don't last for days. Good luck to everybody there.

    --
    You knew the job was dangerous when you took it. -- Super Chicken
    1. Re:Tornado the size of a hurricane by omnichad · · Score: 2

      With gusts up to an EF-5.

  20. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by fermion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes. Obama created this storm to destroy his Kenyan birth certificate that his mother secreted at an Indonesia Bank as it was foretold by a witch doctor before his birth that he would one day be president and it would be necessary to conspire to plant a fake birth certificate and an announcement in a Hawaii while securely deposited the real documents in a place far from the reach of the Fancy Haired One that would someday come searching for it. This not so farfetched. I have seen many claims that this supernatural powered president created Sandy to win the election. Two Sup(t)er Storms! How grand.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  21. Re:The fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nanananananananana, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, Nanananananananana

  22. Re:typical American imperialism by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 2

    Are you serious? The average American weighs 450lb.

  23. Re:oh noes by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah how dare they live where natural disasters could hit! They should be in one of the few regions in North America or Europe which have an unusually low number of natural disasters. Anywhere else and you might as well be sitting on god's shooting range like those crazy Japanese who nobody ever offers aid to due to their recklessness.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Re:oh noes by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    This one goes beyond the bad category, is not the same falling from a chair than falling from the top of a building. We are getting a hint on how bad could be "extreme" weather, much stronger than Sandy and Katrina. You really don't want any of this "bad weather" hit any place near you, and it could become the new normal.

  25. Where "on record" means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming that by "on record" you mean a roughly 100 or perhaps (let's be generous) a 500 year period during which Western sailors might have known the area and kept logs. The 500 years is roughly 1/10th of human history, which is 0.005 of a million years during which human-like species roamed the planet. OK, human-like species were around longer than that; but let's keep it simple. Move the decimal again and you get into an era with no humans, but plenty of dinosaurs and shit. That's be the shitaceous era, which encompasses several other epochs. So. Our recorded history covers 0.0005 times that. I suppose it wouldn't be fair to go back to when the Earth was a molten glob and the proto-Moon collided with it. Now that's one helluva typhoon.

    1. Re:Where "on record" means... by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I suppose it wouldn't be fair to go back to when the Earth was a molten glob and the proto-Moon collided with it.

      You're absolutely correct when you say that.

      Now that's one helluva typhoon.

      No, no it is not. A typhoon is an atmospheric event and requires, you know, an actual atmosphere in which to occur.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  26. bet they are happy .... by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    That US bases there. Plenty of extra help.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:bet they are happy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No US bases in philippines since 1992.

    2. Re:bet they are happy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. :)

      Though the Philippines now wants us back due to China.

    3. Re:bet they are happy .... by varmfskii · · Score: 2

      Can't have the U.S. back unless they amend their constitution. It currently prohibits the stationing of foriegn troops in the Philippines.

    4. Re:bet they are happy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I was just checking. We have a small force there now, and the phillipine gov. asked the US to increase it last July. So, we are stepping it up, as a 'temp' base, instead of a permanent base.

  27. Re:The fault by lookingglass · · Score: 1, Troll

    This storm is weather. Global warming just makes it more likely that you will get this weather. So no, the storm was not caused by global warming.

  28. Some relief agencies by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure that the relief agencies would be happy to take a donation. I think these are correct, but double check for yourself. I apologize for not including everybody, please don't let that stop you from making a donation.

    American Red Cross
    British Red Cross
    Canadian Red Cross
    Australian Red Cross
    New Zealand Red Cross
    Irish Red Cross
    Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
    Croix-Rouge Francaise
    Röda Korset
    Røde Kors
    Røde Kors
    Rode Kruis
    Schweizerisches Rotes Kreuz
    Croce Rossa Italiana
    Cruz Roja Española
    Polski Czerwony Krzyz

    Salvation Army donations

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Some relief agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't donate because they don't accept Bitcoins or World of Warcraft gold.

    2. Re:Some relief agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even homeless Filipinos have standards, apparently.

    3. Re:Some relief agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post, cold fjord!

      (I tend to criticize many of your posts, but this one deserves its moderation, and then some. Very good.)

  29. Re:oh noes by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    efinitely fit the description "stuff that matters".

    Yes, it matters on the whole. No, it doesn't really belong on a tech news website, but then again, a good percentage of the stuff coming through the firehose is tabloid tripe these days.

    I don't have anything against helping people out but I read /. to get away from the drama of reality for awhile. You might as well put one of those stupid red tickers at the bottom of the page and be done with it.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  30. You didn't, for a start. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever watched TV?

    Ever noticed that EVERY SINGLE NEWS segment ends with a "look at the weather".

    Weather.

    News.

    You wouldn't believe it, would you.

    1. Re:You didn't, for a start. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It's called a 'tease'. The weather segment gets the highest ad rates. It doesn't matter that the department is run by soothsayers.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re: You didn't, for a start. by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      soothsayers are more reliable.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  31. Not for anything by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    But winds of 195MPH and up would decimate most of the eastern coast of the U.S. that's insane.

    1. Re:Not for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just hope the red light cameras get knocked out first. I'd hate to see the ticket when my car gets blown through a red light when moving near 200MPH!

  32. Re:typical American imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pssst... hey, buddy, if you're trying to make a joke, try to NOT make it sound word-for-word like what a libertarian whackjob would really say.

    Unless you seriously believe that drivel, in which case, well, I have to admit, you're definitely the better joke.

  33. Happy to help - You are welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure this means that the US government will be sending money and equipment their way at the expense of the US taxpayer.

    1. Re:Happy to help - You are welcome by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Good heavens, no! I hope that you and your family will be able to eat next year, despite the extra $5.27 you paid in federal taxes for foreign aid and relief. It accounts for a whopping 1% of the federal budget.

    2. Re:Happy to help - You are welcome by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nah, last time Indonesia refused help from the US, they were afraid of Christiand pushing their beliefs in a Muslim nation. There were "relief" workers who showed up with cases of bibles and no food or supplies. They were a drain on relief resources, and in direct violation of their pledges. US "help" is often rejected because we lie and go in with ulterior motives.

  34. followup to recent 7.1 earthquake by jcgam69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck the PI a few weeks ago which cause widespread damage to buildings and infrastructure. Bridges collapsed and many roads are still impassible. The earthquake and hundreds of strong aftershocks serve to intensify the effects of this storm.

    1. Re:followup to recent 7.1 earthquake by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck the PI a few weeks ago which cause widespread damage to buildings and infrastructure. Bridges collapsed and many roads are still impassible. The earthquake and hundreds of strong aftershocks serve to intensify the effects of this storm.

      In case it is not fully clear... the earthquake exacerbated the effect on human infrastructure and safety. It did not intensify the windspeed or lower the pressure of the storm.

      I'm sure 99% of people will read it in this manner, I just want to forestall the 'earthquakes cause superstorms' correlation.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    2. Re:followup to recent 7.1 earthquake by dlingman · · Score: 1

      No, this is what you get if you sacrifice the wrong colour of goat. Forgetting the entire goat earns you a free visit from Balmer.

  35. No, that was extremely silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Saying "but that would be extremely silly" is the extremely silly part.

    Well, maybe saying this: "the SUV you almost certainly drive." tops it in crass stupidity, but it's a close run thing.

    Here you go: CO2 isn't only a product of SUVs.

    And that temperature? 33C of it is from the greenhouse gasses that blanket the earth, the single largest contributor that has no control to remove on a century to millenia timescale is CO2, the other (H2O) raining out within weeks and therefore not self-sustaining on even monthly scales.

    So what do YOU think happens to temperatures when the CO2 is increased 40%?

    H2O increases.

    And that's the top two of the GHGs that caused that 33C warming.

    So lets go along to this PDO. Thought question (I realise you're not equipped to actually think, but what the hell): if the earth were 50C colder, then how much would the same magnitude shift in the temperature of these waters that we currently get with PDO affect the climate?

    Here's a hint: fuck all.

    Because an oscillation doesn't cause hurricanes.

    What DOES cause hurricanes?

    Sea surface temperature is a big one.

    And 33C of that temperature is due to GHGs that we've just upped one by 40%, increasing the effect of the other top contributor.

    So what is that CO2 from your SUV doing that's so special it doesn't work like any other CO2 molecule?

  36. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting,eh? This is when Slashdot moderation gets scary.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  37. Re:oh noes by AndrewBuck · · Score: 1

    You can help out directly by creating an account on openstreetmap.org and then helping to map the buildings in the (likely) most affected city of Tacloban. We have set up a task manager job to track the progress of the mapping work at the link below. Every little bit of extra mapping work helps out first responders by giving them a better picture of where aid is likely to be needed. Imagine trying to navigate around a city of 200,000 people without decent maps and then on top of that, a city where many roads might be blocked or flooded, preventing you from taking what is normally the most direct route. Having buildings mapped also helps signifigantly with damage assessments that are also critical to relief work.

    http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/338

  38. Re:typical American imperialism by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

    DON'T TREAD ON ME!!!!

  39. dry run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is just to test the the new nuke reactors in vietnam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_energy_in_Vietnam

  40. Re:oh noes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what can the /. community do? We're all underpaid tech nerds living off Ramen noodles. =(

    Sounds a lot like offshore workers in the Phillipines.

  41. Re:typical American imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you stole them. We saw you.

          - I'm no small Glurmo, but at least I'm from Oz...

  42. Re:oh noes by Sique · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone with a brain mod the grandparent flamebait. Poor planning doesn't kill. Planks falling down from houses do. Poor planning, overpopulation and lack of education just decrease the life expectation by increasing the chance of an early death.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  43. Re:oh noes by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    People are welcome to live where they want, but it does help to build something strong enough to keep the rain out. There is no such thing as a 'natural' disaster. Poverty and corruption and negligence are responsible for the suffering.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  44. Re: Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This storm is clearly a false flag operation intended to take away attention from Obamas obsession with denying our second amendment rights.

  45. Re:Soulskill gets it wrong -- yet again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is from yesterday, it has gotten stronger since then.

  46. 10 feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about using metric system (ISO standard)?

  47. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Yes. Obama created this storm to destroy his Kenyan birth certificate that his mother secreted at an Indonesia Bank ...

    Really? I heard that was all just a plot to help hide the fact that Obama is a lizard man* and Biden used to wear a mullet (party on Joe!).

    * That was enlightening. There are some Slashdotters I can peg to a number of those theories..

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  48. Typhoon Ida (1958) was more intense by Sara+Chan · · Score: 2

    Typhoon Ida (1958) had sustained winds of 200mph. That means that the energy in its winds was about 5% greater than the energy in the 195mph winds of Typhoon Haiyan (squaring speed to get approximate wind energy).

    1. Re:Typhoon Ida (1958) was more intense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sustained vs peak. 195 is the SUSTAINED wind speed, peak is well over 200.

    2. Re:Typhoon Ida (1958) was more intense by FirstOne · · Score: 2

      Super typhoon Ida achieved it's maximum intensity well out at sea when it had a tiny eye, similar to Wilma when it rapidly intensified in it's early stages. Ida subsequently lost most of energy before it landfall in Japan as a cat-3.

      Meanwhile Super Typhoon Haiyan made landfall at near peak intensity with an eye wall diameter of nearly 20km..

      .

  49. Re:Soulskill gets it wrong -- yet again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it hasn't. It's weakened over land.

    And there's plenty of debate about the top speeds which have been inferred from satellite images. Speeds measured at the surface are much lower.

  50. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    The "Fancy Haired One"? What's scary is that could be applied to several people of similar political bent.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  51. Re:oh noes by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah how dare they live where natural disasters could hit! They should be in one of the few regions in North America or Europe which have an unusually low number of natural disasters.

    People tend to live in places which have some unique economic advantage: fertile ground, a navigable river or deep water port. The miner will be looking for mountain-building, the rancher, grasslands on which to raise cattle. To get what you want you can't always play it safe.

  52. Re:oh noes by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Wow I thought I was well clear of the Poe effect...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  53. When they come to clean it up... by BobMcD · · Score: 2

    ...hopefully they'll leave the cholera at home this time.

  54. Re: Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    Exactly. But Obama's even trickier than that... he hides his bias against guns by cleverly signing bills to increase places people can take them. National parks and Amtrak. Diabolical!

  55. Re:oh noes by DexterIsADog · · Score: 2

    Walk up to a New Jerseyite whose beach house on LBI was flattened by Sandy and tell him it wasn't a natural disaster, it was "corruption and negligence" (not poverty, those houses aren't cheap). Go ahead, tell him that. Then report back your findings.

  56. Global Warming is Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh, let the karma roll in...

  57. US WWII Fleet was caught in one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the results were pretty bad. I think that Halsey steered right into it.

  58. Re:oh noes by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, fuck 'em. I feel the same about the assholes who rebuilt their houses in the same place they were flooded out by the Mississippi river, and demanded to be covered by their insurance at the same rates! The Mexicans sat under Wilma for 48 full hours and nobody died and property damage was minimal, including the houses on the beach. Lights were back on in the center of town in less than 12 hours. Well made concrete and underground electrical lines hold up pretty well. Sorry, I cannot sympathize. Their houses were flattened because they were not built to withstand a little wind and rain. A hurricane should not be a big deal. And they aren't with a little foresight and proper planning, and a lot less tolerance for corrupt government/corporate power. They serve as a reminder to stock up on more beer.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  59. Re:Soulskill gets it wrong -- yet again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first link (the one that mentions Tip) is from noon yesterday. if you look at the second link it gives a decent timeline, the noon entry quotes 190 just like the first link does. However it later says 195.

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Re:oh noes by OneAhead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wilma had wind speeds of 240 km/h at the time it made landfall in Mexico. Haiyan had wind speeds of 315 km/h when it made landfall (highest wind at landfall ever recorded). Knowing that structural stress on buildings goes approximately with the square of the wind speed (kinetic energy and things), that's almost twice as powerful. Many general aviation airplanes (for example the cessna 172) have "never exceed speeds" that are lower than 315 km/h; in other words, if you make a dive and reach that kind of speed, you're at risk of your airplane disintegrating. I have strong doubts about the economic feasibility of building houses that can reliably withstand such wind speeds, especially in poorer countries. It's like trying to mount a house on top of a (non-American) high-speed train and take it to top speed.

  62. Re:oh noes by OneAhead · · Score: 2

    ...so instead of making snarky remarks on the internet about unrealistic building standards and people making the bad choice of being born in a poor country, better pray for those who will lose their lives in that monster.

  63. Re:oh noes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walk up to a New Jerseyite whose beach house on LBI was flattened by Sandy and tell him it wasn't a natural disaster, it was "corruption and negligence" (not poverty, those houses aren't cheap). Go ahead, tell him that. Then report back your findings.

    No, it was building on a temporary geological structure (a barrier island is just that, no matter that it seems like it has always been there to humans) and expecting it to remain a permanent structure because one bought a house there that was the source of the disaster.

  64. Re:oh noes by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    Build with what? There are plenty of people who live in shacks made of simple materials because having a roof over their head is better than saving up for 1000 years at their rate of income for a house built according to western standards.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  65. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be joking, but I can assure you when you are born into a prominent family like he was it is almost certain you will wind up President regardless of your wishes and aspirations.

  66. not what I voted for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    honestly, Obama's like the worst socialist ever .

  67. different beasts, but yeah by almechist · · Score: 2

    I'm no meteorologist but those wind speeds would make this an F4 tornado. We get tornadoes here in the middle of North America, but they don't last for days. Good luck to everybody there.

    Very strong tropical cyclones like this one do contain very high sustained winds equivalent to what you would find in a significant (F3 or higher) tornado, which is why the NWS occasionally issues blanket tornado warnings for areas lying in the path of the most intense and dangerous part of a hurricane's eyewall, which is usually the NE quadrant. The practice is controversial, though, and has been inconsistently applied. Keep in mind that wind speed isn't everything when it comes to how much damage is done by a storm, in a tornado there are sudden shifts in pressure and wind direction that you wouldn't necessarily find in a cyclone's eyewall, while the winds from a cyclone generally last a lot longer and of course with a cyclone you also have storm surge and flooding to worry about. Both types of storm are incredibly dangerous, but a structure that might survive the one could still be totally wiped out by the other, and vice versa, even if the wind speeds involved were pretty much the same.

  68. Re:The fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know what you're talking about. So no.

  69. Re:Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soo true; and President Bush created Hurricane Katrina because he didn't like black people from New Orleans. Moreover FEMA did so an Intentionally lousy job because the head of FEMA was a racist and wanted to get all the black people out of New Orleans. It is not only Republicans that play the silly partisan game. Both sides have been doing it. It is time to come together as USians and stop this left / right debate. The Chinese and Mexicans are all united and they all want your job.

    “If we do not hang together, we shall surely hang separately.”
    Thomas Pain

  70. Re:oh noes by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    This isn't a tech news site, it's a STEM news site -- and meteorology and climatology are both sciences.

  71. Re:cue up Kanye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    global warming doesn't care about poor people

    Nope, sorry... global warming is false. This is all part of God's plan. Someone in the Philippines must have admitted they support gay marriage.

  72. Re:oh noes by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

    Most things being reported by mainstream newsmedia fit the description "stuff that matters". The question is, why does this matter to STEM nerds, which ostensibly is the intent of this website? (I say STEM nerds because just about anyone interested in a particular thing can be called a " nerd" nowadays; however this website started when nerd had a more specific meaning.)

    The answer is, Slashdot cherry-picks clickbait, polarizing-to-STEM-nerds stories out of mainstream newsmedia. Rather than having any real STEM connection, they are merely topics about which STEM nerds tend to have strong opinions about. Common topics are almost always political: political debates climate change, political debates about alternative energy, political debates about privacy, American politics, and American foreign policy. (Note I did not say scientific or technical discussions of those topics. This website doens't really have those.) Even the Microsoft stories, which are at least about a tech company instead of about politics or mainstream news, tend to be non-tech pieces about how terrible Microsoft's business practices are, or yet another article about how Win8 Metro sucks.

  73. Supter-Typhoon Haiyan by phluid61 · · Score: 1

    "... called 'Supter-Typhoon Haiyan'" yes, apparently, but _meant_ to be called 'Super-Typhoon Haiyan.' One typo should not be allowed to propagate so far across the internet. Next thing people will be misspelling 'colour' everywhere, or something equally ludicrous.

  74. Re:Hair dryer? by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was more like a blast furnace. Riding through the Sacramento Valley in summer, leathers zipped and gauntlets on, I used to marvel at the fools in shorts and shirtsleeves, and wonder how they survived at all. By around 160kph every leak or gap in my protection felt as if it was on fire.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  75. 10K dead by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I made a bit of a joke the other day, but I hope that the DOD is pushing a large number of ppl into there to help. Like Haiti, Philippines has a long and complicated history with the USA, and we need to help.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  76. Re: Manbearpig in 5...4...3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either way, I am well-hung. Chew on that bitch!

  77. Re:oh noes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, praying will do them lots of good. Much better than demanding their government actually use the money they steal to actually provide some assistance..... idiot.

  78. Re:oh noes by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    s/pray for/think of/

    Happy now... you empty headed animal food trough wiper?

  79. Re:oh noes by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Also, did you realize you're replying to a post that was made shortly before the typhoon hit any major population center? Since we currently don't have the technical means to artificially deflect or weaken a typhoon, and preparations were in full swing, what would you do? Thinking about these people for a minute is a good humbling experience, and makes one more likely to donate to aid efforts later on.

  80. Re:oh noes by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Uh, I was responding to a comment about Sandy and New Jersey. Poverty is hardly an issue for those people with their beach houses there. And if they want to rebuild, they damn well better do it right next time. As for the Philippines, corruption is the cause of the poverty and whatever disasters they suffer, not nature. And like the AC said, praying for them doesn't do squat. Try harder.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  81. Re:oh noes by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Uh, I was responding to a comment about Sandy and New Jersey.

    Short memory much? The person you were defending there was talking about the Philippines.

    As for the Philippines, corruption is the cause of the poverty and whatever disasters they suffer, not nature.

    Dude, are you living under a rock? As I pointed out in the preceding post you so conveniently ignored, this was an exceptional record-breaking typhoon. No non-corrupt advanced city on earth would have weathered that storm without significant loss of life and human suffering.

    As for your point that corruption exacerbates poverty, which in turn exacerbates loss of life and suffering in the case of a natural disaster, that's true of course. But... picture yourself being born in a poor and/or corrupt country. What are you, as an individual, going to do about it? How would you like it if I say (paraphrasing your words): "fuck you, you're corrupt and negligent. Your house was flattened because it was not built to withstand a little [270km/h gust] wind and rain. A well-made house [which you can't possibly afford] would have held up pretty well."

    And like the AC said, praying for them doesn't do squat. Try harder.

    Unfortunate choice of words, addressed here and here before your post. Referring to that last link, you in particular would benefit from pausing for a moment to think of those people, as you have not displayed the basic empathy to put yourself into their place. "Try harder" indeed.

  82. Re:oh noes by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I was responding to this specifically before you jumped in. The disaster is still man made. I did not specify which man. Though I will say now that the ones on top the totem pole are the ones to look at. They neglected to care for their people. Hurricanes, regardless how big, don't make surprise attacks these days.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”