Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo To Wipe Superfish Off PCs

An anonymous reader send news from the Wall Street Journal, where Lenovo CTO Peter Hortensius said in an interview that the company will roll out a software update to remove the Superfish adware from its laptops. "As soon as the programmer is finished, we will provide a tool that removes all traces of the app from people’s laptops; this goes further than simply uninstalling the app. Once the app-wiping software is finished tonight or tomorrow, we’ll issue a press release with information on how to get it." When asked whether his company vets the software they pre-install on their machines, he said, "Yes, we do. Obviously in this case we didn't do enough. The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience. The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off. Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation."

266 comments

  1. Got found out ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... good.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: Got found out ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where's the proactive removal of other sketchy software that their CPO's team found during the regular audit?

      It's almost like they're only doing this 'cause they've been caught stealin' user data with SuperPhish.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Got found out ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In other news, Superfish has now been added to the Windows Defender malware database.

    3. Re:Got found out ... by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Got found out ...

      Yup! One of the clues that Lenovo already knew this was bad software because it is designed to hijack people's data to inject ads, breaks security, and can't be uninstalled (hence the company is currently working on an uninstaller).

      In unrelated news, a murderer that got caught said that the bullet was intended to enhance circulation, but he received negative feedback from his customers, and is working on instructions on how to remove all traces of the bullet (except, of course, for all the damage it already caused).

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re: Got found out ... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where's the proactive removal of other sketchy software that their CPO's team found during the regular audit?

      It's almost like they're only doing this 'cause they've been caught stealin' user data with SuperPhish.

      Not to defend Lenovo in this, but yeah, that's not how it happened. Keep in mind they stopped installing this a month before they "got caught".

      There's no reason to assume that Lenovo knew, or was told everything this software could do. Personally I would definitely attribute malicious intent to the developers of the software, not the company that agreed to install it.

      Expecting Lenovo to manage to learn/know/discern every bug, flaw, or undesired side-effect of every software package they allow on the preload image isn't practical. I mean, if they preload Java, are they responsible when the computer gets hacked because it's buggy? Flash? Windows itself? A driver? What about CD-burning software that could potentially have a back-door or rootkit? Now, yeah, this was shit-ware to start with but it's hard to know exactly where to draw the responsibility line.

      Regardless, this isn't a matter of stopping because they "got caught". They stopped before they got caught. They just didn't offer to fix things until after it was discovered just how bad it is.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    5. Re: Got found out ... by crunchy_one · · Score: 1

      Expecting Lenovo to manage to learn/know/discern every bug, flaw, or undesired side-effect of every software package they allow on the preload image isn't practical.

      Then they are doing their customers a disservice by including it. No way around it, stuffing retail machines with crapware is evil.

    6. Re: Got found out ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they knew.

  2. The lesson here by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off.

    Translation: our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work.

    Good to know!

    1. Re:The lesson here by kuzb · · Score: 0

      I have a lenovo laptop, it does serious work just fine. Obviously they care about people like me, because they're taking steps to fix the situation rather than ignoring it.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    2. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From a partner email regarding the SuperFish software:

      "Please note that Lenovo has NOT loaded this software on any ThinkPad notebooks, nor any desktops, tablets, workstations, servers or smartphones. The only impacted models are the following consumer notebook series: Z-series, Y-Series, U-Series, G-Series, S-Series, Flex-Series, Yoga, Miix and E-Series."

    3. Re:The lesson here by penix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obviously they care about people like me, because they're taking steps to fix the situation rather than ignoring it.

      Well, since the crapware came pre-installed, to really show they care they AREN'T providing you with a new system image with it removed. Instead, you are left to remove it yet again if you ever have to reset to factory....Yay Lenovo!

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    4. Re:The lesson here by mea_culpa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a lot of truth to that statement.
      It was the cheaper consumer models that were affected. Retail profit margins are so thin that manufacturers and retailers make up for it with preloaded crapware.

      Lenovo's business products were not affected by this as these aren't usually preloaded with crap.
      The same goes for other manufactures too. Dell and HP both offer cheap crapware infested models, along with pricier crap free business models.

      You do get what you pay for.

    5. Re:The lesson here by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're taking steps to fix the situation, after having been busted putting spyware on them. That doesn't exactly make them sound honorable.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:The lesson here by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work....

      Considering that Lenovo has a consumer line of laptops and a business line of laptops (the ThinkPad brand), there may be a shred of truth in what you say.

    7. Re:The lesson here by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Translation: our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work.

      Isn't that the case with pretty much every consumer-level laptop on the market today? This was a particularly bad case of pre-installed crapware, but I can't think of a laptop sold at any American retailer today that isn't guilty of the same.

      If you want to do real work, skip windows and put an OS on your laptop that is useful for real work.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    8. Re:The lesson here by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Damage control FTW

    9. Re:The lesson here by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a lenovo laptop, it does serious work just fine. Obviously they care about people like me, because they're taking steps to fix the situation rather than ignoring it.

      "Our reputation is everything"

      They care about saving face because they were caught which can directly impact sales. It doesn't mean they're going to uninstall the other crapware you're not bitching about right now. When that goes viral, they might remove it then, but make no mistake as to their overall intent of ensuring as many revenue streams as possible.

    10. Re:The lesson here by The-Ixian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was the cheaper consumer models that were affected. Retail profit margins are so thin that manufacturers and retailers make up for it with preloaded crapware.

      This may have been true at one time, but I don't think it is the case any longer. I think that the ubiquity of cheap components and the falling price of Windows for OEMs, the profit margins have been steadily increasing over the years.
       
      I think it is just that OEMs have become dependent on the revenue stream they get from app developers who want their software included in the base image.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    11. Re:The lesson here by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you buy a laptop/computer from the Microsoft Store, I think they all feature Signature Edition, which they state includes the following

      Signature Edition PCs are tuned for fast performance from the second you turn them on. They include free anti-virus software that never expires and have no junkware or trialware, ensuring that your new PC is always clean, fast, and protected.

      It seems that MS realizes there is a problem with junkware included with their OS. They can't force manufacturers to not install junkware on the computers they sell, but it looks like MS is trying to do something to alleviate the problem. It actually looks like the machines sold on the Microsoft Store are actually quite competitively priced.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:The lesson here by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      So, if a neighbor is caught sleeping with your spouse, and promises to stop, it is now OK?

      I'd rather have neighbors and spouses that don't do that.

    13. Re:The lesson here by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Apple...

    14. Re:The lesson here by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why prevent your spouse to have fun? Share the love !

    15. Re:The lesson here by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      My wife's MacBook Air came with no crapware preinstalled. My Ubuntu Dell XPS 13 neither.

      I have no idea what you're talking about.

    16. Re:The lesson here by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a lot of truth to that statement. It was the cheaper consumer models that were affected. Retail profit margins are so thin that manufacturers and retailers make up for it with preloaded crapware.

      Lenovo's business products were not affected by this as these aren't usually preloaded with crap.

      So you say, and I am inclined to believe it is so. Nevertheless, Lenovo has demonstrated, in clear and undeniable terms, that profit outweighs the needs of their customers, including the need to have a secure and trustworthy computing platform. The have violated that trust.
      "And for that reason, I'm out."

    17. Re:The lesson here by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're taking steps to fix the situation, after having been busted putting spyware on them. That doesn't exactly make them sound honorable.

      Worse than just spyware, far worse. They installed a trivially easy-to-exploit vulnerability which affects the security of every web app their customers might ever use.

    18. Re:The lesson here by quetwo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except on most of those Signature Edition PCs, they still include a trial of Office 365 :) The HP's on the site have pre-loaded software that help you buy ink. So, it's halfway true...

      It's just other people's trialware or junkware they don't include.

    19. Re:The lesson here by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it is just that OEMs have become dependent on the revenue stream...

      They aren't dependent on it, they just don't want to leave a revenue stream untapped.

    20. Re:The lesson here by Zordak · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of truth to that statement. It was the cheaper consumer models that were affected. Retail profit margins are so thin that manufacturers and retailers make up for it with preloaded crapware.

      Lenovo's business products were not affected by this as these aren't usually preloaded with crap. The same goes for other manufactures too. Dell and HP both offer cheap crapware infested models, along with pricier crap free business models.

      You do get what you pay for.

      The last consumer-grade Dell PC I bought came with a restore disk that was just a plain vanilla Windows 7 image. It didn't even have drivers. So, voila, perform a clean install right out of the box, install the drivers (from the included driver disks), and you've got a crapware-free Windows. (Of course, it's still on a consumer-grade Dell laptop, and that's a little harder to remedy. But like you say, you get what you pay for.)

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    21. Re:The lesson here by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Not to troll, but you're right. The hardware costs a lot, but they're built like tanks for the most part. Yeah, it's OSX... whatever. Put what you want on it (but that takes the discussion off the topic...)

      Anyrate, the biggest bennie is the complete and utter lack of shitware - no "trial" apps you cannot remove, no adware, no bullshit. I didn't have to blow away the HDD and install a fresh OS when I got it, and as a result, there was no scrambling or sorting through the driver mess (especially those "drivers" the OEM supply which slather on even more bloat and bullshit; quite honestly, one does not want or need these things, and they often destroy performance entirely.)

      To be fair, nearly every OEM will provide a laptop with no shitware on it - if you're willing to buy something off the business model line and pay the difference, or if you order the damn things in bulk. Other sellers will do so if you're willing to pay a premium, because they're too often too small to give you the dirt-cheap pricing. Either way, the prices for doing this often put you in Apple territory anyway, so I figured fuggit - may as well take the plunge, buy something that will hold up to abuse, and run like a champ for the most part.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    22. Re:The lesson here by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      Or at least neighbors and spouses that offer the option to pay them a little extra money (e.g. $10) to have them not sleep with each other. That seems like a good deal for everyone involved.

    23. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been busy removing superfish, groovorio, and fifty search engines and other junk from a Lenovo Thinkpad T420 laptop my neighbor has.

      Yep! no mention of removing it from the restore partition or recovery.

      Moreover, the built-in webcam for alot of Lenovo's computer laptops isn't detected by Win 7, Win 8/8.1 since it doesn't show up in the device manager regardless if you have the device driver installed or not. On power up, it blinks the light, but that is it.

      As for Asus, U24E, this laptop shows no device installed by "sound" tool on Win 7/8/8.1. Another laptop that people are complaining alot on this issue.
      If one goes to the BIOS and enable sound after POST during boot you can hear sound out of the speakers during boot, but when Windows is logged into, it shows no sound installed message. Yes, it has the latest sound driver version, and the Windows Audio and the other audio service (??) running and restarted them too.

    24. Re:The lesson here by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      If I were to use Apple products, I'd have to either use OSX, which I loathe, or replace the OS, which means that there is no point, since I can replace the OS on x86 machines too.

      As bad as all that shovelware is -- and it is bad -- This Superfish thing is far worse. It is active spyware that opens your machine up to be easily hacked by anybody.

    25. Re:The lesson here by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every company's primary goal is maximizing profit. The only difference is between strategy. Some companies try to maximize profits by cutting their own costs by being efficient and making a superior product that customers actually want. Some companies try to maximize profits by bribing politicians to pass laws hindering their competitors. Some companies try to maximize profits by tricking people (e.g. tricking them into buying products that are not as good as advertized).

      If the trust that you had violated was your trust that a corporation valued profit over you, then it's time to stop being a consumer and to start farming in your back yard.

      Asking a corporation to value it's customers more than profit is like asking you to value a corporation more than your children. Neither party should be under the false pretense of the other having unconditional loyalty. This is a mutually beneficial business arrangement that is ended the second either side realizes it is no longer beneficial to them.

      What I am getting at is that the problem is not that they placed profit above you. Every corporation (even the good ones) do that. The problem is that they tricked you. "Good" companies don't trick people, not because the don't value profit above all else, but because unlike Lenovo, they actually do care about their reputation (as a means to profit).

    26. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not damage control, bloatware has always been worst in the consumer models going back as far as it was pre-installed. The small business and enterprise computers were rarely, if ever, so infected. These days I just buy small business laptops when I'm not building my own desktop for that very reason.

    27. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just download the ISO from MS and use the key that comes with the laptop to install. Problem solved. I wound up doing that with my last Thinkpad and apart from having to install some special apps to make use of the special buttons it worked out just fine.

      But, the real answer here is to not buy consumer computers and expect them to be good. The markup on those is probably about $20 over the actual cost of the hardware and the service and support reflects that.

    28. Re: The lesson here by oldgunpraa · · Score: 1

      Really? Only $10?

    29. Re:The lesson here by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most computers these days don't come with a restore disc, let alone a disc drive.
       
      Nowadays they have a compressed restore image on the drive that occupies between four and twenty GB as a restore option, which likely comes with the crapware ready to spring in to action(!).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    30. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good: my Thinkpad E540 series is ok!!
      IEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe or NOT! :
      The only impacted models are the following consumer notebook series: Z-series, Y-Series, U-Series, G-Series, S-Series, Flex-Series, Yoga, Miix and E-Series."

      oh, and the guy said 'our reputation' ... Is that like: "the toothpaste had the reputation of tending to stay within the confines of the tube" ...????

      More gibberish from these folks!

      Geeez!!! TWO 'highly-regarded' tech companies (Samsung, Lenovo) discovered to be spying on customers in the SAME WEEK!

      I think i'll just go buy stock in companies selling pencils and paper .. OH screw!! Those pens exist that 'bluetooth' what you write, into digital form!!! )
      ^&^-ed again!!

    31. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off.

      Translation: our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work.

      Good to know!

      I beg to differ. Lenovo has one of the highest quality laptop lines out there.

    32. Re:The lesson here by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Makes me feel like maybe the premium we pay for Apple hardware/software has some serious value beyond the obvious. Pretty crazy that mainstream brands are shoveling this shit down people's unsuspecting throats and at the same time expecting to build brand value.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    33. Re:The lesson here by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Any custom software installed beyond the OS is circumspect.

      Probably best to only buy Windows certified from the Windows store or Apple products these days.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    34. Re: The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Linux.

    35. Re:The lesson here by kuzb · · Score: 0

      It matters little to me because when something happens with my laptop my answer is never "reinstall the entire thing". Was it a shitty thing for them to do? Yes. However I have better things to do with my day than sit there like an angry little person and dwell on it. Fix it and move on. Your rage achieves nothing.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    36. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The T420 was released almost 3 years ago and is a business laptop. There is no history of Lenovo putting Superfish on 2-3 years ago from what I can read or on any business laptops. You may have been removing spyware from your buddies laptop but that is probably not stuff lenovo put on there from the start.

    37. Re:The lesson here by simplypeachy · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Please keep buying ThinkPads! Please!"

    38. Re:The lesson here by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      This is a good point - I was pretty surprised with all the bouncy in-your-face crap software I found on the E series I bought for my dad last year. I removed virtually all of the "extras" immediately. That some of the Lenovo series has one that is verifiably sketchy; I'm not surprised. The things I was seeing smelled like adware/spyware right from the get-go. Somebody responsible for these partnerships with Lenovo obviously knew about it, at least to some degree. If I were a senior admin making these agreements with vendors, I would be damned sure the software is audited before I expose my division to that type of liability. Wouldn't you?

      I guess I'm going to have to go through and do a more thorough examination of the Lenovos I own. And to think I was just about to buy my husband one of the larger-screen Z series when it became available here.

    39. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. And the fact that they tried to spin having loaded this bullshit on the computer as some value-added aspect to the customer further shows how stupid they think their customers are. They didn't want to make shopping online easier for us. They just wanted the extra revenue.

      When I go looking for a new computer later this year, their off the list of considerations.

    40. Re:The lesson here by spitzak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nobody does that any more.

      In addition the ability of a consumer to install from that disc is about equal to their ability to install Linux. It is not going to happen.

    41. Re:The lesson here by spitzak · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I don't think the trial Office does anything unless you actually open it (or open a .doc file). It's not like it pops up when you edit any text with a window saying "click here to edit your text in Office!".

    42. Re: The lesson here by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      He probably has a lot of neighbors. Do you want him bankrupt?

    43. Re:The lesson here by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Half a loaf, bud...

      --
      That is all.
    44. Re:The lesson here by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      This may have been true at one time, but I don't think it is the case any longer. I think that the ubiquity of cheap components and the falling price of Windows for OEMs, the profit margins have been steadily increasing over the years.

      You haven't been buying laptops for very long, have you? I've bought:

      A Thinkpad 700 (monochrome, not color) in 1994 for about $2100.
      A Thinkpad 701c in 1996 for about $2800 (original retail in 1995 was about $3800)
      A Thinkpad 560E in 1999 (2 years after release) on sale for about $2600 (nearly $4000 in 1997)
      A Toshiba Portege 3440CT in 2001 on a killer sale for $1750 (was $2500 when new)
      A Thinkpad T40 in 2004 for $1800
      A Sony S360 in 2006 for $600 in a killer sale (original retail approx 2x).
      A Sony Z122 - their top of the line model - in 2010 for $800 in a killer sale (original retail approx 2x).

      The ubiquity of cheap components has been translating into much cheaper laptops over time. If you look at the profit margins of these companies, they've been pretty stable at 5%-10%. Apple is the only one who's figured out a way to sell cheap components at a huge markup.

    45. Re: The lesson here by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      How much money do you think Lenovo makes from putting all this bloatware on your computer?

    46. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work.

      Isn't that the case with pretty much every consumer-level laptop on the market today? This was a particularly bad case of pre-installed crapware, but I can't think of a laptop sold at any American retailer today that isn't guilty of the same.

       

      MacBooks :-)

    47. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't call a year license to Office 365 a trial. And with a tablet the personal edition of Office 365 also gives you a desktop license for a year too. It's not installed, there is just a link on the Start pain to get it.

    48. Re:The lesson here by LessThanObvious · · Score: 2

      Did someone say spyware? I heard revenue stream. I'm just glad companies are working so hard to enhance my shopping experience. Adware that purposefully circumvents data encryption shouldn't be seen as a criminal violation of the CFAA, clearly they are just enhancing it.

    49. Re:The lesson here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm with you, I'm with you...

      BTW, who else makes a laptop with a nipple mouse these days? Are we stuck on recycled Dells for eternity?

    50. Re:The lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes well beyond the usual crapware. Lenovo has still not apologized, mea culpa. They're passing the buck, but they have yet to say that doing a man-in-the-middle attack on secure communications is unacceptable. Nor have they said they won't do it again. I personally own a G-series laptop. I wiped it and installed Linux. Maybe next they'll hide stuff in the hard drive firmware? You and others seem to think that kind of thing is acceptable do to thin margins. Lenovo's business products are affected. I will seriously reconsider purchasing from them again. "You get what you pay for" doesn't include cheating and hacking your customers.

    51. Re:The lesson here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      ...our laptops are for consumers to buy crap online, and not for any kind of serious work....

      Considering that Lenovo has a consumer line of laptops and a business line of laptops (the ThinkPad brand), there may be a shred of truth in what you say.

      A shred I'll grant. But I think the Yoga line has been advertised mainly as a business accessory, as a phablet for light or portable business use.

      They also present their "consumer" line as being good for "small business" on their website, so it is not so clear really.

    52. Re:The lesson here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They can't force manufacturers to not install junkware on the computers they sell

      See, I wouldn't have expected that sort of... oddity from your user number. I'm assuming you inherited your grandparent's account and weren't around for the 90s?

    53. Re:The lesson here by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I doubt that. Reasonably speced laptops are now cheaper than ever to buy. From the outside it looks like the savings are being passed on in the form of market competition for the price sensitive buyer.

    54. Re:The lesson here by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      You have better things to do with your day than sit there like an angry little person and dwell on it. But you don't have better things to do with your day than telling others that you have better things to do with your day than sit there like an angry little person and dwell on it. You also don't have better things to do with your day than falsely proclaim that Lenovo care about people like you because they're taking steps to fix the situation rather than ignoring it. I note that your so proclaiming also doesn't achieve anything.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    55. Re:The lesson here by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      To be clear, because it appears I was not, I don't consider it a corporate responsibility to be truthful, or in any way moral at all. I expect them to pursue profit. Period. Call it whatever you like, I'll use the word "trust" to describe my expectation that no corporation would be so fucking brain-dead stupid to do something like this because, as we have seen, it's going to hurt their profits, a lot.

  3. Seems like they should send out DVDs by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems like they ought to be offering to send out fresh system restore images to customers, either via download or by DVD-for-a-small-shipping-fee. A tool which promises to remove the offending infection seems inadequate.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Both alternative should be present.

    2. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The should send out vouchers for OS purchases from MS. Why would anyone trust software delivered by Lenovo now?

    3. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no they should out windows DVD / USB sticks. they should work with the windows keys in the bios.

    4. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a tool to make a backup of the restore partition to DVD/USB which then would scan the DVD/USB copy and clean it up. Then copy this cleanedup copy back to the restore partition for future use.

    5. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, except I don't see why customers should have to pay any shipping fee for such a DVD.
      That burden should be Lenovo's problem, after all, they are responsible.

    6. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I agree, except I don't see why customers should have to pay any shipping fee for such a DVD.

      Well, what year is it? I live in the sticks and it's not an arduous task for me to download an ISO with my janky WISP connection.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Seems like they should send out DVDs by davidshewitt · · Score: 1

      They should be sending out images via flashdrive (since most machines don't have optical drives anymore). Once a box is compromised the OS cannot be trusted again. And they should send them for free. This is a huge breach of trust.

  4. Sony Comcast Level Reputation by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 0, Troll

    Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation.

    You reputation is now at the Sony and Comcast level: Scum bag assholes who are out to fuck their customers every way they can.

    1. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by BenFenner · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Acer.
      Hardware keylog me once, shame on me...

    2. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be fair. Sony and Comcast have both blamed their customers and dallied around in court for quite a while before doing anything, or avoided doing anything in some cases. Lenovo reacted within a day. Lenovo may have taken a fall, but there are circles to Hell, and they aren't in the same class as Sony and Comcast.

    3. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by BenFenner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dammit, George W. Bush really has screwed my memory of that saying. =(

    4. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Got a link on that?

      I tried googling and all I found is various keyloggers for sale.

    5. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Good point. I give them a plus for at least properly listening to feedback.

    6. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by hyperar · · Score: 1

      Same here

    7. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with this. While the initial decision to put spyware on the customers computers was on Sony/Comcast level the response when called out on it was a bit more consumer friendly.
      Hanlon's razor says "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
      I've often seen it used when stupidity or incompetence doesn't adequately explain the action. By trying to correct the mistake Lenovo can still claim to be stupid rather than malicious. Perhaps they just didn't understand that consumer doesn't want "help" with deciding what to buy.

      I'm not going to put them on the no-buy list yet. But I will remember that Lenovo doesn't always make the smartest choices next time I buy a laptop.

    8. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      I might agree with you if their initial response hadn't been lying (they claimed that they thoroughly tested and there was no security risk) and designed to avoid taking real responsibility (we did this for you!)

    9. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by jriding · · Score: 1

      There is no "to be fair". This is how these companies and politicians get away with everything. Well that company came forward and admitted they were raping us so they are better then the ones that don't admit it.
      The answer to that is NO. There will be no raping.
      You rape you lose. Go to jail, loose your business, etc.
      Otherwise they just keep raping and just apologize as soon as they are caught. There is no penalty in the "to be fair" model.
      If we want them to change they need to know, if they are caught they are out of business, out of office, in jail, hung by the neck.

      --
      love the taste, hate the texture
    10. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Which level of Hell is Sony in for not knowing that a company they bought 6 months had distributed the rootkit (prior to Sony buying them)?

    11. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo has had some bad PR, so I'm guessing they reacted on this pretty quickly because they don't want to lose the enterprise market. They are still fighting the (AFIAK unsubstantiated) allegation that their products were banned in some government places [1].

      I'm pretty sure the fear is that if the consumer level stuff has added programs which may cause security issues, then there might be something with other lines they sell.

      [1]: In fairness to Lenovo, there are a lot of rumors and conjecture about this, but I've not found anything factual on the Internet saying that their stuff is banned from USG purchases.

    12. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to say you make a good point, there. However, it still doesn't change the problem: that OEMs think that they know "best" what should be on YOUR machines. Until that self-centered mindset changes, I'd always suggest a fresh reinstall for any computer you buy. Hell, I could say the same for phones and tablets, with how much pre-bundled crap you get ...

    13. Re:Sony Comcast Level Reputation by jittles · · Score: 1

      there are circles to Hell, and they aren't in the same class as Sony and Comcast.

      Is this where Google+ got their Circles idea from? I wonder if Satan had filed a trademark on Circles in the US?

  5. Accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone needs to be fired for this. Someone very high up the corporate ladder. Someone who thinks SuperFish improves the shopping ecperience. Someone who needs to be blackballed from the industry and die penniless huddled in a cardboard box drinking sterno.

    If that doesn't happen, SuperFish and problems like it will continue to happen.

    1. Re:Accountability by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      No, because New Coke.

      The American public's reaction to the change was negative and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:Accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but no. New Coke was a reversible change: reintroduce the old recipe, and everyone's happy, no harm done. Lenovo threw away their reputation by bundling software that MitM'd every machine and fucked up holies of holies like banking; reputation doesn't recover from that without cleaning house. This is a different ballpark from reintroducing a recipe; this is about holding investigations to see how far this went through the company, who was involved, who got paid, and who didn't speak up. Heads need to roll.

    3. Re:Accountability by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      People in the US executive class fail upwards.

    4. Re:Accountability by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Lenovo is Chinese. How do executives in the Chinese executive class fail?

    5. Re:Accountability by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      upwards.

    6. Re:Accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, and where is Lenovo headquartered again? Oh right, China. Good fucking luck getting heads to roll.

    7. Re:Accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo is dual-headquartered in China and North Carolina. Which branch was responsible for planting spyware in the English language version of the OS is debatable.

      In China they actually do execute corrupt corporate executives and government officials (the overlap between the two job descriptions can be extensive). See the examples of Liu Han, Zeng Chengjie, Zhang Yujun and Geng Jinping, and Zheng Xiaoyu. So, yeah, heads could actually roll, if the Chinese felt that the offense was of detriment to China, but planting spyware on English-language computers probably doesn't fall into that category. In fact, someone in China is probably getting a round of free drinks.

    8. Re:Accountability by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      "Coke Class" was not old Coke. It used corn syrup, intead of beet sugar or cane sugar,.The shift from old Coke to New Coke to Classic Coke effectively hid the money saving change.

      I still occasionally get a bottle of Mexican Coke at a store near me, to savor the taste difference from my youth.

  6. The password for the private key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the name for some other malware. What else is on those machines?

    1. Re:The password for the private key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Lenovo has researched and found no security issues. And all the bundled software is there only to improve your shopping experience, they do not have any malicious intent nor they provide any revenue to Lenovo.

    2. Re:The password for the private key by mlts · · Score: 2

      My shopping experience is just fine without active MITM attacks.

      The ironic thing is that Lenovo has had a good reputation. They inherited the Thinkpad name, and it used to be that it was the go to brand for laptops before Apple jumped in that market. Plus, business-line Thinkpads are pretty secure, be it a decent TPM implementation, fingerprint scanner, and other items.

      I just hope they learn their lesson, and this doesn't pop up again, as their products are quite usable.

    3. Re:The password for the private key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope they learn their lesson, and this doesn't pop up again, as their products are quite usable.

      Not to worry. What the American consumer took from this experience is,

          Lenovo ... Makes ... Cheap ... Laptops.

      This is a win for Lenovo. You can't buy marketing like this.

  7. That's a stretch by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience.

    Shut up. It injects advertising into search engine results, and also has the capability to intercept and hijack SSL/TLS connections to websites, thanks to the installation of a self-signing certificate authority on affected machines. You are not enhancing my shopping experience in any way, but you are doing a great job ruining my computer experience. This is nothing more than classic OEM crapware at its best.

    1. Re:That's a stretch by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The first followup question should be; did / do you have Superfish installed on YOUR computer? I would be really interested to hear how much he valued this 'enhanced shopping experience'.

      The simple fact is they willfully shipped spyware. Beyond that they willfully shipped spyware with the potential to compromise one of the most fundamental security mechanisms Internet users rely on, SSL/TSL by inserting itself into the authentication chain. Beyond that the Superfish spyware did compromise SSL/TLS because the private key it uses to generate proxy certificates was poorly protected.

      So on the first count we might excuse them, everybody does it although its still slimy. On the second count they should have know they were crossing a line and entering deep scumbag territory. On the third count well, again I guess everybody does it.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:That's a stretch by aaron4801 · · Score: 2

      "The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience."
      Also dollars. The intent was dollars.

    3. Re:That's a stretch by fermion · · Score: 1

      The reason i almost never buy a PC is that the prices are so low the manufacturers are basically forced to provide these addons so they can get a little profit from each sale. If I do have a PC, I usually have my own install and wipe was comes with the machine.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:That's a stretch by by+(1706743) · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...on affected machines.

      People always misuse that word. I think you mean, "infected" ;)

    5. Re:That's a stretch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience.

      Shut up. It injects advertising into search engine results, and also has the capability to intercept and hijack SSL/TLS connections to websites, thanks to the installation of a self-signing certificate authority on affected machines. You are not enhancing my shopping experience in any way, but you are doing a great job ruining my computer experience. This is nothing more than classic OEM crapware at its best.

      So does Facebook and every other website on the planet.

    6. Re:That's a stretch by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      It injects advertising into search engine results, and also has the capability to intercept and hijack SSL/TLS connections to websites, thanks to the installation of a self-signing certificate authority on affected machines.

      It's worst than that. Not only can the program MITM SSL/TLS connections on the infected machine, so can anyone else in a position to intercept the traffic. The private signing key employed by the program is public knowledge at this point, and the same on all infected systems.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    7. Re:That's a stretch by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well, here's a question I haven't heard addressed yet:

      Did Sony actually know it was spyware when it shipped? Or did they trust what the program's owners said about it?

      This is how Superfish markets itself (filched from their website):
      ============
      "Superïsh delivers the true promise of visual search. Our patented image-to-image search technology analyzes images from every angle and perspective. The deep data algorithm searches thru millions of possible matches, then ranks and prioritizes your results. This process provides results that are based on how you see things, rather than how you describe them. See why millions of consumers use our visual search technology to find what they are looking for."
      ============
      Combine this great-sounding ad copy with a significant cut of revenues (I'd guess Sony's cut was around 30%) and it's an easy sell as preinstalled software. It's pretty obvious from the ad copy that Superrfish is not concerned about presenting their stuff honestly.

      No doubt this is exactly how it was presented to Sony's suits. And the suits may have believed it without reservation, and without consulting any either an in-house or independent expert. If so, that's ignorance, but it's not willful wrongdoing.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  8. Banned from our approved vendors list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My company already removed them for our approved vendor list now. I wonder how many other companies have done exactly the same thing because of this little mistake.

    1. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many companies (with approved vendor lists) actually use the image the laptop came with in the first place?

    2. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by rjhubs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any competent company should have their own OS image put onto new laptops. This should not affect the corporate world.

    3. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't matter. That they were willing to do this on low-cost consumer machines indicates a lack of judgement that reflects on all aspects of their company.

    4. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just fine in bigass-corporate-company land, but the world is bigger than that. A huge amount of US economic activity is in small business, and how many of those have competent IT? This will be a possible opening of a lot of companies for a long time.

    5. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Why? The ThinkPads are the business level laptops, which are what you should be buying if you are buying for a business. The ThinkPads did not have superfish installed.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    6. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It also wouldn't affect the corporate world because business-grade PCs were never infected with it in the first place.

      However, the real issue -- the one that makes competent companies completely justified in shit-listing Lenovo -- is the argument that if a company is capable of exercising such poor judgement now, then who knows what other poor judgement they might show in the future. Maybe the next "oops" will be a hardware keylogger in Thinkpads or a compromised WiFi firmware or something.

      Lenovo may have backpedaled this time, but the malware only happened to begin with because somebody at Lenovo thought it was a good idea. That, by itself, poses an unacceptable risk to any sane customer.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, they claimed it wasn't a security risk. What other poor decisions are they making when they build driver packages, etc.

    8. Re:Banned from our approved vendors list by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Why? The ThinkPads are the business level laptops, which are what you should be buying if you are buying for a business. The ThinkPads did not have superfish installed.

      Because Lenovo has demonstrated such an extreme amount of bad judgement with this Superfish thing that it demonstrates that the company cannot be trusted at all. Thinkpads may not have Superfish installed -- but they might have other things that are awful, or Lenovo might start putting awful things into their business products as well. In other words, if Lenovo can think that putting Superfish onto cheap consumer computers is just fine, they are capable of pretty much anything else as well.

  9. Root Cause by zieroh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience.

    The belief that the "shopping experience" of their users needed "enhancing" speaks loudly as to exactly how little Lenovo understands.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    1. Re:Root Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What frustrates me is that if I paid for the computer already, why are they still shoving advertisements up my ass?

    2. Re:Root Cause by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      The assholes have to appreciate that sticking to their core competency is more profitable, in the long run, than fucking with their gear in order to increase CEO salaries.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Root Cause by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's marketing speak for....marketing speak.

    4. Re:Root Cause by kat_skan · · Score: 5, Informative

      The belief that the "shopping experience" of their users needed "enhancing" speaks loudly as to exactly how little Lenovo understands.

      They don't believe that. They believe their customers are stupid enough to believe it.

    5. Re:Root Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same reason you have ads on cable TV, the executives of the company are psychopathic greedy fucks with no morals who can't ever get enough profits from you.

    6. Re:Root Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The belief that the "shopping experience" of their users needed "enhancing" speaks loudly as to exactly how little Lenovo understands.

      They don't believe that. They believe their customers are stupid enough to believe it.

      They don't believe that. They believe that they can get away with it. And they can.

    7. Re:Root Cause by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Of course they believe that. If the online stores make more money, that's "enhanced", isn't it?

    8. Re:Root Cause by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The belief that the "shopping experience" of their users needed "enhancing" speaks loudly as to exactly how little Lenovo understands.

      They don't believe that. They believe their customers are stupid enough to believe it.

      Well... Are they wrong?

  10. Chinese Company With Spying by Desidivo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm..... Who would have thought a Chinese company would install software that is capable of spying on laptops? Wonder how the world's secrets keep getting stolen? If you buy a Lenovo and expect anything different, you deserve what you get. This is not the first time, nor will it be the last time. They just got caught this time.

    1. Re:Chinese Company With Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Let us not forget the Malware developers "Superfish" are a VC funded startup in Palo Alto with funding from the likes of Tim Draper.

    2. Re:Chinese Company With Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are actually an Israeli company, Palo Alto is just an office, the CEO is ex MOSSAD (according to forbes) and if there is one thing we know is there is no such thing as a "former intelligence agent"

      they are a front for mossad with the goal of intercepting companies/individuals secrets and financial info, staffed entirely by US schooled Jewish citizens

    3. Re:Chinese Company With Spying by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links to back these assertions?

    4. Re:Chinese Company With Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Barak Weichselbaum, Komodiaâ(TM)s founder who was once a programmer in Israelâ(TM)s IDFâ(TM)s Intelligence Core"

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/th...

      Board of Directors
      Andrea Stavopouslos, Partner, DFJ
      Abe Finkelstein, General Partner, Vintage Investment Partners
      Anat Segal, CEO, Xenia Venture Capital
      Shai Saul, Managing Partner, DFJ
      Tuvia Barlev, Founder and Executive Chairman, Actelis Networks
      Yen Lee, SVP Corporate Development, Ebates Inc.
      Professor Tomaso Poggio, PH.D â" MIT
      Prof Lior Wolf â" MIT/Tel Aviv
      Professor Yosi Keller â" Yale/Bar-Ilan
      Olga Russakovsky, PH.D â" Stanford (Fei-Fei)
      Ron Bekkerman, PH.D - University of Massachusetts
      Zeâ(TM)ev Rozov, CEO and Co-Founder Rewardpod

    5. Re:Chinese Company With Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/th...

      And thats not counting their VC partners, again staffed with ex intelligence operatives, the whole setup is shady and they need to be jailed

  11. CTO admits Lenovo does not know its customers... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    ...When asked whether his company vets the software they pre-install on their machines, he said, "Yes, we do. Obviously in this case we didn't do enough. The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience. The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful...

    It is a rare occasion when a C-level exec admits that his company has not got a clue about what its customers want.

    .
    Since the marketing team are usually the ones responsible for knowing customer needs, will we be seeing a change in Lenovo's executive suite soon, say a new chief marketing officer?

  12. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how what kind of thought process led to them thinking that a piece of software that injects crap into and modifies web pages served via https can be considered useful by anyone.

    1. Re:Hah! by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      They were right in thinking that a piece of software that injects crap into and modifies web pages served via https can be considered useful by anyone.

      They just got the wrong "anyone."

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  13. Trust has been broken by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    we will provide a tool that removes all traces of the app from people’s laptops;

    So how I do trust that:

    1. This tool will do as it says
    2. You won't repeat the process in the future?

    The trust with Lenovo has been broken and I can't see what they can ever do in order to restore it.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Trust has been broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What more do you want? They admitted the problem and provided a removal tool.

    2. Re:Trust has been broken by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Their removal tool is garbage and does nothing to fix any damage done to the cert stores of browsers like FireFox and Opera, and will not fix your Thunderbird cert store either, if any of those were infected.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Trust has been broken by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      They only admitted the problem and provided a removal tool after they were caught. As a parent, I've tried to teach my boys that it is better to admit your mistakes outright and correct them than to wait until you are caught and then try to apologize. The former is more likely to be accepted and forgiven. The latter just shows you are sorry you were caught, not you are sorry you did the misdeed in the first place.

      Lenovo isn't sorry for putting Superfish on PCs. They're sorry they were caught.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Trust has been broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things that just DO NOT WORK:

      1) Security by obfuscation, and
      2) Security by trust.

      One would think people would know this by now ...

      'Dog-eat-dog' capitalism , dog-eat-dog government, now meet dog-eat-dog security'

    5. Re:Trust has been broken by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      I guess maintaining integrity from start to finish has become far too much for anyone to expect out of today's companies? I'm sorry, but whatever happened to "you only get one chance"? Much as the many facets of Sony have garnered the "this bridge must now burn" hatred from me due to actions from 10 years ago, so too has Lenovo now entered this hated realm. They will not have a single dollar from me, ever, and I pray they crash and burn.

    6. Re:Trust has been broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't so your problem is moot.

    7. Re:Trust has been broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fiance's were, so the problem is NOT moot.

  14. Simply by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    we will provide a tool that removes all traces of the app from peopleâ(TM)s laptops; this goes further than simply uninstalling the app. Once the app-wiping software is finished tonight or tomorrow, weâ(TM)ll issue a press release with information on how to get it.

    Pathetic

  15. Useless by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

    I will guarantee you that this particular 'update' will only take care of the core OS infection. If you have FF, Opera, or Thunderbird, do not expect this to work. You're stuck fixing those programs and their cert stores on your own.

    I wouldn't trust Lenovo, anyways. They can't keep a story straight.

    First they say 'Between October and December' and then just a few lines later contradict themselves by saying they stopped in January.

    Then they further contradict their words by releasing a security advisory stating they stopped in February.

    We know this software has been on Lenovo laptops since June, at the least. So the Oct-Dec statement is a lie. Three straight lies in a row.

    Simply put, you cannot trust this company any longer. Their 'fix' is a lie, their statements are lies, and they're trying to save face to avoid the Federal hand of pain bearing down upon them.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Useless by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Is there some reason you DID trust Lenovo at some point?

    2. Re:Useless by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      We know this software has been on Lenovo laptops since June, at the least. So the Oct-Dec statement is a lie. Three straight lies in a row.

      Corporations don't lie. The spokesman was simply "mistaken" in those previous statements.

      Simply put, you cannot trust this company any longer.

      Is there one you can trust? I just prefer to trust none of them, buy the hardware that meets my needs, and nuke it from orbit when it comes in with the OS of my choice with 100% less crapware.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Useless by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I have a t420s - business grade laptop that I bought for personal use. its what everyone else had at my previous job, they were reliable, they were well built (they really are, even to the level of having a plastic spill-protector layer over the motherboard, inside the case. nice touch.)

      the business grade laptops didn't have this spyware installed and they would probably not risk their business customers.

      consumers: they are fuckable. we can screw them and we don't care. no one respects 'consumers' anymore anyway. if we get pissed off, so what; we are only shopping based on lowest price and not loyalty so some other schmo will come along and find we have a low price and buy our stuff. they do not care about return customers. almost no one does anymore, which is quite a shame.

      would I buy another lenovo? probably not. the thing that annoyed me the most about my t-laptop is that it has a blacklist and refuses to accept a pci-e card of MY choice (ac wireless, for example). you have to buy the branded lenovo version and it has to come WITH the laptop or it will be blacklisted in the bios. I found a 3rd party hack for the bios to remove the blacklist but now, technically, I can't truly trust my bios anymore. I have no certain idea what the 3rd party did to remove the blacklist. maybe nothing bad, but who knows!

      so, lenovo business lappies are locked down and that sucks. consumer grade ones are full of crapware and the company does not respect you in the least.

      maybe that really is a good reason to stop buying lenovo, for ANY reason. hardware is nice, and I loved having a 3 button mouse on the bezel, but maybe I'm done with this company, at this point.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there some reason you DID trust Lenovo at some point?

      The Thinkpad line is the most solid line of laptops I've used over the last 17 years. They have run circles around Dell, HP and Toshiba in both quality and customer service when problems do arise.

    5. Re:Useless by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I buy old Thinkpads from FleaBay and use them for all kinds of things where I need a rugged computer, doesn't have to be real fast, great display, and low enough cost to not cry if it dies. The newer Lenovos are utter crap in every possible way but raw speed compared to the old Thinkpads.

    6. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you recommend then? Toshiba? Asus?

  16. Lenovo were already falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Instead of the eclectic quality stuff that would let you get some serious work done, they'd already turned the thinkpad line into boring mass-market hunt-and-peck-optimised dvd ogling boxes. In that sense, I'd written them off years ago.

    Now they need a massive bag of egg on their face to realise that even as largest laptop-and-desktop-peecee brand they really can't afford to lose custom over sheer towering arrogance, so in that sense their reaction is a good sign. It would have still been far better to not breach their users' trust in the first place. The "but the program was never a danger for you, honest" line, for example, is still condescending PR. "Yes we had our preloaded programs do a MITM on you but no harm was done, really." Oh, really? That's not how it works, friend.

    So I'll agree that it's not quite the same but at the same time they're not that far apart, either.

    1. Re:Lenovo were already falling by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

      they'd already turned the thinkpad line into boring mass-market hunt-and-peck-optimised dvd ogling boxes. In that sense, I'd written them off years ago.

      Really? I have used both IBM and Lenovo ThinkPads and while the Lenovo ones aren't quite as great as what IBM made, they are still vastly superior to any consumer laptop on the market today. You might be thinking of the IdeaPad line, which looks like a ThinkPad to a small degree but isn't nearly the same thing. The ThinkPads are still solid - and someone else pointed out they don't have Superfish on the, either.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Lenovo were already falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That title now belongs to apple.

      Shit creep is starting to get to the ThinkPad line. Many thinkpad models just /look/ like the trusty IBM tanks you used to love. There's no trust. No consistency. I don't like feeling as if I'm stepping through a minefield when I'm making a laptop purchase.

      The best mobile windows devices you can own come from apple (Macbook pro, explicitly supports native windows installations but for 95% of non-gaming tasks of the time a slick VM solution will give you the best of both worlds) and Microsoft (Surface Pro)

    3. Re:Lenovo were already falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think installing your own OS image is enough ? You can embed malware in the bios.
      Would you like me to post a proof of concept ?

      I won't buy a Lenovo after this incident. No way. Done.

    4. Re:Lenovo were already falling by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Agreed that the Lenovos are pretty good. Current T-series and X-series are very good laptops. Carbon, Yoga and X1[234]0 being a little odd.

      The Acer-built IBM Thinkpad i1400 sets a low-quality mark for the Thinkpad brand. I remember the 760 line burning people's laps, the 520 edge systems were flimsy... 600 systems were okay, but heat, power etc, not impressive. The T-series brought some consistency in quality, but there were always golden models a notch above the others. I still know of people clinging to their T20. I stil have a very much working X24...

      It's hard to compare pre-2005 laptops though, materials, batteries, cooling, power consuption, etc, etc., have all improved so dramatically. The cost has dropped too, 'premium' machines are very affordable now. The x24 MSRP was >$2400. Today a Macbook Pro Retina starts at half that.

      All this said, Lenovo bought the Thinkpad line a long time ago now. Anyone who thinks that Lenovo hasn't proven themselves yet, never will.

    5. Re:Lenovo were already falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder about Thinkpads ... Lenovo's notice says no superfish on Thinkpads, but then says it IS/was on " E-series " devices.
      My Thinkpad is an E540 series !!! More Lenovo double-speak is not helping us!

    6. Re:Lenovo were already falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I have used both IBM and Lenovo ThinkPads and while the Lenovo ones aren't quite as great as what IBM made

      Lenovo made them back then too :)

    7. Re: Lenovo were already falling by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      I think they have an E series Ideapad, so it is probably that.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    8. Re:Lenovo were already falling by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I'm still moderately happy with the modern Thinkpad T series that we've purchased for others in the office (T440 series). Not sure that it will live up to my T61p in terms of longevity (7.5 years old now).

      Guess I'll find out when I replace my laptop next year.

      The important things to me are reliability, longevity, 4-5 year warranty, 16-32GB of RAM, Intel i7, docking station, and two internal drive bays.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    9. Re:Lenovo were already falling by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think installing your own OS image is enough ? You can embed malware in the bios.
      Would you like me to post a proof of concept ?

      I won't buy a Lenovo after this incident. No way. Done.

      You don't need to. Their business-grade lines (e.g. Thinkpads) include remote administration tools that basically let you do whatever you want to the laptop over Ethernet without turning it on. You can disable it in the BIOS/UEFI, but it's enabled by default.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  17. Don't forget samsung by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.pcworld.com/article...

    Samsung also got caught this month injecting ads into TV viewing. They only got caught because they screwed up the algorithm and injected ads into people's personal ad-free videos. And then samsung's genius engineers biffed again by sending the TV microphone pickups back to samsung (which is okay--that's what siri, alexa, cortana, and google do) but doing so unencrypted.

    Obviously parasitic ad injection is the the single most lucrative way to earn money on the internet. Your doing it just like google does for nearly all its revenue, selling ads and harvesting click-thru data, but your doing it without the associated cost of attracting customers with a product. No wonder Lenovo wanted this action.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Don't forget samsung by mlts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ad injection is quite lucrative. This is what entire companies like Phorm which intercepts in-flight connections and inserts ads.

      As for ad injection like this, I've seen a number of consumer level PCs route traffic through a local proxy, installing Web browser add-ons to keep the browser switched to the proxy and to inject their own SSL key. The fix was removal, and even then, there were processes that had to be stopped via autoruns, as well as blocked from phoning home via the Windows Firewall (so there wasn't a chance they could do damage even if restarted.)

      The exception to this seems to be HP, which might have sample programs on it (Norton, for example), but no crapware that loads in Web browser add-ons. It actually was a shock seeing a new HP consumer laptop actually in a usable state out of the box, without having to go swinging at what starts up with the autoruns pickaxe.

      The problem is that companies face zero negative consequences for adding intrusive software like this onto a machine. Joe Sixpack won't know or care that his search engine gets redirected through some no-name third party site so his google search page has flash ads. With the private key out, he won't realize that his banking stuff is compromised until his bank account gets drained.

      The fix? As a consumer, either bring your own OS and completely wipe and reinstall the box, or buy a business-line version. Lenovo would not dare to try installing anything like this on the Thinkpad line, just like Dell's Latitude line, and HP's EliteBook line. Of course, there is always Apple, which seems expensive, but if one compares like for like, a MacBook Pro actually has a price advantage to a comparable business line HP or Dell with the same features and chipset.

  18. On the bright side by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe I can get a Lenovo laptop at deep discount and put Mint/KDE on it.

    1. Re:On the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I can get a Lenovo laptop at deep discount and put Mint/KDE on it.

      now you have two problems

    2. Re:On the bright side by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Maybe I can get a Lenovo laptop at deep discount and put Mint/KDE on it.

      But can you trust their BIOS firmware? I guess the NSA already taught us that all computers can be assumed compromised, so maybe Lenovo isn't lowering the bar any. So maybe it doesn't matter either way.

    3. Re:On the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, nobody outside of geek circles care, and thus nobody is going to be dumping these laptops.

  19. Re:CTO admits Lenovo does not know its customers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a rare occasion when a C-level exec admits that his company has not got a clue about what its customers want.

    Actually, in today's business they do have a clue, but they ignore it, because it more about earning money for the stockholders than making life easier/happier for the customers. They try their best to throw things at users and hope it isn't noticed. They had to take this move because they got caught and know that if they do not do this, then they will have the stockholders lose money in the end.

  20. And we trust the fix because ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was a Lenovo customer, I would never trust their fix to actually fix the issue. What Lenovo should do is pay for affected customers to take their computers to the technician of the customers choice and have it fixed. If they want to regain the customers trust, they should spare no expense. It appears that they are still putting money before their customers. It won't be long before people start thinking of them in the same way they think of Facebook. The advertisers are the customers, the consumer is the product in their view. Shame too. IBM computers were the best of the best until Lenovo got a hold of them.

    1. Re: And we trust the fix because ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of when I was a big fan of ubuntu and they announced they were doing business with canonical. I immediately put them on my do not install list. I had no idea Lenovo was chinese. For that reason alone, I would never buy their pc's. F*** superfish in any form.

  21. Re:CTO admits Lenovo does not know its customers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, whenever I buy a new computer, "Enhancing my Shopping Experience" is not usually on my short list of reasons to part with my money. As a matter of fact, I don't think that I've *ever* heard it being used as a reason to buy a new computer. I've been using computers since 87' My first one was a TI-99-4A.

  22. Maybe the Feds were right by Terry95 · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Feds were right when they said they'd never buy Chinese PC hardware. I was just looking at how attractive and powerful their current laptops are. This all makes me FAR less inclined to ever buy one.

    Between Ubuntu and Lenovo who needs the NSA? Anyone can just pay these asshats for all your data.

    1. Re:Maybe the Feds were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Feds are stupid. The laws and trade policies of the U.S. that encourage outsourcing and offshoring have made it such that no computers are made in trustworthy countries.

      All computers that you and I can buy are made in China. (There may be special military grade computers that I'm not aware of that are made entirely in the U.S. but cost $20,000.) Apple, Acer, Dell, Lenovo. All of these say, "Made in China" at the bottom.

      Even if they're not made in China, most if not all of their components are made there.

  23. Only a partial removal? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Some news reports say that the removal tool is only partial. It removes the evil Certs from some browsers but not all. In particular not Firefox. However, it could be that there is yet another fix in the pipeline and that this is what the story is referring to.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Only a partial removal? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well Mozilla products are defective in this area IMHO. They should system certificate stores by default rather than their own. On Windows they should the windows store, on OSX they should keychain and on linux/bsd they should use /etc/ssl

      Shipping their own is confusing for end users and forces them to manage multiple trust locations. I can totally see some people wanting to use a different keystore for their web browser than other software uses and having an option would be nice, but it should NOT be the default let alone the only offered behavior. I write this as a long time Seamonkey user, but this would be my biggest complaint.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Only a partial removal? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Well Mozilla products are defective in this area IMHO. They should system certificate stores by default rather than their own."

      Nope. Having your own cert store protects you if the primary OS cert store gets fucked.

      My god it is like the lessons of granular security have just been totally forgotten, these days.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Only a partial removal? by higuita · · Score: 1

      ?!?! what ??! those news reports don't know what they are talking about!!

      firefox was not affected by this, it have it own certificate store and this software didn't installed any CA on it.

      HTTP traffic from all browsers should be views and changed by this software, but HTTPS was only intercepted by the browsers that use the system certificate store

      --
      Higuita
    4. Re:Only a partial removal? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I got news for you if your primary OS cert store gets fucked you are fucked. What do think your OS uses to validate updates etc? hmm?

      If you OS is compromised there is little (probably no) information an attacker won't be able to get in terms what you are doing in your browser. So I reject your argument.

      Like I said having the option to use its own keystore is a good thing. If you for specific reasons you may have don't want the browser to trust what is in the system store or want the browser to trust something you don't want to put in the user or system level CA stores that totally makes sense to me as needed granularity but its not what everyone needs and not what most will want much of the time. Its not a good default.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Only a partial removal? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "I got news for you if your primary OS cert store gets fucked you are fucked."

      Given the history of the NSA and Microsoft, you're better off assuming the OS cert store is fucked in the first place, sir.

      There's a good reason to have security on every program with its own rules.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Only a partial removal? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      There's a good reason to have security on every program with its own rules.

      Sounds good, but its not really true. Security is absolutely more about people than technology. The tech is important certainly but you have to think about the people first. Few people will audit their cert stores, fewer people will audit multiple cert stores.

      People will be in the generally sense served by few more consistently applied and predictable rules thought the system; this increases their ability to understand them and enables them to make good decisions. I dare most Web users today don't understand the CA the relationships between certificates, keys, and CA certificates.

      If there is one repo for CA certs by default (whether it has a user level overlay or not) you can at least kinda get people to understand hey you trust all the organizations you see in this key chain to vouch for the identity of others. What you advocate means you have to add, "unless you using an application that keeps its own list some place else", that isn't a win.

      Now if they change an app like firefox to use some other list fine, than they probably understand the effect of what they are doing to a degree, but its not a good default.

      On the technical side.

      Given the history of the NSA and Microsoft, you're better off assuming the OS cert store is fucked in the first place, sir.

      If the NSA I assume I am fucked, there is nothing I am going to short of giving up on the Internet entirely that is going to thwart a Trillion dollar agency if they decide to look at me. If my OS is compromised than keyloggers and screen scarpers, api hooks etc are going to discover everything I could possibly want to protect with any application specific security rules. So if you start for the assumption the OS is compromised this entire discussion is moot.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:Only a partial removal? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The discussion is far from moot. Security also involves mitigation. By assuming your OS is fucked in the first place, you get programs that should in theory provide more security by using their own stuff instead of the OS, thus mitigating (or outright eliminating in some cases) the specific threat to the point of rendering it useless. Thus, even if the OS isn't actually compromised, you've still greatly managed to increase your security over the baseline.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  24. Reputation by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation.

    Well, they'll miss it then! Their reputation is now that they are a sleazebag company willing to compromise their customers security so they can make a few bucks injecting unwanted advertising, then lying about the security risk when they got caught.

    That's a company I will never do business with again.

    1. Re:Reputation by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Err... Their reputation wasn't based off of THEIR products.... It was based off of the Thinkpad line that IBM sold them several years ago. People trusted the IBM Thinkpads, and Lenovo acquired that trust when they bought the Thinkpads. It was just a matter of time until they ruined the Thinkpad reputation.

    2. Re:Reputation by rwv · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that anybody believed Lenovo had a good reputation dating back to when they took over the IBM Thinkpad brand of laptops (in 2005) since IBM didn't want it anymore. Prior to that, I haven't heard of Lenovo. After that, I knew of Lenovo as a Chinese company. 'Nuf said.

    3. Re:Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Right. Love the hyperbole.

    4. Re:Reputation by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Prior to that, I haven't heard of Lenovo

      I hadn't heard of ASUS either when they appeared to come from nowhere. Turns out they had been building nearly everything from Dell that wasn't complete crap, and they came out on their own after they put a distribution network together and no longer needed Dell.
      Similar thing with Lenovo, they were making stuff for IBM but had no international distribution network of their own. Now they are a mulitnational and for all we know this stupid MITM policy could have come from New York or San Francisco instead of Beijing or Hong Kong.

  25. a round of testing perhaps? by magarity · · Score: 2

    As soon as the programmer is finished...

    Oh boy, another case of testing in production.

  26. Yeah, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SURE they're removing it, not just installing Superfish 2.0: NSA Boogaloo.

  27. They should charge their customers for the removal by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    That's ATT's new model. In Kansas you can get a $70, gigabit connection from ATT but if you want to opt out of the customer abuse plan they charge you $30/mo extra. No I'm not making that up, but they don't call it the customer abuse plan, but that's what it is. The $30 is so they don't track you and monetize you with the scrutiny that only an ISP can do (see Verizon's tracking cookies).

    Lenovo should just say the truth: the laptop was $200 cheaper than it would have been because of SuperFish. If you want to opt out of da'Fish then you gotta pay. Nobody gets hurt okay.
    http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  28. "the programmer" by Rob+Bos · · Score: 2

    So, they only have one at Lenovo? Explains a few things.

    1. Re:"the programmer" by kmahan · · Score: 2

      Hope "the tester" hasn't been let go.

      --
      Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
    2. Re:"the programmer" by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      LOL wishing I still had mod pts for you

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    3. Re:"the programmer" by bitflusher · · Score: 1

      Lets hope the (Original) programmer documented all malicious behaviour and settings.

  29. Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Informative

    February 20, 2015 Dear Andrew, As you may have heard, select Lenovo consumer notebooks shipped after September 2014 included Superfish Visual Discovery software as a shopping aid to customers. Superfish is a TrustE certified third-party software vendor, with offices in Palo Alto, CA. User feedback on the software was not positive and we received some reports of security concerns. Please note that Lenovo has NOT loaded this software on any ThinkPad notebooks, nor any desktops, tablets, workstations, servers or smartphones. The only impacted models are the following consumer notebook series: Z-series, Y-Series, U-Series, G-Series, S-Series, Flex-Series, Yoga, Miix and E-Series. If you use any of these Lenovo consumer models in your enterprise, please refer to the Customer Support information below. While this software does not impact the models typically used by businesses, we wanted to let you know that we take user feedback seriously at Lenovo. We know that millions of people rely on our devices every day, and it is our responsibility to deliver quality, reliability, innovation and security to each and every customer. We make every effort to provide a great user experience for our customers. We recognize that the Superfish software has caused concern. Lenovo has taken steps to address that concern. â Superfish has completely disabled server side interactions (since January) on all Lenovo products so that the software is no longer active. â Lenovo has stopped preloading the software and will not preload this software again in the future. â Lenovo has provided instructions for uninstalling this software and will soon provide a software removal patch. For more information on this, or for instructions on Superfish software removal, please visit http://support.lenovo.com/us/e.... We appreciate your confidence in Lenovo. Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy Lenovo reserves the right to alter product offerings or specifications at any time without notice. Models pictured are for illustrative purposes only. Lenovo is not responsible for typographic or photographic errors. Information advertised has no contractual effect. You are subscribed as andrew.coleman@dpw.com. To ensure delivery of Lenovo email offers to your inbox, please add lenovo@update.lenovo.com to your address book. Lenovo and the Lenovo logo are trademarks of Lenovo. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Lenovo 1009 Think Place Morrisville, NC 27560 © 2015 Lenovo. All rights reserved.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      We know that millions of people rely on our devices every day, and it is our responsibility to deliver quality, reliability, innovation and security to each and every customer.

      If they know that, then why are they installing adware with security holes?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot Thinkpad Tseries i.e. T420. It was bought Dec 2014 and has taken me a week to clean superfish and alot of other adware off the system

    3. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Because knowing and caring are two different things.

    4. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      There is no hint that they're uninstalling the fake SSL signature authority, which is installed by the software and is fairly easily used for man-in-the-middle attacks of Lenovo customers. I do wonder who has the private keys to that signature authority, because they could have _already_ issued fake SSL certificates for all sorts of fake websites.

    5. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by joemck · · Score: 1

      This seems awfully late to have bought a T420 new. I got a factory-refurb T440p in July 2014. It came pre-loaded with Windows 8.1, which I still have on it and it has never had Superfish. They also claim that they didn't put Superfish on any ThinkPad branded laptop.

      If yours came with it, someone somewhere installed the wrong image or additional-software bundle.

    6. Re:Here is the letter Lenovo sent out to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so we've learn also not to trust TrustE

      No more TrustE certified software for me

  30. They got caught this time... by JimMcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But what about next time?

    What about other vendors?

    The quest to further "monetize" customers that have already paid for a product is one that more and more companies are doing. I understand the business reasons behind it, but what about the consumer's rights? Do we have any let? Superfish is an especially egregious example if this problem. It is, in essence, a back door installed into millions of consumer devices. The penalties on a company should be so severe that they couldn't just make it disappear in one quarter, but not so severe that it forces the company in bankruptcy. In other words it needs to be painful enough that other companies will think long and hard about possibly doing something similar, but stopping short of putting the head of the villain on a stick outside the castle walls.

    Sadly, I think the extent of the punishment will be a little bad press for a few days, then they'll continue on as if nothing had happened.

    1. Re:They got caught this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about the consumer's rights?

      Consumers have the right to not purchase from Lenovo again. We have the right to tell others about companies that have proven themselves trustworthy.

    2. Re:They got caught this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that other companies will think

      Yeah, that'll be the day. Just like retail POS security breaches have shown upper-management thinking abilities.

  31. I'm more upset they destroyed thinkpad keyboard by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Bring back the old-style Thinkpad keyboards and all will be forgiven.

  32. Crappy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As soon as the programmer is finished"

    How much do you not want to be that guy right now........

    1. Re: Crappy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. I'd be willing to bet large sums of money that whatever he comes up with will still miss a few things.

      I hope after the "fix" is issued that a few people fully scan their computer (files and registry) for the string superfish and see what is left behind if anything.

  33. Brand damage by jdgoulden · · Score: 2

    Sure, they reacted quickly but it should never have happened in the first place. The damage to the Lenovo brand is permanent. There are plenty of folks who won't by a Sony product of any kind, for similar reasons.

    1. Re:Brand damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5+ months isn't quick :) You are absolutely correct that the damage to the brand is permanent no longer will I say "I've had good experiences with those" when someone asks me about Lenovo. I'll say "they got caught pre-installing software that spies on your online activities in 2014"

  34. Send it back as defective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I wouldn't trust the offender (Lenovo) to clean the computer. I would send it back and demand a full refund.

  35. Re:The lesson here = Wipe & Reinstall by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    No other rational choice.

  36. Dear Peter Hortensius by stasike · · Score: 2

    Dear Lenovo CEO Peter Hortensius.

    My shopping experience needs NO enhancements, and especially NO enhancements in form of additional injected ads. I haven't even started talking about you installing appaling security holes and other crapware on MY new computer.

    Your apology has made the situation even worse. I would have appreciated if you said something like "margins on PCs are very thin so we have to take any opportunity to offset the price of Windows licence by installing questionable things on our computers".

    Not that I would buy Lenovo notebook even without this scandal. You do not let users to make backup media with a "factory restore" image. If a disk dies, or if somebody wants to install an SSD to his notebook later on, he has to seek Lenovo technician to get the image with OS.
    The only way to redeem a little bit of respect would be if you started bundling vanilla OS installation media and media with drivers. Like it was done long time ago.

    Yours truly
    *very* pissed off potential customer.

    1. Re:Dear Peter Hortensius by GNious · · Score: 1

      Yours truly
      *very* pissed off potential customer.

      So thats one "pissed off potential customer", with ca 2 billion remaining potential customers who will never hear about, let alone care about this incident, and thus remain non-pissed-off.

    2. Re:Dear Peter Hortensius by wendyo · · Score: 1

      I'm no happier about this than you, but I have bought a large number of Lenovo laptops, and they have come with OS installation media.

    3. Re:Dear Peter Hortensius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should refer to him as Horter Pretentious.

  37. Dear Rat Fuck dice.com employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is your disappearing audio ad making a comeback you broke the fucking comments. Fuck you, I'm just here for the comments.

  38. reputation = ruined by noldrin · · Score: 1

    When are customers ever happy about having their shopping experience "enhanced" especially by adware? I would suggest wiping those computers clean and putting a third party OS install on them as Lenovo has pretty much shown how it views it's customers.

  39. ceo talk translation by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    he says: "The feedback from users was that it wasnâ(TM)t useful"

    what the users REALLY said was more like: "you compromised our security, you installed spyware and didn't tell us about it or provide the option to opt-out, your uninstaller did not fully uninstall it and we now have to wipe and fully reinstall, costing us all lots of time and money, since a gaping security hole was opened up and god knows what came thru that hole before we knew abou it."

    ceo-speak really is an amazing language to learn. its all about lies and deceipt, but it sure is a 'skill' one has to learn to be a top ceo these days.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  40. Feedback from users... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

    "The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off."

    There's a tiny difference between "nah, this isn't helpful" and "this creates massive security holes and radically impairs my ability to safely use the computer."

  41. How do I buy a laptop without preloaded crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious question: How do I purchase a windows laptop that does not come with preloaded advertising?
    (Obviously, just having windows means it's automatically full of bloatware. "Wipe it and install Linux," you say.)

    But take this question seriously for a moment: How do you purchase a windows laptop without preloaded crud?

    1. Re: How do I buy a laptop without preloaded crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really trust large retailers so that leaves smaller custom PC boutique style places.

      I think the easiest answer is to simply use your own installation media and wipe the computer itself before using it.

    2. Re:How do I buy a laptop without preloaded crap? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Assuming you want Windows (and not Apple or Linux or BSD or any of a bunch of other suggestions people will make)

      From previous statements it sounds like buying the much more expensive "business model" will get this. You may have to do a bulk purchase of dozens of them.

      Another suggestion was to buy a system at a Microsoft store. They do have an interest in making Windows not suck.

  42. Where's the damned accountability? by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

    No, this is not enough. Where is the fucking accountability? The person who proposed this needs to be named, and fired, and any bonuses paid for this need to be taken back.

    You are only sorry you got caught with your hands in the cookie jar.

    This type of shitty nonsense have been going on for years, and I'm surprised that both Microsoft *AND* Windows users just tolerate it.

    *WHY?*

    1. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right. because everyone is omniscient about everything they work on, things tat go wrong are always malicious, and there is no such thing as a mistake.

      grow up.

    2. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Actually, they need to be criminally charged with hacking. And copyright violations, for creating unauthorized derivative works of whatever web pages they messed with. And breaking wiretap laws.

      But that won't happen. They're a corporation.

    3. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, when someone installed software which hijacks my secure web session with my bank...it is time for heads to roll.

      If this were anyone else but a giant corporation the FBI would be so far up their ass they could see the back of the guy's teeth.

    4. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we should personally hurt them for the anguish they caused you. Wipe the cheetohs off.

    5. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It won't happen, not because they are a corporation. It won't happen because they are in China. If I was criminally charged in a Chinese court, I don't think I would bother showing up.

    6. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      So the company makes a scapegoat out of one guy and that's what you consider accountability? Even if they somehow managed to recoup every cent that was paid to this person (salary, bonuses, etc), that just gives Lenovo more money, in addition to a scapegoat.

      It's not like that money would go to customers who were harmed by this malware.

      I think you're lucky if superfish is the worst thing in a Lenovo laptop. I work for the defense industry and we are not allowed to use Lenovo laptops because of the possibility that there is malware in the hardware (e.g. like the NSA malware discovered in the harddrive firmware of some computers).

      Those sorts of things are really hard to detect, and I don't think the Chinese government is morally opposed to doing such a thing. I'm not saying they are doing this. I am just saying that if they aren't, it's because it's too hard to pull off (for now).

      Not that there isn't potentially malware in American made computers, but presumably if there is, it was put their by our own government rather than a foreign one...

    7. Re:Where's the damned accountability? by joemck · · Score: 1

      "And copyright violations, for creating unauthorized derivative works of whatever web pages they messed with"

      God I hope not. That could spell the end for AdBlock, Privoxy, Squid, upside-down-ternet, ...

  43. I trust the NSA more than them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your computer isn't trustworthy, you don't own the computer. Doesn't matter that they belatedly pulled the malware, it would be recycle time for anything from Lenovo.

  44. readamading compreheminsionation failuration /gwb by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Isn't that the case with pretty much every consumer-level laptop on the market today?

    The HP business laptops do not ship with crapware.

    Wherethehell is IKANREAD when we need him?!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  45. To Google, Lenovo, et al by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

    I don't want you fucking around with my 'shopping experiences'. Please, please do not sell my eyeballs to advertisers and claim (even with a wink and a nod) that you are somehow doing *ME* a favor.

  46. Too late. by BLToday · · Score: 1

    Lenovo is going to come off my recommendation list. That list is getting shorter and shorter everyday.

  47. Microsoft Windows Defender to remove the Superfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has updated Windows Defender to root out the Superfish bug

    http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/20/8077033/superfish-fix-microsoft-windows-defender

  48. Please download our tool ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .... SuperDuperFish.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. Time to be nice by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Now that we've been caught....

  50. Our reputation... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience. The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off. Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation

    This really starts to make sense in the sense that Lenovo has 2 sets of products and 2 sets of users. Regular people are users of their computer products, and advertisers are users of their malware products to advertize to those computer users.

    You can't please everyone.

  51. Some joke using the word "appwipe"... by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I got nothin. You?

  52. At this point... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    At this point I would be satisfied with having the option to pay a little more to *not* get all the extra bloatware on my computer. Surely there is some amount of money that the manufacturers like Lenovo get for putting that shit on their computers. What difference does it make to them if they get this money through bloatware vendors or the customer?

    In the past I would probably gladly reinstall windows myself and save the $10 (or whatever it is), except that now they don't make that easy either, because often their windows reinstall discs have the same bloatware on them. You can't just install some random windows ISO and use your own product key. Even if the ISO is legitimate, it may not be a version that accepts your product key.

    Just let me pay the price, or at least see what that price is.

  53. Seems fair by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Lenovo is about to be wiped from the marketplace as a purchase to never make again.

  54. Sure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody else buying this nonsense story?

  55. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't buy Lenovo until they get rid of this CEO and stop putting spyware on PCs.

  56. Our reputation is everything by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation.

    This is like Putin saying "Equal rights for gay people are everything". Either you are lying, or you are extremely incompetent.

    It's really easy to have a reputation of not putting bloat/spy/ad/malware on your computers. You actually don't have to do *anything* to achieve this reputation. It requires effort to ruin it. Just like it requires effort to harass gay people.

  57. too late i don't trust any Chinese tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time to end the purchasing of Chinese Technology products. Can't trust them.

    Who knows what's installed on iPhones. I think it's time we do a deep dive into an iphone. I'm sure we will find something.

  58. Enhancing users shopping experience by Rudisaurus · · Score: 2

    "When asked whether his company vets the software they pre-install on their machines, [Lenovo CTO Peter Hortensius] said, "Yes, we do. Obviously in this case we didn't do enough. The intent of loading this tool was to help enhance our users’ shopping experience. The feedback from users was that it wasn’t useful, and that’s why we turned it off. Our reputation is everything and our products are ultimately how we have our reputation."

    Far too little and far, far too late!

    If Superfish was merely not "useful", some people would carp about it and most would just ignore it. It is far more dangerous than that because it deliberately behaves in a way that undermines the integrity of the trust system on which internet is based and so jeopardizes the security of the user. To claim that this was done in order to "enhance" the user's experience is cynical beyond belief. I'm certain Hortensius is right when he says that the software was vetted at Lenovo. I'm also quite sure that it performed precisely the way it was intended to. But who on earth thought that was a good idea?

    There has to be a price to pay for this major failure of judgement and I can only hope that it is both hefty and that it impacts those at Lenovo who were ultimately responsible for it, Hortensius among them.

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  59. I don't want to use the tool by schlachter · · Score: 1

    I don't want to use the tool because I don't want to degrade my enhanced shopping experience. It's just so premium now.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  60. Here's an idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, Bunny Huang was making a "laptop", but forewent the keyboard because, he claimed, everyone has their own taste anyway and they're easy to pick up. Well, not for me they aren't, but perhaps they are in Shenzen.

    So the obvious idea is for a (monied, with some free time) reader here to pick up the slack: Go to Shenzen, cobble together a laptop to nerd specs, sell it. Could start with Bunny Huang's board even, but something faster would be nice too.

    Specs? Old-style thinkpad keyboard*, trackpoint and no touchpad, 4:3 matte screen with nicely high resolution**, at least one gigabit ethernet, room for wifi and mobile cards, couple usb and one extra, say firewire, ext. video probably still vga for presentations, vol up dn mute and one extra button***, and of course a fully open source BIOS. CPU doesn't need to be x86 nor x86_64; a nice low-power but fast MIPS or ARM or even PowerPC would do just as well. If you can do SPARC then suddenly you have a market with the military.

    It's really quite curious that there now exist "made-to-order" laptop manufacturers except they all produce the same souped-up glossy widescreen dvd player with a shitty keyboard and a (multitouch!!1!) touchpad but nothing geared toward getting things done.

    * With a few mods for me: Decent-sized ESC, put CTRL in lower left with FN next to it, no windows keys, arrow keys without those extra keys so I can find'em in the dark, that big-ish right shift can be a bit smaller to make room for a compose key, and a couple other tweaks I'd have to think about for a bit.
    *** Those pixelqi screens are cute but not available in 4:3? Well, maybe you can find a supplier of colour e-ink. Those do at least 12fps these days. That's fast enough for email, even writing code, and basically all office tasks.
    *** Which I'll have invoke the passworded screensaver.

  61. The lesson here - most revenue streams are yellow by burtosis · · Score: 1

    Great to source, not so great to recieve. Unless you are really into that kind of thing.

  62. Way to own it, dickhead by Wee · · Score: 2

    You fucking suckhole, at least have the balls to own up to your mistakes. You assholes not only put a shitty MITM attack in the OS, you fucking used the same goddam key so that anyone else could MITM us too?! And not a single person with half a clue ever stood up in that design meeting and asked what a monumental fuck-up that was? Right. Trying to make the "user experience" better by inserting your ads into my TLS-based google searches or my secure bank session? It "wasn't useful"?! Just stop. Stop that nonsense and own your mistakes like a real actual person.

    I've been buying and recommending Thinkpads since the late 90's. I'm using one now in fact (thankfully re-imaged, no thanks to the twatwaffles at Lenovo). I'm never going to do either of those things again. I might have if they had said, "You got us, our bad, we're sorry and it won't happen again". But not anymore. Not with the wishy-washy corporate-speak bullshit.

    Do not fuck with people's stuff for ad revenue. And if you do and get caught, at least fucking own up to it.

    And so now I'm wondering what my next laptop will be. Because it sure as shit isn't going to be a Lenovo...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  63. hmm by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    So what else are they going to update?

    My money is on New and Improved SuperUltraFish

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  64. "The" programmer? Only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As soon as the programmer is finished..."
    Really? Only one 'programmer'? Wow. Obviously, they are not giving this much attention.

  65. Why do they even TRY with this B.S.? by sirwired · · Score: 2

    Obviously the "intent" with this tool was not some sort of alutruistic impulse to "improve our customers' shopping experiences"; the "intent" was to collect some tiny payment per PC in exchange for their users giving up some of their piracy.

    I'm willing to believe they didn't realize the security implications of this junk, but they might as well admit they play the Crapware game all the consumer PC makers do because it makes them money.

  66. Meh China by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    I welcome the day that the FTC actually holds them accountable, and fines the crap out of them. But that will not happen because the last ten or so years China has become the god of exports. They export everything including the fake crap, and the crap that contains enough toxins to ruin kids the rest of their lives. China must be proud of themselves. They would have to be how else can you explain their junk coming over to the USA in record numbers, and the US citizens buying it right and left without even looking at the label, or asking the right questions? Like for instance why is China's goods so much cheaper than anyone else's? How can China get away with shipping goods to the US full of toxins and not suffer any consequences? There is enough stupidity, greed, and ignorance to go around. To tell you the truth I don't know who's bumper to kick anymore. Set up your provisions and line up ...this will take a long time.

    1. Re:Meh China by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yep, Chinese like Peter Hortensius who appears to be responsible.
      Sorry did I ruin your rant by pointing out that Lenovo is a multinational?

  67. No trust for ANY OEM from my side by bitflusher · · Score: 1

    Ever since Windows 7 pc's have been loaded with crapware and "enhancing experience" so hard it slows new pc's to a crawl. Almost every OEM has customer feedback background service that does not turn off after answering the user does not want to participate. For all customers I wipe pc's and install it with an MSDN downloaded installation before it is first booted. This has included lenovo machines in the last years. Glad to see I was right to do so. I have access to MSDN If you do not and download elswhere, please compare hashes of downloaded and Original iso files, you do not want to replace your OEM crapware by other malware. pro tip, your windows 8(.1) windows key is stored in the bios and not on a sticker. this can be recovered with "rw-everything", microsoft has official dummy keys you can use while installing (but will not work to activate)

  68. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would a Superfish by any chance be a Crayfish?

  69. Programmer? by coop247 · · Score: 1

    "As soon as the programmer is finished"

    You're a company the size of Lenovo and you've got one dude working on it? Does he get to do QA and deployment too?

    --
    //TODO: Insert catchy phrase
  70. Autocorrect? by Sketchly · · Score: 0

    Are you sure he actually wrote 'app'-wiping software?

  71. Well thank you very much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May I have another?

  72. What's in the HARDWARE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, but is there anything we should worry about in the FIRMWARE of the devices?

  73. Wake up call - get rid of other MITM devices by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's a wake up call - now can we get rid of those fucking stupid "SSL accelerators" that do the exact same man in the middle attack and are prone to the same problem if somebody who wants your banking details has or gets hold of the details of the cert.

    If it's for "business reasons" that a workplace sniffs all the traffic that's supposed to be encrypted then they should consider what a hit Lenovo's business is going to take over this, and how their business would cope if the lawyers from a couple of major banks go after them for interfering with transactions when a hack happens. They'll want blood, and if the perpetrator can't be tracked down they'll happily take the blood of whoever put the stupid "SSL accelerator" box in and the company they work for.

    It's fucking insane to listen in to other people's supposedly secret communications unless you are immune to the legal system. That's without even getting into moral implications.

  74. Buyer Beware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the Chinese buy an American company I never buy from them again. I'll bet the Red Army had more than "Adware" in there. ;>)

  75. Software truth in packaging by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    When you buy something to eat at a store, you can read the label and find out what is in it.. When you go to a restaurant, you can get the caloric count. If you have allergies, you can avoid eating something that could be toxic for you.

    Why not software? When you buy a computer, smart phone, cable or fiber box, or other internet connected gadget, you have no idea what you are getting. The vendor can put in anything they want, as Samsung demonstrated by shipping a smart TV sets that can send out audio and video without any indication to the user.

    If consumers were informed what kind of crap was being shipped with their gear, it would go a long way towards cubing this kind of intrusive behavior. Nobody wants a device filled up with junk when they get it, but it's hard, even for Slashdot types, to find out what's in the box before it shows up. A list of add on software that you could see before you buy would make all the difference.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  76. Preinstalled Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bundling malware with your computers is a great way to kill reputation. I would never buy a Lenovo device of any kind after this.

    It is good to see there is still some resistance to adware and spyware on PCs at a time when it seems to be accepted as normal on smart phones.

  77. As usual no fines, no firing for illegal product by johncandale · · Score: 1

    null