Slashdot Mirror


Nearly 2,000 Chicago Flights Canceled After Worker Sets Fire At Radar Center

SpzToid sends this news out of Illinois: Nearly 2,000 flights in Chicago have been canceled so far today as federal aviation officials slowly resume operations at O'Hare and Midway airports following a fire that was deliberately set at an FAA radar center, apparently by a disgruntled worker. The center handles high-altitude traffic across parts of the Midwest. Controllers there direct planes through the airspace and either hand off the air traffic to other facilities handling high-altitude traffic or direct the planes to terminal radar facilities, including one in Elgin, which in turn direct planes to and from airport towers.

144 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. I've heard of burning your bridges, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    but this is way too literal.

  2. Obligatory by DougOtto · · Score: 1, Funny

    You mad bro?

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I... I... I said if they... if they move my desk one more time I'll set the building on fire!

    2. Re:Obligatory by Zynder · · Score: 2

      It must be the geezer in me bitching about his lawn, but since when did anything with bro become obligatory, bro?

    3. Re:Obligatory by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      If it was on the Simpsons, it is.

  3. Disgruntled worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a high-visibility example, but employers should really learn it can be much cheaper to gently gruntle your workers than to deal with the consequences.

    1. Re: Disgruntled worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, what's the cost ratio of one Swingline stapler versus thousands of cancelled flights?

  4. FTFA by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Police said the man is a contractor, not an air traffic controller or FAA manager. ";We understand that this is a local issue with a contract employee and nothing else,"; Aurora Police Chief Gregory Thomas told reporters. ";There is no terrorist act."

    Thank Allah!

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:FTFA by ruir · · Score: 1

      Corporate doublespeak and half truths. So it means they were cheating out the poor sod of security on the job, and probably means, I suppose, they have got "permanent"/consultant contractors, which is say, quite smart for a job of this importance. We also have got this scam running him, and people hate it. Mostly used by the call centre, cleaning crew, IT people, and nurse industry to screw then over.

    2. Re:FTFA by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the sudden impression that at least 50% of slashdot comments are created by bots?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    3. Re:FTFA by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Ssshhh.

      Slashdot is really a huge covert communications channel, I'm sure. You've seen the nonsense AC posts? I'm pretty sure those are coded messages :P

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  5. Who knew Milton Waddams worked at the airport? by JoeyRox · · Score: 2
  6. Re:Smart move moron by rcamans · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently you did nod read the lead. He fired them.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  7. Scorpion ot the rescue! by macraig · · Score: 2, Informative

    So did they send in the new Scorpion team to save the day?

    1. Re:Scorpion ot the rescue! by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2

      So did they send in the new Scorpion team to save the day?

      They tried, but were having trouble finding a 458 that could transform into a 360 and back in the blink of an eye.

      (The dash they flash to while accelerating was a Ferrari 360, not the 458 he was driving)

  8. Re:dehumanization in action: by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    Alternate view;
    You come in late, leave early and do as little as possible while you are here. When someone calls you on it you try to burn the place down. Keep up the good work.
    Is there any wonder there are disgruntled employers?

  9. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your solution is "don't travel so much?" With all due respect, go fuck yourself. We already pay fees on airline tickets to pay for things like this. If the system cannot handle the current load, then the system needs to be upgraded.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  10. No redundancy? by billrp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So there's no provision for having the work done at this center be taken up at other centers? The news reports say radar center, but can't the data be routed elsewhere? What it there were a much larger fire that took down the facility for months? Does that mean Chicago becomes a no-fly zone?

    1. Re:No redundancy? by jfmiller · · Score: 2

      Press reports are still very sketchy, but it seems like the suspect was in charge of maintaining the very systems that allow such transfers of control and that he intentionally destroyed key connections between radar and radio installations and the Air Traffic Control system. Why this building contained single points of failure is something I'm sure the NTSB report will focus heavily on, but at some point a connection has to exist between the physical hardware that track aircraft and transmits radio instructions and the network routes that information. The report that he had "ripped up carpet and cut cables" reads to me like someone who knew where to find one of these critical single points of failure.

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    2. Re:No redundancy? by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

      Unless somebody has changed the rules since I last looked, center handles all enroute IFR (instrument flight) traffic in a larger area, not just that above 10,000 feet. There are significant numbers of remoted radio transmitters and receivers so center can talk to all the aircraft over a wide area. Relocating the whole thing to another area doesn't just mean re-routing the radar replies, and coming up with another fully manned center, it means rerouting the audio and control to all those transmitters and receivers. It's not a trivial job at all.
      To give an example of just how far away center can be, I live in far west Texas, about 70 miles from the Mexican border. When I call up center, I'm talking to people in a room in Albuquerque, NM. I believe their remote transmitter for this area may be in Ft. Stockton, TX, about 70 miles from here.
      A nasty problem it is, and quite possibly one with no affordable solution.

  11. Re:Big Goverment no backup by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    They have a backup for the hardware but when the building had to be cleared the controllers had to leave their stations. Sorry but it is not feasible to have a complete crew sitting around in another complete office just in case something goes wrong.

  12. RTFA by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    No

  13. Really, a single oint of failure? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would think that the major hubs in the US didn't operate with this poor of a practice. Honestly, I'm flabbergasted. This is not something you can hide when it's exposed. What I find more surprising is that with this big of a deficiency, they didn't go with the "terrorist" card in order to deflect some of the backlash this should cause.

    I wonder how many other airports are using a system with similar vulnerability.

    I don't see this as just a problem with some guy who obviously did something wrong. Seems like lighting or other natural events could have the same impact.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by plover · · Score: 2

      This is an AIR traffic control problem, and is not localized to O'Hare airport. They manage all the flights over the entire region. I'm sure they will extend the operations to the surrounding regional centers to make up for the loss, but due to the sheer volume of traffic the Aurora center used to handle, the other centers will need to add a lot of extra staff to deal with it.

      I suspect they are temporarily operating with local staff called in for the emergency, but that's not sustainable. They'll likely need to redistribute the Aurora staff to the other centers. It will take several hours for them to all travel to their new assignments. It takes about six hours to drive from the Aurora center to the Farmington center near Minneapolis, and that's not counting going home and packing for an extended stay.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Xipher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Redundancy costs money, and people don't like spending more money. To save cost you cut redundancy.

      --
      I don't know everything.
    3. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      . It takes about six hours to drive from the Aurora center to the Farmington center near Minneapolis, and that's not counting going home and packing for an extended stay.

      Drive? Why would they drive that far? It's much quicker to fly.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I would think that the major hubs in the US didn't operate with this poor of a practice. Honestly, I'm flabbergasted.

      Huh? What "poor of a practice"? Evacuating a building that is on fire? My God! How stupid can that be? Leave them in the building and let them burn, just as long as no flights are delayed.

      I wonder how many other airports are using a system with similar vulnerability.

      You mean a "system" where people work in buildings where there could be a fire? I think I can answer this one: ALL of them.

      Seems like lighting or other natural events could have the same impact.

      Buildings are rarely evacuated because of lighting. The centers are usually operated at reduced lighting levels anyway. They are also not usually evacuated because of lightning, and while a lightning strike can take out commercial power, the backups will come online quickly.

      Can "natural events" take out a radio transmitter? Of course. That's why there are backups for those, too.

      Now, what happens when a nutter cuts the cable going out of the building, or sets it afire? Yeah, it has a serious impact.

      This isn't a glaring example of government mismanagement. Dial it back a few notches, ok?

    5. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      . It takes about six hours to drive from the Aurora center to the Farmington center near Minneapolis, and that's not counting going home and packing for an extended stay.

      Drive? Why would they drive that far? It's much quicker to fly.

      Well, duuh. All the planes are grounded. How are they supposed to fly? ..... ...or was that a big wooosh?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    6. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, duuh. All the planes are grounded. How are they supposed to fly? ..... ...or was that a big wooosh?

      Barring inclement weather, if all the commercial planes are grounded so that traffic is not an issue, it should be well possible to land planes visually for a purpose like bringing in the experts to fix the situation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Barring inclement weather,

      Not even barring inclement weather. The navigation aids were not impacted by this, only center. Departure and approach were still functional, too. Get an IFR clearance and fly it. You don't have to talk to a center to do that.

    8. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by plover · · Score: 1

      The Mythbusters demonstrated it's plausible that driving distances less than 400 miles is faster than flying.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      It's almost exactly a 400 mile journey that takes 6 hours.

      https://www.google.com/maps/di...

      And if you're hauling a month's worth of stuff, or a family, you might not want to stuff it in a single checked bag.

      --
      John
    9. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      ...or was that a big wooosh?

      No, just a joke. :^)

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Depends on the cost.

      If an extra building would add $1 to each ticket-- might be worth it.

      But if it adds $20 to every ticket and it happens once per 20 years.. probably not worth it.

      No good information in this case to make a decision on.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Not even barring inclement weather. The navigation aids were not impacted by this, only center. Departure and approach were still functional, too. Get an IFR clearance and fly it. You don't have to talk to a center to do that.

      It's the getting the clearance which is the issue. Because of the problem the FAA might reject your flight plan. If the flight is effectivly a charter by the FAA then that isn't likely to happen.

    12. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Now, what happens when a nutter cuts the cable going out of the building, or sets it afire? Yeah, it has a serious impact.

      Where there is malicious action that can easily circumvent "redundancy". Especially where this involves "insiders" who can know which parts of systems are the least redundant. Since redundant systems are generally intended to be so against random damage.

    13. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by mpe · · Score: 1

      You might as well be the person in the back yelling "WHY AREN'T WE TAKING OFF" after a blown tire and abort near V1.

      Or even the one in the back of the plane behind the one now stuck half way down the runway until all the wheels on the MLG are changed.

    14. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      They could always land at Meig's. Oh wait... F'ing Daley.

    15. Re:Really, a single oint of failure? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It's the getting the clearance which is the issue. Because of the problem the FAA might reject your flight plan.

      The FAA cannot reject your flight plan. The clearance they give you may not match what you ask for, but they'll give you something. And, as you continued, you'll definitely get something if you are an FAA-operated aircraft transporting FAA personnel to repair an out-of-service FAA facility.

  14. Re:what a difference a day makes by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Police said the man is a contractor, not an air traffic controller or FAA manager.

    Reading is hard.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  15. Re:Smart move moron by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    Considered that the article refers to him as a "worker" and not an "ex-employee" he may not have even been fired yet. If he wasn't fired before he definitely will be now and no unemployment benefits as it is termination for cause.

    Well, he does have SOME benefits. He'd get free room and board and meals for a number of years now.

  16. Re:what a difference a day makes by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    If he was hired to mow the lawn he would have access to the site. It's pretty hard to stop someone from taking a can of gasoline and tossing it over a fence (or some such).

  17. Re:Smart move moron by plopez · · Score: 1

    It also comes with a free gym membership where he can meet new and interesting people.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  18. Could be worse by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    In one workplace in Ohio a coworker chopped off someone's head after being fired.

    Fire is the least of your worries

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Could be worse by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      that was Oklahoma, not Ohio you Insensitive Clod!

    2. Re:Could be worse by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Lest we forget Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771, which saw a plane load of people killed because some guy didn't like that they got fired for stealing money (which he did, he was caught on camera).

  19. what a difference a day makes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    its obvious that we need to regulate matches. When one person can just walk into a store buy a pack of matches and threaten 1000 innocent airplanes we have an epidemic in the USA, Other countries have sensical match control laws. It is about time the USA got on board too.

    If we could have outlawed matches this tragedy could have been avoided. Yes the problem with the USA is there aren't enough common sense laws.

  20. Re:Really, a single oink of failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Redundancy is really expensive, bro. How will management pay for their golf outings if you spend the budget on actual work?

  21. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Dishevel · · Score: 1
    Is it though feasible to set up the the system so those controllers can go home, login to a VPN and have a nation wide system that they can load their area into and continue work?

    Reroute the data to a cloud service have the PCs remote into virtual workstations and have the radio fed through the same system. Small amount of latency, but should not be an issue. Hell. Build out the whole system on the same frame work and distribute the hell out of the workloads.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  22. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Wookact · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You want them to land planes from home? LOL That has to be the silliest thing I have heard all week.

  23. Re: Smart move moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    . . . and unlimited dates!

  24. Striking air traffic controllers fired by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember when Ronald Reagan fired all of the air traffic controllers because they had the nerve to form a union and strike for better pay? Now the air traffic controllers work on obsolete equipment, get paid very little, have a stressful job with long hours, oh and are the only people stopping planes from running into eachother. I am almost amazed no one has gone crazy before now.

    1. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Remember when Ronald Reagan fired all of the air traffic controllers because they had the nerve to form a union and strike for better pay?

      You mean, when they conspired to cripple the nation's air-transportation — holding the rest of us hostage? Imagine, Verizon turning off all telephones to demand lower taxes — a public employee has an even stronger monopoly power...

      Now the air traffic controllers work on obsolete equipment, get paid very little, have a stressful job with long hours

      That must all be Reagan's fault, right, 30 years later...

      I am almost amazed no one has gone crazy before now.

      Maybe, it just is not quite as bad as you are describing?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I've mentioned a few times here on /. that people blame the poor quality of air travel on Reagan firing the ATCs 30 years ago. Some don't believe me. Some think it's only the Deregulation that people blame.

      Thank you for showing us that there are people who, after three decades, still blame him for firing people who refused to work.

      And with that low enough of a UID, it isn't like you're a newbie here.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you'll substantiate that.

    4. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      oh and are the only people stopping planes from running into eachother.

      Believe it or not, there are other people who stop planes from running into "each other". They're called "pilots". Actual human beings who control the airplanes and where they go.

      Of course they aren't perfect at keeping airplanes from running into each other. They're humans. (And computers aren't perfect at it either.) Just like the ATC humans aren't perfect at keeping minimum separation.

    5. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I am almost amazed no one has gone crazy before now.

      Well, there's always alcoholism.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Like all other federal employees, the FAA ATC staff are legally barred from going on strike.

    7. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      See and avoid doesn't work so well when you're in the clouds.

      No, but commercial aircraft in high traffic areas tend to have TCAS and similar to alert them to traffic, and if on a proper clearance won't run into anyone anyway.

      Also, you might not see an aircraft coming at you until it's too late.

      Like I said, they are humans in the cockpit, and their failure to be perfect at see-and-avoid doesn't mean ATC is the only person keeping them apart.

      So, yeah, the OP was right.

      No, he was wrong. The pilots are also there to keep planes from running into each other. If you are going to discount their presence because they are imperfect at it and think only ATC has that job, then you better discount ATC as well because they are not perfect, either.

      In many (most?) situations, controllers are the only people stopping planes from running into each other.

      Bullshit.

    8. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      In many (most?) situations, controllers are the only people stopping planes from running into each other.

      Bullshit.

      Parent has seen all the proof he needs in "Die Hard II".

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    9. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mpe · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there are other people who stop planes from running into "each other". They're called "pilots". Actual human beings who control the airplanes and where they go.

      They also tend to have a direct personal interest in planes not colliding too. They are also not obliged to follow ATC either. There are rules specifically indicating that if ATC and TCAS are in conflict to follow TCAS. Though a pilot might have to answer to all sorts of people afterwards if they said "unable" without a good reason.

    10. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mpe · · Score: 1

      No, but commercial aircraft in high traffic areas tend to have TCAS and similar to alert them to traffic, and if on a proper clearance won't run into anyone anyway.

      IIRC there are plenty of places where TCAS is mandatory. Even for light aircraft which intend to use that airspace.

    11. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mpe · · Score: 1

      Parent has seen all the proof he needs in "Die Hard II".

      This fiction. Mythbusters managed to inadvertantly "bust" the ending too.

    12. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the big, bad UNION . I don't defend them all (police unions are the biggest sacks of unionized assholes in the world) but let's take your Verizon example and switch it up a bit.

      Boeing and Microsoft have or are threatening Washington state. Both are doing it for profit for the companies and directly against the interest of their own employees. What about the collusion among tech companies to not hire each other's employees? Why devalue and demonize workers so much? Demand higher standards, absolutely, but understand that sometimes we need to to fight back rather than fighting each other for the scraps.

    13. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      You mean, when they conspired to cripple the nation's air-transportation — holding the rest of us hostage? Imagine, Verizon turning off all telephones to demand lower taxes — a public employee has an even stronger monopoly power...

      That's how strikes work - they cripple their industry as an extreme resort for bargaining purposes. You can make it sound very scary for other situations too, like the time the fast-food workers conspired to cripple the nation's fast-food industry - holding the rest of us hostage!

      A comparable situation with phones would be when manual patching was needed if the switchboard operators went on strike to demand better working conditions/pay. Strikes are done by employees against the company, not by companies against the government.

      Now the air traffic controllers work on obsolete equipment, get paid very little, have a stressful job with long hours

      That must all be Reagan's fault, right, 30 years later.

      You are correct. A union would have been able to negotiate better pay and working conditions.

    14. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mi · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the big, bad UNION .

      Yes, them. Labor unions are nothing but monopolies (or wanna-be monopolies), whose sole official purpose is maintaining and increasing the prices, their members can charge. As such, they ought to be treated to the anti-monopoly laws as well as, when the members break the law (for the union's sake) with the federal RICO law — as racketeer-influenced and corrupt organizations — rather than have each beating, shooting, or property destruction treated as isolated crimes committed by individual members on their own.

      On top of it, any union, whose connection to the bona-fide crime is proven (even if it is just a single union official), must be disbanded automatically and immediately — the innocent members, who wish to unionize again, can do so under a new name later.

      Both are doing it for profit for the companies and directly against the interest of their own employees.

      They do. But they've grown to become that way naturally — not by using the law to force others to join them, as the unions are legally empowered to do.

      What about the collusion among tech companies to not hire each other's employees?

      Such collusions — if they are legal to begin with — are not supported by the existing law. Very much unlike the unionization — whereby a group of employees may vote to "unionize" a particular workplace and then they get to force other employees to join their union as well as prevent the employer from hiring outside of the union.

      Sure, people ought to be free to associate with each other. But labor unions have much more law on their side, than a church club or a bowling league. And that just should not be the case...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    15. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mi · · Score: 1

      That's how strikes work - they cripple their industry as an extreme resort for bargaining purposes.

      Sure. All monopolies work that way — this is why we have anti-monopoly laws. We just aren't applying them to unions for some mysterious reasons, even though — letter by letter — that's exactly, what they are. Monopolies seeking to maintain and ever increase the prices of what their members are selling (labor).

      If the US saw fit to block a merger of Staples and Office Depot — for fear of the resulting entity dominating the market of the freaking office supplies, how come we not merely tolerate, but encourage monopolies in the market of law-enforcement, teaching, healthcare, and construction labor?

      A union would have been able to negotiate better pay and working conditions.

      Hanging a couple of grievance-mongers would've improved the morale just as well — and cost much less, don't you think?

      Seriously, nobody is forcing people to become — and remain — air-traffic controllers. We don't have slavery — not even indentured labor — and have a reasonably free market. If one remains on the job, then it must be good enough for him to not seek an alternative...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      By that logic, the FAA has a monopoly on hiring air traffic controllers, but no one would say that because it's ridiculous. Unions exist because a single employee does not have bargaining power against a corporation. Without them, we'd be working 10 hours a day, 6 days a week with no benefits. People aren't the same as products. They have basic needs and human rights that we prefer them to have.

    17. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by mi · · Score: 1

      FAA has a monopoly on hiring air traffic controllers

      Yes, and Pentagon has a monopoly power to hire soldiers. It is a governmental organization and any government is a monopoly by definition (which is a good reason to keep its responsibilities to a minimum, but that's another story).

      Unions exist because a single employee does not have bargaining power against a corporation.

      Which corporation were the air-traffic controllers bargaining with, when Reagan crushed them? Hint: public employees (be they air controllers or policemen) aren't struggling against any corporations — their employers are the taxpayers. They should not be allowed to unionize — and certainly, not strike:

      strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable

      Franklin Delano Roosevelt

      Without them, we'd be working 10 hours a day, 6 days a week with no benefits.

      Really? So, if we get the current abysmal union-membership to, say, above 80%, we'll only have to work one day a week? For 2 hours? Wouldn't that be great!!

      People aren't the same as products.

      People — workers — choose to sell their labor on the free market to the willing buyers. Any attempts to make that market not free should be met with the same energetic response Standard Oil and AT&T have encountered, when they tried to become a monopoly.

      They have basic needs and human rights that we prefer them to have.

      Any smart employer addresses basic needs of the workers — in order to keep them happy and thus more productive. No employer is allowed to violate human rights — unions or not...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    18. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Which corporation were the air-traffic controllers bargaining with, when Reagan crushed them? Hint: public employees (be they air controllers or policemen) aren't struggling against any corporations — their employers are the taxpayers. They should not be allowed to unionize — and certainly, not strike:

      The FAA is the "corporation" in this case. Just because it gets its money from tax payers doesn't mean it can't abuse its employees and doesn't mean the employees don't get human rights.

      Really? So, if we get the current abysmal union-membership to, say, above 80%, we'll only have to work one day a week? For 2 hours? Wouldn't that be great!!

      Probably so - American workers are much more efficient than in the past which is part of why unemployment is so high. If businesses hired two employees for 30 hours a week rather than one for 60, it'd be much more beneficial to society. Of course there are issues with employee overhead such as health care, but that's just more reason the US needs to meet the level of the rest of the first world countries and provide it.

      People — workers — choose to sell their labor on the free market to the willing buyers. Any attempts to make that market not free should be met with the same energetic response Standard Oil and AT&T have encountered, when they tried to become a monopoly.

      There are still difference between humans, unions, and corporations. If you think a union is a monopoly on the supply side of labor, then the corporation is a monopoly on the demand side. You also have to remember that monopolies aren't illegal. We have laws against abusive monopolies to protect consumers (people) from abusive corporations. Unions do the same.

      Any smart employer addresses basic needs of the workers — in order to keep them happy and thus more productive. No employer is allowed to violate human rights — unions or not...

      Unfortunately, short term gains often come first, so many don't even pay employees a livable wage.

    19. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Parent has seen all the proof he needs in "Die Hard II".

      And in "Scorpion", where we learned that nobody can land anything if the tower software is out of operation, that transcontinental aircraft carry a copy of the ATC routing software, that those aircraft have a cat5 cable hanging around in the equipment bay that can be dropped out a wheel well so a hacker can download the software, that an ATC software failure can disable the red/green light guns that are installed in towers explicitly to deal with communications failures, that the data archive disk for the ATC software has a label "FAA" on it, that right handed data server managers put their important servers on the right side of the room, that a 500,000 kW glitch in the power grid will cause data center doors to open, ... OMG.

      The only reason to watch that show is for the mom. I recorded it and I'm keeping it, if for no other reason that to have something to point at as an example of really really really bad technical content in a prime time program. I can't wait to see what they slaughter tonight.

    20. Re:Striking air traffic controllers fired by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      IIRC there are plenty of places where TCAS is mandatory. Even for light aircraft which intend to use that airspace.

      You may be thinking of transponders with Mode C. I don't know of any airspace where TCAS is required for all aircraft, but class B requires Mode C. At least in the US.

  25. HR still says by Livius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    cheap contract workers are better than investing in employees!

    1. Re:HR still says by mi · · Score: 1

      Nobody owes you a living. Not even if you are a well invested-into employee.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:HR still says by Zynder · · Score: 1

      So people in America are starving then. Thanks.

    3. Re:HR still says by mpe · · Score: 1

      loyalty side effects may occur (aka you get what you pay for)

      There are also highly paid (possibly overpaid) people who show utter contempt for their employers though.

    4. Re:HR still says by theCoder · · Score: 2

      Your comment got me interested in actual numbers, so I did some Google searches. I expected to find a small but nonzero number of yearly deaths. The results I found indicated that death by starvation in America is so infrequent that it's not even tracked. Occasional cases do occur, but they are often the result of something other than lack of access to food, such as child neglect or mental illness. Even Feeding America only talks about the effects of hunger and food insecurity, not actual starvations. There are lots of programs, both government and private charities that provide food and assistance to those who need it.

      That's not to trivialize the very real problems of malnutrition or hunger, which can have serious consequences. But outright death to lack of access to food does seem to be practically non-existent in the U.S.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  26. The kinder, gentler terrorism by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nearly 2,000 flights in Chicago have been canceled so far today as federal aviation officials slowly resume operations at O'Hare and Midway airports following a fire that was deliberately set at an FAA radar center, apparently by a disgruntled worker.

    If a single person can cause so much havoc without killing anyone — and without the condemnation and sympathy for the victim concomitant with any would-be murder — the terrorists don't need to kill.

    Heck, they don't even need to set fire — just phone-in an anonymous warning.

    A moderately motivated group could also disable a city's subway system for hours — by boarding the trains on carefully picked stations and pretending to have a seizure of some sort. Our kind society's rules (as evidenced in that paragon of humanity New York City) say, you can not be taken out of the train — except by "qualified personnel". So all other passengers will be removed from the car and the train will wait for the EMS to arrive and figure out, what to do with you. If your friends do the same to every other subway lines at the same time — during rush hour — your organization is bound to get donations, all without you killing or maiming a single person...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by Livius · · Score: 1

      the terrorists don't need to kill.

      The terrorists just need to say a few things on their cell phones, and let the NSA and paranoia do the rest.

      Bin Laden's goal was to turn the US into what it's become. He succeeded.

    2. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by mi · · Score: 1

      ... and let the NSA and paranoia do the rest

      I strongly suspect, the NSA are a lot smarter, than your average pig or a school principal. Their reaction will be more appropriate than that of a local police department or school...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      No one said terrorists are smart people... Probably cause smart people have better things to do with their time.

    4. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by Livius · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are confused about which side the NSA is on. They are not interested in reducing anyone's fear, not even their own.

    5. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by mi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are confused about which side the NSA is on.

      Seems like one of us is confused indeed. They are on America's side and they are sincere. They will not act on a threat — such as a prankster talking about a terrorist act on his phone — if they consider it bogus. Now, it may be possible for such a prankster to fool them — and they may choose to err on the side of caution. But they are quite smart, so fooling them is not easy...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    6. Re:The kinder, gentler terrorism by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      If your friends do the same to every other subway lines at the same time

      you could potentially get the bonus effect of a pandemic frenzy. Not only would all of the "seizures" shut down subway traffic (assuming your situation is plausible, which it sounds), but it would have a lingering effect as news stations trip over each other to get the first word about a dozen "mysterious" seizures happening in the same system at the same time and saying they're hypothetical biochemical weapons or some disease. As each one feeds upon the speculation from the other 24-hour news channels, the local population could be whipped into a small frenzy and leave the subways much emptier the day afterward. Other cities with subways might have minor hiccups as well as people become worried about something similar happening there, or any poor soul who has a real seizure on the subway causes panic as people shove over each other to get the hell away from him.

      While the truth would come out in time, there would still be permanent damage as the news reported it was a terrorist plot, compounding the fear that existed already by that point. Even if no one was killed, there would then be added concern of orchestrated terrorist activities within the US.

  27. Re:Smart move moron by kefkahax · · Score: 1

    He was transferred to Hawaii. I can think of few reasons to not want to leave the midwest for Hawaii (or, basically, anywhere).

  28. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Sure they did... they've got backup airspace all over the US.

  29. Re:Smart move moron by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Apparently he tried (unsuccessfully, so far) to commit suicide, so job prospects were probably not part of his agenda.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  30. Re:what a difference a day makes by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's actually a really good point. If you want to get access to sensitive locations, get hired onto the work crew. Want a key to the CEO's office? Become a janitor.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  31. single point of failure? by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I don't know much of anything about how air traffic control works, but a fire at a single radar station practically shutting down o'hare seems to point towards a single point of failure, that probably ought to be looked at.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:single point of failure? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I don't know much of anything about how air traffic control works either. But with airports being thought of as the main point of terrorist activity, their immediate reaction was probably "Lock down due to possible terrorist activity". Then once they discovered what happened, they properly diverted to whatever backup plan they have for fire situations.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:single point of failure? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If only it worked like that. As long as planes don't actually crash they only need one radar, and all the disruption can always be blamed on someone else. Why spend money on preventing things you won't take the blame for?

      In other words, they want maximum profits and minimum costs, not reliability.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  32. Backups? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Aren't these kinds of critical systems supposed to have backups? I see DHS/TSA is too busy strip searching children/grandmas, securing chicken farms & writing up justifications for their abuse of authority to bother with the "unimportant" things like securing/fortifying the transportation infrastructure.

    1. Re:Backups? by ruir · · Score: 1

      I would be far worried about this kind of industry cheating out people/workers of job security with fake consulting/(sub)contracting roles for years to circumvent labor laws than with backup systems. When you fuck with people and they have got nothing to lose, shit like this is bound to happen.

    2. Re:Backups? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      Giving people a reasonable sense of job security is definitely a step in the right direction, but you still have to be ready for the rare nut-job (employee or otherwise). While that includes onsite backup equipment (which they apparently had) it must also include off site backup facilities. I work with my local PD a bit and from what I understand even they have contingency plans for if the 911 dispatch center is evacuated/destroyed. If something happens the entire call load for the county can be redirected to one of several other sites in a few minutes. If a mid sized county (less than 100,000) can manage that kind of capability you would think a multimillion dollar air traffic control facility would be able to.

    3. Re:Backups? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      "Load balancing" the work like that works nicely.. until you run at 90% load all the time, and you suddenly lose 15% of your capacity.

    4. Re:Backups? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      Real world situations are rarely so cut and dry as "we can't handle the entire load, so we can't handle any of it". Being able to at least transfer the communications/information to another center(s) would allow for directing of a portion of the flights. A very similar thing happens every day with inclement weather, with flights being slowed, redirected or delayed.

  33. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Are you under the impression the controllers land airplanes?

  34. Re:Big Goverment no backup by sabri · · Score: 1

    Reroute the data to a cloud service have the PCs remote into virtual workstations and have the radio fed through the same system.

    Imagine making the call to your HOA: "do you mind if I install a primary and secondary radar system on the rooftop of the apartment building? Yeah, I need that for work. Ok, thanks, bye"

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  35. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you under the impression that every home internet connection has an SLA? I really wouldn't want to be in the air with an emergency while my controller was staring at "Connection reset by peer".

  36. Re:Smart move moron by tompaulco · · Score: 1, Troll

    He shouldn't have too much trouble finding work. Alton Nolen, the guy that beheaded a co-worker in Oklahoma this morning in another incident that is also Not Terrorism had only been released from prison a year ago:

    And I am sure our wonderful District Attorney Prater is already on his way to file life in prison charges against the owner of the company who saved countless lives by shooting and killing this maniac. But that's modern liberal life in Oklahoma. Kill a gun wielding thief, go to jail for life. Kill a couple of unarmed innocents, go to jail for maybe 10 years, out in 5.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  37. Re:what a difference a day makes by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is exactly why lots of people wonder about the intelligence of hiring on the lowest bidder to clean out and stock commercial aircraft. You know, those people who scrunch down everywhere in the cabin with no supervision. Who load baggage in the hold after the TSA 'screens' it. Who deliver boxes and boxes of stuff to all manner of aircraft.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  38. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Anrego · · Score: 1

    Indeed.

    And even if the system is secured (hah), all it takes is some malware on a controllers home computer (or if there is a work issued one, for one of them to let their kid install limewire (or whatever the current virus bag is) on it.

  39. Re:Big Goverment no backup by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    Is it though feasible to set up the the system so those controllers can go home, login to a VPN and have a nation wide system that they can load their area into and continue work?

    And then when some Chinese hacker breaks in and redirects every plane in the country to Newark, you'll be bitching about the stupidity of connecting the air traffic control system to the Internet.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  40. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by jonwil · · Score: 1

    The real problem is that the airlines switched from having a few flights a day between point a and point b using medium sized or large aircraft to having more flights per day using smaller aircraft.
    Reverse that and you wont have anywhere near as much of a problem (especially if the airlines have an incentive to use larger planes as demand grows rather than adding more flights)

  41. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    You do realize that 50 to 60 percent of an airline ticket are taxes and airport fees?

    Yeah....that's not true.

  42. Re:what a difference a day makes by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    The people you're talking about go through a ton of screening before being allowed onto an aircraft. They couldn't just bring a bomb in from their car.

  43. Re:Big Goverment no backup by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    You fail-over to another controller, obviously.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  44. Site Design by asasdlfgnjl · · Score: 1

    Looks like TFA was designed for 640x480. Also what happened to the borders for slash posts/comments? My brain craves structure. Floating in whitespace unsettles me.

  45. Let's see whether they actually prosecute, first. by pupsocket · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy was a telecommunications specialist working in the basement. Are you familiar with the type?

    He is a contractor whose direct employer is specified as Company A in the affadavit.

    Apparently he looked in the mirror and did not like what he saw in himself or in his employer.

    He was being transferred from Chicago to Hawaii. Disgruntlement?

    He claims it's a crisis of conscience.

  46. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    These are not the trollsocks you want...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  47. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have a backup for the hardware but when the building had to be cleared the controllers had to leave their stations. Sorry but it is not feasible to have a complete crew sitting around in another complete office just in case something goes wrong.

    No, but it is feasible to have fire breaks that make it unnecessary to evacuate all of the controllers in the event of a fire. Check out the way they do it in the UK counterpart: http://www.bristolairfield.co.uk/london_control.php

    Has 1000 smoke detectors and 500 manual fire alarm call points
    Is divided into compartments separated by walls giving two hours fire resistance.

    Of course that UK centre's building is probably several decades newer than the building(s) were in the US.

  48. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    depends on how transparent the breakdown is... I do recall some airfares that were pretty close to 50/50 fare/taxes+fees, and I certainly have long distance phone bills that clearly show pennies worth of calls and dollars worth of "fees" that are carefully described as "not taxes".

    So, while everything isn't "taxes", they are larger than you think, but the "profit" part is generally pretty small. For example, the current "profit margin" for American Airlines is negative That can't be good...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  49. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    travel forced on employees

    I'm a frequent business traveller. I appreciate getting out of the office and getting in front of customers and other users.

  50. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Whoosh!

  51. And HomeLand Security Theater TSA Was ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    sitting off in a corner of OHare masturbating like there was no tomorrow.

    I'm sure the Führer of HomeLand Security will goose-step march into Big-O's Orifice and demand TSA guards assigned 1-to-1 for every FAA employee, in order to kill the FAA employee when signs of Impurity and Treason occur.

    Sig Heil

  52. Re:what a difference a day makes by spitzak · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, everybody should carry matches! They would surely have stopped this maniac that way! It's the damn gubiment saying we can't carry matches...

  53. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    ... If the system cannot handle the current load, then the system needs to be upgraded.

    The system handles the current load just fine. They just haven't gone to the expense of making it doubly redundant so when a major facility goes down it causes problems. Once ADSB becomes mandatory in 2020 this will be less of an issue for a radar facility like this since each airplane will be broadcasting it's position and vector to every other ADSB equipped airplane and they won't need ground based radar to maintain separation.

  54. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    I don't know about commericial airlines, but I know that when I was checking private jets, the airline fees and taxes was much more than 50% of the cost. It was closer to 80-90%.

  55. Re:dehumanization in action: by HiThere · · Score: 1

    But which do you think is more common?

    Mind you, doing it in a way so easily traceable is a sign of being so upset that you count as crazy, but there's often a reason (or more than one) that people go crazy.

    FWIW, "going crazy" in ways analogous to this is a part of our evolutionary toolkit for dealing with abusive management. It doesn't work as well in modern society, as those in control have learned to isolate themselves from the possibility of retribution, but in earlier times reactions analogous to this would lead to the abused person being killed, and the abuser being injured, often permanently. Which would make it much easier for his successor to take him down. The math justifying this is too complex for me to follow, but those who have worked it out say "it's probably right". It does assume that most of our evolution happened in small groups of reasonably closely related individuals, but that seems a quite reasonable assumption.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  56. Re: dehumanization in action: by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    Overall I don't know and neither do you because there are no real numbers. There are plenty of example of workers slacking off. Just go to any road construction site.

  57. Re:what a difference a day makes by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    "...The people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. [pause] Do not fuck with us."

    --Tyler Durden

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  58. Re:dehumanization in action: by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Is there any wonder there are disgruntled employers?

    Disgruntled employers?? Shit like this pisses off everyone. It causes panic among the people that get to enact new laws that fuck over the rest of us, for our protection!

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  59. Re:Big Goverment no backup by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Reroute the data to a cloud service

    Oh what fun the hackers would have!

    Oh I get it, cloud service ...planes ...the sky ...funny.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  60. Re:Let's see whether they actually prosecute, firs by pupsocket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will the person who modded my comment down please read it?

    He did not set the whole facility on fire. He tore up the floorboards and set fire to whatever was underneath his basement workplace.

    He was cutting his own throat with a knife when emergency crew got there.

    He wrote that for the first time in a long time he gave a shit.

    This is not the profile of a disgruntled worker. It sounds more like a story about a repentant member of some secret police -- domestic surveillance squad.

    The reassignment to Hawaii sounds like a promotion, as it was for Snowden.

    We'll know more if the government actually brings this guy to trial. That's why I think they won't.

  61. Single Point of Failure by jfmiller · · Score: 1

    Several comments have questioned the single point of failure. I am sure that it will be a key question for the NTSB to examine when it looks into this incident. However, I would point out that the system is designed to fail to backups, but it appears that Mr. Howard who was "worked for an FAA contractor at the Aurora facility for about eight years, handling communications there" knew what to destroy so as to prevent such back-up systems from functioning. The report mentions "The (radio) frequency failed" which would lead me to speculate that he severed the connections to the physical transmitters before torching the communications system. The comment about "a floor panel had been pulled up, exposing telecommunications cables and other wires" seems to say that Mr. Howard who should have know the system he maintained well, was able to damage a particularly sensitive set of equipment and or connections.

    My biggest question is, what is so bad about a transfer to Hawaii? I'm sure there were personal reasons to stay, but I still cannot help thinking that if I gout the chance to leave Chicago for Hawaii I'd jump at it.

    --
    Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  62. He tried to make it worse by tomhath · · Score: 1

    The paramedic then saw Howard’s feet sticking out from under a table, and saw Howard under the table, shirtless and in the act of cutting his own throat, according to the complaint.

    Turns out it's very difficult to behead yourself.

  63. Re:what a difference a day makes by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The people you're talking about go through a ton of screening before being allowed onto an aircraft.

    As someone who works at an airport, no, they don't.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  64. Re:Big Goverment no backup by itsenrique · · Score: 1

    No, but they do sometimes make confirmations visually. Now by web-cam? Sorry but I don't want the ATC turned into the University of Phoenix.

  65. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    That would be tower controllers. This fire was in a windowless building.

  66. Re:Smart move moron by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the Troll mod, Prater.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  67. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by jbengt · · Score: 1

    You do realize that most of the taxes and fees on your airline ticket go to things like building, maintaining, and staffing airports, traffic control centers, etc? So these are legitimate expenses of running an airline that would be built into the cost of a ticket one way or another.

  68. Re:Taxing the Congested Skies by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    The complaint is probably more about fossil fuel consumption and associated pollution. That's a lot of crap being spewed into the air.

    He's still a jackass, though.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  69. Re:Smart move moron by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Yep, I'm sure Prater comes on, gives himself a few modpoints, and personally mods you down.

    More likely you got downmodded for half-offtopic political ranting.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  70. Re:what a difference a day makes by jbengt · · Score: 1

    The people you're talking about go through a ton of screening before being allowed onto an aircraft.

    If by "a ton of screening" you mean a fingerprint check and signing a statement saying you haven't been convicted of felonies like murder, arson, & hijacking in the last ten years, then yeah, a ton of screening.

  71. Re:Big Goverment no backup by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    You'd think they could just distribute the load a little bit, instead of cramming everyone and every function into one place.

    Building A goes down, you can operate at reduced capacity by carrying on with Building B.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  72. Re:Big Goverment no backup by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    The way air traffic control works is responsibility for each aircraft is handed off from center to center as the move between area. The issue is the controllers have to work together to ensure safety and separation. If you "distribute the load" to different buildings you decrease communication and therefore decrease safety. When you are dealing with aircraft going hundreds of miles an hour you can not wait a couple of minutes for a question to be answered.

  73. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    There's probably a good reason for that. AA simply refuses to take my money, and on the occasions that they do, they don't fly.

    In the last 18 months, I've booked 3 flights with AA to/from various parts of the world, however I have flown with them precisely zero times in that same time period. I have, however, booked and flown on numerous other routes with numerous other airlines without any issues, so I've pretty much given up on even trying AA.

    From what I hear, I'm not missing out though... so fuck 'em.

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  74. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    I just bought return tickets to England. $293 flight, $768 taxes and fees. So yeah...

  75. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by Richy_T · · Score: 2

    Some of them are. Most? I'd like to see a breakdown of that. I recall reading that TSA fees alone recently went up double digits of $ and since I consider the TSA not to be legitimate in the first place, that's a good place to start.

  76. Re:what a difference a day makes by mpe · · Score: 1

    That's actually a really good point. If you want to get access to sensitive locations, get hired onto the work crew. Want a key to the CEO's office? Become a janitor.

    Cleaners and janitors are a known known issue with physical security. So this is unlikely to work with the likes of the NSA :)

  77. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Dishevel · · Score: 1
    Not all cloud services are run by outside companies.

    You can (and should in this case) run your own private cloud for something like this.

    I know it is all the rage to be an ass. You fail at it though and still look like an ass.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  78. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Talderas · · Score: 1

    All cloud services are run by outside companies. That's what makes them cloud services. The cloud is everything you don't have direct control over.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  79. Re:Big Goverment no backup by Wookact · · Score: 1

    Yes I want the people tasked with keeping planes from hitting each other sitting in their recliner fighting sleep cause they are overworked. I want them to be susceptible to loosing Internet in their apartment because the cable man is an idiot and cant hook up the new neighbor properly. I want them to be susceptible to usage caps and the prime time netflix slow down that happens every night. I want them to be distracted by kids making noise in the parking lot and the lawn care guys mowing outside their window.

    I just think working from hoe for them is a super keen idea!!

    Protip: Think things through some huh?

  80. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Sick brag.

  81. Re: Taxing the Congested Skies by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Wasn't meant as a "brag", but it's the only numbers I had access to. For example, a 4-seater jet from my local airport to one that I fly to most:
    Source Airport Fee $4,336.35 ($956 Fuel, $31.44 Landing, $157.60 "other", $22.31 parking, $3,169 reposition)
    Dest Airport Fee $4,662.04 ($269 Fuel, $6.26 GPU, $12.29 landing, $37.53 "other", $8.34 parking, $4328 reposition)
    Flight Rate $9,029.13
    Fed Excise Tax $1,461.69

    54% in airport fees and taxes.