Slashdot Mirror


At CIA Starbucks, Even the Baristas Are Covert

An anonymous reader writes with this interesting story about what it's like to work at “Store Number 1,” the CIA's Starbucks. The new supervisor thought his idea was innocent enough. He wanted the baristas to write the names of customers on their cups to speed up lines and ease confusion, just like other Starbucks do around the world. But these aren't just any customers. They are regulars at the CIA Starbucks. "They could use the alias 'Polly-O string cheese' for all I care," said a food services supervisor at the Central Intelligence Agency, asking that his identity remain unpublished for security reasons. "But giving any name at all was making people — you know, the undercover agents — feel very uncomfortable. It just didn't work for this location."

242 comments

  1. What's so hard about using the time-honored by Chromium_One · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... tradition of ticket numbers?!

    --
    When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    1. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by toejam13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Came to say the same thing. How many different restaurants print your order number on your receipt, then call the number when ready? While more impersonal than calling names, it makes it easier since you can display a number on a screen. Also, numbers are more easily pronounceable than some names, and avoids the issue when two or more customers have the same name.

    2. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

      They tried that, but the customers all fought for ticket number 7.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were double and triple claiming the same order.

      And when they examined the receipts, they all had the same ticket number!

    4. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is nothing more annoying than:
      1) Fake friendliness (if you care so much about my name try and remember it for next time since I tell you it on almost a daily basis)
      2) People who can't pronounce my name
      3) People who can't spell my name
      4) People who use alternate spellings of my name without confirming the correct one (my name has 3 alternate spellings)

      After being annoyed at one or more of the above for the umpteenth time I started giving my name as Dave and don't care if they use Dave, Davie, David, Day or any other variant as it isn't actually my name.

      PS: they could just have the loyalty/payment card show them my name and not have to ask but that would be too easy.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    5. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh forgot to add (even though it goes against 3 and 4 slightly):
      5) Being asked to spell my name when all I want is a freaking coffee.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    6. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Jstlook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it would have been a great idea on the part of the supervisor to, rather than write their names on the cups, just give them each a name as they order. "Hi! Your name is Fred today, what can I get you?"

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    7. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      I would have thought that all the spies would want Number 6.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    8. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would you believe... 99?

    9. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by txoutback · · Score: 3, Funny

      When they ask your name, Have a laugh and just say "call me mindwhip"... they'll get the message.

    10. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't have worked anyways aren't they all called 'agent Lynch'

      1. Agent Lynch
      2. Agent Lynch
      3. ...
      4.. Agent Prophet nah just kidding you already know the future agent Lynch!

    11. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by philip.paradis · · Score: 3, Funny

      First world problems.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    12. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by pipedwho · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am not a number, I am a free man.

      Oops, my bad, I forgot we're talking about somewhere in the USA.

    13. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      What do the Village People have to do with this? Is it fun to work at the old CIA?

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    14. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      I see the word "pipe" in your handle. Does that refer to a crack pipe?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't give your name... Honestly I doubt anyone does care what it is.

    16. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I see "cold fjord" in your handle. Does that refer to the /. kook of the same name?

    17. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sadly the Socialist Slave Number has taken away that freedom :-/

    18. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      I am not a number. I am a person!

      Be seeing you.

    19. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First world problems.

      Screw that, I live in Mexico, there is plenty of fake friendliness going on. And I can assure you they cannot pronounce my name, let alone spell it, despite it being a common one you could easily pronounce as an English speaker.

    20. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by xushi · · Score: 1

      Agree.. it's not for an interview, just for a cup of coffee.. you can give them the name Homer for all they care, as long as a few minutes later you know when your order is ready..

      But that said, now I really want to know what your name is (that comment of it spelled in 3 different ways) :) ..

    21. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      "/. kook"?? In other words, a normal person.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    22. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      Or John. John Doe. Or Smith, A. Smith. Or ......

    23. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      There is nothing more annoying than: 2) People who can't pronounce my name

      Really? It's mindwhip - you say it like it's spelled!

      Just like Wojohowitz.

    24. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until they put too much emphasis on the 'h'

    25. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Okay, sure, a normal American person. That is to say, mildly retarded and mistaken about 80% of the things you "know" are true.

    26. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Funnier yet, it's actually "Wojciehowicz". Though they spelled it wrong of the board the last season or so.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    27. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      They tried that but they had to add a a one time pad and people got random drinks

    28. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Its hillarious to spend a weekend with folks from actual oppressed countries who are here on asylum and then cap the weekend with self-entitled slashdotters whining about how bad we have it here in the US.

      Dont worry about the fresh shot of perspective, its on the house.

    29. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      At the moment I would say you seem pretty normal.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    30. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using a number alienates the hipster crowd.
      So we have Starbucks now in India. Try writing Nahasapeetlamon on a tall cup using thick markers. Poor baristas.
      Everybody should have a Starbucks name. Mine is Tom.

    31. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ticket #007

    32. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by devilspgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better yet, go with "Bueller" and then leave without your coffee, leaving them calling Bueller, Bueller, Bueller.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    33. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The fights that break out in the morning with everyone trying to be 7th in line.

    34. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is nothing more annoying than:

      1) Fake friendliness (if you care so much about my name try and remember it for next time since I tell you it on almost a daily basis)

      2) People who can't pronounce my name

      3) People who can't spell my name

      4) People who use alternate spellings of my name without confirming the correct one (my name has 3 alternate spellings)

      I get that all the time because of my European surname, I mean how hard can it be to pronounce Echsteinlefahrtengruber? With my Serbian wife I can understand it, Grzplstcknfltmrzovic can be a bit of a mouthful the first time you see it, but anyone should be able to get my name right.

    35. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Mine is what. When the repeat it i saw yes. Then they look confused and i say what the fuck is the difference its just a damn coffe i could get anywhere else for one fifth the price so what is my name.

    36. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just use Anglicizer (Android app). Gives me a generic Anglo name that they'll remember long enough for serving my coffee but common enough that they'll forget me next time

    37. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      If you live in MX, odds are good you aren't trading nearly the amount of currency the GP is yielding on a daily basis for that take friendliness. Therein lies the essence of a first world problem.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    38. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would make her Mrs Grzplstcknfltmrzovic-Echsteinlefahrtengruber.

      I would SO use that name just for the fun of it :)

    39. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by xushi · · Score: 1

      Them: 69 ?
      Me: Well I never...!

    40. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name can be spelled 4 different ways...now your should be really intrigued. And it only has 5 letters to begin with!

    41. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing more annoying is whinging losers like yourself. GTFU

    42. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      well whats ur name jerk face if its so precious

    43. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      I second mildly retarded :)

    44. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your name is Dick today, how about a handjob?

    45. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by sr180 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some Comedians (The Chasers) in Australia booked and checked in online for a flight using the names Mr Terry Wrist and Mr Al Queda. When they didnt show for their flights, the calls across the terminal were pretty comical. www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FkYPV7Iwu4

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    46. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      but then they have an ID NUMBER! NUMBER OF THE BEAST!!! attached to them.

      i think the whole thing just sounds like a starbucks advert mixed with some agent mysticism shit. the fuckers ARE GOING TO USE some name when they go to a real star bucks while "undercover".

      and while at base, they could just make their own damn coffee.. wouldn't have to worry about people spiking it up.

      nevermind that almost all other places than starbucks manage just fine without names.. and in fact, the starbucks outside USA manage just fine without names too.. that i've been to. the names are mainly just to attach a bit of personality into waiting.. waiting something they make in 20 secs. fifo would work just fine.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    47. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck

      See, they asked for your name, not your surname. You should answer "The fuck".

    48. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the Monty Python parody?

    49. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by dbIII · · Score: 1

      tradition of ticket numbers

      Number six your order is ready.
      I am not a number, I am a free man!


      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_Six_%28The_Prisoner%29

    50. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you trow this account away and start a new one? Everyone here knows that you are a pro-fascism by now.
      Almost every post you have made that isn't an attempt at character assassination have been an attack on freedom.

    51. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have all seen this before.
      http://www.netjeff.com/humor/audio/AirportPrank.html

    52. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to "know" a lot of things that aren't true.

    53. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You didn't give us a challenge, you didn't give us sufficient information. I'll just pick one at random.

      Sarah, Sara, Zara, Seraiah, Sarai.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    54. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by tburkhol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's the problem: the person who takes your order is not the person who delivers your order. There needs to be some way for server A to identify you to server B. Possible solutions:

      Assign a number to customer, and expect customer to answer to that number. Problems: depersonalizing, customers forget their numbers, "thirteen" sounds like "thirty"

      Let the customer assign an identifier for his order, providing some illusion of personal service. Problems: customer identifier may be confusing, customers may get annoyed if server A does not use the mystical spelling customer has in mind, servers may spend more time massaging the identifier than actually preparing product, server B may not pronounce the same identifier as server A recorded

      Photograph customers for product delivery. Problems: privacy fanatics, bad pictures, servers turn incidental photodocumentation into DMV-like picture-taking ritual

      In sum, there is no good way to make high-volume service look like personal service. People pretty quickly see through efforts to disguise it. While many people are willing to play along, occasional servers and customers will both manipulate these systems for their personal amusement. Misspelling your name is the barista equivalent of building paper-clip animals. Giving a fake name is the equivalent of painting your stapler purple. Try not to get bent out of shape when they call you "Susquehannah" instead of "Susquanna" or "Todd" instead of "Tom": they aren't trying to annoy you; they aren't trying to learn your name; They aren't likely to remember you next time; the content of your name is irrelevant to the process; and and effort to "get it right" only delays people around you.

    55. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by salimma · · Score: 1

      I'm going to try using "007" or, in case they insist on words, "Bond, James Bond" next time I'm in that silly place :p

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    56. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by salimma · · Score: 1

      The first time you get a name collision and the spy gets his/her real name assigned randomly, expect sparks to fly

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    57. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Nikker · · Score: 2

      This is just a fluff piece. Lying would be so ingrained into an agent of this type that their own mothers probably don't know their names anymore. If someone asks you your name for something like this you just make up a name, that is their job. If anyone asks just say your name is Lorem Ipsum.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    58. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, have you checked how many names are available out there? I'm sure there's at least 1 or 2 English, or Liberal Arts majors working at that Starbucks!

    59. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks really needs to fix this. Five Guys uses numbers and it's fun. Our Starbucks doesn't even bother to remember your name, they just state the item. I'm not sure what deranged managers or the upper escalon of Starbucks were thinking about using names or items. A true lack of insight. The simple change of using ticket numbers would make the miserable Starbucks Stores (there are plenty of them) approximately 150% more accessible.

    60. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      Lorri

    61. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      I can see you haven't been to Starbuck in MX. The cost is the same as the U.S. It's way expensive.

    62. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The disadvantage of using ticket numbers is that they are usually sequential and only differ from the next or previous order by one or two characters at the most. With names the likelyhood of having identical first and last name is pretty tiny, and even when it does happen it would probably standout to the worker because it is an unusual circumstance. For keeping things easily and clearly seperate, names, even if they are fake, make much more sense.

    63. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing more annoying than: 1) Fake friendliness (if you care so much about my name try and remember it for next time since I tell you it on almost a daily basis) 2) People who can't pronounce my name 3) People who can't spell my name 4) People who use alternate spellings of my name without confirming the correct one (my name has 3 alternate spellings)

      After being annoyed at one or more of the above for the umpteenth time I started giving my name as Dave and don't care if they use Dave, Davie, David, Day or any other variant as it isn't actually my name.

      PS: they could just have the loyalty/payment card show them my name and not have to ask but that would be too easy.

      My wife's name gets mispronounced all the time over here. Granted she was born overseas, but why must people assume all foreign looking names are Spanish?
      Likewise I end up spelling her name for every doctor visit because the staff inevitably get it wrong.
      My surname has 93 acceptable alternative spellings. People have used five of them with me without asking which is the one I use. I even ran into a fifth cousin who uses an alternative pronunciation (my line's pronunciation has been verified through the 1700s).

      If these are the most annoying things in your life, you've got it easy!

    64. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh forgot to add (even though it goes against 3 and 4 slightly): 5) Being asked to spell my name when all I want is a freaking coffee.

      At a fast food joint I used to frequent, they had a theme of the day. For example, one day they asked everyone for their favorite movie from the 1980s, and would call out that answer instead of names.

    65. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blow me!

    66. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      Some Comedians (The Chasers) in Australia booked and checked in online for a flight using the names Mr Terry Wrist and Mr Al Queda. When they didnt show for their flights, the calls across the terminal were pretty comical. www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FkYPV7Iwu4

      Chasers war... fucking classic!

    67. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by schlachter · · Score: 1

      customer: "Bond, James Bond"
      barista: "Uh, another coffee for Bond"

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    68. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by schlachter · · Score: 1

      They didn't like that their days were numbered.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    69. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by schlachter · · Score: 1

      They should have one of the little mics in their sleeves like the secret service, and every time someone orders, they can raise their wrist to their mouth and whisper the order while looking all serious. The baristas will nod as they receive the order in their headset, and say "roger".

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    70. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no one else could spell it after the Asian (Yemana) died?

    71. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Grzplstcknfltmrzovic

      Good lord, that needs about 3-5 more vowels. Or a Kleenex.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    72. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      You should try something more exciting like "Velociraptor" or "Analrapists."

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    73. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly on-topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    74. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by briancox2 · · Score: 1

      Aren't these secret agents?

      I don't think a secret agent who cannot make up a fake name within 1 second is really cut out for the job.

      --
      We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    75. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      customers all fought for ticket number 7.

      Starbucks-fighting is part of the basic agent training.

    76. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by geekoid · · Score: 1

      2) So what? - You'll know you beverage is ready when they butcher your name
      3) So what? WTF does spelling matter? As long as they say it the same way, or in a recognizable buthering
      4) So what? Again? why would you care?

      It's fucking coffee, not a medical record and student transcript.

      PS: Your name is not that important.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    77. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by deadweight · · Score: 2

      They forgot Mike Hunt, General MalFunktion, Hugh G. Rection, E. Normous Johnson, Ben Dover, I.P. Daily, Richard Cranium, and a few others...

    78. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doing better then an oppressed country does not mean we are doing well.
      That's kind of a low bar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    79. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing more annoying than:
      1) Fake friendliness (if you care so much about my name try and remember it for next time since I tell you it on almost a daily basis)
      2) People who can't pronounce my name
      3) People who can't spell my name
      4) People who use alternate spellings of my name without confirming the correct one (my name has 3 alternate spellings)

      After being annoyed at one or more of the above for the umpteenth time I started giving my name as Dave and don't care if they use Dave, Davie, David, Day or any other variant as it isn't actually my name.

      PS: they could just have the loyalty/payment card show them my name and not have to ask but that would be too easy.

      Or, you could tell them your name is, appropriately, "Dick".

    80. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If I have a name generator, and it coincidentally says the person name, and they say nothing about it, how is anyone going to know that's their real name?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    81. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They want to maintain the habit of not giving out your name, and remember who you gave it to and why they are important.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    82. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am not a coffee drinker, so I never went into Starbucks. Why is it even needed? When I go into a place and I order something to eat or drink, the person serving me makes the drink and gives it to me and takes my money.
      Having worked in bars they either are too cheap to pay enough staff or too cheap to buy enough hardware to make the coffee. A third option might be that they save on training, so not everybody can do it.

      Amazing what marketing can do. From what I hear it is lousy service for lousy quality at lousy prices and people stand in line for it. THIS is the reason sales and marketing people get away with so much, because they are actualy the people bringing in the money.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    83. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      I think it would have been a great idea on the part of the supervisor to, rather than write their names on the cups, just give them each a name as they order. "Hi! Your name is Fred today, what can I get you?"

      A thermal scanner to watch their face for stress would probably flush out real names pretty accurately, if the barista managed to guess right. Really the key security issue with this whole premise is the barista. Why not just do a background check on them?

    84. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... tradition of ticket numbers?!

      It would stop at 007

    85. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just say "Bob" or "Jan" or "Enrique" who freaking cares what name they use. With all the spying they do they should have access to an endless names database.

      Searching for sympathy for government employee concerned for their privacy.... hmmmm, yeah I can't find any!

    86. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Superman couldn't get Mxyzptlk right. He kept saying it backwards. (If you can correct this, you get ten bonus Geek Cred points.)

    87. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Improv Everywhere did "Spartacus" at Starbucks. (I'm Spartacus!)
      http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=improv+everywhere+spartacus&FORM=VIRE2#view=detail&mid=C25A8CF6882638E18202C25A8CF6882638E18202

    88. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a magazine article years ago suggesting that one should never make restaurant reservations under one's real name? Instead, use a name appropriate to the cuisine of the restaurant - or, if traveling, the local language. It's more likely to be recognized, and may get you more karma points in advance.

    89. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go, I can hear the baristas calling "Free Man" every few orders . . . .

    90. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      With ticket numbers being assigned by the register / receipt printer, they could be successive Fibonacci numbers or whatever else people want.

    91. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Fake friendliness (if you care so much about my name try and remember it for next time since I tell you it on almost a daily basis)

      They arent being friendly to you but to your money. Its like in the service, you salute the rank, not the person - in retail, you say Sir to the wallet, not the person.

      2) People who can't pronounce my name

      Not everyone went to a "pronounce-all-names-that-might-come-up" class. Youre taking something personal that wasnt meant personally.

      3) People who can't spell my name

      Youve been doing it your whole life. No one else has. Again, youre choosing to take shit personally that is obviously not meant personally.

      4) People who use alternate spellings of my name without confirming the correct one (my name has 3 alternate spellings)

      They probably assume what I would - if it bothers you that much, youll say something. If you dont say something, it obviously doesnt bother you that much.

      You just seem like a self centered asshole that looks for reasons to be offended. Whatever the fuck you are in your own mind, in reality youre just another schmuck trying to buy coffee.

    92. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How cute. Someone thinks he's special, by birth!

    93. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by easyTree · · Score: 1

      lol

    94. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I grew up in an area of the South where the w-/wh- distinction is preserved by many people (including me). College friends from the Northeast found it bizarre.

    95. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      "Thirteen" and "thirty" only sound the same in Strane.

    96. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      My answer is to reply "thank you". I so enjoy
      hearing "Thank you, your coffee is ready".

      But here on /. some other negative or Enders Game name would play better.

      Note that if you answer a phone the only approved answer in
      many TLA sites is the extension. Just the number... 69951 or
      whatever is marked on the phone.

      As a visitor locked in a closet I always answered "Wei" or "Mushi Mushi"

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    97. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ghoti

    98. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      You've managed to miss the point while proving it, which I must say is an impressive accomplishment. The point is that the majority of the population of MX lacks the fiscal resources to purchase Starbucks beverages for precisely the reason you've noted. This is why a reply of "first world problems" is either funny or sad (perhaps both) irrespective of the buying power of a small fraction of the population of any region where a business with relatively expensive products happens to open a storefront. To help reinforce the point, you may wish to reference a list of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    99. Re: What's so hard about using the time-honored by rioki · · Score: 1

      I don't know about his name, by my name is Sean. You can have Shown, Shaun and possibly misshearings such as John. But then again I don't care, if it is for coffee.

    100. Re:What's so hard about using the time-honored by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Oh. my. god. You like, took my own joke, copied it, and used it against me! How... how... retarded.

      Good job.

  2. Use the old spy trick of an alias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligence agency indeed.

    1. Re:Use the old spy trick of an alias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "'The Man with the Umbrella Buys a Double Mocchachino in the Plaza' I repeat: "The Man with the Umbrella Buys a Double Mocchachino in the Plaza"

      Spy tricks indeed.

    2. Re:Use the old spy trick of an alias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DODGSON, we got DODGSON here!

      Nobody cares...

    3. Re:Use the old spy trick of an alias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B2, B2, daar heb je die clown, en die acrobaat!

  3. Typical Government Hypocracy by pubwvj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet the government (FBI) objects to our desires for privacy (Apple & Google on-phone encryption).

    1. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by VanGarrett · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, but they know why they want their privacy, and are concerned that you might want yours for the same sorts of purposes.

    2. Re: Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. Terrorism! Please be properly frightened! Your fear is the fuel to your protection.

    3. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hypocracy? That's awful. I'd hate to be ruled by hypos.

    4. Re: Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You worried about getting killed for who you work for when you go overseas too? Wow...

    5. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypocracy = either "ruled by the below" or "beneath rule"

      You probably mean "hypocrisy" which means "beneath a mask," from the Greek word for "actor"

    6. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about being ruled by hype?

    7. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Operational security is a concern for you on a daily basis?

      Talk about hyperbole. No, operational security isn't a concern for even those at CIA Starbucks on a daily basis. The reason they don't like names or number tickers or anything else that could directly or indirectly produce a pattern that can track their actions because they're so very aware of how everyone else not part of their system is or can be directly or indirectly tracked through a pattern of their actions. Although I guess if the Chinese and Russians are doing the same thing as part of their systems, it's not wholly unwarranted to think they may end up being tracked.

      Foreign states might try to coerce, corrupt, or disappear you?

      It's not rampant paranoia because everyone really is trying to get them? No, it's still really rampant paranoia. The thought they they might (1) engage in some top secret op under a variety of aliases, (2) use another series of aliases with their Starbucks coffee, and (3) it's (2) that's the linchpin on how they were secretly poisoned or whatever is absurd. Why? Because (a) it's unlikely they'll be adequately tracked through operation (1), (b) even if they were it's unlikely they'd choose CIA Starbucks as the source of their plan to kill you, (c) even if they did, they don't need to rely upon an alias on a cup to determine it's your drink when your drink may well be unique enough, the person to poison you will likely verify it's actually you before adding the mix to the drink, and there's literally hundreds of ways to kill you that are less obvious (a name on a cup of a prominent dead person looks suspicious as would a tracking number if it's loudly spoken at any point) if you're trying to quietly assassinate a person.

      No, this is all about some pretend thing in their heads that they're special enough to kill and yet smart enough to be hidden. The truth is most people are aware of how unimportant they are as a target and don't even attempt to hide themselves. But even those who try don't generally blend in very long--and by standards of the CIA, very long would be the rest of your natural life. The CIA/NSA/FBI all take advantage of this, have a certain level of loathing of the "sheep", and don't want to be placed into the same category because it fundamentally goes against their feelings of superiority of not being so "stupid".

      Honestly, "operational security", "ongoing investigation", and "national security" are the words of cowards more often than a real and meaningful thing used to actual protect the populace at large. And I should know as an Anonymous Coward, right?

      *Captcha: botulism

    8. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    9. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Foreign states might try to coerce, corrupt, or disappear you?

      No, as an American citizen, my own government might try . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by sjames · · Score: 1

      Well, we've tried the elephants and the donkeys so far. I don't see how the hypos would be any worse.

    11. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by david.given · · Score: 2

      ...are you thinking of hippos?

      Although I have to admit a hippocracy sounds freakin' awesome.

    12. Re: Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interrogator: Now tell me where is the secret lair?

      Spy: Why do you think there's a secret lair?

      Interrogator: TELL ME OR ILL GIVE YOU A MOCHACHINO!!!!

      Spy: No! Not a mochachino, I'll tell you everything!

    13. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by umStefa · · Score: 1

      Well... as somebody who is both a) not an american and b) a former employee of my countries government... the answer is YES

      --
      Technology is most abused by the very people it was created to help
    14. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but they know why they want their privacy, ...

      no they don't. they want their privacy because they think they're in a james bond movie. that, or they're just anti-social pricks like me..

    15. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Yet the government (FBI) objects to our desires for privacy (Apple & Google on-phone encryption).

      No, they don't object to the desire for privacy. What they object to is not being able to get the unencrypted data with a warrant.

      Your post misstates the matter.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the commenter does not spell as well as you, O exalted paragon of linguistic virtue. But maybe it's just some form of Freudian slip? (S)He was obviously thinking about hypocrisy and government at the same time as writing the words and you know, sometimes when you do stuff like that, weird shit just happens. Sometimes - as it is here - it can be funny as well.

      Knob!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    17. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Really? Operational security is a concern for you on a daily basis? Foreign states might try to coerce, corrupt, or disappear you?

      Forget about foreign states, U.S. citizens are much more likely to suffer any of those from their own government.

    18. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign states might try to coerce, corrupt, or disappear you?

      No, as an American citizen, my own government might try . . .

      Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.

    19. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Or, could it possible be, finally in spite of all evidence to the contrary, that those CIA torture freaks are finally feeling some sense of shame for the perverse behaviour. I wonder how recruiting is going?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Operational security is a concern for you on a daily basis? Foreign states might try to coerce, corrupt, or disappear you?

      No. Local ones might. As such, I feel it is reasonable for me to protect myself from the people with power around me, in as much as they feel they have the right to protect themselves from the people with power around them. They don't like me thinking that way though, as it means I keep putting locks on things that they have to break. If only they asked politely and gave a reasonable reason for me to tell them everything that I do/say/think...

    21. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, this is all about some pretend thing in their heads that they're special enough to kill and yet smart enough to be hidden. The truth is most people are aware of how unimportant they are as a target and don't even attempt to hide themselves.

      Do you think that journalists and aid workers are so unimportant as to not be targets? It seems that ISIS disagrees with you.

      Jihadi John: FBI 'identifies' Isis militant who 'beheaded' British aid worker David Haines and US journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff

      If they can be targets, why not CIA/NSA/FBI officers?

      And it isn't just an overseas threat.

      Oklahoma Beheading Suspect Shared Photos of Himself Giving ISIS Salute

      The CIA/NSA/FBI all take advantage of this, have a certain level of loathing of the "sheep", and don't want to be placed into the same category because it fundamentally goes against their feelings of superiority of not being so "stupid".

      Maybe what it actually goes against is their attachment to their head?

      Honestly, "operational security", "ongoing investigation", and "national security" are the words of cowards more often than a real and meaningful thing used to actual protect the populace at large. And I should know as an Anonymous Coward, right?

      Even though they can be and have been abused at times, what they are in fact are genuine issues that have to be dealt with by people in responsible positions in government. The fact that you don't deal with that demonstrate your post is disingenuous nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    22. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, a hippocracy should be the word for a government with horses in charge. However, since hippo is shorthand for hippopotamus, my first thoughts involved those big-mouthed more-lethal-than-crocodiles obese animals.

    23. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, could it possible be, finally in spite of all evidence to the contrary, that those CIA torture freaks are finally feeling some sense of shame for the perverse behaviour.

      No. Paranoia is part of their training. We see this again and again, and it is the same way in every country.
      Working for an intelligence agency makes you a complete nutjob that sees ghosts everywhere.
      Everything that is the slightest out of the ordinary is a threat, everything that is ordinary is a possible coverup, every criticism of you or information that doesn't fit your world view is part of propaganda from the enemies intelligence agencies.
      Putin is a prime example of what happens to people that work for too long in those environments. CIA doesn't operate that differently from KGB and people working there acquires the same kind of paranoia.

    24. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a two pump mocha blended cream frappuccino for Botulism. Botulism, where are you?

    25. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Journalists and aid workers in a war zone are about as far as you can get from a bunch of federal employees working for the CIA at the pentagon. Those people that ISIS has beheaded on video weren't picked because of what they were doing, they were just easy to find, capture, and killing them gets a rise out of the civilized world.

      If anyone at the pentagon thinks they work there secretly they are fools. All you'd have to do to determine who works there is set up a series of hidden cameras to capture plate numbers of vehicles entering the facility. Then feed those numbers through a batch of people who have access to the national plate registry system, cops do this for practically every traffic stop. It would be a joke for a nation state to obtain that kind of information and it is definitely inside the realm of possibility for groups like ISIS or AQ. Some of the vehicles will be essentially government limo service, which makes tracking the identity of the person being given such privilege a little more difficult but it also tells you a lot about their value as a target.

      The Oklahoma thing was only tangentially related to ISIS. It was a work place violence issue and the method he chose on the spur of the moment aligned with his sympathies. This is really only an issue at the Pentagon so far as regular work place violence is.

      Operational Security is a real thing but it doesn't really come into play when talking about an eating establishment labeling you with a name inside a secured facility.

    26. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can't spell hypocrisy forfeits the right to invoke it in my book.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    27. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty selfish and stupid book you got there.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I'm just tired of hearing people on Slashdot constantly misuse the term, Mr. Constantly Call Everyone on Slashdot Stupid with His Dunning-Kruger Effect Signature.

      Ironyyyyyyy

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    29. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can be targets, why not CIA/NSA/FBI officers?

      Feel free to answer that question. Here's a helpful hint: the CIA/NSA/FBI offices aren't located in Syria/Iraq nor is CIA Starbucks. Meanwhile, the absurdity of ALL aid workers and journalists making demands of a Starbucks to not use their name on cups....

      Maybe what it actually goes against is their attachment to their head?

      How many CIA officers have been beheaded again? Yet we see them cowering in holes. Meanwhile, the journalists seek out the truth and report it, and the aid workers provide the humanitarian care for the people. It's clear that ISIS sees journalists and aid workers as bigger threats than the CIA. Oh, that and they're easier targets given they're actually in the area*.

      Even though they can be and have been abused at times, what they are in fact are genuine issues that have to be dealt with by people in responsible positions in government.

      Which is why you support Obamacare, Welfare, and the Federal Government's expansion of control over State-level decisions. Oh, right, no. You're a supporter of the MIC and killing foreigners by any means possible. Because in your head the one purpose of the Federal Government is military protection of the States and having cowards "in responsible positions in government" who can wield unchecked power upon other countries has no effect except to further the MIC and kill foreigners. That "terrorists" or "communists" might be collateral damage is just icing on the cake.

      The fact that you don't deal with that demonstrate your post is disingenuous nonsense.

      Well, you ARE the king of disingenuous nonsense, so I bow to your wisdom.

      *The hyperbole of Lindsay Graham and the threat of ISIS: "This president needs to rise to the occasion before we all get killed here at home." Because ISIS isn't content to kill a few journalists or aid workers in Syria and Iraq. They're going to come to the US and behead us all. So, everyone, remember: everyone's name from now on is "Anonymous Coward"**. If it works for the CIA, it'll work for the rest of us, right?

      **And in the Land of the Brave, it would be "I am Spartacus". The journalists are Spartacus. cold fjord is Anonymous Coward.

    30. Re:Typical Government Hypocracy by sudon't · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say, I think we are ruled by hype.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  4. Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While they fund their black ops with drug dealing by moving cocaine and of course heroin from Afghanistan that they completely own.

    Can we retitle this to "Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money" , or post an story exposing one of the most corrupt organizations in the history of mankind?

    1. Re:Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no cunt, and your assertion that the CIA is self-funding is completely inconsistent with your assertion that they're "Getting more taxpayer money."

    2. Re:Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to interfere with your nascent flame-war or anything but "self-funding" is not inconsistent with "getting more taxpayer money". First, they may get larger appropriations while at the same time running side businesses. Second, even if their appropriation were cut to zero, any money they make on the side becomes "taxpayer money."

      One of the most fundamental principles of our form of government is that no executive branch agency can spend money without Congressional approval, no matter where that money came from. The reasons for this go back to the English Civil War. Charles I attempted to rule without calling Parliament, but since the Magna Carta English kings did not have the power of taxation; the House of Commons did. So Charles attempted an end-run by exploiting a fee that had been traditionally levied on coastal towns to pay for maritime protection in time of war. Charles's attempt to use "Ship Money" as a revenue source independent of Parliament was one of the key events leading to the Civil War, and was familiar history to the framers of the US Constitution.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that communication companies are more corrupt.
      Don't forget that comcast is the highest spender in lobbying. Only second is the industrial-millitairy lobby.

    4. Re:Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck on enforcing that in modern day America

    5. Re:Treasonous CIA gets more taxpayer money by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Well, both heroin and cocaine are cheaper and purer than ever, so here's one government plan that seems to be working.

      Hate to go back to the original topic, but, hey CIA guys, you can give any name you want! Although I have to admit, I sometimes forget which exotic-sounding name I give to clerks, causing them to call it several times before I remember that I'm Paco, Goober, or whoever.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  5. Yeah So? by p0p0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, and what? Is that it? Starbucks at the CIA doesn't use names for customers, just like any other coffee shop in the world, or any shop for that matter.

    News for nerds = Nope.
    Stuff that matter: = Negatory.

    1. Re:Yeah So? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been to many coffee shops. Starbucks usually use names for customers as do plenty of other coffee shops.

    2. Re:Yeah So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They usually use whatever name you give them. Even when you pay with plastic they're more than happy to put the name you give on it. Presumably there are limits in that they won't put obscene language on the cup, but there's no reason why people can't use pseudonyms for their names on the cups.

    3. Re:Yeah So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been to many coffee shops. Starbucks usually use names for customers as do plenty of other coffee shops.

      This has to be an American paranoia (among thousands other paranoias).
      If I don't give them my name I get no coffee ?

    4. Re:Yeah So? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      This is a North American thing. In most of the world, coffee shops would never ask your name, even if they are Starbucks-clone chains. Starbucks locations abroad may ask your name, but this is obviously imposed by a customer service manual written in the US, just like McDonalds abroad makes staff smile broadly and recite lines totally out of context with the country around them.

    5. Re:Yeah So? by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      Given that they apparently couldn't figure out how to work around the issue for themselves we might not be talking about the most imaginative bunch of case officers here. I can picture it now; they got a whole queue of people called "Bond, James Bond", "Jason Bourne" and "Jack Ryan". Hilarity ensues...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    6. Re:Yeah So? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK. Busy take-away food places also ask for names when they are busy, and you will have to wait for the food. And I'm not talking about ones that are US franchises.

      But sure the culture probably did start in the US, as did the whole fast food and large-cup-coffee shops thing.

      European style is to sit at a table and be served by a waiter.

    7. Re:Yeah So? by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can picture it now; they got a whole queue of people called "Bond, James Bond", "Jason Bourne" and "Jack Ryan". Hilarity ensues...

      Yeah, just watch out for the one who asks for Kim Philby.

    8. Re:Yeah So? by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is a pretty pointless article, and the same stuff is talked about in every CIA TV documentary and news article anyway.

    9. Re:Yeah So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European style is to sit at a table and be served by a waiter.

      What's not to like ? Is it too aristocratic for Americans ?
      Americans, always searching for efficiency at the cost of all else. In my opinion it's a shitty way to go through life .

    10. Re:Yeah So? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Aldrich Ames, Jonathan Pollard, Alger Hiss, Benedict Arnold, Julia Child.

      Don't forget Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning. And Chuck Barris.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    11. Re:Yeah So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it to the Germans.

    12. Re:Yeah So? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Never have been asked for my name in any other coffeeshop than starbucks.

      --
      bickerdyke
    13. Re:Yeah So? by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      European style is to sit at a table and be served by a waiter.

      Ever been to an Italian espresso bar?

    14. Re:Yeah So? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yes. You can also order at the counter in France and elsewere. But the norm is table service.

    15. Re:Yeah So? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      It's their attempt to be personal.

  6. Well they can be like rest area places where name by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Well they can be like rest area places where it has the name but other stuff in under control of a overall vendor.

    If not for that then the Manger will have to answer to Starbucks and not the CIA.

  7. uh... which starbucks is this? by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    my local SB even if they know you by name (I have long histories with a lot of coffee shops around here, most of them know me by name and how I like my coffee), none of them write names on cups. They all, for large orders (more than 4 cups) write what's actually in the cups.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:uh... which starbucks is this? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      It started a year or two ago IIRC. Basically many starbucks ask for your name, and write it on the cup. That way you know the venti cappuccino is indeed for you, and not the guy next to you. (They also write the order)

      I travel a lot and I've had the fortune of going to many starbucks, globally. I'd say maybe 50% use names, but it hasn't been implemented everywhere.

    2. Re:uh... which starbucks is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple Starbucks baristas have been writing my name on the cup for 9 years, often with a smiley face after it.

      The standard protocol for calling an order from the register to the barista includes "for [your name]" at the end of the order.

  8. Why do they even have a Starbucks? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Regular coffee is too cheap for them?

    1. Re:Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Starbucks probably paid a pretty penny to lease that location. Guaranteed monopoly for a 24/7-run location with caffeine-addicted analysts. Who wouldn't want to sell coffee there?

    2. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closest thing to regular coffee you can find in North America?

    3. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closest thing to regular coffee you can find in North America?

      You mean something that looks like, tastes like but is not coffee by any meaningful definition ?
      That's 100% american coffee for you. I remember going to New York many years ago and the only bad memory of have of that trip is coffee (or what Americans consider to be coffee). Simply disgusting. I doubt that in the meantime they've learned how to make a good cup of espresso or cappuccino.

    4. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by digitig · · Score: 3, Funny

      My defence against Americans criticising British coffee always used to be that the worst coffee I ever had was in a cafe in St. Petes, FLA. Then I had a coffee in a Starbucks at London Heathrow, and I was forced to concede to Americans that the worst coffee I ever had was indeed in Britain. :(

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    5. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh. Americans suck at coffee. That is why there are 100s of Starbucks in the UK with LINES OUT THE DOOR.

    6. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh. Americans suck at coffee. That is why there are 100s of Starbucks in the UK with LINES OUT THE DOOR.

      Yeah I wouldn't much faith in the culinary tastes of the British. For good food and beverages go to Spain, France and Italy. I don't now why Americans are incapable of producing good coffee. Maybe they use different machines ? Maybe like everything else over there, it has to be oversize so a small and a mean a small cup of espresso is out and you need to drink half a liter of coffee ? I drink one small cup of espresso I make every morning and it's enough to keep me awake for the whole day. I simply do not understand people that drink coffee like it's water.

    7. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Americans suck at coffee. That is why there are 100s of Starbucks in the UK with LINES OUT THE DOOR.

      Actually, Americans do suck at coffee. And Starbucks isn't helping, serving up fattened brewed charcoal water in pretentiously-named servings at ridiculous prices.

      Then there's US Navy coffee, reputed to be too corrosive for use as battery acid.

      It's mostly that Americans just drink so much coffee. And suck even worse at tea.

      You can find decent coffee in the USA. it's just more of a challenge than you'd expect, considering. Then again, we invented McDonalds, too.

      Until Starbucks came along, though, we really didn't even pretend very hard to have good coffee.

    8. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I think you meant St. Petersburg, FL. Many of the cafes sort of treat coffee as an afterthought rather than specializing in it. A cafe is often more of a restaurant. There are some locally run coffee places that are fairly decent, however

    9. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Until Starbucks came along, though, we really didn't even pretend very hard to have good coffee.

      That's not strictly true, at least not in some big cities and college towns that had decent coffee shops pre-Starbucks. It was really quite sad where I was living at the time when Starbucks came to town and basically started taking over spots that used to be indy coffee shops. Sure, not all of them were great, but they were generally better than Starbucks... Which frankly is terrible. Even if they had decent coffee, I wouldn't prefer to go there because of the pretentious BS of it all. No, I don't find it sophisticated or even cute to call sizes by some bizarre names, no I don't want to be asked 20 questions including my name just to order a plain standard drink. In Italy, you can find better coffee on any block at the local bar, and they don't need any of this crap "grande white chocolate mocha 1% with whip" to serve up something decent. You don't need white chocolate syrup and whipped cream to make a decent espresso taste good. I'd personally rather get a coffee from Dunkin Donuts than Captain Ahab's mate's joint.

    10. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For crying out loud, if you want any authority country on coffee you should ask the ones that actually use it the most. Adn that's Finland. 12 kilograms per person per year. US, UK, and Italy are way way behind.

    11. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Large corporations suck at coffee.
      Some place in America have great coffee, like Portland, Or.
      It's regional, but that's becasue the US is so large.
      Not to imply only portland has good coffee.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It is my opinion the Starbucks over roasts their beans specifically to upsell into the sweeter dessert coffee beverages.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For crying out loud, if you want any authority country on coffee you should ask the ones that actually use it the most. Adn that's Finland. 12 kilograms per person per year. US, UK, and Italy are way way behind.

      Quality matters not quantity.
      So you'll excuse me but for coffee I'll trust a French or an Italian way before someone from Finland.

    14. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      I have to agree - it's next to impossible to get good coffee in the US. Trust me, I've been almost everywhere in the US. Hell, I went into a supermarket yesterday (Food Lion, in the southeast Carolinas) and they had no whole bean coffee! It's one thing to not find decent coffee in restaurants, but to have trouble buying beans just blows my mind. Yes, I went to Starbucks.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    15. Re: Why do they even have a Starbucks? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Food Lion is a Wal-Mart wannabe when it comes to groceries. Odd sizes, limited inventory, horrible layout.

      Try Duncan Donuts. Their coffee has been praised a lot lately and they may sell whole bean bags in their shops. They do in Publix supermarkets, and I'm pretty sure you can find Publix in SC. Also check out Cost Plus/World Market. They have whole bean of various qualities and an in-store grinder. Another local option you may find is The Fresh Market, which also has a grinder.

      Or, you could just order green beans from Sweet Maria's and roast them yourself!

  9. I have a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we use 2D QR codes 3D printed on the side of the custom made drone delivered pumpkin lattés? I mean I've been told the game has changed so much that I can't believe anyone still waits in line for someone to boil water for them!!????

  10. Sounds like hands-on training by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's to give undercover agents in training some semi-real-world experience with giving false names with confidence?

    1. Re:Sounds like hands-on training by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Correct answer should be - use a code name.

      Or just change the way of working - give a number. Today I'm number 42.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  11. supervisors always come up with crap ideas. by NemoinSpace · · Score: 0

    the lines, both in the morning and mid-afternoon, can stretch down the hallway.

    Open up another register dopey. - Or are you purposely trying delay those guys from spying on us?...nah, I'm sticking with the dopey, cheerleader theory.

  12. Anonymous ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous coffee ?

    But no US citizen visiting US web sites can be anonymous on the Internet ?

    Private phone calls threaten National Security ?

    Oh my God Buffy, they might find out you ordered a sex toy.

    Or my fetish with kitten videos !

  13. Store # 1? by mbone · · Score: 2

    I thought that was a Pike's Place in Seattle?

    1. Re:Store # 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show you who is REALLY funding Starbucks.

    2. Re:Store # 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe every store is Store #1. Like Colbert's gag about the "Fighting First" district everywhere (and second, third, fourth, fifth, etc.)

    3. Re:Store # 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's probably Starbucks Store #1.
      This might be CIA privately-run for-profit on-site store #1.

      There's probably ten stores. So far, the existence of one has been authorized to be leaked.

    4. Re:Store # 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a false flag against Seattle apparently.

  14. I hope visiting SIS oficers by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

    Use Pike or Howard :-)

  15. What undercover agents are these? by orzetto · · Score: 1

    I thought undercover agents would be trained to conjure up a fake identity on the spot, even under duress, and keep it consistent with any information the interrogating party may have.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:What undercover agents are these? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      This is one - just one - of the many reasons you're not an undercover agent.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:What undercover agents are these? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      If they're tottering about in CIA HQ, then I suspect neither are any of these people.

    3. Re:What undercover agents are these? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Is that becasue you think spies are all like James Bond? Never have down time? never get debriefed? Never get training? Just run around, shoot things and bang hot women?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Is it that much of a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long can it take to prepare a cup of coffee-based food product?

    1. Re:Is it that much of a problem? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      A minute or two, actually.

      Tap previous grounds into a knock-box, rinse portafilter, grind beans, tamp them down, draw espresso shots, steam milk, style a love heart in the froth.

      That's just for a caffe latte. The slow pour-over filter coffee nerds rave about is an art form that takes a while...

  17. Traffic engineering by mbone · · Score: 2

    I can actually understand this - suppose I was an agent and I made up a random name, like 'Polly-O string cheese'. If I used it consistently, a spy for the other side could do traffic analysis - things like " 'Polly-O string cheese' always gets a coffee, except for 2 recent periods of about a week each. Suspected agent X was reported as being in country Y, an ally of ours, during those 2 periods, and at no other time. Next time 'Polly-O string cheese' doesn't get a coffee, if X is in country Y, get the Y state security to arrest him.

    If I were agent X, I would be very nervous at having to give any name, even if I could make one up each time. Humans are not very good at making up random things...

    1. Re:Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, then you have an overly literal mind.

      What do you think this offers over subverting a barista who works there, and could actually tell you that the fat greasy spook with a missing left pinkie was OOO on June 17th?

    2. Re:Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I would be very nervous at having to give any name, even if I could make one up each time. Humans are not very good at making up random things...

      So get a name frequency table and use the most common name for each country you happen to be in.
      Good luck tracking "Bill Johnson" at starbucks in the USA.

    3. Re:Traffic engineering by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      I can actually understand this - suppose I was an agent and I made up a random name, like 'Polly-O string cheese'. If I used it consistently, a spy for the other side could do traffic analysis - things like " 'Polly-O string cheese' always gets a coffee, except for 2 recent periods of about a week each. Suspected agent X was reported as being in country Y, an ally of ours, during those 2 periods, and at no other time. Next time 'Polly-O string cheese' doesn't get a coffee, if X is in country Y, get the Y state security to arrest him.

      If I were agent X, I would be very nervous at having to give any name, even if I could make one up each time. Humans are not very good at making up random things...

      If a nefarious entity has access to detailed records of what names are written on the plastic cups, as an intelligence agency you're already well-screwed.

      Y'know, I wonder if they scrub the money involved for DNA before handing it over to the clerks...

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    4. Re:Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can actually understand this - suppose I was an agent and I made up a random name, like 'Polly-O string cheese'. If I used it consistently, a spy for the other side could do traffic analysis - things like " 'Polly-O string cheese' always gets a coffee, except for 2 recent periods of about a week each. Suspected agent X was reported as being in country Y, an ally of ours, during those 2 periods, and at no other time. Next time 'Polly-O string cheese' doesn't get a coffee, if X is in country Y, get the Y state security to arrest him.

      you watch too many james bond movies. the starbucks in the middle of cia headquarters isn't exactly where i'd get my intelligence.

      Humans are not very good at making up random things...

      well, let's give it a shot. pauly, buster, sawyer, homer, salty, hickory, buzz, dumbo, egg...

      i guess you didn't catch the part where these are people who work at the cia?

    5. Re:Traffic engineering by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That only works if you give a consistent code name.

      Act random style and you will confuse even the best statistician.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they change their face and outfit randomly too? Do they ask for some coffee they hate just to stay undercover? Just have a guy sit there and take note of "[order] made by [description]" and you have your data.

    7. Re:Traffic engineering by stoploss · · Score: 1

      Your entire attack vector is obviated by the fact that these people are probably mostly paying with plastic. If so, you have their real names anyway. Attack there rather than some esoteric sampling attack based on the analysis of called names.

      Besides, if you're going so deep into pattern analysis that you fear the effects of calling a pseudorandom name, I *guarantee* you there are better identifier proxies... most notably time of day/order type correlation, which is likely to be far more stable and restricted than the spectrum of pseudorandom name choices you fear. I wouldn't care if I were randomly called Enzo or Charles, but I would never order a pumpkin spice latte. I'd probably order an Americano 98% of the time, and I probably place my order within the same 20 minute window each day. So, which is likely to be a better identifier?

      Or they could just coopt the goddamn barista and get them to compares faces/dates present at the CIA vs field surveillance photos. Which is probably the best solution, and completely sidesteps your abstruse attack vector.

      Why would the attacker choose to do it "the hard way"?

    8. Re:Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      projection, correlation is not causation

  18. gold star card by xombo · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised that they don't accept the rewards cards.

    Why not have it randomly select a Starbucks store ID from the POS every time it processes a transaction at that location?

    1. Re:gold star card by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Another intresting fact: My (europa based) rewards card was sent by international mail from Seattle. But is not accepted in the united states.

      --
      bickerdyke
  19. This is a very real concern by kriston · · Score: 0

    This is a very real concern. They don't want you to know they work for the intelligence community. They work in a submarine as much as humanly possible.

    But on a more important topic: I have *never* been in a Starbucks that does anything other than call out the name of the drink ordered.

    This story baffles me. I'm calling B.S.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:This is a very real concern by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Really? odd. Every Starbucks I've been to uses the name on the cup, unless they can't read it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Bond by PPH · · Score: 2

    James Bond. And I'll take that shaken, not stirred.

    What was I thinking? I'll just send Moneypenny down to fetch the coffee.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. The CIA are one of the 'boys' now? by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Let's not lose sight of the fact that they're mostly psychopathic mercenaries and murderers -- on behalf of Big Bucks, not Starbucks.

  22. Phase Three by RDW · · Score: 1

    Is this connected with the transition from Phase Two to Phase Three? Presumably it must have helped with recruitment:

    "Though the coffee chain's specific plans are not known, existing Starbucks franchises across the nation have been locked down with titanium shutters across all windows. In each coffee shop's door hangs the familiar Starbucks logo, slightly altered to present the familiar mermaid figure as a cyclopean mermaid whose all-seeing eye forms the apex of a world-spanning pyramid...Remaining Starbucks employees earmarked for re-training are being taught revised corporate procedures alongside 15,500 new hires recently recruited from such non-traditional sources as the CIA retirement program, Internet bulletin boards frequented by former Eagle Scouts, and the employment section in the back of Soldier Of Fortune magazine."

    http://www.theonion.com/articl...

  23. Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would call it the study of graph theory, but that aside, I used to go to a new donut shop in town but they tried really hard to always remember peoples names, i didn't like, I stopped going there, also of note is that a group of police went there one time and I never saw them again after they had to use their names, I still pass the place almost every day

    also another food place had five people use the same name, and yes I got the order for someone else, i just kept the food it was close to my order

  24. loyalty programs... by ArieKremen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but they all use their loyalty program cards tied to their personal credit cards....

    --
    -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    1. Re:loyalty programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the article....

      There are no frequent-customer award cards, because officials fear the data stored on the cards could be mined by marketers and fall into the wrong hands, outing secret agents.

  25. names happen ... by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    I don't even drink coffee, but when I go with other people, there are plenty of coffee shops out there (some Starbucks, some not) that ask for your name.

    It stands out to me, because one of my co-workers ends up with 'Richard' on his cup, because he doesn't want to waste 5 min repeating his name and then trying to tell them how to spell it.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  26. Capacity planning by ebonum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Because the campus is a highly secured island, few people leave for coffee, and the lines, both in the morning and mid-afternoon, can stretch down the hallway."

    What a waste of time and resources!

    For a group of people who likes to give the impression they are all super geniuses (and by extension deserve X 100 billion a year in funding), I would expect at least one person could have done some capacity planning and figured out how big the Starbucks need to be for that location. How about some accountability? Fire the person who planned this coffee shop. His/her mistakes cost the country the hourly rate of each person in line * the time they waste standing around.

    1. Re:Capacity planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're probably salaried to a man, it's not the sort of job that lends itself to a 40 hour work week. I can tell you FBI agents are expected to work at least 50 as well as being on call.

    2. Re:Capacity planning by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      If they were smart enough to figure that out then they would probably just make their coffee flavored milkshakes at home and put it in a thermos. Or get one of those single cup coffee machines.

  27. Traffic engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet it still reeks of irony. The agents are nervous about being identified and traceable, except that's what they do to the rest of us every day. Every. Single. Day!

    Oh I get it, they focus on bad people. But in the course of finding the baddies they are stepping all over everyone else. Funny, they used to be able to do their jobs with at least a passing reference to due process. Well, except for that Hoover thing...

  28. Pff by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    1) Every agent give the name "John Smith." Duh.

    2) You take the supervisor to the basement and put one in his ear. Also duh. God damn are we running an intelligence agency or a kindergarden?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Every agent give the name "John Smith." Duh.

      Wouldn't work; everyone knows Agent Smith prefers ice cream.

  29. Kind of sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just get the impression that they're all just wannabe spies who wanna act top-secret. I'm not expert, but I'd be surprised if there was anything at stake with random CIA employees getting coffee. If there was, I'm sure the Agency would interfere swiftly and silently.

  30. It's almost as if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Public anonymity is important to people; a shocking revelation for the government to be sure.

  31. Love to take themselves seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people to assert themselves like this. Oh we're all secret agents, so we can't give out our first names to the gal who makes the coffee, not even here inside our secret agent headquarters, it would be a security risk, and we're all about security and secrecy.

  32. SB #1 is Seattle NOT Langley Virginia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ummm.. Starbucks #1 is in the Pikes Place marketplace in Seattle Washington, not CIA HQ.... somebody got their wires crossed...

    1. Re:SB #1 is Seattle NOT Langley Virginia.... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. Starbucks #1 is in the Pikes Place marketplace in Seattle Washington, not CIA HQ.... somebody got their wires crossed...

      You mean Pike Place Market in Seattle.

      There is no Pike's Place Market. There never has been.

      And the first rule of CIA Starbucks is there is no CIA Starbucks.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:SB #1 is Seattle NOT Langley Virginia.... by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      SB probably had to tell the CIA it was #1 to get permission to build a Starbucks at Langley.

  33. dialogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: Sugar with that?
    B: Not at liberty to say.

  34. A coffee shop name by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I started using the name 'Bob' at the local Starbucks because of the pronunciation issue, not to mention I am a wee bit paranoid.

    Just because I am paranoid DOESN'T mean they aren't after me.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:A coffee shop name by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Of course it doesn't. paranoid means specifically that people are out to get you.
      Paranoid Delusion mean you think they are, but they aren't.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Obama Throws US Intel Under The Bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US Intel is NOT going to be happy that Obama is trying to pin the blame on THEM.

    Expect more "Chicago Stye" bullets in the walls of The White House!

    Snicker snicker.

  36. If they have nothing to hide... by doug141 · · Score: 1

    then they have nothing to worry about!

  37. This is news? by eyegone · · Score: 1

    So you're telling me that "security" people are self-important asshats? Who knew?

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  38. Desk jockeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm betting its just the desk jockeys being precious, I very much doubt the real spies have any trouble with using an alias to get their coffee.

  39. CIA food court by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    I've had lunch there, and it is pretty surreal how they have this normal mall food court in the middle of one of the most secure places on the planet.

    But I guess everyone needs a slice from Shapiro pizza now and again.

  40. No wonder the CIA sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even I use a fake name at Starbucks. Their undercover agents need a refresher course on espionage methinks.

  41. bucks by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Star Bucks

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  42. really makeing them uncomfortable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well for me at least it makes me uncomfortable at every location.
    How about this. Since I don't know you and you don't know me; I will call you sir and you will call me sir and we will have a nice conversation between 2 people that aren't trying to pretend there best friends.

  43. Spy vs. Spy by TheRealCodeRed · · Score: 1

    Barista: Can I get your name?
    Spy: I feel uncomfortable with this line of questioning
    Barista: Sir, I just want to put your name on the cup so you know when you coffee is ready.
    Spy: I don't know I think answering this question could compromise my cover.
    Barista: Sir, I swear I just want to make sure you get the correct coffee.
    Spy: I need to push this up the line. Make sure I can get clearance to give you my name
    Barista: Never mind your coffee is ready. Here you go. Would that be cash or credit.
    Spy: Credit here you go.
    Barista: Thank you Mr. Smith have a nice day.

  44. Sounds like hands-on training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt undercover agents spend much time in the CIA building.

    This would be more the Q's and Moneypenies and less the James Bond's.

    The most likely problem was that for essentially no good reason everyone gave a pseudonym and much like people tend to pick terrible passwords, they rendered the system pointless by picking the same handfull of pseudonyms causing confusion and delays instead if making the process more efficient.

  45. Doesn't inspire confidence by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    If they can't come up with a fake name to give to a person that makes coffee then I don't have a lot of confidence in their job performance.