Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Bans 100,000 Cheaters In Massive "World of Warcraft" Ban Spree

MojoKid writes: Like many MMORPGs, World of Warcraft can be a grind. To sidestep the time commitment required to continually level up a character, gather resources, improve skills, or whatever else is desired, some gamers turn to bots, software that automates the process. The only problem is, Activision Blizzard isn't so keen on this behavior and has dropped the ban hammer hard on gamers who've been using them. Activision Blizzard didn't specify exactly how many people it booted, saying only that it was a "large number of World of Warcraft accounts." However, a screenshot of a conversation between a player, Game Master, and Activision Blizzard employee suggests that over 100,000 World of Warcraft accounts were identified and booted.

204 comments

  1. Valve's turn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about fscking time. You would think they'd protect their billion dollar brand better.

  2. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that they are making a choice between short term profits and long term customer satisfaction

    Maybe this leaves a market segment open to people who want to run games as large scale hack-a-thons, but Blizzard does not seem to want to be that company

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  3. Why? by XanC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why would anybody play a game where you're required to spend time playing it just for the sake of playing it? Where you're building up the skill level of your character rather than yourself?

    1. Re:Why? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where you're building up the skill level of your character rather than yourself?

      Why do some people smoke weed rather than building up themselves? Because it's easier and they're unmotivated. *shrug*

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Why? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I know, right!
      I heard that online role playing genre is a dead end.
      I mean, Activision Blizzard is only pulling in a billion a year.

    3. Re:Why? by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      Honestly, that describes almost every hobby people have where you do not use personal job skills by extension. (Sports, Reading Fiction, Social Planning...) MMOs are social platforms people play them more to communicate, but the platform is filled with lots of short term activities with long term rewards. That is to say the platforms are designed with carrots on sticks but you don't realize for a long time when your playing. Initially you wan to learn the lore, maybe gain skill at the platform and play with friends, but your friends are leveling up so playing with them is a moving target. Once your max level then you have gear score to keep up with to keep running new content. When you add collecting achievement systems and various other built in bottle necks you slowly realize your chizzling away at a very thick wall trying to tunnel out.

      I personally can not believe blizzard did this. Wow isn't free to play thats 14.99 x 100k or 1.4 Million a month that is a lot of beer for developers. Something had to happen to really make them believe they had both good detection system that wouldn't have to many type I errors and additionally, removing the income would some how stem the tide of its legitimate subscription loss. I'm honestly surprised they didn't try to instead tax the accounts in some way via both in game and real world currencies.

      --
      Momento Mori
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To piss off pompus jerks like you.

    5. Re:Why? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Honestly, that describes almost every hobby people have where you do not use personal job skills by extension. (Sports, Reading Fiction, Social Planning...)

      Sports improve your mental and physical health while making you more attractive to potential mates. Sinking hours of your life into WoW does none of those things. It may be a decent stress outlet, in the short term, but so is Grand Theft Auto and that doesn't require a recurring monthly fee.....

      I personally can not believe blizzard did this. Wow isn't free to play thats 14.99 x 100k or 1.4 Million a month that is a lot of beer for developers.

      They probably figure that the number of players that get pissed off at the cheating is greater than the number of those that cheat.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Why? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      Letting cheaters continue to cheat if they decide to pay a fee would piss off the legit players way more than just deleting the accounts. Not that the cheaters would be cool with having to pay extra either.

    7. Re:Why? by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 2

      Most people who are in to sports don't actually play them. They watch other people play them. At which point your just learning how to commentate on a game and I doubt the fact that other people are exerting themselves really makes it better then then playing a video game.

      --
      Momento Mori
    8. Re:Why? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a time-sink. There's a market for it, and Blizzard (and others) merely capitalize on this. It's really not up to anyone to question what someone else chooses to do with their time. Would you rather he be getting drunk every night at a bar and then driving home? Or hitting on your wife? People need their little things, it's what makes them feel that their life belongs to them.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Why? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      People like different parts of the game. Who are you to judge?

    10. Re:Why? by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sports improve your mental and physical health

      [citation needed] I can give you plenty of examples where sports have outright killed and injured people. There's no case to be made for sedentarism but there is also mounting evidence against excessive exercise too. As usual the best path is moderation.

      while making you more attractive to potential mates.

      Yes, because if there is anything the world needs, it's MORE children. Besides, look around you. By your argument only jocks get to breed. I'd say you're mistaken.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do some people smoke weed rather than building up themselves?

      There are plenty of warnings and laws about weed, but do they have a statutory warning stating the time spent on one such MMORG may be equivalent to time spent on a full time college education -- thousands of hours? If not, they should be required to do so, by law, to prevent gamers from wasting their lives away performing boring, repetitive actions, so they get some e-resource, which in turn is used to actually play the game.

    12. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anyone play any game?
      Because it's fun dumbass.

    13. Re:Why? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You know, why do people go to movies where the only thing they do is watch a movie? Or other things that count as entertainment? Sure, the botters are doing it very, very wrong, because if playing the game does not entertain you, then you should simply stop, but many people are stupid.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Why? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      It's really not up to anyone to question what someone else chooses to do with their time. Would you rather he be getting drunk every night at a bar and then driving home? Or hitting on your wife?

      No, I'd rather be hitting on other people's wives.

    15. Re:Why? by xvan · · Score: 1

      Besides, look around you. By your argument only jocks get to breed. I'd say you're mistaken.

      You must be tired of hitting that strawman.

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do some people smoke weed rather than building up themselves? Because it's easier and they're unmotivated.

      Have you ever seen a stoner without a bowl? You wouldn't believe the engineering talent hidden under the dreadlocks and the rasta shirt made from 100% all-organic hemp. Reefer madness, I tell you!

    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really not up to anyone to question what someone else chooses to do with their time. Would you rather he be getting drunk every night at a bar and then driving home? Or hitting on your wife?

      No, I'd rather be hitting on other people's wives.

      More the point, banging them and getting them pregnant. Bonus points if it's mixed race so when the baby is born she can't claim it was the husband's.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a time-sink. There's a market for it, and Blizzard (and others) merely capitalize on this. It's really not up to anyone to question what someone else chooses to do with their time. Would you rather he be getting drunk every night at a bar and then driving home? Or hitting on your wife? People need their little things, it's what makes them feel that their life belongs to them.

      "Nobody on their deathbed has ever said 'I wish I had spent more time raiding in WoW'". -- Rabbi Harold Kushner, if he were 60 years younger

    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being pathetic requires dedication to mediocrity you'd never understand. Massive WoW ban and nothing of value was lost.

  4. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bots are the reason I'll never pay or play a mmorpg anymore.

  5. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6 months is plenty of time for the hardcore players to get over the addiction. this is a good moment for so many disillusioned pvpers

  6. Yesterday's news. by zephvark · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If Slashdot is going to be relevant, it might start by posting news that is, you know, actually new. This story hit everywhere else days ago.

    I still play WoW when I'm particularly bored. It's a dead-easy game these days, and I see no reason anyone would actually use bots. Blizz has been very slow at policing but, you can go into cities now without getting trolled by half a dozen "buy gold here" sites, any more, which is progress. To be sure, the cities tend to be empty of everyone, not just the gold-sellers.

    1. Re:Yesterday's news. by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must be new here. /. has been like this for nearly 8-9 years.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Yesterday's news. by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      *looks at userids*

      Yeah. He's new here. /pre-emptive UID-off.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Yesterday's news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss "New Here". Slashdot isn't the same without him.

    4. Re:Yesterday's news. by elvesrus · · Score: 2

      Am I doing it right?

    5. Re:Yesterday's news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MojoKid is just a mouthpiece for that website. Which is funny because that site is *always* behind on reporting, and has really crappy content. It has to be alive purely from slashdot traffic.

    6. Re:Yesterday's news. by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Yes

    7. Re:Yesterday's news. by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      I'd rather click this stale news than the fresh fembait elsewhere on the front page.

    8. Re:Yesterday's news. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      What server has empty Stormwind or Org? NONE of them.

      WoW is, despite my own personal drop being taken out of the bucket, at 7-10 megasubs. You could fit almost all the lesser MMOs inside there and still have room.

      These are pvp botters that shit up the random queue battlegrounds while their owners are asleep. I don't play right now, but I'm very glad they got the boot. Those guys are awful.

    9. Re:Yesterday's news. by Smurf · · Score: 1

      More or less.

    10. Re:Yesterday's news. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Breakin' the law, braikin' the law!

  7. the next one banned.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean fired, will be that gm and employee that gave out the, no-doubt confidential, details.

  8. cry more, newb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  9. how old is WoW? by zerodl · · Score: 2

    easiest way for getting rid of all cheaters and whatever on WoW is to close everyone's accounts and discontinue the game.

    --
    - -= Napalm means serious BBQ =-
    1. Re:how old is WoW? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      November 2004 is when the open beta started I believe, and the "final" version (not including all the subsequent updates) was a month later.

    2. Re:how old is WoW? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      That is also the easiest way for them to stop making money.

  10. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you kidding? These same people will be back again, which means they have to buy all new copies of the game to get a fresh set of keys which is even more revenue for Blizzard. I imagine that a lot of them are accounts to farm and sell gold or other items so it's not as though they're just going to close shop and go elsewhere when there's still a demand for their services. One could argue that there's even more money to be had right now if the number of sellers has seriously decreased so there's a lot of incentive for these people to get back in the game.

  11. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Maven0 · · Score: 1

    I have been clean for 4-5 years and I still miss the arenas in WOW. It is not something that ever goes away....

  12. What is worse? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Not playing a computer game, or watching some other people do things on reality TV?

    The thought process that goes on in some people's heads must be truly baffling.

    1. Re:What is worse? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      The truth is none of it makes any difference at all. In the long run, we are all dead.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:What is worse? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh no doubt. The question is what is the value of life? Personally I'm just an active and excitable energy machine. I have problems with doing nothing (though I like the occasional day off). I even do the same on my holidays where I prefer to go hiking through some foreign country, climb some mountain, or go an experience something new and unique.

      Some people like to sit on a cruise ship for a week at a time trying to maximise their chances of skin cancer. Others including my girlfriend's parents are happy in front of the TV watching the world go by.

      I wasn't being derogatory or even judgmental. I'm just fascinated by the human mind's ability to find satisfaction (I assume) from something that I consider some form of personal hell.

    3. Re:What is worse? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Different people have different brains - and it's also influenced by the type of work they do.
      I work long hours very often, much of my free time is spent on DIY projects, sometimes electronic, sometimes around the house - occasionally just spending a day watching movies with my daughter is bloody nice - because it's so rare that I have the opportunity to not be chasing a goal.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    4. Re:What is worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're already judging them by being so dismissive of their hobbies.

  13. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe things are different on WOW but CS:GO whenever there's a ban-wave that just means cheaters buy a new account.

  14. Good for them! by blogagog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good for the players who got booted, I mean. It's easy to waste large portions of your life playing that type of game. Think of the productivity gain they will experience now that they are not playing a grinding game.

    1. Re:Good for them! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Every game is grinding. Grinding the combo in Street Fighter to get the win. Or the people grinding Sims. Or just about any game.

    2. Re:Good for them! by Nonesuch · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the "tedious, repetitive, and unenjoyable" factors in most definitions of "grinding". Not every game is grinding, not every game makes you repeat a boring task just to gain enough in-game currency/status/whuffie to proceed to something interesting.

    3. Re:Good for them! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you want to beat the boss in Street Fighter, you have to "grind" the lower fights to get to the boss fight. Much like if you want to fight the raid bosses in WoW, you must "grind" the gear to do so.

    4. Re:Good for them! by I4ko · · Score: 2

      you miss the point. they weren't playing the game in the first place. their bots were.

    5. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Practice is the definition of tedious and repetitive. Most activities require tons of repetition to become competitive at. Enjoyable is in the eye of the beholder. I know a few guys who get kicks out of building ships in bottles. I personally make electronics and between the two groups neither of us understand the other ones hobbies.

    6. Re:Good for them! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      A well-designed game makes the grinding feel progressive the natural. Usually this means giving the player always a series of goals to strive towards in different time frames: Your long term goal might be to defeat the UberMegaDragon boss, but right now your objective is to clear this level and collect enough kobold stomachs to trade in for some leather underwear of fire resistance.

      In a badly designed game, the immediate goal is too far away and obviously artificial: You need to collect a thousand gems, but only 1% of the monsters drop them and the gems serve no purpose except to create a time barrier - and it's especially annoying if you know you can buy them on the game website for real money.

    7. Re:Good for them! by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      EVE Online minimizes grinding. Irrespective of one's inclinations, it's not hard to hook up with like-minded players to contribute to some shared purpose. Highly skilled mining groups will take on a hauler to skill up and take a cut to become a highly skilled miner. Competent pvp groups will take on a relatively young player with limited assets and share access to resources. The social aspect is quite profound, actually.

    8. Re:Good for them! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yup, less grinding, but real-time based training that leaves new players unable to "catch up" no matter how hard they try, or how much time they can spend playing.

    9. Re:Good for them! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      'Catch up' only matters if you ever look at the 'leaderboards.'

      WoW is a virtual world and you can play it as a 'regular grunt' and just have fun how you wish. Sometimes just leveling up skinning in Elwynn Forest is a fun escape for a few hours or days.

      As in real life, you don't have to be part of the core of the vanguard unless that's your thing. The only way to lose at WoW is to accept the notion that it is possible to win at WoW.

    10. Re:Good for them! by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Botters mostly were botting on alt accounts.

    11. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A common falsehood. EVE's skill system is very broad but shallow. You can be a top-notch frigate pilot (which are still needed in all fleets) in a matter of weeks and a top-notch pilot of any sub-capital ship class in only a couple months. It's simply a matter of figuring out what you want to do and then training for that, rather than trying to train for everything.

    12. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it reflects reality then?

    13. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the other... how much is 100000 as per cent of 7 000 000 000 anthropoid population? who do NOT GIVE A DAMN about videogames and actually BELIEVE it is a bunch of sinning wackos who should be better put to sleep? Blizzard is going crazy, right? If you cheat not for money (real life) in a game, the game is too hard, boring or is no longer a game but a job... Gospel. Spread.

  15. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bots like TinTin++ were the only reason I played old-school MMORPGs AKA MUDs. Programming your character to be successful is a game in itself.

  16. Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When people are into something and when they are into that something _deep_ it is very difficult for them to plug themselves out of that sinkhole

    No matter if it's WOW or weed or even slashdot ... a bad habit is a bad habit

    1. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Define "bad" please? Do come up with the one definition that we can all agree on. Or how about you butt out of people's lives? What difference will your opinion make in 5000 years? If people want to waste their time then more power to them. It's their time to waste, after all. Life is more than slaving away to make someone else rich or staring at a sunset or a flower. What we choose to do (or not do) with our time is what defines us as individuals.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Time you enjoyed wasting is not wasted.

    3. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But without weed I'll go blinder.

    4. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Define "bad" please? Do come up with the one definition that we can all agree on. Or how about you butt out of people's lives? What difference will your opinion make in 5000 years? If people want to waste their time then more power to them. It's their time to waste, after all. Life is more than slaving away to make someone else rich or staring at a sunset or a flower. What we choose to do (or not do) with our time is what defines us as individuals.

      Bad = violates Terms of Service. If you find the terms overly onerous, then don't play. Yes... if people want to waste their time more power to them... but when one set is restricted by following the rules, and a subset is wasting it by "cheating," well... it's different levels of play. Blizz is doing the right thing by trying to maintain a level field. Hard for you to "butt out of people's lives" yourself when your botting is affecting them every minute that bot is active.

    5. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That depends on what your actual goals are.

      If you said, "I want to play WoW and have recreation time, and fuck everything else." then that could be true.

      On the other hand, if you had goals for yourself that were impaired by the time or money spent on the game, and now you're wondering why you can't achieve those same goals, then you wasted your time.

      You can play WoW in moderation and be fine. No question about it. And I am given to understand, it is much easier to be casual these days to boot.

      However, if you look up many disorders, pathological behavior consists of actions done to such an extent or in such a manner as to interfere with the ability of someone to function normally in life, such as making a living, or even eating and sleeping properly. You certainly can play WoW too much, and you certainly can spend too much money on it, via paying for gold outside of the game.

      If you're not measuring up to your own yardstick, you're wasting time, and not because someone else told you its wrong, but because you're objectively hurting yourself or preventing yourself from achieving your goals.

      I used to be a guild and raid leader on endgame content. I remember more than one teen or college age student that was having problems and spent far too much time playing the game. Of course, I doubt the problem was solely the game, but they certainly used the time to do that, rather than addressing issues that they had.

      As you'd expect, I used to play quite a bit myself, but eventually I realized that I simply didn't have enough time to play the game and still do what I wanted to do. It was time to quit. And looking back, I remember having a lot of fun. So, I don't regret it, but I also don't regret putting it down either.

    6. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Bad
      Adjective
      1) Wasting time posting about video game issues on Slashdot.
      2) of poor quality; inferior or defective.
      3) not such as to be hoped for or desired; unpleasant or unwelcome.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      "You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight, and since you won't, if you're not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then, clearly, we can not use the organizations of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us and it can't be of very much use to yourself."

      -- George Bernard Shaw, communist

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bad" as in it was ruining pvp. Queue times for random battlegrounds went up 20 minutes after this ban wave.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHeSHT2ZDnU

      It's equally as bad in arena where kick bots and such tend to dominate.

      I personally don't have a problem with botting outside of pvp.

    9. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you said, "I want to play WoW and have recreation time, and fuck everything else." then that could be true.

      On the other hand, if you had goals for yourself that were impaired by the time or money spent on the game, and now you're wondering why you can't achieve those same goals, then you wasted your time.

      If I set goals for myself, to reach a certain point in a game, but then the weather was too nice, and I ended up doing something outside instead, did I waste my time?

      Or is that only when the "waste of time" is a game?

    10. Re: Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is like beauty. It's only valuable to those who value it. If someone does something it is up to them to decide how to proceed to think about it. Not some sort of existential crisis we need to sort out here or anywhere. People should decide for themselves.

    11. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      As you'd expect, I used to play quite a bit myself, but eventually I realized that I simply didn't have enough time to play the game and still do what I wanted to do. It was time to quit. And looking back, I remember having a lot of fun. So, I don't regret it, but I also don't regret putting it down either.

      Curse you and your well balanced attitude. I was looking forward to some serious self-righteous smugness and you've ruined my day.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, most people are failures. If you ask people to objectively list the things they want in life and what it would take to make them happy, you would conclude that playing some silly video game on a daily basis [among other stupid behaviors] is actively hurting their forestalling their personal goals and lowering their happiness. It doesn't take a rocket scientist, although I did become one when I decided my video game hobby should die with my teens, or at least shrink to about 1% of my annual free time.

    13. Re:Why do people wasting time on ... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I'd hope not, because as a raid leader I used to most definitely set goals in-game. And I'm glad I achieved them.

      There is a certain bias towards going outside and all, and I do suggest it, but it all comes down with what you want to do with your life. If you want to have been #1 to beat all end game content on your server and that is your goal, go for it.

      There will be people who judge you for doing that, but then, there are people who judge others for having shitloads of money, and you usually wouldn't consider people who have shitloads of money to be failures.

      Could going outside be a waste of time? Yes it could. If your goal was to kill that one boss, and you prepared and did the grinding for all the shit so you could beat it, and you set up the raid and everything. And then, you decided to take a walk and blow your opportunity....

      And then you still kicked yourself for not getting that boss done and you went through all of the same stuff again to get it.

      The operative phrase being "kicked yourself". If you did all that and didn't care? Then no time was wasted. You did what you wanted to do. You determined it was more important for you to take a walk and be outside. Good for you.

      Oh, and you're off raid status. Because you just wasted *my* time, asshole. :)

    14. Re: Why do people wasting time on ... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but I think that some people become confused with how they ended up in a place where they didn't want to be, and they wonder how they got there.

      That's sometimes due to short term thinking when some long term planning would have shown them exactly where they were going.

      Time is probably the most valuable resource available. You don't waste it if you use it in the manner that makes you happy, but you can totally use it in a way that makes you less happy in the long run. Sometimes, you have no choice because life just hits you with an external problem you had no control over. Other times, though, you were almost fully in charge of what happened to you and you squandered your opportunity.

  17. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is the reason why I never played any online games with blizzard.

    As an adult, I can't spend the time required to see everything. I have to actually work and sleep.

    I agree with them locking out people who cheat while playing online players. I disagree venomously with them locking out non online players for using all codes and hacks to play. They bought the game - if they want to be invulnerable during all phases of the game - then it should be allowed in single play.

    It's unfortunate that the major game companies started focusing on metrics and statistics. If they just focused on making good games that were free from bowing to the company their profits would increase.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  18. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That might lead a jaded person to believe that they are simply pumping revenue

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  19. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Less revenue, stronger brand. No one likes a cheater. There is such a thing as a bad customer and you want to get rid of them as quickly as possible.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  20. Same reason folks post here by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Abnegation.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. False positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of those ~100,000 were false positives?

  22. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Drakonblayde · · Score: 2

    Depends. If the botters have switched over to buying WoW Tokens for their game time, then Blizzard doesn't lose a dime in revenue

  23. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It appears to be a six month ban, not permanent. Also, although it's hard to be certain, part of the motivation may have been to combat farming of honor points in PvP, which apparently has been rampant. There are cheat programs designed to help players do just that in PvP, so it could be that Blizzard found a reliable way to detect those programs running, and laid down the ban-hammer on everyone caught using it.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  24. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's a lot of revenue per month Blizzard has chosen not to receive.

    Well, there are two points to consider about this:

    1) The ban was not permanent, but was only six months. This is a departure from their previous botting bans and will put expiration near the end of the year, which lines up with a potential patch / expansion release.

    2) As others have mentioned, getting banned does not prevent you from creating a new account and buying the game again. That's an instant ~$70 for Blizzard, equivalent to a player subscribing for about 4.5 months.

    3) Botting had gotten very bad in some places. A lot of customers were complaining about them turning a blind eye to it and they really needed to do something.

    Finally, the primary botting software that was targeted was HonorBuddy which is mostly used for player-vs-player activities. Given how much people have complained about the current state of PvP it's not surprising they went after it in an attempt to improve things. As a bonus, the developer of HonorBuddy has said he will be discontinuing development of the software due to the ban wave.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  25. Automation and outsourcing by sinij · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dear Blizzard,

    If large number of people want to automate or outsource your game experience, then what you have is not a fun game but a chore.

    1. Re:Automation and outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they intentionally want you to waste your time on chores and pay them a monthly subscription fee for it as well.

    2. Re:Automation and outsourcing by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People cheat at every game, because there are always people who want more reward for less effort. WoW was actually a lot less grind-y than other MMOs when it came out, and it's driven the competition to be more friendly to casual players. It's been some time since I played, but from what I hear they're still making efforts to make things easier for casual players, and if you're not obsessed with minmaxing and getting rare stuff you could certainly explore and play for years without ever grinding content. With upwards of 10,000 quests and continents bigger than many games' worlds, it absolutely puts the 'massive' in MMO.

      If you *are* grinding, I'm sorry, but Blizzard isn't forcing you to aim for piles of gold, rare mounts, or heroic gear sets. *You* want to be a top tier player with better stuff than everyone else, but then you complain about having to work harder than other players to get it. It is hard because you want it to be hard, it is a chore to keep the 'riff-raff' out, so you can show off what a special snowflake you are. If the stuff was easy to get...you'd want other stuff.

      Now I won't argue that Blizzard is guilty of exploiting players' OCD; there's always something you really want tantalizingly within reach. It's very much a 'one more quest...one more battle...one more level' addictive sort of experience. It's well balanced, in that lots of things seem to be *just* worth the effort to aquire them, and once you do, there's more...and more...and more. Addictiveness is of course not a bad quality in entertainment, like a novel you can't put down, but if you can't keep in control and balance it with your life, or have to resort to exploits that make the game worse for everyone, then it's simply not for you. Sorry!

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Automation and outsourcing by drnb · · Score: 2

      Dear Blizzard, If large number of people want to automate or outsource your game experience, then what you have is not a fun game but a chore.

      Thank goodness that you are here to straighten out the developers of a game that after nearly ten years consistently has over 7 million subscription paying players. :-)

    4. Re:Automation and outsourcing by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Answer me one thing. If you want to be a simple explorer in WoW (and engage in casual quest unintentionally), you can do this without having to spend many weeks "grinding" to have the minimum of the minimum to be able to go around exploring without getting killed in seconds? And you can avoid (hopefully, ignore) the retarded brats who infest every MMO? I usually ignore MMOs for not have as much free time as they require and not find any fun in grinding.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    5. Re:Automation and outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, if you like exploring, you can mainly do questing to level and explore an area at the same time all while remaining level appropriate. Certainly some of the quests are more "grindy" (i.e. go gather 10 pieces of bacon by killing some pigs wandering around the area that only drop 1/3 of the time) than others.

      If you want to play casually, WoW also gives a bonus for "rested" experience. So if the goal is quickest to max level you'll do more game play time grinding than if you play a couple hours a week on a character.

    6. Re:Automation and outsourcing by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      You can definitely do this (I have, back when it was a lot harder) but I'd suggest picking a PvE server and a stealthy class like Rogue or Druid if you plan to explore areas significantly beyond your character's level. Stay out of enemy cities and give mobs with skull icons a wide berth and you can explore a lot of the world with a low level character. As beautiful as the zones are, though, I'm not sure you'll keep busy for more than a week or three *just* exploring.

      On the other hand, there's really no grind to speak of until you approach/reach the level cap. Pick up a questline and follow it, run some dungeons (there's so many at low levels you don't need to do the same one twice) and you'll level up extremely fast and with very little boredom. If you're a casual player, the rest system will make your leveling go even faster. There's even a class they added recently, the 'Monk', which gets an big boost to leveling, and their refer-a-friend program bonus makes leveling just ridiculous. And if level capping faster than most single player games wasn't enough, they've started offering a huge boost when you buy the current expansion, so you can start a character at close to the maximum level, ready for almost anything in the game.

      Of course things get dull again not long after you hit the level cap, so you might also consider rotating MMOs; there are tons of them these days; play one till you get bored or hit the "grind starts here" level cap, then switch to another; when you get back round to the first it should have new content to keep the grind away a while longer.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    7. Re:Automation and outsourcing by jon3k · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't play WoW or know anything about the bot, what it did, or how it was used. You're assuming people used it to automate "boring, repetitive" parts of the game. This is true for about 2% of it's use. Most people used it for high end raiding (combat routines), battlegrounds and arena PvP. They used it because it played the game better than them. It did what most people consider the fun part for them.

    8. Re:Automation and outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer me one thing. If you want to be a simple explorer in WoW (and engage in casual quest unintentionally), you can do this without having to spend many weeks "grinding" to have the minimum of the minimum to be able to go around exploring without getting killed in seconds? And you can avoid (hopefully, ignore) the retarded brats who infest every MMO? I usually ignore MMOs for not have as much free time as they require and not find any fun in grinding.

      As long as you play on a non-PvP server, you won't get killed in seconds.You can't engage in any quest unintentionally, you have to explicitly accept quests, usually from an NPC.

      You can actually play a huge amount of content as if it were a solo RPG.

    9. Re:Automation and outsourcing by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The game is setup for a very gradual progression if you just want to quest and explore the world. My wife plays the game just for questing, she hates raiding. The allure of the game for her is the expansive world and having a place to escape to for an hour or two. She never got into the playing for hours at a time and raiding all weekend style of game play. To me, it seems like a waste of time to level characters and never raid, but it keeps her entertained. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

  26. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more than that, and in fact in the long term this is more revenue. Games with excessive cheaters and bots end up turning actual paying customers away from it eventually as they find they're getting little to no enjoyment out of it anymore.

    As you say, there's such a thing as a bad customer, and in this case they drive good customers away.

  27. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally I'd agree with you, but if you look at the kind of things that these bots do, it turns out that the bots are not a symptom of bad players, but of a bad game. Repetitive skill-less tasks that take forever and are required to get to the promised exciting parts of the game. No wonder that people want to bypass that. And this doesn't hurt other players at all, this is just the grind before you can even think about what competition means in a game like that. Who cares how long another player has been grinding?
    Well, Blizzard does. Because for Blizzard the grind is simply an extension of the time needed to play through, which is an extension of the time the player pays for the subscription, which in turn may mean that the player still subscribes when the next expansion is finally ready, which increases the chance that the player stays p(l)aying.
    But don't think this is about cheating. It isn't.

  28. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, if they have "players" who have a financial interest in breaking the rules, I don't see a problem with a tax on them.

    I remember playing, and honestly, when it was fun, it was pretty fun. When it got to be a real grind, I quit, I didn't pay someone else even more money to keep playing a game that I didn't actually want to actually play any more. And I do suspect gold dealers do affect the game balance decisions somewhat, which means they are actually are affecting the people who don't want to pay.

    Of course, there are people out there who will pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars to pimp out a character in WoW or some of those terrible pay to win games, so there's no way that aspect of the economy is going away, unfortunately.

  29. Activision Blizzard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Activision Blizzard likes it when Activision Blizzard talks about Activision Blizzard.

    Activision Blizzard!

  30. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowhere has it been mentioned that any game company is locking out people from using singleplayer cheats, not to mention that TFA is talking about World of Warcraft, an entirely online-multiplayer experience.

    What are you talking about

  31. so what by kuzb · · Score: 1

    By the time they get their asses in gear to ban botters, the damage is already done. It takes months - sometimes years for Blizzard to actually take action. Even when the person botting is obvious and blatant.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  32. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exactly. Not to mention they were recently selling max level characters for something or other. So it's ok if Blizztard sells you cheats, but not so if a Chinese entrepreneur does the same thing...? Right. At least EVE Online is honest in its own corruption.

    100K is a good start - only 7 million to go. Then other mmorpgs might come out from under the shadow of the worst mmo to ever excrete itself onto a finite market.
    To think, this drek keeps on going & going, whereas innovative, quality mmos like CoX go under. At least there's the likes of GW2 - B2P - buy once, play forever.

  33. What time commitment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've played WoW a bit, and I estimate that the amount of time and effort required to get a lvl 100 character with "epic" gear today, is perhaps 1/5 of what it used to take to achieve the equivalent lvl 60 back in the day.

    Blizzard dumbed down, simplified, and accelerated the game, in the shear fear of losing a subscription somewhere because some kid quit when he couldn't get everything instantly, and people are still lazy enough to cheat their way to 100.

    1. Re:What time commitment by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      I ask you if is necessary to have high level to get out exploring the game without being killed in seconds. If your answer is yes, then there is the problem.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:What time commitment by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Play on a PvE server and you cannot be killed by another player unless you choose to engage in PvP. There are dozens of them.

  34. Why ban? by Weirsbaski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of banning them, give people a settable-but-not-clearable checkbox:
    - "I won't cheat", if you're caught then you're subject to a ban
    - "I might/will cheat", fine, but you can't run multiplayer with others who won't

    Heck, go one step simpler- no checkbox, but if you're caught cheating you can only go multiplayer with others who were caught. But the flag clears itself after 'X' amount of "time served".

    --

    I am not a sig.
    1. Re:Why ban? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Your last suggestion makes a lot of sense. Then the botters can brag about besting other botters. Of course, a lot of them are in it explicitly to harsh someone else's game. But, screw them.

    2. Re:Why ban? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Send suspected botters a captcha. If they don't get it, disable their weapons, set them PvP enabled, and broadcast the location of some 'known criminals' for players to come after.

    3. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send suspected botters a captcha. If they don't get it, disable their weapons, set them PvP enabled, and broadcast the location of some 'known criminals' for players to come after.

      Wait, if they don't get it?

      So, if they are a real person mistakenly suspected of botting, and can't figure out what a terrible mishmash of pixels is supposed to be, you want to punish them, but if they have a program to decipher captchas, they don't get punished?

      Captchas nowadays are unreadable to most humans.

    4. Re:Why ban? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the system Capcom created for people who disconnect when they are losing in PvP. Unfortunately that system didn't work well as people with crappy internet connections were penalised.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World of Warcraft is a multiplayer-only game.

    6. Re:Why ban? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      It would have to be a good captcha. I coded a vision to text function myself for another game i was botting on, it's actually not hard to bypass. It did piss people off when they reported me and I passed, sometimes when I came back i saw upwards of 10 successful passes on my log.

    7. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only someone who has absolutely no clue of how an MMO or WoW in general works would make such an asinine suggestion.

    8. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why buy and play a game just to cheat?

      I guess that's the fundamental question I find most perplexing. Regardless of how cheating screws up the game, why do it in the first place? To me it's like buying a puzzle that's already solved. What's the point? Why not just buy the picture it was based on?

    9. Re:Why ban? by neminem · · Score: 1

      That already totally exists, in the form of private servers. Private servers are full of people who might/will cheat, and you are probably not going to get banned for cheating. (They're also generally buggy as frack, but still.)

    10. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Slashdot's captcha. I get the same 12-15 words over and over. Not hard to code around that one, if one wanted too.

    11. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anybody cheating at the game bother to now abide by these stupid checkboxes?

    12. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send suspected botters a captcha. If they don't get it, disable their weapons, set them PvP enabled, and broadcast the location of some 'known criminals' for players to come after.

      Wait, if they don't get it?

      So, if they are a real person mistakenly suspected of botting, and can't figure out what a terrible mishmash of pixels is supposed to be, you want to punish them, but if they have a program to decipher captchas, they don't get punished?

      Captchas nowadays are unreadable to most humans.

      Cool! A random element that makes WoW more like real life, e.g. that guy carrying a BB gun that the police shot in the Wal-Mart.

    13. Re:Why ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of banning them, give people a settable-but-not-clearable checkbox:

      - "I won't cheat", if you're caught then you're subject to a ban

      - "I might/will cheat", fine, but you can't run multiplayer with others who won't

      Heck, go one step simpler- no checkbox, but if you're caught cheating you can only go multiplayer with others who were caught. But the flag clears itself after 'X' amount of "time served".

      Option 1 is what already exists, so no point going into that. Option 2 sounds ok from a user standpoint, but then Blizzard has to spin up more servers for the "cheaters only" population - most of whom won't check that box anyway. I mean, half the point of cheating is to trounce people who can no longer compete against you and can't prove you did anything wrong.

      And the final option has a lot of very bad long term implications. If, instead of banning, all that happens to a cheating account is that they go into a temporary "time out" area where they can still play, you'd be incentivising cheats that are harder to find. Instead of cheaters getting their account banned and having to level up a new one from scratch if they want to cheat again, they can just continually refine their cheats on the same account. If they ever get to the point where they find themselves back with the "normal" population after having run their improved cheat, they know they have beaten the detection system. Result? Cheating becomes more rampant and even harder to prove.

  35. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    Bots like TinTin++ were the only reason I played old-school MMORPGs AKA MUDs. Programming your character to be successful is a game in itself.

    My feelings exactly. It turns games that are designed to have no satisfaction of winning into games that you can enjoy beating.

  36. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The smart thing would be to sort the players. But the bot-users and hackers on one set of servers, and the genuine players on another set. Get money from both camps, without them disturbing each other.

  37. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diablo 3, Starcraft maybe? (yes, the single player portion is online as well)

  38. People proclaim their innocence all the time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How many of those ~100,000 were false positives?

    Zero. Its not behavior based. Its based on physically inspecting the game's code executing in RAM and recognizing modifications to that code. Whether the player knew they were using a hacked copy of the game is debatable, that the game code was hacked is not debatable.

    People proclaim their innocence all the time and the honest ones eventually return to forums saying that they did some investigation and found out that yes their brother/cousin/friend had installed a hack on the computer they played from.

  39. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not discontinuing development at all. They shut down the authentication servers that check your key whenever you load honorbuddy. Honorbuddy is not going anywhere for now, unless they are unable to get around the new detection scheme.

  40. Re:People proclaim their innocence all the time .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doing it that way has lead to banning people who were running WoW on Linux previously. So yes, it can lead to false positives.

  41. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Actually, it is the other way round: There are a lot of customers Blizzard wants to keep doing business and hence has decided to get rid off about 1.5% bad apples that really piss off the other ones by breaking the rules of the game. Quite akin to banning people that post offensive content.

    The only thing that may be surprising is the size of the wave. But that also makes sense because cheater-tech is usually bought by the cheaters (most cannot code themselves one bit) and if they were to bann often, cheater-tech makers could easily determine what Blizzard does to identify cheaters.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  42. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "So it's ok if Blizztard sells you cheats, but not so if a Chinese entrepreneur does the same thing."

    You got it! Louis Vuitton, Ralph Lauren, Prada, Rolex etc have the same policy.

  43. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by gsslay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So it's ok if Blizztard sells you cheats, but not so if a Chinese entrepreneur does the same thing...?

    Yes, because it's their game and in their interests they don't screw it up. A Chinese entrepreneur didn't develop the game and doesn't care. If Blizzard are screwing up, then feel free to go play somewhere else.

    Also..

    Blizztard

    What are you? Ten years old?

  44. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Karmashock · · Score: 0

    WoW is dead isn't it? I mean... that game is so fucking old at this point. What kind of future can it possibly have. And really, banning people at this point? Why not so many god damn years ago? The gold farmers have been a problem in the game since always. There are literally chinese convicts playing WoW to sell gold to lazy fat kids that are so stupid they'd rather pay someone to lessen the irritation of the skinner box rather than just STOP playing a shitty game.

    Sorry... I hate grindy games. I like to game but I do NOT like to grind. The only games I'll play that have grinding are Mobas and that is only because the level progression caps out after about 15 minutes in most cases. Grind COMPLETE.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  45. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By that logic, they would earn even more if they actively helped people cheat.

  46. But they get refunds, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they can't play the game they bought because it is now deliberately defective by the "owner", they get a refund, right?

    You see, this would be 100% problematic if you could run your own server. But as they showed with BNetD, they are shit scared of any competition in how "their game" can be played by the people who FUCKING GAVE THEM MONEY.

    I would totally demand through the courts a refund of the money for the game.

    1. Re:But they get refunds, right? by ledow · · Score: 1

      They agreed to the EULA.

      In the same way if you buy a DVD, copy it and then "demand a refund" you're only entitled to one if the product was faulty (and then only through defective materials or workmanship, etc.).

      The EULA is a legal contract on how both sides behave. They let you use their copyright works. You have to abide by non-cheating conditions and not redistribute it, etc. to stay within that contract.

      You can disagree as much as you like, but a court will laugh in your face.

      "Hey, I entered into a contract to borrow this guy's car after signing to say I'd not take it on the motorway. I did, and now he's revoking the contract." Er... yeah. Of course.

    2. Re:But they get refunds, right? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Shared real life spaces like hotels, apartments, etc. require you to play by the rules and be a good neighbor.

      You can't start blasting heavy metal at 2AM every morning and then get upset when you get evicted.

      Similarly, cheating completely screws Blizzard's economy, and can ruin the PVP experience depending on the cheat. So you're disrupting other people's enjoyment of virtual space.

      MMOs are shared spaces. Play by the damned rules.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    3. Re:But they get refunds, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey, I entered into a contract to borrow this guy's car after signing to say I'd not take it on the motorway. I did, and now he's revoking the contract." Er... yeah. Of course"

      more like "Hey, i asked to borrow this guy's car and he said yes. it had a paper in the back seat that said not to take it on the motorway. i didn't read it and never signed it. i went on the motor way and now hes suing."

    4. Re:But they get refunds, right? by ledow · · Score: 1

      If at any point he mentioned that you would be bound by it, then not reading it and not signing it are your problem.

      Sure, signing it makes things easier to prove in court, but that's about it. However, if they can prove that your only valid assignment of copyright is reliant on you having agreed to the licence, then it really doesn't matter and it just comes under whether it's a binding contract or not.

      Pretty much, those things tend to be unless they are incredibly unreasonable.

    5. Re:But they get refunds, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your country's laws. For example in Germany an EULA is not legally binding, unless it was already agreed BEFORE the sale of the product. Yeah, US-Companies largely ignore this fact, but strictly after the law they are not legally binding. Not that I would be for gold-selling or cheating... but still... this has to be said about EULA's...

    6. Re:But they get refunds, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on in which country you live. For example in Germany EULA's are only legally binding if they have been agreed on before the sale of the product. Yeah, US-Companies largely ignore this fact, but it's still true ;-)

      Not that I like gold-selling in MMOs or Cheating... but has to be said about EULA's...

  47. A few solutions to WoW problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) Each month you get a certain "allowance" and hours played deduct from that. Any unused allowance is turned into some form of in-game loot (gold or random enchants, or credit for next month). Therefore when you aren't able to play due to work or holiday for some time, you don't feel you've wasted the months' subscription. This also means you can avoid some grind and gold farming becomes less necessary to pander to: you farm gold already, or play and get much more gold by actively playing than you would when you can't.

    2) Self hosting servers. Hell, if their scares about how the protocol would be hacked and their servers compromised for cheaters were relevant (See SMB and the Intel BIOS for why it's a load of crap), have two protocols, at least different interpreters, therefore compromised differently, and use one for the self-host and the other for official walled garden games. Banning accounts merely becomes a "You can't cheat on our systems, play with others who don't care".

    3) Cut the grind. Maybe by making a single line of synergistic abilities easy. The grind would come when you need to up the other abilities to get a well rounded character that doesn't lose if they're not playing a well balanced and cohesive party. Two problems fixed here:

    a) you need all archetypes playing together, and this can be hard without including people you don't know, hence cheaters get "in". Making the grind game rounding out your character means experienced players can gravitate away from forced co-op with random strangers and the demand for all usual players to organise together to play at the same time. You can do without one or two of them for sessions.

    b) you can speed up the grind without unbalancing. Those who grinded already have more varied skills, so they won't have to restart.

    1. Re:A few solutions to WoW problems by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      This is written by someone without even the vaguest since of how World of Warcraft works, or gaming at all?

      1 real worldified: "The should pass a law saying every car could only be driven 20 hours a month. That will reduce the amount of time people spend travelling."
      -> See the problems with this? They all apply to WoW. Alternate transportation, owning five cars, etc. All apply. Solves nothing, shits on everyone.

      2 real worldified: "Instead of the google, we can all search with our own search engines that we run locally, on our smartphones"
      -> All the scaling problems apply.

      3 real worldified: "Instead of making everyone get a phd in physics, math, stats, philosophy, journalism, and computer science, maybe we could offer individual degrees. I will propose this as a solution to the problem of everyone in the whole world needing to get all of those things, because that entirely represents reality as it is now"

      1)- You can't regulate hours played. If you did this, it would mean that the only people with alts were ones who could buy multiple accounts. It would also completely destroy the play experience, which involves a great deal of relaxing and talking. If you had to watch a clock super hard... just awful.

      2)- You have no conception of the value provided by the servers. There are people who (against the ToS and in some cases copyright law) host world of warcraft (and other games) servers. These are known as "private servers", and you can google them. While a real server can have thousands (and interact seamlessly with OTHER servers with also thousands), these servers struggle mightily with tens, and implement almost none of the actual server side scripting that takes up so very much computational power.

      3)- The game already offers a great deal of this, and importantly, the bots were almost all alt characters to begin with. This means that they were grinding to get access to more play styles. This is also monumentally stupid because the entire concept of "the grind" is not really being understood as something to even complain about properly.

      Let me say this: in every game I have played, there are cheaters. What non-mmo games normally have is, is a pool of non-gamers who understand that cheaters are the problem. The solution isn't "there outta be a law" (to limit play time, to prevent you from accessing your client RAM, to ensure that the giant data centers are somehow freely available to you), the solution isn't "reduce the grind" because the "cheaters are justified because I don't even play so I totally get this". It's to ban cheaters, and keep banning.

      Ban cheaters.

      Keep banning cheaters.

      That's the answer. In all the games. You just. Fucking. Ban. Cheaters.

  48. It isn't hteir game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those people paid for it.

    It's still cheating. That's the same as what they call cheating when other people do it.

    1. Re:It isn't hteir game by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand games a service.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:It isn't hteir game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's entitled to his opinion just like you, asshole.

    3. Re: It isn't hteir game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, he is entitled to his opinion, but however entitled his opinion may be, his opinion is contrary to fact.

  49. Name one person who likes the grind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody does. My sister plays. She walks off while playing, the laptop still on, still dinging sounds coming as "the character" continues to level up smithing or something to a perk. So 100% not playing the game because it's the grind.

    Yet still "playing" it. And, because online, paying for it.

    The playable points are a long grind away. And designed that way, hence I agree with the OP that WoW is a waste of time.

    Until you've spent enough to actually play the fucking game, that is. But that's the problem here: you have to play the non-game of the grind. That's what the OP is talking about. Whereas you're talking about the "post-grind" game.

    Kill the first.

    If you grind on a server that you don't pay for, then there would be pressure on Blizzard to make the grind less onerous and still give it purpose. As it is, they want to make the grind longer and more boring, which makes farmers of game points valuable. Depending on how much free time you have it can easily be CHEAPER to pay someone a large sum to bypass the grind. They profit too because they can put much more time into it. Only Blizzard loses, because they aren't getting the money from the gamer with a life and commitments outside the game. This is why they're against farmers: it costs them unearned revenue.

  50. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by DrXym · · Score: 1
    TinTin could certainly be used for cheating but it also had some useful functionality - hilighting useful info, aliases, command history etc. I expect most people who used it did so in a relatively light manner. They probably had it set to flee if a battle proved too much, had aliases to loot, wear all, hilights for whispers etc,

    I don't know what constitutes bot use in WoW but if the bot is designed to enable automated levelling then it's a big no-no. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the gold farmers have such bots running on an almost factory-like basis.

  51. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Informative

    They still have 7M subscribers. I'd hardly count that as dead.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  52. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    It helps if you know what you're talking about. Starcraft you can mod all you want in single player, in fact, they effectively encourage Starcraft mods.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  53. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OR, they are just trying to make you think they are. "Let's not, and say we did," and keep the money and make the customers happy.

  54. But did they undress them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the said undressing of them, the 100000 player character should have indeed jumped to their deaths from the highest peak of Azeroth, simultaneously. Banning is a spectator sport, you know.

  55. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

    Sort of ironic the current botters were only banned for 6 months, I was perma banned for botting in WoW circa 2006. I didn't do it for gold, in fact I probably had more gold than 99% of the players on that server at the time from cornering the AH market on many items better than most could on my server. I was quite upset at the time since I had been hoping to sell my account as a just-graduated-student at some point for $3-4K... which was an enormous amount of dough for me at the time. My account was worth a lot not just for the characters I had, but the crafting skills and rare recipes I had collected. Foolish thing about it all was I only botted because I wanted a 5th and 6th lvl 60 and no longer had time to play as much as I wanted to spend more time with my then-gf-now-wife. In hindsight, getting banned was probably the best thing that could have happened to me! Minus the loss of money of course lol

  56. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by whopis · · Score: 1

    Blizzard now has a system where you can trade in-game gold for playing time. Since that was just implemented in the past couple months, I would wager that this mass ban is related to that.

    Now the bots and gold farmers may have a direct impact on Blizzard's revenue.

  57. Aren't they now selling fully leveled characters? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    What is the difference between buying a fully leveled character and using a bot to make one?

    And I've played grindy MMOs before, when you get good at it (the grinding) your actions aren't easy to tell from a bot anyway.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  58. WoW is not a grind fest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP needs to play a real MMO to know what a true GRIND is. WoW was and is the easiest MMO to level up in.

  59. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 2

    Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded. Yogi Berra

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  60. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's all part of their new $25 "World of WarCraft BanHammer" expansion.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  61. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

    Repetitive skill-less tasks that take forever and are required to get to the promised exciting parts of the game.

    It's not like that. I will admit to repetitive, but skill helps tremendously. The ban was applied to accounts using a bot that automated PvP...that means one human against another. Or, rather, twenty humans against twenty others. Since humans are so ingenious, it can be quite challenging, particularly against people who are experienced. However, since it was twenty against twenty a bot could be "carried" by nineteen humans and gain honor, which is coin with which to buy armour and weapons. The armour and weapons didn't allow you to get to an exciting part of the game, it made it more difficult for other human-operated characters to kill you. The bot allowed the owner to start it and leave, coming back hours later to spend the coins that it had received.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  62. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like thinking in terms of countries...there are still more WoW subscribers than people in Denmark, Norway, Finland, or Singapore. But yes they have declined from their peak when WoW was bigger than Cuba, Greece, or Belgium.

  63. tl;dr version by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    blizzard banned 1 bot and 179 dedicated players.

  64. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 2

    Every MMO wishes they were as dead as WoW. Most wouldn't have had to turn off their servers if they were one seventh as dead as WoW...

    WoW is essentially the only MMO, their own genre. Everyone who makes an MMO uses so many similar things to WoW that they are essentially wowlikes. At this point, they've added more things that stuck than everquest, have added more content of more types than most games ever can, all while being around longer than anything else can, and being wildly profitable the whole time.

    Also they ban people all the time. What happened here is interesting because of the scale of it.

  65. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling your character would also be banned.

  66. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    PvP rewards you for playing it. The character progresses from weakish pvp to strongish pvp gear, and then normally has to compete in tough rated combat for the final pieces.

    Many players want to skip the first part of that- they essentially want to have gear on all the character classes so they can play whatever is most powerful.

    The bots are disgusting. You'll enter a battleground, and it becomes very obvious who is botting immediately. When I started playing, the bots would mostly jump in place to avoid being marked afk (afk removes them from battleground). Then they implemented features to report non contributors. A few years ago, we started seeing bots that were smart enough to acquire enemies, move toward them, and press skills uselessly- thus rendering them unable to be kicked. The last time I played, you would see those bots sometimes, and it was always shitty to load up what looked like a decent battleground only to find your team infested with them.

    It looks like Blizzard figured out how to catch those cheaters, which is great.

    These are cheaters, plain and simple, and I love that they get banned. They ruin the game for the actual players. They aren't "skipping a grind" by having some guy hit hogs in a field, they are actual players who want gear faster by setting a bot to run a character overnight / when they can't play because of work or school. They just want more than everyone else has, and it's bullshit when it works.

  67. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    They have never sold max level characters. Not really.

    A few months before the cap pushed up to 100, and after that fact was announced, they sold 90s. What is missing is, to have a decent character towards the end of an expansion requires you be both max level, and have had some time in the different tiers of content. Each expansion raises the cap, meaning that the different tiers of content at the old max level no longer are relevant.

    For what it is worth, I hated that, and it's a very small part of why I don't play any more- but lets not pretend that this was some giant grind skip. The levelling game is very streamlined as it is, and the majority of the work to make a powerful character happens once you are AT max level.

    I'm sure they will begin selling 100s at some point once there have been enough waves of content at 100, and when 105 or 110 or whatever is announced. But if you take them up on that offer, you'll end up with a character who still needs a decent amount of gear to matter- they are just giving you a fast intro so your friends can help you, or so you can be playing with the majority of the playerbase.

  68. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blizzard allowing you to skip a solo pve grind is very different from a bunch of botters shitting up your battleground and ruining your team pvp experience.

  69. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 2

    Their accounts are banned. This means that they cannot log in for a fixed amount of time, possibly permanent. No one has their identity or credit card banned, ever- any one ever banned is always welcome to buy a new copy of WoW, and many do.

    But a ban is a very meaningful disincentive in an MMO. Losing all your stuff is the MMO player's apocalypse. It's not about "this guy is a cheater, we blocked his IP", it's "this account cheated, so its player has lost everything".

  70. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Incorrect.

    This is a pvp bot that shits up queues with dumb fucking bots while their players sleep, normally on alts. It has nothing to do with the WoW token, nor does Blizzard stand to gain anything from that. Anyone can rebuy WoW, and most banned players will have actually had an alt account ban- even botters aren't universally stupid enough to bot from their main account, by and large.

  71. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Of the people who play that I know, every single one of them bought a new copy of the game and leveled from 90 to 100 over the weekend. Some even bought gold from Blizzard (via their WoW Tokens). This was a huge cash influx for them. And in 6 months when the accounts get unbanned, they'll make all the money for people paying to merge the accounts back together to avoid paying two monthly fees.

  72. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Arena is still great, played a ton over the weekend. I've never found another game that has the same level of complexity or requires the same level of coordination between partners than WoW arena. We mostly played KFC (arms warrior / bm hunter / resto druid). Let me tell you the state of arena now vs 4-5 years ago, insanely different. The level of competition is in another league completely. For reference I was a ~2400 rated player in WotLK.

  73. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 2

    We had five people in our guild banned for botting with Honorbuddy. Every single one of them bought a new copy of the game and started leveling again. Most purchased a new copy on Thursday/Friday and I know of at least one that is already back to level 100 (took him 15 hours of /played). Blizzard is going to make so much fucking money off this ban. Not to mention people had to buy WoW tokens (gold) to buy their heirlooms and they will have to pay to merge the accounts together in 6 months.

  74. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Blizzard has never sold max level characters. They sell level 90 character boosts for $60. You still have to level from 90 to 100 to reach max level.

  75. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 1

    First let's specify what bot we're all talking about: Honorbuddy.

    BGs was only one part of it. High end guilds were raiding using the combat routines. A number of progression guilds broke up entirely because 90% of their roster is banned. It was also being used in arenas (look up "Gladiator Suite" on the honorbuddy forums). People were playing literally in gladiator range (2700+ arena rating) using the bot. It had perfect DPS rotations, CC'd, used cooldowns correctly and could perfectly kick any cast. It was also being used to farm professions (herb, mining, etc) and pretty much any other aspect of the game. Personally, I leveled one of every class to 100, including multiples of some classes (for arena purposes, so I could play with less skilled friends without affecting my rating).

  76. Lot of uninformed scrubs in this thread by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's some context:

    WoW has a bunch of things you can do.

    Level: You have to level to participate in most content. Bots that automate this are often ignored, because they aren't that much better at it. This is not about one of those bots at all.

    Raiding, an organized pve (player versus environment, in other games pvm for player versus monster)- an experience at max level versus challenging encounters. If you fail on one "boss", he "resets", and you have to try that boss again from the start. Each boss encounter is 3-10 minutes, and raiding guilds normally meet at specified times when everyone can be available, and clear multiple bosses (ideally all of them) in one or more difficulty levels. The hardest levels are almost unbeatable except for the top few thousand players out of millions, and it normally takes some time for even the professional players to get down the hardest bosses on the hardest difficulties whenever a new raid is released. When you do beat a boss, he drops random loot- potential upgrades, hopefully, to make you and your friends more powerful. The gear dropped from the toughest bosses is the best currently in the game for pve.
    No bot can raid. A few bots can automate certain tasks, but these are rarely employed- the tasks needed for automation are so dynamic, and the risks so great, that it's almost unheard of.

    Ranked PvP- At max level, you can join a premade group for arena (2v2, 3v3, or 5v5 death match) or rated batteground (objective based 10v10 play). These modes are very difficult to win at the higher level. Participation grants access to the best pvp gear in the game.
    No bot does these things. A few players use bots to automate certain tasks- for instance, one really hard task is to "kick" an opponent when they are casting. Since there is a lot of latency and ability to fail (the opponent will often start a cast, then stop, hoping that you will "kick" when he is not casting, thus wasting your cooldown, and allowing him to cast again, this time without fear of interruption), kickbots are a thing- but they are much harder to get away with. All ranked pvp is very hard to cheat at, because you will generate a series of complaints from your opponents, and get banned permanently for it.
    This is not what's being discussed, and a kickbot or other arena program is ultimately trying to provide your character with one or more superhuman responses. These are rare and actioned severely.

    Casual PvP- generating the gear needed to play in ranked, this involves being thrown in with mostly random people in an objective based pvp environment. Very popular among those who don't want to coordinate in Skype, or people who just want to play some.

    *This is what the bot in question does:* It automates this casual pvp. This allows the players to have alternate accounts that are getting gear on multiple characters. This means that they can play pvp with different classes easier than those who do not cheat. A few fools even botted from their main accounts, which the bot authors always tell you not to do. These bots shit up the game- you'll queue up and notice some of the players are bots, and if your team has too many, you'll lose. If the enemy team has too many, your win will not be fun, because bots are stupid.

    I don't play WoW right now, but I'm very glad to see them banning these clowns.

    1. Re:Lot of uninformed scrubs in this thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'scrubs'

      seriously kill yourself

    2. Re:Lot of uninformed scrubs in this thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bots can and do raid and play ranked PvP

      I personally had a dozen max level toons and used a bot that would automate all my actions except my movement. It literally min/maxed everything for me on the fly and was a huge advantage in Arena and Raids. It would automatically swap weapons, used defensive/offensive cooldowns at hthe best time and performed my DPS/healing rotations perfectly. I could set the every detail I wanted.

      This is very common in high level play, trust me.

  77. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Echo_Hotel · · Score: 1

    WoW has 7.1 million subscribers this quarter (Q1 '15).
    Q4 '14 (When the Warlords of Draenor expansion hit) WoW had 10 Million subscribers.
    Q3 '14 there were 7.4 million.
    Q2 '14 There were 6.8 million
    It is pretty obvious that new content is not helping retain players for more than a month or teo.
    It's all downhill from here, unless some miracle happens.

  78. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

    The smart thing would be to sort the players. But the bot-users and hackers on one set of servers, and the genuine players on another set. Get money from both camps, without them disturbing each other.

    Not sure if this idea would really work. If cheaters have been using bot/hack, why would they be spending more money into the game? Thus, is it really worth keeping them on a separated server that the company has to maintain (spend money)? Got rid of them would be a better choice, I think.

  79. Fight Bots with Bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not fight bots with bots? Players caught using bots get a "special" servers, where the bots cheat, and constantly pummel the players.

    After a few days of getting pummeled, getting their inventory reduced to nothing, the problem will take care of itself, and they will either stop using bots, cancel their subscriptions and start a new one, or just quit altogether.

  80. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

    Selling your character would also be banned.

    It's true that Blizzard doesn't want you selling your characters, but it happens nonetheless. This was especially true around the time he's talking about, before Battle.net accounts were a thing and it was fairly simple to merge WoW accounts, but it's still possible today. I have a friend who started playing in 2004 and he sold his account for about $4,000 right before starting college in mid-2006.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  81. Baffled by mrjimorg · · Score: 1

    So people pay to play this game...... then they pay other people so they don't have to......... odd

  82. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Jax+Omen · · Score: 2

    Arenas are the reason I could never get into PvP in WoW.

    "Sorry, you picked the wrong class, you have to either find friends of these exact two other classes/specs to play your preferred spec, or reroll healer". FOR EVERY ARENA SEASON EVER TBC-Current

    Yes, I'm a bitter enhancement shaman.

    I play League of Legends for my PvP fix. I play WoW for it's group dungeon content, the one thing they actually do well.

  83. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for, ya know, Eve Online. Which is nothing like WoW.

  84. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Yeah it makes it a lot harder to play with friends. But most people played at least a couple classes. And since honorbuddy got popular I have (i think) 14 level 100s. I'd have to count to be sure, I have one of every class plus 3 druids and 2 shaman. And it's so easy to gear up a class now that you can really play anything you want. They've also instituted a system that makes it easy to find arena groups and I've had some good sessions playing with random people I've found that way.

  85. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Xenx · · Score: 1

    Because they'd still have to pay their monthly fees.

  86. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Not to mention they were recently selling max level characters for something or other. So it's ok if Blizztard sells you cheats, but not so if a Chinese entrepreneur does the same thing...? Right. At least EVE Online is honest in its own corruption.

    100K is a good start - only 7 million to go. Then other mmorpgs might come out from under the shadow of the worst mmo to ever excrete itself onto a finite market. To think, this drek keeps on going & going, whereas innovative, quality mmos like CoX go under. At least there's the likes of GW2 - B2P - buy once, play forever.

    IF GW2 had half the story writing team of WoW, I might have made it more than 2 hours before going, Gee, this grind is way too boring. I really don't care what is going on right now.

  87. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's ok if Blizztard sells you cheats, but not so if a Chinese entrepreneur does the same thing...?
     
    What about the real customer experience? Why have you skipped over that concept?
     
    I don't mind playing a fair game and losing. I hate playing a fair game just to get swindled by cheaters. I tend to avoid games with easy exploits because of this. I don't know what the WoW cheats really do (I speak from an old EQ1 perspective) but you better bet that Sony wouldn't have seen much of my money if I were camping a rare spawn and had to contend with known cheaters to just try to get a shot at my target. Not to say there weren't cheats and bots in EQ but I was never at a place where it was utterly obvious that I was playing against cheaters.

  88. $$$money$$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either that, or the in-game capital has an exchange value to real-life currency, and they want more of that for some reason.

  89. any real players should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move to a real game that is fun enough that you dont want to bot! check out Archeage

  90. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's fine, as long as everyone else agrees that is a valid venture. I'm sure it's a challenge to develop a competent WoW bot... but a majority of players don't want that in the game world, which is a reasonable sentiment for that game.

  91. I am shocked by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    oh, wait, no, those were just account stealing gold pirates and people using bots.

    God those are so annoying.

    Way to go, Blizz!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  92. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >We had five people in our guild banned for botting with Honorbuddy. Every single one of them bought a new copy of the game and started leveling again. Most purchased a new copy on Thursday/Friday and I know of at least one that is already back to level 100 (took him 15 hours of /played).

    Yes, but the question is are they botting again? I would assume only if they were stupid, or liked hitting their heads with walls. The point was to stop botting and hopefully it was successful.

  93. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to be jaded to believe that Blizzard chases revenue.

  94. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The smart thing would be to sort the players. But the bot-users and hackers on one set of servers, and the genuine players on another set. Get money from both camps, without them disturbing each other.

    Wouldnt work.

    CRZ and rated battlegrounds. Unless you separated them at that level you may as well not bother.

  95. The only question on my mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they drop any good loot?

  96. Some people are alcoholics, so no one by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 1

    should be allowed to drink alcohol.
    Some people are drug addicts, so no one should be allowed to use drugs.
    Some people are addicted to World of Warcrack, so no one should be allowed to play WoW.
    The baby can't digest meat, so all of us have to drink milk....

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  97. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    The smart thing would be to sort the players. But the bot-users and hackers on one set of servers, and the genuine players on another set. Get money from both camps, without them disturbing each other.

    it's all about having an advantage. bots exists to gain an advantage. if everyone is a bot, it defeats the point.

    not to mention, bots put excessive load on their servers beyond what would be possible with a human player.

  98. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    Because they'd still have to pay their monthly fees.

    what costs do those monthly fees go toward, pre-profit? bandwidth. electricity. maintenance. etc. all of those costs get multiplied by bots. humans don't play for weeks straight. a bot is a net loss for the company.

    people seem to forget that just because it's digital doesn't mean it's without operating costs.

  99. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    if you look at the kind of things that these bots do, it turns out that the bots are not a symptom of bad players, but of a bad game

    yes, it's so bad that people pay their monthly fees and spend thousands of hours leveling their characters. just a terrible game indeed.

    And this doesn't hurt other players at all

    wrong. MMOs are all about your place respective to other players. how do you think it makes the non-cheating customers feel if they spend 5000 hours leveling their character but someone else does it in 10 hours of screen time with a bot? you think it makes the vast majority of paying customers feel good about the game? like they want to keep devoting their precious time and money?

    this is nothing more than keeping the vast majority of the paying customer base happy. and yeah, it's a money grab because as soon as the average person feels the game is overrun with bots, they stop paying.

  100. Starcraft by JThundley · · Score: 1

    Great, can you guys get on the Starcraft cheaters now? Those cheaters only cheat to beat other individuals and they really ruin the game for everyone.

  101. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://ezserveronline.com/forums/index.php

  102. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WoW reported 10 megasubs a few months ago. It's likely lower, probably down to 8 or something.

    Eve posted an all time high of 500 kilosubs a few years ago, and seems to be well behind that these days.

    Is it even the same genre?

  103. Re: Not sure if smart or retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shamans are healers, you had plenty of time to shine. No, not every side spec is supported in all seasons, but shamans have had decent numbers over the years.

  104. now address Starcraft 2 cheats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great move by Blizzard. Now we need to go after the clowns that hack Starcraft 2. I really don't understand the mindset of cheaters/hackers... it's like they so utterly fail as human beings that they can't even have fun playing a video game without cheating. If you really hate "grinding" at WoW (and the article and comments suggest that this type of grinding isn't at all necessary to enjoy the game) then don't play it. Starcraft 2 hacking (generally maphacking to gain vision of your opponent's base and army) is even more counterproductive: the matchmaking/MMR system gives you opponents judged to be at exactly your skill level, with an expectation of 50% win/loss. By hacking you artificially inflate your perceived skill... leading to harder opponents, who can and will beat you DESPITE the cheating. Losing even when cheating must be a special kind of awful.

  105. Re:Not sure if smart or retarded by Whorhay · · Score: 1

    The only time I've ever botted in a game was SWG. I wanted to level up some crafting professions. The only way to earn the relevant xp was to craft thousands of items, which had little to no value to anyone in the scheme of things. The crafting system involved a series of windows with recipes to be selected, materials to select, various options and finally finish the crafting resulting in a finished item. I figured out that you could actually use the ingame macro system to perform all of the actions in a perpetual loop, except the selecting of materials, which required some double mouse clicks. So I spent some time doing nothing but selecting crafting materials with the mouse while the running in game macro did everything else as rapidly as it could. But I realized I was looking at doing that and nothing else for something like 5 or 6 hours straight. So I found a mouse macro utility that would interface with the OS mouse drivers and feed it the appropriate mouse actions to move the cursor back and forth double clicking at the appropriate times. Then I sat down and read a book while it did the grind for me.

    It was honestly a very silly system, the only significant barrier to maxing out those professions was the speed at which the interface reacted and your ability to double click rapidly in the same spot(s) for a very long time.