Slashdot Mirror


Sears To Convert Old Auto Centers Into National Chain of Data Centers

1sockchuck writes "Sears plans to convert dozens of Sears Auto Center stores into a national chain of server farms, saying it wants to be "the McDonald's or Starbucks of data centers." The strategy is an evolution of Sears Holdings' previously announced plan to turn old Sears and Kmart stores into IT centers. Instead, it will focus on the more than 700 Sears Auto Centers, which include many stand-alone cement buildings on mall perimeters. Ubiquity Critical Environments, the data center arm of Sears, will team with Schneider Electric to turn these sites into data centers. They'll use repeatable modular designs to add power and cooling infrastructure, targeting at least 23 smaller cities where there currently aren't many options for IT outsourcing."

167 comments

  1. Trying a new business model by cpicon92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's commendable that Sears is trying something new instead of trying to sue its way out of irrelevancy. Whether or not it will work remains to be seen, though...

    1. Re:Trying a new business model by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      If the price were absolutely right, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.

    2. Re:Trying a new business model by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Seems like they sell it as a close but pricey for everything play.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on how secure and reliable it is. Prefab has its benefits until disaster strikes.

    4. Re:Trying a new business model by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      If the price were absolutely right, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.

      If their service reliability and scalability is well above industry averages and they have excellent backbone connectivity to their suburban mall parking lots, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat. But that's a long shot.

    5. Re:Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Solid as Sears.

      They used to say to that when you drop off your car at the auto center that you could go in an shop for tools or maybe look into getting Allstate insurance. Now the outlook is cloudy.

    6. Re:Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for Sears, where wold I go to shop for clothes in 1983???

    7. Re:Trying a new business model by aztracker1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The irony is they (Sears) shut down their Catalog support after the internet started to really take off. They were in a position to be what Amazon is now, back when Amazon was just books, and already had the infrastructure to support it... Even if they just put their catalog online in 1997 (with telephone ordering/payments), they'd still be very relevant today. "We tried that with Prodigy, the Internet is just a fad."

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    8. Re:Trying a new business model by immaterial · · Score: 5, Funny

      It does make a lot of sense. Unlike their future-proof retail stores, automotive services are too easily purchased over the Internet nowadays. I mean seriously, who isn't buying oil changes on Amazon?

    9. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I used to work at a Sears Auto Center as a stock clerk when I was fresh out of high school. They have an underground basement that is essentially a bunker that is the same size as the enter area above it.

      It's a fantastic idea. It's built like a bunker, and certainly not the regular pre-fab. Remember, these centers have to be seriously strengthened to handle the weight of the cars on top of it.

      I'm looking forward to see what they do with it.

    10. Re:Trying a new business model by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

      But seriously, folks, I did happen to buy an oil change on Amazon recently, through their "Amazon Local" service. But it was from a local Goodyear dealer, not from Sears Auto.

    11. Re: Trying a new business model by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but only a Die Hard would really seek out using Sears Auto for their data needs...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They have an underground basement that is essentially a bunker that is the same size as the enter area above it.

      Underground facilities don't handle flooding very well, though.

    13. Re:Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least they are starting out well in regards to battery backup.

      jr

    14. Re: Trying a new business model by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      Well, now you've let the cat out of the bag about how they were going to handle power uptime.

    15. Re:Trying a new business model by aaronb1138 · · Score: 2

      No, but small auto shops are consolidating. The internet, especially YouTube, has opened the door to amateur auto mechanics who wouldn't have learned otherwise. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the privately owned shops have become so inconsistent from shop to shop in honesty and competence that most people feel (are) safer taking it to the dealership. Again, communication enabled by the internet has increased the awareness of consumers that frequently the work the shop did was bs or overpriced.

    16. Re: Trying a new business model by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      most of usa doesn't get any flooding at all.. and if they were on floodplains, they'd be water damaged already.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:Trying a new business model by cusco · · Score: 2

      Worked as a service writer for a while, and quite a few people would come in for an oil change at our shop even though we were almost twice the price of the quick-lube place down the road. The selling point was "Our mechanics weren't flipping burgers or cutting lawns last week."

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    18. Re:Trying a new business model by icebike · · Score: 1

      If their service reliability and scalability is well above industry averages and they have excellent backbone connectivity to their suburban mall parking lots, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat. But that's a long shot.

      Why would that be a long shot?

      This type of equipment, racks and blades and switches, is dirt-f'ing cheap right now. Malls already have big pipes, and if they aren't big enough getting bigger pipes isn't that hard.

      Most of these sears stores weren't in the Malls anyway, they were in the somewhat smaller strip malls.
      If they do it on a grand enough scale, it would make a good server farm, close to their commercial customers.

      I do worry about the name though... Ubiquity Critical Environments, = UCE (unsolicited commercial email).
      Dammit! Et tu, Sears?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:Trying a new business model by icebike · · Score: 1

      Where ever your mom dragged you.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    20. Re:Trying a new business model by icebike · · Score: 2

      The irony is they (Sears) shut down their Catalog support after the internet started to really take off. They were in a position to be what Amazon is now, back when Amazon was just books, and already had the infrastructure to support it... Even if they just put their catalog online in 1997 (with telephone ordering/payments), they'd still be very relevant today. "We tried that with Prodigy, the Internet is just a fad."

      Yup. They were both too early and too late to the same party.

      No vision except hindsight.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    21. Re:Trying a new business model by petsounds · · Score: 2

      My grandmother has some Sears catalogs from the 1800s. The 1800s! I mean, they made it a hundred years doing fairly well, but they couldn't seize the opportunity of the Web that they -- more than any other company in the USA -- were positioned to grab. It makes me kind of sad, not that I have any great affinity for Sears, but that it was a national institution throughout the 20th century (at least until the 70s where they started to decline) and they just couldn't adjust to the march of technology. But I guess you could say that about a lot of well-established American companies; resting on their laurels until resting turned to rusting.

    22. Re:Trying a new business model by contrapunctus · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's about suing, I think it's about defrauding their investors (the whole bankruptcy BS).
      Some of their stores are in really really prime real estate locations. They can just sell 1 store at a time and remain profitable for at least 50 years.
      I don't know what their strategy is now...

    23. Re:Trying a new business model by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hard to believe how ahead of their time Sears was on one hand, and how unbelievably myopic on the other. In the early 20th century, you could order a HOUSE from the Sears catalog. They would ship it in by train as a kit. A fucking HOUSE! Yet along comes the internet, and they completely missed its implications. Here is a company that *specialized* in having people in the boondocks order shit from a large catalog selection, and shipping it to them (and had been doing it for over 100 years). And they take one look at the internet and say "Eh, no opportunity there." Just amazing.

      Proof positive that you can get so locked into a certain mentality of how things are done that even the slightest attempt to step outside of that conventional thinking can completely elude you.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    24. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but only a Die Hard would really seek out using Sears Auto for their data needs...

      Agreed, but I wouldn't rule them out since they seem to be Craftsman at the retooling game...

    25. Re: Trying a new business model by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but apparently as a company they seem to Evolv in the wrong direction...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    26. Re:Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dealership I go to charges less than the oil change chain and they don't try to up sell. However, they are 30 minutes away and I have to wait up to an hour while the oil change place is 5 minutes away and it takes 10 or 15 minutes. It depends on how much time I have.

    27. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *smacks palm to forehead and sighs dramatically*

    28. Re:Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair though at the time their sales from storefront dwarfed the catalog. It was not even close. That and their shipping was horrible. When you would buy something they said 6-8 weeks. They meant it. Usually more like 10+ weeks was more like it. The other catalogs were destroying them. I could get the same quality stuff for less or the same and have it in 1-2 weeks. AND delivered to my house. At the end they made you goto the store to pickup. They do have online now. But the layout stinks. They are getting crushed by Amazon for good reason. Amazon is a better web store.

      I knew they were going downhill when they got rid of two sections that made no sense to get rid of. Toys and candy. Every kid out there wants both of those. People remember 'oh yeah I got *special toy* at sears'. Now 'oh yeah I got *special toy* on amazon'. Even to this day I still look to sears/kmart to buy things even though it is mostly crap. That is how powerful their brand was. They missed a huge amount of propaganda that could be drilled into a child's head. Instead they made the garden section bigger and the kids cloths bigger. No kid wants to go into either of those. So now those kids who did not grow up with sears toys and candy see it as a boring store, and it is.

      These days their stores are rather unpleasant to be in. They are usually very poorly stocked and things seem random. It varies from store to store and depends on the manager running it. Then if they do have a toy section it is not fun to be in. They are just stacked walls of stuff with some stuff you need to be a 6'5 adult to reach. They forgot to showroom their stuff to the idiots who will be begging their parents to let them have it. Let a kid touch a toy and they *will* want it.

    29. Re:Trying a new business model by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      They never were and never will be in a position to compete with Amazon:

      http://www.tmz.com/2009/08/20/the-perfect-grill-for-a-cannibal/

      At the time, they were running the show with 100s of offshore devs whose programming literacy I would place on a scale of non to bordering on competent. No version control. I am dead !@#$ing serious.

    30. Re:Trying a new business model by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      Internet. 100% internet. But building those properties using the Monty Python castle in a swamp strategy.

    31. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have an underground basement that is essentially a bunker that is the same size as the enter area above it.

      It's a fantastic idea. It's built like a bunker, and certainly not the regular pre-fab. Remember, these centers have to be seriously strengthened to handle the weight of the cars on top of it.

      I'm looking forward to see what they do with it.

      Sounds like a great place to cook meth.

    32. Re:Trying a new business model by undeadbill · · Score: 2

      I think it would be reasonable to assume that it could work. To go after under served markets like this, that is pure genius. Most of the cities that they will be targeting desperately need some kind of modern IT infrastructure for hire. I'm thinking of counties, school districts, and other municipal services tapping into this immediately. This also opens up markets for startups to migrate to, as well. Another thing to consider is that these small secondary market data centers can also serve as a showcase for selling services in building out data center space- again, Sears could offer their expertise to under served markets to local governments and such to update their infrastructure based on the Sears model (and I'm thinking about this because Sears used to sell flatpack houses in a similar manner).

      Sears auto centers have been built with a highly standardized construction model. This means that the installations of the data center equipment can be modularized and costs will be standardized, which leads to an overall savings when replicated across multiple sites. Most of the management for these sites can be handled remotely, requiring maybe one onsite technical staffer and a regional team of specialist consultants on dispatch. Everything else could be handled from a central data center, including updates, upgrades, site to site failover, etc. Sears's overall costs for doing this are going to be much lower than anyone else attempting this sort of venture.

      The buildings are already structurally sound, because they have to handle vehicle loads. Electricity is absolutely not an issue- they ran high draw equipment at the auto centers to begin with. Alarm system infrastructure is already there, and only needs modification. Sears very likely have easements in place already for data lines, so all they have to do is update existing connectivity (which has gotten much cheaper to do).

    33. Re: Trying a new business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Floor loading in garages are no higher than living rooms. Cars may be heavy, but the load is over a large area.

    34. Re:Trying a new business model by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      They WERE what Amazon WANTS to be... a location to pick up catalog merchandise in every town. Sears had that nailed in 1970. it was the "Internet" part that was too immature for them to see past it at the time.

      You'll note JC Penny's used to have exactly the same order-to-pickup setup and they haven't really managed to parlay that into any kind of meaningful traffic either and they were not hurting for business till the last few years.

  2. Seems like expensive space by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Or have malls been giving sweet deals to the big end cap stores? From a DC perspective if you can get servers inside metro Ethernet ranges that opens up a lot of consolidation opportunity to get servers out of closets and other non idea spaces.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:Seems like expensive space by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      With questionable bandwidth.

      A small server farm 10 miles away seams a bad compromise between local servers and a bigger data center.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Seems like expensive space by sandoz · · Score: 1

      The Metro Ethernet ranges are dumb as well. I wish the telco's would fix that.......AtoM anyone?

    3. Re:Seems like expensive space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Metro Ethernet ranges are dumb as well. I wish the telco's would fix that.......AtoM anyone?

      Ass to mouth? eww...

    4. Re:Seems like expensive space by msauve · · Score: 2

      Sears generally owns the properties, it doesn't lease them.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Seems like expensive space by aergern · · Score: 2

      Apparently the other articles were not read about the fact that Sears outright OWNS most of their space across the country. They are turning buildings they all ready own outright into data centers. And not just auto centers either but retail stores they've closed.

      --
      Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    6. Re:Seems like expensive space by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Sears probably owns a good number of KMarts as well. Sears Auto Centers is something I almost forgot about existing. The two old Sears/KMarts in my town stood vacant for years until a college took over one and Burlington Coat Factory took over the other one.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Seems like expensive space by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Or have malls been giving sweet deals to the big end cap stores? From a DC perspective if you can get servers inside metro Ethernet ranges that opens up a lot of consolidation opportunity to get servers out of closets and other non idea spaces.

      The article I read pointed out that many of the "end cap" stores are in 20- or 30-year leases. If the store has closed and you're on the hook for another 15 years, it makes sense to put something there. The same article mentioned that something like 85% of the population lives within 15 miles of at least one Sears store. If that's true, it would be quite and advantage for a distribution network.

    8. Re:Seems like expensive space by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      The Auto Centers are probably too polluted with oil and fluids to turn into retail or dining, so it may make sense.

  3. Wait, what? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "We at Sears hold substantial real estate with high retail value. So we're going to turn it into something that is best located where nobody else wants to go, since that's where taxes and traffic are lowest."

    Wait, what?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Wait, what? by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      “We really want to be the McDonald’s or Starbucks of data centers,”

      Wait, what? Sounds like these people heard the word "Technology" and signed at the bottom line, no?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Wait, what? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> something that is best located where nobody else wants to go

      Like their execrable stores evidently.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE5dJDgZ644#t=20

    4. Re:Wait, what? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Old shopping malls are precisely where "nobody else wants to go".

      Since businesses cannot be interrupted long enough to replace aging malls, building new malls then closing the old is standard where land is reasonably priced. Malls are disposable.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Wait, what? by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      McDonalds I can understand. Starbucks I can’t. Running a server farm is on the commodity end of the business. You are not looking to be fancy or cutting edge, you are looking to be reliable, low cost, and dull.

      Sears has gobs of real-estate coming out of its ears. This is one of the better ideas that I have heard. (Not saying it is a winner of an idea, just better than the other plans I have seen.)

    6. Re:Wait, what? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Just build the Wal*Mart, then close everything else.

    7. Re:Wait, what? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Yeah I guess. I was more going toward the point of it being Sears, going into the server-farm business. Any employees rolling over? Probably just higher management, fat cats. And wtf do they know about server-farms, much less who to hire that does. Sounds like there was a lot of brandy that night.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    8. Re:Wait, what? by cusco · · Score: 1

      If they're pairing with Schneider Electric they'll at least have competence on the infrastructure and physical security side.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    9. Re:Wait, what? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      except with the big Cable companies all colluding against nationwide IT structures, having a local Sears location on every LOCAL branch of the network might make a lot of sense especially for colocation of local businesses. There are tons of businesses that really want managed services but they want to be able to reasonably "touch it" if they feel the need. putting those in a familiar place would probably flip a lot of small businesses over to their side versus nameless giants like Rackspace.

    10. Re:Wait, what? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      nobody is building NEW malls, my local mall is pitifully staffed versus 10 years ago. 1/3 is probably empty space. Most of the NICE malls in my area have shops that are decidedly "C team" because they can't fill the space with name brands anymore.

  4. They are priced very well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They only take Discover though.

    1. Re:They are priced very well by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      Or the Sears card at 22%...

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:They are priced very well by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The name of these new data centers will be, wait for it, "Die Hard."

  5. Sounds Good by wrackspurt · · Score: 1

    But you need demand. Just because your bricks and mortar are in place in small centers it doesn't mean the demand is there. Still though if you've got the assets paid for and in place it's probably worth the try.

    1. Re:Sounds Good by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Do they have a clue what they're getting into?

      They might have the real-estate... but where the heck are they gonna get the fiber built to these facilities, and electrical infrastructure required to run them reliably? Huge capital expenditures....

      Aren't all the small businesses moving into the cloud?

      Is there really an underserved niche for more server farms, all across the country?

    2. Re:Sounds Good by wrackspurt · · Score: 1

      I dunno and I don't think they do. My guess, based on retail management types I've known, is that they were just trying to come up with something that would fit in the space and seem innovative. Personally I don't see why they just don't turn them into lube & brake shops.

  6. Have you been to a Sears lately? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to buy a lot of stuff from Sears. My shed and garage look like an advertisement for Craftsman. Sadly Even their tools have dipped in quality since being bought out by KMart. I know a few people who were pissed that they received a "made in China" replacement tool for one that was "made in the USA". I'm not as hung up on that. But when the original tool lasted for several decades and the replacement a few months, there's a problem.

    The stores were dirty and disorganized the last time I was in one, which hasn't been for several months. In my area they also started closing at 7:00 or 8:00 pm, which has caused them to lose my business on several occasions. I'm not sure why anyone would trust their data in a place that they will never see when they can't even make the public areas of the store presentable. It's kind of sad to watch them die a slow death.

    1. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by couchslug · · Score: 2

      Now that Craftsman have turned to shit, especially their ratchets, I have no use for Sears. There are plenty of other tool vendors.

      The K-martization of Sears is vile. I hope both companies crash and burn.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Now that Craftsman have turned to shit, especially their ratchets, I have no use for Sears. There are plenty of other tool vendors.

      The K-martization of Sears is vile. I hope both companies crash and burn.

      Yeah, once they turned the once-vaunted Craftsman tool line into run-of-the-mill cheap Chinese shit, it was game over. Luckily, there's still Snap On and SK. That being said, the last 3 appliances I got was from Sears.

    3. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      I know you'll probably slap me for being pedantic, but it's Sears that bailed out K-Mart. Not the other way around.

      You are mistaken, Kmart bought Sears.

    4. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to Klein for hand tools.. they're pretty decent.

    5. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a Sears about 2 weeks ago to buy some tools.

      When I did, I took it up to the counter where the cashier proceeded to purchase the item through the online system using an iPad. This seemed odd, as this adds several extra components to the checkout (he needed to unlock the iPad, sign into the system, needed functional wireless connectivity, functional web servers, etc), so I asked the cashier why he wasn't just using the standard Point of Sale register (as it wouldn't need him to login twice and find the item, then add it to the cart, then checkout and go through the payment system). He told me that the supervisors were pretty strict there about it and that he'd be reprimanded if he used the regular Point of Sale register too often, but we'd use the register if we had too many issues.

      After about 3 (unsuccessful) attempts at checking out, we went over to the old register and he rang up the items in a few moments.

      This seemed like an example of technology getting in the way of functionality and poor engineering for their own internal systems. I'd really question going to Sears for handling someone else's processing.

    6. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      At one point the website would require you to navigate 8+ slowly-loading, cookie-dropping pages after you'd pulled the trigger on wanting to buy something. I once witnessed the legal department getting its 2 cents in and forcing change on some logos that it didn't like the look of. Purely aesthetic concern. It is the single-most dysfunctional corporate culture I've ever encountered.

    7. Re:Have you been to a Sears lately? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      the thing is that they probably have really solid building services. Backup generators, lots of phone service, old warehouse space, etc. They've tried turning it all into "customer space" and it hasn't worked. They could probably take half the footage of the average K-Mart and wall it back off as server space then make the remaining space more edgy ... or just rent it to Amazon! but either way, if they rent what they have, then they "pay to keep the lights on" for each location and can find some other business to learn to use their space.

  7. Valuable real estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What most folks don't realize is how awful retail's network infrastructure is. Having a data center in the same city will dramatically decrease latency. If they turn around and contract with those malls, they might have something here.

    1. Re:Valuable real estate by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'm going out on a limb and say retails network infrastructure is 'good enough'.

      Anybody ever not able to buy something? Once at a place that did very little retail business. I used cash instead.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Valuable real estate by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I am going to guess at most larger retail the network is less than critical. I worked for a big box retailer for a couple years. I was writing financial software for them not store systems but I interfaced with the store systems developers and operations people a lot because obviously for financial cost control tools and stuff we needed lot of information about what was happening in stores each day.

      The network isn't critical. Each box store has its own AIX cluster that hosts everything needed to support the registers, price guns, time clocks, etc. It manages all the stores inventory etc. A few times a day the mainframe sweeps up sales history, inventory levels, whatever demand adjustments the local manager has keyed in, selling exceptions, time clock info needed for payroll etc.

      The store can run with the network down for a considerable period of time. About the only customer facing thing that might not work is the gift registry kiosk. Most employees would never notice anything was wrong either. Now after a couple days things might start to get interesting demand info won't be transmitted so you won't get restocked, you may be nearing a payroll window etc.

      If its happens connections are down or expected to be for a long time the stores GM knows how run a job that will put all the information on LTO tape, and it can get couriered back to HQ if connectivity can't be restored.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:Valuable real estate by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Having a data centre located in the mall would enable the mall to sell large amounts of digital content. Don't think CDs and DVDs, perhaps something like super duper immersive games.

    4. Re:Valuable real estate by symbolset · · Score: 1

      A big deal with cloud is the need for metro area redundancy. For storage this might include a Fiber Channel or iSCSI SAN and add some clustered fail over servers at least 50 miles from the primary site. For this to work properly with synchronous replication and seamless failover you need low latency and fairly direct routes. Many failed malls are almost perfectly located for this.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Valuable real estate by evilviper · · Score: 2

      The store can run with the network down for a considerable period of time. About the only customer facing thing that might not work is the gift registry kiosk. Most employees would never notice anything was wrong either.

      What the HELL are you talking about? Haven't you ever heard of CREDIT CARDS?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Valuable real estate by cusco · · Score: 1

      Big changes the last few years, then. The phone systems have gone IP, the HR and time clock systems run from a server at the District office.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:Valuable real estate by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Those failed over to pots lines in the back room. Transparent to those at the register mostly but likely a little slower.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Valuable real estate by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Failing-over to a redundant internet connection would be the smarter way to go, all-around... In fact it was years ago that our bank was trying hard to get us to replace all our old modem-based units with internet/IPSec based replacements.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  8. At least they are trying by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While i think its pointless and will only hasten their demise, at least they are trying to save themselves.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:At least they are trying by symbolset · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that Sears and KMart have been taking turns going bankrupt since I was a kid.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:At least they are trying by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I still remember when Sears ruled the retail world, and we looked forward to the xmas catalog each year.. Wwhen K-mart was still called Kresge, and we would go once in a while to the in-house food grill.. And Woolworth wasn't just a memory but an actual store...

      Different world today.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  9. RIP sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was over when kmart bought them. Instead of getting kmart prices and sears quality. We got kmart quality and sears prices.

  10. No thanks by msobkow · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't trust Sears to run a vaccuum cleaner.

    Most of their internal systems are still green-screens, FFS!

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:No thanks by DewDude · · Score: 1

      They *COULD* have upgraded to all new POS systems; but they decided to give some people jobs in retrofitting stuff.

    2. Re:No thanks by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >Most of their internal systems are still green-screens, FFS!
      So it probably works.

      The POS in my wife's yarn store is text mode (python+curses).
      It makes it a heck of a lot easier to maintain and you can log in from anything with ssh.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:No thanks by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Most of their internal systems are still green-screens
      and that's bad..why?
      Have a system that's custom, specific, easy to enter data, and doesn't change is a good thin for data entry.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's wrong with the green screen? Costco uses iseries/as400 pretty heavily on the back end. I work at a hotel that uses an iSeries to run it's hotel system and came from another that ran mutiple hotels on it.

      Guess what? It just works. ZERO unplanned downtime. Can't say that about the windows and unix based systems like Micros and Opera.

    5. Re: No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must like beta .slashdot.org...

    6. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running a data center should be done by people who don't have a damn thing to do with POS and/or inventory system. Who cares what they run at their cash registers?

    7. Re:No thanks by msobkow · · Score: 1

      There are a number of problems with the Sears plan.

      1. With green screen apps in house, where is their experience running a non-mainframe data center to come from?
      2. They're setting up facilities in retail space, which is more expensive than most, which will drive up costs.
      3. The locations aren't already configured with high speed pipes, power, and cooling -- all of which is expensive as hell to add when you're dealing with retail facilities that have customers wandering all over the place for the other vendors
      4. Sears hasn't turned a profit with any of their ventures in a good many years, so what do you do when they pull the plug on this future failure and leave you without service?
      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    8. Re:No thanks by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Most of their internal systems are still green-screens, FFS!

      That's the sign of a good, lean company. It at least means they don't have clueless executives forcing IT to switch all their systems to the latest fads every few years. They save money over PCs in up-front costs, maintenance, power, etc.

      And the green-screens don't indicate the back-end is ancient... There are extremely capable terminal servers available that are just network connected SSH clients, which can connect to Amazon's "cloud" just as easily as they could an on-site mainframe.

      I do admit to migrating several companies off of "green-screens", but it's typically a long, slow payback, which may only be advisable for the greater flexibility, and commodity prices of PCs versus the shrinking market for green-screens, and often moves along at the pace that existing (old) equipment dies off.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:No thanks by cusco · · Score: 1

      Schneider Electric are specialists in the "high speed pipes, power and cooling", and apparently they see enough of an opportunity here to make it worthwhile to be partners in this enterprise. They already own the property, so that's not a concern. Key is going to be who they partner with to manage the data centers.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    10. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer the Green Screens.

      A few weeks ago, I was in a Sears and they were forcing the cashiers to do checkout through an iPad that was connecting to the Sears website.

      After several failed attempts at checking out, the cashier brought me over to the green screen POS terminal and we checked out in a few seconds. The green screens are very effective. Certainly more effective than an iPad connecting to a website (there are dozens of additional points of failure with that model).

  11. it was going poorly? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    The only bad things I heard about the Sears auto thingy was the prices. With Circuit City gone though, they would do a better installation job on aftermarket equipment like backup cameras and subwoofers than Best Buy. I would think their profits would have gone up after Circuit City closed. What the heck happened?

  12. That's certainly thinking out of the Big Box by BLToday · · Score: 1

    That's certainly thinking out of the Big Box.

  13. So.... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will these Data-centers defraud their customers like the auto-centers did?

    http://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/23/business/sears-auto-centers-halt-commissions-after-flap.html

    Sears has been dead to me for at least 15 years, and it's not due to their irrelevancy. They have destroyed the public's trust in them with very long series of scams and deceptions. Remember the craftsman lifetime unlimited warranty on tools? Try getting them to fulfill that now... they just tell you they don't make that part anymore and offer you a coupon for a new wrench. Fuck sears, they should have died in the 80s.

    1. Re:So.... by mspohr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Recently decided to buy something from Sears mail order.
      It was a total disaster. First, their web site wouldn't take my correct address leading to a 6AM call from the East coast warehouse to sort out the address. They then shipped a cheaper substitute part (different part number) and insisted it was just fine. Wouldn't take a return or ship a replacement. Finally protested the charge to my credit card and got a refund.
      Never again.
      Ironic that Sears can't even do mail order right these days.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:So.... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      As I remember, their catalog sales operation was a can't-lose lottery. You filled out an order, paid for it, then picked it up when it arrived. But what you PAID for was what you ORDERED, and their policy of hiring the cheapest possible people to pack boxes meant that was not necessarily what you GOT. You might order an ignition feeler gauge and get a drill press...and if the reverse happened, you could always return it.

    3. Re:So.... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Or, you might order a cheap drill press like I did a few months back, and never have anything show up at all. Fortunately it was a "ship-to-store" situation where I would have paid at the store, but after calling the store twice to see if it had arrived only to be told "it didn't come in with this week's restock, try next Thursday", I ended up buying a press elsewhere. To this date I still haven't received a phone call, e-mail, or any other communications from them. You'd think they'd have wanted a several-hundred-dollar sale, but I guess not.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:So.... by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      As an ex-employee I'm all over dogging Sears but to be fair, that happened 21 years ago.

  14. Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You need three things to set up a server farm (apart from the servers and people to manage it..)

    1. A Building with lots of floor space.... Yea, An ex-auto repair building could do for that. Check..

    2. Connectivity to the internet... Uh, going to have to spend money on that one.. NO check..

    3. Electrical power, backup power, cooling, security infrastructure? Uh on, we don't have that either... No Check... But you'd have to spend money of all this anyway.

    I don't think this will work out all that well for them. All they have is floor space that is likely pretty expensive if it is located near any major retail but it will be fixed in size. They won't be building new buildings here or expanding by adding more stories. They won't be saving any money doing the conversion from auto repair stalls to server racks because they'd have to do that anyplace else they wanted to set this up. What's going to kill them is the network infrastructure, unless they don't care about reliability and have SLA's for their service that matches. Getting redundant high bandwidth links to these buildings could be expensive, if they are not already near high speed network connections. Comparing their costs to their competitors, I just don't see this working out. Their competition will be working on much larger facilities, located much closer to network infrastructure with lower cost structures and less limitations on their building sizes. Sears may be getting the building for free, but their other setup and operating costs will be higher.

    About the only way this is going to pay, even marginally, is if they can use their unique locations to provide points of presence for services like Netflix or Amazon video to cache content locally or something along those lines. Other than that, I just don't see this working out.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if they can use their unique locations to provide points of presence for services like Netflix or Amazon video to cache content locally or something along those lines.

      That is exactly what this is about. Netflix and Youtube are 50% of all US internet traffic now. These Sears properties are numerous and right in the middle of neighborhoods where the data consumers live. Network operators can offload huge amounts of peering traffic by caching bulk data close to clients.

      These properties are all near major roads in urban areas that can supply sufficient power and run fiber without much drama, but the fact is they don't need bullet-proof power or network service to stream bulk data; when a local cache drops out clients can be temporarily served by more distant servers.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sears will negotiate leases at mall sites for decades per term, the rental expense is already fixed, and they are under contract in most locations for another decade or two I suspect....

    3. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that physical proximity != internet proximity?

    4. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waat. if you have a datacenter in timbukton, North Dakota, you will definitely be better of caching data there than transporting data over a fiberlink from chicago or kansas city. they are going to do what akami and google have not done, and that is provide POP in rural regions rather than metropolitan

    5. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by bob_super · · Score: 1

      CEOs like to follow the trends. "Cloud" is the buzzword? Here comes Sears Cloud! Bonus check, please!

      More seriously, the advantage of the Sears usually central location is the availability of a central office not too far, which means potentially lots of bandwidth without ginormous installation costs.

      The power side? Ya, that's gonna hurt.
      But if they succeed the can get a check from the mall for providing heat for everyone in winter!

    6. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These properties are all near major roads in urban areas that can supply sufficient power and run fiber without much drama, but the fact is they don't need bullet-proof power or network service to stream bulk data; when a local cache drops out clients can be temporarily served by more distant servers.

      Bulk caches like that don't need and can't really use an auto center worth of floor space though....

      They need perhaps 2 48U racks. With each of the major CDNs cache boxes taking approximately 6 to 8U of space.

      The application is too small; and I don't think anyone will pay them much for doing that.

      There's plenty of caching already available at service providers' facilities.

      End user's traffic still has to go all the way to their provider's facility, before going out to edge cache devicenodes...

      It's unlikely that Sears will offer residential ISPs such a great deal, that the ISPs close down their server rooms and move everything into Sears' auto centers.

    7. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      2. Connectivity to the internet... Uh, going to have to spend money on that one.. NO check..

      Malls seem to always be very centrally located. Right near the interchanges of major freeways/highways, not far from big population centers, etc. And furthermore, I'm betting any decent sized mall already has more than 128K DSL lines going in and out, what with companies so heavily automating their inventory systems and needing reliable internet service to do so. Give that, I have to assume getting a few OC lines run to their mini-data centers is going to be considerably cheaper than some new building out in the middle of nowhere.

      3. Electrical power, backup power, cooling, security infrastructure? Uh on, we don't have that either... No Check...

      They'll have some "Electrical power" already. Being located in a mall, they might be able to just use existing (large) transmission lines. Building wiring will obviously need to be installed from scratch, but not paying for a transmission line is a big up-front savings.

      They will have some existing commercial cooling systems to build on, and with an operating store right next to it, it's possible they'll be able to combine duties for their HVAC and other maintenance personnel, saving money.

      They'll need some new, dedicated security guards for the data center. But they're probably in an area that's already getting frequent police patrols. The Sears auto center nearest me is located in a major shopping mall, which has it's own large police department satellite office.

      They'll still need to dump in a lot of money to convert it, but they're not starting from a hole in the ground in the middle of nowhere. Locating your data center in abandoned stores in shopping malls has some advantage.

      And in this case, Sears doesn't have to make a big profit on it... The property is essentially FREE, as their rental agreement surely has some stiff fines for early termination, so they're just trying to make *SOME* money off of it, rather than it being a complete loss.

      While this won't fly for big companies I've worked for that have a big and expanding footprint, the smaller ones that just need a single rack for DR, or just need faster/cheaper/reliable internet access than they can get at their offices for their web presence, could really benefit from small, conveniently located data centers like these. With the suburban locations, there might be an easy supply of inexpensive employees tired of commuting. And with the free rent, Sears might manage to offer some decent hosting prices. Hell, if Amazon can do it...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by swillden · · Score: 2

      You do realize that physical proximity != internet proximity?

      But lowering latency is very often all about getting physically closer. The protocols we use most require a few round trips to set everything up before they get going, so whatever lightspeed delays you have get multiplied significantly. And it gets really bad when you get a bit of congestion and drop a packet or three. Long tail (95th or 99th percentile) latencies are often two to three orders of magnitude greater than median latencies, so a millisecond or two can turn into serious sluggishness from time to time. Reducing the number of hops is also useful, because routers add latency too, but when you've squeezed all you can there you're left fighting the speed of light, and the only way to win that battle is to reduce distance.

      Of course, packets can take crazy routes. Physical proximity doesn't guarantee low latency, but it gives you a fighting chance, and distance does guarantee it's going to be slow.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Indeed, many malls have moderately robust HVAC and power - think of all the incandescent lighting used in retail, esp since these structures were built pre-CFL/LED. Many also have basic power backup (generators) to power emergency lighting for egress. It may not be *enough* for full redundancy, but if the infrastructure is there it can be easier to upgrade than to install from scratch.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    10. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a strange way to count to 3. 2+1+1+4 !=3

    11. Re:Not going to work out for them I'm afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malls usually have backup power. There's too many lost sales during an electricity outage for them not to do so. In smaller towns malls have the only backup power, so they often have telecommunications cabinets in one of the non-shopfront rooms.

      Malls also have airconditioning plant. Usually old, which means a simple upgrade of parts will upgrade their capacity.

      My concern would be around the quality of "remote hands". Big data centres get enough work their their staff see a lot of equipment. So there's not a huge risk in shipping them a card and asking them to use it to replace a faulty one. With a more distributed data centre the experience of the remote hands staff would be more of a concern.

      Financially, I'd be worried about the cost of fibre tails. They can vary by 1000x, so you'd want to have worked out the detail for enough representative sites to be sure of your figures.

  15. The Cloud has officially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jumped the shark.

  16. Whatabout "National Security Data Center" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring all your Dataz to Uncle Samz and the Nazional Security Letterz !

    Folks, don't eat spam. Here's some real meat: http://scherbius2014.de

  17. Sears is OK by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Craftsman servers come with a lifetime warranty?

    Actually, I'm not a hater - I have a lot of Craftsman tools, and have put them through a tom of abuse. They all have survived, despite my best efforts, with the exception of the screwdrivers. What can you do, they wear out, and they've always warrantied them for me.

  18. Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or have malls been giving sweet deals to the big end cap stores?

    Many mall owners are desperate. No new enclosed mall has been built in the US in the last ten years. (American Dream Meadowlands in New Jersey doesn't count; after two bankruptcies and a roof collapse, they're "on hold".) There are hundreds of dead malls in the US. If you have a use for mall-type space that doesn't have to be near customers, there's plenty of space available.

    1. Re:Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by Megane · · Score: 2

      Rackspace HQ is in a dead mall, but they don't locate their servers there because of the power it would require. I think they were originally only in an expansion section of the mall (the Mervyn's building), but now occupy all of it. The northern half of the mall interior can be seen on Google street view.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is another angle to this – the REIT tax exemption. Sears is cash poor but land rich.

      There is a quirk that Real Estate Investment Trusts don’t have to pay corporate tax if they pay out most of their profits. REITs included apartment and office buildings, public storage, warehouses, and maybe server farms. (IIRC Rackspace was trying to convert. I don’t know what become of that.)

      Sears is trying to figure out how to move it assets over. This could be a angle where they rent the building but outsource the server farms to their partners.

    3. Re:Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I was last at Rackspace in 2010, they had moved much of their operations to the part of the Windsor Park mall in San Antonio that used to house a Montgomery Ward's and looked to be progressing quite well. Despite the dread I had of moving there due to the terrible acoustics amongst a staff that was phone intensive, I thought it was a neat idea from an urban planning and community reinvestment perspective since much of the surrounding area was degrading economically with rising crime rates. I haven't checked up on them recently but the plan was to take the entire former mall over and convert it into their HQ, completing the move from their previous location at the old Datapoint building.

    4. Re:Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting from within the Winsor Park mall now. There are thousands of people here, and they're working on remodeling the last parts of the mall as office space. The mall has been our HQ for some time now.

    5. Re:Vacant malls are no longer expensive space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      City Creek in Salt Lake City, UT opened in the last year.

  19. Potential win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making money off their already owned space, lowering latency to local customers using their services and NOT taking up any more parking spaces doing both of the above! I wish more businesses would combine and leverage resources like this. The urban sprawl in the United States is a HUGE part of what's killing it right now.

  20. How about a dead mall? by bhhenry · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of this story of a data center currently in an old Boscov's that was interested in taking over the entire mall: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2013/06/13/cybernap-looking-to-expand-into-entire-failing-mall/

    --
    signature not found
  21. "cement buildings"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The buildings are made of concrete.

    Cement is just 1 ingredient in concrete, along with sand, gravel, and water.

  22. I work at Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I work at a Sears store (Well, while i'm finishing college, at least- I'll be an designer/engineer before long. )

    I read about this a few weeks ago in an investor press release. It's a nifty idea for sure, but I feel like they're shooting themselves in the foot a bit. There are a *lot* of people who seem to rely on those auto centers, and it definitely brings foot traffic into the stores. People seem to love buying a set of tires, getting a ridiculous amount of reward points back, and then spending it on clothing, or tools and what have you.

    I also really question if the back-end infrastructure exists for them to actually do this conversion to data centers as planned. I mean, they can't seem to get better then a 1 Mbps DSL? line to the store I work at (that EVERYTHING, far as I can tell; payment processing, computer terminals for training and paperwork, etc. is tied to) and just that alone seems to cause all kinds of sluggishness on the systems there. I mean, when a 2 minute training video takes 10 minutes to buffer, something just isn't quite right.

    There's other issues as well with the IT infrastructure, I think the POS terminal is from 2004-ish, and the software functional, if the DOS style interface slightly archaic. Inventory management, again late 90's era Palm-OS based devices, which I really question how they're still getting repair parts for....

    That said, they ARE trying to upgrade equipment. I know they're attempting to phase out the 90's era equipment and replace it with IOS devices (Which actually work rather well, kudos to an IT guy somewhere), but again our particular store doesn't seem to have that upgrade prioritized, for reasons even the regional manager doesn't understand. Heck, even a few stores are experimentally trying full-on RFID tagging. I truly wish I could do more to increase efficiency, but as a cashier, I'm rather limited in what I can do.

    I'm sorry the last Sears store you visited was a total mess- I try to to the best I can in my area (mens clothing, lol) to keep things clean, but it's often a losing battle. We're understaffed, if for no other reason then the pay at Sears simply isn't competitive compared to other retailers nearby. For instance, Sams's Club across the street is $9 USD starting, meanwhile we're looking at minimum wage, with no opportunity for an increase.

    I hear you about the tools as well- the American made stuff definitely had better quality control. Some of the wrenches and ratchets still are USA made, but I think globalization has been causing that to die a slow death. That said, lifetime warranty is lifetime- If you want to bring in a set of your grandpa's old, rusty craftsman wrenches and trade them in for new ones, You're more then welcome too.

    1. Re:I work at Sears by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I work managing Data Centers.

      There is no way this will ever get off the ground, and is just a ridiculous idea for so many reasons, I can barely count. This is clearly some "genius" idea from some marketing person attached to the Corporate Real Estate group within Sears trying to drum up excitement to help them liquidate their properties.

      There is plenty of "big empty box" real estate all over the country that's vacant. There's nothing special about these auto centers, including the 16 foot ceilings or whatever they're touting as significant. It takes much more than a big empty building to create a well designed Data Center. Here are a few items I think would be worth noting:

      1) Insufficient Electrical Utility Feeds - no way these Auto Centers have 5 or 10 MW of Utility coming to them. Plus, if they're in the parking lots of shopping malls, I don't see how you could install that type of Utility in a cost effective way.
      2. Insufficient Communications Infrastructure - similar to the Utility, there's no way there are OC-48's or multiple T1's coming into these sites, and the cost of putting them in through an existing parking lot is going to be miserable
      3. Generators - Getting permits and permission from adjacent business owners to put in multiple Generators on the site is going to be challenging at best. Good luck getting the Mall Owner to allow you to stack your place with loud, smoke producing Generators and run them whenever you want.
      4. Security - do I even need to say it? Can you imagine having to try to keep your place secure when it's regularly overwhelmed by Christmas shoppers parking next to your building, or the local skate kids practicing tricks on your curb after getting tossed from the shopping mall next door?
      5. Diesel storage - no way you're getting permission to put in a UST, and the risk of having an AST that's so accessible to vandals or thieves is going to be tricky. Ditto for trying to get tanker trucks to come in an fill your tanks easily.
      6. Chillers or Condensers - Either way, you need a lot of room to put your cooling infrastructure....more than is likely going to fit on the roof. That old parking lot around the Auto Center is going to get swallowed up quickly with gear.


      and on and on and on...

    2. Re:I work at Sears by operagost · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's so difficult about running power and telecom to an EMPTY building. Dig up the empty parking lot.

      I assume they aren't going to do this with properties that are directly adjacent to an existing mall... or perhaps, they are going to remodel to recover space.

      You run your generators all the time? That kind of terrible power infrastructure would make me nervous.

      Datacenters are smack-dab in cities like Philadelphia. They don't have trouble maintaining security or keeping their generators or HVAC.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:I work at Sears by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's so difficult about running power and telecom to an EMPTY building. Dig up the empty parking lot. I assume they aren't going to do this with properties that are directly adjacent to an existing mall... or perhaps, they are going to remodel to recover space.

      From TFA:

      While some auto centers are attached to mall-based retail stores, more than 50 are stand-alone facilities, located on the perimeter of shopping malls

      If you have an abandoned Auto Center, but it's adjacent to a large, functioning mall, it's going to be a logistical challenge to get the power lines and comm lines installed with minimal impact to the businesses adjacent to the area. Also, it could potentially be a challenge even finding enough capacity of either in that particular area. Retail areas of municipalities usually are not on a "priority one" section of the electrical grid whereas Hospitals and certain Industrial Areas tend to be. If you're planning a Data Center, you want to be on a "priority one" grid to be sure you get the first attention in the event of an extended outage.

      You run your generators all the time? That kind of terrible power infrastructure would make me nervous.

      ??? Not sure where you got that idea. However, it is industry best practice to run your generators regularly. I recommend weekly no-load tests, and at least quarterly load tests. I'm suggesting that a big shopping mall is likely to complain when you're belching black diesel smoke weekly when you spin your gens up for a few minutes.

      Datacenters are smack-dab in cities like Philadelphia. They don't have trouble maintaining security or keeping their generators or HVAC.

      Indeed, my point wasn't that the Data Centers in large cities are a security problem. I was pointing out that if you put one in the middle of a parking lot, adjacent to a large retail establishment, with multiple driveways, adjacent (busy) city streets, lots of pedestrian traffic, and the other things that come with a shopping district, THOSE THINGS are going to create security challenges.


      I don't think you're following me.

    4. Re:I work at Sears by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

      I'd argue most of those malls ALREADY have many of those things.

      Many malls are pushing 50-75 shops, so that's a LOT of electric and telco already present as well as UPS/FedEx/USPS drop points.

      Malls are often near highways which is where most of the fibre got laid so it's easy to add.

      Many malls already have basic backup generators (plus natural gas and such already ran) in place for stores, not to data center standards, but in place.

      These shops aren't "that big" that they need major renovation into data centers, they'r plain brick boxes right now. They are more the size of a telecom CO office. It's only now that everybody is Blade servers + SAN that it would even be practical to use the space.. again because they are SMALL enough not to be a major drain on power resources like the major centers are. I understand your point, as I work for a steel melting mill and many data centers are starting to catch up with OUR power usage.

      as far as security, the best security is often in plain sight. most of the abandon mall properties I see (at still used malls) are kept up on the surface pretty well. There's plenty of security already for the mall (to watch for parking lot vandals and robbers, etc)and these would not have any foot traffic to speak of.

    5. Re:I work at Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue most of those malls ALREADY have many of those things.

      With respect, you're flat out incorrect in some cases, and misguided in others.

      Many malls are pushing 50-75 shops, so that's a LOT of electric and telco already present

      As you can see here, the electrical consumption of your average mall runs around 9 Watts/sq ft. Even a moderate Data Center load is going to be around 75 Watts/sq ft just in terms of IT load. Once you factor in Mechanical Cooling, it's just going to go up from there. Furthermore, even if a mall had say a 10 MW electrical feed, you're obviously going to want 2 or more separate, dedicated feeds for your Data Center. You don't want to share that feed with the mall. Any disturbance on that mall's feed could impact your own. So when the maintenance guys at the mall screw up and accidentally single phase a compressor on their chiller, you don't want to have the fault on your line. Thus, any way you slice it, you're putting in your own feed(s). Figure in also, you have to think whether the local electrical utility planned for an additional several Megawatts of power in this particular section of their grid. Perhaps they had planned for maybe a 10-15% growth in the mall's load, but not quite for a sudden 5-10 MW being dropped on the circuit(s).

      Malls are often near highways which is where most of the fibre got laid so it's easy to add.

      Again, you're missing the point. In some cases, yes, lots of fiber trunks are laid where the freeways and highways are. This isn't always the case, but I'll go with it. You still have to get comm into your facility, and I'm continuing to say that this is going to be a little more of a hassle if you're adjacent to a busy, functioning mall.

      Many malls already have basic backup generators (plus natural gas and such already ran) in place for stores, not to data center standards, but in place.

      Irrelevant. Yes, some malls have cute, little natural gas generators to run their Fire/Life Safety Systems (elevators, emergency lighting, security system, etc) as required by code but a) this is not even slightly close to what you'll need to run a Data Center and b) even if it were, you'll want your own dedicated generators for your Data Center. Do you really want to run the risk of not being able to power your Data Center during a utility outage because the elevator to the Cinnabon needs to run?

      These shops aren't "that big" that they need major renovation into data centers, they'r plain brick boxes right now. They are more the size of a telecom CO office. It's only now that everybody is Blade servers + SAN that it would even be practical to use the space.. again because they are SMALL enough not to be a major drain on power resources like the major centers are. I understand your point, as I work for a steel melting mill and many data centers are starting to catch up with OUR power usage.

      I don't think you are getting my point. This isn't about the physical space in the building, it's about all the other things. To your point, the Blades and SAN configuration does indeed take up a smaller footprint than some of the older hardware, but it is DRAMATICALLY more energy intensive (thus my reasons for harping on things like electrical utility, generators, and cooling). A moderate Data Center with around 75,000 square feet of raised floor is probably going to draw somewhere between 5 and 10 Megawatts. I'd say that's probably very close (if not beyond) many industrial applications.

      as far as security, the best security is often in plain sight. most of the abandon mall prope

    6. Re:I work at Sears by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1
      Crap, wasn't logged in.


      I'd argue most of those malls ALREADY have many of those things.

      With respect, you're flat out incorrect in some cases, and misguided in others.

      Many malls are pushing 50-75 shops, so that's a LOT of electric and telco already present

      As you can see here , the electrical consumption of your average mall runs around 9 Watts/sq ft. Even a moderate Data Center load is going to be around 75 Watts/sq ft just in terms of IT load. Once you factor in Mechanical Cooling, it's just going to go up from there. Furthermore, even if a mall had say a 10 MW electrical feed, you're obviously going to want 2 or more separate, dedicated feeds for your Data Center. You don't want to share that feed with the mall. Any disturbance on that mall's feed could impact your own. So when the maintenance guys at the mall screw up and accidentally single phase a compressor on their chiller, you don't want to have the fault on your line. Thus, any way you slice it, you're putting in your own feed(s). Figure in also, you have to think whether the local electrical utility planned for an additional several Megawatts of power in this particular section of their grid. Perhaps they had planned for maybe a 10-15% growth in the mall's load, but not quite for a sudden 5-10 MW being dropped on the circuit(s).

      Malls are often near highways which is where most of the fibre got laid so it's easy to add.

      Again, you're missing the point. In some cases, yes, lots of fiber trunks are laid where the freeways and highways are. This isn't always the case, but I'll go with it. You still have to get comm into your facility, and I'm continuing to say that this is going to be a little more of a hassle if you're adjacent to a busy, functioning mall.

      Many malls already have basic backup generators (plus natural gas and such already ran) in place for stores, not to data center standards, but in place.

      Irrelevant. Yes, some malls have cute, little natural gas generators to run their Fire/Life Safety Systems (elevators, emergency lighting, security system, etc) as required by code but a) this is not even slightly close to what you'll need to run a Data Center and b) even if it were, you'll want your own dedicated generators for your Data Center. Do you really want to run the risk of not being able to power your Data Center during a utility outage because the elevator to the Cinnabon needs to run?

      These shops aren't "that big" that they need major renovation into data centers, they'r plain brick boxes right now. They are more the size of a telecom CO office. t's only now that everybody is Blade servers + SAN that it would even be practical to use the space.. again because they are SMALL enough not to be a major drain on power resources like the major centers are. I understand your point, as I work for a steel melting mill and many data centers are starting to catch up with OUR power usage.

      I don't think you are getting my point. This isn't about the physical space in the building, it's about all the other things. To your point, the Blades and SAN configuration does indeed take up a smaller footprint than some of the older hardware, but it is DRAMATICALLY more energy intensive (thus my reasons for harping on things like electrical utility, generators, and cooling). A moderate Data Center with around 75,000 square feet of raised floor is probably going to draw somewhere between 5 and 10 Megawatts. I'd say that's probably very close (if not beyond) many industrial applications.

      as far as security, the best security is often in plain sight. most of the abandon mall properties I see (at still used malls) are kept up on the surface pretty well. There's plenty of security already for the mall (to watch for parking lot vandals and robbers, etc)and these would not have any foot tra

  23. Thinking outside the big box by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

    It's been reported that the value of the real estate held by Sears Holdings is greater than the stock-market value of Sears Holdings itself. How can that be?

    I've wondered exactly how "valuable" a dead KMart or Sears store really is. After all, what else can you turn it into? The more successful big-box folks like Wal-Mart and Home Depot already have their own big boxes. Plus, KMart and Sears stores typically are in older locations that are in retail decline. For example, the Sears Auto that's closest to me is outside a large indoor mall that's nearly vacant. And the KMart across the street from it currently is in the process of closing.

    So what do you put in a retail location that nobody wants to shop at anymore? A data center, of course. Seems like an innovative idea.

    However, it remains to be seen whether this will work as a business concept. For example, I assume access to network infrastructure is important. But if it does work, it would "unlock" the value of Sears' real estate that otherwise has little value.

    Best of all, if a server rack ever needs to have its oil changed or its muffler replaced, it can be lifted at the touch of a button.

  24. It is so stupid, I have to stop and think if it is by acscott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it's stupid. But here's what they should do: spin them off into 501(c) 3's and turn them into solar-based (and other) charging stations for electric autos. Use this to start a new brand. Gently and carefully test and enter the brand into your e-stores. Oh why is it stupid? I'm not sure. Probably better to turn those sites into Dr. Clinics, or blood-test labs. Get away from work to go to the Dr. and go shop!

  25. Re:It is so stupid, I have to stop and think if it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your idea is dumber. Data centers are in high demand today. Electric car charging is not. Sure some day in the future car charging might be a big thing, but data centers are a proven commodity.

  26. Re:It is so stupid, I have to stop and think if it by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    Get away from work to go to the Dr. and go shop!

    That's going to be a problem. You see, most of these Sears that are closed were the last or near last stores in their malls to close. The little stores went out first, and the big anchor stores held on as the malls got emptier and emptier. So generally, there's little or no place around them for people to shop.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  27. Demand for "retail" lower-end data center space? by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In some ways I think data centers have gotten out of hand and created a market for less intensive, more retail-friendly versions.

    I get that there's definitely a need for all the security and triple-redundancy that high end data centers provide. But I also think there's definitely a market for a less complex version that maybe doesn't have the kinds of security or redundancy that big operations have. Not zero redundancy or zero security, but a less involved version -- maybe less peering, less security, one generator instead of two, etc.

    I work in SMB consulting and there's a certain number of clients who host their own systems in house but could benefit from putting them in a data center, but who don't quite want to pay the costs asociated with the standard model of data center. What they need is a rack with reliable power and cooling and better internet connectivity than they can get from a DSL line + Cable.

    A "retail" data center might let them get their toes in the water and solve some short term problems without having to cross the Rubicon into "big time" datacenter use.

    The most apt comparison I can make is Snap Fitness vs. Lifetime Fitness. Lifetime has more and better equipment, trainers, a pool, tennis, etc. But some people just want to lift weights and run on a treadmill.

  28. Circuit City... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...might be a great name that they could use.

    What? Oh wait...

  29. Desperation. by 0b1knob · · Score: 1

    Sears grasps at new business schemes like a drowning man might grasp at straws. One story is that they will discard everything but their insurance business. Remember Sharp electronics? Outsourced EVERYTHING. Today nothing is left but a strawberry farm.

  30. Data centers? They couldn't run a garage. by swm · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will be any better at running data centers than they were at running auto centers.

    We used to take our cars to Sears to get the oil changed.
    Nothing complicated, just an oil change.

    I'd say they succeeded in changing the oil about two thirds of the time.
    But one third of the time, something would go off the rails, and we would go home without the oil change.
    Eventually, I gave up going there.
    Some time after that, they closed their auto centers.

  31. Dying Company Grasping at Straws by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    Sad Really, Sears used to stand for something and unfortunately bad management and ineffective reaction to the marketplace has left them in the position of closing for good. I stopped shopping there permanently after a problem with an appliance, that had the service package and was still under warranty, wouldn't be serviced by them for weeks. They just couldn't get us an appointment. Much of what they sell you can get online from other vendors with better service and for better prices and that unfortunately will be the undoing of a lot of these chains so for me good riddance!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Dying Company Grasping at Straws by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Sad Really, Sears used to stand for something and unfortunately bad management and ineffective reaction to the marketplace has left them in the position of closing for good. I stopped shopping there permanently after a problem with an appliance, that had the service package and was still under warranty, wouldn't be serviced by them for weeks. They just couldn't get us an appointment. Much of what they sell you can get online from other vendors with better service and for better prices and that unfortunately will be the undoing of a lot of these chains so for me good riddance!

      The only alternative for appliances are now Home Depot, Lowes or Best Buy. I doubt they are much better. There is no way any company is going to come running out to fix your appliance for a free warranty claim.

      Sears has as good a price or better as Amazon on many products. Nothing beats placing the order and picking it up 20 minutes later at a local Sears or Kmart.

      Amazon has gone heavily into data center business as well. It makes as much sense for Sears to do the same. Sears can attract the small local businesses who want IT services like mail, storage and custom apps without paying for an in-house IT and a local venue to go to if there is something wrong or if they want custom services.

    2. Re:Dying Company Grasping at Straws by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If anything, appliances (and perhaps tools) will be what keeps Sears around and kicking for years to come. Shipping prices will prevent the likes of Amazon from ever competing in that market. And the nature of appliances being a long-term investment, requires trust that cheap junk retailers like Walmart / Home Depot don't earn.

      Sears has earned a reputation for quality that Walmart and Home Depot can't match. When you go into a Sears and buy the cheapest refrigerator they've got, you can be pretty sure it's a decent piece of kit. With Walmart / Home Depot, you might be getting a complete piece of junk that is terribly misdesigned, and will fail shortly outside of the warranty.

      A big part of this is Sears' Kenmore brand being inexpensive while top-notch quality. So much so that I'm often able to find GOOD Kenmore appliances cheaper than the no-name worthless junk appliances ("GE" / "Magic Chef" / etc.), that Walmart / Home Depot stock. Whatever Sears' overhead and problems may be, they're still out-competing everyone in household appliances. And the Kenmore (and Craftsman) brand was one of the few big reasons K-Mart bought the company.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Dying Company Grasping at Straws by aztektum · · Score: 1

      shut down the malls. turn the land into new neighborhoods, with apartments, coffee shops, gyms, parks, gardens, etc.. move the malls into automated warehouses outside the city were autonomous vehicles pick up packages for delivery to the neighborhoods homes and biz

      we may not be able to create flying cars, but we can still create some awesome shit. it's a shame we're held back by outdated ideas of what it means to be a valuable person (wage slave) in the servitude of the wealthy.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    4. Re:Dying Company Grasping at Straws by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      And the nature of appliances being a long-term investment, requires trust that cheap junk retailers like Walmart / Home Depot don't earn.

      Sears has earned a reputation for quality that Walmart and Home Depot can't match. When you go into a Sears and buy the cheapest refrigerator they've got, you can be pretty sure it's a decent piece of kit. With Walmart / Home Depot, you might be getting a complete piece of junk that is terribly misdesigned, and will fail shortly outside of the warranty.

      A big part of this is Sears' Kenmore brand being inexpensive while top-notch quality. So much so that I'm often able to find GOOD Kenmore appliances cheaper than the no-name worthless junk appliances ("GE" / "Magic Chef" / etc.), that Walmart / Home Depot stock. Whatever Sears' overhead and problems may be, they're still out-competing everyone in household appliances. And the Kenmore (and Craftsman) brand was one of the few big reasons K-Mart bought the company.

      Your experience has been different than mine.

      Sears had a reputation for quality, and while some people still see them as such, it's long been the case that "Kenmore" is just a private label on a white box made in the Maytag/Whirlpool factory.

      Just remember: K-Mart bought them. That's how weak they were after their bankruptcy. They've been betting big and surviving on their long history as America's super retailer but those days have passed, and they haven't kept up.

      I used to work for a consumer products company who was all but married to Sears. They were our #1 customer in both volume and revenue. They stuck us with plenty of unpaid bills during their bankruptcy, but we stuck with them because they provided a sales channel that dwarfed our next five customers. Sears got exclusive features and custom products, and when they told us to jump, we only nodded and asked how high. They dictated payment, delivery, and profit margin, and we were grateful to have the business.

      Over the past 10 years, each year has been a steady decline. While they are still a large customer, other retailers like Target, Amazon, Wal-Mart, and Sam's Club have taken their place in my ex-employer's ledgers. Just last year, we were able to negotiate an increase in our margins; something that would have been impossible 3 years ago. The company still sells plenty through them, but if trends continue they will be a very minor player within 5 years.

    5. Re:Dying Company Grasping at Straws by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Sears had a reputation for quality, and while some people still see them as such, it's long been the case that "Kenmore" is just a private label on a white box made in the Maytag/Whirlpool factory.

      A cheap Maytag/Whirlpool appliance is still a good thing.

      As I said, Kenmore is right at the bottom of the price range, competing NOT with Maytag/Whirlpool, but with poorly designed, no-name junk like: GE, Magic Chef, Hot Point, etc.

      Just remember: K-Mart bought them. That's how weak they were after their bankruptcy.

      I'm well aware of that... Which is why I started my post with:

      "If anything, appliances (and perhaps tools) will be what keeps Sears around"

      I'll be exclusively buying appliances, car batteries, tools, and clothes with Sears, until they disappear. They are a throwback, in that they take responsibility, and don't stock utterly cheap junk Walmart-esque crap that doesn't work, and just throw-up their hands when you complain, and/or return it. I don't like retailers that are hoping to trick me, who hope I'll be too busy to return their junk in time.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  32. I order from them weekly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I've had a problem in the past 15 years or so. My anecdotal evidence is stronger than yours.

    1. Re:I order from them weekly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck do you need to order on a weekly basis from Sears that you can't get cheaper and faster elsewhere?

      If you're going to try to make a point with a made up story, at least try to make a believable one.

  33. sears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are they still around? I haven't seen any Sears store in a decade or so.

  34. They need star power by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    I will only consider using them if they promise to start a web series called "This Old Server Rack" with Bob Vila in which he takes old run down servers and makes them run like new. Come on Sears, you have got to have star power!

  35. Gonna smoke all that yourself or pass it around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sears has deals with local installers who will bring the devices (fridges, dishwashers, dryers, etc). out to your home, install them, and remove the old ones. Amazon doesn't. That's the difference.

    They also have a fairly large selection, especially on unusual appliances that other stores don't stock and won't order. (Like say a stove with a downdraft vent fan in the middle of the burners, which was never really in style back in the 80s when they came out.)

    The Kenmore brand is just Sears slapping their brand-name on GE, Whirlpool, etc. Often with no changes in hardware, only higher prices and the need to go through sears for overpriced replacement parts.

    Quality is hit or miss. Repairs are outsourced to local firms. The sears "warranty" is a complete joke. I had a fridge from Sears. Didn't work right. We'd call under warranty, they'd send the same repair guy out over and over again, who would swap some random part, completely hit or miss, usually miss, and leave claiming "job done". We never did get that fridge to go below 40 degrees. And it's a $2000 fridge. Last time I buy top of the line! Or their "warranty"! (We learned years later there was a recall on the baffler design on that fridge as it kept freezing up.)

    The stove I bought from sears. Lets see, the igniters failed and had to be replaced almost immediately. The power cord failed, cut on metal backplate, and had to be fixed. It's almost like it was defective by design, out of the box, to encourage repeated repair business.

    Saw the same thing with my laundry washer, a Kenmore brand incidentally, that leaked water. You had to turn it upside down and calk the gasket, otherwise the leak would rust out the bearings and prematurely destroy the washer. Or you could go with annual "official" repairs and just replace the gasket over and over again. Expensive to do even just once, let alone annually!

    The dishwasher I bought, also a Kenmore, has had several water leaks including a broken intake valve and more recently hard-water stains clogging the water-intake port. Due to the questionable design of this Kenmore dishwasher it responded to hard water by just pouring water out all over the floor and incidentally rotting out the bottom of my kitchen cupboards.

    No, I'm not seeing quality here. Sears is now the last place I look for appliances.

    Tool-wise, they have a nice selection. But the quality again is lacking. It's cheaply made stuff, grossly overpriced, with their lifetime warranty slapped on. That warranty is nice, and frequently used. But for the money they charge, I'd rather buy something decent! Or cheaper at Walmart and replace it myself without all the inconvenience.

  36. Maybe they will bring Prodigy back. by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    After all they were in on the original one.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodigy_(online_service)

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:Maybe they will bring Prodigy back. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, pop up ads do seem to have made a come back since their initial trials were less than successful.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  37. Tatted up methhead data centers by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Oh you mean replace them all with 4 foreigners. Yeah that'll work.

  38. What's with the old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with all the old news being posted as new lately? I heard about this Sears things last May.... http://gizmodo.com/sears-plans-to-retrofit-2-500-ghostbox-stores-as-data-510333088

  39. They could have fixed their auto centers. by stinkbomb · · Score: 1

    Sears used to be a great place to go for auto service, but the rise of cheap tires and oil changes at places like WalMart really took a bite out of their business. They could have competed on price or quality of service, but I think they just gave up. The last time I was at a Sears auto center, it was a really grim deal. None of the employees seemed that interested in helping me, and their prices were ~30% higher than their competitors.

    This strategy of embracing all things internet seems to be their current game plan: when you talk to a salesperson in-store, part of what they're trained to do is guide you through the process of shopping online. Clearly, this doesn't bode well for Sears' brick-and-mortar presence, nor for the employee forced to sacrifice his own commission, but it's where the future of retail is headed. However, to put all your eggs in the internet basket seems unwise. There's always going to be a market for skilled auto-mechanics that are associated with a company with a good reputation, but a Sears data center? I can think of dozens of companies that I'd turn to first.

  40. uh ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing says "quality" like McDonald's

  41. remember that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sears CEO: "Do you guys remember that kid that used to sell electronics for us that made all those snarky comments then quit in a huff saying he had just been hired to go work for a software company in Seattle? Maybe he had the right idea. Let's all do that."

  42. Makes sense since they are brownfields by kriston · · Score: 1

    This maks sense since many of these sit on heavily polluted land and can only be sold off as brownfields. Now they can use the land and buildings that otherwise they'd have to pay to get rid of.

    --

    Kriston

  43. Why shut them down? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    The real question is why are they closing those Sears Auto Repair shops? A lot of folks still use them. Are they going to get into a market that they're just trying out, becuase it's IN!!!, and dropping one that works?

    Y'know, like having a niche market, and then pissing off that niche by trying to appeal to a different niche which ain't interested, like the skiffy, er, sci-fi, um, syfy channel?

                    mark "their B movies ain't even fun anymore"

    1. Re:Why shut them down? by kriston · · Score: 1

      Sears was the target of multiple TV news magazine scandals in the 1990s. NBC had an axe to grind with Sears and pummeled them on Dateline. As a result, Sears exited the full-service Sears Auto Center market but kept installing batteries and tires.

      Some Sears Auto Center locations remained in operation as Sears Tire Centers with a side business of installing batteries, but even the battery upsell business was targeted by a new wave of TV news magazine "scandal" reports.

      After the battery upsell "scandal" (there really wasn't one), Sears had finally had enough with the auto centers. Some Sears Auto Centers changed into Sears Tire Centers which only sold tires and nothing else. Some contracted to independent firms like Jiffy-Lube and retained much of their former Sears Auto Center function but without the Sears liability.

      Other locations were abandoned in-place and their environmental problems were remediated and the sites sat as polluted, idle brownfields with an unexpected future potential. These are the stand-alone buildings that sit in the parking lot, separate from the main mall building. These are apparently going to be the data centers.

      It's a brilliant plan. Stable power and lots of cooled, open space, in bunker-like buildings with plenty of city water. Ideal data center locations.

      But they still smell like used motor oil.

      --

      Kriston

  44. Come See the Softer Side of Sears by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Automotive repair is in itself a lucrative business. The problem with Sears is they have been caught cheating people too many times. They were caught charging people for lift time (1 mechanic, 8 lifts each with a car in the air, and all being charged for wrench time by the hour), selling returned batteries, even after being caught by 60 minutes a couple of times - and just horribly corrupt practices across many stores. These ultimately caused Sears to exit the automotive business after several class action law suits. Now we’re supposed to trust them with data? If you’ve got crappy management who look the other way when you’re screwing people, it really doesn’t matter what you sell - be it tires or teraflops - you’re going to fail.

  45. Re:Demand for "retail" lower-end data center space by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Data by definition and law requries security. Working out doesn't. Security and redundancy are expensive. Placing expensive equiptment and security measures in high traffic, high cost retail areas push up the price. Now it's not competitive.

  46. Re:Demand for "retail" lower-end data center space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stuff that it won't kill you to go offline for a while in the event of system failure. Think a place to put your TF2 server, or a box with encrypted drives to serve as an offsite data center.

    It really would be the Mcdonalds of datacenters. Not very fast infrastructure, mediocre service, but it's right there and you can go in and check up on your servers with little fuss.

  47. "from the where's-roebuck-all-this-time? dept." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > from the where's-roebuck-all-this-time? dept.

    Unsure about now, but he was on LOST: http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Daniel_Roebuck :>