Slashdot Mirror


This Is Your Brain While Videogaming Stoned

Daniel_Stuckey (2647775) writes "Pot and video games have long been bound together in hazy, wedded bliss—as well as in compulsion and codependency. Many a World of Warcraft binger has been found in the darkest hours of the night with clouds of sweet, milk-white smoke curling around him, a bong next to the keyboard. But the way these lovers, games and weed, commingle has only rarely been studied, and when done so, usually exclusively in the context of substance abuse and how it relates to what is known as PVP: 'problem video game playing.'" Motherboard takes a different look.

95 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. PVP? by waddgodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Say PVP to a gamer and they're thinking of how to frag everybody else, not that they're addicted.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    1. Re:PVP? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      And I'm also quite sure that you find very few potheads in the PVP ganker club.
      Live and let live, love and let love, and by the way, do you have a bag of crisps?

    2. Re:PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Was this an intended response to the parent.. because if so.. not only is it quite silly, it makes no sense.. he's stating a fact about a well known acronym.

    3. Re:PVP? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Oh you have PVP problems? I feel sorry for you. Not everyone can be 31337. Maybe if you dedicate more hours. Maybe if you stopped drinking and getting stoned you'd have better reflexes.

    4. Re:PVP? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Capitalise your sentences and proper nouns, you colonial oaf.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      actually it's the other way around.

      pve takes no skill whatsoever. you learn an encounter. then you do it. whoopdyfuckingdoo you child.

      actually it's the other way around.

      PvP is just running around shooting with no tactics or learning. whoopdyfuckingdoo you child.

      I've beaten PvPers in my game of choice so your assertion means shit.

      I have raided with PvPers and they are more often than not they are shit. They don't work with other people and have massive egos.

      it's bad.

      it's sad.

      and your chip on the shoulder proves it. :)

      you fucking know it and it galls you.

    6. Re:PVP? by blackiner · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Back in MY day, we called them PKs.

    7. Re:PVP? by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      And I'm also quite sure that you find very few potheads in the PVP ganker club. Live and let live, love and let love, and by the way, do you have a bag of crisps?

      utter SHITE .. i love to get stoned and get some FPS action.. some good weed and ,atm Wolfenstein the new order, also a bit of Nether and some black ops zombie shootage with friends.... save yer "peace,love" and all that fucking bollocks.. give me weed and give me blood and guts and guns!

    8. Re:PVP? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      omission of capitalization is a hallmark of early internet adepts (primarily 'murican, of course) who cut their teeth on BBSs, usenet newsgroups, IRC channels, MUDs, etc... the ongoing trend of silicon valley start-ups avoiding capitalization in their names likely began as an homage to this habit. you'd do well for your johnny-come-lately national presence on the internet to raise your awareness of and respect that.

    9. Re:PVP? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      omission of capitalization is a hallmark of early internet adepts (primarily 'murican, of course) who cut their teeth on BBSs, usenet newsgroups, IRC channels, MUDs, etc...

      I can attest to that, having first gone online with a 300 baud modem in 1982. Back then, a lot of smaller computers and some mainframes had no lower case letters (my first two computers had no lower case), so the technical people got used to ignoring the shift key while office workers had IBM-PCs and Wang... uh, I forgot what they were called; it was a minicomputer that was kind of dedicated word processor with multiple terminals the secretaries typed on.

      you'd do well for your johnny-come-lately national presence on the internet to raise your awareness of and respect that.

      You'd do well to respect the properly written word so as to avoid looking like a juvenile and to make what you write more readable. As to respecting writing that uses no capitals, it's like respecting bird shit on your windshield. It was a stupid fad that lasted way past its time and deserves no respect whatever.

    10. Re:PVP? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      As an American, I would like to completely endorse "Colonial Oaf" as the prefered insult of my nations people. Thumbs up.

    11. Re:PVP? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Blame the pot smoking hippies. PK implies that one person is dominant over the other. Player Verses Player impartes the much more polictially correct notion that we are all equal. (Yes, I am joking.)

    12. Re:PVP? by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      If you're havin PVP problems I feel bad for you son, I got 31337 problems but bein n00b ain't one.

    13. Re:PVP? by Brulath · · Score: 1

      you'd do well for your johnny-come-lately national presence on the internet to raise your awareness of and respect that.

      So some people used a system with no lowercase letters 30 years ago and that means they write in lowercase today. It's perhaps more likely that the startups don't capitalise because it reads as more informal, and the anonymous coward didn't use capitals because they couldn't be bothered (much like they couldn't be bothered to log in). It'd be pretty weird, but I guess not impossible, for someone to go 30 years communicating online with people that use capital letters and not attempt to retrain themselves to do so.

      I mean, it's not like it doesn't have benefits; capital letters – where appropriate – can improve the readability of a paragraph quite significantly. A single-world name? Not so much.

    14. Re:PVP? by StrangeBrew · · Score: 1

      Agreed. 'Grandpa' first drove a truck with no power brakes, steering or windows. He'd look pretty stupid if he bought a new vehicle with all of those features yet had them disabled or otherwise refused to use them because they never existed when he started driving. Put a similar way, it's one thing to be proud of learning to drive a vehicle with '3 on the tree'. It's another to only use the first 3 gears on your brand new truck.

    15. Re:PVP? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The due respect this concept commands, in my humble opinion, is no more than the simple recognition of its place in the history and lore of our beloved internet community that you demonstrated adequately in your first paragraph.

      As does my pen name. It honors the history, but the concept, again, was like hula hoops and ma jong: a meaningless fad.

      To put it in terms an average person such as yourself

      I'm anything but average. As to a review, I'd love to see a negative critique.

    16. Re:PVP? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      As does my pen name. It honors the history, but the concept, again, was like hula hoops and ma jong: a meaningless fad.

      Well, in terms of my originally intended context, I guess we're on the same page. Outside of that context, the issue of its status as a meaningless fad... I don't know... I'll just say there are plenty of folks still communicating across mediums and spending time in interfaces where the the habit is still reinforced regularly. I'd probably do it more habitually if it wasn't for corporate email and places like slashdot. I'll also say that, for those who've spent more time communicating on IRC and in various games than we should have, the concept lends itself to a certain voice of familiarity. Like a biker's colors, perhaps? Maybe it's a little bit trivial to those outside of that realm, but I don't think it's meaningless.

      I'm anything but average. As to a review, I'd love to see a negative critique.

      I'll grant you that. ;-)

    17. Re:PVP? by vandelais · · Score: 1

      You! Alright! I learned it by watching you.

      --
      Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
    18. Re:PVP? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It certainly made sense playing Quake, I'll agree.

  2. Wait by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pew pew pew...
    <PAUSE>
    <SCHLERP (bubble bubble)>
    "What?? That's ridiculous."
    <UNPAUSE>
    Pew pew pew...

  3. Comparison with other drugs by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see this same thing repeated with these for comparison:

    alcohol
    cocaine
    LSD
    MDA
    MDNA
    adderall
    zoloft
    perkoset
    xanax

    etc...you get my point...

    every damn time people anywhere talk about "drugs" and their effects we need to **compare** it to other similar things!

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Comparison with other drugs by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Let's see this same thing repeated with these for comparison:

      Reading Slashdot.

      every damn time people anywhere talk about "drugs" and their effects we need to **compare** it to other similar things!

      Comparison does not prove causation! We read and write that multiple times each day on Slashdot.

      You must be nude here.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Comparison with other drugs by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      So, you didn't read the paper did you?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    3. Re:Comparison with other drugs by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      So... you didn't read the paper and then made a bunch of stupid assumptions... off of a /. summary! How dumb can you be?.

      Thanks AC, your verbal diarhea is terribly enlightening.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:Comparison with other drugs by jones_supa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      etc...you get my point...

      No, I don't. Of your list of drugs (which included both recreational drugs and medicinal drugs), some of them might increase a person's gaming capabilities, while some of them might dampen a person's gaming capabilities. So what?

      every damn time people anywhere talk about "drugs" and their effects we need to **compare** it to other similar things!

      I do not see why that would be necessary. You don't need to review other drugs to see how marijuana affects a person.

    5. Re:Comparison with other drugs by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      i love that the one you havent' done is coke...may FSM bless you

      slashdot: don't ever do coke! it's the drug choice of douchebags

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
  4. This again... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Do we link emo children to the sad music they listen to or stoners to the bad tv they watch?... Come on.

    Enough with trying to demonnize video games to a generation that never experienced them and so only has their own ignorance to base anything upon.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:This again... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, it's getting harder and harder to demonize video games. The kids of today are already the second generation of gamers, their parents are the first. Having a teenager (i.e. the time when you start wondering "just where did my kid go wrong?") means that you're about 40 years old. That is about the age where you had an Atari 2600 or a C64 as a kid.

      Demonizing weed isn't easy either, since it's been around for two generations by now (or rather, two generations had some rather high rate of exposure to it).

      What's left is demonizing the combo. Because when you were a kid during my generation (i.e. the "40ish" people of today), you were EITHER a geek OR doing dope. The combination was rather rare.

      And it simply can't be that your kids are simply walking hormones that come without a user manual, where you have to figure out how to deal with them. So SOMETHING must be wrong here. He was always such a nice boy...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:This again... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure the 'two generations' makes it all nice and neat for you, but you're just so wrong.

      Cannabis has been around pretty much as long as humans have. The only time there was a drop in 'exposure' was during the propaganda wars starting in the 1930's by good ol' US capitalism and even that didn't last long, just eliminated all the medical supplies and drove use underground.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    3. Re:This again... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      hahaha, obviously you were too stoned and couldn't read or remember his second paragraph, eh?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:This again... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Cannabis has been around for ages. Yes. But it's only become a "youth thing" two generations ago. It was outlawed some more generations ago (after being legal for ... well, pretty much all of humanity's existence), probably around the same time we tried to do the same with alcohol, and the 60s youth revolution "rediscovered" it. They had to deal with a parent generation that grew up without it and hence feared that, to them, unknown drug. Since then, it's been part of our "youth culture", in a way.

      In other words, the parents and grandparents of today's teenagers were "potheads" already, or at least had exposure to it. With the grandparents actually having more exposure to it than the parents. Along with other drugs like LSD. I'm fairly sure that there are more 50-60 year olds around that took a trip to the skies than there are 30-40 year olds.

      The kids of today are "only" the second generation of gamers. Still, bad mouthing video games won't do it, since the parents, the first generation gamers, won't buy it.

      Since we do apparently have that need to blame the unruly youth at something, and since the young'uns today don't do anything their parents or grandparents didn't do (aside of "social networking", but guess what: The parents and grandparents do it TOO, so that can't be it), we can only try some combinations. Parents enjoyed video games, grandparents enjoyed drugs, but it must be the combination thereof that makes our youth go bananas.

      We need to pin it to something. Bad parenting can't be it, and now hush li'l Jonny and watch your TV, mom's busy on the phone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:This again... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      The combination is very common in my experience.

      I assume you meant to use the past tense since he was talking about the late 70s to early 80s and my experience was quite different.

      Smart people experiment, and quickly realize that marijuana is the safest recreational drug we've ever found.

      Smart people don't use themselves as guinea pigs on an unstudied drug which may or may not have long term negative affects on memory. Anecdotal experience seems to support some memory decline with long term marijuana use. I wouldn't go near the stuff for that reason alone. Until it has been proven to be safe through long term placebo controlled studies I would hope that most intelligent people would give it a wide berth.

      As far as the late 70s to early 80s I have to agree with the observation of potheads and geeks not mixing and that geeks who spent most of their time either playing computer games or Dungeons and Dragons or writing computer games generally did not smoke pot.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    6. Re:This again... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Citation for your misguidedness?

      After all, you don't even know why it was prohibited. BTW, the drug cartels would beg to differ with your made up history.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:This again... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      it was a bullshit article, with a bullshit point, that shouldn't have made it onto Creed's thoughts (oblique reference to 'The Office') let alone on Slashdot.

      Headline: People enjoy smoking pot while engaging in leisure activities.
      Headline 2: Young people often have the copious amounts of free time and lack of responsibilities that enable playing video games and/or smoking pot.

      Neither of these are newsworthy, or interesting at all.

      The following exposes would be equally fine examples of journalistic ... something.
      - Drinking beer at a bar, while playing pool.
      - Old men in tiny cars and ridiculous hats playing golf while smoking cigars.
      - Fat bald men bowling while sipping budweisers.

    8. Re:This again... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You forgot the dart profi players!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:This again... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Ah, the new slashdot.

      Everbody reads the crap article by a bunch of stoners, nobody bothers to read the scientific paper. Then a bunch of stoners keep replying to stuff that's happening in their head and not in the threads.

      I can certainly see how the resulting chaos caused by stoners reacting to ghosts in their head might spice up online gameplay.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    10. Re:This again... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a damn good thing you're a smart person who doesn't smoke weed!

      Please cite the part where I claimed to be intelligent. I made no such claim. But I value whatever intelligence I do have. Which is why I give drugs with any evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, of mental decline a very wide berth.

      Enjoy your beer, coffee and/or cigarettes, at least the government and their hand-picked research buddies have determined those to be far safer than weed

      They have? You have a cite for that? Are you seriously claiming the government has done placebo controlled studies comparing marijuana or THC and alcohol, cigarettes and coffee/caffiene?

      Actually I have personally read studies that show caffeine and other stimulants like amphetamines to improve the outcome following brain damage. I have also seen plenty of anecdotal evidence that stimulants in general can increase mental performance. So that much is plausible.

      Incidentally I don't drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes and I drink coffee only rarely.

      Now that my sarcasm reserves have been fully depleted, can you please tell me how I'm capable of remembering my humongous password, which is ~128 bits of entropy large and ten words long, despite my handicap of having been a daily cannabis user for over 10 years?

      If you are referring to a diceware password then 10 words is not particularly impressive. I have a truly awful memory and I also have a ten word diceware password memorized. In any case how good your memory may or may not be at the moment isn't the point. The question is how does it compare to before you started smoking regularly.

      How am I even capable of using Linux, which demands a large portion of the brain's memory be dedicated to a plethora of commands, syntax and philosophies?

      It demands no such thing. I run Arch Linux and again I have a terrible memory. I just look up commands when (not if) I forget them. Also this does not speak at all to the question of whether smoking marijuana affects memory. All it proves is it doesn't cause actual brain death or mental retardation. But it still could drop your functional IQ by 10 points for every 3 years of 'wake and bake' or something similar. Since peoples' IQs tend to drop every year after their 18th birthdays in any case this would not be simple to demonstrate.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    11. Re:This again... by BilI_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Studies (just the other day there were reports about a recent one, I believe even here on /.) have shown that people with high intelligence

      Stop right there. We don't even have a way to measure someone's level of intelligence, so that's bullshit. IQ, if you were going to bring it up, is nothing but bad science. IQ was designed to test how well someone would fit into the formal education environment, which likely has little to do with intelligence.

      I would have thought people with "high intelligence" would be able to see these studies as the bullshit that they are. I'm not even saying anything about weed or drugs here.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    12. Re:This again... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      >LOL...we're talking about a much much safer alternative to alcohol, not something that needs placebo controlled studies.

      What does alcohol have to do with anything? That's just a question of legality. I support the legalization of all drugs including heroin. So that's irrelevant to me. What I care about is whether Cannabis/THC has been proven to be safe. I don't care if it's safer than driving your car into a bridge support at 50 mph or downing huge quantities of Everclear every waking moment or sniffing acetone all day long or whatever. The question is whether or not regular use of the drug has any negative effects on memory or cognition. AFAIK long term effects have not been studied properly. Based on what I have seen personally in my own life I remain concerned.

      think that's a myth, and again, these would be people who are the equivalent of alcoholics.

      I don't think it is easy to draw a particular line between a frequency of use that is harmful and one that is not. If it is harmful at all and obviously such harm has not been demonstrated scientifically (which again does not prove that it is not harmful) then it may be that the harm is proportional to the frequency of use. The relationship may be linear or nonlinear or there may be no harm at any frequency of use. It's impossible to say at this point because I don't think you can legally do such studies outside of Uruguay or Colorado and in any case none have been done AFAIK. I have personally seen anecdotal evidence of such memory decline that seems to follow taking up pot smoking. While that doesn't prove anything. It may just be coincidence, but I'm not rushing out to start smoking myself. I'm not willing to take the risk of my memory getting even worse than it is now.

      I think that's a myth, and again, these would be people who are the equivalent of alcoholics.

      It's also almost certainly safer than putting a sawn off shotgun against your head and pulling the trigger or dowsing yourself in salt water and then sticking your fingers in a light socket. The amount of harm that alcohol may or may not cause is not relevant except for legalization arguments. Not to belabor the obvious but just because something is legal does not mean it is an intelligent thing to do.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    13. Re:This again... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      After all, you don't even know why it was prohibited.

      And how could you know that he doesn't know? Historians have written hundreds of books on the subject. It appears that your knowledge of 20th century American history is weak; you might start by reading up on this guy. He was the assistant prohibition commissioner in the Bureau of Prohibition, before being appointed as the first commissioner of the U.S. Treasury Department's Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN) on August 12, 1930.

      He was the one behind marijuana prohibition. Books I read (granted, four decades ago) stated that there was an either real or perceived heroin problem, and since Congress wouldn't cough up more cash for his fight against heroin, so he made up the marijuana menace out of whole cloth so he could divert funds appropriated for marijuana prohibition to fighting heroin use.

      At the time, about the only people who used marijuana during the '30s were blacks, Mexicans, musicians, writers, and artists, all of whom were irrelevant in politics at the time. Watch Reefer Madness, an anti "muggles" (slang for marijuana at the time) propaganda film. It's actually funny, especially if you're stoned.

      One or two books I read had the Hearst family's fortune tied up in industries that competed with hemp: cotton, paper, plastics (rope), etc, but those books had no citations so were a bit suspect.

      Now, here's a bit of history I lived through. I don't think I even heard of marijuana until the sixties when I was a teenager. What happened was white kids started coming back from Vietnam, where the black guys introduced the white guys to that killer Asian bud, and once home it quickly spread to other young whites.

      And the anti-pot hysteria continues, despite any proof whatever that marijuana isn't the least dangerous of all psychoactive substances and even safer than many over the counter medications, such as aspirin or Tylenol (acetaminophen), the former of which can cause stomach and intestinal ulcers, the second of which can damage your liver.

      The newspapers have been reporting on two people having psychotic episodes after eating huge amounts of pot, without noting that crazy people use pot, too, and one of the two had other psychoactive drugs in his system.

      There was a fellow I was stationed with in the USAF who merely thought he'd been given LSD, and that was enough to trigger a psychotic episode. Crazy people are crazy, drugs or no drugs.

    14. Re:This again... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Smart people don't use themselves as guinea pigs on an unstudied drug which may or may not have long term negative affects on memory.

      True, smart people read everything they could about the subject first.

      Anecdotal experience seems to support...

      Anecdotes are not data and have little value.

      As far as the late 70s to early 80s I have to agree with the observation of potheads and geeks not mixing and that geeks who spent most of their time either playing computer games or Dungeons and Dragons or writing computer games generally did not smoke pot.

      I turned $10 transistor radios into $250 guitar fuzzboxes for my stoner musician friends as a teenager, although I never smoked it myself until I was 20.

      If you're worried about memory loss, stay away from all alcohol use.

      Until it has been proven to be safe through long term placebo controlled studies I would hope that most intelligent people would give it a wide berth.

      Placebo? LOL! There is no such placebo. However, millions of people have used it long-term with no ill effects so no such study is needed. Studies have been done, statistical studies looking at pot smokers vs nonsmokers show that smoking it (actually smoking anything) long-term is bad for your lungs, but doesn't cause cancer and actually helps prevent it in cigarette smokers.

      Studies have shown, however, that smoking pot before adulthood can indeed have a negative affect on the brain, so young folks ought to stay away from it.

    15. Re:This again... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      If you're worried about memory loss, stay away from all alcohol use.

      Thanks for the advice. I do. I keep well away.

      Placebo? LOL! There is no such placebo. However, millions of people have used it long-term with no ill effects so no such study is needed.

      Really. Have a cite for that?

      Studies have shown, however, that smoking pot before adulthood can indeed have a negative affect on the brain, so young folks ought to stay away from it.

      Define 'adulthood'. And if it can damage a younger brain that makes damage to adult brains a hell of a lot more plausible. Excellent reason for anyone who values whatever intelligence they have to stay far away until or unless long term use has been proven to be safe.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    16. Re:This again... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Define 'adulthood'.

      Everyone is different and grow and mature and age at different rates, but the trouble with pot and teenagers is that the teenaged brain is not yet fully formed.

      As to a citation for "no such placebo", it would be like a placebo to study drunkenness. One feels the effects of mind-altering substances. Rather, they do statistical studies comparing users with non-users.

  5. being stoned helps the grind by Nyder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I'm stoned and I've been playing video games stoned for almost all of my video game life.

    And all I have is this to say:

    What are we talking about again?

    --
    Be seeing you...
  6. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Which ones first? The cigarette smokers or the drunks?

    I'd start with them, they're easiest to find.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Gamers? by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gamers? What about the programmers? They can't be straight.

    Portrait of J. Random Hacker: Ceremonial Chemicals

    I have often found that when any problem is to be solved, be it creating universes from singularities, forming life from atoms, building solutions from syntax, etc. the process will benefits from an entropy gradient: Energizing and expansion, Heating then chilling, Randomizing design patterns then benchmarking, Changing strategies and sorting what works. Any who think that drugs are inherently evil and detrimental are arguing against the nature of the universe itself.

    Sometimes considering every option methodically gives insight, but that is not the only way, that is not natures way. Sometimes the entropy added is natural, sometimes deliberate. Sometimes induced by the disjoint dreams of sleep. Humans are tool using creatures, and with moderation of dosage they may even use drugs as tools. A recreational chemical may give a different perspective, heighten some inherent ability, dull some pain or inhibition, or mix up the approaches to problems. A little entropy can be a good thing in a self corrective system. Without chaos there would be no order: There would be no life, only crystals; No mutation only stagnation; No adaptation only the vulnerability of the monoculture; No new discoveries only existing knowledge; No new innovations only the dark ages.

    Sometimes the temporary detrimental effects of being mixed up inside are worth the resultant order that settles out from the chaos. Even the ancients knew of catharsis. Their trial by fire is yet another stress then relaxation.

  8. In other news: my iPhone keeps tigers away by Powercntrl · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Could it be the case that playing video games are simply the most likely recreational activity a stoner is going to feel motivated enough to perform? Honestly, how many people get stoned and then go hiking, running, playing football or whatever?

    It's bad enough that some people believe video games cause violent behavior, but now drug use too? Next we'll be demonizing food, since every murderer, stoner and rapist ate food regularly during their lives.
     

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:In other news: my iPhone keeps tigers away by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      it's more like the recreational activity which they can engage in and stand zero risk of getting arrested, losing student loan eligibility, and being denied the opportunity for a proper job -- oh and I guess working for the FBI.

    2. Re:In other news: my iPhone keeps tigers away by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      You might want to re-calibrate your worldview. Talking about gamers smoking pot isn't "demonizing." Ooooh scary drug use.

      I personally know a few people who have been busted for possession and it's going to be on their criminal record for the rest of their lives. Heck, even having a stoner friend accidentally leave a tiny "baggie" in your car can easily turn into an expensive legal nightmare if a cop notices it before you do. The "world view" may be different but here in the USA, there's still a war on drugs here and the law will happily fuck your life up without giving it a second thought.

      You also just lumped those of us who enjoy marijuana in with murderers and rapists. Are you trolling, or just really sheltered?

      You missed the entire "correlation does not imply causation" point behind that statement. By the way, I don't see any tigers here, so my iPhone must be working great!

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    3. Re:In other news: my iPhone keeps tigers away by mikael_j · · Score: 2

      Plenty of people use cannabis and go hiking, hang out with friends and have normal lives.

      Just check out /r/trees on reddit (or some similar forum), plenty of users there post "smoke spot" pictures from hiking trails and the like.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  9. And here I am... by drake2k · · Score: 1

    Reading this article, atl-tabbed in between 2 battlegrounds, hitting up the bong at 1AM

  10. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    Don't forget the caffeinators!

    Mark my words, that's the drug that's going to lead to zombies!

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  11. Alcohol too by Hamsterdan · · Score: 2

    I used to drink when playing Quake 2 and UT with my clan. The goal was not to get too drunk, but just enough to be a real Kamikaze. Weed also enhances creativity as many artists will confirm.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  12. God Bud? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    Is that because it's au naturel and hasn't been trimmed?

    That's a helluva lot of leaf!!

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  13. Drugs and programming by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From personal experience, drinking while programming isn't so bad, although the increasing mental and physical clumsiness will eventually become a problem. Smoking weed while programming, on the other hand, is asking for trouble. If you're a designer brainstorming before coming up with a rough design document, weed's probably an ally in many ways. Programming, though, God help you. I suppose it adversely affects the ability to base one logical proposition upon another, which is generally bad for a series of equations relying upon the results of the previous for a useful result.

    While playing games it depends on the game. If it requires the same sort of sequential, analytical processes as programming then you're doomed. If it's just a twitch game with simple goals and gameplay you'll be minimally handicapped. In any case, I can't imagine being high will improve your ability to play a game; just your enjoyment of it.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    1. Re:Drugs and programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From personal experience, drinking while programming isn't so bad, although the increasing mental and physical clumsiness will eventually become a problem. Smoking weed while programming, on the other hand, is asking for trouble. If you're a designer brainstorming before coming up with a rough design document, weed's probably an ally in many ways. Programming, though, God help you. I suppose it adversely affects the ability to base one logical proposition upon another, which is generally bad for a series of equations relying upon the results of the previous for a useful result. .

      Bullshit! There are many a programer that do their best work high.

    2. Re:Drugs and programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My experience, with average programming, is that a not too big dose of weed might numb my brain a bit, but on the other hand i am more focused on the work and can make up the lost brain power by sitting for a longer time, while also enjoying myself more.

    3. Re:Drugs and programming by bemymonkey · · Score: 2

      The interesting thing is that I seem to have conditioned myself to only be good at videogames (I play mostly Counter-Strike GO these days) when I've had a sip of beer - not even a lot of beers, just one or two over the course of a few hours of gaming. I can't hit anything when I haven't cracked open a beer, but as soon as I take that first sip, the headshots start coming.

      I'm actually sliding down in the ranks slowly because I've been too lazy to buy beer lately...

    4. Re:Drugs and programming by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I guess it rather depends on the dose.
      When I was young and drank cocoa with canabis, I rather felt inspired than stoned.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Drugs and programming by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What being stoned has done to my programming are increase likelihood of trying silly things. Tied that terrain system I spoke of into an equalizer for music, hilariously bad idea.

      Hilariously great idea, you mean. I imagine a spinning globe. Mountains, islands, ranges, whole continents are spawned in response to music. They sink back into the ocean as the globe rotates.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Drugs and programming by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      Please tell us that the source code to your equalizer is online somewehre

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    7. Re:Drugs and programming by strikethree · · Score: 2

      From personal experience, drinking while programming isn't so bad, although the increasing mental and physical clumsiness will eventually become a problem. Smoking weed while programming, on the other hand, is asking for trouble.

      There are numerous people who have the EXACT opposite experience. That is part of what makes the world so marvelous: We are all different. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    8. Re:Drugs and programming by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      From personal experience, drinking while programming isn't so bad, although the increasing mental and physical clumsiness will eventually become a problem. Smoking weed while programming, on the other hand, is asking for trouble.

      That was the opposite of my experience back when I was programming. Two beers and I couldn't program my way out of a paper bag, but being high was actually beneficial, so long as I didn't get zombified.

    9. Re:Drugs and programming by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Oh that's cool, thanks for the info! TIL...

    10. Re:Drugs and programming by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Might be an effect of being slightly more relaxed, the same effect a very small amount of alcohol can have if you're tense. So you get better reaction time because you don't have to overcome muscle tension first.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  14. My Takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Playing stoned made them more confident. They felt like they were playing better, so they took more risks. A lot of games have systems in which risky behavior is often more greatly rewarded, but rewarded less frequently. Spelunky especially is one of those games. Tetris, however, can be much less forgiving of risky behavior, hence the lower scores there.

    So I don't think this was a very good test of the effect of actual basic skills that contribute to good or bad play. I think a series of reaction time tests, memorization tests, and problem solving tests, independent from complex interactions within the game itself or the nebulous "score" would make for a better testing environment. Also, three people playing just four games, all of which are single player and most of which are puzzle games, doesn't seem like enough data to come to any useful conclusion whatsoever.

    I've played with and against players who were high in competitive multiplayer games in which the high players were obviously making mistakes and playing poorly (the whole time insisting that playing high enhanced their abilities) to change my belief that playing high probably makes you worse rather than better. Especially in a multiplayer context with a group of highly skilled and experienced players, ones overconfidence can be much more directly and specifically exploited and countered. The high players were not only overconfident, but much less likely to recognize and acknowledge mistakes, leading them to repeat those mistakes or allow their opponents to capitalize on the mistakes even more frequently or severely than normal.

  15. I wonder about other game genres by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    like, RTS, for example. I suspect that THC is helpful for situations where one needs to focus in, but the opposite of helpful for situations where one needs to multitask. However, that which seems like multiple tasks to one mind may well be perceived as a single (multidimensional but easily subject to simultaneous apprehension) task to another. If people play video games for job interviews as was discussed this past January, ...

  16. yes you bastards! by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    instead of doing something you love you should spend all your time beating the bible outside the grocery store, cause drunk on jesus is fine but playing a dumb ass game is not

  17. Re:Gamers? by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure GP was talking about pot, but probably about psychedelic drugs like LSD, mescalin, psilocybin, ayahuasca, DMT and so on. But even for pot I'm sure that, while there certainly are some who use it strictly as recreation, there are also those who achieve real insights under its influence.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
  18. Re:Gamers? by Prune · · Score: 1

    > ayahuasca, DMT

    Listing both is redundant, as DMT is the active ingredient in ayahuasca (the MAOI component in this plant extract is there to prevent the DMT from being destroyed in the gut by monoamine oxidaze, and its psychoactive effect is miniscule in comparison to the DMT -- if MAOIs had a strong psychoactive effect they probably wouldn't be used as antidepressants). Listing DMT would have been sufficient; listing both is kind of like listing mescaline and peyote both, which doesn't make sense -- one comes from the other.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  19. Re:Gamers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The most important difference to me is that anti-drug people are trying to control my actions without justification through legislation while the pro-drug people, whether their statements are true or not, are not.

  20. Man by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Mannnnn, have you ever looked at your hand controller? I mean, REALLY looked at it? It's like, wait... it doesn't control MY hand. It should be called a control handler. I smell a conspiracy and it smells like pop tarts.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  21. Re:Gamers? by turp182 · · Score: 1

    Already at +5, so well spoken.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  22. Re:Gamers? by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

    > ayahuasca, DMT

    Listing both is redundant, as DMT is the active ingredient in ayahuasca (the MAOI component in this plant extract is there to prevent the DMT from being destroyed in the gut by monoamine oxidaze, and its psychoactive effect is miniscule in comparison to the DMT -- if MAOIs had a strong psychoactive effect they probably wouldn't be used as antidepressants).

    The harmala component in ayahuasca is there (mostly) to facilitate ingestion, yes, but DMT can be used without it when smoked or snorted (which I think was the original use, powder processed from yopo bark).

    Anyway, it might be a regional thing, but my impression is that to the extent that is to be found at all, "DMT" here in the EU refers to synthetic stuff meant to be smoked in a base pipe, and probably is not the 5-MeO-DMT variant found in ayahuasca. Is this use of the terms different in the US?

    Listing DMT would have been sufficient; listing both is kind of like listing mescaline and peyote both, which doesn't make sense -- one comes from the other.

    Mescaline can come from peyote, of course, but also from San Pedro. The effects are reported to be distinct, to some extent, due to the various other components in either plant. Which presumably make both slightly different from synthetic mescaline. I can't actually say this from personal experience though, these things are not at all commonplace or easy to procure where I'm at.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
  23. "problem"? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    problem video game playing

    That's when your video card can't handle Watch Dogs on high graphics settings.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  24. Re:Pah by gigne · · Score: 1

    It's not finished.

    It's finished.

    --
    Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  25. Very interesting article... by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    ... even if N = 4 in a non-double-blind placebo-controlled experiment isn't exactly science. But a lovely anecdote, and one that matches my own personal experience (from long ago) in many ways. I hope people are actually reading TFA -- but wait, this is /. so that's a silly thought.

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  26. "addiction" error by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I've seen similar comments from others on this thread...

    TFA isn't just examining effects of marijuana...it's using the data to ***draw a conclusion*** about marijuana

    what conclusion?

    it wasn't just about performance, but "addiction"

    they're trying to see if marijuana smoking during video games makes the video gaming "more addictive"

    TFA had an agenda to show that somehow either weed or video games (or combination thereof) is inherently "bad"

    this is just like those B.S. studies that were gamed to make stoned drivers look as bad as drunk drivers...however, the data itself, just comparing how weed affects all kinds of tasks, sure that's beneficial

    but again...why aren't we doing this with ***other drugs***

    does Ritalin, Adderall, and other pharma's affect driving?

    if it affects driving, then why do we let people who work with their hands take it?

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  27. Re:Gamers? by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure GP was talking about pot, but probably about psychedelic drugs like LSD, mescalin, psilocybin, ayahuasca, DMT and so on. But even for pot I'm sure that, while there certainly are some who use it strictly as recreation, there are also those who achieve real insights under its influence.

    Yeah, I read that bullshit as a teen too. I got over it.

  28. Re:Gamers? by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    Vice also recently posted an article about how the FBI can't find any expert hackers because they would all fail the Government mandated drug tests. So yeah, the programmers aren't straight either.

    I saw a paper detailing why people in technical fields are more open to recreational drug use, they found that the anti-drug propaganda doesn't work on people in this group because of the associated critical thinking skills, they will rather go out and research the truth about recreational drugs. Unfortunately I can't find it now.

    I've worked in a technical field my entire career, and in my experience technical people have no better critical thinking skills than the average person. Tech people with liberal arts degrees are a little better, but then so are non-technical people with liberal arts degrees.

    Jonathon Coulton's "Code Monkey" song is a pretty accurate picture.

  29. I know this is Slashdot but please RTFA by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    You clearly didn't read the article (The "Motherboard takes a different look" one at the bottom)

    They killed it on the games while stoned, performance was equal or greater (often massively so) in all cases. It's also full of references to other studies (for example about driving) suggesting weed does not decrease focus & performance, and in some instances enhances it.

    So.... pretty much the exact polar opposite of the "demonizing" you're complaining about.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  30. PVP = 'problem video game playing.'? by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    Take your new acronym, put it back on the shelf.
    PVP = Player vs Player.

  31. Re:It takes Slashdot 24 hours to install it by gwgwgw · · Score: 1

    My Mozilla variant, Timberwolf, really howls over that expiration. It took a fair amount of reading and 6 clicks to get the browser surrender and let me look at /.

    Didn't any staff see that coming?

    --
    That was Zen, this is Tao
  32. Alcohol and Pinball by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Back in university, I tried playing Pinball after two or three beers. I quickly realized that there was no point. No matter what pinball game I played, I was very much worse in my reaction time and coordination.

    --
    I come here for the love
  33. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Don't do the white stuff!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Re:Gamers? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I never found pot did much beyond relaxation, a bit of silliness, and maybe some enhanced enjoyment of music. Yeah, everybody reacts to drugs differently, your mileage may vary, and "relaxation" for me included reduced muscle pain and indica couch-lock, but it wasn't particularly psychedelic. Closest I got to hallucinations from it was a bit of tunnel vision which came with a strong suggestion that I ought to sit down, right then, to avoid falling over.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  35. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? Really? Is that how we score ironic humour around here nowadays?

    That said I suppose a +5 Flamebait is probably a sign of muddled /. groupthink.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  36. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Looks more like off topic stalking complete with irrational profanity to me.

    Sorry, what was that APK?

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  37. Re:Gamers? by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

    I would never recommend using entheogenic substances to anyone who wasn't very curious and confident. Having said that, those who've never tried it can not possibly know just what is and isn't bullshit about the effects. I'm not a believer in supernatural or magical things, but nevertheless some of these substances have allowed me to learn valuable lessons about myself and in one case basically cured a mild phobia. Like GP says, there can be real benefits (and dangers) to this kind of mind annealing.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
  38. we're all stars in the dope show by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    why didn't you post even a few sentences from TFA to support your contentions?

    i read TFA...I was stoned while I did it, but I'm usually stoned....it looked to me like they were trying to link "addicting" behaviors like video games and marijuana

    if you want to converse on this, show me where you think TFA proves my interpretation wrong

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  39. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Saw your post history. You're apk obsessed. Get professional help.

    And who are we pretending to be now, APK?

    Oh, and of course you saw my post history, you're busy stalking people who you complain are stalking you.

    Way to get the moral high-ground, retard. Yes, that's right, the word is 'hypocrite', the same word you like to throw around about other people.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  40. Re:Druggies Go Home. Now! by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Quite unlike the completely sane and rational APK. Yup, gottit.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  41. Re:Gamers? by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    I have tried many drugs, including the hallucinogens. The effects produce no more insight than the oxygen starvation-induced delusions that people report from near-death experiences.

  42. Re:Gamers? by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

    Ah, well, sorry if I came off as a bit snarky -- your original post mentioned "reading" and clearly that is no substitute for actually experiencing. Anyway, apparently they did not do much for you, still I wouldn't presume to make blanket statements about what they might do for others.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)