Slashdot Mirror


Marvel's Female Superheroes Are Gradually Becoming More Super

New submitter RhubarbPye writes: A new study shows an increasing trend in the power and significance of female superhero characters in the Marvel comic book universe. Several criteria were used to examine the trend, including cover art, dialog, and the actual superpowers. Over 200 individual comic books from Marvel's 50+ year history were compared for the study. What's of particular interest is the study's author is a 17-year-old high school student from Ohio.

127 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Everyone grab your popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This should be entertaining to watch.

  2. Re:Last sentence by Reason58 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary makes no mention of the author's gender.

  3. Re:Last sentence by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Seems a bit condescending, why wouldn't a girl be able to do this?

    What are you talking about? A girl did do this.

  4. Re:Last sentence by HappyHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems a bit condescending, why wouldn't a girl be able to do this?

    Er... the last sentence was "What's of particular interest is the study's author is a 17-year-old high school student from Ohio." - the "interesting" part is that they're a highschool student and 17 years old, with a published scientific paper to their name. The summary doesn't even mention that they're a girl, you'd have to go and read the article to find that out.

    Reading the article... what kind of first post-er are you?

  5. Bottom Rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is more a result of low powered secondary characters gaining power, the main female characters have always been over powered compared to the male characters on the Marvel side.

    If you look at mutants, they all get exactly 1 power, healing factor, or eye beams or telepathy or teleportation... unless they're women in which case they often get several. Jean Grey has a couple, Pixie has several, Wanda has several, Emma Frost has a couple, Rogue only has one but it gives her more

    Even for non-mutants if you look at the fantastic 4, they all get 1 power... except Susan Richards. Arguably Reed Richards has two as he is also a super scientist, but that wasn't a result of the accident.

    1. Re:Bottom Rising by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Ororo only has one power, but when that one power is weather control, who needs more? I can't think of any male mutants with that level of power, except Magneto.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Bottom Rising by hey! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Originally Susan Richards' powers were turning invisible and creating a force shield around herself. This wasn't for doing cool things, it was for staying safely out of the way while the boys did the fighting. By the mid 70s when I was buying comic books her purely defensive powers were upgraded to being able to produce a shower of spherical force bubbles, which on the offensive force scale was about one step up the awesomeness scale from telekinetically throwing couch pillows.

      I don't think the reason for this change was to throw a sop to feminists, or because fans were demanding strong female characters. In either case she'd have got a more impressive upgrade. I think it was simply upgraded storytelling. A character that can basically hide and shield herself is not as versatile as a character than can do useful things. So this kind of incremental upgrading naturally gave her more of a swiss-army knife skillset.

      As for modern superheroines having multiple, I have not much to add, other than an observation. This multiple super-power thing kind of mirrors what we expect women to be like today. We expect them to be able to multitask, to juggle several very different roles on our teams. Versatility has become a cultural expectation for women, so it might not be coincidental that female superheroes get more of toolkit rather than one very big hammer.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Bottom Rising by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Even in the X-Men universe, the stories are concentrated around Wolverine, Professor X and Magneto.

      I know we all have blocked out XMen 3, but that movie was 100% about Jean Grey (and we knew it would be from the end of X2).

    4. Re:Bottom Rising by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      It was about Jean Gray walking around and looking menacing. Magneto was the villain with an actual agency.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    5. Re:Bottom Rising by Lotana · · Score: 1

      (Magneto, possibly Prof.X, and uh, ... )

      You forgot Apocalypse. His level of power is unsurpassed (as far as I know) and has many powers.

    6. Re:Bottom Rising by T.E.D. · · Score: 2
      TFA is talking about power in the story itself (as in the Bechdel test), not the badassness of their superpowers.

      Katherine focused on seven different criteria, and ranked each on a scale from one to five. Was a woman on the cover? How did the female characters look? Did women in the comic book talk to each other about important issues? Was the storyline about a woman? Were women in positions of power? Did they make their own decisions? Did they have jobs?

      Not that what you are talking about wouldn't be a legitimate and interesting study topic as well. It just isn't what was being studied here.

  6. Super hero relative power co-efficients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is that in Supermans per second or Dr manhattans per minute or metric spider men per cubic meter.

    1. Re:Super hero relative power co-efficients by magarity · · Score: 1

      WTF Supermans per second? It specifies Marvell right there in the title.

    2. Re:Super hero relative power co-efficients by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Marvel you fool!

    3. Re:Super hero relative power co-efficients by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Than it must be Spidermen per cubic meter...right?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:Super hero relative power co-efficients by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's a special crossover measurement.

      It converts most easily to hulks per meter.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Super hero relative power co-efficients by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I thought the best measurement was Multiple Men per second.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  7. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I get it, I'm an evil being for being born with a penis.

    Strawman arguments are lies.

  8. Re:Last sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering his level of obsession with female superheroes, I assumed he was a 17-year-old boy, with sore wrists.

  9. Re:Last sentence by magarity · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary makes no mention of the author's gender.

    RTFA: "Katherine Murphy, 17"

  10. Re:*sigh* by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So your thesis is that males would prefer to look at drawings of men in skin tight costumes over women in skin tight costumes?

  11. Re:Super-Cook? Super-Housekeeper? by x0ra · · Score: 1

    super baby producer... 12 in 12 !

  12. Re:Last sentence by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The person I was replying to was clearly referencing the summary.

  13. Increase in acceptance of women leads to more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Stop the presses, this is front page news! The idea that as acceptance of leading ladies grows they'd be more accepted? Holy crap that is unbelievable.

    50 years ago women were always the damsels in distress now we have entire film series based around strong female characters. OF COURSE comic books will feature more and more women as it becomes more mainstream to have them as worthwhile characters and not simply used as something to be captured by the baddies and saved by the goodies.

    Marvel wouldn't have been going for 50+ years without adapting to the current trends. Why has there been this sudden spate of research which is telling us exactly what we already knew?

    1. Re:Increase in acceptance of women leads to more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of insecure people need every opportunity to point at something and shout SEEEE SEEEEEEEEEEE?!

  14. Re:Super interesting by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Well only those of you who didn't bother with reading the opening paragraph of the linked article.

  15. Race to godhood by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    It has always been the case that comic superheros have escalated in power. From the first superman to now, their powers have increased in the manner of schoolboys yapping about who's better.

    1. Re:Race to godhood by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with great power comes great responsibility. But you knew this already.

      Seriously, that's the best part of comix; their super powers are helpful, but do not always save the day. Sometimes the powers get in the way of having a normal life or doing things without getting a giant stone boner. This is the bane of the Incredible Thing Guy.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Race to godhood by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, it's better than the ADD MORE DIGITS mentality some developers have for hit points shown in games.

      That started with pinball machines. Now get off my lawn.

  16. Re:*sigh* by meza · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, but why the sigh? The aim of the study was to see if portrayal of women in the comics had changed over time. It was found that this was the case and indeed it was hypothesized from the investigator that the reason was change in reader demographics as well as writer demographics. Sounds like a nice little study (especially as they hint to a somewhat randomized process in selecting the comic books), would have loved to actually see the data though rather than just the summary.

  17. Re:Super-Cook? Super-Housekeeper? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1
    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  18. Eh, a 17-year-old? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I suppose that's interesting, but considering the subject matter maybe not so much. Now, if it had been a 60 year old, I would have found it disturbing. Anyway, the kid found a very good excuse to read lots of comics.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Eh, a 17-year-old? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I find it more interesting that it was a 17 year old girl. I have never known a woman that was into comics, and Big Bang Theory even makes jokes about it, so I guess I'm not the only one. Do all the guys in the comic book store stare when she goes to buy her comics?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Eh, a 17-year-old? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Back in '83-'84, when I was at UCSC, we had a geek crowd that was into comics. We had two women in our group.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Eh, a 17-year-old? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I have never known a woman that was into comics

      **points at wife and daughter** I know two....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Eh, a 17-year-old? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Comics? Don't you mean serialized graphic novels?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Eh, a 17-year-old? by xvan · · Score: 1

      2 years ago I told my nephew that I'd enlighten him about good old stuff (not that shitty Ben10 that he was watching), and streamed the fist Hellsing chapter from youtube only to remember that the first scene is a fellatio...

  19. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Scottingham · · Score: 1

    wow, your chromosomes are XY? Damn you must be ugly.

    Personally I have an X and a Y. I can't imagine the poor sod with XY XY

  20. Re:There's more. by ckatko · · Score: 4, Funny

    The big question on everyone's mind:

    Could She-Hulk lift a glass ceiling?

  21. Re:Last sentence by fche · · Score: 1

    ... because that is Very Important.

  22. More super? by Chas · · Score: 2

    Okay, the most powerful super in the setting is one SQUIRREL GIRL!

    She's the living embodiment of "Chuck Norris Facts" for the Marvel Universe, and is basically on par with the Living Tribunal (a fundamental entity of the universe and essentially a godlike manifestation).

    How, pray tell, does one get "more super" than that?

    ASIDE from grating on about the feminist implications of "Name+GIRL" vs "Name+WOMAN" or "Name".

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:More super? by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      Franklin Richards? He's beyond an Omega Level Classification according to Celestial. Given he can Create Galactius out of a thought, or a whole new universe, he'd give Squirrel Girl a run for her money, but any of the Omega Levels would because pissing any of them off is an instant reboot switch Marvel has built in. Squirrel Girl has yet to exhibit any Universe rewriting abilities.

    2. Re:More super? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Okay, the most powerful super in the setting is one SQUIRREL GIRL!

      I don't know the background and I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but on the off chance you're not, "Squirrel girl" is about the least bad-ass name since Pillow Man.

        http://smbc-comics.com/index.p...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  23. Are we not men? We are devo. by swell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a vague memory of a time when children read comics and adults read books and newspapers. It seems now that children are busy with Twitter while adults are living in a fantasy world. Where will the de-evolution of humanity end?

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:Are we not men? We are devo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a vague memory of a time when children read comics and adults read books and newspapers.

      Those children grew into (surprise surprise) adults who like comic books. It turns out that people like stories delivered by a familiar medium. I think you'll find that the adults who read books also read them as children.

    2. Re:Are we not men? We are devo. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Many have commented on this shift. It appears - at least to casual observation - that the social conventions regarding age-appropriate media and activities are becoming less important. Things that would once have been regarded as shamefully childish for anyone past their teenage years are now a lot more acceptable for all ages.

      The reaction to this seems to fall along political lines. I've seen a number of columns from conservative authors warning about the infantalisation of society and suggesting it will weaken western civilisation as people lose the emotional maturity to make rational decisions - but there are also those of a more liberal bent that celebrate how the artificially imposed notions of age-appropriate are falling, allowing people to enjoy what they like without shame and allowing media that was once constrained by a socially-mandated target age to develop in new directions.

    3. Re:Are we not men? We are devo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Critics who treat 'adult' as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence." - C.S. Lewis

    4. Re:Are we not men? We are devo. by asdfman2000 · · Score: 1

      The reaction to this seems to fall along political lines. I've seen a number of columns from conservative authors...

      I'm not sure if you read slashdot, because there was an article posted last week from a left-leaning writer / psychologist basically saying these kinds of hobbies are bad:
      http://games.slashdot.org/stor...

      In fact, the "men are failing to grow up" is a common theme in many feminist circles, which are largely characterized as "liberal". Example: http://time.com/179/men-are-ob...

    5. Re:Are we not men? We are devo. by slew · · Score: 1

      Why do liberals tend hate comic books?

      It's because it suggests to people that government is at best impotent and more often then not evil. However, some rich dude can be a hero (e.g., ironman, batman) can come in an save the day (generally against yet another rich evil dude, not an ideologue). This generally isn't the narrative they want to hear. Of course comic writers throw the liberals a bone once in a while (e.g., a gay character like iceman)...

      However, most comic books are simply apolitically anti-establishment, not catering to any ideology other than angst and self-reliance of socially isolated individualism. This caters to the aspirations of their target reading audience, which is generally not aligned with liberal/conservative politics, but weakly aligned to a libertarian/progressive slant. The most common morality plays in comics appear to revolve around fate, fear, revenge, jealousy, penance, and sometime just spite which generally don't fall along political party lines (or maybe they do), but tend to move the plot along...

  24. Let me know by msobkow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me know when they stop drawing them with FF tits and thighs and asses you could crack walnuts on.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Let me know by countSudoku() · · Score: 4, Funny

      NO! Just stop this, right this minute! No one ever solved a problem by making boobs smaller, unless that problem is a bad back caused by excessively large breasts.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Let me know by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I'd like to test Rule 34 involving walnut cracking via female comic heroines using various parts of their anatomy, but I'm at work

    3. Re:Let me know by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Okay, but only when they stop drawing men with packages so large they look like they're wearing a codpiece and muscle structure that makes them look like they're popping steroids.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Let me know by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The guys too... It makes sense for some, but most of them are basically ordinary guys in good physical condition, but get drawn like steroid pumping bodybuilders.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Let me know by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      They will get to that right after they stop drawing male heroes in ripped and in skintight clothes or shirtless.

  25. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geez. Are you overly sensitive. There wasn't any mention in the article of 'see these results prove women are still oppressed', or calling for 'more female represenation'. In fact the results from the study would suggest that 'see women are represented rather well in Marvel comic books' (or at least 'better than they used to be') but it makes no such conclusions one way or the other. As a good study should it simply states the results without interpretation of 'what they mean for society'. Though the article does indicate that the 'cause' may be because there are more female comic book readers & artists/writers....surprise surprise...someone catering to 1/2 the population with disposible income using people who might understand more about the demographic than the other 1/2....

    Look there is SJW 'bullshit' all over the place that can & should be called out, but if every story about women leads you to believe its an 'SJW conspiracy' you need to grow up, pick your battles wisely.

  26. Re:Super interesting by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Well only those of you who didn't bother with reading the opening paragraph of the linked article.

    So...everyone.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  27. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    You only have one X and one Y? How do you survive!?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  28. Re:*sigh* by countSudoku() · · Score: 2

    SHE HAS A NAME, and it's Lara Croft, you insensitive clod! And she IS my heroine, same thing

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  29. Re:Last sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear God, you moron. Can you read the fucking OP and see why it is relevant? It isn't that hard.

  30. Re:Super interesting by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    BY BETHANY BROOKSHIRE 7:00AM, MAY 19, 2015

    Yeah...I guess so, but RhubarbPye isn't quite as clearly female.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  31. Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by medv4380 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I could do the exact same analysis on Superman and find the exact same result that over time his powers have inflated. Power Creep is a well known issue in comics. The score of 12.2 in the 60's to 22.5 for female characters today is absolutely meaningless without the corresponding male character scores.

    1. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Power Creep is a well known issue in comics.

      Power Creep is my favorite superhero.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      He's my favorite villain.

    3. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
      No you couldn't, because that is not the kind of "power" they are talking about. They are talking about power over the story itself.

      Katherine focused on seven different criteria, and ranked each on a scale from one to five. Was a woman on the cover? How did the female characters look? Did women in the comic book talk to each other about important issues? Was the storyline about a woman? Were women in positions of power? Did they make their own decisions? Did they have jobs?

      If you did the exact same study with Superman, you'd certainly not find his "story power" has been increasing. In the early comics he was the sole hero, so he'd be getting perfect scores for all those.

    4. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Power over the story itself? Blonde Phantom, She-Hulk, and Squirrel Girl. All three have comic awareness and can use that to their advantage (She-Hulk usually just threatens the writer or penciler, whereas Squirrel Girl defeats Bi Beast, Dr Doom, Deadpool, Galactus, MODOK, Thanos, and Wolverine). Their only male counterpart with this ability is Deadpool.

    5. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Not RTFA is one thing, but not reading my quotation of it in my post is a whole new level of Slashdot. I am truly impressed.

    6. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      If you did the exact same study with Superman, you'd certainly not find his "story power" has been increasing. In the early comics he was the sole hero, so he'd be getting perfect scores for all those.

      Perfect score? You really think Superman was the only Golden Age Hero too?

      Lets assume you're correct and Superman would have got the Perfect Score of 35 because he was the only hero. This assumes that all the characters were put on a scale, and ranked from best to worst. This would imply that 18 would be the median score meaning that the modern day score of 22.5 implys ether a favoritism towards women, or that it's reached equilibrium, but since the measurement error wasn't given in the article that makes it fairly difficult to ascertain.

      However if you had bothered to read the article you'd know that's not what she did, and would still need the male score in order to extract any meaning at all. As for Superman and talking about the abstract "important issues" there is clear power creep between Silver Age stories with Fat Superman to the more serious Modern Area with Infinite Crisis. It's the problem with the Slapstick 60's and the slow methodical March to the age of Miller.

    7. Re:Power Creep Unless Proven Otherwise by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      not reading my quotation of it in my post is a whole new level of Slashdot. I am truly impressed.

      *cue dramatic music undertone*
      It is my power. It is my curse. It is my responsibility.
      *crescendo*
      *fade to black*

  32. Re:There's more. by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

    Yes! Nice one, Centurion!

    Also, Susan Storm agrees with this thread. She's a Fantastic gal, I mean person with super powers of any gender

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  33. They're of almost no cultural relevance by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    There is very little development in the existing super hero universe.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  34. They always WERE more super by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    But the press didn't show that.

    Just like they did after WW II, pretending that all the superheroes who were women went "home".

    Adapt. Because change is coming regardless.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  35. Re:You won't like this... Maybe... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Off the top of my head...

    Aeon Flux
    Ultraviolet
    Black Widow*
    Jean Grey
    Rouge
    Storm
    The Invisible Woman (Fantastic Four)

    Can't think of any more, but I am sure there have been other female super hero movies.

    *though I wouldn't exactly call Black Widow a super hero, she still holds her own in the Avengers movies, even against the Hulk

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  36. Re:*sigh* by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To give some small sliver to credit to comics, their stock-sexyness isn't just a female thing. While it is true that their female superpowered characters generally wear accessorised bikinis, have breasts bigger than their heads and spines made our of rubber, the men fare no better. Just about every male superpowered character gets the torso of a bodybuilder and a face angled like a brick.

    Blame the readers. The publishers just make what they know will sell.

  37. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Given that half their characters are either aliens, engineered or highly unusual mutants, their genetics might not even be xx/xy.

  38. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't we touchy?!
    Equality makes boys feel inferior. Men can live with it.
    So, shut up, you big baby!

  39. Re:Last sentence by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Informative

    That poor little boy Kathy, I'll bet he got beat up a lot

    I guess you never heard the Johnny Cash song, "A Boy Named Sue"

  40. Re:*sigh* by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

    It's a chicken/egg question. Do boys buy most comic books because girls have no interest in such things? Or do boys buy most comic books because the existing books are all marketed to boys? Historically, the answer has been believed to be the first option, but society generally has discovered over the last 50 years that with comic books as with many other things, the answer is the latter option... people make assumptions about what boys and girls want and thus drive the market thereby leaving out many consumers who don't fit the stereotypes.

  41. Re:You won't like this... Maybe... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    I read that as a list of characters who appeared in bad movies.

    Black Widow appeared in good movies, but as a fairly minor character. I've not seen Age of Ultron yet, I hear she gets her own sub-plot in that.

  42. Re:Last sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the last time, it's "I swear she told me she was 18". If you mess it one more time you'll have to find another lawyer.

  43. And yet by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    the greatest Superheroine of all time was "the new Wonder Woman" of the 79's. A Diana Prince who lost her powers

    WW the comic was dying, and this version revived her.
    She was killed off by the 70s version of SJW.

  44. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In japan, where comic books/novels are more accepted form of reading you see that the demographic of readers are across gender, age and class groups.

  45. Re:*sigh* by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    I think most the readers don't care until they are older and have been reading comics for a while. The boobs, porn faces, and porn poses are a result of the artists. Powergirl specifically has big boobs as a prank by the artist.

    Once the readers are a bit older (14+), then yea some would like to buy a sexy version of the superheroine they've read about rather than a sexy poster of some random victoria's secret or sports illustrated model. Either way, the 16 year old boy is going to have a sexy poster of a girl of some kind. And there are sexy boy posters for the girls at that age too tho most are teen bands.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  46. Re:Last sentence by tomhath · · Score: 2

    the "interesting" part is that they're a highschool student and 17 years old, with a published scientific paper to their name

    I'm pretty sure all the authors of papers presented as the Intel International Science and Engineering Fair are high school students.

  47. Re:*sigh* by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    You forgot the part where she calls it "science".

  48. Nah. by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Powder Puff Girls kicked her butt.

    1. Re:Nah. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Not if I Ching is with her!

  49. Re:Last sentence by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Informative

    Considering the state of highschool science education in the USA, it actually is pretty impressive.

    If reading comics counts as science, no wonder it's in a state.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  50. Re:*sigh* by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    you are confused, males want fanservice type females in their comics

  51. Re:They masterbate with them? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's masturbate.

    Thanks - i struggle with my English, so i (as most non-native speakers i think) appreciate grammar NaZi's!

    Second, your old-fashioned line reminds me of a great poster. Tradition: just because we've always done it this way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid. We're moving forward whether you like it or not.

    I liked the poster's message - BUT:

    a) what does that mean for "super-heroines"? You think people like me (even the next generation of awful people like me) will stop masturbate with them just because some SJW will get angry?

    b) who is "WE" (i.e, "YOU") "moving forward"? I had a great reply from an anonymous commenter here

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  52. Indeed O'Neal... by stink_eye · · Score: 1

    Female character powers have gone up, along with boob dimensions, whilst waistlines, hemlines and clothing coverage have dis-proportionaly shrank! God Bless comic books, if it wasn't for them I wouldn't have developed the keen interest in realistic female body types that I posess today! I truly appreciate powerful, statuesque, scantilly clad women!

  53. Not Just Marvel by sonicmerlin · · Score: 2

    Honestly this is a trend in all of TV, and to a certain extent it's really silly.

    Show writers desperately want to put women in positions of power and control, essentially switching the male and female roles. Take "The 100", where literally every military (and thus population) leader of the Grounders is a female. Except... that doesn't even make sense. In what universe have women ever aspired to be military leaders? You have some native american tribes for example, where the female "healer" or "shaman" might be a clan's spiritual leader, but they put women in positions that are so diametrically opposed to how women behave in real life, it becomes a laughably unrealistic scenario.

    I mentioned this in another thread, but other shows like "The Flash" depicts every single fracking woman as a supersmart, unmatched computer or mechanical engineer, programmer, physics whiz, etc. What universe does this show even take place? When was the last time you saw more than a tiny fraction of women showing interest or excelling in something like engineering or computer programming? Heck in "The 100" the best mechanic to grace the Sky People in 52 years is a young woman named Raven. Really??? My university had something like 95% male engineers, 5% female. And the brightest were always guys. It's almost laugh out loud funny how out of place these actors seem in their roles. Well it might just be the bad acting, but that's also magnified by bad casting.

    1. Re:Not Just Marvel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you saw more than a tiny fraction of women showing interest or excelling in something like engineering or computer programming?

      Out of interest who is the only person to have won two science Nobel prizes in different disciplines?

      My university had something like 95% male engineers, 5% female. And the brightest were always guys.

      Mine was about 85% guys and the smartest in my year was female. Not only got the top exam mark she was excellent at the practical side too.

      Just because they might be rare doesn't mean truly astoundingly bright female scientists and engineers don't exist.

      I mentioned this in another thread, but other shows like "The Flash" depicts every single fracking woman as a supersmart, unmatched computer or mechanical engineer, programmer, physics whiz, etc. What universe does this show even take place?

      A truly realistic universe where a guy can run at 1000 miles per hour?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Not Just Marvel by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I mentioned this in another thread, but other shows like "The Flash" depicts every single fracking woman as a supersmart,[...]

      Well, no. The Flash TV show has 2 women. Dr. Caitlin Snow, yes super smart but no more able than Cisco, and Iris West, normal woman reporter, not a supergenius whatsoever. The only other genius woman I recall was the bee robot girl. The female villains do not seem more powerful than the male villains.

      In "The Arrow" the only supergenius woman is Felicity and she is also the only person in the world who is not a killing machine. So, your perception of those shows seems a bit off.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  54. ZZzz by siphonophore · · Score: 1

    zzZZzz

    --
    Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
    -Scott Adams
  55. Women are actually human by Livius · · Score: 1

    If you think every story that mentions women is saying the same thing, then 1) you didn't read any of them very carefully, and 2) you're one of the worst examples of sexism in existence.

  56. And both genders are relentlessly de-aging by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was 13, I was reading stories about competent 30 year old war and super heroes. Reed Richards had a decade of experience.

    Today, everyone seems to be 19 to 22 yet they are somehow completely experienced and more competent than anyone older than they are. (re: the recent Star Trek films). Rogue especially has deaged tremendously from about 30 to about 20.

    For some reason, when i was a kid, you didn't need children to attract an audience but these days you do.

    It's so unrealistic that it is really jarring to me. These young children lack the experience and gravitas to be in the parts they are playing.

    Wolverine at least still has an appearance of being in his mid 30's but he's basically immortal so it doesn't really apply to him except... it seems like a lot of "tricks" he would have seen a dozen times by now.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  57. Re:You won't like this... Maybe... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Woman vs. man in a bare-knuckle, no-rules fight? It happened, and the story is a wild one

    http://mmajunkie.com/2014/10/w...

    âoeI have total respect for him, for taking that fight,â Pereira said. âoe ⦠Iâ(TM)ve been asked if I was crazy to set up that fight. Thatâ(TM)s true. I was crazy. I was crazy to have her fight against one man only. To make it fair, she should have fought two men.â

    I'm 6'5" and I'm sure Ediane Gomes could kick my ass six ways from sunday in a fist fight. It would be entirely credible.

    ---

    The only reason that a female superhero wouldn't be credible is acting, direction, and writing.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  58. Sue Storm has always been powerful by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    Invisible Woman has almost always been one of the most powerful and versatile superheroes in Marvel. She can knock out the Hulk. She can kill Wolverine. She can redirect a gamma bomb blast, saving the lives of all the other superheroes who have gathered (in that canon issue, her husband was already dead).

    1. Re:Sue Storm has always been powerful by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      I remember when she was referred to the Invisible Girl. One issue in 1960s is where Sue and Reed were looking for a house in the suburbs (landlord of Baxter Bldg was kind of upset about all the damage after a big fight with Dr. Doom, "why do you reside here in middle of city subjecting downtown to constant attacks?"). A group of teenage boys, "Hey look it's the Invisible Girl, yeah everyone knows what the Invisible Girl looks like! Can you show us how you turn invisible?"

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:Sue Storm has always been powerful by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Another that gets forgotten is the Scarlet Witch, magneto's daughter.

      In one arc her powers run amok and completely change the whole of reality for nearly everyone, including most mutants.

      *Begin Spoiler*


      * Spoiler: It's not 100% her fault. A retcon in Children's Crusade revealed that she meddled with forces beyond her control to try and recreate her children. Those forces caused her to attack the Avengers in the Disassembled arc and eventually House of M.


      *End Spoiler*

  59. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, but there has been such a rise in feminism over the past 10 years that it seems every facet of society - no matter how trivial - is viewed through the prism of how it affects females.

    If school boys were exposed to as many "news" articles covering the topics in which males are screwed - e.g. in the areas of health, education, criminal law, family law, etc - then you would also see school boys motivated to research and publish articles focused on males. Unfortunately, the popular media only ever publishes articles on "male privilege", rarely (if ever) on "male disadvantage". Conversely, we often see a lot of "news" articles that highlight "female disadvantage", and rarely (if ever) "female privilege".

    Women and girls encounter notable disadvantages in every day life. The goal of the Mens Rights Movement (MRM) is to raise awareness of the disadvantages that men and boys also encounter in every day life. Unfortunately, some people see this as a zero sum issue; any government funds diverted to assist boys represent funds taken away from girls. So sadly, we end up with a number of people who try to silence Mens Rights Activists whenever such issues are raised in a public forum.

  60. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    isn't majority of comic buyers male?

    Yes, which means that women - 50% or so of the population - aren't a large portion of comic buyers.

    would make sense to make male chars super duper = $$$

    Not if you understand math and market segmentation. You can pander to the people who *already* buy your product, in the hope that you'll get them to buy one or two extra comic books a month, or you can get aim at the group of people who have never bought a comic book in their lives, and hope to convert some percentage of them to lifelong customers. Men have PLENTY of "super duper strong" male comic book heroes to choose from. While that may be of interest to some females, it's human nature to enjoy reading stories about people to whom you can relate somehow.

    People know comics aren't real? right?

    Unfortunately for your point, sales and marketing *is* a real thing, and that explains 100% of the drive to capture more of a female market in comic books.

  61. Totally not a paid study to astroturf Marvel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not even wearing my tinfoil, this just makes business sense. This study portrays a specific company too positively to not be a part of some social engineering ploy. See: Employees fired for offensive tweets and the decidedly feminist slant of last Superbowl's ads. There's a huge incentive for traditionally male-dominated fields of entertainment (video games, football, comics) to say, "Look! We're progressive too!"

    Note that I'm not criticizing the social trend of gender-equality. However, when a profit-first publishing monolith like Marvel tries to manipulate public perception by using some faux moral high ground as a marketing point, it makes me nauseous. That is what is happening here, it could not be more transparent.

  62. Re:Last sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think being smart and being tough are mutually exclusive, then you are neither.

  63. Re:Last sentence by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

    If reading comics counts as science, no wonder it's in a state.

    I imagine it comes under "sociology", which is counted as a science. This study probably has better research practices than 90% of the sociology papers out there,

  64. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by russotto · · Score: 1, Troll

    Simply being male doesn't make you evil in the eyes of a SJW. Being a *white*, *heterosexual*, *male* makes you evil (and responsible for all bad stuff in the world).

    Any one makes you suspicious and any two seals the deal. I say embrace it. Be the evil they claim. There's even prizes: if you commit 1 million documented microaggressions you'll get a free puppy (to kick) from the Patriarchy.

  65. Powergirl Expansion a Myth by glennrrr · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, and I wish it were true, but the story about Powergirl being expanded that way was pretty easily debunked by looking at the issues in question. Some stories are just too good to check.

    1. Re:Powergirl Expansion a Myth by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      I found the article you were referring to.

      http://ragnell.blogspot.com/20...

      It was written after the principles were dead and after several of them had confirmed the story.

      Sure- they may have been lying. But also, looking at the older issues, her breasts do not seem like the double G whoppers they became later.

      They do complement Woody in the article on at least drawing her with realistic anatomy.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  66. Re:*sigh* by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    Your explanation makes less sense to me than the question.

    Heterosexual male here. I prefer stories where the femaile characters are strong and independent. I dislike stories (and real life) that makes assumptions about peoples capabilities which are based on stereotypes.

    Just maybe, this is a result of changing cultural norms rather than catering to a female audience. Don't be fooled by how loud the knuckle dragging frat boy voice is on Slashdot.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  67. soft vs hard powers by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Some essay on the web discussed how male superheros had hard powers (massive strength, power beams, etc.) where female superheros had soft powers (invisible force fields, hex waves, etc.) illustrating psychological perceptions.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  68. Re: Last sentence by chromeronin799 · · Score: 1

    Or the man they call Jayne.

  69. Re:In other Cinema vs MRAs news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How are they embarrassing all men? Are female MRAs embarrassing all women?

    They are embarrassing themselves. It has nothing to do with me or any other non-MRA man.

  70. Re:*sigh* by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    You'd also have to break it down by how much control the CCA had over the industry and how they exercised that control and then by art style. Also you'd want to look into current CEO's and see if there's any trend there. Merely ascribing it to time or some feminist hook seems to be immensely shortsighted. Of course, she is in high school, so that might be why the science portion of her science project was so shitty.

  71. Re:*sigh* by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    it's a little hard to kick ass in a suit and tie. It would probably look kind of funny too.

    I think John Constantine would dispute that

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  72. Re:Last sentence by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    That's his point. The "What's of particular interest..." suggests it's an unusual and unexpected occurence (although the summary doesn't even say it's a girl, the OP seems to have thought it did).

    Seems a bit condescending, why wouldn't a girl be able to do this?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  73. Re:*sigh* by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Maybe I WANT to be sexually harassed. I also want more oxidizers in margarine as well as permeate in my milk. And for good measure, I'll add my own woosh.

    WOOSH!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  74. Re:Last sentence by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Yep, I read it the other way.

    The fact that the gender wasn't mentioned in the summary at all let alone the sentence he singled out; led me to initially assume he'd just assumed it was a boy. So I read it as:

    I read it as:

      "A boy did this, so what?... why wouldn't a girl be able to?"

    I realized as the thread developed that he meant:

      "A girl did this; why would we think she couldn't?"

    And he originally replied to the thread himself essentially confirming this and also WTFing the fact that the gender he thought was in the summary wasn't actually present. /shrug. one of those cases where I wish I could at least edit posts or add an update to them after the fact...

  75. Re:Super interesting by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

    Listen and Believe

    ?? Oh, yes... 'Hear and Obey' was already taken. Though I still think 'Listen and Believe' is in this context a lame plagiarism.

  76. Re:Last sentence by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I imagine it comes under "sociology", which is counted as a science.

    Well it does have the same ending as Astrology, so I suppose it must be.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  77. Re:Super interesting by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    I guess if you don't know what the headline, byline, and article text are then other simple concepts might be an issue too.

  78. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by samwichse · · Score: 2

    A certain species of whiner that brings up SJWs at every opportunity is actually an irritating SJW itself.

    Ironic.

  79. Re:Super interesting by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I will quote what you replied to so that maybe you can read and understand it a little better:

    Secretly, we all know a male SJW wrote this.

    You then go on to tell AC that the researcher was female. The word "this" could refer to TFS, TFA, or TFRP, not just TFRP. I was pointing out that the person who wrote TFA, was indeed female, but the person who wrote TFS wasn't as clearcut. Your lack of understanding of the GGFP does not mean I failed to understand what you typed.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  80. Re:Enough with this SJW nonsense by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    I think at this point SJW is about as useless a term as hipster is. It's got no meaning other than "those other people, not me though".

    (can't say it ever really had any meaning, just like hipster)

  81. Re:They masterbate with them? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I'm having this conversation:

    Well, you have it, so you better believe it.

    a) You're never too old...welll I haven't found the age yet

    For What? "Never too old" for WHAT?

    b) THIS is where you fall off the 'clue train'....along with 'real' SJW's as opposed to what you probably see as an SJW.

    I'm 52 so I guess I can claim being 'old-fashoioned' too...when I was heavy in to comics (teen years through well in to my 20's...I still think their cool but moved on & can't catch back up) I saw nothing wrong & still see nothing wrong with viewing a hot super-herione as a strong super-herioine AND 'holy crap is she hot' (Starfire from the New Teen Titans). That's what I mean about 'your adolescent mindset' as you seem to think these two thoughts are entirely incompatible (they aren't)...

    I respect that but i was speaking for myself - i am a sexist old Greek, and i wrote "sorry, i am an awful person, i know, but..."

    and if you were REALLY 'old fashioned' you'd know something about decorum & politeness & wouldn't spew every random thought out of your head on the 'internet' that you wouldn't say in public...and trust me I've read/heard it all (so I'm not shocked by anything) I was on newsgroups long before the rest of the world discovered the 'internet'.

    The SJW's didn't make it 'TMI" for this forum it's ALWAYS been 'TMI' for this forum, there are forums where that's not TMI, go find them (this isn't alt.sex.masturbation).

    That's where our cultural backgrounds conflict. I am Greek: saying in public (even in front of ladies) "i will masturbate to a super-heroine" is an "Aristophanic" way to make my (sexist) point. I am new to THIS forum (a month old account), but i have the feeling that you are right: too "UN-Aristophanic"... but i am not sure if it always was this way, or it is because of the current SJW insurgency. Anyway, i know "this isn't alt.sex.masturbation" but you should watch/read some Aristophane - he wrote his work for grown ups like you and me, not teenagers who can't handle a fact of life!

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  82. Re:*sigh* by russotto · · Score: 1

    it's a little hard to kick ass in a suit and tie. It would probably look kind of funny too.

    I think John Constantine would dispute that

    Or the Men In Black.

  83. No matter .... by wartizmukul · · Score: 1

    Character makes the difference no matter who you are.... Marvels make the all character like super hero and heroine.