Slashdot Mirror


Secret Service Plans New Fence, Full Scale White House Replica, But No Moat

HughPickens.com writes The NYT reports that the Secret Service is recruiting some of its best athletes to serve as pretend fence jumpers at a rural training ground outside Washington in a program to develop a new fence around the White House that will keep intruders out without looking like a prison. Secret Service officials acknowledge that they cannot make the fence foolproof; that would require an aesthetically unacceptable and politically incorrect barrier. Prison or Soviet-style design is out, and so is anything that could hurt visitors, like sharp edges or protuberances. Instead, the goal is to deter climbers or at least delay them so that officers and attack dogs have a few more seconds to apprehend them. In addition, there might be alterations to the White House grounds but no moat, as recently suggested by Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee. "When I hear moat, I think medieval times," says William Callahan, assistant director for the office of protective operation at the Secret Service.

The Times also reports that the Secret Service wants to spend $8 million to build a detailed replica of the White House in Beltsville, Maryland to aid in training officers and agents to protect the real thing. "Right now, we train on a parking lot, basically," says Joseph P. Clancy, the director of the Secret Service. "We put up a makeshift fence and walk off the distance between the fence at the White House and the actual house itself. We don't have the bushes, we don't have the fountains, we don't get a realistic look at the White House." The proposed replica would provide what Clancy describes as a "more realistic environment, conducive to scenario-based training exercises," for instructing those who must protect the president's home. It would mimic the facade of the White House residence, the East and West Wings, guard booths, and the surrounding grounds and roads. The request comes six months after an intruder scaled a wrought-iron fence around the White House and ran through an unlocked front door of the residence and into the East Room before officers tackled him.

107 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. still can't beat Kentucky by turkeydance · · Score: 1, Funny

    outside of Washington

  2. Why use secrete service agents by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why use secrete service agents when instead it could be a dual use facility for the training of the US Olympic track and field team. They excel at running and jumping so if it puts things beyond their abilities then it would be well beyond the abilities of any ordinary fence jumper.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Why use secrete service agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "secrete service?"

      Do I even want to ask what manner of substance they secrete?

    2. Re:Why use secrete service agents by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because they aren't looking for the best pure athlete to simulate an intruder. Presumably Secret Service agents (at least those that are on White House duty) would also have training in searching for evasive intruders, and therefor would have an idea how to play the role of one as well.

      Now perhaps they could train world class athletes as well as cross train them to be Secret Service agents...

    3. Re:Why use secrete service agents by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why use secrete service agents when instead it could be a dual use facility for the training of the US Olympic track and field team.

      It would make more sense for them to practice at the "real" White House, and have Obama move to the remote "fake" White House. Is there any reason the POTUS needs to be physically located in downtown DC?

    4. Re:Why use secrete service agents by thedonger · · Score: 2

      It would make more sense for them to practice at the "real" White House, and have Obama move to the remote "fake" White House. Is there any reason the POTUS needs to be physically located in downtown DC?

      Proximity to lobbyists and think tanks?

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    5. Re:Why use secrete service agents by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Why use secrete service agents when instead it could be a dual use facility for the training of the US Olympic track and field team.

      It would make more sense for them to practice at the "real" White House, and have Obama move to the remote "fake" White House. Is there any reason the POTUS needs to be physically located in downtown DC?

      Or just practice when he's not there. It's not like he's there all day every day. He goes on plenty of out of town trips and even
      if he didn't there is no reason that you couldn't still practice with him there as long as everyone was properly informed.
      Lifeguards routinely have fake drownings to keep them on their toes. Guests are used to it and it doesn't cause any alarm.

    6. Re:Why use secrete service agents by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Based on reports about their behavior, I'd guess "the enthanol that their liver couldn't handle".

    7. Re:Why use secrete service agents by TWX · · Score: 1

      $8 million would not build another fully functional White House. That's probably enough to reproduce the grounds, the fencing, a portion of the sidewalks around the grounds, and some basic exterior walls to simulate the footprint of the outside of the White House itself. It would probably take another order of magnitude to reproduce the building with an interior that even has the same layout and basic infrastructure as the real one.

      They essentially want a park on which to do training, and they want it somewhere off-limits so that neither their training exercises nor the details for the layout of the grounds can be easily inspected. Unfortunately that means money. On a bright side, if they want to suggest changes to the grounds to see if they'll be effective, having a simulator on which to test them first would mean that they can both find out if they're effective and figure out how to implement them in the shortest time possible at the real site, reducing construction time at the actual White House.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:Why use secrete service agents by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just practice when he's not there.

      Thus giving anyone passing by a free demo of what will and won't happen if they decided to give it a try.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:Why use secrete service agents by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      The 'real' White House has a lot of valuable antiques (including the building itself), a large number of regular employees, and a steady stream of guests and visiting dignitaries.
      Even a simulated terrorist attack could get messy, and they'd have the inconvenience of having to schedule around the President and staff's activities.
      A staging site makes perfect sense here.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    10. Re:Why use secrete service agents by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Athletes certainly run fast and jump high in well defined conditions but the Fosbury flop is clearly not the best way to jump over fences.
      A parkour team would probably do much better considering that obstacle clearing is their specialty.

  3. Secret? by hooiberg · · Score: 2

    Secret Service? And we are reading about what it does on Slashdot... Not so so secret, are you?

    1. Re:Secret? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think that the only thing that was ever really "secret" about it was that its agents didn't wear uniforms.

      The US Secret Service historically has carried 2 primary mandates. To protect heads of state and to protect the reputation of US currency.

      Tells you where priorities lie.

    2. Re:Secret? by TWX · · Score: 2

      Secret Service was a division of Treasury for a very long time before they were split off.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Mmmm by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "the Secret Service is recruiting some of its best athletes to serve as pretend fence jumpers"

    Why? There seem to be plenty of amateurs doing quite well in that discipline.

    Shouldn't they train to stop the real jumpers when they get down on the other side?
    That's where the deficit seems to be.

    1. Re:Mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But we are going to be paying these people to jump over fences for a living.

      After a few months of training the professionals should be able to out fence jump the amateurs.

      Also that gives me an idea for a TV show... "Professionally trained to climb over the most robust fences by the US government Rob Howard went rogue and now spends his time helping the wrongly detained escape." a little bit cop drama (did they do it?) a little bit prison break show, I little running from the law, and a touch of breaking the law to do the right thing robin hood style. After a season or two when the ratings start to drop we can have a competing mercenary fence jumper become his competition, with no regard for right or wrong just for getting the job done. He was likely trained as a fence jumper in one of those communist of socialist countries.

    2. Re:Mmmm by houghi · · Score: 1

      Or they could use Google and find out what the current world record is for pole vaulting and build a new fence each year when it is a bit higher again.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Mmmm by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      Alternately - and this seems more inline with current government policies - they could just make jumping illegal. That should solve the problem quite thoroughly, I'm sure.

    4. Re:Mmmm by camelrider · · Score: 1

      Staying awake on guard duty would seem a useful tactic.

    5. Re:Mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Expecting civil servants to be competent in their job is completely unreasonable. Instead, they are expected to constantly ask for more money, more staff, and more power.

    6. Re:Mmmm by TWX · · Score: 1

      You can also artificially increase that distance if you're willing to have something of a dry moat right at the fence itself, only about four or five feet deep. One could even plant some extremely thin plants that wouldn't help break the fall there, so that it doesn't look like a dry moat.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Mmmm by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Yes, should be recruiting linebackers. Of course the last jumper pushed past a female agent pretending to guard the door, if they are going to do affirmative action it should at least be from women's rugby or powerlifting

    8. Re:Mmmm by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      That'd work right up the point the new grounds keeper drove the lawn mower over the edge.

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  5. Maybe useful, maybe not effective? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    It seems like this could be a useful training tool, especially for more complex/dangerous threats like multiple agent terrorist attacks. However, I fail to see how this will improve an agent's ability to stop a guy from jumping a fence and making a break for it. This might be simplistic, but isn't the solution to that problem to keep your eyes open and then radio it in? You know, like every other security job in the country?

    1. Re:Maybe useful, maybe not effective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eh, a lot of people need practice and routine to drill things into their head, and get them a sense of how to respond, especially when matters get a touch more complex. That's why sports teams run plays in a live environment rather than just learn it in their head, and why actors rehearse a play rather than just memorize lines, and why firemen practice putting out some buildings, and more.

      And yes, that includes a lot of the more involved security jobs. Your local police probably has a number of training programs.

    2. Re:Maybe useful, maybe not effective? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I understand what they want. It is to train on different situations. It is much easier to do something when you have done it before.

      Because they should NOT radio it in, they should take imediate apropriate action. Otherwise it will be too late.

      That said, they could easily put fake bushes in the parkinglot. Sure it would be nice to have a copy, but nice to have is not the same as a must.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Maybe useful, maybe not effective? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I don't think you even need your eyes open. When I was at school I was given a tour of the local pharmacutical R&D company's facility. They had trouble with animal rights protesters, so the fence would alert security if it was knocked by a person and bring up the appropriate CCTV camera to that panel.

  6. Glass? by asylumx · · Score: 1

    Just curious, couldn't they make it out of bulletproof glass? Then the aesthetics would be great because it's clear and yet the glass is slippery so there's nothing to grab hold of in order to climb over.

    1. Re:Glass? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

      "Bulletproof" glass is actually some kind of plastic polymer that degrades with UV light, ie sunlight, as in the kind of light you get in the brutally hot summers in DC. They'd have to replace the entire thing every year.

    2. Re:Glass? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      > brutally hot summers in DC.

      Coming from Texas, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH,

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Glass? by interiot · · Score: 1

      There's increased costs, for maintenance (regular cleaning) and replacement (it still cracks when damaged, even if it stays in one piece).

      Glass by itself isn't nearly as strong as steel, so it would either need bollards or a steel fence to protect against vehicles. Vehicles crashing through gates can be very bad.

      Bollards may not be a good idea though, because a smaller vehicle such as a motorcycle might still be able to go between the bollards and break through the glass.

      Perhaps the lower half of the fence could be the current steel fence (to protect against large and small vehicles), and the upper half could be glass (to reduce the aesthetic impact).

  7. But without moat... by Matt.Battey · · Score: 2

    How do they expect to repel the Mongol Hoard that doesn't know how to swim?

    1. Re:But without moat... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless you're stockpiling Mongols, then it would, in fact, be Mongol Horde.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:But without moat... by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      I sense a TLC reality show spin-off in the works.
      Mongol Hoarders - so many warriors, so little space

    3. Re:But without moat... by Matt.Battey · · Score: 1

      In my defense, I was on my cell phone, in the private cell phone usage room.

  8. Call Disney's zoo design team.... by bob_grahame · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Animal Kingdom park has lots of cool visual tricks so you can't see the things keeping the animals from eating the visitors (and/or vice versa). Things like ha-has can be made almost invisible from both sides, with good landscaping.

  9. How about a minefield? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    Doesn't have such a negative visual aspect as a perfectly secure fence, doesn't involved major works such as a "medieval" moat etc? Would look like theres nothing there.

    Fairly cheap as well.

    Or turn over the outer lawns to rabid badgers.

    1. Re:How about a minefield? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have such a negative visual aspect as a perfectly secure fence, doesn't involved major works such as a "medieval" moat etc? Would look like theres nothing there.

      Fairly cheap as well.

      Or turn over the outer lawns to rabid badgers.

      Mantraps would also work. I.e. trap doors that open up with a 20ft fall (you could put a net at the bottom if you wanted to be nice.
      Basically, it would be rather simple to create an invisible moat and anyone that gets past the invisible moat should probably just
      be shot as it's then obviously not an accident.

  10. Ideas by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Transparent : tall invisible bars are aesthetically acceptable.

    Fragile : make it seem easy and simple but fragile in a way that once broken it becomes hard to climb. If you break something and hurt yourself few people will blame the inanimate object.

    Sticky: as soon as you touch it, it secretes superglue. The guards come with an innocuous solvent.

    Hidden : fill the moat with a "non-Newtonian" dirt colored fluid. Doesn't look like a moat, but people do fall inside and it's hard to move fast through it.

    1. Re:Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The day after a cute little furry animal gets trapped in the moat and dies it would be filled in followed by congressional hearings on why the secret service insists on killing cute little furry animals.

    2. Re:Ideas by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      If you break something and hurt yourself few people will blame the inanimate object.

      You obviously haven't experienced the US Justice system much. Not only do they blame inanimate objects, they blame those that make them for the stupid stuff that people do with those objects.

      There is a reason why hair curling irons have this warning: "Do no attempt to curl eyelashes with this product. Serious injury is likely" (or similar). It is because someone did it, hurt themselves, and blames the hair curling iron manufacturers for their idiocy.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  11. Another solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about locking the damn doors?

    1. Re:Another solution by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      They could either do that or spend 8 million dollars to build a full scale replica of the White House. To each his own.

  12. Secret Service Agent Clancy by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    Love the name, but then I'm approaching that demographic.

  13. Ditch the White House by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For that kind of money it would be more economical to actually build a real work residence for the president. Why stay in a 18th century mansion when you can build a modern facility with serious infrastructure. Keep the White House for tourists and perhaps as a museum or special press meetings, but let real work take place in a secure environment that is actually designed for the modern state.

    But I guess 8 million for a full-scale doll house is better for morale.

    1. Re:Ditch the White House by cavreader · · Score: 4, Informative

      The WH has plenty of very secure infrastructure but you can't see it because it is underground. Infrastructure supposedly capable of surviving a nuclear attack on Washington. All of the secure meeting rooms are located several levels down to help protect against electronic surveillance.

    2. Re:Ditch the White House by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The WH has plenty of very secure infrastructure but you can't see it because it is underground.

      And all the stuff rumored to be on the roof as well.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Ditch the White House by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ... a 18th century mansion ...

      Only the exterior is 18th century. The interior has been fully gutted and rebuilt.

      .

    4. Re:Ditch the White House by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 1

      Still way too small for the size of the US Govt.

      Seriously, a modern state needs some modern buildings.

      Plus the so-called 'curtains' in the blue room are so tacky - they are painted on the wall. Not only is it cheap, but it looks gross.

      The White House was built to try to impress the 18th century folks that we *maybe* had some class. It was cheap shit that we just sort of faked even back then. Let's build something worthy of the most powerful nation on earth.

  14. Laugh by koan · · Score: 1

    Yeah why get poked by a fence when you can get mauled by the dogs when you hit the ground.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  15. Moats are still a good idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    A moat is still a good idea. It can be an attractive feature, if done correctly, and someone entering the moat is a flag that they may be able to jump the fence.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Moats are still a good idea by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed.

      I can think of a few modern large buildings in the UK with linked duck ponds with ducks, water lillies, fountains etc. in landscaped grounds. They look attractive and it's only when you stop and really look you realise their main functionis a moden day moat.

      Indeed apart from protection, the visual amenity is worthwhile (relatively low cost to provide a place to feast your eyes at lunchtime) and they also offer the potential for a heat sink for cooling.

      Just make sure you keep a view on expenses though (see parliamentary expenses scandal a few years back - Douglas Hogg claiming moat cleaning on his family's ancestral home or Peter Viggers claiming for a duck house)

    2. Re:Moats are still a good idea by houghi · · Score: 1

      A moat has an association with middival times when people where being tortured, the rich had all the power and war was done as an excuse to enrich the few. We can not have that association.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Moats are still a good idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Water features also provide significant air quality benefits, especially if you aerate them. There's just lots of good reasons to implement them. Trees, as well; I cringe when I see posts permanently erected for vehicle control. Removable or sinking bollards, certainly. They have their purpose. But fixed ones?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Moats are still a good idea by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Exactly, we don't want to be associated with torture, that stuff has to be kept quiet. It is no longer socially acceptable to openly torture.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Moats are still a good idea by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm bewildered by "That's a medieval thing" as a reason, rather than an appreciation of its function, effectiveness and potential attractiveness.

      A moat would be far nicer than a fence and could be easily as effective.

  16. A moat is too old-fashioned. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    ..."When I hear moat, I think medieval times," says William Callahan, assistant director for the office of protective operation at the Secret Service."

    Yeah, we wouldn't want to get too old-fashioned here as we build these upgrades to fend off religious fanatics and their ideals that go back thousands of years.

    1. Re:A moat is too old-fashioned. by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      A moat can house sharks with frickin' lasers. Nothing medieval about that.

    2. Re:A moat is too old-fashioned. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Stop calling it a Moat then.

      Call it a "reflection pool" or some other term.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  17. Maryland training exams. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    Marylands mock-up white house will likely also include the current secret service qualification/training exam questions along with a few new ones developed by the pentagon to address recent lapses.

    1. At what point during the mad dash through the side door of the whitehouse by an assailant is the benny hill theme to be activated?
    Bonus: If Sir Digby Chicken Caesar is being chased through the west wing with a bust of grover cleveland, How many chesterfield cans can he fit under the lincoln bed?
    2. If skeeter and bo-jack both drink 4 shots of bourbon, but skeeter has had 3 more beers than Bo-Jack but 1 less than when he accidentally shot the cleaning lady at marthas vinyard, when is it appropriate to invoke state secrets after slamming into a security fence at on-ramp speeds?
    3. At what point should you tip a south american prostitute? (Hint: the US currency exchange rate is in your favour.)

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  18. aesthetically unacceptable / politically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the same time, ugly fences are not an issue when it comes to US embassies on foreign soil.

    A good example might be the one at 1, Liberty Square, Budapest, Hungary.

    Bonus points for the address...

  19. Replica? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ...Secret Service wants to spend $8 million to build a detailed replica of the White House in Beltsville, Maryland to aid in training officers and agents to protect the real thing....

    Which of the recent Secret Service failings to protect the White House were caused by a lack of a replica to train on? Would the agents have missed the concrete barrier on the way back from a party if they had trained on a replica of the White House? Would the White House usher have turned off the alert box if there were a replica of the White House to train on? etc., etc.

    .
    It is looking as if the Secret Service is piling on requests in this time of scrutiny.

    1. Re:Replica? by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      Read TFS again. They're trying to build a better wall, and so would need to test said wall. Hence, the replica. This isn't about why they did or didn't need it in the past, but why they need it in the future. You want to beat them up over the security breaches, and when they try to fix it, beat them up over what they need to fix it?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  20. Re:Maybe once the white house fence is complete... by houghi · · Score: 1

    You assume that _only_ non-US citizens want to kill the president of the USofA. The past attacks have proven this not to be true.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  21. Presumably by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Anyone who actually wanted to hurt anyone would fire an RPG at the house from several blocks away.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Presumably by operagost · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly. D.C.'s draconian gun control laws make that simply IMPOSSIBLE.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Presumably by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Don't RPGs have accuracy issues at longer ranges? This sounds like more of a mortar job.

    3. Re:Presumably by fnj · · Score: 1

      Mortars have pretty poor accuracy as well. As well, they are not line-of-sight, so you have to have knowledge of the exact range and a good characterization of the ballistic performance of the mortar; then you have to dial in the correct elevation.

      An RPG you just point directly at the bloody target and fire.

  22. Re:How about by Coisiche · · Score: 1

    Well, aside from the fact that about half the US electorate are going to hate whoever wins the election; there is a large number of people outside the US that wish ill on the US president irrespective of which party he* represents. Some of them might even know his name.

    * yeah, like it's ever going to be otherwise

  23. Politically Incorrect? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for some explanation of how fence can be politically incorrect. Does it discriminate against handicapped people? Do we need to build wheelchair ramps so the "differently abled" can also jump the fence?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  24. The man in the high castle by DCFC · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a loyal citizen o Her Britannic Majesty, I ind this whole thing hilarious.

    You need a castle mate.
    All this bollocks about fences "looking like a prison" is failure of imagination on a galactic scale.
    For centuries people from less happy lands have crossed our silver sea to raise the hand of war against out kings and queens but their knavish tricks have been frustrated by our castles.

    They are so aesthetically pleasing that millions of tourists flock to them, The Tower of London has no moat but would remain fast against any plausible attack. We use it to store the Crown Jewels.

    If your Mr. Obama would care to contact Her Majesty then I'm sure she would supply the plans as a gift, I have her address if you need it.

    Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Queen of Canada,Queen of Australia,Lord of Man,Overlord of Sark Defender of the Faith
    Buckingham Palace
    London
    SW1A 1AA

    --
    Dominic Connor,Quant Headhunter
    1. Re:The man in the high castle by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...The Tower of London has no moat but would remain fast against any plausible attack. We use it to store the Crown Jewels....

      Weren't the Crown Jewels moved to Fort Know, KY, USA temporarily during World War II?

    2. Re:The man in the high castle by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      They were indeed hidden, but the location has never been disclosed. Source: http://www.royal.gov.uk/Monarc...

    3. Re:The man in the high castle by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ... the location has never been disclosed...

      Perhaps not disclosed by the British. However, Ft. Knox had owned up to it in the past.

    4. Re:The man in the high castle by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:The man in the high castle by DCFC · · Score: 1

      Depends whether you think that the White House will be attacked by a major nation state ?

      The diligent historians amongst us will remember that when the White House was attacked by a nation state, it got trashed big time...

      --
      Dominic Connor,Quant Headhunter
    6. Re:The man in the high castle by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      "The man in the high castle" - was that a thinly veiled reference comparing the US to the Nazi's? Because if so, bravo sir.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    7. Re:The man in the high castle by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      https://web.archive.org/web/20...

      ...During the war the U.S. Bullion Depository continued to operate at Fort Knox, receiving more and more shipments of the country's gold reserves. The Gold Vault was also used to store and to safeguard the English crown jewels and the Magna Carta, along with the gold reserves of several of the countries of occupied Europe. ...

    8. Re:The man in the high castle by DCFC · · Score: 1

      Wasn't making that comparison, indeed Hitler had much little personal for most of his time, even when the war started. Also of course he fought for country in WWI doing a very dangerous role, got decorated. Obama never served, GW Bush's daddy got him the job of defending Florida from North Vietnam, Clinton dodged the war altogether, Reagan never saw action, etc.

      McCain did do serious military service, yet in free and fair elections the American people rejected him for President.

      I mention this because of the sheer number of films where the US President is portrayed as a cross between a Captain America and Batman., Independence day, White House Down, Olympus Has Fallen, Air Force One et al.

      Yet the reality is that US Presidents cower in corners.

      --
      Dominic Connor,Quant Headhunter
    9. Re:The man in the high castle by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Very interesting observation, but I was referring more to the whole country and the draconian fascist state it's becoming.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  25. Re:How about by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    You mean one who would please all of the people all of the time?

    Yeah... good luck with that!

  26. Re:How about by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone in the entire country who would fulfil that criteria?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  27. Perimeter detection by helsinki92 · · Score: 1

    I work at an organization that uses a perimeter detection system around its campus, while not very advanced, it does work. I would think that the white House has some of the most advanced perimeter detection systems in the world. This seems to be a problem that is trying to be resolved by means other than a simple "make sure people actually do their jobs".

    1. Re:Perimeter detection by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      Its much easier to say "there isn't enough training," than to say "our people exhibited gross incompetence."

  28. Japanese garden water feature by Squiggle · · Score: 1

    Moats can look good and can be crossable only at slower speeds:

    https://www.google.ca/search?q...

    --
    Complexity Happens
  29. Four words: by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Ring of rose bushes." In fact, such was a common element in medieval fortifications, perhaps just as much as moats.

    1. Re:Four words: by operagost · · Score: 1

      And as someone who has to deal with invasive Japanese roses on his property, those can be a formidable obstacle in numbers.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  30. Shallow depression + thorn hedge by goodmanj · · Score: 2

    No need for a moat. Just make a shallow depression on the White House side of the fence, and plant the slope back up to the White House Lawn with a low hedge of barberry, firethorn, and roses. Beautiful for picture taking, will make casual fencejumpers think twice, and slow down anyone who does. Won't stop a serious assault, but that's not what this is about.

  31. What about cars? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Will they also have their best alcoholics try to run through the fence with a car?

  32. Colombia by operagost · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'd have enough energy to catch the fence jumpers if they weren't so tuckered out by patronizing Colombian prostitutes.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  33. The Annual White House Fence Run by rvw · · Score: 2

    My proposal: the Annual White House Fence Run. Then some hide and seek, and whoever doesn't get caught gets to play President for one day.

  34. Public-private partnership by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that the film and TV industry could really use a fake White House in the DC area as well.

    So two options. First option, the Secret Service goes ahead and builds their fake White House outside of town, and then rents it out to movies and TV shows when it's not being used for drills, offsetting part of their budget.

    Second option, some enterprising DC-area landowner builds their own fake White House, and rents it out for both Secret Service drills and for movies and TV shows.

    Also worth pointing out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... -- there actually is a fake White House in the DC area already, but the grounds aren't very much like the real thing, so it's not too useful for the Secret Service.

  35. just doing what you are supposed to be doing by dwpbike · · Score: 1

    would be a quantum leap

  36. Pop up fences by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Since money is no object why not a series of pop up fences. These fences are normally hidden and underground until triggered.

    1. Re:Pop up fences by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Why not a set of increasingly difficult pop-up challenges, each more fiendish than the last?

      Then it doubles as street entertainment and a prime-time TV show!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  37. Re:Cock lube and genital electrocution? by thedonger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't they just put up a normal sized fence, but cover it in cock lube so that it's really slippery and anyone who tries to climb it will just fall off?

    To prevent people from jumping over, they should put tasers along the top, with computer-guided targeting systems that will shoot the tasers into the genitalia of anyone jumping the fence.

    If somebody does make it over, they can just beat the person in the groin with sticks.

    Sure, then the White House grounds would be inundated with masochists getting their jollies by scaling the fence; soon, as the prisons fill with them the ACLU gets involved, declaring the security practice "discriminatory," and our courts are clogged with lawsuits declaring the right to have one's testicles electrocuted is guaranteed in the Constitution. The Department of Health and Human Services will find some US code that can be interpreted loosely to agree with that assertion and circumvent Congress, forcing states to provide Testicle Electrocution centers. Due to cost concerns the states will be allowed to make electric car charging stations dual purpose ("charge your electric car...or your nuts"), but soon angry parents will protest because charging stations near schools will have to allow guys to pull out their nuts in public. The teachers' unions won't allow the government to move the charging stations because they are in bed with the "green" movement, so now regular old perverts will hang out at the stations and pretend they are electrocuting their nuts.

    In conclusion, your idea will lead to perverts showing their balls to school girls, you insensitive clod.

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  38. Really obvious solution being overlooked... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    This is not complicated, You can link Secret Service agents arm-to-arm around the White House and some nutjobs are still going to try to make a run for it.

    But post just one IRS agent at each entrance and you will not have a problem again.

    1. Re:Really obvious solution being overlooked... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      But post just one IRS agent at each entrance and you will not have a problem again.

      TSA. :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  39. Siege Warfare by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    What I want to know is how they will be defending against trebuchets.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Siege Warfare by klek · · Score: 1

      With a Boeing-designed energy force-field, of course.

  40. Ultimate Filming Location by djtremel · · Score: 1

    The simple answer is to get a studio to build this for a movie. Market it as the ultimate White House replica. Use it for training the 99% of the year that it's not being used for filming. Everyone wins. The Secret Service doesn't throw away $8 Million and gets to pretend some one there actually has a brain.

  41. Re:How about by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    RE: Assassination attempts on Presidents, do a little research and find the political persuasion of those would be assassins. I won't tell you the results, because 1/2 of /. would call me a troll for simply pointing out facts. Which should tell you about name calling as well.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  42. Prison Style by Froggels · · Score: 1

    A White House "prison look" is more than appropriate with the incarceration rate being what it is in the US.

  43. Slippery by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    You forgot Slippery.

    I know of two instances of Vaseline being used to prevent people from doing things. In once instance a home owner coated his external TV antenna to keep kids from climbing it. Also a town with a outdoor Christmas tree had kids stealing light bulbs, so they smeared those as well. In both cases, it A) Makes whatever it is you are trying to do more difficult, and B) pretty disgusting.

    For bonus points add a localized smell. For extra credit, add a trace agent, so that under UV light or whatever it is easy to detect and hard to wash off, so you can find out who has been messing with stuff...

    Also you could just electrify it... it doesn't have to be lethal, just enough to be very unpleasant if continued for any period of time. Otherwise I would go with bowmen and walls, they are good for defense.

  44. Re:Cock lube and genital electrocution? by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

    That was amazing. Thank you for protecting our future.

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  45. New fence? Meh. by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    I've got one word for ya:
    "butter".