Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Revive a Giant 30,000 Year Old Virus From Ice

bmahersciwriter writes "It might be terrifying if we were amoebae. Instead, it's just fascinating. The virus, found in a hunk of Siberian ice, is huge, but also loosely packaged, which is strange says evolutionary biologist Jean-Michel Claverie: 'We thought it was a property of viruses that they pack DNA extremely tightly into the smallest particle possible, but this guy is 150 times less compacted than any bacteriophage [viruses that infect bacteria]. We don't understand anything anymore!'"

121 comments

  1. Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This virus will be our undoing. The end is nigh!

    1. Re:Welp by GloomE · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

    2. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Humanity is like a big baby left unsupervised, licking, poking, touching everything, because it can. Sooner or later, the fork ends up in the toaster or it drinks the dish washing liquid.

    3. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There would be no toaster or washing up liquid if Humanity was not like this...

    4. Re:Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I dunno about humanity, but the scientists obsessed with this is headed toward a socket with a butterknife. Will we have anothe contestant for the Darwins?
      Scientist revives bacteria that kills him could be a winner this year.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:Welp by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

      I appreciate your optimistic. However, I feel that you are on an extreme side because you said "nothing can go wrong"; where as, the OP is on the other side because of "The end is nigh!".

      My concern is not about right now, but it is about what if. Reviving something that has gone for a long time from the world would open up many different events that could be both good and bad because everything has an impact on one another. The impact could be very little and seems to be none, or it could be very significant. Right now, we know nothing. If the impact is good or neutral, there is nothing to be worried about. What if it is bad and significant even though it could be extremely rare? It is similar to that you have a group of people. You need only one bad apple in the whole crowd to cause trouble. This situation is similar to it -- only one bad impact could cause a serious trouble.

      Therefore, I would be a bit concern but not panic. In other words, I will have to keep an eye on what they are doing and will not completely trust what news they produced; however, I do not protest them to stop what they want to do...

    6. Re:Welp by Matheus · · Score: 1

      Zombies.

    7. Re:Welp by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Scientist revives bacteria that kills him could be a winner this year.

      If memory serves, one of the people who helped resurrect the Spanish flu died, sadly, as a result.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    8. Re:Welp by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I disagree strongly. Panic now. Avoid the rush later.

    9. Re:Welp by Enfixed · · Score: 1

      What kind of butter knife are you using that A) fits into the socket and B) has an extra prong to complete the circuit? Although, now that I think about it perhaps your analogy is correct in the sense that the virus is essentially harmless...

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    10. Re: Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh...alternating current + feet on ground = complete circuit.

      Square plug sockets can fit a butter knife into them. Quite common ...beyond the USA.

    11. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMMMM.. dish washing liquid....

    12. Re:Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Standard butterknife, go for the bigger opening. Circuit is complete @ ground where your knees/feet are on the floor.
      Give it a try! Let us know how you come out.
      Its SCIENTERRIFIC!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    13. Re:Welp by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      oooh ooooh like Mary Curie you mean???? errrmmm didn't she win a Nobel prize, twice? once for physics and then for chemistry?

    14. Re:Welp by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your optimistic.

      I appreciate your optimism.
      I appreciate you're optimistic.

    15. Re:Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      And a posthumous Darwin for lack of good sense in matters of safety.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    16. Re: Welp by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Define good sense in matters of safety keeping in mind these facts: 1. That certain kinds of matter emit radiation on their own accord was discovered in 1896. 2. The election was discovered in 1897. 3. The term radioactive was coined by Marie and Pierre Curie in 1898. 4. In 1932, the FDA started a crackdown insisting on proof of the safety and effectiveness of radioactive health products. 5. Hindsight. 6. The GAIAE (General Authority of Islamic Affairs & Endowments) has issued a fatwa, (an official Islamic ruling) to warn Muslims against a Mars mission based on health and safety concerns.

    17. Re: Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Good damn thing they werent inventing rocket fuel or theyd have been barbequed on the spot.
      A part of good sense is the ability to at least attempt precaution when dealing with the unknown. Well call it survival instinct. Those without it are on their way out before they can breed further members of the species with poor traits. Good sense isnt necessarily indicative of high intelligence and visa versa, but isnt exclusive of it either. We can call it foresight.
      As for your attempt to degrade Islam in order to draw attention to yourself, Id point out, religion is a closed system with its own rules relegating wisdom to higher powers and isnt relevant here. Unless ,of course, Curie spilled isotope on herself whilst on her prayer rug.
      Perhaps her discovery was more chance than skill. It happens. Even the dopiest hillbilly can win the lottery.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    18. Re: Welp by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      From thinking that the atom was indivisible to actually splitting atoms within a span of some 40 years, all the people involved in the pioneering work were idiots of the first magnitude. Oh and Pierre (Nobel laureate) and Marie Curie (twice a Nobel laureate) did breed, their daughter Irène Joliot-Curie was awarded (shared with her husband, Frederic Joliot-Curie) the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1935 for the discovery of artificial radioactivity but clearly, the entire family was a bunch of hillbillies because they did not realize that radiation was dangerous to human health and failed to take proper precautionary measures.

      As for your attempt to degrade Islam in order to draw attention to yourself, Id point out, religion is a closed system with its own rules relegating wisdom to higher powers and isnt relevant here. Unless ,of course, Curie spilled isotope on herself whilst on her prayer rug.

      It is relevant because those muftis are saying pretty much the same thing you are and if humanity had subjected itself to what you are selling, we'd still be living in caves, hunting during the day and cowering in fear during the night, eating uncooked food and going around naked! Christopher Columbus would never have discovered the Americas (both the North and the South), Australia and the Antarctic wouldn't be on our world map (and the rest of the world wouldn't be on the world map of the Native Americans and the Aborigins) and the Christians and Muslims would have wars over whether the earth was flat and the center of the universe (what the Church said) or if it was round and revolved around the sun which itself was hurtling through space (what the Quran says).
      Also, if talking against these muftis and their idiotic fatwa somehow degrades Islam, then by that same logic every time I condemn the imbecile mullahs and muftis over fatwas glorifying the Taliban/al-Quaida, I somehow degrade Islam. Rest assured, despite what the fundamentalists on either side will have you believe, that is not the case. Islam, the religion, and the mullahs (along with their fatwas) are not the same thing!
      And Marie Curie was an atheist so her being found on a prayer mat would be a shocking revelation. Read some history!
      Oh and for the record, I am a Muslim so your 'outrage' at the perceived degradation is misplaced!

      Perhaps her discovery was more chance than skill. It happens. Even the dopiest hillbilly can win the lottery.

      Yes and based on chance discoveries, she was awarded the Nobel prize twice implying that the Nobel Committee was comprised of idiots.
      Einstein was an idiot too...he said in an interview that Hendrik Lorentz and Madam Curie were two individuals he respected the most.
      Of course with your wisdom and intellect you know better about how to judge another person's intellect and the rabble who praised and still praise Madam Marie Curie for her accomplishments are a bunch of hillbillies.

    19. Re: Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Yes, I see you are a fanboy and even pretending to be Muslim for added drama.
      Perhaps you will win a Nobel someday, If Obama can get one, I expect they will be dispensed from slot machines soon.
      It should provide some comfort that your misplaced emphasis could show others all your thoughts are only memories of what you have been told.
      Your regurgitation of mantra is as convincing as regurgitation on the ground.
      Go practice on your mama or your professor, THEN, come back with something besides This is the education that I paid for and if you contradict it, Im gonna get mad and stomp my feet, proving for once and for all I am right because I have a majority behind me. (like any good lemming)

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    20. Re: Welp by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Yes, I see you are a fanboy and even pretending to be Muslim for added drama.

      Fanboy of what exactly?
      Kazmis are a sub-branch of the Syeds, people who can trace their ancestry directly to Ali and Fatima (the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet of Islam and the daughter of the Prophet of Islam), so pretending indeed.

      Perhaps you will win a Nobel someday, If Obama can get one, I expect they will be dispensed from slot machines soon.

      Hopefully some day I'll write an algorithm to rule all other algorithms and win a Nobel prize for that, one can hope.
      Which field of science was Obama awarded the Nobel prize for? Also, you failed to take into account Einstein's respect for Marie Curie.

      It should provide some comfort that your misplaced emphasis could show others all your thoughts are only memories of what you have been told.
      Your regurgitation of mantra is as convincing as regurgitation on the ground.
      Go practice on your mama or your professor, THEN, come back with something besides This is the education that I paid for and if you contradict it, Im gonna get mad and stomp my feet, proving for once and for all I am right because I have a majority behind me. (like any good lemming)

      My my, where to begin...having lived in a Muslim country most of my life and being in comp-sci, Marie Curie was never a part of my curriculum...
      Regurgitation? Maybe...still as valid as the first time I said it...you still have to come up with a valid counter argument which you repeatedly fail at. Personal attacks don't count (you aren't very good at those either to be honest but meh.
      From the sounds of it, you are getting very flustered at failing to defend what you evidently very strongly believe in. Also, I belong to a minority sect in my country (in terms of religion) and on top of that, not a lot of people share my beliefs about how everyone should be equal under the law but yup, I have always enjoyed the support of the majority. Keep assuming, it's rather hilarious (in how ridiculously wrong you are).
      Just out of curiosity, what do you have against education?

    21. Re: Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigger opening on an outlet is the neutral, smaller is the hot.

    22. Re: Welp by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Not here it isnt.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. Pray or Prey? by JimSadler · · Score: 5, Funny

    just hope that this bug is not designed to attack large, warm blooded, animals.

    1. Re:Pray or Prey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As even the summary stated quite clearly, it's only able to attack amoebae. Mind you, that does adequately describe the reading comprehension skill level of some slashdotters.

    2. Re:Pray or Prey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, so now we'll have virus ridden shoggoths roaming the streets.

    3. Re:Pray or Prey? by halfEvilTech · · Score: 2

      well the assume anyways - other giant viruses are the same in that they only attack amoebae but this giant virus is also unlike anything they ever tested. The basically set the permafrost in a container and let it go to work. They didn't try other organisms. so their assumptions are partially based on the work of prior giant viruses.

    4. Re:Pray or Prey? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I volunteer any member of Congress to go mano a mano with the virus. Friggin bunch of disorganized slime that they are, it might find some valid targets.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Pray or Prey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As even the summary stated quite clearly, it's only able to attack amoebae.

      And scientists are never wrong...

  3. 30,000 year old nope by dgp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Revive a 30,000 year old virus, they said. It'll be fun they said.

    1. Re:30,000 year old nope by MaksimS · · Score: 5, Funny

      What could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:30,000 year old nope by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Funny

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Hey, are my eyes supposed to be going black?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:30,000 year old nope by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Hopefully it won't result in some form of mutant giant man-eating amoeba like things, or something. Of course a virulent microscopic blood-borne disease organism would be bad too.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is not dead which can eternal lie,
      And with strange aeons even death may die.

    5. Re:30,000 year old nope by wallsg · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing that popped into my head also. What was the name of that show?

    6. Re:30,000 year old nope by Eloking · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi novel aside, I really wonder what are the risk that a 30k years old virus would be able to survive in our environment. I'm no microbiologist, but am I wrong to think the virus is not equipped to infect any "modern" living organism?

      --
      Elok
    7. Re:30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-files. You're thinking of the Black Oil.

    8. Re:30,000 year old nope by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Nah man, if we had only known about the existence of giant amoeba-eating viruses at the time those movies would have ended much sooner.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:30,000 year old nope by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      30,000 years is a blink in the evolutionary time line. While it might have a few novel antigens, it should be mostly harmless.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:30,000 year old nope by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the giant virus didn't cause the problem. ;)

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    11. Re:30,000 year old nope by steelfood · · Score: 2

      It'll be fun

      Famous last words.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    12. Re:30,000 year old nope by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Purity.. but not to be confused with POE
      http://x-files.wikia.com/wiki/...

    13. Re:30,000 year old nope by Phoeniyx · · Score: 1

      Johnny Cage, I challenge you!

    14. Re:30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helix

    15. Re:30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "revive"? Viruses are not living beings, they are just crystals containing information. I'm surprised Nature's editor didn't catch that...

    17. Re:30,000 year old nope by teg · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi novel aside, I really wonder what are the risk that a 30k years old virus would be able to survive in our environment. I'm no microbiologist, but am I wrong to think the virus is not equipped to infect any "modern" living organism?

      A virus isn't living in the first place.

    18. Re:30,000 year old nope by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      A virus isn't living in the first place.

      Says you and most people, but there's room for doubt.

      Besides, GP never said viruses were alive.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    19. Re:30,000 year old nope by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      A virus isn't living in the first place.

      It is made of living things and reproduces by attacking living things turning them into a selfdestructive mockery of live. Virus is not fully alive, it is UNDEAD.

    20. Re: 30,000 year old nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life imitating art*.

      *very loose definition of art...

    21. Re:30,000 year old nope by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      And how hard could it be?

  4. What... by Naatach · · Score: 1

    could possibly go wrong?

    --
    There may be no "I" in team, but there's also no "F" in way.
  5. Why bother optimising for size by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Beh. You can be the size of a basketball if you plan on infecting these beasties

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Now we finally know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the Stuxnet virus came from...

  7. We were warned by grimStone · · Score: 2

    I seem to recall something similar happening on X-Files, Stargate, and Fringe. It didn't turn out so well.

    1. Re:We were warned by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall something similar happening on X-Files, Stargate, and Fringe. It didn't turn out so well.

      and Helix.

    2. Re:We were warned by grimStone · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall something similar happening on X-Files, Stargate, and Fringe. It didn't turn out so well.

      and Helix.

      and Thing.

    3. Re:We were warned by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      At least we had fun with X-Files in War of the Coprophages, Stargate with Window of Opportunity and Fringe with Walter's drug-induced Monty Python clip in Black Blotter.

    4. Re:We were warned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall something similar happening on X-Files, Stargate, and Fringe. It didn't turn out so well.

      Don't forget about Star Trek: Voyager. (Or maybe you do want to forget.)

    5. Re:We were warned by tenco · · Score: 1

      If only they had Kathryn and an EMH...

  8. in prehistoric Russia by zlives · · Score: 5, Funny

    the virus catches you

    1. Re:in prehistoric Russia by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Well done.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  9. I think I've... by roc97007 · · Score: 1
    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:I think I've... by Xiver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you like The Thing then read this. It is a short story from The Thing's point of view.

      --
      10: PRINT "Everything old is new again."
      20: GOTO 10
    2. Re:I think I've... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Also consider "Blood Glacier", a German film about a hostile microbe that escapes a thawing glacier. It's a shameless Thing derivative but the puppet effects are a lot of fun.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  10. So this is coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Code bloat! Nature finally optimized for the present day.

  11. Over compacted, under compacted ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    Jean-Michel Claverie: 'We thought it was a property of viruses that they pack DNA extremely tightly into the smallest particle possible, but this guy is 150 times less compacted than any bacteriophage [viruses that infect bacteria].

    I am sure this scientist is going to be perplexed by this too. this . I expect him to say, "I expect the human torso to be kind of roundish in cross section and two hands hanging by the side. But this guy is over compacted. We don't understand any thing anymore."

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Over compacted, under compacted ... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Could be springs don't wind tightly when they're stored at very very cold temps for tens of thousands of years.

      That said, this should not impact the viability of virii.

      They just look bigger.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Over compacted, under compacted ... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's a live, reproducing virus. They know what it looks like when it's fresh.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Over compacted, under compacted ... by demonrob · · Score: 1

      they don't know what it looks like when its fresh-ly eaten brains.

  12. We don't understand anything anymore! by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    Beautiful, beautiful words from a scientific perspective.

    1. Re:We don't understand anything anymore! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Taken out of context and going to be used by idiots to prop up the god damn false dichotomy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:We don't understand anything anymore! by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Taken out of context and going to be used by idiots to prop up the god damn false dichotomy.

      If we're lucky, real lucky, the age of this -phage will be used against idiots who prop up the damn false god dichotomy.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:We don't understand anything anymore! by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yes, because if we know anything it's that you need to lie to people about science because a few nutters might post nonsense on the internet.

    4. Re:We don't understand anything anymore! by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      because a few nutters might post nonsense on the internet.

      But if its on the internet it must be true!

  13. Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What could possibly go wrong, right?

  14. We'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know how things are going 28 days later.

  15. virus fossilization by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    The size could be the result of the process of being packed in ice for long periods of time. Some sort of virus fossilization where the virus dna gains dna from its prehistoric host.

  16. The first known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sabertoothed virus!

  17. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no one who commented even bothered to read the SUMMARY? Is the internet full of fruit flies? THIS VIRUS CANNOT ATTACK MAMMALS, IT GOES FOR AMOEBAE YOU ILLITERATE ADHD PATIENTS!

    1. Re:Wow by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      So no one who commented even bothered to read the SUMMARY? Is the internet full of fruit flies? THIS VIRUS CANNOT ATTACK MAMMALS, IT GOES FOR AMOEBAE YOU ILLITERATE ADHD PATIENTS!

      Then how come we haven't heard from the researchers for the past couple of weeks?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no one who commented even bothered to read the SUMMARY? Is the internet full of fruit flies? THIS VIRUS CANNOT ATTACK MAMMALS, IT GOES FOR AMOEBAE YOU ILLITERATE ADHD PATIENTS!

      At least that's what they think. But they also didn't think virii could be this big...

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They finally dug down to the giant amoebae

  18. lol by hamburger+lady · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We don't understand anything anymore!" says the guy reviving a 30,000 year-old virus. sheesh.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we understand, there are understood understoodables; there are things we understand that we understand. There are understood nonunderstoodables; that is to say, there are things that we now understand we don't understand. But there are also nonunderstood nonunderstoodables – there are things we do not understand we don't understand."

    2. Re: lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get moded up for this...nice very nice.

    3. Re: lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see the same video of a guy running out of a mosque with a vase 100 times and you think, my god, can there possibly be that many vases in the entire country

      I've got nothing.

  19. OMG Helix! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    The crappy Resident Evil knock-off.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    1. Re:OMG Helix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helix isn't a knock-off, it's a charming parody! It's survival horror set to easy listening jazz. The soundtrack dissonance alone makes Helix worth watching.

  20. Thus began the zombie apocalypse..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus began the zombie apocalypse.....

  21. What could possibly go OMG ZOMBIES by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Hmm.

    I wonder if it's safe.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  22. Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is how the zombie apocalypse starts.

    Well, I for one welcome our 30k year old over sized virus overlords.

  23. 30,000 years old? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm surprised this thing is very different to modern viruses given that it's *only* 30K years old. I appreciate these things are always evolving, but I would've thought they'd have done most of their evolving in the previous 3-billion years or whatever. So presumably, being big wasn't a problem for a virus until relatively recently?

    1. Re:30,000 years old? by Mortiss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, these viruses may have found a relatively safe niche in a biosphere, where large genome is not a huge disadvantage and simply stayed that way. These giant viruses (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimivirus) seem to have acquired a large number of metabolic genes from their hosts, which in case of human viruses would be very disadvantageous, since in this environment large = easier to detect and eradicate.

    2. Re:30,000 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm surprised this thing is very different to modern viruses given that it's *only* 30K years old. I appreciate these things are always evolving, but I would've thought they'd have done most of their evolving in the previous 3-billion years or whatever. So presumably, being big wasn't a problem for a virus until relatively recently?

      You're displaying your ignorance I'm afraid, and I don't mean that disparagingly. Viruses are short lived and the number of copies that reproduce is huge. That makes (at least some of) them ideal for studying evolution in short time spans. HIV/AIDS is a key one for studying evolution.

      http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/relevance/IA2HIV.shtml

    3. Re:30,000 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the contrary.

      he is displaying the knowledge of not knowing.
      That was the right question to make give his info.

      So thanks for the answer, which adds to the conversation. And thanks for the parent for asking. You wouldn't have posted the info if it weren't for him.

  24. Has anybody asked.... by BenJeremy · · Score: 2

    ...what could possibly go wrong? Because, that simply can't be asked too many times, right?

    Ugh.

    It will actually turn out that this virus will simultaneously cure cancer and all known diseases in humans. They'll call it the Ponce de Leon infection as it also stops and even reverses the effects of old age, and will result in a sharp drop in mortality rates and a rapid increase in population.

    Eventually, the Earth's population of humans will outstrip its ability to support them.

    Then the real carnage begins.

    1. Re:Has anybody asked.... by koan · · Score: 1

      ...what could possibly go wrong?

      I wish someone would have asked that about Google Glass.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Has anybody asked.... by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      .... but it will also sterilize 99% of the population . . . Oh, wait, that was Stargate. And Star Trek. And maybe it explains why elves didn't overpopulate Middle-Earth.

  25. We don't know why it isn't densely packed. by Chas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's possible that this one was warped by its environment.
    Another possibility is that we're looking at a sign of evolution here.

    It's possible that 30,000 years ago, the environment (and carriers) could support the existence of larger, loosely packed viruses.

    Then with the advance of medicine and sanitation (and possibly changes in climate), that behemoths like this simply weren't viable anymore. They were too fragile (or just too obviously large) to withstand the immune responses in healthier, cleaner hosts.

    As such, these oversized viruses died off the same way various megafauna did. Their ecological niche was either stressed (or closed). Thus the only survivors were smaller, more compact variants.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:We don't know why it isn't densely packed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible that 30,000 years ago, the environment (and carriers) could support the existence of larger, loosely packed viruses.

      Not only support, it might have given them a benefit. My first thought goes to conifer trees. Normally trees lose their leaves when there is a risk of ice forming in them. Conifers will not lose their leaves. Instead they have extra room in their "leaves". If ice forms inside, it will have room to expand without breaking anything. When spring comes, the ice will melt and the tree is unharmed.

      I imagine the ability to be frozen and unfrozen without dying could be a good one during an ice age. After the ice age this ability would no longer be needed and the price paid to have this ability killed it as competition didn't have to pay that price.

      Sure it's just my own personal theory based on a hunch (not really scientific), but I don't go around saying "I don't understand anything anymore". Perhaps being an engineer I will be more likely to think of a physical/mechanical explanation than a biologist would.

    2. Re:We don't know why it isn't densely packed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While those are possibilities, which I'm sure will be explored, the prime comment still stands.

      We don't understand anything anymore

      I think it would be approriate, given cultural and fictional accounts around such a scenario, that while humanities education is growing extensively every daily, we're still quite ignorant. Of A LOT! Especially when the historical evolution of diseases is involved!

  26. "we don't understand anything anymore" by koan · · Score: 1

    Obviously... when you're digging up 30,000 year old virus, right about the same time the Neanderthal disappeared.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:"we don't understand anything anymore" by Natural+Philosopher · · Score: 2

      I'm no biologist, but... don't viruses mutate quickly and unpredictably? And perhaps into a strain that is able to infect mammals?

    2. Re:"we don't understand anything anymore" by koan · · Score: 1

      They can, it always makes me nervous when they pull these things out of the ice or attempt to "recreate" them.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  27. "...150 times less compacted..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what do people think they mean when they write shit like this?

    1/150th as dense?
    0.66% space/material efficient?
    150 * the size?

  28. Already happened in Star Trek by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Captain Kirk already visited such a planet with no disease and no death that had dramatic overpopulation

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

    Mumbai, India has 33,000 people per square km, which makes places with only really high population density like London (8500 people per square km) seem sparsely populated.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  29. Large Single Cell Organisms by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    There are single celled organisms at the bottom of the ocean, xenophyophores are one example, that are single-cell creatures visible to the human eye --- and in fact larger than a centimeter.

    It should come as no surprise there are giant viruses in more primitive times, more primitive times are alive and well in the ancient creatures that live in the deepest parts of the oceans.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  30. famous last words by wasteoid · · Score: 1

    "it might have a few novel antigens" - infamous quote from pre-antigen-ravaged world

  31. Natural selection wiped this one out by greggster · · Score: 1

    and humans go and bring it back. This oughtta be good. Lets hope this tinkering with disaster is handled correctly, or shaved, sterilized and destroyed.

  32. That's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revive? How do you revive something that is inanimate matter?
    Oh! That's right!!! For evolution to be correct then viruses have to alive.
    Smallest unit of life is the cell.

  33. Do we have to freak out? by Fourgaver · · Score: 0

    What IF? What will Happened? What should YOU gonna do? and What we should have to do? How to prevent? how to protect? I think every questions goes like that! The name itself viral! It will infect. Do we have to be scared of? :(

  34. Stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop the tech before it's too late we don't have enough antibiotics or anti viral as it is let something go that we have no knowledge of and it is Pandoras box I beg you quit now

  35. Where's the surprise? by JockTroll · · Score: 0

    Of course it's less packed. They didn't have compression algorhytims back then. It's an obsolete virus anyway, I bet it can't run on any modern animal's OS.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  36. Black Death 2? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Supposedly, the Black Death came to Europe from the Crimea and/or further east near China. Look how well that worked out.
    It's interesting that while a lot of super scary viruses originated in sub-Saharan Africa, there are other origin places with radically different environmental conditions.

    1. Re:Black Death 2? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Black Death. Spanish Flu. Popular culture like "Downton Abbey" has revived awareness that pandemics really happen, and these events are in comparatively recent history. Yet it seems that nobody takes it seriously, despite the faster transportation and greater population density we have today. Before worrying about total unknowns, just consider what a Spanish Flu outbreak would look like in NYC or LA or Hong Kong.

  37. Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be the Chinese icebreaker, but it was too slow a virus and frozen into the ice...

  38. And The name is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots call it "The Thing"

  39. Meh by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Just means that modern humans have had 30,000 years for their immune systems to evolve additional defenses.

    Talk to me when you find a virus from 30,000 years in the future, then I'll be scared! :)