Slashdot Mirror


Harley-Davidson Unveils Their First Electric Motorcycle

Major Blud writes Harley-Davidson has unveiled their first electric motorcycle called "Project LiveWire." The bike is currently not for sale and detailed specifications are scarce. Harley plans on taking it on a demonstration tour of the U.S. for the next year to gather customer feedback. "The new LiveWire won’t make the distinctive 'potato-potato-potato' chug that Harley once tried to patent. Its engine is silent, and the turbine-like hum comes from the meshing of gears. But electric motors do provide better handling and rapid acceleration — with the electric Harley able to go from 0 to 60 mph in four seconds. LiveWire’s design places the engine at the bottom of the bike."

345 comments

  1. Nice looking bike... by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice looking bike, but I wonder if they're going to offer something more cruiser-like. I'm certainly not opposed to a "greener" ride, but I'd look a damned fool on one of those.

    1. Re:Nice looking bike... by oic0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just take off the pirate outfit and put on a full face helmet and proper motorcycle safety gear. It will look natural I promise. ;)

    2. Re:Nice looking bike... by cheater512 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Didn't you know? Looking like a damned fool is compulsory for 'green' modes of transport.

    3. Re:Nice looking bike... by msauve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's OK. Without the loud noises, you won't get the attention you desire, anyway.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Nice looking bike... by mellon · · Score: 1

      I'd look badass on one of these.

      And man, did you see the hair on those guys? Do they actually ride motorcycles?

    5. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nice looking bike, but I wonder if they're going to offer something more cruiser-like. I'm certainly not opposed to a "greener" ride, but I'd look a damned fool on one of those.

      What are you worried about ? How you LOOK ?

      You have confirmed you ARE a damned fool.

      Real riders ride, looks are for chumps.

    6. Re:Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever heard those crazy bastards claim "loud pipes save lives"?

      A REAL motorcycle makes plenty of noise, but by the time anyone hears it, the bike is a couple hundred yards out in front of them. The thunder always follows the lightning. Loud pipes are compensation for 75 year old technology that won't run any faster than the family car. It's amazing how many people have spent all that money on a Harley, but either the machine won't run over 80 mph, or the rider is to scared to exceed 80. My commuter is 33 years old, only 500 cc, and it will run 100 mph from one fill-up to the next. The other bike is only 7 years old, 600 cc, and it runs well over 150. I don't know HOW MUCH over 150, because I've not had the opportunity to find out.

      Loud noise? I sure as hell can't hear the exhaust, for all the wind noise. Attention? Don't need it, don't want it.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. The girl in back resonates at exactly 80mph. She really hums..

    8. Re:Nice looking bike... by metlin · · Score: 1

      I dunno, as someone who enjoys crotch-rockets (Hayabusa FTW), I love its look.

      It's almost like something that Batman would ride.

    9. Re:Nice looking bike... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Funny

      Loud pipes are compensation for 75 year old technology

      Incorrect. "Loud pipes" are compensation for a small penis.

    10. Re:Nice looking bike... by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't get it. The girl in back resonates at exactly 80mph. She really hums..

      Back of the T-Shirt. "If you can read this, my bitch fell off"

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:Nice looking bike... by msauve · · Score: 1

      This thread is about Harleys, not Hummers.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots like this get killed or maimed. Health Insurance? You're welcome.

    13. Re:Nice looking bike... by trawg · · Score: 2

      Incorrect. "Loud pipes" are compensation for a small penis.

      FWIW, I have several friends that ride bikes. None of them are the sort of people that I would classify as the type that would do something just out of some sort of inferiority complex.

      They uniformly tell me that they see loud pipes as a critical safety measure to make drivers aware that they're there.

      I do not know if drivers in general (i.e., around the world) are uniformly bad at paying enough attention to notice riders (of bicycles or motorbikes), but certainly here (Brisbane, Australia) people seem to be pretty woeful at their situational awareness when driving.

      For me, that is enough to keep me off the road on a bike. I don't even like driving much (my car was new in ~2004 and now has ~38,000km on it).

      One of my motorobike riding friends was recently hit by a clueless driver while on a bicycle.

      tldr: enough drivers are so bad at being aware of what is aorund them that loud pipes help make riders safer (... or at least, feel safer. I don't know if there is data showing that they are).

    14. Re:Nice looking bike... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile auto makers are getting ever better at making their cars sound proof, and promote that in advertising. Then top it off with ever better sound systems, and you wouldn't hear an F-18 if it buzzed the car with 10 metres to spare at Mach 1.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    15. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries, you look like a fool on any Harley.

    16. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that, there is enough power for a sub-woofer under the back seat. One the benefits of a large battery between ones legs.

    17. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 0

      I am a bike rider, have a cbr1000rr currently and I live in Brisbane.

      Personally I strongly believe that a louder pipe keeps you safer. The primary time it seems to make the difference is travelling along multi-lane roads. With a stock pipe you seem to have more people merge into you then you do when you have the louder pipe. This could of course be confirmation bias but I still have the stock pipe on my blade atm and i'm having a lot of "oops I didn't know you were there" moments currently.

      Compare that to the Akros that I had on my previous zx-10 and it almost never happened. Of course that bike was blue and this one is black so maybe that is a bigger factor?

    18. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malcolm Corley: Yeah, he knew I was dying... And he knew that my will would put him out of a job. He wants to take over Corley Motors, Ben! Sell it off to foreigners, lay off workers, start making minivans... You understand me? MINIVANS! Unhhh! You gotta hurt him for me, Ben. Promise me you'll hurt him bad!

    19. Re:Nice looking bike... by _merlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My uncle had been riding a white BMW for decades, and one day he decided to paint it black. After that he noticed that people weren't keeping out of his way the way they used to. It may have been because people associate white BMW bikes with cops (NSW police used them for years before switching to Yamaha) and normally don't give a fuck about motorcyclists, or it could just be that a white bike is easier to spot.

    20. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice looking bike, but I wonder if they're going to offer something more cruiser-like. I'm certainly not opposed to a "greener" ride, but I'd look a damned fool on one of those.

      Yeah, fat people don't look right riding crotch rockets.

    21. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      My old man has a white Honda ST1300 that was meant to be a cop bike. Even has all the extra switch gear but never got delivered because they shifted to the BWMs that year.

      His problem is people see him and brake because they think he is a copper

    22. Re: Nice looking bike... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Going beyond 80mph is illegal.

    23. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I ride bikes and I've always seen this attitude as more of an excuse to ride an anti-socially loud vehicle more than anything else. I'm not sure how blowing a lot of extra noise out behind you is supposed to help the cars in front of you (who so like to pull out of side roads) notice you, with their windows shut, AC blasting, and perhaps the Stereo on.

      Just ride defensively and stop giving politicians more reasons to legislate motorcyclists

    24. Re:Nice looking bike... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      These things almost never get hit out on the highway where there's plenty of room and everything's moving. It's suburbia and relatively low speed where cars are more likely to hit motorcyles so I think they do have a point.

    25. Re:Nice looking bike... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's a Hardley Rideable, not a bike!

    26. Re:Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Black bikes are notoriously easy to overlook. When I got my current bike (Yamaha XT660X), it was black. Looked pretty mean, but I knew it would become a problem. So I switched out all of the plastic parts for the bright orange spare parts that I got with the bike, and now you really have to be legally blind to overlook it. And I've found that personally, bright goddamn orange looks cooler than all black, anyway.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    27. Re: Nice looking bike... by MrMickS · · Score: 2

      Not everywhere...

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    28. Re:Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Loud pipes don't make a difference, riding defensively and not putting yourself in bad positions relative to other traffic is what makes a difference. Visibility also makes a big difference. Consider that most cars these days are very thoroughly sound-proofed, and most people have their radios up loud enough to be heard clearly from outside the car. They routinely fail to notice emergency vehicles until they're literally right in front of them. They probably won't notice the fart can on your bike.

      My previous bike was a 1996 Suzuki Bandit 600. It had a completely straight-through "muffler" with all the wadding blown out from years of (ab)use. That thing was loud enough to wake the dead and cause cows to stampede when I rode by. It also spat fire when hitting the limiter and burbled gloriously under engine braking. In short, it was a fantastically antisocial mode of transport. I had a number of close calls while riding it, which I attribute partly to my inexperience, and partly to the fact that it was very dark green, almost black.

      My current bike is almost completely opposite. It's a bright orange Yamaha XT660X with stock pipes, and in the two years I've ridden it, I have only had one "close" call. It was really that close at all, just some guy merging closely in front of me. All I had to do was close the throttle and beep the horn. We waved 'hi' to each other as I passed him, he did look a bit sheepish, but I guess he was chatting with his passengers, and I might have been in his blind spot.

      And I promise you, I ride every bit as hard on my new bike as I did on my old one. I'm just a lot more conscious about making myself visible and not putting myself in dangerous positions in relation to cars. Exhaust noise doesn't even factor into it.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    29. Re: Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you ride. Some places have speed limits that are higher than 80mph, or no speed limits at all.

      And a lot of people are perfectly happy doing 10-20mph over the limit, even if it is illegal. That does not invalidate the OP's argument.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    30. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These would look great charging on sunshine with the EV ARC by Envision Solar, they've got them at a Google office

      http://envisionsolar.com/ev-arc/

    31. Re:Nice looking bike... by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's my issue with the whole loud pipes thing. Take out a dB meter, pick an arbitrary cutoff, find a nice spot out in the open, and start your motorcycle. Now walk in front of it until you hit your target dB level, then walk around it maintaining the dB level and mapping out the distance you are from the motorcycle.

      You'll find that loud pipes give you a quadrant behind the bike that's extremely noisy, noisy for a far longer distance than in other directions. But is that really the direction you want to be throwing off noise? Is that really the most likely direction for an accident to a motorcycle to come from? I really doubt it.

      And let's be honest, are audio cues really the best cues? When people are driving along, they're not "listening for other vehicles", they're *looking* for them. If you really want to increase people's awareness of your bike, put little flashing lights or the like on them. But that'd "look gay" or something, right? It feels better to pick a "manly" way that makes you feel better about safety than something would have a lot more effect at getting drivers' attention, doesn't it? I'm not saying that sound doesn't play a role, but it mainly plays a role at the pedestrian level; pedestrians rely on sound cues far more than drivers.

      My last problem is, picture what things would be like if everyone started driving their cars around with their hand on the horn at all times because "Constant honking saves lives!" Do you really have the right to create noise pollution so that you can get a greater feeling of safety for a means of travel that you yourself elected to take part in, knowing the risks? Does everyone else have to endure your pollution of the commons for your enjoyment? Do I have the right to jet-ski in a drinking water reservoir or offroad a caterpillar in a national park? The commons is just that - common. Everybody owns it and has a stake in it. Meaning you don't get unlimited access to dump into it without the consent of others, regardless of your intentions.

      --
      Give a boy a gun and you arm him for a day. Teach him how to make a gun, and the whole metaphor breaks down.
    32. Re:Nice looking bike... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I dunno, as someone who enjoys crotch-rockets (Hayabusa FTW), I love its look. It's almost like something that Batman would ride.

      Yeah, almost, except that it has half the range and half of the performance of the competition, which is already shipping bikes. It makes no sense to sell this bike as a H-D.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting little flashing lights on your bike isn't "gay", just illegal.

    34. Re:Nice looking bike... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Author needs to understand combustion = engine / electric = motor. Therefore motor is at the bottom of the bike, not engine.
      Putting cards in the spokes should make up for the lack of loud chugging( actually a safety feature).

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    35. Re:Nice looking bike... by Rei · · Score: 2

      I don't know about for motorcycles, but it's at least not only legal for bicycles, but recommended. Regardless that was just an example. Paint the bike bright neon orange, fly a bright-colored flag from the bike, cover it in fur and googlie-eyes, whatever. The goal should be to increase the *visibility*, because that's what drivers use to make decisions when driving. About the only sound drivers don't tune out is that of a police / ambulence siren.

      --
      Give a boy a gun and you arm him for a day. Teach him how to make a gun, and the whole metaphor breaks down.
    36. Re:Nice looking bike... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why one would want to ride a bike associated with the kind of individuals who are the most loyal purchasers anyway.

    37. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little flashing lights might "look gay" or something... but the real problem is they are pretty much illegal for anything but emergency vehicles in a lot of states.

      Also I've found that modulated headlights are annoying as all get out, and tend to cause people to either pull off the road (thinking you are an emergency vehicle, of steer into you because they are staring at your headlight...

      Those things being said, I'm not a HD rider, I have a Honda, and it is quieter than my car.

    38. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'll find that loud pipes give you a quadrant behind the bike that's extremely noisy, noisy for a far longer distance than in other directions. But is that really the direction you want to be throwing off noise? Is that really the most likely direction for an accident to a motorcycle to come from? I really doubt it.

      And let's be honest, are audio cues really the best cues? When people are driving along, they're not "listening for other vehicles", they're *looking* for them. If you really want to increase people's awareness of your bike, put little flashing lights or the like on them.

      A good friend of mine was riding his police motorcycle - covered with flashing blue lights and a forward facing siren (all on) - and a woman in a minivan still turned left in his path and killed him.

    39. Re:Nice looking bike... by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      I think some people just like to hear explosions, once you start going deaf it won't bother you as much!. But in all seriousness sport bike riders use "loud pipes" as well because they are less restrictive, usually giving a little boost in the upper part of the rev range ("racy", "radical" powerband). People use earplugs if they don't want to go deaf.

    40. Re:Nice looking bike... by microhax · · Score: 1

      Loud pipes may not help in an urban environment but you can be damn sure deer on a country road will hear you coming and (hopefully) get scared off into another direction that isn't directly in front of you. That said, my pipe (singular) isn't very loud but loud enough to scare wildlife.

    41. Re:Nice looking bike... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      People need to learn that defensive driving doesn't mean "driving like a pansy". It means being observant of your surroundings, and watching for things other drivers would miss, e.g. Parked cars with turned wheels may pull out, looking for reflections in windows to see around obscured objects etc. Driving defensively is not riding the ass of the car in front, not accelerating hard to beat the lights, paying attention to the road conditions in the distance as well as immediately in front of you.

      Hell, they should just call it "driving"; There's nothing defensive about it.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    42. Re:Nice looking bike... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'll find that loud pipes give you a quadrant behind the bike that's extremely noisy, noisy for a far longer distance than in other directions.

      Also, due to the way sound dissipates, I'd argue that having a loud motorcycle does more to impair the motorcycle driver's hearing of his/her surroundings than it does to alert other drivers to the presence of a motorcycle.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    43. Re:Nice looking bike... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Harley is working to expand their appeal given that their customer base is getting steadily older. Thats the reason for the new 500 and 750 water cooled base models coming out. They aren't going to do everything right and perhaps will mostly make mistakes but I appreciate that they are at least making an effort and as long as they acknowledge the mistakes and double-down on the successes I think they might be ok. I've always liked their bikes... I just couldn't justify the price and I hate the style-first clothing store feel of their dealerships.

    44. Re:Nice looking bike... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      And on the plus side, it will make your bike look like it was made by Celestron. (With the fancy custom orange anodized parts.)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    45. Re:Nice looking bike... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Harley is working to expand their appeal given that their customer base is getting steadily older.

      Yeah, they tried that. I don't know if every Buell ever made had a life-threatening safety recall (stuff like "front wheel falls off at high speed") but I know at the point when I stopped caring, that was the case.

      Their core customer base will not embrace such a product, which is the reason why they are making so few of them. As you say, H-D is about an aesthetic, which no one can deny is now a part of the American mythology and landscape.

      If I were H-D, and I wanted to have a future, I'd instead make propane bikes with even less power than what they have now, but also even more mileage. Then I'd bill them as eco-friendly (snicker... but in theory they could be converted easily to methane and run on shit) and continue to emphasize the style, which is what they're actually selling anyway.

      If they do actually sell electric motorcycles, they really need to do it under another brand. The imp in me suggests that they buy the rights to the AMF name, that would be kind of hilarious in a hipster, self-referential way. If they hadn't already ruined the name, I'd have suggested they sell them as Buells.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:Nice looking bike... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      More importantly, the doppler effect will ensure that most of the sound you make is behind you when moving.

      The "loudness = safety" is the same idiotic bullshit that make people want to legislate "vroom vroom" speakers to be placed on all electric cars. Are bikers actually advocating this shit?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    47. Re:Nice looking bike... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      They uniformly tell me that they see loud pipes as a critical safety measure to make drivers aware that they're there.

      I do not know if drivers in general (i.e., around the world) are uniformly bad at paying enough attention to notice riders (of bicycles or motorbikes), but certainly here (Brisbane, Australia) people seem to be pretty woeful at their situational awareness when driving.

      Visibility is a much more important safety issue for bikes yet the Harley riders seem to revel in the lowest visibility colors for their riding attire and bike paint. If they really cared about safety, they would dress in bright colors that contrast with the road and other cars.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    48. Re:Nice looking bike... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      My uncle had been riding a white BMW for decades, and one day he decided to paint it black. After that he noticed that people weren't keeping out of his way the way they used to. It may have been because people associate white BMW bikes with cops (NSW police used them for years before switching to Yamaha) and normally don't give a fuck about motorcyclists, or it could just be that a white bike is easier to spot.

      I suspect the bright color over the more stealthy black has the biggest impact over looking cop like.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    49. Re:Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      The data is there. No, loud pipes don't save lives. In the US, the Hurt report, and in Europe, the MAIDS report came to very similar conclusions, on that and more. The two reports had differences, that are pretty easy to find if you're interested, but overall, their conclusions agreed on most major points. And, the loud pipes thing has no statistics to back it up.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

      The schools of thought in Europe and the US merge and diverge, and criss-cross each other - a rider who rides well on either continent is likely to have no trouble adjusting to the other. Squids, on the other hand, are going to go squish on either continent. All of that said, there really ARE some differences that a rider must keep in mind.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    50. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to post as A.C., but I'm just a lurker. But I had to come out of the woodworks to say BULLSHIT!! If being loud were only about safety, and nothing to do with looking cool, then you'd simply bypass the horn button and save a ton of cash. Fucking jackasses like you are why everybody hates me on my quiet BMW.

    51. Re:Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Your thinking is good - and statistics bear out the idea that visibility saves lives, while loud pipes do not.

      I'm part of a school of thought, though, that actually doesn't WANT to be seen. I ride dark colored machines, I wear a black textile armored jacket, and I wore a black and gray helmet for a long time. (Speed and Strength, 1100 I think it was) The kid gave me his hand-me-down HJC which is red - kiind of a dark red, but still red.

      I'll refer you to David Hough, and his books on "Mastering the Ride", where he does a fair job of presenting both schools of thought.

      I'll mention that old myth about "make eye contact" specifically. The driver of an auto, or the rider of a bike both go where their eyes are pointing. Really, seriously, I don't WANT the driver of that oncoming vehicle to be looking at me!! I want him to keep his eyes on the road ahead of him, and just IGNORE ME!! And, I'll do my part, by keeping the rubber side down, and somewhere out of his lane. (don't ask where the shiny side is though - sometimes it is down pretty far too!)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    52. Re:Nice looking bike... by PatMouser · · Score: 1

      Or the one one of my friends wears when she's riding: "If you can read this, the bitch got her own bike!"

    53. Re:Nice looking bike... by PatMouser · · Score: 1

      As I've told a few Harley-Davidson employees, including some pretty high up in the management chain, the reason I ride a BMW R1150RT is because Harley doesn't make a sport-touring bike. I've already warned my wife that the day they put a fully faired, Revolution powered sport tourer on sale, I'm buying it.

    54. Re:Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Yes, indeed, SOME bikers advocate that shit. If you should visit the various biker's forums, however, you will quickly find that older drives, as well as more experienced drivers tend to argue against it. Young and/or inexperienced drivers tend to argue for it. That isn't a strict rule, but it's good enough for a rule of thumb.

      I will note, that you can find riders who have owned bikes for thirty or even fifty years, and are STILL "inexperienced". The bike comes out on sunny weekends to be washed and polished, they might ride to dinner two or three times a year, and maybe make one poker run with the guys. I've seen plenty of ten year old bikes that only had 2 or 3 thousand miles on them. These riders are "inexperienced" in my book.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    55. Re:Nice looking bike... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      With motorcycles acceptable lighting really depends on the state. In Georgia I can run any color under the sun except for blue; and even white, amber, or red must be tied with head lamps, signal indicators, or brakes respectively. In some of Georgia's counties, I can even get away with blue so long as they don't flash, and in other counties headlight modulation can be iffy. There are other states that say that you can't run any lights. There's also a few states where they don't even allow bikes with mounted extra lights to even pass through (I can't remember if this was Mississippi or Tennessee). Doesn't matter if they're actually wired in or not.

      In Georgia, the primary reason for the lighting restrictions is that State Government takes impersonating a police officer extremely seriously, thus they banned anything that could possibly be construed as emergency vehicle lighting.

    56. Re: Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I suppose there is some point to that observation . . .

      I presume that you have never outrun a cop, nor would you even think about trying. FYI - few cop cars can exceed 160. Some can, but not many. Of those that can, none of them can corner and accelerate like a motorcycle can.

      On the Pennsylvania turnpike, on a bright sunny day after a rainy night, bright bright greens all around, a dark green car sitting on the side ahead. Look at the speedo - not quite 100. What to do? Roll on the throttle! For the barest instant, look down, and see two huge blue eyes opened wide, staring at you - framed in Pennsylvania State Police green uniform, and Smokey the Bear hat.

      It's not as big an adrenaline rush as doing Mach 2 in a jet fighter, but it's as good as most mortals ever experience.

      No, I don't know how fast I was going - Smokey never caught up to tell me!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    57. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about for motorcycles, but it's at least not only legal for bicycles, but recommended. Regardless that was just an example. Paint the bike bright neon orange, fly a bright-colored flag from the bike, cover it in fur and googlie-eyes, whatever. The goal should be to increase the *visibility*, because that's what drivers use to make decisions when driving.

      What if you're driving blind?

      P.S. Slashdot Beta is awesome in braille.

    58. Re:Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It looks a lot like a wannabe KTM, actually. Which isn't that bad, I kinda want a KTM, preferably a 690 SMC or a 1290 Super Duke.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    59. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last problem is, picture what things would be like if everyone started driving their cars around with their hand on the horn at all times because "Constant honking saves lives!"

      They do exactly that in China.

    60. Re:Nice looking bike... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      All the safety features in the world can't change the size disparity between a minivan and a motorcycle. A collision between two cars that would be a minor fender bender with nobody hurt can be deadly if one of the vehicles is a motor cycle.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    61. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people are driving along, they're not "listening for other vehicles", they're *looking* for them. If you really want to increase people's awareness of your bike, put little flashing lights or the like on them.

      In many jurisdictions, flashing lights of particular colors on a vehicle are restricted by law.

    62. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might make your vehicle louder but the other driver's cannot hear other sounds that may be important as well. ie. ambulance approaching, large transports, etc

      I find it really distracting when driving to have an obnoxiously loud vehicle approach from one side. So much so I might look in that direction and inadvertently pull the vehicle towards you.

    63. Re: Nice looking bike... by praxis · · Score: 1

      Going beyond 80mph is illegal.

      You forgot to specify where. There are plenty of jurisdictions with more reasonable speed limits. There are also race tracks. There are also areas without traffic laws.

    64. Re: Nice looking bike... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You forgot to specify where.

      Roads.

    65. Re:Nice looking bike... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Here's my issue with the whole loud pipes thing. Take out a dB meter, pick an arbitrary cutoff, find a nice spot out in the open, and start your motorcycle. Now walk in front of it until you hit your target dB level, then walk around it maintaining the dB level and mapping out the distance you are from the motorcycle.

      You'll find that loud pipes give you a quadrant behind the bike that's extremely noisy, noisy for a far longer distance than in other directions. But is that really the direction you want to be throwing off noise? Is that really the most likely direction for an accident to a motorcycle to come from? I really doubt it.

      And let's be honest, are audio cues really the best cues? When people are driving along, they're not "listening for other vehicles", they're *looking* for them. If you really want to increase people's awareness of your bike, put little flashing lights or the like on them. But that'd "look gay" or something, right? It feels better to pick a "manly" way that makes you feel better about safety than something would have a lot more effect at getting drivers' attention, doesn't it? I'm not saying that sound doesn't play a role, but it mainly plays a role at the pedestrian level; pedestrians rely on sound cues far more than drivers.

      My last problem is, picture what things would be like if everyone started driving their cars around with their hand on the horn at all times because "Constant honking saves lives!" Do you really have the right to create noise pollution so that you can get a greater feeling of safety for a means of travel that you yourself elected to take part in, knowing the risks? Does everyone else have to endure your pollution of the commons for your enjoyment? Do I have the right to jet-ski in a drinking water reservoir or offroad a caterpillar in a national park? The commons is just that - common. Everybody owns it and has a stake in it. Meaning you don't get unlimited access to dump into it without the consent of others, regardless of your intentions.

      Wow, exactly right.

      The other problem is loud pipes spew low frequency noise, which is highly non-directional. All you know is there's a bike around. You don't know where, you don't know how far, that's it.

      To properly engage human direction finding requires a noise far higher in frequency - around 2-8 kHz or so, which most human hearing is well attuned to (since it's where a good chunk of human vocalizations are at).

      Of course, this means your loud thumper pipes are turned into loud grandmother nagging pipes.

      Also, in urban areas, the loud pipes reverberate for miles - and drivers (and the rest of the people in the area) simply tune it out, making them even worse than useless - the people who you want to hear you automatically tune you out because they've been hearing the noise for so long. Counterproductive.

      Most people I've seen with loud pipes have 'em so they can goose the throttle when the light turns green and spew out 170db SPL to show off. The only time I've seen them not do this is when there's congestion and they don't have the wide open roads to accelerate.

      Nothing beats visibility - including the clothes. And driving/riding responsibly - if there's places where a car can suddenly pop out because of a hidden driveway, then even car drivers slow down because a car and suddenly pop out on them.

    66. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I suspect the bright color over the more stealthy black has the biggest impact over looking cop like."

      You'd be surprised. Back in the seventies, I had a Honda 750 Four, and I noticed a huge difference in surrounding traffic after I mounted some extra lights on it that coincidentally were where the cops mounted their blue-and-reds. It was amazing to me how much more visible I became with the addition of just two lights in a strategic location. Turns out I didn't care for how the lights worked, but I kept them on the bike for the visibility. In other words, I couldn't see any better, but other folks sure saw me. or rather, NOTICED me.

      tldr: Looking cop-like WORKS.

    67. Re: Nice looking bike... by praxis · · Score: 1

      You forgot to specify where.

      Roads.

      Incorrect. It is not illegal to drive over 80 mph on roads. It is illegal to drive over 80 mph where the speed limit is below 80 mph. Not all roads have speed limit under 80 mph.

    68. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The goal should be to increase the *visibility*, because that's what drivers use to make decisions when driving."

      Ok. Buddy of mine was on his bicycle, and got rear-ended by a car. I don't believe he had any lights on his bike, but he did wear to court what he had been wearing when struck. It took the judge less than a second to ignore the "I didn't see him" argument, as my buddy was in bright orange bike shorts with a fluorescent green jersey. It was a case of "Ok, if you didn't see him, then you're legally blind and I'll take your license away from you. So, tell me again why you hit him". It did NOT go well for the driver.

    69. Re: Nice looking bike... by praxis · · Score: 1

      You forgot to specify where.

      Roads.

      There are roads with 80 mph (or more) speed limits in Argentina, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France (except in the rain), Germany (no limit), Greece, Hungary, Italy (except in adverse weather), Kosovo, Lithuania (not year-round), Macedonia, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine (except motorcycles so you are right about that), United Arab Emirates and the United States.

      Note the inclusion of the United States.

    70. Re: Nice looking bike... by ti-coune · · Score: 1

      Something like this : Zapmotorbikes.com I built it myself, no joke. Electric.

    71. Re:Nice looking bike... by ti-coune · · Score: 1

      Nice looking bike, but I wonder if they're going to offer something more cruiser-like. I'm certainly not opposed to a "greener" ride, but I'd look a damned fool on one of those.

      Something like this maybe ? : http://www.zapmotorbikes.com/ I built it myself, electric, no joke.

    72. Re:Nice looking bike... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to drive so fast? I bet you're one of those assholes who likes to try and get pancaked on the interstate every day, aren't you?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    73. Re:Nice looking bike... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There are other electric bikes out there? Can you name some for the curious?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    74. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Trust me, you already do. If you are in any way concerned about your essence of coolness vis-a-vis your vehicle (especially of the 2 wheeled variety), you have already lost that game, friend.

    75. Re: Nice looking bike... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Countries that use kilometres are irrelevant. People don't talk about "going faster than 80mph" there.
      Moreover 130km/h (which is the speed limit in France, and one of the highest speed limits) is 81mph. That's hardly higher.
      Apparently most of the freeways in the US have a limit of 70mph, with some exceptions that go up to 85. That's hardly much more than 80.

    76. Re:Nice looking bike... by Altus · · Score: 1

      riders are taught to ride durring the day with high beams on. It makes a huge difference in how many people notice you. Noise matters too, my bike is louder than my girlfriends and when we ride together people don't end up cutting her off nearly as much as they do when she is alone.

      Now those stupid loud straight pipes, those are just compensation.... but I do think a totally silent bike would kill a lot of riders. This one doesn't seem to fall into that category though, it still makes noise, though its not a very pleasant one from the movie they released.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    77. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing loud pipes achieve is pissing off your neighbors.

    78. Re:Nice looking bike... by Altus · · Score: 1

      you can get a device that basically flips your high beams on and off during the day, it improves visibility a lot. There are also flashing break light kits that draw extra attention. Lots of stuff helps but there is no single fix for distracted drivers checking facebook on the road.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    79. Re:Nice looking bike... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1
      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    80. Re:Nice looking bike... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Zero Motorcycles has a few electric versions, but they are pretty expensive (~$12k and upwards).

    81. Re:Nice looking bike... by Altus · · Score: 1

      You mean doctors and lawyers?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    82. Re: Nice looking bike... by praxis · · Score: 1

      Countries that use kilometres are irrelevant. People don't talk about "going faster than 80mph" there.

      Why does it matter what language they say it in or what units they use? They travel faster than 80 mph legally.

      Moreover 130km/h (which is the speed limit in France, and one of the highest speed limits) is 81mph. That's hardly higher.

      Hardly higher is still higher. We're talking about a limit here. Doing 80 mph in a 81 mph limit is legal.

      Apparently most of the freeways in the US have a limit of 70mph, with some exceptions that go up to 85. That's hardly much more than 80.

      Again, there are roads in the US were doing 80 mph is legal.

      My only point was that "Going beyond 80mph is illegal." is only true on a subset of roads, not globally true.

    83. Re: Nice looking bike... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      When people say "going faster than 80", then refer to 150 a bit later down the text, they don't mean 81. They mean a value that is significantly higher than 80.

    84. Re:Nice looking bike... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Cruiser bikes weigh more, so you would end up sacrificing range to have one... not to mention that cruisers are for going longer distances. I think the bike looks great compared some of the other electrics out there and wouldn't mind having one for around-town if it doesn't cost too much.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    85. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let's be honest, are audio cues really the best cues?

      That's all good, but what about us blind drivers?

    86. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what "Celestron" is, but it sounds like a My Little Pony Transformer.

      And that sounds awesome.

    87. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone constantly honking their horn is what driving is like in India. supposedly it's the law when turning a corner (could just be what they told the dumb visiting American coworkers?), which might make some sense in remote areas, but is just a loud mess when everyone in a huge city is doing it. ugh, so loud...

    88. Re:Nice looking bike... by Snufu · · Score: 1

      I can second this. My first motorcycle was purchased from a California Highway Patrol man. It was his weekend recreational motorcycle and had been modified to match the riding position of the CHP cruisers, long handle bars for an upright stance, big fairing. I didn't have a proper helmet at first so instead used an old egg shaped white bicycle helmet.

      The unintentional comedy was delightful. Complete strangers slowing down in their cars upon seeing me, yielding in all situations. Every time I put it in gear I swear I could hear the theme from CHiPs.

    89. Re:Nice looking bike... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      More importantly, the doppler effect will ensure that most of the sound you make is behind you when moving.

      Why would a change in [apparent] pitch alter the direction of propagation?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    90. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. "Loud pipes" are compensation for a small penis.

      I always thought it was compensation for not making enough fart jokes in third grade. Seriously, listen to a motorcycle in stop-and-go traffic sometime -- it sounds like the guy's riding a flatulent rhinoceros.

    91. Re:Nice looking bike... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      After pooling some of the bikers in my family, it seems older ones are saying it, but I don't think they actually dumb enough believe it makes them safer. I think they are just using this is an excuse to have loud bikes and make sure they are not banned.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    92. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I think there is a balance point. I believe stock pipes are too quiet. I also believe that full system race pipes are too loud.

      By louder pipes I am not suggesting bullhorns. There is a point at which a louder pipe makes you more noticeable without you being offensive.

        Also who cares if audio cues are the best cues? If they are a cue AT ALL then they contribute to safety. I've always thought that the "if it isn't the best option it's stupid" argument to be totally retarded. 6 point harnesses in cars are the best type of seat belt, yet we all use sash type. Is that stupid because it isn't the best? I'm sorry this option makes you 5% less likely to die. But we won't use that option because this one makes you 30% less likely. Personally I would like the combined advantage please, or if I can't have the 30% option I will take the 5%.

      Also I wear a high vis vest over my leathers - neon orange. My leathers are also silver with reflective material sections in them.

      Finally flashing lights are illegal in australia. As are lights that aren't the stock colour.

    93. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I agree that riding defensively makes the biggest difference. But I don't agree that sound makes none. Yes many cars are highly noise insulated and lots of people have their radios on loud. But there are still plenty of people who drive with their window down. Or not having the radio blaring.

      Personally if I can have any extra difference I will take it.

    94. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Riding with high beams on in Australia is illegal if you have on coming traffic. Exactly the same as if you were in a car.

    95. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Actually it is wind noise that has the biggest impact not exhaust note. If you have wanker loud pipes then yes but I have always found it to be the wind noise from air moving around the outside of the helmet.

      It's why I wear ear plugs.

    96. Re:Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Even if it causes "normal people" to dislike you for making excessive noise?

      Motorcycle riders are unpopular enough as it is, due to squids and biker gangs. Why make people hate us even more?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    97. Re: Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, my experience exactly.

    98. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Because I believe there is a balancing point that I believe is louder than a stock pipe.

      Megaphone exhausts are obnoxious. A slip on generally isn't.

      A set of Termignoni's on a Ducati 1198 is in my opinion too fucking loud. You can feel it in your chest. An Akrapovic slip-on on a zx-10r however is not. Not everything in life has to be on or off.

    99. Re:Nice looking bike... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      There is a balance point, and it lies where the current stock exhausts are. Just about any sportbike or naked bike you can find will be relatively quiet at idle and at low revs, but make a decent racket at full tilt. This is done with clever piping, flaps in the exhaust, well-designed mufflers and so on.

      Aftermarket exhausts tend to be all noise, all the time. The only benefit they have over stock is a slight reduction in weight.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    100. Re: Nice looking bike... by praxis · · Score: 1

      When people say "going faster than 80", then refer to 150 a bit later down the text, they don't mean 81. They mean a value that is significantly higher than 80.

      People should write what they mean. "Going beyond 80mph is illegal." clearly means greater than 80 not greatly greater. Also, even if we rule out the ~81mph speed limits we are still left with a good number higher than that and some which are unlimited.

    101. Re:Nice looking bike... by Altus · · Score: 1

      even durring the day? Thats not a particularly good law. At night, obviously it is different.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    102. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Guess we have to agree to disagree then. I don't tend to ride my bike at full tilt so noise production at low revs is more important for safety than the noise at ring it's neck speeds. Especially if I am going full tilt on my bike the speed I am doing is far more likely to get people upset and angry with bike riders then the noise coming out of the can.

    103. Re:Nice looking bike... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      High beam headlights

      A driver must not switch headlights to high beam if another vehicle is closer than 200m in front of the driver's vehicle.

      A driver may flash the headlights briefly before overtaking another vehicle.

      Drivers must ensure that they do not dazzle other road users.

      Sections 218 and 219 of the Queensland Road Rules apply.

    104. Re:Nice looking bike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not surprising to read all the negative comments regarding Harleys' on this website, as the majority of of readers aren't capable of riding a motorcycle in real life. As a motorcycle rider (road licensed) for 37 years, and owned 15 different brands of bikes) I have had numerous occasions when the pipes have provided enough presence to avert an idiot from pulling out in front of me.

      To the people that think that the noise from "loud pipes" only affects people behind the bike, I offer you this: When was the last time that a Harley approached you, and you thought: wow I didn't hear that comming...." Obviously the sound behind the bike is louder, but it is still audible in front of the bike, which is the whole point of of "Loud Pipes Save Lives".

      BTW, Pirate outfit, is required by the FSM. Idiot.

  2. Dangerous by blackiner · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I sincerely hope they add some sort of noise generator, bikes are dangerous enough already.

    1. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bikes aren't dangerous ... bimbos in SUVs are dangerous. Cell phone drivers are dangerous. Bikes are devices. People are the problem.

    2. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      People are the problem.

      In particular, the people that ride bikes.

    3. Re:Dangerous by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, are you one of those people who thinks a glass muffler gets you noticed and keeps you safe? More likely startles some poor minivan driver into swerving into your path. If you want to stay safe, the way to do it is to pay attention. Keeping the bike quiet means you'll hear Mr. Minivan coming. See and avoid, man. See and avoid.

    4. Re:Dangerous by msauve · · Score: 2

      So, you're one of those people who are oblivious to the traffic around them, and depend upon others to be defensive when around you. You shouldn't be on the road.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Dangerous by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      No amount of noise is going to make a bike safer. The noise FOLLOWS you, it doesn't precede you. The guy 200 yards behind you on the interstate hears you, the guy 200 yards ahead of you doesn't hear a thing. I don't give a damn that they guy behind me can hear me - he is no threat to me. That guy ahead though, could be a problem.

      Noise generator - what a waste of energy.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Dangerous by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      People are the problem.

      In particular, the people that ride bikes.

      Don't be so mean. The world has enough of a donor-organ shortage as it is, without you going and discouraging nice, healthy, young specimens from doing things that not infrequently result in massive cranial trauma that leaves much of the rest of the body so usefully intact...

    7. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope they add some sort of noise generator, bikes are dangerous enough already.

      Noise doesn't make a bike safer.

      The way to be safe is to increase the VISUAL presence of the bike.

      Informed riders know this. Idiots like you keep parroting "loud pipes save lives"
      while ignoring the fact that the noise is not even apparent until the bike passes
      by. If you question whether this is true, take note the next time a loud bike approaches.
      The sound doesn't get loud until the bike is next to you and passing you.

      .

    8. Re:Dangerous by murderdeathkill · · Score: 1

      High visibility doesn't help at all. Car drivers don't care. Though, if you look like a cop, and they'll violate your right of way less frequently. My bike is somewhat loud. The stereo in my truck is louder.

    9. Re:Dangerous by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Bikes aren't dangerous ... bimbos in SUVs are dangerous. Cell phone drivers are dangerous. Bikes are devices. People are the problem.

      The fact that 'people are the problem' are what makes bikes dangerous.

      If you're behind the wheel of a Smart car and you're hit by a bimbo in an SUV you get up and walk away.

      If you're on a bike you're a dead skidmark if you're lucky and in a wheelchair for the rest of your life if you're not.

    10. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the skin. That gets cheese-grated off. Does make it easy to get the organs.

    11. Re:Dangerous by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      umm NO. sound travels in both directions, a bike does not move at sufficient speed for sound to only be behind them. The benefit of hearing a bike is not for cars on the interstate, it is for pedestrians that will step out in front of you, people that are doing slow speed manoeuvres that may fail to see you in the mirrors but still might hear you coming 20-50 yards behind them. push bike riders that at the best of times are a hazard even when they know you are there.

    12. Re:Dangerous by blackiner · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose that may work better. I go running on the side of the road a lot and I pay careful attention to hear cars come up behind me, which lets me turn my head and see if they have moved over enough not to smash me. I pay a lot of attention to sound while driving (obviously not as much as visual) so I figured it would help though, it definitely helps notice ambulances and police.

    13. Re:Dangerous by markdavis · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't need to be *LOUD* to accomplish that. It certainly needs to be no louder than a modern, quiet car.

      I wish people with loud vehicles would be ticketed to death... and that especially holds for boom-box cars.

      http://www.southparkstudios.co...

    14. Re:Dangerous by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      I have long advocated an exemption from mandatory-helmet laws. So long as the rider agrees to register as an organ donor.

    15. Re:Dangerous by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If you run on the road, and you don't do it on the shoulder on the side of the road where you are facing oncoming traffic, you are doing your running on the illegal side of the road. Pedestrians should always travel facing motorized traffic. It's the law.

    16. Re:Dangerous by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Idunno about that "healthy young specimens" bit. That was true when I was young. But now most of the hog riders I see on the road are gray bearded balding overweight guys who would have trouble pulling their bike upright if it fell over.

      --
      Will
    17. Re:Dangerous by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. That would work if you turned your pipes around so you were blasting the loud exhaust ahead of you.

      Maybe you should do that. It would make a truthier statement about who you really are.

      --
      Will
    18. Re:Dangerous by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      who said anything about it needing to be loud? it merely has to be at an audible level, something around the average car sound is sufficient.

    19. Re:Dangerous by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, it doesn't need to be loud, just at a level to make it audible at close distances, quiet car level is many times better than silent. morons that modify cars and motorbikes just to increase sound for some sort of dick waving exercise should be fined to oblivion.

    20. Re:Dangerous by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes and no.

      While bikes are more dangerous than cars you can avoid more accidents on them then if you are in a car.

      What most bike riders don't like to acknowledge is that, as much as we would love to blame the volvo driver, we tend to kill ourselves by ourselves.

      Have a look at the statistics. A huge percentage of fatal motorcycle accidents are single vehicle. It comes from the fact that you can but an absolute weapon of a vehicle for essentially pocket change. Then most of us ride for fun at the weekend so our total number of hours driving a bike are relatively low, and as such so is our skill levels.

      My bike will do 120kph in 1st gear and get there unbelievably quickly, then the only thing that caps its speed as an electronic limiter at 300kph..... Way faster than this electric harley. There are so few cars that can even come close and none of them are affordable.

      If we weren't out having fun on our super awesome toys tearing up and down the local mountain the fatality rate would be a hell of a lot lower.

    21. Re:Dangerous by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      It's the people next to you on the interstate that are the dangerous ones... Not the one 200 yards in front or 200 yards behind.

    22. Re:Dangerous by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Dangerous to your trim, maybe. Dangerous to your life? Not so much.

      It is not speed, but difference in speed, which is dangerous to your life. I fear the one coming up behind me at a difference of 50+ MPH MUCH more than the one next to me doing a couple MPH different. Yeah, the guy next to me may take out my mirror or scuff my door, but the guy behind me may kill me.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    23. Re:Dangerous by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about from a motorcycle perspective - that guy next to me merges into me. I come off the bike. Hit the road. Hope like hell I stay following the road and not run off it and into armco - posts or trees while also praying that the person who was behind me doesn't run me over.

    24. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such law either way, but it is advised that people on foot travel with traffic.

    25. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dominos has an electric bike scooter doing delivery in the Netherlands that has a noise machine.

      http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1075563_dominos-electric-delivery-scooter-best-new-alert-sound

    26. Re:Dangerous by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The way to be safe is to increase the VISUAL presence of the bike.

      Finally, someone sensible joins the discussion.

      In my own experience, going from a dark green (near black) bike with an obnoxiously loud exhaust to a bright orange bike with quiet stock exhausts, it is definitely the visual presence of the bike that matters. And that includes actively making yourself as visible as possible, never riding in blind spots etc.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    27. Re:Dangerous by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Dangerous to your trim, maybe. Dangerous to your life? Not so much.

      It is not speed, but difference in speed, which is dangerous to your life. I fear the one coming up behind me at a difference of 50+ MPH MUCH more than the one next to me doing a couple MPH different. Yeah, the guy next to me may take out my mirror or scuff my door, but the guy behind me may kill me.

      NOT On a motorbike, the person next to you is as dangerous if not more so than oncoming traffic. when your travelling at speed on a motorbike a tap from the person next to you that doesn't see you can be just as fatal as a head on. Usually I am far more concerned about whether the person next to me has seen me, oncoming traffic is far easier to predict and handle on a motorbike, the driver that merges without indicating is nightmare that you need to be constantly aware of if you want to stay alive.

    28. Re:Dangerous by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Dominos has an electric bike scooter doing delivery in the Netherlands that has a noise machine.

      More for pedestrians than cars, to stop them walking in front of the bike because they don't hear it, this happens to me fairly often when I'm cycling. People won't even check the road but will assume that because they can't hear anything nothing is coming.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    29. Re:Dangerous by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I go running on the side of the road a lot and I pay careful attention to hear cars come up behind me

      Actually, if you're running on the side of a road without a sidewalk, you're supposed run on the left side of the road so you can *see* the oncoming traffic.

    30. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the law. Pedestrians walking in a roadway are legally required to walk facing oncoming traffic.

      To do otherwise is stupid, dangerous, and illegal.

    31. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bikers gambles on gaps between traffic that is a high risk maneuver, or cause traffic to swerve. They walk through vehicles at red lights trying to squeeze to the front rather than wait in line with the other vehicles. They overtake many vehicles in a single move, going massively over the legal limit, often causing opposite flow to swerve. They cut into gaps between cars that would result in serious personal damage, even death, should the vehicle in front need to stop. There's a reason we have braking distances. They like to record themselves doing 180mph on country roads, rather than visiting a speed track on open days. They pull wheelies to show off.

      Ironically, it's not Harley riders doing this, they're just old men doing a "look at me" routine with their obnoxious exhausts.

    32. Re:Dangerous by oobayly · · Score: 2

      Is this what we've come to? "It's not a law", so fuck common sense?

    33. Re:Dangerous by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Having a something visible in incredibly important. I've never owned a bike, but did own a Westfield (Lotus Super7 style) kit car - it was 425kg of box metal and fiberglass. It was bright yellow, and I always drove with my headlights switched on. When you're driving something in which you'll most likely die in the event of an accident you make sure that people will see you. It wasn't massively noisy (2 twin webber carbs are noisy but behind a scoop, but it had a good exhaust silencer) compared to most kit cars, and as most people have said most of the noise is behind you.

      I picked up a lot of good habits from motorcyclists when driving that car that I still use - always look over your shoulder (don't rely solely on mirrors) when changing lanes, never assume that people realise how quickly you can accelerate and never assume that people have seen you. In fact, assume nothing.

    34. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bikers also kick puppies and eat small children. How could you have possibly left that out?

    35. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of idiots running, on narrow streets, with their backs to traffic and wearing headphones/earbuds. Similarly, I see them on the street when there's a well-maintained sidwalk available for them.

      However, it's all good, because the world revolves around them.

    36. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "more.... THEN"?

      American?

      You don't understand what the words 'than' and 'then' mean? Unbelievable.

    37. Re:Dangerous by Talderas · · Score: 1

      The only time where you should walk on the side of the road with traffic heading in your direction is if the other side is not passable for pedestrians or it's a pedestrian sidewalk.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    38. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accidents don't happen on the interstate very often. You have room to move. They happen in city traffic, often when someone rear-ends you. Now I recommend keeping it in gear and paying attention, but sometimes you want to rest your clutch hand. Loud pipes certainly do attract attention in city driving and might even keep the guy in the semi from pulling forward over you for no reason, or alert the half blind grandmother or texting teen to your presence. Now I don't have any statistical evidence it makes you safer. It might make you less safe overall, but I have seen drivers react to loud pipes and I don't think it is reasonable to dismiss out of hand the possibility.

    39. Re:Dangerous by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but people without a functioning liver will probably take one with a little mileage on it. In fact, they'd probably take half of one.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    40. Re:Dangerous by sjbe · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope they add some sort of noise generator, bikes are dangerous enough already.

      Bullshit. I ride a bicycle which makes no noise and somehow I manage to never cause accidents. Noise does not make a bike safe. Good riding habits make a bike (relatively) safe.

    41. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not. And no, you are not supposed to walk towards oncoming traffic.

    42. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody Take Notice!!! Precious snowflake coming through! Potato potato POTATO potato...

    43. Re:Dangerous by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      White helmet, hi-vis vest, ride with your lights on. You can't see any of those things while you're riding, so it doesn't matter how "cool" you look.

      Nobody looks "cool" doing 35MPH over a car bonnet.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    44. Re:Dangerous by fredrated · · Score: 1

      My doctor friend tells me that his beef is with the nazi war helmets. He claims that after an accident, the rider stays alive enough for his organs to fail and be worthless for a transplant.

    45. Re:Dangerous by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      That I agree with. I'm a bicyclist, I use a rear view mirror mounted on my hazard glasses, and I'm pretty good about maintaining situational awareness. You get that way after pedalling for 45+ years. But there was still one time when a silent Prius sneaked up on me in a parking lot. Really startled me, like finding a rattlesnake in a mailbox.

      Cars and motorbikes should make a little noise. Not very much, but a little. (Good bicyclists know how to say "behind you", "on your left", etc).

      --
      Will
    46. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a rider who wears a full face helmet, let me tell you. With the wind noise, even in a full face helmet, you don't hear much. Once had an ambulance right behind me, sirens blaring, didn't hear it.

      The way to stay safe is simple. Assume that everybody on the road is either an idiot or purposely trying to kill you. Keep that in your mind always, any time somebody pulls up to make a turn in front of you be prepared to slam on the brakes or swerve. Noise makes no difference, loud or quiet. Just remember that vehicle licensing is a source of tax revenue, and the government is more concerned about licensing as many people as possible to collect maximum tax revenue and doesn't give two squirts on if you can actually drive.

      BTW, fun fact. Did you know that distracted drivers kill more people in the US than guns do. And I'm counting suicides in the gun deaths. Yeah, that phone call, isn't important, it can wait.

    47. Re:Dangerous by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      What most bike riders don't like to acknowledge is that, as much as we would love to blame the volvo driver, we tend to kill ourselves by ourselves. Have a look at the statistics. A huge percentage of fatal motorcycle accidents are single vehicle.

      That's irrelevant when you're talking about whether or not to "blame the Volvo driver" (also, you haven't compared it to other vehicle-type crashes.)

      In cases involving pedestrians, motorcyclists, and bicyclists, the statistics are the same: car/truck/bus drivers are at fault in the vast majority of crashes with them. But it's much easier to blame the victim, and cast pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcycles as "reckless" and supposedly completely unaware of the danger they face.

    48. Re:Dangerous by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I've transferred a lot of good riding habits over to normal driving. Proper orientation like you mentioned, and never assume that someone has seen you, even if you have direct eye contact. Looking far ahead is also very important, don't just stare directly at the rear lights of the car in front, look through it or around it, keep an eye on what's happening up ahead. And keep proper safe following distances, that's probably the biggest once. Never assume that you can outbrake the vehicle in front of you.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    49. Re:Dangerous by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Because of EU regulations, I can't even turn off the lights on my bike, they're permanently on if the engine is running. Every little bit helps when it comes to visibility.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    50. Re:Dangerous by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      High visibility is the best way to decrease the likelihood of a car violating the right of way of a motorcycle. Most motorcycle crashes involve cars turning left in front of motorcycles that they failed to see. The single best way to increase your safety on a bike is to wear a bright colored jacket.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    51. Re:Dangerous by praxis · · Score: 1

      That I agree with. I'm a bicyclist, I use a rear view mirror mounted on my hazard glasses, and I'm pretty good about maintaining situational awareness. You get that way after pedalling for 45+ years. But there was still one time when a silent Prius sneaked up on me in a parking lot. Really startled me, like finding a rattlesnake in a mailbox.

      Cars and motorbikes should make a little noise. Not very much, but a little. (Good bicyclists know how to say "behind you", "on your left", etc).

      For even more safety, bicycles should also make noise.

    52. Re:Dangerous by imikem · · Score: 1

      Get it right, man: Potatoe

      D. Quayle

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    53. Re:Dangerous by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What, like your flashy lights that are distracting enough that I've almost hit people BECAUSE OF THEM?

      News flash: flashing red is Not Allowed. Flashing yellow is not allowed unless your vehicle is disabled. Flashing white should be reserved for dangers to other drivers, such as work trucks.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    54. Re:Dangerous by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Just so long as your headlight isn't the strobing brighter-than-the-sun variety with flashing red on the back.

      That shit is unsafely distracting.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    55. Re:Dangerous by Altus · · Score: 1

      You should really get your hearing checked, that is not good. I ride a 2000 HD lowrider, not a super quiet bike, and I can hear plenty around me.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    56. Re:Dangerous by Altus · · Score: 1

      on a bike, even a tiny hit can be lethal. People merge into motorcycles all the time without even noticing. I don't even react anymore when it happens, I just avoid them and then get away from them. Its not even worth getting upset about it because it happens just about every time I go out on the bike.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    57. Re:Dangerous by Altus · · Score: 1

      They happen often enough on interstates, but worse are multi-lane state highways, they are usually more constricted and people treat the 2 lane ones pretty much like they are regular roads and change lanes with very little consideration.

      I learned to ride in New Jersey, land of such roads... these days I barely notice when someone cuts me off or merges into my lane. I am numb to it.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    58. Re:Dangerous by Altus · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of friends who ride bikes in the city, most of them have been hit or had a door opened into their path. Don't get cocky or you may find yourself bleeding one the pavement one day.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    59. Re:Dangerous by jjbenz · · Score: 1

      Idiots texting while driving seems to be the big thing these days.

    60. Re:Dangerous by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most motorcycle accidents are single vehicle. The biker doesn't need help to kill him/her self.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    61. Re:Dangerous by jjbenz · · Score: 1

      a blaze orange helmet goes a long way as well toward being seen.

    62. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what you do, because I don't recall ever saying anything remotely like that. In fact, I stated quite the opposite.

      Next time, only respond to posts that you are able to comprehend. Adults are talking here, kid.

    63. Re:Dangerous by mellon · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't know that, because it's not true. Actually, the numbers are just about even.

      If your helmet is making so much noise, consider (a) wearing earplugs and (b) tweaking your fairing setup. I had the same problem on my R100RS, and I'm pretty sure it's because of the way the wind was breaking off the fairing. It might seem like wearing earplugs would make it worse, but it cuts down on the white noise and seems to allow more signal to get through. Anyway, if you can't hear an siren blaring right behind you, you have a problem.

      That said, your basic point, that _you_ have to be the one to see potential accidents and avoid them, is completely true. Straight pipes are a way to try to get more people to be aware of you, but you are still relying on their competence and good will, one of which you are wrecking, and the other of which you are compromising when you use pipes so loud they cause a stress reaction.

  3. Livewire? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    "The new LiveWire won’t make the distinctive 'potato-potato-potato' chug that Harley once tried to patent."

    I'm pretty sure Livewire can chug in any way it wants, if they include it.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Livewire? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I chugged a LiveWire once. KickStart is much better.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Livewire? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Something something Live Wire.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  4. Potato? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I've ever considered a Harley to sound like a potato.

    1. Re:Potato? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only hear it when the bike is off.

    2. Re:Potato? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but they sure as shit move like one

  5. A sure failure by preaction · · Score: 4, Informative

    Harley owners want to be noticed, and without the 120 decibel roar, we won't be paying enough attention to them.

    1. Re:A sure failure by msauve · · Score: 3, Funny
      • Talk louder, they can't hear you.
      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:A sure failure by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      TALK LOUDER STILL if THEY'VE BEEN RIDING for a WHILE. THE NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS MAKES it HARDER STILL for THEM to HEAR.

      (lower case used only to get around the lame filter.)

    3. Re:A sure failure by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      120 decibel roar

      80 dB is the legal limit.

      Riding a 120 dB bike would be painfully loud for the rider.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:A sure failure by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Not when the majority of those pressure waves are emitted away and not towards the driver...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  6. Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bike this ineffective at advertising how small the penis of its rider is will surely be a failure!

    1. Re:Compensation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      Some of you people can turn anything into a penis envy match. Gun control advocates are like that too. They see a weapon, and they think "PENIS!" What sad lives some of you live . . .

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas you simply don't care about lack of same.

    3. Re:Compensation by msauve · · Score: 1

      You're just upset because you always lose the matches.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not nearly as sad as the gun nut who honestly thinks at any moment he'll be raped by a pack of savages. I can't imagine living in that much fear, needing a weapon like a security blanket.

      Gun advocates never stop letting the world know that they are frightened. It's got to be a mental illness of some kind to seriously think your life is in danger at every moment.

    5. Re:Compensation by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Much like seat belt users...mentally ill.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Dead on arrival by mendax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can predict that such a motorcycle will never have much of a market. Here's why.

    Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make. It's a marvelous thing. While I personally dislike the noise Harley engines make—they're too damned loud—I like the healthy, high octane growl the 1.2 liter engine I sit just above and behind makes. Then there are the vibrations from the engine. At 90 mph, the engine spins at about 5500 rpm. It's an incredible feeling to sense all that power at my command being exerted.

    As you can expect, none of these things are present in an electric bike. It's going to be quite a dull experience to ride an electric bike I think.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, another guy with a small penis who needs everyone to notice him.

    2. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make.
      We'll you and your kin are the only ones. Nothing more annoying than a handful of Harley's driving downtown between the buildings, holding the clutch in, and revving the engine.

    3. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please buy one and get rid of your ridiculous 130 db bike. Nobody is impressed. The noise of 30 bikers rumbling through tourist towns and mountain scenic highways is highly annoying. I've been in towns like Taos and Durango where Harley bikers are not appreciated by the business owners. They don't buy the art and they scare away customers who want to eat outside on beautiful days.

    4. Re:Dead on arrival by mellon · · Score: 1

      Bikers appreciate all kinds of different things. I like something that handles nicely in the turns and has lots of torque. Quiet is a bonus for me, not a drawback.

    5. Re:Dead on arrival by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      They don't do noise like ICEs do; but electric vehicles do tend to combine a battery pack that could (possibly literally, in the larger models) melt a crowbar with a motor that looks only slightly different than a dead short at zero RPM.

      If they can't make that combination, through some combination of vibration and sheer acceleration, inject the sentiment "Plenitudo potestatis. fuck yeah" directly into the operator's brain, they are doing something wrong.

      If they can do it without the noise, they are doing something right.

    6. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make. It's a marvelous thing...I like the healthy, high octane growl the 1.2 liter engine I sit just above and behind makes. Then there are the vibrations from the engine. At 90 mph, the engine spins at about 5500 rpm. It's an incredible feeling to sense all that power at my command being exerted.

      TMI. Keep your sex life to yourself, and in your mom's basement.

    7. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. I ride, too.

    8. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You clearly haven't expierenced the thrill that instant electric torque can provide. This may not appeal to Harley's traditional customer, but this could make motorcycles appealing to a whole new segment of the population. No shifting, pure power.

    9. Re:Dead on arrival by mendax · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know that no one has ever complained about my penis. It's more than adequate I assure you. Have you looked in a mirror yourself?

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    10. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^
      Pansy Brigade

    11. Re:Dead on arrival by mendax · · Score: 1

      > Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make.
      We'll you and your kin are the only ones. Nothing more annoying than a handful of Harley's driving downtown between the buildings, holding the clutch in, and revving the engine.

      You're damned right! However, I personally dislike the noise Harleys make. They're too damned loud. I ride a Suzuki Bandit. That's a Japanese sport touring bike with a big crotch rocket engine. It's reasonable quiet until you get onto the freeway and wind it up.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    12. Re:Dead on arrival by mendax · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've experienced it. But on a bike that high torque is going to leave you on your ass and your bike bent up as you pop a wheelie using all that torque. I'll stick with gasoline and pistons.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    13. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL that your small hands haven't complained about your small penis.

    14. Re:Dead on arrival by metlin · · Score: 1

      Not all bikers are like you. Personally, I would absolutely love an electric motorcycle.

      Plus, all that power and more will be exerted in an electric motorcycle - they just won't be wasted on noise and vibrations. They will be efficiently used in a servo motor, and as a geek, that excites me more than any rumble of power being at my command.

    15. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But on a bike that high torque is going to leave you on your ass...

      So, uh. Reduce the torque or balance the bike to compensate? I, for one wouldn't mind moving the power generation for my ride to a very large, substantially more efficient-per-watt generator out in the boondocks.

    16. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. It's assholes like you that make incredible noise in the dead of night. It's a thrill for you to wake up an entire neighborhood, being passive aggressive at 60 miles per hour. Anyone who's been unfortunate to have a motorcycle nut for a neighbor knows how they love keeping people awake for blocks all around.

      Motorcycles are like pit bulls; they're cool but 90% of the owners are worthless anti-social trash. I'm sorry your penis is so small that you have to make up for it in decibels.

    17. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they don't complain, bikers beat their women. Nobody would laugh at your micropenis with a black eye and a dislocated jaw.

      Please tell me you're a pothead so I can have the satisfaction of knowing you embody everything that's wrong with white trash.

    18. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All that power" in a Harley? Joking much? Possibly the worst power to weight (and reliability to boot) in a bike, regardless of country of origin. The only reason to buy HD is the noise and optional "Loud Pipes Save Lives" bumper sticker for your giant Ford limited-edition one-person-only SUV. Also bragging rights on who gets to spend the most on repairs and shiny gidgets and old-school girlie-bike handlebars.

    19. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you can expect, none of these things are present in an electric bike. It's going to be quite a dull experience to ride an electric bike I think.

      Electric motors deliver 100% of their torque immediately. Dull experience? Depends on how you ride.

    20. Re:Dead on arrival by johnnys · · Score: 1

      Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!

      90% of motorcyclists are perfectly reasonable people who ride motorcycles with the original quiet mufflers, or a reasonable muffler that is not a lot louder. The 10% of cretins who ride with earsplitting open pipes are the MINORITY. Don't think that because they make 90% of the noise that we're ALL like that.

      I've ridden 40,000 miles on motorcycles in Canada and the USA and I always had a reasonably quiet muffler. So please don't keep spreading the lie that "90%" of us are lowlifes: There's probably a MUCH higher percentage of politicians and bankers who deserve culling than motorcycle riders!

      --
      Sometimes the "writing on the wall" is blood spatter...
    21. Re:Dead on arrival by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >" That's a Japanese sport touring bike with a big crotch rocket engine. It's reasonable quiet until you get onto the freeway and wind it up."

      I *have* a 1.4 liter Japanese sport touring bike with huge performance. And like all other factory Japanese bikes, it is not loud at all, regardless of how much I "wind it up". Why? Because I didn't replace the stock, legal, quality, perfectly appropriate muffler with some loud, annoying aftermarket thing that serves no purpose except to scream "look at me" (or "listen to me, whether you want to or not") and pretend that it does something for performance (which they do not).

      Loud is not performance. Loud is not safer. Loud is just annoying.
      http://www.noiseoff.org/pipes/

    22. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is to say that you enjoy the illusion of power, but aren't competent enough to handle actual power and wish to compensate for that with a lot of noise. At least, I have to assume that, since your arguments against are 1. Too powerful and 2. Doesn't sound powerful.

    23. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. Have you tried to ride a bike with a constant torque? Not many have. Would be interesting to hear from those people. May be inner ear can provide a better perception of power.

    24. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will be easy to do a launch control system on that bike...
      1. Lean forward
      2. Let off brake squeeze throttle keep wheel straight
      Enjoy the warp speed rush.

    25. Re:Dead on arrival by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding me? I've been riding motorcycles for 35 years and I'd stand in line for a chance to own something like this, and I've owned some fast bikes. Zero to 60 in 4 seconds? And it does it quietly? Hell, yes! Fewer moving parts to wear out? Hell, yes! No massive amounts of heat generated? Hell, yes! For 100,000 miles the only thing that would likely need replacing are brake pads and tires? Oh HELL YES!

      You, on the other hand? As others have pointed out, sounds like you want compensation for something you're lacking, buddy, not necessarily a motorcycle. Midlife crisis much?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    26. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because no one can see your micropenis without a microscope

    27. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to Durango to buy art is about as lame an idea as I've ever seen, It is mostly overpriced tat.
      Even the Steamtrain costs an arm and a leg to ride.
      Durango is a tourist rip off. Jesus, even the local IPA is so yeasty that it is undrinkable yet the 'grockles' love it.

      However you are perfectly correct about the noise. 50+ Harleys riding in convoy produces way too much noise.

      (Note to US Microbrewers. Even unfiltered beer can go clear. Just let the cask settle for 48 hours before you serve it. Don't use CO2 to serve it either. A Proper handpump please.)

    28. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to hear the guys on the other side of the glory hole like your penis dude...

    29. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought that others may not want to hear your motorcycle noise when you are in a public street?

    30. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I personally think that efforts to rebrand electric motorcycles as 'cabin scooters' could gain a lot more traction. Just add a shell and something to substitute for the driver's feet when the bike isn't in motion, assuming it isn't a three-wheeler already, and presto. You have the lightest, cheapest possible commuter vehicle that's still governed by motorcycle regulations.

      Motorcycle culture is about fun, not efficiency. Well, usually. I'm not saying that to be down on anyone because a hobby's a hobby, I'm just saying, what you bikers care about at the end of the day is that you enjoyed your ride and why you enjoyed it. Meanwhile, folks like me look at the exploding, skyrocketing cost of personal transportation and see motorbikes and their partially or fully enclosed kin as a great possible solution, especially for low income earners. Electric vehicles can't just be for yuppies, yaknow. Until we here in flyover country can afford an electric vehicle that can make highway speeds, they're never going to matter.

      A lot of modern day efforts at creating cabin cycles look way too dorky to ever make it anyhow. They all try to ape that Apple chic look but they wind up looking like they were designed by engineers from a dildo factory. Now the Quasar, that was a sexy machine. The Velorex Oskar had a certain old fashioned charm to it, and so do three wheeled vintage offerings from Morgan Motors. These could be updated to incorporate a range of efficiency-boosting (and also speed-boosting) aerodynamic features. Even a design based on the sidecars from the Art Deco era would be nice. Hell, I'd almost prefer that.

      So in short, I agree that this is aimed at the wrong market but it's nice to see Harley Davidson making the effort. What I'd really like to see is a cabin cycle with a low price tag and mass market appeal, preferably an electric one. (I'd settle for a high fuel economy gas version for the time being.) That's where this kind of effort should be invested, building up that class of vehicle as a brand in and of itself and showing America what's possible.

    31. Re:Dead on arrival by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Then there are the vibrations from the engine. At 90 mph, the engine spins at about 5500 rpm.

      Have you ever actually tried a battery operated sex toy? They could build one right into the seat.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Dead on arrival by HnT · · Score: 1

      You are of course spot on and everything you said goes double for a Harley. Everyone I know who ever looked at a Harley did so for the "legend" and the noise and definitely not the technology.
      Theoretically the e-engine would give this bike some crazy pick-up just like all those e-cars have shown us but of course that does not matter even a tiny little bit for the typical chopper and Harley rider.

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    33. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can predict that such a motorcycle will never have much of a market. Here's why.

      Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make....

      So you speak for all bikers worldwide?

      I have been riding a motorbike for more than 90% of my life. Bikers such as myself appreciate the increased reliability and increased performance (not racetrack, real world tight winding roads... max torque = huge improvement) that electric bikes will bring.

    34. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're too damned loud for how slow they are. They should go 150 mph for the noise they make at 50.

    35. Re:Dead on arrival by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Sure, I like revving my big thumper (660cc single-cylinder) and feeling the vibrations, but have you ever ridden or driven a decently powered electric vehicle? They're not silent, there is a very definite motor/geartrain noise, and the torque and responsiveness really has to be experienced to believe it.

      They may not roar, but they are anything but silent:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And just listen to this as he's braking into the corners:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Eat the rich.
    36. Re:Dead on arrival by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 0

      Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make.

      Anti-social fucktards like you need to be eradicated.

      Are you so retarded that the only thing you can contribute to society is to annoy an entire suburb of people (literally) with your 'fat pipes' at 1:00am? Seriously, go look up 'sociopath' in the dictionary. There's a picture of you on your motorcycle happily making people deaf.

      Go do in a fire Wanker!

    37. Re:Dead on arrival by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Stop deceiving yourself on your true intentions and buy a sybian then,

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    38. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, mister funny guy...

    39. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like your motorcycle is the equivalent of an unsatisfied housewife's sex toy. If this is the best you can do then you're in a pretty bad place.

    40. Re:Dead on arrival by hey! · · Score: 1

      In years of commercial software development, I learned a number of important principles for designing new products.

      (1) "Everyone wants what I would want" is a bad assumption. Chances are there are lots of people out there like you, but a lot of the untapped market may be people who want something different.

      (2) There is an adoption curve for anything new. At the head of the adoption curve are people who want things that are new because they are new. At the tail are the people who don't want anything new until it's become old. In the middle are people who can be persuaded for various reasons to try something new, but only if they see other people using it successfully. Therefore the first thing a new product must be is new. The second thing a new product must be is practical. The last thing a new product must be is relatable in terms of older technology. A product that achieves all three can eventually sell to all three adopter types.

      Notice how the bike in question tries to fit this model. The gear whine sound it makes struck me as unnecessarily loud, and the Harley people went on and on about the distinctive sound it makes. That sound is different from the traditional sound of Harley, which gets the attention of the early adopters. That sound is unnecessarily loud, which makes the bike relatable to a long tradition of unnecessarily loud Harleys. In a way the early adopters will be having a very traditional Harley experience of riding by and everyone thinking, "There goes one of those damned Harleys!"

      (3) Experience is not the same as understanding. The classic example is the client who knows which websites he likes and dislikes thinking that means he can design a website himself.

      What you experience riding a powerful bike is real. It is also artificial -- in the sense that it was deliberately crafted by talented designers, working with a toolbox of ideas that are probably unfamiliar to you unless you're a designer yourself. That doesn't mean they're smarter than you (gosh that's a big mistake for designers to make), it means they're more expert in their field than you are in their field.

      There may be other ways of producing the experience you value, or indeed entirely novel experiences that would be equally powerful. They can try to reproduce the traditional bike experience, or they can try to redefine it. Chances are they'll fail either way because both are going to be difficult. Still, nobody can really know for sure until they get you on their new bike.

      (4) Care about what users have to say, and listen to them very carefully, but don't believe them. Presuming they haven't contradicted themselves (which they'll do sooner or later), and you build them exactly what they ask for, most of the time they won't like it. I call it the "I know what I don't like when I see it" response. Your job as a designer is to think about what users tell you until you understand at least some of their needs better than they do. Then provide them with something they want without having realized they wanted it.

      All of which means when you design something, it has to be just the right mix of surprising and familiar. The only way to know whether you've achieved that with a product like a high performance electric motorcycle is to build a prototype and have lots of typical users ride it. The results are probably going to be a total dud, as you're expecting. Or they may be a revelation. Or they may work for other people, but not for you.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    41. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been riding for 30+ years, and I would love an electric bike. For me, riding is all about the turns; I like a quiet engine. An electric motor also has tons of torque low down, which is fun and a lot of the appeal of singles and twins. So a good handling electric bike is just what I'm looking for.

    42. Re:Dead on arrival by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link to NoiseOFF. That is a very interesting site. Combined them with the efforts of the International Dark-Sky Association, and the world would be a better place.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    43. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there are the vibrations from the engine. At 90 mph, the engine spins at about 5500 rpm. It's an incredible feeling to sense all that power at my command being exerted.

      You know, you could just buy a motorized dildo instead of annoying us with your loud motorcycle.

    44. Re:Dead on arrival by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nobody can run a bar without CO2 on the kegs. Hand pumped kegs are bad in 3 days, maximum.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You really have come out of the closet as being a total faggot who loves leather and power. I'm salute you for your frankness about being an unabashed homosexual.
       
      But your little motorbike still sucks an asshole.

    46. Re:Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. There'll be a market segment.

      although, I really think Harley should spin off another brand for their electric vehicle division
      Like, seriously -- the kind of people who would buy this aren't interested in the trademark Harley looks or sound. They're uninterested in an Harley Davidson, they just want an electric bike.

  8. Butt pirate outfit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Ever notice how the queers who own Hollywood always sneak in pro-homo garbage in their movies? Like the queer who "peaks" when Adam Sandler is peeing in Little Nicky, a kids' movie?
     
    The same thing happens with the naked queer law enforcement officer in Wild Hogs when his "hey you guyth!!!" while skinny dipping behavior is portrayed over and over and in a positive light.
     
    In conclusion, this is PERFECT for the middle aged homosexual yuppie Harley rider that would be afraid that he would break a fingernail on a REAL Harley and would be afraid that the vibrations from the garbage flathead motor would be too much stimulation on his prostate after the previous night of massage...

    1. Re:Butt pirate outfit! by tepples · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how the [LGBTs] who [allegedly] own Hollywood always sneak in pro-homo garbage in their movies?

      Don't worry; they squeeze in plenty of anti-Homo sentiment as well.

    2. Re:Butt pirate outfit! by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 0

      LGB-Transexual

      --
      Will
    3. Re:Butt pirate outfit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess someone doesn't watch South Park...

  9. From a BMW Rider by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    The "won't be paying enough attention to them" is true enough. But the Dead on arrival comment is perhaps not accurate. Well, accurate enough for a Harley rider. But I rode a BMW R75-5 airhead for a decade or so. Quiet, vibration free. But hardly dull.

  10. What? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How will they make it leak oil and break down like normal Harleys?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:What? by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Funny

      Firmware upgrade

  11. potada by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I bet 50% of the energy goes into the straight pipe boom speakers. potada potada potada....

  12. just buy a vibrator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, it's cheaper and it doesn't annoy the shit out of everyone else. I hear the Sybian is great.

  13. Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Marrow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sound and the fury are great; there is no denying that. But I would be very interested in an electric bike that just runs. No oil, no fuel, no maintenance. Just a ultra-reliable ride.

    1. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're called bicycles.

    2. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > no maintenance

      As someone that just spent $900 on my Harley's 5,00 mile maintenance and almost $1,900 on my Ducati's the 7,500 mile maintenance, I would love to buy an electric bike. The valve shim kit alone is $300 for the Ducati because you need to shim both the opening and closing of the valves unlike any other engine made since the 1930s on a production engine.

      Of course you'll still need to lubricate and adjust the throttle, brake and clutch cables, inspect/repair the brakes, inspect shock absorbers, inspect/replace front fork seals, inspect/add front fork oil, adjust the chain (or belt, if it's a Harley), lubricate steering head bearings, and go over all the critical fasteners. The only real difference is changing the oil and adjusting the valves. Maybe the electric ones aren't that much better.

    3. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it'll still be a Harley. One would be wise to have some decent tools...and a multimeter as well.

    4. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not even a little bit clever.

    5. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you'll still need to lubricate and adjust the throttle, brake and clutch cables

      A throttle cable? Why would you want a cable to move a potentiometer to adjust current flow? Just put the potentiometer on the handlebar and run a wire down to the engine. All solid state.

      Brake cables... maybe, though they could be eliminated if you want.

      Clutch cable? With an electric there's no need for a transmission, so no need for a clutch.

      inspect/repair the brakes

      Yes, although with regenerative braking there's a lot less wear on brake pads and discs.

      inspect shock absorbers, inspect/replace front fork seals, inspect/add front fork oil

      Yes, still need those, although why you wouldn't just go with permanently-sealed shocks I don't know.

      adjust the chain (or belt, if it's a Harley)

      It looks like this model still has a belt, but it could actually be eliminated and replaced with a hub motor.

      lubricate steering head bearings, and go over all the critical fasteners

      Yes, although with so many fewer moving parts there will be far fewer fasteners.

      The only real difference is changing the oil and adjusting the valves.

      Only if you insist on designing an electric bike to be identical to a gasoline-powered bike. But there's really no need to do that.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You'd not want a hub motor because it increases unsprung weight which has an adverse effect on handling. Same with electric cars - Tesla for instance doesn't use hub motors but the traction motor for the Model S is attached to the structure of the body.

      Then again, we are talking about a Hardly Rideable rather than a motorcycle...

    7. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1
      --
      Eat the rich.
    8. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no bicycles that run faster than 80km/h on normal roads.

    9. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, I'll wait until Google invents a self-driving motorcycle. Then I can show off, "Look, ma, no hands!"

    10. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a bicycle that zero to 60s in 4 seconds and hits 90?

    11. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brake cables would never be eliminated. I'm sure there are some vehicles out there that use fly by wire brakes, but even today, most are hydrolic. When they fail, they tend to fail nicely. They rarely just totally give out all at once, they tend to go soft first, letting you know there's something wrong. Regenerative braking, I'm not 100% on exactly how it works, but answer me this, how much does it weigh? The weight of a bike is important, if you drop it, you need to be able to set it back up. Goldwings (or rolling sofas as I like to call them) can't be lifted and it's a huge problem if they fall over. And as much as you might want to say "well, don't drop it" remember that most bikes I've seen that have been dropped were because they parked it in a parking lot on a hot day and the surface sucked and the kickstand sunk in to the ground.

      The suspension design on a bike is extremely different than on a car. It wouldn't surprise me that it was impossible to use a permanently sealed absorber. The people that design bikes aren't idiots, and if they aren't using them, there's probably a reason.

      Also, you're incorrect that there's no need for a transmission. Electrics still have transmissions, they're just different than a standard vehicle. Unless you use direct drive you still need to get the power from the motor to the wheel. And on that point, hub mounted motors aren't a good idea. Beyond screwing up the balance of the bike (which is extremely important btw) and remembering that electric motors are small, but they're not that small, it complicates removal of the back tire. Keep in mind, 10K miles is a long time for a motorcycle tire to last. Mine usually need replaced every 6K. Literally every year I have to buy tires. It's hard enough as it is with the current set up, the thought of having to remove a motor as well is enough to make me cry.

      As for the fasteners, all of the ones related to the engine aren't the ones I'm worried about failing when I'm riding, and those are the only ones being removed.

      You seem to not understand that even with the greatest advances in electric cars, short of the drive train, electrics are almost identical to gasoline. There's over 100 years of engineering and it's stupid to just throw it out. Keep what works. And remember, a lot of what's in a vehicle isn't the drive train, and doesn't rely on the drive train. Unless you have a provably better solution, I wouldn't recommend changing too much.

    12. Re:Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep hearing about how much less maintenance is for an EV but I've also heard Tesla's annual maintenance is 600 usd. I can't speak for motorcycles but my car (that can beat a Tesla Model S on the 0-60 and the quarter miles) costs less than 600 a year for maintenance. Once you discount the amount I'd have to spend on either car (tires, state inspection, wipers, etc etc etc) I've spent about half as much on my car in its 8 year/120k miles of life (and still going strong).
       
      I'm probably going EV after this car dies but I'm highly doubtful that my maintenance costs are suddenly going to get any lighter than what they are today. I know it's not exactly on topic but I find the argument that EVs are less complex thus easier and cheaper to maintain to be questionable.

  14. Re:An electric Harley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy it will be made err assembled in america or it will be history in the Making as Harley davidson finally make an efficient engine!

  15. Sounds by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    They could always digitize the sound of the Harley. That would be cool.

    1. Re:Sounds by maliqua · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      because even if they don't have to be annoying they will still want to be.

  16. So hang on, by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harley Davidson is rebranding itself as Hardley Audible?

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:So hang on, by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 4, Funny

      I understand that they are also developing a graphene playing card / titanium clothespin module that can be attached to the front fork for that awesome 1950s Schwinn Beach Cruiser buzz.

      --
      Will
    2. Re:So hang on, by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      If it has a Harley logo, some idiot will buy it.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    3. Re:So hang on, by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah, you should have said that

      If it has a Harley logo, an awful lot of people with more $$$$$ than sense will buy it. These will be mostly middle aged (or older) men who want to do their 'Easy Rider' trip.

      Yes I do ride bikes but frankly, I'd rather be pushing up dasies than be seen on a Harley. Others will have differing opinions though.

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    4. Re:So hang on, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Harley Davidson is rebranding itself as Hardley Audible?

      The real question is how they're going to make an electric motor leak oil?

    5. Re:So hang on, by Barsteward · · Score: 2

      "make the distinctive 'potato-potato-potato' chug that Harley once tried to patent" - Really???????????????

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    6. Re:So hang on, by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      More dollars than cents? j/k

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:So hang on, by wideglide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends ... I prefer my 1982 H-D Wide Glide Shovelhead over my 1939 BMW R71 ... both are not really reliable but at least the old shovel can almost be used on a regular base. The BMW is a different beast ... And regarding the $$$ for the H-D - I bought it new in '82 when everybody was talking about H-D shutting down. Rode her around the mediterranean in '82 and up to the north cape in '83 - over 330'000 km with 2 rebuilds. The price was steep even then but I wanted it and I worked 2 shifts for 1 1/2 year to get the cash together. The electro bike looks sharp, I'd love to test ride one of these. And with a range of around 200 km I could live. Not doing long tours anymore ... just some small roads on a clear evening or saturday / sunday. No traffic, scenery is beatiful and this will burn the days issues and stress away. Bikes are like women - they come in all flavours. To each his own ...

      --
      The sum of intelligence on a planet is constant. Nowadays we have more people. When classic goes away, so do I. Copy
    8. Re:So hang on, by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in the early days, Harley-Davidson used to make bikes known as "silent grey fellows". A stock modern Harley is actually surprisingly quiet, while still having that characteristic lumpy idle that has become their trademark.

      They only become unbearably loud when dumbass idiots put SCREAMIN' EAGLE pipes on their bikes because LOUD PIPES SAVE LIVES and CHOPPER CHOPPER CHOPPER CHOPPER, 'MURICA!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    9. Re:So hang on, by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Inversely , some genius will buy it too.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:So hang on, by flyneye · · Score: 1

      No, no, Im in total agreement that Id rather see you pushing up daisies than riding a Harley.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    11. Re:So hang on, by flyneye · · Score: 0

      Dumbass , an 82 is a knucklehead. Shovels are closer to being a 47. A transplant makes about as much sense as putting a model T engine in a Mustang. Not to mention its the dumbest bullshit story I ever heard without a lot of beer around.
      Wannabes always out themselves at the peak of bullshit.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:So hang on, by wideglide · · Score: 1

      looks like you are having a bad day - did your medicine run out ?

      --
      The sum of intelligence on a planet is constant. Nowadays we have more people. When classic goes away, so do I. Copy
    13. Re:So hang on, by PatMouser · · Score: 1

      Umm, no. You're the dumbass. Knuckleheads were made from 1936-1947, shovelheads were made from 1966-1984.

      http://www.harley-davidson.com...

      http://www.harley-davidson.com...

    14. Re:So hang on, by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You've still got a transmission that needs lubrication :D

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:So hang on, by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'lumpy idle'? Is that a nice way of saying rough, missy, terrible?

      I've been looking for something nice to say about fords sense they sold their tractor division (they used to make good tractors). Any ideas?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:So hang on, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will be an app for that.

    17. Re:So hang on, by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Bikes are like women - they come in all flavours. To each his own ...

      And you know something is wrong when they are silent.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    18. Re:So hang on, by wideglide · · Score: 1

      so 1982 fits the year for a shovel ... as I wrote '...my 1982 H-D Wide Glide Shovelhead ...' - in switzerland the '1982' means build year, not engine size (which is still around 80 cui, barrels & pistons on 2nd oversize.

      --
      The sum of intelligence on a planet is constant. Nowadays we have more people. When classic goes away, so do I. Copy
    19. Re:So hang on, by PatMouser · · Score: 1

      Yep, I was replying to flyneye, not you. Sorry for the confusion...

  17. Electric motors are awesome! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    It's electric storage that is the problem. Fix the range problem, and I'm not talking about the average or median range here, and we"ll all be golden.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  18. Re:Dead on arrival (not) by patniemeyer · · Score: 1

    Your thinking about the engine noise will totally change after you drive an electric bike that is faster and better performing than any gas bike could ever be... You'll pull up next to someone with an old fashioned gas bike roaring and making noise and fumes and you'll just effortlessly smoke them while they are roaring and straining to keep up with you.... and you'll start to think of the noise not as power but as "poser"... like a fake strong man groaning to lift a tiny weight or a rock guitar player making that strained face as if it it takes physical effort to play. It will happen to you...

  19. Imagine a bike that only needs tires and brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a screaming electric motor might sound pretty good.

  20. loud = fast NOT by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"with the electric Harley able to go from 0 to 60 mph in four seconds."

    Wow, so that makes it only twice as slow as my old gas Kawasaki. Extreme noise (because people think loud = performance, which it does not) and vibration (along with poor handling and old tech) are Harley trademarks... I can't imagine why they would be interested in producing such a model.

  21. Re:Loud for a reason by mark-t · · Score: 1

    FYI.... these motorbikes are not silent. Watch the video.

  22. Dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe you have to see south park season 13 episode 12 'the f word'. I have about the same view about bikers.

  23. Re:loud = fast NOT by PinJunkie · · Score: 1

    Wow, so that makes it only twice as slow as my old gas Kawasaki.

    but twice as fast as your gas Harley.

  24. Wonderful by msobkow · · Score: 1

    They'll finally have a model that doesn't sound like an elephant with a bad case of gas. :(

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  25. If it's anything like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwHO6sC7Lhs

    Then it's an entirely different experience with sound and feeling. That rotor whine is terrifying and the tire noise... damn. It's like driving an insane predator drone.

  26. Tesla superchargers by gringer · · Score: 1

    And now that Tesla has freed up the patents for their superchargers, you'll be able to plug an electric bike into something that uses that connection and current (not necessarily the Tesla ones). Given that the motorcycle battery packs are much smaller than the car packs, I don't expect that a 2-minute charge to full would be out of the question.

    That might almost be quicker than walking up to a cashier and paying money, and certainly would be quicker if you're not the first person in line.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  27. It's 2014 now by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Back in 2000 I had some students who put together an electric bike that could do 0-60km/h in about 5 seconds (the Harley doing miles is of course much more impressive). With a range of around 100km. Fourteen years ago. With lead-acid batteries. Put together by undergraduate students.
    With vast advances in batteries, motors, everything that range problem is now around equivalent to the "range problem" with a tank of fuel. There's still a fast charging problem but the "range problem" has effectively vanished unless you are talking about an offroad vehicle with nowhere to recharge.

    1. Re:It's 2014 now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "range problem" has effectively vanished unless you are talking about...
      distances greater than 27 miles ???
      WTF

    2. Re:It's 2014 now by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      The range problem has vanished if your benchmark is bikes with tanks so small they have a range of about 150 km. I ride further than that before my first stop most days. The benchmarks for range are touring and sport-touring bikes with large tanks that are capable of 350-450 km between stops.

      When an electric finishes the Iron Butt Rally, I'll say the range and charge time problems are licked.

    3. Re:It's 2014 now by dbIII · · Score: 1
      This one says 225km:
      http://www.zelectricvehicle.com/18.html

      The benchmarks for range are touring and sport-touring bikes with large tanks

      That's a niche even among fuel driven bikes so you shouldn't expect electric bike manufacturers to go for that before even gaining traction in the mainstream.

  28. hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the summary it mentions electric motors provide "better handling". Handling in vehicle terms is a function of chassis rigidity and geometry, suspension and a lot of other very complex factors. None of which are related to the powerplant itself. Admittedly they have stated the motor is placed low in the chassis facilitating a low CofG, but that is also something you can do with a IC engine with good design choice. Look at the design of the humble Honda C90. Or a BMW flat twin, or or or or or...

    After that bullshit, I didn't bother reading more since it can no longer be considered a reliable article, rather like the zero announcement where it goes on to shout numbers, then mentions quietly that the numbers being quoted everywhere are from the race prepped limited bike prepared for the bonniville attempt.

    TMH, too much hype.

  29. A Harley that isn't obnoxious? by sjbe · · Score: 0

    I'll believe it if they ever really sell any. I'm tired of listening to d-bags on Harley's violating every noise ordinance without consequence or consideration.

  30. The build quality by rundgong · · Score: 1

    My father always said you had to be a mechanic if you wanted to own one of the old Harleys.
    Well I guess things change. In the future you have to be an electrician... :-)

    1. Re:The build quality by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you'll still need to be a mechanic. If you've seen H-D build quality, you know they haven't even mastered welding yet. Every time I see detailed pictures of a harley part, or god forbid see it in person, I am staggered with wonderment that anyone would pay that much for that piece of shit. I guess no Harley owners ever really look at their bike, because from a distance it looks pretty nice, but when you get up close you can see that they did everything the cheapest, heaviest way. There is no finesse anywhere on the typical H-D, just lots and lots of steel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The build quality by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      There is no finesse anywhere on the typical H-D, just lots and lots of chromed steel.

      Got to have something to polish, aside from their ego, and their... Ahem... Helmet.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  31. As a Motorcyclist, I Declare "Meh" by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

    The limits of existing battery chemistries is what will reduce the LiveWire to an expensive hipster commuter toy. A 54 mile range per charge is not sufficient for anything but a typical daily Home - Office - Grocery Store - Home - Recharge cycle and the price will kill consumer interest. No one is going to buy this EV motorcycle for weekend back road twisties or poker runs. Or Track Day. Or pretty much anything else people use motorcycles for.

    For electric vehicles to be practical a significant breakthrough in battery technology must occur on two fronts - Batteries must become significantly cheaper, have significantly higher energy density (storage), or both.

    One of the many reasons an EV motorcycle makes little sense is that it erases one of the attractions of motorcycles in the first place - Price. $4-12k will buy nearly any Japanese brand you care to consider, brand new off the dealer floor. I absolutely guarantee the LiveWire will cost > $20k, just like the other boutique electric cycles out in the wild. That's well into "fuck it, I'll buy a Prius" territory.

      Then, add the "Harley Tax." Ha! And you thought the "pride of ownership / marketing brainwashing tax" only applied to your MacBook! Tell that to people who ride what are essentially farm tractor engines sold for > $20,000.

    A brand new Honda CBR 250 costs $4,000 and will get > 50 mpg. http://powersports.honda.com/2...
    A Honda VStrom 700 costs $9,000 and gets >60 mpg.

    Neither of the two random bikes I listed above needs to be plugged into a 220v outlet for nearly 4 hours to "refuel." You can ride both of them all day on one "charge" of fuel and refill them in 1 minute at any one of hundreds of thousands of fuel stations.

    John McCain may have been right about one thing, years ago during his campaign - We need a "Manhattan Project" level of concerted effort into producing an evolutionary leap in battery technology. THAT will change the world - not shoehorning a pile of laptop batteries into a motorcycle frame and calling it the wheel reinvented.

    Someone in Milwaukee got tired of watching Elon hog all the media adoration a year or so ago, and decided to create a Halo product that won't break even but will bring young buyers back to Harley Dealerships.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    1. Re:As a Motorcyclist, I Declare "Meh" by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "A 54 mile range per charge is not sufficient for anything but a typical daily Home - Office - Grocery Store - Home - Recharge cycle and the price will kill consumer interest."

      Err, ITYF a lot of people don't much like the image of scooters and buy a bike anyway just to commute. For those sorts of people this is ideal. You have a point about the price though.

      " No one is going to buy this EV motorcycle for weekend back road twisties or poker runs. Or Track Day. Or pretty much anything else people use motorcycles for."

      No one buys current harleys for any of the above either - they're for going in a straight line and posing. End.

    2. Re:As a Motorcyclist, I Declare "Meh" by Thagg · · Score: 1

      *sigh* that's a Suzuki DL-650 Vstrom, not a Honda. The new one does get about 60mpg, my 2009 only about 55.

      I agree with those that say that, unfortunately, this is not going to be a successful bike. I really like the idea of an electric motorcycle, but it should come from a company that does exactly that. H-D fans aren't going to want it, and the insane high price that they will charge for the nameplate will keep others from buying it. I'd love a 60 mile-range electric bike that cost $10,000. I'd buy it tomorrow, but this isn't that.

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    3. Re:As a Motorcyclist, I Declare "Meh" by Altus · · Score: 1

      to be fair, people said the same kinds of things about the V-rod and that has sold quite well. As it is I think this bike has some issues, too expensive (well, most harleys are) for a commuter only bike, too short a range for a long weekend adventure, but its a first step in a new direction.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  32. Loud pipes save lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As both a Harley Rider and a cyclist I can safely say I have zero interest in this idea. One of the main things I like about my Harley is that motorists can hear it. They seem to be blind to bikes (motor or push) but they always hear my Harley coming.

    When I come to a junction on my pushbike it's quite common for a motorist coming out of a side road to slam on their brakes at the last minute because they simply haven't seen me on my pushbike (even worse they'll cut me up). They never, ever fail to notice when I'm on my Harley as you can clearly tell that even if they haven;t seen me they've heard me coming.

    Loud pipes save lives.

    On which note how they hell are wildlife supposed to know that a vechile is coming when it's making no sound ? The trend towards quiet vechiles is an environmental disaster. At the very least all electric vechiles should have to put out directed ultrasound in front of them to give the poor critters a chance to hear them and get out of the way.

    Loud pipes save lives.

    1. Re:Loud pipes save lives. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Loud paint saves lives, not loud pipes. Get a grip. Stop trying to find excuses to be an annoying muppet on the road. Do you think drivers are driving around not listening to their stereo, with their windows down, just listening out for loud muppet bikes, so they can get out of their way? Of course not. They're using their eyes to look for hazards. Even if they can hear your bike, they might not know where it's coming from, as sound isn't a great way to locate something in a noisy environment (compared to something like, I don't know, light).

      So again: Stop trying to find excuses to be a muppet. The only people who think loud bikes are cool are loud bike owners and 8-year-old boys. Everyone else knows you are compensating. Watch South Park s13e12. Please.

    2. Re:Loud pipes save lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then how will i hear you annoying fags coming in time to load my gun and get out to the front porch

    3. Re:Loud pipes save lives. by Altus · · Score: 1

      Its a shame you have to paint your bike black when you put aftermarket pipes on it. I really wish someone could do something about that.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  33. Re:Loud for a reason by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Loud pipes don't save lives. Loud paint does.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  34. Re:loud = fast NOT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    but twice as fast as your gas Harley.

    Can a gas harley actually make 0-60 in only eight seconds? Hmm, looks like yes. Even a fat boy can make it in 7.2 seconds. My car can do it in 6.7, but I have to admit it's a $70,000 piece of kit. Well, originally. I paid less. A lot less. It's kind of amazing how poor the performance is on harleys. How do they actually make the bikes perform that poorly?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. EV bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it might not sound like a harley. But the acceleration on electric vehicles is insane. All that torque doesn't need windowdressing by sound, it'll just shoot off. It might not be what you expect for a bike, but the idea has merit.

  36. Except Ford, sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly they're routing sound from the engine into the passenger compartment so
    the engine sounds "good" when you stomp on the gas. Interestingly enough even car
    reviewers like this feature.

  37. Re:loud = fast NOT by karnal · · Score: 1

    Low RPM low horsepower air cooled. I know some are probably water cooled, but they're still rather low performers out of the gate.

    I switched from a "touring" bike that just about every biker in america seems to ADORE (taken from my experience at biker gatherings and punchy quips thrown at my ride) to a sport touring bike that looks like a crotch rocket but with a much better seating position. Going from a 0-60 of around 9 seconds as well as a horrible handling ride to one that does the same in 2.8 seconds and is beautiful to handle is such an awesome experience. Shame I can't convince the haters to at least try it before they hate.

    --
    Karnal
  38. Re:loud = fast NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but twice as fast as your gas Harley.

    Can a gas harley actually make 0-60 in only eight seconds? Hmm, looks like yes. Even a fat boy can make it in 7.2 seconds. My car can do it in 6.7, but I have to admit it's a $70,000 piece of kit. Well, originally. I paid less. A lot less. It's kind of amazing how poor the performance is on harleys. How do they actually make the bikes perform that poorly?

    Making them is the easy part... it's how they manage to sell them that confuses me.

  39. Re:loud = fast NOT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Low RPM low horsepower air cooled.

    All that sounds great until you get to the "low reliability" part. And then you need special tools. Might as well drive a VW [original] beetle convertible. You'll look just as anachronistic, it will cost you almost as much, you'll sound just as stupid but not quite as loud, and people will see you! It will break down just as much, but parts are a hell of a lot cheaper and more readily available.

    If only harleys would just run forever without literally shaking themselves apart, then they would have a reason to exist beyond fanboyism.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. What? by Bravoc · · Score: 1

    How will they make it leak oil and break down like normal Harleys?

    You obviously haven't owned a Harley in the last 30 years or so.

  41. Re:Dead on arrival (not) by Blrfl · · Score: 1

    ...an electric bike that is faster and better performing than any gas bike could ever be...

    I'm as excited about electrics as the next guy, but there's a fistful of gassers that will run rings around the current crop of electrics on performance measures alone and an armload if you factor range into it. That will change, but I'm not holding my breath for something that fits my needs (fast, comfortable and capable of 500-mile days without gaps in the middle) in the next 5-7 years.

    The Livewire has marginally better torque- and power-to-weight ratios than HD's Sportster 883, which isn't a stellar performer by any measure. What it does have is full torque available from zero, and that makes it a good (but not fantastic) stoplight racer.

  42. New electric Harley by zeroryoko1974 · · Score: 1

    With optional sound effect machine to make really loud obnoxious exhaust noise so you don't feel left out

  43. Loud bikes are just obnoxious by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Ever heard those crazy bastards claim "loud pipes save lives"?

    Which is BS argument. There is NO excuse for most Harley's being as loud as they are. It's just noise pollution. Nobody buys a Harley because they are concerned about their safety.

    1. Re:Loud bikes are just obnoxious by Altus · · Score: 1

      Nobody buys a motorcycle because they are concerned about their safety, the idea that somehow harleys are extra dangerous is asinine. Motorcycles are dangerous, in large part because car drivers are often distracted and don't notice bikes on the road around them.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:Loud bikes are just obnoxious by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Nobody buys a motorcycle because they are concerned about their safety, the idea that somehow harleys are extra dangerous is asinine.

      Harley's aren't extra dangerous, they are just extra annoying. There is NO reason for any street legal motorcycle to be as loud as your typical harley. None. They are tuned needlessly loud - to the point where they can damage hearing. They almost certainly violate most noise ordinances. In fact their noise level is so high that if one is operating near you, you can barely hear anything else including some things you might actually want to hear. People who ride bikes tuned that loud are self indulgent assholes who have no consideration for anyone around them.

      Motorcycles are dangerous, in large part because car drivers are often distracted and don't notice bikes on the road around them.

      Motorcycles are dangerous for several reasons. 1) They have essentially no protective shell or other safety equipment comparable to that in a car. If you hit something the only thing between you and whatever you hit is whatever clothing/helmet you are wearing. This rarely ends well for the rider. 2) Motorcycles have an extremely high power/weight ratio. This means they are fast - your typical crotch rocket is MUCH faster than any car you can buy. Too often the person riding the bike cannot handle its full capabilities. 3) Motorcycles are small and easy to overlook even by attentive drivers much less the distracted texting-while-driving assholes you often find on the road. 4) Too many motorcycle riders do not ride sufficiently cautiously or defensively. They tend to be ridden by young men who are seeking thrills and who think they are bulletproof. I've seen jackasses literally doing wheelies while passing me on a highway. 5) Bikes have fewer wheels and thus are inherently less stable than a vehicles with more points of contact with the road. A 2X4 laying across a road is no big deal for a typical car but can easily result in a motorcycle wreck.

      You'll notice that noise isn't mentioned above. Noise doesn't make a motorcycle safer nor more dangerous except in rare circumstances. There is no credible evidence that I'm aware of that harley riders get in accidents at a rate that is statistically significantly different (better or worse) than other motorcycle riders. If the noise was related to safety in any way, you would expect to see a difference in accident rates.

  44. Noise != Safety by sjbe · · Score: 1

    They uniformly tell me that they see loud pipes as a critical safety measure to make drivers aware that they're there.

    Which is a load of crap. I ride a bicycle which makes basically no noise whatsoever and I've managed to never get hit by a car. My safety is primarily dependent on my riding habits. I don't do stupid things and then expect others to compensate for me. Nobody rides a motorcycle because they are deeply concerned about their safety. Furthermore the loud noise is primarily behind you so it does little for safety anyway. People like loud Harley's because they think it is badass and they want to show off.

  45. We might just get this by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    We've talked about getting a motorcycle for around town use. I work four miles from the office and I feel silly driving a mid-size sedan here daily, especially since I can avoid major highways (except for one traffic light controlled intersection.) I wouldn't take a motorcycle on anything bigger than a two lane road (too many idiots on highways).

    Most importantly, the local Harley shop is about three blocks from my house. If it does something strange I can walk it to the shop for repairs.... assuming it has the electric equivalent of a neutral gear.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:We might just get this by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      I think his point was more that if it breaks, there needs to be a way to disconect the rear wheel from the motor so the bike can be pushed around. I'd think that from a practical standpoint, you'd have to have that for everyday use anyway unless you can run it in reverse.

  46. Doppler effect by sjbe · · Score: 1

    umm NO. sound travels in both directions, a bike does not move at sufficient speed for sound to only be behind them.

    Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Doppler effect. Even on a Harley making a huge obnoxious racket it is easy to get dangerously close to someone before they hear you.

    The benefit of hearing a bike is not for cars on the interstate, it is for pedestrians that will step out in front of you, people that are doing slow speed manoeuvres that may fail to see you in the mirrors but still might hear you coming 20-50 yards behind them.

    Safety does not depend on others hearing you. Safety results from proper and responsible bike handling. YOU need to be aware of what is around you. YOU need to ride cautiously and defensively. Ride like a bicycle rider does and presume everyone around you is an idiot unaware of your existence.

    1. Re:Doppler effect by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Doppler effect [wikipedia.org]. Even on a Harley making a huge obnoxious racket it is easy to get dangerously close to someone before they hear you

      Perhaps you should have read the article you cited. Doppler shift affects the observed frequency of the sounds but does not affect the speed at which that sound travels in a given medium. In addition it is the difference between the speeds of the observer and the source. If both are traveling at the same relative speed, there will not be a shift in the frequency for that observer.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Doppler effect by Altus · · Score: 1

      Humm, they why is it that I can hear them coming up my street 10 seconds before I can see them? I must have magic ears.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:Doppler effect by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      More likely, you live in a place where there are surfaces behind the riders for the noise to reflect and bounce back in your direction.

      Go to a wide open area sometime and have anything with an audible exhaust drive by you. You'll hear a lot more if it as heads away than when it's coming toward you.

  47. Loud bikes are obnoxious by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Bikers such as myself appreciate the engine noise their bikes make. It's a marvelous thing.

    "Marvelous"? It's obnoxious, wasteful and noise pollution. I think people with loud bike are self indulgent a-holes.

    As you can expect, none of these things are present in an electric bike

    If you think there aren't thrills to be had on a fast electric bike then you are Doing It Wrong.

  48. Sound and fury by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The sound and the fury are great; there is no denying that.

    I'll deny it. The "sound and fury" are obnoxious. There is NO need for it. It is wasteful and self indulgent.

  49. Faster than a Gas Harley maybe, but not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0-60 in 4 seconds seems fast, until you compare it to modern day sport bikes, my old Kawi could hit 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, and that bike is slow compared to newer ones that are out. And believe me 0-60 in 2.8 is ripping fast.. I used to get off that thing every time feeling like they should be illegal, but smiling from ear to damn ear and thankful they were not.. :)

    Now, before the Jap vs HD flamewar, I love, and have owned Harley's too, and actually this electric bike looks better than I thought it would. Would be interesting to take it for a spin..

  50. This is news because it's Harley by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    When companies like Zero and Brammo actually produce and sell electric motorcycles, it isn't news. But when Harley-Davidson announces that they will do the same at some point, it's big news.

    That said, I do applaud this effort -- the more companies that make electric vehicles, the better.

  51. "Project Livewire" by LeadSongDog · · Score: 2

    What, "ElectraGlide" was taken?

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  52. HDs are junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet it will still leak oil.

  53. We might just get this by computrius · · Score: 1

    "assuming it has the electric equivalent of a neutral gear." I don't think there would need to be. An electric engine doesn't need to remain running like a gas engine. You give it power and it goes. Though I think I would be disappointed if there was no need to shift gears. That is half the fun. I like manual transmissions.

  54. We might just get this by computrius · · Score: 1

    Aparently I can edit my post. I just noticed I misunderstood what you said. So strike the "I don't think there would need to be. An electric engine doesn't need to remain running like a gas engine. You give it power and it goes. ".

  55. Electric, hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will it still be able to leak oil all over your garage floor?

  56. Re:loud = fast NOT by Altus · · Score: 1

    my harley is nearly 15 years old and it runs beautifully... The new engines (the ones that started with the 88ci one back in 1999) are really quite reliable and pleasant to work on when you need to. Tools are simple and plentiful. Honestly if you want to talk about bikes that are a bitch to work on its got to be 80s era Japanese bikes. I had a Yamaha Maxim that had an electrical diagram that would make your head spin and the engines are often so compact that they are incredibly hard to work on, especially on the side of the road.

    luckily, while harley has improved its reliability, Japanese bikes have improved their maintainability and right now there are a ton of good bikes on the road, not to mention Victory and Indian and a lot of Euro brands that you didn't see in the states back then. Its a good time to be on 2 wheels.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  57. Re:loud = fast NOT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The electrical complexity of a motorcycle can never get all that egregious, because there's only room for a few dozen yards of wire :) But I take your point about the parts being packed in tight.

    I'm in the middle of disconnecting the entire engine bay/undercar harness on my A8 D2 so that I can track down whatever faults are causing it to throw codes intermittently while otherwise working beautifully. Clear codes, drive for miles, then suddenly there's like six codes. I pulled the intake manifold already, and removed most of the harness. I should have done more work on it before I installed the intake manifold, but luckily it seems to have come off without anything happening to the gaskets... There's probably more wiring just under the hood than there was on your entire Yamahahaha, even if you don't count the E-box.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. Range on a racing bike by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It appears this one is designed for performance not range. Since that bunch of undergrads 14 years ago got 100km on a relatively low budget I'd say a professionally designed machine with modern batteries could do something with reasonable performance as well as decent range instead of this thing that sacrifices range for performance.
    So the main cause of the range problem now is designers thinking that other things are more important. There's probably already long range electric bikes out there with a top speed around highway speed limits.

  59. Electric Harley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Electric Harley" would be an awesome name for a rock band!!!!!

  60. Like a REAL Harley by bregmata · · Score: 1

    The expensive part comes from sticking a credit card in the spokes to make it sound like a real motorcycle.