Slashdot Mirror


Internet Shutdown Adds To Venezuela's Woes

Slashgear reports that many state-run internet links in Venezuela have been shut down by that country's government, as censorship efforts there step up along with widespread turmoil, partly in the form of widespread anti-government protests. The article begins: "Don’t expect one whole heck of a lot of tweets coming out of Venezuela in the immediate future as President Nicolas Maduro’s government has shut down the internet and select TV channels. Having shut down Twitter access for the area this past week, Venezuela’s state-run ISP CANTV has been cut in areas such as San Cristobal. This area is a regional capital in the west of the country and CANTV controls the vast majority of internet connectivity in the area. The Electronic Frontier Foundation made note that Venezuelans working with several different ISPs lost all connectivity on Thursday of this past week. Users lost connectivity to the major content delivery network Edgecast and the IP address which provides access to Twitter’s image hosting service while another block stopped Venezuelan access to the text-based site Pastebin."

194 comments

  1. This is true by Skatox · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm Venezuelan and I live in San Cristobal, my Internet service was cut 36 hours by my ISP (Cantv which is the biggest in the country and fastest, but it's owned by the goverment). This was due to prevent comunication because my city is one with the most prostest in the country, also, a the same time where it was shutdown, the Minister of Defence annouced militar strategies to control riots in the city. People are using Twitter and Zello app, to comunite and to know what's happening because traditional media is not publishing this events.

    1. Re: This is true by Skatox · · Score: 1

      Because you don't live in San Cristobal. If you read the article, this happend in San Cristobal and some zones in Tachira.

    2. Re: This is true by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      I'm glad you can speak for all users of the internet across Venezuela, very impressive.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re: This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know much but existential quantifier does not imply universal quantifier. There may be different ISP's and who knows how many access points there are into Venezuela.

    4. Re: This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is affected. Usually it's some zones for those who use CANTV. If you have another ISP or live in a Maduro-supporting zone you'll be OK.

      Outside of Caracas, other ISPs don't have much of a foothold, so shutting down CANTV will kill a lot of the internet access. In Caracas you probably use cable instead.

    5. Re: This is true by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      It depends on location and ISP. I'm guessing your ISP isn't CANTV.

    6. Re:This is true by ComputersKai · · Score: 1
      welp, i guess this is one not-so-secretive crude way to "quash" protest

      just turn off internet access in stead of bothering with censorship

      even if it means your country will be severely disadvantaged and all that...

    7. Re:This is true by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      How are you using twitter if you don't have internet access?

    8. Re: This is true by Ateocinico · · Score: 1

      San Cristobal was isolated from the internet. But the rest of the country suffers the blocking of certain sites like NTN24. But the use of TOR and other measures is spreading.

    9. Re: This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say your internet was cut off... By posting on the internet?

    10. Re: This is true by cslibby · · Score: 2

      You say your internet was cut off... By posting on the internet?

      Please note, he said it was cut off for 36 Hours. He posted after the cutoff ended.

    11. Re:This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What you're telling me is that while my country is at peace, we should make a deliberate transition to an internet that is not at all controlled by government so that it cannot be used to control us if the government becomes a problem for the people it governs.

      I'm sorry for your issues and I hope you the best. Thanks for sharing your experience for us to learn from. If I could help in some way, I would.

    12. Re: This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if I have Internet or not, if I'm running into troubles to find toilet paper. Do you have plenty of it?

    13. Re: This is true by SalvadorSpataro · · Score: 1

      It is true. I live in San Cristobal too. Internet was shutdown. Zello was blocked. Twitter images were blocked.

      You do not have to believe me.
      Check Zello on twitter. @ Zello . They issued and update on Android to bypass the block and updated unblockable versions are on review for ios and bb10.

      Twitter confirmed the block:
      http://news.softpedia.com/news...

    14. Re:This is true by CodeBuster · · Score: 2

      How is it that Maduro and his allies can continue to persist with economic policies so patently stupid that even an undergraduate student of economics at any American or European university can predict and explain their inevitable failures? I mean bare supermarket shelves in a country with some of the largest oil reserves in the Southern Hemisphere? That's humiliating. How can Maduro possibly explain this with a straight face other than to admit that currency controls and confiscation of private property for redistribution to his supporters is not the way forward to economic prosperity? Don't they realize that the American and European financiers are laughing at them even now? What a bunch of balloon heads. Why don't Venezuelans living abroad, especially economists, call them out? A public shaming of Maduro and his cronies might achieve what street protests and violence have so far failed to deliver, a return to economic sanity in Venezuela.

    15. Re:This is true by johanw · · Score: 1

      Because those economic policies are dictated by different premises. Not "maximise the profit for the big companies and their managers" but "maximise the living standard for the poor". Not everyone likes that of course, perhaps he has underestimated the way the rich and the US are trying to sabotage his policy.

    16. Re:This is true by CodeBuster · · Score: 2

      Who is hurt most by empty shelves at the supermarket or shortages of even such basic items as cooking oil, toilet paper and milk? Is it big business or the poor? As much as Maduro and the Chavistas would love to blame the US for "sabotaging" their socialist paradise, they have none but themselves to blame for the obvious harms visited upon the economy or the sufferings of ordinary Venezuelans in whose interests they claim to be acting.

    17. Re:This is true by johanw · · Score: 1

      And whose fault are those empty shelves? The US and the powerfull rich in Venezuele are actively sabotaging the country. Kilobug explains it nicely here: http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

      And for other examples, look at the economic blockade of Cuba by the US. The country is not threatening at all to the US but they have a different economic religion than the US has so the regime has to go.

    18. Re: This is true by xelah · · Score: 2

      Because this sort of politics is not based on using rational understanding of the world to make good governmental decisions to achieve some goal, it's based on group dynamics. Look at how the US and 'saboteurs' are blamed for everything, and how people are prepared to attack others for mere membership or association with the other group. It's about orchestrating an us and a them, creating insiders to fight and to hate for you to defend your tribe, so the powerful can keep themselves there.

      It seems like some people can't see politics or government any other way. Look at the partisan hatred in the US, or those who respond to climate change arguments by ignoring the science and concentrating on defining 'scientists' as a group and questioning their motivation. It's everywhere, from more benign forms to the extreme, from biology teaching in schools to traditional religious wars to nazism and the soviets, and extreme politicians always make it their weapon.

    19. Re:This is true by Skatox · · Score: 1

      Read my comment, it was shutdown for few days, but Twitter images are blocked but you can bypass this using a VPN

    20. Re:This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the country of the oil corporation coup. The one where the military that participated in the coup did an about face and put Chavez back in power. The cutting of Twitter access is not part of any struggle for hearts and minds. The instructions to the protesters are distributed through social media. That has been clearly documented by US reporters is the past. So cutting internet access keeps protesters from getting their marching orders.

      I think the Venezuelan government action is weak. It would seem that less crude measures could provide opportunities for the government. Masquerading as protester leadership or participant to have protesters basically march themselves into arrest would seem preferable. The US government has experience doing this. Don't the Venezuelans have professional "anarchists" to physically join the protest and start destroying property so the police can club and arrest everyone except the anarchists? Venezuelan government employees haven't been reading the news.

    21. Re:This is true by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Clearly "the rich" should pile more goods onto those shelves to be sold at a loss. If they refuse, then soldiers should point guns at them to force them to do so. If entities from outside the country subsequently refuse to continue shipping in goods, after all the "rich" people's money is gone, clearly the UN will have to be empowered to force these outside companies to ship more goods, at a loss, into Venezuela.

    22. Re:This is true by alantus · · Score: 2

      How is it that Maduro and his allies can continue to persist with economic policies so patently stupid that even an undergraduate student of economics at any American or European university can predict and explain their inevitable failures?

      Stupid or genius? Depends on the goal.
      If its to improve the economy and life quality, plain stupid. If its to stay in power forever, genius!

      1. Ruin the economy, make people poor and easy to manipulate
      2. Create many social programs to "help" the poor, the poor depend on the state
      3. Confiscate and nationalize everything, the state must run as much as possible, have everyone working for the state
      4. Make it clear that they have to support and vote for you, or they lose their job and "hard earned" state benefits
      ...
      6. Profit! You get all the votes from the poor, and most people are poor now :)

      This strategy worked well for Chavez, and now his golem, Maduro.

      Read this enlightening interview with the ex CEO of PDVSA (the oil company):
      http://globovision.com/articul...
      For the Spanish-impaired, a google translation is quite decent:
      http://translate.google.com/tr...

      Here is an interesting bit of this interview, just in case the page is removed (because Globovision is now controlled by the government):

      "Look General, you still don't understand the revolution! Let me explain: This revolution aims to make a cultural change in the country, change the way of thinking and living, and those changes can only done being in power [in office]. So the most important thing is staying in power to make the change. We get the political floor from the poor: they are the ones who vote for us, that is the reason for our speech of defending the poor.
      So, THE POOR MUST CONTINUE TO BE POOR, WE NEED THEM LIKE THAT, until we can achieve a cultural transformation. Later, we can talk about economy of production and wealth distribution. Meanwhile, we must keep them poor and with hope."

    23. Re:This is true by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 2

      How can Maduro possibly explain this with a straight face other than to admit that currency controls and confiscation of private property for redistribution to his supporters is not the way forward to economic prosperity?

      State-controlled media, which is all most people have access to, have kept pumping propaganda about how the downturn is due to an "economic war" waged by the capitalists to damage the government. Over 15 years the govt has managed to create a polarized climate where, if you disagree with the government, you're lying b/c you're a CIA shill. The poor are inclined to believe the government not just because of the 24/7 propaganda, but because they're uneducated and the government very overtly gives them minor aid (while screwing them behind their backs using mechanisms they don't understand). It's a tragedy.

    24. Re:This is true by schnell · · Score: 2

      he has underestimated the way the rich and the US are trying to sabotage his policy.

      Of course it's somebody else's fault, preferably the US. I mean, it's just not possible that Chavez and then Maduro were running a terribly unsustainable economic model where they got very popular by subsidizing consumer goods with massive oil profits and then as soon as oil prices went down the country was exposed to the real economic world, is it?

      Here's a pretty good explanation of the situation economically.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    25. Re: This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep up the fight!!! We support you in Sweden!!! Viva la revolucion!

    26. Re:This is true by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Do you not realise this is exactly what the rich do to gain control over everything. What good are full shelves in only a minority can afford them. What should a country be something that only serves the minority driven by economics or something that serves the majority. Don't ever think that psychopathic minority will ever stop plotting scheming or manipulating to gain total control the ability to lord it over the minority. That is exactly what they are paying the US government to do. They pay those campaign contributions to create a government that will do their destructive bidding across the globe not just in the US and create chaos where ever they touch, in the end if they can not control it they will attempt to leave it in chaos whilst emptying the US treasury into their pockets.

      Will they succeed in taking over Venezuela, pretty obviously no but they want stop them from trying or leaving it in a self destructive civil war. So why the lack of patience why no long term view because the rich and greedy want their money and power now, fuck future generations, as far as the current rank of psychopaths are concerned if future generations are stuck with a burnt out hulk of planet so the fuck what.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re:This is true by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And whose fault are those empty shelves? The US and the powerfull rich in Venezuele are actively sabotaging the country.

      Whose fault were the empty shelves in the USSR from late 70s onwards? There were no "rich" in the USSR to sabotage the country.

      Heck, empty shelves seem to be a persistent attribute of all regimes that think that they can solve poverty by taking full control of economy and just redistributing things. Either there's a lot of sabotage going on, or the model just doesn't work. Occam's Razor makes me lean towards the latter.

    28. Re:This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing his Cantv access is for landline DSL but his cell phone has a Telefonica (Movistar) line and it might not be blocked. There's a lot of people sending tweets from their cell phones, especially with pictures showing the amount of people at the protests, or different aspects of each "event".

      According to a recent article (in Spanish), since the protests started, on Feb 12th, . Telefonica has no fixed lines in VZ, everything goes through the mobile cell nextwork.

      While the Gov't can certainly order Telefonica to block certain internet services, or internet access in its entirety, it's not as quick and easy as it is for the Gov't-owned cantv (which also has a cellular network, Movilnet).

  2. Coming soon to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-04-21-ObamaChavez.jpg

  3. And while Maduro murders Venezuelans... by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:And while Maduro murders Venezuelans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who still pays attention to what Joe Kennedy has to say? The guy lost his marbles years ago.

  4. Man Shot To Death For Texting During Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  5. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That doesn't really work for you if you are in the damaged / isolated area.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  6. Poor hams by mattr · · Score: 2

    So.. ham radio. Radio Club Venezolano. National Emergency Network. Satellite Dishes. ISS. Free hosting. Google... Facebook... friends.
    There are probably a bunch of ways to get information in/out of Venezuela, at least in a one-way burst.
    On the other hand http://www.yv5rcv.org/ tweets pane shows "Hmm, an empty timeline. That's wierd." Ouch.

  7. Venezuela thinks it is Madagascar by js3 · · Score: 2

    Only Madagascar can shut down everything

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  8. Communists by snilloc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They're Communists. This is their bag. Don't put communists in power. Full stop.

    1. Re:Communists by johanw · · Score: 1

      They'renot American cowboy-capitalists. That's something else as being communists, althoug it might be difficult to see for some rednecks who can only think one-digit binary.

    2. Re:Communists by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be out selling the newspaper right now? They're not going to let you sit at the lit table on campus and discuss the finer points of dialectical materialism with the pretty coeds if you don't sell your weekly quota of newspapers.

    3. Re:Communists by snilloc · · Score: 1

      Well, when you start building communes, seizing the means of production, and shutting down dissent and any political opposition, I'm pretty comfortable using the "communist" label.

  9. a very bad decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know why incumbent governments ever think this is a valid why to curb public sentiment. In every single situation where they try to do this to control the population it does the exact opposite and incites them to get off their lazy bottoms and rebel. They must not realize that cutting off internet access also cuts off pornography which means you have a lot of angry frustrated men with some serious aggression to work out roaming the streets. It is the worst move I can imagine.

    1. Re:a very bad decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment ever :D

    2. Re:a very bad decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also thinking, "OH I get it. Now it affects me. This government has to go!"

    3. Re:a very bad decision by tsa · · Score: 1

      When your government shuts down the internet you're sure they are there for themselves and not the people.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:a very bad decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with curbing sentiment. The protesters get orders through the phones via twitter or have in the past. This cuts that communication of orders. I think it is crude and clumsy but I don't believe it has anything to do with influencing opinion. To the contrary. It is sacrificing some public goodwill in order to block some disruption.

    5. Re:a very bad decision by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Those darn hooligans and their twitter. It's good to see somebody here willing to type common sense! Harumph!

  10. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It senses any attempt to do so as damage and routes around it.

    Yes, but with less bandwidth.

    I use a private ISP (Intercable) and while my ping to www.google.com usually sits around 100 ms, now it's usually at 800 ms or so.

    Now it might be backbones shutting down or it might just be that everyone is on youtube and twitter trying to get news and clogging the links.

    There's also a lot of people recommending VPN apps for their computer or phone to get around censorship, others using zello or other apps to get news and communicate, and so on.

    Funny this is what gets talked about rather than Maduro kicking CNN out of the country, the dead protesters or the armed 'non-government' supporters atttacking them. But hey, this is /. I guess.

  11. Ask Slashdot: What Does Edward Snowden Deserve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting
  12. AMA by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 2
    I'm from Venezuela. Ask me anything. :)

    Most of what you may want to ask is probably already covered here, tho: http://caracaschronicles.com/2...

    BTW, full Internet shutdown seems to be in effect only in San Cristobal. In most other places, you can bypass the blocks by using the Tor Browser.

    1. Re:AMA by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Ok you naysayers, this is what /. is good for. Along with recycled jokes and car analogies of course.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:AMA by johanw · · Score: 1

      So, that's some prejudiced site. To quote:

      "Was Maduro fairly elected?

      No. Maduro’s party, PSUV, relies heavily on state resources to fund and execute their campaigns"

      Does not looks any worse than the US president election, where those who can get the most money from their followers (who expect something in return) gets elected. At least Maduro got the majority of votes, unlike required in some other "democratic" systems.

    3. Re:AMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you left off "Additionally, many irregularities were reported prior, during and after the election: coercion, threats and manipulation of the voting machines." So if that's true then "No" is correct.

    4. Re:AMA by Ardyvee · · Score: 1

      What do you think of the situation? Do you think that this time protesters will finally justify the lives lost or will they walk away with nothing (or worse)? Do you think the government will further escalate the arms race? Do you think the protesters will match the use of force?

      --
      I don't care if I'm wrong. I only care about everyone obtaining something from the discussion.
    5. Re:AMA by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1
      There is a BIG difference between effective fundraising for your party and outright stealing from the STATE to fund your campaign. On top of that, Maduro moving up from VP to President after Chavez died, broke several major laws in the run-up to the election, including one that explicitly says he couldn't campaign from office. Also, Maduro barred segments of the population where he was weak from participating in the election (Miami residents, 30K+ and 18-yr olds, 100K+). On top of that, the Govt barred the oppo candidate from TV, both covertly and overtly.

      And as the other reply stated, you completely omitted the part about irregularities.

    6. Re:AMA by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1
      This is very hard to predict. Foremost, I think there's no going back to the status quo. Either Maduro leaves office or is forced to make major concessions (tho some argue that the radicals in his clique simply won't let that happen), or the govt just plain completes its transition into overt military dictatorship with death squads and all.

      Yes, the govt has shown every intention of escalating. Barring a military revolt, protesters simply don't have the weapons to match the level of force, but some are already becoming desperate and this could very well turn into a civil war soon.

    7. Re:AMA by johanw · · Score: 1

      I don't see ANY difference. In both cases it can be called corruption. What you call fundraising I call bribing the potential president / senator / congressperson (many companies support both candidates just to be sure, good for them the US has effectively a 2-party system so they don't need to bribe more candidates). In the US case, it always means that the extreme rich and big companies can buy their influence. Remember what happened to that congressman that wanted to shorten copyright life? The industry kicked in, called in their bought politicians and got him kicked out.

      Now someone is doing the same AGAINST the extreme rich and big corps and they start screaming.

    8. Re:AMA by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. If Obama had even tried to fund his re-election campaign using the White House budget, he'd be in prison or worse right now. During the campaign, Maduro literally forced ALL TV and radio media to transmit pro-government events and messages FOR HOURS EVERY DAY. No joke.

  13. Follow the money by Livius · · Score: 0

    Who would benefit most from disruption of Internet service in Venezuela?

    (Hint: Not the Venezuelan government.)

    1. Re:Follow the money by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The Venezuelan regime treats every problem as a nail to be hammered, so it THINKS the Internet shutdown will help them. And if the OAS and the rest of the Latin American governments don't see this as "crossing the line" and start treating Maduro like the tyrant he is, the regime might as well be right.

      I have no idea of what other party are you implying might benefit? Is Google expanding Fiber to South America?

    2. Re:Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bet Obama's doing it. Venezuela did offer Snowden citizenship.

    3. Re:Follow the money by hjf · · Score: 2

      The rest of the latin american governments, except Chile and maybe Paraguay are controlled by "socialists". Argentina has expressed "full support" for Maduro's governent. Ridiculous, really.

    4. Re:Follow the money by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I bet Obama's doing it. Venezuela did offer Snowden citizenship.

      No, Obama is responsible for climate change and the Kennedy assassination.

      Get it straight.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hitler was elected. Being elected doesn't mean you aren't a tyrant.

    6. Re:Follow the money by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rest of the latin american governments, except Chile and maybe Paraguay are controlled by "socialists".

      Colombia and Mexico are both run by right-of-center governments (at least by Latin American standards). Both are firmly anti-Maduro, especially Colombia, since Venezuela has actively supported the FARC guerrillas operating inside Colombia.

    7. Re:Follow the money by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Getting elected in a country governed by a constitution and the rule of law shouldn't allow you t do anything you want. The problem in places like Venezuela and Ukraine is that the elected seem to believe that getting a plurality of votes legitimises any and all future actions.

      Venezuela's democracy seems.paper thin to me.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Follow the money by tsa · · Score: 1

      Janoekovitschj also seemed to have forgotten that yesterday.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:Follow the money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, if their election process at least ensures that the one to be prez gets the plurality of the votes they're already a step ahead from some other countries...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Follow the money by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      http://www.borderlandbeat.com/

      Mexico is not run by the government. Mexico's government uses a corrupt military and police force in an attempt to make a show of running the country, but it isn't working.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Follow the money by psmears · · Score: 2

      The Venezuelan regime treats every problem as a nail to be hammered, so it THINKS the Internet shutdown will help them.

      I was in Egypt when the government shut down the internet for several days to prevent protests, prior to the ousting of Mubarak. It was a very short-sighted move: to a great extent, the only thing keeping a lot of people off the streets was Facebook - take that away, and people's only option (for information and/or entertainment) is to go outside...

    12. Re:Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting elected in a country governed by a constitution and the rule of law shouldn't allow you t do anything you want. The problem in places like Venezuela and Ukraine is that the elected seem to believe that getting a plurality of votes legitimises any and all future actions.

      Venezuela's democracy seems.paper thin to me.

      The government doing what every it wants, as long as the majority approve, is precisely what democracy is.

      Democracy and freedom are not the same thing.

    13. Re:Follow the money by johanw · · Score: 1

      He was elected in a deeply divided country with 2 almost equal groups opposinbg each other. That's almost guaranteed to lead to instability.

    14. Re:Follow the money by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention his election was highly suspect and not under fair conditions, just like the FAQ I posted states.

    15. Re:Follow the money by kasperd · · Score: 1

      if their election process at least ensures that the one to be prez gets the plurality of the votes

      Be careful about cause and effect.

      In some countries you may become president because you got the majority of the votes. That would be typical in a democracy.

      In other countries you may get the majority of the votes because you are the president. That is definitely not a democracy.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    16. Re:Follow the money by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Hitler was elected. Being elected doesn't mean you aren't a tyrant.

      Saying Hitler was elected was a misnomer. The Nazi party had party members monitor the voting booths to ensure everyone was voting "correctly". They were basically stand over men.

      Not that I disagree with your point but Hitler is an example of how democracy is subverted, not how democracy can still make mistakes. George W Bush and Tony Abbott are better examples of that.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:Follow the money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And yet in other countries they count long enough 'til either the intended result comes up the way it should or some judge will decide.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Additional Cuban troops arrived too by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    https://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/...

    Maduro wants no possibility of an Arab spring or Ukraine revolt

    1. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What I find quite interesting is how the media is *really* pushing hard on anything Ukraine related, but is damned quiet on anything relating to Venezuela.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Maduro wants no possibility of an Arab spring or Ukraine revolt

      Cutting off the Internet didn't save the pre-revolution Egyptian Government and it won't save Maduro either. It's a sign of weakness.

    3. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by ruir · · Score: 1

      They are quiet until they are sure of the outcome. They dont want to broadcast a possible revolution live.

    4. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find quite interesting is how the media is *really* pushing hard on anything Ukraine related, but is damned quiet on anything relating to Venezuela.

      In the US, it has always been like this. Ukraine is connected to European issues, and ex-Soviet conflicts. Venezuela is connected to South America, and it is only known for producing drugs or vacations.

      (Incidentally, I met a guy from Colombia once... he said that he avoided planes whenever possible, because everything gets searched every time he goes anywhere, and that's not just in the US, but in Europe, or, .... So next time that you think TSA is hard on you....)

    5. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, at the moment the Ukraine revolt is far more bloody and destructive. At the moment.

    6. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      To be fair, at the moment the Ukraine revolt is far more bloody and destructive. At the moment.

      Really? Last I heard 60-70 odd people dead in the Ukraine, and over 300 dead in Venezuela.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      In the US, it has always been like this

      That's great, but I'm not in the US. I'm in Canuckland, and it's not just the US media, it's the international media. I'm decently fluent enough that I can read media in 4 other languages, can't speak it but that's okay. It's the same from Japan to Europe, to the Americas. Unless it's the South Americas in which case it's even quieter.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Additional Cuban troops arrived too by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's basically over in Ukraine, with a grand total of 81 dead (which includes police and special forces, not just protesters). There may be further violence in southeast, esp. Crimea if they decide to separate, but that would be a separate affair. Most violence was contained to a single square in the capital so far, incidents outside of it a few and far between.

  15. Hi, jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like this new slashdot look isn't going away. What are some other news sites with equivalent stories that I can read instead?

    1. Re:Hi, jack by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You could log in and be on Classic in one jiffy!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Hi, jack by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Don't lie. I used my stopwatch, and it takes 3.18 jiffies to get logged in.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Hi, jack by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      soylentnews.org
      pipedot.org

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Hi, jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!!!

      (this is for the lameness filter, and I am unsure if it is needed).

    5. Re: Hi, jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://soylentnews.org/

    6. Re: Hi, jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.soylent news.org

  16. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Funny this is what gets talked about rather than Maduro kicking CNN out of the country, the dead protesters or the armed 'non-government' supporters atttacking them. But hey, this is /. I guess.

    If you care then you're seeing that stuff already. This, however, is news for nerds. I, for one, welcome our on-topic overlords. So long as they don't Beta me.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    or in countries where the authoritarians demand an 'internet kill switch'.

  18. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by dugancent · · Score: 1

    How do you route around damage if you have one way in and one way out?

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  19. Pay Attention by The+Cat · · Score: 1

    Because the more mergers our bought-off government allows, the closer we will be to an off-switch here.

  20. He's s shill probably by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you look at his account, it is brand new and this is his only post. I've noticed this kind of thing on various sites when there's a story on Venezuela that is critical of the government or that talks about the problems happening. People who have never posted before pop up and say it isn't true, or blame the US, or whatnot.

    Now maybe they were longtime readers who just happened to suddenly decide to participate, but I kinda doubt it. I think it is a bunch of pro-government types that are out to shill. Could be officially sanctioned, could just be a bunch of nationalist types (which all countries seem to have) that are doing it of their own accord.

    Seems to be happening fairly often with Venezuela stories though, so one way or another I think this is a concerted effort on the part of some people, and not just happenstance.

    1. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Welcome to Communism. Totalitarian leader. Oppressive regime. Total economic collapse. Continuous propaganda internal and external.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:He's s shill probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Under capitalism, man exploits man.

      Under Communism, man exploits man, and they censor the Internet.

    3. Re:He's s shill probably by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      with venezuela, the kneejerk "blame america" is pretty swift and is standard

      when venezuelans started protesting last week, they kicked out some american diplomats in response

      http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/17/...

      either:

      1. the usa is pushing magic buttons in washington dc and making venezuelans revolt (and not the actual issues and problems about venezuela the people revolting articulate)

      2. it's a tired bullshit cynical ploy that, unfortunately, still works with large enough of the population that it is still worth doing

      or... i dunno, as an american, maybe i have dark magical powers over venezuela i have not fully explored

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:He's s shill probably by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You act as if any of "our" regimes would act differently when the protests start. Rest assured, the first thing that will be shut down is communication between protesters.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:He's s shill probably by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Communism. Totalitarian leader. Oppressive regime. Total economic collapse. Continuous propaganda internal and external.

      Err! were does it state that Venezuela politics is communistic? although the major parities do have those type of leanings but basically the people do have the right to vote with the voting age starting at 18. If you stated that the political party has leanings of Fascist-ism then I may agree with you however the truth is much more complex. If you look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V...> Wiki you will find out that "Venezuela is among the most violent places on Earth. In Venezuela, a person is murdered every 21 minutes." This is mainly due to the high crime rate and rampant corruption.

      I will leave this to the citizens of Venezuela to elaborate further.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    6. Re:He's s shill probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err! were does it state that Venezuela politics is communistic? although the major parities do have those type of leanings but basically the people do have the right to vote with the voting age starting at 18.

      Yeah, so what? How is voting incompatible with communism?

      Communism is collective ownership of all and unrestrained Democracy is collective ownership of all through the vote.

    7. Re:He's s shill probably by kasperd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Under Communism, man exploits man, and they censor the Internet.

      I think that is not communism but rather corruption. I suspect communism might be so prone to get corrupted, that many people cannot tell the difference between communism and corruption.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    8. Re:He's s shill probably by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      join the club!

      at this point in the US's history, I can't tell the diff between capitalism and corruption.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:He's s shill probably by johanw · · Score: 0

      The magic buttons of the US are $$$$ and the promise of lucrative contracts (read: more bribes) for a new ruling caste when the old one, which is not US friendly, has been removed. That's the same since the 1950's in Latin America so why should it be dufferent now (or why would the Venezuelan government think it would be different now)?

      The US POV is probably: the current Venezuelan government offered Snowden asylum soit has to be destroyed.

    10. Re:He's s shill probably by johanw · · Score: 1

      The Brits were discussing of blocking BBM when they had riots some time ago, but they ended before a decision could be made.

    11. Re:He's s shill probably by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Informative

      No under capitalism no one is exploited. Values exchanges for value and nobody does anything forcibly against their will. It's only when you add government activity beyond the protection of private property that you get exportation. Suddenly there all these regulations and tax requirements and other things that require people to do things.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    12. Re:He's s shill probably by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People never seem to understand is Communism just exchanges one currency for another, instead of trading gold or dollars of people just trade political influence and favors. Naturally favors and influence are much harder to account for the dollars, so the tendency is going to be of course toward corruption as transparency becomes nearly impossible.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    13. Re:He's s shill probably by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No under capitalism no one is exploited.

      What colour is the sky on your planet?

      Values exchanges for value and nobody does anything forcibly against their will.

      Sure. And people can just decide not to eat for prolonged time whenever no acceptable way to generate income is available. </sarcasm>

      It's only when you add government activity beyond the protection of private property that you get exportation.

      You mean, government activity like protection of lives? Protection of freedom? Or protection of any other human rights?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:He's s shill probably by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Sure. And people can just decide not to eat for prolonged time whenever no acceptable way to generate income is available.

      If you want to eat offer something of value to someone with food. Truth is the number of people in the US who could not afford the calories basic nutrients they need to survive even is vanishingly small. Sure that might mean a diet of whatever canned vegetable is on special this week, beans, fortified bread and water; eaten cold because you have no resources with which to cook it. Pretend whatever you want but most people could easily meet their needs if they thought about it.

      Not eating when you are unwilling to do anything for your supper is not exploitation, demanding someone feed you is.

      You mean, government activity like protection of lives? Protection of freedom? Or protection of any other human rights?

      I would argue freedom and private property are synonymous. Please try to define freedom without it coming down to being able to have things that are yours to do with as 'you like' or a have a place to do in what 'you wish'. Protecting private property is again pretty much the same thing as protecting lives. Nobody should be able to just kill you and take your stuff, instead they should have to offer you something you will accept in exchange for it. Nobody should be able to come and kill you for practicing your faith in your home, its your home; etc. "Human rights" needs a defined as well, that means something different to pretty much anyone you ask.

       

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    15. Re:He's s shill probably by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      You mean like during the Early Industrial revolution?

      It's comments like yours that make people dismiss libertarians as disconnected from reality.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    16. Re:He's s shill probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only when you add government activity beyond the protection of private property that you get exportation

      You mean a non minimalist government is necessary for a net positive balance in international commerce.

    17. Re:He's s shill probably by kasperd · · Score: 1

      at this point in the US's history, I can't tell the diff between capitalism and corruption.

      I see your point.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    18. Re:He's s shill probably by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Whatever the system of government, the best thing to limit corruption is a free and unbiased press. Any form of government is subject to getting out of hand and/or being corrupted.

      Governments have long known how to stifle the press, and they're learning now how to stifle even communication between people who are using the internet.

      The main problem we have here in the U.S. is corruption - at all levels of government. We don't even have real Capitalism; we have crony Capitalism, and I personally lay the blame at the feet of the press. They just won't hold anybody accountable who is on their side politically. Our republic is long gone and we may never see it again.

    19. Re:He's s shill probably by guises · · Score: 1

      That's a great line, very quotable. I will probably reference you (without attribution) at some point in the future.

    20. Re:He's s shill probably by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      venezuelan government just does what it did last time.

      but yeah of course it's USA's fault that the people are using dollars since the domestic currency is so fucked.

      obama really doesn't have to care either way..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    21. Re:He's s shill probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to eat offer something of value to someone with food. Truth is the number of people in the US who could not afford the calories basic nutrients they need to survive even is vanishingly small. Sure that might mean a diet of whatever canned vegetable is on special this week, beans, fortified bread and water; eaten cold because you have no resources with which to cook it. Pretend whatever you want but most people could easily meet their needs if they thought about it.

      You paint a wonderful image of the capitalist dystopian race-to-the-bottom, where unskilled workers toil all day in exchange for three cans of beans and access to the company can-opener.

      The reason unfettered capitalism produces an unhappy society is that capitalism is based on exploiting scarce resources for personal benefit. The resources are scarce, so they are necessarily held by a minority of the population. The minority thus hold power over the majority, who are forced to compete for access to scarce capital (ie: jobs). This allows those in possession of the capital to retain almost all of the value created by labor. eg, Walmart earns a gross profit of $58,000 per employee, while paying those employees an average of $25,600. Apple makes a gross profit of $803k per employee, while paying them around $50k.

      So, the market for labor is intrinsically inefficient, and inefficient markets are the bane of capitalism, even in utopian theory. In fact, the whole purpose of governments, in capitalist utopias, is to enforce efficient free markets, in which your counterparty can't lie to you, or cheat you, or otherwise deal unfairly. That means government has to do something to enforce a fair market for labor, even though this means acting against the best interest of their corporate overlords.

    22. Re:He's s shill probably by aled · · Score: 1

      join the club!

      at this point in the US's history, I can't tell the diff between capitalism and corruption.

      Oh, but there is a difference. As much difference as you are willing to pay for.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    23. Re:He's s shill probably by aled · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Communism. Totalitarian leader. Oppressive regime. Total economic collapse. Continuous propaganda internal and external.

      My country only had have capitalists non democratic governments with those characteristics until now but YMMV.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    24. Re:He's s shill probably by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Sure. And people can just decide not to eat for prolonged time whenever no acceptable way to generate income is available.

      That was largely the way it worked back when America was great and there was supposed to have been plenty of opportunities that we can't seem to find now. Hunger seems to be a perfect motivation to try harder. But as it is now, hunger is the government's fault because they didn't give you enough food stamps in order to sell half for booze or drugs and feed yourself with the other half.

      You mean, government activity like protection of lives? Protection of freedom? Or protection of any other human rights?

      How can you claim it is protecting freedom when it costs something on the order of 10k just to legitimately open a business in government regulation and permits alone in some places today? Is that like how snooping on every citizen is also protecting your freedom and rights against unreasonable searches and seizures?

      Here is your problem. Obviously he wasn't talking about protecting your freedom or whatever shady words you want to contrive into this. He was talking about over regulation and the unnecessary involvement of government that creates a limiting burden on the people who attempt to do more then work at McDonald's or Burger King flipping whoppers for a living. Why people like you think laws like no spitting on the side walk is some valiant effort to protect everyone's freedoms or lives or human rights or something. There is such thinking that there can be too much of a good thing and often the government falls right in line with that. But as an example, Warfarin- a common blood thinner given to humans is used as a pesticide for rats and mice. So a good thing can be too much.

      So how about you use that cognitive reasoning ability and actually think about what you are replying to before doing so. Maybe it would be better is you actually think a bit about what it is that you believe in concerning your worldviews as they seem to be completely jaded from reality.

    25. Re:He's s shill probably by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Go back to your cave Ogg. Pound on some rocks with your stick. The tribal leader will send for you when the council has decided your fate.

    26. Re:He's s shill probably by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In capitalism, corruption lasts until someone comes along with something better.

      In Communism, corruption lasts until the corrupt are unable to kill everyone with a better idea.

      With any luck, you can learn to see the difference before one becomes the other.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    27. Re:He's s shill probably by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I linked to a factual and reasonable lecture about Marx below and the lefties modded it down. Which is behaviour I see repeated very often when dealing with Marxists/Communists/Feminists. The video by Stefan Molyneux can be viewed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      Can't keep the truth down, you misanthropes!

    28. Re:He's s shill probably by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      the venezuelan system doesn't work, and the people are organically angry about that, with the venezuelan govt

      it has nothing to do with the usa

      i don't know how or why you frame this as the usa doing something it did in the cold war, when all of the angry venezuelans on the street right now are in the street because of how fucked up the system is in venezuela is right now, because of something their own govt is screwing up. nothing to do with the usa at all

      you don't really have any understanding of the situation in venezuela. you have the same tired old cold war thinking that the propaganda by the venezuelan government deploys. which, because as the existence of people like you show, still works as propaganda

      but it has nothing at all to do with reality. the cold war is long over

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    29. Re:He's s shill probably by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0

      communism is supposed to be about fairness and generally equal sharing.

      captitalism is about polarity: you can't have a capitalistic society unless you have poor and rich classes. those in power want to keep it that way, too.

      the corruption factor in capitalism is far greater, I think. the unlimited funds to the maximally greedy folks is too great to ignore. otoh, communism does not have to be a corrupt system. a kibbutz, for example, is a sharing community and I'm not sure they would be considered examples of corruption.

      I don't think its possible to have a balanced capitalistic system. it does not want to be balanced. in fact, if you try to balance it, it becomes a commune by definition!

      in the US, at least, we continue to propagate the lie that anyone can become rich and the new upper class. its a LIE. it rarely happens. those at the top keep themselves and their cronies at the top and its very much a closed club. they do NOT take new applications and if you were not born in the right family, of the right color and right religion, you are generally not going to be upwardly mobile.

      at least with communism, you won't be pennyless and homeless if/when you get a big medical illness. this is a huge reality for us in the US and it should be the #1 reason why we should abandon our current system and migrate toward somthing a bit less 'polar'.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    30. Re:He's s shill probably by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The majority of Venzuelans voted for the government they have today. They stood idly while Chavez rewrote the constitution "for the common people". Now they get to enjoy the benefits.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    31. Re:He's s shill probably by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      communism can work on a small scale, a few dozen people or a few hundred even. But as soo nas we start talking about large scale communism it without fail will collapse

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      captitalism is about polarity: you can't have a capitalistic society unless you have poor and rich classes. those in power want to keep it that way, too.

      Wow, you've really swallowed that propaganda whole.

      Let me ask you this: if the average worker by the end of a productive career owns roughly 1 per-capita share of the means of production, is that capitalism, or communism?

      Capitalism is the means of production owned by the people (maybe inequitably, but that's not a requirement), while communism is the means of production owned by the government "in the name of" the people.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:He's s shill probably by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      ok and if we close down wallmart or apple, all those people have no jobs at all. Does someone who puts up a large amount of risk not deserve to be paid for doing so? Why would "rich people" even open a business if the only thing that is going to happen is people bitch and moan that they dont get a cut either. Why should a rich person put up billions in the case of apple to bring new products to market without being able to actually make money? what reason would they have? Every "rich" person out there could closeall their businesses right now and live happy for the rest of their lives, this is a fact.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    34. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      But as it is now, hunger is the government's fault because they didn't give you enough food stamps in order to sell half for booze or drugs and feed yourself with the other half

      Well, your argument falls apart there, since it's hard to imagine someone to whom the government isn't giving enough food stamps. Somewhere around 2011 we passed the threshold. More people receive means-tested government assistance (like food stamps, but this excludes retirement programs) than pay income taxes. Can a democracy with more takers than makers survive? I suspect we share an opinion on that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      You do realize the during the early industrial revolution people flocked to those jobs because they were so much better than what they had before, right?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    36. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? Surely those Slashdot stories about government kill switches for smart phones have nothing at all to do with America! It's just a coincidence.

      But if we can stave off the communism here, maybe it won't come to that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    37. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      When you nationalize the primary industries of your nation, congrats, you're a communist state. Economic collapse is now just a matter of time.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    38. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      I wish a was more optimistic about America being on the same path, if at a slower pace. Still, we have time left to choose a different way.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    39. Re:He's s shill probably by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I was being facetious on that point. What I was trying to say is that when people got hungry, they did something about it, now it seems like they complain until someone else does something about it for them. It's the difference between when life was good and now where everyone wants to recount their misery.

      And please keep in mind, when I say everyone I'm not really talking about everyone. There are plenty of people who fail and work harder just to succeed. There are plenty of people who will be more than happy to do for themselves. Those people are not typically the ones you expect to see on the gov dole demanding more and more and more though.

    40. Re:He's s shill probably by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I live in the US and I see what capitalism is, at its worst. we are the leaders world-wide in abusing the capitalist concept.

      what I see is that NOTHING is owned by The People anymore. its owned by corporations and those are the new government. we traded elected officials for unelected ones.

      at the end of the day, I'm just as poor as I was the day before. growing wealth is a lock-out market and nearly none of us will die much richer than we were born. this is the failure of the so-called american dream.

      whether a corrupt government owns my shit or some corrupt corporation, the lower classes are never allowed to rise and the middle class is being actively dismantled. find the movie 'inequality for all' (its on the bay) and then come back and rant about how good and proper capitalism (in the modern west) is.

      its a 100% failure and its not fixing itself any day soon!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    41. Re:He's s shill probably by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      link for the movie I referred to:

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt22...

      find it on TPB.

      watch it and tell me that capitalism is AT ALL better than any other system. in modern times, its a complete and total failure for everyone but the ruling classes.

      just like every other system out there!

      of course, those at the top LOVE making bank on the backs of the rest of us. for them, its a godsend!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    42. Re:He's s shill probably by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      If you want to grow wealth, the secret is simple. Live below your means. It's difficult for many to do.

    43. Re:He's s shill probably by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of corruption in capitalism, but as long as most people are reasonably well off, people won't revolt. People only start caring about corruption when they are impoverished.

    44. Re:He's s shill probably by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      What is this capitalism you speak of and where does it exist?

    45. Re:He's s shill probably by mjwx · · Score: 1

      No under capitalism no one is exploited.

      Sure, those company towns saw no-one exploited.

      It's not the GP's fault, he's just repeating what the magic libertarian unicorn told him.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    46. Re:He's s shill probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Esperanto works on a small scale. It isn't really saying much.

    47. Re:He's s shill probably by Third+Position · · Score: 1

      The majority of Venzuelans voted for the government they have today. They stood idly while Chavez rewrote the constitution "for the common people". Now they get to enjoy the benefits.

      Well, sure. But then, we can assume that Venezuelan democracy isn't so different from our own. Most likely they voted for it not because it was wonderful, but because it was the least bad choice on the ballot. Just because you get to vote, doesn't necessarily mean you get to vote for what you want.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    48. Re:He's s shill probably by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A former Stasi officer recently said in an interview, if they had had the means to spy on your citizens that are employed today, the GDR would still exist.

      Food for thought.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:He's s shill probably by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      But as it is now, hunger is the government's fault because they didn't give you enough food stamps in order to sell half for booze or drugs and feed yourself with the other half.

      Blah blah blah are you people STILL beating that dead horse? It was vanishingly rare when it happened at all, and since EBT cards have been in use, it's been nonexistent. That is, for over 15 years now. Give it a rest.

      How can you claim it is protecting freedom when it costs something on the order of 10k just to legitimately open a business in government regulation and permits alone in some places today?

      What are you on about? I can open a sole proprietorship anywhere in the United States for $0. If I want to do business under a name other than my own, I can do that in my state for $7. I can even submit the form online. Rates are similar in most states. That's if I run it out of my house, which is perfectly legal (and a tax writeoff to boot). If I want an office in the nearest city, it's $50 for the occupancy permit if it's less than 12,000 square feet or $100 for anything over 12,000 square feet. That's hardly unusual, either. Pointing out the prices in Belle Aire is not doing your argument any favors.

      Why people like you think laws like no spitting on the side walk is some valiant effort to protect everyone's freedoms or lives or human rights or something.

      Because when that law was passed, it literally was an attempt at protecting lives. Sidewalk spit spread tuberculosis and diphtheria. The fact that it was unenforceable didn't mean there wasn't a reason for it.

      You anti-government people piss me off. You're always all or nothing. How about we try for GOOD government, which is precisely what we need. We certainly can't exist with no government, not in our current numbers, and we've tried every possible bad government. Maybe we should have good government, for once.

    50. Re:He's s shill probably by kasperd · · Score: 1

      this is the failure of the so-called american dream.

      To most people the american dream is just a dream - hence the name. How large a fraction need to be able to live the dream in order for the rest to be able to keep dreaming? Is it one in a million people or perhaps only one in a hundred million? Is the american dreal really an ideal to strive for? You can work hard throughout your life, if you are lucky it pays off, and you become rich. Everybody else is just working hard without ever getting any richer. This is the american dream in a nutshell.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    51. Re:He's s shill probably by lgw · · Score: 1

      Over half of Americans own stock now. Yes, there's a serious political corruption problem, nearly as bad as the 1880s, but we got through that and we'll get through this. Meanwhile, the "owning class" is gradually becoming "most people".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    52. Re:He's s shill probably by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

      They haven't taped your mouth shut yet, have they?

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  21. Cuba...redoux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maduro, the new Nikita Castro ;) What a fool, they will cut his balls off and drag him through the streets before this is all over. Wanna be Commie dictator will get his.

    1. Re:Cuba...redoux by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      He exhibits all the authoritarian zeal, and none of the charisma, of his predecessor. It's fairly obvious what the outcome will be.

  22. dont think it can't happen in your country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all governments will do this if they feel threatened

    the 99% need a communication network that is out of the control of governments and corporations, and the way to do this is with mesh networks that are easy enough to use that "normal people" can do it without the help of geeks

    we aren't there yet but some people are working on it, and hopefully a truly "public" internet is in place soon, one that no government or corporation can shutdown not matter how badly they want to

  23. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...like the US?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Pulling the plug at the ISP leaves you no place to route. Pulling the plug at the backbone might allow you to route within the portion of the internet on your side of the plug, except that your ISP may very well pull the plug at the same time.

    You can try this yourself on a small scale. Go to your modem/router, and pull the plug. Unplug ALL the wires going into it. Few modems, if any, will continue to route WIFI - but even if it does, what are you going to get on your local network? It's highly doubtful that you can connect to Slashdot to refute my post. Those who are using an iPhone or similar to browse are ultimately using a wired connections somewhere between their phone and Slashdot. The government knows where that wired connection is, and government can cause that connection to be unplugged.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  25. Beware of the media manipulations by Kilobug · · Score: 1, Informative

    So, a handful of people (the recent "protests" were in the number of hundreds, maybe a few thousands at most, nothing of a big and massive popular protest, as Venezuela had in the past, with both opposition and chavistas massing hundred of thousands, even millions) violently protest, attack public infrastructure (city halls, metro stations, hospitals, ...). People are killed - not by the police, but by the protesters, most of the death are _chavistas_ not opposition.

    Then, the opposition start a massive media manipulation, with photos and videos of repression taken from all around the world (Chile, Spain, Greece, ...) pretending it's the Venezuelan government doing it. All the western media jump on that, and without a single second of critical thinking, claim Maduro is repressing.

    And now, some governmental Internet links have problem functioning. It must be Maduro doing censorship ! From France, I've troubles reaching many Venezuela government sites, like VTV (state TV) website, or CanTV (public operator) website. Why would Maduro censor his own sites ? Especially VTV ! And why would he cut CanTV, while it's just one operator among many, especially on mobile Internet (and most people in Venezuela, especially among the opposition, have a cell phone) ? It just doesn't make sense.

    Couldn't it be that the violent protests damaged the infrastructure ? Couldn't it be that the Venezuela opposition, which is _very_ rich (they have the 1% among them, and they get massive funding from the US), is doing some DDoS or similar attack on CanTV ? Couldn't it be a sabotage, from opposition workers inside CanTV, or from abroad ? I should remind you that during the 2003 oil "strike" in Venezuela, the US corporation that handled the computer systems of PDVSA (state oil company in Venezuela) sabotaged them, just to add to the chaos and create the conditions for a military coup.

    Given all this past and all those facts, shouldn't we wait until the exact reasons of the (very partial) shutdown of CanTV services are known before yelling "censorship" or "dictatorship" ? Because that's exactly what the Venezuelan extreme-right wants us to do, and it's not the first time they would manipulate media and perform false flag attacks to do it (remember the events of 2002, where the opposition killed people, blamed Chávez to justify a coup).

    1. Re:Beware of the media manipulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the specifics regarding this supposed shutdown.

    2. Re:Beware of the media manipulations by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Wow. You can see all of that from your vantage point in France. I imagine it must be gratifying to have the capacity to have things so well figured out with so little actual information flowing your way.

  26. USA needs to go in an fix things by greggster · · Score: 1

    We should march in there and setup democracy just like we did for Iraq. Then we gun down "terrorists", and finally make friends with the government as our Oil Tankers are pulling up to the docks.

    1. Re:USA needs to go in an fix things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US does't march into our southern neighbors silly. We use gunboats.

  27. All of their problems are part of the one issue by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    That government has to go... Chavez and those he brought into power are a cancer.

    And they can either cut it out or rot.

    Up to them to decide and do the deed one way or the other. But I'm done feeling sorry for people that don't fight oppression in their own backyard.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:All of their problems are part of the one issue by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      Not easy to fight oppression when the other side has all the media, all the money, all the weapons. It can be done, but the cost of lives would be in the thousands at least and will likely leave a permanent rift and hate among venezuelans. I would like to avoid that, and the OAS is supposed to be in place for exactly that reason.

    2. Re:All of their problems are part of the one issue by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Such is the price of liberty.

      Pay it gladly. It is worth every drop of blood.

      Understand, the forces that wish to enslave mankind are without remorse. We have wild eyed religious fanatics. We have self interested tyrants that just want all the whores they can stuff into a gold plated building. We have fanatical ideologues that wish to use humanity as lab rats in their social experiments. Etc...

      And when you face such people reason means nothing. Appeals to morality mean nothing. Appeals for mercy mean nothing.

      They understand nothing but naked force. Its unfortunate... but they will not stop.

      So if you wish to be free... There is no other way.

      It is how the United States became free. We did not compromise. We did not waver. We defied the Crown and fought until the Regulars were killed or driven out of the country.

      Then they came again in 1812... and we drove them out again. They burned the white house... struck right at the heart of our power. But we did not waver.

      The correct choice for Ukraine is probably to split the country between east and west. Let the eastern half be Russian or whatever they want. Let the western half be free.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  28. censorship long-term effects by lkcl · · Score: 1

    it will be interesting to see and learn what the long-term economic and social effects of these censorship attempts are. the effect of censorship is not just going to cut off the "pruhtesters", it'll cut off researchers from access to papers and equipment, businesses from the customers and suppliers, and, additionally, cut off government departments within venezuela from effective communication with each other in the day-to-day operations. looking further ahead i look forward to seeing whether other governments find this lesson useful or not.

    1. Re:censorship long-term effects by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They don't need businesses talking to their suppliers. The suppliers might figure it out.

      "Profits are soaring on record sales! Please just ship in more goods! The check is in the mail."

    2. Re:censorship long-term effects by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Venezuela imports everything and local currency is pretty much worthless on the outside.

    3. Re:censorship long-term effects by esaulgd7195 · · Score: 1

      The govt probably doesn't intend the censorship to be long term, just until "the protest is quelled".

  29. Days of the Dictator are Ending by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    False information and no information to people in a country (ala the old Pravda in the USSR) as a means of achieving a politically repressive end is coming to a close.

    Cuba, Ukraine and Venezuela are the proving grounds to show that governments can no longer keep the free will of the populace from exerting itself.

    But the old dictators will hold on until they are thrown out. It could still take decades in some places where the dictatorship is effectively run by the military and they are the true power, like N. Korea.

    The trend of history is clear over the last 150 years as countries have moved to freer and freer elections. The king is dead.

    1. Re:Days of the Dictator are Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False information and no information to people in a country (ala the old Pravda in the USSR) as a means of achieving a politically repressive end is coming to a close.

      Fox News.

    2. Re:Days of the Dictator are Ending by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There's always Rachel Maddog to save us.

    3. Re:Days of the Dictator are Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you're repeating right wing speech without knowing the facts (or you do?).
      Maduro has won elections least that a year ago, how could you ever think that he is a dictator?
      They have a very clean election system..

      See some hard numbers by yourself on how the country was transformed the las 14 years.
      Your problem people is news media, the support corporation's power and misinform.
      Opposition in Venezuela has tried everything, they have lost elections, failed a coup l'etat and now they try to destabilize the gov.

  30. one whole heck by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    one whole heck

    I was only expecting half a heck.

    How many shedloads is that?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  31. Hurry Oliver! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Someone call Oliver Stone, he'll know what to do!

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  32. Utopia ? by m0s3m8n · · Score: 2

    But hasn't Venezuela been turned into a socialist utopia by taking over and tossing out all the bourgeoisie. I see no reason for the government to need to censor the people who clearly benefit.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:Utopia ? by johanw · · Score: 1

      They were not tossed out so now they're making trouble.

    2. Re:Utopia ? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      The bourgeoisie were not removed and retain a great deal of power outside of the government they used to own. It is a difficult situation where the poor try to setup a modern democracy with a more old-school marketplace without the established powers locally or abroad helping; in fact, they do things to undermine success. It's not good for multinational exploiters and power brokers like the IMF to have free countries succeed.

      It is pretty much human history, the ones with power will not be civil about relinquishing it and want nothing to change because it was going great FOR THEM. Many under those conditions become conservative, not by ideology but for self interest... to the point where they can drown out actual conservatives and give them a bad reputation for being self centered psychopaths...

      Any success is met with a new group of middle class people in the middle between protecting their gains and wanting more; who can easily be distracted and subjected to even more propaganda. To me it seems akin to middle management... they are wannabes, easy to control and feel like they belong with the administrators who look down upon them. The better they do the more resistance to progress forms - causing a somewhat stable boom/bust political cycle only if they are lucky... Then you have middle and upper classes fighting against the poor. Class warfare is as old as... well... the human sized brain.

      A modern problem with openness is that is a double edged sword; historically, it was a big threat to the elite but increasingly it is becoming a powerful tool for them as well. I often wonder if democracy is possible anymore as social sciences make working control schemes that leverage open communications. You don't need to censor to gain similar powers anymore. So, if you were trying to do the "right thing" how do you counter an enemy with more mind weapons? It's a Brave New World (book reference intended.)

  33. IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, "The Venezuelan regime" (democracy, he won the election with more than 50% of votes) recibed Argentina support (support from another goverment that won the elections with almost 54% of votes). Why it is ridiculous?

    Notice that also did it:
    - Brazil (goverment electer for more than 55% of votes) (http://www.telam.com.ar/notas/201402/52714-el-pt-de-brasil-condeno-la-desestabilizacion-del-orden-democratico-y-manifesto-su-apoyo-a-maduro.html) ,
    - Ecuador (almost 57%) (http://elcomercio.pe/mundo/latinoamerica/correa-protestas-intentan-desestabilizar-gobierno-maduro-noticia-1710381)
    - Bolivia (62%) (duck duck it)...
    - Uruguay (53%) (duck duck it)...
    - etc

    Take into account that this numbers are huge, specially because in this countries people choose between several political parties. Even so, most of them have been accused of being dictatorships.

    Socialists? Yes. A bit of populism too.

    Latin american expressed support because of two reasons:
    1) They are plagued by private media who give their full and explicit support to economic liberalism (even some of them supported military dictatorships in the past). And many actions of these governments protect low income people and try to impose restrictions to the very few economics groups that controls the countries. In other words, private media want to overthrow the government.
    2) Latin america has a lot of natural resourses. and don't want to be the next middle East. (Do not be surprised of the support given by Russia and Syria).

    There were many twits from opposition politicians encouraging violence. Many post showing photos from other places or times disturbs described as located in Venezuela, looking for national and international support. It is very easy to prove with sites like www.tineye.com (see for example http://albaciudad.org/wp/index.php/2014/02/la-primavera-photoshop-medios-y-tuiteros-opositores-utilizan-decenas-de-imagenes-de-represion-policial-en-otros-paises-para-alegar-que-ocurren-en-venezuela/).

    Please, critically analyze and inform yourself before posting.

  34. Climate change arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, those who question that CO2 is a pollutant and that man is causing global warming have voulmes of science (nipccreport.com) to prove the sun, volcanoes and ocean currents, etc. go through natural decades long cycles and are the real cause of climate change, both warming and cooling. Those pushing AGW are the ones ignoring science and making it political (carbon taxes, shutting down clean coal power plants, etc.)

  35. And by "hundreds of people"... by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    ...you mean hundreds of thousands, as numerous pictures from Newspapers and Twitter have shown.

    The rest of your post is of similar accuracy.

    Now why don't you tell us how Euromaidan in Ukraine is "just a handful of extremists"?

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  36. Slashgear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashgear? Really? Is that even a real website? I thought all they did plagiarize other websites and make money off it.
    Not unlike, wait never mind...

  37. Re: the government has the absolute right to do wh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello,
    The citizenry in Venezuela have only themselves to blame for what is all honestly quite justifiable by the government. If they had behaved in a peaceful, civil manner, none of this would have been necessary and the government would not have needed to shut down the Internet, or anything else, for that matter.
    People need to behave in a civil, respectful manner, otherwise there will be consequences. To be quite honest, would it be so bad if this kind of thing happened here in the US? Perhaps we would have less terrorism and more civility if Obama used his powers for a good cause instead of bowing to so-called Freedom-loving rabble.

  38. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    If you think the US is an authoritarian country you don't understand the meaning of authoritarian.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  39. Poor people are the majority by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The poor majority doesn't need internet and can't have it. As long as the poor back the government and will take action, as they did in the past - it's not the same situation.

  40. Interesting outcome by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt taught us that when the government cuts Internet, people have to gather to exchange ideas, and that fuels the protests.

    But I bet the situation in Venezuela is not comparable. The government is legitimate and won election that everyone recognized as fair. The only concern at that time was the opposition attitude, which was not obviously ready to accept the election outcome. Therefore I suspect the current protests are manipulated. Cut Internet access, and the manipulation becomes a bit harder.

    If I am right, Internet restriction will not worsen the situation. If I am wrong, it will throw more and more people in the streets.

  41. Re:The Internet cannot be shut down. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Authoritarian? No. Not really. It's far more insidious.

    The Commies forbade you to speak your mind. We're quite a bit further ahead. We already learned that it doesn't matter at all if people can speak, as long as nobody is listening. We mistake the right to say the truth with having to say the truth. Just because the media can tell you how it is doesn't mean that they will do so. I hope I needn't point out that our media are dependent on advertising income.

    Well, do you think banks pay for those double page ads that nobody really notices because they want to attract customers? Do you think various companies that happen to have "accidents" suddenly feel the need to polish their PR image by buying prime time ads? But don't take my word for it. Wait for the next catastrophe to happen, then check which media report it, whether and how they report it, and watch their ads for a bit. Maybe you will spot a curious coincidence.

    The fun thing is that Communism IS the opposite of Capitalism. In Communism, the state controlled the industry.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks to the exploitation and harsh treatment done by USA to Latinamerica since ages. So many dictatorships backed by the US to do away with comunism has only made it bigger and stronger.