Slashdot Mirror


LAX To London Flight Delayed Over "Al-Quida" Wi-Fi Name

linuxwrangler writes A flight from LAX to London was delayed after a passenger reported seeing "Al-Quida Free Terror Nettwork" as an available hotspot name and reported it to a flight attendant. The flight was taken to a remote part of the airport and delayed for several hours but "after further investigation, it was determined that no crime was committed and no further action will be taken." That seems an awfully low threshold for disrupting air traffic, since wireless access points can be had for just a few dollars these days.

339 comments

  1. This was no AP. by tibit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    wireless access points can be had for just a few dollars these days

    What? I very much doubt this SSID was broadcast by a stand-alone AP. It was, likely, due to default behavior of old versions of Windows, setting up an ad-hoc network with an SSID of the last seen access point. Someone somewhere has jokingly set their SSID to "Al-Quida ...", and there was that one Windows-running laptop that someone had that picked up on that SSID and kept broadcasting it. Even if someone set such an SSID on purpose on their mobile device, it's still irrelevant and inactionable.

    Delaying a flight over this shows how much technical ineptitude is there.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    1. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, blame Microsoft for this.

      Or, you know, every smartphone made in the last 5 years.

    2. Re:This was no AP. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The image in TFA shows a phone seeing the network as an AP. Chances are someone with a phone set up AP mode (fairly standard on Android devices).

      The whole thing is dumb. The name clearly states that the network is "Al-Quida Free", as in there is no Al-Quida in it. Incredible that they managed to spell "Al-Quida" correctly but misspelled "nettwork".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:This was no AP. by marquisdepolis · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were scared, scared I say, over the terrible spelling.

    4. Re:This was no AP. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What? I very much doubt this SSID was broadcast by a stand-alone AP

      Brace yourself: defending @timothy for a moment. *

      His point wasn't that you need a certain piece of gear, but that for a few dollars (or as others are pointing out "zero dollars", which a few dollars approaches asymptotic to zero) you can incite bureaucrats to attack the air traffic system.

      Which I guess is the major strategy of Al Qa'e'da - asymmetrical attacks - so timothy can expect Hydra to be by momentarily for relocation and reeducation.

      * someday Slashcode will catch up with the aughts and the at-tag will link this comment as rendered from the database

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:This was no AP. by Lazere · · Score: 2

      Wow, you must use a cheap airline.

    6. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. They will ignore the fine itself as they likely can't pay, and if their stuff starts to be taken from them, they'll declare bankruptcy. They'll thus move from being an immature idiot to an immature idiot who has nothing left to lose.

      I.e. precisely the opposite of the most beneficial outcome, which is to educate the guy and those who would do similar.

      Punishment doesn't work. It is sadism for the punisher.

      (And, yes, this is wrong behaviour. Even Alan Partridge got the terror squad arriving at his hotel when he registered under the name "the real IRA", because, well, some nefarious people tell the truth and speech has consequences. But those consequences don't have to themselves cause harm.)

    7. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      Delaying a flight over this shows how much technical ineptitude is there.

      It also shows, however unfortunately, the futility of trying to protect everyone against everything all the time. Who needs to blow themselves up, or even risk the explicit criminal sanctions you'd face for making a bomb threat, when you can just co-opt some unwitting and otherwise innocent traveller's personal device somewhere outside a travel hub or other likely target for an attack?

      If our threshold for fear has become so low that some kid's not-so-funny practical joke can now result in several hours of delays to long distance transportation, then apparently in a very literal sense the terrorists have already succeeded. Next you'll be telling me we spend time and money prosecuting angry travellers over tweets sent in frustration when airports are closed.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:This was no AP. by Redmancometh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or rather the airline should have to refund a portion of everyone's ticket for the sheer ridiculousness of delaying a flight over this.

    9. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Chances are someone with a phone set up AP mode (fairly standard on Android devices).

      +1 Exactly what I was going to say.

      This kind of hysteria is the result of "see something, say something" + "we must take all threats seriously"

    10. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No shit, if that was Air Canada they'd take your house just for collateral.

    11. Re:This was no AP. by unixisc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ain't there 2 ways of parsing this? One is 'Al-Quida Free', but the whole name was 'Al-Quida Free Terror Nettwork'. In other words, it could easily be parsed as 'Al-Quida: Free Terror Nettwork'. In other words, terror is available for free. The misspellings don't mean much, since English usually ain't the first language of Jihadis.

    12. Re:This was no AP. by ameen.ross · · Score: 1

      This is something that a 10-year old would do.

      --
      $(echo cm0gLXJmIC8= | base64 --decode)
    13. Re:This was no AP. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      How about they fine the idiot that reported a Wifi network as a terrorist threat instead?

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    14. Re:This was no AP. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That's just stupid.

      It's like stopping a flight because someone carries a newspaper with the headlines "Terror actions imminent" and then it's revealed that it's 10 years old.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    15. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole process of losing what he has would make him wiser. Beyond that, he does anything, throw his butt in jail, preferably w/ prisoners who'd molest him.

    16. Re:This was no AP. by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which I guess is the major strategy of Al Qa'e'da - asymmetrical attacks

      http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WO... Per Osama Bin Laden, their goal is to bankrupt the USA. They seem to have achieved a pretty good ROI if the returns are counted as dollars spend by the US fighting Al Qaeda. They don't even need to do anything these days, just having their name mentioned can cause costly countermeasures to kick in.

    17. Re:This was no AP. by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would be the real solution adressing the core problem.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    18. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Losing what he has" is not a natural consequence of setting a stupid AP name - it's someone else making the separate, conscious decision to take stuff from him. They can tell him they're taking all his stuff because he set a stupid AP name, if they want, just as I can say I'm cutting off your arm because you're wearing blue, but it still is still a cruel non sequitur. It doesn't explain to him why he shouldn't be setting a stupid AP name. It doesn't enable him to be a more responsible, well-integrated member of society - in fact, it does precisely the opposite.

      Pretty sure you're troll with the sexual assault would fix him bit, so I'll ignore it :D.

    19. Re:This was no AP. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 5, Funny

      The image in TFA shows a phone seeing the network as an AP. Chances are someone with a phone set up AP mode (fairly standard on Android devices).

      That was my first thought. I know when I'm running my phone as a hot-spot, I have the SSID set to "FBI Surveillance Van 42".

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    20. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite sure it's "Al-Qaeda" and not "Al-Quida", given that Qaeda [kaa-eh-daa] is phonetically closer to the actual pronunciation than Quida.

    21. Re:This was no AP. by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that free as in beer or free as in speech?

    22. Re:This was no AP. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      It makes you realize how dumb and inept Al-Qaeda are. They could easily case mayhem at minimal risk to themselves, yet prefer to waste their time plotting elaborate schemes that rarely come to fruition.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:This was no AP. by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why it won't happen.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    24. Re:This was no AP. by tibit · · Score: 2

      Very true. What should have happened, in an ideal world, and I'm not sarcastic here, was that a flight attendant would react to this "revelation" by looking at the customer and telling them "Are you fucking stupid?", perhaps in a more politically correct way. And that should have been the end of it.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re:This was no AP. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2

      ... for a few dollars (or as others are pointing out "zero dollars", which a few dollars approaches asymptotic to zero) you can incite bureaucrats to attack the air traffic system.

      Cheap phones in AP mode with maliciously-chosen SSIDs, randomly distributed at airports = instant DoS attack against the US air travel system.

      Doesn't really seem like Al Quida's style, but I imagine people at Amtrack and Greyhound might be interested.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    26. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incredible that they managed to spell "Al-Quida" correctly but misspelled "nettwork".

      It's also redundant. Al-Quida means "The Network", I've seen several cases were people jokingly set their network name to Al-Quida because of this.

    27. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al-Quida=CIA so what's the big deal?

    28. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was hilarious. Of course, I wasn't on the flight that got cancelled, but sometimes it takes shit like this to highlight the idiocy of the kind of security theatre we have to put up with now. I mean, there was absolutely no indication of any threat here. Anyone can name an AP anything they like, but the one group you can be absolutely certain wouldn't use an SSID with "Al-Qaeda" (however you spell it) in the name would be Al-Qaeda. If anyone should be fined, it's the moron who decided to delay the flight over this.

    29. Re:This was no AP. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Al-Qaeda is Cobra?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    30. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was assuming a smaller passenger load. Then I read the article and looked up the plane type. 777-300ER, depending on configuration could have a 3 class load of 350 pax. No telling how full it was, assume 85%. Planes run pretty full these days. So doing some math...

      Oh fuck it. Who the hell cares. I am so sick of you fucking nit-picking slashdot morons. The point is a fine proportional to the impact on the airline and passengers would make the fucktard think twice about doing it again. $100K, $500K. Either would do.

    31. Re:This was no AP. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And real terrorists would broadcast they are in the vicinity by stating so loudly, of course.

      Now do have a concern if the access point had been named "Good On You England No Terrorist Here".

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    32. Re:This was no AP. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      They didn't spell Al-Qaeda correctly at all. That looks like the spelling of someone who's only ever heard the name and spelled it the way they were taught English.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    33. Re:This was no AP. by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      The third meaning. See my sig for details.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    34. Re:This was no AP. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      The core problem being what?

      Idiots scared of obvious troll APs?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    35. Re:This was no AP. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Who says they plot elaborate schemes that rarely come to fruition?

      Those going bankrupt, or those sending up wild goose chases?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    36. Re:This was no AP. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I like the direct route. Many people don't get the subtlety of 'politically correct'.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    37. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to login. Just copy it here, please?

    38. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, I'm Al Quida, and my name was spelled fine, thanks very much.

    39. Re:This was no AP. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      sounds like it could cause a tainted colonel, to me...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    40. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone somewhere has jokingly set their SSID to "Al-Quida ..."

      You hope it was a joke. ISIL scaremongering aside, most of these home grown "loan rat" wannabe terrorists aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer. It's entirely possible that kind of SSID was chosen by someone who is in the process of self-radicalizing. If it was just someone having a laugh, it wasn't a very good joke.

      This may seem like an overreaction, but if I were on that flight I'd rather have been delayed for a few hours, than have one of these self-radicalized nut-jobs take over the aircraft and point it at some monument or other hard object that ends with me being part of a fireball.

    41. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree, but who put a 10 year old in charge of security at LAX ?

    42. Re:This was no AP. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      actually, we need more of this.

      why?

      we are being desensitized to sensibility. the 'zero tolerance' world we now have - the so-called 'new normal' is BULLSHIT and needs to end.

      the more we call attention to stupidity (no, not the wifi name but the airlines, in this case!) the better. we need to have more and more of these incidents to make us re-realize that stupid things are not going to hurt us. jumping at every bump-in-the-night is a failwhale.

      we need to grow some balls. if it means that more 'authorities' have to start THINKING on their own instead of covering their asses, so be it. but zero-tol is not working and needs to end asap.

      some kid takes a PBJ sandwich and eats part of it so that a shape of a gun is made; and he's sent home or expelled. this is just more of the same zero-tol CYA bullshit that also has to end immediately. if we don't come to our senses, we will be ruined (we're long on our way to ruin, as it is; due ENTIRELY to our own fear level).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    43. Re:This was no AP. by pem · · Score: 1
      Original:

      That seems an awfully low threshold for disrupting air traffic, since wireless access points can be had for just a few dollars these days.

      Parent:

      If our threshold for fear has become so low that some kid's not-so-funny practical joke can now result in several hours of delays to long distance transportation,

      Me:

      Don't scare the horses.

      Seriously. Even before 9/11, any joking about a bomb in an airport would be problematic. You can't expect everybody in a position of power to be intelligent, so don't frighten the ones at the airport.

      Now, you can argue it shouldn't be that way, and you may well be right. That's just like arguing you ought to be able to walk anywhere in Chicago any time of the day or night. True, but immaterial to reality.

    44. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They didn't spell Al-Qaeda correctly at all. That looks like the spelling of someone who's only ever heard the name and spelled it the way they were taught English.

      Right. "u" and "i" should not be in Al-Qaeda.

    45. Re:This was no AP. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

      Al-queda opposes beer, free or not, and free speech.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    46. Re:This was no AP. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Zero Tolerance is simply lazy judgement policy. Instead of having rightful judgment everything is viewed in the eyes of Lawyers suing people for shit beyond anyone's control, so you do everything (zero tolerance) in your power to stop everyone doing anything resembling the thing you're trying to stop. This catches a shit ton of false positives, which seems to be the "choice" we would rather make.

      That being said, my solution to all of this is simply incarcerate the bastards and feed them all pork products until they starve themselves to death.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    47. Re:This was no AP. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      ... It was, likely, due to default behavior of old versions of Windows, .... there was that one Windows-running laptop that someone had that picked up on that SSID and kept broadcasting it...

      No wonder they say future airliners will not have any windows....

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    48. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Network is not misspelled. They forgot a space however. Clearly a Patriotic BBW wanted to show of her terrifying networked twerking skills.

    49. Re:This was no AP. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      It isn't even that. The ineptitude of those looking for the AP is astounding. You stop the plane. You open up your wifi analyzer app and walk down the isle. Then you check all the devices in those few rows (4 tops) , and boot the asshole playing the joke. 1/2 hour tops.

      Is it overkill? Probably, but I don't fucking care. Assholes are assholes not because they do anything wrong (they do, but that is besides the point), but because they don't give a shit about anyone else but their little joke.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    50. Re:This was no AP. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Remember this story from shortly after 9/11?

      It was a book rather than a newspaper, and only he was prevented from boarding rather than the whole flight being cancelled, but on a stupidity scale, pretty much the same level as your hypothetical.

    51. Re:This was no AP. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Political Correctness is stupidity dressed up as reason.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    52. Re:This was no AP. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In other words, terror is available for free.

      That's probably it. They didn't want people giving away the airline's product for free. It costs money to provide airline food and airline toilets and airline seats.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re:This was no AP. by timothy · · Score: 1

      Huh -- I've always heard it translated as "The Base" (which is also what Wikipedia says: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...); I think there was an SNL episode in which GW Bush referred to his "base" as his "al-quaeda," which I thought was a clever language joke ...

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    54. Re:This was no AP. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My father likes to tell the story of his and my mother's honeymoon. The whole thing was a disaster (my mother ended up with an injured neck during a hike). When their return flight was rerouted to another city entirely, my father had enough and loudly complained to a flight attendant about his wife's injured neck. The plane landed but didn't go to the hanger. Instead, the plane was surrounded and people boarded the plane, came to him, and asked if they were the ones who needed medical attention. As they left the plane, my father whispered to my mother "I guess they found the bomb."

      Turns out a passenger heard this and reported it. When my parents went to collect their checked baggage, they found it on one side in chains. After the "bomb threat" and luggage turning up that nobody claimed (my parents having gone right to the hospital), the police suspected their suitcase of containing a bomb. After examining it, they let him go with his luggage. Nowadays, he'd probably be arrested for making a terrorist threat or would have his luggage blown up as a "preventative measure."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    55. Re:This was no AP. by tobe · · Score: 1

      Seeing as it's a transcription from Arabic there's some leeway for spelling. How many ways have you seen Gadaffi spelt, for instance.

    56. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Incredible that they managed to spell "Al-Quida" correctly but misspelled "nettwork".

      They didn't. Back at 9/11 they spelled it Al-Qaida, and then since a few years later it's been Al-Qaeda. Not aware that a 'u' was ever involved.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    57. Re:This was no AP. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps we should jail the idiots who think that AP names matter so much? I would love to see some of these idiots who think that its A-OK and unintended consequence free to deal with the public, a public that is supposed to be free people capable of saying what they want and representing any ideas they want, in a ham handed fashion?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    58. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I'd phonetically spell it Al-Kyda, but hey.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    59. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole process of losing what he has would make him wiser.

      Or, y'know, just angrier. If I had my life ruined due solely to making a joking name on my computer, you'd better believe I wouldn't be getting all introspective about how dare I attempt to make a politically incorrect joke, I'd be thinking the rest of society is fucked in the head.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    60. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      * someday Slashcode will catch up with the aughts and the at-tag will link this comment as rendered from the database

      You can keep your Twitterfication (twatification?), thanks. I don't come to Slashdot for hashtags and 140 characters.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    61. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0, Troll

      to be fair, somebody was being a real douchebag. of course it unnerved people.

    62. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      lose-lose. what kind of mofo joins up with a terror nettwork fighting against beer? Now free beer is a cause I can get behind. Free beer and titties. Where do I sign up?

    63. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #blaspheming #luddite

    64. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's more than that. Zero tolerance is a systematic attempt to brainwash people away from using rational thought. They want you believe the world is black and white, instead of shades of grey. They want you to stop thinking for yourself.

    65. Re:This was no AP. by TWX · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a mobster name.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    66. Re:This was no AP. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      The transcriptions I've seen have all maintained the phonetics of the Arabic word al-qÄÊidah as al-KY-dÉ(TM)

      What we have here is

      al-kwid-a

      , as in quid pro quo or the slang for a British pound.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    67. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or announce to everyone on the plane that this passenger is concerned by this, and if taken seriously, will cause a multi-hour delay to the flight.

      Then step back while the rest of us provide a beat-down and throw him out the door. Total delay not more than 30 minutes.

    68. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a public that is supposed to be free people capable of saying what they want and representing any ideas they want, in a ham handed fashion?

      Look, you don't understand: you're absolutely allowed to say anything you want. Especially if you believe it, or sort of believe it, or heard it might be true from someone you met at the bar. But you can't lie - I mean, who does that? Only people trying to commit fraud, which is a crime.

      Likewise, names - why would you call something "Al Qaeda" unless it is Al Qaeda? You wouldn't put up a sign claiming to be President Obama or Donald Trump, right? That'd be identity theft, which is a crime.

      So I hope the find whoever was claiming to be Al Qaeda, and I hope Al Qaeda sues them for everything they own. It'd serve them right.

    69. Re:This was no AP. by itzly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Free as in terror.

    70. Re:This was no AP. by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Funny

      The image in TFA shows a phone seeing the network as an AP. Chances are someone with a phone set up AP mode (fairly standard on Android devices).

      That was my first thought. I know when I'm running my phone as a hot-spot, I have the SSID set to "FBI Surveillance Van 42".

      Mine is simply 'Virus.net'. Best I've ever seen though is 'It burns when IP'

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    71. Re:This was no AP. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Serve them right for what....offending your sensibilities? Doing something you can't understand that caused you to jump to idiotic conclusions? Yes, clearly the problem is them.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    72. Re:This was no AP. by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was assuming a smaller passenger load. Then I read the article and looked up the plane type. 777-300ER, depending on configuration could have a 3 class load of 350 pax. No telling how full it was, assume 85%. Planes run pretty full these days. So doing some math...

      Oh fuck it. Who the hell cares. I am so sick of you fucking nit-picking slashdot morons. The point is a fine proportional to the impact on the airline and passengers would make the fucktard think twice about doing it again. $100K, $500K. Either would do.

      The fine should be given to whatever dickhead decided an obviously shady network name was enough grounds to delay a flight for several hours. You know, when you idiots run scared from every little boo the terrorists have won. Once you introduced TSA they had you on the backfoot and now this. America is shitting it's pants while the rest of the world looks on in disbelief and the actual terrorists are pissing themselves laughing.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    73. Re:This was no AP. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Foolish persons, it's free as in 'Socialist' - they're terrorists. Say's so right there.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    74. Re:This was no AP. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I knew it!

      It's Bush's fault.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    75. Re:This was no AP. by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I know, every time I read about something like this I think "these idiots are really opening themselves up for a massive DOS attack". It probably means a whole load of overtime, so maybe that's why they do it.

    76. Re:This was no AP. by tburkhol · · Score: 2

      It isn't even that. The ineptitude of those looking for the AP is astounding. You stop the plane. You open up your wifi analyzer app and walk down the isle. Then you check all the devices in those few rows (4 tops) , and boot the asshole playing the joke. 1/2 hour tops.

      Why on earth would you make 200 people sit on the tarmac for even half an hour? This kind of event requires absolutely no response. Any acknowledgement of goofy AP name, even out of "an abundance of caution," amounts to hysteria.

      It seems we've forgotten, but it is actually possible to have no official response to trivial events. It is possible for law enforcement not to "do something." Picking on the methods used in tracking down the offending wifi is like criticizing the validity of polygraph testimony at a witch trial.

    77. Re:This was no AP. by imikem · · Score: 2

      And in unrelated news, the makers of "Depends" announced record profits this week.

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    78. Re:This was no AP. by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Panicky people are fun to watch. Your"douchebag" is merely pointing it out. I think mocking hysteria is a good thing. It has a chance of knocking it out of the morons out there who make life miserable for the rest of us.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    79. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mine's CIA Surveillance Van 37.... Hmm......

    80. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do that too to screw with the neighbors. It's called "FBI low side" (because in gov circles you have "low side" which is unclassified, "High Side," which is classified). Another neighbor responded renaming their SSID to "FBI Unmarked Van," a few days later.

    81. Re:This was no AP. by davidwr · · Score: 1

      some kid takes a PBJ sandwich and eats part of it so that a shape of a gun is made; and he's sent home or expelled.

      Or: Some kid takes a PBJ sandwich to school and the kig gets expelled and the cafeteria undergoes an expensive ebola-style decon just because his mom was out of town and she forgot to tell his grandma that someone in the school was highly allergic to peanuts and peanut dust and as a result the whole school is a peanut-free zone, nevermind that the kid with the allergy would only suffer if he got close enough to smell it.'

      Okay, I'm exaggerating only slightly here. More realistically, the sandwich is confiscated, put in an airtight bag, and thrown away and the parents are sent a reminder to never let that happen again.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    82. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally, right on, and I agree 100%.

      As soon as this ebola epidemic is over and I can come out of the basement I will be the first to take to the streets. But not at night, because there are scary people out there at night.

    83. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1, Insightful

      trolling has its place, but making jokes about terrorism on a crowded airplane is not the place to do it. That's just common sense. At least the plane was on the ground at the time so it didn't have to be diverted.

      Or maybe you also think that it's funny to be doxxing women who speak out on cultural issues, because panicky people are fun to watch.

    84. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You open up your wifi analyzer app and walk down the isle. Then you check all the devices in those few rows (4 tops) , and boot the asshole playing the joke. 1/2 hour tops."

      "You don't have a warrant? Piss off!" ::quietly turns off phone::

    85. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But technical ineptitude is the best kind of ineptitude.

    86. Re:This was no AP. by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's leeway, but depending on which English-speaking country is talking about them, their respective government (and to a lesser extent, media) have settled on an established spelling. In the US, it's usually defined by a three-letter organization.

    87. Re:This was no AP. by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah - but a net twerk ?

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    88. Re:This was no AP. by flu1d · · Score: 2

      Weird, I just saw a similar (or same) SSID in my neighborhood... Do you live in Denver?

    89. Re:This was no AP. by Garfong · · Score: 2

      I would say at least three. An alternate parsing is as Al-Quida Free Terror Nettwork. I.e. if you're looking for a terror network, use this one: it's free!.

    90. Re:This was no AP. by pooh666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad thing is that this is now taken to be, "common sense", instead of acknowledging the environment of fear created, NOT by the terrorists.

    91. Re:This was no AP. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We've done this already. You don't believe in free speech. I don't care.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    92. Re:This was no AP. by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 2

      So, using the same logic that makes an SSID into a terrorism threat, I should report you for pretending to be a law enforcement agent.

      --
      XDInd
    93. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there's leeway, but depending on which English-speaking country is talking about them, their respective government (and to a lesser extent, media) have settled on an established spelling. In the US, it's usually defined by a three-letter organization.

      What??? Highly doubt your assumption that this is the case...any evidence to back up the claim on agency based spelling?

    94. Re:This was no AP. by yacc143 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, since when is naming a WLAN grounds for criminal action? And what consists an "illegal" WLAN name?

      Is it illegal to have a WLAN "Honeypot" because a group of "people strongly allergic to honey" start to go into panic seeing "Honeypot" on their phone?

    95. Re:This was no AP. by yacc143 · · Score: 1

      Not for a WLAN name. It's one thing to try to impersonate somebody, but having some name in the WLAN, ...

      Ok, guess it's a serious crime to have a WLAN called "I'll kill you if you use me"?

    96. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, are they jumping all over various violent sci-fi games and Star Wars character tee's with their light sabers, blasters, and other fanciful weapons which "look" equally dangerous, or are those not being bought and worn any more? Seems that I still see them for sale in most clothing stores (in the "Young men's" section of course...).

    97. Re:This was no AP. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      It depends on how you count the return. The US GDP is still going up. Perhaps it would be going up faster if we weren't jumping at our own shadows, but it doesn't appear to be bankrupting us.

      We do a much better job at it ourselves. A graph of GDP shows only one visible hitch, the 2007 crisis. That had nothing to do with terrorism, unless you want to call the widespread fraud by the major investment banks "terrorism" (and I bet you could find some people to agree with you if you wanted to). It certainly wasn't Al Qaeda's fault; any hitch in the graph around September 2001 is lost in the noise.

    98. Re:This was no AP. by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

      Are we sure this wasn't a Free hotspot only for Al-Quida Terror Network members?

    99. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Home for the brave indeed more like home of the fucking pussies

    100. Re:This was no AP. by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I blame the pathetic cowards who shriek, hike up their skirts and do the mousey dance every time someone sneezes at the airport.

    101. Re:This was no AP. by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck it. Who the hell cares. I am so sick of you fucking nit-picking slashdot morons.

      "Who the hell cares" should end in a question mark, even if it is only rhetorical.

    102. Re:This was no AP. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      English spelling rules mandate a 'q' is always followed by a 'u'.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    103. Re:This was no AP. by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      I see your point. But, the world has far too many panicky people. Maybe it is time to decide that nowhere is sacred. Maybe they should be trolled into panicking until enough of them finally wise up and stop running around yelling that the sky is falling every time something seems a little off.

    104. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can also DoS someone financially by "claiming" terror when no sane person would even feel threatened in a given situation. For a person holding enough seniority I could see them bankrupting someone by claiming that their slightly-too-pink-salmon could indicate their involvement in a terrorist organization.

      This terrorist thing has gone entirely too far now. Everyone is a terrorist. Everyone is waving fingers at everyone else decrying their "terroryness". We're already past the point of sane argument. To end a political debate you use "because terror" in exactly the same way you end a religious debate with "because God". It's that intangible thing that nobody questions because it's some higher authority and it's beyond all logic, question and reason.

      It's a witch hunt for the 21st century.

    105. Re:This was no AP. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      "I have a gum."

    106. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free, as in my money not being constrained to the confines of my account any longer."

    107. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they'd cared they'd look up which language spells Al-Qaeda and network that way, and look at the passenger list... but that'd just be a witch-hunt, since no crime was committed. And yet someone with decision-making powers shat themselves...

    108. Re:This was no AP. by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 2

      The real douchebags are the cowards who freak out over things like this. Sometimes they even end up infringing upon people's fundamental liberties to make themselves feel better.

    109. Re: This was no AP. by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      I think Leo McGarry had a few things to say about the correct spelling of the former Libyan dictator's name. And he's ordered airstrikes against the man's house, so he knows!

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    110. Re:This was no AP. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Free as in bird.

    111. Re:This was no AP. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Here's something fun you can try: Buy a bottle of nitromethane (model aircraft fuel, also Top Fuel racing), put it in a plastic spray bottle, and spray it on seats where departing passengers are likely to sit. Then get arrested because you're in a crowded fucking airport spraying nitromethane on the seats in front of hundreds of witnesses.

      FTFY

    112. Re:This was no AP. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      WTF do these have to do with eachother?

      In one case you have a small sample (given the size of the public from which they are drawn from, a puny number) of people who actively work to stifle speech of individuals. This doesn't sound like trolling at all to me, it sounds like personal harassment.

      This person made no threat at all. All negative consquences were the result of people overreacting based on nothing but a name on a device. It barely even qualifies as a joke.

      Frankly, this is a prime example of why orgs like the TSA need to be held financially responsible for the damage they cause. Oh Delayed flight? Take the cost of every ticket on that plane out of TSA salaries. See if that shit happens again.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    113. Re:This was no AP. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Welsh spelling rules mandate several more soft consonants.

    114. Re:This was no AP. by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      so don't frighten the ones at the airport.

      If they're frightened, they're cowards and deserve to be desensitized.

    115. Re:This was no AP. by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      Once again, the asshole isn't the one making the joke, but the cowards who take it seriously.

      Here's a series of steps that they should have taken in response to this:
      1) Don't do anything, and continue as usual.

    116. Re:This was no AP. by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      If it was just someone having a laugh, it wasn't a very good joke.

      Because you're a coward.

      This may seem like an overreaction, but if I were on that flight I'd rather have been delayed for a few hours, than have one of these self-radicalized nut-jobs take over the aircraft and point it at some monument or other hard object that ends with me being part of a fireball.

      Then you're a coward, too, and part of the problem. The reality is that, regardless of whether or not they use the name of some bogeyman group, everyone has a chance to be a terrorist. Using your logic, you should never be able to do anything ever merely because some people might be terrorists.

      But that's not how 'the land of the free and the home of the brave' is supposed to operate. Quit being a little wimp.

    117. Re:This was no AP. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I don't recommend starting a panic, but if you want to get away with it, apply the nitromethane to the seat of your own pants and contaminate the airport seats that way.

    118. Re:This was no AP. by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      ...as in Iraqu and Quatar. But those are Arabic words, not English.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    119. Re:This was no AP. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I just saw the perfect name for these people:

      The Bedwetter Caucus... It's a very influential group. Let's promise them free diapers if they go away.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    120. Re:This was no AP. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      And real terrorists would broadcast they are in the vicinity by stating so loudly, of course.

      Yes !
      Terrorists, by definition, terrorize. Killings are just a mean to an end. As such, loudly announcing their presence before they attack may be an effective strategy. The goal would be to make people panic at the slightest hoax by making a few hoax-like events real.

    121. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Al Quida is not correct... (It's Al Qaeda or Al Qaida, I've never seen Al Quida before)

    122. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      List of English words containing Q not followed by U

      qi, qat, niqab...

      Next we'll be complaining that we should spell Deutsch as doych.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    123. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      I don't think you know what free speech means. maybe you need to get some education?

    124. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      In both cases, you have people getting some lulz without considering or taking responsibility for the fact that their actions have great consequences.

    125. Re:This was no AP. by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      And yet someone with decision-making powers shat themselves

      The same kind of brilliant decision makers who suspend 1st graders for pointing their fingers at other students in a gun like manner.

    126. Re:This was no AP. by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you play Words with Friends or Scrabble.

    127. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a pretty weak connection. I bet people in both groups drank water too!

    128. Re:This was no AP. by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I like the cut of your jib. We should put you in charge of something where idiots are currently likely to be in charge...such as a school or airport.

    129. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My SSID is always set to "RemoteBombDetntr DO NOT CONNECT".

    130. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Nah. For one thing, I'd have a difficult time convincing myself to use a Zynga anything, even if it was free. Not really that good at Scrabble either, but I'll admit I'm something of a grammar Nazi.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    131. Re:This was no AP. by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      Free Hat! Free Hat!

    132. Re:This was no AP. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Here's something fun you can try: Buy a bottle of nitromethane (model aircraft fuel, also Top Fuel racing), put it in a plastic spray bottle, and spray it on seats where departing passengers are likely to sit. Then get arrested because you're in a crowded fucking airport spraying nitromethane on the seats in front of hundreds of witnesses.

      Wouldn't work anyway unless those passengers were subjected to enhanced patdowns; walking through a metal detector or body scanner doesn't usually subject you to a sniffer, AFAIK.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    133. Re:This was no AP. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      lose-lose. what kind of mofo joins up with a terror nettwork fighting against beer? Now free beer is a cause I can get behind. Free beer and titties. Where do I sign up?

      Your nearest U.S. Army recruitment office?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    134. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about they fine the idiot that reported a Wifi network as a terrorist threat instead?

      They don't do that because it almost certainly would actively discourage others from coming forward to report suspicious activity. See, the very last line of defense is average citizens who step forward to report strange behavior. Now, nine times out of ten the reported strange behavior turns out to be nothing. However, police would much rather someone come forward with whatever information they have and let the professionals handle it from there. That is the way the system is suppoosed to work. If we start fining people because they came forward with information that later turned out to be "nothing", we would pretty quickly short-circuit this process of having average citizens be the eyes and ears of the police. On the othe hand, it might be much more effective to take the miscreant who thought it would be pretty cute to set up a wifi hotspot called "Al-Quida Free Terror Nettwork" off the plane so that he can spend some quality time in a bare windowless room with a single light bulb and a wooden chair to get more intimately acquanted with "Bubba" and his rubber hose. After all, 9/11 wasn't that long ago, so he really should have known better. If he didn't know better, Bubba can then remind him.

    135. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't explain to him why he shouldn't be setting a stupid AP name. It doesn't enable him to be a more responsible, well-integrated member of society - in fact, it does precisely the opposite.

      Seriously?!? The vast majority of us still have vivid memories of 9/11. It has been on the collective consciousness of the nation ever since. If this knucklescraper can't be bothered to keep up on world events of the last several years then he really is beyond hope. Unfortunately, you can lead idiots like this to clues, but you can't make them think.

    136. Re: This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may not know what free speech means to *you.*

      He may not even know what free speech means to the federal government of the United States.

      It may surprise you to learn there are multiple definitions of "free speech."

      You learn other people's definition of free speech in high school, coming up with your own definition is one the things college is there for.

    137. Re:This was no AP. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      And real terrorists would broadcast they are in the vicinity by stating so loudly, of course.

      While I agree, remember that the guys who tried to bomb the World Trade Center back in the '90s were caught when they went back to pick-up the deposit on the rental trucks they used as bombs.

      Sometimes people make stupid mistakes which gets them caught.

      Here's a fun one to try: Set up a Wireless Access Point with an arabic name and see if people freak out.

    138. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct why bother blowing up the plane if your a suicide bomber just blow yourself up and 60lbs of ball bearing in the airport at holiday time.

      More terror and certainly more chaos.

    139. Re:This was no AP. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Or it is a terror network that is Al-Quida-free. Because you know those Al-Quida people are always downloading porn...

    140. Re:This was no AP. by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      I don't think you know what free speech means.

      Better than you, guaranteed... Your version is pure, sickening bourgeoisie (overused term, but applies here). Maybe you need a little "education" yourself...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    141. Re:This was no AP. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      2) Something happens to the plane.
      3) Sue the Airlines
      4) ???
      5) Profit (mostly lawyers)

      If you don't do something, and something bad happens, because you didn't bother, are you liable? Of course you are, and you'll go out of business. Brilliant Business Plan.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    142. Re:This was no AP. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      All a terrorist had to do was create the AP on a phone, wait until somebody noticed and reported it, then delete the AP and watch the fun as everybody runs around trying to find it. All the disruption of a bombing without the inconvenience of getting yourself killed or arrested. If that's not what happened this time, it soon will be.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    143. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      you seem to think that free speech means you can spout your mouth off whenever you want. I know that free speech means protection from unreasonable government interference. I got news for you, you keep spouting your mouth off and somebody's gonna bop you in the nose, and the government isn't going to interfere with that, either.

    144. Re: This was no AP. by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      Increased military spending wouldn't cause a drop in gdp if the funds are largely spent domestically, would it? It would instead decrease funding available to other, more long-term constructive uses and contribute to debt accumulation.

    145. Re:This was no AP. by cusco · · Score: 1

      More like they were trained by the CIA. How many failed attempts did they make to kill Castro?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    146. Re:This was no AP. by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      If you don't do something, and something bad happens, because you didn't bother, are you liable?

      That's a problem with our system, not the person making the jokes. Most Americans are so retarded that the concept of probability seems to completely elude them. And the fact that our legal system is sometimes completely absurd and... the results aren't good.

    147. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry man, the censors have your back*. Verbal "assault" merits verbal response, nothing more. The first guy to actually draw blood should always be the one to pay the price. You are defending people who can't control themselves. You are what would be called, a weenie. Enjoy your tyranny, little man...

      -f

      *Posting AC cuz the mods are now on the attack.

    148. Re:This was no AP. by SgtAaron · · Score: 1

      Huh -- I've always heard it translated as "The Base" (which is also what Wikipedia says: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...); I think there was an SNL episode in which GW Bush referred to his "base" as his "al-quaeda," which I thought was a clever language joke ...

      The terrorist network's name does mean "The Base". It's used a lot, such as in "miltary base", "base of operations". Heck, even a meeting place can be qaeda. Like "Al qaeda is at the store 1pm". Let's meet at the store at 1pm.

      I have no idea what Al quida is supposed to mean. I suspect it's a typo, OP says it's network in Arabic, but my check says it's "shibka". I studied arabic in the army but I had to google that, it's been awhile.

    149. Re:This was no AP. by SgtAaron · · Score: 1

      That's only three syllables. The original arabic is tough to phonetically spell because there are two letters not in our alphabet. For instance, the "Q" is used because the first letter is a hard K, which you use your throat to pronounce. And in the middle is the "ain" letter, which also one uses the throat. The word is prounounced *something* like "al QAA ih duh". There's actually an official government transliteration alphabet that is used when that needs to be done. But I can't remember it and it wouldn't help you :)

      It always grated my ears when I heard Bush call them "Al kayda". It offended my arabic language neurons every time!

    150. Re:This was no AP. by RollTRS · · Score: 1

      Incredible that they managed to spell "Al-Quida" correctly but misspelled "nettwork".

      But they didn't. Al-Qaeda would be the correct spelling.

      --
      "Perl is my favorite... It's like wiping your ass with unix." - Lord Ender
    151. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I hope you'll understand if I don't feel like spending a lot of effort on pronouncing their name correctly...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    152. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to clarify for you because frankly, it is very tiresome to attempt to reason with idealists.

      There is no verbal action on this planet that is capable of physically compelling a person to act. None, zilch... You are talking out your ass. Only through a malfunction on the part of the listener could something like that be even remotely true. Do not ever try to hold me responsible for somebody else's actions. Never. No matter what. Fuck you if you ever try!

      -f

    153. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      The first guy to actually draw blood

      Now I'm picturing some Oxford-educated guy going around with a rapier, provoking people into challenging him to a duel over his obscure (yet correct) English usage.

      I'd watch that show.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    154. Re:This was no AP. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Salameh had reported the van stolen, and when he returned on March 4, 1993, to get his deposit back, authorities arrested him.[23]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1...

      Even if it *was* stolen, why the heck would they give him his deposit back? "Oh, I'm sorry, I lost your vehicle somewhere...can I have my deposit back that I gave you to cover this exact eventuality?" Maybe if the cops recovered it somewhere, fine, but that obviously wasn't going to be the case.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    155. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think mocking hysteria is a good thing. It has a chance of knocking it out of the morons out there who make life miserable for the rest of us.

      Except when you are trampled by the crowd in the process. Herd mentality may be worth mocking theoretically, but in practice they are the herd after all...

    156. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it kinda reminds me of that scene where Firefly says, "Sooo, you won't shake hands with me, eh? This means war!"

      -f

    157. Re:This was no AP. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's very powerful that. But in humans it shouldn't be involuntary, because if it is, it's time to rethink how "advanced" we really are. Civility needs a thicker skin.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    158. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al-Qaeda means "the base"

    159. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do that, the FBI hates competition.

    160. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you say, I <agree with you> but <my main point> you have used a response pattern that indicates you really don't believe a word the other person said.

      I completely agree that it common sense to report such minor items and delay all air traffic "just in case"; but, that's just stupid.

    161. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I seem to recall the USA doing something similar to that to bankrupt Russia. We supplied the Afghanis with cheap training and surface to air missles, and Russia spent more and more in their war to subdue Afbhanistan.

      Except that Russian eventually bankrupted, and it took nearly a decade before it regained enough power to be considered a major world player again. Oh wait....

    162. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The airlines would find a way to justify their actions. Something about the chance that they'd lose the whole plane and all the passengers being remotely small, but just large enough that it made financial sense to inconvenience all the people.

      The formula is

      (Risk Cost) = (Possibility) x (Cost)

      So I could see a negligible chance they'd lose the plane and passengers keeping all the passengers grounded for about a week.

    163. Re:This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Of course they are. Cops deal with assault and battery cases all the time, and they're employed by the government.

    164. Re:This was no AP. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Or non-Muslims wanting to join a terror network, and can't join Al-Quida since it is Islamic

    165. Re:This was no AP. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Their actions have essentially no consequences. The actions of people who get panicky when somebody whispers something scary like "Ebola" or "Al-Qaida" or "Kim Kardashian" are their own.

      You can't have a functioning democracy without shaking some people up.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    166. Re:This was no AP. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Is there an accepted English spelling (like Cairo for a city whose inhabitants call it something similar)? I've seen Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaida, for example. Given that, I'd say that phonetic pronunciation is as good as we're going to get, and that you can't really misspell it in any script but Arabic.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    167. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      well the govt has laws against speech that incites danger or violence. These laws are constitutional, say the supremes. They ruled in the 60's that speech that can be reasonably expected to cause imminent danger is not protected by the constitution. so go ahead and do what you want but sux for you if you get arrested.

    168. Re:This was no AP. by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      You have to figure out who made the stupid decision, and fine that person or persons. Using the name of a terrorist organization as an access point name isn't necessarily too bright, but it isn't a threat. Reporting the name to the authorities should be harmless. The real culprits are those who took that to be a threat.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    169. Re:This was no AP. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Not even close. Looking at the other responses, I'm clearly not the only one who's thought of this joke.

      My personal favorite SSID that I've seen was when I was eating at Buffalo Wild Wings. I went to connect my phone and saw their public hotspot, but someone nearby had set up one called "pubes in my bww". I'm assuming it was just some customer with a sense of humor, but I like to think it could also be either an unhappy neighbor or a semi-disgruntled staff member.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    170. Re:This was no AP. by wellsdm · · Score: 1

      Right, any smartphone with the FoxFi app could have done this in about 2 seconds.

    171. Re:This was no AP. by clanrat · · Score: 1

      I thought it meant 'the base' ?

    172. Re:This was no AP. by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

      You want to know what free speech is? Next time you're in a theater watching a movie, stand up and scream "fire". You'll soon find out that there are limits to free speech!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    173. Re:This was no AP. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. What imminent danger is caused by the naming of a WiFi access point?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    174. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      panic in an enclosed space. if it hadn't been detected on the ground, panic in an enclosed space 30k feet in the air. what's the imminent danger of somebody shouting ebola on a crowded bus? That's not protected either.

    175. Re:This was no AP. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      sorry, wrong link. Here you go.

    176. Re:This was no AP. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Seems to me like blame should be placed where it is deserved....with any people who freak out and panic. It is their panic which creates unsafe situations. See something, say something, get removed from society for the good of everyone around your paranoid delusions.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    177. Re:This was no AP. by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Mine's 'Big brother is watching'.

    178. Re:This was no AP. by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Personally, I am terrified of my wrists...

    179. Re:This was no AP. by jmcvetta · · Score: 2

      How about we fine the dunce in charge, who decided a humorous wifi name was a good reason to go into ape-shit public panic mode.

    180. Re:This was no AP. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The misspellings don't mean much, since English usually ain't the first language of Jihadis.

      ... Except for those jihadis for whom English is their first language. (Though they tend to have averagely execrable spelling anyway,)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    181. Re:This was no AP. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It isn't even that. The ineptitude of those looking for the AP is astounding. You stop the plane. You open up your wifi analyzer app and walk down the isle. Then you check all the devices in those few rows (4 tops) , and boot the asshole playing the joke. 1/2 hour tops.

      Why on earth would you make 200 people sit on the tarmac for even half an hour?

      Indeed. You alter the set-up of the several WiFi repeaters on the route from the plane to the customs post (you may need to have the plane go on a short magical mystery tour of the outer reaches of the field while doing this) so that they listen for WiFi hotspot's names. At the same time, you use the existing CCTV coverage to notice which passengers are passing each WiFi repeater when the rogue name appears. You may wish to fiddle with (programmable) signs to stir the passengers around a little. Direct them to different belts, or put up "HOLD - re-assigning baggage belt" type messages ; to generate turbulence in the pipeline of passengers. When you've idenitified the person carrying the offending item, you flag them for excessive duty-free as they're going through the customs post and ... in the back room, the rubber gloves come out, then plunge out of the light of day.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. wireless access points, what is this? 2002? by miknix · · Score: 2

    since wireless access points can be had for just a few dollars these days.

    Every major phone nowadays allows setting up a softAP, you do not need a frigging wireless AP to send a few "Al-Quida" Wi-Fi beacons..

    1. Re:wireless access points, what is this? 2002? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless cellular phones can do this too, not just wired.

  3. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What are Bennett Haselton thoughts on this? I'm sure he has an opinion. He's a frequent contributor.

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (ALL) He contributes. Frequently.

  4. Funny by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read about this on CNN and just about had an asthma attack from laughing. You know this was a distinctly American joke because it was misspelled - it should've been spelled as 'Al Qaida Free Terrorist WiFi Network.' That's what made me even laugh harder. People are living life with their assholes puckered. I'm sorry to have to put it that way but it's true that Americans are living in a constant state of fear. If it isn't terrorism, it's Ebola, if it isn't Ebola, it's the weather. Good gravy people, the sooner you get that life constantly changes and is impermanent, the better you'll be able to deal with it.

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're kidding... Everyone knows our media our sensationalist fucking retards... No one "lives in fear" over here. The most you hear is other people bitching about how the media is making a huge deal out of something retarded again.

    2. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Americans are living in a constant state of fear. If it isn't terrorism, it's Ebola, if it isn't Ebola, it's the weather.

      I am a cord-cutter and I mostly consume pirated media which means no commercials and very little video news (i do read stuff off news.google.com but I block cookies so google doesn't put me in a news-bubble).

      Occasionally I will use the over-the-air antenna to watch a little bit of broadcast news. And oh my fucking god it is terrible. Non-stop fear-mongering. Even the PBS Newshour has unrelenting coverage of fear with ebola as the lead story. I can't believe how out of control it is. It makes me wonder if it has always been that way and I never noticed it until I got out of it, or if something has changed over the last decade.

    3. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should reconsider the idea that Americans are the only ones with this problem, and then the assumption that this (very stupid over)reaction came from a very real and not-just-American (not even MOSTLY American) problem.

      Oh ho, hilarious, life is tenuous, bad things happen. Yep, that's a nice and carefree way to live, as long as your value on your own life extends exactly as far as "well, whatever, if someone wants to kill me I suppose I'm done." Not all of us -- American or not -- feel that way.

    4. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one lives in fear unless it's technology. Not the technology!

    5. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AI devil is going to destroy us!

    6. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooh, how about Al Qaeda is spreading ebola using wifi, but you can only get it by using wifi during a thunderstorm, because the system needs the extra lightning power to move the virus.

    7. Re:Funny by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      I know you were being funny, but take australia as an example. its often said that everything that moves around down there with more than 2 legs is ready to kill you. all kinds of dangerous venemous creatures in oz; and yet, they are just as afraid of their shadows as we yanks are. they are being terorized by their own people just like we are (ie, the 'authorities').

      we have little to fear about the big bad foreigner. we have much more to fear by our own lawmakers and those who carry guns under color of law.

      but terror 'sells' and every country has pretty much realized that by controlling people via fear, they can pass any restrictive law they want, spy on anyone they want and get huge 'toys' budgets passed. this never would have happened a few decades ago, but now, we are all pussies - the whole world, pretty much. cowering over shadows in the night.

      this is not at all a funny matter.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Funny by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      just about had an asthma attack from laughing.

      Maybe that was the intent of the terrorists . . . !?!? They are now going at us using "Joke Warfare": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

      I think the NSA needs to hire more Joke Analysts to carefully monitor this danger on the Internet!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    9. Re:Funny by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, that was the intent of the terrorists - to scare us and make us afraid of them.

      Unfortunately for them, we wouldn't have been afraid (for long) with just the one attack on 9-11. Fortunately for them (and unfortunately for us), the government and media has latched onto the whole "scare the people" routine and are playing it for all it's worth.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    10. Re: Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you read the Elon Musk headline.

    11. Re:Funny by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as "misspelling" an Arabic-transcribed word. They don't use the Latin-1 character set, and what they do use doesn't have a one-to-one mapping to it. Any supposed spelling using Latin-1 characters is just an approximation to how it is pronounced in Arabic. That's why you'd see all kinds of creative spellings for the name of the former despot of Libya back when he was alive too. (Gaddafi? Khadafi? Something with a Q perhaps?). So a person can do a good or bad job of rendering an Arabic word in Latin-1 characters, but there's generally no one "right" way to do it.

    12. Re:Funny by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...we have much more to fear by our own lawmakers...

      So much so that you are compelled to reelect them or their corrupt party over and over? Don't fear the lawmakers, fear your neighbor that votes for them. He is the hangman that makes it all happen. He is the guy who flips the switch, pulls the trigger, pushes the button.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or " ... the sooner you get that life is neither guaranteed or infinite ...". There are a million ways that one could pass. The plane ride itself probably has more risk involved than a terrorist attack.

    14. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you are why we live in fear. You are too stupid to see what's going on around you, too stupid to know that you're already censoring yourself out of fear. As someone said above, the whole purpose is to stop you from thinking for yourself. It's sad that nearly every American would prefer to be told what to think, nay, demands that politicians think for them. My biggest regret in life is that it took me til I'm 50 to understand how stupid you all are. If I'd known when I was 10, and was devoid of empathy, I'd own the world by now. Why not? You're just a bunch of monkeys, dancing in awe around a fire. Might as well use you for my own purposes.

    15. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because there is no canonical right way to spell something doesn't mean there is no wrong way to spell it. If I try to write Khadafi, spell it Falafel. That's clearly wrong. As spelling network with two Ts.

    16. Re:Funny by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      Overreacting to jokes is the problem. Someone using the name of some bogeyman group does not increase the probability that they're part of it, and probability is what matters.

      If you were scared of this, never get into a car again, coward.

      Oh ho, hilarious, life is tenuous, bad things happen. Yep, that's a nice and carefree way to live, as long as your value on your own life extends exactly as far as "well, whatever, if someone wants to kill me I suppose I'm done."

      Except that's not how it is, or what anyone thinks, you ignorant fool. People with brains just take into account probability and don't overreact to jokes. Just because you're mentally retarded and bought into all the nonsensical fearmongering doesn't mean it's a good thing.

      But hey, if you're really so scared of this, you should also be scared of everyone on the planet. After all, even people not using the name of some bogeyman group could be terrorists! If you're not panicking, you obviously take a carefree approach to life and don't care if you get killed! Sound logic, dipshit.

    17. Re:Funny by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      Far more important than safety (in this case, safety from a nonexistent threat) is freedom, but that seems to be lost on you fools.

    18. Re:Funny by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There's no one right way, but there are plenty of wrong ways. A transliterated word is considered misspelled if the transliteration cannot possibly be pronounced in a way that sounds similar to the original. The spellings "Al Qaeda" and "Al Qaida" are considered correct, because it is typically pronounced "Al Kah ee dah" or "Al Kie dah". You might even consider "Al Kaida", "Al Kaeda", "Al Caida", or "Al Caeda" to be plausible transliterations, albeit highly nonstandard ones.

      However, "Al Quida" is not correct, period. In English, that would be pronounced "Al quid uh", or if you assume it was a borrowed Spanish word, "Al Kee duh", neither of which is a reasonable approximation of the original pronunciation as far as I'm aware.

      That said, at least they didn't transliterate it as the "Al Pastor Terror Network". I mean, that is by far the tastiest terror network of them all, but it is clearly not a correct transliteration.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. A Pox on Both Your Houses by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

    Overrreaction? Yes.

    Really dumb SSID name choice? Yes.

    1. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure how much it was an over reaction. Seemed reasonable to me. It's unfortunate it happened, but TPTB were screwed no matter what they did.

      If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.

      If it was reported, dismissed, and something bad happens, then it was something that was preventable.

      If they did what they did, it's labeled as an overreaction.

      It's not like passengers were ordered off the plane, stripped searched, and received a free body cavity search. They were inconvenienced for a few hours before a 11 hour flight. It happens.

    2. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just covering their asses.... something happens, "the sign was right there why the fuck didnt you do something!?" or something doesnt happen "overreacting idiots."

    3. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not do that stupid false equivalence bullshit.

      The overreaction was by the people who have have authority and the corresponding responsibility to be sensible.
      The SSID name choice was somebody just futzing around on their phone who has no responsibility to any but himself.

      The scale of fuckup here is completely disproportionate.

    4. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      True but I have used some SSIDs like FBI4395, NSA02395, and BugsBunny as SSIDs.
      Some kid with a cellphone hotspot set it up as a joke and forgot that it was still on the phone when he got on the plane.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure how much it was an over reaction. Seemed reasonable to me. It's unfortunate it happened, but TPTB were screwed no matter what they did.

      If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.

      If it was reported, dismissed, and something bad happens, then it was something that was preventable.

      If they did what they did, it's labeled as an overreaction.

      It's not like passengers were ordered off the plane, stripped searched, and received a free body cavity search. They were inconvenienced for a few hours before a 11 hour flight. It happens.

      Everything beyond a mild chuckle was an overreaction.

      If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.

      Unless they stuck to their guns and pointed out, like most of the posters here likely will, that it's incredibly stupid to ground a plane over a joke SSID.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.

      No threat is too small!

    7. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      [I]t's incredibly stupid to ground a plane over a joke SSID.

      It's incredibly sad is what it is. What if the SSID were "There is a bomb on this plane"?

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    8. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      If so, then shhhhh, don't tell anybody who cares to that for the investment of several throw-away Wi-Fi routers, and several cheap digital timer-enabled powerbars, they can utterly fuck up any airport they choose to, for potentially years to come, with a few hours work of plugging the aforementioned bits in out-of-the-way places.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Here's the reason for the "overreaction". Lawyers. Suppose, just for a second, that they ignored the SSID and the plane fell out of the sky. End of that Airlines (multi-billion dollar business). Risk / Reward analysis is you don't risk the entire company on something that might be a joke.

      The issue isn't the overreaction (it is), the issue is that there is an asshole who thought the whole thing was funny.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it wasn't, now is it - if it was, though, it'd be a lot more reasonable in my opinion to delay given the difference - which, IMO, is very obvious (a name of a terrorist organization versus a tangible potential threat)

    11. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      I know terrorists aren't the brightest bulbs in the chandelier but they know enough not to name their networks after a famous terrorist group. What exactly is the threat that caused the delay?

      A "few hours" X 400 passengers IS a big deal - and delayed flights mean missed connections, The aircraft my not be available for its next schedule flight etc.

    12. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by tburkhol · · Score: 2

      If it was reported, dismissed, and something bad happens, then it was something that was preventable.

      This is the single worst notion that ever wormed its way into a decision-making process. It is the foundation of authoritarianism. It justifies any excess. It provides a cover of legitimacy for any surveillance or intrusion. It is the cancer that is killing freedom in the US.

    13. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      A sane risk/reward analysis would say that this risk is acceptable because there's no real chance of this happening.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    14. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone who had a real bomb tell everyone on the plane that they had a bomb, before the flight took off? Why would terrorists name their SSID after a terrorist group? Are they trying to get caught? They should pick something inconspicuous. If you were going to rob a bank, would you call them up before hand and tell them that you plan on robbing them?

    15. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess all those full-body scanners and x-ray machines really aren't doing their jobs very well and we should get rid of them.

      I can say a lot of things that aren't true. We can call them lies. We can call them exaggerations. We can call them jokes. Look at the other side of it - if you were planning on blowing up a plane then why the heck would you be advertising that with a SSID? They also don't strap comedy bombs to their waist with old bell alarm-clocks with black and red wires sticking out of it. I remember a story of someone that got pulled over in an airport because they had wires and an LCD display on their t-shirt. Wires = bombs, obviously. We should arrest all the electricians since they're clearly a terrorist organization.

    16. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What freaking possible threat? If I were the pilot/whoever made the decision, and a journalist asked me why I ignored an SSID that mentioned "Al-Qaeda", I'd ask them if they think the terrorists are that incompetent that they'd announce themselves like that. Maybe I should also ban all magazines and newspaper on board which contain articles about terrorism!

    17. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how much it was an over reaction. Seemed reasonable to me. It's unfortunate it happened, but TPTB were screwed no matter what they did.

      If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.

      If it was reported, dismissed, and something bad happens, then it was something that was preventable.

      that's like saying that some of the 9/11 terrorists wore wristwatches, so we must now be vigilant for anyone who wears a wristwatch. having a ssid with a scary name is a fucking useless clue, and not what we should be looking for if we want to spot an impending attack. it sounds the authorities investigated in order to cover their asses, and not in response to any suspicious activity. so now, we have a security model in place where the goal is to cover asses, not prevent terrorist attacks. does everybody feel safer now that most (not all) asses are well covered?

    18. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      Really dumb SSID name choice? Yes.

      No more dumb than any other.

    19. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 1

      Nope. The answer would still be "do nothing." Stop giving in to fearmongering.

    20. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2

      A agree. How is this different from making "bomb" jokes at the airport. Everyone knows "bomb"-jokes are not taken lightly by serucity personnel. Same holds for using such stupid SSID. I *also* know this does no actual harm and, most likely, real terrorists would not use this name etc, but broadcasting such an SSID in an airport is just not a very smart thing to do because it can be expected to trigger security folks. Note that I am not defending them, just saying that their reaction is not completely unpredicatable. If you value such a joke more than your time, go ahead, but I don't.

    21. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by sootman · · Score: 1

      > I'm not sure how much it was an over reaction.
      > Seemed reasonable to me.

      No, this was an overreaction. Raise your hands if you *really* think Al-Quida would NAME THEIR ACCESS POINT "Al-Quida". I'm not a member, but I'm PRETTY SURE they're into secrecy, and wouldn't do something so obvious. I'd bet my next paycheck that you could walk by their headquarters with a laptop and not see that SSID.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    22. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      That's what they said about Ebola. And they are planning on expanding Ebola in the US even as they prove they cannot contain even one nurse. Brilliant!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    23. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like passengers were ordered off the plane, stripped searched, and received a free body cavity search.

      Of course not, that happens before they can board the plane.

    24. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by slew · · Score: 1

      Really dumb SSID name choice? Yes.

      Depends on what it was: a law enforcement honey pot for terrorist wannabes or a snot nosed trouble maker...

      Well... okay, maybe you're right, it was a dumb choice either way ;^)

    25. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I went to the doctor today for a routine checkup. At check-in, the receptionist asked me if I'd traveled outside the country in the previous twenty-one days. She sounded annoyed by the requirement when I mentioned it.

      At least we aren't quarantining people from West Africa in an unheated tent (Minnesota policy is to quarantine people traveling from affected countries in their homes for three weeks).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      That works, until Doctors and Nurses refuse to be quarantined, claiming civil rights or some such shit.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    27. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if it was really Al Qaeda, it would be named "American Airlines" or similar.

      Yet, people panic about the one name that's least likely to have anything to do with Al Qaeda.

    28. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Really dumb SSID name choice? Yes.

      NO. It's NOT a dumb SSID name. It's a FUNNY name. When most people see an SSID with a funny name, it makes them chuckle. It takes a special kind of fucktardedness to call in the Gestapo because of someone's mildly amusing joke.

    29. Re:A Pox on Both Your Houses by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Should I live in terror of an anvil spontaneously falling thru my ceiling and crushing me? 'Cuz there's no real chance of that happening either.

  6. A Better Terror Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't be happy to see terrorists advertising that their networks are free of Al-Quida? Come on people, mission accomplished!

  7. Free Terror, what a bargain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a wonderful future we live in. No purchase necessary. Terror is Free!! It's all over the news! BE TERRIFIED!

    1. Re:Free Terror, what a bargain! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's a wonderful future we live in. No purchase necessary. Terror is Free!! It's all over the news! BE TERRIFIED!

      Yes, but is it open source? I refuse to use any closed source terror.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Free Terror, what a bargain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has always spawned at the airports, so it is and always has been tax-free, which is even more important to certain political circles. Free, tax-free terror is the best kind of terror.

    3. Re:Free Terror, what a bargain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source is in Buckingham Palace

  8. LAX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is LAX?

    1. Re:LAX? by RadioTV · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    2. Re:LAX? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yo mamma so lax...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:LAX? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Once the plane leaves, is it EX-LAX?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:LAX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I fly I have to make it through lax security.

    5. Re:LAX? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      *golfclap*

    6. Re:LAX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha - that almost made me shit my pants!

  9. We are utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have allowed just about anything, no matter how innocuous, in the aeronautics world to scare us to death. We are an utterly stupid bunch, who seem to enjoy living in fear over essentially nothing.

  10. Programing at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly how programing work, just repeat something a billion times and you will get them programed. Good sheep, now come back to your everyday tube slave.

  11. Easy to Summarize, Now for some fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, this is easy to summarize (as someone already did) ...
    Stupid choice of HotSpot name (soft AP) name and silly overreaction to it ... done.

    Now that that's over ... what are some good Access Point Names that are also fun that you have used?
    e.g. I have a friend that names his 'FBI Surveillance Van'

    Other suggestions/stories?

  12. Where is that surveillance van? by portwojc · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've had the FBI parked outside my house for seven months now. I just can't figure out where "FBI surveillance van 42" is at.

    1. Re:Where is that surveillance van? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the FBI parked outside my house for seven months now. I just can't figure out where "FBI surveillance van 42" is at.

      You must live close by, I have the same guy in my neighborhood.

      I'm sure The Answer is out there somewhere.

  13. Low threshold = enormous rate of return by stritt · · Score: 2

    We will be defeated not by force but by our own fears.

    1. Re:Low threshold = enormous rate of return by camperdave · · Score: 1

      This is the way America ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. BOO! TERR'ISTS! HAPPY HALLOWEEN! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    what, no clever copyeditor threw out "BROWN TROUSER TIME AT LAX" ?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:BOO! TERR'ISTS! HAPPY HALLOWEEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check El Reg's site - sure to be there somewhere...
      http://www.theregister.co.uk

  15. congratulations america, theyre still winning. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless of all that freedom-isnt-free these-colours-dont-run support-the-troops rhetoric, 13 years after the original terrorist attack on America this is still happening. Terrorists have succeeded in doing what they sought to achieve: terrorizing. liquids are treason on airplanes, nail clippers are an assassins blade, and full body virtual nudity is encouraged prior to boarding. Now, a simple SSID is cause to lock down an entire flight. For all your achievements, oh how the mighty have fallen. We once sent real people to the moon and laughed at the vacuum of space. Lawn darts existed for a decade before their retirement. even a 9 year old can have access to a fully automatic machine gun. however the minute someone breathes an utterance of terrorism its secret prisons, wiretaps, indefinite detention, extrajudicial rendition targeted killings, and secret courts. and you know whats hillarious? Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year. thats 150 times the number of people who died in the world trade center but we still sell sandwiches called the baconator and a small or as we rebranded it 'regular' drink is still 22 ounces. smoking kills almost 400,000 americans a year, or roughly 32000 times the number of people who died in the pentagon on 9/11 but we still sell vape kits and marlboros and 5% of the states in our union still permit indoor smoking.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      however the minute someone breathes an utterance of terrorism its secret prisons, wiretaps, indefinite detention, extrajudicial rendition targeted killings, and secret courts

      The response is so out of proportion to the threat, it makes you wonder if there's an ulterior motive for stripping people of liberties and increasing the power of the government and military, merely using islamic terrorism as an excuse?

      Nah, that's crazy talk.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year.

      Out of a population of 300 million, that is pretty horrendous.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by david_bonn · · Score: 0

      Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year. thats 150 times the number of people who died in the world trade center

      Given that the U.S. population is around 300 million, the only way we could get to 600 million deaths heart disease deaths per year is by importing 600 million people per year and force-feeding them bacon. Lots of bacon.

    4. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why bacon is so expensive now...

    5. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by RaccoonBandit · · Score: 1

      Or via really short gestation periods and reproduction at a young age.

    6. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      if they need a volunteer, I'm happy to join in.

      you gotta go somehow. if I die by bacon, at least I die happy.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the reaction is overboard. Pity about the math, though.

    8. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris Morris: The American car company, General Motors, have today announced a cut in their workforce at their plant in Detroit. Our economics correspondent, Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan, is there at the moment. Peter, what's going on?
      Peter: Chris, it's a mass redundancy measure! It's the biggest lay-off in American industrial history! Thirty-five thousand jobs in one fell swoop, gone!
      Chris: Thirty-five thousand?
      Peter: Yes.
      Chris: Peter, there's only twenty-five thousand people at the plant.
      Peter: That's right Chris, mass redundancy on an unprecedented scale!
      Chris: Would you mind telling me how the plant can function on minus ten-thousand workers?
      Peter: [smiling] I don't know, Chris, you tell me!

    9. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by joss · · Score: 1

      Fair point generally, but..
      > Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year
      600 thousand, not million

      > we still sell vape kits
      vape kits reduce smoking deaths

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    10. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you have no idea how a heart attack feels.

    11. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      Considering the over-reaction we're getting from a lot of people around Ebola - and that includes people who laugh about bureaucrats' overreaction to blinking lights in Chicago and WiFi network names - I'm going to guess that most people are just scared shitless of stuff they don't understand and willing to sacrifice everything to feel safe again.

      That doesn't make it any better, but it gives us a better shot at fixing the issue (educate people) than the conspiracy theory approach.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    12. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 3, Funny

      400,000 / 32000 = 12.5 So twelve died and one is mostly dead?

    13. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out, bacon by itself isn't bad for you.
      Dietary fat only becomes dangerous in the presence of carbs.

      http://www.reddit.com/r/keto

    14. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      I'd call that good riddance.

    15. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Ssshhhh! You're going to ruin my tinfoil hat business!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      He dies at midnight on New Year's Eve/New Year's Day, of course, so they weren't sure what date to put on the certificate.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    17. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rabbits.. Like Rabbits.

    18. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by hey! · · Score: 2

      I went through a period of my career where I was taking two, sometimes three business trips per month. I was supposed to fly on one of the planes that flew in the WTC on 9/11, but my trip was cancelled a couple days earlier so I could attend a meeting up in Nashua with Oracle. I've never been hijacked or crashed, but I've been in more than one near-miss, which takes a lot of flying. I've also been stranded by missed connections multiple times. Take it from me, Chicago Midway is the worst airport hub to spend a night in.

      One day I was stranded at Phoenix Sky Harbor by a missed conection. Standing in the customer service line, watching the passengers ahead of me yell at the woman behind the counter about things she couldn't fix, I had an epiphany: air travel sucks, *and nobody's going to fix it*.

      So here's my strategy when it comes to flying: minimize my exposure to the system by taking an alternative whenever it is remotely practical. Rather than fly to Sacramento, which involves at least one flight change from where I live, I fly direct to San Francisco and drive for two hours each way. Rather than take the shuttle from Boston to New York, I take the bus which costs only $22. Spending four hours on the bus is not *safer*, and it's certainly not *faster*, but it sucks soooo much less. On a recent business trip to Blacksburg VA (in the middle of nowhere), I took Amtrak and drove the final two hours, anticipating that 12 hours in the rail system would be *much* preferable to four hours in the air travel system -- and it was.

      When I *do* have to fly, I try to do it in cheerful acceptance that the experience will be uncomfortable, inconvenient and possibly personally degrading. It doesn't matter how mad you get, the system isn't going to respond *as long as you continue using it*. The only thing it *will* respond to is more people opting out whenever they have *any* feasible alternative.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    19. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by koan · · Score: 1

      Who encourages this sort of thinking? The media, who controls the media... see now you're getting some where.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    20. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be tired, I read that as "Dietary fat only becomes dangerous in the presence of cats"

    21. Re: congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.5 states allow indoor smoking?

    22. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's part of it, but there's clearly an agenda being pushed by TPTB.

      Look at what happened in Canada. One guy runs through parliament and shoots a soldier (terrible tragedy, heart goes out to his family, etc etc) and immediately Harper says they've got legislation already written that gives them more power to spy on people and even pre-arrest people "to keep you safe!" A few months back one nationalist nut killed three mounties, but nary a word about how this is "an attack on our institutions." Doesn't fit the narrative.

      They've got the laws already written. They just wait for an excuse and bam, cameras up your bum.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    23. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year. thats 150 times the number of people who died in the world trade center

      : O
      : O
      : O
      4 MILLION PEOPLE DIED AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER!!!1

    24. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Heart disease kills 600 million americans a year. thats 150 times the number of people who died in the world trade center but we still sell sandwiches called the baconator and a small or as we rebranded it 'regular' drink is still 22 ounces.

      What evidence is there that drinking a 22 ounce drink or eating a "baconator" increases your risk of heart disease compared to drinking a 12 ounce drink or eating a sandwich not called a "baconator" - or heck, not containing bacon at all? I just had a baconator for lunch today and I've lost 50 pounds in the last year, and my 16 oz drink contained no calories.

      I won't argue that people eat a lot of unhealthy stuff, but I'm not convinced that bacon is necessarily among the worst of it.

    25. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he's slightly alive

    26. Re:congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be afraid, be very afraid! And don't worry about the traffic, the police, the police state, NSA, FBI, R2D2, or other minor inconveniences.

  16. um by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LAX To London Flight Delayed Over "Al-Quida" Wi-Fi Name...

    You mean...

    LAX To London Flight Delayed due to Authorities being morons...

    1. Re:um by Sperbels · · Score: 2

      I expect there would be far fewer incidents if the news media started covering them like this.

    2. Re:um by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Flight Delayed when excited man greeted his friend, Jack Plainsman, at the gate.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  17. SSID: Al-Qaeda Ebola TEA Coordination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, surely (Shirley) they could have come up with a better SSID that rolls more threats all in one. We know that TEAparty is a subversive organization fronting Al-Qaeda, pushing cutting government funds to epidemiologists so that, Al-Qaeda's master plan for distribution of hemorrhagic fevers can proceed. Ultimately, of course, it's the Koch brothers, who have been secretly developing a vaccine and treatment regimen, will profit, since they will have a corner on the market. (Remember Bunkie Hunt and Silver!). While that plane sat on the ground it was burning fuel, creating profits for the hydrocarbon extraction hegemony. OTOH, if the doors were opened while waiting, the union flight attendants stop getting paid, which is even better.

  18. Aaaand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the terrrrists win again.

  19. Some 13 year old with an Android phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is laughing his ass off. Probably wasn't even on the delayed flight.

  20. DoS test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PASSED.

    It that wasn't the intention, that's what they actually accomplished. Think of it people!

    Can you imagine the chaos if this is deployed at a large scale?

  21. Not really a low threshold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared to someone joking about planes blowing up and how seriously they take that, this seems par for the course.

  22. America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When the body mistakenly believes a substance to be a pathogen, it kicks its immune system in high gear and starts attacking it like Don Quixote charging the windmills. That over reaction harms the body more than what the substance could have caused.

    America's overreaction to ISIS, al-queda etc fall into this category. We are doing a lot more damage by such over reactions than what these entities could do to us. We need a strong dose of anti-histamines. (Of course there will be people protesting the discrimination against the histamines)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      We see this response in other areas - such as the Ebola "crisis" also. So far around 9 people in the US have come down with Ebola. In all cases, the people were working closely with people with Ebola. So far, none of the Ebola victims' friends, family, or random people on the street that they bumped into have gotten Ebola. Any yet, many people are acting like it is the zombie apocalypse. Did that man just sneeze? Does he have the Ebola? I feel a little warm, I must be coming down with Ebola!

      Politicians looking to use fear to secure themselves more political power and media outlets who use fear to get more viewers are just exasperating the issue.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

      We need a strong dose of anti-histamines

      Hopefully you Americans won't have these "anti-histamines" for quite a while, else your leaders have to send a few more planes in some of your buildings.

    3. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      "I am a histamine, you insensitive clod" is the canonical response.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by koan · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone even remotely concerned with Ebola, you must be surrounded by idiots.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    5. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Nine people in the US coming down with Ebola? As far as I know, the only people who have caught it in the US were the two Dallas nurses, and four cases have been imported. Am I behind the times?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:America's auto-immune disease: Terrorism. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I'm counting the people who began showing symptoms while in the US but who actually caught it abroad. You're right, though, calling this a "crisis" looks even more ridiculous when you notice that only 2 people have caught it while in the US and those two people were closely working with someone who clearly had Ebola.

      So if you're going to an area where Ebola is running rampant? Be very concerned and take all available precautions.
      If you're treating someone who clearly has Ebola? Be very concerned and take all available precautions.
      If you're Joe Citizen walking down the street? Don't be worried about Ebola (despite the politicians foaming at the mouth about it or the media trying to whip up a panic over it) and go about your business.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  23. 600,000 not 600 Million, but point still valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CDC says that about 600,000 people die of heart disease each year. Also, about 3,000 people or so died in 9/11, right? so 400,000 smoking-related deaths are 4/3*1000 ~ 1,333 times more, not 32,000 times more. But other than the fact that nimbius is mixing up his figurin his arithmetic, the point is still valid: Terrorist attacks are still, and will remain in the foreseeable future, an insignificant threat to the safety and well-being of Americans - but the government will not think on investing anywhere near that kind of money in, say, preventative health care.

  24. My SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is NSA Field Location Sector 7

    I live in a major metro area.

  25. expensive "free wifi" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Heh, my android phone's hotspot SSID is "$12.99 per minute". Which never ceases to give me a chuckle when I hear someone muttering "how expensive the free wifi is" in that location.

  26. Not available without Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you opt out of Beta, you cannot access this article. Definitely not kosher, I don't appreciate being forced into beta. Exactly how much negative feedback do you actually need before you understand we don't want Beta. It's not an improvement in any way shape or form.

  27. In the programming world... by OldIsCool · · Score: 1

    ...this is what we call bounds checking. Watch your 6!

  28. awfully low threshold for disrupting air traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's funny. This is what you get for your hysteria. Troll the system until it breaks. FUCK DA POLICE!

  29. never heard of Al-Quida before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard of Al-Qaeda.

  30. Where is that surveillance van? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse, I've had the "4chan Party Van" parked somewhere nearby and I can't find them.

  31. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if nobody has their assholes puckered, and the media just wants you to believe it? What if the only way to scare people is to make them believe other people are scared? What is this is ridiculous abuse of authority is for conditioning?

  32. Zero Tolerance by linuxwrangler · · Score: 2

    I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  33. The "terrorist" won... by koan · · Score: 2

    The goal of terrorism is to disrupt life and create fear, so when you look at how we have to live now it's clear they won.

    Whoever "they" is...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  34. O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave, by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    O'er the land of the DHS checkpoint/asset seizure/SWAT raid and the home of the easily scared?

  35. Free Public WiFi by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    Imagine if the bug that used to rebroadcast SSID’s in WinXP was still prevalent in widely used systems? All it would take was one of these in an airport, and it would be bouncing around for days...

  36. Don't say "hi" to your friend named Jack by istartedi · · Score: 0

    Don't say "hi" to your friend named Jack at the airport. Everybody knows this. A lot of people are saying the authorities over-reacted; but what kind of a person fails this basic rule of common sense? That's not a rhetorical question. From a psychological standpoint, are such people just clowns, idiots, or are they acting out a fantasy? Is it like kids who hit dogs, and then grow up to become serial killers?

    I'm going to take the unpopular stand and say it was right for them to attempt to find who did this. At the very least, that person needed to be interviewed and checked for possible mental health issues. It's too bad they couldn't find them, and had to inconvenience people; but that's life. As for the real terrorists using this kind of thing to disrupt flights, I doubt that will happen. If it becomes common-place, they'll make a rule about such things, make it easier to find the SSID broadcast source, and kick your sorry ass out of the airport.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Don't say "hi" to your friend named Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mental health issues? Having fun instead of running scared is now a possible mental health issue in 'murica?

  37. See something say something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The overreactions are used to condition people to be afraid of everything so continued aggregation of government power is welcomed with open arms.

    Enjoy your police state you've earned it.

  38. So what should we say? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Hola Jack?

    No, then the right-wing-nuts will think we are illegals from South of the Border and insist that we be deported immediately.

    *sarcasm*
    I can't wait for someone to pull a gun on a city bus and say "Everyone freeze, this we are hellojacking this bus."
    */sarcasm*

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  39. That Fits Gov Christie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The monster in human skin Gov Christie is a terrorist, same as Cumo Corp and Great Scott.

    With monsters like these within the USA and governors of states to boot who need pussys like Al Quida or the Taliban.

  40. Puckered by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    People are living life with their assholes puckered.

    Well, I'd certainly hope so.

  41. Is that all it takes nowadays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If an airline can be delayed several hours from an SSID like that, next time I fly, I'm setting my SSID to "Mile High Club Recruitment Center." At least that will make the flight enjoyable.

    I reserve the right to sex-select.

  42. congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5% of the 50 states permit indoor smoking?

    Which is the half-state that allows it?

  43. A bit slow, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calibrate your sarcasm detector.

  44. This was no AP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt many laptops nowadays still run Windows XP, which has this bug...

  45. Importance of hyphenation by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

    Clearly this would not have been a problem but for someone's ignorance of hyphenation. If the intent was to declare the network was free of "Al-Quida", the proper spelling would have been "Al-Quida-Free Terror Network", but someone with that level of sophistication would probably have spelled "Al-Qaeda" correctly as well.

    This is the like the difference between "high-school boys" and "high school-boys".

  46. Re:This was no AP. But what it's Ebola?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what it's Ebola?!?!

  47. really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see we still haven't learned common sense. Do we REALLY think the "al qaeda:", which btw never actually existed and was created by the CIA and this is public knowledge even before wikileaks, would be stupid enough to 1) Name their wifi network "Al Quida free terror network" much less 2) Actually broadcast the SSID? GMAFB.

    By this logic, the wifi network at my old apartment named Holiday Inn must mean there was a holiday inn in the middle of the complex that no one knew about and they were jerks because they locked the network.

    1. Re:really by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Terrorists are often stupid. Remember the first World Trade Center attack, where the terrorist was arrested when he tried to get his $400 deposit back on the truck he used?

      Also, people tend to do stupid things in high-stress situations, and bombing a plane is a high-stress situation. People also joke about high stress situations, and I could easily see an actual terrorist doing this as a joke.

    2. Re:really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know, that said "first wtc attack" was plotted and executed by the FBI?
      The "would be terrorist" got suspicious about their "contact" person who was ousted as an fbi smook and the "terror suspects" cried false flag!

    3. Re:really by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Remember the first World Trade Center attack, where the terrorist was arrested when he tried to get his $400 deposit back on the truck he used?

      That part of the Official Mythology has always seemed a wee bit implausible to me...

  48. congratulations america, theyre still winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your math......I want to see the planet where it originated.

    3,000 x 150 is 450 thousand.

    Times 1333 equals your number which was almost twice the number of American people currently alive.

  49. Luckily the network wasn't named "ebola" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. or all the passengers would now be quarantined for 21 days.

  50. lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some dumb niggers truely take the cake

  51. Re:This was no AP. But what it's Ebola?!?! by sjames · · Score: 1

    If someone sneezes blood and has a fever, feel free to quarantine them and whoever they sneezed on.

  52. Or ... by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

    Another way you can view this is as a very successful terrorist action: it was effectively a proof-of-concept of a denial of service attack.

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
  53. Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have several APs set up with the FreeKiddiePorn SSID.

  54. HAhhahHHAHHAHHAHhhaaaaaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahhahaaaaspilttlechokehahahhahahaaaaaaa

  55. What about Al-Gebra? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    Just think the terror when I type use a hot spot called 'Al-Gebra'

  56. Well yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that your dad had probably actually said the 'bong', and when they rummaged through the luggage on a bomb threat and only found a bong they felt pretty dumb about themselves.

    Nowadays however both are threats to our patriotic freedom to speak either of the political views provided to us by television depending on if you're a goddamn dirty 'free thinking' hippie, or a righteously member of the religious right.