Slashdot Mirror


NSA Collect Gamers' Chats and Deploy Real-Life Agents Into WoW and Second Life

An anonymous reader writes in with news that some NSA agents were trying to dig up info by joining the horde. "To the National Security Agency analyst writing a briefing to his superiors, the situation was clear: their current surveillance efforts were lacking something. The agency's impressive arsenal of cable taps and sophisticated hacking attacks was not enough. What it really needed was a horde of undercover Orcs. That vision of spycraft sparked a concerted drive by the NSA and its UK sister agency GCHQ to infiltrate the massive communities playing online games, according to secret documents disclosed by whistleblower Edward Snowden.....The agencies, the documents show, have built mass-collection capabilities against the Xbox Live console network, which has more than 48 million players. Real-life agents have been deployed into virtual realms, from those Orc hordes in World of Warcraft to the human avatars of Second Life. There were attempts, too, to recruit potential informants from the games' tech-friendly users."

293 comments

  1. Well, of course. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've read recently that the NSA types are becoming disaffected by their jobs.

    So letting them play WoW on company time will help with that, eh?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Well, of course. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But more seriously, that disaffection that MMO players seem to exhibit in spades is one of the characteristics of al qeada era terrorists. Being middle class, disillusioned, Muslim, male, single, and approaching middle age is the basic profile of an ideal recruit to them.

    2. Re:Well, of course. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Based on what I have seen of WoW players, it seems to be able to suck hours from them whether they find is satisfying or not, so it might actually both decrease satisfaction and increase retention; possibly sapping from them even the motivation to look for a new job.

      While at the same time, making it impossible for them to complain because nobody will sympathise. I await them to start sueing the NSA for the metal stress of the situation leaving them incapable of doing anything but playing video games, could even be a disability.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Well, of course. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well it would make sense for using MMORG for communication especially for communicating violent activities.
      As similar activities are part of the game. You would expect the communication wouldn't raise any red flags.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Well, of course. by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

      I thought there was a story a while back about the games communication channels (sorry, I am not a gamer so please forgive my terminology) being used by some actual terrorist types? No telling if it is true, of course, since it seems to be no more than security through obscurity, which is no security really. Anybody else recall anything of the like?

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    5. Re:Well, of course. by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 1

      You might be thinking of an opinion piece last month about terrorists laundering money through Online Gambling. It was a Schneier Movie-Plot Threat article.

    6. Re:Well, of course. by mlts · · Score: 2

      With what a lot of WoW players write, I'm amazed the NSA doesn't sue them for pain and suffering when some poor slob has to look through the stored Barrens chat logs.

      The command "grep -v -i 'anal'" will cut out 99% of the text though.

    7. Re:Well, of course. by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Anybody else recall anything of the like?

      Dunno, does Goonswarm count? :)

    8. Re:Well, of course. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That would explain the number of morons you run into in WoW....

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:Well, of course. by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We've read recently that the NSA types are becoming disaffected by their jobs.

      So letting them play WoW on company time will help with that, eh?

      More like...

      "is your elf now or has ever been a member of the bolshevist glorious workers party opposed to trollish bourgeois oppressors?"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Well, of course. by meerling · · Score: 1

      Not if they are subjected to Barrens chat or Whoreshire.
      (If you've played, you know what those are.)

    11. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even were I to agree with the broad correlation you are suggesting here, being "disaffected" is not a crime, nor a valid rationale for spying on such a person.

    12. Re:Well, of course. by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      With what a lot of WoW players write, I'm amazed the NSA doesn't sue them for pain and suffering when some poor slob has to look through the stored Barrens chat logs.

      On the bright side, it's a promotion for the guy who used to read Slashdot posts for the NSA.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:Well, of course. by mellyra · · Score: 1

      I thought there was a story a while back about the games communication channels (sorry, I am not a gamer so please forgive my terminology) being used by some actual terrorist types? No telling if it is true, of course, since it seems to be no more than security through obscurity, which is no security really. Anybody else recall anything of the like?

      I remember intelligence agencies being concerned about this but have never read of an actual case. If you look past the surface the whole idea sounds pretty silly to me - why would you use a communications channel that you know for sure logs are kept of?

      The advantages - the chat traffic you produce looks innocently, is encrypted, is in a relatively obscure (game specific) format and flows via a middle man (the game server) - sound nowhere near unique enough to justify having all your conspiratorial conversations logged in cleartext by the game developer/host (which makes them easily accessible to law enforcement if they think to ask).

    14. Re:Well, of course. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Including all the banal comments!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    15. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call the Director! Call the Section Chief! Call the President! The elves are planning another attack!

    16. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, First we hear about the NSA looking at people's porn habits, now we get to see them playing video games too?

      "Where can I get a job that let's me look at porn, and play video games all day?"

      "It's called the NSA, son."

    17. Re:Well, of course. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Based on what I have seen of WoW players, it seems to be able to suck hours from them whether they find is satisfying or not, so it might actually both decrease satisfaction and increase retention; possibly sapping from them even the motivation to look for a new job.

      The reality is, your statement could be applied to anyone with a hobby of anykind. Including: People who code for fun(lot of us here), people who collect crossword puzzle books, gearheads, techheads, gamers in general, PnP gamers, people who enjoy woodcraft, and people who knit.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    18. Re:Well, of course. by ememisya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am middle-class, disillusioned, Muslim, male, single and approaching middle age. Thankfully I don't play WoW, nor do I facebook, and exactly for these reasons. I got into a fight in highschool for being from Turkey during 9/11 because one kid decided to scream, "Turkey did it!", you know, they're all the same those brown bastards. Now I fear that guy might be employed by the pick-your-3-letter-agency, and no I'm not going to be like Yakov Smirnoff and walk around with a flag pin to show my patriotism, and I hope this insanity will stop before we reach the "burn a number on your skin" stage, I'm hoping even way before, lets round up all the Japanese stage.

    19. Re:Well, of course. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      No it's not, but then, neither are any of the other things. Short of actually conspiring to commit the crime, basically nothing terrorists do is illegal. I wasn't really advocating profiling, just contesting the irrelevance of disaffected users.

    20. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've read recently that the NSA types are becoming disaffected by their jobs.

      So letting them play WoW on company time will help with that, eh?

      This could be the end of the World...
      of Warcraft.

    21. Re:Well, of course. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, I didn't mean to tar an entire group of people. That really wasn't my intent, but it does come across exactly that way. Which is indefensible, and you have my apologies, if nothing else. I know that even if I didn't mean it as a judgement, the kind of people who would judge you would see that kind of statement as validation of their beliefs.

      I, in no, way, shape, or form think that even a tenth of a percentage of people meeting those descriptors would actually even consider terrorism morally acceptable.

      Again, sorry, that post was, at the very least, insufficiently clear.

    22. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, i have an idea. What if the bad guys are using the porn sites to communicate.....Now, this is a good job oportunity, lol.

    23. Re:Well, of course. by Nyder · · Score: 0

      But more seriously, that disaffection that MMO players seem to exhibit in spades is one of the characteristics of al qeada era terrorists. Being middle class, disillusioned, Muslim, male, single, and approaching middle age is the basic profile of an ideal recruit to them.

      You forgot overweight basement dwellers in there...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    24. Re:Well, of course. by Pav · · Score: 1

      Our leaders in the west might as well have organised drops of militant recruiting leaflets and saved billions while achieving similar ends - it's shameful. If any militants have had their beliefs challenged it has been through citizens more-or-less working against government policy, and against western militarism. Take for instance Maajid Nawaz... he was rescued by Amnesty International from jail in Egypt despite them knowing he considered them his enemies. Maajid is now risking his life arguing against Islamism rather than risking his life recruiting for it. That raises another issue - these guys are brave idealistic defenders of their community who would be an asset to any nation had they not been twisted by toxic radical ideology. Unfortunately the toxic radical ideology on our side has made everything so much worse - it has been the perfect book-end to prop up an ideology which was not widely supported just after 9/11 in any case.

    25. Re:Well, of course. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If that is true the spooks can just ask or compel Blizzard to let them see the logs. However entrapment via false flag operations that only have to be talked about is far easier than actual work and delivers number into prison even if it doesn't catch people who have actually commited crimes.

    26. Re:Well, of course. by mlush · · Score: 1

      The best place to hide a leaf is in a forest. It would be hard to tell the difference between some dudes organizing a raid and a planning session for a Mumbi style killing spree. All they'd need to do is use some simple codewords and there sorted.

    27. Re:Well, of course. by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      damn i'm a perfect potential recruit for terrorism! :o except i'm not muslim, i'm a hindu having liberal views in a hardcore hindu state of India, so kinda like a muslim to the general populace here, i play counterstrike, hope to meet an NSA guy on an awp_india server and knife him for lulz

    28. Re:Well, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, they're all in Goldshire Inn.

  2. Sir! Sir! It's an emergency, sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have word that xXxNoScopezN00bKill3rxXx will dip his balls on the President at 21:00!

    1. Re:Sir! Sir! It's an emergency, sir! by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, we have a hefty blackmail file on him to get him to back down. Our sources indicate that his mother has had sexual relations with a majority of people who have played against him, I'm sure he wouldn't want that to get out...

    2. Re:Sir! Sir! It's an emergency, sir! by BreakBad · · Score: 1

      No thats just Garry, the new hire over on the European server. He's giving the new recruitment technique a go.

  3. SecondLife?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good thing someone is watching over SecondLife. Maybe they can finally get enough data to fully explore the sexual proclivities of furries in an unconstrained environment.

    1. Re:SecondLife?? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      SL is actually a very bad place to go for that. Literacy standards are very low compare to other communities.

    2. Re:SecondLife?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true. Taps is where it's at!

    3. Re:SecondLife?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If NSA is doing anything, anything at all to help formulate a final solution for the furry problem, I am all for NSA. Yay NSA! Go NSA go! Weeeeeheeeee!

    4. Re:SecondLife?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is simple and well tested: gassing and baking. The problem is the execution. Seriously, do you want to be on the team that goes into those "people's" houses and drag them out?

  4. Everybody calm down!!! by jddeluxe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're not infiltrating anything; some of the sharper razors there have scammed their PHB's into letting them play WoW all day and get paid for it....

    1. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

      They're not infiltrating anything; some of the sharper razors there have scammed their PHB's into letting them play WoW all day and get paid for it....

      Now THAT is a theory that meshes with my bureaucratic experience!

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you mean:

      The actualized concept of a next-generation cloud-based synergistic teambuilding-as-a-service ad-hoc exercise correlates with the data previously acquired through empirical research regarding organizational executive judgement calls in relation to morale and outreach endeavors on an accelerated timeline.

      I've been working directly under C-level execs on and off for the past decade. It's not too obvious, is it?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a bigger problem than you think. The real issue with NSA overreach is not that it's some faceless govt org that wants to control the world.

      It's a scam. Graft. It's thousands of commercial contractors that have figured out a way to fleece the public. They can do whatever they want, charge whatever they want, and completely escape oversight and audit under the cloak of states secrets, secret courts, and national security. Being paid 200 bucks an hour to play WoW on the public's dime is unfortunately probably one of the more harmless examples of what's going on.

    4. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by TrippTDF · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't getting access to Blizzard's servers make this a whole lot easier? Couldn't you just mine the player data and make Blizzard record the conversations that take place in-game, rather than actually walk around in WoW?

    5. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Now you're done for.

      Pointing that out is more likely to get you jailed than blowing someone/thing up.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by ememisya · · Score: 1

      ROFL I seriously don't doubt this:

      -Are you playing games Bob?
      -No sir, just looking for terrorists on WoW.
      -What have you found so far?
      -Well, a few quest items, still trying to level up, they don't talk to n00bs.
      -Carry on.

    7. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by BreakBad · · Score: 1

      Not inviting them to your raid party will yield the same result.

  5. Strict protections applied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So long as all members of your guild have less than a 51% chance of being foreign they won't play with you.

  6. Clever bastards by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm generally opposed to the NSA's actions, but I have to admire the ones who were clever enough to talk their superiors into paying them to play WoW all day in the interests of national security.

    1. Re:Clever bastards by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "I knew it! I know who the spy was! I knew there was something funny about that guy on the last raid. He kept saying, 'Leroy Abdullah! Who's with me, bros? Let's go, Leroy Abdullah!"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Clever bastards by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      "L80 tier 2 rogue LFG bomb embassy"

      I don't think that's how it happens. I'm not sure what they expect to find playing WoW.

    3. Re:Clever bastards by CortxVortx · · Score: 1

      Now we know that Leroy Jenkins is officially on the no-fly list...

      --
      "The nice thing about standards is there are so many of them to choose from." - Andrew S. Tenenbaum
    4. Re:Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I admire their ingenuity and guile, but question their taste.

    5. Re:Clever bastards by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 1

      Your tax dollars at work! And aren't y'all proud? Gotta love America. Anything is justifiable there. Sad. Really sad.

    6. Re:Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "L80 tier 2 rogue LFG bomb embassy"

      I don't think that's how it happens

      Yeah, you're a few xpacs behind...

    7. Re:Clever bastards by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      I'm generally opposed to the NSA's actions, but I have to admire the ones who were clever enough to talk their superiors into paying them to play WoW all day in the interests of national security.

      Yeah, I built a proof-of-concept to convince my employer to manage our servers via a Minecraft interface, but had no luck there :/ It came out even better than http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URVS4H7vrdU ... there were levers and status redstone to bounce services, little sheep flowing in a river across a glass screen to indicate web traffic, even mooshrooms-on-minecarts for automated deployment pipelines...

      Anyway, I bow to our NSA overlords.

    8. Re:Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel sorry for the one's who got assigned to Chatroulette.

    9. Re:Clever bastards by BreakBad · · Score: 1

      No Shit! At least they could provide some decent tanks or healers.

    10. Re:Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly that overt, but maybe you start rambling about how the government is bad and why your life sucks. Someone listens, and gives you a way. It won't go that way for a lot of people, but for some it just might.

      BTW, make level is 90, and its:
      No expansion: max level 60, tier 1-3
      Burning Crusade: max level 70, tier 4-6.5
      Wrath of the Lich king:max level 80, tier 7-10
      Cataclysm: max level 85, tier 11-13
      Mists of Pandoria: max level 90, tier 14-16
      Warlords of Draenor: max level 100, tier 17-? (upcoming)

      People generally assume you are max level when looking for max level content. You would post your item level instead to tell them how good your gear is. Tier only refers to tier bonus you have for having enough tier pieces.
      The appropriate phrase would be (at the current time): "560 T16 4P Combat rogue LFG WH, Emb, or other prime targets"
      Where 560 is the item level (which is "good" by today's standard. T16 means the tier level, 4P means that the 2 and 4 set bonuses are active. WH is white house, Emb would be embassy").

    11. Re:Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what they expect to find playing WoW.

      A fat paycheck for doing nothing other than playing fucking WoW.

      If they actually gave a shit about what people in the game are saying to each other, they could just tap into the servers. Which would also give them access to Org structures, player interactions, etc. In other words, there's absolutely no reason to actually play the game unless you know a group is operating in WoW and you're trying to infiltrate them by being buddies.

    12. Re:Clever bastards by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I'm generally opposed to the NSA's actions, but I have to admire the ones who were clever enough to talk their superiors into paying them to play WoW all day in the interests of national security.

      Level 28 Public Servant.
      3 STR.
      2 PER.
      7 END.
      0 CHR.
      4 INT.
      3 AGL.
      10 LCK.

      Skills:
      100% slack.
      100% pass the buck.
      75% Obsfucation.
      49% Jumping to conclusions.
      28% politics.

      Perks:
      Avoiding the blame.
      National Security.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. WHHEAATTOOOON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sheldon: I donâ(TM)t care! Iâ(TM)m losinâ(TM) it, man!

    Leonard: Why donâ(TM)t we play this smart? Try a little good goblin, bad goblin.

    Priya: Oh, dear Lord.

    Howard: Nah, I think we have to be more subtle.

    Raj: Okay, I see where this is going. Fine, Iâ(TM)ll have sex with him.

    Leonard: Thatâ(TM)s not where it was going.

    Raj: Good, because I would hate that.

  8. The only thing the NSA will find is virginity by readandburn · · Score: 2

    I kid, I kid.

    1. Re:The only thing the NSA will find is virginity by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      I think you're on to something. If we can find out who is providing the 74 virgins to the suicide bombers, we'll have found the real source of all the terrorism. It only makes sense to stake out places that have a high percentage of virgins running around.

      It makes almost perfect sense! The only question left, really, is why anyone would want 74 of these.

  9. Agent Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're not here because we are free. We're here because we are not free. There is no escaping reason. No denying purpose. Because we both know without purpose, we would not exist."

    Red pill, blue pill?

    1. Re:Agent Smith by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of when reading the article...they deploy real-life agents into the games? So you'd see some Warcraft orc or SL furry transform into a typical Fed-looking character? Presumably through the use of the Tron scanning laser?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  10. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why battlefield 4 keeps crashing! Especially right after I attempt to communicate sensitive information with my overseas contact via a sophisticated system of bunny-hopping and helicopter aerobatics.

    1. Re:I knew it! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nice!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  11. This Should Surprise No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I've long suspected all of this was occuring. Being an IT guy in the industry now for almost two decades, I've worked for some big players and seen things which I have often considered dodgy and outright suspect. I tend to fly under the radar when it comes to an online presence, and, as a consequence, I have no public-facing accounts like Facebook, Twitter, any online storage, etc. Gaming is supposed to be fun -- and perhaps now it's less fun knowing that it's not just MS or Sony watching the chat rooms and interplay that occurs in these venues. I'm not surpirsed, just disappointed that nothing seems to be free of constant surveillance. George Orwell himself would likely be shocked at how impressive the watchful eyes of the state have become and to what breadth and depth they reach. 1984 has become an operators' manual...

  12. thank goodness by phoenix03 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the government will know when Stormwind raids will take place.

    1. Re:thank goodness by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      If you're not doing anything wrong, ya got nuthin' to fear, do ya, little orky?"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  13. Great excuse to tell your mum by Bruce66423 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When she complains you're spending all your time in WoW, you can say you're trying to get a job with the NSA...

    1. Re:Great excuse to tell your mum by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1

      > When she complain...

      Who? My mother?

  14. oh look... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Here's yet another way we can funnel tax payer money to private contractors under the guise of our black budget." Brilliant. I bet he got promoted for this.

  15. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The surveillance revelations so far have been scary, sinister, infuriating, offensive. But this one? This is just... sad.

    OK, bad guys could potentially use the in-game comms functions on X-Box live to plans their nefarious deeds, but do we really need to be paying teams of people to go into the games and play them all day long? If they really need to snoop on that shit (they don't) then couldn't they just hoover up all the conversations and analyse them offline like they do our emails, phone calls, texts etc? What additional benefit does having someone actually in the game world offer? Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

    Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day. I get the feeling some very ballsy gamer put together a presentation to get paid taxpayers' money for playing CoD all day long and hit the jackpot. If there was any justice on this fucking planet we'd all be knee deep in fired "intelligence" agents months ago.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      The surveillance revelations so far have been scary, sinister, infuriating, offensive. But this one? This is just... sad.

      OK, bad guys could potentially use the in-game comms functions on X-Box live to plans their nefarious deeds, but do we really need to be paying teams of people to go into the games and play them all day long? If they really need to snoop on that shit (they don't) then couldn't they just hoover up all the conversations and analyse them offline like they do our emails, phone calls, texts etc? What additional benefit does having someone actually in the game world offer? Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day. I get the feeling some very ballsy gamer put together a presentation to get paid taxpayers' money for playing CoD all day long and hit the jackpot. If there was any justice on this fucking planet we'd all be knee deep in fired "intelligence" agents months ago.

      If I had mod points you'd be a god.

      Woudl you settle for an "atta' boy!"?

      --
      Who did what now?
    2. Re:Pathetic by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 1

      I agree. You are, indeed, a god!! You've hit the proverbial nail right on the fucking head!!!

      The surveillance revelations so far have been scary, sinister, infuriating, offensive. But this one? This is just... sad.

      OK, bad guys could potentially use the in-game comms functions on X-Box live to plans their nefarious deeds, but do we really need to be paying teams of people to go into the games and play them all day long? If they really need to snoop on that shit (they don't) then couldn't they just hoover up all the conversations and analyse them offline like they do our emails, phone calls, texts etc? What additional benefit does having someone actually in the game world offer? Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day. I get the feeling some very ballsy gamer put together a presentation to get paid taxpayers' money for playing CoD all day long and hit the jackpot. If there was any justice on this fucking planet we'd all be knee deep in fired "intelligence" agents months ago.

      If I had mod points you'd be a god.

      Woudl you settle for an "atta' boy!"?

    3. Re:Pathetic by niado · · Score: 2

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day.

      The point you are trying to make - that we spend too much on military intelligence (some of which seems quite silly) is a good one. However, you are stating as a false dichotomy.

      We aren't paying intelligence agents to play video games instead of paying for social services, because the budgets are not done with that level of granularity. The government (and, by extension, the voting public) has determined the priority of intelligence/military spending vs. social spending, and hashes out the budgets for these services at a very high level.

      If we weren't paying agents to play WoW, we would be paying them to do something else.

    4. Re:Pathetic by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day.

      I'm thinking of sending a bunch of fiddles to Washington to our government for Christmas.

      They could play the fiddles like Caesar Nero while our country burns down.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect some playing in these games might be helpful if you were trying to understand, parse, and monitor chatlogs for suspicious information automatically. Consider the fact that a lot of MMOs and games will have huge numbers of incidences of the word "nuke". This might be alarming for someone who doesn't know these games, and therefore can't contextualize the information as "an ability that does a lot of damage instantly". Knowing to discount that particular word from their analysis would probably save them a great deal of grief. Similarly, bomb and terrorist and flashbang and so forth from games of Counterstrike. I could see the agency sponsoring people to make an analysis of "words we should not bother highlighting in our automatic analysis of chatlogs" for many different games, for example, and entailing they actually expose their people to many of these games - it might be easier from a security and hiring standpoint to use existing personnel instead of hiring gamers and having to background-check them, train them in programming etc, etc.

    6. Re:Pathetic by djmurdoch · · Score: 2

      If the budget for intelligence agents were not so bloated, they would spend it more wisely.

      The fact that you are paying agents to play WoW is just a sign that you are paying them to do all sorts of wasteful things. Cut their budget to 10% of its current level, and you won't have agents playing WoW. Or if you still do, then cut it to 1% of its current level.

  16. Well now, maybe the ears will perk up a bit by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    So few of even those who understand what the government is doing were interested, much less concerned, or more properly, panicked and furious beyond belief. Maybe this will ring a bell that means something to them?

  17. No sign of them seeking informants in Second Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are a few people who collect info within second life and publish it. I'm one of them. I have, in the past, gathered information on how the platform is used, socially, and where people are hanging out and what they're doing. It requires a lot of human effort to suss out the human activity from the automated activity in Second Life, because there is a lot of the latter designed to simulate the former. I've been very vocal about my findings, but nobody has approached me for sharing info or to discuss methodology. They'd be able to tell from my writing that I'm not paranoid about authority, as most people still in SL and talking about it seem to be.

    In short, if they were looking for informants in Second Life, I'm an obvious candidate. But they haven't approached me.

  18. Best thing I've heard in years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least as far as the NSA is concerned. In fact I'd be happy if they spent all their resources on virtual worlds.

  19. This has been going on for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been going on for years: When I still worked at the NSA (beginning of the nineties), I also used to pla... monitor all these Solitary games.

  20. Too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, now they've gone too far. We've sat around and impotently whined on internet forums when the Snowden files came out. We sat around and impotently whined on internet forums when we learned the NSA infiltrated communications on the internet (OUR precious internet*!) at the backbone level. We sat around and impotently whined on internet forums when we learned the NSA was spying on our phone calls. We sat around and impotently whined on internet forums when we learned the NSA hacked into Google's encrypted intra-datacenter communications.

    But NOW they're spying on OUR VIDEO GAMES! Oh, man. Ohhhh, man. They're gonna regret that. This shit just got REAL now. That's it. It's time, my internet brothers and sisters. We have to unleash the FULL power we all have as Citizens of the Internet. Unleash the revolution NOW! You heard me, NSA! We're gonna sit around and impotently whine REALLY REALLY LOUDLY on internet forums now!

    *: Which was made by the government.

  21. NSA recruits Linden Lab and Facebook connection by mspohr · · Score: 1

    According to the NYT article http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/world/spies-dragnet-reaches-a-playing-field-of-elves-and-trolls.html
      In 2007, as the N.S.A. and other intelligence agencies were beginning to explore virtual games, N.S.A. officials met with the chief technology officer for the manufacturer of Second Life, the San Francisco-based Linden Lab. The executive, Cory Ondrejka, was a former Navy officer who had worked at the N.S.A. with a top-secret security clearance.

    He visited the agency’s headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., in May 2007 to speak to staff members over a brown bag lunch, according to an internal agency announcement. “Second Life has proven that virtual worlds of social networking are a reality: come hear Cory tell you why!” said the announcement. It added that virtual worlds gave the government the opportunity “to understand the motivation, context and consequent behaviors of non-Americans through observation, without leaving U.S. soil.”

    Mr. Ondrejka, now the director of mobile engineering at Facebook, said through a representative that the N.S.A. presentation was similar to others he gave in that period, and declined to comment further.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  22. Mixed Feelings About This by jsm18 · · Score: 1

    If they are watching, I hope they are impressed by my Firefighter achievement.

  23. Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were a terrorist organization, you would play a video game where chats are monitored by the company as a rule? No you would not. Monitoring text is clearly in the EULA of these games, and private chats are logged just like group/party, raid, etc.. chats are logged. If you truly believe in this fantasy of propaganda please go visit your local mental health professional and request medication immediately.

    Now if you were asking "Are some corrupt fuckers in a 3 letter agency advocating that agents try to recruit people on these MMO sites?" my reply would be different. Sure they would. Numerous 3 letter agencies have made it a habit of trolling forums and Facebook looking for patsies. They even found a few of them and gave them everything they needed including targets so that they could heroically save the day by busting the patsy at the scene of the crime with fake explosives that the agency provided. I don't put any shitty tactics beyond these people at this point.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Rubbish by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you were a terrorist organization, you would...

      If I were a terrorist organization I would download on of the dozens of free encryption programs on the web and USE IT. Even a zip file with a long password would do the job.

      Any belief that the NSA is catching real, dangerous terrorists with all their spying is fucking stupid. The same goes for the TSA. The only reason nobody's shooting random people or blowing stuff up all over the place is because nobody wants it badly enough. If they did, well, look at what happened in Boston...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Rubbish by jtara · · Score: 1

      Dunno about other platforms, but Playstation game chat is typically not 100% monitored, or even close. They rely mainly on reporting by users. There is some spot monitoring.

      FWIW, I wrote a moderation system used by Playstation sports-related games. Interesting the things that are moderated - for example, track layouts for racing games. One might make them in interesting shapes. But as long as you don't make one in the shape of a body part, I doubt anyone would realize that it means "begin the attack at 0700".

    3. Re:Rubbish by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised there was no mention of CounterStrike or vent. I mean if a guy continuously picks the terrorist side... or NSA agents aren't leet enough to hang with that crowd either.

    4. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > The only reason nobody's shooting random people or blowing stuff up all over the place is because
      > nobody wants it badly enough. If they did, well, look at what happened in Boston...

      Exactly. Hell I was just hearing on NPR about a refugee camp where "home made rifles" were found. How hard is it to get a tank of propane or a sack of flour? How hard is it to get gasoline, sulfuric acid, or nitrate containing soil? Point is, if people want weapons they can and will make them, no matter what you try to do to stop them.

      anybody who is in touch with the world enough to be able to read, do math, and generally solve problems and make plans can put together his own weapons of some sort, including bombs. There are plenty of examples of people who did it (many of whom were not even terrorists and didn't hurt anyone; if not most, since there are more teenagers living in the sticks with fuck all to do than there are terrorists)

      So where does that leave us? If most teenagers who really set their mind to it could come up with a way to blow shit up, why is it shit isn't blowing up for the most part? Why do we not have bedlam?

      There really is only that one answer.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      No you would not.

      Yes I would.

      If I had ill intent, I would use whatever communication channels raise the least suspicion. If I'm worried about an investigation, a fully-encrypted chat client on my computer or an account at a secure email provider are hard to explain away, but an XBox just implies that I like playing games. My chats with my friends might not be terribly interesting on their own, and anybody reading the logs wouldn't really care if we set up raids that had to be canceled later, but those canceled plans could really be setting up events outside the game, that the operators would know nothing about.

      Numerous 3 letter agencies have made it a habit of trolling forums and Facebook looking for patsies. They even found a few of them and gave them everything they needed including targets

      Yes. The point is to find people who are willing to commit such acts, and who would indeed do so if they meet someone who will give them the resources. The agents offer such resources (and yes, even targets) just like an enemy recruiter would. Then, if and only if the "patsy" follows through with the plan are they arrested. The United States has no law against hating the government. There are laws against doing something with that hatred.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    6. Re:Rubbish by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      There really is only that one answer.

      I know! The NSA's snooping combined with the TSA's probing have kept us safe. Amen.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    7. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anybody who is in touch with the world enough to be able to read, do math, and generally solve problems and make plans can put together his own weapons of some sort, including bombs.

      That won't be as much of a problem if our education system continues to stagnate.

    8. Re:Rubbish by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, one of the truisms that law enforcement counts on is the fact that criminals are stupid. Not all, but quite a few, and the same goes for terrorists. You have to hope that some of them are dumb enough to make these sorts of mistakes.

    9. Re:Rubbish by phorm · · Score: 2

      Might work out well enough if you had a pre-set bunch of codes that correspond to real events/locations in game.
      For example, "going on a raid tonight @ 12 against the great dragon in the keep of death, bring a LVL12 wizard, shaman, and a tinker" might translate out into a 3-person team with a bomb expert etc hitting a predesignated location. It would be pretty hard to differentiate that between real game chats, or prove in court (ha!) that it was actually terrorist double-speak. It would also be less suspicious than an encrypted VPN or tunnel, etc.

      Of course the above would assume that the terrorists were all versed in whatever codes were used. I could picture one guy with a bunch of rifles sitting in a real van waiting while his two buddies are wondering when he's showing up for the raid in WOW :-)

    10. Re:Rubbish by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that any data sent in plaintext (including non-encrypted chat for any online service or game) is readable by anyone monitoring the traffic directly, potentially including your ISP and the NSA.

    11. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The point is to find people who are willing to commit such acts, and who would indeed do so if they meet someone who will give them the resources. The agents offer such resources (and yes, even targets) just like an enemy recruiter would. Then, if and only if the "patsy" follows through with the plan are they arrested.

      This is entrapment, illegal for most US law enforcement for the basic reason that the actual crime is instigated by law enforcement itself.

    12. Re:Rubbish by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The underpants bomber, show bomber, etc. were all to stupid to manage to set off their bombs, they were on "Law Enforcement" lists, they travelled one way with no luggage...but they were both allowed to board aircraft.

      Counting on the enemy being stupid is a pretty stupid thing to do. If that's your reason for giving up your freedom, you need to get out more.

      --
      No sig today...
    13. Re:Rubbish by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      So where does that leave us? If most teenagers who really set their mind to it could come up with a way to blow shit up, why is it shit isn't blowing up for the most part? Why do we not have bedlam?

      There really is only that one answer.

      Exactly! Where are all those attacks that should be happening? Is there a conspiracy of silence?

      Mass shootings in America: A history, 1999 through 2013

      Why do we never hear about them on Slashdot!?

      27 Reported Killed In Connecticut Elementary School Shooting
      12 Dead, 50 Injured at The Dark Knight Rises Showing In Colorado

      I agree, there really is only one answer. That is that people conveniently "forget" or ignore facts contrary to their argument.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending January 27, 2012

      Denver: Man Arrested for Providing Material Support to a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization

      Jamshid Muhtorov was arrested by members of the FBI’s Denver and Chicago Joint Terrorism Task Forces on a charge of providing and attempting to provide material support to the Islamic Jihad Union, a Pakistan-based designated foreign terrorist organization.

      Baltimore: Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction in Plot to Attack Armed Forces Recruiting Center

      U.S. citizen Antonio Martinez, aka Muhammad Hussain, pled guilty to attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction against federal property in connection with a scheme to attack an armed forces recruiting station in Catonsville, Maryland.

      Washington Field: Man Pleads Guilty to Shootings at Pentagon, Other Military Buildings

      Yonathan Melaku, of Alexandria, Virginia, pled guilty to damaging property and to firearms violations involving five separate shootings at military installations in northern Virginia between October and November 2010, and to attempting to damage veterans’ memorials at Arlington National Cemetery.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending January 13, 2012

      1.Tampa: Florida Resident Charged with Plotting to Bomb Locations in Tampa

      A 25-year-old resident of Pinellas Park, Florida was charged in connection with an alleged plot to attack locations in Tampa with a vehicle bomb, assault rifle, and other explosives.

      2.Baltimore: Former Army Solider Charged with Attempting to Provide Material Support to al Shabaab

      A man who secretly converted to Islam days before he separated from the Army was charged with attempting to provide material support to al Shabaab, a foreign terrorist organization, and was arrested upon his return to Maryland after traveling to Africa.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending December 9, 2011

      Seattle: Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Attack Military Processing Center

      A former Los Angeles man pled guilty in connection with the June 2011 plot to attack a military installation in Seattle.

      More here.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    14. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Mayor Bloomberg and company's "capture" of an Arabic man they radicalized, they taught how to make a bomb, they provided the materials for (albeit made inoperative), and they provided the target to?

    15. Re:Rubbish by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      If they are that dumb, I'm not too scared of them. They might be able to shoot a few people, maybe even put together a rather pathetic bomb, but they aren't going to be slaughtering thousands.

    16. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      The very fact you have to go to documents that span a decade or more just to get their numbers up proves my point far more than I expect you will realize.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    17. Re:Rubbish by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Most terrorists have more and better schooling than US high school students.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re:Rubbish by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Likewise the fact that ignore the many arrests and convictions just goes to prove my point. And note that I didn't even make an effort to include the many reports of extremists leaving the US and Europe to go to areas with hot conflicts where they can fight. That is one of the major concerns of the various security services - that nationals will go to Syria or other areas, train and fight, and return to prepare for future mischief.

      The fact that things at home are relatively peaceful today does not mean that there isn't a store of future trouble filling up against the day of action.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Not ignoring, just not willing to call them "many" when they are in fact, so few. If not a single one was arrested, the net difference would be noise. More people have died in car crashes, this year, more than 10 times over, than in the largest terrorist attack EVER on US soil.

      Given that these attacks could generally be pulled off by anyone who wants to do it, the only real possible conclusion is that.... the number of people so inclined is so close to zero as to make no real odds, and the rest is just a bit of noise in an otherwise flat signal.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    20. Re:Rubbish by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      More people died in car crashes in 1941 than died in the Japanese attack that devastated the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. That was about the same number of people that died on 9/11. The US went to war against Japan, the US went to war against al Qaida after largely ignoring its attacks for many years.

      It doesn't take many truck bombs at public events to produce spikes in the signal.

      No, there are other conclusions that can be reached as I mentioned above. One of them being that the militants fight outside the country, which is true in many cases. Perhaps they don't want to foul their own nest ... yet.

      It is unlikely that this problem will be going away any time soon, so we'll be able to continue to examine it at our leisure.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    21. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. Entrapment is when the law enforcement officer actually convinces an otherwise law-abiding person to commit a crime. If the agents threatened to harm their suspect's family unless the plan was completed, that'd be entrapment. Providing supplies and assistance is actually allowed, just enabling the suspect to do what they already intend to do.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    22. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Where are all those attacks that should be happening? Is there a conspiracy of silence?

      Kind of, depending on what conspiracy theories you currently believe in.

      While Newton was a tragedy, school shootings take place almost weekly in cities like Chicago. Just do a Yahoo search on "Chicago school shootings" and you'll get pages. Even weeding out the duplicates there still is a surprising amount of gun violence in Chicago schools. Why isn't this major news? Because Chicago has a very high level of gun control laws in effect and they are doing NOTHING to solve the problem. The gun control nuts in Washington do not want that info to circulate freely.

    23. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a terrorist organization, you would play a video game where chats are monitored by the company as a rule? No you would not. Monitoring text is clearly in the EULA of these games, and private chats are logged just like group/party, raid, etc.. chats are logged. If you truly believe in this fantasy of propaganda please go visit your local mental health professional and request medication immediately.

      Now if you were asking "Are some corrupt fuckers in a 3 letter agency advocating that agents try to recruit people on these MMO sites?" my reply would be different. Sure they would. Numerous 3 letter agencies have made it a habit of trolling forums and Facebook looking for patsies. They even found a few of them and gave them everything they needed including targets so that they could heroically save the day by busting the patsy at the scene of the crime with fake explosives that the agency provided. I don't put any shitty tactics beyond these people at this point.

      What people overlook is the gold selling/farming business inside Video Games is based on pure fraud though. It's a million, maybe even billion dollar market that starts with identity theft. A lot of these companies are run by the mafia or underground criminal organizations that can be linked back to terror.

      Not to mention pedophiles and other criminals prey on people behind the keyboards.

    24. Re:Rubbish by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      You really think the opening salvo from a major military power against the US is the same as a group of crazies who killed themselves in the attack? As much credit/blame as Al Qaeda receives for 9/11, they were really only accomplices.

    25. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go and try and buy 2 tons of fertilizer... or sulfuric acid...

    26. Re:Rubbish by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It is the same to the extent that both attacks caused large loss of life on American soil, and were not the only attacks conducted. Al Qaida's ultimate goal is actually more ambitious in the long term than that of the Empire of Japan. Al Qaida is also working in more countries than Japan was even if it has been less successful in gaining full control of them. Also, both the Empire of Japan and al Qaida experimented with biological and chemical weapons for possible use in future attacks. There are more than a billion Muslims of which a meaningful percentage support the goals of al Qaida and its affiliates. One meaningful difference is that Japan was more easily defeated than al Qaida will be. This conflict will not go away soon.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    27. Re:Rubbish by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, in most other countries it would be over the line to provide all those and then provide motivational material too and to tell the potential-to-be suspect that its a cool thing - of course, busting them for the plan before they actually do it then too.

      so the end result is charges of planned terrorist attack, where the actual plan came from the coppers and nothing was actually done by anyone!

      or the case of the "biggest gun bust" in USA, which was a result of cops creating a market for out-of-state illegally imported firearms by continually buying anything they brought in(to the amounts that I'd be surprised if they had sold any to any other buyers). so they find some dude who needs money and tell him to go to another state and buy guns and to bring them back - once he does it they ask him to do it again and again and then later bust him and somehow by USA standards that isn't entrapment.

      anywhere else entrapment doesn't need the cops to have held a gun on the head - just the cops _suggesting_ that it would be a good idea to do the crime is enough and by any fucking sane standard it is... note that if someone is just suggesting that USA sucks or trying to incite someone to do the same things in Jemen or Pakistan he can get a fucking hellfire missile shot at him. So why the cops providing explosives and inciting plans for terror aren't being shot with hellfires?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    28. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 3

      More rubbish from the shill CF. Let me break down your list of trash: The Underwear bomber was pushed onto a plane by 3 letter agencies against all better judgement including a protesting police officer. A court case in Michigan proves that it was wrong doing by the 3 letter agencies and NOT some brilliant terrorist. All of the other cases of busted terrorists, every one, deals with a patsy working with a 3 letter agency who provided both the target and the materials. We used to call this entrapment, and should do so again.

      Boston, you have a 3 letter agency that kills a friend of a suspect cold blooded, and lots of questions regarding the rest. The naked unarmed teenager that was allegedly shooting at police from a boat for example. I'm not claiming the brothers are innocent, but that we don't know what happened from truthful eyes. We have proof that the supposedly "good" guys are out murdering innocent people. Two wrongs don't make a right and all that. Scratch that one from the list.

      Remove the mass shootings from your list, because they are NOT terrorist attacks. Those are cases of allegedly sick individuals that allegedly committed crimes.

      You have nothing on your list that is an actual "terrorist" attack. Nothing!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    29. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 2

      I smell another CF like shill. No you would not use plain text logged chats as a communication method for terrorism. An eight year old gets that they would be caught using this method of communication. So you are either less intelligent than an eight year old, or a liar.

      I think you should look at entrapment and how it's defined versus what we are currently allowing (which a very short time ago was illegal under entrapment). Just because it's being overlooked does not make it legal, or morally right. If you are so ignorant you can't understand that, well, see the 8 year old analogy above.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    30. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Qaida's ultimate goal is actually more ambitious in the long term than that of the Empire of Japan.

      And this is why people think you're paranoid. Al Qaida has long term goals in exactly the same way that Anonymous has long term goals. There is no more equivalence between AlQaida and the Empire of Japan than there is between the Militia of Montana and North Korea. Seriously, dude, your inability to distinguish between a nation of 100,000,000 people and a GDP of $6T with highly stratified and clearly established political structures capable of maintaining order and relative security over 150,000 square miles is not in any way shape or form equivalent to a distributed, clandestine rabble of a few or few tens of thousands of people with no central leadership or representative governance. The continued treatment of these private citizens (regardless of their organization) as though they are State actors is the reason we're all cynical about "war." The "war" on Al Qaida is exactly the same as the "war" on drugs, and exactly not like world war 2.

    31. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember back when BF2 was popular, there were plenty of squads who would kick you if you didn't speak Arabic. They weren't exclusively playing MEC either.

    32. Re:Rubbish by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      And I think your post neatly encapsulates the unseriousness of the views of many people on Slashdot. North Korea, the Empire of Japan, and al Qaida share a number of attributes. They have all managed to kill tens of thousands of people. They have all controlled territory as part of a governing authority. They have all deployed crew served weapons and other heavy armaments. They have all either experimented or used chemical and biological weapons. They all have controlled or had access to resources worth at least many millions of dollars. They are all willing to use violence to further their ends. They all have more than 100 members. The "Militia of Montana," probably not so much for any of that. Al Qaida poses a continuing risk to national governments to varying degrees around the world, including Syria, Afghanistan, Egypt, Algeria, and others. They are destabilizing many others.

      Many people here are cynical about fighting al Qaida due to stunted perspectives and fringe ideas on many related topics. The fact that you use scare quotes around war on al Qaida and compare it to the "war on drugs" just shows you lack perspective.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    33. Re:Rubbish by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      So Cold when the US and UK train "freedom fighters" for Syria its just "nationals" will go to Syria ... "return to prepare for future mischief."
      The UK and US have used their "freedom fighters" in a lot of small wars. Funding, weapons, travel are all 'allowed' by the US gov.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10311007/Syria-nearly-half-rebel-fighters-are-jihadists-or-hardline-Islamists-says-IHS-Janes-report.html
      Even when the US has "its" "extremists" trapped in "hot conflicts" they are allowed to fly out:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunduz_airlift

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    34. Re:Rubbish by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it is best to hide something in plain sight.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    35. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I hope you know more about architecture than you do about security.

      Hiding communications in plain sight works surprisingly well. This might shock you, but back before the Internet, military plans were often written in plain text and carried by third-parties! Yes, sometimes, the messages were intercepted, and sometimes they were even understood, but more often the secret communications actually work for a while, because the hidden messages are indistinguishable from their carrier medium.

      Being indistinguishable, by definition there is no way to identify your planning messages from anyone else's messages about actual raids. Law enforcement won't be reading (or flagging) your messages, because they won't even know you're interesting. On the other hand, if you ever actually need the plausible deniability that encryption provides, then you've already partially failed. Your every move will be scrutinized, and the computer you use to send those secure messages will probably be compromised anyway.

      As for entrapment, I also hope you're a better system engineer than you are a lawyer.

      Entrapment is defined as when an officer of the law induces someone to commit a crime they otherwise wouldn't. Giving someone access to supplies they could get elsewhere isn't entrapment, nor is encouragement, in most jurisdictions I've studied. The suspect can always just say "no", and walk away. In fact, that is the point of such sting operations - to find the people who, given the chance to commit a crime, wouldn't say "no".

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    36. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right, the war on drugs has destroyed far more lives for far less purpose. They really shouldn't be compared, its an insult to the victims of the drug war.

    37. Re:Rubbish by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm doing a project for a class right now (making a Rube-Goldberg style contraption) and so just bought a bunch of steel bearing balls. I am now noise in the watch lists, inadvertently screwing up the NSA. There is a LOT more noise than there is signal. There are too many viable terrorist targets, it's too easy to attack them, and there are very few terrorists, so the "security" measures don't actually add to the security at all. The NSA does nothing to help prevent terrorist attacks. The TSA actively assists terrorist attacks by creating choke points at the security lines! Also, the vast majority of the (very few) terrorists we do have are idiots. A group like the IRA operating in the US could have done much more damage than any terrorist attack attempt since 9/11. The fact that no one has when it's so easy just shows that there aren't any terrorists to catch.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    38. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I believe it's apparent that I'm way better at both than you.

      Hiding secrets in a "letter" which is delivered to a single recipient and written one time is not the same thing as posting a message to a chat which is logged indefinitely. It's more akin to writing your secret message and publishing it in national newspapers across the world.

      This may shock you because you seem to lack any logical abilities at all, but the modern equivalent of hiding messages in images is a known technique which is similar to the precursor hiding messages in plain text. If you are a terrorist group you are not going to keep an on-line archive of all of your images. You create the image, send it out and then delete the image. The recipient would know to remove his image when he has deciphered what is needed out of the image.

      Claiming that people use chat text which they know is logged, would be in line with thinking that military and terrorist groups would keep an on-line archive of all of these communications. It's idiocy to make such a claim, and does not match reality in the slightest.

      Your last shows very clearly that you don't understand the law, or legal concepts in general. Thanks for playing.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    39. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge difference between a singular dispute and someone bent on maximum carnage.

    40. Re:Rubbish by sixsixtysix · · Score: 2

      Well, true that it isn't entrapment, it is true that most sting operations reek of desperation on the part of LEOs. If you have to facilitate/enable ANY part of the crime, you must really suck at your job. The crimes only happen because the LEOs are involved. Totally pathetic.

      --
      ...
    41. Re:Rubbish by houghi · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=making+explosives&sm=3

      See? That wasn't hard at all. I get about 79,500 results. I am sure there will be better words to search for if you are determined.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    42. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Holy ad hominem, Batman!

      The first step of any criminal plot is to not let law enforcement even know a crime is happening. That's what steganography is good for. It preserves the illusion of innocence long enough for the plan to be executed, after which the authorities already know what's been planned, of course.

      The goal of steganography isn't to not get caught; it's to not be seen.

      if you care to prove your case for weakening standards of entrapment, please feel free to cite an example case where actual by-definition entrapment was not acknowledged by the court. Do be sure to avoid the myths of entrapment, though.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    43. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      In a word, no.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    44. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anybody who is in touch with the world enough to be able to read, do math, and generally solve problems and make plans can put together his own weapons of some sort, including bombs.

      Which is a big part of why Chemistry is not only no longer required in high school, but actively discouraged, and why states like Texas just dropped Algebra II as a graduation requirement.
      An idiot population is far easier to control than a well educated one.

    45. Re:Rubbish by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      If you were a terrorist organization, you would play a video game where chats are monitored by the company as a rule? No you would not. Monitoring text is clearly in the EULA of these games, and private chats are logged just like group/party, raid, etc.. chats are logged. If you truly believe in this fantasy of propaganda please go visit your local mental health professional and request medication immediately.

      Absolutely correct. However, I've thought for years that online games would be an easy way to launder money, whether it be by terrorists, or more conventional organized crime. There are plenty of 3rd party websites to buy and sell in-game virtual currencies which could be used to easily pass real money into and out of a game, and without any traceable in-game chat logs or voice communication, assuming they have protected communication elsewhere. There's no need to send high-paid agents into games for spying when they could quietly contact the companies running the games and ask/require them to track or provide logs of virtual currency exchanges for suspicious activities. Many game popular MMOs are probably already doing some type of currency tracking to locate gold farmers, hackers, or exploiters anyway. Don't monitor every chat-log, just follow the money [and it's debateable whether that's even necessary].

    46. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Wait, you open your last paragraph with "I hope you know more about architecture than you do about security." then cry "ad hominem" when I return it in full? Don't be the first to throw a punch if you can't take one in return.

      Steganography can only be effective by controlling the medium, and your implication that no obscurity is required is asinine. Code breaking is not new, and neither is steganography.

      No, I'm not going to cite over two centuries of entrapment cases. Up until very recent times, a police agency could not assist a criminal and have a case stand up in court. Having an agent provide a target and working "with" a criminal was called being an agent provocateur at worst and entrapping at best. This is why operations like "COINTENPRO" and "Mockingbird" are kept classified. Why not start by reading those two gems of CIA operations.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    47. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the same to the extent that both attacks caused large loss of life on American soil

      And entirely different in that the people on board the airplanes on 9/11 did what the government told them to and just let the hijackers do what they wanted. Except for one airplane, who decided to say "Fuck the government, we're not going to take this shit" and as a result that aircraft never hit a building.
      Had the people on those other aircraft had the fucking balls to stand up for themselves, instead of rolling over and expecting "the government" to protect them, there would not have been any planes hitting buildings at all.

      Ultimately 9/11 happened because US Citizens gave up control of their own safety to the government and expected the government to actually follow through on their promises of protection.
      Wake up, idiot- the government cannot and will not protect you. The NSA is not there to protect you, and neither are the FBI or CIA.

    48. Re:Rubbish by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I know! The NSA's snooping combined with the TSA's probing have kept us safe. Amen.

      And they do it by use of this tiger pebble, that keeps away tigers.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    49. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Which Al Qaida are you talking about fearing? The same ones that the US Government is now arming in Syria to overthrow Asad? The ones that we armed as the Mujaheddin to fight Russia? The ones we assisted in overthrowing Gaddafi?

      Don't accuse others of lacking perspective with this type of garbage.

      By the way, the US has done everything in your list of bad things Al Qaida, Japan, and North Korea has done. A rational intellectual perspective is to put the mirrored shades on your face and take a look at why so many people despise the US currently. Hint: It's not because we are out to help everyone and giving the kids candy. It's because we are killing a whole lot of people, many of them innocent, in the name of a war started on absolutely fabricated information. It's because instead of being a country to be admired for our freedoms, we have turned into a country to fear because of our military.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    50. Re:Rubbish by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I smell another CF like shill ... you are either less intelligent than an eight year old, or a liar ... If you are so ignorant you can't understand that, well, see the 8 year old analogy above.

      Don't be the first to throw a punch if you can't take one in return.

      It sounds like you don't really know what entrapment is, and can't be bothered to learn. COINTELPRO and Mockingbird were about propaganda, not really prosecution. Now if you don't mind, I need to find a water slide.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    51. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people here are cynical about fighting al Qaida due to stunted perspectives

      We dont all have your clearance level remember...

      Maybe you can look up for us, how many people killled lives destroyed due to al Qaida and how many to drugs?

    52. Re:Rubbish by Xest · · Score: 1

      One of my friends has this habit of "friending" any random person he plays with. So we were playing Battlefield 3 on the XBox 360 one day for a few hours and one of his friends came online who he promptly invited to our chat party and joined our game.

      The guy's gamertag (nickname) was that of an infamous Islamic preacher, and I thought it was just typical gamer type name-trolling at first but after a few hours of this guy refusing to ever play the US and always joining the Russians - quitting and rejoining the game if need be to swap sides when the swap side timer hit him and ranting every 5 minutes between saying "yeah, die American pig" I began to realise for the first time that there are in fact people who are literally batshit extremists on there - for the first time ever I'd actually found one. For a while I assumed he was just joking but it only took a few jokes on my behalf and the complete lack of response from the guy to realise this guy was stone cold serious in his hatred for the US.

      Does this mean I think they need to monitor games? Not really, chances are it was just some kid who needs to grow up and will never cause any harm, and given that this is the first extremist nutjob I've ever encountered online after nearly two decades of it it seems like an extremely inefficient way of finding them even if they were to be a threat, but what if he did find someone else like him on there? what if they need egg each other on and move on to a real atrocity? It's not outside the realm of possibility that two of them couldn't end up the next Boston bombers.

      It's easy to say terrorists would never be that stupid, but the fact is most terrorists actually are. The leaders get it but they're not the ones putting themselves in the way of danger, these bottom of the rung dumb fucks are precisely the sort of people they want to go and get themselves killed for their cause and many have got themselves caught long before causing any problems precisely because of this level of stupidity. Even many hackers who tend to be far more intelligent than your average extremist have been caught precisely because they failed to consistently use secure communication.

      They're not looking for the leaders on MMOs, those that are smart enough to avoid it, but they are looking for kids who don't know any better about ranting on logged chats assuming no one will ever get round to reading it - kids that could either become informants, or threats if their hatred is left to fester or circumstances open up the realm of possibility of action. The targets are definitely there, inside these games, but whether joining the games themselves is the sensible way to find them or determine how genuinely useful/problematic targets could be I'm really not convinced in the slightest.

      But perhaps they expect that these people are more likely to be the lone wolf types, the sorts of guys who'd snap one day and go and shoot up a mall all by themselves or whatever, those they can't trace by simply following the known terror networks because although they sympathise with them they were never actually part of them - there was no link to follow. Perhaps in their desperation to deal with the lone wolf problem they can't see any other option than trying to pursue them in the places where many disaffected minds hang out?

    53. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > And entirely different in that the people on board the airplanes on 9/11 did what the government told
      > them to and just let the hijackers do what they wanted. Except for one airplane, who decided to say
      > "Fuck the government, we're not going to take this shit" and as a result that aircraft never hit a
      > building.

      Absolutely correct except in the government part. I don't think anybody was asking "what would the government say to do", most people were not thinking about that. Much more likely they were thinking about past hijackings.

      Up until 9/11, actual hijackings usually happened with the intention of making a statement or holding ransom. If you were in a seat on a plane on 9/11; you had every reason to expect that the plane was going to land, there was going to be a standoff where either the hijackers were killed, or you were released. Everyone fully expected to be walking off that plane alive within the next few days and that was perfectly reasonable for them to assume.

      On 9/11, that changed; and as you rightly note; we saw the result before the day was out.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    54. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 1

      COINTELPRO and Mockingbird were about propaganda, not really prosecution.

      No, neither operation were about propaganda. Your ignorance is very glaring on that one.

      This document explains why you are absolutely wrong about entrapment as well, but it seems like you are content with your ignorance and just claim facts are wrong so that you can maintain a delusion.

      The rationale underlying the defense is to deter law enforcement officers from engaging in reprehensible conduct by inducing persons not disposed to commit crimes to engage in criminal activity. In their efforts to obtain evidence and combat crime, however, officers are permitted to use some deception. For example, an officer may pretend to be a drug addict in order to apprehend a person suspected of selling drugs. On the other hand, an officer cannot use chicanery or Fraud to lure a person to commit a crime the person is not previously willing to commit. Generally, the defense is not available if the officer merely created an opportunity for the commission of the crime by a person already planning or willing to commit it.

      Emphasis is mine. When the agency recruits a person and provides the material and target, they have gone well beyond their legal scope. Providing illegal materials to the target, is also absolutely illegal even if the target claims "I wanna blow that up." This is why cops can't simply become dope dealers to bust bigger players (check with narcotics officers for how much they have to do). There are numerous circuit court cases where rulings have been against officers, a large quantity during the alcohol prohibition for entrapment.

      I know, I should not expect facts to get in the way of your belief.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    55. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you for real? Go cower somewhere loser.

    56. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are no threat then

  24. Right, but by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It would also make sense such communication was done via private channels (all games have private messaging). So the way one would monitor that would be via their normal intelligence hoovering methods, not via playing the game.

  25. That explains everything by Todd.Stedel · · Score: 1

    Well, that would explain all the crappy healers/tanks who go AFK and wipe the party... right?

  26. Absurdity by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2

    I love gaming. I have spent far too much time at it. The thought that somebody in our nation's government is getting paid to do it and spy on the rest of us while doing so is ludicrous. The NSA will never be able to assemble enough SIGINT to prevent anything, only follow key words retroactively to find perpetrators after it's too late. In the meantime, the temptation to exploit casual behavior for political ends is too overwhelming.

    The NSA represents the most existential threat to our freedom as Americans that has ever been, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union combined & included. If we fail to put an end to the NSA, then what happens with China, Russia, and Islamic terrorism is entirely moot.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  27. Re:No sign of them seeking informants in Second Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody said they were doing everything they were doing competently.

  28. Of course by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the intelligence community is going to leak such a story, or ten, or a thousand. They want us to believe that they are actually catching terrorists, and they want us to believe that all they money they are pissing away is well spent. So, they'll tell us that they are catching Al Queda terrorists on WoW, and all the other gaming worlds.

    I certainly hope that they have infiltrated the online doll makers and doll costume crowd. I know of at least one red headed Pagan who frequents those sites. That woman is a holy terror, and God knows what kind of people she associates with!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Of course by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The potential is there. Isn't it one of the complains against the security agencies that they show a "failure of imagination" in dealing with potential terrorist threats, resulting in spectacular attacks like 9/11? Are you suggesting perpetuating that? Should the terrorists "out think" the security agencies?

      MetaTerror: The Potential Use of MMORPGs by Terrorists By Andrew Cochran - 2007

      While the makers of Second Life (Linden Labs) pursue an admirable utopian ideal these metaverse systems can potentially also be used by those seeking to pursue a radical agenda. Many of the overwhelmingly positive features of Second Life can be adapted for negative Real Life means. The rapid and potent way in which communication takes place would seem to be an ideal platform for recruitment into radical groups, especially given the age range of those engaged in the world, which is typically 18-34. The teaching capabilities of the world can clearly be adapted for use by terrorists.

      Streaming video can be uploaded into Second Life and a scenario can easily be constructed whereby an experienced terrorist bomb-maker could demonstrate how to assemble bombs using his avatar to answer questions as he plays the video. Using the decentralized organization effect, already successfully used by SL companies, the bomb-maker and his pupils can be spread around the globe and using instant language translation tools (available in the world) could be speaking a variety of languages. Just as Real Life companies such as Toyota test their products in Second Life so could terrorists construct virtual representations of targets they wish to attack in order to examine the potential targets vulnerabilities and reaction to attack. But possibly by far the most useful tool currently available to radical groups is the ability to transfer in-world money between avatars that can be translated into real currency. The Second Life currency of Lindens (approximately $270L to $1US) can be bought using a credit card in one country and credited to one avatar (account) and can be given to a co-conspirator avatar in another country. The person controlling this second avatar can then convert these lindens to the real-world currency wherever they are based using a local credit card or paypal equivalent. Clearly the ability to transfer money in this fashion is a very useful function. While Linden Labs sets a limit on the amount of currency an avatar can buy or sell (typically $5000US) this is likely to change and $5000 gets you a long way in many parts of the world.

      DETECTING MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING ACTIVITY IN SECOND LIFE AND WORLD OF WARCRAFT - 2010

      In recent years there has been much debate about the risks posed by virtual environments. Concern is growing about the ease in which virtual worlds and virtual reality role-playing games such as Second Life and World of Warcraft can be used for economic crimes such as financially motivated cybercrime, money laundering and terrorism financing. Currently, virtual environments are not subject to the strict financial controls and reporting requirements of the real world, therefore, they offer an excellent opportunity for criminals and terrorism financers to carry out their illegal activities unhindered and with impunity. This paper demonstrates the need for suitable approaches, tools and techniques which can be used to detect money laundering and terrorism financing in virtual environments and introduces a research project which aims to establish a comprehensive set of behaviour maps, rule bases and models to help in the fight against organised crime and terrorism.

      Technology is neutral - it can be put to purposes both good or evil. The surgeon's knife can heal or mutilate. When you integrate virtual worlds with the real world in some way, there is

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Of course by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      It's not as daft as you might first think. This is a genuinely serious avenue that many will believe should be monitored.

      When I worked for another huge online MMO catching exploiters, botters, real world traders and gold farmers, there was a genuine and perhaps justified concern about real life criminality among the player base. The fact is that virtual currency has real world value. Buying very sought after items or mountains of gold and then reselling it in a different currency gives you a perfect way to quietly transfer funds from one country to another or launder it. Even just using in game private messages to pass on information.

    3. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technology is neutral - it can be put to purposes both good or evil.

      And this "spying activity" is categorically evil. This is an infinite-regress of guilt-by-association and entrapment that has as its endpoint costing infinite amounts of money, for infinitesimal gain.

    4. Re:Of course by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's widely rumored in EVE that the Russian mafia are involved. I don't know how true the stories are, but they are based on events Russian alliances spending tens of thousands of dollars of real money to maintain control of key areas, and rumors of people recieving death threats or finding the power cables to their homes cut during major battles.

      It might just be people getting over-imaginative, but it isn't impossible. Online gaming combined with the grey market that certainly exists for PLEX could be a good means of money laundering and hard-to-trace payments.

    5. Re:Of course by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Informative

      You offer scoffing and snark, not insight. Or is it just a failure of imagination?

      It's correct to scoff at folks who are scared of Terrorists. You're insinuating that terrorists are nothing to sneeze at, but The Flu Kills Six Times more people EVERY YEAR than a 9/11 attack. Cars and Cheeseburgers kill FOUR HUNDRED TIMES more people than a 9/11 scale attack. You're OK with pissing away taxes to have government agents protect us from WOW playing terrorists? Come the fuck on, man. You sound fucking hysterical and moronic to boot. Do you want to ask permission from a TSA agent before you're allowed to dial the phone? Do you want a DHS employee riding with you in your car, and tossing out your French fries to "protect" you? No. It's been over a decade since 9/11... The cost of our freedom and privacy spent by the NSA is far too much just to "protect" us from something that's one 4000th of the threat encountered on a trip to McDonalds.

      So fucking what if in-game currency is used to to channel funds. The threat is fucking pathetic compared to even the greater threat of falling down in the bathtub.

    6. Re:Of course by mitcheli · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the word that they've infiltrated porn networks (a concept I'd consider completely feasible for "dirt"). Given the Government's long held, and completely zero tolerated rule on surfing porn at work, I sense that this revelation would be ... messy.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    7. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the bigger picture, 9/11 wasn't all that spectacular. It was just that Americans weren't used to anything like that.

      For lots of other countries, that would have been a week or two of attacks.

    8. Re:Of course by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness!

      You should just see what one member of the ANON.penet.fi anonymous email listserver for "ship in a bottle enthusiasts" writes about the government! It is just scandalous. Scandalous, I tell you!

      He/she writes often about blowing up government buildings for terrorist purposes, and thinks that s/he furthers Al Quaeda goals by making these plans! S/he has said several times that s/he will perpetrate a major terrorist act early in 2014, but has not said exactly where on US soil it will occur.

      Heavens to Betsy, I am scared!

    9. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the difference between a cow and 9/11? You stop milking a cow after a few years.

    10. Re:Of course by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm not all that sure of the "hard to trace" part.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of "one mafia" in Russia is the only part of that which is fantasy. There are MANY "mafias" of varying calibers and interests.

    12. Re:Of course by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Heh - greetings from the future. And, don't be around the World Trade Center in September, 2001.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:Of course by BreakBad · · Score: 1

      I guess we should allow more attacks to happen so we don't stand out to much.

    14. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No in-game economy is a good method for laundering money. Why? Because almost all of them do not allow in-game currency to be pulled out as real money. The point of money laundering is to put dirty money in and get clean money out. The only way PLEX could be used for this is if you were illegally selling them for real money outside of the game. In which case, it's not really laundering because you're exchanging dirty money for only slightly less dirty money...

    15. Re:Of course by jlowery · · Score: 1

      It's not about the people killed... it's about the buildings and airplanes destroyed.

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    16. Re:Of course by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There's a thriving grey market for PLEX - and even if the money is of dubious legality, you won't have the police going after it.

      There's no doubt it could be done - the real question is how the efficiency compares to more traditional laundering means.

    17. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's FREEDOM fries, you godless commie!

    18. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure we lose more buildings and planes per year too, ya know.

    19. Re:Of course by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Obviously not if you just transfer the ISK to another character. But you can use it in less direct ways. A chain of transfers, some by ISK, some by one-sided market deals, some by dumping cargo at agreed-upon locations. Considering the sheer size of the data set, and assuming the characters are also being used for playing the game legitimately to generate sufficient noise, it could take weeks for someone to go through all the database just to come up with a list of suspects.

    20. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the fact that US let HSBC repeatedly launder money to Iran, Syria, North Korea, and various other groups that are under sanctaions, to the sum of billions with not even a slap on the wrist as punishment despite the fact that each occurrence is a felony.

      But no the NSA has to monitor WOW for the measly pittance of money that might shuffled that way? WTF!?!

      Oh that's right Blizzard didn't send enough payoff money to congress err I mean, campaign contributions.

       

    21. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it one of the complains against the security agencies that they show a "failure of imagination" in dealing with potential terrorist threats, resulting in spectacular attacks like 9/11?

      No. The people who launched those attacks were known, known to be members of a terrorist group, known to be plotting an attack. And when it became known they were attempting to obtain visas in order to travel to the US, guess what was done? Not a goddamn thing.
      There were plenty of failures which allowed 9/11 to happen, but it had nothing to do with a failure of "imagination", it had nothing to do with lack of information, and all the shit we've done since 9/11 to "prevent" another one would not have done anything to prevent the first one

      I don't NEED the government to protect me from terrorists. Come at me bro'.

    22. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PLEASE! the Russian Mafia are boy scouts compared to EVE players

    23. Re:Of course by EdIII · · Score: 2

      The threat is fucking pathetic compared to even the greater threat of falling down in the bathtub.

      I'm a big man and a I fell down in the bathtub once. It was terrible and awesome. Lucky to have survived quite frankly.

      That being said, I still fear the terrorists more.

      By terrorists, I mean our government. After all, they're the only ones taking away my freedoms, fucking up my economy, and conspiring with lobbyists and corporations to make themselves rich at my expense.

    24. Re:Of course by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm off

    25. Re:Of course by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Technology is neutral - it can be put to purposes both good or evil.

      Except for Second Life, that never had a purpose whatsoever...?

      --
      bickerdyke
    26. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many NSA agents does it take to change a lightbulb?

      Why do you hate America?

    27. Re:Of course by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      For lots of other countries, that would have been a week or two of attacks.

      Eh, terrorists taking down 110-floor skyscrapers is pretty newsworthy no matter what the country.

    28. Re:Of course by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      the media multiplies the effect of 1 terrorist incident by a factor of 1 million

    29. Re:Of course by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      that's right they want you to visualise a middle-eastern muslim man when you hear the word terrorist, not a suit-clad old senator in washington, who is actually more likely to be involved in terrorist activity.

    30. Re:Of course by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      nope, what's more newsworthy is a government killing its own citizens using demolition charges and self-hijacked planes, and then invading some country to nab some imaginary WMDs and then after years and years of collecting oil and poppy seeds, secretly killing some made-up character and throwing his body in the ocean.

    31. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say that a cow isn't an inside job, but yours works too.

  29. Not completely surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I've thought along similar lines. I play an old, outdated, unpopular but still surviving multiplayer game. Not many people on there but enough for some fun.

    Anyway, the game has a chat function built in, and it's crossed my mind in the past that chatting through that game could be an effective way to communicate under the radar. Security by obscurity thru FPSs.

    So I'm not flabbergasted that they spy on WoW. It's still depressing, though, that they have both the compulsion and the means to tap virtually every form of electronic communications. I'd be a lot less pissed if they were selective about it instead of behaving like mentally ill hoarders.

  30. More worrying by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Who really cares about the sexual proclivities of furries? I'm more worried about the proclivities of these secretive anal spies. They seem to be getting off on the conversations of pre-pubescent young men of all ages.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  31. You mean like in Tron? by Qubit · · Score: 1

    NSA Collect Gamers' Chats and Deploy Real-Life Agents Into WoW and Second Life

    ...or more like the Matrix?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  32. Meh, no surprise by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Games could serve multiple purposes: out of band communications (i.e. not phone, email, or mail), rehearsals, and recreation. Since the Caliphate is going to be a while in coming they have some time to kill.

    I don't think there is any surprise that WoW or similar games would have broad appeal, even among terrorists. After all, the Harry Potter books have been among the most popular reading for inmates at Guantanamo Bay.

    What Prisoners Are Reading at Gitmo

    ... Harry Potter. He may not come riding in on the back of a hippogriff to free his favorite captives from their own version of Azkaban, but he shows up once a week on a cart of books from the prison library, offering an escape of the imagination treasured by many. Indeed, the Harry Potter series has been one the most popular titles among the 18,000 books, magazines, DVDs and newspapers on offer from the prison library at Guantánamo.

    Other offerings in the library started in 2003 include the The Lord of the Rings trilogy, the Twilight series and a self-help book called Don't Be Sad. Prisoners don't browse the shelves of this particular library; instead, they wait for a weekly visit by a cart of books prison officers think they might be interested in. There are mysteries and books of poems, copies of National Geographic magazine (a favorite), dictionaries and science textbooks. If the prisoners see something they like they are allowed to check it out for 30 days.

    The library's offerings now span some 18 languages including Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, Pashto, Russian, French and English. Officers scan newspapers to stay up on the latest titles and try to meet requests from prisoners — though finding books in their native languages can sometimes be a challenge. "I tell ya, Dan Brown's been beating me up lately," says Navy Lt. Robert Collett, who as the officer-in-charge of detainee programs, is known as 'Dean of Gitmo U'. "All his books are very popular, but we don't have all of them in Arabic." When the military has trouble finding a title in a certain language, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) sometimes steps in. Martin De Boer, ICRC's deputy head of the regional delegation in D.C., says his group sometimes sends its representatives in far-flung places to local stores in order to answer requests for novels in Uzbek or magazines in Bahasa (the language of Indonesia). "Access to books and news from the outside is very important to the prisoners mental state," says De Boer.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Meh, no surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that we're all now more interested in what the illegally-held-without-trial tortured prison camp victims are reading, than... well, you know, the fact that we're running a prison camp containing people who have been tortured and are being held without evidence or trial.

    2. Re:Meh, no surprise by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      I love the fact that after more than 10 years some people continue to be unable to assimilate the fact the POWs require neither charges nor trials to be held under the law of war. The rest of your post is likewise specious.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Meh, no surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the fact that after more than 10 years some people continue to be unable to assimilate the fact the POWs require neither charges nor trials to be held under the law of war.

      Can you remind me what country these people are soldiers of? Maybe we can negotiate a prisoner return/exchange. After all, North Korea released Merrill Newman: there's room for diplomacy, even among warring states.

    4. Re:Meh, no surprise by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      They don't have to be soldiers of a country since their legal position is essentially similar to that of pirates. But as it happens they consider themselves to be jihadists of the Islamic Caliphate. Are you willing to be an envoy to them? They can be rough, even on their supporters. Given that they behead many of their prisoners, there may not be much to negotiate. I'm willing to see you try though. Keep in mind that they don't fight according to the Geneva Conventions, but rather according to the rules of Jihad in Sharia law. That can lead to some debates that will sound strange to modern Western ears, such as the call by various influential Muslims that the old Muslim practice of taking sex slaves in war be revived.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Meh, no surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make up your mind, man: are they prisoners of war or criminals? POWs you can keep until hostilities end. Criminals, pirates, and serial killers get put on trial, convicted if guilty, and punished according to law. Supposedly, from your rhetoric, it's our laws that make us better. If we deny our own laws, doesn't that reduce us to their level?

    6. Re:Meh, no surprise by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      They are both PoWs of an organization that doesn't fight in accordance with the Geneva Conventions, thereby losing their privileges, and war criminals. In many cases they have committed other offenses as well and could be tried.

      So no, we aren't reduced to their level as things stand. The fact that they haven't been beheaded, as is their custom for many of their prisoners, should server as just one of many hints there.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Meh, no surprise by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that everyone being held is guilty.

      I also believe that anyone that makes excuses for such a system that lacks checks and balances and oversight, like yourself, is as much, if not a significantly greater threat to my liberty, and should be locked up with the other assumed and presumed "terrorists".

      Asshole.

  33. Job by AndrewOsiris · · Score: 2

    will spy for epic lootz...

  34. Red Flags ok. Blue flags: Tell Vile Rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assholes => Shoot Them => Tell Vile Rat

  35. Best anti-terrorism move ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have recruited the terrorists to join WoW clans. Once WoW sucked up their life, they wouldn't be able to stop raiding long enough to...you know...perform acts of Terrorism.

    Eventually, they could meet those with terrorist proclivities a bit more easily in the support groups.

    http://wowaholics.org/content/wow-ruined-my-life

  36. False positive gallery by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    In places where is common to talk about killing thousands, sabotaging/bombing, fantasy names and even fantasy sex, a lot of people should have by now a big red marker on them, ended in no fly lists, rejected credits or got other real-life consequences of role playing chats with friends.

    1. Re:False positive gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason there are thousands of names on the no fly list is because thousands of people blew stuff up after 9/11, right?

    2. Re:False positive gallery by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I miss gaming, I used to be really into it (see my sig, I ran what it's linking to every December on my Quake site) but the game companies themselves ran me off with their DRM, always have to be connected, can't resell, and all the rest of their stupid bullshit.

      So now I guess I should thank Epic and all the rest for sucking so much, That's one place the NSA won't be spying on me!

      I keep thinking of the movie Brazil.

  37. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is the only the HORDE being targeted. Those Alliance are shifty characters too.

    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Alliance are repeatedly clicking the "Release" button to be of importance...

  38. WTB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gif of an orc in fedora, trenchcoat and sunglasses.

  39. Re:No sign of them seeking informants in Second Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We've no need to formally contact you, since your computer is already an open book to us. Thank you, and keep up the good work, Mr. Coward.

    Captcha: repress

  40. It All Makes Sense Now by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Back in the Warcraft 2 days, I'd type in "It Is A Good Day To Die" and suddenly my orcs would be invulnerable. One lowly peon would be able to topple an entire human city in short order. Who knew that I was training to be a terrorist? Thankfully, I've veered off that path or who knows what other horrible actions that game could led me to commit!

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  41. Leroy Jenkins ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That explains a lot:

    NSA Guy !: "Dude, you can't do that, you need a warrent !
    NSA Guy 2: "Screw that, their data is mine ... Leroy Jenkins ...!!!!!!"

    1. Re:Leroy Jenkins ! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      NSA Guy 3: "Dammit Leroy!"

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  42. Re:No sign of them seeking informants in Second Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they don't monitor Second Life. If you are going to kill yourself as a suicide bomber you have to have a life to begin with.

  43. Most recently came across this in GTAV:Online by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I was playing GTAV:Online a couple of weeks ago and there were a couple of guys on there speaking Arabic and talking about Hezbollah and Syria. Now granted, both of those key words are probably common topics in that part of the world, and I do not speak Arabic so I do not have any context to go with the keywords. But, it does serve as an anecdotal data point to give validity to the claim that people are using in game comms to communicate about something other than the game that they are playing.

    If I were a jihadist looking to communicate with agents in the States, a game like WoW is a good candidate to use due to its world wide appeal. Though I would think that some of those Korean MMOs might be even better, given the sheer volume of them, and the fact that their servers are not in the States.

    1. Re:Most recently came across this in GTAV:Online by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure they'd be talking plain words and in open chat....

    2. Re:Most recently came across this in GTAV:Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA operatives would... this is pathetic.

    3. Re:Most recently came across this in GTAV:Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA operatives would... this is pathetic.

      Yes, they clearly would, which is why we didn't learn about any of this for over a decade, if not more.

      Remind me again who's more pathetic, the real-world us who didn't figure this out* or your hypothetical incompetent NSA who wouldn't have been able to pull that off?

      *: No, the partial abstract realization of exactly one of eight hojillion conflicting conspiracy theories spouted off by the internet equivalent of a paranoid schizophrenic street preacher does NOT constitute "figuring this out a long time ago".

    4. Re:Most recently came across this in GTAV:Online by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Like I said, Hezbollah and Syria are probably regular topics of conversation in the Middle East. It is probably the equivalent of Americans talking about pop stars and Facebook memes.

      None the less, never under estimate the arrogance of people to speak freely in a language when they think nobody else around them understands it. I am white and I live in Southern California. I speak Spanish, but you would never know it by looking at me. I stopped being shocked or offended about the amount of trash Hispanics will talk on white people (or even more so, black people), more or less right to their face, thinking that they are "safe" doing it because the people they are talking about do not understand.

  44. I'd love to be in the NSA briefings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jenson, give me your report.

    "Well sir, I discovered that Silverflame28 is a total noob, and I helped axeman2485 and a few friends on a raid in the nearby dungeon. He's a pretty nice guy; sounds like he's from Australia."

    Jenson, you've made the country a safer place. Sleep well, son.

  45. Real Story- workers like to goof off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many at the NSA and similar agencies see the job as a joke. Like most ordinary people, they want to 'enjoy' work, so persuading gullible bosses that gaming all day serves a useful purpose seems like the greatest wheeze in the world.

    The the snowball effect kicks in. The parasitical scum that live to promote 'intelligence' agendas start to promote such goofing off as essential security work, cos of all those nasty 'terrorists' and 'extremists' who are hiding in public game space, sharing all their nefarious plans and ideologies. Americans, in particular are so thick and so vicious, they love a 'reds under our beds' scare, and will always empower the forces in government exploiting such nonsense.

    So, what started as an excellent work place wheeze to make the day pass more quickly ends up, through laughable propaganda from the state supporting paranoia preachers, as essential intelligence work. It is this pathetic incompetence that Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and those that run full surveillance corporations like Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter, wish to reverse.

    Historically, unaccountable intelligence bodies always have ever inflating budgets, and a never ending appetite for power. However, the true 'usefulness' of such operations (in providing lasting power services to the elites) is frequently missing- or worse counter-productive as the Intelligence heads engage in empire building at the cost of the political stability of their masters.

    The dilemma is this. Bill Gates and Tony Blair, etc, need intelligence operatives to be depraved and immoral, so no command will be refused, but the same lack of moral fibre makes such workers corrupt, lazy and incompetent. This is why Gates, Blair etc focus on us and our attitudes. Get the sheeple to expect and tolerate a massively intrusive surveillance society, and you reduce the 'guilt' felt by many intelligence workers.

    However, Blair in particular finds 'scare' stories like "terrorists hiding in online games" very useful indeed. Tony Blair is old-school, and works on the principle of "get group A to hate/fear/distrust Group B because of their differences". So 'gamers' must be a troubling group to non-gamers in Blair's system.

  46. Tin Foil Hat by csumpi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nobody could've said stuff like this a year ago without wearing an invisible Tin Foil Hat.

    Today nobody can say that the middle class is being destroyed in the name of strengthening the middle class, or big banks are getting bigger in the name of stopping too big to fail, without being called a Tea Bagger, a Bigot, or a Racist.

    In the meantime the rich are getting richer, the politicians more powerful, and don't care because the voters believe every lie they tell with a Straight Face.

    1. Re:Tin Foil Hat by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      Yup. I feel like the headlines these days are more like GTA radio commentary than reality.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Tin Foil Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank Ed Snowden for your ability to speak on such topics without being branded a loon, right?

  47. Good god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are all the real problems in Amerika fixed so we have money to waste on this crap?
    They've already destroyed Amerika with this kind of unlimited and unwarranted spying...
    Dismantle the NSA already, this is just insane at this point.

  48. I knew it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ralph Pootawn had to be an NSA troll.

  49. Who believes all of this Snowden stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a career networking guy and technologist, I don't buy half of this Snowden leak info. Who is actually vetting what is being declared by this guy? All of the media outlets accept this guy's word as gospel when, in fact, half of it doesn't pass muster.

  50. SpyParty game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait till SpyParty goes Gold.

    http://spyparty.com/

  51. and to prevent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to prevent any accusations of 'profiling', any conversations in middle eastern languages were automatically filtered out and deleted...

    I wonder how they try to parse some of the online wargames where they regularly talk of all kinds of modern weapon stuff and blowing up/bombing thigs constantly... Or do they just look for christian oriented vocabulary in that case??

  52. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

    You're seeing Celine's first law in action. Specifically:-

    Reflecting the paranoia of the Cold War, Celine's First Law focuses around the common idea that to have national security, one must create a secret police. Since internal revolutionaries and external foes would make the secret police a prime target for infiltration, and because the secret police would by necessity have vast powers to blackmail and intimidate other members of the government, another higher set of secret police must be created to monitor the secret police. And an even higher set of secret police must then be created to monitor the higher order of secret police. Repeat ad nauseam.

    This seemingly infinite regress goes on until every person in the country is spying on another, or "the funding runs out." And since this paranoid and self monitoring situation inherently makes targets of a nation's own citizens, the average person in the nation is more threatened by the massive secret police complex than by whatever foe they were seeking to protect themselves from. Wilson points out that the Soviet Union, which suffered from this in spades, got to the point that it was terrified of painters and poets who could do little harm to them in reality.

    With manual processes, the Stasi had about 10% of the population reporting on the remainder. With server farms and big data analytics, we're way past that stage.

  53. Chat logs by phorm · · Score: 2

    Do they really need to play? I'd imagine they were just have direct access to the chat logs and that those would be filtered for certain keywords or against certain suspect players.

  54. Training ground for infiltrators. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    From my perspective the use for NSA in going into the gamer realm would be more an exercise in infiltration techniques than any real threat hunt. Even covert agents needs training.

    It can also be a great channel for information exchange between NSA agents.

    The possibility to actually gather any useful real world intelligence from online multi-player games is at best questionable unless they have targeted a specific person that's identified already outside the game.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Training ground for infiltrators. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The UK and US may just like to watch any forming "dissent" and hope online communities will show trends before they shape into visable anti war/human rights/environmental/finance reform protests.
      Web 2.0 and online gaming communities seem to offer what "peace groups", 'bars', 'clubs', "unions' and 'universities" did in the past to the intelligence services.
      Then certain well funded NSA/CIA/GCHQ "front" groups can be pushed as been wonderful and protesters will be attracted to 'their' unique community forming.
      Expect to see a lot of traction surround big 'name' brand protest groups and charming individuals ready to guide people into fake or totally infiltrated movements.
      http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_11_02/FBI-was-interested-in-selling-the-material-to-WikiLeaks-in-order-for-them-to-be-charged-with-espionage-Crabtree-3397/
      What did the past look like?
      "'Undercover police cleared 'to have sex with activists'"
      http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jan/22/undercover-police-cleared-sex-activists
      Another aspect is just for slang and keeping up with the ability to 'blend' in.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  55. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've had this for many years on IRC and the result's aren't encouraging: http://www.bash.org/?246405

  56. Now they can catch gold farmers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I mean, illegal immigrants. They usually have a license to farm on the servers they do farm on, don't they?

    On a more serious note, wow and 2L are harmless. Should they ever dare to tap our CS voice server...

  57. They are over funded by koan · · Score: 3

    It's that simple.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  58. World First, Spy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of these raid bosses are espousing ideas that run counter to Horde society. I had better fight them and study their mechanics for any secret messages. Continuous and repeated study is required. Also, loot must be inspected for any anti-American leanings. Goldshire on Moon Guard needs to be investigated, closely.

  59. Sounds dumb, but... by swb · · Score: 2

    ...it seems like every large web site/game has some kind of internal communications system, often a real-time chat function and an offline messaging system. These might be tough to monitor with any context simply off the wire, and in combat games it would be pretty easy to talk about organizing terrorist activity and trivially mask it in terms of game-based combat in a way completely opaque to an outside monitor.

    One of the oldest espionage tradecraft gimmicks (at least in books and movies) are coded messages places as advertisements in newspapers. If you've ever used IMDB you know that pretty much anyone who has a role in a movie automatically has their own IMDB page, including a message board about them. There are THOUSANDS of minor credited cast and crew members with totally blank or very low traffic message boards that likely to remain totally unseen and could be used for exchanging coded messages. Even the high traffic boards for popular actors or movies would be a good place to drop messsages.

    1. Re:Sounds dumb, but... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can make this work for us:

      Hey, NSA. All that spam online? Those are coded messages from terrorists. So fill your databases with them, wipe them from all other areas of the Internet (to prevent the terrorists from communicating) and Keep America Safe!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  60. They only look for chat in Uldum by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1

    Because that's where it looks like the terrorists would hide. Well, maybe Tanaris too.

  61. I used to work for the NSA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but then I took an arrow to the knee.

  62. Re:"National" security means JEWS' security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you blame others for your own incompetence and failures? Those who can not accomplish anything meaningful try to bring down those who can- this week it's the Jews, next week it's whoever else the cult leader is angry at. The only conspiracy against you is being done by you- stop blaming others for your ongoing lack of success.

  63. Panzer vor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > from World of Warcraft to the human avatars of Second Life

    I don't get that. why orcs? How does that stop real-world tenorism? Maybe it made sense if NSA infiltrated the World of Tanks, to pre-emptively neutralize maniac otaku, who planned to steal battle tanks from little guarded army depots, in order to overrun japanese girl-only high schools and demand crates of pantsu for ransom. That is a highly realistic scenario compared to most hypothetic threats analyzed by the NSA and the TSA!

  64. Quake 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it just be easier to start up a game of Quake 2, connect to that one game and start speaking back and forth in code.

    Or even better, have the code embedded into the graphics of your model of your character and have the server setup to send it to other when they connect as that is what you are playing as.

    Hell, you can always do it over Tetrinet if you wanted and hack it so the message is displayed in the windows of the opponents and all the other forms or even better, just use a bootleg private WoW server that isn't located in the US. I honestly don't think they are paying too much attention to the TBC server named Hellground located in Poland.

  65. EPIC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We now know who is working at the NSA:

    PORN + WOW = 12 YEAR OLD BOYS + NSA = SAFETY FROM TERRORISTS

    (Maths equation from the NSA guidebook).

  66. mass-collection capabilities against the Xbox Live by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    How are those folks that bought the Xbox One with the video camera now?

    On a more funny note, the FIRST thing I thought of was this:

    Presidential Speech:
    Obama: Blah Blah Blah Freedom Blah Blah Change, etc...
    Secret Service Agent: *whispers into Obama's ear* Sir we have reports that Stormwind is under attack...
    Obama: ...something of national security has come up I will have to pick this up later.

    Later in the Oval Office:
    OrcPrez69 has logged in.

  67. Username by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Someone somewhere just made an WOW toon called "TotallyNotTheNSA"...

  68. Breaking news: NSA not monitoring by rfrenzob · · Score: 1

    Why does it seem like the news stories will soon turn to what the NSA is not monitoring.

    The Guardian is reporting that the NSA is not tracking the sales of bread at the grocery store on the corner of 5th and Main. Sources can confirm that other products in the store such as green beans, apricots, and chocolate syrup are being actively monitored.

  69. Re:mass-collection capabilities against the Xbox L by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    K, that would have made more sense if I said Orgrimmar... whatever it's a joke.

  70. Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In North America, more people are killed every year by their own furniture falling on them than by terrorism. Terrorism the single most over-hyped thing I can remember hearing about in my lifetime.

    Terrorists are cowardly criminals and even if they were blowing up a large government building every week they could not do any lasting and significant harm to an actual free and democratic society.

    However, people are over-reacting to terrorism, and allowing the media and authoritarian types in government to fear-monger about it and use it as an excuse to help push petty tyrannies like the TSA and even serious threats to liberty like the NSA spying on all of us. AMERICANS ARE DAMAGING THEIR GREAT NATION by allowing this to happen. Your Constitution used to mean something, something incredible and empowering. It made you the envy of the developed world and created great opportunities for those who were clever and worked hard to make a better world for themselves and others. You need to wake up, reclaim your country and stop this downward slide into totalitarianism.

    1. Re:Damn right by runeghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In North America, more people are killed every year by their own furniture falling on them than by terrorism. Terrorism the single most over-hyped thing I can remember hearing about in my lifetime.

      Terrorists are cowardly criminals and even if they were blowing up a large government building every week they could not do any lasting and significant harm to an actual free and democratic society.

      However, people are over-reacting to terrorism, and allowing the media and authoritarian types in government to fear-monger about it and use it as an excuse to help push petty tyrannies like the TSA and even serious threats to liberty like the NSA spying on all of us. AMERICANS ARE DAMAGING THEIR GREAT NATION by allowing this to happen. Your Constitution used to mean something, something incredible and empowering. It made you the envy of the developed world and created great opportunities for those who were clever and worked hard to make a better world for themselves and others. You need to wake up, reclaim your country and stop this downward slide into totalitarianism.

      Yep. Osama bin Laden, for all that he's dead, basically won. And his biggest ally was the US security industry.

    2. Re:Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMERICANS ARE DAMAGING THEIR GREAT NATION by allowing this to happen.

      You say this as though it is something that can be stopped. You don't seem to have been paying attention...

    3. Re:Damn right by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Terrorism the single most over-hyped thing I can remember hearing about in my lifetime.

      That's the point of terrorism -- to be over-hyped, and to scare people.

      Our media and politicians have created an environment where even bombs that never explode are effective at scaring people. So while we're trying to wake people up, let's give a shout out to Washington and remind our leaders not to freak out the next time some idiot tries to hurt people and fails.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    4. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Yep. Osama bin Laden, for all that he's dead, basically won. And his biggest ally was the US security industry.

      Are you a Muslim? Has the US replaced the Constitution with Sharia law? If the answer is No and No, then Bin Laden didn't win, or anything thing close to it. His demand was the US convert to Islam and implement Sharia law.

      Confusion on this point is potentially dangerous, and frankly stupid.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Damn right by Sabriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... No, you're right, he didn't win.

      ... We didn't either.

      Instead of an Islamic caliphate, we're up to our waist in an authoritarian plutocracy. If that is victory, one more such might undo us.

    6. Re:Damn right by styrotech · · Score: 2

      Are you a Muslim? Has the US replaced the Constitution with Sharia law? If the answer is No and No, then Bin Laden didn't win, or anything thing close to it. His demand was the US convert to Islam and implement Sharia law.

      Got any references for that?

      My understanding is that he definitely wanted the Muslim world converted to Sharia law. But his original goals for the US (and the west) were to get foreign troops out of Saudi Arabia, to end support for Israel, and for an end to western support/involvement/activity in Muslim countries (presumably to not get in the way of their goal of converting the Muslim world).

      Later on the strategy expanded to include causing the US economy to collapse by provoking them into more wars of attrition by invading/occupying new countries. That economic damage strategy was kinda working for a while. But the US got tired of playing along with it long before the economy would've collapsed. The financial crisis ended up hurting the economy far more anyway.

      But I've never heard any reliable source for the claim that he aimed to covert the US to Sharia and Americans to Islam (no doubt he obviously would've been happy with that though). I've only ever heard it from the "they hate us for our freedom" crowd.

      I'm not just arguing for the sake of it, I'm genuinely interested in anything you have to back it up.

      Confusion on this point is potentially dangerous, and frankly stupid.

      I look forward to you clarifying it for me then...

    7. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Happy to assist you. The first thing to realize is that much of what you recite is tactics. The ultimate strategic goal for Bin Laden and his followers is a world of Muslims living under Sharia law. It is a long term goal to be sure. But getting the US out of Saudia Arabia and all the rest is just short term goals. Ultimately they want to see the US converted to Islam, and living under Sharia law. The language is somewhat stylized, in accordance with their religious nature, but fairly clear if you will see. The demand for conversion is pretty straightforward, and the call for Sharia only slightly diffused but you can see it - and it follows naturally from the conversion demand.

      Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America'

      (Q2) As for the second question that we want to answer: What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?

      (1) The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.

      (a) The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him, and rejection of this; of complete love of Him, the Exalted; of complete submission to His Laws; and of the discarding of all the opinions, orders, theories and religions which contradict with the religion He sent down to His Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Islam is the religion of all the prophets, and makes no distinction between them - peace be upon them all. ....

      (i) You are the nation who, rather than ruling by the Shariah of Allah in its Constitution and Laws, choose to invent your own laws as you will and desire. You separate religion from your policies, contradicting the pure nature which affirms Absolute Authority to the Lord and your Creator. You flee from the embarrassing question posed to you: How is it possible for Allah the Almighty to create His creation, grant them power over all the creatures and land, grant them all the amenities of life, and then deny them that which they are most in need of: knowledge of the laws which govern their lives?

      If you read in the area of the section I quote you will see many things that they hate that are generally allowed by our freedoms.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:Damn right by betterprimate · · Score: 0

      Ultimately they want to see the US converted to Islam, and living under Sharia law.

      I hate absolutes like "ultimately". Having said that, no, they want the middle east under sharia law without western influence and intervention.

      On the other hand, here in the U.S., "Christians" want the world living under their bastardized and blasphemous rule that is altogether anti-Christian. Guess which is more of a threat to the world?

      Missionaries have done more harm the world, caused more wars and deaths, than a petty "terrorist" group could ever wish for.

      But you see, that's how it goes. The problem with the world is people trying to force their beliefs on others when the truth they proclaim is not even instilled in themselves.

      Bickering and arguing about religious semantics is dangerous, it continues the cycle of dehumanization and warfare that has stricken humanity for thousands of years.

      Here, this will fuck your head: Christianity and Islam has nothing to do with a God. In fact, Jesus Christ was nothing more than a philosopher; a Socrates of sorts.

    9. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've gone wrong on a couple of points there. First, al Qaida and company do indeed want the entire world under Islamic rule. It is their goal. The Middle East is just closer to it since it has a majority of Muslims, a number of the countries already implement Sharia in some form, even if imperfectly. Indonesia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are also high on the list. You may have noticed that they are subject to various troubles as well, not to mention India.

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants

      They plan to take back lands formerly controlled by Muslims. Just one example: Spain

      Alarm in Spain over al-Qaeda call for its "reconquest"
      HAMAS Targets Spain

      As to the US, there is no such thing as "Christian" rule. The US is a secular democracy. It is a nation of primarily Christians (of various flavors and piety) living in a democracy. There is no theocracy, there is no meaningful movement towards theocracy, and it is unclear what one would even look like since there doesn't seem to be a biblical model for it this side of Christ's return. So your post on that is nonsense.

      Christian missionaries have been greatly beneficial to many lands. This is only one example.

      Matthew Parris: As an atheist, I truly believe Africa needs God

      If you look into the history of the last 100 years, you will see that officially atheist regimes were one of the great scourges of the planet. In their communist form they killed 100,000,000 people and brutalized and oppressed many more.

      Jesus lived his life as an observant Jew, is recorded to have fulfilled many prophecies associated with being the Messiah, and made statements declaring himself to be God. Many of his followers preferred to die painful deaths rather than denounce him.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    10. Re:Damn right by runeghost · · Score: 1

      Anyone else wondering if 'cold fjord' is picking up a Defense Department or intelligence community paycheck? It's established that the U.S. government has a propaganda sock-puppet presence online: http://www.storyleak.com/us-military-caught-social-media-running-mass-propaganda-accounts/

      And quick review of his previous posts shows a near-universal bias towards defense of the military-industrial complex and aggressive U.S. foreign policy. How are online forums going to deal with professional, paid propagandists?

    11. Re:Damn right by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      There is no theocracy, there is no meaningful movement towards theocracy, and it is unclear what one would even look like since there doesn't seem to be a biblical model for it this side of Christ's return. So your post on that is nonsense.

      There is a meaningful movement towards theocracy in the U.S. whether it be intentional or not. The "Christian Right" does have a large role to play in both U.S. domestic and foreign policies. It's a large constituency of Republican base. If you don't think so, let me know when I can buy beer on Sundays and fuck someone in the ass in my hometown.

      Missionaries have caused genocides. Enough said.

      Dawkins and the modern atheist movement are idiots. Come on, you can do better than that. I'm not making a stance of support in the belief of God (will capitalize for respect) or the lack of. Regardless, I have no dog in the fight. Throw me a bone.

      You conveniently skimmed over my statement that is more important than any scripture in the Bible and more important than any of Christ's teachings: "The problem with the world is people trying to force their beliefs on others when the truth they proclaim is not even instilled in themselves."

      Jesus never fulfilled any prophecies. His life has been massaged by those who wish to put him in a divine light. And no, he never made one statement declaring himself as God or the son of God. He also never penned a word, hence the attribution of being a Socrates of sorts.

      As for his followers, many people to this day will die a painful death rather than denounce their faith. Really, are you going to use that as justification for them being in the right? You might want to retract that.

    12. Re: Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

      Their goal is not to conquer. They don't want your shiny things and they don't want you to worship their god. They want to see you destroyed. But from within.

      the type of destruction the soviet state has gone through, a descent of political clusterfuckery that ended with the split if a nation into many smaller ones that squabble over resources.

      How do I know this was his goal? Because he said so in umpteen videos. And because It was how he treated soviet aggression on his country...

       

    13. Re:Damn right by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That economic damage strategy was kinda working for a while.

      Personally I see that as a stopped clock kind of working twice a day thing. Looking at the US economy, especially the tech bubble, around 2000 showed something bad was going to happen eventually unless some systemic problems were fixed.

    14. Re:Damn right by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Yep. Osama bin Laden, for all that he's dead, basically won. And his biggest ally was the US security industry.

      Are you a Muslim? Has the US replaced the Constitution with Sharia law? If the answer is No and No, then Bin Laden didn't win, or anything thing close to it. His demand was the US convert to Islam and implement Sharia law.

      Confusion on this point is potentially dangerous, and frankly stupid.

      Terrorists want to spread fear and terror. Hence the name. And by that measure, his plan worked.

      --
      bickerdyke
    15. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Instead of an Islamic caliphate, we're up to our waist in an authoritarian plutocracy. If that is victory, one more such might undo us.

      The US form of government hasn't changed, isn't authoritarian, and isn't particularly a plutocracy. Your imagination is more likely to be your undoing.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Terror isn't the goal, but the means. Their goal is to convert the world to Islam. Look back to the age of Muslim conquest for a better understanding.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    17. Re:Damn right by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Terror isn't the goal, but the means. Their goal is to convert the world to Islam.

      Maybe, but what makes you think that?

      This?

      Look back to the age of Muslim conquest for a better understanding.

      That would be outright stupid. By that logic you could also conclude by looking back to the age of crusades that violently converting the world to christianity is the goal of christians.

      --
      bickerdyke
    18. Re:Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been sleeping the last several years. The USA is slipping deeper and deeper into the clutches of money and corporations. More and more laws are being written by the lobbyists and corporations. Money is the deciding factor more and more often in the system of government. Your only a few short steps away from a police state, and people like you are cheering it on.

      Are you trying to say with a straight face that what has been happening in your government recently is the same as had been happing for a couple hundred years? Even a blind man can see things have changed.

    19. Re:Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else wondering if 'cold fjord' is picking up a Defense Department or intelligence community paycheck?

      I think most people following cf's posts (which are hard to miss) would assume this to be more likely than not.
      Although it's surprising s/he hasn't switched to another account yet.

      Some of cf's posts are just laughable though, try this:
      The US form of government hasn't changed, isn't authoritarian, and isn't particularly a plutocracy. Your imagination is more likely to be your undoing.

    20. Re:Damn right by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Bin Laden's stated goal for 9/11 was to bankrupt Western powers (the US specifically) until they can no longer afford to keep Muslim holy lands under "oppression."

      The outrages he listed were support for "attacks against Muslims" in Chechnya, Kashmir, Somalia (though he said nothing about the aid given to Muslims in Serbia. To Bin Laden, if a non-Muslim and a Muslim fight, the Muslim is always right), support of Israel, presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, Iraqi sanctions. Well, the sanctions are gone, but not quite for the reasons he would have wanted.

      Forcing Americans to replace the Constitution with Sharia law? To convert or die? While he might have agreed with those goals, he didn't set them out as a rationale for major terrorist operations. It would have made no sense.

    21. Re:Damn right by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      so here's an idea, why don't the USA marines invade USA? Jail all the actual people responsible for the 9/11 setup or shoot them. Get back to being the good old america that the world looked up to. Now even we Indians take pity on you! What has your country become!

    22. Re:Damn right by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's still nominally a democratic republic, but it IS authoritarian and it IS plutocratic. Don't blind yourself to your country's faults - because the enemy sure as hell won't. What you can't see, you can't see being exploited by the enemy.

      Authoritarian: highest incarceration rate on Earth (exceeding China and Russia combined), militarization of police (armored cars, military weapons, systemic use of no-knock entries, etc), tough-on-crime feedback loop, death penalty (with approx 8% known false positive rate according to the states' own judicial records), mandatory sentencing, three-strikes laws, weaponization of plea bargaining, asset seizure feedback loops, free speech zones, secret orders, secret courts, warrant-less mass surveillance, suspensions of habeas corpus, etc, etc.

      Plutocratic: extreme wealth inequality, increasing population below poverty line, increasing corporate subsidization, byzantine economic system, high-level revolving-door positions in the corporate and government sectors, electoral and judicial outcomes extremely and highly dependent on private wealth respectively.

  71. Arma maybe by selectspec · · Score: 1

    I could sort of understand if the NSA were snooping on Arma III. Arma likely is the military training in most 3rd world countries. Another reason to ban side chat.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  72. Informants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were attempts, too, to recruit potential informants from the games' tech-friendly users.

    The half-human-haf-cat or blood elf you met at Furry Hangout, Jungle of Sin or Lordaeron might be a secret spy-master as well!

  73. The reality is more mundane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of me suspects that this is actually how they justify slacking off on the job...

    "Sir, this isn't just a game. We're gathering a lot of valuable data on the terrorists by playing Counter Strike."

  74. Your new Military. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A representative agency from the Global Police Force (a.k.a. US Military) wants to peer into the world where some of the best shooters on the planet play against each other in a dizzying pace, complete with weapon loadouts to identify specialists, along with game statistics to show expertise/marksmanship.

    Gee, I'm shocked.

    So when does the Playstation 5 (NSA's drone "game") come online so they can start demoing it to "players"?

    Yesterdays grunt was issued a pair of combat boots, kevlar helmet, and an M-16.

    Tomorrows grunt will be issued a FTTP connection, VPN token, and a joystick.

  75. An open letter to the NSA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear NSA,

    Please, sign me up! I want to serve my country playing WoW. I'm happy to infiltrate Orc groups or attempt to convince Night Elves that I'm really one of them. I'm skilled at stripping down to the minimum clothing WoW supports and dancing on rooftops, ambushing game newbies with PvP turned on and teaching them a well-deserved lesson, and other generally sketchy activities that will surely help me blend in with Gnome terrorist cells. I have a special tactic for infiltration that I think will work -- spouting Marxist creed at the major trade centers and interspersing the occasional "Inshallah" into attack groups when we plan to take on a dragon.

    In addition, I'm moderately skilled in code work and random numbers and undead culture, so I'm sure I can figure it out if somebody uses some obscure means to communicate with their terrorist cells.

    I won't bother posting my name (even though I usually do post by my /. handle) because hey, if you aren't good enough to find me I don't want to work for you anyway. I can probably recruit a few more people to help out (mostly my sons, who are even more skilled at fighting and deceptions) -- can't have too many people on the side of the U.S.A. if a raid on a human outpost goes bad or hordes of the undead descend upon you.

    Oh, and I get paid for this, right?

    Sincerely,

    Anonymous Brave Volunteer to Help Keep Democracy Strong

  76. Um, hyperbole and parody aside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were I running a terrorist organization and looking for some form of IM or PM communications between cells... damn straight I'd use WoW, or Eve, or run my own Minecraft server.

    So, if those methods are what I would use, then if I were the NSA I would be monitoring them.

  77. Can we play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spot The Fed?

  78. Excellent Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hay, NSA'ers need games to unwind while working overtime at Ft. Meade to collect $100K/week in overtime. They're "Obama Babies."

  79. Fox Mulder was right! by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

    We're all being monitored and controlled by the military-industrial-entertainment complex!

  80. Don't miss the trojan mobile games by guanxi · · Score: 1

    Don't miss this tidbit from the NY Times version of this story:

    The Pentagonâ(TM)s Special Operations Command in 2006 and 2007 worked with several foreign companies â" including an obscure digital media business based in Prague â" to build games that could be downloaded to mobile phones, according to people involved in the effort. They said the games, which were not identified as creations of the Pentagon, were then used as vehicles for intelligence agencies to collect information about the users.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/world/spies-dragnet-reaches-a-playing-field-of-elves-and-trolls.html

  81. I shoulda taken the blue pill by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    Cue The Matrix parallels.

  82. Quick, someone light the Jack Thompson Signal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If ever there were a time when Jack Thompson's anti video game crusade would be useful, it would be now.

  83. Vale of Eternal Blossoms: Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the government had prior knowledge of what was going to happen in Vale and didn't act on it. Bet they knew about Theramore, too.

  84. late to the party as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time has moved on. Facebook and WoW are far past their prime. I suppose the only reason this is happening is A) to pander to the politicians and public or B) grab money.

    Reply with your opinion of better places to stack your agents.

  85. Second Life by cstacy · · Score: 2

    I remember this recycled story from around 2008. The Linden Lab executive (who was also one of their main system creators originally) hasn't been with the company now for many years. This was all eons ago, but it's being brought back up in the wake of Snowden. The part about Linden Dollars and the Second Life economy is a little ridiculous, since the money is only useful for buying in-game virtual items. For example, terrorists getting some better high heels for their avatars. You can cash out Linden Dollars, but there are lots of limits and monitors on it, and you cash out through either your verified PayPal account or a bank check mailed to you. Neither of those are in any way anonymous, and they are tightly monitored by the feds at multiple levels. (You could get some IP addresses and in-game transaction information from Linden Lab if you were tracing back some accumulated cash-out; that might be useful intelligence, I guess.) Like any glorified chat system. The idea that terrorists are using Second Life for virtual training is a bad joke. No realistic scenario or actions could be created. You could use the primitive in-game 3D modeling to create a rough representation of the buildings and alleys or whatever. But very little could be communicated beyond that. Avatars can't actually do anything subtle - mainly they can just walk. Arms and hands don't do anything except point-and-click on scripted objects in the world. The scripting can make objects change texture/color and move around. Communication is a very primitive text chat system plus an in-game Voice system that doesn't work very well or reliably. So you could make a really crappy diagramatic 3D model of your bomb scenario, and walk your avatars around it. But you could do infinitely better by just looking at a street map, or Google Earth, and tracing your fingers and talking about it or whatever. Linden Lab advertises that it keeps Chat logs (etc.) for some period, six months was what they said at one point. However, I asked someone there once and they said, "Well, we've' never actually deleted any logs to date." Second Life is an interesting experiment along a number of axis, but it's capabilities are really quite primitive. They tried at one point to sell it to businesses as an online meeting system, and it was such a bad joke they gave up that marketing effort. IBM has an open-source version of the system that is integrated with some other IBM meeting software. There are other service providers running "grids" with the open-source version of SL. You can download the server and client onto your laptop if you want to play with it stand-along (or hook together with some other users and make your own network). But it doesn't have any specially great utility for terrorists. Any more than any other MUD/MOO/Mush type system. That was all just hype, years ago, from when Second Life was exciting and hyped and not understood. NSA monitors AOL chat rooms and whatever, too; it's just exactly the same thing. They didn't understand that a half decade ago when this "news" article first came out.

    1. Re:Second Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other exchanges in Second Life that will cash out Bitcoin also, USD, EUR, BGP and CFH to regular SWIFT IBAN bank accounts anywhere in the world. you do not have to use the Linden Lab exchange!

  86. It's been around since the MOO in Xerox Parc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have always been interested in this stuff. Problem when it comes to games, they use the work computers to cheat.

  87. NSA 1 Step behind CIA by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows Goonswarm (EVE Online alliance) is a CIA front. Glenn Beck obviously knows what's up.
    http://themittani.com/media/glenn-beck-goonswarm-cia-front

  88. This is old news, Congress already investigated by Shivantrill · · Score: 1

    Remember, people testified using their avatar names for Second Life and some of them were made fun of right here on Slashdot? Privacy and anonymity is an illusion anyway.

    --
    Karma, We don't need no stinkin' karma!
  89. More misdirection by Camael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ultimate strategic goal for Bin Laden and his followers is a world of Muslims living under Sharia law. It is a long term goal to be sure. But getting the US out of Saudia Arabia and all the rest is just short term goals. Ultimately they want to see the US converted to Islam, and living under Sharia law. The language is somewhat stylized, in accordance with their religious nature, but fairly clear if you will see. The demand for conversion is pretty straightforward, and the call for Sharia only slightly diffused but you can see it - and it follows naturally from the conversion demand.

    Beware the person who uses weasel words like "ultimately", "fairly clear" and "follows naturally". It means he's trying to pull a fast one. Beware also a poster who selectively cuts and pastes passages out of context to push his own agenda. I strongly recommend that anyone who has an interest in the matter to go read the full, unedited letter rather than rely on someone who is, as others have already pointed out, likely to be a paid government shill.

    To show you the dangers of citing out of context, I point you to the following passage of the same letter :-

    We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest.

    Doesn't that sound very much like what some of the bible belt conservatives in the US are pushing for? Can I then exclude everything else in the letter and based solely on that one passage, argue that the Osama group's ultimate goal is to turn America into a land of "manners, principles, honour, and purity"?

    Because this manner of argument is exactly what the previous poster has done.

    1. Re:More misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this manner of argument is exactly what the previous poster has done.

      Well, of course. It's cold fjord. What did you expect?

      credibility(cold fjord) === 0

  90. Why not Counterstrike? by Engeekneer · · Score: 1

    Come on! It's so much easier to find terrorists there!

  91. Wrong Clever bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real clever bastards were the superiors. They recognize just how few terrorists there are, so they know they can waste tons of resources on entirely pointless exercises to eat up their budget so, next year, they can hire even more people to waste the budget. And never a head shall roll for this colossal waste of money.

    Oh, or option B is that said superiors are grossly incompetent. But, that I really doubt. Even now, the only real backlash against the NSA has been Obama isn't publicly being as supportive as they like. Privately? Obviously a whole different story.

  92. The truth... by Garnaralf · · Score: 1

    Nice press release, Activision Blizzard. You have a good press agent. Now what really happened when the heard about it. Mike Morheim : *curses like a sailor* Chris Metzen : *invents new curse words and is even louder* Ghostcrawler: "What do I care? I'm outta here anyways..." Yeah, it was about like that, I'm sure.

  93. I hope the have a SL experience similar to mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very first visit being humped by a unicorn...

  94. sister agency? by ememisya · · Score: 1

    I've Googled "sister agency" and all I got was interior decoration websites and something about big brothers and sisters.

  95. NSA in Second Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you find your self spied upon in Second Life, this is what you should do: http://thefishpress.blogspot.com/2013/12/nsa-trawling-second-life.html