Slashdot Mirror


U.K. Supermarkets Beta Test Full-Body 3D Scanners For Selfie Figurines

Lucas123 writes Walmart-owned ASDA supermarkets in the U.K. are beta testing 3D full-body scanning booths that allow patrons to buy 6-in to 9-in high "selfie" figurines. Artec Group, a maker of 3D scanners and software, said its Shapify Booth, which can scan your entire body in 12 seconds and use the resulting file to create a full-color 3D printed model, is making its U.S. debut this week. The 3D Shapify booths are equipped with four wide view, high-resolution scanners, which rotate around the person to scan every angle. Artec claims the high-powered scan and precision printing is able to capture even the smallest details, down to the wrinkles on clothes. The scanning process generates 700 captured surfaces, which are automatically stitched together to produce an electronic file ready for 3D printing. Artec offers to print the figurines for booth operators (retailers) for $50 for a 6-in model, $70 for a 7.5-in model, and $100 for a 9-in figurine.

165 comments

  1. UK article, US units by loufoque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is that allowed?

    1. Re:UK article, US units by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why is that allowed?

      The Mars probe mishap still haunts everybody, especially when it comes to body parts.

    2. Re:UK article, US units by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, given that fuel is dispensed in litres, but distances are measured in miles, wine is measured in ml and beer in pints, the systems we tend to use are somewhat fluid.

    3. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the UK still use english measure?

    4. Re:UK article, US units by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      It's an improvement.

      The "exocomets" article had a six orders of magnitude error. Which in this case would mean saying that the booth scans your entire body in four and a half months. Then, for a measly $100,000,000 they build you a nice 228km high figurine.

    5. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice pun.

    6. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the imperial system in the UK, and it's still used for quite a few things.

      I think the original poster was referring to the prices being in dollars, though.

    7. Re:UK article, US units by pjt33 · · Score: 3, Informative

      For some things. But a lot of the units which people in the US call English are different sizes to the units with the same name in England. And the UK certainly doesn't use $ for its currency, which I think is what the GPP was talking about, although I think they may have overlooked a context switch from the UK beta tests to the US launch.

    8. Re:UK article, US units by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I said nine inches, not nine centimeters!"

      Yeah, I can see how the gift replicas could become awkward...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:UK article, US units by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      They will also ask for a payment of five Ningis, in cash.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:UK article, US units by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      I have one Triganic Pu. Will they make change?

    11. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is making its U.S. debut this week

      Because it's actually a US article, but the summary is badly written in a way that you think it's exclusively about the beta-test in the UK.

    12. Re: UK article, US units by CPUmonster · · Score: 1

      I think because the article is talking about how it is making its U.S. debut this week.

    13. Re:UK article, US units by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Is it fluid enough that money is counted in dollars too?

    14. Re:UK article, US units by Grantbridge · · Score: 2

      UK used to use Imperial measures, but now everything is metric with the exception of distances on road signs which are in miles. Milk and beer is normally sold in 568ml units, which happens to be the same as 1 pint!

      American units are different, their pints are smaller (16 vs 20 fl.oz.)

    15. Re:UK article, US units by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      US prices, too.

      Give 'em an inch, they'll take an ell.

    16. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, yes on the distances, no on the beer and milk.

      Beer is sold in pints when sold on tap in pubs and restaurants, I've never seen a ml figure listed anywhere. Pint glasses typically even have a "1 pint" mark on the glass, so that you can see that you haven't been short-filled. Bottled and canned beer is typically sold in sensible fractions of a litre (1/3 - 330ml) or 1/2 - 500ml usually), not a metric equivalent of a pint, although you do see 275ml bottles, which is not too far off a half-pint.

      Milk is typically sold in litres in supermarkets, usually 500ml or 1 or 2 litre bottles. However it is also sold in pint-equivalent quantities like you mentioned by some companies, especially those that deliver milk to peoples homes, where the pint is a bit traditional.

    17. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American units are different, their pints are smaller (16 vs 20 fl.oz.)

      But the US fluid ounce is bigger (about 29.573531mL vs about 28.413063mL). A US liquid pint is about 473.176mL while an Imperial liquid pint is about 568.261mL. The ratio is about 6/5, while implying equal sized fluid ounces would give 5/4 as the ratio. Check definitions at this site, as Google occasionally gets it wrong.

    18. Re:UK article, US units by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      We still use imperial measures for height and weight of people (e.g. 6'1" tall and weighing 14st 6lb).

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    19. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and for body part sizes - boobs, willies, etc

    20. Re:UK article, US units by Grantbridge · · Score: 2

      Weight is normally KG now, I have no idea what my weight is in stone. Height is still probably more often in feet than cm. Weight or height of anything you buy is always in kg/m though.

    21. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      They'll make whatever you want.

      It will still take those four and a half month, though.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    22. Re:UK article, US units by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      It probably depends on what scales you use, but in general if you ask someone their weight, they'll answer in stone. In official contexts KGs are probably preferred.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    23. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Milk is typically sold in litres in supermarkets, usually 500ml or 1 or 2 litre bottles.

      Not really. You might see the litre-based equivalent volume printed somewhere on the label, but every supermarket I know sells milk in 1/2/4/6 pint bottles, including at least one store for most of the big name chains.

      Source: I just looked in my fridge. :-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    24. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stand corrected. Obviously I pay more attention to beer than milk.

    25. Re:UK article, US units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Division by 14 is too hard for Americans, so they just give a number in pounds (202lbs in your example)

    26. Re:UK article, US units by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but the best we can do is 1:1 scale, it doesn't enlarge.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    27. Re:UK article, US units by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      # Stonehenge - where the demons dwell,
        where the banshees live and they do live well...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:UK article, US units by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      And who would want a 9" pianist figurine anyway?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    29. Re:UK article, US units by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Well, given that fuel is dispensed in litres, but distances are measured in miles, wine is measured in ml and beer in pints, the systems we tend to use are somewhat fluid.

      Pint isn't an official measurement (officially its 568ml) but it's popular in colloquial usage, you buy a pint of beer, but not a pint of milk or motor oil. Ordering a pint is just something that's ingrained in UK culture (and most commonwealth countries) and not going to change any time soon.

      Height is a good example, when talking about height we use feet and inches but on any official document it's measured in centimetres.

      Australia fully converted to metric before I was born, but old imperial measurements are still popular in conversation.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    30. Re:UK article, US units by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      And who would want a 9" pianist figurine anyway?

      In a world where the Baby Jesus Butt Plug is a real artefact, and given the frequent public redneck masturbation on Slashdot over the buttocks of Obama, I can guess that slightly modified 9in Obama-dildoes are going to sell well.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. The obvious question is by ruir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it print *naked* figurines?

    1. Re:The obvious question is by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, that's the next generation, when they add backscatter and/or millimeter-wave scanners.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:The obvious question is by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Does it print *naked* figurines?

      It does print naked figurines, which don't require any quotation marks, if you take off your cloths inside the booth when the scan is taken.

    3. Re:The obvious question is by rioki · · Score: 1

      There is no reason why it can not. If you can handle the civil disorder charges afterwards, you know since it is in a public place...

    4. Re:The obvious question is by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They should do a tie-in with RealDoll.

      Then Lennart Poettering would be able to comply with everyone's wishes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:The obvious question is by microsquishy · · Score: 1

      Let's hope not. Have you seen the the people of Walmart website? I shudder to think.. oops... too late... must unsee with the mind's eye... arrrgggghhh!!!!

    6. Re:The obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it print *naked* figurines?

      It does print naked figurines, which don't require any quotation marks, if you take off your cloths inside the booth when the scan is taken.

      Just be prepared for the 3D image file to be leaked from the cloud and have millions of people worldwide with naked figurines of you to masturbate to. :-P

    7. Re:The obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The killer app will be *lifesized* *inflatable* figurines of your SO in their prime.

    8. Re:The obvious question is by Cederic · · Score: 1

      'to'? I want one for her to masturbate _with_

    9. Re:The obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go into the booth clothed, then get nekkid, than what's the problem? It's all going to be enclosed, so if the operator is ok with it then nae problem. Anyway in the UK being nekkid in public is only a crime if someone who sees you is offended.

    10. Re:The obvious question is by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the NSA would never want to tap into something like that.

      ... Your honor, it is a legitimate means of identifying, uh, potential terrorists.

    11. Re:The obvious question is by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      if you take off your cloths inside the booth when the scan is taken.

      What, if anything, is to stop you from taking your clothes off outside the booth? It doesn't have to be on the street, you know.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:The obvious question is by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If you can handle the civil disorder charges afterwards, you know since it is in a public place...

      No, it's not in a public place. It's on private property (a supermarket) to which the public are *granted* access but do not have a *right* to access. Which is why they have to employ security guards who do not have the powers of the police (they can't touch you, except in self defence, nor detain you except under the normal conditions of a citizen's arrest). You do not have the right to go there - the store can refuse you access and demand that you leave (and you're then committing a public order offence if you don't then leave the private property).

      If the store management object to you stripping your clothes off, then they can request that you leave. But they've invited you onto their property and if they don't like you stripping off and dancing naked down the aisles, it's for them to deal with, not the Police.

      The boundaries are subtle, but they are there.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    13. Re:The obvious question is by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer - I'm talking about Scottish law ; I am not sure of the state of English law. I'm sure that Asda's Scottish advocates do know and can inform their English barrister associates which bits of Asda HQ's English laws are not going to work in Scotland.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Already Done by darkain · · Score: 2

    This has already been a thing here for several months here in the states at anime / gaming / sci-fi cons, mostly targeted at cosplayers. Kinda cool... kinda creepy... kinda indifferent about it, I guess?

  4. Do we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get to edit the image before printing?

  5. No thanks by hyperfine+transition · · Score: 1

    We had a high resolution, full-body scanner at work that was being used to build a database of body shapes. I volunteered but was rather dismayed when I loaded the 3-d model to see what shape I really am ...

    1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be an opportunity for artists to manipulate the model to make it look more ideal.

    2. Re:No thanks by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: either you don't have access to a full-length mirror or you never bother to look at yourself in one. Granted, you can't get a good look at your backside that way, but you should have a fairly good idea of what you'd see if you did.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  6. Privacy bla bla oh my God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh wait...

  7. Voodoo by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Voodoo doctors are salivating over the possibilities...

  8. Re:The obvious question is NOT QUOTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are not quotes ... which is funny because I don't know what "naked" means. I'm going to get naked but not really because of the flesh colored underwear.

    Asterisks imply *emphasis* not quotes.

  9. This won't end well by sjames · · Score: 1

    While most users will be more or less what they expect, they will likely have more than a few nudes. So far, no big deal, but I'll bet they won't all be over 18.

    1. Re:This won't end well by loufoque · · Score: 3

      What's the problem? Are you afraid of nudity?

    2. Re:This won't end well by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm not. Much of society is, particularly if it's under 18 years old.

    3. Re:This won't end well by sjames · · Score: 1

      you'd have to be stupid or shameless

      You have just described a significant portion of the population.

      The booth in the video was enclosed, so would be no more exposing than a dressing room. The files are sent off for the actual printing with the result sent back a week later. So by the time anyone sees what you did, the (possibly illegal) deed is done.

      It may not come to anything, or it might be the next internet fueled fad.

    4. Re:This won't end well by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Sexting is sooo last decade!

    5. Re:This won't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when its of the typical types of people who shop at Asda, yes I am. Very afraid.

    6. Re:This won't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is this thing called walls. It blocks view.

  10. Re:Do wee wee... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Sorry, you can only subtract things, not add to them.

  11. The dirty mind plays up by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Would I be able to surprise mi SO with a special toy made in my full body shape. I wouldn't need sharp edges, a soft material would better suit the purpose and no toxins should be freed on body contact -especially with the mucus membranes.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:The dirty mind plays up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And finally she can get 6 inches.

    2. Re:The dirty mind plays up by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Where does the battery go?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:The dirty mind plays up by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      She'd surely pay the $100 for the tenfold improvement.

    4. Re:The dirty mind plays up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battery? Everyone knows premium toys run on premium unleaded.

  12. Already Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had this at ASDA in mid July and it was reported in the UK press and media from last October http://www.techradar.com/news/computing/get-your-own-in-action-figure-at-your-local-asda-3d-printing-station-1188006
    Keep up.

  13. This won't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since you get scanned, go do your shopping, then collect and pay at the till, you'd have to be stupid or shameless to try and get a nude figurine, even assuming the scanning booth operator didn't object to you stripping down to your birthday suit in full view in the supermarket.
    If it didn't end in arrest for public indecency, it is very unlikely you'd be allowed to purchase the figure.

  14. Re:The obvious question is NOT QUOTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are not quotes ... which is funny because I don't know what "naked" means. I'm going to get naked but not really because of the flesh colored underwear.

    So you're going to be "naked"?

  15. Boycott ASDA by hughbar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many of us boycott ASDA anyway, since it's Walmart. Waitrose provides good food and pays its staff. And no, I don't work for Waitrose.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
    1. Re:Boycott ASDA by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      The two are hardly competing for the same market. Waitrose is aiming for the aspirational middle classes. Asda is... not.

      If you have the kind of household budget which means you shop at Asda, then making the switch to Waitrose is probably not a realistic option.

      Though on the few occasions I've eaten Asda food, their meat has had this weird texture, like it's already been digested once.

    2. Re:Boycott ASDA by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Asda, Morrison, Tesco and Sainsbury are all pretty similar in terms of quality and price, whatever people try and pretend.

      They're all equalled in quality and undercut in price by Lidl and Aldi, it's just that you generally have more choice in Asda et al as they have bigger shops.

      But if you want an aspirational carrier bag you go to Waitrose,or M&S.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's accurate - I've gone through stages of shopping in Tesco, Asda and Morrisons. We tend to switch when we notice the quality of the own-brand products going down. Morrisons is where it's at right now in our opinion.

    4. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's strange, I find their steak as good as that at Tesco or Sainsburies

    5. Re: Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of anybody boycotting Asda "because it's Walmart" before. Can't be that many people doing it!

    6. Re:Boycott ASDA by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      And many of us don't give a fuck and shop at ASDA, get good quality food, a good experience and low prices. Plenty of other employers around, the staff don't have to work at ASDA if they don't want to.

    7. Re:Boycott ASDA by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Morrisons (my closest one is too far away) but Aldi currently beats Tesco and Asda on quality.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    8. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Asda, Morrison, Tesco and Sainsbury are all pretty similar in terms of quality and price, whatever people try and pretend.

      We have mostly Tesco and Sainsbury's around here, and my experience has been quite different. They are aiming for similar markets, but their quality for own-brand goods, the kind of name-brand goods they sell, and their prices all fluctuate significantly over time. Right now, Tesco is clearly winning on all three counts for most of what we buy for my household. As little as 2-3 years ago, it was the other way around.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    9. Re: Boycott ASDA by hughbar · · Score: 1

      I notice you're an AC. Yes, a fair amount of the radical London East End left do it + the London chattering classes {N16, N1]. Since you probably work for ASDA or Walmart, you're not doing it, of course.

      Of course, the 'not many people doing it' so it's useless is a common way to try and instill powerlessness. Got to start somewhere, ASDA, Coca-cola, KFC etc. etc.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    10. Re:Boycott ASDA by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Plenty of other employers around, the staff don't have to work at ASDA if they don't want to.

      Ah yes, in a country with permenantly more people than jobs (only recently dropping below 7%) is clearly a country with plenty of other employers around. Some people do not have a great deal of choice over their employer.

    11. Re:Boycott ASDA by rkww · · Score: 1

      um... Asda is one of the better employers

    12. Re: Boycott ASDA by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Here's some fucking news for you: London is not the world. London is not Europe. London is not the UK. London is not England. London is not a fucking barometer for behaviour across the country.

      Just because it's fashionable to declare that you're boycotting Asda to excuse choosing to shop at Waitrose in London doesn't mean that's a common thing. I live outside of London and I know nobody that boycotts Asda for any reason other than price or quality of product.

      Some people prefer to shop elsewhere, but that's not a boycott.

      Personally I prefer M&S but Asda, Sainsbury, Morrisons and Tesco all offer far greater variety and are often far easier to get to, so they all continue to draw greater numbers of shoppers than the more constrained supermarkets.

      If it helps any, I don't work for Asda. Or Walmart. Or indeed any retailer at all. I just share the Scot's dislike of the attitude of people that live in London and the way the government pander to them. You're not special, and you don't speak for the rest of us. Do try and remember that.

    13. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are buying regular brands then the quality is all the same anywhere, so it's only the own brand stuff that is different, Asda is a step down from the rest in that regard, their own brand stuff is just like blocks of lard with flavourings and their fruit looks like it is kicked onto the shelves by retarded gorillas. The biggest downside to Asda is being inside an Asda store, if you go into Asda at 9pm on a friday, it's like something out of fallout, half empty shelves, cages and scraps of packing strewn about the aisles, barely-human mutants bragging their knuckles as they scavenge for food. .

    14. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aldi and Lidl destroy the rest on own brand stuff and destroys most of the actual brands, if you check the ingredients, the only place with the same quality of stuff is Waitrose, Their non-food stuff is better too, where else will someone give you a 5 year guarantee on a kettle?

    15. Re:Boycott ASDA by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In a country where retail jobs are pretty much readily available, especially if you have retail experience, yeah, it's a matter of choice.

      If Asda treated their staff _that_ badly they'd get fewer recruits and have to improve working conditions. Walmart benefit from the relative lack of a safety net in the US but in the UK people just don't have to take abuse from employers.

      That said, Asda have gone from winning 'Best company to work for' awards (e.g. Sunday Times Top 100) to not even featuring in the lists, so Walmart's influence does sadly appear to be taking effect.

      Purely anecdote, but a former girlfriend likes her job at Asda. Then again she was also an instigator of domestic violence, so who knows.

    16. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two are hardly competing for the same market. Waitrose is aiming for the aspirational middle classes. Asda is... not.

      If you have the kind of household budget which means you shop at Asda, then making the switch to Waitrose is probably not a realistic option.

      Though on the few occasions I've eaten Asda food, their meat has had this weird texture, like it's already been digested once.

      This picture is why: http://www.tekjournalismuk.com... That's your meat.

    17. Re: Boycott ASDA by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Never said that I did? As for your bad language and attitude that speaks for itself, doesn't it? So I wouldn't want to speak for anyone with that size of chip on their shoulder. It's nothing to do with 'fashionable' and nothing to do with 'excuse', it's e-th-ic-al. One side of my family are lowlands, but you make me ashamed. Enough said.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    18. Re: Boycott ASDA by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Ethics? In London? Don't make me fucking laugh.

      As for language, it's called English. Leave the boundaries of the M25, you'll find we still speak it in the rest of the country.

    19. Re:Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Why? It can't be regarding wages, since walmart is known to advocate for a higher minimum wage.

    20. Re: Boycott ASDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I work for myself, am "anonymous" simply because I don't have an account, and shop at Waitrose/M&S. I have shopped at Asda in the past however. I've no idea what the "radical East End" is.

      Good luck with your cause, you certainly seem very passionate about it even if you don't wish to explain why!

  16. This will be wildly successful by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

    in our narcissistic society.

    Really, it puts "selfie-sticks" to shame.

    Now, if you'll excuse me I need to search for my recent slashdot posts to admire them again.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  17. wide like whoa by darkitecture · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>Artec Group, a maker of 3D scanners and software, said its Shapify Booth, which can scan your entire body in 12 seconds and use the resulting file to create a full-color 3D printed model, is making its U.S. debut this week.
    >>The 3D Shapify booths are equipped with four wide view, high-resolution scanners, which rotate around the person to scan every angle.


    It's the US, you better fucking hope they're wide view!

    1. Re:wide like whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Artec Group, a maker of 3D scanners and software, said its Shapify Booth, which can scan your entire body in 12 seconds and use the resulting file to create a full-color 3D printed model, is making its U.S. debut this week.

      >>The 3D Shapify booths are equipped with four wide view, high-resolution scanners, which rotate around the person to scan every angle.

      It's the US, you better fucking hope they're wide view!

      And they'd better have auto-photoshopping available to make the figurines thinner or else no one will want them. Seriously, kids have their year book photos photo-shopped already.

    2. Re:wide like whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Artec Group, a maker of 3D scanners and software, said its Shapify Booth, which can scan your entire body in 12 seconds and use the resulting file to create a full-color 3D printed model, is making its U.S. debut this week.

      >>The 3D Shapify booths are equipped with four wide view, high-resolution scanners, which rotate around the person to scan every angle.

      It's the US, you better fucking hope they're wide view!

      Ah, yes, especially since fat women have now managed create an entire MTV meme out of their laziness and call this the Year of All Dat Ass.

      China is much less subtle about it. They just call it the Year of the Pig.

    3. Re:wide like whoa by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > In the UK... "$50 for a 6-in model, $70 for a 7.5-in model,
      > and $100 for a 9-in figurine."

      In the US, that's for girth, not height, btw.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  18. why do they need the scanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    walmart stores have so many fucking cameras, including for facial recognition now.... they should have enough data to print just about any of their customers.

  19. Re:The obvious question is NOT QUOTED by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    And what's the *emphasis* equivalent of air quotes? Jazz hands? ...*Naked*....*\o/*

  20. scan this! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    hmmm....what if I just want a, um, "figurine" of just a specific part of my body?

    1. Re:scan this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pack of cocktail sausages would make a cheap and delicious alternative.

    2. Re:scan this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alginate kits are already available for moulding your wenis in latex. Look online.

  21. Cool as a generic service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could not care less about selfie action figurines. But it would be cool to have a 3d scanning facility for people and smaller objects. I could get models for sauerbraten gaming, blender, etc.

  22. Copyright/trademark issues? by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if wearing a t-shirt or other item of clothing with a copyrighted or trademarked item/logo?

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How would it be any different than normal photos, legally speaking?

      You've already bought the clothes you're wearing.

    2. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easy. It's different because you don't own the "camera". Just like how you can modify a book you own but you can't pay someone else to preemptively buy a book and modify it for you then sell it to you. Nor can you sell a book that you modify without the risk of copyright infringement claims--the big saving grace is that a one-off affair like that is unlikely to spawn a lawsuit but a franchise machine in hundreds of supermarkets is likely to do so.

      Welcome to the insanity that is copyright law.

    3. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I don't have to pay a yearly subscription rate to wear some corporate logo?
      Its like I bought a perpetual licence for the content? Goodness.

    4. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by baKanale · · Score: 1

      It's different because it uses a new and different technology, which is scary, so we automatically throw out all the existing rules and run around like chickens with their heads cut off. It also let us make more rent seeking power grabs, so there's a plus.

    5. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Are you planning to duplicate your figurine hundreds or thousands of times and sell it? If not, this is clearly fair use.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Copyright/trademark issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... from a 3D printer"

      will be the new

      ".... on the Internet".

  23. Photogrammetry by JonathanR · · Score: 1

    Is there enough material out there for a 3D JLaw reconstruction?

  24. Why call this a "selfie"? by psymastr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How the hell is this considered a "selfie"? It's just an automatic 3D scanner. Its function is similar to automatic photographing machines whose output nobody would call a selfie.

    Ah, but you certainly sound "hip" and "cool" when discussing technology merely in the context of inane teenage habits.

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  25. Re:The obvious question is NOT QUOTED by gnupun · · Score: 1

    You could use unicode but, it looks like the Unicode 7 standard missed the opportunity to add air quotes emoticons

  26. Better use: online clothing shopping by b4nd0ler0 · · Score: 2

    I always thought it would be nice to have some kind of publicly accessible 3d scanner to get a standardized model of your body and use it to buy clothing online to make sure stuff fits properly. It would save time and reduce returns.

    1. Re:Better use: online clothing shopping by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I find that not lying to yourself about your actual body measurements helps.

      If those 34 inch waist jeans are too tight to do the fly up, it's most likely that you are in fact a 38 waist, rather than that the jeans are mislabelled.

      Top tip: most people don't have the same statistics at 38 that they did at 18.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  27. boring...... i'd rather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    have one of these.

  28. And in other marketing opportunities by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    No doubt there will be a brisk trade in copied files of some of the cuties who will use the booth to make anatomically perfect dolls of themselves.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:And in other marketing opportunities by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Where do you think Skynet will be sourcing its replicants from? C'mon, look at the timeline and start to do the math, then all this makes perfect sense.

    2. Re:And in other marketing opportunities by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      So the Terminators won't actually look like Arnold, but will appear as good looking women. "Run, everyone! Run! Hey, stop gawking at them! They aren't women! RUN!!!!" *entire group gunned down while they stare at the Terminators*

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:And in other marketing opportunities by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Even with the warning, I'd probably be the first friggin' corpse.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    4. Re:And in other marketing opportunities by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You may be onto something there. I mean, seriously, without this kind of lure, how would they ever get good-looking women into WalMart?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  29. They look rather cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had one of these set up at a electronics chain in Sweden a couple of weeks ago. Price ranges from I think 300-700 SEK (about 50-100 USD) for the figurines. this scanner was in an open area (no enclosed booth) and I saw no one use it, but all the figurines on display were of employees so I would assume it works pretty well.

    Fun idea.

  30. Actually, yes. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    You must be a dude. Women's clothes are generally not labeled by measurements but by a non-dimensional number which means almost nothing from brand to brand, and even from year to year. To wit:a young women's clothing store near me recently changed all their sizes. Everything changed by one value (what used to be and 8 is now labeled as a 6). They even had convenient "conversion" charts in the store listing the "old" size, and then a column with the "new" size, exactly one size smaller.

    Men's clothes are less variable, especially with pants (though different styles do vary by 2-4 inches in actual measurement/fit). However; shirts are notoriously inaccurate, and a full size difference (M-L or L-XL) is common between manufacturers.

    For online shopping, if the vendors could accurately identify the fit (doubtful), it would make for a lot less guesswork.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Actually, yes. by swb · · Score: 1

      I've bought clothes from LL Bean for over 25 years. On more than one occasion over that time I've noticed new pants bought in the same size and style as I've been wearing suddenly getting a little roomier.

      I'm not sure if the sizing changes were the result of changes in fashion or adaptation to a clientele with more girth. If you look at magazines from the 1960s and 1970s, a lot of mens clothing was much slimmer fitting and perhaps a looser fit became the fashion standard. But it could also be that people were simply buying larger sizes to accommodate weight gain and vendors adapted their sizing in ways that made them looser fitting without specifically altering the specific dimensions of waist size or leg length.

      It could be just changes in contract manufacturers, but I think that kind of variation would be too small to notice.

    2. Re:Actually, yes. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Shirts usually come with a collar size measurement - 15", 17.5" etc. Only cheaper shirts Ive seen come with a generic size band of S,M, L etc

    3. Re:Actually, yes. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Dress shirts come with collar size measurement. If you're buying t-shirts or non-dress long sleeve shirts, though, you need to content with Small-Medium-Large-XL. I can be a medium from some places (where mediums run large), a large in other places, and XL from some places that run their sizes on the smaller side. Clothes are one of the few items I mostly refuse to buy online (with the occasional TeeFury shirt as the exception) because of this sizing issue.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  31. Wow this is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truly, 3D printing has changed the game forever and we are now truly an intergalactic post-scarcity society. Awesome! 3D printing has changed our lives forever!

  32. Clothes by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind a time when shops had this and could use it to print (or, somewhat more old-fashioned: sew) clothes THAT ACTUALLY FIT. For some or other reason I have a hard time to find clothes that are long enough around the legs, arms, and body, not too tight around the shoulders and a little less tent-like around the waist. No, I'm not exceptionally tall and I also do not have a body builder upper body. Just dislike the Made In China (for Americans, presumably) stuff sold where I live.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Clothes by coofercat · · Score: 1

      If you want clothes that fit, you don't shop at Asda.

  33. not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the Pound sinks to parity with the US Dollar. Seeing as the Pound can currently buy 1.6 US Dollars, that might not be anytime soon. In addition, given that there are 1.26 Euros to the Pound, we're more likely to align with the Euro. *gulp*

    I don't know which would be considered worse, subsuming the Pound into either the Dollar or the Euro. I imagine that the Dollar would be preferred over a pocketful of Strasborgian counters, but we'd have to see a couple of squadrons of Gloucester Old Spots doing aerobatics at Farnborough before either happened!

    1. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people care about what currency we use? It's pretty irrelevant, and factors like inflation are more important. This issue of the pound seems to get sucked in to the whole jingoist anti-EU debate. The people who feel so sentimental about the pound seem to be deluding themselves and forget that it's only been in existence since 1971.

    2. Re:not until by Winter+Lightning · · Score: 1

      not until the Pound sinks to parity with the US Dollar. Seeing as the Pound can currently buy 1.6 US Dollars, that might not be anytime soon.

      It's already been there and the fall can be quite fast. In the early-mid '80s the Pound dropped from over $2 to a little over $1. On one trip I took in early '85, the effective rate was less than $1 to the Pound by the time the bank had taken its cut.

    3. Re:not until by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Which currency we use can be very important due to factors like inflation or qualitative easing. You have a point as for most transactions the currency is just used as a middle-man for swapping services (e.g. time you spent working for someone) for products or other services.

      If you have a lot of currency "saved" then the choice of currency can be very important as the value of each currency can dramatically change (e.g. hyper-inflation can wipe out the value of a currency).

      As a UK subject, I don't feel sentimental about the pound, but historically it has been a lot more stable than other currencies. At the moment, I believe that Sterling is in a safer position than the Euro as the Euro has problems with some of the countries having financial difficulties (e.g. Greece).

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    4. Re:not until by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Your complete ignorance of economics has been dealt with by another poster, so that just leaves history.

      The people who feel so sentimental about the pound seem to be deluding themselves and forget that it's only been in existence since 1971.

      You appear to have misspelled 1694.

      Could you even point to the UK on a map, or are you crap at geography too?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:not until by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ...we'd have to see a couple of squadrons of Gloucester Old Spots doing aerobatics at Farnborough ...

      As an American, I've watched just enough UK television to know what that means - "When Pigs FLY!!!" I learned about Gloucester Old Spots from "The Two Fat Ladies" and Farnborough from some other show re: airplanes.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:not until by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      At the moment, I believe that Sterling is in a safer position than the Euro as the Euro has problems with some of the countries having financial difficulties (e.g. Greece).

      Yes, one of the most important things about choosing a currency is who else uses it.

      In purely economic terms -- that is, ignoring politics and other factors -- it might make sense for the UK to share a currency with, say, Germany or the USA. These are all first world countries with well developed and reasonably stable economies.

      However, it makes little sense for the UK to share a currency with somewhere that has very different economic conditions. In this case, what happens in the nation with the weaker economy will inevitably and adversely affect what happens in the nation with the stronger economy.

      This is why, for example, the Germans took a hit they didn't deserve during the Euro problems of recent years. It's also why you'll see pigs flying past your window before you see the UK joining the Euro with the kind of variation we have across the EU today.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:not until by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Could you even point to the UK on a map, or are you crap at geography too?

      They tend to get goatse when they look for a map of the UK.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:not until by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      As a UK subject, I don't feel sentimental about the pound, ...

      I've seen a pound note and it doesn't weight nearly that much. I'm confused.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:not until by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a pound note for years. Probably the last one I saw would have been a Scottish one ('I think you'll find that's legal tender').

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    10. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many pence were in a pound in the 17th century? In fact, how many pence were in a pound in 1970? The only connection between the currency in England now and in 1694 is the name; it bears no other resemblance. Good try though.

    11. Re:not until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans have more than benefitted from being in the Euro, as I'm sure their own DM would have appreciated significantly and impacted their exports.

      A big economy like the US is ok having a single currency because its citizens don't seem to have a problem picking up sticks and moving 3,000 miles when the local economy tanks. Despite the EU making freedom of movement a core concept and commitment, this doesn't work so well because there are much bigger language and cultural barriers, and people just tend to be more tribal and insular.

      Banksy's recent work in Clacton, holding up a mirror to the UKIPers, was genius.

      Little countries like Montenegro seem to have done ok assuming a larger country's currency, although I did find it more expensive than its neighbours, including the full EU member Croatia.

      Some people say that the UK has very different economic conditions to Europe, but if you look at a GDP change graph of the last 20 years I don't think you will see much difference between it and the EU average. Maybe the UK is more extreme with its crashes and highs, but the general trends are synchronised. Besides, at 50% of the UK's export market, the EU has a strong impact on the UK whether or not the UK has its own currency. I'd say the UK has a very strong self interest in sitting at the table and being able to contribute to the EU's decision making process.

    12. Re:not until by Cederic · · Score: 1

      See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

      But go for it, deride someone for being precise in a manner you hadn't anticipated.

    13. Re:not until by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      From your link:

      " Consideration was given to introducing a new major unit of currency worth ten shillings in the old currency: suggested names included the new pound, the royal and the noble. This would have resulted in the "decimal penny" being worth only slightly more than the old penny (this approach was adopted, for example, when Australia and New Zealand decimalised in the 1960s, adopting respectively the Australian dollar and New Zealand dollar equal in value to 10 shillings). But Halsbury decided, in view of the pound sterling's importance as a reserve currency, that the pound should remain unchanged."

      tl;dr It was only the sub-units that changed. Old notes remained valid, and coins too where they mapped to an exact amount under the new system.

      Can I deride you for linking to an article you haven't read or understood? See, I was there when it happened, so I knew what he was referring to. Thing is, unlike some, I also know what really happened.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Online clothes shopping, surely ? by gripfin · · Score: 1

    The direct value add here should be that they keep your bodyshape in the cloud and you can reference it during online clothes shopping (or bike frame shopping) so that the site selling jeans etc can send you the right size. The indirect value add is that they keep anonymised copies of every scan to build a database of what size patrons actually are (and sell the data to people designing clothes). You could launch a business where you scan people for free, and charge online merchants a fee to access the profile when suggesting clothes for sale. I could see high price gyms doing you before and after scans as part of the "6 weeks with a personal trainer" package. And yes (though it horrifies me) I could see people one day linking to their 3d model (rather than a photo) in online dating profiles. I'm sure you'll be able to stitch an actual face photo onto the 3d model. People will add their own bodies into first person games. I could see eventually a self service booth that scanned you monthly and gave you targeted health / exercise advice entirely without human intervention. I'd use that, if I had guarantees of data security. ("Do more situps !"). Police mugshots would be 3d eventually, allowing better matches with CCTV and Thermal CCTV Airlines could decide in advance how to balance the plane / assign legroom based on passenger dimensions Automakers could supply personalised foam seat inserts You could do tuxedo rental by post, no high street premises needed. What fun this will be.....l Keep your eyes open for when it comes to Facebook - the new "share my body" option box will be checked by default, I bet...

  35. Better use: couples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd consider buying a figurine of my partner and me hugging if my partner wouldn't find it too weird.
    Could also put it on the wedding cake instead of the generic figurine they put there.

  36. New frontiers in narcissism by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this considered a "selfie"?

    Because this will be its biggest consumer market. Just imagine: I can surround myself with icons of the glorious figure that is me, and they will make great gifts (suitable for worship) for all of my friends and followers as well. And who on this Earth wouldn't be interested in an ultra-realistic 3-D model of what I ate for lunch? You could almost recreate the experience of what it is like to be me, looking at my lunch.

  37. Re:Do wee wee... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, you can only subtract things, not add to them.

    Wouldn't that be "subtractive manufacturing"?

  38. airport scanner in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you know if they have the t-ray naked scanners like they have at the airport?
    Then the owners could print you out in whatever they want.

  39. Hypernarcissism?? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    The selfie being an evident sign of narcissism, isn't a 3D selfie a thing of hypernarcissism? Why would I want a figurine 3D of myself?!? #WTF

    1. Re:Hypernarcissism?? by machineghost · · Score: 1

      Artec (the company behind this) has a storefront in downtown Palo Alto, so I decided to go in and get one myself. I'm not a narcissist, I just thought it would be fun, and wound up giving my figurine to my wife as an anniversary present (like a framed photo, only 3D).

      BTW for those that are curious the storefront literally uses an XBox to do the scanning (unless you pay a lot, I think $200, to use a professional grade scanner). They don't do the printing on-site so I'm not sure how that's done, and I also don't know if the booths are any different (but I wouldn't be surprised if they had an XBox powering them).

      Personally I enjoyed the whole experience and would recommend it to others. Getting a 3D-printed version of yourself feels very futuristic, and it's certainly something unique to have.

  40. Re:Do wee wee... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    If you're fat enough, that's not really a problem.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  41. Model size by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    Presumably the taller models costs more due to the extra material involved. Shouldn't the price also therefore be varied by waste size? A 6 inch figure of a super model will use a lot less plastic than a 6 inch figurine of my manly figure.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  42. bobble-head option? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Without that, what's the point :-) .

    Go ahead, make some Rule34 versions of what "bobbles" you want to get.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  43. The obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next news story on this will be that someone has hacked the computer and stolen the 3-D figure of Jennifer Lawrence's naked body, and she will be very upset, and the plans will fetch $5,000 on the dark web. You just wait.

  44. Couples? Families? by delcielo · · Score: 1

    Of course, there are lots of salacious possibilities, but also a lot of quite ordinary.

    It would be cool to have something like this of my wife and I or my family every few years.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  45. basic approximation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pricing was adjusted for the average spherical human.

  46. Data collection? by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a great way to get bio-metric data on costumers and have them pay for it... That being said, I'd buy a figurine of myself :)

  47. Who owns the data? by bugi · · Score: 1

    I was at an event last weekend that had a photo booth. Before using it, you had to sign a waiver letting them use the photo for whatever they want.

    Who owns the scan of you in this case?

    1. Re:Who owns the data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at an event last weekend that had a photo booth. Before using it, you had to sign a waiver letting them use the photo for whatever they want.

      What sort of moron would sign that waiver? I suppose the sort who'd not yet noticed almost everyone's carrying a cellphone, and who'd missed the development of colour printers. Elbonians?

  48. What happens to the data? by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Oh this one will drive the conspiracy nuts wild! After that scanner is finished, where does the data go? Is it deleted, is it stored, shared? Oh the possibilities with that data...

  49. Ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who ends up owning the digital rights to your 3D image and how will it be used in the future?

  50. 21st century narcissism ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... at its finest.

  51. Well.. by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    Are naked selfies allowed?

  52. heheheh by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Magic the Gathering card "Avatar of You" from unhinged? :D But seriously, I totally need a D&D miniature of myself. Unfortunately, 6 inches is far too large to fit on the 1x1 grid. I think that was a bit of an oversight but maybe the resolution of the 3D printer wasn't good enough.

  53. Why should this be modded down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should this be modded down? You wouldn't like it if anyone shoved their religion down your throats, so why is it acceptable to shove your metric system down everybody else's?

    Now fuck off.

  54. Bad idea for a supermarket. It would be better at by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    a gym. If you're unhappy with your shape at a supermarket, you'll probably buy less, but at a gym they can be all "we'll get you into the shape you WANT to be!"