Slashdot Mirror


How Apple's CarPlay Could Shore Up the Car Stereo Industry

Velcroman1 writes: "Car stereo salesmen and installers around the country are hoping Apple's CarPlay in-car infotainment system will have a big presence in the aftermarket car stereo industry. The Nikkei Asian Review reports that Alpine is making car stereo head units for between $500 – $700 that will run the iOS-like system Apple unveiled last month, and Macrumors added Clarion to the list of CarPlay supporters. Pioneer is also getting into the game, with support said to be coming to existing car stereo models in its NEX line ($700 – $1400) via firmware update, according to Twice. Given Apple's wildly supportive fan base, its likely that a lot of aftermarket CarPlay units are about to fly off stereo shop shelves. Indeed, CarPlay coming to aftermarket stereo units could bring back what Apple indirectly stole from the industry going back as far as 2006."

132 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. in-car is legacy-ware by turkeydance · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    no further comment.

    1. Re:in-car is legacy-ware by Barsteward · · Score: 2

      Try read this for more info .... http://www.computerworld.com/s...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  2. Wouldn't trust Apple by StripedCow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't trust Apple. When this becomes successful, before you know it, they will force other manufacturers out of the market. Look at how they are controlling the app-store, and forcing developers to not compete with Apple's products.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course they will. That beautiful system in all its glory. Like Google would. Or Microsoft. Or any other ginormous American company that bribes itself out of trouble. Fair competition doesn't work anymore. Next system please.

    2. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most of Apple's customers are children, yuppies, and idiots. No one who actually understands technology[hardware and software] and mathematics buys Apple products.

    3. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or... instead of spending 500-700 bucks for an iOS head unit ... you can spend maybe $200 for a good regular head unit and spend the remaining $300-500 on an amplifier and good speakers. You'll enjoy it much more.

    4. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're working under the assumption that consumers will demand them...I'm kind of thinking that's a negative. I think most of them are probably more interested in having a tablet or smartphone instead. When it comes to me getting cars, I don't really give a shit about infotainment systems as I've always found my smartphone to be much more flexible. Music? Pandora. GPS? Google Maps. How would CarPlay improve anything? Maybe, *maybe* for a self-driving car, but beyond what I mentioned, I don't really mess with any controls while I'm driving.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    5. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In a car, the number one thing you can do to improve the sound is to close the windows. Given so many people that turn it up with the windows down, I presume "good speakers" are not required.

    6. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "I just don't 'get' the ambiguous sexuality of apple products."

      What? Oh, I get it. It's a joke. OK!

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    7. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by green1 · · Score: 2

      CarPlay is likely to assume integration with an iphone. fewer consumers have iphones than have non-iphones. Why do you think most people would demand a system that is unlikely to work well with their phones?

    8. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      We all believed you until you hit "A Wife." This is ./, and we already know that the virgin crowd rules these shores...

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by iluvcapra · · Score: 2

      Okay here we go

      I have the following:
      $600,000 loft (and appropriate decor/rooftop pool)
      BMW 328i
      84 IMDb credits, and my crew has won three Oscars
      2 dogs
      2 iPhones
      1 Macbook Air
      2 MacPros
      (I also have a MacBook running ubuntu)

      I am uncertain of the future of tech without Apple products.
      I just don't 'get' the obnoxious contrarianism of Android products. Or their enormous screens, or their uniformly poor OS upgrade and hardware support, or Google's completely obscure roadmap for Android.

      The thing Apple is selling you, beside the hardware, is the complete integrated product. They take your money, they give you something that works, that's their sole "monetization" strategy. Unlike everyone else in the business, trying to suck you into their various creepy ad/clickstream/search front-running scams.

      I won't even go into the Google tracking everything you do to, you know, "help" you.

      This isn't the 1990s, competitive Apple products are always competitively priced. It's the feature packages on Apple kit that people get upset about.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by nomanisanisland · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most of Apple's customers are children, yuppies, and idiots. No one who actually understands technology[hardware and software] and mathematics buys Apple products.

      That's interesting, since I meet a lot of software developers at other companies and the most common laptop maker they have (by far) are Apple ones: MBP or Air. Now maybe it's the tech industry I'm in (networking), or the type of developers I meet (highly paid ones who travel), but they can't all be stupid.

      I used to tease them about it, until I got one because I was fed up with my employer-supplied laptop... and I have to say they are really, really good. There are some very frustrating things about Apple, no debate, but compared to the competition? Not even close. If I want to boot to linux or run it in a VM I can, but sometimes you just want something that works well without being a sysadmin; and the physical design is really good.

      They're way expensive, but it's the thing you use all day, every day. If you can afford it at all, I think it's worth it. If you can't afford it, there's nothing to argue over.

      It's like arguing over monitors. If you can afford a 30" or bigger IPS and you would use it all the time, get one. If you can't, don't complain that you don't need the extra inch or two.

    11. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by nomanisanisland · · Score: 2

      Probably because it's geared towards the high-end of the market. The aftermarket stereos and cars this is geared toward are luxury ones, not economy brands. My guess is the demographics of that market are more in Apple's iPhone/iPad sweet-spot than Android's. But I have no data to back that up, just personal observation.

    12. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lots of people have product preferences without being a pretentious twat about them. Maybe give it a try some time?

    13. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Sique · · Score: 1

      Or just be like me and not care about in-car-entertainment. All I use the car radio for is listening to some news channel. I don't have ever burned a CD for my car, I never took a bought CD in my car, I don't have any USB-based devices or anything else.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Why are automakers lining up to join the linux foundation?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    15. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      More an educated guess than observation. here is something to read... http://www.computerworld.com/s...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    16. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      CarPlay is likely to assume integration with an iphone. fewer consumers have iphones than have non-iphones.

      The number of consumers having each kind of phone doesn't matter. The number of consumers demonstrably willing to spend several hundred dollars matters.

      Seriously, if you have one guy who paid $600 for an iPhone, and 10 guys who spent $100 for the cheapest Android phone they could find, who is more likely to spend $500-$700 on music in their car?

    17. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Wow. the fanboys are out in droves today. Funny how Google is one of Apple's largest customers is somehow missed by the fandroids (40k Apple systems as I understand it).

    18. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Funny how these "you don't know what you want, but I'm smart and know what I want" are typically ACs...

    19. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      But but but... there's over 1 billion Android phones out there!!! That only 2%-5% are running the latest Android, and they're still selling Android v2 phones? *IRRELEVANT!!!*

    20. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      The thing Apple is selling you, beside the hardware, is the complete integrated product. They take your money, they give you something that works, that's their sole "monetization" strategy. Unlike everyone else in the business, trying to suck you into their various creepy ad/clickstream/search front-running scams.

      QFT.

      I think though, that you're overselling the size of the vocal anti-Apple Android user base. I think they've just grown accustomed to hacking around bad design.

      This quote comes to mind.

      The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw

      Android users think they're adapting tech to themselves, Apple users think Apple is adapting the tech industry to their whims.

      In the end, the question is, who's design decisions do you trust, yourself or Apple's? I opt for Apple.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    21. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by Barsteward · · Score: 1
      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    22. Re:Wouldn't trust Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yes I saw that. It seems to cover rather less manufacturers than CarPlay does. And also the article predates CarPlay, so many of those that were previously thinking of Linux may be going for Carplay instead of or in addition to.

  3. The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I don't know if CarPlay will gain any traction. Since Apple has no control over quality of implementation, we'll see some really awful interfaces on top of CarPlay...

    But one great aspect of CarPlay has already done something I thought would not happen for a while - breaking the car manufactures monopoly on in-car mapping. Car makers have been constantly pushing very over-priced terrible in-car GPS systems for a while, and CarPlay at least brings a reasonable and cheap mapping system into cars without having to replace the whole stereo system and/or shoe-horn in a screen. I could see many people adopting a CarPlay stereo just for that.

    One thing I really wish would happen would be to have the car industry be also mandated to provide third-party access to all of the screens that will be mandated in cars soon because of the back-up cameras... that could lead to a real renaissance in what smart-phones can do for you in-car.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by lgw · · Score: 1

      Car makers have been constantly pushing very over-priced terrible in-car GPS systems for a while,

      I'll have you know my car has a very over-priced mediocre in-car GPS system! Actually, its flaw is no good interface to set a destination address (voice recognition and arbitrary proper nouns is just a bad combination in general). I really want a way to attach a keyboard, or to pull an address from my phone contacts list in some sane and reliable way.

      One thing I really wish would happen would be to have the car industry be also mandated to provide third-party access to all of the screens that will be mandated in cars soon because of the back-up cameras... that could lead to a real renaissance in what smart-phones can do for you in-car.

      There's real potential there, but I want it to work both ways: the car should accept any screen though some standard interface (2-way HDMI maybe?). The built-in screens will have terrible resolution, no doubt, but it seems like a good part for an aftermarket upgrade.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      This won't stop the car industry.
      I can't easily replace the navigation system in my car, because it controls the air-con.
      The whole system is integrated in to the dash, the steering wheel controls, the trip computer and air conditioning.

      There are aftermarket options on ebay, but the risk it won't work is high - The car is made in Japan with several options for air con (single/dual zone) and is visibly identical to other models made in USA which may or may not be wired the same. Added to the fact the model name of the Japanese car is the same as a completely different USA model and the one that's physically the same as a different name.

    3. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Since Apple has no control over quality of implementation

      But one great aspect of CarPlay has already done something I thought would not happen for a while - breaking the car manufactures monopoly on in-car mapping.

      These two points contradict each other.

      If Apple has no control over implementation, then implementation is till reliant on the good will of the car manufacturers to put it into _THEIR_ in car entertainment systems.

      I don't know if CarPlay will gain any traction.

      It wont, precisely because the manufacturers don't want to give up their monopoly.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can't easily replace the navigation system in my car, because it controls the air-con.
      The whole system is integrated in to the dash, the steering wheel controls, the trip computer and air conditioning.

      This article is a load of toss. The problem is right here. Even before apple/android devices were around, automakers did their best to frustrate after-market installers by using odd dash shapes, surrounds, and separate control panels. With the advent of Nav and touchscreen controls(and the various iDrive systems on some makes), the problem is swiftly getting worse.

      Nearly all new Ford, Chrysler, and GM products have some sort of touchscreen "radio" that also contains the environmental controls, adjustable seat settings, Nav (if equipped), and various other things that no longer have separate dash controls. Foreign makes have been going this way for several years in higher end vehicles. The only way to get a radio that can be removed without affecting other equipment is to buy a base, fleet-trim vehicle that doesn't have any other options to begin with.

      CarPlay is too late; it is no longer possible to install aftermarket head units in more than 90% of new cars on the market.

    5. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      The point you're missing about maps is that maps in car play is fed via Apple maps. Which updates more frequently than maps for car systems.

      Car manufacturers don't mind giving up control over things like the entertainment system provided it works better than what they can do. A lot of makers are signed up for it. From BMW to Hyundai to ford and GM.

      How it'll do in the future... No one knows.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by narcc · · Score: 1

      breaking the car manufactures monopoly on in-car mapping.

      WTF are you talking about?

    7. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      How much do I pay for Maps updates with Apple? 0.

      How much do you pay for mapping updates in most cars? LOTS AND LOTS (sometimes over $1k!)

      Not to mention Apple maps can be fed locations from any application, whereas the car nav can only get input through whatever torturous interface the car make has put in place.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      all of the screens that will be mandated in cars soon because of the back-up cameras...

      Yeah I never really understood this. I'm too lazy to look up statistics for people killed from cars backing up, but it can't be higher than those killed from "inattentive driving". What they really need to mandate is fucking bluetooth speakerphones. It would be a lot cheaper than a screen and save more lives.

    9. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by dk20 · · Score: 2

      "breaking the car manufactures monopoly on in-car mapping..."

      Will this be similar to how apple "broke the monopoly on ebooks" http://online.wsj.com/news/art...
      Or how they "Broke the monopoly on hiring". http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/...

      Ever heard of getting a third party GPS for like $99 at costco with lifetime maps? When it gets old i just throw it out and get a newer/faster/whatever one.
      Far cheaper then getting the fancy in-dash model and not being able to replace it.

      "One thing I really wish would happen would be to have the car industry be also mandated to provide third-party access to all of the screens"

      Really, you think that is fair? Would it work the other way as in i think apple should be mandated to provide third party access to their very lucrative add-on market (cords, chargers, etc).
      Why should the auto industry be "forced" to open up to a company which is known for vendor lockin?

    10. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      Will this be similar to how apple "broke the monopoly on ebooks" http://online.wsj.com/news/art...

      Possibly, Apple tried to save us from an Amazon monopoly and failed.

      Ever heard of getting a third party GPS for like $99 at costco with lifetime maps?

      Yes, and they suck compared to a smartphone because they aren't integrated with anything. I have some left over from the Old Days.

      Really, you think that is fair? Would it work the other way as in i think apple should be mandated

      Get the stick out of your ass man. I was talking about car regulations. Any device can charge by USB now so your griping looks like lunacy.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    11. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by swb · · Score: 1

      I think the whole point of CarPlay is that it's an external display/mirroring solution that takes over the entire in-car display. Knowing Apple, a term of licensing is probably not allowing any overlay or alteration of the display. The only thing allowed is probably switching away from CarPlay completely to show in-car data like the backup camera or car-specific info.

      What hasn't been talked about is whether OEM integration with CarPlay to control OEM-specific features like HVAC, audio settings (EQ/fader) or trip computer data currently controlled or displayed on the in-dash display. I can see either Apple providing generic CarPlay apps (eg, "Climate") that tie-in to these OEM systems or some combination of a generic apps and maybe an OEM app that implements these features in CarPlay.

      As for taking over/using an OEM display, check out the "Mimicsx2" -- it looks like it implements the bits for using an OEM display with a phone by basically acting as a switcher and touchscreen coupler. I'd call this basically a third party hardware hack for implementing CarPlay-like functionality. It looks interesting, but obviously not nearly as slick as one purpose built for phone integration.

    12. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Some manufacturers, like Toyota and Subaru, have been offering MirrorLink capability for a few years. It lets you mirror your phone screen to the in-dash screen, complete with touch control, and you can use any navigation app you like.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Apple tried to save us from an Amazon monopoly and failed.

      Hahaha! No they didn't. They tried to insulate themselves and their profits from having to compete with Amazon. It had nothing to do with "saving us" at all. Amazing how quickly fanboys will rewrite history for the sake of their favorite corporation, no matter how evil they're shown to be.

    14. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by suutar · · Score: 1

      indeed, and this will be one of the criteria I use for my next car. If I can't swap out the stereo, forget it. I realize I'm in the minority with that, and at some point there may be no new models with swappable stereos. At which point I fall back to a used older model that I can maintain :)

    15. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Far cheaper then getting the fancy in-dash model and not being able to replace it.

      To be fair, the flip side is that you have to unplug/unattach/pack away third party GPS units when you park if you don't want to come back to a smashed window and no GPS.

      Model specific built in panels that have GPS as one of their functions don't work in other models of car, and thus have no resale value to crack-heads.

      That need to keep packing the GPS away every time you park, or have the feeling of insecurity if you risk leaving it, is a non-negligible cost.

    16. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Any device can charge by USB now so your griping looks like lunacy.

      So please take your "standard" USB on one and and mini or micro on the other and charge any apple product with it.

      orginal IPOD -firewire and dock connector
      Next gen ipod - USB and dock connector
      Now what is it, usb on one end and "lightening" on the other?

    17. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Your concerns are valid.
      I dont drive often and so it is not much of a pain to use it and put it away when i do. Flip side, the days of them being > $300 and worth stealing are long gone.

    18. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      So please take your "standard" USB on one

      I do every day and charge iOS devices with it all the time. The cable hardly matters, and in fact it's easier to find an Apple cable in a store if you've forgotten one than the "wrong" kind of Micro-USB cable (since there are a few different types).

      You are on the wrong side of standards on this one.

      The fact that you can plug anything into USB is enough.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    19. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Car manufacturers don't mind giving up control over things like the entertainment system provided it works better than what they can do.

      A number don't like it, especially dealers. The base unit is a $50 piece of junk, the $500 option cost them $100, and the $5000 option cost them under $1000. $4000 extra profit per car is a nice thing.

    20. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by dk20 · · Score: 1

      So by that token the car manufactures can say they are following a standard (the one they made) just like apple did with their dock connector?

      Granted (and you probably already assumed this) i dont have an iphone but several coworkers do. I often hear then trying to borrow other peoples chargers/cables . Care to enlighten me as to why they cant just use the standard "micro-usb" cords on their desks that they use to charge our work-issued phones? I can charge my non-apple phone on the same cord i use for my BB without issues.

      My guess is they forgot their $21 "adapter"
      http://store.apple.com/ca/prod...

    21. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What make and model? Why withhold these details?

      Many modern Japanese cars offer MirrorLink support so you can use your phone for navigation. For a long time some have offered two double DIN slots (older Nissans for example) and I can't think of any that integrate AC control into the head unit. I've been looking at new Japanese cars myself recently so I'm keen to know which one has this deficiency.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by makomk · · Score: 1

      How much do you pay for Maps updates with Apple? Presumably, the amount it costs to buying a new iDevice every time they stop supporting the old one, plus the cost of a data connection... which is quite a bit.

    23. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they suck compared to a smartphone because they aren't integrated with anything. I have some left over from the Old Days.

      I suppose many factors depend but my Garmin beats my Galaxy Note II for navigation every day of the week.
      1) It comes with a great mount. I have yet to find a workable mount for my phone. One I literally put the phone near, it snaps into place magnetically, and is already powered by the mount so I'm not also plugging in power.

      2) I can leave it in my car and it's always ready to go. I always want my phone with me for obvious reasons.

      3) No complications from other apps / lock screen / notifications or whatever that can interfere or distract me from directions. This is mostly on me - any notifications make me almost compulsively check, deal with, and clear. But why not just avoid that problem if I can?

      4) Familiarity - I've been using Garmin since 2007 or so with a Street Pilot and I know how it's instructions go. I find that it's harder to hear and the voice is harder to understand on google maps, and WAZE doesn't seem to have functional nav half the time (one time it said nothing till telling me I'd arrived, thanks to my garmin).

      5) Garmin junction view and lane guidance are amazing. It's the difference between 2007 era "turn left in .25 miles" and "Be in either of the two right lanes and turn right at the end of the street, then bear left" with a overview of the lanes and a purple line showing the lane changes needed.

      Oh, and the recent Garmin's can bluetooth to an app on your phone for sending addresses or subscribing to live traffic, weather etc. Though the one thing I thin WAZE does do amazingly is traffic, hazard, and police reporting. If that could be integrated into the garmin display it would be amazing I think.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    24. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      First of all, sorry about your not closing the quoting tag you used. I do that sometimes, and it's so sad to see all your hard work obscured under an italic fog... so I thought I would at least respond in detail to help make up for it.

      The charging point you make is a great one. There are some powered mounts that you can plug a phone into, but they require more work to fit... I prefer a general mount you can use with separate power so that as I change phones I can maintain the same mount.

      A really excellent non powered mount is the FlexPod, if a model exists for your car... it's very sturdy and is not obtrusive when not in use.

      If notifications are an issue you can usually set the phone to something like Do Not Disturb mode. But I've never had that really cause issues.

      Now about the Garmin device giving great directions - that may be true, dedicated devices have had a while to build good nav systems. I personally use Apple Maps and find the navigation for that works pretty well, it also gives land guidance... (it was better than Google Maps for navigation from Day One).

      But, there also exists a Garmin dedicated app with offline maps. You get all of the Garmin benefits you detailed, only it's easier to update,

      And you can switch to Waze when not needing navigation (I totally agree with you about Waze navigation not working very well). As you say, nothing beats the Waze Police/Hazard alerts.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    25. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Sure, how?

      Looks like it only has a "lightning" interface: http://support.apple.com/kb/sp...

      i know, you use your USB 2 Lighening dongle?

    26. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every Honda in the last 10 years.

    27. Re:The Real Breakthrough - non auto-maker Maps by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Sure, how?

      Looks like it only has a "lightning" interface: http://support.apple.com/kb/sp...

        Plug the cable into the android charger. You know, the same way you plug the micro-usb cable into the Apple charger to charge the Android phone.

      i know, you use your USB 2 Lighening dongle?

  4. Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently bought a new car with the USB dongle in the glove cabinet to hook stuff directly to the car stereo. (a 2000 bucks option)

    They failed to mention it only supports apple products.

    Its time that a ISO standard arrives for cars so i can hook any device to it that supports the standard.

    1. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I recently bought a new car with the USB dongle in the glove cabinet to hook stuff directly to the car stereo. (a 2000 bucks option)

      They failed to mention it only supports apple products.

      Its time that a ISO standard arrives for cars so i can hook any device to it that supports the standard.

      So you paid $2,000 for something without bothering to do the slightest little bit of research on it.

      Yeah that's definitely a problem with the car.

    2. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Skater · · Score: 1

      They failed to mention it only supports apple products.

      Are you sure? Android phones now use something called "MTP", which most devices don't seem to support (neither of our car stereos do, one is a factory Honda, the other is a Pioneer; similarly, my Macbook Pro *still* can't connect to my S3, a year and a half after I bought the phone). Did you try a standard USB drive? I bet it'll work.

    3. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Petersko · · Score: 1

      My 2009 Santa Fe might have a crummy monochromatic display and obtuse choices for button functions, but it reads MP3 files off standard USB sticks, nests the folders properly, and doesn't accuse me of DRM violations. I'm set.

    4. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      This thing is much more than a connection. With CarPlay, the phone essentially takes over the display on your car. Makes it display the phone icons and such. Through a proprietary protocol, btw.

    5. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      dude, you dropped $2k for that?

    6. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by grumling · · Score: 1

      Audi's stereos work with iOS only, depending on what system you pick.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    7. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      3rd party GPS is gimped due to a lack of wheel rotation data from the car which OEM GPS get's "for free". This wheel rotation data helps update direction, speed and position far more frequently than GPS can. If CarPlay gets access to the car's telemetry feeds to pickup wheels rotation data, it will make a huge difference in accuracy. From there on out OEM is a dead. For sure you will be stuck in a walled garden though... renting your map data at $3 a month. But that's better than an over priced, 3 years out of date system that only gets worse as time goes on. Updates are very much the exception and not the rule in OEM electronics.

    8. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It would be fine with me if the USB port was just powered.

      Given how simple USB wiring is, that's trivial to fix. Get a nice buck converter for a few bucks on eBay, and wire in a USB power injection cable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      To me, phone GPS is plenty good enough for car use (either Google or Apple). I've been using a car mount to hold my phone for years and have never had issues with it reporting where I was accurately, outside of one odd anomaly somewhere in the middle of Utah where for about thirty miles GPS assured me I was 500 feet off the side of the road.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I installed my own garmin gps in my car about 10 yrs ago when I bought the car, new. I did a very custom install and people are usually impressed by it. its also quite hidden, which is why its not been taken OUT of my car in 10 yrs.

      but now, 10 yrs later, the maps are very out of date for many areas I drive in (bay area). I'm too cheap to buy an update and so I use my android phone. it sits in a center cup holder area, it uses cellphone locations and gps and always stays current, for free.

      I don't love google, believe me, but I'm not sure I'm willing to go back to old school gps boxes again. I also can't see paying the car co for their version when a cellphone does gps these days just fine.

      if I had garmin stock, I'd sell it. same for others. they were great when they were all you could get; but now smartphones have this one killer app and that's gps, for many of us. I value the gps almost more than I value remote email and web on the phone.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by jrumney · · Score: 1

      3rd party GPS is gimped due to a lack of wheel rotation data from the car which OEM GPS get's "for free".

      Phones have accelerometers, gyros and in some cases barometers that can adequately make up for the lack of wheel rotation data to cover gaps in GPS coverage. A bigger problem is the size and position of the GPS antenna, especially when the windows have metallic coatings.

    12. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If you just bought a new car and paid $2000 for an upgraded stereo, why aren't you using the Bluetooth connectivity that it doubtless comes with, rather than clumsy dongles that are apparently proprietary?

    13. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is a standard, it's called MirrorLink. Even Apple supports it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      For $2000 I'm guessing the word Monster was in there somewhere.

    15. Re:Less apple more ISO standard interface please by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My Honda Insight has USB that has some sort of magic integration with iCrap, but can treat everything else as USB storage.

      It would be fine with me if the USB port was just powered.

      You're old enough to drive? You do surprise me!

  5. If Apple infotainment is great why dont we see it by Trachman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Apple infotainment is great why don't we see it in the airplanes. We don't see it because it is damn too expensive. I do respect Apple's commercial acumen, quality, design and innovations, but I don't own any of the apple's products nor am I planning to, and I have tried..... No offense to Mac owners and I have heard a lot about their quality and durability. When someone is buying and Iphone, it is easy to bury equipment depreciation to service provider fee. When someone will buy a car in the nearest future, apple infotainment will be one of the many junk services that people will just cross out. I quietly hope that Apple infotaintment will take the same place among junk fees and services such as extended gold service plan, super coated seat protection, anti-theft glass engravings, floor plan fee and other.

  6. People need to grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    about Apple. The products are not worth the acquisition cost or the ensuing lock in.

    Let's not even discuss their attitude towards security.

    1. Re:People need to grow the fuck up by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      The irony in your post is that you also need to grow up about Apple, and recognise that for a lot of people, they are exactly what people want. Ranting about them is just as childish as being an uncritical fanboy.

      As for security, what's the problem exactly? How's all those Android viruses working out for everyone?

    2. Re:People need to grow the fuck up by Scowler · · Score: 1

      A rational person would realize popular product A has pros and cons when compared to popular product B. That rational person would not get bent out of shape shilling for either product A or product B. That rational person would not dismiss either product A or product B as merely being "shiny".

    3. Re:People need to grow the fuck up by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Ahhh but it's not just because it's shiny. Apple is so easy my mom actually bought an iPhone on her own and managed to get all kinds of apps. She wouldn't have been able to do that with Android and don't get me started on what happened when she brought home a PC laptop. (She's been a mac user for probably 7 years but the salesman somehow convinced her to go with a PC, based on price, he sold her a shitty little netbook with the new windows. After 7 years of no computer questions I had to resume my role as her tech support).

      They're that easy because they spend a lot of time researching how to be easy to use.

      It doesn't matter if a system is technically superior if it is inaccessible to users or hard to understand.

      Don't believe me? Well ten years ago on slashdot I heard similar statements about how people should start using Sparcstations or whatever technology was better than the status quo. Despite the better design of the Sparc processors, Intel won. Despite the benefits of Linux / FOSS, most people still use Windows.

      Sad people are so misguided, I know, but it's an unfortunate truth about humanity.

    4. Re:People need to grow the fuck up by narcc · · Score: 1

      The irony in your post is that you also need to grow up about Crack and recognize that, for a lot of people, it is exactly what people want. Ranting about it is just as childish as being an uncritical fanboy.

    5. Re:People need to grow the fuck up by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Is it still irrational to pay more for it if it works better?

  7. Burned once by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    Car stereo salesmen and installers around the country are hoping Apple's CarPlay in-car infotainment system will have a big presence in the aftermarket car stereo industry.

    Well, it could have, but after investing in a head unit with the expensive licensed connector for my iPod, then finding when my out-of-warranty iPod died that my new one would not work with the very expensive head unit any more because they changed the connector ... well.

    As the saying goes: "Screw me once, shame on me, screw me twice, Fuck you Apple - NEVER AGAIN!!"

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Burned once by aybiss · · Score: 1

      You haven't been burned just once. Every car that's been made with built-in iPod support but no equivalent open standard connector has been made obsolete by Apple, so you've been screwed by proxy via your automaker as well.

      We should boycott this shit so hard, I already have a useless connector in my car and I'll be reminded every time I sit in it that that's Apple's fault.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    2. Re:Burned once by Skater · · Score: 1

      Uh, Apple does make an adapter for it... I know it's $30, but it's at least a solution. (Our car has a USB port, so it's just a matter of changing the cable for us.)

    3. Re:Burned once by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Uh, Apple does make an adapter for it... I know it's $30, but it's at least a solution. (Our car has a USB port, so it's just a matter of changing the cable for us.)

      Except that unlike the old cable, with the adapter it doesn't provide a charge, only the connection. So it drains the battery as it's used, then I have to charge it by connecting it to the car charger. There doesn't seem to be a way to connect it to the stereo and charger at the same time, at least with the adapter.

      Really renders the whole thing useless. The cheapest fix is to return this iPod, and buy an iPod classic for about $250. Way more capacity than I need, and more money than I wanted to spend, but it does have the 30-pin connector like my old (!!) 5th gen, so hopefully it would work the same...

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Burned once by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      alternatively you could buy an old touch or mini on craigslist or ebay.

    5. Re:Burned once by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      The 30-pin connector was in use for about a decade, and you can get an adapter to use Lighting connector devices with 30-pin connector accessories. This is a non-issue.

      The adapter, when used with the car head units designed for 5 - 6 gen iPods, does not supply power, and that IS a MAJOR issue!

      The solution is NOT a $30 adapter, it's a $250 iPod classic!!

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    6. Re:Burned once by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      I'm sad to say I have to agree with Curunir... Apple has this nasty habit of breaking adapters for reasons I can't understand and then failing to provide a way to intermingle the old and new ones without buying a new computer. The new magsafe adaptors come to mind.

    7. Re:Burned once by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I'm sad to say I have to agree with Curunir... Apple has this nasty habit of breaking adapters for reasons I can't understand and then failing to provide a way to intermingle the old and new ones without buying a new computer. The new magsafe adaptors come to mind.

      You mean the new magsafe connectors that have a $10 adaptor that Apple sells to convert between the two?

      Oh, sorry, you were making an uninformed Apple bash for karma, sorry to interrupt with something as trivial as fact.

      http://store.apple.com/us/prod...

  8. Android ... by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I've seen Android frontends for a while now.

    1. Re:Android ... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I have one in my car and it's awesome.

    2. Re:Android ... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Which model?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Android ... by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Yes. I'd love to hear an unbiased review from a site that doesn't sell them. ...bought myself a WiFi hotspot and a cheap service plan (FreedomPop) today to start down this path.

    4. Re:Android ... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes. I'd love to hear an unbiased review from a site that doesn't sell them. ...bought myself a WiFi hotspot and a cheap service plan (FreedomPop) today to start down this path.

      There is an unbiased site, but you need to own a unicorn to get membership.

      I'm still looking for a wiring loom for a Honda Integra (Acura RSX for the Americans).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. Siri in my car? by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    After listening to the kids for a while, all she says is, "Don't make me pull over and come back there!"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re:If Apple infotainment is great why dont we see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like this? Where it's free? Across a whole airline?

    http://www.cultofmac.com/26985...

  11. Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by plebeian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I really want is someone to design a micro USB car dock and app so that I can plug my android phone in and have it replace the Stereo and GPS, charge, and allow me to display performance data (a la Torque) at the same time. All I really need mounted in the dash is an AMP and speakers. P.S. make it compatible with tablets as well..

    --
    "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
    1. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by mishehu · · Score: 1

      I've done that one myself... bluetooth supporting head unit + android tablet. The only thing I've got left to do (when I have time) is to cut up a piece of polycarbonite to mount it on the center console in place of the ash tray and broken drawer on my car.

    2. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of Android head units available now...

    3. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by Scowler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is this better than vanilla Bluetooth Audio?

    4. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's more reliable. Bluetooth Audio is miserably finicky. The only thing that ever worked right with my JVC was AT&T Fuze. With a couple different Android devices now including the Nexus 4 I get occasional skips. I used to use an Xperia Play, that skipped a lot. Flawless using the headphone cable in my truck instead.

      I'm going to try adding bluetooth to my car anyway, switching into the line inputs from the changer with an audio signal relay, and using an ultra-cheap receiver. but i'm also going to have line in, just in case.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by evilviper · · Score: 1

      All I really need mounted in the dash is an AMP and speakers.

      That's pretty much what ALL cheap car stereos have been doing for the past decade. Except they throw in a clock, USB & SD card slots for MP3s, and usually a radio.

      How does $25 grab you:

      https://www.amazon.com/XO-Visi...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by plebeian · · Score: 1

      1. A bright enough display on the phone eats a lot of juice. If you are going to have your phone display on all the time so that you can change music or have a nav display you really need to have it plugged into external power. 2. If you are going to have to plug it in why not run everything over the physical plug. It removes problems introduced by Bluetooth (RF interference, degraded sound quality, extra power drain..etc). 3. It allows people to update their displays as new technology becomes available. Updating an App to support the new 8" 4K oled tablet that comes out in a year or two is a hell of a lot easier than replacing a bunch of built in entertainment clusters. 4. If you were a car manufacturer you could sell a premium entertainment system that is basically a $100 amp with a $200 tablet on the front end(all you have to do is develop the app). Considering they wanted $2100 for a bluetooth entertainment/nav system when I bought my last car you could charge $1000+ and make a killing. 5. By developing an app in house you could incorporate music controls and performance/error monitoring in a single system(this could be seen as a drawback by manufacturers that are tied into a dealership network as dealerships make a lot of money because of the lack of adequate error reporting being built into vehicles today). Need I go on..

      --
      "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
    7. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the exact opposite experience I've had. I've never had an issue with BT audio, even once. Range seems to top out at about 30 ft and for music listening, is perfect. I've run in to audio lag (20-40ms) issues when streaming audio to bottom tier $20 adapters but it's completely replaced physical audio cables in my house. The sounds system in the living room and bedroom both use it exclusively and I just stream to either/or from my phone as the "head unit" and use the speaker system as a dumb Amp.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Why spend another $700 for a car stereo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Already exists, it's called MirrorLink and several manufacturers of cars and after-market head units support it. There is also the proprietary but well hacked Pioneer AppRadio. Plug your phone in and stash it out of the way, the screen is fully mirrored with touch control in the dash and you can even use the car's GPS antenna.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. External touchscreen by amorsen · · Score: 1

    All I want from a car unit is a touchscreen + audio. Alas, while most phones can handle external displays, external touchscreens are generally unsupported.

    A car has to last at least a decade. Trying to build in intelligence is futile, and adding 3G/4G is not much better. In a decade, CPU's and software and data transfer standards will hopefully have advanced greatly.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    1. Re:External touchscreen by grumling · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Just provide a display and hooks to the steering wheel controls (use something standard like Bluetooth HID profiles and HDMI). No need to come up with your own "solution" that will be obsolete in 3 years, or worse, lock me into a monthly fee.

      The problem continues to be that car manufacturers want to control the whole "experience" no matter what, because they know that their products are remarkably similar to everyone else's products. The stereo/info-tainment system is about the only part of the car that isn't designed by DOT regulations, so that's where they differentiate themselves from other manufacturers.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  13. Apple head unit? by csumpi · · Score: 1

    An Apple head unit? As in super expensive?

    Jumping the shark?

    First of all, most modern car stereos do much more than play the radio or act as an amplifier for an mp3 player. They also serve as controllers and displays for other computing units in the car. How will the Apple head unit reset the maintenance reminder?

    Further, the head unit is probably the best piece of a stock car audio system. Money would be much better spent upgrading the speakers, or adding an external amp with a subwoofer.

    And another step further, Apple can shove In-App-Purchases up it's own ass. Definitely not gonna make an entrance in my car.

    1. Re:Apple head unit? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My goodness you really made yourself look foolish didn't you?

      This is about a protocol that head units can support. It is not about an Apple-made head unit. Apple will not be making a head unit. Companies like Alpine and Pioneer (and others, but not Apple) who do make head units can implement the CarPlay protocol allowing the extension of the phone's interface beyond more than the current protocol enables.

      These head units, of course, can/will/may not implement other protocols, such as the similar one that supports Android phones.

  14. not at those prices, it won't fly off the shelves by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and frankly, in-car entertainment is dangerous. like the other poster said, all I want in there is an amp and speakers with a jack for audio input. the stuff is expensive, too tempting to look away from the road, and between Ford and BMW, is a monster. totally ergo inappropriate. put the frickin' screen in the dash where the speedometer is now, and stop the contortions.

    I'd like my 1964 Dodge back. fixable, the controls fall where your hands are, no menus, and no nonsense.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  15. Apple stole nothing by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The car electronics companies gave away the market. I was in car audio for years while in college. I sold and installed almost every brand you can stick into a dashboard - that was in the 90s.

    Mobile electronics interfaces are still stuck in the 90s. The mobile industry has completely ignored the user interface advancements of the last 10 years. Take a look at the average aftermarket radio - buttons and dot-matrix LED displays that should have been replaced years ago.

    Don't even get me started about bluetooth in car - absolutely no mobile manufacturer makes a stable bluetooth implementation. They all universally suck.

    The best thing I put into my car was a bracket to hold my smartphone. After trying 5 different headunits, I finally gave up trying to find one that approaches the functionality and usability of my Nexus and iOS devices.

    The mobile electronics companies screwed this up - apple stole nothing from them.

    1. Re:Apple stole nothing by grumling · · Score: 1

      When I was picking options for my last car I decided not to go with the in dash navigation system, simply because I knew I could install a bracket for my phone that did much more than the nav system. If the nav system was $300 more than the "premium" stereo (with line-in) I could have justified it, but it was a whopping $1800 more than the mid-range system, which I'm sure wasn't cheap (it was part of the package). For what basically is a small PC running VXWorks or some such real-time OS and a DVD drive.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:Apple stole nothing by Toshito · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buttons are the way to go for an interface in a car. That and big knobs or switches. Something with a lot of tactile feedback. Just look at an airplane's cockpit.

      A touch interface has no place in a car, much too dangerous to use, and totally useless in winter when it's -30C and you wear gloves. The screen becomes slow as molasses and you can't control it without removing your gloves.

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    3. Re:Apple stole nothing by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      This. Why doesn't Apple simply implement a "CarPlay" function on the phones screen so when you get in your car to drive it can switch over. 4-6 big buttons for common apps like Maps, Music, search, or phone, Siri is active so voice commands can be used, BT is turned on so it can interface with the car system. An option to either read texts/email to you (and reply via voice) or a function to quick reply to the sender that I am driving and can't respond right now but will shortly. Heck even add an OBD dongle to your car that can give you real time data on all your mileage, fuel, computer codes, etc.

      Adding a simple bracket to your car to hold your phone is going to be much better than some hacked and expensive car stereo interface that won't receive timely updates. LifeHacker did an interesting article yesterday about the apps available to interface with OBD dongles. Surely someone can perfect that interface and make it useful? Either way, the car interface of today is hopelessly out of touch with modern tech and usefulness. All these things can be accomplished without leading to more distractions and can actually improve road attentiveness.

    4. Re:Apple stole nothing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Have a look at the Tesla implementation. Works with gloves, very responsive and easy to use. There are physical buttons on the steering wheel that can be configured to control different things (radio, climate, navigation etc).

      Realistically you can only remember the position of so many buttons, so end up looking for more obscure functions even if there is a physical switch to control them. The Tesla implementation is no worse than that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. Knobs and buttons by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    The wife just got a car with touch screen doodad that controls pretty much everything. Talk about device which main purposes seems to be to cause distracted driving. I'll take buttons and knobs any day.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Knobs and buttons by grumling · · Score: 1

      Oh, but buttons and knobs cost money to make, the touch screen is just a few bucks.

      And touch screens are sexy. Touch screens sell cars. Knobs are sooooo 20th century. Your granddad's car had knobs.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  17. Re:If Apple infotainment is great why dont we see by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

    If Apple infotainment is great why don't we see it in the airplanes.

    How exactly would this work? You'd be able to airplay GPS to the screen in front of you for a turn by turn play?

    While it would be great if all cars used some sort of standard system, for now I'm happy they're using any kind of standard.

    In a few years time, either Android phones will start having an iPhone compatibility mode, or a standard will emerge.

    (Frankly I don't know which will happen since both have happened in the past)

  18. Re:If it has Apple's name on it, it's crap. by mevets · · Score: 1

    A bit of a sore spot, eh? You work for MS? Maybe on the SYNC?

  19. Re:STOLE??? by narcc · · Score: 1

    As Steve Jobs once remarked (about iTunes for Windows users), like giving a glass of ice water to someone in hell.

    iTunes for Windows? I thought that WAS hell?!

  20. Re:not at those prices, it won't fly off the shelv by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    like the other poster said, all I want in there is an amp and speakers with a jack for audio input

    That's what I put in my truck. You can't listen to optical media in it unless you have a heavy load, because the suspension is too hard. So I have a $20 amplifier with stereo in and four outputs.

    I'd like my 1964 Dodge back. fixable, the controls fall where your hands are, no menus, and no nonsense.

    Yes, if I had perfect foresight instead of excellent hindsight, I'd have kept my 1960 Dodge. It got over 20 mpg on the freeway and it was stupid simple. But I didn't know how to rebuild a brake system then (dirt simple, as it turns out) and so I couldn't afford to keep it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:Works fine for me by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    You using an Apple adapter or a knockoff?

    The lightning adapter is Apple - not sure if any knockoffs exist at this point. But, apparently, it depends on the Alpine deck you have, and the cable used to connect to that. I guess it's complicated.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  22. I recently bought a peripheral that didn't work! by mveloso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recently spent $35,000 on a peripheral for my phone, but I forgot to check if the peripheral worked with my phone.

    Can someone write a law that says that all peripherals have to work with my phone?

    Thank you very much.

    Signed, ignorant consumer.

  23. You do by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    You know those USB ports in the back of some airlines seats? You can use them to stream video from an iPad.

    That was from 2006... I thought I had read recently where some airline was working on a system where you could get in-flight movies on your iPad.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. The adaptor does charge by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I use the adaptor in my own car, which provides a custom cable from 30-Pin iPod to the car's USB port (but it needs that cable in order to run an app specific to the car).

    I've been using the lightning adapter with the iPhone 5 every since it came out, it charges just fine.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. MirrorLink by Rockets84 · · Score: 1

    There was already a OS-Agnostic standard for this - MirrorLink. Yet again Apple pushes another proprietary standard when an open alternative already existed. Airplay/DLNA, ALAC/FLAC & now CarPlay/MirrorLink and the iSheep will eat it up a think it's the best thing since slice bread.

  26. Dead-end Market? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

    I'm confused. Wasn't the last car capable of a having an after-market head unit installed manufactured a solid 10 years ago? I fail to see the point. The number of such cars is on a rapid decline. For collectors if you're going to buy an ancient car, then wouldn't you be buying it for nostalgia's sake and want the old crappy radio that came with it?

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:Dead-end Market? by Rockets84 · · Score: 1

      Yes cars are now being manufactured with all encompassing Infotainment and HVAC control all off what was the factory head unit. Unfortunately they deliver awful sound, crap display's and when Apple decide to change their connector or protocol for iPod/iPhone in newer devices they are rendered useless for music playback because you need a manufacturer specific cable. Just have a look at Alpine's Perfect FIT solutions and you'll what lengths that after market solutions they have and what lengths they go to see what I mean.

    2. Re:Dead-end Market? by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      I'm confused. Wasn't the last car capable of a having an after-market head unit installed manufactured a solid 10 years ago? I fail to see the point. The number of such cars is on a rapid decline. For collectors if you're going to buy an ancient car, then wouldn't you be buying it for nostalgia's sake and want the old crappy radio that came with it?

      Pretty much, unless you buy a car with just the basic radio. I traded in my 2003 Murano for a new car last summer and it was 10 years old. The A/C controls were built into the Bose radio system. It took an aftermarket company 7 years to release a control panel that would let you swap out the stereo system. Once they did, I was able to replace the crappy Bose with a Kenwood Navigation system without losing any functionality.

      My new car is a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and I have the Uconnect 8.4 infotainment system. It's a good system, but everything is built-in to the unit. It would be necessary to get an add-on module on top of a new stereo system to retain all of the current functionality. The only company that I know of that is on the cutting edge of developing these modules is iDataLink (http://maestro.idatalink.com/). They don't have a module for my car yet, but they do have modules for GM On Star, Ford Sync, and older Uconnect systems.

      Personally, I wouldn't replace any stereo system to get CarPlay. In my opinion, its a dumbed down system because it requires you to use your cell phone for the majority of the functionality. Plus, if you have a family who all drive the car, everyone will need an iPhone. Give me a unit with built-in Garmin GPS any day....

    3. Re:Dead-end Market? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Toyota and Subaru both offer MirrorLink capable head units, even as standard on some models. No real need to replace it when you can replace the entire UI, unless you really need a bigger amp.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  27. Re:If Apple infotainment is great why dont we see by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

    There is no service or fee associated with this feature. It's not something you subscribe to, any more than you subscribe to Windows or your Sony alarm clock. This product is simply an app that sits on top of Blackberry's QNX operating system that drives a lot of the high-end car stereos, allowing the stereo to interface more easily with iOS products. Nothing more. You're not even locked into using it, since you can exit out to the car manufacturer's QNX interface.

    Moreover, suggesting we'd see it in airplanes first makes little sense, given that retrofitting entire fleets costs a HELL of a lot more than adding a new feature to a line of cars that gets updated every single year. Besides which, some fleets actually are testing services where they offer in-flight movies free to iPad users, though that's in no way relevant to this discussion, other than that both involve Apple products.

  28. Smartphone king of offline mapping also by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    How well do the maps work when you don't have cell coverage in most cars? Just fine.

    Same is true of the phone. Either you can buy any offline mapping program ranging from $10-$20, or just use what offline maps exist in Google/Apple maps (Apple maps once it starts a nav route no longer requires a network to get to where you are going).

    Those are all updated automatically, for free, and I can chose the navigation I think works best for where I am.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  29. Re:not at those prices, it won't fly off the shelv by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    all I want in there is an amp and speakers with a jack for audio input

    Yep, me too. I have a 1999 Holden (Isuzu) Rodeo V6. It's a low-tech car, no computers or gizmos at all (excluding the engine's ECU). Like an old nail, it's utterly reliable - it has 350,000km on it and it just works, day in, day out. In the Australian climate it's not even going to rust away.

    My one concession to modern in-car electronics was just last weekend upgrading the stock radio (with cassette!) to a new Sony head unit which plays CDs, FM and (key feature) has a front input jack. Along with a 12V cigarette-lighter to USB power adapter, I'm all set. The whole kit and caboodle cost me $AU85.

  30. Re:Show me a good regular head unit and by mlts · · Score: 1

    Even the meth-heads have stopped stealing car stereos. That is how stagnant the industry has gotten.

  31. Not for those of us who listen to the radio by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Try getting a good reception on an iWhatever inside a car and then try changing channels on the move.

  32. Re:Show me a good regular head unit and by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Car stereo crime has more or less stopped because car manufacturers shifted from having standard stereo enclosures to fitting decent model specific stereos that wouldn't fit in other makes or models of car.

    Standard interfaces are not always a good thing!

  33. Re:No Thank You. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons I didn't buy a Ford was because of the Microsoft crap and I am not going to buy a vehicle with anything from Apple installed. If they want to conform to an industry standard port / interface then maybe their products will have a use in my vehicles.

    Then it's a good job that Apple won't be installing anything in a vehicle.

    This is about the Carplay protocol, not about Apple making head units or stereos.

    Man, I know that slashdot users can't read the articles, but it's getting bad when they don't read the summary either before rushing to post.