Slashdot Mirror


US May Prevent Chinese Hackers From Attending Def Con, Black Hat

Taco Cowboy (5327) links to a report from Reuters that says "Washington is considering using visa restrictions to prevent Chinese nationals from attending popular summer hacking conferences in Las Vegas as part of a broader effort to curb Chinese cyber espionage, a senior administration official said Saturday. The official said that Washington could use such visa restrictions and other measures to keep Chinese from attending the August Def Con and Black Hat events to maintain pressure on China after the United States this week charged five Chinese military officers with hacking into U.S. companies to steal trade secrets."

193 comments

  1. They're doing it wrong by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Under the Obama administration, the preferred form of entry into the U.S. is via the Mexican border. Once they cross by that border, they'll be untouchable by INS, and even committing serious crimes will not guarantee their removal from the U.S.

    Or, to summarize, visas are for suckers.

    1. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pretty much. I'm sure people are going to froth at the mouth and all the rest until you post stories like this.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Because this is slashdot am I suppose to care about your mail order bride? I don't and I guess that is why you are so bitter.

    3. Re:They're doing it wrong by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      you had me until breitbart

    4. Re:They're doing it wrong by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Had she came through the Mexican border and dropped an anchor baby, she would be set to a path of citizenship no doubt.

      Or, she could've come through before that Reagen policy thingy. What was that called back then? Oh yeah, AMNESTY.

      (the chance of R hero being elected today, ZERO)

    5. Re:They're doing it wrong by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      You had me at "breitbart". You had me at "breitbart".

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    6. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't "until" stop at the first "breitbart"?

    7. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason you're so bitter is because even your mailorder bride turned you down, your hand falls asleep on you, and you can't even see your penis when you take your mom's thong off.

    8. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Def Con was for suckers. What games do you play, other than meet your favorite gman?

    9. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under the Obama administration, the preferred form of entry into the U.S. is via the Mexican border. Once they cross by that border, they'll be untouchable by INS, and even committing serious crimes will not guarantee their removal from the U.S.

      Or, to summarize, visas are for suckers.

      No, no, no. That only applies to some people. If you're Muslim, you're screwed. Now apparently they are extending the Muslim treatment to the Chinese.

    10. Re:They're doing it wrong by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I thought it was via H1-B.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    11. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      you had me until breitbart

      That's nice, now go read the article and what will you see? Oh that's right, an actual ICE report(including metrics) that lists what they've been doing. That was later picked up by some other news services, damn that reality check.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's funny is I had a green card when I was doing some work in the US back 12-15 years ago, and considered seriously becoming a US citizen(from Canada). What burns my ass, is that if I follow the rules I could be waiting upwards of a decade. While people who enter illegally can skip the entire process, get a pat on the head, and basically gloat in the face of the rule of law. What the purpose of even having the rule of law, if no one is going to enforce it? And at the very worst, actively work against it because of their ideology--instead of "doing it the correct way."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:They're doing it wrong by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      They've heard that the Chinese are confusionists, and that doesn't go with their ideas of law and order.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:They're doing it wrong by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      "Under the Obama administration"

      You say that as if anything would have been different 14 years ago. Obama and ICE are still deporting lots of people. We still have a border with Mexico so it's a good way to sneak in.

      The comment you made is lazy and stupid and has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    15. Re:They're doing it wrong by dbIII · · Score: 1

      if no one is going to enforce it?

      King Canute used the tide as an example of something he couldn't stop. Similarly illegal imigrants are so much of a part of the US economy that there is not seen to be a hope or point in stopping them, hence the "pat on the head, and basically gloat in the face of the rule of law".

    16. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In my town there were tons of complaints about the little park downtown, where the illegal Mexicans/Brazilians (mainly) hung out every morning from like 6-9am for scummy contractors who would drive to the curb and pick out a few for 'day work', for miniscule pay. The mayor decided to start sending the cops there every morning and arrest any illegal immigrants - the ACLU or something like that took it to court and got the court to say that he couldn't legally have *illegal* immigrants arrested (and attempt to deport them). ... meanwhile, of course, they can apply to the local school system for ESL classes and school for their kids, which my tax dollars to the town pays for. Funny how "illegal" somehow means you get all the benefits you want, while me being a legal citizen means I get taxed to pay for it.

    17. Re:They're doing it wrong by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      (the chance of R hero being elected today, ZERO)

      Very insightful. He's dead.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:They're doing it wrong by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Immigration status doesn't really have much to do with basic human rights.

      At least, not in civilized countries.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    19. Re:They're doing it wrong by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Apparently, he hit a nerve.

      And why would Clinton have banned the Chinese from DefCon? They were helping get Al Gore elected that year.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    20. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is Slashdot full of libtards?

      -Most libtards don't have jobs so they can comment on things they don't understand like energy policy all day as they don't care what the working man pays for energy as long as they feel good about controlling people for bullshit reasons like global warming.

      -Slashdot posts stories about solar panels and electric cars that appeal to libtards. Libtards love to push shitty technology on everyone to jack up the price of energy so we have to live in a third world hellhole again all over bullshit global warming.

      -Slashdot is very LGBTQ friendly. While this in itself is not a problem this combined with all of the libtards means that straight white men are nothing but targets and I'm fucking tired of this!

      -Slashdot has the Anonymous Coward feature which means libtards can show their real racist tendencies.

      -Lastly most people here love Obama who is the ultimate libtard. Even mention conservatives and you get modded until oblivion.

    21. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigration status doesn't really have much to do with basic human rights.

      At least, not in civilized countries.

      Take a look at Mexico's immigration laws sometime. They're much stricter than USA's. Even legal immigrants there are not allowed certain properties etc, those are reserved for citizens only. They're clearly designed to have Mexico be for Mexicans. And you know what? There's nothing wrong with that. Anyone who thinks that's unfair can choose not to go. Anyone who thinks it's worthwhile can accept it. I would never move to Mexico unless I intended to become a Mexican. I woudln't go there and expect them to accommodate my foreign langauge and culture.

      But they're lucky. They're predominantly the same skin color, not nearly as diverse as USA. So much harder for divide-and-conquer politicians to scream RACISM every time they want to enforce their laws.

    22. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh Confuscious was all about kissing the ass of his emperor. Which meant obeying laws and making obedience into high virtue. He definitely was not such a "question authority" type. That would have been biting the hand that fed him.

    23. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't the mayor have the contractors arrested?
      There are two parts to this - supply and demand, yet we seldom address the supply side.

    24. Re:They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What planet are you from? I want to go there and have some of what you're smoking.

    25. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      King Canute used the tide as an example of something he couldn't stop. Similarly illegal imigrants are so much of a part of the US economy that there is not seen to be a hope or point in stopping them, hence the "pat on the head, and basically gloat in the face of the rule of law".

      Oh please. The only people making an excuse that immigrants are a "part of the economy" are people who don't want to enforce the law. I remember here in Ontario when they changed the law to allow crop pickers in, and basically forced out everyone who'd been doing it for years. Now we've got a temporary foreign workers(TFW) program, and people have had enough.

      If Canada's population can figure it out and pressure politicians, can't figure out why Americans can't.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    26. Re:They're doing it wrong by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm not making excuses, I'm pointing out what has happened. The two speed situation annoys me as well (since a friend had to jump through a lot of hoops to prove she wasn't just marrying a US citizen for citizenship), but I can see how those who want to retain an easily controlled underclass have driven things to the point where the situation has become what it is.

    27. Re:They're doing it wrong by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      you had me until breitbart

      That's nice, now go read the article and what will you see?

      Yeah...uh, by the time I closed the annoying pop-ups and stopped the auto-playing video commercial that was loaded, I decided NOT to read the article. Chew on that reality.

    28. Re:They're doing it wrong by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah...uh, by the time I closed the annoying pop-ups and stopped the auto-playing video commercial that was loaded, I decided NOT to read the article. Chew on that reality.

      That's nice. After all, what does it take to pause something, and close a popup these days? 8 seconds, 10 seconds? Apparently that's too much effort. Why are you using the internet without an adblocker anyway? Besides pure laziness.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    29. Re: They're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global warming? Liberals being called libratards? This is just slander. Nothing to do with the article. Educate yourself. Stop being a dick.

    30. Re:They're doing it wrong by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      That's nice. After all, what does it take to pause something, and close a popup these days? 8 seconds, 10 seconds? Apparently that's too much effort.

      That is nice, isn't it? But you're repeating yourself.

      I've long been in the habit of quickly bouncing off sites that use annoying advertising tactics like breitbart.com. Personally, I wouldn't link to such a site in this or any other forum. But that's just me. You obviously feel differently.

      In any case, the FACT that Andrew Breitbart was an ideological blowhard had nothing to do with my comment to your post. I just don't like douchey sites that pull that kind of cheap advertising crap.

      Why are you using the internet without an adblocker anyway? Besides pure laziness.

      Not that it's any of your business, but on my personal devices I DO use an adblocker. This might come as a shock to you, but sometimes folks access the internet on computers they don't own. It just so happens that I was using my sister-in-law's laptop when I followed that link you posted. The fact that you so quickly resorted to an insult without considering that possibility says way more about the rigor of your thinking than mine.

      Cheers!

  2. Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good move US, isolate yourself from the rest of the world, so we don't have to do it.
    See how that goes for you. Moves like this will only make the next Con's happen in a non totalitarian country, your loss.

    PS: Isn't the 2nd amendment's sole purpose to prevent your government from acting against the people? Can you tell me what the f* you're waiting for?

    1. Re: Isolation by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure most believers in the 2nd Amendment don't give a rat's ass about helping the Chinese.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re: Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, it's not about helping the Chinese.
      It's about your government turning the country into a giant jail and you all are the inmates. Keeping Chinese nationals from Def Con, really? REALLY? Like that will achieve anything, so desperate for a new cold war to cover up their own shit and distract from their own illegal activites.
      It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.

    3. Re:Isolation by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      Bearing arms is a last resort, we prefer to exercise the 1st amendment to resolve disputes.

    4. Re:Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we prefer to exercise the 1st amendment to resolve disputes.

      "Sit on your ass and do nothing of consequence" is an amendment now? What a country.

    5. Re: Isolation by vux984 · · Score: 2

      so desperate for a new cold war

      Wot are you on about? A "new" cold war? Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

    6. Re:Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bearing arms is a last resort, we prefer to exercise the 1st amendment to resolve disputes.

      You mean this 1st amendment?

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

      I actually lol'ed, are we even talking about the same United States? Because the United States I am talking about has neither freedom of speech, nor a free press. And the right to "peaceably assemble", really? Tell that to the people who got treated like criminals and/or terrorists during Occupy Wall Street. Macing and tasering people doesn't look to me like much respect for the right to assemble.

      I am sorry, but if your 2nd amendment was created to protect the people from an overreaching tyrannical government, wake up, you HAVE IT ALREADY. Again what are you waiting for?

    7. Re:Isolation by mmell · · Score: 1

      Four boxes to use in defense of freedom: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    8. Re:Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bearing arms is a last resort, we prefer to exercise the 1st amendment to resolve disputes.

      You mean this 1st amendment?

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

      I actually lol'ed, are we even talking about the same United States? Because the United States I am talking about has neither freedom of speech, nor a free press. And the right to "peaceably assemble", really? Tell that to the people who got treated like criminals and/or terrorists during Occupy Wall Street. Macing and tasering people doesn't look to me like much respect for the right to assemble.

      I am sorry, but if your 2nd amendment was created to protect the people from an overreaching tyrannical government, wake up, you HAVE IT ALREADY. Again what are you waiting for?

      I'm sorry, are you trying to complain? You can only do that over there in that muddy area behind the dumpsters - yeah, that's our "free speech zone" - and don't make it too loud, or that line of cops with pepper spray and tasers will have to shut you up. We'd love to just eliminate that pesky 1st amendment, but we can't make it that obvious yet until we get rid of their ability to fight back.

      Luckily we're drugging your children at younger and younger ages to put an end to this nonsense. Sure, a few flip out from the drugs and use guns to shoot up public places, but that is just a bonus because we get to use it to show how evil guns are and, despite declining violent crime in the nation overall, how you need to turn them all over and let us eliminate that pesky 2nd amendment thingy.

      Don't think you can say anything about this, we know you're doing something wrong, and can send in the black clad assault teams anytime we want to either arrest you or shoot you. We have tons of proof collected by secret surveillance, authorized by secret judges in a secret court, which we are sure isn't against the 4th amendment... well, it might be, but if you try to go public with that the president now has the power to order you assassinated by a drone strike based on secret information that can't be taken to a trial of your peers because, well, it's secret.

      Any questions? Now click your heels on the ground sharply, raise your right hand to the sky palm forward, and repeat the national motto: "USA #1... HEIL USA!"

    9. Re:Isolation by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      PS: Isn't the 2nd amendment's sole purpose to prevent your government from acting against the people? Can you tell me what the f* you're waiting for?

      2017.

      No one wants to martyr the first black president.

      After he leaves office, if the next guy doesn't actually reduce the entire federal government, we won't last a decade without a new American civil war.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:Isolation by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Do you have your shortcuts mixed up? This isn't Alex Jones' Infowars website.

    11. Re: Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People who ardently believe in the 2nd amendment, tend ONLY to believe in the 2nd amendment.

      It's supposed to be the bulwark against government overreach but these people were nowhere to be seen when the US government started torturing people. They were completely absent when the US government lied to get into a war. They did nothing when the US government for the third time in a decade was caught red-handed wiretapping its own citizens. They were at home polishing their guns and patting themselves on the back when the US reserved the right to kill people without due process.

      The behavior of the US in the past 30 years has shown me one thing: the only thing the believers in the 2nd amendment will fight for is the 2nd amendment. It's not the bulwark: it's the only amendment they care about. ...and the rest of us don't have any guns. :->

    12. Re:Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American public won't do shit and here's why: as long as people don't *starve*, they will pretend that their cages are gilded.

      Give people Netflix, cheap crap at Wal-mart and stress them out at work and they will live in a state of constant Stockholm syndrome where they defend their nation as the shining beacon of freedom while all towing the line and being terrified that their boss is going to have a bad day tomorrow and poof goes the pension plan and healthcare coverage. Any solution to any problem that another country has come up with is rejected out of nationalistic xenophobia that even rivals China.

      The proponents of the 2nd amendment as a bulwark against government overreach are engaging in fantasy. Your government will reach ever farther and you won't do anything to prevent them except fool yourself that your next figurehead president is going to fix everything. He won't. You are cowards because you see the problem but are too scared to stand up to it, fooling yourselves that you'll oppose the *next* one. sure.

    13. Re: Isolation by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to be the bulwark against government overreach but these people were nowhere to be seen when the US government started torturing people. They were completely absent when the US government lied to get into a war. They did nothing when the US government for the third time in a decade was caught red-handed wiretapping its own citizens. They were at home polishing their guns and patting themselves on the back when the US reserved the right to kill people without due process.

      I don't think you know what you are talking about. They were certainly there, some protesting and some supporting and some in parts of what you said while not in others. Stop thinking everyone around you is just like you and the rest are the opposite of you.

      The behavior of the US in the past 30 years has shown me one thing: the only thing the believers in the 2nd amendment will fight for is the 2nd amendment. It's not the bulwark: it's the only amendment they care about. ...and the rest of us don't have any guns. :->

      Like I said, get your head out of your ass. Up in arms figuratively does not mean pointing guns. As long as there is the ability to address these problems through the courts, elected representation, and exposing the problems, there is no need to stand on the ammo box.

      It is the soap box, ballot box, jury box, then ammo box. any order is fine as long as the ammo box is the last stand.

    14. Re: Isolation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but his summation seems about right to me. Not that I have any belief that you COULD have done anything except make things worse.

      As for publicly complaining, yes, various people did that from all sides. And it was totally ignored, whenever the govt. felt like ignoring it, and without any consequence to the govt. folk either actual in the present or plausible in the future.

      At one point the "right to bear arms" was an important defense against the power of the government. It hasn't been for over a century, and its importance has been monotonicly declining during that entire period. Please remember that during most of its lifetime the proportion of the populace owning guns in the USSR was higher than in the US.

      I think that the crucial turning point was when "a well organized militia" became interpreted as a militia organized and run by the government. OTOH, I'm not real sure what our cities would be like if they were dominated by competing rival private militia. The interpretation may have been a practical necessity, even if it's a violation of the original intent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re: Isolation by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but his summation seems about right to me. Not that I have any belief that you COULD have done anything except make things worse.

      lol.. You say he is right then go right into countering him. You also go into how the government ignored everyone so it is likely that NOTHING could have happened that would have made it better.

      As for publicly complaining, yes, various people did that from all sides. And it was totally ignored, whenever the govt. felt like ignoring it, and without any consequence to the govt. folk either actual in the present or plausible in the future.

      Yes, and this is the exact reason why you need to give up on third parties and adopt a strategy like the tea party. I know they are evil incarnated and vile and all that bullshit around here because 1 person at 1 rally raised a confederate flag so that makes them all racists and because they held up passage of a budget and the government got shut down and the news was all over how the government had to close an open air memorial dedicated to WWII vets and threaten them with arrest when they wanted to see it or how they put up road barriers to pull over spots on highways so motorists could look at Mount Rushmore from a distance. But they have the right strategy- infiltrate the party most resembling them and effect change from within. When those second amendment supporters were bitching about spending, they listened and tried to do something about it- although failing in the process. But if the problem is government not listening, they at least listened which is more then you can say for your tried and true party liners or the third parties who never seem to get elected to anything important.

      At one point the "right to bear arms" was an important defense against the power of the government. It hasn't been for over a century, and its importance has been monotonicly declining during that entire period. Please remember that during most of its lifetime the proportion of the populace owning guns in the USSR was higher than in the US.

      I don't think this is true. Remember the battle of Athens? As just demonstrated with the cattle grazing BS by that racists up north, when citizens with guns showed up, the massive government sector quasi military backed down. The BLM showed up in force complete with snipers and fully automatic weapons thinking they could just flash a gun around and do anything they wanted. Now I don't particularly support Bundy outside of him sharing a name with the fictional Al Bundy (who is a hero to many), but at the same time, I found the show of force appalling coming from a government entity who had not been threatened at all before hand. It's the reason why we read about armed death squads called SWAT Teams invading the wrong house all the time and killing the family dog or the owner who opens the bedroom door with a ball bat in his hand because he rightfully thinks his life is in danger from a home invasion.

      IF more people cared about their second amendment rights, government wouldn't do this crap.

      I think that the crucial turning point was when "a well organized militia" became interpreted as a militia organized and run by the government. OTOH, I'm not real sure what our cities would be like if they were dominated by competing rival private militia. The interpretation may have been a practical necessity, even if it's a violation of the original intent.

      A militia- private or organized by the government is not above the law. Competing militias could not violate the laws and go around battling each other or do anything that violates the law. The most they could do is start a cola type war where they advertise and compete for market share. But the original militia was never an organized militia. We did not have a standing army (had somewhat of a navy) at the time. Although we did later

    16. Re: Isolation by russotto · · Score: 1

      Please remember that during most of its lifetime the proportion of the populace owning guns in the USSR was higher than in the US.

      And the oppressive government of the USSR is gone while the oppressive government of the US remains. See: Guns work.

    17. Re: Isolation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Welllll... I wasn't aware of private gun ownership having anything to do with the collapse of the USSR, but I can't prove that it didn't. I can't validly argue against your point, but I also can't accept it without either more evidence, or a consistent causative model that would predict that rather then use it as post hoc justification. As far as I recall, nobody predicted that the USSR would collapse because of private gun ownership, and no one used that argument as an explanation at the time.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:Isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst, you STILL do not understand: I represent the FINEST line on Earth of only-beings-thinking-on-Earth since ever, but for Chinese I am not worth even half Chinese, and to their symbionts the Africans, even LESS. And if I am not worth as MUCH, YOU are not even subject to value! You have the idea, they have a *voice* ,and the ideas is not yours, ever, so you get INSTANT CLONING! You are not needed afterwards, but molest _THEM_ enough and you get... THE GIRL! Though of course if you do not want the girl... expendable. After all why you wanted the idea OR the money after all if you did not want the girl? What you ll get is more Chinese, ugly, and many less of you, of course. Because remember if THEY hear, the idea is NOT yours. It is SO EASY to use commerce, but they want all the blueprints, the materials, the processes, the ideas and do not even care to think there was a YOU were there is now only CHINESE... (sorry for THE GIRL, they may have the BEST LEFT, after all ANY woman vaguely resembling ANY Chinese will be called Chinese and you know can be done if YOU are not worth less Chinese to them, and much less to their symbionts the India, Africans, Arabas...)

    19. Re:Isolation by silent-listener · · Score: 1

      Both are about Open Source software. Open mean also open for all. The partisans should exchange there views and software, maybe the Chinese want to inform other about there findings, as NSA always do.

  3. better idea by ebonum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic.
    Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

    Keep in mind. The US sets the standard. If we start doing things like this, don't whine when the China does the same thing. They could make the same case for any conference on any topic. If Americans come, they will steal XYZ.

    1. Re:better idea by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1, Funny

      If we start doing things like this, don't whine when the China does the same thing.

      can't tell if serious

    2. Re:better idea by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      No, but there's nothing wrong with barring people based on political or military affiliation. China is not the US. They carefully control who they allow to leave China for the US, and so the Chinese citizens attending Def Con are doing so with the implicit permissions of the Chinese government.

      They could make the same case for any conference on any topic.

      Yeah, next time there is a hacker conference like Def Con based on complete freedom of expression and anarchy in China let us know. I won't hold my breath. And if China starts banning all US citizens from attending conferences, said conferences will no longer be held in China. But they won't, because the majority of China's economy currently revolves around placating American investors.

      You can trash the US all you want, but there are a limited number of countries in the world that would even allow a conference like Def Con or Black Hat.

    3. Re:better idea by dryeo · · Score: 2

      You can trash the US all you want, but there are a limited number of countries in the world that would even allow a conference like Def Con or Black Hat.

      Many totalitarian governments like to get all the dissidents together in one easy to manage group. Show up and get entered into the database for extra scrutiny plus having all those dissidents in one group makes doing intelligence on them much easier. Always a good chance of hiring some too.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:better idea by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Now how exactly does the NSA know it was members of the Chinese military. Let me guess after initiating proper diplomatic relations the NSA approached China's computer crime task force and initiated a legal joint investigation in the hacking and after proper legal investigation discovered the perpetrators. What, don't tell me this didn't happen, not even fucking close.

      So the NSA hacked computers in China, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt those computer could be hacked and placed 'er' discovered proof of network hacking in the US, conducted by the NSA 'er' government of China and now the NSA 'er' government of China seeks to cover it up.

      You can see the real problem here. The NSA blatantly and publicly lied repeatedly to it's own government, the NSA now has publicly declared it is hacking government computers in China based upon the evidence they are attempting to submit. Now we know how naughty the NSA has been, the question is would they, hack computers in the US and then falsify evidence and plant it on computers in China that it has now publicly admitted to hacking, in order to deflect attention away from it's own criminal activities.

      Surely those idiots can see the problem they have created for themselves in combining network defence and network assault in the one unit. They are an offensive computer network organisation, their role is to destroy and break the security of other countries networks. Which now they are publicly admitting to via this flawed investigation, all based around hacking networks and breaking security and publicly proved only thing, is did hack government computers and networks in China. As to the validity of the evidence, they utterly tainted it to the point that only corrupt courts within the US would accept it and the rest of the world and the international courts would have to reject due to that extreme contamination.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:better idea by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending.

      The problem is that it's more than just the military, it's practically everyone there with any competency in computers. The rest are accessories.

      Oh, and it doesn't take cheap shots at the NSA to know that.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    6. Re:better idea by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You really don't get it at all. It is the sheer mitigated arrogance of the US government and claims that it's laws apply to every other country including the laws that the US government does not have to obey others countries laws in those countries. The total in you face arrogance of it all. For a start the NSA should have been told to STFU and everything should have been handed over to the FBI and the FBI should be pursuing the prosecution. This because they are a policing organisation that acts legally and not an espionage organisation that acts criminally (surely you can see the logical legal difference and also how the rest of the world would view it) but NOOOO, they had play knob head driven ego games and try to make the NSA look better after fucking up all over the place only to make US foreign affairs look stupidly arrogant instead and when that was failing double down on the stupid by banning arbitrary people.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:better idea by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic. Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights. The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending; doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities and rights and privileges.

    8. Re:better idea by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Yeah, totalitarian. Clearly the US government is totalitarian. Or maybe you should go look up that definition before you use it again.

      Show up and get entered into the database for extra scrutiny plus having all those dissidents in one group makes doing intelligence on them much easier.

      What you have described is exactly the Chinese government model. Except for the hiring part - the US clearly does that at Def Con, but instead of threatening to jail people they threaten to pay them 6 figures.

    9. Re:better idea by thsths · · Score: 1

      > we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      You don't? That does not align with my experience. How about Syria or Cuba?

    10. Re:better idea by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      You really don't get it at all. It is the sheer mitigated arrogance of the US government...

      How exactly is the US government's arrogance being mitigated? Based on the context, I'm guessing you meant 'unmitigated'.

      And we wonder why folks outside the US think we're all morons. Sigh!

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    11. Re:better idea by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic. Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights. The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending; doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities and rights and privileges.

      I didn't even need to read TFA to know that this will be accomplished by denying visas to those folks, not by posting law enforcement personnel at the doors to the conference and checking IDs. The US can (and does) deny visas to all sorts of people, and for many reasons, including this kind of thing. As do most other countries.

      Perhaps you should think about what you say before you say it? That's not meant to be an insult, just a suggestion.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    12. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending.

      Standard authoritarian response from any grandstanding politician or bureaucrat who doesn't know what "honeypot" means.

      I loathe the fact that NSA has turned the US into a surveillance state that exceeds the wet dreams of Stalin and Erich Honecker combined. But I'd be equally disappointed in the US if it didn't give NSA a free shot at whatever assets the PLA wants to throw our way.

      I guess I'm doomed to be perennially disapointed. I'm used to it by now.

    13. Re:better idea by dryeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, America has inverted the normal definition of totalitarian to pretend they're the opposite. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re:better idea by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind. The US sets the standard.

      I will agree with that. In the sense that any nation whose performance is lower than the US definitely deserves an "F".

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    15. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually you do bar people on the basis of nationality. Indians and Chinese are not eligible for the Diversity H1B and have a 20-30 additional years waiting period for a green card compared to other countries

    16. Re:better idea by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Move the conference to Europe, which already has many similar ones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:better idea by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      I agree with this.

      If we believe in "America" and Democracy -- we should stick with treating people equally. Back when this was something we did with pride -- we had a lot of people defect. Now we've got Americans selling out for a buck and a lot of "espionage" is done by buying databases from contractors with the US Gov -- go check out a wikileaks document dump sometime and get back with me if you doubt this.

      By using drones instead of diplomacy. By cracking down on "Arab looking" rather than bad acting. By being police state pricks instead of a nation of ideals: we are alienating the next Einstein rather than offering him refuge from a country that abuses power, demonizes a "type" of person, and tries to use enforcement rather than empathy.

      Going after the obvious "you look Chinese so get out of the party" will only cause the committed "bad guy" to jump through another hoop and do the same thing -- while alienating the allies who "are Chinese" that might have helped you. We've got corporate espionage going on because it's profitable -- not because the world has Chinese looking people.

      It's amazing that "barring Chinese" is even considered an idea worthy of discussion.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    18. Re:better idea by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      Bar members of the Chinese military from attending. Even that is purely symbolic.
      Someone should tell Obama that in American we don't bar people based on race or nationality alone.

      This is all highly unconstitutional. If they are allowed to enter the united states, AND they are not being
      arrested or detained, then they have the rights and privileges that those present in the US have...

      Including the right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to organize and assemble.

      The Defcon. and Blackhat conferences are an exercise of free speech rights.
      The government cannot lawfully prohibit those conferences or prevent anyone from attending;
      doing so is in direct violation of the bill of rights due to interference with and abridgement constitutionally protected activities
      and rights and privileges.

      I didn't even need to read TFA to know that this will be accomplished by denying visas to those folks, not by posting law enforcement personnel at the doors to the conference and checking IDs. The US can (and does) deny visas to all sorts of people, and for many reasons, including this kind of thing. As do most other countries.

      Perhaps you should think about what you say before you say it? That's not meant to be an insult, just a suggestion.

      I don't need to RTFA or read your prior comment to understand that barring Visas for this sort of thing is STUPID. They'll just pay some white guy to give them the data while a few hundred thousand Chinese who MIGHT have learned we are a great nation will become annoyed and say; "Well, I guess they saved me from visiting a ridiculous police state."

      Making America act like the old USSR or some banana Republic isn't the way to win anything. By the time you protect virginity of your daughters, they've been walking the streets giving BJs to hobos.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    19. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Keep in mind. The US sets the standard. If we start doing things like this, don't whine when the China does the same thing. They could make the same case for any conference on any topic. If Americans come, they will steal XYZ."

      China is already like this. Try go being a professor at a Chinese comp sci university if you are not Han Chinese.

    20. Re:better idea by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      FBI... Policing.... That's good, tell me another. J. Edgar Hoover pretty much set the tone for the FBI. Which organization do you think is actually prosecuting most whisleblowers and anyone the gov doesn't like?

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    21. Re:better idea by dkf · · Score: 1

      Move the conference to Europe, which already has many similar ones.

      But then most of the employees and contractors of the NSA won't be able to attend!!!

      That's not a bug in your plan, of course...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    22. Re:better idea by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you have described is exactly the Chinese government model. Except for the hiring part - the US clearly does that at Def Con, but instead of threatening to jail people they threaten to pay them 6 figures.

      How soon we forget. The FBI arrested Dmitri Sklyarov at DefCon.

    23. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Spy" would be the classification under which such a military person would be banned. Diplomates and other "civilians" as well as Military personel in Moscow or Washington D.C. are routinely banned and deported or barred entry (and by all other nations) permanently because they are suspected of spying. With all the hacking that goes on back and forth between the US and China and China's buring desire to build the best technology, it's not unreasonable that such spying is done. That an individual or company or country, would want exclusive use of the benefits from knowledge it paid to have someone create for it is only rational and fair. Freedom has always been expected to be governed, hopefully by individuals' own morals and ethics, if not "the powers that be" will. If you have a better way, send off an email to your govenrmental respresentative (if you can do so safely, which may not be true of all /. readers). In the US, the biggest flaw in govenment is the lack of participation of the governed, imo.

    24. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just pay some white guy to give them the data

      They don't need to go that far. The Defcon talks are all posted on Youtube, and on the Defcon website, and mirrored all over the place.

      Unless the US is going to go full-retard and ban all US persons from communicating with non-US persons, there's basically no way they can prevent Chinese (or North Korean, or Iranian) nationals from viewing the talks.

    25. Re:better idea by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A few hundred thousand Chinese hackers were going to attend Defcon, but the US is preventing them from coming by blocking their VISAs? Vegas should be pissed! All those tourist dollars going away. Oh, wait! They were going to use their *mumble mumble* Credit Cards to pay for everything....

    26. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the wake-up call for me, but it's gotten worse since then. Defcon is really Fedcon, and this isn't something that happened recently. Feds recruit openly and are allowed to do so in settings where younger hackers don't realize authoritarians have a more dangerous kind of ambiguous ethics than the rest of the conference. Most others are aiming to be ethical but sometimes falling short or deceiving themselves because they are illiterate spazzes. Feds aim to have control and try to define that as ethical, which is much more dangerous because even Hitler thought he was on an ethical mission.

      The failure of US conferences to show the ethical leadership that the German ones did must have helped the NSA become so excessively powerful that even experts have no reasonable tools with which to protect themselves other than screamy delusional denial. Defcon has a lot to answer for.

    27. Re:better idea by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It's considerably worse than that, it's stupidly counterproductive. If DefCon is held somewhere else next year, it will just put the US to a lot more trouble.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    28. Re:better idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The US can (and does) deny visas to all sorts of people, and for many reasons, including this kind of thing. As do most other countries.

      They can... but once someone gets a valid visitor's Visa and comes into the US -- they can't turn around and say you are not allowed to attend any security-related conferences.

      The article headline didn't say US to deny Visitors' Visas to Chinese.

    29. Re:better idea by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      The article headline didn't say US to deny Visitors' Visas to Chinese.

      That's true. I guess it's too difficult to read the first sentence of the summary. tl;dr, huh?

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    30. Re:better idea by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      You can trash the US all you want, but there are a limited number of countries in the world that would even allow a conference like Def Con or Black Hat.

      Maybe the US allows these kinds of activities because there's so much power here that it's not perceived as much of a threat. I doubt that things will be so free and open here when we use up all of our natural wealth.

    31. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the US already hacking and listening in on private information on the web, of both individuals and larger organizations (other governments?), they don't really need to have people together physically. They can hack the info on any and all persons they feel might be interesting, or not. They don't need a reason for this, just a paranoia that is a danger considering the power of the country. And who's watching the watchers?

    32. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US don't consider the rest of the world have any rights over their decisions, their actions, or their restrictions. They don't listen to OTAN, or follow the Genever Convention, so what would any outside opinions have in way of effect on their shady habits.

    33. Re:better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's your freedom as US citizens that is being abused, so think about that... no insult, just a matter for reflexion.

    34. Re:better idea by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That whole situation sucked and should never have happened. Though the result was he was released on bail, charges were eventually dropped, and after a jury trial Elcomsoft was found not guilty as well. Checks and balances... executive branch overreached and abused their power, judicial smacked them down.

      Compared to recent events in Russia where a couple of musicians were arrested, held without bail for over 6 months, convicted in a kangaroo court, and sentenced to 2 years in prison for singing an "offensive" song in a church.

    35. Re:better idea by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      An interesting take. I addressed this further elsewhere. You might like to take a gander.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  4. Better than arresting people at random by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since the US is under such an oppressive regime, it's better to be denied entry than the other thing that usually happens over there: detention with no accusation.

    1. Re:Better than arresting people at random by MobSwatter · · Score: 2

      In Soviet 'merica, the crooks jail you!

  5. Next defcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yeah this is the way to do it. Look forward to going to defcon 2015, Beijing, China

    1. Re:Next defcon by cheekyboy · · Score: 2

      Why china? you still need a visa, why not taiwan which is next door, or hong kong or somewhere else thats reasonably easy to get into.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Next defcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or somewhere else thats reasonably easy to get into.

      Parents Basements it is!

    3. Re:Next defcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you aware that people need a visa to get to the US?
      The Chinese visa is super easy to get, you don't need anything if you go as a tourist, no interviews, nothing (unlike the multiple interview trips to the US embassy to get the visa and the TSA on arrival). Invitation letters and stuff only if you need to get the visa on the application day (instead of 3 to 5 days later).
      Beijing is a great venue for big events.

  6. Limit CS classroom education of Chinese students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If the government wants to stop Chinese from hacking US companies, it should limit the number of Chinese students studying Computer Science in American universities. That would cut the number of skilled Chinese hackers, and would increase the number of places in American universities for American students. ( See the article "Chinese flock to elite U.S. schools". ) Of course there are worldwide MOOC classes, but limiting access to classroom Computer Science education would help.

  7. Call me Snake by Chas · · Score: 0

    It's about your government turning the country into a giant jail and you all are the inmates.

    I thought I was dead...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  8. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if the U.S. forgot about the Snowden leaks or is trying to encourage other countries to start blocking U.S. citizens from traveling abroad.

    Maybe they are using this as a controversial topic to get into the news so that people start thinking that since the Chinese are hacking/spying, that the U.S. isn't the only ones doing it, making it less of a serious issue...

    I really would love to hear Washington's response to why they think they have the right to block China travelers for doing the same thing the U.S. has 100% proof of doing, not just claims.

  9. A little late isn't it? by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    After all the reports of Chinese based hackers penetrating every nook and cranny of Federal and Commercial Defense assets over the last couple of years this seams a case of closing the barn door long after the horse has left...

  10. Hysterical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China should just stop lending money to the US and watch it default.

    1. Re:Hysterical. by dugancent · · Score: 2

      Then we could stop buying goods from China and watch them collapse.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    2. Re:Hysterical. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Then China wouldn't have any dollars to roll into Treasury Bonds and we'd collapse.

      Globalization is a bitch.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Hysterical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not need Chinese cheap labour as much as we "needed" it 10 years ago. We can automatise most of the work. That does not help all the western people who can not find manual labour work for them self. China looks to be able to handle this change by help of the one child policy. China might be reducing the working population enough to handle the downsize of the demand for manual labour.

      China do not need the western world in the same way as before neither. They do need resources, but they do not need buy those from the developed world. Africa and other corrupt underdeveloped countries are happy to supply China.

    4. Re:Hysterical. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the US would also collapse, so it would be cutting off your nose to spite your face. The US economy needs cheap Chinese goods to make those extremely low paid service jobs it is based on viable. What do you think would happen if two thirds of Walmart's shelves were empty?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Hysterical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People might have to start *eating* all that corn.

  11. Piss off a few more who can damage us? Good Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, lets just piss them off some more at us. They are obviously the 1 group on this planet that wont retaliate.

  12. Bicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone having watched the simpsons knows that americans are ready to sell nuclear secrets to the chinese government for a bicycle.

  13. Good. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Given how much they've already stolen from us and other First World countries, it would be a good thing.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only got to be a first world nation (in some aspects in others your still 3'rd world) by stealing from the Brits and China etc at gun point.

  14. Prevents a Security Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're probably all running XP on their laptops, so keeping them out would significantly cut down on the number of vulnerabilities floating around the con WiFi.

    1. Re:Prevents a Security Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's racist - but funny.

  15. Except for past/curr. Chinese history and practice by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The Chinese don't have solid proof to the level that the US has on the Chinese. The Chinese only can cite a person that handed over US secrets, while the US can cite private and public sector examples (much less Chinese history of stealing from their own).

    That, and it doesn't look like the US wants much from the US aside from a compliant labor pool.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  16. Nothing but crims there anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get for this "edgy" poser naming of yourself. It's costing you your fourth amendment rights. And furriners, well, no need to teach'em the skills outright, no? As far as the US Gov't understands (which isn't that far off the picture that the "security experts" love to paint of themselves!) this is perfectly reasonable. So no complaining to them. Complain to your fellow hat wearers.

  17. Report from NIOC Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Recently finished up my 8 years in in Navy, last for were spent working alongside NSA, when you say "China's in every nook and crany" i't for the most part just bs malware...China is actually the #1 intruder we CATCH...it's the ones that we dont know about that to be worried about. Also, Defcon is all about freedom of information, i find it rather counter-productive to limit what it stands for...espeically comming form US with our "freedom of speech"

  18. No, the US hasn't been proven to anything. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    The only solid (and court-tested) proof exists on the Chinese against the US (and about every First World country).

    Snowden will only count when he and his case comes before a US court. Until then, any statements, materials, or positions held by him / his supporters are only conjecture.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:No, the US hasn't been proven to anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the veracity of the materials is not in doubt, and it was not he who created them.

      What kind of serf fails to have even the admissions of his leaders register on him?

    2. Re:No, the US hasn't been proven to anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One who doesn't deserve the freedom he imagines he has, even though he doesn't actually have it.

  19. Not if they just repudiate the debt. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    There's always the rest of the world(read: countries within the NATO-defined First World) that doesn't want the US's head on a plate.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's always the rest of the world(read: countries within the NATO-defined First World) that doesn't want the US's head on a plate.

      Dude, I hate to disillusion you, but we ALL want your head on a plate. If you meet someone and they lead you to believe otherwise, you should try to recognize that he's talking out of both corners of his mouth in an effort to get something out of you. None of us like you. I was half tempted to say that, maybe, the Israeli's, but honestly, I'm confident they think of you as a self-absorbed pack of idiots whose only role is to be exploited.

      This is not a troll. At least, it's not intended to be a troll. I genuinely am trying to set you straight, help bring your perspective a little closer to the realities that exist outside your borders.

      The shit you guys are responsible for as a nation is not a joke. No one is laughing along with you.

      Inside your country, you can divide things up into "The CIA did this, the NSA did that, I didn't do shit, I was just here minding my own business and paying my taxes.", and that flies with the people you meet on the street.

      But then when Chinese hackers do something, you say "China did it."

      That's how it is for the rest of us too. Without open warfare, you can't intrude into the inner workings of China and hold individual citizens accountable, you need to deal with the entire state, hold them accountable, and leave it to them to hold the individual citizens accountable, or not.

      We can't intrude into the inner workings of America and hold individual citizens accountable, we need to deal with your entire state, hold you accountable, and leave it to you to hold the NSA accountable.

      So, basically, everything your government does to the rest of us, you have done to the rest of us. You can argue about fairness and prejudice till you're blue in the face, but these are the power dynamics, and that's just how it is.

      You seriously need to clean your house before the rest of the world is forced to come do it for you. If you don't realize just how precarious a position your government has put you in, you really need to wake up.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously need to clean your house before the rest of the world is forced to come do it for you. If you don't realize just how precarious a position your government has put you in, you really need to wake up.

      Ha. How are you going to do that? You and what army?

    3. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You seriously need to clean your house before the rest of the world is forced to come do it for you. If you don't realize just how precarious a position your government has put you in, you really need to wake up.

      You and which army? Seriously, grow up. Read some history. Right now we are in a 'Pax Americana' bit of time (for various values of 'pax'). This will ebb and flow and it may be that China becomes ascendent in the next couple of decades. Or not. These changes often take hundreds of years to play out and what appears to be a certainty one year may seem like a distant dream (or nightmare) the next. Maybe Europe will become a dominant force although history tells us that if you want to go that route, you'd best beef up your military instead of hanging on to ours.

      Nobody in the espionage game is any different from the others. Nothing is particularly new in that game, just improvements in both offensive and defensive strategies.

      Your post shows a shatteringly naive view of 'power dynamics'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always the rest of the world(read: countries within the NATO-defined First World) that doesn't want the US's head on a plate.

      Dude, I hate to disillusion you, but we ALL want your head on a plate. If you meet someone and they lead you to believe otherwise, you should try to recognize that he's talking out of both corners of his mouth in an effort to get something out of you. None of us like you. I was half tempted to say that, maybe, the Israeli's, but honestly, I'm confident they think of you as a self-absorbed pack of idiots whose only role is to be exploited.

      This is not a troll. At least, it's not intended to be a troll. I genuinely am trying to set you straight, help bring your perspective a little closer to the realities that exist outside your borders.

      The shit you guys are responsible for as a nation is not a joke. No one is laughing along with you.

      Inside your country, you can divide things up into "The CIA did this, the NSA did that, I didn't do shit, I was just here minding my own business and paying my taxes.", and that flies with the people you meet on the street.

      But then when Chinese hackers do something, you say "China did it."

      That's how it is for the rest of us too. Without open warfare, you can't intrude into the inner workings of China and hold individual citizens accountable, you need to deal with the entire state, hold them accountable, and leave it to them to hold the individual citizens accountable, or not.

      We can't intrude into the inner workings of America and hold individual citizens accountable, we need to deal with your entire state, hold you accountable, and leave it to you to hold the NSA accountable.

      So, basically, everything your government does to the rest of us, you have done to the rest of us. You can argue about fairness and prejudice till you're blue in the face, but these are the power dynamics, and that's just how it is.

      You seriously need to clean your house before the rest of the world is forced to come do it for you. If you don't realize just how precarious a position your government has put you in, you really need to wake up.

      You make a lot of assertions but with nothing by your own opinion to back it up. In fact you are wrong. Pew research indicates most of the world--and especially europe--have a positive view of the USA:

      http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/07/18/global-image-of-the-united-states-and-china/

    5. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that REALLY is the view that you and everyone else has, then fine. FUCK YOU. I will 100% support my government's domination of ALL of you nasty small minded mother fuckers. Is my government wrong? Yes, Am I going to support them in being wrong? Fuck yes! You asked for it, you got it. Bitch. ;)

    6. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These changes often take hundreds of years to play out

      This is why I left slashdot and return less and less frequently. No-one thinks before they speak. Hundreds of years? Really? In the last couple centuries, there have been many world dominating regimes that have come and gone... French, Ottoman, British, etc etc

      The rise of USA came about in a couple of decades around the time of the two world wars. The fall of an empire tends to happen much faster.

    7. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck all those "research".
      I can tell you never traveled internationally.
      Any dumb fuck American international traveler knows, not to mention caution from the State Department, to not identify yourself as Americans (even "proudly" putting on Canadian Maple Leaf designs to pass as Canadians).
      TBH all that "research" is not worth the paper it's written on.

    8. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now we are in a 'Pax Americana' bit of time (for various values of 'pax').

      For various values of 'pax', I presume you mean substitute the word 'Pax' with words like 'Coup', 'Civil war', 'Illegal intervention', 'Rendition' and 'Unequal Trade Treaty'.

      Don't know on which planet you're living, but there's nothing 'Pax' about your 'Pax Americana', though essentially the same could be said about the Pax Romana, which was brought about by subjugating all neighbouring cultures. The similarities with Rome may not end there, though I doubt that the US will last another 500 years (give or take a few decades) the way they're going right now (which is actually quite regrettable in some ways, since there are definitely aspects I do like about the US)

    9. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and which army? Seriously, grow up. Read some history. Right now we are in a 'Pax Americana' bit of time (for various values of 'pax'). This will ebb and flow and it may be that China becomes ascendent in the next couple of decades. Or not. These changes often take hundreds of years to play out and what appears to be a certainty one year may seem like a distant dream (or nightmare) the next. Maybe Europe will become a dominant force although history tells us that if you want to go that route, you'd best beef up your military instead of hanging on to ours.

      Nobody in the espionage game is any different from the others. Nothing is particularly new in that game, just improvements in both offensive and defensive strategies.

      Your post shows a shatteringly naive view of 'power dynamics'.

      well considering your army is spread thin around the entire world, i would argue that it would only take a few of them and murrica has done good at pissing off the middle east and to quote Obama "now we are shifting the focus of foreign policy to asia" so after 20+ years of messing up the middle east you are going to attack china.. keep making enemies and you will be surprised when the blow back comes.

      your intelegence agencies cant stop terrorists, or even find them so you kill innocents and then claim they are terrorists...

      its funny how Al-Queda has gotten larger since the war on terror has started..

      how about you go to economics school and realize that you live in a consumer country and if everyone stops sending you things to buy there is no way that your "army" can come get us all.. and then if you do come by force you are no better than any other dictator or tryant.

      finally id like to address one sentence in your post:

      "Nobody in the espionage game is any different from the others. Nothing is particularly new in that game, just improvements in both offensive and defensive strategies."

      WRONG! no one else spends unknown amounts of money on their intelligence apparatus, no other country has the facilities that Murrica has when it comes to the base amount of money that they dump into their army and intelligence apparatus, why? its simple. because other countries have to take care of their citizens, you know like health care, education etc etc. Murrica is not a first world country any more, half of your population lives below the poverty line.

      the next change wont take hundreds of years, it will be quick and fast and you wont see it coming. it will happen when your wall street bankers crash the markets yet again and more of your citizens drop below the property line, or when the BRICs nations decide to drop the petro-dollar for something else. worse yet, china could re evaluate their currency on gold (whens the last time you saw a gold or silver bar from a Chinese mint).

      your post shows just an alarming naive view of power dynamics too.in the modern age of globalization physical force only works against countries who cant apply economic force.

    10. Re:Not if they just repudiate the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post seriously followed the question of "You and which army?" with the statement that the OP should "grow up."

      That made the rest of the comment gulag worth wading through.

      Hi-larious.

  20. Hack the planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see them try.

  21. How now, 50 Mao? by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Well, it doesn't matter if the US helps its friends and acts to defend against enemies (such as the BRIC countries and their allies).

    It'll be more pleasant when people are penalized for aiding and abetting anti-US countries like China. Now if it only extended to guest worker programs as well.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:How now, 50 Mao? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then I guess all the corporations who let China build cheap crap for the US are traitors? And everyone buying something "Made in China" is as well?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:How now, 50 Mao? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      As to the first part, if they are incorporated in the US there's an arguable case for that. As for the second, I'd instead target those who wrote the import/export laws, rather than those who, in obeying them, purchase legally imported goods.

      OTOH, given that treason is defined quite specifically in the constitution, they may be traitors, but they haven't committed treason.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:How now, 50 Mao? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUt you have to prevent Chinese by the EYES... not by some document! Or all of them will be there nonetheless and they are Americans. As far as it comes to schizophrenia it is the exactly the same save the tag, and theyll hear you ideas before you know how.

  22. Separate cabinets for pots and kettles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, really.

  23. Time to move the conferences by spasm · · Score: 5, Informative

    When the US govt starts dictating who is allowed to come to your conferences you need to move the conference. Same as the AIDS research conferences have been held anywhere except the US since the 80s because from 1987 to 2009 the US govt banned people with AIDS from traveling to the US.

    1. Re:Time to move the conferences by Frobnicator · · Score: 5, Informative

      It isn't the only one. Quite a few conferences dedicated to cryptography and security have been held outside the US because of the ITAR controls and other regulations that treat encryption as weapons and security systems as terrorist devices.

      Cryptographic systems were listed as arms until about a decade ago, and even today some security technologies are potentially on the list. Even if they aren't on ITAR any more, attending the conference is certain to get your name entered to all kinds of US-based lists. Rather than risk being considered for international arms dealing and international terrorism, quite a few conferences take place anywhere but the US. The risk both to the conference itself and to those who might attend the conferences are just too great.

      Austria, Switzerland, France, Malaysia, ... many countries are still more popular for security conferences than the US.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:Time to move the conferences by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Great point.

      Reagan showed the World what America was all about; "provincial prejudice and backwater pride."

      They'll move the venue and some other nation will become a beacon of enlightenment.

      Now there are people who say we can't tax wealthy people because they will all move -- and somehow they understand THAT concept but not this one. I'd rather have a lot of enlightened smart people, than people with money. The one makes the other regardless of who is talented with money.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Time to move the conferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, American developers are not allowed to contribute to security-related open-source projects, due to the problems with export restrictions and the frequency of sabotage. Why bother keeping conferences in America?

  24. Obama is a jerk by renzhi · · Score: 0, Troll

    Obama is a jerk, the whole administration keeps on making stupid decision. If you keep on doing things like this, just don't come crying when other people would do the same thing to you. It's not just China, it could be any country too.

  25. Ping ping by Arduenn6058 · · Score: 1

    US May Prevent Chinese Hackers From Attending Def Con, Black Hat. The official said that Washington could use such visa restrictions and other measures.

    It's already been hacked. They offered me cash to go there in their stead.

  26. Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    Ok, the U.S. (through the NSA) has been revealed (through Snowden) to be able to:
    1) record and retain EVERY phone call made in an ENTIRE country (actually two, the Bahamas and Afghanistan I think)
    2) hack into the e-mail of at least some world leaders (for example: Germany, not exactly weak in the technology department)
    3) subvert (and exploit?) the standards for some of the world's most widely used security protocols
    4) hack into the networks of Huawei to view source code (and change it?), one of the largest vendors of routers and other critical network gear
    5) collect and retain for later data mining, the text and metadata for hundreds of MILLIONS (billions?) of people for YEARS
    6) record conversations, videos and other intel through devices even when they appear to be OFF
    7) has planted HARDWARE back doors in the equipment used worldwide for computing and communications
    and on and on...

    So why can't they tell China to STOP HACKING our networks for business advantage or ELSE
    1) release the e-mails and other documents showing the favors given to the families of the top Chinese officials
    2) publish the electronic money trail where the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars worth of bribes have gone (at that scale you don't use scraps of paper)
    - this includes MONEY and other assets like property illegally squirreled ABROAD, which may be an offense (under Chinese law) punishable by DEATH
    3) publish information regarding kept mistresses of the marriage officials of the elite, their names, dates of assignation, children born out of wedlock, assets
    - throw in pictures (videos?) and every tabloid would have a field day
    4) detail the political "assassinations" (sometimes literal!) and other dirty deals the elite have done to get into and remain in power

    It appears that as a byproduct of their goal(?) of ferreting out security threats to the U.S. (or just plain building their capabilities) the NSA has a treasure trove of information that could topple MANY corrupt, authoritarian governments. Of course the U.S. is not immune to corruption but (I read) the (illegal) corruption in the U.S. is measured in the millions not billions of dollars. That's to be distinguished from the legal forms of corruption, lobbying, that plagues the U.S. :(

    The NSA, starting from WWII, has had many decades (and a budget in the tens of billions A YEAR) to build up their technological supremacy (as well as being the single largest employer of mathematicians on the planet. Think of what THAT means). That is not an insignificant amount of money, it DWARFS most countries entire defense budgets! Also remember that the U.S. (and to a lessor extent Britain) are the CREATOR of the Internet as well as the modern computer; remember that Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Cisco, Intel, IBM, AMD, ARM, Nvidia are all Anglo-American companies. Think of all the "backdoor" connections that have been made over the past half-century at informal (high school/college buddies), formal (legal demands for information) and top secret levels (matter of national security or else go to prison). It's at the point where, to a foreign government, every CPU made or designed in America (basically all of them) and every packet (sent from America) must be suspect.

    So the Chinese have MUCH much more to fear from the U.S. If they don't want a "digital Pearl Harbor" they would be wise to play by (America's) rules.

    1. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why can't they tell China to STOP HACKING our networks for business advantage or ELSE
      1) release the e-mails and other documents showing the favors given to the families of the top Chinese officials
      2) publish the electronic money trail where the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars worth of bribes have gone (at that scale you don't use scraps of paper)
      - this includes MONEY and other assets like property illegally squirreled ABROAD, which may be an offense (under Chinese law) punishable by DEATH
      3) publish information regarding kept mistresses of the marriage officials of the elite, their names, dates of assignation, children born out of wedlock, assets
      - throw in pictures (videos?) and every tabloid would have a field day
      4) detail the political "assassinations" (sometimes literal!) and other dirty deals the elite have done to get into and remain in power

      It appears that as a byproduct of their goal(?) of ferreting out security threats to the U.S. (or just plain building their capabilities) the NSA has a treasure trove of information that could topple MANY corrupt, authoritarian governments. Of course the U.S. is not immune to corruption but (I read) the (illegal) corruption in the U.S. is measured in the millions not billions of dollars. That's to be distinguished from the legal forms of corruption, lobbying, that plagues the U.S. :(

      The NSA, starting from WWII, has had many decades (and a budget in the tens of billions A YEAR) to build up their technological supremacy (as well as being the single largest employer of mathematicians on the planet. Think of what THAT means). That is not an insignificant amount of money, it DWARFS most countries entire defense budgets! Also remember that the U.S. (and to a lessor extent Britain) are the CREATOR of the Internet as well as the modern computer; remember that Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Cisco, Intel, IBM, AMD, ARM, Nvidia are all Anglo-American companies. Think of all the "backdoor" connections that have been made over the past half-century at informal (high school/college buddies), formal (legal demands for information) and top secret levels (matter of national security or else go to prison). It's at the point where, to a foreign government, every CPU made or designed in America (basically all of them) and every packet (sent from America) must be suspect.

      So the Chinese have MUCH much more to fear from the U.S. If they don't want a "digital Pearl Harbor" they would be wise to play by (America's) rules.

      Uh, that's "striking back"? That's like throwing a nuclear bomb on a fireworks factory to "strike back". Americans are nutcases.

    2. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyberweapons aren't nukes, they can be very very precise in both targeting and impact.

      You could release just one piece of information on one individual. It doesn't even have to be very damaging information, maybe just something that will make the target realize you could've released much more (like the last four digits on a target's swiss bank account). Just enough to persuade them to STOP THE HACKING OF AMERICAN COMPANIES.

      However, the Chinese should realize that if they escalate this conflict, they will lose and lose big time.

    3. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are nutcases.

      However, the Chinese should realize that if they escalate this conflict, they will lose and lose big time.

      Q.e.d.

      What fscking hypocrisy. You cannot really "escalate" cyberspying beyond the level that the American NSA is doing.

      If the Chinese want to "escalate", they can just put a trade embargo on the U.S. and the U.S. dollar. Guess whose economy would collapse in consequence.

    4. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Both of them.

      Not that I'd mind, being European... but while the Chinese may be much, they're hardly dumb.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! ...

      So why can't they tell China to STOP HACKING our networks for business advantage or ELSE

      You stupid fuck. How the hell can you mention Snowden and NOT realize that if a shitty 20 something contractor can get all that, then a state level Chinese, Russian, Iranian, etc. spy has ALL OF THAT AND MORE. The US doesn't "strike back" because it would simply sound their death knell. You wonder why Cyber Nukes aren't flying about? Did you miss the fucking Cold War? We have Mutually Assured Cyber Destruction, moron.

    6. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not recently worried too much about cyberspying, I keep "my nose clean" don't do any illegal money transfers, don't look at child porn, terrorism related web sites or have any involvement in subversive government activities.

      I think the head of Kaspersky(?) once said he ASSUMES that his laptop is owned (I think the term is "pwned") by at least three separate government agencies.

      So if the NSA or KGB or whatever the chinese equivalent really wants to know who my current gf is, or what is my stock portfolio or whatever; all I can do is say "C'est la vie". I'm not an important person so I don't really think it's worth their effort to try to hurt me.

      What we're talking about is not escalating cyberspying (as other posters have said there is plenty going on) but the RELEASE OF DAMAGING INFORMATION. That is a card that the U.S. could (should?) play. And considering its demonstrated access to information all over the world, it has a pretty powerful card to play.

      As another poster said, a trade embargo would hurt both parties. Who would be hurt more? I don't know but remember, in the "real" world, the U.S. has the ultimate trump card; overwhelming worldwide military supremacy (12 aircraft carrier groups, battle tested armies, bases in every corner of the planet, an invulnerable triad of nuclear delivery systems).

    7. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why can't they tell China to STOP HACKING our networks for business advantage or ELSE...(my asshole don't stink gobbledygook)

      wisebabo, you might want to stop jerking off to kiddy porn at the same time you are trying to make your point.
      Your ecstasy muddled brain just negated your premise that China is running roughshod in American networks.

      Of course the U.S. is not immune to corruption but (I read) the (illegal) corruption in the U.S. is measured in the millions not billions of dollars

      WTF? "illegal corruption", are you fucking kidding me?
      You make a distinction between "illegal" and "legal" corruption?
      Lay off the the contemporaneous kiddy porn masturbation is key my friend.

      So the Chinese have MUCH much more to fear from the U.S.

      But if the Chinese are so afraid, are they masochists hoping to be Pearl Harbored? That or they are just more stupid than we give them credit for?

      And there's so much more, but I won't keep you from pleasuring yourself with images of naked young boys...maybe Asians?

    8. Re:Why doesn't the U.S. STRIKE BACK?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but remember, in the "real" world, the U.S. has the ultimate trump card; overwhelming worldwide military supremacy (12 aircraft carrier groups, battle tested armies, bases in every corner of the planet, an invulnerable triad of nuclear delivery systems).

      That's why a bunch of losers with table cloth on their head is kicking the shit out of various expeditionary units, paratroopers, special forces...:)

  27. Xenophobia by phmadore · · Score: 2

    Why are they singling out the Chinese? Don't throw statistics at me. There are French, Israeli, Egyptian, South Korean, Japanese, and on down the line who've hacked facets of the US Government and US Companies. If you're going to go down this road, you have to disallow everyone. I'm not saying you should go down this road. Then again, I aspire to be a Chinese Citizen.

  28. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    If the government wants to stop Chinese from hacking US companies, it should limit the number of Chinese students studying Computer Science in American universities. That would cut the number of skilled Chinese hackers, and would increase the number of places in American universities for American students. ( See the article "Chinese flock to elite U.S. schools". ) Of course there are worldwide MOOC classes, but limiting access to classroom Computer Science education would help.

    Of course. Because no one else, anywhere in the world, knows how to hack. Or understands computer science.

    Pro Tip: Get a passport and travel around a bit. You'll find that there are bright people everywhere, and often they have indoor plumbing and stuff.

    Heck, in some places they even have universities (even in China). What a shocker!

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  29. These Are Standard Tactics by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    Used by countries the world over. "No, your people can't come to our country for this or that conference/function/speech, etc. You guys piss us off about something or other, so we're going to make a stink about it.

    This is nothing new, nor is it especially interesting. It's just a (not so) friendly reminder to the Chinese that we don't like their attempts (both successful and unsuccessful) at espionage (both industrial and political). That we do it to them and others is irrelevant. This is a political ploy with a long and storied tradition.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  30. Pot, meet kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The US has been guilty of pervasive industrial espionage for a very long time. The whole US regime is just an extension of corporate power. It always disgusts when, when I hear Americans talk of democracy. At least in China the opposite is true, corporate power is largely an extension of the regime, and however opressive, there appears to be a genuine attempt to improve social conditions instead of just boosting shareholder profit.
    All these accusations levelled at China, seem merely to be a distraction from the real problems in the United States. The US regime has become a kind of Hyper Stasi, with much souped up surveillance over its original East German template, and of course with similar murder harassment, and imprisonment without trial of opponents, in much the same way.

  31. Correction: by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    That, and it doesn't look like the US wants much from the Chinese aside from a compliant labor pool.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  32. Why not ban the NSA? by Casandro · · Score: 2

    I mean those people create _actual_ harm.
    China cannot harm people outside China in any significant way, and should they ever do, your local government would at least protest. However no western government ever protests against the US... even when they abduct people.

    China doesn't even run large sigint installations in Germany the way the US does.

  33. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, what kind of a racist asshole are you? Denying some random Chinese kid education in a bid to fulfil some supremacist fantasy, seriously WTF is wrong with you?

    You're aware that there are 56 ethnic groups that make up the Chinese population, and that they are not all ethnically Han, right?

    Or are you a racist asshole who believes that the basis for the denial is going to be that they're Han, rather than their nationality, which has diddley squat to do with their race?

  34. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by GNious · · Score: 2

    Pro Tip: Get a passport and travel around a bit. You'll find that there are bright people everywhere, and often they have indoor plumbing and stuff.

    If you're telling an American to go travel, you'll first have to explain that there is part of the planet that is outside of US, Canada and Mexico .
    - Then you should explain the concept that people outside of those 3 countries do not always speak English ..
    - and that they have sovereign countries with laws differing from those of the US (1) ..
    - and that getting there likely requires more than a car ..
    - and that people outside of those 3 countries might not be Christian, or Muslims (2) ..
    - and that Americans usually cannot bring their guns with them when traveling internationally (3) ..
    - and that spending a week in Paris doesn't qualify as "seeing all of Europe" ..

    In fact, while I commend the idea of getting more Americans to travel internationally, I suspect you're setting yourself up for a lot of hard work.

    1: Judging from posts on Slashdot, the prevailing sentiment is that the World is subject to US laws
    2: Judging from Fox News, those are the only 2 type of people in existence
    3: See signs when passing from El Paso, US, to Ciudad Juarez, MX

  35. Re:Except for past/curr. Chinese history and pract by mmell · · Score: 1

    Well, a compliant labor pool and maybe a few weeks grace on this month's loan payment.

  36. Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't part of being a hacker the ability to get into somewhere without the knowledge of that somewhere's owner? Of course there is a good and dark side to that. But lets just focus on the good (albeit, black hat)

    Maybe the success of a hacker can be first determined by their appearance to the event. Immunity to the imposition expressed.

  37. Reviewing the preamble to the Constitution. by mmell · · Score: 1
    WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.

    Doesn't say anything in there about helping anybody but us. Doesn't say our rules apply (or should be applied) to anybody but us either. I've also noticed that much of the Bill of Rights refers to 'the rights of the citizens'. Just being on US soil doesn't mean the Constitution applies to you - if it did, it would make it nearly impossible to deport illegal aliens - it would violate several of their Constitutional rights to deport them if the Constitution applied.

    I'm just pointing out that this isn't a Constitutional issue, at least not on the face of it. The US Government has complete authority to select who it will admit and who it will deny based on any criteria the government chooses to apply. Now (theoretically) our government is bound by Constitutional law when dealing with our citizens and is (theoretically) answerable to the will of our citizens. We are still (technically) a Republic.

    We do have international obligations to honor, however. Like every other country on the planet bar none, we will only obey even our own rules only when it benefits us to do so. This isn't a matter of right or wrong, it's just so. Argue political philosophy all you want, in the end no country does anything but what it thinks is best for it's [people|rulers|bottom line]. That "free speech" thing you mentioned - that only applies to US Citizens, and only while they are on US Soil. We tend to extend those rights to anybody that's here, but non-US citizens can/should not count on it.

    Yes, I know - that's exactly the kind of reasoning that leads to US torture of foreign nationals, the Guantanamo Bay fiasco, and many other not-so-nice things our government has done on our behalf. Not saying it's right, just saying it looks to me like it's so.

    1. Re:Reviewing the preamble to the Constitution. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Doesn't say anything in there about helping anybody but us. Doesn't say our rules apply (or should be applied) to anybody but us either.

      Hi, to be clear. That is a statement ONLY about the people establishing the constitution. When the PEOPLE established the constitution, we created a government of enumerated powers.

      The first amendment doesn't say that it applies to citizens only, AND it does not apply to citizens only.

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press

      PERIOD. There is no exception. it's not "OKAY to attempt to abridge natural right of free speech," as long as your victims are not US citizens. This applies to any person subject to US legal jurisdiction, including foreign nationals.

      Also, US citizens still have their free speech rights, even when the recipient of their speech would be a foreign national. SHALL NOT ABRIDGE, is not a selective or a limited restriction. It applies to congress and the federal government in all circumstances.

      Just being on US soil doesn't mean the Constitution applies to you - if it did, it would make it nearly impossible to deport illegal aliens - it would violate several of their Constitutional rights to deport them if the Constitution applied

      Not a single of their constitutional rights are violated, if they are deported, because they were caught entering unlawfully. Constitutional rights do not prevent the prosecution or enforcement of judgements against criminals

      On the other hand, if a person has lived in the US and formally purchased or rented land on which they live, then their rights cannot be denied on account of foreign nationality or residing without lawful citizenship.

    2. Re:Reviewing the preamble to the Constitution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just being on US soil doesn't mean the Constitution applies to you

      The Constitution never applies to "you". It applies to the United States government. And it always applies to them, not just where US citizens on US soil are concerned.

  38. Def Con cancelled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard Def Con was cancelled this year anyways...

    1. Re:Def Con cancelled. by PsyMan · · Score: 1

      I heard they were moving it to the CNCC Grand Hotel in Beijing?

  39. No, the US hasn't been proven to anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which assumes that the US legal system applies. Why should it? It's a corrupt system controlled by a corrupt government.

    That's like claiming Nazi Germany did nothing wrong because the Nazi courts did not convict Hitler.

  40. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soap, ballot, then ammo.

    Even if you want to get in the jury box you only get a chance what, once every year or two, and if you're even vaguely interesting you're likely to have either the prosecution, defense, or both see you discharged.

    Pretty sure by that thread of thought soap and ballot are pretty questionable as well: What changes have *YOU* wrought recently either through force of word, or through force of vote?

    1. Re:Well... by mmell · · Score: 1

      I didn't make that one up. Just quoting someone else (and I truly can't remember who. Sorry)

  41. For about as long as it takes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to finish 'integrating' Native Americans into the 'American' racial type.

    The Chinese may say they're keeping their diversity open, but go and look at how they're actually treating those other 55 ethnic groups...

  42. So what about the organizers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't the organizers just move the conference to Canada (or wherever) if they do this kind of stuff and people can't attend?

  43. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    He didn't talk about Han, and given that there are 292 languages in China it is pretty obvious that the 56 ethnic groups you mention and who are officially recognized by China do not represent the whole of China. And yes, someone who wants to deny education solely based on nationality, when it was previously possible, is a racist asshole. Besides all that, science is universal. Once you start limiting and nationalizing it, your research will go down the gutter within a decade or so. With a "reverse brain drain" the quality of US science would indeed decline very rapidly, since the US educational system is incapable of providing enough smart and educated people for top universities and centers of excellence.

  44. It all makes sense by jameshofo · · Score: 2

    The implied ending to "Yes we can" is "do whatever the hell we want"

    --
    Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
  45. Don't you ever learn? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What do you think will the net effect be? It might work this year, and next year you'll see the conference move abroad, costing you not only income from tourism but also the ability to sneak your spooks easily into the con.

    I sometimes really wonder if the responsible parties in the US are acting dumb or whether they are.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. It wouldn't be a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've heard that the Chinese are confusionists, and that doesn't go with their ideas of law and order

    That shouldn't be any problem what-so-ever

    Them Chinese being confusionists they got confused all the time, and easily confused people can be easily conned

  47. Oh the Irony. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the world is kind of concerned about hackers at the moment, but China isn't the source that is of concern.

  48. If anybody was still wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why US "hacker conferences" are considered pretty much a joke these days, there you go.

  49. All information is not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if these governments have as much as a determined "insider" working for over a year(?), changing jobs to maximize his data collection with top secret clearance (but I grant you, it is hardly out of the realm of possibility, they could very well have much more) so what?

    What dirt could they have on the U.S. that could cause a revolution? Maybe they have proof that Obama illegally helped his aunt stay in the U.S. Or maybe they have some damaging e-mails about Clinton's involvement in Benghazi.

    Yawn.

    The difference is that the Chinese (and many other authoritarian governments) long ago left the U.S. behind in the scope of their corruption (like I said, we're talking HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars from various estimates. There was an amusing article in the NYTimes asking "if the Chinese money supply has DOUBLED why hasn't inflation spiked?" The answer of course is that a lot of this money was stashed away.)

    Of course, the U.S. has more than its share of corruption, unfortunately it is LEGAL :( It is called lobbyists and the buying of votes (Supreme Court Citizen's United).

    So while the Chinese may be able to inflict horrific damage in a cyberwar, blackmail isn't (likely) to be of much use. And it hits the Chinese elite where it hurts the most, in their grip on power (and in their pocketbooks!).

  50. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    well it could be just about racism against people who look chinese you nitpicker you.

    you would be hard pressed to find anyone who would consider those 56 groups as different races. not that it matters since that's not what racism means nowadays(get over it).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  51. Obama Racism On Parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hay, when they apply for an entry visa they should call themselves "Obama's Black Girls Coming Home."

    Customs Pervs will salute that one for sure.

  52. choose a free country instead. by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Defcon should think of hosting in a free country instead of the USA

  53. Keep Your Enemies Closer by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

    Instead of banning them, we should be inviting their hackers over here and either bugging them or turning them. Isn't this spycraft 101?

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  54. Censored from DEFCON, now it makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presentation: Chinese Cyber Espionage: The #1 Threat to National Security?

    Check this out at Cryptome: http://cryptome.org/2014/05/defcon-spy-backing.htm

    See also on Cryptome's front page:

      Note the article describes how James Clapper will attend.

    There you have it, dear readers, ugly out-group homogeneity bias on display by the U.S. government. Every Chinese citizen is deemed to be a spy. Why? Because DEFCON is actually a platform for the U.S. intelligence community and they wouldn't dare entertain dissenting opinions that might reveal American spies for what they are: the Praetorian Guard of the corporate elite. As you, John Stockwell, Bill Blum, Noam Chomsky, Peter Dale Scott and many other researchers have found.

  55. Lots of garage sales. Ebay auctions. Less waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of garage sales. Ebay auctions. Less waste. More money to spend on services.

    Since America has become a service economy we need people to stop buying cheap chinese crap and buy American's services and the products of American craftsmen, farmers, etc.

    ironic captcha: venture

  56. But what about blizzcon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are throwing a temper tantrum over being banned from Def Con, why the fuck are they banned from Def Con? Arguably some of the best players in the entire world as far as gaming is concerned are coming out of China so to speak... What the fuck is this extreme jealousy + Ban Issue. It looks like some serious ugly troll spammers are , who by the way barely have jack shit to do with the term troll to begin with but are one ;) if you know what I mean. Ugly and fucking annoying. Some people call them SHIT DISTURBERS , why? Because that's what they do. They go around and disturb the peace. What peace? Well obviously us gamers have our own way of doing things outside of people who aren't frequent computer operators or gamers...
    What would the world be like if I had credit for all of my art featured in the game World of Warcraft?
    What would the world be like if I got paid for Charlie the unicorn merchandise; based on the fact that I came up w/ the
    IDEA for the character...= D $_$

  57. And this would do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there talks that don't make it on youtube?

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=defcon

  58. So let me put things straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ban the chinese. You avoid getting information that they could posibly provide to you to secure your systems. The other chinese that don't go to the conference keep doing their stuff cause the others couldn't give you the information. What you win? Please stop being stupid. Besides those conferences and papers go in the open. This is not a way to protest. Besides the NSA does more spoinage than anyone in this world. You should protest about the violation of your civil rights in your own country by those hipocryts that do it in the name of fighting terrorism.

  59. Israel's spying is at least as bad as China's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.newsweek.com/israel-wont-stop-spying-us-249757

  60. Re:Limit CS classroom education of Chinese student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an awful prospect, at least for those who are not US citizens!
    I think Americans should stay in the US, and thus the world would be a safer place, outside the US (it does exist).
    It's so fortunate that US laws do not apply every where a US citizen places his feet, but will they ever accept that fact?

  61. Why not ban the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA has always considered itself to be bigger and better than the rest of the planet, despite the obvious harm they do, physically, politically, environmentally and...almost ever other *ally you can think of. It's well past the time that they should be obliged to live with the rest of the planet, not against it as they've been doing for years.
    If the NSA was banned who could the people blame the damage on? Same for all the other Gov run organizations. The average US person needs a scapegoat, as they couldn't accept the fact that the US isn't the Best and the Biggest, especially with it's recent blunders.

  62. More accomodating venue by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the DefCon planners could move it to a more accomodating venue, like Antigua.

    But don't plan to sail back afterwards.
    --
    We're monsters. We all are. We're history's most average monsters. -- Ryan North

  63. logical fallacies with this thinking... by Finite9 · · Score: 1

    It's racist to forbid a certain race of people from attending a civilian public conference.

    People post on the internet anyway. The information will become free, so unless the US creates a great firewall of USA, they aren't going to stop the information from reaching other countries anyway.

    The US, by following through on this threat, would create a precedent for similar actions at other venues, and for other countries to follow suit.

    It's a short sighted and immoral suggestion. Which individual suggested this action again?

    --
    "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
    1. Re:logical fallacies with this thinking... by Finite9 · · Score: 1

      and after RTFA, I could find no mention of the name of "the offical" from Washington anywhere. Almost as if they didn't want to mention their name. Huh. I wonder why? I'd say that was either poor or deceptive reporting from that newspaper.

      The only name mentioned in the last paragraph was "State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki", but it is not certain that she was the same official making the statement.

      --
      "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman