Slashdot Mirror


L.A. Science Teacher Suspended Over Student Science Fair Projects

An anonymous reader writes "A high school science teacher at Grand Arts High School in Los Angeles was suspended from the classroom in February, after two of his science fair students turned in projects deemed dangerous by the administrators. "One project was a marshmallow shooter — which uses air pressure to launch projectiles. The other was an AA battery-powered coil gun — which uses electromagnetism to launch small objects. Similar projects have been honored in past LA County Science Fairs and even demonstrated at the White House."

253 comments

  1. Sudden outbreak of common sense by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine if these things fell into the hands of tairsts, or pediofiddlers? Someone could lose an eye.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ROFL I love the way you said tairsts!

    2. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt this is about whether the projects are actually dangerous, but the representation of guns being ok in schools.

    3. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by gman003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      tairsts

      For a minute I read that as "tsarists", which was arguably more interesting.

    4. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Tarsiers?

      That would be adorable.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Paper mache vulcanos are the only science high school students will ever need to know. That and intelligent design.

      Also; nukular.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by operagost · · Score: 1

      I used to be a scientist like you, until I took a marshmallow in the eye.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      I used to be a scientist like you, until I took a marshmallow in the eye.

      Sounds like the typical "mad scientist" boiler plate.

      So, when do you reveal your great invention that will make marshmallows tremble at the mere mention of your name?!
      Muuaaaahahahahahhahahaha!

    9. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I used to be a scientist like you, until I took a marshmallow in the eye.

      No lollygagging.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by saramakos · · Score: 1

      What's the matter? Did somebody steal your sweetroll?

    11. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC gone PC MAD, getting worse by the day . . .

  2. i would like to suspend the (mis) administrators.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from some sort of stock arrangement, where marshmallows and small bits of metal can be shot in their general direction...

  3. Sick Society by JimSadler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suspending a teacher over such nonsense borders on drooling idiocy or insanity. Any decent science class unavoidably teaches students to build devices that might be used to do harm. If you teach a kid in chemistry class how not to make an explosion you are also telling him exactly how to create an explosion. That does not imply that teachers should not teach chemistry.

    1. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is insane, in fact insane people are more sane than this. I feel sorry for the poor teacher. I grew up in the 50's and sure wouldn't have survived these times.

    2. Re:Sick Society by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly what is wrong with the schools here. Stupid administrators making decisions on what should and should not be taught in the classroom and disciplining teachers for actually inspiring their students to think and build things. All administrators want nowadays are kids who are only capable of mindlessly following a given set of instructions.

    3. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things have changed. Perhaps you have forgotten about all of Jon Katz's posts concerning "the post-9/11 world". Whatever happened to him anyway?

    4. Re:Sick Society by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      I looked at this as the administrator was fine combing and looking for a reason to fire him/her.

      It is hard to fire tenured teachers and many have resorted to doing things like complaining on their credential to professional boards as an example to find something to fire them etc.

      Get rid of tenure and the problem goes away and they do not have to make up excuses. My exwife was a teacher and you wouldn't believe the crap they tried to pull to make her quit. Of course she is very opinion oriented which didn't help and caused the situation.

    5. Re:Sick Society by meerling · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Go to the article source and read the comments.
      There are a number of them by the locals involved with that school.
      It looks like this is a not uncommon tactic variation certain higher ups use to punish those they don't like, as well as those peoples supporters.
      All very questionable and completely unethical. Hopefully this time it backfires in a big way.

    6. Re:Sick Society by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      These days my high school physics instructor would probably have gotten in trouble or us students would have gotten arrested for bringing weapons to school when we had to design and build trebuchets and catapaults to launch tennis balls.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The teacher should be jailed and the students subjected to intensive and lifelong therapy. How can they call this "science" when it involves neither endangered species nor oppressed communities. Time for a revival of electoshock counselling.

    8. Re:Sick Society by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you think that schools would be better if it was easy to fire teachers who had opinions that differed from the administrations, leaving only the mindlessly obedient ones to teach the nations children how to also be mindlessly obedient?

    9. Re:Sick Society by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not about science, it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance.

      Seriously - stop spreading their propaganda. They explicitly want those in power to have all the guns they need. They just want the People to be disarmed and figure their friends will be in power.

      This is not at all an anti-gun stance, it's a central-control stance. This gives them a sense of security, like those living under Mao or Pol Pot.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what it was. This teacher pissed off a school board member or something. It was mentioned in the comments on another site when the story went around.

      Just local politics needing to find some excuse to get rid of someone.

      Complete bullshit. But that's our system. The biggest turds float to the top.

    11. Re:Sick Society by russotto · · Score: 0

      They should love the sociology project I suggested, then -- feeding endangered species to members of oppressed communities.

    12. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science is not required to form good little consumer drones that always follow the rules. Science and it's teachers will be removed.

      Now suck it up and get back out there. Those made in china products at walmart won't buy themselves.

      Don't forget to vote republicrat in your next election consumer drone. Or you will be removed too.

    13. Re:Sick Society by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Grand Arts High School was formerly known as Ramon C. Cortines School for Visual and Performing Arts . . . apparently, lowly science is not a "Grand Art". It doesn't sound like the place you would send your kid to prepare to study Physics at Princeton or Electrical Engineering at MIT. I pity the poor teacher of science or math in a school full of kids from "pushy" parents, determined that their offspring is destined for stardom.

      Kinda weird . . . normally we expect the anti-science crowd to come from the religious corner off the ring . . . and low and behold . . . they get upstaged by a "Grand Arts" school staffed by administrators confounded by the entire concept of what "science" is.

      "Grand Farts High School", indeed . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    14. Re:Sick Society by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So you think that schools would be better if it was easy to fire teachers who had opinions that differed from the administrations, leaving only the mindlessly obedient ones to teach the nations children how to also be mindlessly obedient?

      Lets turn the tables?

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses? What makes them so special? Do we need to be mindlessly obedient at work? Yes. Do not like the door is right there etc!

      Yes this sucks in life, however it is setup that way for a reason. Shit needs to get done and bosses need to discipline and control their employees to make sure things are running smoothly. If not then their jobs are on the line. Sucks worse for them than it does for us if you think about it?

      There are bad employees everywhere and teachers are not any different. If a teacher can not work with staff or perform their expectations to raise the test scores and teach they need to leave. Here is another table turning. Would you want your kids to be taught by an incompetent teacher? I think not and they take our money as tax payers.

    15. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the situation we have at our college. A department head was recently fired for disagreeing with the dean. Our dean was stocking shelves at K-Mart just a few years ago. Seriously, it's on his CV. The person who was fired is a West Point graduate who finally had enough of our dean's lack of concern for our students.

      Mindless obedience is exactly what they want.

    16. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well do you get special treatment at your job?

      No

      The reason why is yes it can be abused, but the need to be efficient and serve customers is more important than the rights of workers. Troublemakers who are decisive can really make your life hell if you need to manage something.

      If he or she can not work with you they must go or you will go when they fuck something up. Now which is unfair?

      Want a bad teacher teaching your kids? I think not. What about the childrens' and parents rights? Don't they count? They count more than the teacher as they are hired to serve them logically speaking right? Not the other way around.

    17. Re:Sick Society by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No it's not anti-gun, you're talking about a country who believe their right to own guns trumps all other rights thanks to a document written many years ago.

      This is all about thinking of the children. It would have been no different if they made little mini bombs, or used fire, or anything else that they should be teaching in chemistry these days. I wonder what it would be like if they distilled alcohol at the science fair. God forbid they use little magnet toys for something.

      After all we're talking about a country where toy magents are banned even from adults because it killed 2 kids, but rifles are available off the shelf to suit kids.

    18. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. You fire a teacher if he is not doing his job, teaching. You don't fire a teacher because he disagrees with your bullshit. Competent teachers don't need administrators to tell them how or what to teach, they need them to provide support (like functioning printers and paper) and disciplining students, if needed. Thin-skinned administrators who mistake themselves for "bosses" are always a problem. Dealing with classrooms full of children is more than enough work--who wants to have to worry about constantly kissing some insecure fool's ass.

    19. Re:Sick Society by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses? What makes them so special?

      You don't seem to understand what tenure is. Tenure doesn't protect teachers from being fired if they act irresponsibly or do not do their job. Tenure only protects the teacher from being fired without just cause.

      The case here is really the question of whether allowing a student to build a marshmallow gun powered by compressed air represents just cause. The administration says it is, but they have an axe to grind with the teacher in question because he's also a union representative, etc. (as detailed in other comments)

      The suggest that the solution is to just give the administrators the right to fire all teachers without any justification for the firing is idiotic.

    20. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was the case then perhaps the schools could do or say something about the unending stream of wars that the USA seems to enjoy engaging in.

      Fuck you and all your hypocritical kind.

    21. Re:Sick Society by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, that explains why the cities with the strictest gun control laws have the lowest murder rates and those with the laws making it easier for law-abiding citizens to own and carry guns have the highest murder rates...No, wait, it's the other way around. If you actually look at the facts it turns out that it is people like Bloomberg who are blood-drenched and the NRA who are the heroes.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    22. Re:Sick Society by schwit1 · · Score: 0

      Bloomberg is a hypocrite, not a hero. He's all for disarming the general populace since he has the money to live in a secure home and hire armed guards for personal protection. The rest of us don't have that luxury and must fend for ourselves.

    23. Re:Sick Society by BiIl_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. If that's the case, they should be going after actual guns (Not that I would support them, but if that's their goal, then this doesn't make sense.), not science projects. This does nothing to curb violence. It's all about controlling people with their nonsensical zero tolerance policies.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    24. Re:Sick Society by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. You fire a teacher if he is not doing his job, teaching. You don't fire a teacher because he disagrees with your bullshit. Competent teachers don't need administrators to tell them how or what to teach, they need them to provide support (like functioning printers and paper) and disciplining students, if needed. Thin-skinned administrators who mistake themselves for "bosses" are always a problem. Dealing with classrooms full of children is more than enough work--who wants to have to worry about constantly kissing some insecure fool's ass.

      Stop right there.

      Yes, a boss has a right to complain if you do not perform your job a. what b, when and c. how it is done to his or her specifications. Do not like then go get another job. Dealing with a classroom full of children is part of the job and yes a teacher needs to worry about kissing ass because it is part of the job. The teacher agreed to it right?

      This is no different than any other position out there. Doesn't matter if you feel the job sucks, easy, hard, whatever. You agree agree and a boss watches over to make sure things are moving smoothly. If not then the boss can't do the job and the customer looses. In this case the students and parents.

      It is up to the teacher not the principal to discipline kids. Ask anyone in the teaching profession. If the principal has to do your job then you suck as a teacher and can't manage your classroom. It is part of the job description.

    25. Re:Sick Society by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses? What makes them so special?

      You don't seem to understand what tenure is. Tenure doesn't protect teachers from being fired if they act irresponsibly or do not do their job. Tenure only protects the teacher from being fired without just cause.

      The case here is really the question of whether allowing a student to build a marshmallow gun powered by compressed air represents just cause. The administration says it is, but they have an axe to grind with the teacher in question because he's also a union representative, etc. (as detailed in other comments)

      The suggest that the solution is to just give the administrators the right to fire all teachers without any justification for the firing is idiotic.

      My exwife and I worked at school districts. Trust me if administrators want a 1 and 1 they get a stiff rebuke email from the union rep threatening job termination without the union there! What the hell?

      Do I get this at my job? No. I am employed at will. So you are stumpy. It is in good taste and for fear of liability that we have an HR representative due the threatening and a humiliating letter 3 times in a row and then a box and boot out the door after time# 3.

      Yes some may want to mod me down after reading the last paragraph or think I am being a dick, but I am just the messenger here. Remember at work it is always about the customer. Not you. Kids and parents are the customers.

      This is what it is like everywhere and if principals had more authority our schools would be better. Yes I will concede teachers put up with a lot of crap and have big responsibilities. I understand that.

      But understand the lack of firing people make them do batshit stuff like claiming "... not dressing appropriately " in their teaching certificate or making up stuff in science fairs. It is standard procedures in the teaching world when someone is tenured or the union rep says "NO! You may not put down such and such in this write up ... etc" so this is a way around it.

      I have seen this at 2 different school districts.

    26. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you "fend for yourself" with a gun, you're more likely to be murdered by it than to save the life of you or someone you love.

      completely untrue, but keep spreading brady lies like they're truths and eventually some retards will believe you.

    27. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nonsense. If that's the case, they should be going after actual guns

      there are over 100,000,000 gun owners in the united states, owning more than 300,000,000 guns.

      you cannot "go after guns" and expect to accompish anything in one year or even ten years. you have to play the long game, and that includes any number of tactics, including conditioning kids into being so scared of even talking about anything remotely related to firearms, so that 50-100 years from now, gun owners are a tiny minority, at which point there's no real opposition to your idiotic control schemes, because really, gun control is people control.

      british history lesson: http://www.guncite.com/journals/okslip.html

    28. Re:Sick Society by BiIl_the_Engineer · · Score: 0

      Certainly, there are probably some who feel this way, but I don't think even most pro-gun control people accept this idiocy.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    29. Re:Sick Society by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As long as the NRA and RWNJ refuse to acknowledge that we have a gun problem, not a people problem, the deaths will continue and there will be nothing to stop it.

      ~300,000,000 guns, ~100,000,000 gun owners, with about ~14,000 annual homicides committed with firearms. Rhetorical question: What's 14,000 divided by 100,000,000 or 300,000,000?

      It is a people problem. Studies have shown that the vast majority of first time murders already had extensive violent criminal records. Clearly the justice system is not doing these people or society justice, since there were ample opportunities to intervene before they took a human life.

      It's also a socioeconomic problem, because crime is driven in large part by poverty. You want to cut gun violence? End the war on drugs, increase education and job placement funding, and start to look at seriously reforming our mental healthcare system.

      Of course, all of those things are hard to do. It's a lot easier if you can just blame the guns, as though inanimate objects are possessed of powers of their own.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    30. Re:Sick Society by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      No, it is anti gun just as i said it. There are people who think the second amendment to thr constituton is out of touch and knowing they cannot muster enough suppot to amend the constitution, they are activly subverting it. This is one of those attemps and ypu can see other posts in this thread that illistrate that.

      You see, unlike magnets, guns cannot easily be banned because of that very old document- as long as people ate not afraid of guns. As soon as they are, they tend to side with getting rid of those scary things. So even though guns are made for kids and the government cannot ban them, they can place age restrictions on purchasing them.

      This is about guns- not science.

    31. Re:Sick Society by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine what they'd have thought of a chemistry set from the 50's! Oh man, they'd shit bricks.

    32. Re:Sick Society by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take a four year old to the range with his/her first bb gun during a protest and watch how they react.

      Bonus points if the kid tells them 'they'll get his gun from his cold dead fingers'. I can still see the reaction from the fuckers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    33. Re:Sick Society by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Or teaching them Physics! They may -gasp- figure out that rocks can be thrown!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    34. Re:Sick Society by Euler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The US is tops of the list of gun violence for any country with a stable government."
      Yes, we all have heard this statistic. Basically, it is cherry-picking by various ambiguous qualifiers: "stable", "developed", etc. Usually these are just keywords for "..as compared primarily to the UK, Western Europe, and Canada.."

      Russia and Mexico both have stable governments. They also have strict gun control (at least according to the written laws.) Guess what, both have a much higher gun homicide rate compared to the USA.

      Don't get me wrong, the homicide rate in the USA is embarrassingly high. There are many honest discussions to be had. But for now, both sides continue to dig in and not look for any real solutions that would fit with the culture and political setting of the USA.

    35. Re:Sick Society by tepples · · Score: 2

      Yes, a boss has a right to complain if you do not perform your job a. what b, when and c. how it is done to his or her specifications.

      The problem comes when the school administrators micromanage said specifications in a political way that interferes with education.

    36. Re:Sick Society by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The administrator wasn't doing the teacher's job by disciplining the kids because the kids did nothing wrong. It was completely correct what they did. But the administrator disagreed. And that kind of disagreement is *exactly* why we have tenure: to protect teachers who actually teach something controversial.

    37. Re:Sick Society by Euler · · Score: 1

      Correction: there do not appear to be published numbers for gun homicide rate in Russia, just total homicide rate in Russia (which is still higher than USA total homicide rate.)

    38. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The administrator needs to be fired, and sued for everything they have.

      Blatant misuse of power, total ass-hattery.

    39. Re:Sick Society by lgw · · Score: 1

      Got it in one. He was the union negotiator in an ongoing dispute. Now he's not.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    40. Re:Sick Society by lgw · · Score: 1

      Dammit, why must you oppose my project to feed members of oppressed communities to endangered species? Surely we must have some common ground.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    41. Re:Sick Society by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Lets be real. Obama is not Mao, nor is he Pol Pot.

      You're welcome.

      Yes, let's be real. The primary obstacle to people like Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc from becoming like Mao, Pol Pot or insert your favorite genocidal dictator here, is that they face a strong opposition.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    42. Re:Sick Society by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Basically, it is cherry-picking by various ambiguous qualifiers: "stable", "developed", etc. Usually these are just keywords for "..as compared primarily to the UK, Western Europe, and Canada.."

      It's a dog-whistle for the obviously racist intent of "majority white". That's what they mean, that's what they're saying, they just lack the guts to be explicit with it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    43. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an european it's frightening the (mainly, but not limited to) US mindset of seeing everything in terms of consumerism. There are no "patients", only customers of health services, and your health is not our concern but your money is. There are no pupils, only customers of education services, and as long as you pay I will reassure you your child is absolutely bright and reward your generous money with as many A grades. Soon (cynicals will say already) there won't be citizens, only customers of justice, administration and political services, and they'll be as well served as their money will buy.

    44. Re:Sick Society by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Mexico's government may be "stable" in that they have elections but they do not have full control over large parts of their territory.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:Sick Society by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses?

      Yep.

      Do we need to be mindlessly obedient at work?

      You seriously need to pull your head out of your ass ASAP. Even soldiers who can be sent to prison for NOT following orders are not required to mindlessly following orders. In fact they're required not to follow illegal orders.

      The rest of life is no different. Apart from in your rather odd fantasy world, bosses are not absolute rulers. There are whole piles of law in fact about what they cannot do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    46. Re:Sick Society by Yoda222 · · Score: 0

      There are about 300 000 000 boobs in the USA, and only about 40 000 women die of breast cancer each year. Divide 40 000 by 300 000 000 and you have a proof (in your mindset) that there is no link between boobs and breast cancer.

    47. Re:Sick Society by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Erm no it doesn't. Free speech is not what gives me the right to say what I just did. In fact DICE has every right to delete this comment.

      Now get back on your meds.

    48. Re:Sick Society by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      SO? Who cares whether the homicides are done with gun or without? Dead is dead.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    49. Re:Sick Society by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 2

      Russia has strict gun laws? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

      As far as Mexico is concerned the gun homicide is not independent of US. In fact lax gun laws and huge drug demand in the US coupled with extreme economic disparity is creates this gun-toting criminal network in Mexico responsible for all the killings.

      Other stable and developed countries like England and Australia have unfortunately had mass shootings like the US, and result was stricted gun laws and less gun deaths. As far as sound public policy is concerned, it makes sense to keep guns out of the hands of stupid an irresponsible people.

      As far as keeping the King in check, gun owners do very little for that (who did more to influence the NSA all the gun owners in Texas or Edward Snowden). Voting and involvement in the political process is a lot more valuable than irresponsible posession of dangerous firearms.

    50. Re:Sick Society by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Japan is stable and developed and not majority white. Also has very good gun control and very few gun deaths. I must be a racist!

    51. Re:Sick Society by nbauman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Give up. This is not about science, it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance.

      In your haste to construct an anti-liberal, pro-gun narrative, you missed the real reason for his suspension, which somebody mentioned above.

      http://articles.latimes.com/20...

      Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

    52. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I get this at my job? No. I am employed at will. So you are stumpy. It is in good taste and for fear of liability that we have an HR representative due the threatening and a humiliating letter 3 times in a row and then a box and boot out the door after time# 3

      It took me a few minutes to figure out just how to parse this gobbledygook, but it seems like you're suggesting that because you are employed "at will" in a non-union shop, then no one should be permitted the protections of collective bargaining nor a third party advocate during job disputes. It sounds like you're suggesting that, as long as "the boss" has a second company representative communicate complaints, then any thinly veiled excuse is a valid reason for job termination.

      You do suck. You do imply that, just because someone has risen to a position of power, that everyone else should just keep his head down and submit. Now, that may work well for some job classes (burger flippers and floor sweepers come to mind), but to challenge authority and ideas is an important part of education. Making teachers kowtow to principals and political appointees is not going to teach your children to be independent and creative thinkers.

      There is more to education, to real education, than passing some no-child-left-behind criterion test. In fact, to many educators, such criterion tests are the opposite of education. Is it not interesting, in the same 13 years we have suffered under NCLB, that employers have started complaining loudly of how poorly prepared Americans are for technical jobs? In the same period that US education has emphasized rote memorization, fewer people seem able to solve job-relevant, real-world problems.

      You don't get intellectual challenge from youtube videos, or from a live teacher reading a school-board approved script. You get intellectual challenge by figuring out what excites each individual student, and pushing him or her to explore that area, in means or under sufficient supervision that they aren't likely to do permanent physical harm to themselves. Like building a marshmallow cannon.

    53. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a people problem. Studies have shown that the vast majority of first time murders already had extensive violent criminal records. Clearly the justice system is not doing these people or society justice, since there were ample opportunities to intervene before they took a human life.

      15% of murders are committed by a domestic partner. 56% of murders are committed by friends or acquaintances. The notion that murders are committed against random people by some set of hardened, life-long criminals is not supported by data. Perhaps all the more so, given that convicted felons are generally prohibited from owning firearms.

      Likewise, given that 65% of gun deaths (as distinguished from murders) are suicides, I have to say I consider it highly unlikely that the vast majority of gun violence is committed by people with extensive criminal records

    54. Re:Sick Society by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      How much controversial stuff is taught in High school? Tenure makes sense in a college setting where professors are given the freedom to teach. Tenure in grade school and high school is just a method to protect incompetent teachers. Many states and teachers unions got rid of tenure for that very reason, even then it is still difficult to get rid of bad teachers. Private schools don't have that issue they can hire, fire, and compensate based on performance, couple that with them not being forced to babysit kids that don't want to learn and you can see why private schools routinely outperform public ones.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    55. Re:Sick Society by jittles · · Score: 1

      There are about 300 000 000 boobs in the USA, and only about 40 000 women die of breast cancer each year. Divide 40 000 by 300 000 000 and you have a proof (in your mindset) that there is no link between boobs and breast cancer.

      Well you have to remember that boobs are part of an organism. Breast cancer can only be caused by living cells. So again it sounds like its a problem with organisms and not a problem that exists due to inanimate objects. It's much easier to get people to volunteer to raise money for breast cancer research than it is to get people to address social/economic issues, however.

    56. Re:Sick Society by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is a people problem. Studies have shown that the vast majority of first time murders already had extensive violent criminal records. Clearly the justice system is not doing these people or society justice, since there were ample opportunities to intervene before they took a human life.

      15% of murders are committed by a domestic partner. 56% of murders are committed by friends or acquaintances. The notion that murders are committed against random people by some set of hardened, life-long criminals is not supported by data. Perhaps all the more so, given that convicted felons are generally prohibited from owning firearms.

      Likewise, given that 65% of gun deaths (as distinguished from murders) are suicides, I have to say I consider it highly unlikely that the vast majority of gun violence is committed by people with extensive criminal records

      There is data collected by the FBI and local state agencies if you'd like to check. For starters not all homicides are gun-related. Secondly, the question is not whether it is strangers murdering strangers, but whether 1) poverty and drug-related crimes/drug-related environments are fueling the bulk of homicides (and gun-related homicides in particular) and 2) the typical perpetrator has already a crime record.

      The data I alluded, collected by various law enforcement agencies and 3rd party organizations/analysts points into that direction. African Americans and Hispanics (my community) are dis-proportionally represented in gun-related homicides. When you break down gun-related homicide by race, we find that among non-Hispanic Whites, the murder rates are comparable (slightly higher but still comparable) to those in Western Europe.

      Furthermore, 80% of gun-related homicides are committed by hand guns, not the ZOMG assault weapons politicians like to ban. I cannot find the link to the FBI study where it showed the type of handguns used the most in homicides, but it clearly mentioned the majority of them were on the cheap end, 2nd-hand saturday night special type of hand guns, not the $500+ firearms the typical law-abiding gun-owner possess.

      So, clearly, race and income are a factor. Since race and income are (still) tightly correlated in the US, we can generalize this by simply saying it is a class-related phenomenon. Add to the fact that drug-related crimes significantly affect African Americans (where there has been a marked breakdown in families and an increase in single-parent families), Hispanics and to a lesser extend Caucasians in the South due to the "meth" belt, we see a strong correlation with the war on drugs.

      Now, I'm not saying we should not have tighter controls with firearms. I own firearms, and I conceal carry wherever it is legal. But I also acknowledge we should have much better ways to track who buys or sells what. Illegally acquired firearms and straw sales are a major factor in gun-related crime. So we have to deal with it.

      But the primordial factors here are race/economics, poverty, even health ([a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/01/03/how-lead-caused-americas-violent-crime-epidemic/" target="new"]refer to lead poisoning as a possible cause in the spike of crime from the late 60's to the 80s[/a]). Most importantly, it is culture.

      Fins and Swiss have significant %s of gun-ownership, and the Swiss can open carry, and yet you do not see the significant murder rates as in the US (though there are rates of spousal murder where alcohol is involved, but that is a universal.)

      Honduras is the capital murder of the world, and although gun laws are flexible, most people simply do not own a piece legally (prices are out of reach to most - ownership is for the well-to-do). Poverty is rampant, the police is ill-equipped to deal with gang/drug related violence, and the country lacks institutions to deal with recidivism.

      Nicaragua, adjacent to Honduras is the poorer of the two, with gun laws and legal private own

    57. Re:Sick Society by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Bloomberg is a hypocrite, not a hero. He's all for disarming the general populace since he has the money to live in a secure home and hire armed guards for personal protection. The rest of us don't have that luxury and must fend for ourselves.

      If you "fend for yourself" with a gun, you're more likely to be murdered by it than to save the life of you or someone you love.

      Citations please.

      Never mind the chance your young child will blow off his head, or that of a friend.

      That's what locks and safes are for. It's not rocket science and yet the hordes of idiots that live among the anti-gun crowd (and the idiots who own guns without a lock) seem too stupid to grasp this very simple concept.

    58. Re:Sick Society by BVis · · Score: 1

      All employers want nowadays are workers who are only capable of mindlessly following a given set of instructions.

      FTFY.

      You could argue that by conditioning the students to never question authority and do exactly what they are told with no questions asked (or allowed), they are preparing them with the skills they will need in their future employment, where wage slavery and a dependence on one's employer to provide the coverage that will keep one alive keeps the proles in line.

      Until employment in the USA is more than one step removed from indentured servitude, this will be the way of the world. Don't question, citizen, know your role and consume.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    59. Re:Sick Society by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Divide 40 000 by 300 000 000 and you have a proof (in your mindset) that there is no link between boobs and breast cancer.

      If you want to take this stupid analogy to its logical conclusion you'd have to suggest mandatory mastectomies to save those 40,000 souls. Granted, you'll be punishing 99.987% of women, but you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, eh?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    60. Re:Sick Society by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the men you'd be punishing!

    61. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @ billy gates gruff:
      urine idjit, please don't breed...

    62. Re:Sick Society by Yoda222 · · Score: 1

      In fact you missed several interresting point in my stupid analogy. These point are common to both situations.

      1) it's stupid to say that gun have nothing to do in dead by guns. They have at least some influence on it. Dead by real laser saber per year is 0.
      2) both situation use an interesting stupid idea: compare dead in one year with the total boobs in circulation. You should compare death not per year, but over the lifetime of the boobs (or compare the dead by year with the number of breast created every year.). Or the lifetime of the gun or gun user.
      3) Not all women who have breast cancer died from it. Maybe we should also count people injured by gun, not only dead.

    63. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you advocating that all females should have their breasts removed from them as a way to prevent these 40,000 deaths? If not, why are the gun victims so special that you'll take away all the guns but you'll allow the women to keep dying from breast cancer?

    64. Re:Sick Society by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Japanese Americans have an even lower violent crime rate than Japanese at in Japan.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    65. Re:Sick Society by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't work as an English teacher.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    66. Re:Sick Society by Euler · · Score: 1

      According to that link, Russia's gun laws are much stricter than most states in the USA, except maybe New York. Only some US states have magazine limits or universal background checks. And no state is tracking the number of (unrestricted) long guns owned in order to impose a limit.

    67. Re:Sick Society by IsNewToYou · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was a great read. Glad to see someone knows how to think and post with citations.

    68. Re:Sick Society by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

      It is on Grand Street, btw.

    69. Re:Sick Society by rezme · · Score: 1

      I'm really surprised this lot missed the chance to scream about unions too...

    70. Re:Sick Society by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

      So, you mean a state like Texas - loose gun control - with a 2012 murder rate of 4.4 (per 100,000 people) versus a state like New York - tight gun control - with a rate of 3.5? Which is the lower number? See http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.or... . Better yet, look at the ranking by murder rate -
      and tell me if you think the top of the list - the high murder-rate states - Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Michigan, South Carolina, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware, Tennessee, and Arkansas - sounds like a bunch of states with tight gun control laws?

    71. Re:Sick Society by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Not just opinions, but pay rate too.

      As we've seen on new teachers who enter the workforce, schools will mass fire the teachers after the year then re-hire them before the next at reduced pay. Or fire one experienced and well paid one for two that just graduated.

    72. Re:Sick Society by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      it's stupid to say that gun have nothing to do in dead by guns

      Good thing I never said that then. All I hinted at is the stupidity of punishing ~100,000,000 gun owners because of the actions of ~14,000.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    73. Re:Sick Society by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      A city is not a state.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    74. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course nobody will point out the teacher's real failure. Which is that these were engineering projects, not science experiments. What's the hypothesis being tested? Whether or not little Jimmy can build something that he saw on YouTube? A demonstration of a machine that uses scientific theories in its operation is not the same thing as a test of that theory.

    75. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How much controversial stuff is taught in High school?

      Are you fucking kidding? Evolution ("devil's lies"), geology ("more devil's lies"), sex ed ("don't teach children that filth"), art ("waste of time"), foreign language ("waste of time" and "everybody should speak english anyway"), gym/athletics ("waste of learning time"), sports ("waste of money").

    76. Re:Sick Society by russotto · · Score: 1

      Ah,the circle of life. Somehow I always thought it would be larger though.

    77. Re:Sick Society by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that explains why the cities with the strictest gun control laws have the lowest murder rates and those with the laws making it easier for law-abiding citizens to own and carry guns have the highest murder rates...No, wait, it's the other way around.

      Without bothering to fact-check: either cities with high murder rates tend to ban guns in an attempt to lower it, or something about the city culture fosters both murders and gun control laws. Ever since I started reading /., I've known that correlation is not causation.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    78. Re:Sick Society by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In eleventh-grade physics (about four years ago), my son was supposed to construct a trebuchet. It didn't work really well, but I liked the principle of the thing.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    79. Re:Sick Society by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Bloomberg is a hypocrite, not a hero. He's all for disarming the general populace since he has the money to live in a secure home and hire armed guards for personal protection. The rest of us don't have that luxury and must fend for ourselves.

      If you "fend for yourself" with a gun, you're more likely to be murdered by it than to save the life of you or someone you love.

      Citations please.

      Never mind the chance your young child will blow off his head, or that of a friend.

      That's what locks and safes are for. It's not rocket science and yet the hordes of idiots that live among the anti-gun crowd (and the idiots who own guns without a lock) seem too stupid to grasp this very simple concept.

      Do your own research. I have, many times.

      And there are far too many of those idiots who own guns and don't use locks. In fact, many of them say that locks defeat the purpose of owning a gun, since it's not ready at any time to blow away an intruder. (Or your own son who wanders into your bedroom.)

      Anyway, most of the "anti-gun" crowd aren't anti-gun, they're, like me, pro-safety, and are well aware of the value of safes and locks.

  4. First they get rid of shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then Chemistry labs.

    Now this. Sigh.

    Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens. We have to give everyone a medal for participating, not discipline kids who tell teachers to go f**ck themselves, can't teach controversial subjects requiring critical thinking skills, can't flunk them, etc.

    We are not doing them any favors when they get out in the real world afraid to take risks or wonder why their boss fired them instead of giving a raise for participation?

    1. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't we just send the protesters from the cattle thing in Nevada down there - give them people with actual weapons to worry about and they'll forget the fake ones in the science fair.

    2. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Chemistry labs.

      Now this. Sigh.

      Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens. We have to give everyone a medal for participating, not discipline kids who tell teachers to go f**ck themselves, can't teach controversial subjects requiring critical thinking skills, can't flunk them, etc.

      We are not doing them any favors when they get out in the real world afraid to take risks or wonder why their boss fired them instead of giving a raise for participation?

      To THINK that kids at one time played DODGE ball in PE class. Now, they don't. It might hurt their self esteem. (It was so fun to see a kid smacked in the face with a rubber ball; bloody nose. But, it made us a little tougher; almost like the varsity. Or the band.) It is a wonder that the schools even allow senior prom to happen, given the self esteem quakes from that event. Who, who is running this country?

    3. Re:First they get rid of shop by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets burn the lawyers offices down.

      The lawyers are powerless without the courts. It's the Court orders, backed by ... wait for it ... men with guns that make this environment possible.

      Do you know why everybody is so jumpy and the cops are doing summary executions now? Because everybody is a criminal, everybody is a suspect, and the cops and the courts enforce these absurd laws rather than than defend the Constitution as a co-equal branch.

      Hell, the Constitution didn't even make it past 1803 intact in design, and FDR accepted the Supreme Court's final surrender in 1937 from Chief Justice Hughes as a settlement to his plan to expand the Court with its cronies. Overnight, SCOTUS began finding all of Roosevelt's programs suddenly Constitutional even concluding that growing wheat for your family farm is part of "Interstate Commerce" and suddenly of Federal providence.

      The problem now is that it's impossible for the People to know what the Constitution says because (supposedly) it doesn't mean anything until SCOTUS tells us what it means, which might well be the opposite of what we "think" it means (that is, the plain English meaning). The catch is that the Constitution is what authorizes the government in the first place. If the People aren't competent to understand their agreement with that government, then they weren't competent to create it in the first place and the grant of power is void.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:First they get rid of shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The courts typically back the schools. My exwife was a teacher and took education law class.

      The problem is it costs money to prove you are innocent. Schools included spent as much money paying off bad parents and lawyers as budgets for freaking books in a given year! How is that for fair?

      All to prove that the judge says, well gee the school has a right to create a learning environment based on such and such in 1934 bla bla. NEXT ... oh the lawyer bill will be $380,000 etc.

    5. Re:First they get rid of shop by rainmaestro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My 8th grade elective (in 1998) was rocketry. We spent the semester building and launching model rockets. Something tells me that elective is no longer being offered.

      You can still find sanity in a few holdouts. My high school (a magnet program, not a regular public school) had a well-stocked research lab and all students performed research. Mine involved cellulolysis and a strain of bacteria that I forget the name of now. The lab (and the research) is still ongoing, though I suspect the program's status gives it more freedom than a regular school would have. They even still had shop courses, or at least they did when I was there. No dodgeball, though, that was forbidden.

    6. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Chemistry labs.

      Yeah, if my son did half the stuff I did in Chemistry class (and got Bs and Cs on), he would be in prison for the rest of his life. Aluminum foil and Drano? OMG this guy is trying to destroy the school!

    7. Re:First they get rid of shop by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Lets burn the lawyers offices down

      can't. don't know how.

      they canceled arson shop, too.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're killing the messenger here. People should be afraid of lawsuits. That's the point of them. The problem is that conservatives have been pedaling an agenda of eliminating meaningful enforcement of civil law for decades, and as a part of their campaign they convince people that they can be sued for any ridiculous thing.

    9. Re:First they get rid of shop by jxander · · Score: 1

      We have to give everyone a medal for participating

      Should we really be giving students metal? It could be ferrous, and people are already in trouble for experimenting with magnetic acceleration!

      Oh, wait .. you said ... nevermind.

      --
      This signature is false.
    10. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing:

      The kids are treated as prisoners from K-12 with no critical thinking skills.

      Then once they graduate, they have to face the fiercest competition the world has for any job. Want in IT? It will be you and a H-1B battling it out for the third shift, weekends and holidays phone support position.

      So, in effect the schools put kids into vacuum beds for the 13 years of school education... then expect them to crawl out and win a race against the Usain Bolts of the world in order for them to earn a daily living.

      It is no wonder why home-schooling is starting to take off. At least the kids there have learned to be aggressive without that quality beaten out of them by muckety-muck administrators.

    11. Re:First they get rid of shop by Tom · · Score: 0

      Lets burn the lawyers offices down.

      That's bullshit. Lawyers are just dogs biting at whatever we (as society) tell them to bite at. It's the laws that need changing. If we hadn't allowed these ridiculous lawsuits in the first place, they wouldn't exist.

      Case in point: In many countries in the world you can tell a stupid kid that its stupid without fear of a lawsuit. Or you can run science projects. And you don't have to print "contents could be hot after heating" on the package of microwave food and "don't use to dry pets" on the microwave itself.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    12. Re:First they get rid of shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit. Lawyers are just dogs biting at whatever we (as society) tell them to bite at.

      You're an asshole. I've worked with lawyers as a legal IT specialist for the last fifteen years, and these self-aggrandizing pompous pricks will go after whatever they think will make them money.

    13. Re:First they get rid of shop by Tom · · Score: 1

      I've worked with lawyers quite a bit during my career, both as in against them and as in I hired them. As human beings, they aren't better or worse than any other profession - you have assholes, you have great people, and a lot inbetween.

      Sorry to hear you only got the assholes.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  5. Yeah, sure. by drolli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am lucky I grew up in the 80s I guess.

    1. Re:Yeah, sure. by cultiv8 · · Score: 5, Informative
      I suspect there is a secondary motive here, the science teacher was also the teachers' union representative and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement. His suspension removed him from those discussion. Source and quote:

      Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    2. Re:Yeah, sure. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Based on all the supposedly really dangerous crap we did in the 80s I think we should be lucky we grew up at all. When I was a kid our Chemistry set had chemicals in it. Could you imagine? Nothing like today's "safer" alternatives.

      And remember if you every feel like questioning anything or applying logic, just stop and think of the children.

    3. Re:Yeah, sure. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      I mentioned this already and as someone who worked at a school district I can vouch. If they get rid of tenure and go to what regular folks have a 3 write up and you are out this wouldn't happen.

    4. Re:Yeah, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know people whine about tenure, but this sort of thing is EXACTLY why tenure exists.

    5. Re:Yeah, sure. by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 2

      Wait. Did you just admit that he's being targeted improperly because he is the union rep . . . and then say that if we got rid of tenure and let them fire whoever they want for whatever reason it wouldn't be a problem anymore?

    6. Re:Yeah, sure. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Wait. Did you just admit that he's being targeted improperly because he is the union rep . . . and then say that if we got rid of tenure and let them fire whoever they want for whatever reason it wouldn't be a problem anymore?

      I sure did.

      This guy prevented bad teachers from being fired. I know call the lawyers bla bla. But if he is the problem why LA school districts are failing he needs to have some leighway and let the administrators do the write ups and terminations. Yes some is political. Welcome to work. Most though needs to be documented and finished.

      Walmart does this all the time to keep prices low.

      The American Teachers Association needs to go back to it's roots to advance the career just like the state bar does with lawyers. Does the bar protect bad unethical lawyers? No they take away their bar license. The American Teachers Association needs to be de-certifying the bad apples and helping them succeed. Helping as in getting training needed and setting up licenses for professional teachers. Not protecting them.

    7. Re:Yeah, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *good* *teachers* *dont* *NEED* *tenure*

      In fact, tenure does not even BELONG in schools, it has been twisted and mis-represented.
      Tenure was never intented to 'protect teachers', it was to allow advanced researchers at universities, how often spend years looking at areas with little return in the hope of finiding 'an answer' to hold their positions.

      It has been horrible twisted into a way to give poorly performing teachers a free ride, at the cost of the children who end up suffering in their classrooms.
      It is of course horrible that they need to twist a stupid situation like this - but it is tenure that forces it!
      Remember, schools empolyment situations is one of THE most fucked up (yes, I will say it that strongly) employment situations around.
      Have a look, for example, at the male:female ratio in schools, and ask yourself why there is no affirmaive action being made to find more
      male teachers. Have a look at the downward spiral of results, and ask yourself why NO focus is coming on to quality of teaching. Have a look
      at the huge pressure put on by teachers and their representatives to remove ANY form of performance meaurement from their positions.

      Think of the damn children! (and this time, it does actually matter..)

      We have all failed them, because of what we are letting happen in schools.
      Shame on us.

    8. Re:Yeah, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low prices does not equal a quality product. We don't want education to come at a low price. We want it to come at the highest quality.

    9. Re:Yeah, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you are. I took an electronics extra in 10th, it was after the Columbine tragedy. Well when a student was asking me about repairing CRTs. I was working on something with power tubes and blew a couple apart, I got thrown out of school for a year and that class was removed from the school curriculum. The latter was probably for the better considering me and that student I was advising seemed like the only two actually interested in more than "how to make sparks".

    10. Re:Yeah, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fucking school administration should be fired if they can't find a legitimate reason to fire bad teachers.
      Of course they have no evidence the teachers are bad. They're probably just mad because the students actually like those teachers.

    11. Re:Yeah, sure. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I guess that could be the case. Although based on the quote, it seems more likely that he's needed to mediate between the teachers and the administrators.

    12. Re:Yeah, sure. by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I am lucky I grew up in the 80s I guess.

      Now that's something I don't hear every day. :D

      --
      ~X~
    13. Re:Yeah, sure. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      It's also a way to offer some level of job security in a field with rapidly changing local demand, a field that pays decent, but many of the benefits come in long-term job security and stability.

      My ex was a teacher, and tenure was a big deal, the state often would change funding levels, laying off close to 10% of staff (we watched student:teacher ratios vary from 25:1 to 30:1 while class sized got smaller). Without tenure there was no way to plan on staying in the same area for even the middle term.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    14. Re:Yeah, sure. by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      You have entirely no clue.

      "Tenure" in the vast majority of school systems is pretty much just a requirement that due process be followed before you can fire someone. This usually means a few hearing, some appeals, and an actual cause for firing.

      Before tenure, teachers could and did get fired for the horrible offenses such as:
      1. Not campaigning for the right school board member
      2. Being an unmarried woman who went out on a date
      3. Being gay
      4. Being older and therefore demanding a higher salary than a new, not very good teacher
      5. Daring to question or report wrongdoing of an administrator

      If you don't think those things will happen again once tenure is gone, you have no clue. You can still fire someone who is not doing their job well. It happens all the time, even in states with tenure.

  6. Marshmallow shooters can be quite dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    if you cross the streams.

  7. Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is part of the war on pretend violence which is really a war on boys who enjoy war and fighting fiction. It shouldn't surprise any man that if we give an assignment of write anything you want. That young men might write about what it would be like to be a sniper or hunt down a fish. But yet if they do that their must be something wrong with them.

    1. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      A marshmallow shooter isn't the start of the slippery slope to gun violence any more than the pervasive availability of knives contributes to stabbings. It used to be normal and accepted practice in western society to teach boys to hunt game to help supplement the family's food supply.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Growing up all through school, I would often get bored in class and draw pages and pages of stick-figure battles, anyhting ranging from medieval battles to Star Wars to WWII. I'm talking body parts flying everywhere, blood spraying, and explosions. I feel like if I was in school now and did stuff like that, I would be expelled on the spot. And the sad thing is it's been less than 10 years since I graduated high school.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      God forbid we teach them reason & respect for others in the mean time.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The days of the Wild West are long since done with. Nobody in schools kills their own game. Contrary to the NRA propaganda machine, guns are for one thing, and that is for funerals. A school district is only doing its duty by nipping the the urge to be a homicidal shooter in the bud before that persists into adulthood and can be acted upon. Lets be real here -- schools are doing their job by stopping the hyperviolent behavior it now before the "stick" or "pop tart" becomes a real gun come high school.

    5. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What gets me is the blowback issue. The schools are starting from a small age forbidding anything gun related... and we all know that the harder stuff gets forbidden, the more it gets in demand.

      I'm reminded of this when it comes to American/European kids. Though some Europeans drink more, it is the American kids who tend to binge more.

      The same thing applies to guns. Forbidding it where if a "L" shaped cloud goes overhead, all students get suspended. This just creates demand. When (not if) said kid gets a gun in real life just because it was denied him... there wouldn't be knowledge there on gun safety. The only knowledge would be what is shown on music videos.

      And that is scary. I'd rather have kids trained from kindergarten on up for the basics of shooting and safe carry (things like not keeping the finger on the trigger 24/7) than extreme, zero-tolerance bans.

      This ties into why I have issues with modern pushes for gun control. The US has had one failed round of prohibition, and is dealing with a second around (marijuana). With every prohibition comes a criminal organization dedicated to satisfying that need for a forbidden item. I really fear what the organization that would form whose job it is to do black market arms trafficing in the entire US. If one thinks the crack dealer on the corner will be a shooting match, wait until there are dealers who know that they either win a gun battle and flee, or face life imprisonment.

    6. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Nobody in schools kills their own game

      I know quite a few people that hunted when they were in high school, and probably hunted since they were at least in middle school. And I live in a large suburban area, not even out in the country.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reason leads to rational thinking.
      Rational thinking leads to hatred
      and hatred leads to suffering!

    8. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What really got them on my case was the stick figure flip porn on the edges of classroom copy text books. I figured everybody was a bored as me.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by jxander · · Score: 1

      What gets me is the blowback issue. The schools are starting from a small age forbidding anything gun related... and we all know that the harder stuff gets forbidden, the more it gets in demand.

      As some one who grew up as the friend of a preacher's daughter (both literally and figuratively, her dad was a preacher and had very strict rules regarding boys) I can very enthusiastically confirm this concept.

      --
      This signature is false.
    10. Re:Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      OK, so I need to recalibrate my humor detector. I totally missed the "pop tart" bit. D'oh!

      But just in case anybody else takes you seriously, I'd like to interject. In Texas it's quite common for families to supplement their food supply with fresh game and fish. A buddy of mine gets over half of his protein budget from stuff he raises, catches, or shoots. He grows most of his own veggies, too. The Wild West might be long gone, but feeding your family the old fashioned way is still appreciated around here. Even in the suburbs where I live, we have neighbors who eat quite a bit of fresh-caught fish and venison.

  8. Marshmallow, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marshmallow is the perfect metaphor for the administrators of GAHS.

  9. Tintin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe its me but that professor looks like the professor from tintin

  10. Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read article by drnb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens.

    Its not fear of lawyers, its an anti-gun agenda. I'm not kidding, from the article:
    “supervising the building, research and development of imitation weapons.”

    Things that look or function remotely similarly to a gun are not to be tolerated. If you let kids shoot marshmallows at stacked plastic cups they might have fun, take pride in their mastery of ballistic trajectories, and you never know where that might lead ... nerf ... airsoft ... a .22.

  11. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    imitation weapons ... again fear of a lawsuit from a disgruntled ambulance parent.

    Anything that can use force can be a weapon. Ban pencils next!

  12. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps teaching kids that use of guns and violence in schools will not be tolerated is a good thing? Do we want to teach out kids how to use fake guns now, then careless use of real guns once in the real world? Schools need to keep zero tolerance on anything gun related if we want to see our crime rate go down (hint: Only a few countries have worse gun violence than the US... and they either have unstable governments, or no governments.)

    The better thing is to actually educate children about the dangers of firearms, and how to tell the difference between real guns and toys/replicas/marshmellow shooters. I grew up playing with toy guns, but my grandfather had several real firearms that he kept in a wood and glass gun cabinet. I was taught that they were dangerous and to only touch them with my grandfather or father. Keeping children from getting exposure to guns other than in video games or on TV means that if they are over at their friend Timmy's house and find his dad's gun they start playing with it and blow little Timmy's head off. If the child knows what to do when they find a gun (don't touch it, leave the area, and find and tell the nearest adult) little Timmy gets to go to school the next day. Abolition won't stop gun violence or even get rid of guns (out of the 6 guns that I own only 3 have any documentation of me purchasing them, and one of those is a hunting rifle). But education will reduce gun deaths significantly.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  13. Administrative politics by wickerprints · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is about office politics. The administration at his school has decided to make an example out of him, and they're using these science experiments as an excuse to make his life miserable. That's what this is really about. He doesn't toe the line, so someone with power has decided to exert their authority.

    To make this about gun politics is as equally absurd as to say that we should stop kids from eating any food because there's an obesity epidemic. These science projects are no more related to actual firearms than the gas stove in your kitchen is related to a nuclear bomb. The only plausible explanation for this situation is that Schiller dared to butt heads with some administrator, and this is payback.

    1. Re:Administrative politics by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even though the administration said the science experiments were the reason for the suspension, it is likely the true reason was something else.

    2. Re:Administrative politics by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      This pretty much sums up what I was thinking too. This guy is a union rep and somebody in charge at the school has butted heads with him.

      Plus, you get extra point for not saying "tow the line."

    3. Re:Administrative politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The teacher was also the union representative involved in several disputes between teachers and the administration. With his suspension, he is also removed from those discussions. http://articles.latimes.com/2014/apr/09/local/la-me-lausd-science-teacher-20140410

    4. Re:Administrative politics by argStyopa · · Score: 0

      You don't think there's a larger agenda here?

      http://www.eutimes.net/2014/04...

      White House counterterrorism and Homeland Security adviser Lisa Monaco gave a speech this week in which she urged parents to watch their children for signs of "confrontational" behavior which could be an indication of them becoming terrorists.
      During the speech at at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government on Tuesday night, Monaco, who replaced John Brennan last year in overseeing the executive branch's homeland-security activities, said that parents need to be suspicious of "sudden personality changes in their children at home."
      "What kinds of behaviors are we talking about?â she asked. "For the most part, they're not related directly to plotting attacks. They're more subtle. For instance, parents might see sudden personality changes in their children at homeâ"becoming confrontational."

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:Administrative politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not exactly sure how suspension with pay is making his life miserable.

  14. Moron Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Large numbers of stupid people, just smart enough to read and write spotted in the greater Los Angles area.

    Be safe out there. Zombie imitations may get you past them. Don't stop west of the Rock Mountains

  15. Electricity by edibobb · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should ban electricity in science fair projects. Electricity is highly dangerous. People die from electrocution every year, some of whom are not even enjoying capital punishment.

    1. Re:Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Electricity is nothing compared to the dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide! http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

    2. Re:Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were bored at work one day and looked up the MSDS on it... turns out the LD50 is 9% body mass. Sounds pretty deadly!

  16. High School by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Fire the administrators immediately and vote the school board out of office.

  17. what is next basic computer skills = hacking by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what is next basic computer skills = hacking

    time to suspended the tech teaches

  18. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps teaching kids that use of guns and violence in schools will not be tolerated is a good thing?

    Perhaps you're a blithering idiot. Oh, wait: there's no question about that.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  19. This is a direct attack on our welfare system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The masquerade of public education has been exposed. Liberals everywhere should move for summary judgement before this gets out of control. The usurpation of a union controlled beuracracy is in progress. The sooner Schiller and his murderous minions are brought to justice, the sooner we get back to businss as usual.
    Soccer mom's need there sleep. The countless hours that will be spent at board meetings to extract the inevitable "this matter has been referred to our attorney" response will clearly interfere with the School Board's ability to screw up everything else that is on the agenda.
    Forget the think of the children meme, We need Obama to come in and declare - When I was a student getting my fake degree, I had a prof that looked like Schindler.
    Look, I realize I left a few jabs out. Feel free to add your own.

  20. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gun safety is something every parent owes their children. Along with power tools, basic electrical wiring, plumbing, plant a grape vine, how to build a computer, tune an engine, build a computer and compile a Linux kernel.

  21. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens.

    Its not fear of lawyers, its an anti-gun agenda. I'm not kidding, from the article:

    “supervising the building, research and development of imitation weapons.”

    Fucking exactly right. Anti-gun liberal extremists is the problem.

  22. Good, and this is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This will do more to make students hate Political Correctness and despise authority than simply reading that those things are bad.

    Good!

    BTW the Hippies were right, and now the rest of the country is discovering the Establishment DOES suck, even when run (perhaps) by former hippies.

    Good.

  23. I was lucky to grow up in a saner environment by spiritplumber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://spiritplumber.deviantar... This is a SLIGHT fictionalization of what happened to me when faced with a derpy administrator -- the dates and names have been changes but you can probably guess my age by the stuff referenced in. Ultimately, teachers and administrators operate in loco parentis; the parents have to get mad.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  24. Another school shooting averted. by Elyjah · · Score: 4, Funny

    I approve of this decision. Someone finally thought of the children; just think how many lives were saved! Science is dangerous, and definitely has no place in our schools. Clearly, the children that built these have some severe mental problems, and all right-thinking people know their parents must be fat, conservative tea-baggers. The kind of violence exhibited by these devices cannot be tolerated. This is exactly why children should not be allowed to think for themselves in school; they are too unpredictable.

    I'm glad we were able to stop these domestic terrorists before they killed anyone.

  25. Sick government schools by Kohath · · Score: 1

    It's not society this time. The sickness here is all in the government schools.

    But remember this: even though government schools do a bad job of teaching children in poor neighborhoods, we can't have non-government schools. Because poor kids wouldn't get a good education with non-government schools.

  26. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Charliemopps · · Score: 0

    No, it's not necessarily an anti-gun agenda... But what's going on is Doctors have come to the conclusion that children are safest if you do not have a gun in the house at all and if the children have no concept of how a gun works, so theoretically the kid will have no idea how to use or fire a real one if the find it and maybe they'd be terrified of it because of its unfamiliarity. Unfortunately, in practice, this idea is flawed. Of course kids know how to shoot a gun. The action is designed to work on instinct so you don't forget how to use the weapon at the critical moment you need it. So if kids do find a gun, of course they can figure it out, and now that they have no firearm safety training... so... Yea, it's a stupid policy created by people that don't own guns. If they simply had the local hunters safety instructor come in and give about 5hrs of instruction per year it would go a lot further.

  27. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    Sigh do not bring politics in this.

    As someone who has worked in the school district I can tell you administrators need to make up good reasons to get rid of bad teachers and this is one of them and yes lawsuits prevent both administrators and staff from doing their jobs.

    If the teacher said you can use this as a weapon. Then yes that would be very bad and inappropriate. If it is used to teach expansion of gas in a chemical reaction then that is a different matter.

    I guess we will find out. Administrators have a reputation of being clueless. More likely they are puppets of the lawyers of school districts and need to do things like this to get rid of a few tenured bad apples.

  28. It's a good start. by clovis · · Score: 1

    After shutting down all science projects that involve projectiles, we need to move against other deadly militaristic skills.

    1) stop all activities that train for grenade throwing.
    For example, one so-called sport has a group of five taking turns attempting to throw a projectile through a 'hoop', where it should be obvious to anyone that this is training terrorists to hurl molotov cocktails through the windows of our leaders homes as well as elementary schools.

    2) stop all activities that train for Hoplite style of battles.
    For example, one so-called sport has a groups of eleven engaging in pushing and shoving to get a ball to a goal behind the group.
    This is clearly military practice to train for close quarters combat without firearms. No doubt their plan is to disrupt the police who may be engaged in clearing streets from deranged people such as the occupy Wall Street protestors.

    3) debate clubs. Why do we need debate clubs except to train people to delude and confuse the populace? The government licensed media should provide all the news and opinions we need.

    1. Re:It's a good start. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand, they want kids taught the transferable skills. So athleticism and mindless team-patriotism that can be steered towards being a good foot-soldier. Debate to identify useful propagandists for recruitment. ("Oh, since you're good at debate, have you considered doing Pol.Sci or Law?" "Oh, you're doing Law with a minor in Pol.Sci, have you considered doing an internship with Senator Snot's office?" "Oh, you interned with the Senator? Here at Snot, Booger and Loogie we do a lot of work for clients who enjoy political... access.")

      Science, otoh, is notorious for not following the party line. If your science teacher isn't following the letter of the rules, then you risk creating students not doing so when they work for on politically important research. Understanding reality? Following evidence? WTF is that shit? Your job is to provide evidence to justify what we already decided.

      1) stop all activities that train for grenade throwing.
      For example, one so-called sport has a group of five taking turns attempting to throw a projectile through a 'hoop'

      Really? You wanted a grenade analogy and you went with basketball? When baseball was available?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    2. Re:It's a good start. by tepples · · Score: 1

      In baseball you're not trying to get the "grenade" into a target almost as high as a second-story window.

  29. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anything that can use force can be a weapon. Ban pencils next!

    I have a minor scar on my forearm that was caused by a pencil in high school. Yes, seriously.

    cheek += tongue;
    It really is unfortunate that they didn't ban pencils way back then, because then I wouldn't have been stabbed by the pencil-wielding psychopath.
    cheek -= tongue;

    Captcha: armament - how appropriate.

  30. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imitation weapons ... again fear of a lawsuit from a disgruntled ambulance parent.

    Anything that can use force can be a weapon. Ban pencils next!

    Good point. After seeing the Joker (Heath Ledger) demonstrating his disappearing pencil trick, it's obviously a weapon. The children would realize and embrace its elegant simplicity for being able to use it kill everyone they hated. Pens and pencils should be banned, replaced with keyboards and swipe screens.

  31. We become nation of sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid we were making rockets from empty soda CO2 cartridges and matches. Not in school of course, The containers were popular in the 60's, made of high strength steel. Me and bunch of my friends were shooting those rockets from the old bicycle pump tube that happen to have almost the right internal diameter. The missile was capable to pierce single layer brick wall through when launched from several yards away. One in few launches failed exploding the missile and the launcher tube with a great bang and pieces flying around. That thought us better than any school to understand the danger and the power of such devices and treat them with respect. You had to take precautions by being "safe" distance from the launcher when firing. The fuse had to be long enough to allow us to walk to the safe distance in reasonable time, we had to take shelter against failed launch. etc. Not advising to have such science project. But put that into perspective with today sissies society.

  32. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Pens and pencils should be banned, replaced with keyboards and swipe screens.

    Are you nuts? Have you seen what someone can do with a keyboard? http://youtu.be/XH7CXtxOflI?t=...

    At least with swipe screens their arms will be too tired to hit anyone with!

  33. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps teaching kids that use of guns and violence in schools will not be tolerated is a good thing? Do we want to teach out kids how to use fake guns now, then careless use of real guns once in the real world? Schools need to keep zero tolerance on anything gun related if we want to see our crime rate go down (hint: Only a few countries have worse gun violence than the US... and they either have unstable governments, or no governments.)

    Another culturally broken catholic obsessed with turning this country into another dysfunctional society; eventually to lead the U.S. into being just another poverty stricken boot licker operation with favored families. No one will be able to help one another and everyone will be running away from everyone else to somewhere else.

    (Hint: Just because you think this sounds cool, you think it's a fact based truth.). Save the favored family jackass agenda for your "peons".

  34. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by mlts · · Score: 1

    I feel like a survivalist stating this, but I think it is good to teach kids some skills that are not dependent on electricity, if only how not to be completely helpless during a power outage or a disaster:

    One example is basic usage and care of a generator. It is surprising how few people don't get that there is a difference between a Harbor Freight special (which is an ET800 clone of a Yamaha model made in the early 19702), versus a Honda, Yamaha, or other quality generator with an inverter (or at the minimum active voltage regulation) that puts out clean power.

    Another example, something simple as planting a garden or raising chickens. Skills that may not be needed all the time, but if something does happen, are worth having.

  35. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rock 'n' rolla

  36. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    administrators need to make up good reasons to get rid of bad teachers and this is one of them

    I could understand, if it was a good reason. But it's not, it's a shit reason.

  37. This is the state of gun laws by Arancaytar · · Score: 0

    Pointing a finger gun at school: NO.
    Building a marshmallow gun: NO.
    Giving real guns to children: YES.
    Buying assault weapons without background checks: YES.

    Yay for the second amendment, apparently. 'Merca.

    1. Re:This is the state of gun laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so motherfucking stupid that I'm surprised you figured out how to post on a website. You really do live in a fantasy world.

    2. Re:This is the state of gun laws by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Buying assault weapons without background checks: YES.

      You mean assualt rifles? Sure, you can buy them illegally without a background check from the local gunrunner/gang member for a couple grand. Or spend about $20k on the gun and a couple k on the tax stamp and Class III license. Oh, wait, you meant the scary black guns with the pistol grips and plastic furniture. Because something like this is perfectly fine, but add a Tapco stock to it and you might as well be carry the next cloest thing to a nuke the way some poeple act.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:This is the state of gun laws by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Comments as rude, insulting and assholish as yours are why we are afraid that people like you own guns.

    4. Re:This is the state of gun laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he means scary looking guns.
      Oh no! A pistol grip!
      So much more dangerous!

    5. Re:This is the state of gun laws by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Giving real guns to children: YES.

      Oh, hell yes!

      Teaching basic gun safety to children is one of the best ways to ensure they don't do something stupid like accidently shoot someone the first time they touch a gun.

      Note that, once upon a time (when I was a kid), it wasn't unusual at all to give a kid (for values of kid > about 10 years old) a .22 and teach him to shoot. Certainly that was true in my extended family. And I can't think of a single one of us who ever shot someone, accidently or on purpose....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  38. Progressives are *not* anti-gun ... by drnb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance ...

    Progressives are *not* anti-gun, neither are environmentalists, etc. Ex. Teddy Roosevelt was known to be a fan of target shooting and hunting.

    Call it what it is, the radical left. Don't let the radical left redefine and despoil the term "progressive" and they did "liberal".

    1. Re:Progressives are *not* anti-gun ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ship has sailed.

      The radical left is going through labels like MTD mowers. Junk is junk.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  39. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... it's a stupid policy created by people that don't own guns ...

    There is nothing wrong with not owning guns. Its a personal choice, OK for some, not for others.

    However creating policy and regulations when you are completely ignorant and misinformed about firearms, that is something else. Some non-owners are quite well informed and not hysterical. Some owners are quite ignorant and in dire need of instructions and education.

  40. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by drnb · · Score: 1

    The problem with this theory is that it sets bad policy that persists and that can affect good teachers at a later date.

  41. leftards are dangerous so lets ban THEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the kind of stupidity perpetrated by leftists and yup-yupped into our society by neoliberal dolts.

    Our academia needs a complete cleaning out of these devisive freedom haters.

    DOnt like what I said ? Too bad its called free speech dimwit, another thing you hate ?

    1. Re:leftards are dangerous so lets ban THEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the kind of stupidity perpetrated by leftists and yup-yupped into our society by neoliberal dolts.

      Our academia needs a complete cleaning out of these devisive freedom haters.

      DOnt like what I said ? Too bad its called free speech dimwit, another thing you hate ?

      In your case, it's not the speech I deplore. It's the poor usage, spelling and syntax that annoy me. Just sayin'.

  42. Wrong viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember at work it is always about the customer. Not you. Kids and parents are the customers.

    Wrong-o. Society is the customer and that's why it is society, not the kids and not the parents, who pays the bill for tuition though high school.

    1. Re:Wrong viewpoint by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      And which side does society stand on? Polls show they are agaisn't the teachers for failing our children.

      It is why they call it work. You may have a passion to help kids but in the end only your results matter no different than any other job out there.

    2. Re:Wrong viewpoint by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      And which side does society stand on? Polls show they are agaisn't the teachers for failing our children.

      Classic example of a case in point....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  43. Its not about saftey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

    cite
    Its not about safety, its about removing the union rep from negotiations at the expensive of his students who are preparing for their AP exams.

    1. Re:Its not about saftey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Y'know, I was wondering why they suspended the teacher instead of the students. Now it all makes sense.

    2. Re:Its not about saftey by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Funny how the media always leave the informative bit for the last paragraph.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Its not about saftey by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Funny how the media always leave the informative bit for the last paragraph.

      They know most people don't read the articles all the way to the end. Just like corrections and retractions of articles aren't put on the front page.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Its not about saftey by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you agree this is a dirty underhanded tactic, please sign the petition to get him reinstated.

      https://www.change.org/petitio...

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Its not about saftey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't his precious union save his job? That's the whole point of those damn things, isn't it?

    6. Re:Its not about saftey by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      at the expense^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H profit of his students who are preparing for their AP exams.

      It's to the profit of the students : this is a valuable lesson. DO NOT stand up for your (or even worse, other people's) rights ; DO NOT oppose The Management.

      The students should be paying extra tuition fees (cash only) to the Administrators who came up with this stunt.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  44. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you nuts? Have you seen what someone can do with a keyboard? http://youtu.be/XH7CXtxOflI?t=...

    I laughed. I laughed out loud. The flight pattern of those keyboard letters (and the tooth at the end) flying away after that head smack was awesome.

  45. When I was in school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used highly radioactive Co-60 sources to test spacecraft electronics for radiation hardness.
    We regularly used 10 liter dewers of liquid nitrogen with liquid helium coldfingers (one exploded and destroyed everything in the room).
    We'd generate phosgene, silane, arsene, cyanogen, and cyanide gases to figure out the absorption spectrum of Jupiter and Saturn
    With high power pulsed lasers, we'd shoot holes in polymer films

    The most dangerous thing I was exposed to were the cookies at journal club. The snickerdoodles could rot your teeth at twenty paces.

    Of course, this was grad school: the Lunar & Planetary Laboratory (Univ/Arizona) during the mid 1970's.

  46. All these things are designed to get you fed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With public school and pull your kid out and place them in more expensive private school.
    And by and large it is working anyone who can is.

    What is going to happen is those who can teach wont.
    Anyone who gets anywhere near kids has to have a screw loose.

    1. Re:All these things are designed to get you fed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There can be unexpected blowback. It can cause parents to homeschool their kids, which can even be worse. Some homeschooled children are well off. Others have very little experience with any books other than the Bible, and their social skills are next to nothing.

      So far, the best school system I've seen are the tent schoolhouses that pop up for renaissance faire children that run the "circuit" (i.e. travel between faires.) There are so many different personalities that teach there, that the education kids get is from a lot of different walks in life.

  47. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    The article mentioned he was a head of the union who prevented the firings of several teachers.

    It was a political ploy

  48. tsarists by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Tsar Vladimir has a couple million soldiers with automatic weapons firing 5.45x39 rounds, I think those would be more effective than marshmallows.

    1. Re:tsarists by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Yes but arshmallows would add an element of surprise.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:tsarists by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 2

      Not to mention, yummy.

  49. related: Teacher suspended for bring weapons by BradMajors · · Score: 1

    "An Illinois federal court has ruled that Chicago school officials did not violate the rights of a second-grade teacher who was charged with possessing weapons on school grounds after he displayed garden-variety tools such as wrenches, pliers and screwdrivers in his classroom as part of his second grade teaching curriculum that required a “tool discussion.”"

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/fe...

    1. Re:related: Teacher suspended for bring weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And boxcutter and utility knife. Funny how those were only mentioned near the end of the article. Almost as if the article would not have been read once someone saw that he brandished dangerous weapons of terrorists' choice. Decades ago, every second grader would have had a pen knife and might have played mumblety-peg before or after school (although it was against the rules on school grounds because of the danger of foot injury). But BOX CUTTERS?! AKA Safety cutter? String that terrorist scum up by his bung-hairs!

  50. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Euler · · Score: 1

    That's another arm of the anti-gun agenda: make it a 'health' issue (because that presumes a zero-tolerance for acceptable risk.) It should be an evaluation of risk issue just like owning a swimming-pool, trampoline, or automobile. Honestly, I would prefer getting the anti-gun lecture from my life insurance agent since he is trained to make those evaluations of risk.

    I completely agree that leaving kids ignorant will not help. Hollywood teaches kids every incorrect way to handle a weapon as long as it looks cool. And people don't die as long as they are needed in the sequel.

  51. To err is human, to minless enforce a rule isn't. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    "We will always err on the side of protecting students."

    Emphasis on "err".

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  52. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by Euler · · Score: 1

    The zero-tolerance stance used in school administration is the bigger concern. It deadens the entire concept of teaching common sense in kids, and enforces robotic black and white thinking if it disagrees with the ideologues in charge of the school. IMHO the exact opposite reason we send our kids to school.

    Whatever happened to "hey billy, this isn't the right place for playing cops and robbers on the school playground, please save that for when you go home." Instead kids are suspended for minor mistakes which presented no actual danger.

    I want to look up the list of countries who are worse off in terms of gun violence, can you post a link?

  53. I did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back when I was in maybe 9th grade I created a coil gun for a physics project. The solenoids drew a lot of current. Being the poor boy that I was, I couldn't afford the heavier gauge wire so after a few shots the insulation melted off the wires. I needed the current to get the projectile at the velocity I wanted. This wasn't going to be your average sissy grade school coil gun.

    Was it dangerous? Absolutely, mostly the electrical system. What did my physics teacher say after seeing the projectile shatter off the wall? "Cool."

  54. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    > Things that look or function remotely similarly to a gun are not to be tolerated. If you let kids shoot marshmallows at stacked plastic cups they might have fun, take pride in their mastery of ballistic trajectories, and you never know where that might lead ... nerf ... airsoft ... a .22.

    Clearly it is the result of too many people watching Ghostbusters in the 80s.

    We need to ban dangerous marshmellow-based violence from our television and movie-screens.

  55. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Splab · · Score: 1

    No, it's not anti gun propaganda. I'm from a country where guns are banned and people are wholeheartedly against guns, but we aren't fucking stupid! We enjoy science and experiments like these are allowed; but under proper supervision.

    This smells a lot like someone wanting an excuse for firing this particular teacher.

  56. Sometimes I miss W, but not for political reasons by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "The tairsts are trying to git nukalar weapons. We must make sure their missionification is not completificated."

  57. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by thsths · · Score: 1

    Better not let them play any ball games either, just to be sure. And no contact sports either.

  58. Gun control is people control ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you are scarred shitless of your governement, as most americain seem to be. Meanwhile in europe in soem country when people goes to the street and protest, without gun and with gun control law, governement comply, or even falls. By your own count they should actually laugh people out and ignore them. And yet this is not what happens. Maybe.... Maybe, just maybe, gun control is actually one of those "hot button" issues used to [b]split[/b] the voting falk into two camp, and making them ignore the real issues....Just like other hot button issues. Maybe , just maybe, in reality they are perfectly content to leave you your pityful guns as long as you stay like sheep and adhere to the party line of one of the sides... Practically any military or police force is much better armed than the average citizen. Who cares if the peon have a few guns or rifles ? Far more important the peons do not have L.A.V., explosives, sniper riffles-a-gogo, widespread bullet protection usage, drones, and who knows the fucks what. And massive ammunition fabrication is controlled or controllable. So really what do you do with your gun when you have an excruciating process to get black powder , starter and shell ? If you think your guns will do anything in that context you fool yourself.


    No. really. At this point I view the second amendment fight and the war on drug together, as a way to split the electorat , while leaving the big city unsecure enough that they require huge police force.


    They already hamstringed you, trhey already shepherded you and you are still thinking you are free. In reality you are probably LESS free than people with healthy governement on the east side of the pond.

    1. Re:Gun control is people control ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people with healthy governement on the east side of the pond.

      what a joke.

    2. Re:Gun control is people control ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you are scarred shitless of your governement, as most americain seem to be.

      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. If you are not extremely cautious of what the government does, you end up with things like the TSA, mass surveillance, stop-and-frisk, the drug war, constitution-free zones, free speech zones, etc. We weren't cautious about our government in the US; many seem to only care about the second amendment, and will happily sacrifice every other freedom if they are told it will keep them secure, even though people who are truly free and brave (as we're supposed to be) would never sacrifice such fundamental freedoms for safety.

      It doesn't matter where you are. If you're not cautious of the government, they will begin infringing upon individual liberties. It's happening in every country in the world, in different (but sometimes the same) ways.

  59. Mexico and russia ? by aepervius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason western europe and canada is compared to USA, rather than say mexico and russia, is because they are the one which ressemble much the cultural, economical environment but also far more important political environment of the USA. Mexico and russia may fullfil one or two of those, but not all 3.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  60. Death Ray- poppycock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, it doesn't even slow them up!

  61. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If the teacher said you can use this as a weapon. Then yes that would be very bad and inappropriate.

    Why? Weapons are based on physics and (lots of!) energy, and provide a really interesting framework for thought experiments ranging from newtonian physics to nuclear fusion. Saying a marshmallow shooter can be scaled up to a potato launcher provides useful information, in that it indicates the process can scale.

    Is it "inappropriate" for a science teacher to say a low-density pile of Uranium lumps and moderator is a reactor, and a rapidly-squished-to-high-density U lump is a weapon?
    Is it "inappropriate" to use an artillery scenario (or god forbid the hyperviolent computer war simulation known as "Scorched Earth") in a discussion of ballistics?

  62. NOT TRUE by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Progressives are *not* anti-gun, neither are environmentalists
    THIS IS NOT TRUE. They are absolutely anti-gun and anyone claiming otherwise, isn't paying attention. Teddy Roosevelt has almost nothing in common with today's Democrats and their progressive/environmental constituency. The fact that you try to tie the two together only further proves the point.

  63. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, ban sticks. Not even pointed ones. Go see what happens in kali and escrima, which is done with soft(er) rattan sticks. Imagine doing that with a piece of oak, or some other hardwood, let alone ironwood or heart of palm.

  64. Where are they? by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Some non-owners are quite well informed and not hysterical.
    Where are these people? We need their help bringing intelligence into this conversation. Unfortunately, I fear they are scared to speak up, lest they be tarred by the anti-gun proponents who revel in intimidation tactics.

    In all seriousness, it would be nice to hear from non-gun owners who aren't hysterical and who do know the difference between a magazine and a bullet. They would be a welcome breath of fresh air into an otherwise tired debate.

    1. Re:Where are they? by rezme · · Score: 1

      Got one right here. I have children, so I don't have guns. I felt it was the simplest way to guarantee their safety while not inconveniencing myself in the process. That, and that guns are fracking expensive. I will say there are a number of people I've known who were gun owners, that scared the living hell out of me. Such as the MENSA candidate that lived next door to me, and loved to pull his Desert Eagle out on 4th of July to fire rounds into the ground in the easement (15 feet of it) between our houses...

  65. Bras by sycodon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, the correct analogy is that there are over a trillion bras.

    Clearly, there is a link between bras and breast cancer.

    We should outlaw Bras! Mod up to outlaw Bras!

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Bras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you'd love to. It's because you hate women because you're a flaming faggot gay.

  66. Oh who cares anymore by gelfling · · Score: 1

    After they get that MFA in post modern Lesbian Marxist theater they're still going to be working the espresso machine for all the foreign scientists who go to school here.

  67. Proved a totally different point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That article goes into incredible detail to describe how the British have by-and-large, lost both the right and desire to own guns.

    This probably goes a long way to explaining the fact that American has 10.3 Firearm-related deaths rate per 100,000 population, and the UK has 0.25.

    10.3 vs 0.25. If only America's desire for guns was more like the British.

  68. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by drnb · · Score: 1

    The article mentioned he was a head of the union who prevented the firings of several teachers. It was a political ploy

    So it serves two agendas. This makes it no less of an anti-gun.

  69. PINO - Progressive in Name Only by drnb · · Score: 1

    Progressives are *not* anti-gun, neither are environmentalists THIS IS NOT TRUE. They are absolutely anti-gun and anyone claiming otherwise, isn't paying attention. Teddy Roosevelt has almost nothing in common with today's Democrats and their progressive/environmental constituency. The fact that you try to tie the two together only further proves the point.

    No. My point is that the radical left is trying to rebrand themselves and usurp a nice sounding existing label. These modern democrats are PINO, progressive in name only.

    1. Re:PINO - Progressive in Name Only by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      No. My point is that the radical left is trying to rebrand themselves and usurp a nice sounding existing label. These modern democrats are PINO, progressive in name only.

      If you mean that they're Progressive In Name Only because many of their policies are objectively the same policies championed by conservatives two decades ago, then you are certainly correct.

      What specific policy positions taken by the current Democratic Party do you feel are "radical left"? Real stuff, not "I heard Breitbart and Fox speculating about internment camps for white people".

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    2. Re:PINO - Progressive in Name Only by drnb · · Score: 1

      What specific policy positions taken by the current Democratic Party do you feel are "radical left"?

      You are moving the goal post. The actual conversation is that the "progressive" label is being co-opted by the radical left. The California state legislature offers some good examples. Absolute control by the Democratic party for decades and unlikely to change, a strong tolerance and occasional embrace of its more radical elements. One example would be a ban on civilian ownership of firearms. I'm in California, some Democratic state legislators are literally behind such legislation each and every year. They consider this a regular every-day "progressive" position.

  70. Statistics anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we have to drop the shitty smelling politics into the middle of stuff?

    100 million gun owners with 300 million guns, plus darwin, statistically means that the more guns around idiots there are, the more gun related idiots evolve into a grave. Simple really.

    Do people who have less sex get less STDs? Hmm...

    1. Re:Statistics anyone? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      In the 2010 edition of his (well researched) book "More Guns, Less Crime" , John Lott, Jr analyzes gun and crime statistics, public policy, gun control laws, etc. and draws a very distinct conclusion that (legal) gun ownership has no more of an effect in crime, including homicides, than any other type of weapon. He also asserts that gun ownership is actually a deterrent to violent crime. Asserting that just because 300 million people own 150 million guns (or visa-versa, take your pick) is spurious at best. One has to analyze the actual data as Mr. Lott has done in three separate editions of his book. However, the mass media does little justice to the facts in this case. Thanks to the blindly bias groups like the Brady Campaign, the general public (like is often the case) is sorely misled on the truth.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
  71. Hey kids! by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    By all means, let's keep kids from exploring science in an interesting way. I made a Van DeGraff generator in HS for a science project that would draw a one foot spark and light up flourescent tubes in the ceiling in the 70's as a way of exploring static electricity. I'm sure today it wouldn't be allowed in a science fair. Safety culture has become so oppressive that many kids just avoid science and technology altogether. If you haven't shocked yourself silly messing around by High School, you're a wimp.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  72. High speed rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a coil gun experiment at my local museum for the kids. They pretend it's a high speed rail mock-up, but it's clearly an electromagnetic mass accelerator.

  73. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by rezme · · Score: 1

    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

  74. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by rezme · · Score: 1

    If you read the previous comments, it's mentioned that this particular teacher was a thorn in the administration's side, being a union representative that wasn't rolling over for whatever management's flavor of koolaid was this week. I think it was absolutely an excuse to get rid of an obstacle, especially since he's no longer in charge of those negotiations because of this. People are always looking for grand conspiracies to take their guns away, when the truth is much less insidious. I guess they'll take any excuse they can to beat that drum...

  75. kimcil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good info
    thanks

  76. Tom = multiple /. sockpuppet using scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's let TOM speak shall we:

    "I'm having great conversations on this site with one of my alias accounts" - by Tom (822) on Monday April 07, 2014 @02:29PM (#46686259) Homepage

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    (Downmodding the last time I posted this http://slashdot.org/comments.p... Tom? That's all you've GOT vs. your b.s., & using your sockpuppets makes THAT downmod easy to do, now doesn't it? Just like it would modding YOUR OWN POSTS up!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Tom *tried* to libel me & failed after I destroyed him in a technical debate on hosts files... result?

    Tom ended up "eating his words" here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... spiced with "the bitter taste of SELF-defeat" + HIS FOOT IN HIS MOUTH

    ... apk

  77. Tom = multiple /. sockpuppet using scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's let TOM speak shall we:

    "I'm having great conversations on this site with one of my alias accounts" - by Tom (822) on Monday April 07, 2014 @02:29PM (#46686259) Homepage

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    (Downmodding the last time I posted this http://slashdot.org/comments.p... Tom? That's all you've GOT vs. your b.s., & using your sockpuppets makes THAT downmod easy to do, now doesn't it? Just like it would modding YOUR OWN POSTS up!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Tom *tried* to libel me & failed after I destroyed him in a technical debate on hosts files... result?

    Tom ended up "eating his words" here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... spiced with "the bitter taste of SELF-defeat" + HIS FOOT IN HIS MOUTH

    ... apk

  78. you're missing a part of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Criminals DO exit city limits to get weapons and DO commit crimes inside of city limits with said weapons.

    The part you are missing is the one where their victims are unable to defend themselves from the criminals because they not only obey the law - they obey the spirit of the law for the municipality they live within.

    By "sorts of firearms" I would imagine you've believed the media hype and mean assault rifles, even though the vast majority of firearm related murders [somewhere around 85-95% according to FBI statistics, if i recall correctly] are committed with handguns.

    We DON't have a gun problem. We have an empathy problem. We have a lack of thinking problem [you're case in point], we have a problem teaching our children the value of life.

  79. most dangerous project ever by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Wasp air pistol..

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  80. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I'd bet it was an anti-union move, an excuse to get rid of an inconvenient person in negotiations. That is normally done by anti-union right-wingers.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes