Slashdot Mirror


Asus Announces Small Form Factor 'Chromebox' PCs

MojoKid writes "Asus stepped out this morning with something new for the Chrome OS powered hardware crowd, called a "Chromebox" small form factor PC. Just as Google has been evangelizing with its Chromebook notebook initiative, the pitch for these Chromebox systems is that they're capable of doing everything you need to do in today's connected world. While not everyone will totally agree with that marketing pitch — gaming, 3D modeling, and a host of specialized tasks are better suited for a PC with higher specs — there's certainly a market for these types of devices. They're low cost, fairly well equipped, and able to handle a wide variety of daily computing chores. There are two SKUs being released in the U.S. The first starts at $179 and sports an Intel Celeron 2955U processor, and the second features an Intel Core i3 4010U CPU (no mention of price just yet), both of which are based on Intel's 4th generation Haswell CPU architecture. Beyond the processor, these fan-less boxes come with two SO-DIMM memory slots with 2GB or 4GB of DDR3-1600 RAM, a 16GB SSD, a GbE LAN port, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 2-in-1 memory card reader, four USB 3.0 ports, HDMI output, a DisplayPort, an audio jack, and a Kensington Lock. ASUS also includes a VESA mount kit with each Chromebox, and Google tosses in 100GB of Google Drive space free for two years."

76 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Really? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just as Google has been evangelizing with its Chromebook notebook initiative, the pitch for these Chromebox systems is that they're capable of doing everything you need to do in today's connected world. While not everyone will totally agree with that marketing pitch — gaming, 3D modeling, and a host of specialized tasks are better suited for a PC with higher specs — there's certainly a market for these types of devices.

    Wasn't one launched by Samsung a few years ago and utterly flopped?
    http://www.engadget.com/2012/0...

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes. At $329.

      Minor difference there.

      Cost. It's important.

    2. Re:Really? by tangelogee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose it depends on the cost. The Samsung box was $329, which you could find a PC for about the same price. If they can bring it down to about $100, it would definitely be a lot more tempting.

    3. Re:Really? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Funny

      This will definitely make 2014 the Year of ChromeOS on the desktop!

    4. Re:Really? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      What I think would be more tempting would be an all-in-one. I'm sure that Asus could build essentially just a monitor with ChromeOS on it, and a bluetooth keyboard and mouse that works natively. It would be slicker than this, and no wires.

    5. Re:Really? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I imagine that the problem with an all-in-one (aside from being harder to hit impulse-buy pricepoints) is that if you want to go all in one, you either have to bury yourself in incrementally different SKUs, or make potentially alienating decisions about what monitor sizes your customers will want, both today and until you refresh the product.

      That isn't trivial at the best of times, budgets and priorities vary (though easier for Apple, since they can eliminate the approximately-mini-tower competition by simply not building anything except all-in-ones between the mini and the Pro); but it's probably particularly touchy for ChromeOS: Users who want simplicity might well be willing to spend plenty for a nice wall of pixels (or be old people and need the giant text), while users who are cheapskates or kitting out a thin-client toildrome at minimum cost want 17 inch TN panel shit, and are only refraining from reusing last year's monitors because people kept messing with the extra cabling.

      Given ChromeOS' somewhat weird demographics, I wouldn't want to be roped into choosing a screen size.

    6. Re:Really? by mikael · · Score: 1

      The monitor and disk drives are the component most likely to break. The last thing I would want to do is to have to replace one simply because the other broke. The best design I can think of would be to go back to "podules" where the CPU/GPU/memory and disk drives were on separate blocks but slotted into the base of the monitor.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Really? by mlts · · Score: 1

      I'd just like a standard PC in that form factor. The only real "full" PC I've seen that might be decent would be Apple's Mac Mini, especially in the video department.

      Something that size with 128GB SSD, decent CPU, decent GPU, and 8-16 GB of RAM would be a nice change, and since it would mount on the monitor (if it followed the VESA standard), it would be completely out of the way.

    8. Re:Really? by JMZero · · Score: 1

      Look for Intel NUC boxes - you can get a reasonably powerful computer in a very small box. They're expensive, and they need a high speed fan to keep them running, but otherwise are pretty cool.

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    9. Re:Really? by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

      I'd just like a standard PC in that form factor. The only real "full" PC I've seen that might be decent would be Apple's Mac Mini, especially in the video department.

      Something that size with 128GB SSD, decent CPU, decent GPU, and 8-16 GB of RAM would be a nice change, and since it would mount on the monitor (if it followed the VESA standard), it would be completely out of the way.

      ..and I would want mine to be fanless, with no spinning of any kind involved to make noise in my living room. And for that, I'm more than willing to sacrifice some performance.

      I recently solved this with a box from fit-PC, bought diskless and fitted with a 128GB SSD. But the asus offering would have been interesting if I did not yet have a fanless living room box, particularly given the price (so long as I can swap in a reasonably sized SSD, and boot it into my choice of linux distro, of course).

    10. Re:Really? by mlts · · Score: 1

      One idea I've been thinking of is having a small PC, fanless, and with a SSD. Then, using a 10gigE or even a gigabit Ethernet connection directly to an iSCSI box that would be either placed in the attic or a well-sound-attenuated place. That way, I have the best of both worlds... no fans, no drives, little noise, while having decent drive capacity.

    11. Re:Really? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It's $495, http://www.amazon.com/Intel-D5... if you scroll down and look at the "Frequently Bought Together" section.
      That is, if you consider an Intel 5000 GPU decent...

    12. Re:Really? by mlts · · Score: 1

      A Chromebook might be useful as a secure terminal if one is running a Citrix XenDesktop [1] installation. That way, if the laptop is stolen, there isn't anything on it that is confidential.

      [1]: I wish there were an alternative to Citrix that had a client app that worked on iOS and Android... something that didn't require a third party server that middle-manned the connection, which virtually all the remote session stuff have. I want the authentication to be at my end, not trust a third party with the keys to my network's perimeter.

    13. Re:Really? by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      In "tech years" they may as well have launched it a decade ago. People who dismiss a product because it failed a few years ago are usually the same ones left holding the bag when another company, such as Apple, makes it successful.

    14. Re:Really? by rthille · · Score: 1

      I picked up two Core i5 based Chromeboxes (from the Google Dev conf) on Craigslist for $200 each. Seemed like a bargain. One's running Crubuntu, and the other is awaiting me having time to flash a new bios so I can run straight Ubuntu.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    15. Re:Really? by GezusK · · Score: 1

      Samsung was charging more for their device than their regular Chromebooks cost. That made no sense, since it didn't include an LCD, keyboard, touchpad, and battery. I still think this one is a little high, but closer to where it should be than the Samsung device.

    16. Re:Really? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I bought a couple of "NetTop" boxes back when "Netbooks" were a thing... they were competent little things, kind of painfully slow with the Atom chips, but did what they did well and in a very nice form factor.

      Too bad the power supplies were crap and when they died, they were gone.

    17. Re:Really? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Slicker but monitors have a long useful life so it's worth having the things as separate units.
      Besides, ASUS already sell something like you suggest only it doesn't currently come with ChromeOS.

    18. Re:Really? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Why the hell do you need iSCSI? Just use NFS or CIFS and mount your data from the remote box.

    19. Re:Really? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of RDP clients for Chrome that don't require a third party in between, and such clients exist for Android as well.

  2. So... Linux? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    Can you put Linux on the thing?

    It would be nice to have something I could use to write up blog posts and the like, without having to resort to touchscreen keyboards or breaking out the 5 lb, 17" powerhouse I use for *real* work.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:So... Linux? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      yes theirs a project that installs ubuntu on top of chrome os being these systems have locked down bios.

    2. Re:So... Linux? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chrome OS uses a special bootloader and some other stuff, but you can install a Linux-based OS on a separate partition (after resizing the partitions) and dual boot it, as long as you can enable "developer mode" on the box so it will boot unsigned code (there's a switch for it on my Chromebook behind the battery). Or you can install one right inside Chrome OS with a chroot, if that's sufficient, again it requires developer mode turned on.

      You could probably just blow everything away and put Linux on it alone, but I dunno how you'd go about doing that.

    3. Re:So... Linux? by reikae · · Score: 1

      Isn't ChromeOS a Linux distro at its core? Installing a different distro should be fairly simple, I hope. This thing is cheap enough, I'm considering getting one as a toy.

    4. Re:So... Linux? by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Informative

      You set developer mode in bios and poof, you own your device again. So far, no chromeos vender has locked that out, if they ever do then the devices just become training wheels for the internet.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:So... Linux? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Can you put Linux on the thing?

      It would be nice to have something I could use to write up blog posts and the like, without having to resort to touchscreen keyboards or breaking out the 5 lb, 17" powerhouse I use for *real* work.

      Linux yes, Windows no (unless it has a BIOS - of which only the Pixel is known to have).

      But unless you use the chroot Linux, it isn't a pleasant experience - developer mode requires you hit a key combo on startup to acknowledge it. if you wait too long (30 seconds) it times out and complains of wanting to go into recovery mode., So you have to reboot and hit the key combo within 30 seconds every boot and recoot.

      Or it could be the other way - you have to wait 30 seconds at the screen while it tells you how to recover the thing.

      In the end I just left it running ChromeOS.

    6. Re:So... Linux? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It is linux and has X.

  3. That's a perfectly good desktop PC for business by Animats · · Score: 1

    That's a perfectly good desktop PC for business. It doesn't need to be set up as a Chromebook. This thing will be powering call centers and other desktops with modest requirements.

    You could probably put Windows 7 Embedded (which is simply a version of Windows that lets you make a distro with unwanted features removed) on it.

    1. Re:That's a perfectly good desktop PC for business by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      My experience has been...less pleasant... that the salesguys promised; but somebody kitting out a whitish-collar sweatshop would probably be accessing a terminal server with these (I think both RDP and Citrix are available, not sure about VMware).

  4. Brilliant for business use. by Dzimas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These things might sell quite well to libraries and businesses that need clients for web-based apps. They're also ideal second (or third) machines for households with kids. Maintaining my kid's Windows-based machine takes time and effort and Chrome would do away with that while still allowing him to use the sites and apps that matter the most -- Youtube, Google Apps for homework and gmail. He doesn't need or use much more.

    1. Re:Brilliant for business use. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Except that no vendor will support it. Unless they get someone like oracle involved that would be willing to mass-port a large number of apps. It's one thing to buy a web app and know it'll work with Chrome OS, it's an entirely different thing to then have problems with that web app... go to your vendor, and have them close your ticket immediately with "Using unsupported OS" which is exactly what they'd do.

    2. Re:Brilliant for business use. by swillden · · Score: 1

      go to your vendor, and have them close your ticket immediately with "Using unsupported OS" which is exactly what they'd do.

      Unless there's some funky browser-specificity going on (which is common for older webapps, but becoming less so), you should just be able to reproduce the issue on a supported OS and go back to the vendor with that. If you have apps that don't work on Chrome, of course, Chrome OS is a bad choice.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Brilliant for business use. by GezusK · · Score: 1

      We're already rolling out Chromebooks for our 1-to-1 effort for 8th graders. These would be nice to replace aging machines in our libraries (book searches), and our elementary labs (mostly education web sites).

      Then we plan to combine this with a VDI roll-out for those few times they do need a Windows app.

  5. NUC-like? by zvu · · Score: 1

    Just looks like an ultra low end NUC with Chrome OS on it.

  6. Re:Further Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Frankly, you seem to be an idiot. There is an expected minimal level on technical intelligence, and you lack it. You don't even seem to read the article you are asking questions about, as reading the article would have answered your question. Please stop posting, you just waste people's time.

    And, no, of course it wouldn't be good for cyyptocurrency.

  7. Re:SKU? by Gerald · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stock keeping unit. Kind of like UUIDs for things you buy in stores. I take it you've never worked in retail?

    (I don't care that you don't care. Others might.)

  8. Re:Further Review by luther349 · · Score: 1

    you cant mine at 5gh either. .

  9. FU Microsoft by xtal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Thanks for Windows 8!"

    Heh heh.

    Cheap hardware. No MS tax. Noms.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:FU Microsoft by Drew617 · · Score: 2

      You better believe there's a Google tax, though. You pay in a less direct way maybe, but it's there.

      No shilling here, I still use Google products where no convenient alternatives exist. But don't allow yourself to believe the services are free.

      Given Google's (as perceived by me) direction lately, I'm to the point where I'd much rather pay cash (to some non-evil entity) for a platform than become their product. Seems like a cool box and a good idea but ChromeOS would keep me from even touching one of these.

  10. Grandma by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This or a chromebook is the ideal computer for grandma who just needs to check her e-mail and surf a bit. I know because I got one for myself then when I could not stand Chrome-OS's annoying limitations I transferred to an elderly relative. CHromeOS is a wonderful concept and I thought it would be a panacea but it just blows for anyone but the most primitive user.

    things you can't do without pain:
    1) this network OS can't actually do any local networking.
    2) can't mount a local network disk
    3) can't print to a local printer by itself
    4) can't run any other OS practically. Oh sure you can install linux, but then the whole machine goes to crap. It won't autoupdate chomeos any longer once you install linux. And it will erase the linux partition if you touch the wrong key at boot time. Some nut jobs have told "just reflash your roms so doesn't do that". Which sort of proves my point.
    6) you can't run most software without an internet connection.
    7) all the chromebooks I've used don't handle many common external screens properly.
    8) there's no granularity of security. your username and password is your login. you can't sever the connection. You can't tell what exactly APPS do with the permissions you give them.
    9) virtually no documentation and fickle SDK capabilities at googles pleasure.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Grandma by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      I meant that your google user name and password are your login. y'know the same one you use for your google wallet, and gmail.

      10) Ironically, it ChromeOS wont run chrome screen sharing so you can't maintain one of these remotely.
      11) you can't share the devices disk to other local computers, so it's not useful as a personal server or media station

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:Grandma by mjwx · · Score: 1

      4) can't run any other OS practically. Oh sure you can install linux, but then the whole machine goes to crap. It won't autoupdate chomeos any longer once you install linux. And it will erase the linux partition if you touch the wrong key at boot time. Some nut jobs have told "just reflash your roms so doesn't do that". Which sort of proves my point.

      If you can replace the storage with something larger, this makes a perfect, if not basic media player. Great if you don't want a bulky mATX box sitting under the telly.

      However something tells me they used an internal SD Card for storage (like so many bare bones ESXi servers I get these days) so the upper limit on storage is pretty low ATM (IIRC, 128 GB)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Grandma by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Actually, it can. You can use Google Docs offline mode, play locally stored music and videos, test network connectivity and use SSH with the Secure Shell app.

  11. Google Drive is a disincentive by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    Hah, unless Google fixes their bandwidth greedy sync engine for Google Drive, offering free storage is not much of an incentive...unless the people who buy it have not actually tried to use GD before, I suppose.

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    1. Re:Google Drive is a disincentive by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      This is only relevant if you're using google drive on a computer that would see to store files locally, surely ?

      Um, I thought that's what they're talking about here? A standalone, small form factor PC running Chrome which would (presumably) come with a Google Drive client preinstalled?

      I suppose you could uninstall the Google Drive client from the unit and only use the 'free' storage manually via the web interface, but that kinda defeats one of the basic benefits of using Google Drive instead of just using a cheap remote FTP storage service...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    2. Re:Google Drive is a disincentive by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how it's an issue. You run a program that uploads data, and your issue is that it eats up your bandwidth? Seems like a non-issue to me!

    3. Re:Google Drive is a disincentive by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how it's an issue. You run a program that uploads data, and your issue is that it eats up your bandwidth? Seems like a non-issue to me!

      Except for the fact that DropBox is also 'a program that uploads data', yet they (most sensibly) implemented a user-controllable bandwidth limiter on their desktop client right from day one. Most people don't care if it takes a half hour or three hours to upload that folder full of jpgs, but they do care (very much) if they lose their internet connection entirely while the folder is uploading. Even if it only takes ten minutes at full bandwidth, that tends to piss people off...and is completely unacceptable in a business environment.

      It just boggles the mind that Google, ostensibly a top-notch service provider, hasn't figured this out yet...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  12. Re:GET ME OUT OF THE BETA! by trytoguess · · Score: 1

    You're going to want to delete slashdot's cookies to get out of beta mode.

  13. Re:Further Review by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Upon actually bothering to read the summary (I figured it was a new, low-end Chromebook), I now see that it's not a laptop, but looks more like a set-top box.

    So, new question... would it make a cost-effective Scrypt-based cryptocurrency miner?

    If memory serves, Scrypt crunching is still markedly faster on GPUs than CPUs, so this is probably a poor bet. It probably has a miniPCIe slot for the wireless, so you could theoretically pull a single lane off with a suitable adapter(and theoretically even put multiple GPUs on it, with a PCIe switch and extraordinary luck with the firmware); but that would be a fairly painful exercise for mediocre results compared to just buying whatever motherboard/CPU combo with lots of PCIe slots is cheapest and a few PCIe 1x ribbon-cable risers.

  14. Re:Man... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until Google starts going downhill, and all these little spy boxes get thrown away.

    Why so wasteful? With a coreboot port these things would be damn nice little computers. Not for gaming or workstation tasks; but perfectly pleasant.

  15. Re:GET ME OUT OF THE BETA! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Same issue on my phone.

    Holy crap.

    Slashdot is not useless on it. Good GOD

  16. Re:Do Want by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    Fanless? Can I swap the SSD and slap Windows 7 on the i3 model?

    If you put Windows on it (good luck with that) you will probably need a fan.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  17. Tough Sell by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    These things have been around as a niche product for many years. Only difference is Asus is loading Chrome on them, when usually they don't come with anything.

    I always thought they were a bit of a tough sell. 2-400$ where 3-4 you get a netbook, or 4-5 a low end laptop. That come with windows. That come with a monitor. That come with a battery and can be cordless.

    Anyway I don't see this as much of a move, simply another player in a small market.

  18. Celeron? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Ick.

    1. Re:Celeron? by vivek7006 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Celeron? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be nice if Intel could use some form of consistant branding scheme? Those specs actually look half-decent - not a class I'd expect to see labeled as a 'Celeron.' That term has mostly been used for the budget chips, generally ones seriously short on cache.

    3. Re:Celeron? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      The budget chips have grown up and are now capable.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  19. Been wanting a BeagleBone Black... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    If this type of box was under $100, I would jump on it. At $65 I would buy several. Currently trying to get a BeagleBone Black (when they get stock again) for the same general purpose, but being able to drive a 4k display would be worth a little extra.

  20. Re:Further Review by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    and how big is your mothers power bill?

  21. Yeah, but you can't pawn them by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    The Pawn Stars guy won't give you enough for a bus ticket to Reno. Oh NOES!

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  22. Re:Man... by LookIntoTheFuture · · Score: 1

    Why so wasteful? With a coreboot port these things would be damn nice little computers. Not for gaming or workstation tasks; but perfectly pleasant.

    I wasn't aware of that project. I guess if you could nuke the OS that comes with it, it would be kind of cool.

    --
    Brave Sir Robin ran away. ("No!") Bravely ran away away. ("I didn't!")
  23. Does Steam run on ChromeOS by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

    Can you run steam on this . Or load SteamOS if so I think this would be very interesting to have this coupled with steam in home streaming.

  24. Re:GET ME OUT OF THE BETA! by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    Isn't there still a tiny "use classic mode" link at the bottom of the page?

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  25. Hmm - this seems the wrong way around by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Surely it would be better to have a TV, with a built in Chromebox?
    As you go up-range on TVs, you get seem to get the same panel, with a prettier frame, and more and more god-awful/useless features.
    In the same way the computer invaded my phone, could they please invade my TV?
    You suddenly get something supported, that can run cross-manufactuer apps etc - and once you've got a CPU and some storage in there, you can start to bolt the tuner/PVR/Guide etc into the OS. Then add in the Google 'cloud' and you'd be able to sign into your hotel room TV and watch your films, your channels and maybe video-conference to your friends. God-knows if this is the direction of the TV world - but it's certainly not a curved screen, and I'm sure Google would fall over themselves to know what you're watching when you're not in-front of your PC.

    1. Re:Hmm - this seems the wrong way around by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      TV manufacturers can either:

      1 - Put a real PC on your TVs, something that'll run the software that I want it to run; or
      2 - Sell dumb displays, bonus points if there are hooks where I can fix a computer.

      There is no other option. I (and I'm quite typical in that) will refuse to buy smart TVs unless they fit into #1 there, as I (and I was quite typical by the time) refused to buy smart phones before they fit that too.

  26. Re:SKU? by rthille · · Score: 1

    Not at all like UUIDs. UUIDs are gobally unique, SKUs denote a class of items, of which there can be many items of each SKU/class.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  27. Re:Looks like Mac Mini by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Because unlike the cheap crappy PCs, mac mini is an expensive crappy PC. Market for those is fairly limited, as people who go for "style over substance" who are the main apple audience generally want to have a more expensive and powerful machine at their disposal. At the same time people who for for substance over style will get a much cheaper PC which will likely perform just as well if not better in most tasks.

    Remember, most of the low end stuff that is bought today is laptops. Desktop prices on sold machines are going up because people don't buy the crappy desktops all that much any more.

  28. Cost is importand by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    It appears one just gets the box. Unless you can re-purpose old accessories, you'll need to buy a monitor, HDMI cable, mouse and keyboard which in total could cost more than the black box. Of course if you have an HD TV with HDMI input, that takes care of that and maybe a old mouse and keyboard, you're all set. You also must run the HDMI cable from the box to the TV if that's your choice which could be inconvenient in the living room. A BT keyboard and mouse would be better in that situation. One could also get a KVM switch with HDMI ports added to your current setup. All this would increase cost regardless of your situation and choices. On the other hand, Chromebooks might cost less as the screen is there as well as a trackpad and keyboard.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Cost is importand by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      A lot of school systems like the one I work for have lots of 5-6 year old PCs that we are about to have to try and upgrade to Win7. Lots of them won't make it, leaving a lot of keyboards, mice and monitors sitting around with nothing to do. This could be a very cheap option.

    2. Re:Cost is importand by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the Asus solution doesn't run Windows which may or may not be important for your students. For elementary school children that may not matter if you can find the apps that teach what you want. For HS students, more advanced hardware with Windows may be needed. A careful evaluation of what you need and what will fill that need will be important before making a choice. It's probably not simple.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    3. Re:Cost is importand by dbIII · · Score: 2

      High school is supposed to be about education and not training. Also there's no point training somebody on MS Office 2012 when it's going to be 2018 when they graduate and the interface has changed again. Instead it's worth educating them in general terms and any word processor, spreadsheet etc will do for that.
      So your carefully crafted deliberate seed of doubt fails when exposed to a bullshit detector.

  29. Re:So... Linux? Intel NUC by Technician · · Score: 1

    The box looks like it is based on the Intel Next Unit of Computing, but at a much lower price point. A bare "kit" of an NUC without a drive is more expensive. It should be able to run Linux after the Chrome bootloader issue is addressed.
    http://www.intel.com/content/w...

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  30. Asus by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

    I have a x501a Asus i3 4 gigs ram and it struggles to play facebook slot machine games like doubledown and doubleu. If you have less than an i7 I guess your boned.

  31. Re:Further Review by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    mining scrypt is a huge focking waste of time, it is worthless and will always be worthless

    Tell that to the Litecoin that was worth $2 when I mined it 6 months ago.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  32. erm, that was my point by goldcd · · Score: 1

    I've got a TV that I use as a big dumb display, with the items providing my media, hanging out the back of it on wires.
    There's a big chunk of manufacturer bullet points in their sales pitch completely ignored - as I'm much happier bypassing them all.
    Would be much better if they'd actually built something I wanted into the TV initially.
    Better still, if they'd all build something in that was standardized. I get a new phone, I sign in, my profile/apps/etc all magically get pulled down from the cloud. I'd quite like to be able to do this with all TVs I bump into.

  33. Re:Man... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Coreboot is, unfortunately, not available for nearly as many chipsets as one would like; but where it is available, it's pretty neat. It can boot a variety of payloads; but it's ability to get you from power-on to linux like a bat out of hell is an impressive reminder of how slow your usual firmware is.