Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Health Scientists Resort To Sneaker Net After Funding Slashed

sandbagger writes "Health Canada scientists are so concerned about losing access to their research library that they're finding workarounds, with one squirreling away journals and books in his basement for colleagues to consult, says a report obtained by CBC News. The report said the number of in-house librarians went from 40 in 2007 to just six in April 2013. 'I look at it as an insidious plan to discourage people from using libraries' said Dr. Rudi Mueller, who left the department in 2012. 'If you want to justify closing a library, you make access difficult and then you say it is hardly used.' This is hardly new for Stephen Harper's Conservative government. Over the Christmas holidays, several scientific libraries were closed and their contents taken to the dump."

168 comments

  1. Not only in the US... by surfdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...are we batshit crazy. What the FUCK ever happened to science? We are descending back into the dark ages...

    1. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Science involves education. Educated masses are not useful to political parties.

    2. Re:Not only in the US... by lgw · · Score: 2

      Wait, isn't the Canadian Library Association controversy the story we just read? Or was that some different CLA?

      (BTW, there was slow but steady technological and economic progress during the "dark ages", it led pretty smoothly into the Enlightenment)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Not only in the US... by Slur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's become something of a crusade of mine lately to promote reason, spurred on by stories like this, the rise of scientific illiteracy, and the destruction of culture through a dumbed-down commercial media. I'm not down with any specific ideology, in fact I promote rising above ideology to a more anthropological and phenomenological view of humanity and nature, and a faithful application of empiricism to all things we call "knowledge." Too many people invoke the chemical feeling of "belief" just to get high on it, and have no interest in the hard won truth which comes by skeptical inquiry. Too many of us are willing to swallow conspiracy theories that fit our overblown narratives of authoritarian control, as well, and in that manner also become stupid with time-wasting and untenable beliefs.

      I urge people to get into understanding things as they actually are, practicing their arts and exploring the sciences with enthusiasm, focusing on results rather than just pure jollies. Religion, ideology, and self-deception are insidious traps that can hold people for a lifetime, and are very hard to fight against because people are so inured. But fight we must.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    4. Re:Not only in the US... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...are we batshit crazy. What the FUCK ever happened to science? We are descending back into the dark ages...

      In the specific context of Canada, certain uppity scientists suggested that there might be unpleasant environmental side-effects to the plan to use tar sands to turn Canada into a dysfunctional petrostate.

      In a not-at-all-dysfunctional-petrostate move, the Harper regime decided to show those uppity scientists where they could shove their 'evidence'. (Probably not a library, anymore)

    5. Re:Not only in the US... by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      One can say now that a trip to the dump could be "a truly educational experience."

      Who would benefit from the destruction of knowledge in Canada?

    6. Re:Not only in the US... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who would benefit from the destruction of knowledge in Canada?

      A government who refuses to make evidence-based decisions, and instead likes to believe their ideology defines reality.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Not only in the US... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The two major players would be tar sands development and (relatively distant second) fisheries lobbies who would rather fish their quarry into extinction and then go bankrupt, rather than suffer some sort of limits now in the service of having fish in the future.

      The fisheries guys are comparatively small-time (and have been around for decades, and also have a love/hate relationship with scientific fish experts, nobody likes being subject to quotas; but fishermen aren't dumb enough to think that the future of fishing is in having no fish, so they agree in principle, if not in yearly numbers and exact population estimates, with the science guys), so my money would be on the tar sands sector.

    8. Re: Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people who would profit from that everywhere else. Timid conservatives (sorry, that was redundant), religious idiots, power hungry megalomaniacs who want docile, easy to control citizens, oligarchs who want cheap, uneducated workforce, luddites.

      In a nutshell : all the assholes of this world.

    9. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Things like this have been going on for some time in Canada. For example, world class science was being done at the Experimental Lakes Area, see section on it's defunding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_Lakes_Area

      I'm from Buffalo NY (USA) and we recently spent a weekend with some scientist friends in Toronto -- they took us to a lecture about this major problem. One of the conclusions was that scientists (in Canada) aren't used to political action, so this government move has (to some extent) blindsided them.

    10. Re:Not only in the US... by rmdingler · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Conversely, religion involves indoctrination.

      Consolidated masses are very useful to political parties.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    11. Re:Not only in the US... by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Your quest is commendable, but realities suggest a general readiness to succumb to the belief system.

      It's just easier for many to believe in something than it is to understand everything.

      There is comfort in the validation of long held beliefs, no matter the measure of it's bias on the scientific method.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    12. Re:Not only in the US... by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's fine so long as you're telling people how things are, but very limited if you want to think about how they should be. The problem with abdicating from advocacy is that there are plenty of people without your knowledge, understanding or benevolence who are prepared to fill in the gaps for you. This is why 'promoting societal good' is rightly now a key aspect of scientific endeavour.

    13. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Insidious plans and Stephen Harper go hand-in-hand.

    14. Re:Not only in the US... by dryeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're thinking of the closures of the fisheries libraries over the holidays. This is the closure of the health libraries. The other year it was the closure of a bunch of research stations. It's the typical right wing agenda, cut taxes slightly so business doesn't have to give cost of living wages, increase spending so the government is running in the red (they came into power with a pretty good surplus) then cut those parts of government that don't agree with their ideology and give lots of money to their favourite industry, oil. Bonus with all the government re-purposed to supporting the tar business they can claim that they're spending more on science then ever.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    15. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To paraphrase Sid's Alpha Centauri:
       
      Beware those who would deny you knowledge,
      For in their hearts they dream themselves your master

    16. Re:Not only in the US... by k31 · · Score: 1

      Nobody will notice.

      The shiny rectangles will keep them filled with 'dark light of unenlightenment'.

    17. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure empiricism is dangerous if there is not good theory to back it up. The ideal is that you can reason from plausible first principles to make precise predictions that match observed results. In practice there are always subjective choices about which evidence to ignore (because something probably went wrong, a coincidence occurred, etc) and which type of evidence gathering to perform/fund.

    18. Re:Not only in the US... by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      Science is just fine in Canada, in reality you're reading a story from the CBC. The equivalent of Pravda, with more spitshine and gloss. They have an axe to grind against any government that isn't the liberal party, and sometimes the NDP.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    19. Re:Not only in the US... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Informative

      That also covers the US under the Bush administration.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      A quote from Ron Suskind, 2004 (the aide he is referring to was later identified as Karl Rove):

      The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality--judiciously, as you will--we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    20. Re:Not only in the US... by downundarob · · Score: 1

      The newly elected (Sep 2013) Australian Government no longer has a Science Minister.

    21. Re:Not only in the US... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      But both require funding. Patents for protection. New pharma for profits before the patents can expire. Patent portfolio trading and litigation. Oppress the innovators, for they don't make us any revenue.

      Lead the lemmings to the cliffs. Make them buy or die. Threaten new products with massive litigation costs so that investors will shy away. Bribe the legislatures to protect the monopolies. Buy out any interesting startups so that no one can take their place and use their intellectual property as threats to others that might try.

      Keep the government out. They have no place here. It should all be in the hands of private business to manipulate at will. Keep the masses fighting about social issues so that these will eclipse what's going on behind the curtain of the Oz built from the fruits of the yellow bricks.

      This isn't about future generations; this is about wealth protection for the current generations so that their children can survive the coming dark years before the end times.

      Sorry, I was channeling Palin again.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    22. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Marcus Aurelius.

    23. Re:Not only in the US... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      they don't go bankrupt, they go on corporate welfare. right now, in the maritimes, they have institutional employment insurance, where they work exactly enough to qualify for maximum EI benefits, then are laid off and new workers hired. lather rinse repeat.lk

      in the rest of the country, you can't do that, because EI benefits are more limited [same max benefits the first time, but you can't collect as if you are a repeat customer].

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:Not only in the US... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      yes, the religious nutjobs have moved north, and are basically doing to the Conservatives what they did to the Republican party.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    25. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is unreasonable about those claims?

    26. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join the JREF at www.randi.org.

      While they deal mostly with the truly sillier pseudo-sciences, the point is reason. Not knee-jerk skepticism, but reason.

      No relation beyond being a happy member,

      AC

    27. Re:Not only in the US... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you missed the part about Rove being a steamrolling asshole.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    28. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science is just fine in Canada, in reality you're reading a story from the CBC. The equivalent of Pravda, with more spitshine and gloss. They have an axe to grind against any government that isn't the liberal party, and sometimes the NDP.

      Science is fine in Canada?

      For the first 4 years of the Harper regime we had a Minister of Science who was a creationist... That's how "fine" science is in Canada.

    29. Re:Not only in the US... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      For the first 4 years of the Harper regime we had a Minister of Science who was a creationist... That's how "fine" science is in Canada.

      So tell me there AC, how has that actually effected scientific industry in Canada. Come now, you can cough up actual and provable points and not something from the CBC or rabble right?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Not only in the US... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's supposed to be the point where the sociopath gets led off by nice me into the rubber room. Unfortunately the sociopath was so well connected that he was above the law. King John would have killed to have that immunity.

    31. Re:Not only in the US... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The saving grace of idiots is laziness and incompetence. It's hard to destroy things when you are off on vacation a lot.
      Plus, since it takes a long time for something to go from concept to product, it's hard to see the results immediately. For example - HP is taking a long time to die but that idea would never have been thought of while they had thriving R&D.

    32. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I honestly don't understand the problem with claiming that people with alot of power can shape the future in ways impossible to predict by studying the past.

    33. Re:Not only in the US... by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      yes, the religious nutjobs have moved north, and are basically doing to the Conservatives what they did to the Republican party.

      Not religious nut jobs, we had one years ago out west by the name of Bible Bill. He like the tar sands was from Oilberta, his religion was GIVE PEOPLE ENOUGH CASH AND THEY WILL BE HAPPY. It was called Social Credit. Now it has morphed into a dysfunctional party that took over from what was left over after the alcoholic bindges of Sir John A MacDonald, the sales of Canadian assets to the United States by Dief the Chief, the all out fire sale of any remaining assets within the economy by phoney baloney Mulroney. Then after going and having some sort of sex party with some separatists in Quebec and getting an almost fatal dose of the clap in the process they realized that they would have to go back to basics and horn swauggle con the people with economic hogwash fears of "THE SKY IS FALLING YOUR NOT SPENDING ENOUGH SO BORROW CASH AND HELP THE POOR BANKS!!!" Social Credit style economics disguised as sensible economic policy. In the mean time cutting funding for education, science, culture, the arts, and every other possible thing they could.

      In the mean time they reduced individual income tax only a fraction and shifted it to an even greater extent upon the working poor and small business. Increased subsidies to the oil industry to build and expand the oil sands, pipe lines, reduced Arctic costs by creating tax incentives for those who drill in the far north, reduced lease cost for drilling rights to huge swaths of everything north of 60. Pretended to help small native communities where there is extreme poverty with all sorts of fanfare about how the jobs created in the petro and mining sector were going to help our native peoples to suddenly become "productive citizens" under the Harper dynasty. THE BULLSHIT FROM THE, reformed Social Credit, Conservative Zombie undead party of Canada is spectacular, and THE PEOPLE ARE STILL LAPPING IT UP LIKE kitty milk.

      Maybe in a hundred years some comedic genius, perhaps even the re-incarnation of Mel Brooks might make a movie out of the bullshit that goes on in Canadian politics and how they get away with the smoke and mirrors act so easily.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    34. Re:Not only in the US... by mcneely.mike · · Score: 0

      Makes me think of "Two by two, hands of blue."

      Harper and Evil Government.... two by two, hands of Tory Blue

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    35. Re:Not only in the US... by Reibisch · · Score: 1

      The situation you're referring to is seasonal abuse of the EI system where employers pay salary during the season and then lay them off at the end of the season, after which the workers collect EI until the next season starts. This works largely because those workers work sufficient hours during that period to qualify for EI. "New" workers are seldom if ever hired to replace those laid off workers as there's simply no work to do.

      As a side note, this abuse is in no way limited to the Maritimes. You see exactly the same sort of abuse in any seasonal industry in Canada (see: oilpatch).

      EI reforms have been slow and have met with extreme resistance from both social and business groups. If you want to draw coarse circles around issues, then a big one is the blanket EI system that operates with so few parameters that allow this sort of abuse.

    36. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Morpheus said, "You think that's air you're breathing?"

      Nobody understands everything. We all believe in some things whether we want to admit it or not. The notion that science versus faith and belief is entirely misleading. Check out "The Healing Power of Faith" by Harold Koenig. This man uses science to promote faith. Science is a tool, not a savior. And sometimes reason and science can suggest something divine.

    37. Re:Not only in the US... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Oh, crap. So the Western-culture countries are just giving up and handing the future to Asia. I suppose it's the logical conclusion of the MBA disease, where if something doesn't make a profit this accounting cycle then it's not worth doing.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    38. Re:Not only in the US... by mevets · · Score: 1

      So, if the CBC reported it, it does not count? That is convenient.
      If you were interested, though I doubt you are, you could look at the references, citations, etc.. in:
          Muzzling Civil Servants: A Threat to Democracy?
      which google will happily provide you a pointer to.

      In the unlikely event that you would bother, I am sure you would label them all, along with the authors, institutions, neighbourhoods, cities and provinces as anti-right. Facts are no match for blind, stupid partisanship.

    39. Re:Not only in the US... by chihowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because he seems to be confusing "We're powerful enough to avoid facing the consequences of our actions" with "Because we're so powerful, our actions lack any undesirable consequences".

      In the short term, and from his perspective, there is no difference between the two claims. Over the long term, though, this position is unsustainable and will lead to the fall of his "empire". Pretending that you change reality by sheer force of will and political power doesn't actually change reality.

      Either he isn't concerned with the long-term consequences of his actions (maybe because he'll be dead by the time that they start to come due), in which case he's a self-centered asshole, or he genuinely thinks that politics determine reality, in which case he's a lunatic.

      What's unreasonable about those claims is that they are the same power-drunk ravings that have brought down every empire that has ever existed.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    40. Re:Not only in the US... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      People in power can and do shape the future, but they can only do so within the bounds of reality. Obama can't make a speech and declare that potato chips are now the cure for cancer. If he wants to shape a future with a cure it will take a " judicious study of discernible reality."

    41. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      Promoting anything, let alone someones opinion of what is or isnt the "societal good" is not in any way a valid endeavor of science.

      Science involves the finding of/discovery of facts. How those facts are acted upon or used is not the job of the scientist to waste their time with.

    42. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cure for cancer could get put into potato chips...I don't think he was referring to declaring something during a speech.

    43. Re:Not only in the US... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, of course you could put the cure for cancer into potato chips. But you'd have to actually know the cure first. No matter how much leadership you have, you can't simply change the laws of physics.

    44. Re:Not only in the US... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Having an ideology is an insidious trap?! Are you a nihilist or something? Oh wait...isn't nihilism an ideology too...hmmm...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    45. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well personally I think medical research has been purposefully held back since at least the 1990s. How else do you explain that 90% of papers are just comparing two groups over and over again and seeing if they are different, not even trying to look at individual results or distributions? It is 50% chance the group that gets the drug will be better on average, just spend enough money on sample size to see the effect. Add in publication bias and its completely possible that all that's being measured is opinions. It wouldn't surprise me if there was some black budget version of NIH that is 50 years ahead, which would be consistent with Rove's claim.

    46. Re:Not only in the US... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Always a good plan to assume, since you know what it makes you right? As for the story "muzzling civil servants..." remember Betteridge's law of headlines?

      Right.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    47. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what he meant but I interpreted it differently. When a small group of individuals can make decisions that have such a strong influence on outcomes it is easy to see why looking to the past would be a poor indicator of the future. I did not interpret the quote as meaning they know what the consequences would be themselves. "Reality-based" is a poor choice of words though.

    48. Re: Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These cuts to departmental libraries in the federal government have been happening for a while now. It is only recently that they are starting to garner the media attention they deserve. Destroying libraries is akin to burning books.

    49. Re: Not only in the US... by gdewis · · Score: 1

      Science involves the finding of/discovery of facts. How those facts are acted upon or used is not the job of the scientist to waste their time with.

      Einstein and the other Manhattan Project scientists might disagree with you of this. Scientists have as much an interest in how their work is being used to better society as anyone else does.

    50. Re:Not only in the US... by tc3driver · · Score: 0

      Educated masses are not useful to Conservative political parties.

      Fixed that for you.

      Wow the stupid flows strongly with this one.

      Uneducated masses are more akin to treating political parties as a religion instead of being able to see that things have more than one side. Political parties serve no other purpose that to divide a nation. Pit one against another, thus shading the truth and misdirecting on things that should be the primary focus.

      So continue your silly blame the opposite party for all that is wrong with the world, or open your eyes and see that both sides are controlled by the same puppeteer.

      --
      42 69 6C 6C 20 47 61 74 65 73 20 69 73 20 61 20 77 68 6F 72 65 21
    51. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sad. I'm a dual Can/US citizen, living in the US, and I always thought I could go to Canada to retire and spend my life savings on Caribbean (hrm) cigars

    52. Re: Not only in the US... by locke.th · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing; when you're employed, you pay into that fund. So does your employer. In effect, you're taking out your own money. Now, if you get the minimum number of hours, you don't get to have the full number of weeks, and how much you get per week is nominally determined by how much you made while you were employed. In the maritimes, there is very little full time work in comparison to the rest of the country...bigger provinces get higher priority than us. I won't deny there are people that abuse it, but those of us that want to live and work honestly have three choices; accept the fact that we can have decent wage work for part of the year, work minimum wage all year, or get work/move out west. In the end of all this, EI is money that we put in, employer and employee...what god damn right does the government have to deny us what we put in and had put in on our behalf? Real reason for EI controversy; they want to dip into that fund, or probably already have.

    53. Re:Not only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harper's thugs burned the books, so a trip to the dump will be less educational than you might suppose. They burned the source data and research so they can tinker with the digitized versions to spin some new Harper "truths". I am willing to "take care" of Harper for only my out of pocket expenses. :-)

    54. Re:Not only in the US... by captainlavender · · Score: 2

      This is very hard-line. Despite what the reddit atheist crowd thinks, there are a lot of religious people who understand that there is no scientific basis for their beliefs. These people, like us seculars, are able to distinguish faith from reason, but they choose to partake of both.

      I also have a problem with scientific reasoning when it is overapplied. Sometime, stuff is hard to measure -- for example, social phenomena and things like how prejudices play out in different situations. Saying "but there's no scientific proof!" is used as an easy way to dismiss any of these more abstract ideas, regardless of merit. When a teacher keeps a student after class and verbally abuses them, there may not be proof, but there are at least concrete actions to point to. But teachers don't usually do that -- if they don't like a kid, it's all subtle, it's all "the way they said it", it's all disputable. If you can find a way to measure those things at all, it's usually ingenious, because there's no formula for stuff like that. Science is also frequently invoked, incorrectly, to explain differences that are the results of circumstance (an extreme example would be saying that black people in the US are less successful because they lack intelligence... but a more subtle and insidious example could be saying that women are better shoppers because they have a gatherer instinct). Evolutionary psychology is infamous for being misapplied in this way. And I will say, this kind of reasoning is particularly prevalent among young students in STEM fields who don't understand the limitations of scientific research. Aka about 60% of the slashdot crowd.

    55. Re:Not only in the US... by inHaliburton · · Score: 1

      ...are we batshit crazy. What the FUCK ever happened to science? We are descending back into the dark ages...

      Agreed. I don't know why Harper is doing crazy stuff like this. If he doesn't agree with our scientists' research findings, he gets rid of them and/or buries their findings and recommendations. He's dishonest. He's a liar (the Senate scandal. He denies knowing anything about it).

  2. But there's good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They'll welcome Slashdotters with serious software skills who keep saying they can no longer live under the US government.

  3. Odd Change of Paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to be, we wanted to know everything about everything. Now it seems there are powers out there that want a select few to keep their knowledge, and everyone else should know nothing.

    1. Re:Odd Change of Paradigm by neiras · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Used to be, we wanted to know everything about everything. Now it seems there are powers out there that want a select few to keep their knowledge, and everyone else should know nothing.

      This. The whole "knowledge is power" thing isn't just a platitude. The rich and powerful have realized that the lower classes are beginning to figure out a little too much for their liking. I think the Internet upset the balance a bit and gave 'em a scare until they realized that Facebook was the great pacifier.

      Mobile tech, internet addiction, social media, health care costs, mortgages, unpaid internships and student loan debt... control the population by enforcing a giant wealth/knowlege/skills/health/opportunity gap. Let the plebs smash themselves to bits trying to get ahead.

      Can't fix the system by playing a part in it.

    2. Re:Odd Change of Paradigm by pepty · · Score: 1

      Hey now, they do want people to know something about everything. They'll even spend hundreds of millions of dollars of their own money to inform everyone about those opinions they should agree with. Bless their hearts.

    3. Re:Odd Change of Paradigm by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Why is this post moderated as troll? Cold fjord received mod points?

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    4. Re:Odd Change of Paradigm by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Spend their own money? No, this government spends more on advertizing then all the previous governments put together. If you ever see ads about the keystone pipeline, remember that it is the taxpayers of Canada paying for those ads.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  4. So-called "conservatism" in action. by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'If you want to justify closing a library, you make access difficult and then you say it is hardly used.'

    So we have "starve the beast" in Canada now.

    Spiffy. Not.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you spend years running on the failure of government, is it any wonder when you get into power and make that happen even faster?

    2. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do electorates keep falling for this "Government doesn't work! Vote for me, and I'll PROVE it!" crap?

    3. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you could vote for the guy [...]

      Or, in the case of americans, you guys could try to vote for any party other than the two responsible for fucking everyone over all the damn time? Of course, that's easy on paper but in practice it wouldn't work as it'd require billions and the only way to get that kind of money is by making a deal with the devil, or if he isn't morally corrupt enough, the usual culprits.

      I don't know. Maybe because big government DOESN'T work. Could that be the reason?

      The system is working as designed. It's a feature, not a bug.

    4. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by bmo · · Score: 1

      Or the guy who had adopted the oh so brilliant minds of the Foreign Policy Initiative (nee PNAC) so that we would be dropping bombs on Tehran two months after inauguration.

      His Romneyness didn't back away from the statements by Dan Senor that we would be at war with Iran at the behest of Israel.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This still makes me chuckle:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbZjGGWk528

    6. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada we're actually suffering from the tyranny of the minority. The Conservatives got 38% of the voters who bothered to vote.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you support the guy that you know lies to you.

      Listen up DNC, just lie to BMO here and he will support you. Don't bother following up on your promises, because he is so stupid he will still support you and shill for you online for free.

      And people wonder why things are they way they are.

    8. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Ah you mean the Liberals were elected to power when I wasn't looking? If you want an example of tyranny of the minority you only need to look there and the amount of special-interest crap that went on during the Chretien days. Especially the massive-super-screwover of Western Canada and the Eastern provinces. The only thing that mattered to them was: Ontario(electorate), and Quebec(electorate). The current government is at least working with the primers of each province, and isn't telling them to go away(Chretien did that multiple times).

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:So-called "conservatism" in action. by GeekBoy · · Score: 0

      It's not so called conservatism it's actually conservatism. The public service in Canada is pretty large and it's not sustainable. Canada is basically going through it's own downsizing of government they started about 1-2 years ago when they laid-off a lot of public sector employees and reduced spending all around. Every public servant in Ottawa was in a tizzy for months, you'd have thought the world was coming to an end to hear them speak of the calamities that were going to result in this. Personally, as a Canadian I pay way too much in taxes already while public servants make more, work less and have big pensions that they can retire on. Me, I'll probably never be able to retire.

      So yes, this is liberal hand waving at it's finest. (And just so you know, national archives and many other gov't department 'libraries' are the places where they send the people no other group wants; because of the unions they can't fire them.)

  5. NWO Illuminati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't own most of the wealth if one country has too much progress.

  6. Reality has a well known liberal bias by presidenteloco · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fairness, the libraries aren't being closed. They're being re-purposed as public relations offices responsible for such things as communicating the need to move forward with new forms of multimodal multimedia information dissemination, on a go forward basis.

    Also, the books are not being dumped, they're being converted into bio-fuel (burned in very efficient co-generation waste incinerators).

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reality has a well known liberal bias"

      What smug bullshit.

    2. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Public Relations = Lobbying

    3. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butt-hurt much?

    4. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how funny I find that. You have no clue about me at all. LOL

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bias is an inclination of temperament or outlook to present or hold a partial perspective and a refusal to even consider the possible merits of alternative points of view.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias

    6. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 0

      As if you were familiar with the "facts of life".

    7. Re:Reality has a well known liberal bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to all the gay animals everywhere. Facts of life are much more varied and liberal than your narrow-minded ideology can understand.

  7. Like the Fisheries libraries by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once again the data is (allegedly) retained, but moved and is now less convenient to access.

    Before the main library closed, the inter-library loan functions were outsourced to a private company called Infotrieve, the consultant wrote in a report ordered by the department. The library's physical collection was moved to the National Science Library on the Ottawa campus of the National Research Council last year.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Like the Fisheries libraries by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, the new "Beware of the leopard" signs are still in the contract-tender phase, and are expected to be delayed. In the meantime, feel free to check the locked filing cabinet.

    2. Re:Like the Fisheries libraries by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      With the inter-library loan system, there doesn't really need to be a physical copy of every book in every library, because it's expensive to house so many books, especially in areas with high land prices. But instead of shutting down libraries, they should be downsizing them so they're still local, and moving to digital copies of books. A neighborhood library could be nothing more than a shelf full of holds, a drop box for returns, and a few terminals to request holds and check out physical and digital books. A kiosk at the local mall might be big enough for all that.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Like the Fisheries libraries by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      and if you need reference help of course you are screwed because there is no librarian.

    4. Re:Like the Fisheries libraries by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      and if you need reference help of course you are screwed because there is no librarian.

      There could still be librarians. Add a telephone to each terminal that dials directly to a call center in India.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  8. Neo-Conservatives and education are incompatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't like "experts", "indoctrination", public servants, unions, facts that conflict with domestic rhetoric, have banned CRITICAL THINKING in Texas, tried to eliminate the Dept. of Education, tried to keep minorities/migrants out as possible, and it seems the only remaining motivation they could have for destroying these establishments as possible is to prevent people from realizing that their brand of politik isn't about what you KNOW, but what you BELIEVE in the face of contrary fact.

    This is the cargo cult. And you're the cargo, ultimately.

  9. You get the best government you deserve by worldthinker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the people of Canada think this is horrid and despicable, they only have to look into the mirror to see who is responsible for electing a Tory government. Next thing you know, your precious universal health care will be under siege. Wake up neighbors!!!

    1. Re:You get the best government you deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You get the best government you deserve

      Stop it. Just stop with this. Does an average person have any control over a government? No. They can write letters or vote for whatever paid-off politician they wish.

      That does not mean they are getting what they deserve. They are merely getting what people with power and influence want. Nothing more.

    2. Re: You get the best government you deserve by Vanderhoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      We have 3 parties the Tories won a majority from just over 37% of the vote. Most of which came from Alberta (North Texas). There's not much the other 63% of us can do, it's how the system works. That being said 2015 is an election year, hopefully the damage Harper's done to the public service by then will be remembered.

    3. Re:You get the best government you deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might want to read up on the election fraud that occurred here. Google: "2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal", aka the Robocall Scandal.

      The Cons worked hard at getting that swept under the rug. For any act like this that politicians get caught in, you can bet there's probably a dozen more they pulled off without the public knowing.

    4. Re: You get the best government you deserve by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Most of which came from Alberta (North Texas).

      2011 election, Tory seats won:
      Ontario: 73
      All four western provinces: 72
      The land of Oil and Evil and Oil (aka Alberta): 27

      Like Texas, everything is bigger in Alberta. Including, apparently, our votes.

    5. Re: You get the best government you deserve by prince_of_disks · · Score: 1

      ~40% vote won in election with ~60% voter turnout = ~24% electorate represented. This Harper government represents a "majority" in no genuine sense.

    6. Re:You get the best government you deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it. Just stop with this. Does an average person have any control over a government? No. They can write letters or vote for whatever paid-off politician they wish.

      All government power is generated by the people willing to grant that power. So yes, the average person has power over the government - the power to declare it illegitimate and overturn it through simple disobedience. Governments can only enforce their rules if the vast majority of people follow said rules. If people stopped doing that, then what do you suppose they can do about it? Fine everyone?

      It's not the lack of power that lets governments get away with anything. It's the unwillingness of the people to do something about it.

    7. Re:You get the best government you deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stop it. Just stop with this. Does an average person have any control over a government? No"

      They do have the vote, if they bothered to think and research but most people don't.

    8. Re: You get the best government you deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop this nonsense. Those who chose to affect governance voted and Harper won that vote. Those who didn't vote must legally adhere to the results of the election, and due to their (in)action they implicitly supported the outcome of the election.

  10. Wasn't there a story about this by plopez · · Score: 1

    By like some famous author dude where you couldn't get books so people like memorized them or something?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Wasn't there a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fahrenheit 451 - Ray Bradbury, nice one

    2. Re:Wasn't there a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By like some famous author dude where you couldn't get books so people like memorized them or something?

      Books are the source of evil. They must be burned lest some crazy ideas creep into the minds of the populace.
      We wouldn't want that. Keep them ignorant. Keep them in front of a 100 inch lcd/plasma wall display. But for pete's sake don't give them books. Your civic duty is to denounce those hippies that still cling to those old fashioned dead trees. Burn them, burn them all to hell. Remember citizen, the only good book is a burned book.

    3. Re:Wasn't there a story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fahrenheit 451 - Ray Bradbury, nice one

      Or A Canticle for Leibowitz, or Small Gods, to name two others that come immediately to mind. It's not exactly an uncommon theme.

      All three of those books are worth reading, at least.

  11. To the dump!? by Immerman · · Score: 1

    What a horrible waste. I hope they at least had the libraries open to the public as a well-publicized "everything's free bookstore" for a few weeks before hauling the leftovers to the dump.

    I remember my library growing up had a "free shelf" in the basement of old books that were to be discarded. They were often a bit tattered and worn, but what a treasure trove for a young book lover on a shoestring budget.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:To the dump!? by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      that sounds like a step down the slope of Communism.
      The kind of people who throw away whole libraries wouldn't dream of letting people have the books for free.
      They aren't trying to privatize the library, they are trying to bury it.
      It's about making information that you don't want go away.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    2. Re:To the dump!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The information thrown out involved data sets collected going around a hundred years. A number of universities would have probably been willing to take possession of those records but the government never provided any notice to any one that the documents were just going to get shipped to the dump. They were supposed to get "digitized" by a third party that only digitized a small portion of the records and threw out the rest. By having a third-party to blame, the government can claim plausible deniability and, if the heat gets too high, that's probably what they will do.

    3. Re:To the dump!? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It's extremism of the same sort the Islamic Fundamentalists practice.

      Next up is no education for girls and religious instead of secular law.

    4. Re:To the dump!? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Digitize everything, store it in Library Genesis (including the 20M-and-counting papers section)...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:To the dump!? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I remember the same thing in a a county library in Colorado, except the library would sell their unwanted books at ridiculously low prices. Older reference books worth hundreds would go for a dollar or two. A treasure trove indeed. Hopefully the the books sent to the dump were at least offered to the public first!

      I should also add that a local university library near where I live now recently sent a bunch of their old books to the dump (except the ones I fished out of the dumpster) Shame on you, University Of Canberra.

    6. Re:To the dump!? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      What a horrible waste. I hope they at least had the libraries open to the public as a well-publicized "everything's free bookstore" for a few weeks before hauling the leftovers to the dump.

      I must admit I got the image of book burning, without the burning. The end result is pretty much the same, in the sense it is destruction of knowledge and culture. Then again I see a lot of common with Harper and a certain historic figure with a narrow moustache (not Charlie Chaplin).

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:To the dump!? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      We need a new culture law - I propose we call it "Chaplin's Law": Any sufficiently large asshole can ruin a cool mustache for everyone.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  12. Re:Neo-Conservatives and education are incompatibl by plopez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't there some Austrian dude who like burned a bunch of books and restricted what would be taught in schools to only support his totally bogus regime?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  13. Don't believe everything you read by GeekBoy · · Score: 1, Informative

    I lived in Ottawa for over 15 years and worked with government employees every day. Anything that comes along and 'the sky is falling' this is just more of the same nonsense.

    1. Re:Don't believe everything you read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... "more funding please" -- words heard from government officials, and from scientists. In this case, it's a twofer.

    2. Re:Don't believe everything you read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that a reduction in staff from 40 to 6 is not a matter of requesting more funding. How about just not cutting it by 85%?

  14. Can they crowdsource adoption? by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    If we each get one and scan it... I'd be game, so would my significant other.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    1. Re:Can they crowdsource adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably the only way to do it going forward. Governments have shown that they cannot be trusted.

  15. Re:Neo-Conservatives and education are incompatibl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey, I know Arnold Schwarzenegger did some unpopular things, but I haven't heard anything about the book burning.

  16. They are doing this to all Federal Libraries by thirdpoliceman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked for Natural Resources Canada's library system in 2011. My friend worked at Transportation Canada.

    They closed Transportation Canada's library system. It no longer exists. Who knows what happened to the information there, if it even exists any more. My friend told me they housed some of the world's foremost research on transportation science, and were called upon by international colleagues to provide them with information.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

    They did a similar thing to the library at the Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic...

    Environment Canada

    http://o.canada.com/news/last-...

    This government has a war on science and knowledge and actively prohibits scientists from speaking to the media without government approval.

    http://scienceblogs.com/confes...

    The Conservative government does not care about facts. They have policies they want to implement, and they will do WHATEVER it takes to ensure those policies are enacted. Even if it means destroying our scientific heritage.

    1. Re:They are doing this to all Federal Libraries by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny thing is there's a travelling exhibition called "lost treasures of Kabul" which is made up of stuff the museum workers hid from their own government to prevent it from being destroyed. I wonder how the Canadian government would like that comparison?

  17. Alternate Headline by CauseBy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Alternate Headline: "Public Agency Finds Less Expensive Way to Do The Same Job; Saves Taxpayer Dollars".

    This is what people voted for. It's a democracy. If people want the more expensive solution which does the same thing, then they'll vote for that instead.

    1. Re:Alternate Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that the cost savings here ... are negate by the millions spent on advertising for programs that don't even exist yet.

      It isn't "less expensive way to do the same job" anyway, it's less expensive for inferior services.

    2. Re:Alternate Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, and that's why democracy is no longer a workable form of government. We need democracy 2.0 where the elected country management group can still set policies but overseen by an independent group that makes sure concepts like science, health care, education, culture, utilities and infrastructures are maintained at a high level, no matter the managing group.

    3. Re:Alternate Headline by dryeo · · Score: 2

      This government got 37% of the votes (much less when you consider the people who didn't vote) so no, it is not what the people voted for. This government has also squandered the surplus and ran a deficit the whole time they've been in power. Billions spent on advertising how we have the best science and billions given to the bitumen industry. Its got to the point where the oil companies don't really want any more tax credits as they know it looks a lot better if they pay a little tax.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:Alternate Headline by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm a big-government tax-and-spend bleeding-heart redistribution-loving socialist liberal, so it's not how I would run the library system, or public science programs; but even more than I'm a socialist liberal, I'm a small-d democrat, and if the winners of the election want to "starve the beast", or shut down libraries, then tough titties for people like me.

      I'm also an American. I don't know how Canada runs elections, but here we have plurality winners, so 37% can be enough to win.

  18. Re:Neo-Conservatives and education are incompatibl by bob_super · · Score: 1

    Yes, but he achieved full employment, no debt, huge GDP growth, major scientific progress, and offered free train trips to millions regardless of their class.
    He just had to deal with minor terrorism issues, but our governments have learnt from his mistakes.

  19. Curtin Uni in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was a student at curtin for a while. Whilst I was there they binned some old chemistry reference books than no one had used in a while.
    They were a near complete set of chemistry journals from the 1750ish through 1910 ish. These were one of maybe 3 sets in the world, we sent to the tip. Gone forever.
    This is why I am keen in the digitization of works copyrighted or otherwise.

  20. Re:Neo-Conservatives and education are incompatibl by squisher · · Score: 1

    Hey, I know Arnold Schwarzenegger did some unpopular things, but I haven't heard anything about the book burning.

    Turns out Schwarzeneggger isn't the only Austrian dude out there who ended up in government in another country...

  21. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by Vanderhoth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually 5 years ago personal HDs were made against the rule. They were collected then outright band from the network. Employees were mandated to use server storage, but in the last two years, with the creation of Shared Services Canada, there's been confusion about who's supposed to provide that service. A budy of mine who works for DFO is always complaining about fights with IM&TS and SSC. Both suppose to provide a service neither one doing it. Data is the casualty.

  22. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for idea by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    Sorry, meant personal external HDs

  23. Slashdot is lost to the luddite cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So someone gets down-modded for being the person who dares to point out they should have digitized data long ago? What kind of Slashdot is this, filled with moderating luddites who proclaim Science to be holy and even the worst mistakes scientists makes are holy things, not to be criticized.

    And you morons wonder why the general populace is drifting away from science? Believe me, it's not them - it's you. Actions like continuing to keep PAPER RECORDS in this day and age are the metaphorical equivalent of massive B.O., the populace reeling away from the stench of your actions and religion being the only other reason they can find as you offer none.

  24. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So what I don't understand here is what is being lost really if there are digital records of this paper data - or did they never digitize anything? I know there is a cost to it, but over time even a volunteer effort can make large inroads...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Re:The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well apparently "science" decided to hide data behind paper walls, making it accessible to a small elite.

    What complete and utter crap.

    The scientists who monitored these things kept libraries, containing their research journals, results, and papers and the supporting documentation.

    And you, like a fucking moron, jump to the conclusion that "a small elite" have been secretly hoarding all of this information.

    You're a fucking idiot. Some of this stuff is decades old, and predates when you could digitize it.

    The government has claimed they're going to digitize it, but the evidence so far indicates they've barely tried to do that, and are moving straight onto destroying records.

    The people complaining are the people who were trying to preserve the data and keep it accessible.

    The secretive douchebags here are the politicians who don't like it when facts get in the way of policy -- because this government makes policy on what they want to be true, and seldom give a damn about what is actually true.

    Oddly, we see the exact same pattern in the US with your neocons, who like to believe when they say reality is X, the rest of the world jumps and says "yes sir, reality is now X".

    This is a political game, and if you can remove the stuff that proves your government is either lying or failing to make decisions based on actual evidence -- then you can pretend you have all of the answers.

    Sorry, but your screed is directed at the wrong group here, and you are full of shit. The scientists wanted this stuff digitized, and had been told that it would be digitized -- they aren't the ones trying to keep the information secret and only available to them.

    Your entire post tells us you are a moron, who believes scientists are secretly conspiring to make sure they have all the information and the rest of us have none.

    Go crawl back under your rock.

  26. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for idea by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    You have no idea how much data there is. Going back hundreds of years... at least there was. Wish I could say more, but I'm on my phone.

  27. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by dryeo · · Score: 1

    They digitized a few pages as that was all there was funding for. It's the usual bullshit, increase spending while slightly lowering taxes until the government has spent its surplus and gone into debt (we had 8 years of surplus before these guys got in) then scream and panic about cutting spending and cut whatever is against their ideology. Their ideology in this case is that government exists to serve the oil industry.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  28. A warning, not an instruction manual... by matbury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like "... was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual..." is going to be a new meme. First George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four, now Ray Bradbury's Farenheit 451.

    Down the memory hole!

  29. Well said. by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  30. OK, I have to say this by froth-bite · · Score: 0

    With regard to deleting libraries, the only positive thing is that we are trying physically or electronically to follow the limits of human memory, and allow ourselves to start fresh from time to time. I go to the public library twice weekly, so don't take this as "born again, live free whatever", but the electronic age has grabbed everything and brought it with us, generations onwards...same music, books, etc from the past. At some point, we maybe (and I'm throwing this out there) deserve the freedom to discover truths about ourselves, in our time, without the uninformed literature of the past. If we can record everything, we need to think about not saving everything, but what the limits on saving should be.

    --
    In NSA America social networks join you!
  31. Re:Not at all what it seems by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

    lot of financial issues in Canada and it isn't anything new
    [Citation Needed]

    http://www.cbc.ca/news2/intera...
    Canadians had no financial issues until Harper took power. We were on track to pay off the national debt.

    Libraries are hardly used to begin
    [Citation Needed]

    cost a significant amount to create and maintain
    [Citation Needed]

    They are expensive, and a huge tax burden
    [Citation Needed]

    Everything in those libraries are turned into ebooks
    [Citation definitely Needed]

  32. So then they didn't really care by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They digitized a few pages as that was all there was funding for.

    Screw funding. What are grad students for if not the massive man-hours required to simply photograph or scan every page? Where is ANY sign of a volunteer effort to preserve this data?

    Lets say it had not been thrown out. What about Fire? Flood? Library of Alexandra mean anything to anyone? Never has the "those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it" been more percent. To blame funds alone on letting this data slip away is absolving from blame those in charge of caring for the data.

    Sorry, but I simply can't get worked up over the loss of data those closest too apparently never lifted a finger to digitally safeguard.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So then they didn't really care by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Where is ANY sign of a volunteer effort to preserve this data?

      Pretty hard to do that after the fact.

      As for before, I'm sure you could work out with a few seconds thought that even your suggested army of slaves need some resources to keep them going and the scale would be immense. However I suspect pretending to be stupid, angry and ignorant helps push some sort of petty political agenda so thus the tripe above.

    2. Re:So then they didn't really care by Microlith · · Score: 1

      What are grad students for if not the massive man-hours required to simply photograph or scan every page?

      Because there probably aren't enough man hours for such rote, manual labor? Particularly if you're underfunded and your time is split between the research you're supposed to be doing and something completely unrelated to your job?

      Where is ANY sign of a volunteer effort to preserve this data?

      Why should they have had to worry about it?

      Lets say it had not been thrown out. What about Fire? Flood? Library of Alexandra mean anything to anyone?

      Unlikely that they'd take out 22 libraries all at the same time, let alone that this is a straw man.

      To blame funds alone on letting this data slip away is absolving from blame those in charge of caring for the data.

      Given the infrastructure for caring for the data was being actively ripped out, I don't see how removal of funding can't be blamed.

      I simply can't get worked up over the loss of data those closest too apparently never lifted a finger to digitally safeguard.

      Then you're being callous towards those who are being targeted politically for the purpose of silencing them and punishing them for threatening the unclean profits of others.

  33. Re:Not at all what it seems by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Offer the library contents to Google if Google will pay the freight. Truck freight is reasonable and a moving van will hold thousands of pounds of books. Problem solved without loss of access.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  34. Who needs science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs science? We've discovered it all already! They don't teach that science in business schools, so you don't need it. Nuff said.

  35. Re:last time by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    You probably should have worn more than a trench coat, and perhaps your first question shouldn't have been "is porn blocked on the library computers?"

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  36. Harper studied well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a reason he's called Bush-Lite (tm) here in Canada. That's shorthand for 'politician who applies the U.S. Republican playbook on anti-science FUD and obstructionist techniques to demolish science and democracy for the benefit of corporations at the expense of the environment, lower and middle class while entrenching a plutocracy bent on race-to-the-bottom globalization and resource pillaging at any cost".

    Oh, sorry I got a bit 'Occupy' there but it's basically true. I have in-laws who work in environmental science who were saying 5 years ago that their papers were being squashed due to political pressure so it's nothing new here.

  37. So you're saying the Liberals are lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bit disingenuous to assume everyone who didn't vote was anti-Tory.

    That'd be like saying the Liberals and NDP are lazy disinterested citizens.. is that what you are saying?

    Ok, maybe they are more upset with their own parties for corruption etc. and stayed home. From all indications it'll be the Tories turn next election....

    All I can say is thank goodness they were a minority party for most( hopefully) of their run ( and I live in Alberta - where the oil companies started a Rose (Tea?) party just to pressure the provincial-Conservative party and win either way ).

  38. What the fuck happened to education? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Exhibit A - idiotic luddite post above.
    Of course he's probably only pretending to be so stupid as a way to try to mislead the kiddies and brainwash them into some sort of political agenda that sees an aware and informed population as an obstacle.

  39. What town? They should rename it to Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to commemorate the sack of the library.

  40. Conservatives don't like education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a good education system, a conservative electorate becomes impossible. The same applies to religion. With education, religion becomes impossible.

  41. Post it online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, you can just post stuff online for really cheap. The issue is that they are publishing into journals that like to limit their audience as much as possible. Computer scientists post much of our research on the internet and have been experiencing exciting growth over the last 20 years. Controlling knowledge seems to be a problem with the lesser sciences.

    1. Re:Post it online? by Sique · · Score: 1

      The problem are not the new files you create for your work. The problem are the hundreds and thousands of old files, binders, books, journals, research diaries, reports and data, that were never digitalized to begin with. They still occupy storage. And they go back centuries.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  42. Digitize and make free by RoTNCoRE · · Score: 1

    This is why all of this needs to be digitized and made freely available online - so it cannot be controlled or contained. Information is power. How big would the torrent for all of it? The scientists should band together, home build book scanners, and seed away. All the tools for information freedom are now at hand, use them!

  43. shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure how shoes are involved in this story? Unless "Sneaker" is the name of the net/network. I'm confused. lol

  44. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were collected then outright band from the network.

    Let me guess, since you're Canadian your native language is French?

  45. Re: The real dark ages - physical matter for ideas by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    Actually that was because I was typing on my phone and I misspelled a word. I MEAN, Je ne parle pas anglais!!

  46. They still *occupied* storage by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    They still occupy storage.

    The Harper administration, ever the efficient cost-cutters, saved the intermediary step between physical and digital by simply trashing the records instead. Hooray for small government!

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  47. Fundamental Problem by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Not to defend the Conservatives I dislike, however a few points worth noting. I have had some experience with this.

    A) Many of these specialized libraries are not used regularly. There may be a need for the information, and sometimes that need might be more than usual, however for the most part I would bet that most of the staff are not all that busy. Hence the reduction of staff. Though as argued this may have led to a decline in service when they are actually needed, making them even less used, etc...
    B) Digitizing is expensive. Storing the information is expensive. Organizing the information is expensive. Hosting the information is expensive. Now multiply all those things by a factor of 5 because you have to use government services or contractors to built it, and infrastructure to host it. There are a whole lot of reasons for this which I won't get into, but the fact is it is reality.
    C) You may or may not agree with it, but if you lower taxes, you need to cut services, and if you cut services you have to decide which ones. Too many people out there somehow think that they don't have to pay taxes and somehow get all the services they want for free. Some have pointed out that the taxes cut are corporate taxes, and I am sure the Conservatives would argue that this makes Canada more competitive and creates jobs. Personally I think that is BS, but the fact is, less taxes means less services.

    Anyway many are painting this as some sort of dastardly master plan by the Conservatives to destroy science and push their agenda. I think you are giving them way to much credit. That may be the round about way result, that has some small affect on the some specific long term research, but likely its immediate impact and gains (which is what most political parties are looking for, I highly doubt the Conservatives are playing the long game here) are negligible. This is more a simple consequence of the Conservatives following their ideological plan they got elected for. They cut corporate taxes using the assumption that it would make Canada more competitive and thus more attractive to corporate job creation, this costs money so to make up for it, rather than raise income taxes (which they also said they wouldn't do) the cut services to things which they don't see as A) important, and likely B) will have little impact on the short term while they are in office so as to have little effect on the next election cycle.

    So none of this is really all that surprising, nor unexpected. If you want to blame anything it is our electoral process that gives a majority government to party that doesn't even have a majority of the popular vote simply because the left is split, and that because these parties have a election cycle of 4 years, unless you have a strong leader with some legacy fetish, odds are no party will think much longer than those terms.