Slashdot Mirror


NYC's 19th-Century Horse Carriages Spawn Weird, Truck-Size Electric Car

cartechboy (2660665) writes "Led by Tesla, electric cars are all the rage now. And the idea of a nine-passenger all-electric vehicle sounds good--until you learn that it maxes out at 30 mph, weighs almost four tons, and costs in the six figures. What is this monstrosity? It's the Frankenstein creation of a group of animal-rights advocates, who are proposing it as the replacement for New York City's fabled horse carriages--and who paid $450,000 to have a prototype built. Who's against it? Would you believe Liam Neeson and one of NYC's daily papers? The huge electric car--modeled after an early 1900s open touring car, complete with brass lanterns--is on display this week at the New York Auto Show, and it's certainly attracting its share of attention."

204 comments

  1. Animal rights? by PPH · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its either pull a carriage or off to the dog food factory. Ask the horse for its preference.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dog food factory? not anymore
      There are no longer any slaughterhouses in the US that do horse meat. I recall a few years ago this being a big deal because feed prices were at an all time high, people who had horses who fell on hard times really had no recourse except to set them loose.

    2. Re:Animal rights? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      They just want less animals to be born.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Animal rights? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      They just want less animals to be born.

      Or fewer.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Animal rights? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 2

      Wrong.

      End the industry, and it reduces demand for horses. It's not like if there's no demand for horses, they're going to keep breeding them just to send to dog food factories. (And there are a lot being eaten by humans actually. Not sure a lot are being fed to dogs in the US.)

      As it stands, they're used to pull carriages, THEN they're sent to slaughter. They don't get sent somewhere magical once they're no longer useful pulling carriages.

    5. Re:Animal rights? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Wrong.

      End the industry, and it reduces demand for horses. It's not like if there's no demand for horses, they're going to keep breeding them just to send to dog food factories. (And there are a lot being eaten by humans actually. Not sure a lot are being fed to dogs in the US.)

      As it stands, they're used to pull carriages, THEN they're sent to slaughter. They don't get sent somewhere magical once they're no longer useful pulling carriages.

      Depends on the company. I know of a few companies that take horses whose owners can no longer afford to own them, and train those to pull carriages (so they already have a second lease on life). At the end of their service, they're put out to pasture at a petting/riding farm.

      This definitely isn't how all carriage businesses work, but a growing number do. Sure, the animals don't get to choose their vocation, and they don't get to magically revert thousands of years of domestication to roam free in the eurasian steppes once again, but it's a life, and not a bad one at that.

    6. Re:Animal rights? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      And there are a lot being eaten by humans actually

      Not in the US, where they abuse procedural rules to make horse meat effectively illegal.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:Animal rights? by antdude · · Score: 0

      It's = It is. You're welcome. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Animal rights? by MildlyTangy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its either pull a carriage or off to the dog food factory. Ask the horse for its preference.

      The horse was consulted and has been asked which option it would prefer.

      The horse did not respond.

      The general conclusion was that it seemed likely that the horse did not understand English.

    9. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Horse meat is amazing. I had it in Mongolia. Tender, tasty, and lean. Better than dog meat, even (which I've had in Korean, even though the concierge at my hotel in Seoul swore up and down I wouldn't be able to find it).

    10. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funnily, they send the horses to the slaughter in mexico which has zero standards on how the horse are to be treated. My mom sends money to some big cat reserves which means every animal charity on the planet has her address. It's funny to pick her mail up and see one letter telling you to call your representative and tell them to vote no horse slaughter in the good old US of A and then another letter complaining about the poor treatment american horses are receiving in mexican horse slaughterhouses.

    11. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true, the Central Park Carriage horses get retired, basically they find homes for them, and have never had any issues doing so. However, if they shut down the whole Central Park industry at once, the mass influx of horses in need of homes will far exceed their ability to find homes, and the vast majority of the horses currently in service will be put down.

      While I disagree with this shutdown conceptually (seriously, pulling shit is what horses do, that's where the term workhorse comes from) the implementation is flat out embarrassing. De Blasio is just a fucking moron who made shutting down the carriages a campaign promise without bothering to do 10 seconds worth of investigation into what it would entail, and now he's just barreling ahead to avoid immediately starting to break campaign promises after taking office. If you really oppose the carriages philosophically, you could just say "OK, no new horses can be put to work pulling carriages" and then phase them out.

    12. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so isn't this essentially the same thinking as a mother who kills
      her kids, so they won't have to grow up in a evil world?

    13. Re:Animal rights? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you've never watched Ren and Stimpy. The horse's answer was, "No, sir . . . . . I didn't like it."

    14. Re:Animal rights? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The general conclusion was that it seemed likely that the horse did not understand English.

      Two horses are standing around in the stables, minding their own business when some random guy shows up and starts making noises at them.

      The horses look at each other and continue chewing.
      After the random guy leave, the first horse looks at the other and says "I didn't understand a damn word of that. Did you?"
      The second horse's jaw drops a little... "Holy shit," he says. "A talking horse!"

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Animal rights? by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you've never watched Ren and Stimpy. The horse's answer was, "No, sir . . . . . I didn't like it."

      Different horse.

    16. Re:Animal rights? by PPH · · Score: 2

      the horse did not understand English.

      A dog was brought in to translate.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a horse of a different color.

    18. Re:Animal rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a horse of a different color.

      RACIST!

    19. Re:Animal rights? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      So they send unwanted horses to Canada and Mexico, here's an example: http://www.westernjournalism.com/breaking-scandal-blm-accused-facilitating-horse-slaughter/

    20. Re:Animal rights? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Or less.

      Perhaps the poster above you was advocating for fewer purebreds and more "less animals" as a result.

    21. Re:Animal rights? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Fascinating our objection to eating horse and dog, when we'll gladly eat smarter animals (pig, for one).

      I presume border collie is just as tasty as elk.

    22. Re:Animal rights? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Depends on the company. I know of a few companies that take horses whose owners can no longer afford to own them, and train those to pull carriages (so they already have a second lease on life). At the end of their service, they're put out to pasture at a petting/riding farm.

      This definitely isn't how all carriage businesses work, but a growing number do.

      That's only because economic recovery is a dirty lie, and there's simply free horses available. There was a veritable torrent of free horses a couple years back. I live in the country, so I see these things... And there's still no shortage of free horses.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Animal rights? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Funnily, they send the horses to the slaughter in mexico which has zero standards on how the horse are to be treated.

      Or they're slaughtered by Mexicans living right here in the US of A. They seem to be willing to mob up and buy property together. We've got several such settlements in my neighborhood. All clean and orderly, no problems. The biggest messes and the most visits from code enforcement are from/to an old entitled white guy who's the scion of one of the old families here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Animal rights? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Animal rights hippies have some fantasy that once cattle-farming and private horse ownership are outlawed, the cows and horsies will be set free to gallop on the plains (perhaps in slow motion to swelling music). In reality, they would just be either slaughtered or set free in the wild to mostly starve to death.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    25. Re:Animal rights? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy in Capitan who taught his pig to bark at strangers.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    26. Re:Animal rights? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      True, but there have always been free or heavily discounted horses available, for people connected to the right circles. Horses that were raised for show and turned out not to have the correct temperament, horses bought for children who left home, etc. Not all of them can be trained to pull a cab in traffic, but many can.

      The economic downturn definitely flooded the market though; people tend to prefer a roof over their own heads to a paddock for their horse.

    27. Re:Animal rights? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's for sure. I also live in the country, and there are useless horses coming out everyone's ears. Folks who decry horse slaughter should perhaps volunteer the cost to keep a retired horse, which amounts to around $3000/year (plus the vet bills that accumulate more rapidly with an aging animal that, as a species, is already prone to a variety of ailments).

      Funny how these same people who are against killing surplus or useless horses also scream about overgrazing... but they don't seem to have a problem with hay in SoCal hitting $600/ton this spring.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    28. Re:Animal rights? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      This sounds like the beginning of a great limerick.

  2. That Reminds Me by sycodon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pick up some Veal, lamb and Ribeyes on the way home tonight.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:That Reminds Me by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      oooo good idea! I think I'll be picking up an 11oz Sirloin since I have to go to the store and fill my 5gal water jug anyway.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:That Reminds Me by geekoid · · Score: 1

      PETA: Pork, Eggs, Tenderloin, Alligator.
      I can't believe there isn't a beef cut that doesn't start with an A.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:That Reminds Me by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the foie gras.

    4. Re:That Reminds Me by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      There's always "Au jus"

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    5. Re:That Reminds Me by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      But there are whole animals referred to as Aberdeen Angus

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    6. Re:That Reminds Me by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      PETA: Pork, Eggs, Tenderloin, Alligator.
      I can't believe there isn't a beef cut that doesn't start with an A.

      Angus Beef is a very popular premium beef or at least sold at a premium.
      Whether it actually tastes better is probably a matter of opinion.

    7. Re:That Reminds Me by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      In the interest of animal cruelty, I only eat foie gras from duck and geese that have been force-fed veal. Since it's been pointed out to me how unfair that is, I also now only eat veal that has been force-fed foie gras.

  3. Animal cruelty? by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, the car actually seems like a decent idea, and might work well. But their motivation seems a bit ridiculous.

    I've ridden horses. Anyone claiming that riding horses is automatically animal cruelty is quite simply a moron. Fortunately, these people do not seem to be pushing that particular agenda - their claim is that NYC is inhospitable to horses.

    I haven't been to NYC, other than driving through, so I can't personally claim either way. However, if NYC is inhospitable enough to qualify as cruelty to horses, then NYC ought to be abandoned as unsafe for human habitation as well. After all, homo sapiens is a species of animal, so shouldn't animal cruelty apply to us as well?

    1. Re:Animal cruelty? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      The difference is we have a choice when the weather gets too hot and humid or too cold as to whether we want to be out or not. The horses don't. They are at the whim of their owners.

      While there is a group of NYC officers whose job it is to check on the horses when the weather gets hot, and have the power to order the owners to take the horses to the stables, that is still different than humans being able to walk into an air conditioned building whenever they fell like it.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is we have a choice when the weather gets too hot and humid or too cold as to whether we want to be out or not. The horses don't. They are at the whim of their owners.

      Boo fucking hoo.

      If the animal rights activists succeed in this, most of those horses employed pulling carriages will be sent off to the glue factory. I know PETA and a lot of these other groups are idiotic, but this strikes me as stupid even for them. Aside from the lost romance (for those who like such things), it's an unfortunate reality in our world that with no market for carriage horses, there will simply be less carriage horses in the future. The existing ones will be put down, and new ones won't be bred if no one has any interest in buying them. Net result: horses that would have lived will simply not exist, and a lot of existing ones will be killed. Nice job.

    3. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, homo sapiens is a species of animal, so shouldn't animal cruelty apply to us as well?
       
      You ever met a New Yorker? I'll side with the horse on this one.

    4. Re:Animal cruelty? by msobkow · · Score: 0

      As if animals in the wild have any choice in the matter.

      PETA and their ilk are idiots. Pretty, Egotistical Tits and Ass.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    5. Re:Animal cruelty? by rlp · · Score: 1

      Also the NYPD still has a mounted horse patrol unit.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    6. Re:Animal cruelty? by Greeninja · · Score: 1

      Most activists hate PETA for the same reason you do, but don't think that there aren't plenty of farm sanctuaries out there that would skip a beat to take care of one of these animals. The horses not existing is hardly an issue as we created them, and they are a result of being bred into human captivity, there's also the option of rewilding them, letting them roam where they once did.

    7. Re:Animal cruelty? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      How are wild animals forced to walk around constantly in the heat of the day? When it gets too hot they take a nap under a tree.

    8. Re:Animal cruelty? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I was reading a National Geographic from 1914 a while back, and lo and behold: a two page spread on the new top-of-the-line Electric Vehicle Company's fleet of all-electric vehicles being deployed in NYC.

      The saga of the Electric Vehicle Company is fodder for a movie. It involved so many shell companies, buyouts, people who ignored the realities to pursue the dream, intrigue, national bailouts, etc. that I'm surprised it almost vanished into history. There's even an interesting bit about Canada/US ownership squabbles. Eventually it was turned over to a consortium of interested parties, and fizzled out when people discovered gasoline-powered automobiles were gaining traction.

    9. Re:Animal cruelty? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      The ones with big teeth and long claws can do that. Pretty much all the others forage 24/7

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    10. Re:Animal cruelty? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You vastly overestimate the amount of real choice most humans have.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Animal cruelty? by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      It actually ever gets warm enough in NYC to be bothersome to a horse? I'd have thought the pollution issue would be much more salient.

    12. Re:Animal cruelty? by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      there's also the option of rewilding them, letting them roam where they once did.

      You want them shipped to Europe? I'm sure the French/Italians would love that. They'd eat them.

      Fact is, most of these horses are so bred to work with humanity, and be cared for by humanity, that without humanity's help on average their lives would be exceptionally short and nasty.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    13. Re:Animal cruelty? by gman003 · · Score: 2

      And those owners a) are out there suffering as well, and b) are taking proper care of their horses, if they have even an iota of intelligence.

      Horses are *expensive*. Even if you're a heartless bastard, you take care of them because they're expensive to replace. Most of the horse owners I've met take better care of their horses than they do themselves.

      If it's cold, you put blankets on them or take them inside. If it's too hot, you give them more water and don't ride them as hard (and I really doubt it will get too hot for horses in New York - we have wild horses down here in VA, and they deal with the heat just fine).

    14. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The difference is we have a choice when the weather gets too hot and humid or too cold as to whether we want to be out or not.

      The "choice" for a construction worker is show up and work if you want to keep your job, rain or shine.

    15. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as exceptionally short and tasty.

    16. Re:Animal cruelty? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Who is this we you speak of? I guess it doesn't include people who work outdoors, like the folks who drive the carriages, for example. Big animals don't tend to mind cold weather much, it's just physics. Or math. Take your pick. Keeping cool is usually a much bigger deal. It's routine to go out in the winter and see wild horses with frost on their backs, grazing.

    17. Re:Animal cruelty? by hey! · · Score: 2

      Bostonian here.

      My work has taken me to cities all over the country, and I have to say that I've found New Yorkers to be the most considerate and helpful big city denizens in the US. The picture of the typical New Yorker as an obnoxious ogre is a phony movie and television trope.

      People mistake adaptations to the pace and concentration of urban life as unfriendliness. Yes, people don't smile and nod at everyone they meet as they stroll the length of 5th Avenue, because after three or four blocks they'd need a chiropractor. But approach one of those people on 5th Avenue for directions, and most of the time he'll be pleasant and eager to be helpful.

      Of course, you take your chances approaching strangers in any big city, but I also think that a lot of the treatment you receive is determined by the attitude you bring with you. I've heard wildly different reports on the infamous rudeness of Parisians, but the reports are usually a reflection of the kind of person making the report. Courteous people tend to be met with courtesy wherever they go, and obnoxious people get a rude reception.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke, douche. Go fuck yourself.

    19. Re:Animal cruelty? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      ...and nearly every other big city.

      Horses make sense in a number of crowd management situations.

    20. Re:Animal cruelty? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I've also found this to be true. Often people may not look friendly, but will go out of their way to help you.

    21. Re:Animal cruelty? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      The ponies in assateague are not wild. They are feral. The only wild horses are zebras.

    22. Re:Animal cruelty? by dkf · · Score: 1

      You want them shipped to Europe?

      Speaking as a European, we do not want PETA shipped over here; we've got enough of those nuts already.

      Oh, you're talking about horses? Are they food-grade horses?

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    23. Re:Animal cruelty? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The ones with big teeth and long claws can do that. Pretty much all the others forage 24/7

      It's too bad you don't have a yard in the country, so that you would know what goes on in them. Deer lie down in mine all the time. Well, they did before the coyotes moved into the neighborhood in force.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Animal cruelty? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most activists hate PETA for the same reason you do, but don't think that there aren't plenty of farm sanctuaries out there that would skip a beat to take care of one of these animals.

      In fact, there aren't. All the ones that wanted one already got one in the great horse apocalypse. It's still going on to a degree now, but it's not like it was at its peak a couple years ago when I drove past a trailer store and they had their sign configured to say "FREE HORSE WITH EVERY TRAILER". Some idiots still think their horse shits gold and that they will recoup their investment, but in general you can still get horses for free if you're not too picky.

      However, there's lots of immigrants who don't have the same cultural compunctions about eating horse meat that we do, so a lot of those free horses are not going to loving homes. Welcoming, yes. Loving, not so much.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Animal cruelty? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could ship the PETA idiots to slaughter... none of them has ever done any useful work, so they're probably quite tender and tasty.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Animal cruelty? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're talking about horses? Are they food-grade horses?

      Define food grade? I know the USA shipped slaughtered horses to Europe for consumption for quite some time, including former work horses bought at auction and such, but at the same time I know that regulations have tightened since then.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    27. Re:Animal cruelty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah... you must be from Jersey (boom! Bridge & Tunnel slam!)

  4. $450,000? by Andrio · · Score: 2

    Someone's walking around with an extra $400,000 in their pocket.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:$450,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, a 3D printer that can print out an electric carriage costs money, Bub!

    2. Re:$450,000? by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Well duh. The time of the people who had the skills to build this is worth something. In other news every programmer or network admin is walking around with an extra $theentirecostofthejobminusoverhead in their pocket.

  5. And the horses? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    So what happens to the decommissioned horses, should this beast be put into production?

    1. Re:And the horses? by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll take them to a nice farm... um out in the country... um where they can spend all their time in a field chasing rabbits.

    2. Re:And the horses? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      So what happens to the rabbits then?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:And the horses? by Greeninja · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of sanctuaries that take in animals, one of them is called Animal place http://animalplace.org/.

    4. Re:And the horses? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The stables are developed by Trump for another failed monument to his ego. The horses are cooked for opening dinner.

    5. Re:And the horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They get trampled by horses?

      that happens to the grass and trees that the rabbits aren't eating?

      They grow healthier. :) wait tabbits are fluffy and cute so they couldn't possibly be considered a pest ;).

      I kid I kid.

    6. Re:And the horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rabbits form local armed militias and fight back against the tyranny of the horses, thus chasing them back to New York.. oh right.

    7. Re:And the horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what the average "working" life span is for these horses is but my guess is that you tell the breeder that he's losing a customer and that they're gradually phased out.
       
      Either way, your argument sounds like the reasoning of a small minded Luddite when told that the loom would replace hand weavers.

    8. Re:And the horses? by Zordak · · Score: 1

      So what happens to the rabbits then?

      We'll have to nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  6. Cheaper just to modify a Tesla? by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't it be vastly cheaper just to modify a Tesla? While probably not as simple as stretching a car, would it be $300,000+ more expensive to just put the old-tymey touring car body on a stretched Tesla frame?

    1. Re:Cheaper just to modify a Tesla? by Teancum · · Score: 2

      You are thinking too intelligently here and are used to the idea of using competent and proven technology to accomplish your solutions.

      Looking at the specs on this beast, it is lousy even for a custom electric automobile retooling job. There are plenty of custom automobile builders around the country, so I would have to presume that the real deal here is that somebody's nephew or niece was out of work and needed a job, thinking they could also reinvent the wheel at the same time.

    2. Re:Cheaper just to modify a Tesla? by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      would it be $300,000+ more expensive to just put the old-tymey touring car body on a stretched Tesla frame?

      Looking at all the custom design work and fitting for a one-off vehicle I'd say yes. Starting with an $80k donor tesla, figure out how to safely disassemble the unibody, do that, add all the old-timey stuff to it with a rated load over a ton (we're talking americans here...), and then get it to work could easily be in the 1000's of man hours. When they are not your own, hours cost money too.

    3. Re:Cheaper just to modify a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that its just a prototype. The article clearly says that it would probably cost only $150,000 to manufacture if there was a production run. Also, its much larger than a Tesla, and the design of the Tesla doesn't lend itself to much modification either.

    4. Re:Cheaper just to modify a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla?
      Why not just strap two golfcarts together?
      Just buy one of these.

  7. I like it! by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not against the horse-drawn carriages, but I kind of like this car. It's charming. Can we have both?

    1. Re:I like it! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the car looks pretty cool, and I can see a market for something like that... ALONG SIDE of the horse carriages. There is no legit reason to get rid of them, If we thought bloomberg was bad with his soda ban, what did we expect electing someone like deblasio?? but then again, the people of NYC get what they deserve by the people they vote for

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:I like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloomberg didn't ban soda.

    3. Re:I like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man!

    4. Re:I like it! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Like Russia didn't invade Crimea -- it just stood there with their hand squeezing its shoulder while it "voted".

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:I like it! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think it's noteworthy that people outside of NYC are usually more upset about the NYC "nanny state" than the people who live here. The trans-fat ban was a big talking point for conservatives, as evidence that the government was sneaking into every personal decision you make. However, it was ultimately a decision by a local government (don't conservatives like local governments?) to regulate the restaurant industry. While conservatives around the country had a collective freak-out session, I don't think New Yorkers were talking much about it, and there were many who viewed the decision positively. We eat out all the time, and many of us would like to know that the food doesn't have too much unnecessary harmful crap in it. It's worth pointing out that it wasn't a ban on fatty foods-- I believe you could have replaced the trans-fats with bacon grease, and then everything would then be legal.

      The "soda-ban" was similar, except that I think New Yorkers found the ban to be a bit silly. I'm not going on a scientific survey, but anecdotally, the people I've heard from largely don't care. People don't seem to really oppose the "ban" or feel like it impinges on them, but it's more been a question of, "Is this necessary?"

      The horses are more controversial, but again I don't see why people outside of New York see this as a sign of governmental overreach. Some people think that the horses are being mistreated. There are animal cruelty laws everywhere. Then there's also the question of whether horses should be on the road. They shit everywhere and sometimes they mess up traffic. I'm sure if there were constantly horses on the streets of your home town, you'd occasionally get people questioning whether it was a good idea.

      So I just don't really get why you're upset. It doesn't sound like you live in NYC. If not, these rules don't apply to you. There's some controversy within NYC, but I think most of the residents (most of the ones I've met) have some understanding that, with such a large and diverse city, you need some regulation. With all the restaurants, you need a health code-- complain if you want about the implementation, but I'm glad they shut down restaurants with unsanitary conditions. With all the traffic that passes through the streets, you need traffic laws-- argue if you'd like about whether it's good to have horses on the road, but there should be laws about that kind of thing. Even a libertarian with half a brain should understand that a city this large can't operate without some laws. And if you don't live here, I'm not sure why you would care.

    6. Re:I like it! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insightful comments, you do make some excellent points. but just to be clear i do not live in NYC, but I live in the suburbs of NYC and a lot of rules and regulations that NYC passes end up our way next. I do have a legit beef with NYC and the way it is run.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  8. Horse is better for meat then transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The can get one of these cars to power an electric grill!

  9. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Led by Tesla, electric cars are all the rage now.
     
    The EV market was far from "Led by Tesla."
     
    It sounds like the fanboys who all say that Apple led the tablet market.

    1. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like you're getting into an argument over the definition of the word 'led'

      Led as in invented/pioneered, no but Led as in currently the frontrunner in the marketplace, sure that's at least arguable.

    2. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nissan sells more EVs than Tesla. Look into it.

    3. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sells more today yes, year to date in 2014 they're up a whopping 5% over tesla, in 2013 Telsa demolished Nissan 3,200 to 1,302.

      while technically correct you may be missing the big picture.

    4. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... what?
       
        In 2013, the Alliance sold 66,809 electric vehicles worldwide, up 52% from the previous year. Sales of the Nissan LEAF rose 77% to 47,716 units, while sales of Renault’s four electric vehicle models – Kangoo Z.E., Fluence Z.E., ZOE and Twizy – grew 13% to 19,093 units.
       
      Care to cite your bullshit numbers?

  10. Stupid? by chispito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Disclosure: I've never been to NYC, and I don't know how these horses are treated. If they're generally treated poorly, then disregard my comments.

    That said, it makes me wonder if the animal rights activists have ever met working horses. Working animals are bred for their jobs and they tend to enjoy them. My brother owned a draft horse and there was nothing he liked better than pulling. If pulling teams are animal cruelty, then so is playing fetch with your retriever.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:Stupid? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      PETA thinks that vanity pets are cruel slavery. PETA hates animals, but hates humans more.

    2. Re:Stupid? by Greeninja · · Score: 1

      Your dog has the ability to stop playing fetch and go do something else if it wants to, no one is going to play fetch with their dog until it passes out on the pavement from exhaustion, and hopefully you aren't playing fetch in the middle of the road where getting hit by a car is a real issue, something that also happens to a lot of horses. I've met plenty of carriage horses, several ones that have also died because of being overworked. They might be bred to do that job, but saying they enjoy it is like saying that someone bred into slavery enjoys doing the hard labor they are forced to do.

    3. Re:Stupid? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 0

      They never leave the city (except to be sent to slaughter.) Their stalls are appalling. They're in traffic all day, breathing fumes, walking on hard pavement, and constantly at risk of being hit (or breaking loose and hurting someone else.) Often, they don't 'like' pulling, they just 'like' it more than the alternative (which is an appalling stable in this case.) It's often not hard to coerce animals bred over centuries for complacency to do what we want....and easier for us to make ourselves feel better and say 'they like it'.

    4. Re:Stupid? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      If pulling teams are animal cruelty, then so is playing fetch with your retriever.

      This particular group of animal-rights types is not PETA (though they may be affiliated with, or have membership overlap with, PETA).

      That said, PETA does, in fact, believe that you should not be allowed to have a retriever (or any other pet). Much less make the poor dog "play fetch".

      For the record, I have a lab. Nothing he likes better than run and fetch the stick (except run and fetch the steak).

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to NYC, and the horses are treated fine. Anyone who has been around working horses has had the exact same experience as you and your brother. These PETA people are complete idiots and know nothing about animals.

    6. Re:Stupid? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      I would like to see some data comparing the number of hours worked weekly by these NYC carriage horses and your brother's horse. When it was particularly hot or cold one day, I would bet that your brother gave the horse the day off.

    7. Re:Stupid? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the horses who pull in NYC are some of the best treated horses on the planet except for maybe the budweiser clydesdales. Go talk to the people who run them, you wont find anyone who cares more about their animals than NYC horse carriage owners.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:Stupid? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My brother owned a draft horse and there was nothing he liked better than pulling. If pulling teams are animal cruelty, then so is playing fetch with your retriever.

      Just another anecdote, a friend of mine has sled dogs (~30 dogs, two sleds; he's fairly serious about it) and those dogs clearly love to pull. All you have to do is jingle a harness, or start loading equipment into the trailer used to haul dogs + gear and they go nuts with excitement, crowding over and trying to be first into the traces/trailer. You lay the traces out on the ground and they immediately run to their positions, with some squabbling over who gets to be where, and wait anxiously to be hooked up. The toughest part of getting going in the morning is making them wait until you're ready to go, and then they'll happily run all day long (as long as they get suitable breaks, with food and water). Those who are hurt or otherwise getting a day off are clearly dejected by not getting a chance to get into the traces.

      I've known many horses who were almost as excited about their jobs... though I've also known a few who were quite lazy and didn't like to work.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've gotten a reputation for "rescuing" pets from animal shelters, only to snuff them out as soon as possible, to liberate them from human cruelty.

      Awesome.

    10. Re:Stupid? by Greeninja · · Score: 1

      This is a blanket statement though. I'm sure there are people who care about their animals a lot, obviously it goes both ways because nothing is every truly black or white. However, I've seen that statement so many times from breeders who have hundreds of dogs in terrible conditions to family run farms that abuse their livestock when no one is watching them (undercover operations reveal the truth). We get the whole romantic notion and nostalgia from riding in a carriage, we just don't see it as being the best interest for those animals, especially the external dangers they face from cars or becoming panicked in the city.

    11. Re:Stupid? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I live in NYC, and I'm a bit indifferent. I don't know about the horses in depth, but I'd tend to say that if the horses are treated badly, then make laws/regulations on how the horses should be treated. If it's a problem to have them on the street, then don't allow them on the street. I don't see think that having horses pull carriages is cruel in itself, but I also don't see the need to jump through hoops to keep the carriages around if they're presenting real problems. They're slightly charming, but smell like horse shit.

    12. Re:Stupid? by Teancum · · Score: 2

      You very likely don't know the first thing about these draft horses in general and the carriage horses in particular, and I seriously doubt you've seen any of them outside of simply passing by one of them on a street as you were busy getting your latte or spritz after work.

      No competent owner of a horse, nor any of the drivers, are going to be intentionally mistreating a horse in the manner you describe simply from a pure economic standpoint. They are expensive to breed and take at least two years or so minimum before they are even capable of being able to pull one of these carriages, and both owners and drivers develop strong personal bonds with them. The death of a horse is a significant tragedy for both the owner and driver (who may very likely be one and the same). While in the past it may have been true that finding another draft horse was easy, it isn't so easy to do in 21st Century America so you need to have a special relationship with a farm or two where you can get the horses as well. There is definitely a limited supply of those kind of horses.

      I'll also note that any driver who hits a horse is also a complete idiot. An automobile or even a truck is far more maneuverable and faster than a horse drawn carriage, where the carriage also sticks out like a sort thumb in traffic and usually can be spotted blocks away. It is a very rare situation where a horse and a car get in a collision... where not only will the driver get the ticket and the responsibility to pay for the horse (as I said,something worth a whole lot of money) or find their automobile insurance rates will skyrocket. Very likely they will also get a DUI citation because you really would need to be drunk in order to hit one of these horses.

      The only part of your comment that bears anything to reality is the comparison of draft horses to slaves. If that is the case, you need to thank draft horses for ending slavery, because a well care for horse with the right bridal and harness was able to do the work of five men and eat the resources of three.... thus replacing a whole bunch of people from needing to be slaves who instead could be an ignorant college student in a 1st world country thinking they've learned everything there is to know. There is a pretty good reason why slavery wasn't common in Europe in the late middle ages, in spite of being very common in the Roman Empire, and the common draft horse was one of the reasons for that happening. You very likely wouldn't have even written your comment if it wasn't for your ancestors having access to draft horses and using them to support themselves and provide opportunities for their descendents.

    13. Re:Stupid? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      i take my cues on social issues from someone named 'vegan cyclist'. i demand the soy be liberated, for tofu is murder!

    14. Re:Stupid? by bws111 · · Score: 2

      In addition to your economic reasons one must also consider what the horses are doing - giving romantic rides to tourists. There is nothing romantic about a sick, dying, or mistreated horse, so it is certainly in their best interest to not have those conditions.

    15. Re:Stupid? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I can not imagine dealing with what a carriage driver does and not caring for horses. It would be a stupid, tiring, frustrating, and poor job to take.
      They would be better off driving a cab.

      What if those dog breeders had to take their dogs out into the public most days where the where scrutinized?
      Plus, an abused horse make a poor animal to pull a carriage.

      " especially the external dangers they face from cars or becoming panicked in the city."
      How many of these trained horses panic? How many hit by automobiles?
      FYI: 4 in 30 years.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Stupid? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      And 'rogoshen1' is any more deserving? I know you're probably joking, but consider: maybe i've spent more time than the average person looking into how animals are treated, and might actually have something to contribute to the discussion, either factually or philosophically. If all you want is people who say the same thing as you, what are you doing here?

    17. Re:Stupid? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "They never leave the city (except to be sent to slaughter.) "
      not always true.

      "Their stalls are appalling."
      That's a blatant lie.

      " Often, they don't 'like' pulling, "
      You have never worked around horse, have you?

      "which is an appalling stable in this case."
      again,l that's a blatant lie.

      hmm, someone with the name VeganCyclist whose opinion is devoid of facts. I'm shocked.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 'rogoshen1' says nothing about the person. 'Vegan cyclist' says a lot about you.

    19. Re:Stupid? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Animal rights activists release 000's of animals into the wild, regardless that none are actually adapted or can cope, quickly being killed by traffic or predators.

      Rarely are they sensible about what are rather complicated moral issues. Humans are omnivores, and are natural meat eaters. If eating some 'higher' creature that is the result of "millions of years of evolution" is inherently cruel, isn't eating corn pretty much the same thing? Worse, because with corn not only are you eating the product of millions of years of evolution - you're eating their BABIES.
      Furthermore, I don't understand the problem vegans have with EGGS. These are - to the chicken, when unfertilized - essentially WASTE, and incredibly nutritious.

      Anyway, ask yourself this: if one mourns the millions of dead animals slain to satisfy the meat industry...how many pigs or cows would there ever have been, if we couldn't eat them? I'd wager 99%+ of them would never have existed, but for their tastiness.

      Now this has made me hungry, brb burger.

      --
      -Styopa
    20. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn vegans. Why do you hate plants so much?

    21. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many horses do you have personal experience with? I mean actually getting to know them, forming a relationship with them built on love and trust?

    22. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with you vehemently, and I suspect that the "more time then the average person" you spent researching this boils down to two hours on websites with questionable sources. I will eat a steak in your honor tonight.

    23. Re:Stupid? by cusco · · Score: 1

      You've never spent any time with actual working animals, have you? You read your propaganda and decide you know, but really have no clue. I've raised hunting dogs, my dad grew up with draft horses, our friend raised sled dogs. You probably believe we must be horrible, cruel people, our animals would disagree.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    24. Re:Stupid? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Aww - why was this modded down? It's funny!!

    25. Re:Stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what about all those stories you hear about sled dogs being run to death? Do they run to death on purpose or are they put into positions where they're forced to?

      The grandparent made a really slippery claim. Blacks were bred to work in the fields and some of them learned to enjoy it. That doesn't mean it's right.

    26. Re:Stupid? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      A sick, dying, or mistreated horse is not going to seem very Romantic, thus people won't ride the carriage because of it.
      It seems pretty simple to me.

    27. Re:Stupid? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is what I meant.

    28. Re:Stupid? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      You know, lots of people also die doing something they enjoy (like running.) Does that mean they purposely killed themselves or were forced to do the activity? No, of course not.

    29. Re:Stupid? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Blacks were bred to work in the fields and some of them learned to enjoy it. That doesn't mean it's right.

      There's nothing wrong with working in the fields, and lots of people (of all colors) who work farms do enjoy it. Forcing someone to work against their will and without pay, that's not right. But there's nothing at all wrong with farming.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:Stupid? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Playing fetch with my Black Lab is cruel. To me. After a day with her, I feel like I am ready to blow out a rotator cuff or need Tommy John surgery. The damn dog NEVER gets tired. Walking her in the usual fashion is impossible. The only way I can reasonably "walk" her is with a skateboard. Specifically a Landyachtz Evo downhill racer. Riding a skateboard at Black Lab speeds can be terrifying, but one of those bad boys is super stable. Still doesn't tire the dog, though. :)

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    31. Re:Stupid? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Robots! Robots for all! Then neither humans nor horses need worry about it. You can sit in your concrete canyon room with food shoved through a slot by your servant machines.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    32. Re:Stupid? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      While there might be some useful aspects to veganism wrt losing weight in a society with the ahistorical problem of too much food, generally it's just one of the latest in a fad of things where you feel you've latched onto some truth of the universe...and you're so sure you're right you feel justified shoving it down other people's throats. With the force of law if you can swing it.

      So it is politics. It is religion. They are the same phenomenon.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    33. Re:Stupid? by jittles · · Score: 1

      Disclosure: I've never been to NYC, and I don't know how these horses are treated. If they're generally treated poorly, then disregard my comments. That said, it makes me wonder if the animal rights activists have ever met working horses. Working animals are bred for their jobs and they tend to enjoy them. My brother owned a draft horse and there was nothing he liked better than pulling. If pulling teams are animal cruelty, then so is playing fetch with your retriever.

      I rescued a hunting dog (she's actually mixed breed, but 50/50 mix). She lives for the thrill of the chase. She is miserable if she sees a squirrel or a raccoon and she doesn't get to chase it. She is miserable if she doesn't get to track scents. It really is what she loves to do. As you say, these horses will be just as miserable if they don't have work to do. They'll get bored and find ways to cause trouble./P.

    34. Re:Stupid? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      It's impossible for me to talk to committed vegans (not to mention the proselytizing ones) without constantly being reminded that 18th and 19th century missionaries were LIKEWISE absolutely convinced that they were doing the "right thing" for these people's immortal souls by bringing them into Christianity and for their lives by bringing them the modern world.

      Ironically, usually, these are precisely the sort of zealots that are mocked by the kind of people that are 'evangelical' vegans today.

      --
      -Styopa
  11. Use the Big Dog instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bunch of idiots. If they are going that route, why not use dog robot developed by Boston Dynamic? See www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2rq7rKgjJQ

    1. Re:Use the Big Dog instead by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would absolutely pay to ride in an old fashioned carriage pulled by a robotic horse. That's some "Diamond Age" shit.

    2. Re:Use the Big Dog instead by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      This idea is not getting modded up enough.

      You could charge a fortune, and people would happily pay it, to have old-timey carriages pulled by robotic animals in New York City. That just screams "shut up and take my money".

    3. Re:Use the Big Dog instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the steampunk attire for the cabbies.

    4. Re:Use the Big Dog instead by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you're going to claim to be thinking bigger than some "idiots", why not really think big and justify the epithet?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. electric, steam, internal combustion alternatives by peter303 · · Score: 1

    All vying with one another until IC pulled ahead in the 1910s. I've seen the famous "steamer" at the Stanley Hotel in Colorado.

  13. Patuxent National Wildlife Refuge has a bigger one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've ridden an electric tour vehicle through the woods at Patuxent National Wildlife Refuge near the Baltimore-Washington Parkway in Maryland. It's a two-piece thing about the size of an 18-wheeler truck+semitrailer. It goes about 5mph, fairly quietly, and carries around 30 people. It was a surplus vehicle left over from some government project.

    Captcha: forests

  14. Why not both? by GlennC · · Score: 1

    I could see this vehicle as being an alternative to the horse drawn carriages, particularly in the winter. This could also be started gradually as the existing stable of horses is retired.

    If these vehicles become more popular than the horses, it's a good thing. Even if it doesn't fully replace the horse drawn carriages, it would be interesting to see which option tourists prefer.

    --
    Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    1. Re:Why not both? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Horses are well-adapted to the cold. Their winter hair is so insulative that snow will accumulate on their backs, and not melt.

      And because horses sweat, they're also adapted to the heat.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. Market please by jamesl · · Score: 1

    Let the "activists" put up the money, buy a fleet of these things and sell rides through the park. We'll see if the tourists pay for the electrics or the real horses.

    I'll take the horses.

  16. electric golf carts by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, the car actually seems like a decent idea, and might work well.

    A decent idea? They just spent half a million dollars to re-invent the electric golf cart!

    There are a dozen of of these things driving around every airport in America.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:electric golf carts by gman003 · · Score: 1

      They gave the electric golf cart an old-fashioned, high-class feel, which is honestly the only reason people still use horses in NYC. Which means it's a viable replacement for it.

      And that's $500k in R&D, not in per-unit cost, which doesn't seem too bad.

    2. Re:electric golf carts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You go to some fancy airports.

      FYI: Electric vehicle doe snot equal golf cart. No more then Porsche = go cart.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:electric golf carts by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I also like how they make out '4 tons' like it's a big deal - that's 9k pounds, yes, but a plain old passenger van starts out at 7k pounds, for one that only seats 8. 8.6k for one that seats 15.

      After that, well, realize that batteries and bling add weight, and this has a lot of both.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:electric golf carts by suutar · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I don't see the golf cart giving the "Cinderella in a horse-drawn carriage" feel so popular in romantic movies.

    5. Re:electric golf carts by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I see a parallel between the carriage situation and emulating game systems. You get the same practical value (playing the game/scenic carriage ride through Central Park), but you lose the little inconveniences that make the experience special. Oddly enough, the "clip-clop" and stepping over horse manure to get into the carriage are part of what I wanted to pay for, just like I want to swab out old game cartridges and cross the room to hit the reset button when I get frustrated with a tough level.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    6. Re:electric golf carts by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Oops, forgot to mention: The article lists the estimated production price on the new buggy to be $150k-$175k apiece. It'd be interesting to see a cost analysis of the price to buy, feed, stable, and replace a horse compared to the price to buy, maintain, park, and replace one of the new carriages.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    7. Re:electric golf carts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which is honestly the only reason people still use horses in NYC.

      If I go to New York, I'll be taking a carriage ride BECAUSE OF THE HORSE. Based on the article and some common sense, I'm betting I'm not the only one.

    8. Re:electric golf carts by Nikker · · Score: 1

      $500K for R&D? To integrate an electric motor into a design that was already established many years ago?

      WOW

      So how much R&D would it cost to put an electric motor into a Model T? It must be in the millions!

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    9. Re:electric golf carts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that most prototype vehicles cost several million dollars, I'd be very interested to hear what they did to keep costs so low.

    10. Re:electric golf carts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I also like how they make out '4 tons' like it's a big deal - that's 9k pounds, yes, but a plain old passenger van starts out at 7k pounds, for one that only seats 8. 8.6k for one that seats 15.

      No, no in fact, it does not. A plain old passenger van starts out at 5,224 pounds. That right there is probably the most popular passenger van in history, that ol' E-150. The E-Series was supposed to be dead by this year, but too many crotchety old fuckers screamed about it for that to happen, so it's still around.

      My 1992 F250 Super Cab 4x4 XLT 7.3 with a turbo kit weighs someplace around 6800 wet. 9000 pounds is in fact a staggeringly heavy vehicle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:electric golf carts by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Huh, I went with GM. Wonder where my link went to.

      Anyways, the GM site listed gross at 7.3k, gross for the ford is 8.5k.

      For a vehicle that shouldn't be expected to carry cargo, yes you'd want it to be lighter.

      Also keep in mind that net or gross wasn't mentioned, and in reporter-speak '4 tons' could be anything from 3-5.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    12. Re:electric golf carts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also keep in mind that net or gross wasn't mentioned, and in reporter-speak '4 tons' could be anything from 3-5.

      The only weight that is valid when talking about vehicle weight is the curb weight. Anything else is just jerking off. Of course, this is modern journalism we're talking about...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Don't the smell bad? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I never even considered for a moment riding in those horse drawn carts. The idea of sitting close to their behinds was not very appealing and I assumed the animals would smell bad. I have ridden in horse drawn carts in India, but not as fancy tourist thing. They were the taxicabs, (called jatka) of rural India back then. They stank. Many a times I would opt to walk behind, ( a good distance behind), than to ride in those rickety carts, two wheels single axle, never load balanced correctly, with the cabbie calling for passengers to move forward and backward, while the neck of that poor animal provided the fulcrum. Horrible. These animal rights people would be well advised to save those animals first.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Don't the smell bad? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      just so you know, NYC is not india, the carriages in NYC are meticulously taken care of as well as the animals.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  18. Fake cable cars by Animats · · Score: 2

    Not as bad as the stupid fake cable cars we have in San Francisco.

    The fake ones are more dangerous than the real ones. The real ones are limited to 9.5MPH (the cable speed), but the fake ones, on truck chassis, can go at highway speeds. They have sideways facing seats, standees, and no seat belts, which is OK at 9.5MPH but not at 30.

    1. Re:Fake cable cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, a fake cable car can make turns off the route of the cable track -- totally unexpected thing for a cable car to do! ding ding

    2. Re:Fake cable cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, SFMTA shells out like $2-$3 million per year on negligence cases from cable car accidents alone. Often it's crushing incidents, because the cars are hard to maneuver or stop, and people do stupid things. Do you think those fake trolley cars shell out nearly as much money on injuries? I doubt it.

      You don't hear about it because the city never litigates cases for fear of bad press. They immediately pay out any case which is even remotely legitimate. The cable cars nominally operate at a $30 million dollar loss (though they recover more money on a passenger cost basis than the average for the whole transit system), but are iconic and bring in tons of cash for the city's tourism industry.

      Sources: Google, including http://www.sfweekly.com/2013-04-24/news/muni-cable-cars-national-register-of-historic-places/full/

    3. Re:Fake cable cars by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, busses?

      Riding the bus has been shown to be much safer than driving a car.

      Here is a discussion about this topic:
      http://ask.metafilter.com/8158...

  19. is all madness by rewindustry · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    we now live in a world where the car kills more children than anything else, and i don't know about you, but according to the real live property laws in the land where i live, the ONLY allotted space for pedestrians is a strip one and a half meters wide ALONGSIDE the edge of the highway.

    there is literally no other legal way to get from one place to another, entirely everywhere else is property.

    mad, quite mad - the whole plastic footed metal space bug lot of you.

    1. Re:is all madness by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "we now live in a world where the car kills more children than anything else, "
      that ios a good thing. I feel you should know that's mostly due to people not using seat belts and car seats. Also, there has been a 40% reduction of deaths from auto accidents for children. Oddly enough, poisoning and suffocation are skyrocketing.

      Morbid fascination:
      http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisq...
      http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/...

      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Real Estate the reason for eliminating the horses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Liam Neeson has been championing the horse/buggy drivers since Mayor DiBlasio made the elimination of them his first priority. The argument is animal cruelty, but others have shown that the Mayor's biggest supports are real estate developers who want the acreage that the stables currently occupy.

  21. Use Dinosaurs by jayrtfm · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see a few animatronic dinosaurs instead of cars. http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Lucky_the_Dinosaur

  22. Re:electric, steam, internal combustion alternativ by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    Jay leno has a large collection of working steam cars, He says they are some of his favorite https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  23. 30mph is enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we build an intelligent transport system, 30mph for autonomous vehicles is enough. You use it for the last-mile hop, and you use rail for longer distances.

    To put it another way, we tend to walk about 3.1 mph, and it's not seen as a problem that our cars don't drive right into our living rooms. We're fine walking the last-hop at what seems like a snail's pace.

  24. Steam by hhawk · · Score: 1

    If they want to go all Steam Punk they should recreate the Dobles E20 which has a 4 piston steam engine and is nearly silent..http://www.virtualsteamcarmuseum.org/makers/stewart_h_h_steam_stewart_doble_material.html

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  25. Who cares what PETA says by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Who cares what PETA and their ilk spout.

    PETA has shown itself over and over to be far beyond any rational thinking so I, like most other people, disregard everything they say. Frankly, I am surprised they garner as much attention as they do.

    1. Re:Who cares what PETA says by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Truth is stranger than fiction.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Who cares what PETA says by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I am surprised they garner as much attention as they do.

      They had to resort to taking advantage of naive young women and locking them naked in cages on public streetcorners to remain relevant, so I consider them to be broadly considered to be a lunatic fringe group. Slashdot just likes to mention PETA because froth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Tacky solution. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I think the idea of still having a horses in the midst of a busy city is ridiculous.

    That said, the proposed alternative is cheesy. I really struggle to understand the American fixation antique reproductions. It's ironic that in Europe, where cities are much older than NYC, a similar concept would look sleek and futuristic.

    I'm also struggling to understand why this thing is so big and heavy. It's at a point where you might as well just take a double-decker tour bus. It's likely also the safer alternative.

    1. Re:Tacky solution. by bws111 · · Score: 1

      It's not 'ironic' at all. In a city that is old, it is novel to have something sleek and futuristic. In a city that is new, it is novel to have something antique. Not really that hard to figure out.

      It's big and heavy because it is a prototype, built out of other existing things. Again, not that hard to figure out.

  27. Horse alternative by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

    I looked at the Pictured in the article ( I know...!! )

    It looks like a car. They have just taken away the very thing that attracted people to the ride.

    People pay to be taken around the city in a horse drawn carriage because its *not* a motor vehicle. Some would argue its quaint, romantic or just plain neat to experience something a bit different than the status quo of "motor vehicle".

    The horse is not suffering. Leave it alone.

    1. Re:Horse alternative by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

      OMG im SO SORRY, I made a grammar error in the above post!!

      Grammar Nazi's, please just hear me out before you attack me with pedantry.

      I didnt mean to do it, please accept my sincere apology.

      "Pictured" was supposed to be "picture"

      OMG, so sorry!

    2. Re:Horse alternative by Megane · · Score: 1

      It doesn't just look like "a car". It looks like a freaking steampunk Hummer. Except that you can hear yourself think because it doesn't use steam.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Horse alternative by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      Your apology is not going to cut it this time. Seppuku is the only honorable choice here.

    4. Re:Horse alternative by profplump · · Score: 1

      They're doing it for the nostalgia -- they currently use horses, but there's more than one way to convince people they're doing something nostalgic.

  28. This is no Porsche [Re:electric golf carts] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    You go to some fancy airports. FYI: Electric vehicle doe snot equal golf cart. No more then Porsche = go cart.

    This thing is no Porsche. Did you read the article? "a so-called 'geo-fence' would restrict it to 5 mph inside Central Park-- 'thus continuing the tradition of horse-drawn carriages causing traffic congestion in and around midtown,' as New York Intelligencer noted acerbically."

    5 MPH? Calling it a golf cart is rather slandering golf carts. Of course, it can sprint at up to 30 MPH (outside Central Park, only)-- but so can golf carts. They're just not allowed to, because they don't have the safety features of a car. But neither does this.

    It's a golf cart. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  29. 30 MPH by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    You, uh, don't take the bus very often, do you? I haven't seen any public bus, in any city I've lived, with seatbelts, without sideways seats (at least in the back), without standing room, or that stays at less than 30 MPH.

    1. Re:30 MPH by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Well, have you seen how a cable car is in San Francisco ? I don't know how these fake cable cars are, but real cable cars are nothing like a city bus... first of all, they're wide open, and secondly, there are actually people hanging outside of the car... To get a better idea, have a look at that picture.
      So, in the event of a crash, I really wouldn't compare them to city buses.

    2. Re:30 MPH by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You, uh, don't take the bus very often, do you?

      WTF?

      I haven't seen any public bus, in any city I've lived, with seatbelts, without sideways seats (at least in the back), without standing room, or that stays at less than 30 MPH.

      Have you seen any without sides?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. We will call it... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    ...The Homer.

  31. substitution of the Internal Combustion Engine by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    I have always considered that the substitution of the Internal Combustion Engine for the horse marked a very gloomy passage in the progress of mankind.
    (Winston Churchill)

  32. The obvious, cheaper compromise by PapayaSF · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's have animal rights activists pull the carriages.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:The obvious, cheaper compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck getting food for them in New York City.

    2. Re:The obvious, cheaper compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The animal rights activists activists would not like that.

  33. 9 passangers? by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    This is 'merica! Your not going to 9 of us fat ass's in that thing.

    1. Re:9 passangers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your lack of proper English shows you aren't American....or that you are due to our shitty education system. Now I don't know what my fucking point was......

    2. Re:9 passangers? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It was a typo -- the thing holds nine assengers.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  34. Oppostion misinterpreted by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    From everything I've seen, no one is in actual opposition to the development of said vehicular monstrosity; they are only in opposition to outlawing the horse-drawn carriage. If the liberals were actually "pro-choice" in general, they would simply allow group to run its version to compete with the horses and see which one fairs better.

  35. Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Getting rid of the carriage horses means getting rid of the horse stables, which are located on the West Side of Manhattan. Tear down the stables, and Mayor DeBlasio can build luxury condos for his rich cronies.

  36. We're going to miss .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the nostalgic "clip-clop" of horses hooves.

    On the other hand, think of the employment opportunities for people operating the coconut shells.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  37. Real Estate Grab, nothing more by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    Lived in NYC for quite a while..saw the horses every day. A Carriage Ride isn't cheap, and the horses looked healthy...I don't think they were abused, and the load pulled was a cart of tourists on flat ground. I too used them a few times for dates and such. Nope, the real reason is some prime real estate is zoned "stables". Get rid of the horses and a few very, very valuable lots become "residential". Buy up a few bits of "air rights" and the 1% get another choice. Leave the horses...it is a bit of old NY and isn't hurting anyone, including the horses.

  38. Thanks Cy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean only a couple months ago we were all in an uproar about those niggers who just happily sang and just loved to work dem fields. Thanks for your insight Uncle Cy, I'm sure those horses really do love nothing more than working their ass off all day just like dem niggers just can't think of a better time than a day of pickin cotton followed up by a big juicy watermelon and a fresh plucked chicken, fried of course.

  39. What nightmares are made of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partly because of the uncanny valley.

    But mostly because malfunctioning robots going on a rampage is a common scifi-horror trope.

    1. Re:What nightmares are made of by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

      Jurassic Westworld?

  40. Good grief by Guest316 · · Score: 1

    Certain topics really bring the mouthbreathers out of the woodwork. So many here are extrapolating on the whole based on limited personal experiences or even conjecture of whatever they think is "reasonable."

    Some people treat their animals well. Some mistreat them anywhere from slightly to egregiously. I could likewise share my own anecdotes of horses who were kept like royalty as well as others who got the tar beat out of them regularly for no fault of their own. How are the carriage horses typically treated in NYC or elsewhere? I guarantee the answer isn't in your ass waiting to be plucked out.

    Animal labor isn't inherently cruel nor inherently benign. It's like saying all computer hacking is evil, or that no true hacker would ever use his skills for evil--it's very much dependent on the individual.

  41. kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good info
    thanks

  42. 4 ton 30 mph on a jogging trail, really? by zenyu · · Score: 1

    The carriages drive along a crowded jogging paths where motorized vehicles are banned for safety reasons. Allowing this monstrosity where you can't ride a Vespa makes no sense. A reconstruction of a light early electric like a 1902 Wood's Phaeton would have some charm and would be much safer to everyone it encounters in the park.

  43. Re:electric, steam, internal combustion alternativ by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Yes, but he also said that his Baker Electric is his absolute favorite. And it's an EV with similar-era styling to the POS discussed in this article.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. There's other choices. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    The horse could always choose the glue factory!

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  45. Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure those 4 ton electric cars will be most dangerous, as most electric vehicles are.... you cannot hear them coming! Not sure why they would want to replaced those horse drawn carriage with those behemoth rides!

  46. Re:electric, steam, internal combustion alternativ by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    true indeed drinky. I just saw it as a good place to insert some leno

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  47. no by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    kids die getting hit, please get OUT from behind the windshield, step away from the weapon, space bug.