Slashdot Mirror


Listen To a Microsoft Support Scam As It Happened

itwbennett writes You know full well that Microsoft will never call you and ask to "access your computer" to help fix a problem. Yet this is a ruse that many unsuspecting computer users fall for and wind up with their machine hacked. CSO writer Steve Ragan, turns the tables during a phone call with a scammer — and he records it all for us to hear. Do yourself a favor and play it for your parents.

229 comments

  1. the real problem by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And here's a written transcript of all actions taken by the Indian government to stop this scam:

    1. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems fairly straightforward. I can't imagine why this remains a problem.

    2. Re:the real problem by HappyHead · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suspect you've edited that transcript, as it appears to be missing the five minutes straight of laughing.

    3. Re:the real problem by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's the script they use for tech support!

      No, wait, it lacks the "please hold" line.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think governments should step in?

      Because it's the job of Governments to enforce the laws, and India has laws about fraud?

    5. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when the government can ask for a cut / bribe of what they take in why stop them?

    6. Re:the real problem by Steve+B · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you think governments should step in?

      Because suppression of fraud is one of the basic responsibilities of a government.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    7. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common sense is a scarce commodity, and India does well in helping the local industry produce it. They don't have nearly enough to supply the internal demand, but the dollars brought by the exports help expand their production capacity.

    8. Re: the real problem by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      It is fraud. It is the very definition of fraud. Are you trying to say that fraud stops being fraud when it is convincing to the victim? Do you even know what fraud is?

    9. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's so funny, Indian laws only protect against fraud if you're Indian. Foreigners are permissible targets!

    10. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because suppression of fraud is one of the basic responsibilities of a government.

      What about voter fraud?

      Here, they can't decide if enforcing the law is voter suppression or not. I mean, you can't even be required to show the ID that everyone has to make sure you are who you say you are.

    11. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, you can't even be required to demonstrate that there is actually voter fraud before you enact laws to fight it. So we create laws that solve problems that don't exist and in the process create other easily verifiable real problems for voters.

      (I know. Why did I waste my time writing this response? Voter fraud blah blah blah)

    13. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And here's a written transcript of all actions taken by the Indian government to stop this scam:"

      No surprise since this woman sounded Chinese, not Indian...

    14. Re:the real problem by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Here is another, for the rest of the scams.

      There has been a number of news articles about various scams in Canada run over the phone mostly by Indian companies. This one is about windows computers, but it is everything under the sun really. They mostly prey on the elderly.

      If the Indian government doesn't want to enforce international law, then Canada should simply cut off India from all phone communications. We'll see how quickly India reacts then when living in a black box, particularly hurtful to all that off shoring of jobs. If a Canadian company does legitimate business with an Indian company, then they can petition the Canadian government to allow a specific phone connection.

      Anyway Canada would never do it, or even anything remotely useful for fear of being seen to interfering in business and jobs (though in reality it would be probably saving Canadian jobs), and the Corporate kings would pull their strings and watch Harper dance, dance, dance.

  2. sending to partents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've told my parents so many times not to click on links in an email.....now you're telling me to send them a link and have them click on it?

    1. Re:sending to partents by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      +1

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  3. Funny thing... by stazeii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Had one of these (and only one)... told them I only had Mac's at home, and the guy got belligerent and said I was lying, then finally after telling him that over and over for a good minute he basically said FU and hung up. Can't imagine what they'd say if I said I only ran Linux, or something really obscure ("Sorry, I only run OpenVMS"). =D So yeah... guess their scheme falls over pretty quickly if you don't have a Windows box...

    1. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL If you have only Mac's at home, you've already been scammed.

    2. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had one of these (and only one)... told them I only had Mac's at home, and the guy got belligerent and said I was lying, then finally after telling him that over and over for a good minute he basically said FU and hung up. Can't imagine what they'd say if I said I only ran Linux, or something really obscure ("Sorry, I only run OpenVMS"). =D

      So yeah... guess their scheme falls over pretty quickly if you don't have a Windows box...

      For now.

    3. Re:Funny thing... by mlts · · Score: 2

      I've had that happen, and I did warn the guy that the computer I was using really couldn't use MSI files, because they were not in AIX's installp or 64 bit coff format.

      I've always thought it would be humorous to allow them into a VM on an isolated network, just so I can snapshot it and see what type of ugly RAT-ware they are using... but if they started hacking from there, I'd be responsible, so ixnay on that happening.

    4. Re:Funny thing... by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is for stuff like this I wish that phones could record calls. We really need a change of laws. When a business calls and intimidates people, we really need a record.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Funny thing... by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      a friend of mine and his folks have been recently plagued by this.

      He actually did say he ran linux (he doesnt, but that's beside the point) and just hung up. They called again later though.

      He lives next door to his folks (not the basement. next door) so the next time his folks answered. His folks dont know anything about computers but can recognize a scam when they hear one. His mom just blurted into the phone "I dont even use a computer!" and hung up.

      they got quite a few more calls in the week after.

      some part of me wants to see what these guys do when their remote access software trick gets pulled on a throwaway linux VM.

      "Yeah, I have windows. I have one open right now! Go to your remote access client site? OK!"

      "what OS is this? Hold on, i'll check with the console (uname -a) It says it is GNU Linux 3.10.11, but I can totally run windows software (fires up wine regedit) see?"

      LOL, it would be so fun to troll.

    6. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best thing you can do is to talk to these people and swear at them... for every minute that you have them on the line, they're not scamming some's Gramma.

    7. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I have seen on YouTube, they are using legitimate remote-support software (eg. TeamViewer or LogMeIn, etc) to access your computer. Not sure if that has changed...

    8. Re:Funny thing... by BUL2294 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (IANAL) In Illinois, and likely most other states, if you believe that a crime will take place during the recording of a phone call (and this does likely count as a felony), you can record it without permission of the other party. In addition, you are shielded from prosecution for breaking wiretapping laws & your surreptitiously recorded evidence can be used for prosecution.

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    9. Re:Funny thing... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I've tried to keep them on the line and waste their time, but they figure it out pretty fast and just hang up (although once I did get a bit of profanity, so I was kinda proud of that).

    10. Re:Funny thing... by djbckr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I know you're saying that to be funny, but...
      As this story points out, Windows is a horrible, horrible magnet for scams like this, and it's all too easy for scammers to take control over your machine. Plus, I generally find that Windows is more-or-less unusable. My wife and kid both have Macs, and my kid has a Windows laptop that our school district gives all the students. The students are trained on how to use Windows, and my daughter can't understand why "Windows makes it so hard to do stuff". So, Macs at home - I'm not scammed - they are superior machines in every way, and really not much more expensive than comparable computers. I also run Linux on a Mac Book Pro, because it's a better computer than 99% of the stuff out there.

    11. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I told one that I had a MAC and He responded, OK type in T...E...A....M...V...I...E...W...E...R, when I said I didn't have it, he told me to download it.

      At that point it was obvious that they had a script for MAC's too, so I hung up

    12. Re:Funny thing... by HappyHead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another good trick to use is to pretend you're trying to follow their instructions, and that it's just not working.

      Tell them your virus scanner is giving you alerts, they'll think you're a really good target. If your phone has a 'mute' option, ask them to hold on for a second because you've got another call. Come back within a minute or two, and if they're still there, lead them on again. Never let on that you aren't actually following their instructions, never let on that you know it's a scam. As long as they think they've got you hooked, they'll keep trying. As soon as you reveal that you're not buying into their lines, they'll cut bait and look for someone else to scam.

      That's the big difference between the major scammers like this, and the ordinary telemarketers who just want to sell you things you don't need while you're trying to eat dinner - the scammers are allowed to hang up. The regular telemarketers aren't, and you can spend an hour telling them all about the coffee cup sitting on your desk.

    13. Re:Funny thing... by Merk42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows are a horrible magnet for this because they're popular, not because they're difficult to use. If Macs had the same market share, they would get targeted too.

    14. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As this story points out, typical Windows users are a horrible, horrible magnet for scams like this

      FTFY.

      If you had legions and legions of the clueless descending on, say, Linux, you'd get these same scams preying on clueless Linux users. You don't, because generally Linux users are much more tech savvy and don't fall for them, so it isn't a target rich environment like Windows is.

      So yes, Windows sucks, we all know it sucks, but in this case, PEBKAC. I hate Windows but I can't blame it for doing what its owner asked it to do.

    15. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one these guys on the line for about 20 minutes. When I told him that he was talking to the FBI, he got real quiet and hung up soon after. Perhaps next time I should say that a Predator with a Hellfire is on its way. Maybe Adm Rogers' request for red button autonomy is not a bad idea...

    16. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, for all your blathering, you don't off any explanation as to why "Windows is a horrible, horrible magnet for scams like this," let alone why it would be worse than a Mac.

      You speak as if having a different brand of computer would somehow stop someone taking over your computer if they were on the phone telling you what to do.

      I guess this is the part where I make a joke about 'expecting that from a mac user' or some such.

    17. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tech support has the victim download TeamViewer to gain access to his machine... TeamViewer has a OSX version as well... I fail to see how this is a windows problem.

    18. Re:Funny thing... by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why "Windows makes it so hard to do stuff"

      It's what you learn on. I learned on Windows, when I use a Mac I'm utterly lost and think "Why did Apple make it so hard to find anything?"

      I'll guarantee that if you and I spend the same amount of money on a Windows and Apple boxes that I *will* get superior hardware, but that yours is tested by Apple to be compatible with their OS. We'll both get operating systems that we understand where all the moving parts are and will both think that we got the better deal. If MS were to have full testing and approval of every piece of hardware and software and all drivers ever installed on every Windows workstation since the beginning of time it would be known for its stability as well. Instead MS went for maximum flexibility, with the result that their software is installed on most of the desktop computers and around half the servers on the entire planet.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    19. Re:Funny thing... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Typically if you open with "This call may be recorded (or *WILL* be recorded)" that's enough to shield you from the wiretapping laws. Essentially you just need to inform the other party of your intent to record the call in advance. (Not a lawyer in any state, much less all 50, check with your local authoritah yadda yadda)

      There's got to be some android software that lets you accomplish this. It's also easy to do with asterisk if you have landlines or voip. You can just set up a voice menu system that informs the caller when they dial in that calls may be recorded "for quality purposes." Such a warning or system might be enough on its own to discourage a lot of these assholes. I just bounce all calls not on a whitelist into voicemail. If they're important I'll call 'em back. Of course, I don't have a panic attack if I'm not reachable with an uptime of 99.999% either.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    20. Re:Funny thing... by cusco · · Score: 1

      One would think that when I tell them that I've done server and desktop support for close to two decades it should scare them off, but it doesn't seem to. The ones that I've gotten have a script, and they'll follow it off the edge of the Earth. I've kept them on the line for up to 23 minutes, and even then I only hung up because it was time to throw things in the wok and I needed both hands.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    21. Re:Funny thing... by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows are a horrible magnet because they're glass.

      FTFY

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    22. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what does it have to do with my phones capability to record a call?
      "If your hardware could do that thing you want it to do it wouldn't be breaking any laws, too bad it still doesn't have that capability"

    23. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned on MacOS 8 and 9. I went along with the Mac OS X change over for a while, I tried several Linux distros, but ultimately, I switched to Windows.

      It's not about what you learn, it's about whether you're flexible enough, mentally and emotionally, to switch to something else if you discover that it better meets your needs. Some people aren't that flexible. They either lack the confidence, the know-how, or sometimes simply the will to change. Other times, they don't want to look silly, out-of-touch, or un-stylish.

      Most often, though, they just don't care, which means that what they're using right now meets their needs.

    24. Re:Funny thing... by Altrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trouble with trolling them is that they don't really care. The worst you'll accomplish is getting some low-paid (probably illegally low since you know, illegal business anyway) phone drone fired and replaced with the next one.

      Your time is more valuable than theirs..

    25. Re:Funny thing... by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Had one of these (and only one)... told them I only had Mac's at home, and the guy got belligerent and said I was lying, then finally after telling him that over and over for a good minute he basically said FU and hung up.

      That's the wrong way to do it -- instead, pretend to be old and incompetent (and with a similarly old computer). It takes you two minutes to get to your computer, another minute to figure out which button turns it on, another 10 minutes for your computer to boot up (with occasional progress reports so they don't lose heart). In between, you set the phone down and do whatever you were doing before. Like with real tech support, fake tech support requires near-infinite patience and the target demographic is clueless incompetents. The object of this game is to see how long it takes them to run out of patience for your computer to start up.

      Telling them you don't run Windows is a losing proposition -- if they accept that, then they just admitted they're scammers, whereas it would be a common enough test by people who do have Windows whereby insisting that they have a virus-laden Windows machine will earn them the target's trust.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    26. Re:Funny thing... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Had one of these (and only one)... told them I only had Mac's at home, and the guy got belligerent and said I was lying, then finally after telling him that over and over for a good minute he basically said FU and hung up. Can't imagine what they'd say if I said I only ran Linux, or something really obscure ("Sorry, I only run OpenVMS"). =D So yeah... guess their scheme falls over pretty quickly if you don't have a Windows box...

      Only if yo let it. I've gotten those calls and kept them on for quite some time and listen to them get more and more frustrated when they can't seem to get me to give them access but am only seconds away from giving them a credit card number. Frankly, after a while I give up and offer to pay and here is my credit...click...dial tone...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    27. Re: Funny thing... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm gonna burn the +1 funny I gave you and give you a fucking lol instead. Well played.

    28. Re:Funny thing... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      (IANAL) In Illinois, and likely most other states, if you believe that a crime will take place during the recording of a phone call (and this does likely count as a felony), you can record it without permission of the other party. In addition, you are shielded from prosecution for breaking wiretapping laws & your surreptitiously recorded evidence can be used for prosecution.

      In some US states only one party consent is needed to you can record to your heart's content since you consent. No need to do get the other party's consent.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    29. Re:Funny thing... by Steve+B · · Score: 1

      Last time I got one of these calls, it went something like this:

      "I need you to open your Windows."
      "Can you call me back later when it's not raining?"
      *click*

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    30. Re:Funny thing... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      "Do you think I've been living under a rock? Either I have and I don't know what this Windows thing is, or I haven't and I know you're scamming me"

    31. Re:Funny thing... by sribe · · Score: 1

      In some US states only one party consent is needed...

      Most US states, actually ;-)

    32. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is pretty much moot since both parties consented to record everyone else.

    33. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had a wok...

      Seriously! I don't have gas though, and don't really have a good place to put one of those stand alone burners where I wouldn't be concerned about burning the place down.

      So here I am, trying to make thai curry dishes in a frying pan... :(

    34. Re:Funny thing... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Had one of these (and only one)... told them I only had Mac's at home, and the guy got belligerent and said I was lying, then finally after telling him that over and over for a good minute he basically said FU and hung up

      My mom got called once while I was home and didn't give up even when she told him she was using Linux Mint -- I got on the phone and asked the "Microsoft employee" to confirm our Windows Product Key code -- he should be able to see that if he is monitoring my computer after all, I said.

      After a repeated requests for this the scammer actually tried to give a fake one -- that didn't follow the correct format (number of characters or pattern of letters/numbers).
      I pointed this out laughed in his face before hanging up.

    35. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States

    36. Re:Funny thing... by jp10558 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I feel the same way about Macs - they have issues with SAMBA, they can't run lots of software I use, and for lots of the FLOSS I use they don't have a useable installer - or when they do, it fails to do something critical.

      For instance, Fusion Inventory Agent. On Windows, run .exe with configure flags. On Linux yum install RPM and give conf file. In this case, it's all set up, and will check in every 24 hours, and grab all other settings from the server.

      On Mac? lol for the longest time you couldn't get it to install. Last time I tried, it installed, but only ran on boot. No way to get it to run every hour or whatever. Of course, I'm not a Mac guy, but I didn't need to do anything beyond software install + config file on Windows or Linux so . . .

      Puppet? Run MSI with installer flags. yum install rpm with conf file. On Mac? It installs as the user, who, even when admin, doesn't have permissions to run systemwide, or run on a schedule.

      So now I still can't really manage the macs like I can Windows and Linux.

      Snark over - it's what you're used to. There are problems with all OSs...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    37. Re:Funny thing... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      magnets???? how do they work???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    38. Re:Funny thing... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why I have such a hard time with Windows machines. I learned on a TRS-80. I had a keyboard, a little sorta square box, a cassette player, and a screen. Plug them all together, plug in the power, turn it on, wait for the prompt, then c-load your program. Or, just make up your own program in basic. No floppy, no "drive" at all, just the cassettes. It took a couple years to graduate to a "disk operating system" - first there had to be disks! Ahhhh - the lazy, crazy, hazy days of DOS 3.1 . . . . Everything went downhill when they started plugging computers into the telephone lines.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    39. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac's have on-the-order-of 10% installed base (don't dicker with numbers, I don't care if it's 7, or 7.2 or 12; it's about 1 in 10).

      Mac's suffer nowhere near 10% of malware infections or the like.

    40. Re:Funny thing... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      People who use it are fucking retarded.

      So are Anonymous Cowards.

    41. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is entirely irrelevant. If you were going to write malware, are you going to target 10% of the userbase, or 90%? The obvious answer is the 90%, unless there were something very specific to the 10% share that you wanted to target. So, why go through the same amount of effort, while crippling your outcome? There's no reason.

    42. Re:Funny thing... by jimbo · · Score: 1

      Some of these actually have a "Mac expert" they'll hand you over to, even though initially presenting themselves as "Microsoft" or the guys calling me "Your Support Dept".

      I just hang up immediately.

      If you want to insult them, suggest that their mother must be very disappointed with them and hold the phone a bit farther away.

    43. Re:Funny thing... by nobuddy · · Score: 2

      I have a few VM images of crappy insecure Windows installs I use for training. I have one that has every virus I can find on it. I moved a copy of every infected payload file to a folder on the desktop labelled "Financial Records" in the hopes that someday they will call me. So far they have not cooperated on this.

    44. Re:Funny thing... by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      That Mac Book Pro runs the same hardware as any other laptop, at three times the price. You paid an extra $1000 for the OS, then wiped the OS to install Linux.
      That is a special level of duped.

    45. Re:Funny thing... by renfrow · · Score: 1

      Actually, DO allow them in, just throttle their CPU to 5%.

    46. Re:Funny thing... by multisync · · Score: 1

      But what does it have to do with my phones capability to record a call?

      If you can hear it, you can record it.

      I record most of my calls. At work I use a Nexxtech telephone recorder similar to this this. I plug the 3.5 mm jack in to my Tascam DR-07 digital recorder. When I place or receive a call I just press record then log the call details along with the file name when it ends.

      If a call comes in on my cell that I want to record I ask the caller to wait while I put them on speakerphone then use the Tascam's built in mics to record the conversation.

      If you don't have a stand-alone recorder, a laptop with built-in mic and/or audio input and something like Audacity will do nicely as well.

      If your phone lacks the ability to record conversations, either because it doesn't have speakerphone capabilities or can not work with a device like the one I linked to above, I would replace the phone. Cordless phones can be problematic as they emit rf that can be picked up by the recorder but a cordless with speakerphone either on the base station or handset should work with a digital recorder with built-in mics.

      The biggest challenge with recording calls is keeping track of all them so you can find the relevant one in the future. I hacked together a simple PHP/MySQL application I host on my personal site that I use to log calls but a spreadsheet works well too. It's also helpful to begin recordings with whatever detail you can provide prior to dialling or answering. That way you just have to listen to the first few seconds of your recording to find out what the call is about.

      If the laws where you live prevent you from recording a conversation you are participating in I would say you have significantly bigger problems than your phone's hardware capabilities.

      I keep written notes of meetings, I keep my old notebooks, I keep a (semi) daily journal, I archive emails, appointment calendars and task lists as well as text messages and all other forms of written communications. I see no reason why I should not be able to record any conversation I am part of. If a person asks me to not share what was talked about with others, the existence of a recording has no relevance to that. If I can remember it, there is a record.

      As far as calls with companies go, I can't remember the last time a call to or from a business or government agency didn't include the disclaimer that "for quality control and training purposes, this call may be monitored or recorded." I always reply that it most certainly is.

      In general I don't record personal calls with friends or my wife, since it's unlikely I will need a record of those calls in the future. But they *are* being recorded, of that I have no doubt. All calls are recorded by various agencies and companies. I have no control over that. What I can do is keep my own record of my calls, just in case the need ever arises for me to know what exactly was said.

      As long as you take reasonable precautions to safeguard these recordings - as you would your written communications - I can not see why there would be a problem with it.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    47. Re:Funny thing... by hyperar · · Score: 1

      If you changed Windows for Linux you'd have been modded down to hell

    48. Re:Funny thing... by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      I agree with the "waste their time" strategy. We should have a regular competition to see who can keep one of these people on the line the longest.

    49. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS.

      The mindset of those who run macs are such that they would likely fall for this MORE than a windows user. The windows users at least know there are bad people out there trying to scam them. Apple users are sheep.

    50. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What elitist bullshit!

      You keep mentioning Microsofts EULA, but make NO mention of Apples. Why would you accept Apple's EULA but not Microsofts?

    51. Re:Funny thing... by MikeOnBike · · Score: 2

      If you want to insult them, suggest that their mother must be very disappointed with them and hold the phone a bit farther away.

      I've used that. "Does your mother know you are a liar and a thief?"

      No profanity yet, just instant hang up. Although once I did get ignored so I said in a muted voice, "Jeff is that phone trace complete yet?" That did the trick.

    52. Re:Funny thing... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 0

      No troll feeding right? anyways...

      Im a programmer, who's done low level things including some kernel work in both Windows 95 (yeah, dating me some) and a couple UNIXen. I have two Macs at home. The Windows box has been shut down since WinXP stopped getting updates. You gonna make fun of me for the jump from XP? "yeah, you're so hosed, you've got a Mac when I've got WINDOWS VISTA." I tried playing around with Windows 8 when it first came out, and I couldn't even figure out how to do a pic slideshow on it. I'm no anti-Windows snob - I had been using DOS since 5.0 and DOSSHELL, and every Windows version from 3.1 to XP (including WinNT 3.1 on a dec alpha), and I got lost in the UI. I spent 20 minutes trying to find the network settings to get WiFi working, and then had to do odd folder indirection to just show some pics off of a DVD. Again, im no newb... I've done work on IBM Mainframes, UNIX, Mac, Linux, DOS, and Windows. I've done HCI Classes, and I can usually model a new UI in my head. Nope, i was fucked. Multiply that wasted time by a hundred if it was my personal box. That's why I use a Mac. I just get shit done. No Fanboi-ism. I just want to work.

      My sister in law had Vista on her laptop, and we never got it running right. Part of the issue was they de-contented Vista so they could charge the same for the upgrade, and nickel and dime you for the next SKU going up. Is that home premium, home ultimate, home premium ultimate super-size plus fries and a thirty two ounce coke? Mac updates from this time scale were i think $10, no tiering. They are now free. I was able to update my very very hideously techphobic mother in law recently, bumping two Mac OS X versions (for free) with no training. Her biggest issue? The desktop wallpaper changed. Imagine going from WinVista to Win8 and saying that same thing. I was confident enough to send her home (to taiwan - imagine tech support with a 14 hour time zone difference) with the change. Imagine leaving someone from WinVista to Win8 and saying "ok you're updated, good luck with that". You'd be on the phone every other hour.

      Anyways, at home, I have two running computers instead of a Windows Vista or a Win8 box that I'd spend hours configuring.

      Yeah, people like MacOSX enough that they're able to charge a premium on Mac hardware. This popularity is a failure how? The ability to be so popular you can charge more - not sure how that's a "haha Mac you suck" criticism. It's kind of like the "no one goes there any more - it's too crowded". YOU may not think the premium is worth it, but enough do that they don't have to charge prices you wish they did.

    53. Re:Funny thing... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Didn't we just pass some laws to protect cops from recording (cause they'd never break the law - umm Homan Square), so I'm not sure if this is still the case.

    54. Re:Funny thing... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2

      Windows are a horrible magnet for this because they're popular, not because they're difficult to use. If Macs had the same market share, they would get targeted too.

      If so, why aren't iOS devices a target for this?
      And Macs are known for being high-priced toys for rich yuppies with more disposable income than sense, hence the $10k gold iWatch, right? Aren't those exactly the sort of people you want to scam, rather than Joe Schmoe with his 10 year old Stinkpad and $20 in his checking account?

    55. Re:Funny thing... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why not just record?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    56. Re:Funny thing... by antdude · · Score: 1

      If Linux was popular as Windows, then you have the same magnet issue. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    57. Re:Funny thing... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      One of my grandmothers has an Ubuntu desktop, and a chromebook... the other has just a chromebook... I am very happy for this.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    58. Re:Funny thing... by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      I'll admit, the main reasons I have a macbook pro laptop are 1) the touchpad, 2) the display and 3) the styling... Functionally, I could have similar hardware for about $1k less for what I last bought (top end rmbp august 2014)... My last one was stolen, or I'd still be using it (2011 mbp). My home desktop is windows, my htpc is ubuntu, and most of my dev is in a gui editor (sublime) via a smb connection to an ubuntu VM, with a couple SSH terminals in a shell prompt on that VM in either windows, or linux. I edit with gui, and run against Ubuntu... most of the apps I use run wherever, and don't care that much... I also use a Model-M style keyboard at work and home. As for meta in meta... a lot of my target for software is now in docker containers, inside said VM.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    59. Re:Funny thing... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      The trackpad on a macbook is unmatched in any other laptop I've ever used... (all laptop keyboards are pretty shitty), and the screen is nice, but not as unique. I also like the aluminum shell... that said, I'd considered some of the ultrabooks (acer and asus) this last time around... kept me with the touchpad... I care more for what I touch and see than for the guts even. though I did pay too much for 512gb ssd and 16gb ram.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    60. Re:Funny thing... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Arizona only requires permission from one of the two parties (without a warrant) to record a conversation.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    61. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general I don't record personal calls with friends or my wife

      So you're telling me someone actually married you?

      Oh, gotta go, my radio-tooth is ringing.

    62. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So with OS-X having around 7% market share, does that mean the world contains a lot of idiots?
      I know, all those windows users must be wrong?

    63. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL either... NY State has in place the legal right to covertly record a conversation as long as you have the permission of one of the parties involved. I suspect this was a loophole left open for police agencies to record when dealing with informants, etc... but they forgot to close the hole behind them.

    64. Re:Funny thing... by Mictester · · Score: 2

      They get really upset if you keep them on the phone for half-an-hour or more ("there's someone at the door - hang on").... If half a dozen of us do that to each scammer each day, they'll NEVER find any marks! I just play a talk radio station to them, so they know the line is still open. My record is 57 minutes, and the scammer burst into tears when I told him he'd been taken.....

      The other thing to do is to play with their heads - they are just using a script, so if you deviate from it, they haven't got a clue what's going on. I've let these clowns into sandboxed XP or 7 Virtual Images where they've found "Bank Details" which unleash some very nasty malware if they download them! Other zip files they love to download are movies, music and porn - the images I built to hit these cretins had plenty of those....

      A Old Folks Home across the road from me runs computer classes for the inhabitants who're interested - I've run a few classes for them - and they now take these scammers on in much the same way as I do.

      It must be realised that not all these scammers are offshore - there was evidence of the Old Folks Home was specifically targetted by people who were aware of the ages and potential vulnerabilities of the residents.

    65. Re:Funny thing... by infolation · · Score: 1

      I tell them the imaginary colleague (victim, computer owner) they need to speak to is physically disabled, and is currently on the other side of the building, but is conscientiously on his way to talk to them. Then the scammers get restful music on hold, interspersed with periodic updates about the colleague's arduous progression towards the office to take the phone call ("he's on the stairs... oh he's valiantly struggling on the stairs...")

      By tugging at the scammers' heartstrings, causing them to feel guilty that this disabled person is making the effort to talk to them, calls can be extended to half an hour or more with some ingenuity.

    66. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a world where even refrigerators can be repurposed to be part of a botnet - I'd target the absolute easiest target there was out there and let the laws of large numbers take care of the rest.

    67. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Mac users I know are running BSD Unix, comfortable in the command line.

    68. Re:Funny thing... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      So with OS-X having around 7% market share, does that mean the world contains a lot of idiots?

      You must be new to this world.

      Yes, it's full of idiots. Though that is unrelated to the discussion at hand.

    69. Re: Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serve those Mac haters, mfer!

      I agree with your post entirely. Maybe Windows 10 will sort some stuff out, but I stopped at Win XP and switched to OS X as well and have never looked back. I converted my parents and sister to using them as well and they love it too.

      So long, Windows, and thanks for all the malware.

    70. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly an hour, usually at least 40 minutes.

      I figure
      1. I'm messing with their business model by driving up the costs
      2. They're tied up, not scamming someone more gullible
      3. I find it oddly therapeutic

      I'll play the dumb user with slow old computer and see if I can get them hooked - once they've invested a half hour or so they will usually fall for "but your support site doesn't load" line and after a bit can often persuade *them* to go visit the supposed site, which will be a link-shortened lemonparty or tubgirl. Then the swearing starts.

    71. Re:Funny thing... by naich · · Score: 1

      If you've got nothing better to do then it's worth it, even if it just means they aren't scamming someone else for real while you are pissing them around. I've never had one but I fancy being the confused type who has a corded phone that is in a different room to the computer, meaning he has to explain each mouse click, sometimes several times.

    72. Re: Funny thing... by StevenOfford · · Score: 1

      They kept phoning my parents while I was visiting. I answered and followed their instructions to the letter for 45 mins without them working out it wasn't a MS computer,( my Linux netbook). They kept bringing on more "senior supervisors" and just getting more frustrated and confused while I played innocent and nieve, 'till the last few seconds where I changed tone to tell them I knew their game, was just wasting their day for my amusement & to FO&D. I recorded most of that too.

    73. Re:Funny thing... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      TeamViewer runs great on Linux too. I'm waiting for the next scammer to call when I have an hour to kill. Hopefully I'll be on my laptop so I can take it into the small room in my house, so I can give him an earful of my business while he does his.

    74. Re:Funny thing... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Apple's EULA in decades, so I can't say much about that. I have previously stated that I switched off of Apple because of an EULA modification that they included in a security upgrade. That is still true, and I haven't gone back to look. I've seen the MS EULA many times, so I feel more secure abusing THEM over it. (Prior to Apple's attempt to sneak a modified EULA in as part of a security upgrade, I didn't really object to anything they said, as I didn't intend to copy any of their stuff anyway.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    75. Re:Funny thing... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      why "Windows makes it so hard to do stuff"

      It's what you learn on. I learned on Windows, when I use a Mac I'm utterly lost and think "Why did Apple make it so hard to find anything?"

      I think this is only part of it. I grew up using Windows (and am consequently lost on Macs), but I found Linux easier to learn than Windows. This may be partly due to my technical inclinations, but I think that variations in usability and documentation can make a real difference to how easily you can learn to use a system.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  4. Lol by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    "Internet expl..Internet Exploiter?..Internet Explorer?"

    Brilliant.

  5. Re:Photo of Microsoft scammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do not click this link. You have been warned.

  6. NoScript by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are ninety (90) scripts trying to run on that page.

    1. Re:NoScript by tepples · · Score: 1

      How many scripts are acceptable on such a page? If zero, then without script, what would provide controls for the audio playback?

    2. Re:NoScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This always seems to come as a complete surprise to many people, but you can just link directly to an audio or video file. You don't actually need any javascript "playback controls". My OS will take care of that just fine, thank you, and play the file when I click on the link to it. That's what it's for. And it's far more trustworthy than some random site's pile of javascript doing who knows what.

      So yes, zero script is the preferred answer. Like the GP, I disable them locally, so only sites I wish to allow to run scripts can run scripts.

    3. Re:NoScript by sexconker · · Score: 1

      How many scripts are acceptable on such a page? If zero, then without script, what would provide controls for the audio playback?

      Seems to me the standard <embed> has worked just fine for decades. Browsers shouldn't be handling this shit.

    4. Re:NoScript by tepples · · Score: 2

      The <embed> element is not a standard but a Netscape extension. It has been superseded by <audio> and <video>.

    5. Re:NoScript by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, they don't need controls on the page for audio playback. Just hang the damned file up there, and let me point VLC or something at it. All the controls necessary reside right here, in my box.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:NoScript by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then how should they either A. ensure a sponsor's message is played or B. recoup operating costs without sponsors?

    7. Re:NoScript by websitebroke · · Score: 1

      Fine: Here's the file

      Also, SoundCloud is pretty well-known. I'm sorry it's not up to your standards.

    8. Re:NoScript by websitebroke · · Score: 1

      NoScript is currently showing twenty-eight (28) scripts running in my browser (I temporarily permitted all to see what the actual number was). Still kind of a lot, but where did you get 90?

    9. Re:NoScript by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      What part of "I never want to pay for anything ever because I am an entitled asshole" are you not understanding? That seems to represent the viewpoint of the majority around here. They want all the best things and nobody ever pays for them because the magic fairies produce them. Or something like that. I'm not one that believes that way so I've been told I'm obviously to stupid to understand how the free lunch works.

    10. Re:NoScript by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious, is your project or income somehow tied to people watching sponsored content and giving something in return for it (their time or clicks or bandwidth/CPU etc.)? Not saying any of that right or wrong, just wondering if that's related.

    11. Re:NoScript by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      No, my income is derived from people directly paying to use our product on a subscription basis.

    12. Re:NoScript by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      He had just installed an 'anti-virus' toolbar as directed by a helpful caller from Microsoft?

  7. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm shocked that the scammer is an Indian. Shocked, I tell you.

    1. Re:I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      What makes you so sure? I swore at one in Hindi while I was following their instructions and they asked me if I was from Pakistan. The real shock is that TeamViewer hasn't pulled that old download.

    2. Re:I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. by stackOVFL · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the dude said his name was John. That's not a very India sounding name to me.

    3. Re:I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that India is a huge place with lots and lots of local languages, and Hindi is just one of them. You'll probably have a better time using English if you want to insult them in a language they understand.

  8. feels like the 419. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    fake support calls are eerily similar to 419 scams in confidence artistry but it bears remembering why and when these scandals have taken place. In nigerias case oil discovery led to british and american interests propping up a series of dictators favourable to their interests yet despotic to their own people. After a few violent uprisings, oil export dropped to 40%, and largely has never returned. nationalized exports, systemic corruption, and a dearth of unemployment with a sizeable population of educated adults led to the 419 artistry and arguably an increase in piracy.

    in Indias case, rampant corruption and high unemployment combined with a tech industry that favours low worker pay and aggressively combats everything from workplace safety to union organization and benefits has led to the tech support scam, born from the confidence and trust of americans and europeans accustomed to the dulcet tones of the south asian tech support worker.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:feels like the 419. by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      in Indias case, rampant corruption and high unemployment combined with a tech industry that favours low worker pay and aggressively combats everything from workplace safety to union organization and benefits has led to the tech support scam, born from the confidence and trust of americans and europeans accustomed to the dulcet tones of the south asian tech support worker.

      Americans and Britons (what about Canadians?). I doubt you'd find many
      Indians fluent enough in French, Italian, Spanish, German, Polish, ...
      who'd be available for this kind of scam.

  9. Was it a "nice try"? by mi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am a security researcher, and you've been busted. But nice try! :-)

    Was it a "nice try"? And what's there to smile about? You have the criminal's attention for a few seconds — use it to communicate something harmful, something to cause them actual anguish. This is not a game — an asshole entering your home under such pretenses deserves to be shot to death, so do harm such people with words so much, they starts hating her job and become disinclined to do it.

    If that's a woman, for example, tell her, that she'd been identified and cursed to never have children. Something along the lines of 4chan-hatred... No quarter

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Insightful

      depending on his locality, that might be illegal speech.

      (and yes, there IS such a thing in the US too.)

      Better story:

      dont tell them that you are onto them. Instead, monitor the honeypot and see what they install later, what they use the compromised VM for, and build an actual case against them.

      It's one thing to say "these people are taking over computers". it's entirely another to clearly show what they do with the computer afterwards, and build a profile that can be used to detect compromised systems based on activity patterns, then publish.

    2. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by mi · · Score: 2

      depending on his locality, that might be illegal speech.

      No, I don't believe, a threat to curse somebody can be prosecuted in the US. Not even if you are cursing the President.

      Instead, monitor the honeypot and see what they install later, what they use the compromised VM for, and build an actual case against them.

      Yes, that would be more responsible. But it requires much more involvement — with you having fun only for the first few minutes of it.

      I used to do this to spammers: pretending to be interested, collecting responses from their real e-mail addresses, identifying their real web-sites, &c., then trying to get them shut down for good based on all the evidence I collected. It only worked in about 10% of cases (in late 90ies) and now I just post the spam to SpamCop and feed it to my own Bayesian filter...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      The one I got (well the only one I actually bothered listening to) wanted a credit card number before they'd connect and "fix" my machine..

      I hadn't given them my IP so I'm not entirely sure how they were planning to do that, but as I don't have fake CC numbers laying around I pretty much terminated the call at that point so I never got to find out what their next step was..

      My guess is that they would have just kept me on the line for another few minutes claiming to do something they weren't actually doing while they verified and charged whatever to my card. There are much more efficient attack vectors than manually calling people if your only goal is to install a back door into the home PC of someone who doesn't know how to protect themselves.

    4. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If they're calling from India, their local laws are meaningless to me. There's no point in building a case, there will be no prosecution.

    5. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Curses? nCurses, maybe?

      If I'm going to that level, I'll be more straightforward. She's been identified - and we have an office in her city. She can expect a couple of our agents to be visiting her home, as well as the children's school. If/when she says she doesn't HAVE any children, remind her that her sister/mother/cousin does. Better than a curse, IMHO - even if she believes in curse, I don't, and I'll not make a convincing threat with it. I DO believe in tough men with guns carrying a grudge though. We see them in any city of the world, every day.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by mi · · Score: 1

      Better than a curse, IMHO - even if she believes in curse

      You know, I meant it as a joke, but at least two moderators have been sufficiently offended by it to downmod the suggestion. And that's on /., which should be higher in rationality, than average.

      So, I think, it would work on an average script-reading third-world woman hired by a scammer.

      and I'll not make a convincing threat with it

      Yes, this may be a problem. But, as long as you don't use smily-faces, I don't care :-)

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      LOL @ the moderations - everyone who moderates has seen the request to raise people up, rather than to tear people down. Funny, some people just don't see the point in that.

      Me? I mistake sarcasm and jokes sometimes - obviously - but I would never mod you down because I disagree with you.

      Some people, eh?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Was it a "nice try"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > dont tell them that you are onto them. Instead, monitor the honeypot and see what they install later, what they use the compromised VM for, and build an actual case against them.

      Me? I just put them on "hold" (mute, really) and never come back.

  10. These guys call me every few months... by H0p313ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... and depending on my mood I have several strategies;

    1. Just tell them you only have Linux, they'll hang up immediately.
    2. Musical hold, put the phone next to a speaker and go on with your life.
    3. Tell them you have several computers running various Windows versions, which one did you mean... do you have a hostname or IP address so I can narrow it down? You don't? So how do you know it was my machine again? Really? ... So can I speak to your manager. (So far I've never got a manager.)
    4. Pretend to follow along with their instructions, honestly the most time consuming and least satisfying.

    But the problem is not with us, it's with Joe User who for some reason is unaware that Microsoft isn't phoning everybody. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    1. Re:These guys call me every few months... by I4ko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last time I got one of these I was in a playful mood and pretended to be an illiterate, however I answered their questions like I was using a VAX via a green screen VT-100 terminal. Took them 15 minutes to say - "aaah, we are sorry, we don't support that". Especially when they asked me what is the key on the left of Alt and I told them I don't have an "Alt" but a "line feed".

    2. Re:These guys call me every few months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Recently discussing this with friends we came to the conclusion that the best approach would be:
      State that your girlfriend/wife is the main user of that computer.
      Get increasingly angry that "she" has broken it
      Say she's just come home and you'll be back in 2 minutes - you need to talk to her
      Go into another room, shout, make some loud banging noises then go silent.
      On the phone say "oh god what have I done" repeatedly. Maybe cry.

      Once they hang up, carry on as normal.

    3. Re:These guys call me every few months... by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      1. Just tell them you only have Linux, they'll hang up immediately.

      I tried that when they called me many years ago (back when windows XP was new... and they had the same recorded opening message back then) and the guy on the phone told me that no I didn't, my computer was a Microsoft Windows Computer, because that is what everyone has. He literally would not believe me that I wasn't using Windows. He actually got angry with me. It was kinda funny really.

    4. Re:These guys call me every few months... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I have had that call before I took the guy for a ride.

      Can you go to the start menu?

      Do you mean the "K"?
      I don't see control panel but it says system tools.
      when i search for cmd it doesn't find anything but there is a command prompt symbol. It says xterm.
      Yeah it says invalid command.
      I downloaded it but It say it doesn't know how to open the file.
      he finally just hung up.

    5. Re:These guys call me every few months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww c'mon you could have trolled them with the GOAT SE operating system, and wait for them to Google it.

    6. Re:These guys call me every few months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I play along, and get to the point where they ask me to down load their app I play a modem noise. I tell them that my AOL account is limited to 2400 baud. About every 2 or 3 minutes I tell them it downloaded another few percent of the app. Usually around 20%, I tell them my modem crashed, and restart the process. While waiting I ask them invasive questions, or tell them about my favorite animal p*rn. They are remarkably patient. My record was keeping them on the line for 40 minutes before I got bored.

    7. Re:These guys call me every few months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "the most time consuming"

      This is a very ethically sound public service. Not only are you wasting the time they could be using to scam someone else, you are providing a very frustrating data point in getting them to give up on the whole endeavor in that it just isn't paying off. Slashdotters, if you get a call like this, you are ethically bound by being part of the digerati to keep these people on the line as long as you can. The next call will be to your parents/grandparents.

    8. Re:These guys call me every few months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I got one of these calls once. It was my day off, and I was alone with the kids for a couple of hours, so I strung along some guy for a half hour or more. I answered everything very slowly and tried to sound confused.
      It went something like this:

      Him: Is your computer turned on?
      Me: Which one?
      Him: How many do you have?
      Me: Let's see...one...two...three...about six, I think. Which one has the problem?
      Him: Can you get on one of them?
      Me: OK. What do I do?
      Him: Can you see your regular windows and icons and so forth?
      Me: Sure.
      Him: Look down at the keyboard, in the bottom left corner. Do you see the C...T...R...L?
      Me: Yes.
      Him: What is the key to the right of that one?
      Me: Hmmm...I guess it kind of looks like a flag.
      Him: OK. Press and hold the flag, then press the R.
      Me: OK. Is something supposed to happen?
      Him: Yes. What do you see?
      Me: Nothing happened.

      We went through that several times, and my pauses to find the keys were very long. He then tried to get me to do it through the Start menu. I tried to drop hints ("The button with the K on it?"), but he didn't catch on. After the command I was typing failed a number of times, I got tired of the call.

      Me: Do you mind if I ask you a personal question?
      Him: What?
      Me: How old are you?

      I had to repeat myself several times before he gave me an age in the 20s.

      Me: Do you live on your own, or with your parents?
      Him: I live with my parents.
      Me: Does your mother know what you do?
      Him: What?
      Me: This thing that you do, where you call people in other countries and try to break their computers and steal their money. Does your mother know?
      Him: That's not what I do.
      Me: Yes, it is. She probably raised you to be an honest, moral person. She must be very ashamed of you.
      Him: Well, your mother must be a...
      Me: I'm not saying anything bad about your mother. I'm sure she's a wonderful person. That's why she must be so full of shame for what you are doing now.
      Him: Do you read the news? People in your country steal from people in my country all the time.
      Me: That's very bad. What you're doing right now is also very bad. I feel so sorry for your mother, to have her son doing what you do. How very shameful!

      After a lot of swearing, he hung up. Who knows? Maybe I protected somebody from him.

    9. Re:These guys call me every few months... by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent idea.

      Reminds me of a Jerky Boys call. He was telling his imaginary wife to STFU while he was on the phone and then, after he had supposedly knocked her unconscious he wanted the guy on the other end to be a witness for him and tell the cops that his wife had been interrupting their conversation and he therefore had no choice but to hit her.
      I think I'm going to add an additional piece to your plan where I step outside and light off a firecracker before getting remorseful and telling the caller that I need his contact info for my criminal defense.

    10. Re:These guys call me every few months... by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      A valid point, but in terms of cost/benefit, the "musical hold" wins. It's satisfying to know you're wasting the scammers time and it costs you no time or effort other than tying up the phone line.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    11. Re:These guys call me every few months... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Recently discussing this with friends we came to the conclusion that the best approach would be:
      State that your girlfriend/wife is the main user of that computer.
      Get increasingly angry that "she" has broken it
      Say she's just come home and you'll be back in 2 minutes - you need to talk to her
      Go into another room, shout, make some loud banging noises then go silent.
      On the phone say "oh god what have I done" repeatedly. Maybe cry.

      Once they hang up, carry on as normal.

      But they're in India... so yeah...

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    12. Re:These guys call me every few months... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Do you toy with down-and-out street people, too?

      I would if they were trying to rip me off.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    13. Re:These guys call me every few months... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I think from now on my opening salvo will be: "Does your mother know what you do for a living?"

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    14. Re:These guys call me every few months... by dwywit · · Score: 2

      1. I get told that I am lying, and that they KNOW I'm running Windows.
      2. I get more laffs out of leading them astray, "reading" the errors in my event logs.
      3. Tried that. "I have several computers. Which one is it?" "All of them, sir" "But which one do you want me to turn on?" "Any of them, sir" "But which one are you getting the error messages from?" "All of them, sir" and so ad nauseam.
      4. See #2

      I've been handed off to "an expert on your computer", who I promptly told I knew he was a scammer. His reaction was to act surprised and even claim ignorance of phone scams.

      Best reaction was telling one girl that her mother would be ashamed of her. That got a 5 second pause, then "Shit" and she hung up. I told another that I had a broken leg and couldn't get to my computer. You could practically hear the pages flipping as he searched for a response.

      I once strung one along for 16 minutes, but 5 minutes seems to be a trigger point for most of them. I guess if you haven't got to *this* point in the script by the 5 minute mark, hang up and take the next call in the queue.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    15. Re:These guys call me every few months... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Him: Look down at the keyboard, in the bottom left corner. Do you see the C...T...R...L?
      Me: Yes.
      Him: What is the key to the right of that one?
      Me: Its the 'A' key

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    16. Re:These guys call me every few months... by kdataman · · Score: 1

      I think we have a new Turing Test goal. Come up with a computer program that can take over the call and keep these guys running in circles for x minutes.

  11. They tried... by franzrogar · · Score: 0

    ...and got an epic fail with me.

    Once I got a call from "Microsoft Support Service". Tough it happened years ago, I had no problem to discover the scam in the first sentence:

    > "Hello, I'm [her name] from Microsoft Support Service..."

    With that sentence, I knew they were scam. Why? Because I'm Spaniard and they should have said something like this:

    > "Buenos dÃas, mi nombre es [nombre] y le llamo del Servicio de Soporte de Microsoft..."

    Got the difference? ;-)

    1. Re:They tried... by Teun · · Score: 1

      No I don't.

      See, these scammers are just like a typical Hollywood Sci-Fi movie, the aliens always speak English and land in the USA.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:They tried... by cusco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even more epic fail, I've worked on the MS campus a lot, and in fact installed much of the security hardware. I take them on a mental tour of the campus, trying to get them to tell me what building they're supposedly working in, ask them whether the Ms Pacman machine is still in that stairwell, etc. It can be fun.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    3. Re:They tried... by armanox · · Score: 2

      My grandmother did them one better....

      > "Hello, I'm [her name] from Microsoft Support Service..."
      GM: "Sorry, but I don't have a computer"

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  12. Which computer? by bradvoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I received one of these calls a few weeks ago. After the scammer informed me that my computer was compromised but he was going to help me solve the problem I thanked him for his help and asked him which of my computers was infected. He seemed surprised by the question and said, "You have more than one computer?" I replied that I have several and surely he must be aware of that because he had just described the extensive monitoring Microsoft was doing. He said it didn't matter which one; just go to one of them and follow his instructions to get rid of the infection. I said that surely I need to go to the one that is infected to clean it, but he again claimed it didn't matter which one I went to. I pushed the point that if his monitoring was able to detect an infection then surely it must be able to identify which of my computers was infected. He started becoming beligerent, almost shouting that it didn't matter which computer had the infection but that I needed to go to one of them immediately so he could help me clean it. At this point I called him a liar and asked how he felt about lying to and stealing from people. He really started yelling at that point, and I just hung up. I haven't heard back yet.

    1. Re:Which computer? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It saddens me to see what kind of amateurs and dazzlers muscle into the ancient trade, if not art, of grifting. A professional would have said something akin to "Hmm... sadly I only have one set of data here and it doesn't say exactly what it is but from what's installed that would be a ... laptop?" Chances are that you have a laptop and maybe only one.

      Ah well, heavy sigh... But then again, everyone who perfected the art of sweet talking, telling people what they want to hear and at the same time making them fear the world as they know it comes to an end if they don't listen to him and pay him for it has long since moved on into consulting. More profitable and even legal!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Which computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah well, heavy sigh... But then again, everyone who perfected the art of sweet talking, telling people what they want to hear and at the same time making them fear the world as they know it comes to an end if they don't listen to him and pay him for it has long since moved on into consulting. More profitable and even legal!

      The less successful went into politics.

    3. Re:Which computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is funny to ask them what is the IP address of the problem computer that is sending out the packets, they wriggle and squirm and say it is confidential.

    4. Re:Which computer? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I couldn't do that. I shave with a straight razor and I'd fear for my life.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Which computer? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      That's just lazy conmanship. You die with the lie son - tech support doesn't get angry, tech support patiently explains again and again what they want you to do. Needs to be a practiced fake cheerful voice right up to the point they hang up on you.

  13. Here is an detailed video (of another scam) by mtbrandao · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://youtu.be/GVQoAlQrnSg

  14. You can't fix stupid by Brad1138 · · Score: 2

    The problem is, we support & enable "stupid" now, instead of letting them succumb to natural selection like they would have in the past.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re: You can't fix stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While i approve in theory, it is problematic to just let the scammers scam. Why? Because they affect secondary targets too. The victims might have children who will be hurt too.

    2. Re:You can't fix stupid by Altrag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Define "stupid." Would you be able to tell when an auto mechanic is BSing you? When your contractor does a half-assed job building your home but still charges you full price? Any of 1000 other scams that are out there attacking areas of knowledge you haven't studied?

      Just because a person can't tell a mouse from a memory stick doesn't mean they're stupid -- it means they don't know about computers. And that's still a large portion of the population, even among the younger crowd ("can use Facebook" does not indicate "knowing about computers" in any useful sense.)

      Because most people have no need to know. Just like you don't need to know how to design and build the car you drive or the house you live in, most people don't need to know every detail about computers in order to use them.

      There is (or at least should be) an argument that because computers (/phone/tablets/etc) are increasingly storing large chunks of our critical information that we should be training everyone in at least basic security.

      Of course that's easier said than done. Its hard to make a full-term course out of that to push in public education (where they don't have the funding to support existing courses anyway.) Doing it as one of those three-day seminar type courses would be great except how do you convince more than a handful of people to attend? And nobody wants to see registration and licensing for basic computer usage (enforcing a minimal amount of training in order to obtain the license) -- even those who think programmers should be licensed generally wouldn't go that far.

      So until someone figures out how to educate the entire country (/planet!), just calling people "stupid" and shutting down the conversation isn't helping anything. Or you know, since you're apparently perfect at everything (otherwise you'd be "stupid" too) maybe you can be the one to figure out how to solve the problem!

    3. Re:You can't fix stupid by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Define "stupid." Would you be able to tell when an auto mechanic is BSing you? When your contractor does a half-assed job building your home but still charges you full price?

      Generally yes. I know enough about these things that I already have a pretty good idea what is going on with a car that I can take it to a mechanic and not get ripped. For example, does your car make a funny noise? Well you can do simple tests to try and narrow down what makes the noise change, and this gives you a good idea of what the problem might be. I just don't have the time, the tools, or the shop space to do a lot of these jobs myself, so I pay someone to actually do what I need them to do.

      Same on the house. Simple jobs I do myself, other ones I will hire someone to finish things out. In many cases I might not know exactly how a tradesman would do a particular job, so I will watch for a bit so I can learn something.

    4. Re:You can't fix stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, we support & enable "grifters" now, instead of letting them succumb to a good stoning to death like they would have in the past.

    5. Re:You can't fix stupid by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      Define "stupid"

      For 10-20 years now, news outlets (and basically everybody) have been telling people about internet scams and not to fall for them, but still there are the ones that fall for the $1,000,000 waiting for them from a relative in Dubia email. It may not be "PC" but these people are stupid.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    6. Re:You can't fix stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree! if you cannot do simple diagnostics on a car or bother to google for about 10 minutes then yes you are stupid.

      its even more obvious when now you can get OBD2 readers at most autoparts stores. Read the codes and google them..(btw that is exactly what a mechanic will do most of the time)

      if you cannot do the above then yes you are stupid.. stupid is not a lack of knowledge or an impediment in mental health, stupid is being to lazy to make an effort to try and understand.

    7. Re:You can't fix stupid by Altrag · · Score: 1

      So you take your car in to get oil change or whatever and the mechanic tells you your head gasket should be replaced. Your first response is "hold on let me just go ahead and Google that so that I can confirm with my 5 minutes of research whether your 30 years of experience is justified or if you're just trying to pull a fast one."

      Or your dentist says you need a filling.. do you go home and Google how to self-diagnose a cavity? You have the proper equipment laying around to make the self-diagnosis even if you did know how?

      Yes there are plenty of stupid people and I wouldn't disagree with that claim. The part I find disagreeable is the jump from "you did something that I would have known not to do" straight to "because you're stupid" based on a single data point that could have many possible alternate explanations.

  15. Re:Photo of Microsoft scammer by robbyb20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crap, i clicked on it.

  16. But Bill Gates is still sending me $1000, right? by mekkab · · Score: 2

    I've forwarded that e-mail hundreds of times!

    /the world will always build a bigger idiot

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  17. Re:The biggest scam of all is denying us our right by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Your (obvious troll and off topic) post falls flat because it omits one thing. "Two consenting adults".

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  18. Hello, this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a job for Lenny.

  19. Re:The biggest scam of all is denying us our right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when do politicians care about consent?

  20. My parents laugh when they get this call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My father used to run ubuntu now hes on fedora. My mother has been on a mac for the past 5 years. There is no windows in their house. When he gets the scam call about problems with his "windows" he tells them he doesn't have windows, only doors. It takes them a second to figure it out and then they hang up. Its pretty comical, and if more grandma's grandpa's had linux desktops this wouldn't be a problem. All they ever use the computer for is checking email and surfing the web anyway, if you guys haven't moved your parents off of windows by now, shame on you!

    1. Re:My parents laugh when they get this call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't written the vertical apps they need for Linux or Mac, shame on YOU?

    2. Re:My parents laugh when they get this call by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      There is no windows in their house.

      so your parents house is a giant basement???

      My father used to run ubuntu now hes on fedora.

      yup

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  21. Subtitles and playlists by tepples · · Score: 1

    Does your operating system's included video player support synchronizing a timed transcript to an audio file or a set of subtitles to a video file? And in which timed text format? And does your operating system support the concept of a playlist, where an audio or video presentation is made of several chapters each with its own URL?

    1. Re:Subtitles and playlists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All of that depends on his browser's current settings and what other software he has installed on his system.

      You sound like a typical web designer control freak.

      Does your operating system's included video player support synchronizing a timed transcript to an audio file or a set of subtitles to a video file?

      Maybe. It depends on how the video file is handled by the primary user agent. The browser (primary user agent) downloads the file or files, and hands them off to a secondary user agent (audio/video player). It's important to note that this could be any audio and/or video player, supporting some or all of the features you mention. You don't have control over that. You simply make the data available, then you calm the hell down and let people use it.

      And in which timed text format?

      A standard one. And by "standard" I mean a documented, actual, standards-compliant, honest-to-god standard. Not some fly-by-night control freak bullcrap you (or your corporate overlords) just invented but never documented for anyone else to implement. If you're the only implementer and nobody else knows how, then it's not a standard. It doesn't require ISO certification, but you can't keep it all to yourself, either.

      And does your operating system support the concept of a playlist, where an audio or video presentation is made of several chapters each with its own URL?

      Yes. It's called "a webpage full of links to files that can be clicked in sequence and that a secondary user agent will interpret as audio or video". Stop being a control freak. Or there are things like M3U. Which can be handled by just about any A/V player and can be considered a standard.

      So, yeah, it's pretty much exactly the case the GP was making. <audio> and <video> tags are sufficient for the task. Stop hitting things that aren't nails with your Javascript hammer.

    2. Re:Subtitles and playlists by tepples · · Score: 1

      All of that depends on his browser's current settings and what other software he has installed on his system.

      Provided that suitable "other software" is available for the user's preferred platform and the user has permission to install it.

      And in which timed text format?

      A standard one. And by "standard" I mean a documented, actual, standards-compliant, honest-to-god standard.

      What standard might this be? W3C's Web Video Text Tracks (WebVTT) is "not a W3C Standard nor is it on the W3C Standards Track". Timed Text Markup Language (TTML) appears to be supported only in IE; other web browsers that support HTML5 video need shims written in JavaScript.

      It's called "a webpage full of links to files that can be clicked in sequence and that a secondary user agent will interpret as audio or video".

      So as I understand it, the flow without M3U support would be as follows:

      1. The user follows a link to a chapter.
      2. The handler for this URL saves the date and time when this download began and redirects to a video "First a message from our sponsors," followed by a sponsor message, followed by "Now follow the link in your browser once more to view your presentation."
      3. The user follows the same link to a chapter.
      4. If enough time has elapsed for the user to have viewed the sponsor message associated with this chapter, the handler for this URL redirects to the chosen chapter. Otherwise, go to step 2.

      The flow with M3U support would be as follows:

      1. The user follows a link to an M3U file.
      2. The M3U file opens in a video player.
      3. The video player opens the first URL in the M3U file.
      4. The handler for this URL saves the date and time when this download began and redirects to a video "First a message from our sponsors," followed by a sponsor message.
      5. The video player opens the second URL in the M3U file.
      6. The server keeps the connection open until when the sponsor message video should have finished playing and begins to send the chosen chapter.

      But without script, how can the web site determine whether or not the user has a compatible secondary user agent installed?

    3. Re:Subtitles and playlists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, welcome to 15 years ago, lol.

    4. Re:Subtitles and playlists by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      VLC routinely synchronizes audio and video files - I suppose that it could also syncrhonize a "timed transcript" with an audio file. Better yet - why not just make a video of the transcript scrolling down the page as the audio plays? There are a whole bunch of people on Youtube who have figured out how to do that.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Subtitles and playlists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll cut to the most important part

      " Stop being a control freak."

    6. Re:Subtitles and playlists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your operating system's included video player support synchronizing a timed transcript to an audio file or a set of subtitles to a video file? And in which timed text format? And does your operating system support the concept of a playlist, where an audio or video presentation is made of several chapters each with its own URL?

      Of course it does, but that wasn't the topic. The point is that in 99.99% of cases, people are better off with a simple link to the file, not some idiotic javascript player that is inferior to what i normally use.

      But you don't care about what's best for people do you? No, I don't think you do.

      You are everything that's wrong with the modern internet. Please go back to the AOL from whence you came.

    7. Re:Subtitles and playlists by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'd love to. But the operator of a web site needs to recoup the cost of running a web site, and advertisers are unwilling to pay unless a site's operator makes a good faith effort to ensure that the entire ad gets played. Other than ads and paywalls, what's the third way to recoup costs?

    8. Re:Subtitles and playlists by tepples · · Score: 1

      True, VLC supports the LRC and SRT formats for timed text and has supported WebVTT since this commit in September 2013. So that's fine as long as you can ensure that all of your viewers have (or have permission to install) VLC.

    9. Re: Subtitles and playlists by KevReedUK · · Score: 1

      I dunno... Phoning random victims and scamming them?

      OK... So I have a somewhat warped sense of humour!

      --
      Just my $0.03 (At current exchange rates, my £0.02 is worth more than your $0.02)
  22. We need REAL caller ID by dacullen · · Score: 2

    These guys alway call with spoofed caller ID info. Why? Because its easy. I really can't believe that it not possible to create a REAL caller ID system. But the TELCO's will *itch about regulatory interference in their business. I say make them LIABLE for passing on bogus ID info and they will find a way to make caller id work. Calls from overseas? Just ID them as OVERSEAS calls. Co that sell spoofing services, well if the TELCO is liable, they wont allow spoofed ID on outbound trunks. They would rather profit from a BROKEN feature than actually create a working one.

  23. One day, one awesome day ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    one day I shall invent a tool that allows you to kill and mangle people via telephone, and then I can enjoy life again.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. what are they doing once they have access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    installing malware, searching for personal info?

  25. Re:The biggest scam of all is denying us our right by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    That (your?) post was an obvious anti-gay post, trying to make a parallel with pedophilia. I was pointing out the failing in the logic. Politicians weren't relevant to my post.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  26. They call me every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually go with my crazy Luddite character and tell them I have no computers and they need to go hide in the woods because the machines are taking over. That microsoft, google and apple are all a grand conspiracy by the machines to enslave mankind. Usually that gets them to hangup, sometimes I pretend like I'm following their instructions before launching my tirade against technology, that usually prompts them to curse at me. This usually gets the elderly, for the most part they barely know how to use a computer. These people should not be able to process payments, that would put a quick end to it.

    1. Re:They call me every week by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Last time (and only time) i loaded up a VM with a bunch of graphic images on the desktop and had them change every minute or so. kept the guy in my vm for about 15 images until he couldnt take it anymore. I told him i was a photographer

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  27. Never EVER take telephone soliciations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have received a number of these scam calls - "Your Windows system is infected!". The only problem with that is that we have no Microsoft products in our house with the exception of a shut off and retired Nokia 920 Windows phone. All of our gear runs either Linux or Mac operating systems. The last one called me back 4 times. I was so pissed off that I called the police to see if we could trace the call and file charges. Naturally, the call was from outside the USA...

    We have a simple policy in our home - we NEVER accept telephone solicitations unless we asked to be contacted. We simply state "We do not accept telephone solicitations of any sort. Please put this number on your do-not-call list and never attempt to contact us again, or we will trace the call and file a police complaint."

  28. String them along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best way to fight them is to waste their time....

    1. Re:String them along by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      Agreed. At first I just pretended to be following along, and after a while he asked if I was even at my computer. I got on Linux and followed all of their instructions. After a while he gave me to someone else and they walked me through all the steps all over again. Something with the TeamViewer exe wasn't working right.

    2. Re:String them along by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I had one of these guys call me up a couple of weeks ago and after I had messed around with him for at least 10 minutes he got all angry and said "Sir! Stop wasting my time!" before hanging up.

      I was LMAO, first because he was still referring to me as "sir" and second because I was supposedly wasting his time after he was the one that called me.

  29. Get a Refund on those Acting Classes by seepho · · Score: 1

    Because your portrayal of "helpless user" was pretty narrow.

  30. a dearth of unemployment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...sounds like a good thing. Would you prefer an abundance of unemployment?

  31. Better yet by halivar · · Score: 1

    "It looks like you're behind a router; I can't tell which computer on your internal network is the culprit. Let's hit them all just to make sure, ok? If we leave even one, the whole thing could get reinfected!"

    1. Re:Better yet by bradvoy · · Score: 1

      I was expecting him to say something along these lines, but I got the impression that he didn't have enough technical knowledge to ad lib something like this and it wasn't in his prepared script.

    2. Re:Better yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Working for PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte or KPMG?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. works in linux too by mejustme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe 3 years ago I played along with such a caller. I run Ubuntu, but didn't say anything to them about what o/s I was using. When he asked me to visit a web site and download a Windows file from a web page, I laughed inside, thinking nothing would happen. I downloaded the .exe from a throw-away Ubuntu VM I had. Unexpectedly, Ubuntu downloaded Wine, installed it, then ran the .exe file. I was both impressed and scared that Ubuntu had done this automatically to run the .exe file. This resulted in a completely empty Windows (Wine) desktop, to which they of course quickly tried to connect. I kept "accidentally" disabling their control, so they could only look. When I finally gave them access, they were very confused that it had none of the usual Windows applications and menus they were expecting to see, nor did their usual password changing and locking work. More and more people on their end of the call were talking on the phone, trying to figure out what was going on.

    After nearly an hour on the phone, I had enough and told them I was a software developer, and they hadn't scammed me. They swore at me and hung up. Immediately, I got a phone call from someone else saying he was calling to help me unlock my computer for a fee. Obviously as soon as they lock a desktop, they must trigger something in their call system so someone else calls back to earn some money.

    1. Re:works in linux too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I downloaded the .exe from a throw-away Ubuntu VM I had. Unexpectedly, Ubuntu downloaded Wine, installed it, then ran the .exe file. I was both impressed and scared that Ubuntu had done this automatically to run the .exe file.

      Cool story. Too bad it's a lie. At the very least you had to type your root password.

    2. Re:works in linux too by nichogenius · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. That's the amazing thing about linux. If you don't want it to ask for a root password, then you can tell it to shut the Hell up. http://askubuntu.com/questions...

    3. Re:works in linux too by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Why would he? Wine runs as an unprivileged user - the only reason he might have needed root access is to open one of the privileged ports.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  33. One reason for playing along by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 1

    Is to educate ourselves on the nature of the scam first hand. We can hang-up whenever we like so it's not like any commitment. First hand experience of this sort of thing is valuable and gives confidence when it's not so clear cut. Perhaps IT pros won't be clicking on attachments any time soon but the people we support do and we need to find out how far they've been scammed etc. which is a bit weird as WE are trying to do telephone support EXACTLY as the bogus supporters. To the end user what's the difference?

  34. You can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most jurisdictions only one party has to consent to a call being recorded. That party can be you.

  35. Someone needs to make a VM for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be great if we could fight back with a custom made VM purpose-built to screw with these people. Think about it... a Linux desktop modded to look superficially like Windows 8, with a goatse background, the pointer changed to a penis, and random windows popping up with scat porn.

  36. Most Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most interesting part is listen to the background chatter...

  37. If you have the time, insult their family by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Fact is it takes quite a lot of time to string one of these people along. Last time I did more or less what is on this tape, and stopped it just shy of downloading anything. I asked the guy, "What does your mother think about this?" He seemed confused, so I said, "Is your mother proud of what you are doing, trying to trick old people into hacking their little computer?" Then I yelled at him a little bit more.

    So yeah, you can do it, but as someone else said here, your time is more valuable than theirs.

     

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:If you have the time, insult their family by toonces33 · · Score: 1

      That's ultimately it - how much is your own time worth. If you could construct some sort of Siri-like thing that just acted dumb, asked inane questions, and generally ran them in circles, it could be quite funny.

      I suppose you could just tell them you need to let the dog out, set down the phone and not pick it up again until they give up.

    2. Re:If you have the time, insult their family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that and more:
      "You're bringing bad luck to your family"
      "You're bringing shame to your village"
      "How would your grandmother think of you doing this"
      "I'm going to go eat a beefburger now because of you"

      Usually after I've managed to get *them* to go visit some dodgy website (goatse, lemonparty etc) or spell out some profanity one letter at a time and then explain that this is what they are.

      I shouldn't find this so entertaining.

  38. The NSA has all the call records, yet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they can't pass the information about telephone scams on to Homeland Security?

    How can from Cardholder Services stay in business.

    It makes me thinsk that the bad guys make big contributions to Replicrats and the Democons. You don't think the Koch brothers could be behind them all, do you?

  39. Wait just one minute! by PPH · · Score: 1

    That site is trying to con me into installing Flash. What kind of low down, dirty scam is that?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Scam out of area and calling themselves from Micro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had five phone calls telling me that my computer is in trouble and that I have malware and viruses they want me to press control windows button and R. This gives them access to your computer every person in your email your bank account and credit card information. I played dumb and try to get as much information as possible I try to ask for their name and their phone number the first name I was given was SarahThe telephone number she gave me was 806884244 I told her that that was not 10 numbers for phone number but she told me that was the number so I play dumb and went along
    After them getting a supervisor that a manager because it wouldn't work what they asked me to do I hung up. They made the mistake of calling me back and this is what scared the hell out of me it said LA child care phone number 213-222-0040please be careful there are people out there that are mean and nasty and will do awful things to get into your computer and anybody any one would say they are from and say that tries to use a child service is just wrong on so many levels.
    Also want to let you know Microsoft does not call you they do not do that in anyway to tell you something is wrong with your computer or that you have viruses contact them yourself and ask I just happen to be IT and no better how can you use a child care service. And do that that is so wrong how dare they do something so awful so the next time they call, I will post the next message I play a long. How do these people get up and look at themselves in the mirror every day knowing they are ripping people off and hurting so many people he will should be ashamed of yourselves for hurting people that don't have enough money to barely get by and then to pretend that you work for a child service company. Yes I am mad probably would not of posted this if I was a bit more, calm.
    Terry

  41. Re:Photo of Microsoft scammer by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 2

    You must be new here.

  42. Freemium by tepples · · Score: 1

    Would it be acceptable to offer JavaScript streaming without charge and require a subscription for "a simple link to the file", like The Escapist does?

  43. Re:Photo of Microsoft scammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, a warning would be "link involves scat, and I don't mean the singing kind".

    What you posted was practically an enticement. I wouldn't be surprised if you're the AC who posted the link in the first place.

  44. Don't help them by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    The best thing to do to these people (assuming you are bored/have the time to mess with them) is to let them connect to a Virtualbox VM and WASTE THEIR TIME, and then not tell them that you are wasting their time, and most importantly, NOT TELL THEM THE MISTAKES THEY MADE. One time I saw a video of someone from Malwarebytes doing just this. They connected the person to a Virtualbox VM and wasted a bunch of their time, but at the end of the video they explained to the person what they did wrong and practically gave them instructions on things they could've done to make the scam more convincing. I facepalmed at that. You do not give them instructions, or tell them what they're doing wrong. You just waste as much of their time as you possibly can.

  45. Linux users can fuck right off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I told them exactly that, that i run linux exclusively, instant "fuck you, then", which is admittedly far better than the "you've recently had a car accident" people, who even after lengthy arguments, asking them to stop calling, during which they've accussed me of being "sick in the head" and in need of help, continued to call back on a semi-regular basis.

  46. Re:The biggest scam of all is denying us our right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fall flat for an even simpler thing: replying.

    Idiot.

  47. last summer by j'vai · · Score: 2

    I received the same call, but with a guy's voice, far eastern accent. he had me for a second with the "your IP address is sending out bad traffic" & they were getting warning errors on their end.. I was at work on the company's windows 7 box, but was wondering why *I* was getting the call instead of IT.. I decided to play along, I screw him up at the *superkey +r* imagining if I were working on my openbox debian machine; me: "ok, it opened my home folder, what next?" he, seeing that wasn't working, tried to navigate through the c:/ drive; him: ..slight pause .. "ok ok, close that out, I need you to click the windows icon in lower left, then computer, then c:/ drive".. me: "I don't have a windows icon, I using openbox & a home folder" him: "wait you're at home right?" me: "no I'm at work, IT should be dealing with this" phone line: ::CLICK::

  48. Play Along Knowledgeably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last time I had one I played along but gave them perfectly knowledgeable responses back. When asked to open the command terminal I told them I had done exactly that. The caller got very angry when I tried to assert that all the things he called viruses, I called file associations and that I was quite keen on keeping them.

    Even after that they didn't give up and called every week for a while. They stopped when after I answered the phone I said in a loud voice to another person in the room "Hey, want to talk to the Microsoft scammers." They haven't called back since.

  49. Do they only call land lines? by jcr · · Score: 1

    I haven't had any of these calls to date, and it's pretty rare for me to get any kind of phone spam. Since I've worked in tech support years ago, I'm curious how long I could string one of them along. "I only use it to log into my bank, I've got all the money from my accident settlement in there. Haven't noticed any trouble, are you sure I need this? "

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  50. Very Common Scam... good to be aware of by nichogenius · · Score: 1

    My parents just about fell for this exact same scam. After speaking with the scammers directly and Googling around, the process goes something like this: --Caller (usually Indian) calls from a number listed as "out of area" --Caller informs you that they are with Microsoft Tech Support --Caller informs you that they have detected your Windows computer sending out virus reports --Caller asks you to download a remote desktop tool --Caller gets access to your desktop, pulls up task manager to show you some perfectly normal, though suspicious sounding, processes --Caller then tries to sell you a $300 service and asks for credit card information. --Various reports on the internet document the caller performing malicious acts (deleting files etc) on the host computer if you are uncooperative. The sad thing is that this scam works! My parents have been contacted multiple times and they are just one of many households contacted. That kind of call volume requires a lot of man hours and that means it is generating serious revenue. Damn leeches.

  51. just ask for a new pc... by meshmaster · · Score: 1

    Every time I get this stupid scam call on my parent's phone (we are living with them temporarily) I tell the guy on the other end that I don't have a computer but would love one to be delivered overnight. I don't give out my address or anything though... just hang up usually after that.

  52. ReactOS VM by Rangataua · · Score: 1

    I've got a ReactOS VM sitting on my home machine waiting for the scammers to call me. It looks like Windows. It behaves like Windows (this makes it easy to follow their script). However every remote access application I've tried crashes with all manner of creative error messages.

  53. Easiest way to deal with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say "Hang on a moment" and put the handset on the table. They'll waste 10 minutes of their time they can't be scamming someone else before they give up.