Slashdot Mirror


Windows Replacement? ReactOS 0.3.16 Gets Themes, CSRSS Rewrite, and More

jeditobe writes with this announcement from the ReactOS home page: "The ReactOS Project is pleased to announce the release of version 0.3.16. A little under a year has passed since the previous release and a significant amount of progress has been made. More than 400 bugs were eliminated. Some of the most significant include completion of the CSRSS rewrite and the first stages of a shell32 rewrite. 0.3.16 is in many ways a prelude to several new features that will provide a noticeable enhancement to user visible functionality. A preview can be seen in the form of theme support, which while disabled by default can be turned on to demonstrate the Lautus theme developed by community member Maciej Janiszewki. Another user visible change is a new network card driver for the RTL8139, allowing ReactOS to support newer versions of QEMU out of the box." You can download release images here. Want to see how it handles Windows software? Here are demos of Office 2003, Photoshop CS2, and OpenMPT.

179 comments

  1. a better Beta by tirnacopu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot will soon return as http://soylentnews.org/

    1. Re:a better Beta by fisted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      mod parent up

    2. Re:a better Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Show a fully-functional site first and then we'll talk. You have to be better than the Slashdot Beta at least. Currently you do not have anything to show.

    3. Re:a better Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... you can't take the sky from meeee.

    4. Re:a better Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Looking forward to it. Then we can all go there, and SPAM EVERY ARTICLE with anti-Soylent News articles until it becomes unusable for you shitheads.

  2. version 0.3.16. by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Wake me when it gets to version 1.0 at least

    1. Re: version 0.3.16. by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      ReactOS is like Google. Will remain in Beta for years.

    2. Re: version 0.3.16. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least their Betas are good.

      Not like, you know, Slashdot Beta.

      Yeah, fuck it.

    3. Re: version 0.3.16. by enharmonix · · Score: 2

      Worth putting it in a VM and at least trying it out, isn't it? However, I'm with you when it comes to putting on a real machine. I'll wait until 1.0.

    4. Re: version 0.3.16. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sort of a master Beta, if you will.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re: version 0.3.16. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Inkscape went from 0.35 to 0.48 in its 11 years of existence, and is one of the very best and most useful software the free software community has produced. Don't take the 1.0 number too seriously, because there are many other numbering schemes.

    6. Re: version 0.3.16. by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for them to hit version 0.4 for about 5 years now. The goal is admirable, but by the time ReactOS hits 1.0, I can't imagine Windows will be using the NT platform anymore.

    7. Re: version 0.3.16. by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      Windows will most likely always use a kernel and HAL based on the original NT model.

    8. Re: version 0.3.16. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      by the time ReactOS hits 1.0, I can't imagine Windows will be using the NT platform anymore.

      Then a compatible alternative will be more needed than ever.

    9. Re: version 0.3.16. by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I take a gander every couple of versions. I filed a bug report a while back, which hasn't been fixed, or at least for the ancient version of the software I was trying to run, so I'll test myself when I get the chance.

      You could always try installing to a usb thumb drive.

    10. Re: version 0.3.16. by DrXym · · Score: 2
      I think you'll be waiting a very long time. Look how long it took for Wine to get to 1.0 and even that is still hit and miss. And Reactos is Wine cobbled together with a bunch of other Win32 / NT replacement parts so its problems are multiplied. And almost certainly it will never implement .NET, or Internet Explorer. The best it can hope for is it can fool the genuine MS components to run over the faux Windows.

      Anyway, perhaps the best use of Reactos will be found in server farms and VMs. Not for enterprise apps but for cloud gaming, app hosting, automated testing where 100% uptime is not a big deal but the expense of licensing a genuine MS operating system might well be.

    11. Re: version 0.3.16. by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      While you point out a clear exception to the rule. The fact that Inkscape is at 0.48 tells you something about the developers in charge. Amatures. And as an avid Inkscape user and contributor to Apache Batik, having to deal with them is an obnoxious pain in the ass, and they don't seem to be very concerned with shitty UI or buggy SVG support, or basically anything they didn't come up with.

      Groups who misuse version number tell you a shitload about the developers before you look at the software. That goes for something like Google Chrome just as much as it does for Inkscape or ReactOS.

      When you manipulate the version number in silly ways, it also lets us know that you have no intention of being truthful.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re: version 0.3.16. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Precisely!!! When can we have something that we can use?

    13. Re: version 0.3.16. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They should develop VMs for VirtualPC and HyperV

    14. Re: version 0.3.16. by jhoger · · Score: 1

      I ran a little console .net program with p/invoke to the win 32 serial API and .net serial API the other day. It ran better under wine than windows because of crappy Prolific USB serial driver on windows.

      So wine already seems able to run .net presumably through mono.

    15. Re: version 0.3.16. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he who waits for the master that bates, "Harvey Korman" "Mel Brooks"

    16. Re: version 0.3.16. by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Which, I might add, was ripped off from VAX/VMS - With Dave Cutler's comments still in place!!! Dave Cutler, by the way, is the guy behind the VAX/VMS kernel, that Micosoft stole away from DEC (The two companies were across the street from each other)

      The HAL concept - in VMS it was called "kernel mode" and "non kernel mode" was the big invention that made almost all of what you see possible...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
  3. Feature Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have the ReactOS guys reached feature parity with NT4 yet? Last time I tried it, it was almost as unusable as slashdot beta!

    1. Re:Feature Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They started the project over from scratch recently.

      Apparently the old codebase was like polishing a turd.

    2. Re:Feature Parity? by chester_br · · Score: 5, Funny

      They started the project over from scratch recently.

      Apparently the old codebase was like polishing a turd.

      You mean, ReactOS or the Slashdot Beta?

    3. Re:Feature Parity? by DarkRat · · Score: 1

      yes

  4. Join beta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Join our side. It may have problems, but they can be fixed. Beta is your friend. Beta is life.

  5. Cyrillic? by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    Do you have to think in Russian?

    1. Re: Cyrillic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOBODY will get that reference, despite the awesomeness.

    2. Re:Cyrillic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless you're planning to control a frussian ighter plane with it.

    3. Re: Cyrillic? by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      ... Except anyone who bothered to figure out what the Cyrillic fonts for X were.

      Geeks who actually understand UNIX will all get that reference. Some Linux cluebies that think they're geeks because they installed Ubuntu? Not so much.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re: Cyrillic? by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      I did...

  6. One day.... by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now before I say anything, do know that I GREATLY applaud the efforts of the ReactOS platform. I am incredibly impressed by the huge undertaking the ReactOS team has decided to pursue. Programming an open source, binary-compatible alternative to Windows is, in my opinion, the most difficult OSS project to ever make happen - after all, Microsoft can't exactly do it right when they have the actual source code, a lot more software developers, and a LOT more money. I do one day hope to be able to use it as a primary operating system that will work with my existing hardware and software as seamlessly as it presently does with Windows, leaving Windows as a memory as the ReactOS community take the best parts of OSS development and apply it to making my very expensive Windows software run.

    One day.

    I really don't mean to be a jerk to the devs, because I know that I have no skill, talent, or ability to write an operating system. I know that they have to hit a constantly moving target, while making plenty of rough decisions along the way: two pieces of software exist. One doesn't work past Windows XP. One works only on Vista/7/8. Which do you make compatible? Microsoft clearly has their way of going ("forward", i.e. Win8 apps), but ReactOS could easily spur adoption by catering to people who have $5,000 pieces of hardware that are no longer made, perfectly fill their needs, and don't have drivers for >WinXP. This is a tough question to answer, and one I do not envy or posit a response.

    Based on their demos, it seems that they're going the 'Open Source XP' method, as can be deduced based on their demos of Office 2003 and Photoshop CS2, the former being four revisions out of date, and the latter being five (assuming we count 'CC' as a single version). If the /only/ thing it will run is old software that is not being updated, I understand that - it's no longer a moving target, after all. However, constantly playing catch-up with Microsoft, though inherently a consequence of the nature of the project, is all but impossible to truly consider a replacement.

    Perhaps I need to read up on their website or do some Google searching, but are they planning to start eyeballing Win7 at all? What about more recent iterations of DirectX? I'd love to be independently wealthy enough to dump a few million at the project, and yes, next payday I plan on sending $20 or somesuch to the cause. That doesn't mean that the devs will be able to achieve critical mass effectively.

    Having said all of that, if they could get an OSS flavor of Windows ThinPC up and running (i.e. completely iron out hardware compatibility and a remote desktop client), and charge even some nominal amount for it so that companies could use it instead of ThinPC (which is stupidly licensed), that'd be a great way to start making inroads.

    1. Re:One day.... by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe that you can use a standard Windows RPC client with ReactOS.

      I would agree that they need to get some adoption. I think (which has no real bearing on what they should really do) they should work at getting some of those high value applications working 100% on ReactOS, and then create an installer so that the application could install into a version of ReactOS that launches the application by default and that installs into a Virtual machine. This would make ReactOS a compatibility layer for all of those old applications. Any bugs or missing features in ReactOS that are not used by the specific application would not matter.

      Another option would be to try to work with someone like GOG. GOG already uses DosBox and ScummVM to run a lot of games. Having a system that would allow them to package old Windows games would enhance their offerings. Particularly if the system was cross platform, which ReactOS installed to a VM would be.

    2. Re:One day.... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 4, Interesting

      leaving Windows as a memory as the ReactOS community take the best parts of OSS development and apply it to making my very expensive Windows software run.

      I honestly don't understand how anybody could think Windows is expensive. I really think it's cheap considering what an extremely complex piece of software it is. It's probably cheaper per byte than any other software, unless you consider free (as in beer) software. For example, I recently paid about $140 for it, but I paid $40 yesterday for a mere music program. If you think of Windows as a major component of a computer like an HDD or processor or whatever, its cost is about on the same scale.

      I certainly wish the ReactOS folks well, but I'm not sure what problem ReactOS solves. Folks who are enamored with being able to customize their OS already have Linux and several other open-source choices. So, at best, ReactOS just saves me $140. I wouldn't turn that down with all things being equal, but otherwise, I would much rather pay $140 for an HDD or processor that works well than get one for free that doesn't.

    3. Re:One day.... by Jmc23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Something tells me 3,000,000 was around the point slashdot died.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I got a different reading out of the GP's post. The cost being referred to was for Windows-only applications, which can easily be a lot more expensive than Windows itself. And often those specialized applications lack support for newer versions of Windows, so it doesn't matter what Windows costs: Microsoft won't sell you a version of Windows that both runs those applications and still gets bug fixes. That's the niche that ReactOS has an opportunity to fill.

    5. Re:One day.... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      That's a convenient breaking point - why not choose 2353707 instead? Anyway, if you're suggesting that I don't subscribe to all of the Slashorthodoxy, you're exactly right. In fact, I also didn't during my past ten years as a lurker.

    6. Re:One day.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Informative

      ReactOS is at a point where it is as compatible as it is going to get, if you get it to a bug free state. The issue is ultimately with other Microsoft libraries that are "part" of Windows, but not. Things like MFC, ADO, VB6 runtime, Terminal services, just to name a few are things we take for granted that just aren't going to be part of ReactOS. They have proxy DLLs with functions that do nothing, but they are monumental tasks all by themselves and most software needs these tidbits to run.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but are they planning to start eyeballing Win7 at all?

      IIRC, they are a win32 API-based OS. So, no.

    8. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly don't understand how anybody could think Windows is expensive. I really think it's cheap considering what an extremely complex piece of software it is.

      The reason people use windows is because of its drivers and the programs. The drivers are developed by the hardware companies and you pay for them when you buy the hardware. The programs you pay for separately.
      If you start to consider what Windows components you actually use it is horribly expensive.
      A desktop program launcher with a network stack taken from bsd and some filesharing shouldn't be that expensive.

    9. Re:One day.... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With a proper installer, an application requiring those would provide the version it needs, aka DLL hell. If some form of SxS is implemented, you get version specific runtime and no DLL hell.

      There has been no need to rewrite those, for that reason, other than having stubs to link against. And since they reuse wine libs, it may be a wine stub rather than something reactos intends to work.

      Once you are enlightened, your statement is now false. It will get more compatible. And if you require those libraries and it is legal do to so, you can obtain them directly from Microsoft, or the app developer, or anyone.

      There is a reason they are called redistributables. Guess what that is? Go on, I'll give you a hint if you need one.

      And most programs need terminal services? No, some very specific ones do. And that is the idea behind thorium virtual kickstarter. If people fund it, it will exist.

    10. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is really closer to 65536

    11. Re:One day.... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      There's something of an elephant in the room with ReactOS: If it ever got good enough to become a viable alternative to Windows, it's likely that Microsoft would unleash an army of lawyers upon it. But so long as it remains nothing more than a niche tool to run legacy apps that newer versions of Windows can't, they have to reason to do so.

    12. Re:One day.... by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Based on their demos, it seems that they're going the 'Open Source XP' method, as can be deduced based on their demos of Office 2003 and Photoshop CS2, the former being four revisions out of date, and the latter being five (assuming we count 'CC' as a single version).

      I still use Photoshop CS2, I'm aware Photoshop is to be ah rented in the future if not now, seems that would be an easier install as you don't have to mess with a windows installer (Adobe ain't gonna pay for it's use). The demo uses in but it's not an on-line version.

      I can't help but laugh at all the people that will be trying to reuse the key shown to unlock their Photoshops.

    13. Re:One day.... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      The userspace application compatibility is shared with wine and will thus target whichever APIs that modern applications require.

      Last I checked, they were basing their compatibility of the underlying OS on XP 5.2 (Windows Server 2003). Developing an NT clone is a moving target, when you consider MS have had several evolutions since in the form of Vista, 7 and 8. They wanted to get to a point where their OS core was stable (XP compatible) and worry about Windows 9 driver compatibilities when the product was mature enough to re-base, rather than shifting goalposts every few years.

    14. Re:One day.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      Negative. You may not redistribute these packages/DLLs to a non Microsoft Windows platform. It is right in the license.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    15. Re:One day.... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      I got a different reading out of the GP's post. The cost being referred to was for Windows-only applications, which can easily be a lot more expensive than Windows itself.

      After a careful re-reading of it, I think you're right. I guess he's looking to save the $140 or so cost of Windows itself to help with the overall software budget.

    16. Re:One day.... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      I can't help but laugh at all the people that will be trying to reuse the key shown to unlock their Photoshops.

      CS2 has been effectively "free" since Adobe turned off the activation servers and gave away the keys.

    17. Re:One day.... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      It is really closer to 65536

      Now that one probably even predates my time as a lurker! Then again, if only the first 65536 accounts are qualified to provide valuable content here, it's no wonder that Dice wants to pull the plug. ;-)

    18. Re:One day.... by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 2

      will work with my existing hardware and software as seamlessly as it presently does with Windows

      Harsh..

    19. Re:One day.... by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A little anecdote that exposes a bit of the can of worms. Some years ago a software developer made a little program to get files via a non-MS file serving protocol (I can't remember which one). To his astonishment it also worked with the "Microsoft" SMB file serving protocol because that turned out to have been derived from the other without attribution or money changing hands. The free software project later went on to be Samba.
      MS have too much of a mess with bits from all over the place to be able to playing ownership games on anything from a few years ago. They've got better things to do than a PR disaster and feeding another team of lawyers for a decade.

    20. Re:One day.... by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      There is a reason they are called redistributables. Guess what that is? Go on, I'll give you a hint if you need one.

      Because you can redistribute them with your software to allow it to be installed on windows systems that don't yet have those components. That doesn't mean you are allowed to redistribute them in other contexts.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:One day.... by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

      The real cost of windows is not in the purchase price but all the untold hours of messing with it to keep it working in all but the simplest systems/configurations. My time is far too valuable to spend it messing with windows if I don't have to. Unfortunately, right now I have to to keep just a few applications running for which there are no known Linux equivalents.

    22. Re:One day.... by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I can't help but laugh at all the people that will be trying to reuse the key shown to unlock their Photoshops.

      CS2 has been effectively "free" since Adobe turned off the activation servers and gave away the keys.

      Nope not so funny now. No I wasn't aware that CS2 is now "free" and keys available; have just always used CS2 and needed nothing else, so never followed up on it. -I also avoid news list, and product announcements.

      Does explain why I wasn't able to connect to an activation server and had to take other means :}

    23. Re:One day.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      All those DLLs aren't magic, though. Ultimately, they are implemented in terms of Win32 API calls, so if those are sufficiently well emulated, MFC, ADO, VB6 runtime etc should "just work".

    24. Re:One day.... by westlake · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't understand how anybody could think Windows is expensive.

      Walmart --- with its enormous purchasing power --- couldn't price and spec an OEM Linux PC as anything other than a severely crippled bottom feeder. It's depressing to think about how many truckloads of their overstock junk passed into the hands of the ever-credulous geek.

    25. Re:One day.... by voss · · Score: 2

      The first 65536 users don't want dice to pull the plug...we would lose our slashdot awesomeness.

    26. Re:One day.... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      Whatever you do, don't get a Mac. I hear they're even harder to keep running than Windows. ;-)

    27. Re:One day.... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      look man, if you need to run 10+ boxes of windows on hardware that costs 100 bucks, then it's pretty expensive.

      but that's beside the point. it's not about the money and I applaud their efforts, much more worthwhile than yet another linux distro with a different background image.

      (if you just need to run windows apps there's always WINE)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    28. Re:One day.... by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      leaving Windows as a memory as the ReactOS community take the best parts of OSS development and apply it to making my very expensive Windows software run.

      I honestly don't understand how anybody could think Windows is expensive.

      I wasn't referring to Windows being terribly expensive. I was referring to ~$5,000/seat AutoCAD licenses, $1,500 Adobe Production Studio licenses (Pre-CC; some of us actually paid a hefty sum for the plastic-disc version), $7,000 Waves VST plug-ins, and the like. Alternatively, you have things like software drivers for some very specialized printers, e.g. Designjet units that print on rolls of paper four feet wide, or sign-making cutters that cut glass into shapes based on EPS files. $150 for a copy of Windows is indeed chicken feed by comparison. Giving up Windows gets very, very expensive when it means getting rid of a four-figure piece of software or a five figure glass cutter.

      "but I'm not sure what problem ReactOS solves."
      In an ideal world, I'd like to run Windows applications on an operating system besides Microsoft Windows. ReactOS, in its ideal form, solves this problem. Presently, it does not.

      "Folks who are enamored with being able to customize their OS already have Linux and several other open-source choices."
      My ideal computer runs KDE as its desktop environment, as a launcher for Adobe Premiere, Serato, Mediashout, and Mass Effect just as naturally as it will load Konqueror and Konversation. There's a kludgy implementation of KDE on Windows that is in progress, but it does, obviously, require Windows to work. Similarly, "customizable" and "able to run Ableton Live" are mutually exclusive at present.

    29. Re:One day.... by adolf · · Score: 2

      Because you can redistribute them with your software to allow it to be installed on windows systems that don't yet have those components. That doesn't mean you are allowed to redistribute them in other contexts.

      Indeed. From here (which I picked at random after typing "microsoft redistributable license" into Google -- this particular one being for .NET Framework)

      NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A VALID EULA FOR ANY "OS PRODUCT" (MICROSOFT WINDOWS 98, WINDOWS ME, WINDOWS NT 4.0 (DESKTOP EDITION), WINDOWS 2000 OPERATING SYSTEM, WINDOWS XP PROFESSIONAL AND/OR WINDOWS XP HOME EDITION), YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO INSTALL, COPY OR OTHERWISE USE THE OS COMPONENTS AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER THIS SUPPLEMENTAL EULA.

      That said, I have an old XP license.

      So it's not a problem for me in the first world, nor might it be a problem in the third world where such license is likely to be glued to the side of the computer.....

      (IANAL, etc)

    30. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I installed Windows. Didn't mess with it whatsoever. 3 years later, it continues to work just as well as it did on the first day.

      I guess some people are just incompetent.

    31. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its funny how trolls never seem to give out specific verifiable details.

    32. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded to cs4 for the content-aware scale mostly. I was expecting to do another upgrade this year, but then adobe decided to move to CC and won't be getting my money anymore.

    33. Re:One day.... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's funny how some people don't read for long enough to get those "specific verifiable details" - such as the name of the software project "Samba", before posting their baseless insults.

    34. Re:One day.... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I find it surprising he was astonished since he was trying to emulate DEC Pathworks which was itself an attempt to provide DOS networking services to IBM PCs from VMS servers and was based on Lan Manager which is what SMB grew out of.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    35. Re:One day.... by unixisc · · Score: 2

      I certainly wish the ReactOS folks well, but I'm not sure what problem ReactOS solves. Folks who are enamored with being able to customize their OS already have Linux and several other open-source choices. So, at best, ReactOS just saves me $140. I wouldn't turn that down with all things being equal, but otherwise, I would much rather pay $140 for an HDD or processor that works well than get one for free that doesn't.

      Well, assuming that it achieves its goals of 100% binary compatibility w/ Windows, it allows people who are being forced to migrate from one Windows version to another an alternative. As it is, a lot of organizations are showing a major pushback on being forced away from XP, due to the 'if it ain't broke' cliché. With something like ReactOS, such companies can use such a platform and preserve their software investments.

      The real beauty of this platform is that if any organization adopts it, they can hire people to maintain it as long as needed, and even install it on however many extra seats they need. No Microsoft or anybody can force them to switch to Windows 8 or Server 2013 or anything else. They won't even be playing catch-up: the 32-bit OS needs to be as identical as possible to XP, while the 64-bit should be as identical as possible to Windows 7.

      Another thing - since it is FOSS, it could even be installed on non x64 platforms, like MIPS.

    36. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of a WinBox to go with the DosBox?
      That would be cool. I think you can already run Windows 95 in DosBox though, so XP compatibility really depends on who gets there first. I'd love to see an open source XP compatible OS or WinBox sort of thing. I could kill off some VMs that I keep around for legacy applications I bet.

    37. Re:One day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most common comment in regards to ReactOS... In short what they meant to say was "Not Viable". But who really gives a shit?!
      Just let them do their thing and shut the fuck up.

    38. Re:One day.... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      "where it's legal" and "thorium" were important parts of my response, which you ignored. The legality of EULA and how restrictive they can be is rather up in the air. Some things have been clearly rejected, some things clearly okayed, and things in the middle are still a grey area. Not clearly illegal, and probably perfectly fine.

      I know of no test where an installer, containing redistributables, somehow is responsible to ensure that no one downloads or copies the installer package with the intent of running on a non-windows system.

      The intent of the redistributable is to allow the program to run. If you download from Microsoft, you may be subject to their EULA depending on your legal system. If you install as part of the package, and do not have to agree to any part of the Microsoft EULA, as a user you have not breached any agreement.

      Law is hard, and even this is a simplification. "No, EULA" is just not an adequate response.

      And even if we say EULA is the law, the point is that ReactOS is not as good as it will get just because these libraries do not exist. Reverse engineering for the purposes of compatibility is legal enough where it matters. That too is an oversimplification. But EULA is not the law. Which is also an oversimplification.

    39. Re:One day.... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      That is for .NET, which wasn't part of the discussion. Also, since we are talking about 10 year old software being supported, 10 year old packages along with their licenses should be considered.

      In the past decade, Wine has come a long way, and ReactOS has undoubtedly been directed to Microsoft's attention. Why would they say you cannot run it on a non-Windows system if there were no viable ways of doing so? Investigating that question comes to an answer that involves alternative operating systems that run Windows, which did not exist in the past. The EULA would not have included the text you claim it would have.

      Specifically it would not affect installers for 10 year old software which include the libraries as part of the installer. Unless the installer has Microsoft's EULA to click through, the user doesn't have to agree. And if it includes the redistributable package as of that date, it includes the license text of that date. Not what's on Microsoft.com right now.

      Oh, I'm an old man, I've been around a while. MDAC_26.exe contains this agreement, copied from the installer. Slashfuck might have altered the unicode content and links:

      MICROSOFT CORPORATION END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

      Microsoft Data Access Components 2.6

      IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual or a single entity) and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product identified above, which includes computer software and may include associated media, printed materials, and "online" or electronic documentation ("Product"). An amendment or addendum to this EULA may accompany the Product. YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS EULA BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING THE PRODUCT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND.

      1. GRANT OF LICENSE. Microsoft grants you the following rights provided that you comply with all terms and conditions of this EULA:

      a. Installation and Use.

      You may install and use an unlimited number of copies of the Product only for your internal use on your premises. You may make an unlimited number of copies (either in hard copy or electronic form) of any electronic documents included with the Product only for your internal use on your premises.

      b. Storage/Network Use.

      You may also store or install a copy of the Product on a storage device, such as a network server, used only to install or run the Product on your other computers over an internal network.

      c. Performance or Benchmark Testing.

      You may not disclose the results of any benchmark test using the Product to any third party without Microsoft's prior written approval.

      d. Application Development; Redistribution Rights.

      You may use the Product to design, develop, and test your software application products that will add significant and primary functionality to the Product ("Application"). You have a royalty-free right to reproduce and distribute the Product, provided that you comply with the following:

      (i) General Redistribution Requirements.

      You will (a) redistribute, or have third parties redistribute, the Product in its entirety, in object code only, in a single executable file as provided by Microsoft (MDAC_typ.exe), and only in conjunction with and as a part of an Application; (b) not use Microsoft's name, logo, or trademarks to market your Application without the prior written consent of Microsoft; (c) include a valid copyright notice with your Application; (d) include all copyright and trademark notices contained in the Product; (e) include a copy of this EULA with any Product you distribute; (f) indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise or result from the use or distribution of your Application, and (g) not permit further distribution of the Product by en

    40. Re:One day.... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's the one, and the story is that he was astonished. Whether that was true or said to enhance the story I don't know.
      However the point is just from your post we have examples of IBM, DEC and Microsoft being involved so that's a large historical can of worms for lawyers to untangle just there. It, and I'm sure many other things that would be in ReactOS, would appear to be an ownership tangle that would do nothing IMHO but feed lawyers for a long time and generate bad PR if a serious copyright court case happened.

  7. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by LookIntoTheFuture · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...then why not simply disable classic altogether and get it over with ?

    This has me stumped too. Dice obviously doesn't give a fuck about our family. The current Slashdot without the beta has more value than they could possibly understand, and they are going to flush it down the toilet so they can pursue their "vision" of caching in on the Slashdot name. Which won't make them money like they think it will. Sad, indeed.

    Mod me down too. It really doesn't matter any more.

    --
    Brave Sir Robin ran away. ("No!") Bravely ran away away. ("I didn't!")
  8. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear hear

  9. JAZ and ZIP drive support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And can Norton Commander take advantage of EMS memory cards?

    1. Re:JAZ and ZIP drive support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      More importantly, does the video driver support Hercules mono mode?

  10. Re: boycott slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless the new site runs on ReactOS, please shut the fuck up about slashdot beta.

  11. Re: boycott slashdot by enharmonix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless the new site runs on ReactOS, please shut the fuck up about slashdot beta.

  12. Slashdot replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Everybody go to http://www.soylentnews.org

    1. Re:Slashdot replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good. What I suggest is that we all go to it and post "FUCK SOLYENTNEWS" comments in every thread, over and over again, until the website isn't usable.

  13. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Using the URL http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 should fix that.

  14. What's wrong with the beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I only occasionally visit the actual /. site (instead preferring to digest my news via feed-reader), but when I did last week, I was immediately pleased with the aesthetics of the redesign. What are the (perhaps not-so-subtle) nuances I'm missing with which people are so unhappy?

    1. Re:What's wrong with the beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have some comparison screenshots. First, between the first two pics, note that slashdot's solution to the problem that after you get three-four comments deep in a conversation it becomes unreadable is to just not show comments beyond that point unless you repeatedly mash the get more comments button (compare to Reddit's solution of having a link directly to the rest of the thread). Also note how little text fits on the screen in the beta version compared to the classic version.

      For the third screenshot, note how the fonts for different comments are different for no reason, and how small the comment box is. It's also worth noting that they've removed the maxlength attribute on the comment subject box, so instead of the browser telling you when you've reached the limit, your subject is truncated.

    2. Re:What's wrong with the beta? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Comments are what make Slashdot slashdot. I take it you are a PHB who expects everyone to consume whatever it is you regurgitate?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  15. On Topic by mexsudo · · Score: 3, Informative

    "ReactOS is a free and open-source operating system based on the best design principles found in the Windows NT architecture. Written completely from scratch, ReactOS is not a Linux-based system and it shares none of the UNIX architecture. The main goal of the ReactOS project is to provide an operating system which is binary compatible with Windows. This will allow Windows applications and drivers to run as they would on a Windows system. Additionally, the look and feel of the Windows operating system is used, such that people accustomed to the familiar user interface of Windows would find using ReactOS straightforward. The ultimate goal of ReactOS is to allow people to use it as an alternative to Windows without the need to change software they are used to." anybody tried this? pretty obscure, first I heard of it.

    1. Re:On Topic by jordanjay29 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's been around for years, quietly chugging away. The goal is admirable, but with the sluggish progress I've seen, I have little confidence that there will be an actual product someday that will operate as a FOSS platform for natively running Windows software.

  16. Re:Hi by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 2

    What's a vm? Will this run on my dell win8 laptop ok, without ruining my current setup?

    Virtual Machine, yes a VM will run on your computer and allow you to test ReactOS safely.

    --
    /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
  17. 10 year old software? by thebes · · Score: 1

    Why use 10 year old software to demo a "Windows replacement"? If a successful demo only works because it is old software, that somewhat speaks volumes.

    1. Re:10 year old software? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Why use 10 year old software to demo a "Windows replacement"? If a successful demo only works because it is old software, that somewhat speaks volumes.

      Office 2007 and newer have this crappy 'ribbon bar', so since Office 2003 is so widely used... in a way it makes sense.

      I also suspect the newer UI APIs aren't fully implemented, so, perhaps... indeed only the old software actually works.

    2. Re:10 year old software? by thebes · · Score: 1

      I also suspect the newer UI APIs aren't fully implemented, so, perhaps... indeed only the old software actually works.

      I know you are just guessing, but my counter-comment is: so they have caught up to the UI API from 10 years ago?

    3. Re:10 year old software? by Nerd+Flanders · · Score: 1

      Well, with all the abandonware (or existing software that otherwise wouldn't justify an expensive update) that does't work with recent versions of Windows since Vista... Wouldn't a working, F/LOSS, maintained Windows XP replacement prove useful? After all, MS was compelled to provide a "Windows XP mode" in Win7 pro for this use case, but they won't provide XP updates any longer!

    4. Re:10 year old software? by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people are still using a 12.5 year old version of Windows for their day to day computing tasks!

    5. Re:10 year old software? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why use 10 year old software to demo a "Windows replacement"
      Because that's probably why you want something other than XP or Win7 that won't run your old software.

    6. Re:10 year old software? by eWarz · · Score: 1

      "crappy ribbon bar" is a matter of opinion, many of us like the ribbon. The real reason is that office 2007/2010 tends to be much more complex due to the shear amount of extra code. The biggest issue with ReactOS is stability. You still (to this day) can't use it for even the most basic tasks. I've been with (and coded for) ReactOS since before it was ReactOS...it's sad that it still has yet to break out into something much better. I hope that it will eventually flourish, but as of right now i will not get my hopes up.

    7. Re:10 year old software? by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      The real reason is that office 2007/2010 tends to be much more complex due to the shear amount of extra code.

      Where did you find out about the lines of code?

    8. Re:10 year old software? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      However the ALL CAPS UGLINESS in office 2013 is just horrible except to the legally blind.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  18. Oh ok by C00lb34nz · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

  19. Re:Hi by MCROnline · · Score: 1

    VM is Virtual Machine. Go here for a start https://www.virtualbox.org/

  20. Re: boycott slashdot by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If the new site runs on slashdot beta and you're from Soviet Russia, ReactOS shuts the fuck up about YOU.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. Re:Hi by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see the new Beta is managing to attract new readers! Welcome!

    A VM or "virtual machine" is a type of computer program that creates an emulated software environment. Not that any real person actually knows what that means. Think of it as a sort of a computer that runs on another computer. You can run multiple "virtual machines" on a single computer; then you give access to individual "VM" to all your clients or employees. Busy executives like yourself love VMs because it saves them so much money on hardware; why waste money on 100 servers when you can just buy one and make it look like you have 100 computers! All your peons down in IT would probably recommend against running it on Windows8, but that's just because they like running complicated things like Linux. Windows 8 can handle VMs just fine, and - thanks to its colorful and touch-friendly interface - it's so easy to use that you can fire all those overpaid geeks and have your secretary handle everything for you. Think of the cost savings!

    I hope that helps; this is just one of those useful tips you'll find on the new Slashdot, now featuring shorter articles and nice big pictures. Not only has Slashdot has been redesigned to make all this computer gibberish more palatable and understandable for management and accounting types, but we've hidden all the comments from all those grumpy greybeards and nerds to make for a better C-level executive experience! Thanks for coming, and enjoy your stay!

  22. Support ReactOS on Kickstarter!!1 by jeditobe · · Score: 3, Informative
  23. About 2 Years Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would have been a wonderful alternative for businesses running WindowsXP now that Microsoft support is ending. But I think they are too late to the party. By the time this is ready for production deployment people will have already put other solutions into place.

  24. Re:Slashdot replaced... with nothing by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    why go nowhere?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  25. Re: boycott slashdot by richlv · · Score: 1

    in my timezone, one more hour. until then, please, find the person responsible for slashdot "beta" and fuck him/her. they very much need it :)

    --
    Rich
  26. sticking with windows 95 by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    its the best OS evar!!! http://i.imgur.com/1uNNZSp.png

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  27. testicularcancerdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    testicularcancerdot

  28. Re:Slashdot replaced... with nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, nothing is still better than Beta.

    Anyway, try http://www.soylentnews.org/wiki/index.php?title=SoylentNews

  29. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you are not a troll and this is a serious question: If you don't know what a VM is, don't try to use something like ReactOS. Start with something easier, like Ubuntu.

    If you are a troll, very well done.

  30. Toy project by ledow · · Score: 2

    Is it just me that sees ReactOS as a "lab" kind of software - it's theoretical and doesn't follow the outside reality.

    I can't see how it can ever catch up to, say, a lightweight virtualised Linux with Wine for those people who want to avoid a Windows licensing fee. The overhead of a full Linux is absolutely minimal on modern hardware while the hardware support and control is phenomenal.

    Sure, I imagine purists prefer a ReactOS but it's really only for the purists and always has been. Which is probably why Wine etc. get much more of a developer following.

    1. Re:Toy project by TuringCheck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the whole idea of ReactOS was to provide a binary compatible kernel so Windows drivers could be loaded unmodified.

      At the time ReactOS was started the lack of drivers was seriously hurting Linux. Meanwhile the situation has changed and drivers for Linux are no longer something unheard of.

      Also note that ReactOS and Wine share a lot of the higher level library code - in fact all libraries that are pure Win32 with no calls to native libraries.

    2. Re:Toy project by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      ReactOS might still be useful for all that XP-only software (that also requires XP-only drivers for a USB key or similar stuff) out there that's never going to be updated for a newer version.

  31. Question re: compatability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question:
    Is ReactOS going to be 100% compatible with Blue Screens, Malware and Viri?

    If not, then it probably won't run enough of the software that's available.

    It definitely has to pass Windows Genuine Advantage checks, I wonder how that will go....

  32. OS/2 Warp Clone by martiniturbide · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for help on an OS/2 Warp open source clone. Comments, suggestions or hate mail is welcome. Even flaming is considered good feedback on the OS/2-eCS community :) http://openwarp.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for help on an OS/2 Warp open source clone.

      Comments, suggestions or hate mail is welcome. Even flaming is considered good feedback on the OS/2-eCS community :)

      http://openwarp.blogspot.com/

      Alas I never could get OS/2 to install, had to set up a video camera and record the monitor while it was loading; then sneak up on the error frame by frame - was my video driver.

      Being before public Internet access I was stuck. Doom was telling me to play it just one more time; and I lost interest.

      OS/2 would be a very nice os to keep running, while never running it myself all around me were and was coming across as a much nicer OS than Windows was pushing.

      Oh ya; I'm make a great Admin, lots of server commands I'd like to try out :}

      I Wish you luck.

    2. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what place OS/2 has in this day and age, even as an exercise in creativity for an OSS implementation. I always liked WPS, and even used one written by an IBM dev for Windows 3.x back in the day... Today, there are several dock and WM implementations that are similar to OSX or OS/2 Warp. There are also REXX interpreters for most platforms today.

      I don't feel that most of OS/2 at its' core is really worth preserving as it is. DOSEMU does as good with the dos applications on modern hardware as OS/2 can, and windows has all but dropped a lot of that legacy. For GUI applications, other modern toolkits are easier to target and develop for than OS/2 offers. Not to discourage you, but I'd rather see efforts towards improving and mainstreaming some of the OpenStep bits over anything that could be re-implemented from OS/2 ...

      Don't get me wrong, I loved OS/2 for a long time, and until NT4-SP3 came out, it was my main OS. Windows 2000 was really the first version of windows that I used regularly outside the workplace. OS/2 had a lot of power, and was really awesome in many ways. I just feel that there's not much worth taking and preserving from it, when compared to other systems of today.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what place OS/2 has in this day and age, even as an exercise in creativity for an OSS implementation....I don't feel that most of OS/2 at its' core is really worth preserving as it is...OS/2 had a lot of power, and was really awesome in many ways. I just feel that there's not much worth taking and preserving from it, when compared to other systems of today.

      See, OS/2 as a desktop OS, I concur. I got a copy of OS/2 Warp 4 off of eBay for $5 on a whim (Weird Al said it best when he said "junk keeps arriving in the mail...from that worldwide garage sale..."). I installed it on a Thinkpad T61 because I was bored. Half of me says that the choice of a T61 was to give OS/2 the best shot of actually installing without throwing up and that OS/2 wouldn't have done all that great on more exotic hardware not made by IBM who, incidentally, did have an OS/2 driver selection for the laptop on its website. The other half is surprised that a decade-old OS was able to install just fine on the hardware I threw at it, detecting and working with everything but the fingerprint reader and the Intel 5300 802.11n wi-fi chipset. It was a fun experiment, but given that the only software I was able to find to run on it was the garden variety open source stuff you can get for literally every Linux ever, I didn't spend a whole lot of time on it.

      That said, I do know that OS/2 had a few places where it rocked. Notably, ATMs almost universally ran OS/2, and probably still would if it weren't for the requirement for the headphone jack to read everything for the blind community (and no, I'm not upset with the blind community or the legislators that made it possible for ATMs to be used by those with visual impairments - I'm genuinely glad that the problem was addressed). OS/2 is still running in your local Pep Boys; every PoS terminal running there runs OS/2. Microcenter might as well, actually, but I don't have confirmation on that. A friend of mine tells me that he runs OS/2 on a server and was serving up traffic that would max out most rack servers running LAMP (10,000 requests/sec for a PHP heavy forum), but using OS/2 and Domino Server (for web, not mail - he didn't hate himself) on a server with a quartet of 500MHz processors and a gig of RAM (maybe two, I forget).

      I don't know if I'd go all the way to "preserving it", but I do think that open sourcing the existing builds would be wonderful, as its object oriented implementation of...basically everything (including file metadata) could stand to be borrowed elsewhere in desktop OS world.

    4. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to osFree?

    5. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

      The community stills hangs out at http://www.os2world.com/

      There is a OEM version of OS/2 called eComStation, which has ACPI, AHCI and some updated drivers to run on newer hardware. But it is not like the company behind eCS covers all the needs for the platform and community.

      I think that OS/2 also deserves a shot on trying to be cloned and have an opportunity in the open source community. Sadly we don't have the resources to do this, but we need to build up a team of interested developers and supporters to do this.

    6. Re:OS/2 Warp Clone by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

      osFree (http://www.osfree.org/) was having a god moment some years ago, but sadly we lack developers to continue the project.

      What I think that it will be interesting is trying to clone the close source components that runs on top of OS/2 Warp like WPS, SOM and PM.
      - Presentation Manager - http://www.osfree.org/
      - SOM - https://sourceforge.net/projec...
      - WPS - XWorkplace and other OSS WPS classes

      I think we should focus first in only one component that can run over OS/2 Warp 4.5x or eCS to later continue and gain momentum for the rest.

  33. Solution for RSS? by psychonaut · · Score: 0

    Does that query string also work for the RSS feed? Because I don't browse Slashdot by visiting the front page; I use a feed aggregator and click through to interesting articles that way.

  34. Re:Hi by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    doesn't seem to like installing on ESXI 5.1 though

  35. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see your post isn't about ReactOS. So STFU, loser.

  36. Re:Hi by fizzer06 · · Score: 2

    Only one way to find out. Burn the Live version and boot it.

  37. Re:Hi by WhirledOne · · Score: 0

    VM means Voice of Music (http://www.thevoiceofmusic.com/).

    VM was a US company that was a major manufacturer of record changers, especially in the 1960's and early 70's. While VM did not sell a lot of phonographs under its own name, and thus may not be well-known to most Americans, it sold millions and millions of changers on an OEM basis to a lot of US manufacturers. Often these had customized elements such as tone arms and trim, and badged with the purchasing company's brand name, so as to appear distinctive to the end user.

    VM also produced tape recorders and tape mechanisms to be OEM'ed to other companies, but these never attained anywhere near the sales success of their record changers.

    What this has to do with Slashdot, I'm not sure. Oh, wait-- you meant another meaning of "VM". Sorry!

  38. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 10, 2014 @06:47AM

    Weren't you folks supposed to be on some boycott this week?

  39. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Note that so far there has been no admission of just how bad the beta is, only promises to implement missing features and fiddle with the layout. They don't think it is badly broken, that's the problem. It just needs polishing and some more features in their minds.

    The end is coming. The acknowledgement of the problems changed nothing, other than to stop the protests. It seems like most people are just waiting for the end now, consciously or not.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  40. Windows replacement by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    I'd recommend Pella, though, they are expensive. You could go with Curadco for a cheaper replacement.

  41. Re: boycott slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, some of us give a shit and don't want the site to die. Feel free to give up, but don't try to shut down other people's protests.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  42. It's not about saving money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He clearly just wants an open source platform to run his Windows-only applications on without relying on WINE, and doesn't get abandoned like XP is about to be.

    1. Re:It's not about saving money by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      Which at least is interesting in that iirc a lot of the codebase for ReactOS is WINE... They're sharing a lot of the API code... Though other than specific drivers and system applications, most programs run in later versions of windows with minimal issue... the most I've had to do for some older programs is manually install outside of the "C:\Program Files" path... generally, I do a C:\Legacy\* for older programs that don't work in the proper security context. Most work without issue.

      I've only seen a few specific instances of hardware where it was worth while to maintain an old version of windows in place.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  43. Re: Beta, unlike Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, ReactOS is beta, they're honest about it. Unlike Microsoft which ships randomly crashing Windows and that it's ready for business.

  44. I'm switching to this from XP in April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All I needed was evidence that audio worked, thanks!

  45. It's an invisible pink elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using the belief that this will happen to avoid using ReactOS is like using the belief that the second coming of Christ will solve global warming to avoid using solar panels.

  46. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Office 2003? Just like many open sores offerings, a decade late.

    1. Re:Not surprising by voss · · Score: 1

      Considering XP is 13 years old...being a decade late is not a problem :-)

    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, I'd still take 2k3 over open office!

  47. Please stop the denial of service spam comments by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The bitching about beta looks like it could drive me away from this place before I even see beta.
    WTF should we have to wade past hundreds of offtopic posts before we get to the comments about the article?

    1. Re:Please stop the denial of service spam comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bitching about beta looks like it could drive me away from this place before I even see beta.
      WTF should we have to wade past hundreds of offtopic posts before we get to the comments about the article?

      The bitching about people bitching about BETA looks like it could drive me away from this place before I even see BETA.
      WTF should we have to wade through BETA to get to the comments about the article?

    2. Re:Please stop the denial of service spam comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still haven't seen the beta yet? Then before bitching about people bitching about it, go to beta.slashdot.org and see how bad it actually is, then you might not need to ask why so many people are bitching about it the comments to every single story.

  48. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

    Oddly enough, this comment could be about ReactOS Beta, which has been promised for years now.

    Though I'm personally confident that the ReactOS Beta would be more welcolm among the /. community (aka, the "audience") than Slashdot Beta.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  49. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like the redesign, and the occasional redirection to the beta just makes life interesting.

    Geez, take it easy. You act like Slashdot killed your dog.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  50. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look, here comes the Slashdot beta "audience".

  51. Does this support Windows-only games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No? Then it's not a viable Windows replacement.

    I'd switch to some flavour of Linux in a heartbeat if it were possible to play Windows-based games on it.

  52. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by tragedy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I don't really like to contribute to the off topic threads on this any more, but I have to still throw in my two cents here. Dice did buy Slashdot. It's sad that it's been bought by an entity that doesn't seem to care for the community and the history of Slashdot the way we do, but they do own it.

    People have talked about boycotts and Slashdot alternatives and both of those are perfectly valid ways of attempting to influence Slashdot or just plain leave it behind. I'm wondering, however, if anyone has considered putting together an offer to Dice to buy Slashdot back from them? I've been using Slashdot since very close to the start (came in after Chips and Dips, but very shortly after that and lurked and posted as AC for a long time before getting an account). I have enough of an emotional investment in the site that I'd certainly be willing to throw a few thousand dollars into owning a piece of it. How many Slashdotters are there who care enough to do the same? Could we get together twenty thousand people willing to throw in a thousand dollars each and pay Dice the $20 million they paid for Slashdot? 200,000 willing to pay $100.00 each? Are there anything like that number of Slashdotters who really care? Anyone know what the best way to do that would be? Would a Kickstarter campaign be a valid avenue, or would it be better to create some sort of co-op or corporation and sell shares, or are there other ways a large group of people could get together to do something like this (in a form that might allow for a return on investment, but probably not)?

    Has anyone already proposed this? Is anyone already working on it? I would search comments for that, but Slashdot's search tools have been broken and near useless for years, even before Dice came along. Maybe if the community actually owned Slashdot, we could do something about the problems with Slashdot. Personally, I've always wanted an open API for Slashdot so that users can use whatever front-end suits their fancy and even download the entire Slashdot database (well, not the entire database, obviously, but the comments and articles certainly). Maybe, if we owned it, we could actually do something like that and everyone, including Dice, could be happy about how it turned out.

    It's probably a pipe dream, however. There's a lot of vocal complaint (enough to really damage enjoyment of Slashdot lately and I'm sorry to be adding to this thread for that reason), but I don't know if there's really enough of a "core" Slashdot readership left who would be willing to put in that much for our beloved site.

  53. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this whole beta-bashing thing has gone way out of hand. People are not being reasonable at all. The new layout actually looks better - more modern. People have actually been you know, working, on that because they wanted to get rid of the 90's look. Well that's fine to me.

    Sure there are some issues and bugs. Is that so bad?

    People are overreacting and making complaints about petty things. For worse, they do so about a platform that they can use for free.

  54. Re:Hi by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    I would swap all my mod points for a +6 funny here.

  55. Re:Slashdot replaced... with nothing by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    nope, still just getting a domain name placeholder. about equivalent to slashbeta

  56. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not exactly free... There are ads/banners.

  57. Keeps crashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am impressed by the blue screen of death and NT ish debug/loader screens but this is all I've ever seen of ReactOS none of these have ever worked over the years with VMware 6.5 and I'm not going to fork over the cash to upgrade to the latest and greatest just to see if its fixed or spend the kind of time to install an alternate VM product, burn live disks or even shut down my computer. I know this is harsh, lazy..etc of me.. but the question remains... why can't the live CD boot in VMware?

  58. Imperative for Dice by EzInKy · · Score: 0

    Cashing in on any name is Dice's vision. They need money, and they need it now!

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Imperative for Dice by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

      Let's talk!

      Signed,

      J.G. Wentworth

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  59. AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says old timer AC

  60. More than 400 bugs were eliminated? by danknight48 · · Score: 0

    More like, "More than 400 bugs were created due to poor programming, but, now we took the time to fix them, whilst creating a few more no doubt".

    As a programmer, i see the word "bug" as a direct indication of poor programming. When i create bugs in my code, its an insult to my own work and i cant sleep until its resolved, even if this means rethinking the logic completely.

    There seems to be a large gap between software with a few bugs, and those with endless amounts.
    If my software was unstable, buggy and i just left them like these guys, i wouldn't really call myself a programmer.

    Poor logic and lack of knowledge are usually what allows for 400+ bugs.
    If this is trying to get publicity for ReactOS, its only achieved awareness of poor programming and lack of acceptable internal testing.

    1. Re:More than 400 bugs were eliminated? by jeditobe · · Score: 1

      You are bad programmer, because you should know that not even single bugless software exists.

    2. Re:More than 400 bugs were eliminated? by danknight48 · · Score: 1

      You are bad programmer, because you should know that not even single bugless software exists.

      But 400+ is acceptable?
      You must be the best programmer in the world...

  61. Re:boycott slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your site is going to be made up of people who think that a constructive way to criticize a website's forum redesign is to spam every article's discussion until it's rendered unusable.

    Think about that. In the meantime, we, the silent majority on Slashdot who have no problems whatsoever with Dice working on a replacement for the shit that is D2, will consider starting the process and destroying your website, the way you have our's.

  62. Re:Hi by BitZtream · · Score: 0

    Did you try all hypervisor variations? Its not windows, using the Windows quirks mode probably won't work.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  63. Get over yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a protest, it's whining and it's stupid at this point, you complain about beta ruining things and then proceed to destroy any usability of the commenting system yourself. You certainly turned me against your position. Weren't you all supposed to be gone this week so the adults could have real conversation?

    Posted in the BETA.

  64. Re: boycott slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they are still redirecting us to the same horribly broken beta site even after they claim to have heard us, it seems they didn't actually get the message. Therefore it needs to be repeated over and over again until the message actually gets through to them, because if they persist with the beta they will lose a lot of the audience, the same audience that actually creates the content people come here to read.

  65. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    I tried following the link to check out the reactos website but received a Certificate error. Meh...

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  66. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was funny. for some reason, it made something click in my brain. the easiest way to define a Virtual Machine...a software-defined computer.

  67. What it wold solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I'm not sure what problem ReactOS solves. ... at best, ReactOS just saves me $140.

    It wold solve my >5K of software that won't run on any Windows past XP. It would solve my having to deal with Win 8 turning my new computer into a fondleslab. ...

  68. Re:Please stop the redirection to beta by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a good /etc/hosts file successfully drop beta.slashdot.org, while allowing Slashdot.org? Yeah, yeah, I know, ReactOS won't support /etc/hosts

  69. Not a good replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they remove the 400 bugs t will not be able to compete with real windows. Sorry

  70. Re: Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very well done indeed. I haven't seen a troll that good in a long time. My own personal best was when I suggested to slashdot that big business invented the internet. This n00b act is pretty hilarious though. Too bad his username gave him away. With all these slashdot beta posts, I was afraid the trolls had gotten boring while I was away.