Slashdot Mirror


PlayStation 4 Released

Today marks the launch of the latest entrant to the next-gen console race: Sony's PlayStation 4. A number of reviews for the system have already gone up, but many outlets are waiting for next Friday's Xbox One launch before passing final judgment. With regard to the PS4's hardware and UI, Digital Foundry praises the DualShock 4 controller design and the improvements to background downloading, while worrying about fan noise in warmer environments. iFixit provides a step-by-step teardown of the device, giving it an 8/10 repairability score. Ars has many good things to say, but many bad things as well: "The PlayStation 4 has an excellent controller, decently powerful hardware, some intriguing, well-executed new features, and an interface that shows belated acknowledgment of some of Sony's most user-unfriendly past designs. It also has a lot of features that are half-assed, missing, or downright bewildering at this point." Polygon's review is more visually oriented, filled with pictures, videos, and drawings. They conclude, "[T]he PlayStation 4's focus on gaming — and only gaming — is undermined by a distinct lack of compelling software. That failing is sure to improve — better games and more of them will appear on the PlayStation 4 — but right now, this is a game console without a game to recommend it." Eurogamer's coverage includes has a round-up of launch title reviews and gameplay videos. IGN has coverage of the roughly 0.4% of PS4s that arrive broken out of the box, and Kotaku explains how they fixed theirs.

294 comments

  1. Not this time, Sony by faragon · · Score: 1, Troll

    After removing the "Other OS" feature in the Playstation 3, which enabled running Linux, I'm no longer interested in your devices.

    1. Re:Not this time, Sony by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not this again.

    2. Re:Not this time, Sony by bhcompy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've got better machines to run Linux on

    3. Re:Not this time, Sony by faragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agree. But I *PAID* for running Linux, and then they *REMOVED* such feature, unless you kept your console out of date, without playing new games (last firmware with "Other OS" enabled is 3.15).

    4. Re:Not this time, Sony by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Funny

      After removing the "Other OS" feature in the Playstation 3, which enabled running Linux, I'm no longer interested in your devices.

      well you should be happy then that they're this time releasing it with zero features they can drop and instead are to gradually insert them..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Not this time, Sony by 3vi1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ^ My sentiment exactly.

      Sony has repeatedly engaged in anti-consumer activity, so I see no reason to support them. I own all the last gen consoles, but I've had it with MS and Sony (and Nintendo's showing this round is not really compelling, IMHO).

      I'm going to hold out for a really powerful Steam machine for the living room. Valve seems like a friendlier company, and most of us here probably already own over a hundred titles via Steam.

    6. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Liar liar pants on fire. You never used it. If you had, you'd know it was totally unusable as a Linux machine.

    7. Re:Not this time, Sony by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That plus their network being horribly hacked, plus the root kits they used to do on their CD's, plus every other horrible thing sony has done is enough reason to never buy anything with a sony label.

    8. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why the F' would you want to run linux on a system designed specifically to play games? Are there games for linux? Didn't think so. While you are having it out with Sony, the rest of us are happy with $20-$45 ARM devices that run full featured linux and draw 10W at full load. Need heavy CPU power? Try a Quad/Octa ARM android device, for $100 or an intel NUC for $200. These are all far better options, even if the PS4 (or PS3) did run linux. You are now informed.

    9. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea cause Steam's always on DRM is the DRM I want.

    10. Re:Not this time, Sony by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, I was a Xbox fanboy for the previous two generations. But I'm heavily leaning toward the PS4 this time. With the exception of not including a IR input (damn you blutooth-only remote!!) Sony seems to be making all the right moves this time, and MS seems to be making all the wrong ones.

      Sony is $100 cheaper, has better hardware muscle for games (allowing for higher resolution and framerates), has a nice new controller, has that GREAT new "Share" feature, and is focused heavily on the games.

      MS has an annoying overlay for my cable box which I will never use (an IR blaster, seriously??), still requires a $60/year Live membership to access even basic stuff like Netflix and Hulu (no thanks, MS, my Roku lets me do it for free and it's quieter and has a better interface), a mandatory always-on camera and mic that creeps me the fuck out, and seems to treat gaming as an afterthought. Plus I've gotten more and more annoyed by their add-heavy interface in recent years.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    11. Re:Not this time, Sony by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe so, but thats not terribly relevant to this console, which never came with that feature to begin with.

    12. Re:Not this time, Sony by Iceykitsune · · Score: 1

      Any with the cell processor in them?

      --
      GENERATION 24: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    13. Re:Not this time, Sony by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Informative

      At the time the ps3 debuted, there were not cheaper options (better, yes) for muti-core processing. Even the US military used PS3s as nodes for a compute cluster (running Linux, btw).

    14. Re:Not this time, Sony by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not? Is it not okay to hold a grudge for perceived betrayal? That's pretty much #1 on good reasons to hold a grudge.

    15. Re:Not this time, Sony by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bought both the previous Xboxen myself, and I just stopped caring once the homepage advertisements crossed my threshold for tolerance. I am not your damned captive audience.

    16. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to work on your definition of 'feature'.

    17. Re:Not this time, Sony by trdrstv · · Score: 4, Informative

      After removing the "Other OS" feature in the Playstation 3, which enabled running Linux, I'm no longer interested in your devices.

      well you should be happy then that they're this time releasing it with zero features they can drop and instead are to gradually insert them..

      You don't know how true this is. Bluray and DVD movie playback don't work out of the box, you need a Day 1 patch...

    18. Re:Not this time, Sony by timeOday · · Score: 2
      I think a lot of the decision between the XBox One and PS4 will come down to whether you value the Kinect. If you do, then you are getting something for the $100. My family does get a fair amount of use out of the Kinect. (For one thing, we don't limit the Kids' play time on Kinect, since they are at least standing up and some, like Kinect Adventures, are a pretty good workout).

      But the growing dependence of the XBox on paying a recurring subscription fee really does bother me. I don't enjoy online gaming because you waste too much time in matchmaking, too many people are too good, and a lot of people are jerks online. It would help if they would at least agree not to raise the price of the subscription during the life of the device.

    19. Re:Not this time, Sony by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is typical of their behaviour though. Basically it shows that you can't trust any feature they advertise to remain.

    20. Re:Not this time, Sony by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      While I couldn't see it being the only reason somebody bought a PS3, I can see it being a deciding factor. Let's say you have to decide between PS3 and XBox 360. There really isn't much difference. Both have their own exclusive titles, but many titles are released on both. If you chose to buy the PS3 because it had 1 extra thing in the "Pro" column in your Pro-Con list, then you might be well justified in being angry with them removing the feature. Also, the fact that they removed the features means that Linux might have not had enough time to mature on that platform. It's not like it was a standard x86 box where you can load Ubuntu on and start running. It used a whole different processor architecture, which means that you would at least have to recompile everything, and you'd probably run into a lot of issues just getting stuff running.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, your virginity is safe.

    22. Re:Not this time, Sony by smash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More to the point: OtherOS, Sony Rootkit fiasco, being slow/less than 100% honest about the PSN hack.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    23. Re:Not this time, Sony by smash · · Score: 1

      It's not about the features on this console, it is one of MANY instances of sony being untrustworthy, lying wankers. The poster is holding a grudge, as do I, because sony deserve to be punished in the marketplace. Same way half of slashdot hold a grudge against microsoft over the stability of Windows 95.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    24. Re: Not this time, Sony by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Troll

      Agreed. For years they said we could running other operating systems, then changed their mind overnight with a giant middle finger to everyone that bought a ps3. Well Sony, here's your customers giving the finger back. And brand new broken ps4 consoles? Seriously Sony wtf? Do you hate gamers that much? Sony customers are like people that won't leave an abusive relationship.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    25. Re:Not this time, Sony by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bought both the previous Xboxen myself, and I just stopped caring once the homepage advertisements crossed my threshold for tolerance

      That was the point at which I decided that the internet connection wasn't benefiting me, but them. I just disconnected it from the network.

      My XBox 360 is happily still working without an internet connection. But from the sounds of it both new consoles are still mostly going to demand an always-on connection (and if they're not at launch, they will I assume).

      I'm more likely to buy a spare 360 at this point that consider either of the newer offerings from Sony or Microsoft.

      I have no desire to play on-line, give these guys a marketing channel, or provide them with my usage data and a camera in my living room. If game consoles stop being something you can run completely off-line, well, I'll stop having game consoles.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    26. Re:Not this time, Sony by smash · · Score: 1

      Entirely misses the point. A paying customer purchased an item from sony that they retro-actively downgraded. For the obligatory car analogy - its like chevrolet selling you a Corvette ZR1 and then handing you back a regular base model Corvette after the first service. It's not the device you paid for any more. Its the principle of the matter.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    27. Re:Not this time, Sony by chispito · · Score: 1

      After removing the "Other OS" feature in the Playstation 3...

      There are so many better grudges to hold against Sony, I feel like you just phoned this one in and went back to sleep.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    28. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      No, it means any feature they put in solely to bypass import taxes might go away when the tax situation changes. OtherOS was never used by the PS3s target market, so was never missed by the vast majority of users. They did not take away game functionality or limit BluRay playback.

      If you're going to hate Sony, the rootkit from their music division is a much better justification.

    29. Re:Not this time, Sony by smash · · Score: 1

      I'm in the opposite camp. I've bought a Sony PS1,PS2, PS3 and PSP, and this time around I won't be buying Sony. The XBOX one looks like it has some neat features with regards to being an all in one media centre - processing tv, etc. On paper spec the PS4 is superior, but I've seen "in theory" on paper specs failing in reality plenty of times before. At $60/yr, online service isn't a major cost, that's something like 15c per day or $5/month. If it keeps the fuckwits off the service then maybe its not such a bad thing?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    30. Re:Not this time, Sony by Enfixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Considering I'm usually anti DRM anything, I'm surprisingly ok with Steam DRM. Steam itself is fast, convenient and I've never had the DRM get in the way of me playing a game when I wanted to. They maintain my collection of purchased games which I can re-download without hassle as needed. -- After struggling in the past to find old CD keys and media this is the main reason I love Steam. Your mileage may vary, and I don't care. ;)

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    31. Re: Not this time, Sony by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for informing us that there are better options in 2013 than there were in 2006

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    32. Re:Not this time, Sony by 3vi1 · · Score: 0

      If you have a Steam game that you can't play in Steam's offline mode, that's the fault of the people making the game, not Valve/Steam..

      Valve gives devs a choice of how they want to do their DRM, and you have the choice not to buy games from the particular devs that don't meet your individual expectations.

      But, if you'd rather buy a system with more locked down DRM and fewer games, more power to you. You also have the choice to not buy no games that use DRM at all, but then why are you reading a console thread... or is there some option of which I'm unaware?

    33. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Valve is a friendlier company, but a really powerful Steam machine isn't going to do you much good. You still need a powerful Windows machine to run most of the AAA games, which will then stream to the Steam Machine thin client.

      If Linux gaming gains traction due to the Steam Machine, and I hope it does, a powerful one would become useful at that time. One you buy now will be out of date and worth much less than you paid by the time it's actually useful.

    34. Re: Not this time, Sony by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      I agree. $60 a year is reasonable, but $120? $240? What prevents them from raising the price? And once they do what can we do? At least with phones you are under contract, but consoles have no obligation. Tomorrow Microsoft could announce Live is $30 a month instead of the current $5 and what could we do besides throw away our consoles?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    35. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it not okay to hold a grudge for perceived betrayal?

      Methinks you're being overly defensive. I don't think the GP is telling you to drop your grudge. That's your freedom. Other people however have moved on, and they're also free to be tired of hearing you grumble about your lawn.

    36. Re:Not this time, Sony by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > If it keeps the fuckwits off the service then maybe its not such a bad thing?

      I take it you've never been on XBox Live... I know you said you've been a PlayStation person all these years, but if you've ever been over at a friend's house while they are on a multiplayer game, it can be quite horrific.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    37. Re:Not this time, Sony by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I was being defensive, but not for my own sake. I've totally given up on next-gen consoles for unrelated reasons, but I found no reason to summarily dismiss the objections of the OP.

    38. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $60/yr, online service isn't a major cost, that's something like 15c per day or $5/month. If it keeps the fuckwits off the service then maybe its not such a bad thing?

      Trust me. It doesn't keep the fuckwits off... Current xBox users already shows this in online games :)

    39. Re:Not this time, Sony by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      They did not take away game functionality or limit BluRay playback

      That's not entirely true. 3D BluRay is not supported at launch. I know not many tears will be shed over that with most people, but it's yet another thing in a long line of things (along the same lines: no audio CD support, no mp3 file playback) that inspire head-scratching.

    40. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam OS only needs a few exclusives like Half-Life 3 and then the 'year of the Linux desktop' can be a reality.

    41. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I wanted to play TuxRacer and all the really great Linux games on my console!

    42. Re: Not this time, Sony by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was easy for a lot of people to move on, the ones not using the feature that was removed.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    43. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and I've never had the DRM get in the way of me playing a game when I wanted to...

      That's what usually stops me from supporting companies that have the kind of DRM that prevents me from using my legally obtained software. I also so far never had problem with Steam DRM and that's why I am OK with it.

    44. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh get over it.

      Sure, punish them for the rootkit incident, or maybe for not being American (or whatever your favourite nationality is), but by the time the feature was disabled, the PS3 was a pretty expensive way of getting a Linux box with limited RAM.

    45. Re: Not this time, Sony by hattig · · Score: 2

      Please look up the bathtub model of hardware failure - most failures will happen right at the beginning of a product's lifespan, or after a period of time where failure rates are very low.

      On the other hand 0.4% failure on the first day doesn't look great. 0.4% failure in the first month is good. 0.4% failure in the first year is excellent.

      It looks like a dodgy HDMI connector is a common issue.

    46. Re:Not this time, Sony by gameboyhippo · · Score: 2

      Nintendo's showing this round is not really compelling

      Depends on your tastes. Sit down with some friends and play a round of Nintendo Land sometime, then form an opinion. Just because a game looks like a lot of fun doesn't mean that it isn't worth playing. :)

    47. Re: Not this time, Sony by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Sony greatly expanded their target audience by advertising the other OS feature(governments, researchers, anyone doing number crunching), and for them, it wasn't just a minor inconvenience, it was turning the computers into useless gaming consoles and spending lots of time/money replanning clusters because of what was effectively an arbitrary decision on the part of Sony.

      It is a bit insensitive to dismiss that and hold up rootkits as the biggest complaint, given that in any other use than gaming, the rootkits wouldn't matter at all (since the clusters wouldn't need to be online except for updates).

      I would say both of those were equally valid and serious complaints, and doubly bad for Sony.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    48. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on this. I own the ps3, x360, and wii. At one point or another, I really enjoyed all three. Sony's anti-consumer-in-the-name-of-features bugs the crap out of me, they never won back my trust after the PSN hack. Their iron foot down on any consumer wanting to tinker with the hardware is also a big annoyance of mine.

      MS has started going down the road of being a used car salesman with the XBox 360. Every screen, except for in game, is littered with adds. Many of which are deceptive "ESPN for XBox Live (for the low low price of an existing cable subscription or another $10-$15 a month)". If I wanted to spend another $50+ a month on a few "channels" of content on XBL, I'd rather just cough up another $5 and get basic cable.

      With the above and the news of the new stuff, I'm pretty well fed up with console gaming. Here's some reasons I won't be shelling out any money for the new systems:

      • PS4 - Cannot do custom soundtracks, intentionally crippling media playback (DNLA, for example), and instead "urging" consumers to go for Playstation Plus, and another $10 a month for the Sony Music Unlimited "service"
      • XB1 - Also cannot do custom soundtracks. XBL required for net play, and any net app (i.e. Netflix, Pandora, etc...). Focus on being a media center while nickel and diming consumers for any additional content. Look at the model for Killer Instinct, it's Free-to-Play, but you only get one or two characters. Each additional character is something like $5. This is completely inexcusable, even the shareware for Doom had a third of the game.
      • Wii-U - Focus seems to be on the tablet controller and doesn't really have any eye-catching games this time around. It feels like Nintendo is losing steam on the TV and is focusing more on the handheld market.
    49. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus I've gotten more and more annoyed by their add-heavy interface in recent years.

      Do you mean ad heavy or A.D.D. heavy? Or does it add heavily? Does it subtract heavily as well?

    50. Re:Not this time, Sony by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      I've got better machines to run Linux on

      Really? for $400? kewl.

    51. Re: Not this time, Sony by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      one other economic problem for Sony with places like the US Air Force building a supercomputer out of 100 PS3s is when you sell your consoles for a loss expecting to make up the difference in game licensing fees.

      Of course, one other solution is to sell cheaper packages without game controllers or cables.

    52. Re:Not this time, Sony by Megane · · Score: 1

      A subscription fee doesn't help. Here's a helpful infographic:

      http://www.arinmorf.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/20040319h.jpg

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    53. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's what he said.

    54. Re:Not this time, Sony by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      well you should be happy then that they're this time releasing it with zero features they can drop and instead are to gradually insert them..

      Given Sony's history, I'm pretty sure something will be gradually inserted some place.

    55. Re:Not this time, Sony by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Why not? Is it not okay to hold a grudge for perceived betrayal? That's pretty much #1 on good reasons to hold a grudge.

      Theoretically it is okay, but in this case a PlayStation running Linux is just not that important battle to fight. It is primarily a gaming console (and a media player) and it had bad hardware support under Linux anyway.

    56. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beat me to it. But not just game consoles. Sony is off my list period. GeoHot was a wake up call. Sony raped his technology. They did illegal search and seizure. The cops didn't seize, Sony did. All of that, plus they make their crap with proprietary lock in and technology that only their stuff can plug into, and 2 years later they abandon their stuff, leaving you with stuff that nothing else can plug into, and they won't update or upgrade. All that, plus removing "Other OS". I can't update the firmware without disabling it (my firmware is about 5 years old now). I'm advocating for people *not* to buy Sony.

    57. Re:Not this time, Sony by sheehaje · · Score: 1, Informative

      This again for me. I will never buy Sony Products again. They aren't the only company out there that makes mistakes, but the track record speaks volumes of why I won't do anything Sony.

      Just some of the things at the top of the list:

      Rootkits part of game installations
      PSN Got hacked and didn't immediately disclose the accounts that got hacked, and tried to cover up the extent of it.
      and yes - removing functionality from the PS3 (OtherOS) against customer wishes

      Granted - Microsoft isn't exactly high on my list either - I do own an Xbox 360, but probably won't own an XBone

      I'm saving my money for a Steam Machine - whether Valve succeeds or flops with it, I'd rather support them - and the streaming feature alone is a huge win for anyone with a large Steam collection anyway.

    58. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > I've never had the DRM

      What? You can't play the games at all if you can't login. Valve locks your account if someone else tries to login with the wrong password. Also, when their servers are down, Valve does not allow you to play any of your games. Finally, when your Internet connection is down, Valve has a policy against letting you play your games.

      I live in downtown Seattle so there is only a single choice for access faster than dial-up. It goes down several times a day, and Valve does not allow me to play the games I own when CenturyLink is down. I paid for those games. I should be allowed to play them, but the assholes at Valve have decided that we're not worthy of playing their games.

      Really? Defending a company that doesn't allow you to play the games you own?

    59. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would have been a much better media player if it ran Linux/XBMC.

    60. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Theoretically it is okay

      Also in practice.

      but in this case a PlayStation running Linux is just not that important battle to fight

      You should know by now that it's not about running Linux on a Playstation at all. It's about a company deliberately removing functionality from a product they sold you. That's never okay, even theoretically. The fact that the feature did not enjoy widespread popularity does not justify it.

    61. Re:Not this time, Sony by Wootery · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also so far never had problem with Steam DRM and that's why I am OK with it.

      And if/when Valve go bust or turn evil? (I'm aware Gabe said that if Valve go bust they'll unlock the Steam DRM. I don't believe it for a second - I doubt they're even legally in a position to make that call for other companies' games.)

      I use Steam too, and yes it works fine now, but that's not to say that by going with Steam you've escaped all the downsides of DRM. They still hold the keys to your gaming locker.

    62. Re:Not this time, Sony by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      I don't play much on line so I've not encountered these people. What exactly constitutes fuckwit behavior in on-line games?

    63. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam for Linux, and XBMC would be two great reasons, if PS3 Linux was implemented with proper driver support. Plug in a USB tv tuner for live TV/DVR functionality. It could have been pretty cool.

      I don't really have room for, nor want, a bunch of boxes under my TV. Sony could have had the holy grail "convergence" device that all the big dogs have been chasing after forever - and the FOSS community would have developed it for them.

    64. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think he did know that, and that's why he said it.

    65. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still probably lost money; the removal of the ability to sell used PS3s to some part of the market will slightly decrease the value of all of them (by a very small amount, but it still Sony stealing a very small amount from them.)

    66. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also have better players, just play the games man.

    67. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I was speaking of features taken away from the PS3. Lack of 3D BluRay is an annoyance to me since I could never get it working on my PC, and it works great on the PS3 with Sony's HMD. Of course with the lack of backward-compatibility, PS3s will be staying in service next to people's new PS4s.

      Personally I'm waiting until I finish my current games before thinking about a new console. I'm just not excited about this console generation, which already has inferior graphics to a PC on release day.

    68. Re:Not this time, Sony by gmclapp · · Score: 1

      A lot of the games on steam do not allow you to play them in offline mode. There are plenty of exceptions. But one example is Portal 2. You cannot play that offline.

      --
      Common Sense (+1)
    69. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how true this is. Bluray and DVD movie playback don't work out of the box, you need a Day 1 patch...

      You sure about that? I heard about MP3s and CDs, but I suspect DVD and Bluray are working ok out-of-the-box.

    70. Re: Not this time, Sony by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Keep it, just don't tell us about it! One less person in the queue is all you are.

      --
      This is blinging
    71. Re:Not this time, Sony by xero314 · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop using this analogy because it's completely wrong. The truth is the analogy is more like chevy coming out with a new model Corvette and offered their customers a free upgrade, but sadly the new model doesn't have cigarette lighter. Had Sony just named the Post Other OS PlayStation the PS4 they would not be dealing with this issue. It goes like this.

      Sony Releases a new console, Lets call this new console the PS3.5. It was nearly identical to the PS3 accept that it could play new games and did not have Other OS support. Yes it made the PS3 a short lived console and at first people would be very upset. Sony, realizing that it was a short console cycle, decided to allow PS3 owners to upgrade to the PS3.5 for free. Yes that's right, the first console maker ever to release a completely 100% backward compatible, in regards to game play, console with a free upgrade from the prior version. Sure, to upgrade you would lose the Other OS capability, but it's free and optional.

      So had Sony really just screwed it's customers by discontinuing the PS3 and then offering a free upgrade (with no new hardware necessary) they would have been seen as being leaders in the console market and pro consumer. Simply because they chose not to change the name of the console every one is seeing it as if they were taking something away.

      I'm a huge fan of boycotting, and support anyone that is doing so, but make sure you are boycotting for the right reason.

    72. Re: Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Those weren't their target audience. The number of games bought for those consoles was zero, a big loss for Sony. Being able to take advantage of a feature that was put in as a tax dodge, while buying no games at all does not make them Sony's market. In addition, Sony did nothing to alter these consoles, which weren't Internet connected, so I'm not sure what you're on about. If they contracted with Sony, and Sony violated that contract by no longer supplying new consoles with OtherOS, you may have a point, but I'm not aware of such a contract.

      Rootkits had absolutely nothing to do with gaming or being online.

      Is it also insensitive to mention that you're just not making any sense?

    73. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant.

    74. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Steam DRM caused me some minor trouble by locking me out of a game when a Steam server was down many years ago, but the rest of the time the DRM has benefited me by allowing re-downloads of any game, and playback from any machine I log into. Steam seems to be DRM done right.

    75. Re: Not this time, Sony by IrquiM · · Score: 2

      The customer initiated the removal of the feature. I still have a PS3 with otherOS. Noone has taken it from me.

      --
      This is blinging
    76. Re: Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      There's no chance that Valve would sabotage HL3 sales like that. If they ever release it, it's guaranteed to be on Windows PC at the same time as the Steam Box.

    77. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    78. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you need the Live Membership just to use Netflix? Okay, Xbox One went off the consideration list.

      Thanks for the info. I'll verify this myself just to be sure, but if it's true, the other benefits of the Xbox One become irrelevant. I don't intend to pay Microsoft $60 per year indefinitely just so I can watch movies I don't purchase through Microsoft on my damn console.

      P.S. I like This Week in Tech too - which is, I presume, what your name references.

    79. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the ones that kept the feature (other OS) and lost their ability to play new games, access the Playstation Network, Netflix, and forfeited their ability to play Blu-ray movies released not too long after the 3.21 patch.

      Or the people who did upgrade their firmware, lost Other OS, and later on installed 3.50 and lost the ability to use a lot of their 3rd party peripherals .

    80. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Less than honest? are you for real?

      Sony were 100% honest, brutally honest in fact, when they didn't know how severe the hack was, they were 100% right to paint the worst case scenario, sadly the media raped them for doing this.

      Microsoft on the other hand have been sweeping their Xbox Live account emptying problems under the carpet for the last two years.

      Go figure.

    81. Re: Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Are you really this upset over your own fantasy, or do you have some info on actual future pricing?

    82. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because it is encouraging tired old discussion.

      There are certain posts that you can essentially just copy-paste on /. and get modded up to +5. These always dominate the discussions, and the argument/counterarguments are exactly the same. Just for kicks, here's some samples:

      "Bill Gate's philanthropy will never outweigh the damage he did to the computing world!"
      "XXX Android phone can do whatever the latest iPhone does at half the price!"
      "The latest version of Window's has tile based interface that is not ideal for a mouse/keyboard setup!"

      Can someone design a filter to automatically block these sorts of comments and their succeeding discussions? Then maybe we can see some fresh ideas rise to the top.

    83. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      The PS4 has at least one game running at 900p vs 720p on the Xbox One. I assume that this will continue. It's a damn shame that neither console can output true 1080p on complex games like PCs can, but it really seems like the Xbox One is seriously inferior. I bought a 360 long before my PS3, but I'm pretty sure I'll be getting a PS4 long before I get an Xbox One.

    84. Re:Not this time, Sony by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Constantly calling people "faggot," and other early-teen behaviors. You don't want voice chat on when playing with strangers on Live.

    85. Re:Not this time, Sony by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Steam's DRM is optional. Several Steam games have no DRM. You can just copy the exe out of the folder and run on any system.

    86. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats just standard procedure when it comes to licensing. PSP did the same thing with certain formats, and way back in the original xbox days, you had to buy a remote to enable dvd playback. Why pay for a license to play blu rays if the particular device never turns on or gets updated for one reason or another?

    87. Re: Not this time, Sony by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Our their poor grasp of security, or attacks against hackers, or penchant for proprietary connectors and accessories, or fake reviews, or ...

    88. Re:Not this time, Sony by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well you guys shouldn't have use that feature to make it easier to pirate video games.
      or
      Adding a level of complexity to a system that is suppose to be very easy to use for average Joe, Where some game makers try to get people to jump threw hoops to install software because they didn't want to go threw the normal channels.
      how about
      Installing a different OS, with improperly configured drivers could do damage to the system. Like, some components running hotter then the case can handle, because a proper shutdown of the component when not in use wasn't sent, or a component was getting data faster then designed, and the software actually manages the speed...
      perhaps
      All those call to Tech support asking how to get X,Y,Z configured in some unknown OS/Distribution.

      In short if you buy a video game console you should expect a video game console, not a general purpose PC. Sometimes companies need to block features because they do harm then good.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    89. Re:Not this time, Sony by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2

      Rootkits part of game installations

      The rootkit fiasco was about Sony BMG music discs installing rootkits when you tried to play them on a computer and had nothing to do with games.

      I say music discs because said discs lost the right to be called CDs and have the CD Audio logo due to intervention by Philips.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    90. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Live player seems to be a 13-year old boy with an internal dialogue that goes something like: "Man, I can't wait to get online so I can call everyone else a fag and then demonstrate how not-fag I am by teabagging them. Take THAT everyone at school who bullies me!!"

    91. Re:Not this time, Sony by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I suspect DVD and Bluray are working ok out-of-the-box.

      From all the reviews I've read, they really aren't working out-of-box. Or at least Blu-Ray support isn't. That's one of the reasons there's a 300MB firmware update available on launch day.

      Well, technically it was available several days before launch day, so you could download it and stick it on a USB drive so you don't have to wait for their (apparently) massively overloaded PSN service to download it from the PS4.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    92. Re:Not this time, Sony by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      It means that MS seems to assume that everyone with an Xbox has Attention Deficit Disorder, and so has loaded every fucking square inch of their GUI with increasingly flashy and annoying advertisements.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    93. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux on PS3 was fucking awful, none of these lying pirate wannabe liars were using it for anything.

      You can get an x86-based set top box for under $200.

    94. Re:Not this time, Sony by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      PS4 - Cannot do custom soundtracks, intentionally crippling media playback (DNLA, for example), and instead "urging" consumers to go for Playstation Plus, and another $10 a month for the Sony Music Unlimited "service"

      Sony claims to be looking into the media playback formats issue... they claim they didn't think there would demand for playing mp3s and the like. We'll see if they patch it in with a later firmware update.

      From what I've heard, PSN Plus is required for online play on the PS4. much like XBL Gold is for the XB1.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    95. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was only done as a PR maneuver to impress console fanboyz with the zomg xtreme powerful supercomputing Cell chip. IBM tried to sell Cell as in a rack server and there was no market for it.

    96. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like Steams Draconian DRM policies.

    97. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony customers are like people that won't leave an abusive relationship.

      Indeed. They're almost as bad as people that willingly use Linux on the desktop.

    98. Re:Not this time, Sony by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More to the point: OtherOS, Sony Rootkit fiasco, being slow/less than 100% honest about the PSN hack.

      Lik-Sang, DVD-Jon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    99. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam stats indicate that Linux accounts for roughly 1% of their users. Ignoring Android, most large websites show similar stats. There's no way Valve is going to make Half-Life 3 exclusive to SteamOS/Linux, and most console gamers don't really give a shit about Half-Life 3 anyways. It's just another FPS in a market that is already saturated with them.

      They need a bunch of AAA titles from major studios and rumours are that none of the major studios are playing ball.

    100. Re:Not this time, Sony by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Ah, right. The only time I did it for an extended time was a non-serious race on GT5. I don't have voice set but 3 or 4 of the others did. They sounded like regulars and in who knew each other and were clearly adults (30s or 40s). Its pretty amusing listening to their banter. I can see how the early teen thing would be annoying: I read their posts sometimes on the fora and it's quite alienating.

    101. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tomorrow Microsoft could announce Live is $30 a month instead of the current $5 and what could we do besides throw away our consoles?

      I'm not buying an Xbone, nor am I any fan of Microsoft, but this is stupid.

      You could, at the very least, keep your console and continue to use it without the Live subscription. It doesn't need one to function. Even the crazy daily-phone-home authentication scheme it was originally slated to have didn't require a subscription.

    102. Re:Not this time, Sony by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Wait, you need the Live Membership just to use Netflix?

      Hard as it is to believe in this day and age, yes. To get Netflix (and pretty much any other online service), you need to be a Live Gold member (or whatever they're calling it now). So in addition to the $7/month you pay Netflix, you've got to kick MS another $5 just for the privilege of using your Xbox One to do what pretty much every other device under the sun will do for free. Google "xbox one paywall" for the details.

      P.S. I like This Week in Tech too - which is, I presume, what your name references.

      Yep. Been a Leo Laporte fan going back to the ZDTV days.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    103. Re:Not this time, Sony by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      My brother uses offline mode as his internet is unreliable out in the country. The big problem is if you don't put Steam into offline mode before logging off when you do have internet, it will come up trying to login and does not let you play your games when the internet is down. Steam DRM may be better than all other forms of DRM that I have seen, and has features that actually give the customer new functionality, but it isn't fool-proof and perfect.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    104. Re:Not this time, Sony by rossz · · Score: 1

      OtherOS was never an advertised feature.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    105. Re: Not this time, Sony by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      You like every douche here crying over that, never once used that feature, did you? No of course not, it was a broken feature from the start, able to run 1 or 2 Linux distros without full hardware support, specifically graphics. Get... the frakk ... over it. Not a single comment here relates to the ps4. People like you make me sad, for you haven't a clue that you are a troll.

    106. Re:Not this time, Sony by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Installing a different OS voided the warranty, so all your arguments are incorrect.

      Preventing installing of a different OS actually increased complexity, not reduced it.

    107. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine so, much like how it is easy to "move on" regarding unjust laws when they perceive said laws as not impacting them.

      Doesn't make it a smart thing to do though.

    108. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      What is it with Slashdot perpetuating this myth? I've been debunking it for a decade and still people have no clue.

      OtherOS wasn't the attempt to get past any extra import tax on consoles in EU...it was YABASIC on the PS2. Linux on the PS2 and PS3 postdates the removal of said import tax.

    109. Re: Not this time, Sony by timeOday · · Score: 1

      If a price hike is out of the question, then Microsoft could easily quell any concerns by agreeing up front not to do it.

    110. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Online gaming on PSfoo's can/does have similar jerks, though it depends on the game....stay away from the "dudebro games" like shooters and sports games and it's much better.

    111. Re: Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I actually did use the feature, I was a moderator over at the YDL forum, and I'm getting annoyed that people keep bringing it up! The PS3 wasn't the greatest Linux box...the people who did serious number crunching on the PS3 weren't using it for games so they didn't need to upgrade the firmware!

      Twas nice having it for Firefox and a real e-mail client....and Nethack....but I'm not crying over spilt milk.

    112. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short if you buy a video game console you should expect a video game console, not a general purpose PC.

      Even though it was sold that way? You really think it's unreasonable to expect a product you own today to have the same functionality tomorrow?

    113. Re:Not this time, Sony by adolf · · Score: 1

      Installing a different OS voided the warranty, so all your arguments are incorrect.

      [citation needed]

      (And, no: "But everyone says that it voids the warranty, so it MUST be true!" doesn't count.)

    114. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Not this again!

      Look, I had YDL on my PS3 and I was a moderator over at the YDL forums and I find these constant references to OtherOS especially from some other people who never actually used it to be annoying.

      You had a choice...keep OtherOS, but then SCEA doesn't "trust" your PS3 and cuts you off PSN. Or you can update and lose OtherOS.

      Some say that they shouldn't have forced you to make that choice....well blame Piracy Friendly GeoHot for that. Yeah yeah, those PS3 hackers say it was about "freedom to use hardware that you OWN" but they give a wink/nod to the pirates.

      Heck, a bunch of Linux newbs were basically using OtherOS just for emulators...and NOT for homebrew games.

      Besides, the partition schemes were not optimal. you either had 10GB to Linux and the rest to GameOS (which seriously Linux because some compiles would fail without a larger swap partition which reduced your root filesystem even more). Or you had 10GB to GameOS and the rest to Linux which basically crippled GameOS, cutting you off from larger downloads and large game caches would eat up at least half of that space.

    115. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Lik-Sang? You mean the Chinese Piracy Enabling company? And it just wasn't sony that sued them, but also Microsoft and Nintendo.

    116. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony also sued the company that provided the rootkit. They didn't do it in-house.

      Also IIRC BMG wasn't owned by Sony when they contracted out for it.

    117. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      "They" didn't remove it....if anyone did "YOU" did. You had the ultimate choice.

      Another option was keeping OtherOS and getting a second PS3 for games, if you liked Linux on Cell so much.

    118. Re: Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony greatly expanded their target audience by advertising the other OS feature(governments, researchers, anyone doing number crunching),

      I do not think you understand what "greatly" means...there weren't that many PS3's doing scientific computing, compared to the vast majority that did nothing other than playing games and media.

      and for them, it wasn't just a minor inconvenience, it was turning the computers into useless gaming consoles

      What? Computational Computing users weren't using them for games and had no reason to ever update the firmware. Didn't effect them in the slightest.

    119. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Either everything you've said is a lie

      I can't play Portal without an Internet connection. Even with certain Internet connections, I still can't play it. I assume it has to do with what the connection blocks. For example, I can play Steam games from the airport in Seattle, but Portal doesn't work in the Atlanta airport. I can't believe your defending the decision to do this. Us gamers are left with no way of knowing why Valve has decided to not allow us to play the games we have bought.

      Also, I can't play any of my games without getting past the login demand from Valve. They don't even allow me to see a list of the games I own, much less allow me to play them. How do I play something that Valve won't even allow me to see?

      You're the liar here. Please stop with your irrational defense of this horrible anti-gamer system.

    120. Re:Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it was "fucking awful" for one, Firefox under Linux was a much better browser than the PS3's pre-webkit version of netfront (the later webkit version is much better). Until recently, with the release of the TuneIn app, the PS3 couldn't listen to shoutcast/icecast stations. And don't forget Abiword, GIMP, OpenOffice, Nethack, etc etc.

    121. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Us gamers are left with no way of knowing why Valve has decided to not allow us to play"

      Check to see if port 8080 is open. I couldn't play several of my Valve games until I got work to open port 8080 out. As to why in the hell Valve thinks it is morally right to not allow us to play the games that we bought just because we don't allow port 8080 out, I have now clue. Their DRM is arbitrary and hateful. More often than not, I can't play the games I own when I try to play them.

    122. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also removed sacd

    123. Re: Not this time, Sony by phorm · · Score: 1

      Why? It's not like anyone who's been waiting for *years* won't buy it if it comes out in windows a month or two after the Steam Machine/Linux.
      However, holding back might net them more adoption in the other areas.

    124. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't play the games at all if you can't login."

      Exactly. I have a backup generator, but that doesn't help me wrt playing Steam games because my Internet connection goes down when the power goes out because Comcast uses utility power for their amps. I wish I could play the games I paid a lot of money for while my power is down. I don't have anything else I can do when the power is off so it is really annoying that Valve made the decision to not allow me to play my own games.

    125. Re: Not this time, Sony by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Well Sony, here's your customers giving the finger back.

      No. Sorry to tell you, but you and all the other people on Slashdot genuinely angry about the issue are a *much* smaller and less important proportion of the potential customers than the echo chamber here might lead you to think.

      It's like when someone says "I'd buy [such and such locked-down gadget] if they made it more open, so they should do that". They forget that not only are they a relatively small proportion of the potential market, but that this has to be offset against the profit to be made by keeping the device closed and making lots of money from licensing fees and subscriptions on officially-approved software, i.e. milking the great unwashed masses.

      Unfortunately, the vast majority of owners and potential owners never gave a toss about the Linux issue, and still don't.

      I'm not saying I agree with Sony's behaviour re: the PS3 Linux controversy. On the contrary, it was bait-and-switch, and all the counter-arguments about "it's your hardware, but it's their [PSN] service and software and you don't have to upgrade and lose Linux, but Sony aren't obliged to provide access to PSN and new software if you don't" are disingenuous. The machine was sold with the expectation that it can run new release software, and that it can access the PSN.

      But it doesn't change the fact that if Sony has to choose between screwing over and alienating a few thousand customers (*) in this way and closing a hole that might deprive them of income from millions of others, the former don't even count as a rounding error.

      (*) I'm only counting about the ones who put their money where their mouth is, not the far larger number who'll complain vehemently in Slashdot about issues like this, but when push comes to shove will hand over the money for some shiny new product or console, often with a half-baked excuse. Some people here *do* stand up for what they believe in, but nowhere near as many as the most vocal comments might lead you to believe.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    126. Re: Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      They didn't remove SACD from PS3's that had that feature...they just stopped selling NEW PS3's with that feature, since it was a FAT PS3 feature...like the backwards compatibility.

      And as I've said...the biggest complaint about the PS3 from the masses was the price of the launch models.

    127. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (governments, researchers, anyone doing number crunching), and for them, it wasn't just a minor inconvenience, it was turning the computers into useless gaming consoles

      Anyone using Linux on the PS3 for something serious could simply decline to update the firmware. Not being able to log into PSN or play new games is not really an issue for these users.

    128. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try enabling UPnP on the router. I've found that Valve prevents you from playing less often when it is enabled. As to why so damn often other times that Valve decides to prevent you from playing the games you bought, I have no clue. They're jerks for not allowing us to play.

    129. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All things you easily could do with dumpster-dive grade hardware. Or a low power, ultra quiet computer if you're willing to spend a little cash (my old fat PS3 is loud as hell, don't know if that improved with the later models).

      If Linux on the PS3 had proper GPU support, it would have been a lot more compelling.

    130. Re: Not this time, Sony by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      later on installed 3.50 and lost the ability to use a lot of their 3rd party peripherals .

      It wasn't a lot, just a few selection bias addled whiners claiming it was "a lot"

    131. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, I hadn't tried Portal 2. I personally have never had a game not work in offline mode (which I use religiously for modded games), how many titles actually implement this? Is Portal 2 and outlier, or have I just been lucky so far?

    132. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also removed SACD.

    133. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't play Portal without an Internet connection. Even with certain Internet connections, I still can't play it.

      Thirty seconds on Google showed me that most people can play Portal in offline mode. If you can't, you have a tech issue. That's a problem, and it may well be Valve's fault, but it's not a case of "Valve deciding not to allow you to play the game you bought".

      I can't believe your defending the decision to do this.

      Of course you can't believe it. You can't believe it because you know that it's not the truth. It's a strawman argument that you chose to make up and pretend I said. A lie, in short.

      This is what you said, and what I responded to:

      You can't play the games at all if you can't login. Valve locks your account if someone else tries to login with the wrong password. Also, when their servers are down, Valve does not allow you to play any of your games. Finally, when your Internet connection is down, Valve has a policy against letting you play your games.

      These statements are false, because you can play any game in offline mode as long as it doesn't have other DRM of its own (which is out of Valve's control).

      Because those statements are not true, they can only have been made out of dishonesty or ignorance. That is a fact that I stated. I then asked which case applied to you.

      You then read my statement of fact (as proven by your quoting part of it) and knew you could not refute it. That is why you chose to pretend I was "defending" a decision by Valve. I did not defend any decision on Valve's part at all. You knew that but decided to put words to that effect in my mouth anyway. This makes you a liar.

      Furthermore, your response shows that you were also lying (not merely unaware of offline mode) when you first made the post I replied to. If you had been unaware of offline mode, you would have said something to that effect, or not responded at all. Instead, you chose to focus only on the possibility I raised that you were lying (since it was true, which bothered you), and attempted - unsuccessfully - to turn that back on me.

      So, yes, you are the liar. And you know you've been caught, so the only remaining question is whether you are foolish enough to keep digging yourself deeper into the hole you've made for yourself.

    134. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is why are you defending a dishonest company that doesn't allow us to play the games that we bought? You got caught as a dishonest paid shill.

      When I load Steam, it demands my personal e-mail address and a password. I can find no way to bypass Valve's blocking of me from my games other than to connect to the Internet, give them my personal information, and the correct password. If I'm lying then tell my how to bypass that block? If you have a hack that can get past that screen then I'll apologize, but I bet you can't. I've talked to Valve's support several times, and even they recognize their dishonest actions. As the last person I talked to there when I asked about playing while staying in remote motels that don't have Internet access, and his answer was that "you're just screwed." Really, is that the type of thing you want to support?

    135. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that people are defending those crooks. They take our money in exchange for a game then refuse to let us play it. I know other people have filed a complaint with the FTC because of those asshole thieves, and I think it's time that more of us do so. Intentionally keeping us from running the games that we own is criminal.

    136. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, yes, you are foolish enough to keep digging.

      The question is why are you defending a dishonest company that doesn't allow us to play the games that we bought?

      No, the question is what did I say defending any company at all? And you know that the answer is "nothing". Therefore, you are lying when you say that I am doing that.

      You got caught as a dishonest paid shill.

      No, you got caught as a liar.

      When I load Steam, it demands my personal e-mail address and a password. I can find no way to bypass Valve's blocking of me from my games other than to connect to the Internet, give them my personal information, and the correct password. If I'm lying then tell my how to bypass that block?

      You use offline mode. We have already established that you are aware of that solution, but even if you weren't, you'd be able to find it easily by searching for "steam offline mode".

      If you have a hack that can get past that screen then I'll apologize, but I bet you can't

      Indeed I don't have a "hack". What I have is the same thing you have: the knowledge of the offline mode that exists for the explicit purpose of solving the very problem you claim to have.

      've talked to Valve's support several times, and even they recognize their dishonest actions. As the last person I talked to there when I asked about playing while staying in remote motels that don't have Internet access, and his answer was that "you're just screwed."

      If you had spoken to Valve support, they would certainly have told you about offline mode. So either you are lying about having spoken to them, or you are lying about what you were told. Either way, you have again inadvertently outed yourself as a liar.

      Really, is that the type of thing you want to support?

      I don't support it, which is why I haven't said anything in support of it. You want me to support it, though, which is why you continue to lie about what I am saying.

      You are aware that you are embarrassing yourself with your ill-considered lies. However, you are not intelligent enough to think of a way to get yourself out of this situation with your dignity intact. And you also lack the self-respect to simply walk away. So instead you're just going to keep doubling down on the only thing you know to try: more lying. It won't work, and you know it, but you'll keep it up because it's all you can think of. At least until it occurs to you to pretend you were just trolling the whole time.

    137. Re:Not this time, Sony by faragon · · Score: 1

      Come on.

    138. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been following this discussion with some interest because I would love to be able to play the games I bought. So asshole, how do you get past Valve's screen that prevents you from playing the game? What work-around do you have? On screen, there is a LOGIN button and a CANCEL button. There is no "bypass the login" or "let me play the games I own" button. There's a button labeled "RETRIEVE A LOST ACCOUNT...", but of course that doesn't do anyone a damn bit of good if Valve is down yet again or if you don't have Internet access. So you claim Valve doesn't prevent you from playing. Back-up your claim or admit you're a liar. The GP is correct that Valve is run by a bunch of crooks.

    139. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People still say "boxen"?

    140. Re:Not this time, Sony by smash · · Score: 1

      they didn't post the worst case scenario at all.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    141. Re: Not this time, Sony by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy, and not really funny.

      Linux on the desktop doesn't cost $$ anything except my time and even then as long as you have reasonable expectations it just works.

      At least you don't have to worry about bricking your system like PS3 4.45
      https://www.google.com/search?q=ps3+system+update+brick

    142. Re: Not this time, Sony by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > but you and all the other people on Slashdot genuinely angry about the issue are a *much* smaller and less important proportion of the potential customers

      You are forgetting that we also give ANTI-recommendations to friends and family. Namely:

        Never Buy Sony Ever Again.

      All Sony devices have been banned from my house aside from the one PS3 that is used for Blu-ray + NetFlix player. Sony's devices are not worth wasting the money on. Here's why ...

      * One of my friends 2 yr old Sony TV has a thin blue line all the way down the TV. Sony's response? Buy a new TV.
      * Another friend had a system firmware update brick his PS3. (This was a year *before* the 4.45 firmware debacle) Sony's response? Buy another console.

      And this is on top of of the root kit, the PSN security leak, the OtherOS bait-n-switch, the intentional HD vs BluRay war, proprietary formats(1) every time they turn around, the fact that a user can *brick* their TV while updating it, etc.

      Now why should I reward psychopath behavior with Stockholm syndrome again???

      So a lot of geeks say "Fuck-you Sony" for good reason. Sony used to understand:

        1) Hardware; they are OK with
        2) Software; they still don't have a fucking clue about
        3) User Experience.

      I'm not singling out Sony here, Microsoft sucks just as bad.

      (1) Sony has lost every format war they have ever fought except for Blu-Ray. From an old /. post:
      http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2559450&cid=38276024

      - BetaMax/VHS (VHS crushed beta)
      - NT casette/microcasette (nobody remembers NT casettes),
      - MiniDisc/Flash (held on in Asia, but flash and HDD and CDs(2) won),
      - DAT/CD (DAT never made it beyond professional use),
      - MMCD/SD (MMCD abandonned, SD became DVD)
      - VCD/DVD (VCDs saw some use, but DVD came out two years later and started killing it)
      - MemoryStick/MMC/SD/CF/Xd/etc (SD won, even some Sony products use SD rather than MS, CF only sees some professional use), * ATRAC/MP3 (ATRAC never saw much adoption outside of MiniDisc)
      - SACD/DVD-Audio (made irrelevant by digital distribution)

      (2) Sony was hedging their bets as they also co-developed the CD.

    143. Re:Not this time, Sony by Psykechan · · Score: 2

      I'm one of the people who is still mad about the OtherOS removal. Yes, I'm aware that due to how the PS3 hypervisor limits the system that running Linux on a PS3 is comparable to running it on a Raspberry Pi. Heck, you've got more usable RAM on the current Pi than on the PS3. That's not the point.

      The end result of the SCEA v. Hotz fiasco is that once the warranty period is up, Sony can do whatever the hell they want to your console. Any feature is fair game. Sony could legally push an update that turns it into a paperweight if they desired and you would have no recourse. As an addendum, the warranty isn't transferable so this could legally kill the used system market if they so desired.

      The warranty time used to be a safe period at the beginning of a piece of consumer electronics usable life where if it broke you would be able to get a replacement. Now, it should be seen as the entirety of the devices usable life.

      If you are planning on buying a PS4, make sure that you buy the extended (2yr) warranty. Make sure that you get your $450 worth over then next 3 years. Go into this with eyes wide open.

      Yes, this doesn't just apply to Sony but they are the ones specifically have it in their warranty clause, went to court to confirm the legality of it, and are otherwise actively hostile to their customers.

      http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2011/02/otheros-class-action-lawsuit-geohot-sony-now-share-same-charge/
      http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110218181557455

    144. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > offline mode exists.

      Really?

      http://upstate.net/jen/typical_steam_experience.png

      How do I get past the login then?

    145. Re:Not this time, Sony by stub667 · · Score: 1

      Right now you can run more AAA games on a Linux box with Steam than a Playstation 4.

      It will be interesting to see if that remains the case over the next few years.

    146. Re:Not this time, Sony by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the guys currently at the top of Valve are rich and worked at Microsoft in the early days. Points in their favour, sure, but how do these points allay my concern that their company might not last forever...?

    147. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do I get to this mythical offline mode? I'm at a Tully's right now and Steam isn't working with theirInternet connection, but web pages are. There are no options on the login screen to bypass the login wall. You're a liar.

    148. Re:Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not anti-DRM, you're a Valve shill. Go away.

    149. Re:Not this time, Sony by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

      I believe you can disable the mic/video camera thing. And even if for some strange reason you can't disable it with a physical switch and/or software option...you can always do what I do and hook the console/tv/etc up to a power strip (or UPS whatever) and power it all off when it's not in use. Saves on power bills too.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    150. Re: Not this time, Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see an offline option under any of the menus. You Steam fanbois are getting even more bold with your lies. It would be nice if Valve gave us the option to play whenever they are so often down. Most of my time playing games is on airplanes. It really sucks when I can't login at the airport before boarding the plane. Valve's decision to not allow us to play the games we own proves they are a dishonest company.

  2. No media by CimmerianX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used my ps3 for media as well as occasional gaming. PS4 lack of streaming media support that does not originate from Sony's pay sites is a real minus for me. At least with the ps4 released, I can snap up used PS3 for media consoles in the bedrooms now.

    1. Re:No media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the main reason of why I'll buy Xbox One over the PS4.

    2. Re:No media by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Thing is, I'm STILL going to use the PS3 as my primary media console. If I get a PS4 with all those same features, it'd be a bit redundant. (That is, until the PS3 eventually dies.)

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:No media by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      I used my ps3 for media as well as occasional gaming. PS4 lack of streaming media support that does not originate from Sony's pay sites is a real minus for me.

      I'm the same way, and with the Black Friday deals around the corner I can get an extra 1 or 2 cheap.

    4. Re:No media by Sez+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least with the ps4 released, I can snap up used PS3 for media consoles in the bedrooms now.

      This is the main reason of why I'll buy Xbox One over the PS4.

      There is no way I'm putting an Xbox One in my bedroom.

    5. Re:No media by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used my ps3 for media as well as occasional gaming. PS4 lack of streaming media support that does not originate from Sony's pay sites is a real minus for me. At least with the ps4 released, I can snap up used PS3 for media consoles in the bedrooms now.

      For now.

      One of the greatest things about the Xbox One and PS4 is they're keeping Microsoft and Sony honest. When Microsoft announced the draconian DRM scheme, Sony countered, causing Microsoft to completely rethink their DRM position. Of course, Sony did a few more thins to keep Microsoft on its toes.

      And now, the day AFTER Sony gave out its big FAQ, Microsoft announced the Xbox One will support MP3s and DLNA. Which caused Sony to announce it was coming in a future update now. Heck, the whole "voice control" think was hastily implemented by Sony to counter the Xbone's Kinect, which is why it's a bit hokey on release.

      PS4 fanboys can mock the Xbone, while Xbox fanboys can mock the PS4 all they want, and analystics can say "Sony wins", but in the end, it's better that we have the Xbone with the PS4 than either/or.

      Sony can't revert to draconian DRM because they promised not to (and the Xbone can't, either).

      Regardless of which console is "better" (remember, the PS3 outclasses the Xbox360) technically, the best thing is both do well enough that neither decides to leave, and that Nintendo remains as a spoiler.

      Heck, if you want to remember what happened when Sony last thought it had the upper hand on everyone, see the news in the months leading up to the launch of the PS3. Now that Sony's a bit more humbled from that, hopefully things will be more interesting. Microsoft got a bit arrogant during the 360 era, so hopefully they'll be smacked down a bit and have to actually compete. But not too much - just enough to keep Microsoft from thinking it can get away with anything.

      And hell, you have Apple to thank for screwing up the whole business model as well - Apple's approval process is really a very "lite" version of how one develops on consoles and it's forced Sony and Microsoft to rethink how they do development.

    6. Re:No media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get an Ouya instead. Terible gaming platform but great for streaming media through xmbc.
      PS3 has the cineva protection blocking your home rips and poor format suport.

    7. Re:No media by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Check Craigslist; I got a PS3 with a controller and six games for $100 on there. I use it mostly for streaming media and watching blu-rays. I refuse to give any money to Sony though on account of their anti-consumerism so I'll buy used for the right price if I can help it.

    8. Re:No media by Megane · · Score: 1

      "Xbox One is watching you fap"

      Just think of the market research value of finding out what you fap to!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:No media by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      So I assume you also don't allow your cell phone in your bedroom.

    10. Re:No media by Pope · · Score: 1

      There is no way I'm putting an Xbox One in my bedroom.

      Don't worry; it's so huge, you won't be able to fit it in there anyway.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:No media by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Sony have confirmed that this is coming in a future update, if that matters to you.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    12. Re:No media by ChaseTec · · Score: 1

      Everybody keeps saying this without detailing it! What lack of streaming support bothers you? The PS4 has the standard set of NetFlix type internet streaming apps from what I can tell. Are there missing apps? If you are talking about local lan UPnP are you really even using that? I know I used UPnP for a while on my PS3 but lately all my movies that I've tried to rip and copy to my NAS haven't been playable on the PS3. They have this Cinavia piracy protection feature that automatically disables audio when play protected movies. So unless you are using the PS3's UPnP for home movies or torrents that have modified audio I'd almost consider the PS4 as supporting the same streaming options.

      I'm actually curious because I'm very iffy about getting a PS4 and I'm might just go with a Steam box instead. Please provide some detail.

      --
      My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
    13. Re:No media by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      One of the greatest things about the Xbox One and PS4 is they're keeping Microsoft and Sony honest.

      Darn right.

      Heck, if you want to remember what happened when Sony last thought it had the upper hand on everyone, see the news in the months leading up to the launch of the PS3.

      $599 Deluxe model

      Ken Kuturagi: the PS3 is "for consumers who think to themselves 'I will work more hours to buy one'. We want people to feel that they want it, irrespective of anything else."

      Giant Enemy Crab! Attack it's weak point for Massive Damage! Real time Weapon change!

      Riiiiiiiiddggggge Raaaaaccceeeeeerrrrrrrrr.

      I have a PS3 (and PS4 now too) and I think they're funny.

    14. Re:No media by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Sony can't revert to draconian DRM because they promised not to (and the Xbone can't, either).

      Meh... it might get them a lawsuit, but they are under no contractual obligation. Even if they were, they could just throw in some twist and call it something different ("it's an anti-virus security feature"). The only thing that prevents this is the threat of competition (since it seems anyone can build a game console these days) and upset buyers potentially boycotting them.

      To contradict myself, I guess there's an off-chance that some AG's would notice and try to bring home some much-needed bacon for their state's general fund. Maybe Microsoft and Sony are taking that into account.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    15. Re:No media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sony can't revert to draconian DRM because they promised not to (and the Xbone can't, either)."

      Bwahaha,,, I've got a bridge to sell you buddy. NOTHING demonstrates your utter cluelessness more than this comment. It's completely at odds with reality and documented history (esp Sony).

    16. Re:No media by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

      Sony can't revert to draconian DRM because they promised not to (and the Xbone can't, either).

      Right, they would never lie to you.

    17. Re:No media by CimmerianX · · Score: 1

      Yes. I use UPnP almost exclusively. And I don't play Media right from the nas, I have a PS3 Media Center setup to convert any video on the fly as it plays. And I don't pirate movies so I don't worry about Cinavia....

  3. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why cant we get both loosing?

  4. Why is it broken out of the box? by Rhurazz12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To me it's very disturbing that you have to require a Internet connection just to enable features such the Blu-ray player on the console. It SHOULD have it feature already in the box. What if a kid who wants this console don't have Internet in their home. Believe it or not, there are some families who do NOT have Internet because it's not worth the money to invest what their getting out of the connection.

    1. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

      "If you cannot even afford a basic Internet connection of around 1~5 Mbps then you probably can't afford a PS4 either."

      Spoken like a complete fucktard that has never been to Brazil.

      Or any place where electronics and such are taxed so heavily that in many places the only entertainment you have is an internet connection through your shitty cell phone.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you think an Internet connection is "not worth it" then it's a choice.

      If you cannot even afford a basic Internet connection of around 1~5 Mbps then you probably can't afford a PS4 either.

      I'm getting ready to spend the weekend in a fairly remote part of my state.

      There's electricity and running water, sure, but to get internet access out to where we'll be it would cost the residents somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 - $40,000, because there isn't any broadband infrastructure within several miles.

      Sounds pretty damn "not worth it" to me, and it's not like a farmer who owns 250+ acres is broke.

      Sigh... city kids.

      Side note: the juxtaposition of your comment with your sig is wonderfully ironic, you know that?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can't activate the PS4 somewhere with a connection? It only needs that connection once. You knew that, right?

    4. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Spad · · Score: 2

      You don't. You can download the update from a location of your choosing and install it via USB. You can also call a freephone number and Sony will post you the update on disc so you don't need the internet at all.

      The lack of Blu-Ray playback out of the box is to reduce the cost of the unit by only paying licensing costs for users who actually use it rather than having to pay for blanket licensing.

    5. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by smash · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who said anything about "afford"? Not everywhere has good internet. Internet connectivity is not necessarily portable. Game consoles are.

      And you don't even have to go to the third world. I was working out on remote mine sites for a few years. I was on 100-150k/yr (low paying IT job compared to what many others would get on a site). Really poor, or in some cases, no internet connectivity in my room. Which means entertainment is either reading a book, watching TV (barf), drinking beer or gaming.

      Money isn't necessarily the problem, if internet is simply not available.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    6. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      You're easily disturbed. They did this so they don't have to pay BluRay license fees for people who never play a BluRay on their PS4. It was a sound business decision.

    7. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Because of the import tax, it's cheaper for some to fly to the US, buy a device and fly back. I say just spend a night in a local hotel and use their Internet (or an open WiFi) to update the device!

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    8. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Well, until the next update of course.

      That said, there are always options. You can use dial up, you can use Internet Connection Sharing on Windows (or NAT on Linux) and an ethernet cable (crossover is better, but generally not necessary anymore) to hook up the PS4. A 300MB download will only take ~15 hours on a 56K modem, which is bad but you can leave it running overnight and into the morning. There is also Satellite Internet (a much too expensive option if all you care about is 1 300MB download though).

      The easiest solution is probably to lug the box over to a friends house and bum their internet for awhile (maybe take them out to dinner while it downloads) to get the box fully set up.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Cell phone? Satellite? Both of those work.

      If I had to work on a farm, I'd drop the $20-$40k and run fiber to my house, but that's me.

    10. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Nah. First, I don't think sony has to pay any fees for blu-ray, and even if they did, they hit the cap on the fees anyhow, so any "extra" is free. They just want to sell you more stuff.

    11. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      brazil? the country where an xbox one or ps3 costs 1100+ dollars due to penalizing import taxes?

      yeah I think if they can afford that they can afford to have internet which isn't penalized. or if they fucking don't then they should choose that and a sega mastersystem clone over the console.

      (shitty cellphones tend to have wifi ap functionality nowadays too).

      a required system update on startup is just their way of battling modding this time around, really.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      that sounds convenient.

    13. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's an extra fee for the user to activate the BluRay, and yes, Sony does have to pay license fees just like everyone else. They're just one member of the BluRay Disc Association.

      What do you think Sony gets when you activate BluRay? You seem paranoid, but I'm open to any info you have that would seem to justify your beliefs.

    14. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure you can get them to mail you a disk which will activate those features.

      I do agree it's silly that they need to be activated, but it is a one time thing and there is a workaround for requiring an internet connection.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    15. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Or someone who is not active duty military overseas. I'm pretty sure even the Navy would not allow a broadband internet connection in the middle of the ocean even if it was technically feasible. The Army and Marines probably want to spend their money on other things for their foreign bases.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    16. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Great, an AC who's trying to make me look like a psychopath.

    17. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Believe it or not, there are some families who do NOT have Internet because it's not worth the money to invest what their getting out of the connection."

      But buying a PS4 is? If someone is too poor to have an internet connection, what they fuck are they doing buying a PS4? To spoil their fucking kids?

    18. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you cannot even afford a basic Internet connection of around 1~5 Mbps

      Do you realize that many Microsoft employees don't have Internet access as fast at the 5 Mbps you mention cant' afford a PS4? I live in Seattle, and Comcast hasn't expanded to my block yet so CenturyLink is the only option for faster than dial-up access. Because of the distance to the CO, I'm limited to 1.5 Mbps down. Are you really saying that someone in one of the most technical cities in the world with the best consumer connection available in the area can't afford a PS4? That's ridiculous. Microsoft pays well. The city blocks competition and doesn't enforce their franchise agreements with Comcast so we don't have good Internet access. That doesn't mean we can't afford a PS4.

      Do you really think Microsoft employees can't afford a PS4? You're ridiculous.

    19. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by CronoCloud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Military is full of young men....game consoles are VERY popular in the military. From what I've read, bases tend to have reasonable connections...ships less so.

    20. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, disregard my insane rant and denial! I suck cocks!

      - ArcadeMan (2766669)

    21. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " Are you really saying that someone in one of the most technical cities in the world with the best consumer connection available in the area can't afford a PS4?"

      "I live in Seattle"

      I know plenty of people that can afford broadband better than that, just barely, through their cell phone plans, and they're living on the streets, willingly at that.

      Doesn't mean they can afford a PS4, though.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    22. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If they get a connection on a base in Japan it's possible. Middle of nowhere Afghanistan is less likely. So they assumption is that you shouldn't rely on having a connection much less a stable connection if you are overseas. Any console that relies on one just to work will be useless..

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    23. Re:Why is it broken out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure gamers around the world are heartbroken that Brazilians won't be joining them on PS4

      huehuehuehuehue

  5. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by williagr · · Score: 0

    Bah, I was really looking forward to a fully digital distribution model on the XBone, anyone who saw that system as overly negative weren't looking hard enough or didn't want to look hard enough.

  6. We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought we all agreed on the SteamBox so we can play games together!
    Plus in SteamBox doesn't need "other OS" feature as it already is the other OS.

    1. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get it Slashdot. A steambox requires a mandatory online DRM check that the consoles don't have, and only allows you to use your titles in one location (even with family sharing, my friends can't play games because if I play anything else they get kicked off).

      And this is more consumer friendly? Why, because Valve hasn't fucked you over personally yet? Try dealing with their miserable ticket system sometime. They're no saint.

    2. Re:We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Winter is coming.

    3. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by tepples · · Score: 1

      Historically, it's been easier for a smaller developer to get a game greenlit on Steam than on the major consoles' stores.

    4. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. The Steam greenlight program is fairly new and it's trivial to get something on the Xbox online store. It's far easier than getting something greenlit on Steam.

    5. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by tepples · · Score: 1

      it's trivial to get something on the Xbox online store.

      Are you referring to Xbox Live Indie Games, which requires completely rewriting your game in C# and which Microsoft appears to be phasing out anyway?

    6. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is *not* phasing out C#... That's been a "widely believed fact" around Slashdot for some number of years now but there is no evidence that this is true.

    7. Re: We all agreed upon buying SteamBoxes by tepples · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Microsoft was phasing out C#. I said Microsoft was phasing out Xbox Live Indie Games.

  7. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

  8. woohoo it's pay day! i'mma go get one! .. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it only has two games? and one of them is a generic as fuck shooter that doesn't do anything that half-life didn't already do in 1998? Yeah, ok, I think i'll just keep my money.

  9. Don't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move along.

  10. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Troll

    you think sony is any BETTER than MS when it comes to farking over the end-user?

    what the HELL??

    you must be adicted to video games. that is the only reason you'd support sony. the majority of us have shunned this company due to all their collective bad behavior (too many items to list here; search on why people boycott sony).

    MS is evil but sony is much much worse!

    don't forget, sony is a media company and so, by definition, they start out with a balance of evil, numerically greater than zero.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  11. Download firmware in advance! by stevemoink · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a mandatory day-one firmware update, which is just north of 300 MB. If you have an internet connection and a USB drive (aka, if you are reading this) go to PSN to pre-download.

    1. Re:Download firmware in advance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr... it looks like that's ~900MBytes. They didn't ask me to accept a EULA, so presumably I'm free to crack/disassemble this file if I want to try.

    2. Re:Download firmware in advance! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      For me the actual 1.5 update was 300MB, I don't what that is.

  12. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by kamapuaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think you should speak for "the majority of us." My impression is it's a vocal minority upset over things most of Slashdot doesn't particularly care about - they got rid of the Linux OS nobody was actually using, and they purchased BMG right after BMG added anti-piracy rootkits to CDs, 10 years ago.

    I don't think PS4 will fuck over the user. Sony sells it as a game device and it seems to do just that.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  13. Good console but no games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is ZERO reason to buy either the PS4 or the (vastly inferior) Xbox One this season. They are both missing any compelling exclusive games (the four most important exclusives, Killzone, Knack, Ryse and Dead Rising, are terrible), and the cross platform titles (Assassin's Creed, COD, Battlefield) are no better than the same games running on a quite modest gaming PC. GTA5 is missing until next year.

    And, of course, initial hardware tends to have significant teething troubles, and the highest costs. Next year, as Microsoft desperately tries to make up ground against Sony (if MS hasn't sold off the Xbox division by then), a full-blown price-war will be underway, with MS selling a MUCH cheaper Xbone without the NSA Kinect spy sensor system.

    Previous console releases have included, at launch, exclusive software that made PC gamers jealous. For the first time, the BEST games on the new consoles are also on the PC, and run and look far far better if that PC has decent gaming hardware bought during the last three years or so.

    Next year will see the trend reverse a little, as the first games appear that actually take advantage of the power of the new consoles. But it seems likely that the best games will continue to be published on the PC as well (note how Microsoft has paid tens of millions of dollars to keep Titanfall off the PS4, and yet that giant robot FPS is coming to the PC). If AMD's Mantle initiative takes hold, the PC versions will always look and play as least as good as the PS4 version.

    Both Microsoft and Sony should be ashamed that they failed to 'encourage' better launch software.

    1. Re:Good console but no games by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there. When GT7 comes out I might consider the PS4. Other than that, I'm happy with my recently and cheaply purchased PS3. Yes, many games are better on PC (FPS, particularly), but there are enough interesting titles to make the $250 purchase price of a PS3 worthwhile.

    2. Re: Good console but no games by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if you put it that way there is zero reason to ever buy a console during initial release. All have problems and all have few titles. You could just do what I do and wait until the next gen is out and buy up the old consoles then. Yes, I bought my first 360 in July 3013, 200gb special edition with 40 games for $250, and yes, I bought my first original xbox in 2006 with similar extras. No, I don't care if "all my friends" are playing the new system, because no one comes to my house to play console games and I don't play console games online with my friends.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:Good console but no games by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much a given that the launch day titles will suck for a console. The only ones that ever seem to have longevity are Nintendo's pack-ins. By this time next year there should be some good games for both systems though.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re: Good console but no games by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Well, if you put it that way there is zero reason to ever buy a console during initial release.

      Well yeah, you always buy a 2 year old car that someone returned from a lease...

      ...unless of course you like new cars.

      I'll be buying an Xbox One. I'm looking forward to the convergence of living room entertainment and social features. Should be fun. I want to get in on it early, and $700.

    5. Re: Good console but no games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't care if "all my friends" are playing the new system, because no one comes to my house to play console games

      Honestly, you are missing out on one of the best features of game consoles... playing with friends, on the couch, pizza on the way, beer in the fridge.
      Not for everyone, I know, but worth it.

      There are whole genres that play to that on consoles that don't exist on PCs.
      *cough*Mortal Kombat?*cough*

      And dungeon crawlers are much smoother when someone needs to check their gear and you're waiting to eat your pizza anyway. Diablo 3 for example.. you just sit coldly in your computer chair waiting for someone to come back.

    6. Re: Good console but no games by Scowler · · Score: 1

      Agreed. By mid next year we should have Watch Dogs, Destiny, and FFXV. I'll save my purchase for then.

    7. Re: Good console but no games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having bought pretty much every launch console for the past 20 years. I am waiting this one out for a bit. Got burned on a 360 my friend went thru 5 in the first 3 months (and he babies his stuff). It is usually worth waiting these days 6-8 months then buying to see what sort of defects you are getting into. Usually by then you can see if the system is a dud (no titles) or doing ok (which means a decent selection with more on the way soon).

      Also with the platforms basically being a PC we will see tons of shovelware between the two and the PC. So steam should get pretty interesting in about a year once they work out the abstraction libraries.

  14. rootkit/geohot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Sony put out a rootkit a while back.
    2. By challenging Geohot, Sony effectively told the world that you're not allowed to modify the toy you own to make it work in the way you want.

    Those two alone make for compelling reasons not to buy this gaming console right away. Not to mention the potential first-gen problems.

    Wait a year, then see if it's worth your while. Just don't directly support $ony with your money. If anything, go for the lesser of two evils and buy used from Gamestop.

  15. Not again by ketomax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't we get an article for Playstation that does not refer to Xbox or vice versa?

    1. Re:Not again by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Can't we get an article for Playstation that does not refer to Xbox or vice versa?

      Nintendo fan, I'm guessing.

      That's okay, we've got a new entrant in the market we can all talk about instead!

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  16. My PS1 by darrellg1 · · Score: 1

    outlasted 3 xbox 360s and now a 4th is jacked due to an update.

    1. Re:My PS1 by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Its amazing how much older hardware seems to outlast newer hardware by decades. It almost makes me (jokingly) wonder if newer hardware has a built-in time bomb!
      Routers have to be the worst offenders when it comes to this.

    2. Re:My PS1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that if a device is going to die, it will die in the first few weeks or after 10 years. Older hardware gets a pass because it avoided the faulty manufacture window but has yet to hit the worn down window.

    3. Re:My PS1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newer tech is more complex, making it more likely to fail. Older tech is rarely used, extending its lifespan.

  17. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    To teach the industry that consumers wont accept being force fed content consumption models that require us to bend over and take it up the arse

    I'm sorry, but I have seen nothing in the history of Sony and their behavior to believe you'll see anything different from Sony on this front.

    Sony is a HUGE content provider, and is absolutely going to want to monetize everything they can. They're going to be trying very hard to lock you in, get you buying stuff from them, ensuring their DRM is enforced, and generally treating it like it's still their console and not yours.

    For me, both of these consoles fall squarely in the "If they're not screwing you now, they will be soon" category.

    I don't see Sony beating Microsoft in this generation of consoles being any better for consumers in the long run. In the end, they're all going to be trying to do the same thing.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  18. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by smash · · Score: 1

    UH... and you think SONY winning will send that message? Lulwut...

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  19. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because everyone has written off Nintendo. Which is what I'm sticking to this round.

  20. Time to get a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next week seems like a good time to finally get that PS3 I've been thinking about. They've probably gotten all the kinks worked out of it by now.

    Yes, that's not a typo: PS3. Not 4. I don't mind being a generation behind. And hopefully prices on the PS3 will fall pretty quick now.

    1. Re:Time to get a PS3 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually I bought the PS3 SuperSlim this summer. It is cheap and provides excellent value. Lots of inexpensive great game titles (and hey, GTA V), good media playback, clean HiFi sound. Robust build quality and engineering in general. Getting the model with 12GB flash was a bit silly in retrospect though: you can only fit 1-2 installed games at a time.

    2. Re:Time to get a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad OtherOS got removed, because if it could run XBMC and Steam it'd be pretty attractive to plop one next to every TV.

      To change subject, doesn't the PS3 accept any laptop SATA hard drive as an upgrade? Or was that the original fat model?

    3. Re:Time to get a PS3 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      To change subject, doesn't the PS3 accept any laptop SATA hard drive as an upgrade?

      Yes, it is possible. You need a mounting rail kit which is sold as an accessory, and then any SATA drive can be used.

    4. Re:Time to get a PS3 by DMJC · · Score: 1

      No rail mount is needed for the PS3 slim, I upgraded mine to 500gb from 160.

  21. Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If any of you are considering purchasing the console, do ponder for a moment that you're supporting a company that's actively user hostile.

    They're responsible for SecuROM, they handled the PSN hack poorly, they placed root-kits on audio CDs, they removed "OtherOS" and "backwards compatibility" from PS3 units, and that is merely the tip of the iceberg.

    1. Re:Never Forget by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      If any of you are considering purchasing the console, do ponder for a moment that you're supporting a company that's actively user hostile.

      Which console are you talking about ;-)

      btw, the biggest selling consoles of all time are made and sold in China.

    2. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft gave us Windows, so the XBox One should be avoided too :P

    3. Re:Never Forget by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      they removed "backwards compatibility"

      They did that to save on costs! One of the biggest complaints about the PS3 from the masses was the price...all those features added to the price. So the Slim doesn't have backwards compatibility (No PS2 hardware in it), no SACD, etc etc.

    4. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any of you are considering purchasing the console, do ponder for a moment that you're supporting a company that's actively user hostile.

      All companies are user hostile. The only difference is how much of their hostility you are aware of.

  22. Oh... by RandomUsername99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why BestBuy was a total nerdocalypse at midnight when I drove by it last night.

  23. Oh look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another Sony product I won't buy!

    Viva la Dreamcast!

  24. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Why cant we get both loosing?

    They have been loosed upon us.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  25. Conditions under which I might move on by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Other people however have moved on

    I have moved on, from Sony products that is. I'll consider moving back under either of two conditions: A. SCE reverses the decision and embraces hobbyist development of apps and games for PlayStation 4, or B. those in charge of SCE's decision are no longer with SCE. But incidentally, after Microsoft initially announced that only disc game publishers could publish download games for Xbox One, SCE publicly announced one step toward A, allowing indies to self-publish on PlayStation Store in much the same way as on mobile app stores, and got Microsoft to reverse this.

  26. Gotta Be Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you trust this link after the recent GHCQ and NHS spoofing revelations.

    No links on Slashdot can be trusted.

    Thanks dick heads.

  27. AMD Jaguar: Do the math by tepples · · Score: 1

    A quad core with 2-way SMT and out-of-order execution should beat the pants of the in-order Cell Broadband Engine, especially for branchy code.

  28. But is it by the TV? by tepples · · Score: 1

    One problem is that "better machines to run Linux on" usually aren't next to the TV. Though gaming frameworks for X11/Linux happily support several game controllers on one machine, and though PCs have video outputs compatible with HDTV, it's hard for more than one person to view the output of a program running on a Linux box if the Linux box is chained to a desk one or two rooms away from the TV.

    1. Re:But is it by the TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What prevents someone from putting a mini PC next to their TV?

  29. Online pickup games with strangers by tepples · · Score: 1

    Sit down with some friends

    If certain Slashdot users are to be believed, a lot of gamers choose Sony or Microsoft consoles because their friends live hundreds of km or miles away. They can't even arrange schedules for an online friend match let alone an in-person match. So instead, they choose platforms with robust support for online pickup games with strangers, and this rules out Nintendo with its friend codes.

    1. Re:Online pickup games with strangers by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You can also "friend" those strangers so they become "online friends".

    2. Re:Online pickup games with strangers by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Wii U doesn't have friend codes. You can also friend people in real life and invite them over.

      As for me, I found this hack where if you perform a certain action with your wife, you can make your own gaming friends. It does take time before these hacked players are good enough to be competitive. But it's worth it. Plus performing the hack is a lot of fun! So much so, I like to perform this hack even when not trying to hack in new players.

      This hack also works with girlfriends and other female strangers, but I would not recommend it.

  30. Re:Not this time, **Microsoft** by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    FTFY...

    or not...you see, both competing systems are made by large companies who **screw the consumer over** as a matter of bussiness development.

    Microsoft & Sony both bottleneck features to squeeze profit from basic computing functions.

    But that doesn't mean one isn't better for you...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  31. Hobbyists make games for Linux by tepples · · Score: 1

    Are there games for linux?

    Yes, and a lot of them are developed by hobbyists. Every homebrew game for a classic console is a game for Linux. I've written several NES games myself. And every game written in Pygame, the Python wrapper around SDL, is a game for Linux as long as it doesn't use any platform-specific services. I'm working on a couple of those as well. Every game made for OUYA runs on Android, which is a user space that runs on Linux.

  32. fine, have your grudge by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree that those things Sony did are 100% bullshit. Me personally, I was most disappointed by their insistence upon using a proprietary memory stick that only worked on Sony devices.

    fine...

    but /. threads are going to be intolerable if we don't talk about **the alternative** while we bash Sony's dumb design choices...

    **MICROSOFT ALSO SUCKS ASS**

    if any random /.'er wants to vent about how 'Sony still sucks' I say fine, but let's not pretend we're having a productive discussion about which Next Gen system is better or will be more successful, or which one gamers should buy...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:fine, have your grudge by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      /. threads are going to be intolerable if we don't talk about **the alternative** while we bash Sony's dumb design choices...

      **MICROSOFT ALSO SUCKS ASS**

      if any random /.'er wants to vent about how 'Sony still sucks' I say fine, but let's not pretend we're having a productive discussion about which Next Gen system is better or will be more successful, or which one gamers should buy...

      Which is exactly why I'm sticking with PC for next gen games. It's already built. I can upgrade it how ever I like. It will run nearly all games both systems can run but better and at higher graphics. More storage. More functionality. No creepy ass spying hardware. No backhanded Sony tactics. And hopefully in the near future, due to Steam, no bullshit Microsoft tactics either. I have literally ZERO reasons for buying a next gen console. They now have all of the downsides of a PC with none of the benefits anymore.

    2. Re:fine, have your grudge by smash · · Score: 1

      Plenty of alternatives: Xbox. Steambox, whatever. Microsoft may "suck" but they are a LOT less customer hostile than sony has proven to be, irrespective of what the /. groupthink says.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  33. Sony RELEASED PlayStation! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Even after swearing that this time, IT WOULD KILL AGAIN!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  34. Re:I want Sony to win only so that Microsoft loses by Aerokii · · Score: 1

    Nintendo could have had a chance if they'd bothered to release any games at launch. I love my Wii U (and am thoroughly enjoying Windwaker HD at the moment, though more looking forward to Project X), but the launch was absolutely botched.

  35. 0.4% my **** by xkrebstarx · · Score: 1

    I've been on hold for 2+ hours waiting to talk to PS Support about my bricked PS4. Couldn't be more pissed off. It started up and looked pretty quick. Then, it asked me to sync the controller. I pressed the PS button on the controller and everything locked up. Hasn't boot since that time. *Should have bought an Xbox*

    1. Re:0.4% my **** by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Boot the thing in Safe Mode. make sure it's off all the way and then hold down the power button for 7 seconds.

    2. Re:0.4% my **** by xkrebstarx · · Score: 1

      Couldn't boot into SafeMode either. I ended up going to my local GameStop and they also could not get it to work in-store. They were able to replace the console though. Go Gamestop!!!

  36. Minimum service contract by tepples · · Score: 1

    So you can't activate the PS4 somewhere with a connection? It only needs that connection once.

    Satellite Internet equipment costs so much that a "connection once" will cost you the price of 24 months of service with a hefty ETF. It'd be more practical to haul the PS4 into a coffee shop like someone did with a computer.

  37. Exactly by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    If the answer involves giving money to Sony, you asked the wrong question.

  38. Yeah, it's time to get over the rootkit thing... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    ... After all, they apologized and fired the Bertelsmann exec responsible.

    Oh, wait, no, they didn't fire him. They promoted him to the position of President of Global Digital Business, US Sales, and Corporate Strategy.

    Sony customers deserve their own entry in the DSM-V next to sufferers of Battered Spouse Syndrome.

  39. Ooh by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    That would explain the absence of a couple of co-workers at work today. I thought the excuse "24 hour AIDs" was a little suspicious.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  40. adequate $$ hw exists by keneng · · Score: 1, Troll

    mini-pcs can be pricey, but there are alternatives that run Linux/XMBC. This is far from a thoroughly list, but they are relatively recent pieces of hardware:
    http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=85
    http://www.tomshardware.com/news/gigabyte-brix-pc-gaming-iris-pro-5200-haswell,24246.html
    http://www.itxcanada.com/products/VIA_EPIA_P910_10Q_Pico_ITX_Motherboard_1_0GHz_VIA_Quad_Core_E_Processor-1166-0.html
    http://www.ebay.de/itm/Jynxbox-TV-BOX-HD-Amlogic-8726-1080p-XBMC-MELE-F10-PRO-MIC-Speaker-Remote-/400549785064?clk_rvr_id=546961982081

    Simple Android Hardware could do the trick and the price is less-expensive:
    http://en.mele.cn/products/show/31.htm
    http://www.ebay.de/itm/MINIX-NEO-X7-Android-4-2-Quad-Core-2GB-DDR3-WIFI-XBMC-1080p-Rii-mini-N7-Remote-/400566821009?pt=Netzanschluss&hash=item5d43a4a091
    http://www.cloudsto.com/mk902-pc/rikomagic-mk902-quad-core-16gb-flash-dhl-express-shipping-detail.html

    Most inexpensive android ARM-based hardware do not have gigabit ethernet on the hardware because the SOC's can't achieve more than 470~Mbps..
    Intel/AMD motherboards are true-Gigabit ethernet. Gamers would tend to agree this is important for network gameplay. Gamers also tend to purchase PC-Hardware because you can buy gamer-specific optimized network equipment to give you a competitive edge when playing. It's take it or leave it with consoles unless you do mod it yourself. Oh wait, Sony doesn't make open-hardware, so the consumer will go for the open-hardware. It's important to have gigabit ethernet if you intend on running any kind of web server/mail server on your open software system in order for it to be an optimal experience for the user while not costing a fortune for a general-purpose hardware rather than single-purpose game-console appliance hardware. The other added advantage about pc's and mini-pc's over android devices and consoles is that you can create content with them rather than simply consume content with them. Keep in mind content is not king. The consumer is.

    From what I remember slashdot was a place to talk about stuff related to linux. The word "slashdot" and the logo /. have to do especially with Linux/POSIX stuff. Since when does Slashdot plug Sony hardware especially when it's not Linux friendly any longer? Oh yeah since Slashdot is owned by Condé-Nast and needs to generate revenue for its patrons; let me guess Sony is one of it's patrons?

  41. Not this time Sony by DMJC · · Score: 1

    I'm going SteamBox and I'm never coming back. Finally XBMC running on a games console with a massive selection of titles. Bye Bye Sony/Microsoft I will be running Linux and steam on a 22Tb fileserver.

    1. Re:Not this time Sony by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Have fun playing minecraft and freeciv and maybe a few emulators.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  42. All consoles are hostile to game mods by tepples · · Score: 2

    Which console are you talking about ;-)

    All the dedicated consoles have been historically hostile to users who want to use or contribute to game mods. The only console not intentionally hostile to game modders is a living room PC. True, fewer than 50 percent of gamers install user-made mods, but it might not be a minority if consoles supported mods.

  43. Then use a PC as a console by tepples · · Score: 1

    Honestly, you are missing out on one of the best features of game consoles... playing with friends, on the couch, pizza on the way, beer in the fridge.

    Step 1: Plug a PC's HDMI out into an HDTV's HDMI in or a PC's VGA+audio out into an HDTV's VGA+audio in.
    Step 2: Plug in up to four USB gamepads. Many games are already set up for Xbox 360 controllers; wired ones work out of the box, and wireless ones work with a transceiver that plugs into a USB port.
    Step 3: Install a PC game that supports couch multiplayer. I have been compiling a list of games recommended by other Slashdot users.

    There are whole genres that play to that on consoles that don't exist on PCs.
    *cough*Mortal Kombat?*cough*

    Mortal Kombat 2011 is on PC, and classic Mortal Kombat II and Mortal Kombat 3 are emulated in Midway Arcade Treasures 2.

  44. Split or otherwise shared screen by tepples · · Score: 1

    the cross platform titles (Assassin's Creed, COD, Battlefield) are no better than the same games running on a quite modest gaming PC.

    A lot of games, such as every Call of Duty game for Xbox 360 that I've seen, let up to two players use one console by splitting the screen or by putting both players in one semi-fixed camera view. If you happen to have friends or relatives who game with you, this means you don't need to dismantle your PC and take it with you in order to game together in a room. Furthermore, being able to see where your teammate is builds team cohesion. Ideally, more PC games would support split-screen mode when connected to an HDTV, but publishers want to sell multiple copies to a household.

    For the first time, the BEST games on the new consoles are also on the PC

    That'll be true up until the moment Nintendo releases Super Smash Bros. for Wii U.

    But it seems likely that the best games will continue to be published on the PC as well

    Will these games include games that are best played with two to four gamepads? For example, will the next Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat come to PC in month 1, or will there be a 2-year delay as there was with Mortal Kombat 2011?

  45. How do I get started with IRL friending? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can also friend people in real life and invite them over.

    I'm brand new to this real-life friending thing outside my own family. I know kids in K-12 school or college can find real-life friends there, but where does one start after having graduated? (sincere)

    As for me, I found this hack where if you perform a certain action with your wife, you can make your own gaming friends.

    But first I'd need to overcome my low charisma roll and find a wife, which brings me back to the real-life friending thing.

    1. Re:How do I get started with IRL friending? by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      I apologize for my humor if it offended. We're actually very much alike (scaringly so, I use to do Gameboy programming as a hobby for example) and likely have very similar social quirks. So my humor is difficult to discern.

      My daughter is also similar. She was lamenting about not having very many friends at school yesterday. I told her that I understood, but told her that being a bit different meant that she was going to scare off the shallow people and make one or two deep friendships. And that it was probably going to be that way her whole life. But those one or two friends will matter more to her than the thousands of shallow friends her peers have.

      So the question about forming friendships after school becomes tough. I have one friend who I met by chance via 3DS streetpass. I have a riddle on my streetpass and he solved it and thus was able to contact me. We found out we had similar interests and lived fairly close by and thus will occasionally meet up for tabletop games. My acquaintances come from work and church.

      As for finding a wife, I'm not sure how to answer that. The way I met my wife may be uncomfortable to you. In addition to being socially awkward, I believe that the God of the Bible is a metaphysical reality. So if God is a metaphysical reality, then praying doesn't feel weird. So I prayed about it and eventually married a socially quirky woman. As a result, we now have the oddest family in the history of Earth. At my house, I don't feel out of place the way I do everywhere else. But we don't have a ton of friends either. It's comfortable. It's that deep friendship that lasts where I can be myself.

    2. Re:How do I get started with IRL friending? by tepples · · Score: 1
      I wasn't offended so much as just frustrated with other users' flippant comments whose humor ides an underlying "I don't have to care; I've got mine" attitude.

      My acquaintances come from work and church.

      For several years, I worked in a very small business: one sales and business guy (not a gamer) and one developer (me). I changed jobs to a slightly larger small business a few months ago, but there's still the problem that I don't own a car, making it hard to set up play dates when city buses don't run on Saturday evenings, Sundays, or major holidays. I used to attend church until I saw the holes in the theology of the church I was attending. I'm so glad I got out of Jehovah's Witnesses before getting too deep.

    3. Re:How do I get started with IRL friending? by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      For several years, I worked in a very small business: one sales and business guy (not a gamer) and one developer (me). I changed jobs to a slightly larger small business a few months ago, but there's still the problem that I don't own a car, making it hard to set up play dates when city buses don't run on Saturday evenings, Sundays, or major holidays.

      I hear you on the small business. I used to work for a similar business. But then I moved to a very large development company in the city. Now I have a regular 2 o'clock 3DS getogether in the breakroom.

        I used to attend church until I saw the holes in the theology of the church I was attending. I'm so glad I got out of Jehovah's Witnesses before getting too deep.

      The way I see it, is if there is a theology that is factually correct, then people will exploit it for personal gains. So, for example, if Christianity is correct, then it would make sense that there would be pseudo-Christian religions such as Jehovah Witness, Mormonism, Unity, etc... I'm glad you got out of it as well.

      That being said, I would recommend checking out someone like Hugh Ross. He's an autistic astrophysisist who happens to be a Christian. You'll find that not all people of faith are as crazy as the folks at the Jehovah Witness church or the people who claim to be Christians on TV. A bad church can ruin lives. A good church can open up doors.

  46. Four things blocking gaming HTPC adoption by tepples · · Score: 1

    What prevents someone from putting a mini PC next to their TV?

    Four things, at least.

    • First, a mini PC boots by default into a launcher designed for a mouse and keyboard or for a touch screen, not for a gamepad. The Windows Start Screen won't take input from an Xbox 360 controller without third-party mouse emulation software. Some people work around this by buying a Bluetooth thumb keyboard and trackball that fits in the user's hands like a QWERTY slider phone, such as the Lenovo N5902.
    • Second, a lot of mini PCs have Atom CPUs to save on price and cooling, and Atom is designed more for smartphone apps and noninteractive video playback than for the kind of game that one would play on a console.
    • Third, tradition. There's a widespread mental set that PCs aren't for the living room. As CronoCloud put it: "Non-nerds simply have no desire to hook up their PC to their TV." See other Slashdot comments by HTPC refusers.
    • Fourth, there aren't a lot of well-known mini gaming PC brands that one can pick up in a Target or Best Buy store, and not everybody is willing to spend hours learning to build his own mini gaming PC from parts.
    1. Re:Four things blocking gaming HTPC adoption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, a mini PC boots by default into a launcher designed for a mouse and keyboard or for a touch screen, not for a gamepad. The Windows Start Screen won't take input from an Xbox 360 controller without third-party mouse emulation software. Some people work around this by buying a Bluetooth thumb keyboard and trackball that fits in the user's hands like a QWERTY slider phone, such as the Lenovo N5902.

      Then change the default. I have an HTPC that loads XBMC directly upon boot and a remote control that works with it. XBMC handles all of the media playing and program/game/emulator launching. I have a wireless Xbox 360 controller for playing games.

      Second, a lot of mini PCs have Atom CPUs to save on price and cooling, and Atom is designed more for smartphone apps and noninteractive video playback than for the kind of game that one would play on a console.

      I'm not talking about an Atom based PC. My HTPC has a quad core i5 3350 (Ivy Bridge, 3.1GHz), 8GB of RAM, a GeForce GTX 660 and a 2TB 7200RPM drive in a mini ITX case.

      Third, tradition. There's a widespread mental set that PCs aren't for the living room. As CronoCloud put it: "Non-nerds simply have no desire to hook up their PC to their TV." See other Slashdot comments by HTPC refusers.

      Sorry, calling BS on your made-up "tradition". Most people I know who grew up alongside the PC revolution had a PC in their living room. I've seen tons of IBM compatibles, C64s, Apple IIs, Amigas and Macs in the living room.

      Fourth, there aren't a lot of well-known mini gaming PC brands that one can pick up in a Target or Best Buy store, and not everybody is willing to spend hours learning to build his own mini gaming PC from parts.

      Put your own together or have someone more knowledgeable do it for you. These days you don't have to configure jumpers and dip switches. You just plug the components into each other and they work. If you can put a cartridge into a Nintendo, you can build a PC.

    2. Re:Four things blocking gaming HTPC adoption by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then change the default.

      Microsoft won't change everyone's default, and the majority of home PC users are unaware that the default can be changed at all. Most people I've met in person don't seem to know what XBMC is.

      My HTPC has a quad core i5 3350 (Ivy Bridge, 3.1GHz), 8GB of RAM, a GeForce GTX 660 and a 2TB 7200RPM drive in a mini ITX case.

      Who manufactured it, so that I can buy one like it for myself? And was it as affordable as a $399 PS4?

      Sorry, calling BS on your made-up "tradition".

      Sony and Microsoft are doing the hard work to make the public aware of their products. When was the last time you saw a television commercial for "someone more knowledgeable" to build, specifically, a gaming HTPC?

      Put your own together or have someone more knowledgeable do it for you.

      The majority of home PC users are unaware that it's even possible to "have someone more knowledgeable [put together a slim gaming PC] for you." They think a "PC" is a huge tower that sits on a desk.

      If you can put a cartridge into a Nintendo, you can build a PC.

      When someone bought an NES new in box, it came with the Control Deck, video cable, controllers, a Super Mario's Duck Hunt cartridge, and a manual explaining how to assemble everything. Do mini-ITX PC kits come with all the necessary parts, or are people expected to spend hours deciding which parts one needs to buy? And do they come with an assembly manual that even nontechnical end users can understand?

    3. Re:Four things blocking gaming HTPC adoption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then I guess it's a good thing that the discussion was never about non-technical users nor about Microsoft. You just interjected that in there because your original premise is bullshit and you know it.

  47. "Piracy enabling" and the Betamax test by tepples · · Score: 1

    You talk about "piracy enabling" as if, say, infringing copies of major-label GBA games were the only thing that could run on a GBA flash cart. If something has a substantial noninfringing use (Sony v. Universal City Studios) and is promoted for such uses (MGM v. Grokster), I don't see how it's any more "piracy enabling" than a CD burner, especially given what was a thriving homebrew scene on the GBA. For example, in 2004, gbadev.org ran a minigame development competition whose top 10 entries were put on a cart for sale; I have my name in the credits of Swish-It as a music composer. And early 2005, around the PSP's release, a rudimentary music player application to fit 2.5 hours of music on a 256 Mbit cart was released for GBA. And the PocketNES emulator let a GBA flash cart run not only GBA games but also NES games. Without GBA flash carts, PocketNES would have never been developed, which means NES compilations by Jaleco and Atlus on GBA and the unlockable NES games in Contra 4 for DS wouldn't have been possible.

    What else was Lik Sang doing that was more clearly "piracy enabling"?

    1. Re:"Piracy enabling" and the Betamax test by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Oh please, the vast majority of those flash carts was used for piracy. Besides, they were selling mod-chips!

  48. Re: woohoo it's pay day! i'mma go get one! .. wait by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

    It has 22 at launch with downloadable titles, and close to 200 in development...

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"