Slashdot Mirror


UK Man Sentenced To 16 Months For Exporting 'E-Waste' Despite 91% Reuse

retroworks writes: The Guardian uses a stock photo of obvious electronic junk in its coverage of the sentencing of Joseph Benson of BJ Electronics. But film of the actual containers showed fairly uniform, sorted televisions which typically work for 20 years. In 2013, the Basel Convention Secretariat released findings on a two-year study of the seized sea containers containing the alleged "e-waste," including Benson's in Nigeria, and found 91% of the devices were working or repairable. The study, covered by Slashdot in Feb. 2013, declared the shipments legal, and further reported that they were more likely to work than new product sent to Africa (which may be shelf returns from bad lots, part of the reason Africans prefer used TVs from nations with strong warranty laws).

Director of regulated industry Harvey Bradshaw of the U.K. tells the Guardian: "This sentence is a landmark ruling because it's the first time anyone has been sent to prison for illegal waste exports." But five separate university research projects question what the crime was, and whether prohibition in trade is really the best way to reduce the percentage of bad product (less than 100% waste). Admittedly, I have been following this case from the beginning and interviewed both Benson and the Basel Secretariat Executive Director, and am shocked that the U.K. judge went ahead with the sentencing following the publication of the E-Waste Assessment Study last year. But what do Slashdotters think about the campaign to arrest African geeks who pay 10 times the value of scrap for used products replaced in rich nations?

212 comments

  1. And yet by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Somehow, it's worse in th eUSA

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the problem with Capitalism these days, if you're not bribing the right people in government, you can't sell stuff.

    2. Re: And yet by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is that a capitalism problem? Capitalism puts emphasis on the private sector, not the government. Furthermore, I don't think this is even something advocated by any private entities. All of the lobbying behind this is environmentalist groups (which actually tend to lean socialist and/or communist) who think that they're doing the planet a favor by preventing used electronics from going to countries that are often the last stop in the useful life of goods (when they "recycle" them, they send to scrap the valuable raw materials, and just trash or burn the rest.)

      In this case, you have to decide what is worse: Preventing all technology exports to these countries (which guarantees that they'll remain in third world status forever) or allowing about 20% of these goods to end up being discarded on the ground.

      This problem is cultural in nature rather than cost related in nature. For example, in countries like Liberia it is actually common for people to defecate in public and just leave it there (they don't even bury it,) and often eat in the same place (breaking the old "don't shit where you eat" rule.) This creates a health AND environmental hazard that really has nothing to do with technology or politics, rather it's just really bad decisions made by the people over there.

      Depriving them of technology will NOT solve this problem.

    3. Re: And yet by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, the party elite in the soviet union were bribed regularly in order to make sure things happened when they needed to. A government demanding bribes for doing what it's supposed to do is not 'capitalism.'

    4. Re:And yet by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. Because selling used equipment to Africa can be called illegal export of e-waste, it has to be destroyed and a lot ends up in landfills. Real fucking green.

    5. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Everything is capitalism, and the price is always negotiable, depending on the weaponry you hold. Some markets are more open than others. That is the sole difference amongst all nations.

    6. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the party elite in the soviet union were bribed regularly in order to make sure things happened when they needed to. A government demanding bribes for doing what it's supposed to do is not 'capitalism.'

      i wonder if APK can convince governments to use HOSTS files, freeing up computational resources to come up with solutions to this problem.

    7. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you convince him to take his drugs.

    8. Re: And yet by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      In this case, you have to decide what is worse: Preventing all technology exports to these countries (which guarantees that they'll remain in third world status forever) or allowing about 20% of these goods to end up being discarded on the ground.

      False dichotomy. The computers can be sorted into useful and not before shipment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re: And yet by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. The computers can be sorted into useful and not before shipment.

      Well...no. Remember this is the LAST STOP. Even if it is useful when it arrives, it doesn't stay useful forever. And once it stops being useful, then where does it go?

    10. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It's the logical result of capitalism: You get the best government money can buy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Where do ours go if we can't dump them on Africa?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, it's "greedy". And considering greed is one of the main reasons why people go into politics, it's system independent.

      Ah, it's heart warming to see that after all at least some creeds unite politicians all over the globe.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked most of the crap that we consider bleedin' edge technology is manufactured by the yellow man, with the software inside being made by the light brown man.

      If you want to be racist, at least choose your battles in such a way that you don't look like white trash in the end.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re: And yet by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Hey keep quiet. if the NSA used host files snowden would've failed. Don't give them ideas.

    15. Re:And yet by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dell has a program here where I live to destroy all computers that are donated to Goodwill. It doesn't matter if it's two years old or ten years old, if you donate a PC to Goodwill, Dell has a bounty on it and off it goes to the shredder.

      I'd hardly call it a 'green' program. It's Dell insuring that there isn't a strong secondary market for PCs. It's heartbreaking sometimes to see the nice new keyboards, mice, and displays come out on the sales floor, and know that recent-vintage machines were probably donated with them.

      Oh, and it's because the bogey-man would get the 'information' on the hard drives. And... and... and... somebody might install something from Microsoft on the machines that they didn't properly pay for... or worse... something other than Microsoft.

    16. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lesson to all you kids, post all truth anonymously to keep your karma up. The shills have too much power.

    17. Re: And yet by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      And once it stops being useful, then where does it go?

      My environmental training goes basically 'reduce, reuse, recycle, only then discard.

      As such, I think there's serious issues with this case. Even if they end up discarded rather than recycled, from what I've read recycling is often not all that 'environmental', due to the pollution and waste caused by the act of collection and recycling. Reuse avoids the expense of tear-down and rebuild, and is thus often cheaper*.

      Worst case I think is that the stuff ends up stored in a dump until it becomes economical to extract again. There's plenty in things like computers that is rare enough that it's higher density in computers than in the original ore, so once you pile up enough of it to justify the expense of installing a processor in the area, it's easy. Making it easier yet would be that there are large deposits of rare elements in Africa that could be a stimulus.

      *Plastic vs glass bottles is one counter-example.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    18. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe, a larg portion of them will be properly recycled. That means the toxic components will be removed and treated properly. That's not something you can rely on in Africa.

      Difficult call, but it must be done officially and with people properly calculating the lesser evils.

    19. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wait a month or so until things quiet down and dump it on Africa. If somehow the continent disappeared, the waste would just get dumped on that trash island.

      People ignore the real problem isn't useful electronics but dumping trash on someone's else's soil. Here the government had to prohibit importing tires because used tires were being legally imported and (not quite as legally) dumped. Controlling the illegal dumping directly was much harder than stopping it at the border. Not that in Africa that would work, since the only rule in most of its countries is the golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.
      Of course, electronics that don't work anymore aren't quite trash yet. Africans extract valuable metals from them. The nasty chemicals that don't end up in their lungs go to the ground.
      One could argue that at least a few of them are getting enough to eat through that horrible deal. The same argument could be used to defend slavery.

    20. Re: And yet by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I'm not so sure. The stuff is sorted by chunks and in bulk. No one ever desolders components to remove specific toxic components. Rather they strip out the wires, separate a picture tube, and grind the rest up. Often they send this stuff to third world countries where the labor rates are better for handling waste (and regulations more lax).

      Europe does have laws that the original manufacturer must accept the products for recycling, but there's no guarantee that they will do the sorts of recycling that the consumers naively expect will happen.

      So what's better, shipping brand new TVs to Africa or shipping older TVs to Africa that work just find but which first world people think are no longer cool. Oddly the first case seems to be legal but the more efficient second case is not. Poor countries like to reuse things, rich countries prefer to throw away stuff and buy new replacements.

    21. Re:And yet by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This isn't really Dell, but many people just do not want an older computer, even if poor or a charity. Definitely the schools refuse this stuff, they sometimes even refuse new stuff if it's not high enough quality.

    22. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked most of the crap that we consider bleedin' edge technology is manufactured by the yellow man, with the software inside being made by the light brown man.

      Coincidentally, nothing these days works quite ruight and it breaks after three years.

    23. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Damn, you're stupid.

      Most of these "environmental" laws exist to stifle the used product market, preventing manufacturers from being undercut by their own older models. This is capitalism buying regulations in their favor.

    24. Re: And yet by SourceFrog · · Score: 2
      I know I'm fighting a losing battle by pointing out the obvious but that isn't "capitalism" - by definition.

      Capitalism is defined as a system in which private property rights are respected and people have the right to trade. A system which requires bribing officials to use force to limit trade of private property or sieze the private property of others, by definition, falls outside that definition.

      But yeah, this is a long-lost battle to redefine the word amongst the public to mean "whatever evil shit corporations in bed with government do"

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    25. Re:And yet by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      Destroying working equipment and criminalizing the export of working equipment is just plain evil. If disposal thereof is a problem, then enforce disposal laws.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    26. Re: And yet by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      It's the capitalism we've got. The theoretical perfect capitalism would function without bribes, but then so would the theoretical perfect socialism.

    27. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Capitalism puts emphasis on the private sector, not the government."

      Capitalism owns the government. Wake the fuck up.

    28. Re:And yet by ruir · · Score: 1

      Yep, for sure, google was founded in bangalore and linus is from New Delhi.

    29. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this a capitalism problem? Because capitalists realize they can use laws to their favor.

      If as the article says, the "new" products are so shabby, the capitalist selling them needs to block the better functioning used items.

    30. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why I've been having a hard time finding older computer parts for my old DOS gaming machine. Thanks, Dell...

    31. Re: And yet by JRV31 · · Score: 2

      Here in the USA we call bribes campaign contributions.

    32. Re: And yet by pla · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. The computers can be sorted into useful and not before shipment.

      TFA talks specifically about CRTs. It really doesn't matter whether or not they still work - You can't give the damned things away. If you leave it on the curb with a "free" sign, you'll come home to find someone has smashed the end off to get the five-pounds-of-copper yoke, and left the rest there for you to sweep up.

      So if some 4th-worlders can make use of obsolete-but-still-functioning monitors, hey, great! Why wouldn't we let them have as many as they want?

    33. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Corrupt Chicago Politics, everything they touch ends up destroyed...

    34. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most reasoned people would correctly interpret the parent statement as a tongue-in-cheek remark about the modern state of government and it's relationship with it's supposed "capitalism". Instead you interpreted it as an attack on the philosophy of capitalism. I strongly suspect you did this eagerly, seeking an opportunity to rant about something.

    35. Re: And yet by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The same argument could be used to defend slavery.

      No, not really; tribal Africa had plenty of food (and everyone got what they needed) when white people were buying slaves from the tribal leaders, so they were already being fed at that point. Now, poor people in Africa starve to death, which means anything that provides them a job is an actual improvement; very different from slavery, but that was a nice try.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    36. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overlook the fact that the duds function as a spare parts source.
      The people who made the law do not have sufficient training in technology.
      Let my people go.

    37. Re:And yet by volmtech · · Score: 1

      On a trip to our dump five years ago I found a perfectly usable Dell. It had a random reboot problem but as a project for my son it was great. We upgraded the processor and memory, then a new video card. I eventually had to put a new motherboard in it. Now when we go to the dump he plunders through the e-waste pile looking for a system he can refurbish for any of his friends.

    38. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes nobody cares about the environment, its all driven by the corporations and their fatcat c-level execs to maximize their profits and drive the poor unthinking masses into a cycle of product obsolescence ahahahahahahahahaha!

    39. Re: And yet by unitron · · Score: 1

      Did tribal Africa have plenty of food because some of them were selling others of them to slavers, or were they selling each other in spite of not needing to do it to ensure an adequate food supply?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    40. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Since Africa survived quite ok before the white man came (actually, there were a lot of very prosperous empires in Africa before we decided to "civilize" them), I'd guess that they were able to sustain themselves to the point where it was possible to actually establish such empires.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    41. Re:And yet by rhazz · · Score: 1

      This is just completely incorrect. I put up a 10 year old laptop on my local freecycle (a yahoo group for free items) overnight. I took the post down immediately the next morning because I had over a hundred emails from people who wanted it. I even mentioned in the post that the battery didn't work so it had to be plugged in to use. I've also been passing my used computers to my mother and other family members as I upgrade.

      Anything that can get a person on the internet is pretty useful to someone who wouldn't normally afford it.

    42. Re: And yet by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Tribal leaders love the shiny.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    43. Re: And yet by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the backup; I've had a busy weekend and it's left me mentally incapable of forming a meaningful reply to the GP post.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    44. Re:And yet by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So, basically, you got a case and power supply out of it?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    45. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you responded by asking a question that you failed to answer

    46. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The world did actually pretty well before we came and "saved" them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    47. Re: And yet by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Are you trying to educate me, or the other readers here? I ask because it sure seems like you're trying to tell me something I've already more or less stated.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    48. Re: And yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's just me being an old fart sitting on his porch and stating the obvious.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:And yet by volmtech · · Score: 1

      This was over a five year period. It actually had a restart problem, as long as the power didn't go out or a software restart wasn't needed it was fine. The first year he used it without any upgrade. As he got older I put in a faster processor so his games worked better.

      Today the case, power supply, and old processor are part of a system he built for a friend. The video card and DVD writer are in my computer and the fast processor and new mother board are part of his new game rig. The only part tossed was the old motherboard.

    50. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO matter how much you write, I cannot find these worlds in NYC.

    51. Re: And yet by Druegan · · Score: 1

      What on earth makes you claim that our current system is "Capitalist"? By my reckoning, we've been "post-capitalist" since the giant "Debt capacity=wealth" fraud instigated in the 1970's..

    52. Re: And yet by rezme · · Score: 1

      Funny how I never heard anything about Chicago prior to Obama being elected, and now it's "Corrupt Chicago" everything. Was Chicago corrupt prior to Obama's election? If so, why was it not an issue before? Now it's being invoked on an article about some oddball story out of the UK? Weird...

    53. Re: And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pwn

  2. Arbitrage is not for you by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember, arbitrage is only legal when dealing with intangible financial instruments. Arbitrage with actual products is gauche and therefore punishable.

    1. Re:Arbitrage is not for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exporting a product to another market isn't arbitrage. Arbitrage is only arbitrage when dealing with intangible financial instruments. Arbitrage with actual products is simply called trading. You can't set up a risk free deal without them.

  3. The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem. by mellon · · Score: 2

    The way quite a bit of e-waste gets out of countries with strong regulations is by being shipped in "working" or "repairable" units, which are in principle allowed by law, even though they are actually waste. So this may be a bad thing, or may be a good thing, depending on the details. The mere fact that the devices are working or repairable does not mean that they aren't waste--if someone gave you a working 20-year-old TV, would you want it?

  4. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The way quite a bit of e-waste gets out of countries with strong regulations is by being shipped in "working" or "repairable" units, which are in principle allowed by law, even though they are actually waste. So this may be a bad thing, or may be a good thing, depending on the details. The mere fact that the devices are working or repairable does not mean that they aren't waste--if someone gave you a working 20-year-old TV, would you want it?

    If I didn't already have something better, then yes, I would want it. My current main television is about 10 years old, and I bought it used two years ago to replace another that was 14 years old and needed an expensive repair.

  5. what do I think? by schklerg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think, as an American, I need to wait for a politician or a celebrity to tell me what my opinion should be. I'm quite sure I'm outraged, I'm just not sure why yet.

    --
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    1. Re:what do I think? by epyT-R · · Score: 0

      I think, as a European, I need to wait for the American government to tell my politicians what to tell me to think because my culture is too weakwilled and spineless to stand up for itself. America does all the politically incorrect dirty work in the world so my politicians can retain the politically correct appearance needed to survive in my passive aggressive pantywaisted culture.

    2. Re:what do I think? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Or Jenny McCarthy could tour your country and talk about the folly of vaccination. That actually does change a lot of minds in a lot of countries.

    3. Re:what do I think? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And if you were interested in politics as a European, you'd wait for your politicians to come and tell you what to think about it, then you'd have to think hard to come up with a reason why they're lying and demand that they should support the opposite, since you learned that whenever your politicians consider something important, it's important to oppose it. Especially if it is "without any alternatives", which is a sure sign that there is a very obvious and very obviously better alternative they don't want you to think about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:what do I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our overlords, may they rape and plunder this world until no one not even their own children can live on its surface.

    5. Re:what do I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forced vaccination must now be considered a vector for chipping. So while mcarthy is dumb as a brick, she's not all that far from the truth.

    6. Re:what do I think? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Who cares about mcarthy and what your politicians are doing, it's time for football!

    7. Re:what do I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you, Larry Bird?

  6. NTSC TVs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... I understand that most (all?) countries in Africa use either PAL or SECAM, while analog US TVs are NTSC.
    That would make those TVs worthless for aerial reception.

    1. Re:NTSC TVs? by TheDayOfMe · · Score: 1

      It's probably why Benson was exporting British TVs to Africa. I'm fairly sure US TVs end up south of the border.

      --

      One Man's Trash Is Another Man's Treasure.

    2. Re:NTSC TVs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone didn't even read the headline, let alone the article. UK man......... I think the UK, England, and Britain ALL use(d) PAL.

      Posting as AC since I already moderated here.

    3. Re:NTSC TVs? by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      You're assuming that those same African consumers are buying them FOR aerial reception. DVD players aren't exactly luxury items anymore (I could walk into Wal Mart RIGHT NOW and buy a shit DVD player for about $25) and pirated DVDs of movies & TV shows are available in those countries for a pittance. I'd venture a guess that in the poorest countries, rural TV reception is barely worth bothering with ANYWAY, and most TV content gets delivered via sneakernet and open-air markets.

      Also, most American CRT TVs from the 90s required little more to be capable of 576-line pseudo-NTSC than hacking the power supply to convert 220v@50hz into 120v@50hz. Analog CRTs had no fixed concept of resolution... they just swept scanlines over and over, bumping the timing a notch with each scanline, until they saw the vertical retrace signal or rolled over. They might not have had the dot pitch to properly display 576-line video without looking like shit... but that was part of the magic with analog stuff... there was a HUGE gulf between "what it was officially designed to do properly" and "what it could be coaxed into trying to do if you insisted".

    4. Re:NTSC TVs? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You're assuming those same consumers are actually buying these TV's and they're not just being dumped in a country that doesn't ban dumping leaded glass and other toxic materials in CRT TV's..

    5. Re:NTSC TVs? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You not only assume that this shit DVD player is available in Africa, you also assume that 25 bucks ain't a shitload of money and then some to some people...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:NTSC TVs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, most American CRT TVs from the 90s required little more to be capable of 576-line pseudo-NTSC than hacking the power supply to convert 220v@50hz into 120v@50hz. Analog CRTs had no fixed concept of resolution... they just swept scanlines over and over, bumping the timing a notch with each scanline, until they saw the vertical retrace signal or rolled over. They might not have had the dot pitch to properly display 576-line video without looking like shit... but that was part of the magic with analog stuff... there was a HUGE gulf between "what it was officially designed to do properly" and "what it could be coaxed into trying to do if you insisted".

      CSB: That's about the right era where the CRT and yoke are swappable into an old arcade chassis. I've taken tubes from 19" TVs and used them to fix screen-burned monitors from the 80s. It's getting more difficult now that most of the TVs have been trashed.

      Anybody who has a TV with a 19VLUP22 (color, 19", 100 degree angle) or a black-and-white 19" tube (19VARP4) can probably auction it up on eBay and a vintage gamer will buy it.

      The recyclers look at me funny when I show up with a CRT with Ms. PacMan burnt into it, but break out into grins when I explain the story. Same amount of lead goes into the recycling stream, but a 30-year-old game is now good for another 30 years.

    7. Re:NTSC TVs? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Although we do use slightly different standards for audio from anywhere else in the UK. I think it's mostly a frequency thing.

    8. Re:NTSC TVs? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      that doesn't ban dumping leaded glass

      Leaded glass is not a big deal - one example is those "crystal" drinking glasses. Lead on the printed circuit boards is the much bigger deal, especially if the things are burnt for gold recovery.

    9. Re:NTSC TVs? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not been to Africa.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    10. Re:NTSC TVs? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      10-15 years ago, video CDs and VCRs were popular in those same poor countries... with hardware and media costs roughly 2-4 times what a DVD player costs now. For the third world, optical media is actually ideal... you can store it under awful conditions, re-sell it almost without limit as long as it's not physically abused, and mail it for only slightly more than the cost of mailing a postcard.

      Also, there's "poverty", and there's "Poverty(tm)". Even in countries with economies healthier than, say, Niger or Chad, there's a market for people who aren't necessarily living in desperate grinding poverty, but would nevertheless like to pick up an extra TV or two for other rooms in the house for less than what it would cost to buy a brand new LCD TV.

    11. Re:NTSC TVs? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > It's getting more difficult now that most of the TVs have been trashed.

      Well, there's always "Plan B" once 3840x2100 monitors become affordable... at THAT resolution, you can literally emulate phosphor smear and misconvergence, to the point where it almost becomes indistinguishable from a "real" CRT. Increase the framerate to 240fps, and you can even emulate interlaced scanline fade (assuming the game wasn't what would now be called "240p60" with black scanline gaps).

    12. Re:NTSC TVs? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Typical CRT TVs or monitors each contain 4-8 pounds of lead in the glass tube, and the inside of the tubes get coated with toxic phosphor dust.

      http://www.electronicstakeback...

      It's a lot more lead than other types of glass. Significantly more in the glass than anywhere else.

      That's about half the amount of lead that is in a car battery.

    13. Re:NTSC TVs? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are looking at my example the wrong way. The lead in that glass is vitrified and as hard to get out of the glass as in the drinking glasses. The lead on the boards, or in batteries, is not, and can more easily be transported as dust or in water to where it can be metabolised.

    14. Re:NTSC TVs? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia doesn't agree with you
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
      The glass in TV's contains much more lead than lead crystal glass. It may take a while, but the lead does leech out over time. Also, as the amount of lead in the glass increases, the rate at which it leeches out increases exponentially.

    15. Re:NTSC TVs? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      ... Not to mention the cadmium in the phosphors inside the tube.

  7. resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can we keep this economy growing endlessly forever, if people are allowed to resell good working long-lived well designed used equipment, rather than being forced to destroy their old gear and buy brand new bad-lot shelf-returned crap?

    Remember, landfill is profit! Recycling is socialism.

  8. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by mellon · · Score: 1, Funny

    What would you watch on it? Where would you get the power to run it?

  9. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by TheDayOfMe · · Score: 3

    I would definitely take a working 20 year old TV if I had no hope of getting one any other way. It's all about "what can I afford".

    These TVs are waste because they are not digital, the countries they are going to are probably a long way from going digital.

    --

    One Man's Trash Is Another Man's Treasure.

  10. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    My current main television is about 10 years old, and I bought it used two years ago to replace another that was 14 years old and needed an expensive repair.

    You are not the "norm". For the majority of consumers 2 years old is obsolete.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  11. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by mellon · · Score: 1

    In principle, reuse is a really good thing. And in some cases it's a good thing in practice too. There are definitely things we can export to Nigeria for which Nigerians will benefit from that export. But there is also a very dirty recycling industry in the third world. For stuff they can't use, we ought to keep it and recycle it expensively, rather than shipping it there and have them die young of heavy metal exposure recycling it cheaply.

  12. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prehistoric vidya games.

    Just plug it in.

  13. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are not in the norm;
    Most people I know have televisions and other electronics that are 10+ years old; even more so for people in the 40+ demographic.

  14. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Even in the US a converter box or cable box takes care of the digital problem.

  15. NTSC TVs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bad, it's UK, not US.

  16. This is surprising. by sd4f · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've got a Nigerian neighbour (I live in Australia) who fills containers with electronics and sends them to Africa. I spoke to him about it and he said that they repair the stuff there, and reuse most of it. Considering that the analogue TV signal was switched off last year, and essentially all CRT TV's don't work, a lot have been dumped on streets, and they naturally been picking them up for free.

    So it's surprising that they so blatantly claim that they're dumping them, when I can hardly see the sense in spending the money on shipping containers half way across the globe, only to dump it there, when it has already been dumped here. Clearly there's some thing going on which the business world isn't particularly keen on. If this person jailed was being paid to dispose of garbage and he was just dumping it in countries that don't care about dumping, then that's a different matter, but I get the feeling that our garbage is somewhat more valuable in developing countries.

    1. Re:This is surprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the recycling companies extract the spare components by tearing apart the plastic cases, then using outdoor fires to melt the plastic cables and get the raw metal. They'll have children dipping the circuit boards in hot solvents to make the solder melt. Then they pull out the components. What isn't recycled after that is burnt.

    2. Re:This is surprising. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And now we know just who was losing money here...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:This is surprising. by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Europe when you buy a phone, you sometimes get a reduction if you bring in your new phoen. It has to start and no broken display. These are then sold to people who export them to Africa as second hand.
      No problem there as it is working second had that is going to be re-used.

      OTOH many electronic parts get exported as waste, so they can salvage the materials in them. This does not happen in the most enviromental frienly way.. See some images here

      The problem is not that it has added value for the people in other countries. The problem is that we decided the waste should be treated in a certain way for security (of humankind, if you will) and this is not happening.

      So yes, the waste is more valuable and because of that people will die of toxids. There is no excuse to do this other than "I do not care if people die." to allow this.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:This is surprising. by Kremmy · · Score: 1

      Civilization gaps. Any first-world waste that makes it to the third-world stands the chance of empowering the third-world to shed the label. The people with the money and power know that modern civilization is unsustainable, but the best they can do is try to maintain pools of cheap labor by restricting advancement. Look at things like a modern chinese factory, the highest technical assembly lines in the world are people putting things together by hand, being paid minimally for it. But what changes if the people on the bottom of the ladder are empowered with the technology? They stop being at the bottom of the ladder, and the entire power structure as it currently exists collapses.

  17. 15 months - really? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the UK, that's the normal sentence for defending oneself from a criminal attack or leaving your wheelie trash bin out an extra day.

    1. Re:15 months - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get time in prison for escalating the level of violence. That's one thing the UK gets right that the USA gets wrong. Here we treat, for example, women who murder a potential rapist as a hero. It's disgusting.

    2. Re:15 months - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sure if sarcastic or libtard.

      goes to show how stupid they are..

    3. Re:15 months - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a lying scumbag shit. Could you Americans get over the idea that political parties are like football teams?

    4. Re:15 months - really? by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      That slogan was created as a parody to mock the Democrat's pro-gun-control views (i.e. suggesting the obviously absurd proposition that a woman should put up with being raped) - and here we are, people like you lapping up an absurd parody slogan repeating it as "so true" ... lol ... I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I hope your entire post was meant sarcastically.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    5. Re:15 months - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or throwing bacon at a mosque

    6. Re:15 months - really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You should get time in prison for escalating the level of violence. That's one thing the UK gets right that the USA gets wrong. Here we treat, for example, women who murder a potential rapist as a hero.

      I've never seen that, although I have seen that women who murder an actual attempted rapist are seen as heroes. I have a hard time disagreeing, too, even though I am (for example) against the death penalty. I don't see it as directly contradictory, either; the death penalty is premeditated. That is murder. Killing someone to prevent a rape, that's in the heat of the moment.

      I agree that being dead is worse than being raped, but you give up your right to not be killed when you attempt rape. Don't want to be killed? Don't rape.

      If you want to give a citation for your original statement, that's cool.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:15 months - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get time in prison for escalating the level of violence. That's one thing the UK gets right that the USA gets wrong. Here we treat, for example, women who murder a potential rapist as a hero. It's disgusting.

      This makes perfect sense. If someone tries to rape you you can rape them back!

  18. Why do you think I work on 3d printing FLOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have volunteered many, many hours to some 3d printing FLOSS projects over the years.

    There is a reason.

    Manufacturing is a corrupt, bizarre industry. It does not take magic to build a vacuum cleaner. Mechanical inclination is innate to the human brain. The planned obsolescence fad has done nothing in the past 50 years except transfer wealth from the middle class to the top 1%, essentially by committing mass fraud by forcing engineers to use their skills to produce products that fail on purpose for no reason.

    This time is coming to an end. No African would buy castoffs when they can print their own product in their own backyard. Yes, it will be a while before we can print electronics, but it was a while before we could print things like cups and knobs in the past.

    "Oh but what about the jobs lost". Lets talk about that. Lets talk about GM, which purposely shipped huge number of cars, knowing that they had a defect that killed people. For years. And punished the person who tried to stop them. I wonder how people who work for low wages at small businesses feel about watching their own tax dollars being spent to bail out a company that kills people because it's management are lazy and incompetent. This is not about 'saving jobs', it's about ending a corrupt and evil system.

    1. Re:Why do you think I work on 3d printing FLOSS by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      The planned obsolescence fad has done nothing in the past 50 years except transfer wealth from the middle class to the top 1%, essentially by committing mass fraud by forcing engineers to use their skills to produce products that fail on purpose for no reason.

      +5 - Insightful. Too bad I have no mod points left. :(

      "The Economy" is indeed a kind of giant Ponzi scheme.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Why do you think I work on 3d printing FLOSS by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You left out a couple of words, toxic and wasteful. Not only do they drive pointless consumerism but that consumerism drives pollution and the waste of essential resources. Basically myopic insatiable greed destroying humanities future to feed today's egoistic lusts of a psychopathic minority.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  19. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not in the norm;
    Most people I know have televisions and other electronics that are 10+ years old; even more so for people in the 40+ demographic.

    I also wonder if his "norm" is considered "norm" in the Africa these tvs are exported to...

  20. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    My current main television is about 10 years old, and I bought it used two years ago to replace another that was 14 years old and needed an expensive repair.

    You are not the "norm". For the majority of consumers 2 years old is obsolete.

    For the majority of consumers in the first world. If you ever traveled more than 10 miles from your house you might find that other people live differently than you do. A 10 year old TV in some communities in India is a luxury!

  21. Even when not repairable, source of components by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Valuable components for repair of other TVs can be easily desoldered from irreparably broken TVs. This would reduce the environmental load in today's world when the planet is already overloaded.

    On the other hand how to dispose of the rest when the country doesn't have proper facilities for that.

    I think the question whether something is waste or not and whether its good or bad to export it to third world countries is pretty complicated.

    I wonder if it would be illegal to mass desolder second hand electronic components and send them to the third world country for the purpose of repair of broken TVs (regardless of questions of economy or component reliability).

    If containing broken pieces makes a shipment illegal - if a manufacture ships a container of new TVs and some of them are defective, is it classified as illegal export of waste and the manufacturer goes to jail for 16 months?

    Karel Kulhavy, Twibright Labs

  22. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These TVs are waste because they are not digital, the countries they are going to are probably a long way from going digital.

    CRTs also hold up to the elements much better, and some places do not have 24hr AC. Or any AC. (Air conditioning, not power)

  23. E-Waste? by PPH · · Score: 2

    they were more likely to work than new product sent to Africa (which may be shelf returns from bad lots, part of the reason Africans prefer used TVs from nations with strong warranty laws).

    Wouldn't shipping shelf returns to Africa be e-waste as well? Is management of budget video/electronic chains going to be serving their 16 months when caught?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  24. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    For stuff they can't use, we ought to keep it and recycle it expensively, rather than shipping it there and have them die young of heavy metal exposure recycling it cheaply.

    I understand your sentiment, but think how it feels to be told by the first world "You can not have this stuff that you want because you can not use it responsibly." Talk about arrogance!

  25. Lesson learned by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    Never let action get in the way of posturing. What matters is the pretense of concern, not the resolution of problems.

  26. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about this; do you have a source, or is that from experience?

  27. Just ban secondhand goods altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For the corporate capitalist consumerist lobbyists I suggest the following:

    1) A law that every electronic device older than 2 years is e-waste
    2) People who don't throw them away and buy new one will be jailed for illegal storage of e-waste at home, harsh sentences
    3) Claim that people who "illegally store e-waste" (=don't participate in wasteful consumerism) are bad for the environment, because
    the precious metals and other stuffs in their "illegally stored e-waste" is being kept from re-use (add some greenwash astroturfed heartbreaking photos of people being tortured in mines in Kongo, which you accidentally also happen to operate).

    Karel Kulhavy, Twibright Labs

    1. Re:Just ban secondhand goods altogether by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      I somehow doubt most corporations would like the idea of being forced to replace their entire infrastructure every two years. That would get very expensive very fast.

      This actually sounds more like Keynesian theory of breaking windows to build economies (a direct violation of the classic "broken window fallacy".) For a modern example of what you just espoused, look at the Cash for Clunkers program. The environmentalists didn't care for it because it didn't further their goals, and used cars around this time (the market that primarily serves the poor) went way up in price because the supply of used cars was forcibly reduced during this period.

      The so called "capitalists" were actually opposed to the program entirely. Democrats seemed to like it though, and apparently so did NADA (the group trying to force Tesla to sell only through dealers.)

      http://www.politico.com/story/...

    2. Re:Just ban secondhand goods altogether by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Industrial and commercial use of e-waste would of course be permitted. After all, it's professionals doing it. Just us idiots consumers, we have to be protected from the harm the hazardous ewaste could do to us. And our children. Oh won't somebody PLEASE think of the children!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Just ban secondhand goods altogether by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I hazard to think about what an e-waste nazi would think if they came into my lab space. I have a sizable quantity of ancient mercury-wetted relays, and various other cool items in my stock of parts. Lots and lots of non-ROHS electronic components, too.

    4. Re:Just ban secondhand goods altogether by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Please don't give them ideas. I'm already pondering whether I should stockpile on sodium persulfate because sooner or later it will become impossible to get. Either because of environment issues or because someone found out how to use it to blow stuff up.

      And NO, there is exactly NO NEED to point out how to use it to blow stuff up! I need it to make PCBs and it's already damn hard to get anything that could be used to etch them that doesn't either take half a year to accomplish anything or can't be used safely without a hazard suit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by mellon · · Score: 1

    It's not—if they can use the TV, they will want to. The problem is that most likely they can't. Even if it's in working order, it has to be able to display the signals that are available to receive, and you have to be able to get power for it. And CRTs draw a lot of power.

  29. Too Much Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. too little evidence. This entire entry is solid opinionated spin and foregone conclusion. Since I investigated and wrote on the E*Waste topic for several years, I happen to know that there is massive cheating going on, and financial responsibility avoidance at every turn. I dont know anything about this case, but the whole thing looks very fishy to me.

  30. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by mellon · · Score: 1

    Yes, well, we also do a lot to make sure that they don't actually have the opportunity to have a safe environment, and I suspect that feels worse. Talk about arrogance!

  31. Website against planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Website against planned obsolescence where you can register cases of planned obsolescence in any product.

    Major manufacturers already have hefty files there.

    Unfortunately the website is in German so most people need to use some kind of translator.

    Karel Kulhavy, Twibright Labs

    BTW the captcha sucks its so badly distorted its ambiguous to read (a letter could be just the distorting lines, lowercase l, number one, or small p), when I enter one possibility it says I failed to prove I am human, when I try the other it says I failed to prove I am human and should start all over and I cannot get the editing work back again.

    I think this is just deterring legitimate users while spammers pay a cent army of Indians who type the captchas for them.

    1. Re:Website against planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is just deterring legitimate users while spammers pay a cent army of Indians who type the captchas for them.

      There are generally two methods of doing this "without money". First, you make a website where vstor can strip a skinny girl by guessing captchas. Then, depending on whether you want accurate results or not, you can display the captcha to multiple ppl, and then compare the results. If you want really accurate ones, increase the number. Second, you make a bot that solves captchas.

  32. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by sumdumass · · Score: 2

    Recycling is not socialism. Recycling is profit when it makes economical sense to do so. You will find this happens with most metals and a few other products like building materials and certain types of glass. Recycling is an economic drain increasing costs to producers and thereby consumers when it doesn't make economic sense to do so. You will find this with certain paper and most plastic and quite a bit of types of glass.

    The reason is because it is either more expensive or cheaper to create new materials. when it is more expensive, recycling makes a lot of sense. When it is cheaper, it is just a burden.

    Now this can get muddy when you talk about things like electronics. There is money in the metals in most of them but the environmental aspects of extracting them artificially increase the costs. In most of Europe, they have a special tax and a requirement for recycling these devices which covers most of it. In the US, not so much that I know of. In other countries, typically third world countries with lax environmental regulation or lax enforcement, extracting some of these metals are profitable and thereby recycling is also profitable.

    Now, threatening you with jail time or heavy fines if you throw a soda can into the trash or toss a banana peal into the recycling bin is not socialism, it's more akin to fascism or the brand of totalitarian communism that communism (which seems great on paper but never works out in practice) always de-evolves into when they try it.

  33. Punishing the little fry ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Arbitrage with actual products is gauche and therefore punishable ...

    If the arbitrage was carried out by humongous multinationals, such as Japan's Mitsubishi Group or America's GE's, no, nobody dare to punish them

    It's only punishable when small fry does it, small fry like that Mr. Benson in TFA

  34. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by mikael · · Score: 1

    If it is a small mini-portable TV that fits in the corner of a mud-brick hut, then probably yes. There isn't much space once you have a couple of bunk-beds on each side of the door, a cooker and refrigerator on the far wall, and some cupboards on each side. The only space left is an upper corner, which is just enough space for a small TV.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  35. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by mikael · · Score: 1

    Anyone has visited or lived in Africa will tell you that. You just need to look at satellite photographs of Earth at night to see that Africa has electricity. Like any rural area, the main hazards to power supply are thunderstorms and local wildlife. Power failures are frequent, along with the associated power surges and fluctuating power line voltages.

    Africa is on the equator, so the climate is like Florida or New York in Summer but all year round. Sunrise at 6am, sunset at 6pm. Air conditioning is a luxury usually available only to office blocks and hotels. Any building without air conditioning becomes an oven. So having a 32" 600 watt plasma display wouldn't be appreciated. A small 12" black/white CRT is ideal and the bulkiness prevents looters from stealing it.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  36. They are dumping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are "dumping", as in selling below cost! What this does is undercut the new product business, and someone was losing money. Nothing better than to have competition thrown in jail.

    1. Re:They are dumping... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      They are "dumping", as in selling below cost! What this does is undercut the new product business, and someone was losing money.

      That would be a problem, if they were putting African TV manufacturers out of business. I don't think they are, though...

      Nothing better than to have competition thrown in jail.

      Dumping has nothing to do with jailing the competition.

    2. Re:They are dumping... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      putting African TV manufacturers out of business
      Wahahaha, that's real funny, we Africans get our TV's from the same place you do. China.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:They are dumping... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Which was my point. No-one is being put out of business.

      Also, the quote in your sig goes back way further than some slashdotter.

  37. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize that they have electricity and media on the continent of Africa, right? It's a huge and very diverse place.

  38. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Talk about arrogance!

    Arrogance is being told that your actions are self-defeating and harming others, then being told that you know better and carrying on.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    In most of Europe, they have a special tax and a requirement for recycling these devices which covers most of it. In the US, not so much that I know of.

    As usual, just California. We have an e-waste recycling fee which is charged at purchase time. When you want to dispose of electronics, there is no charge. I take them to the transfer station which is convenient for me, but municipalities often have a curbside electronics _pickup_ once or twice a year. Not here, I live in the sticks, which is why there's a transfer station on the way into town from my house.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Rosewill by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    As many of you should know, Rosewill is the house brand for NewEgg.
    A few years ago they started selling fairly decent quality mechanical keyboards ( not as good as some high end keyboards, but certain good quality ).
    Almost everything on these keyboards is repairable. If a keyswitch breaks you can buy a new a new one and solder it in. If the controller breaks you can replace it.
    Even if the pc board breaks, you can get a "phontom" pc board and reuse the parts and the case.

    What you cannot do is purchase it from NewEgg in Illinois and two other states ( NC and NY IIRC ). Why because of the ewaste regulations. So you can buy a cheap keyboard that breaks in six months and basically has to be thrown out, but you cannot buy a keyboard that is meant to last ten years and even then be repaired.

    These are the kind of laws that the weirdo environmental groups push.

    1. Re:Rosewill by statemachine · · Score: 1

      So you can buy a cheap keyboard that breaks in six months

      I've never broken a keyboard through typing alone, and I type a lot. What are you doing to break your keyboards in 6 months?

    2. Re:Rosewill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've clearly not had to use the crappy cheap notebooks with the crappy cheap keyboards they have today.

    3. Re:Rosewill by CongoMongo · · Score: 1

      I've been using the same keyboard for several years. Playing video games, and typing out tons on forums. How're you's going through them so fast lol.

    4. Re:Rosewill by statemachine · · Score: 1

      What's your idea of "crappy cheap notebook with the crappy cheap keyboards" that breaks all the time?

      I buy cheap, and the keyboards don't break. Take a hammer to the keyboard, however.... Are you saying you type with a hammer?

      That's not a euphemism...

    5. Re:Rosewill by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What you cannot do is purchase it from NewEgg in Illinois and two other states ( NC and NY IIRC ). Why because of the ewaste regulations. So you can buy a cheap keyboard that breaks in six months and basically has to be thrown out, but you cannot buy a keyboard that is meant to last ten years and even then be repaired.

      Your comment is frustrating because it does not explain why the e-waste regulations do not permit sale of these devices, and so we have no way to know whether NC and NY are being lame, or Newegg is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Rosewill by unitron · · Score: 1

      Could you post a link to this keyboard (or even a part number searchable on newegg's site) so that I can see what happens when a newegg customer in NC tries to get one?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Rosewill by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      One example RK-9000 --Cherry Blues
      Anything in the RK-9000, RK-9100 series. Actually any Rosewill keyboard, but those are the mechanical keyboards.

      As I pointed out before, I know two states other then Illinois are on the list. I remember them to be NY and NC, but could be wrong. Slo if it does ship to NC check with a zip like 60610 ( Chicago ),

  41. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That's so 5 years ago.

    Today people may consider it "obsolete", but lacking the funds to replace it with something new, it'll have to do. And just WHY people don't buy new crap, whether they are like my dad who just recently realized that he might ponder considering replacing his VHS recorder with a DVD player ("It's still working, ya know?") and who buys a new computer every 10 years or so ("it's still working and I don't run it on battery anyway"), or whether they simply cannot afford a new set despite wanting the latest and greatest in consumer gadgets, the result is the same: NO SALE.

    And that's why the economy is in the slump. People have no money to buy new shit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about Africa now or about my college's dorm?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  43. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

    Probably whatever OTA Analog broadcasts are around ( no digital receivers so older analog is fine), VHS / DVDs from players from the same era, and whatever the local market that wants the damn things has available ETC.
    Just because you are privileged and can afford cable / digital OTA / blueray ETC doesn't mean there isn't a market ( which there obviously is ) for older tech in less privileged areas.

    Besides, I would rather see the stuff being used than have to have plants built for stripping the old crap of anything useful; I don't want the acids, bases, and assorted other harsh chemical shit needed for reclamation anywhere near me.

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  44. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    Heh, I kinda got lost in thinking about CRTs and how they hold up to the elements, and forgot to direct my question at that in particular instead of the AC-related part of that post.

  45. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What would you watch on it? Where would you get the power to run it?"

    Really? Maybe you were the judge in this case? Newsflash: Cities in Africa have electricity and internet. Average urban income is about $3,000 per capita per year. 6M households with TV in Lagos alone. Go to youtube and search "traffic in Cairo" or "traffic in Lagos", search Africa and Tech on twitter, then ask where Africans, who buy these and pay for the shipping, are plugging it in.

    .

  46. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put down your 1960s TinTin comic book. Google "World Bank" and find out how many cities in Africa have electricity and TV stations and internet.

  47. Re:resell working _used_ equipment? Heresy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only Africa had mod points....

  48. Recycling by Princeofcups · · Score: 2

    The last thing that the manufacturers want are people to reuse old equipment. Each is a loss of a potential sale of a new unit. In the perverse eyes of capitalism.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    1. Re:Recycling by SourceFrog · · Score: 1
      That's why TVs were invented under Communism and the most high quality TVs ever created, were created under Communism. Oh no wait, that's not how it went.

      I think the problem you're pointing out is a cultural one - the belief that profit "above all else" is the primary directive of shareholders, rather than value creation.

      Back when things were "built to last", that was under more of a Capitalist sytem than we have today. The asshole MBA types have taken over management at every level, with their "what we can we leverage to squeeze greater profit out of this" destructive mentality.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    2. Re:Recycling by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Back when things were "built to last", that was under more of a Capitalist sytem than we have today. The asshole MBA types have taken over management at every level, with their "what we can we leverage to squeeze greater profit out of this" destructive mentality.

      Uh no. Squeezing is the basic tenet of capitalism. Whatever the market will bear, remember? There is nothing uncapitalistic about making your products shitty so that you can collect more profit. And there's nothing uncapitalistic about spending your ill-gotten gains on bribes to support your business, either. That's just reinvestment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Recycling by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      Uh no. Squeezing is the basic tenet of capitalism.

      "Uh no", it isn't. Where do you see that in the definition Capitalism? The definition of Capitalism is a system in which private property rights are respected and people have the right to trade. NOWHERE in there does it EITHER compel you to create value while earning profit OR destroy it in the name of profit. Therefore, it's a cultural/individual choice within the confines of the definition of Capitalism.

      Squeezing the market may be what they put in the handbook to teach aspiring MBA types, but "Capitalism" is a political term with a political definition. Seriously, look it up.

      Back when they "made things to last", it was more of a Capitalist system than we have now. That's because our culture wasn't entirely overrun with MBA drones chanting 'profit over value creation'.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    4. Re:Recycling by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      And there's nothing uncapitalistic about spending your ill-gotten gains on bribes to support your business

      By the very definition of the word "capitalism", spending money on bribes to get the government to use force to artificially prop up your business is NOT capitalism. By definition. Seriously. Stop f'ing calling it that. That would be called a "corporatocracy" and it's the opposite of free-market capitalism.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    5. Re:Recycling by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      Political systems HAVE NAMES. You can't just use whatever name you feel like. The system you are describing, which is what we have now, has a name, it's called a corporatocracy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracy

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    6. Re:Recycling by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Political systems HAVE NAMES. You can't just use whatever name you feel like. The system you are describing, which is what we have now, has a name, it's called a corporatocracy

      False. What we have now may be that, but it's also capitalistic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. The preferred order of green activity is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. If this gentleman was definitely going to reuse the old TVs, and their fate otherwise was recycling, then I suppose what he was doing ought to be legal.

    However the whole thing sounds a little like a backdoor venture, done either to avoid scrutiny or fees. So one then has to ask, why was this done this way?

  50. Benson video in his own words by retroworks · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Joseph Benson on the "bullyboys". He is illiterate, never attended school, but knows TV repair.

    --
    Gently reply
  51. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > These TVs are waste because they are not digital

    No. One can use them quite easily for digital systems.

    First of all, let's establish what means being digital. Every equipment is not 100% digital, there's always some analog part. That said, one can have a digital tuner/receiver which outputs composite video (analog) to said older sets. The TV is always set to channel 3 or 4 (usually).

    > the countries they are going to are probably a long way from going digital.

    Again, no. That's what happened in Brazil... we went from analog to digital in a few years because of said set top boxes. It only was not easier because local TV providers had a veiled interest (and shares) in paid cable-TV, so everybody said paid TV was technically better -- when in fact and in practice the opposite is true.

    I suppose that if a country adopts an already developed system and set top boxes are cheap (which they can be), as well as transmitting equipment (e.g. with some kind of incentive for manufacturers, 5 years would more than enough for countries with limited area or high urban population density.

    The problem with older TVs is that they didn't break. I myself had to donate mine, which was quite perfect and worked with said receiver flawlessly, to acquire a LCD one some 3 or 4 years ago.

    The traditional CRT set would work only at 640x480, while LCD TVs evolved to show 1920x1080 (Full HD).

    That was the main reason to get rid of the old TV. For comparison, we still have a 1366x768 HD-Ready LCD which annoys me for the lower resolution -- but works nice for World Cup games. My father watched 640x480 via cable-TV until recently and thought it was superb. People watching sports are too much forgiving...

  52. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    You're both correct and both incorrect.

    In the USA the average TV is replaced at about
    six years old. It used to be longer.

    I might consider my TV obsolete, but it's not so bad as to require replacement yet. Same with my computer. Going by family history what tends to happen is that the main TV in the living room gets replaced by a bigger/better one, then the old TV there moves downstairs to the family room, that one ends up in a bedroom, etc...

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  53. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Mostly from experience. I have worked in a few third world places, and in Africa for 6 months. And older, solidly built tech was preferred. Even in the "rich" companies, solid and proven technology was a benefit.

  54. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    What about a 5 year old TV? Most of those still work, and are discarded merely because there's a newer model.

  55. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Hey, Norm!

  56. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Africa has electricity. And they have television signals that European televisions can use. And they have this anachronistic thing called the television repair shop.

    What they don't have is a European/American attitude towards turning everything slightly old into trash, or the income necessary to be wasteful.

  57. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I just now replaced a TV that was15 years old, only replaced because it was breaking down. (I still have it though, it's too heavy to drag down to the recyclers)

    Remember several decades back when there were still television repair shops, so you'd go to have it fixed, replace the picture tubes, tune the chokes, etc?

  58. bad headline is bad by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    That is all.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  59. Very good point above by dbIII · · Score: 2

    I remember it wasn't very long ago that we were all making fun of the Japanese throwaway culture where foreign students could get a lot of decent electronic gear from the curb simply because a newer model had a shiny new feature. Now we act in a similar way and those Africans are probably looking at us the same way.

    1. Re:Very good point above by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Well yeah. Wasteful consumerist societies.

  60. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
    In Africa? Almost all broadcasts in West Africa are digital, requiring a specific STB from the broadcaster. The TV does not even need a tuner, let alone one for the supposed local standards.Can you repiar olnew TVs?

    I live in the UK, and I am using a desktop 3 years old, the family PC is over five years old, and our laptops that are 5 year old Lenovo T61's because they are better than the newer models. We dont play games on PCs - we have Android phones for that. PCs are for LibreOffice and Firefox (and the occasional bit of PCB layout). I think our company (Sun) servers are also more than 4 years old. They work fine. If it aint broke, don't fix it.

    More relevantly: West African transport operators want mechanically injected diesel lorries with no ECU's because if the ECU goes wrong, the lorry and its load are lost. This means buying old lorries. The Western "polution reduction" Euro 5 etc, is about lining pockets for "Add-blu" sales, not about saving the planet.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  61. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    I find it amusing that every reply so far has focused on the rhetorical question at the end of your post, even though you hit the real issue on the head.

    Sure, this equipment is nicely sorted and in usable condition, but is there a distribution network on the receiving end? Are there actual storefronts, or merely front companies for stripping operations? From TFA:

    Benson was previously convicted of exporting similar hazardous waste to Nigeria in 2011, and was appealing against his conviction – unsuccessfully – while continuing to illegally export televisions and freezers to West Africa, the Environment Agency said.

    It seems Mr. Benson has made a habit of this tactic, and should already know that his methods run afoul of export laws. It's not a case of the big bad government out to stop the little guy from bringing luxury to the third-world savages, but rather just another guy who thinks that ignoring laws makes for a good business model.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  62. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    What would you watch on it?

    Aljazeera news and Nollywood movies - so much better than Fox News and Hollywood.

    Where would you get the power to run it?

    From a Honda Generator.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  63. NTSC TVs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter that much. Many tv's, even older analog ones, can receive both PAL and NTSC. The main difference is the color subcarrier being on a different frequency and slightly different timings. The different timings make almost no difference for the typical sync circuit in an analog tv (the older the better actually), so the worst that will happen is that you get a black and white image instead of color. Furthermore, UK has PAL.

  64. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by znrt · · Score: 1

    blacks: the most violent uncivilized race

    note - "saying those things offends me and that makes you a bad person and a big meanie head!" is not a rebuttal against anything i said.

    saying those things can only offend yourself because in absence of a clear definition of "violence" and "civilization" in context it just exposes you as ignorant and racist (what a coincidence!).

  65. Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Equating a "could be repaired or reused as is" number with the same for "definitely are being repaired and/or reused".

    Because I don't think this matter was about off-lease Thinkpads.

  66. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I just now replaced a TV that was15 years old, only replaced because it was breaking down. (I still have it though, it's too heavy to drag down to the recyclers)

    Remember several decades back when there were still television repair shops, so you'd go to have it fixed, replace the picture tubes, tune the chokes, etc?

    There's a perfectly functional Sanyo TV, matching DVD player, and VHS tape deck from 2002 sitting in my entertainment center.

    Right next to a 1970s Lafayette Electronics (remember their electronics kits and Ham/CB radios?) analog stereo receiver, the kind with slide-rule AM/FM dial for the tuner portion, and an analog signal-strength/FM-stereo-signal-centering meter. That powers two pairs of 12"-woofer Rat-Shack "Optimus" speakers from the early 1980s. Still sounds great, and easily powerful/loud enough to rattle the windows and bring the local constabulary.

    I also feed video/audio to the system from my 2001 and 2006 PCs, as well as my SGI Octane system from ~1998.

    My cellphone is a 'soapbar' style basic LG from 2005.

    *I* and people like me who do not throw money at them every other year for the latest "Oooh, shiny!" are their enemy and their target. Africa just has a higher proportion who don't (and/or can't afford to) buy their products according to an "optimum upgrade schedule" designed to maximize their profits.

    The e-waste angle is just another tool being (mis-)used to "nudge" people to keep paying them over and over, and not repair, reuse, and/or re-sell their products.

    A *government* tool that would not exist, or at least not in a form that would allow the corrupt politicians to use in this way, if we did not allow governments to grow large enough to have so much power and control over everything and everybody's life that holding those in government accountable becomes impossible as a practical, peaceful matter. We've seen this recently with the DoJ, IRS, NSA, GCHQ, etc etc.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  67. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true about heat and LCD failure, though the LCD failure attributed to heat could also be from shoddy low cost producers and bad production runs (which also get directed at Africa).. And CRTs are heavy and less likely to be stolen.

  68. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Sure, this equipment is nicely sorted and in usable condition, but is there a distribution network on the receiving end? [...] From TFA:

    That's a good question, but the excerpt that you pasted does not in fact address it. Care to try again?

    It seems Mr. Benson has made a habit of this tactic

    The quoted section only proves that he has gotten in trouble for this before, not anything else.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Where would you get the power to run it?

    From a Honda Generator.

    Ahh, that was the old days. Now people buy china generators. They don't live long enough to get exported. They just get scrapped when they fail utterly, or when they're missing too many parts you can't get.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  70. Typical corporatist greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh, buzzwords! Crap. But really, that's what this is. I'll lay odds that this judge has a financial interest in new electronics (read modern, LCD screens as opposed to older tech like CRTs). All this repair/reuse of old first world tech in a third world market is hitting a LOT of bottom lines, and it's pissing them off royally.

    I wonder what they'd've made of my laptop recycling business I ran up to 2008, where I sent repaired laptops from the likes of Dell, Toshiba, HP and Compaq (before the merge - yeah, that kind of age) to African schools at pretty much the cost to ship them (hell, they didn't cost me anything and it was just a case of powering them up, seeing if they worked and if they did, take out the hard drive, make sure it had a wireless card and whack in a K12LX CD. Even a £20 mark on each unit meant I was making a friggin' fortune).

  71. Good /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stealing pie is illegal, especially if they're billionaires.

  72. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blacks: the most violent uncivilized race

    note - "saying those things offends me and that makes you a bad person and a big meanie head!" is not a rebuttal against anything i said.

    saying those things can only offend yourself because in absence of a clear definition of "violence" and "civilization" in context it just exposes you as ignorant and racist (what a coincidence!).

    i know youre desperate to clutch at straws and find something to disagree with there but i will let you in on something you apparently couldnt figure out on your own: when a definition is not supplied it means we are going by the standard commonly accepted definition of those words. i would suggest consulting the oxford english dictionary if you are unclear about what those two terms mean.

    then you can explain how 7% of the us population (black males) can be responsible for over 50% of all US murders and still be equal to everyone else. while contributing next to nothing in terms of science and new technology compared to whites and asians. then tell me how much you'd like to live in a majority black place like haiti, somalia, or hell detroit for that matter. since you are so very not-racist that should be no problem for you to move your family there - right?

    if you have to play games with definitions and semantics again i will understand. most ppl do that in a desperate effort to save face when they know they are wrong.

  73. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    same here. I don't want a car with a computer-controlled engine management system, because *when* that computer goes wrong, no matter how it goes wrong, that engine ain't starting without a dealer/mechanic EMU reset. Which costs money.

    Nope. Show me a car with a carburetor and I'll show you a wad of ready cash.

  74. Capitalism under attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must find this Marxist Judge, Police, and Prosecutor... ;-]

  75. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who runs a 16:9 CRT TV, he watches IPTV that comes through ADSL on the ISP provided box, and digital movies from Samba shares on his desktop computer, which is connected to a 100Hz CRT monitor. I was amazed that he set up the shares himself, lol.

    Downloaded SD movies look and sound better than ever, by the way. Generated by competent people, from BD rips and with the sound in at least AAC 128K if you're lucky.

  76. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LCDs should be modified for sustain the thermal conditions. Perhaps things will change once the African middle class starts demanding products designed for African conditions. Overheated LCDs have been filling repair shops even here in the arctic North. It is too bad that making the television slightly fatter would likely impact sales. Too few consumer cares about a better sound or increased endurance.

  77. It is a sin to destroy a working Commodore 64.... by luminousone11 · · Score: 1

    Their are many pieces of the past that if works should not be destroyed, And even if they don't work, we can still very likely get parts off it. I personally would love to find an atari ST, atari falcon, Mac 128k, Amiga 600/1200, any of the atari 8 bit computers. It is a shame that so many of these fantastic pieces of hardware end up getting destroyed.

  78. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now people buy china generators.

    Yes, where instead of Copper, they use Aluminium wire...instant decrease in useful lifespan (e.g. I've two generators at hand, one old (20+years) Honda beastie, which just keeps working..and a year old cheap chinese copy (bought for the boat as it was a bit lighter) which has been nothing but trouble..but, as I'm a rather bloody minded individual (with a large spare parts pile), it's not getting scrapped that easily..the generator might be iffy but the engine is fine..)

    They don't live long enough to get exported. They just get scrapped when they fail utterly, or when they're missing too many parts you can't get.

    Tell me about it.
    The good thing is that the chinese engines are usually based on an existing Honda/Other design, and once your scrap pile reaches a reasonable number of failed units, you stand a good chance of Frankensteining something working (but monstrous looking) out of them, usually replacing the obvious weakest link components with scrapped/new 'real' Honda equivalent parts (been there, done that...don't get me started on things like the quality (or lack thereof) of the pull start recoil springs fitted to your average chinese honda engine clone..)

    Over the past couple of years I've had the misfortune to have in for servicing/repair a large number of chinese engined mowers, generators, strimmers/brush cutters, pressure washers, chainsaws, petrol masonry/stihl saws (misfortune, as it isn't technically what I'm employed to do and it takes up valuable time, but hey, I know how to do it, and it's another part of my non-existant job description now..).

    I can honestly say that I've gotten to the point with some of them now that after a cursory look, it's a case of telling the owner that it's scrap, they're not usually happy about this, and when they start going on about how many hundreds of GBP the item cost, I fire up alibaba and show them the FOB cost of the item, and roughly what the import duty etc is, and point out that their 500 GBP item cost the suppliers betwixt 90-140 GBP to bring in and sell to them, and why, factoring in the cost of spares and my time, they're not worth fixing.

    That's usually a fun session.

  79. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    In reality, it's only something like 1% of that 7% of the population, with something like another 5% of that population involved in violent crime or robbery and 10% involved in nonviolent crime (I'm excluding drug use here for a reason). The remaining 84% of that group, comprising 5.88% of the population are, at the least, well-meaning people, and many of them are even pleasant to be around.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  80. Re: The headline is juicy, but hides a real proble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with what you're saying overall, but I think your response was just apologist in nature.

    The underlying problem still is that a majority of the crime comes from a minority population. Softening the problem will only make it worse because then no one will solve it.

  81. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious about this; do you have a source, or is that from experience?

    Not the original poster, but here's my experience.

    CRT Monitors and TVs tend to run hot, were designed to run hot, and seem to survive well in hot ambient conditions. LCD beasties, on the other hand, tend not to like high ambient temperatures for any length of time..in my non-AC'ed house in the third world that is the UK, I've three CRT TVs which have seen off their replacement LCDs..yes, they were replaced with LCD TVs, but these bloody things failed just after the guarantee period (14-16 month mark), and the old CRT ones dragged back out of storage.

    The Monitor on the machine I'm typing this on is a 15 year old 17" CRT, it replaced a 19" LCD IIyama which gave up the ghost a couple of years ago (at the grand old age of three).

    I'll lay the blame firmly on the LCD Monitor/TV design, they're mostly style over substance, from having no forced ventilation (would it hurt to fit an axial fan or two to keep the PCBs etc at a reasonable temperature? I've had a case of a Plasma TV where the localised heat build-up at one point in the case partially desoldered the joints on a flexible cable - causing me a couple of hours of find-the-transient-fault fun..) through general bad case design (seriously, who thought a case where the VGA and HDMI connectors placed right beside exposed mains voltage terminals was a good idea?, another where the act of adjusting the tilt of the monitor placed stress on one of the PCBs inside, eventually casing a ribbon connector to fail, i.e. there wasn't any sort of metal internal frame within the case to prevent torsion..basically it was relying of the LCD panel alone to provide this..not such a good idea ) to the bête noire of LCD TV/Monitors ... crap PSUs (from the usual dodgy Electrolytics to weirder issues, I've traced a fault to a component on the PSU board on a Panasonic model, gotten a copy of the service manual, compared schematic to board - guess what, it isn't the same IC, not even an equivalent funtion device, both SMT ICs came in at, ISTR, 35 GBP and 65 GBP from the only supplier I could find that stocked them in the UK.
    For a TV that was only worth 130 GBP secondhand, it wasn't worth it (so I stripped it out, sold the working panels individually on ebay for more than the second hand value of TV)

  82. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Smauler · · Score: 1

    Africa is on the equator, so the climate is like Florida or New York in Summer but all year round.

    Erm... Africa's quite a big place, with lots of different climates. Nearly all the north of Africa is desert climate, so nothing like Florida or New York. South Africa has ski resorts, Tangiers is Mediterranean climate.

    Any building without air conditioning becomes an oven. So having a 32" 600 watt plasma display wouldn't be appreciated. A small 12" black/white CRT is ideal and the bulkiness prevents looters from stealing it.

    One of the major advantages of LCD and LED TVs is their lower power consumption. See this page for a quick comparison. CRTs have awful power consumption, even tiny ones.

  83. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by znrt · · Score: 1

    i thought you'd came up with some conclussive scientific study showing irrefutable evidence that black humans are more prone to violent behaviour than white.

    instead you're just babbling about crime statistics around the ghettos in your little corner of the world were you happened to threw some blacks in a while back. so now you have a problem with them? don't tell ...

    i guess with such a display of skewed naiveness there's no point in even bothering to talk about civilization. have a nice day, keep enjoying your "commonly accepted definitions", you racist scumbag :-)

  84. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, it's hitler!

  85. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a five year old CRT? Many of those lasted for 10-15 years (I still have mine, bought it around 2000), where as I've been told (by people trying to convince me to buy a new TV, even) that modern LCD or Plasma displays should not be expected to last more than three to five years.

  86. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by deroby · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's what I do too.
    Although LCD technology is catching up (**), it's still hard to beat a SONY Trinitron (100Hz Pal+) IMHO! (much nicer colors, no artifacts, etc...).

    I guess it does consume some extra electricity and yes, it is bulky like hell and often gets some frowns from visitors. But on the other hand, if ever a burglar comes peaking through the window, it's probably the first thing he sees and might actually convince him to switch to the next house =)

    (**: that LG OLED 4K in the mall looked great but simply isn't affordable IMHO; and frankly, most shop-demo-stuff looks a lot nicer than what you actually get to see at home)

    --
    If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  87. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by phorm · · Score: 1

    if someone gave you a working 20-year-old TV, would you want it?

    No, nor would I likely want a 10-year-old TV. However, if somebody sold it to a person in a rather poor country that same TV for an affordable price (when said person is not likely able to afford the newer model, or at least the price difference makes it a reasonable buy), that seems OK to me.

    Better that the heads somewhere it can get a little bit more use, rather than being dumped in the ground somewhere or even separated into various bits in a rather environmentally unfriendly way.

  88. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by mellon · · Score: 1

    RIght, and we should definitely support this plan of yours by relaxing the laws on emission controls... Because after all your desire not to have to repair the computer totally trumps any desire we have to breathe clean air and not see forests destroyed by acid rain.

  89. Wonder what would happen now by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    In the early 90s my Dad was winding down his construction business. He had some Zambian employees, who bought (at slightly above scrap value) a truck that was going to be no longer legal to circulate in Europe due to upcoming emissions standards, and a lot of his old equipment before going home (in the truck) and starting their own business there. We still get a card every day, and they are doing incredibly well. Was that wrong?

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  90. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    I generally downcycle stuff. Get a new computer? The old one becomes the entertainment center, the old EC becomes the backup server for my work, the old server moves over to run the 3d printers, etc. Takes a full day to move over, mind.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  91. Re: The headline is juicy, but hides a real proble by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Nothing apologist about it, just calling out racism where I see it. Statistically yes, at least in the US, it does appear that black males who offend tend to do so more violently and more frequently than other offenders, but let's tow the racism party line by insinuating that all black men are offenders. This is just a case of the few ruining it for the many.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  92. If the Judge knew better.. by doccus · · Score: 1

    If the Judge knew better after reading that report, and STILL sentenced the guy for a crime that he KNEW he wasn't guilty of, then he is obviously corrupt. Welcome to a "brave new world" far worse than Aldous or Orwell *ever* could have believed possible..

  93. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by vandamme · · Score: 1

    No, I already have a 20 year old TV in my living room. Don't need a spare.

  94. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    For the majority of consumers in the first world. If you ever traveled more than 10 miles from your house you might find that other people live differently than you do. A 10 year old TV in some communities in India is a luxury!

    Been all over the world, Mr. Elitist Asshole.

    But as it happens this discussion *is about* "first world" e-trash, so put your head out of your ass.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  95. Re:The headline is juicy, but hides a real problem by toddestan · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure about televisions. A lot of people replaced their CRTs with LCDs and plasmas, so most of the people I know have televisions that are less than 10 years old. Many of them less than 5 years. From what I've seen of the build quality of most modern TVs, they'd be lucky to get 10 years out of them if they are used regularly, so I think the era of buying a TV and keeping it for 20-30 years is probably over for most people.

  96. That is not disagreement on that link by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It may take a while, but the lead does leech out over time

    Hundreds of years. Meanwhile the stuff on the boards is metallic and highly mobile.