Slashdot Mirror


Jimmy Wales: London Is Better For Tech Than "Dreadful" Silicon Valley

Mickeycaskill writes: Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has praised London as a tech hub, saying its cultural assets make it an ideal place to do business and superior to Silicon Valley as a place to live. “I meet people around London and they ask ‘when do you go back to San Francisco?’ assuming I’m here for a few days, but I live in London,” he said at the launch of Tech.London. “There’s always this bit of British self-deprecation about ‘oh well, things are so great in Silicon Valley’. But I can tell you, things aren’t that great in Silicon Valley. London has all these incredible advantages of a tech scene, but it’s also a place people want to live. Nobody wants to live in Silicon Valley – it’s dreadful out there. London is this incredible cultural city, it’s at the crossroads of the world. In the US you have San Francisco for tech, Los Angeles for movies and Washington for politics. In London you have all these things. It’s a great place to do business.”

410 comments

  1. Depends on your perspective and tastes by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

    1. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

      Oh come now. London has many more things to offer, such as pigeons.

      Er, and dickheads www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmWN9VYZXfY .

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup. If you are already very rich then London can be nice, but for everyone else it's just expensive and dirty. Property prices in particular are insane. Its' grimy, overcrowded and generally not a very nice place to live.

      Not that Silicon Valley is necessarily much better, but if you are not obsessed with living in a "tech hub" then there are plenty of much nicer places to be.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Informative

      don't forget CCTV. mustn't forget the omnipresent CCTV (roads, streets and buildings). also, you aren't allowed to withhold your passwords from police, there's even less police/secret services transparency than in the US of A; your kids will probably be taken away if you discipline them in public or if you go to a doctor with any kind of genital problem (UK children are not allowed to have genital problems).

      oh and the sweaty armpits on tube (mmmm yummy), yobs who'll knife you if you complain about their loud music at night (wo'd ya say to mee?) and among the highest rent and property prices in the world. however, it's a good place to live if you're a member of any oppressed minority (race, sexuality, religion) as with so many minorities present nobody gives a shit about that anymore.

      and if you happen to speak the most common language of london - polish, your life will be much cheaper (plumbers, carpenters, builders, car servicing, etc). the first thing you should do when you move to london is get a polish friend. i kid you not, they're 100x more useful than your local "citizen's advice bureau".

    4. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Someone I once worked with put it best regarding living in London, there are two groups of people, there are those who have lived there for a short time, i.e. only a year or two who think it's the best thing ever because they've not yet exhausted all the attractions, and then there are the people who lived there all their lives, and know that once the attractions are done, and you've eaten at all the cool places to eat, it's an incredibly shit city to live in. I suppose you're right, you can add the ultra-rich as a third category who will love it because they have the money to paper over it's problems (i.e. they can get their kids out of there and send them to private school, they have chauffeurs so don't have to deal with overcrowded transport, and they can have a country home to get some actual fresh air on weekends).

      It's anyone's guess why Cameron chose London as the UK's tech hub, when London inherently writes off a good portion of the UK's population as willing candidates either because they can't afford to live there, or simply don't want to live in a shit hole. Cambridge was always the obvious choice, but there are other lesser considered yet far better choices too that have rapidly growing tech scenes that have developed naturally without need for government intervention to try and force it as London's "silicon roundabout" has (e.g. Bristol, Sheffield, Edinburgh).

      Other capital cities like Ottawa and Wellington might not have as much upfront to do as London, but at least they're places you'd actually want to live if you had a choice and are the sorts of places you'd actually want to bring up children.

    5. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Someone I once worked with put it best regarding living in London, there are two groups of people, there are those who have lived there for a short time, i.e. only a year or two who think it's the best thing ever because they've not yet exhausted all the attractions, and then there are the people who lived there all their lives, and know that once the attractions are done, and you've eaten at all the cool places to eat, it's an incredibly shit city to live in.

      I moved from London to somewhere where I can walk to unspoiled moor land from my house and live in a 4-bedroom house at the same cost as a studio apartment in London and have no desire to move back. When I have to travel there for work (maybe a week each year) a single trip on the underground reminds me why I moved out.

      That said there are some people who live in London and love it. I know people who can't imagine living somewhere where the nearest cinema is a half-hour's drive away and the nearest decent theater over an hour away though.

    6. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

      "Other things"???

      Do you mean absolutely anything that doesn't involve culture, crowds and money, or do you have specific other things in mind?

    7. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

      London is cheaper and than the valley, and has the infrastructure to cope better with its population density. 101 is a permanent traffic jam and the Caltrain is laughable.

      Are there really people who love the urban sprawl that covers the entire valley?

    8. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I've visited London for 2 weeks, and while it was good to see it, my overall impression was that I wouldn't want to live there.
      Of course I realize that 2 weeks isn't nearly enough time to really get to know a city, but normally when visiting one of Europe's mayor cities on a two week vacation, I love it. And for some reason London didn't raise that feeling in me.
      Naturally London has its amazing landmarks, but overall the city just didn't make me feel comfortable. The parks are not great, the city somehow feels stark and dirty.

      If I had the choice, I would choose any other major city in Europe to live, especially Madrid, Berlin or Barcelona are great. Paris is lovely still, even though some areas have become quite bedraggled due to immigration and poverty. Amsterdam is of course a fucking amazing city to be, if you can tolerate the extreme tourism and partygoers.
      But London... no thanks.

    9. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      overcrowded? not too much. ever been to hong kong or bangkok?

      of course, it's expensive.

      but that's not too much of a problem for jimmy wales and his highly profitable business.

      what was his high tech business again?. oh yeah... dang.. I thought he just last fall again marketed it as a charity that absolutely must have donations or it'll run out of money in 15 years......

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to live in Europe, and also the inherent quality of life. Also in Europe you do not have necessarily to live in the suburbs. I would say women are also thiner, however last time I was in London the situation where you quickly spot on a family of americans because they are all obese is quickly changing. London has also an huge advantage, not that many americans as in silicon valley

    11. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by ruir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that is really the key thing. On those days of always connected and virtualisation technologies, skips and email in our pocket, why do we have to live in dreadful places?

    12. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jimmy Wales: Hey everyone, look at how hip and worldly I am because I am an ex-pat.

    13. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      London is in Europe...

    14. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Londoner here. I grew up in Zone 4, left for ages and I'm now loving in Zone 2/3 border. It's neither the greatest thing ever nor the worst place ever. I'd rather live someqhere quieter and smaller and closer to the outdoors, such as Sheffield (never lived there but I'd love to).

      Cambridge is prefereable too (I lived there on and off for a number of years),unless you hate cycling into the wind in every direction you go in. Los Alamos, or Santa Fe is probably where I'd live given the chance though.

      Either way, London isn't "incerdibly shit" unless you stick to the central bits norf ovva river. If you want "incredibly shit", try Swindon.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

      You don't live in the London I live in.

      Though I'll grant you the crowds.

    16. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are already very rich then London can be nice

      Incidentally, the Wikipedia donation campaign is currently underway.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    17. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in Europe, but not in Europe.

      In Britain, we think of Europe as one word for two different things - the mainland as one and the mainland plus UK+EIRE as another.

    18. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. did you first discover that you're a fucking asshole before or after smoking your first joint?

    19. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dcw3 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why is the parent modded Flamebait? Is there something inaccurate about his post?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    20. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the first paragraph. You should've quit there, mate.

    21. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      overcrowded? not too much. ever been to hong kong or bangkok?

      It's all relative.

      I grew up in a "big city" in the US. No, not LA or NYC but Houston is still a "big city".

      Now I live in a "town" of about 150,000 people. I've heard people complain about how bad traffic is here. Now that I've lived here 10 years I can see what they mean. During our "rush hour" which really only does last about an hour you might have to wait 2 light cycles to get through a major intersection.

      Note I still call it a "town" but the natives here think it's a full-blown city (after all, we've got a college AND a mall).

      When I lived in Phoenix people actually complained about the HUMIDITY during monsoon season. Seriously, some people think it gets really humid there. Coming from Houston, I was loving the dry heat and I don't put dry heat in quotes because it really is a dry heat and it's so much better than a few less degrees with actual humidity.

    22. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Is London where you developed or discovered your xenophobic streak, or did that happen after you moved to the countryside?

      What's this based upon?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    23. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The majority of CCTV is privately-owned and governed by the Data Protection Act of 1998. Disciplining your children by hitting them is illegal, as it's the last act of desperate, shitty parents. Kids can of course have genital problems - you are just making that up, obviously. It is a good place to live if you are a minority, as it's a very progressive place that doesn't give a shit about such petty bullshit. The Metropolitan Police and armed forces marching in the gay pride parade (in uniform, and officially sanctioned) is a good example of that.

      The most common language of London is English (according to the 2011 census 77.9% speak it as their first language), but I guess that doesn't fit in to your "Polish invasion" narrative. Only ~1.9% of Londoners speak Polish as their first language, and many of those speak English.

      But it seems you're not really interested in painting a more accurate picture of London...

    24. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 2

      It's based on his history of xenophobic posts, mainly targeting Muslims. It was an honest question - I really am interested in learning.

    25. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Paris is bedraggled because of poverty, not immigration. Throwing that one in there isn't going to help you make your argument :)

    26. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, with the magic roundabout?? How is that shit? It's awesome!

    27. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Sheffield for just under 18 years. I love to visit London (tend to come down at least a couple of times a year) but I could never live there - too crowded and too noisy for my tastes. Sheffield's a great place to live (like a lot of folk, I came here for the university and then never left).

    28. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 3

      it's a rhetorical device called hyperbole/amplification.

      regarding the official child snatching, only Norway is known for having a more trigger happy social services. (no hyperbole here)

    29. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London? You mean, bad weather, pigeons and garbage everywhere?

    30. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as it's the last act of desperate, shitty parents.

      Nope. There was a child pissing about on the underground for about 7 stops and was told to sit still about 50 times by his mother. The Nigerian father leaned over and walloped him. he sat down and shut up then. Justice!

    31. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xenophobic but targeting Muslims? how about religiophobia?

    32. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Religiophobia is a fear of religions, not of possible adherents of a particular one. Xenophobia is the correct word in this case.

    33. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think British child services is trigger happy?

      Do you think it's maybe because when they're not and something inevitably does happen because they didn't er on the side of caution they were demonised in the media and subsequently by the general public as in the Baby P case?

      Fact is social services is a thankless job, if you protect kids by taking them away just be certain they're safe you're "trigger happy" and it's "official child snatching", if you don't then you're "paedophile enablers", and you "turn a blind eye to child abuse" and the many other things they've been accused of.

      Blame our fucking blame culture for that if you want to blame anything, people just can't accept that bad shit happens and that's the way the world is. Social services are hate targets along with people like the police (amongst whom there are thousands of great officers, for every shit one) and bankers (who didn't exactly ask Gordon Brown to build a massively bloated public sector on the back of their tax receipts that inevitably nearly bankrupt the country when the tax receipts stopped flowing).

    34. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is the parent modded Flamebait? Is there something inaccurate about his post?

      It's flamebait because it's xenophobic drivel, or do you really believe Polish is the most common language in London?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    35. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The majority of CCTV is privately-owned and governed by the Data Protection Act of 1998.

      Oh thank God, now people can sleep securely, now that we know our precious data are in the hands of the private market.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    36. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      overcrowded? not too much. ever been to hong kong or bangkok?

      Yeah. But it's the difference between ridiculously overcrowded and batshit friggin' insanely overcrowded.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    37. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Sheffield for just under 18 years. I love to visit London (tend to come down at least a couple of times a year) but I could never live there - too crowded and too noisy for my tastes. Sheffield's a great place to live (like a lot of folk, I came here for the university and then never left).

      That's what I heard from a bunch of university folks who went to uni and never left too. Visiting the town gave the impression of somewhere great to live. Lots of bikes, lots of happy looking healthy people, the peaks accessible without motorised vehicles. Nice town centre. What's not to like?

      I came pretty close to moving, but ended up staying in London due to a job situation.

      London is crowded and noisy. South is better then North. More green space, no tourist trade so fewer crowds. It's a place one lives rather than visits. In good areas in the south it's really, really quiet at night.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    38. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Funny

      I moved from London to somewhere where I can walk to unspoiled moor land from my house.

      So you are saying London is nice and all, but you were really expecting moor?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I see your point... I'm actually left on the political side of things. But I'm not a huge fan of political correctness. And fact is, that there is alot of African immigration in Paris, the overwhelming majority of them are very poor, and it has a noticeable impact on the city.

      I was quite shocked when I returned to Paris after a long time, and saw people lying on matresses on the streets, some living in tents, people constantly trying to sell me drugs in parks, shabby characters approaching you asking for money or cigarettes... 90% of these people are immigrants, they bring alot of poverty and it doesn't make the city any nicer.

      That's just the way it is. It doesn't mean I hate immigrants, or that I'm a racist. It does mean that immigration is a problem that is being neglected in Europe and needs some serious attention.

    40. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone I once worked with put it best regarding living in London, there are two groups of people, there are those who have lived there for a short time, i.e. only a year or two who think it's the best thing ever because they've not yet exhausted all the attractions, and then there are the people who lived there all their lives, and know that once the attractions are done, and you've eaten at all the cool places to eat, it's an incredibly shit city to live in.

      I moved from London to somewhere where I can walk to unspoiled moor land from my house and live in a 4-bedroom house at the same cost as a studio apartment in London and have no desire to move back. When I have to travel there for work (maybe a week each year) a single trip on the underground reminds me why I moved out.

      That said there are some people who live in London and love it. I know people who can't imagine living somewhere where the nearest cinema is a half-hour's drive away and the nearest decent theater over an hour away though.

      Doesn't sound much different than the USA then in those regards.

    41. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've visited London for 2 weeks, and while it was good to see it, my overall impression was that I wouldn't want to live there.

      For example - I love New York City. I find it incredibly invigorating and inspiring. Awesome food, a great change of pace from my normal environment, and I like most of the people.

      The maximum time I have been able to actually stay in the city is a week. But 6 months later I'm jonesin' for it again. The old "Love to visit, but don't want to live there" is hackneyed but true.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    42. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's really not just high culture, sure there are Michelen starred restaurants, opera, west end musicals, buildings older than the USA, free world class museums, art galleries etc.. But there is also a thriving counter culture (abeit slightly out of the city centre in areas like Camden, Islington, hoxton, shoreditch, dalston and Kilburn) with live music of all forms, art, events, making, hacking and just about anything else you could ever want to do, it's a huge city (geographically as well as population wise) and as a result you can make anything you want out of the city

    43. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      Yes, you know...

      Storm in English Channel. Europe isolated.

    44. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You just admitted it yourself - they are poor. It doesn't matter if they were born in Paris, Lyon, Mars, Germany, wherever - if you take a poor person and put them in that situation, the outcome is the same. It's not about political correctness, it's about correctness. Getting hung up on an accidental quality isn't going to help the situation. If you somehow got rid of all the immigrants, and made every Parisian just as poor as the immigrants were, it would be a much worse situation.

      So no - immigration is not the problem, but poverty. You said it yourself in your post, a couple of times, actually. Fix poverty, then it you don't have to stop people from moving about. You're not an immigrant hater or a racist, you're just not being very logical :) You can remove every reference to immigration and immigrants in your post, and your argument will make just as much sense, and be entirely accurate to boot.

    45. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      If you want to order in restaurants, a working knowledge of Turkish is helpful. Polish is for tradesmen, such as the cable guy.

    46. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by jittles · · Score: 1

      Yup. If you are already very rich then London can be nice, but for everyone else it's just expensive and dirty. Property prices in particular are insane. Its' grimy, overcrowded and generally not a very nice place to live.

      Not that Silicon Valley is necessarily much better, but if you are not obsessed with living in a "tech hub" then there are plenty of much nicer places to be.

      I've been to quite a few major cities on three different continents. While the underground in London is indeed dirty compared to somewhere like Munich, I would not consider the greater London area to be very dirty at all. Paris is, on the other hand, one of the dirtiest cities I have ever been to. There are major cities in Latin America that are far cleaner than Paris. NYC is pretty dirty also.

    47. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      The problem in both London and Paris is the unvetted, uncontrollable stream of refugees pouring in from across the Mediterranean. These cities have no-go neighborhoods now, just like large American cities.

      Europeans used to think of uncontrolled refugee influx as a Pig AmeriKKKa problem that would never happen to them, but we're all Arizonans now. Watch for France to elect a Joe Arpaio of its own.

    48. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Easy, Hitler. Grown-ups are talking.

    49. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Disciplining your children by hitting them is illegal, as it's the last act of desperate, shitty parents.

      I grew up with people who got to occasional well deserves swat on the butt, they are all pretty well adjusted. I see a lot more kids now who are psychologically screwed up because their parents are verbally abusive because they don't do any sort of corporal punishment. As with anything, excess is bad. And you can really screw up someone without ever laying a finger on them.

    50. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You really have no idea. Your ignorance of politics and geography is astounding.

    51. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking as someone who moved to Silicon Valley from London...

      Oh god, no, no one wants to be in London.
      1) People in the bay area think it's expensive - no, London is expensive. Rents there can be up to 4 times rents in SF. The average is double SF.
      2) Pay is lower in London, despite the place being more expensive.
      3) The weather is fucking terrible.
      4) The people are rude, and unfriendly. Sure, it's not as bad as Paris, but it's much worse than the bay area.
      5) It's impossible to get out of the city without travelling for multiple hours (while in the bay area it's typically 10-20 minutes to some open space).

      Frankly, I'm very glad that the tech industry is all in the bay area, not in London.

    52. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do it. No denying it. Are you so obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing that you must stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it? He's challenged you to do better. It's evident you can't. You can't even prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong, agreeing with him he is correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had.

    53. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Cambridge would have been a great choice. An even better choice though would have been Silicon Glen, which has existed for decades already. The games industry is hugely strong in Scotland, and one of the primary drivers of the economy. He should have tried to build on there being a lot of software engineers already there, and expanded it beyond just the games industry.

      I agree completely that trying to set up "Silicon Roundabout" in London is complete bullshit. But hey, that's the hallmark of the tories - if it's not about the South East of England, then it doesn't count, and/or doesn't exist.

    54. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it almost never makes much sense, in any topic, to talk purely about the -is- state without taking the changes and developments into consideration that caused this state to be. Paris has changed considerably in the last 20 years. One of the most evident change is the increase in porverty, and this is caused in no small part by immigration.

      Why should I not mention immegration as a cause of this development? And what is illogical about saying this?

      In fact it is quite meaningful to make this connection, because it provides the information that the majority of French people are still quite well of and that the poverty mainly affects a fringe group of people due to their special circumstances. It tells us that the problem is not mainly the French economy, but the unusually high influx of unqualified laborers who can not find any jobs.

    55. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 2

      Los Alamos, or Santa Fe is probably where I'd live given the chance though.

      I would recommend you give Albuquerque a chance (that's where I live). If you want less crowded, you can live in the east mountains (Tijeras, etc.) I live on the east side of the city, and I am 2 blocks from the foothill trails, and a 5-minute drive from the tram that will take you to the top of the mountain.

      The cost of living is far, far cheaper than living in Santa Fe; and the coffee shops don't close at 7:00pm like they do in Los Alamos.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    56. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by beelsebob · · Score: 3, Informative

      London isn't cheaper than the Valley at all. Average house prices in central London are £5000 a square foot. Slightly further out they're around £1500 a square foot.

      Compare that to the valley, where in the south bay they're around $1500 a square foot in central SF, and $1000 a square foot in the south bay. (note, different currencies, so the delta is bigger than it looks). London is both more expensive than the bay area, and they'll pay you less.

      As far as urban sprawl goes... the Bay Area is far less sprawled than London. Even if you are in the centre of the largest spread of sprawl in the bay area (probably somewhere slightly west of the centre of San Jose), you're at most 20 minutes from open country side (by car). In London, in the centre, you're roughly 2 hours away, such is the size of the sprawl.

      Even if you measure sprawl by the time it takes to commute, and assume a worst case in the bay area (living in Oakland, working at Apple is probably about the worst) - that's a 1 hour commute. That's a pretty short commute by London standards. More so, the commute in the bay area will have been done entirely on nice (not crowded) coaches, rather than over-crowded, not-air-conditioned trains and underground services.

      Are there really people who love the urban sprawl that covers the entirety of Greater London?

    57. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      And you think these things (mod buildings older than the USA) don't exist in San Francisco?

    58. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, Santa Fe is pricier, but I love the cool laid back feel of it.

      In Los Alamos, you've got some awesome bikable canyons running through the middle of town! And there's the ski hill which is about 15 minutes drive from the town centre to the ski lift.

      And we have a new super Smiths so there's a sports bar (right in the middle---WTF??) open properly late and everything :)

      It was funny returning to London from Los Alamos. I'd go to dinner at 5:30 worries that it might be a bit late, only to get peculiar looks from the waiting staff in an utterly deserted restaurant.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    59. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Xest · · Score: 1

      I've never lived in Sheffield, but I have worked there for a few years and I do go there now and again because I miss the culture - it's very educated and liberal. But I also think what struck me is that so many people there are just great at organising themselves that many other cities like. This means that there are disproportionately more startups than most other British cities, there are many and varied festivals, and there are countless interesting clubs and societies such as a great astronomy society, through to an excellent maker scene, to chemistry clubs that convene regularly in a pub (Chemistry and Beer, what could possibly go wrong!). Even the homeless guy (an ex-Afghan translator for the British Army given asylum here) I used to walk past daily seemed in on the attitude, he was out there selling his magazines whether rain, snow, wind, or sun and never lost his smile.

      Obviously London has much of this due to it's sheer size, but what makes Sheffield stand out in this respect is that it's all condensed into such a small area so you simply don't have to go far to access any of it and it's fairly unique to many other cities in the UK I've frequented in this respect.

      There are still parts of the city that haven't really recovered from the collapse of the mining and steel industry, but the speed at which the shit parts have vanished is unparalleled by any other similarly affected cities and work is still well underway with no sign of slowing down. As such I suspect even the few remaining scratty pockets of the city will look modern and clean within a decade. It's really hard to understate how good a job Sheffield has done against the odds of transforming and modernising itself.

      I also liked the Millennium Gardens there because having what is frankly a big tropical greenhouse to eat your lunch in when the inevitable English rain comes along meant you weren't stuck in your office at lunch time as you are in most cities either, then during the sunnier days sitting in the Peace Garden or the Botanical Garden meant there was always somewhere relaxing to eat.

      There's a big proposal currently from what I understand to completely revamp the Chinese parts of the city and the plans look pretty impressive. The level of Chinese investment in the city cannot be understated - it's incredible how much the Chinese love Sheffield. Like London, it's incredibly multi-cultural, and the Chinese seem to be the largest grouping.

      Oh, and it has one of the only four Taco Bells in the UK :)

      There's lots to love about the city, I'd gladly work there again at the drop of a hat if a job that interested me came up.

    60. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Thammuz · · Score: 1

      Also moved to Sheffield as a student and never left. Wonderful place:
      - Friendly strangers rather than what you get with southerners, who look at you as if you are mad if you speak to them (I'm from High Wycombe originally so I'm in that southerner bracket!)
      - London accessible on 2hr train if you need something bigger/business networking
      - Peaks on doorstep
      - Regeneration is going nicely and the town centre is nice and has everything you really need
      - Central location in the UK easy to get to other places
      - Lots of great breweries nearby
      - Laid back attitude that comes with the generally nice environment and universities
      - Great intermingling of cultures in places

      They are even finally doing something about the roads!

    61. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      the uk is moving in a london vs the rest mode of thinking.

    62. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Errr APK - you are stalking me right now. I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense, in a vain attempt to try to get you to stop. You are following me through my posting history and adding these strange multiple-personality-disorder-esque attacks on me while pretending to be someone else. It's worrying behaviour. Seriously. Get some help.

    63. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor communication followed by ramping straight up to corporal punishment - sounds like the very definition of shitty parenting to me.

    64. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Because regardless of whether it's the immigrants or native-born French people who are poor, poverty is the problem. If you want to fix the problem, fix poverty, as that fixes the perceived problem with immigration and that of poor French people, all without trampling France's history of welcoming immigrants and its egalitarian nature into the dirt through fear-based reactionary politics.

    65. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by funwithBSD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Come on guys, everyone knows the CCTVs are really there for CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    66. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid.

    67. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It's anyone's guess why Cameron chose London as the UK's tech hub

      Not really. Like many others of his class and professional background, he only occasionally remembers that there's life outside the M25.

    68. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Silicon Fen in Cambridge has also existed for decades already. Dundee's biggest advantage over Cambridge might be that it's too far to commute to London: Cambridge is already part commuter town, which is putting pressure on housing.

    69. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment. Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid.

    70. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Keep puffing Dave420! It's done you such wonders.

    71. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Let me put it this way:
      Poverty is the problem. Why?
      Many people do not have a job. Why?
      There is an abundance of unqualified labor. Why?
      Many people haven't had a good education. Why?
      Many people didn't have access to good educational institutions. Why?
      Many people are immigrants from Africa.

      If you want to find solutions to problems, you have to know the causes and the source. Otherwise you are just fighting the symptom. By digging down you list all the points that could be changed to improve the situation.

      You could go on:
      Why are there so many immigrants from Africa?
      There are wars, extreme poverty and human rights abuses in Africa. Why?
      There is a lack of democratic institutions in Africa. Why?
      etc...

      You choose to simply stop at the very first point. In my opinion that severely limits discussion and the options to think and do something about the problem.

    72. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Smoking weed is actively discouraged yet you do it in your illogic logic right there. Keep projecting and puffing, clown.

    73. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 pot puffing clown: Why's it when you speak I hear a calliope play https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ?

    74. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      That's my favorite explanation too.

    75. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by mikael · · Score: 1

      London has fast connections to the rest of Europe; Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, Stansted, and embassies to provide support for international workers.

      All the cities have universities,with each specializing in a particular field; embedded systems, medical research, computer animation. Smaller cities are usually dominated by one or two industries for the highest salaries (like banking, oil and gas or microelectronics), so that other industries can't compete to provide salaries to afford good schools and housing. Anywhere within an hour of London, and you have tech workers competing against city workers for housing.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    76. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Humans are social creatures, we like to be near each other. The value of living in London is all the other people who live in London.

    77. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by mikael · · Score: 1

      They are poor because they don't have any of the skills required in Paris. In France, everyone either gets an Baccalaureate and goes to university or goes to trade school (everything from being a chef, a nurse, a plumber or joiner), does an internship for a couple of years and gets a qualification that allows them to set up their own business.

      If you are an illegal immigrant with no formal qualifications or business experience, then there isn't any way of getting out of poverty. You might be able to live day to day as a street trader.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    78. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Judging by that shit kid's behaviour, immediate execution would have been warranted.

    79. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course cheap and plentiful meth...

    80. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuckle. Not all of us are social creatures :D

      Many prefer to physically stay as far from society as we can. The only interaction being a digital one that can be shut off as soon as it becomes annoying.

      My personal dream of an ideal place to live would be on an uncharted island somewhere. Or in my Evil Lair built into a Volcano. I would be completely content with either :D

    81. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, London isn't "incerdibly shit" unless you stick to the central bits norf ovva river. If you want "incredibly shit", try Swindon.

      I heard they dropped an atomic bomb on Swindon. Did 15 quid worth of damage.

    82. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      It may not be the most common language, but it is probably one of the more useful second languages to know.

      Much like Spanish is in just about anywhere urban in the US.

      I've been to London exactly once, and I was probably served by more people with Eastern European (likely Polish) names than I was by people with actual English names. It was... odd... but not really surprising when I stopped to thing about it for a second. Just like in the US, it's the immigrants who are doing the service jobs.

    83. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by slew · · Score: 1

      France's history of welcoming immigrants and its egalitarian nature...

      I assume you mean just in the last few years.

      The previous administrations headed by Chirac and Sarkozy weren't really known for being "welcoming" to immigrants... According to OECD statistics, during that time, France recorded one of the lowest rates of immigration among top European countries, and the number of naturalizations fell precipitously (~50%) due to more stringent language skills and culture testing requirements. I believe the average time for naturalization is still hovering about 15 years in France (which no doubt is biased by the fact if you are born in France, you can apply for naturalization at 18). In most other countries, time for naturalization (if allowed by visa) is generally around 5-10 years...

      Of course once you become a citizen, it may indeed have an egalitarian nature, but I've heard that prior to naturalization status, it isn't quite as egalitarian as one might expect...

    84. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring the unsustainable population growth in the most impoverished areas in the world sits at the root of all the problems currently being faced in the world today. The exodus of people from these countries into more developed countries has only served to spread the misery across a wider geographical area while overwhelming the receiving countries citizen welfare services and support structures. The new immigrants have also brought their native conflicts into their new host countries. Unsustainable population growth is eating into the planetary resources and creating a future where resource wars are unavoidable. The world keeps ignoring this glaring fact and assuming some magical technological advancements will come along and save the day.

    85. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by aralin · · Score: 1

      Bay Area has shit public transport and highways that only work at times you don't need them. (Outside of 6am to 9am and 4pm to 7pm) So you always end up being stuck somewhere. And everything is too far. People from San Francisco will almost never travel out of the city, for example. You almost have to blackmail them to do it. You might be 20 minutes away from open country, but if you would actually leave work hour early and go there, its 2 hours to get from work to home and 2 hours to get from home to anywhere outside Bay Area. So its dark before you get anywhere.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    86. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Is London where you developed or discovered your xenophobic streak, or did that happen after you moved to the countryside?

      When did you stop beating your wife?

    87. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Religiophobia is a fear of religions, not of possible adherents of a particular one. Xenophobia is the correct word in this case.

      its hard to tell with you whether it's ignorance or wilful misrepresentation - but xenophobia means "Intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries". Hatred of things like Nazism, Islam, and other ideologies based on supremacy and violence or suppression of others is neither irrational nor based on country of origin.

    88. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I commute from the South Downs every day (and it takes under an hour). It's pretty much open countryside around here.

    89. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 does't have a wife but he does plenty of beating if you catch my drift.

    90. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just live in West New York, New Jersey. You get the best of both worlds!!

    91. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by khallow · · Score: 1

      On those days of always connected and virtualisation technologies, skips and email in our pocket, why do we have to live in dreadful places?

      The problem here is that high concentrations of people are always, invariably dreadful. There's various negative factors that come into play with high population densities (eg, crime, transportation logistics, destruction of green space) that we haven't yet figured out.

      Silicon Valley was a nice place before the people. But move several million people into a small place and the original advantages get swamped. It's just the way it is, currently.

    92. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind the dirt so much in NYC, but the smell is just incredible, and it's ever present. It's only after getting accustomed to the smells above that the subway becomes tolerable. And despite the subway being buried the heat down there is worse than on the street.

      I've never been to London, but if I had to choose between Silicon Valley and NYC, I would definitely go with Silicon Valley. I lived all over the San Jose area for a couple years and Mountain View/Sunnyvale/Cupertino/Los Altos were all rather pleasant compared to NYC.

    93. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The rush hour traffic was pretty bad when I lived there around the turn of the century. That said I thought the highway system with expressways and such was a very nice design. The problem was just that at rush hours it gets overly congested, otherwise it worked very well for getting most places quickly. Most of the people I met though that worked in Tech either lived in the immediate area and weren't commuting from SF, or lived much further out but used public transit for most of the commute. As I recall there were light rail stations right by some of the largest employers of the day. I knew a guy that commuted from Hollister using the rail system for most of the trip and just played games on his laptop the whole way.

    94. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Having only spent a few days in London years ago, I don't know. Having grown up near Hamtramck, MI, which had the 2nd largest Polish population outside of Warsaw for any city back then, I was exposed to a lot of that, so maybe it was a dumb question.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    95. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      oh please, the cuisine is the London is non-existent, they don't have any. The weather varies from sucky to horrible. The beer is mediocre except what comes from other parts of the UK, ditto for other liquor. The government run television and radio is hardly a bastion of culture.

    96. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      five years ago your dumbass didnt even know the word "xenophobic". everyone ignore tapecutter as the stupid parrot he is

    97. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Because they all still suck compared to face to face communication.

    98. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      My favorite part is the use of the third person, as if he's trying to convince us that APK is not the author of those posts.

    99. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      That's great for you. Meanwhile I commute from the west of Sunnyvale (takes about 15 minutes), and am about 3 minutes from open countryside.

    100. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I like to be near people, but I don't like to feel crowded by people. London was wonderful to visit, and I was more comfortable there than when I've been to New York City. I could imagine living somewhere well outside the city core and being happy to have the benefits of a large city nearby (similar to my current situation between LA and San Diego). I can't imagine living within the city itself, though. Plenty of people love the closeness, but it just feels like uncomfortable crowding to me, and I wonder if the GP might have a similar opinion.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    101. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite part is seeing Dave420 use his many sockpuppets like you.

    102. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the pot puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid.

    103. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rakarra = Dave420. Dave420's song's playing (pot puffing clown) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and it makes it easy to tell what's what. Poor dimwitted Dave420. He's so transparent. It's all that fine pot smoking doing wonders for his "intelligence". Too bad he's a zero and wonders why. Keep puffin the weed Dave. See where it gets you in life.

    104. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understand you're dealing with an obtuse pot smoking dolt (Dave420) who tries to play smart only to show his utter dope addled stupidity everytime. When you read his puke on slashdot, it helps to hear his themesong (pot puffing clown) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... so you keep laughing all the more, perhaps understanding Dave420's utter stupidity better.

    105. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Poverty, as a whole, is not fixable Excessive immigration is. Reducing the quantity of non-natives reduces both the quantity and severity of poverty.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    106. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunnyvale is fucking ghetto.

    107. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      London is great if you are on a high salary and you don't have kids. I could see myself living in London forever if it weren't such a terrible place to raise kids.

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    108. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Xest · · Score: 1

      Personally even without kids (I don't have any) I'd never live there, but I actually like fresh air and having a decent sized garden.

      Ultimately it depends what you want out of life, if you're happy living with shit air quality and having fuck all space to yourself then as you say London is great, otherwise there's just no real benefit to it - the London salary weighting is rapidly eaten up by the drastically higher cost of living, so you end up with less money to even get out of London and go on holiday and shit too.

      You've really just got to love city lifestyle, if you do then London is about as good as any other major city, but some capital cities like those I mentioned - Ottawa, Wellington and so forth do an excellent job of providing a balance between city life and having more natural features, and personally for me I think that's optimal - you get the best of both worlds.

    109. Re: Depends on your perspective and tastes by Bootes · · Score: 1

      London is fairly similar to NYC, except that it's always overcast/drizzling and the food sucks. England was also known for having pretty crappy Internet in the past. I don't know if that's improved, although it's actually worse in Palo Alto. As someone who has lived in all 3 places, I would easily pick Silicon Valley... The weather is awesome and there's so many beautiful places to explore just a short car ride away.

    110. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ready to be re-flashed with SCORPION STARE firmware... ;-)

    111. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Why not both. Evil lair built into a volcano on an uncharted island. Lasers, sharks, hot grits...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    112. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that the people who disagree with you are all sockpuppets trying to pull one over on you? I suppose when you employ sockpuppet accounts yourself, you start to see everyone else as a sockpuppet of whomever you currently have a beef with.

      What a shame, I don't even have a problem with host-file-based browser security.

    113. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd actually ever lived in London, you would know none of what you said is true...

    114. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I really have to say this here? When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life.

    115. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xenophobia is not based on religion. You're pretty fucking stupid.

    116. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jersey is 99.99% shithole. You know the difference between trash and Jersey girls? Trash gets picked up. Most of the population of Jersey is fucking brain damaged from the pollution.

    117. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      don't forget CCTV. mustn't forget the omnipresent CCTV (roads, streets and buildings). also, you aren't allowed to withhold your passwords from police, there's even less police/secret services transparency than in the US of A; your kids will probably be taken away if you discipline them in public or if you go to a doctor with any kind of genital problem (UK children are not allowed to have genital problems).

      oh and the sweaty armpits on tube (mmmm yummy), yobs who'll knife you if you complain about their loud music at night (wo'd ya say to mee?) and among the highest rent and property prices in the world. however, it's a good place to live if you're a member of any oppressed minority (race, sexuality, religion) as with so many minorities present nobody gives a shit about that anymore.

      and if you happen to speak the most common language of london - polish, your life will be much cheaper (plumbers, carpenters, builders, car servicing, etc). the first thing you should do when you move to london is get a polish friend. i kid you not, they're 100x more useful than your local "citizen's advice bureau".

      Your humor is very sarcastic. Sadly for the USA, almost any place is better than Silicon Valley. Why even Fairbanks Alaska or the Florida keys would be better. Most other US states, Europe, Canada, Latin America, India, Malaysia, and everywhere else have the talented engineers and imaginative people who can do better or equal.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    118. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The Data Protection Act stipulates it precisely is not in the private market - misuse of it is taken pretty seriously. But whatever - kneejerk reactions are waaay more fun!

    119. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Well, you've criticised Islam in the past (by confusing fundamentalist Islam with moderate Islam), and also talked highly disparagingly about Muslim people. That is where it crosses into xenophobia. The fact you can't even get your hate straight in your own head doesn't particularly paint you in a good light.

    120. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Poverty is entirely fixable. You are also assuming non-natives are poorer than Parisians, which is also clearly nonsense.

    121. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's your response? That's all you have? You can't explain your hatred?

    122. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I experienced the same thing heading out to Phoenix at the end of August some years back from Atlanta. It rained there which just made it that much more comfortable. I even went out for a drive to some of the sights and even with 95 degree temps it felt comfortable unlike 95F and >60% humidity.

    123. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But whatever - kneejerk reactions are waaay more fun!

      Sometmes kneejerk reactions are just satirical as well. Keep calm.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    124. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you aren't allowed to withhold your passwords from police" What? Of course you are.

      You can't withhold your password from a court, in exactly the same way as you can't withhold a safe code.

      If you have a problem with the justice system having access to all information before making a decision then I suggest you talk to your democratically elected representative. S/he'll probably do you the courtesy of not laughing in your face.

    125. Re:Depends on your perspective and tastes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose most of those are subjective. They don't fit with my experience. But as someone who commuted from Ascot into the City and then Brighton into the City number 5 is complete bollocks.

  2. Cue the flame war by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As everyone starts to insult where everybody else lives.

    1. Re: Cue the flame war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live on a dung heap, shitboy. Sucks to be you.

    2. Re:Cue the flame war by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      As everyone starts to insult where everybody else lives.

      You could at least tell us where, so we can insult your place intelligently.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Cue the flame war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presently, he's up his own ass. And you're up your own ass. And I'm joining you, but in my own ass.

      Like Americans in cars. (I'm American, BTW.)

      How's that for a start?

    4. Re:Cue the flame war by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Presently, he's up his own ass. And you're up your own ass. And I'm joining you, but in my own ass.

      And just a small piece of paper could wipe us out!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Cue the flame war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could at least tell us where, so we can insult your place intelligently.

      Come now, this is Slashdot. Nothing is done intelligently!

    6. Re:Cue the flame war by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      I for one despise this undisclosed location.

    7. Re:Cue the flame war by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You could at least tell us where, so we can insult your place intelligently.

      Come now, this is Slashdot. Nothing is done intelligently!

      Sigh. I'll just have to wing it then. Godamned People from Boston. Or was that Houston?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Cue the flame war by antdude · · Score: 1

      127.0.0.1

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  3. Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The silicon roundabout is mostly wishful thinking by artsy fartsy posers and politicos. The real tech innovation that does happen in the UK, happens despite all the good intentions, not because of it.

    1. Re:Pfft. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Sounds about par for the course. It got so depressing that I stopped reading.

      Despite all the effort, Old Street is a tech hub, and I work near by. There's a massive amount of fuss about it but none of the government schemes have any bearing on the tech startups working here in any practical sense. The main thing is that there's a dearth of reasonably priced co-working space in London that doesn't suck massive donkey balls (e.g. closing at 8pm!) and round Old St there are a few places which offer it. So of course it fills up with tech companies and that is handy because having peers aruound is nice.

      As far as I can tell the government schemes are nothing more than a noisy and annoying back slapping exercise where they get to talk shit about "innovation" and whatnot without actually lifting a finger to help the small startups that really really need the assistance. I don't know a single person who's benefited in any material way.

      Here's a nice example of a semi-useless scheme. For example you can recoup up to 33% of R&D costs including salaries, which is great for a startup. Except you need 18 months of operating capital because that's how long it takes to get the recoupment back. Naturally I'll make use of it in a while, but the problem is hte next 6 months as always not the next 18. All the stuff is to help big companies.

      So let's see the vaunted schemes.

      There's google's "Innovation Hub". It's an overprice cafe where you can't get a seat because of all the dickheads (technical term) on macbooks camping out for the free wifi.

      There's BT's accelerated broadband rollout which means it takes 9 months to get fibre as opposed to never. Technically that is accelerated.

      There's a bunch of "hackathons" which seem to amount to very little except some cheap IP for the sponsoring companies.

      EE have introduced 4G (but they did that everywhere else anyway so no one gives a crap).

      There's Inmarsat right on the roundabout but that's a closed-door big ass-company which has no effect apart from keeping Silvio's Quality Sandwiches in business.

      And there's a bunch of incestor thingies but basically none of them seem very keen in actually investing in anything and they seem to spend a lot of time talking about how marvellous they are and running camps and contests and giving out business cards and saying how everything is so wonderful and internet of things and cloud and so on and so forth.

      So the good reasons to be here are good transport connections, good co-working space, decent people and companies with which to share the co-working space, reasonable shops nearby (say what you like about Maplin and whatever it's useful to be able to get something NOW), and a few hackerspaces/makerspaces within striking distance so if your company is actually prototyping hardware you have facilities without having to travel for an hour.

      The government for all their bullshit has contributed about zero p towards that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Must be the British self-deprecation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like "high culture", have money, and don't mind crowds then London is great. If you prefer other things not so much.

    Grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

    1. Re:Must be the British self-deprecation? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      No, not really. You either like a city like New York or you don't. Most people don't. That why they avoid such megacities.

      The whole lot of them are like that (SFO,LA,London,NYC,DC). They are nice to visit but you probably wouldn't want to actually live there.

      Glamour cities just get a lot of attention because of media concentration.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Must be the British self-deprecation? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Must be the British self-deprecation? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Well, quite a few of people are at least somewhat positive about living in a mega-city, by definition.

    4. Re:Must be the British self-deprecation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "By definition" would mean that the definition of "mega-city" is: a place where quite a few people are at least somewhat positive about living there.

      Are you sure that ought to be the definition of a mega-city or are you assuming that residency in a large city means that the resident is pleased to live there?

      Believe me, there are plenty of miserable people living in huge cities. They just don't any other choice.

    5. Re:Must be the British self-deprecation? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      New York City is nothing like Los Angeles. NYC is indeed a city, whereas LA is an enormous suburb.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  5. Well, there's no lack of by vanDrunen · · Score: 1

    Indians... I kid i kid. And investors from 'the city'. But if it's truly so great then where are all these new booming tech startups.

    1. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you father and his colonist father (whichever hell they are in) will be very proud

    2. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a common misunderstanding that innovation has to happen in "startups". It can happen in well established businesses too - that now and then bring new cool products to market. They don't necessarily "grow" as a result of this, because their new cool products simply replace older offerings that nobody wants anymore.

      Phones with 4G was not provided by startups - they replaced 2G/3G offerings from established players. And so on - tech producers have a R & D department - or they don't last long.

    3. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he is right. In most part of the suburbia it looks far much more Calcutta than London. Why people cannot say the truth anymore? just because some shit like you does not like?

    4. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      So, can someone list a few of the innovations that have come out of the London area in the last ten or twenty years? It's a serious question...I don't know.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's not that people don't like it, but because it's simply not true, and doesn't matter a fucking bit. Sure, you can find areas where there are Indian communities, but to somehow forget the vast white majority is incredibly telling. You're also forgetting the fact that there wouldn't be a London of the size and influence there is without the immigrants. After WWII they were the ones who moved to the city and rebuilt it. Now that's done, kind souls like you are more than prepared to tell them to fuck off and view them as some sort of undesirable element. You really don't know your history.

    6. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And if you got your list, what would that mean to you? It tells you nothing of the people who invented them (or where they are from), or where the precursor work was performed (and also by whom). It seems like an entirely vacuous thing to want to know.

    7. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can someone list a few of the innovations that have come out of the London area in the last ten or twenty years?

      LIBOR fixing. That was pretty innovative.

    8. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Keep puffing clown!

    9. Re:Well, there's no lack of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Smoking weed is for the vacuous stupid. Keep projecting and puffing, clown.

    10. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      So, because you don't see the point, that makes it vacuous? Well, let's see.

      1. It would either back up or disprove the GP's point.
      2. It would either back up or disprove the point of the article.
      3. And finally, my curiosity got to me regarding an area like SV, which is very dense in tech, vs. that of London which IMO has the claimed culture, finance, fashion industries, but not nearly the tech density...I wondered how it would compare.

      Is that too vacuous?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    11. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yup - still vacuous. It will only ever tell you a tiny piece of the story, so to draw any kind of conclusions from that is rather similar to judging a book by its cover.

    12. Re:Well, there's no lack of by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If you believe what you just wrote, you know zip about logic, data, and making conclusions. Have a nice day.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  6. London's fantastic... by GrahamCox · · Score: 3, Informative

    London's fantastic if you're rich, or at least well-off. If you're poor, or simply young, it's awful. Housing is totally unaffordable.

    1. Re:London's fantastic... by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not quite...

      A lot of the negative preconceptions around London are based on tales from people who are determined to cling to the city centre. I used to be one of them; living in a tiny, poxy flat in Zone 2 and paying through the nose for it.

      I then took stock, realised that I was spending so much on being close to the centre and was so stressed out by the downsides (noise, antisocial behaviour, general crowding) that I wasn't actually enjoying the supposed benefits. So I bought a place - at a fairly reasonable price - in Zone 5 (and south of the river to boot). From stations within a few minutes walk of where I live, I can be at Victoria station in less than 20 minutes and London Bridge in less than 25. I also get a pleasant, leafy environment, a rock-bottom local crime rate and decent - albeit very mainstream - local shops and amenities. And I'm not exactly mega-rich... "reasonable middle-income" is probably the best description.

      If you want to do the full on hipster thing of living in the middle of town so that you can cycle to work and walk to your local pop-up organic smoothie yurt before going window-shopping for hemp underwear, then unless you are rich, you will have no money, will live in squalor and your impressions of London will sour pretty fast.

      If you want good access to the city's big employment centres and cultural highlights, then just conquer your snobbery about the outer Zones (a point-to-point ticket from Zone 5 doesn't cost much more than a Zone 1-2 travelcard) and going properly south of the river.

    2. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or move even further outside, where the greenery increases dramatically and the house prices drop further. I live 60 miles from London in a beautiful house with half an acre of land. My daily commute into London's financial district is 50 minutes. You can have the best of both worlds.

    3. Re:London's fantastic... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      How does that differ from Silicon Valley?

    4. Re:London's fantastic... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      That's another reasonable option and I have friends who do it. Hell, I spent 18 months commuting from Cambridge (close to 15 years ago now) and it wasn't too bad. Wouldn't be possible these days, though - Cambridge living costs are almost as nuts as central London now.

      The only thing you have to watch for with the longer distance commuting is that you really can find yourself at the mercy of rail fair increases; some of the season ticket prices can get very steep indeed once you go beyond the London boundary.

    5. Re: London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the price of your gold plated season ticket would feed a family for a year!

    6. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon Valley is still mediocre if you're rich.

    7. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      All your talk of "zones" makes London sound like an oppressive dystopian nightmare. At least to me, someone unfamiliar with the location. Why "zones"? Are "neighborhoods" or "districts" not high-techy enough?

      But what do I know? I live in the silicon valley...

    8. Re: London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a self righteous cunt. your computer would also feed a child or the cost of your internet connection to help immunize families in Africa. Don't lecture people about luxuries while indulging in them useful prick.

    9. Re:London's fantastic... by Legionary13 · · Score: 1

      Sounds sensible. I did something similar 25 years ago by moving to Luton. The train service was fine and I was a two-minute run from the countryside. Luton house prices were lower than in surrounding towns but I didn’t have any problems in the three years I was there.

    10. Re:London's fantastic... by dave420 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      50 minutes? Fuck that noise. If your time means so little to you, you've already lost.

    11. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public transport zones.

    12. Re: London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If memory serves, the 'zones' are public transit pricing classifications(to allow for a rough, but at least slightly granular, 'further costs more' ticket system. Basically any public transit system will have something similar, though whether or not they are good enough that people talk about them when discussing housing differs. The city itself isn't (yet) built along City 17 style population sectors, omnipresent security forces, and giant projections of David Cameron's head; though not necessarily for lack of trying.

    13. Re:London's fantastic... by dave420 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't assume so much! It's how the London Underground is organised. Of course there are areas of London, but as there are so many of them, zones are used when describing distance from the centre. You can see them in this map. The area in the middle is Zone 1, and they extend outwards.

    14. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 2

      I don't get why people want to live in cities - I really just don't understand it. For example:

      From stations within a few minutes walk of where I live, I can be at Victoria station in less than 20 minutes and London Bridge in less than 25.

      By comparison, from my land in 25 minutes I drive past my neighbor's waterfall on the other side of my canyon, past the fjord, down between the mountains and the ocean and into town. You share a ride with little personal space with strangers in an underground tunnel.

      I just don't understand why people want that kind of life.

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    15. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Since when is London not an oppressive dystopian nightmare?

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    16. Re:London's fantastic... by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      It's for understanding how much you'll pay for public transport, nothing more nothing less.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    17. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In London Zones refer to the way the pricing is set up for all TFL run services ie Underground, Buses, DLR etc. They are a set of rings starting with Zone 1 in the centre and working out to 6 plus 7 8 & 9 in the north west.

    18. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you're talking about Croydon - South of the river with good connections to Victoria and London Bridge...
      Even there, prices have shot up since they announced the redevelopment of the Whitgift centre.
      I bought in 2011, and now similar houses to mine are being marketed at 50% above what I paid (£300k vs £200k I paid). I'm not sure I'd buy where I live if I had to buy now.

      I agree with your sentiment though, I'm staggered by the amount some of my colleagues pay for their zone 2 or 3 (on a tube line) places. I get to Canary Wharf in the same sort of time friends of mine do, and I've got the night train that'll get me most of the way home (Gatwick trains run throughout the night so yay for getting home after 1am).

      But the distance you need to move out is greater than ever, and still increasing.

    19. Re:London's fantastic... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It would be helpful if you could state what town you live in and roughly what size/price your home is. Otherwise it's hard to tell how reasonable your claim that Zone 5 is affordable is, because Zone 5 is pretty large and some parts of it are cheap but shitty and other parts are expensive but as you describe (on the tube lines, low crime rate, leafy).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just described San Francisco.

    21. Re:London's fantastic... by tburkhol · · Score: 3, Funny

      By comparison, from my land in 25 minutes I drive past my neighbor's waterfall on the other side of my canyon, past the fjord, down between the mountains and the ocean and into town. You share a ride with little personal space with strangers in an underground tunnel.

      Some of those strangers are interesting people. You can talk to a dozen different people, each with a unique perspective on the world, some of them quite insightful or funny, during lunch. And a completely different dozen on the way home from work.

      I can understand why you'd enjoy some beautiful scenery and being 25 minutes from the next living soul, but it seems to me a little like the difference between reading "The Road to Character" and reading Slashdot.

    22. Re:London's fantastic... by Livius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      London's fantastic if you're rich

      Everywhere is fantastic if you're rich.

    23. Re:London's fantastic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      From stations within a few minutes walk of where I live, I can be at Victoria station in less than 20 minutes and London Bridge in less than 25

      When I lived in San Francisco I could drive to work including parking within fifteen minutes, and I worked half the city away. You're proud that you can walk to someplace where you can get more transit in longer than it took me to drive to work? Suddenly San Francisco looks a lot better to me.

      Most of what's wrong with all of these cities would be solved with a good PRT system. Cars and cities don't mix. SF is worse for cars now than it was then. It might take me 25 minutes, now.

      Seriously, 20 minutes' walk from transport? That's shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, can you forward me the keys to your place, and move out by next Tuesday? Thanks, that'd be great.

    25. Re:London's fantastic... by dave420 · · Score: 2

      And many people would say the same about your choice of location. Not everyone's the same. Surely you appreciate that some people like the nearly-endless possibilities of living in a global capital city, just as I can appreciate living in a place such as you describe (yet would not want to live there).

    26. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that about 5 years ago. I spent several years consulting in the heart of London. London is as expensive as New York. and it's a mecca for people all over Europe willing to work dirt cheap. Unless you have fairly unique skills, they have little reason to pay the high salaries needed for London expenses.

      The big problem working in London, for most free software and open source mavens like me, is the bureaucracy. It slows down every project, and attempts to look outside the box and to fix the actual underlying problem are often rejected as being "off task". And explaining the problem to the people who'd actually understand it, and be able to address it, can mean wending your way up through managers, to department leaders, back down to their bosses to the people who actually know the other part of the system. The message is often quite lost or confused by then. I was thought to be fairly insane because I'd find the actual technical people in the other groups and "prime the pump", to make sure their problems and mine were actually solved, and *then* get the buy-in from managers.

      The street theatre on the all-night buses, if you were working late, was also fascinating. Along about 3:00 AM, coming back from a midnight task on critical services, I tended to be the only native English speaker on the whole bus, including the driver.

    27. Re:London's fantastic... by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood. He's not 20 minutes from transport, he has a regional station just a few minutes walk from his house, it's the journey to Victoria (major hub) that takes 20 minutes.

    28. Re:London's fantastic... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      If I've seen a waterfall once, I don't really need to see it again. To be honest, a single waterfall sighting every few years is more than enough for me. I'm not really into nature; it gets dull fast and most of it smells of cow poo.

      I'd rather live somewhere that gives me access to one of the largest and most varied employment markets in the world, as well as a first-rate range of cultural and social amenities.

      And London Underground can indeed be a bit grim... which is why I don't use it. The great thing about being south of the river in London is that you are more likely to use surface rail than underground. Faster (since you can get trains to the outer stations that don't stop at every point along the way), generally less crowded (though peak trains can still be busy) and you get a decent view crossing the Thames into Victoria.

      Like trying to stay in Zones 1 and 2 and insisting on being north of the river, clinging to proximity to tube stations is another big mistake that a lot of London residents make. The tube is a convenient way to make short journeys around central London, but surface rail will generally make for a faster and more pleasant commute from home if you have the option. Personally, I never go more than a few stops on the Tube (with the exception of the occasional hike out to Heathrow, which is a pain to reach by other means until we get Crossrail).

    29. Re:London's fantastic... by Wheely · · Score: 1

      There are fjords in England now?

    30. Re:London's fantastic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, well then that's the same level of crap as living in SF, or any other big city. It's annoying. I stand by my statement about cars. They ought to be outright banned from city centers, and replaced with PRT. I like driving, but I still think alternatives to it would be better for the world and I'm sure they'd be better in cities. When they have to compete, though, things fall down. Also, eliminating the cars means lots of space for bicycles, so if you use a PRT that isn't based on roads (tires suck for moving large vehicles anyway) then city transport becomes trivial.

      It sure would have been nice if SF had had roads laid with the terrain, though, and not just in a grid. I'd rather "waste" some space for that than have the ridiculous roller coaster effect they've got now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you pining for the fjords?

    32. Re:London's fantastic... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Sounds fair to me.
      I live and work in South Florida. I have a 30 minute commute which is not bad but yes it is by car.
      The pluses are we have sunshine, beaches, a low cost of living, and lost of places to eat, and some theater.
      I do work for a tech company but not a lot of new ones are moving in down here. I don't know why since this is the birthplace of the PC. I work with a lot of ex IBM and Motorola people.
      Yes you have to drive but with gas at .68 euros a liter here it is not too bad.
      I do admit you comments about zones leaves me blank but oh well.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everybody has the fortunate options you have, either by birth or chosen location.

    34. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still south of the river though, which is basically a hell-hole and commuters nightmare.

    35. Re:London's fantastic... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Plenty of places are fantasic even if you aren't rich. They usually include places where the cost of living isn't jacked up out of whack due to unbalanced supply and demand and too much media hype.

      I agree with the guy that said for townies the attractions wear off after awhile and you've already done everthing. Then the glamour city starts to become a pointless grind.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    36. Re:London's fantastic... by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      Sorry - I should have explained this more than I did. The Zones are technically a part of the public transport charging system (for underground, buses and some rail services) and are arranged in a series of concentric circles. Most of the bits of London that tourists see are in Zone 1. As you get further out, you get more residential areas, as well as (in the outer zones), formerly free-standing towns like Bromley and Croydon which the London sprawl has swallowed over the years.

      But while technically a means for working out how much a public transport journey costs, the Zones are more regularly used in London parlance, particularly when talking about house-prices and so on. There's a perception that the more successful you are, the more central the Zone you can afford to live in. But one of the points of my original post was that this has turned into a bit of a false expectation over time; status conscious people are paying exorbitant prices to live in Zones 1 and 2, when they could have a much better quality of life (often with equally good access to the important bits of the centre) living in the outer zones.

      As people working in the media tend, as a broad generalisation, to be acutely status conscious and to assume that their own experiences are more representative than they are, the stereotype that all of London is over-priced and over-crowded gets more of a public airing than it deserves.

    37. Re:London's fantastic... by nine-times · · Score: 2

      I then took stock, realised that I was spending so much on being close to the centre and was so stressed out by the downsides (noise, antisocial behaviour, general crowding) that I wasn't actually enjoying the supposed benefits.

      This reminds me of NYC. For lots of people, "living in New York" means living in Manhattan. But you do that for a few years, you get over it, and an awful lot of people realize that the other boroughs can be far more pleasant. After a while, Manhattan starts to look like a tourist trap filled with douchebags.

    38. Re:London's fantastic... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying where I live (Zone 2/3), but his claim is prefectly reasonable. If you feel like looking, get a train map of South London and see how far you can get in 20-25 minutes.

      Carlshalton for example is pretty nice. Reasonable connections, pretty quite not appalingly hideously priced.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    39. Re:London's fantastic... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, to be fair, there actually is. It's just that over here we simply call them by their English name of "inlets".

      I know that doesn't make them sound quite as exotic though :)

    40. Re:London's fantastic... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You are describing London :) Cars are actively discouraged from the city centre, the roads were created following the terrain (mainly), and public transport is everywhere, and as close to fantastic as can be expected in an old, sprawling city. The guy in question lives right out in the boonies, and yet still has great public transport links to the city centre, no car required.

    41. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the parrots there are amazing.

    42. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which shows you don't know a thing about London. Zone 5 south of the river... 1) means victoria/london bridge in 20/25 is in an overground train, and if you work flexible hours you can avoid the standing-room-only trains and actually have a pleasant commute in, 2) 20-25 minutes drive in the opposite direction puts you in the middle of the surrey hills, an official 'area of outstanding natural beauty'.

    43. Re:London's fantastic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are describing London :) Cars are actively discouraged from the city centre,

      No. Poor people are actively discouraged from driving into the city center, rich people are welcome. But any cars pretty well ruins the whole thing, because you can't reclaim the roads.

      the roads were created following the terrain (mainly),

      Yes, once the city had mostly burned down, they mostly put in some sensible roads. But it doesn't have to deal with quite the same level of up-and-down that SF has to, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    44. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Technically a fjord is a glacier-cut U-shaped valley with the bottom submerged. There are some in Scotland but none that I'm aware of in England.

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    45. Re:London's fantastic... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Cars are actively discouraged. This is obvious through things like bus lanes taking priority, the congestion charge, and so on. Even if you can pay the congestion charge, you'll still find your progress impeded by the other forms of transport on the road which have priority. People can use the masses of public transport (underground trains, overground trains, buses, boats on the river, etc.), which is good for poor people as these services are cheaper than taking a car into the centre.

      After the great fire the roads were largely rebuilt where they were before. Christopher Wren's grand scheme for flattening and redesigning the city centre with continental-European avenues and boulevards never came to fruition, even though he did submit them to Charles II.

    46. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid yet again as is your usual!

    47. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. You have 1 saving grace in that you are amusing in a clown kind of way!

    48. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 1

      I love how you called it an "official area of outstanding natural beauty". ;) Are the swans trained to stand in just the right places? ;)

      I wasn't even thinking of standing-room only trains, I was picturing being in with a bunch of people sitting down. Yeah, crammed together standing up like a Tokyo subway would be even worse! And you have to "work flexible hours" to be able to avoid that? Geez...

      OMG, I just looked up the Surrey Hills, and its literal name as marked on the map is "Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty". I thought you were just reading off of a brochure or something - that's hilarious!

      I just went to a UK rail planner website - http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/ - and picked a site downtown at random - Hyde Park (all stations) - and the nearest town I saw to "Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty" (snicker), which was Guildford (all stations). The cheapest ticket is 89 bloody pounds and takes 4 hours 28 minutes. I then tried to Dorking (all stations) on the other side of SHAONB... same cost, same time.

      Okay, so maybe it's absurdly long by rail not but not by car? Google Maps says 1-2 hours each way. Judging from the current traffic report, much of it spent dawdling along in-town.

      (BTW, your opinions of "outstanding" are rather different than mine, apparently ;) )

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    49. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 1

      No, you're right - you're a serf locked into a large city against your will. My mistake.

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    50. Re:London's fantastic... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Some of those strangers are interesting people. You can talk to ... a completely different dozen on the way home from work.

      Just to be clear: you're talking in general about cities, right? Talking to strangers on public transport in London is extremely counter-cultural, with the exceptions of checking that you're on the right train and complaining about delays.

    51. Re:London's fantastic... by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Before moving to the East Midlands, I lived in Camberwell (SE) for nearly 2 years and then in Brent (NW) for another 4. That's zone 2 and then Zone 3/4. Both had upsides and downsides, but the transport price was always going up faster than everything else. I could not suggest to anyone to live in a suburb of London in zone 5 or 6 as a cost saving strategy. Your average speed into town is higher than by Tube but if the overground trains are disrupted, you're too far away to have an alternative. When you're home you're too far from London to feel like traveling there to watch a show or something else that you cannot enjoy in the suburbs. I'd say that you either live where you can walk, cycle and use the bus for all your travel, or just move out for good.
      In the end, I think that the secret to happy London living is to have a highly paid job that allows you not to live/commute there. Just enjoy the ride into the big city every now and again, enjoy the buzz, the touristy things, then make your way back to where you don't spend a huge part of your earnings on housing and transport. London is a special place for me, I would not want to ruin it by feeling stuck there.

    52. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an awful lot of people realize that the other boroughs can be far more pleasant. After a while, Manhattan starts to look like a tourist trap filled with douchebags.

      ...yet still unreasonably expensive...and filled with a different kind of douchebag. Williamsburg anyone?

    53. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere is fantastic if you're rich.

      Not Detroit; that's still a shithole.

    54. Re:London's fantastic... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people want to live in cities - I really just don't understand it. For example:

      From stations within a few minutes walk of where I live, I can be at Victoria station in less than 20 minutes and London Bridge in less than 25.

      By comparison, from my land in 25 minutes I drive past my neighbor's waterfall on the other side of my canyon, past the fjord, down between the mountains and the ocean and into town. You share a ride with little personal space with strangers in an underground tunnel.

      I just don't understand why people want that kind of life.

      Because some of us like people, places to go, and things to do, especially in an urban setting. Lived in a town before. Lived in a 25 minute drive to the city before. I found it boring, didn't like the culture that came with it, and don't want to live like that. I like being in a place that has things I want to do, places I want to go to, and people I like. I also like mountains and ocean. In Seattle, I have all the urban setting by walking and the mountains and ocean in the same 25 minute drive. Now, if we'd just get more public transit (like London) so I didn't have to drive everywhere.

    55. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That complete bullshit! It takes about 1/2 hour to get from either Dorking or Guildford to London (Victoria or Waterloo) by train, and it shouldn't cost more than 20 quid for a return ticket.

    56. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you've never been to Fresno.

    57. Re:London's fantastic... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Some of those strangers are interesting people. You can talk to a dozen different people, each with a unique perspective on the world, some of them quite insightful or funny, during lunch

      Most of them are not, and there are enough who are completely crazy or sociopaths to make the occasional bright spot not worth it.

    58. Re:London's fantastic... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Some people want a well-paying job, and those are generally more readily available in large cities.

      Some people love the entertainment opportunities that city life offers, be it night clubs or restaurants or the local show scene etc.

      And so on. Tastes differ. I much prefer small towns for living myself, but not so far from the local metro area that I can't get to all those facilities in a reasonable timeframe if I really wanted to (which I occasionally do). So I settled on a town of 7,000 that is on the very edge of the Seattle metro area, giving me a 35-minute driving commute to work and about 40 minutes to downtown Seattle - while also having affordable land plots and large houses in non-crowded areas where I can have a nice backyard with a large koi pond and almost an acre of a real forest. But I have plenty of friends who live in downtown Bellevue or Seattle proper and love it there, and they find my choice just as incomprehensible as I find theirs.

    59. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Victoria shows a much faster time - a bit over one hour and 15.70 quid. Probably because it has only one change (Hyde Park had three) and because I'm searching longer in advance. It's also possible that some routes were sold out at the last search time.

      Still over an hour by rail, 1-2 hours by car, during rush hour (I'm searching for departure time 17:30 on a weekday each time - earlier it was today, now I'm searching for Monday)

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    60. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do any of those fjords have pines?

    61. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also smell burnt toast? You could be having a stroke...

    62. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rakarra PhD in psychiatric sciences speaks. Bow to his obtuse stupidity + delusions of grandeur.

    63. Re:London's fantastic... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Ahh I think I see the problem, it was giving me the results for the city of Hyde near Manchester, not Hyde Park!

      Okay, so according to the site, Dorking or Guildford to London is about an hour by rail during rush hour, 45 minutes during off-peak (15-20 quid each way); while according to Google Maps it's 1-2 hours during rush hour, 60-80 minutes during off-peak.

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    64. Re: London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hyde, a "city"? You've never been there, have you?

    65. Re:London's fantastic... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Detroit and Fresno are heaven compared to Decatur Illinois.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    66. Re:London's fantastic... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You don't have to have a degree to know when someone is crazy.

      I got sick of riding the bus the third time I had to sit next to the woman who was shouting that the jews at the bank stole all her money, and how the law gives her the right to kill anyone who "messes" with her kids.

    67. Re:London's fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes one to know one "rakarra" and we know you're a weasel hiding behind a bs pseudonym online which says everything someone needs to know about you being a nobody in the world.

  7. Silicon Valley is about the only place... by tlambert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Silicon Valley is about the only place you can have your startup fail, walk down the street a few blocks, and have a nice safe job to tide you over until you decide you need to do another startup (if you do). In other words, there's a job safety net that is not there elsewhere (the article as much as admits this, for London).

    The other issue with any place other than Silicon Valley: Silicon Valley is where most of the VC's are located, and it's where most of the VC's prefer their companies be located, so that they have the option of an acquisition as an exit strategy for the companies they fund. Other locations, not so much.

    Jimmy Wales has a pretty safe gig, which allows him to live anywhere he wants, without having to get more funding, and without having to worry about money too much at all, or about having to get another gig. So he can live anywhere he wants to live, and it's kinda OK.

    I'm personally OK with London as a very nice place to live, if you've got a steady income, and so on. It's an amazing place. But I think you would have a difficult time getting Series A funding there, compared to a 15 minute drive to Sand Hill Road. To get some sense of the absolute importance of this:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/ar...

    1. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While London is nice, it's also a somewhat strange "Oh, so much better than ghastly Silicon Valley" choice because it's extraordinarily expensive.

      Silicon valley certainly has a (well earned) reputation for high costs of living and/or painfully long commutes; but it has those in very large part because it has the features that are directly attractive and useful for tech workers and startups.

      London is both more expensive and more expensive in large part because of demand from non-tech industries and people for various virtues important to them; but not terribly helpful for tech. If you think getting gentrified by Google's code monkeys is a problem, you'll love competing for real estate with City traders.

      If you are willing to skip the specific advantages of Silicon Valley, there are plenty of options that aren't hideous cultural wastelands or still-smouldering post-apocalyptic sacrifice zones; but are also comparatively cheap, have great location and a lot of open space, or whatever your taste may run toward.

    2. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      This. The UK is not a good place for start-ups, investors are far too conservative. There is a show called Dragon's Den on UK TV - I think they have versions in other countries as it was originally a Japanese show - where people pitch their start-ups to investors. Many of them would have a few million thrown their way in the US easily, but most of them in the UK go away empty handed. The investors want to see profits up front before handing any money over, not like in Silicon Valley where you can be bleeding money but the potential to be the next Twitter is enough.

      So London isn't so good for start-ups.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Is Dragon's Den similar to Shark Tank, or purely tech oriented?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Are you really judging the investment climate in London based on Dragon's Den? I thought you were more clever than that :)

    5. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This is true. And if they do invest they want a much higher stake then in SV. In SV, the founders will usually retain control. In London, they want to essentially buy complete control of your company for the series A.

      Fuck that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Silicon Valley is about the only place you can have your startup fail, walk down the street a few blocks, and have a nice safe job to tide you over until you decide you need to do another startup (if you do). In other words, there's a job safety net that is not there elsewhere (the article as much as admits this, for London)."

      Whilst I agree with the rest of what you say, I disagree on this. What you say is absolutely true of London where the market is drastically more competitive, but there are many other places where you have that safety net.

      Here further north in the UK the exact same is also true as what you suggest, there is such a drastic shortage of developers and massive competition for us such that if I wanted to I could walk out the door tomorrow and have another well above average wage job within a week (and even then only because that's how long it takes to organise interviews). The safety net is most definitely not an issue here, but as you also mention, access to VCs most definitely is a problem.

    7. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by coofercat · · Score: 2

      I think we Brits are culturally different from the Americans, which is (in part) why this is the way things are here. I'd say, as a general rule, most Brits don't want to be the next Donald Trump, Richard Branson, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates or whatever. They'd be happy to just carve out a nice living from a job they enjoy. As such, the 'killer instinct' that so many of the 'big' American business leaders demonstrate (or write books about) isn't something we have much of. As a result, if you haven't generated any income (ideally a modest profit) then you're probably not going to make it because you don't have any "killer instinct" at all. A modicum of income/profit shows you're at least able to operate that way, and so may have a business that's a good investment.

      I am of course generalising a lot here, and there are plenty of exceptions in both directions that either prove or disprove what I'm saying. You get the idea...

      As for Dragons Den... I'd love to have a product that's an absolute no-brainer. I dunno, maybe an anti-gravity drive, or a teleporter or something. Then I'd like to rock up to Dragons Den, and ask for a million pounds in return for 1% of my business, just to see what they'd do.

      And just to stay on-topic: I've visited Silicon Valley a couple of times. It's sunny almost all of the time, and generally I've found the people to be pretty nice. It's way, way to spread out though, so you have to drive everywhere (which means no after-work drinking). Probably just as well though, as it's something of cultural vacuum in my experience. A few places are nice enough, but not a great deal of depth to anything as far as I can tell. I'm sure the locals know better places than I ever found, but San Francisco, by comparison, is a far more culturally interesting place to live (and you can get public transport home after going out).

    8. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      As for Dragons Den... I'd love to have a product that's an absolute no-brainer. I dunno, maybe an anti-gravity drive, or a teleporter or something. Then I'd like to rock up to Dragons Den, and ask for a million pounds in return for 1% of my business, just to see what they'd do.

      YOU'RE AN IDIOT!

      Oh sorry that's Jeremy Kyle.

      YOU'RE FIRED!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Only safe that way if you have the common jobs that everyone does, meaning you're an interchangeable cog. IT, javascript, MS certificates in hand, etc. Doesn't pay as much but easier to be a career nomad.

      As far as Silicon Valley goes, at least it's not as expensive as London, not as crowded, etc. London's a fun place to visit but wouldn't want to live there and the weather is lousy, much like San Francisco.

    10. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we end up not spending enough on R&D. In the US they throw money at start-up to see what sticks, in Japan companies do blue sky projects with no specific project in mind just to develop new technologies. In the UK... We are very conservative.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Dragon's Den is Shark Tank's parent show. Dragon's Den was based on/inspired by the Japanese show "Money Tigers."

    12. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sputterings here are apparently inspired by "Dumb and Dumber" Rakarra.

    13. Re:Silicon Valley is about the only place... by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      At least he's not doing it based on "The Apprentice" and Alan Sugar...

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
  8. great place for the right people by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're rich and famous, London is a great place, with per square foot prices about four times what they are in SF. You get to hobnob with all the wealthy and influential people, and get really close to people with tons of money to throw around. Of course, you have to like the lousy weather in London. And you have to not give a shit that your wonderful, privileged London lifestyle is subsidized by hardworking Brits who will never get to enjoy it. I'm sure Jimmy Wales meets all those criteria.

    1. Re:great place for the right people by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure that the people he's meeting are as happy with him as he thinks.

      “I meet people around London and they ask ‘when do you go back to San Francisco?’

      Sounds to me like a polite way of saying "It's it about time that you get the F* out of our country?"

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
    2. Re:great place for the right people by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! I think the correct translation would be "Jog on, you muppet!"

    3. Re:great place for the right people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're rich and famous, London is a great place, with per square foot prices about four times what they are in SF. You get to hobnob with all the wealthy and influential people, and get really close to people with tons of money to throw around. Of course, you have to like the lousy weather in London. And you have to not give a shit that your wonderful, privileged London lifestyle is subsidized by hardworking Brits who will never get to enjoy it. I'm sure Jimmy Wales meets all those criteria.

      To be fair, it's kind of hard to find a place where the rich and powerful aren't subsidized by the hardworking average folks.

    4. Re:great place for the right people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, he is welsh after all...

    5. Re:great place for the right people by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like a polite way of saying "It's it about time that you get the F* out of our country?"

      In London? Polite? Nah..... they would've meant something else.

    6. Re:great place for the right people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is that joke about having a British house, a French cook, and a German car?

    7. Re:great place for the right people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apart from almost everywhere in the world of course. Rich people pay more taxes almost everywhere and they usually get less back from the government than average people do.

    8. Re:great place for the right people by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Its a local shop for local people!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re:great place for the right people by Rei · · Score: 1

      When I was in the UK, I found a strong inverse correlation between "how close I was to London" and "how polite and friendly people were". I could only verify the rule out to Northern Ireland, but if it continues to hold up, then the people of the Pitcairn Islands have to be the friendliest people on Earth ;)

      --
      What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
  9. Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How hard is it to obtain a work visa in London vs. San Francisco?

    1. Re:Work visas by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Good question.

      The EU is very jealous with respect to non-EEA workers and a work visa can be very hard to get. There is a similar exception to America's H1B visa for specialised skills, but my perception is that the US is a lot less rigid about enforcement.

    2. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends. If you are Aryan-looking there should be no problems.

    3. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With the kind of Affirmative action and manginas going around, and not being able to open a fucking technical site without being accosted by articles spewing out misandry as a common place, I would say that London is the last places where you should do well with "aryan" looks, and not for long. If you are dark, feminist, lesbian and to top it off slightly retarded you will always find a job nowadays.

    4. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you are non US/EU citizen, it is easier. Otherwise you can already live in SF or London so it not a fair comparison.

    5. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Witness the post I am replying to as proof thereof and realize you have the intellect of 10 below carrot Dave420. You prove it for me every time.

    6. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that I have an hot asian wife is none of your business. That also does not mean I should be a pussy like you accepting misandry/feminism as the thing that is in vogue.

    7. Re: Work visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the pot puffing clown did his usual as his dim druggie brain shorts out: Tossing names. Remember: Everytime Dave420 posts, his theme song (pot puffing clown) plays in accompaniment for our amusement (lmao) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  10. I'll have what he's smoking by Macfox · · Score: 1

    Ignoring climate... The difference is community focus. Do what you do best, rather than attempt to be best at everything.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
    1. Re:I'll have what he's smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The you'll be wanting Amsterdam, not London.

        (and any of the London pre conditions also apply to Amsterdam, just being more relaxed)

  11. Better outside of London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    London is a hub with lots's of wealthy people, but it's alot more cost effective to live in other parts of the UK who have access to the same resources in London because it's just down the road. Cardiff would be a good example. Cheaper labour and accomodation, but you can still do business with the same people.

    1. Re:Better outside of London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "lots's"... Come on. Lots is? Lots was? Something belongs to the lots? " alot" is not a word.

  12. Not a place most English people want to live by raburton · · Score: 0

    I can assure you, as someone who lives elsewhere in the UK, only people in London want to live in London. There is no desire amongst the rest of the UK population to move there. Unless you have to go there for work it's somewhere you might visit once every few years at most, with a very specific purpose in mind, and you don't enjoy it when you do.

    1. Re:Not a place most English people want to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course, but if you're from the U.S., anywhere in western Europe is an improvement, including London.

    2. Re:Not a place most English people want to live by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Having been to 48 states, living in several of them, and spending six years of my life in Europe, I'll call bullshit. YMMV

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:Not a place most English people want to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It's not a north/south divide, it's a London/everywhere-else divide.

    4. Re:Not a place most English people want to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you, as someone who lives elsewhere in the UK, only people in London want to live in London. There is no desire amongst the rest of the UK population to move there. Unless you have to go there for work it's somewhere you might visit once every few years at most, with a very specific purpose in mind, and you don't enjoy it when you do.

      Sounds like any other major city in the world. Some people just like crowds and overpaying for everything while pretending to be more "cultured".

  13. London is good, Berlin is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IMHO Berlin is much better place then London:
    - it's way cheaper (both in terms of living expenses and salaries)
    - it has amazing startup atmosphere
    - it's the political capital of EU
    - it's located almost in the center of EU, where London is on the outskirts
    - Berlin is a city designed to scale, the transportation infrastructure is 100x better then in London
    - VCs are keeping an eye on this city, as it may soon become the silicon valley of Europe
    - it's the true startup capital of Europe, where London is something between corporate finance and cool stuff

    1. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Lived there for a year. It's got a fantastic culture. Certainly the sort of place that will appeal to the 20-somethings that startups like, and a good startup culture. Plus living there is a lot cheaper.

      Wouldn't rate the transport that far above London. Sure, it's great but London's is pretty good. It just suffers from London's severe crowdedness.

      I'd actually say in Britain, any of the university cities would be better than London. Not just Oxford and Cambridge, but Bristol, Manchester, Edinburgh, all have a tech industry, good connections and a decent culture.

    2. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by ruir · · Score: 1

      I studied in Bristol. The kind of industry is not exactly what IT people want. Low skilled labor, small town syndrome. Apart from some hubs designated to attract students, it is a town with the syndrome of a village. Would not enjoy living there, enjoyed it when younger tough.

    3. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      - Berlin is a city designed to scale, the transportation infrastructure is 100x better then in London

      While I share your opinion that Berlin is a better place to be than London, you must be kidding about this part.

      Well, it depends. Theoretically, or on the rare occations when all trams are functional and running as they should, it really -is- good and you can get around to almost everywhere pretty well.
      Unfortunately the trams are a mess and practically every time I'm in Berlin trams are breaking down and sections of the line are closed due to technical failures.

    4. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How is it living there speaking English?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by michal.slonina · · Score: 2

      In IT you don't need German. English is more then enough. Even though the average salaries are a bit lower then in London you still get much better overall life quality. A pizza during lunch break costs 4 EUR here, a monthly public transport ticket around 80EUR, a decent flat outside of mitte (60m2) goes for 600-700 EUR.

    6. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I've worked there for a couple of companies. There's a pretty solid tech industry up in the north Almondsbury/Bradley Stoke. It's mostly "big" tech companies - jet engines, and electronics multinationals, but there are a few upstarts and startups.

    7. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Easy! Most Germans speak great English, and you can pick up enough German to get through your daily life in quite a short time. Even if the person you're talking to doesn't speak English, the overlap of the two languages is vast, and so with some gesticulation and slow-talking you can hold a conversation with neither of you speaking the same language. You might have problems dealing with contracts and so on, but if you know someone who can help you out with that, then you're golden.

    8. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by michal.slonina · · Score: 1

      I do agree that the trams service is average, but you have U-Bahn(metro) and S-Bahn(train) with S-Bahn ring around citi center and with this mix you can move around the city very very quickly. On top of that you have a lot of car sharing options and Berlin and unlike London, Berlin is very friendly for cyclists. My experience from cycling in London is that it's an extreme sport there.

    9. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Only if you are a hipster. Berlin seems to be hipster capital of the world.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      In IT you don't need German. English is more then enough. Even though the average salaries are a bit lower then in London you still get much better overall life quality. A pizza during lunch break costs 4 EUR here, a monthly public transport ticket around 80EUR, a decent flat outside of mitte (60m2) goes for 600-700 EUR.

      I mean, yeah you might get by but aren't you missing out on actually living there? If you can't read / speak / interact with people without forcing them into your language? There is more to living in a place than cheap pizza.

    11. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by will_die · · Score: 1

      There is more to living in a place than cheap pizza.
      There is also doner kebabs and sausages.

    12. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's 2 kinds of chopped up intestines ...

    13. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Berlin is a highly cosmopolitan city, and many Germans are absolutely thrilled to be able to practice their English with a native speaker. Most people aren't as concerned with language as you seem to think they are - a conversation is a conversation regardless of the language and the country in which it is held.

    14. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. You are amusing in a clown kind of way though!

    15. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by michal.slonina · · Score: 1

      First of all nobody prohibits you from learning their language - on the contrary having access to lots of native speakers enables you to catch up with the language pretty quickly. "Survival German" takes at most 2 weeks to master. If you are not living on the outskirts of Berlin like I do the population is quite mixed ( ratio of natives/population: Berlin - 72%, London - 60% ).

    16. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Currywurst...shudders.

      Don't ever let a German bad mouth American food. Currywurst is an 'Oscar-Myer' grade bratwurst served with Ketchup mixed with a little Madras curry. Unbelievably bad.

      You can get a good brat in Germany, just never on the street. Those are all low end hot dog grade.

    17. Re:London is good, Berlin is better by ruir · · Score: 1

      Yes, for sure, I do remember the huge facilities HP had near the campus.

  14. The air. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lived on the Isle of Skye. Lived in London.

    Every breath in the former is a joy. Every breath in the latter is a dirty disappointment.

    London is a place to show off, but not to live.

    1. Re:The air. by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      If you want to turn your back on a wortd of culture and social interaction, sure. I'm sure Skye is beautiful, but how easy is it to : see world class theatre eat in a great restaurant from any conceivable culture meet new people Solitude is not to everyone's taste

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    2. Re:The air. by ruir · · Score: 1

      You can always get a flight to London in a weekend in any city in europe, see a word class theather, meet new people and not live in a very crowded and expensive city. About the eating, I can't even figure out why I would go to England to eat.

    3. Re:The air. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      how easy is it to : see world class theatre eat in a great restaurant

      As you say, not everyone is the same. I have zero interest in theatre or great restaurants. Skye sounds way more appealing to me. Having to work in London in bad enough, living there would be my worst nightmare,

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    4. Re:The air. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I know it's fun to bash English cooking, but there are some seriously awesome things to eat down there.

    5. Re:The air. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid. Anything tastes good when you're on that weed Dave420. Like you. Dave420 the drug puffing clown (as the calliope plays on, hahahaha).

    6. Re:The air. by ruir · · Score: 1

      If you say so. Living in a European capital with stellar food choices, excellent seafood, very high quality cheap wines, and comparatively much lower prices, and to top if off where people actually know what is good food, I beg to disagree.

  15. Ummm.... no. by dbc · · Score: 1

    Sorry Jimmy, I just got back from London a few days ago, back to Sili Valley where I have lived for almost 30 years. Living in London would make me hate life after about 6 months. Heck, after 3 days I was more convinced than ever that the American war for independence was a very smart move. I'll take Sili Valley over London any day.

  16. Missed the point by Aboroth · · Score: 1

    In my experience, when somebody asks when you are leaving, it is a polite way of saying, "I am sick of you, when are you going away?"

  17. Oh the tales you'll tell... by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

    You can't not have culture, and honestly I would much rather live in Silicon Valley than in London. London is just as expensive as SV, and I guess if you're easily impressed by stuff just because it's man made and old, then that counts as 'culture'? London has two symphonies, which I guess is pretty nice, but also SF has one too and one is plenty.

    What I really think is that Jimmy is just talking shit and probably couldn't really explain what he means when he says 'culture', beyond the usual american garbage about 'oh, Europe has so much culture'. This is just an American Abroad's incredibly insightful (and not at all obsequious) little musings about how *amazing* European 'Culture' (old property) is. I hope he gets licked by a Chav.

    1. Re:Oh the tales you'll tell... by skam240 · · Score: 2

      I've spent a good deal of time in London and live right down the road from San Francisco. Don't get me wrong, San Francisco is a great city and I love spending time in it but you clearly don't know what you're talking about. London is a major economic and cultural hub, the capitol of what was a globe spanning empire dwarfing anything that has followed it in influence and significance, a current major fincial hub, the current capital of one of the most influencal and wealthy countries in Europe, home to immigrants from throughtout the commonwealth and beyond, has been the center of major artistic and musical movements and etc, etc.

      San Francisco is a very dirty little city by the bay whose culture high point was hippies (note: I still love the city).

      The big American comparison to London would be New York which i'd take over London any day (Of course i'm a pretty patriotic American so....). In terms of cultural significance San Francisco doesn't stand a chance versus London.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:Oh the tales you'll tell... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      There isn't a large theater scene in Silicon Valley. And it's geographically huge, with very little public transit, so getting places from the place you can afford to live is impossible unless you also have a car. It's not a major convention center, either. So in cultural terms it is comparable to Akron with hippies and gay culture. The Valley's also got less interesting politics (question time in a Westminster-System country is roughly 500 bajillion times more interesting then anything you can see in a US State Capital, or even DC).

      London isn't that expensive if you're talking about living in the suburban bits, and then you can take the train to the Urban bits and see the rest quite easily. If it was it wouldn't be home to 1/6 of the UK population. And since 1/6 of the UK's population lives there, anything that the Brits do that interests you is likely to have a London scene; which you can easily access via the Tube. Pretty much the only advantages the Valley has on it are uniquely American things like this-side-of-the-Atlantic sports.

    3. Re:Oh the tales you'll tell... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You're the only one who's equating culture with old buildings! London has some of the best museums and galleries in the world, including:

      Tate
      Tate Modern
      Natural History Museum
      Science Museum
      Victoria & Albert
      British Museum
      National Gallery
      National Maritime Museum
      Imperial War Museum
      British Library

      (most of which are free to enter) and not to mention the performance spaces from the Barbican, Royal Albert Hall, to the venues in Camden and across London. London has dozens of orchestras - limiting it to just symphony orchestras (which is what I presume you meant by "symphony") is skewing your perception massively. Let's not also forget it's where the Beatles, Stones, Clash, Queen, Hendrix, Handel (the last two lived next door to each other, centuries apart) and countless other bands, artists and composers lived and recorded their music.

      And the literature! This is where Dickens wrote his works, where Shakespeare performed his plays (which you can still see performed in the original language, in an accurate reconstruction of a period theatre), where Karl Marx wrote Das Kapital, Orwell wrote Animal Farm, and Wells wrote War of the Worlds, to name just a few. Oh, and the King James Bible was completed in London.

      Let's not forget the scientific discoveries! Hosting the Royal Society (founded in 1660), London has had plenty of scientific discoveries. The first mechanical computer was built there, penicillin, epidemiology, and countless other things were discovered there. The list of influential scientists and their discoveries is simply too great to list here. And there is Kew Gardens, one of the world's foremost botanical institutes.

      And then there are the studios where plenty of amazing films have been made. The outskirts of London is where the original Star Wars films were made, where the Indiana Jones films were filmed, Harry Potter, James Bond, and so on.

      Of course if you are interested in old architecture, parts of London date back to the Roman era, including the City of London itself. There are 1800-year-old walls still standing. The Tower of London, including the White Tower from where William the Conqueror ruled, are world-class heritage sites. Then there are the other palaces (Westminster, Buckingham, Hampton Court, Kensington, Kew, St. James, etc.) which are amazing.

      This is just scratching the surface. Thinking London's only cultural artifacts are its buildings is doing yourself, and your argument, a great disservice.

      How does Silcon Valley compare to that? :)

    4. Re:Oh the tales you'll tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't even prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong shown with you agreeing with him he is correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had.

    5. Re:Oh the tales you'll tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't have any of that. Also has very few Brits.

      SI valley is clearly the superior place to live.

  18. What a coincidence by freedom4us · · Score: 1

    that Times has a news saying juuust the opposite. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06... I'd rather live in SV just to avoid extreme crowds and sky high prices in London.

    1. Re:What a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MP3/iPod anecdote in the article says it all: Europeans are good at inventing and developing technology. Americans are good at marketing and selling it. Both are needed for products to penetrate the market, but its the selling that yields the most profits.

      I don't agree with all of the observations about the education systems, however. American education seems focused on obedience and discipline rather than acquiring knowledge and skills, with very strict rules and harsh punishments. I have a hard time believing that that would lead to more free-thinking students.

  19. Relatively difficult to get a work visa for the UK by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

    Relatively difficult to get a work visa for the UK:

    http://www.visabureau.com/uk/i...

    You aren't going to get a Tier 1 unless you are an Olympic athlete, Linus Torvalds, or Craig Venter, etc.. Cap is 1,000/year.

    You could *possibly* get a Tier 2, if you already had a job offer from a UK company. Cap is 20,700/year.

    Intra-company transfers for an existing employer (e.g. IBM), limited to a year if you are making £40,000/year; call it $63,500 at todays exchange rate; this is generally not hard for someone employed by IBM, actually; I have a friend who went to the UK for IBM on one of those, and got her MBA at Oxford (IBM also paid for that, since it was business related).

    If you have money (£200,000 for the business, plus your own living expenses), and can start a viable business, a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Visa is an option. It has to employ 2 EEA people, or you get kicked out after 2 years.

    If you have *lots* of money (£1million), you can get an investment visa; you are not permitted to work any other job, other than managing your investments. I believe this means you can not do international consultancy or remote management of other assets. This is basically similar to the U.S. EB-5 "millionaires visa", by which you are able to (effectively) buy a U.S. green card if you are rich enough, and willing to pump a $750K or $800K house price up to $1M in the outer Sunset in SF (it's basically the reason real estate prices are so high in SF: 5,100 home sales in the Bay area this way each year, 1/3 go to 1,700 EB-5 visa winners, with the remaining 8,300 EB-5's going to other areas of the U.S. and inflating housing prices there, instead. Hint: it's not gentrification that's doing it.

    Tier-3 you can't get (program is suspended); it's for things like swinging a hammer and other labor which is considered unskilled.

    Tier-4 is a student visa; you aren't allowed to work more than 10 hours a week in most cases, generally granted for only one year, requires 15 hours/week study, you must agree to go home after, as a condition of the visa. This is probably not what you want.

    Tier-5 is a temporary work visa with a sponsor; mostly, this is the artist/entertainer visa, but can also be for charity workers and things like Mormon missionaries. If you want one of these, your best bet is to run away and join the circus. :)

    So basically: a heck of a lot less opportunity to go to the U.K. from the U.S. than the other way around.

  20. It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent too by bazorg · · Score: 2

    My view on this, not being involved in the VC/startup/look_at_me_I'm_an_entrepreneur scene, is that there is a lot of political will to turn some of London into a technological hub, hoping that the money and innovation from Silicon Valley can be reproduced here. The trouble is... London is not cheap as SV used to be when it turned itself into an attractive place for techy companies to set up shop.

    A garage in London is not a place to build the new consumer electronics giant, it is a place that is rented for hundreds or even thousands of pounds per month.

    I think it's all great that people want more development and growth from high tech, but the "Silicon Roundabout" is not a place where universities, ambitious people with ideas and office space are all in an ideal state suited for new industry to bloom. The Silicon Roundabout is just north of the City of London, the place where there's only mature, cash rich companies and the Bank of England. It's more of a brand that costs a lot of money to join rather than being an organic growth phenomenon.

    I'd much rather see the new tech hubs turning up away from London, so that all the techy smart people are not wasting their initial funding on paying extortionate rents and are actually doing what current day teach allows you to do: work from wherever suits you. As a nice side effect, new train routes could get more passengers and overcrowded London routes could get some relief.

  21. Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah blah blah *hipster* blah *hipster* blah blah.

    I live in Berlin. I hate this talk, which is just the smell of capital corroding through society.

    Look. I'm a fan of Wikipedia, despite its known failings. I remember how it was before. Therefore I'm thankful to Jimmy for whatever he has done there.

    But this hipster talk about "creative cities", while they are being destroyed by those very hipsters. When the job is thoroughly done, they move on. Does that remind you of anything?

    1. Re: Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, it's very simple. Some cities have potential to be great places for arts, culture and technology. But they need to undergo some improvement first. You have to drive all the horrible, smelly lowlives out and you need to change the ethnic and economical landscape. You need some diversity, but it must be good diversity. You have to close down all the two-bits stores and replace them with cool, hip venues. You raise the value of the estate, which helps driving out undesirables and bring in more healthy, wealthy people. In the end you have a better, improved city with a population you can be proud to call "fellow citizens". Where is the problem=

  22. Racist Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sound's like he' a bigot.

  23. Never again.... Standard of living not great.... by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

    London is a great place to visit.... but I would never want to live there again.

    You arrive and you do all the tourist stuff in the first few weeks (musicals, theatre, dining out).... but after that it just is not worth it.... prices are high, living standards low (small cramped expensive apartments, going out expensive, etc.). I lived there for 1 year and 1 day. I harped that it was not a place that I wanted to live forever... and my PM a proud brit took exception to it to a certain extent. Only when he visited his counterpart in Texas did he actually get what we were talking about (his place was 20% the size and no cool cars in the driveway etc.)... and he was completely thrown.... I hear that he finally made the move to Australia.... something he originally thought he would never do.

    I would never return to live... only to visit.

  24. Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have investments in various countries from India to Kenya to Colombia, amongst other countries

    I am not saying that the West is not doing anything breathtaking - what I am saying is, if you guys are looking for fresh perspective on the tech scene, it's the places outside of the traditional Western sphere which is filled with real excitement

    But of course, what I am saying is based on what I am experiencing --- YMMV

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by dave420 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're not talking about a "fresh perspective", but working in a city with amazing infrastructure, which is the financial capital of the world, in the EU (for now :)), and in a great timezone whose business day overlaps with that of the US east coast and many Asian markets. All those things are simply not available in Africa, Latin America, or Asia. What you are saying, regardless of how accurate it is, has very little to do with this discussion :)

    2. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I have investments in various countries from India to Kenya to Colombia, amongst other countries"

      Well good luck with that, most people don't do that because of the massively high risk of losing it due to corruption. In Western markets you have a relatively high assurance that you can invest based on your understanding of the market and have your return fit your talent on predicting that.

      You don't have that in the countries you list, in Kenya and India your investment is one corrupt government official away from being wiped out.

      This is why dealing with corruption is such a big focus by politicians, and India is a prime example of this. 15 years ago we were told India would be a top 3 world economy alongside China and the USA. Instead it's still stuck at 10 despite having over 21x the population and drastically higher land mass and natural resources than the half way further up the ladder France. India is 142nd out of 189 in the ease of doing business index for this reason, and Kenya is 136.

      Colombia does much better for sure at 34 however so is indeed a sensible investment - and probably will continue to grow as such now that things finally seem to be calming down in a possible more permanent way with FARC.

      So whilst it looks good whilst things are going fine, like DRM corruption in countries like India and Kenya is one of those things that looks harmless until it fucks you, and then that's the end of your investment. They may pay off, but they're incredibly high risk.

    3. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      london is the criminal financial capital of the world.

    4. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      london is the criminal financial capital of the world.

      Kind of redundant, don't you think? ;-)

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    5. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "and in a great timezone whose business day overlaps with that of the US east coast and many Asian markets."

      The internet gives two fucks about time zones and London is in a bad one. I deal with Australia/China/UK almost every morning in Southern California.

      London sucks. It's not even close to being a tech hub. Jimmy Wales has zero clue what he's talking about.

      Closest thing to a 'tech hub' the UK had was O'Neill Modern Media.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave420 the drug puffing clown speaks and the calliope plays in accompaniment hahaha! Why do you constantly stalk-harass apk? Your post history's evidence you do. No denying it. You're obsessed with him doing better than you have in computing so you stalk him harassing him constantly like a psycho you're showing us you are by doing it. He's challenged you to do better. You prove you can't. You can't prove his lists of points favoring hosts files wrong. You've been shown agreeing with him that he's correct on them from recent replies of yours in exchanges with apk you've had. Dave420, keep smoking that dope. It's amusing seeing you fall into your dope brain pattern everytime of illogic logic calling others names when you are cornered failing due to your drug addled dim brain shorting out, lol! Smoking drugs is not being grown up stupid. It's being an imbecile destroying one's self with drugs. I love seeing you try to play smart only to fall into your usual illogic logic ad hominem attacks Dave420. It's proof the drugs have gotten to your already dim brain and when you get 'frustrated' your dull drug brain shorts out, hahahaha, forcing you to do the only thing you know in calling others names out of frustration at your own stupidity. Your post history is again your undoing showing you projecting your pattern of drug induced stupid.

    7. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mispelled "New York"!

    8. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Not really. Some criminals are actually nice people sometimes.

    9. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The internet doesn't, but many startups create interfaces between the internet and the real world, and timezones matter a great deal in the real world. That's the thing. Maybe you don't get it, but plenty of others seem to be.

    10. Re:Want tech? Go Africa, Latin America and Asia by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " many startups create interfaces between the internet and the real world, and timezones matter a great deal in the real world"

      Uh, no. It's called UNIVERSAL TIME. Any informed and modern start-up runs UTC and does not fuck with silly shit like Time Zones and DST.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  25. Re:Relatively difficult to get a work visa for the by ruir · · Score: 1

    Very insightful, and the comment about tier 5 was particularly delightful.

  26. Berlin by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Shameless plug for Germany.

    Though I do not have personal experience working/living in UK, over the years met lots of people who were simply orgasmic after the move from UK to Germany. Especially the London with its outrageous rent prices.

    Munich is good place too. And if you are in the financial software, Frankfurt am Main is the place to go.

    Much better living standards than the UK in general and London in particular.

    The language in large cities in general is not a problem too. Some companies (esp international) require the fluent English, and often offer help to those who just move from abroad.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  27. Jimmy Wales needs YOUR support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, Wikipedia is almost out of money! All that London real estate, the most expensive in the world, doesn't pay for itself you know. Now cough up peasants, Wales needs that penthouse apartment with a view of the Thames.

  28. Re:It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent t by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note to Americans:
    The "City of London" is about a square mile. It's the most downtowney square mile anywhere, and is home to London's finance industry. What you think about when you think about London is called the "Greater London Authority." So this guy is talking about a British government initiative to create a Silicon Valley type space near the most expensive Real Estate on the continent.

    There're actually places in the Greater London Area where rent is reasonable. They're not near the Square Mile.

  29. Re:Never again.... Standard of living not great... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    Your PM?

    Which of Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, and John Major has moved to Australia?

  30. London born & bred by DanJ_UK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was born and bred in London before living in Stockholm for a few years, Dusseldorf for 2 etc. I've worked and stayed for extended periods in Amsterdam, Berlin, Budapest, Hamburg, Frankfurt, Barcelona, Valencia, Rome, Florence, New York, Istanbul...(the list goes on)....

    Every international city has it's own characteristics but ultimately they all share 2 common things, a unique cultural 'vibe' / identity (the style of the buildings, the food you can eat there etc) and 1 other thing: tourism.

    London is unique in the fact that it has everything from every place you could ever imagine. London evolved as a series of smaller villages ("hamlets") that all had their own unique characteristics that slowly grew to merge together. Combine that with the British empire and the way the country was in essence founded over many centuries of immigration and pooling of resources from every corner of the world and you have one big melting pot of culture where you can pretty much see, do, buy, eat anything you want to.

    They say if you're bored of London you're bored of life, in 30 years I haven't seen everything and I was born here, so how anyone could ever see everything in a week, 2 weeks, month, year I have no idea, you can't call it shit, you're just in the wrong part of London.

    I've lived North, South, East and West and I live in Chiswick as of the past 2 years, down the road from where I was born, I wouldn't want to live anywhere else now. There are parts of London I hated living in (especially East London), but each area is so drastically different from another there's always somewhere that will suit someones personality.

    The same applies to every other city I've visited, Amsterdam for example is an awesome city in the centre, go to west Amsterdam though and it's a completely different place, it's a fucking shit hole. Does that make Amsterdam shit? No, it doesn't.

    Contrary to what people think we're a very chatty city and we do talk to people (it's true everyone's always in a hurry though), all too often people rely on tour guides and manufactured tourism maps to direct them to the usual crap instead of telling you to go off the beaten track, the best way to see a city this size is by asking someone who's from here.

    --
    - Dan
    1. Re:London born & bred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's means it is, Mr Greengrocer's apostrophes.

    2. Re:London born & bred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to London. It feels like NYC, but a better accent and much better Indian food.

      Also, hellishly more expensive.

    3. Re:London born & bred by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      so whats your point?

    4. Re:London born & bred by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      London is unique in the fact that it has everything from every place you could ever imagine. London evolved as a series of smaller villages ("hamlets") that all had their own unique characteristics that slowly grew to merge together. Combine that with the British empire and the way the country was in essence founded over many centuries of immigration..

      How is that "unique"? New York evolved in the exact same manner.

      Almost all major western cities evolved by smaller units merged together as immigration swelled the population. That's why larger western cities tend to be more diverse than smaller ones.

    5. Re:London born & bred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this attitude in many places with people. They visit somewhere and decide on the little bit of information they have.

      Take for example Las Vegas. The actual city of Las Vegas is kind of a dump. The area that people think of Las Vegas is actually an unincorporated city called 'paradise'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise,_Nevada . If you get off the strip it is a pretty bleak city (lots of crushed dreams). But has its own personality of live and let live that is quite different from the strip.

      Or if you visit somewhere like Disney World you may think Florida is a nice place to live. It is extremely varied in the type of people who live there. You can live near or in a swamp. Or live on the beach. Or live in a single wide or two miles down the road drive by multi million dollar mansions with 35k sq ft. My father in law lives in a city where every drives around in golf carts and spends their days trying to get a good tee time.

      I have visited or drove thru a good chunk of the US. Outside of the major cities (Chicago, LA, NY, etc). The country is fairly samish with a few dozen different 'styles'. But inside those big cities things are wildly different from block to block.

    6. Re:London born & bred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London evolved over thousands of years. New York, not so much.

    7. Re: London born & bred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York is a financial services centre without much culture. It has an identity that's unique (Manhattan's many skyscrapers) but you'll find a fraction of the cultural diversity / culture you'll get in London.

    8. Re:London born & bred by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      I assumed he meant it's unique in that it has everything (hence the emphasis) rather than unique because it evolved from a collection of villages.

  31. Indian food by Skapare · · Score: 1

    London also has a better selection of Indian food.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  32. what about .... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    .... Dublin?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  33. I've been to London and I've lived in SV by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Both are playgrounds for very rich people. Everyone else suffers.

  34. Re:Relatively difficult to get a work visa for the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The spouse of a full-time student can work full time. I did just that for several years to support my wife's graduate school work.

    And if you have to do that and don't already have a spouse studying there, I'd bet you could find a nice mail order bride who needs her tuition paid for. Just be careful what you get. there are reasons that ReiserFS, the much vaunted high performance freeware file system, is no longer supportd. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reiser )

  35. London == Berlin + extra dirt and price - the vibe by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    London is Berlin plus extra dirt, pricepoint and noise, minus the vibe. At least in Berlin you get the all-out hippster flair, although gentrification has pushed that out of the door quite a bit already. However, Berlin is spread out so far and has so many green areas it's hard for it to gain the solid all-through gentrification and establishment in top-tier living costs that London or Paris have. Which is a very good thing IMHO.

    Bottom line:
    I'd probably choose Berlin over London. But then again, it also depends largely on the people you're with and the job you have. With the right people around you and the right things to do, such a drab town as Düsseldorf can be fun aswell.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  36. Warm beer and cold women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And rain. No thanks.

    I have worked at a British IT firm and British managers are even more greedy and pig headed than American managers. No thanks.

  37. ZOne 5, Henry VIII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe Henry VIII had a similar strategy for getting away from the bustle and noise of the city. Isn't Hampton Court Palace in Zone 5 or 6? It *is* north of the river, though

  38. Jimmy Wales needs your help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very expensive to live in London. So keep giving money to the Wikimedia Foundation, to keep Jimmy in hookers and blow in London.

  39. San Francisco != Silicon Valley by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I'm getting sick and tired of explaining to people that San Francisco and Silicon Valley are not the same place. Every time the news media does a story on Silicon Valley, they show a tech company campus (typically Google) and the Golden Gate Bridge. The two places are 50 miles apart.That's like claiming Florida as a New York City suburb.

    1. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by Temkin · · Score: 1

      I'm getting sick and tired of explaining to people that San Francisco and Silicon Valley are not the same place. Every time the news media does a story on Silicon Valley, they show a tech company campus (typically Google) and the Golden Gate Bridge. The two places are 50 miles apart.That's like claiming Florida as a New York City suburb.

      Given the recent California housing trends, it hardly matters. You can't find a decent house under $500k as far away as Stockton... And the whole state is functionally bankrupt / crippled by the public employee pension system and shallow bench politics. Move to the smaller tech hubs outside California and you can save 15% right up front, and then get a damage multiplier via cheaper living.

      Some examples:
      $3.50 vs $6 for a gallon of milk
      $2.40 vs $3.68 for a gallon of gas
      Nice new houses for under $200k...
      Some tech hubs have no sales tax...
      Some tech hubs have no state income taxes...

      Silicon Valley has every kind of tax possible, and you can't fix it by voting for an election cycle or two...

    2. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by Shados · · Score: 1

      If you live further out you usually want to work remotely though. If you work for a local company, salary just matches cost of living, so you may not make significantly more.

      Live in the middle of nowhere while working remotely for a company in a big tech hub, and getting the same salary as they give locals though? CHACHING!

    3. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Please move to Texas. When a fertilizer plant explodes in your neighborhood, wipes out the volunteer fire department and burns down half the town, you will appreciate why California has taxes and regulations.

      From the article: "But Texas has also had the nation's highest number of workplace fatalities - more than 400 annually - for much of the past decade. Fires and explosions at Texas' more than 1,300 chemical and industrial plants have cost as much in property damage as those in all the other states combined for the five years ending in May 2012."

    4. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by UTF-8 · · Score: 1

      Finally! Someone actually knows their geography. San Francisco is on the peninsula and not in the valley. Most of the tech companies are in the valley, and it's not San Francisco.

    5. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by russotto · · Score: 1

      Move to the smaller tech hubs outside California and you can save 15% right up front, and then get a damage multiplier via cheaper living.

      The frightening thing is that this is true even if your "smaller tech hub" is New York City.

    6. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Atlanta, Austin, the Research Triangle, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Detroit (Yes... Detroit...), Denver, and Houston all have rising tech employment, and are reasonable in terms of cost of living...

    7. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A recent WSJ article mentioned that Silicon Valley is "running out of building space" for tech companies. That's Palo Alto (SAP/Tesla/vmWare), Mountain View (Google) and Menlo Park (Facebook). The northern end of Silicon Valley that has the shortest commute from San Francisco.

      Meanwhile, there's plenty of building space in San Jose and Santa Clara, as two-story tilt-ups are torn down and replaced by four- to seven-story buildings. Recruiters are even offering more pay and perks to get young hipsters from San Francisco to brave a longer commute to southern Silicon Valley.

    8. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by Temkin · · Score: 1

      Please move to Texas. When a fertilizer plant explodes in your neighborhood, wipes out the volunteer fire department and burns down half the town, you will appreciate why California has taxes and regulations.

      From the article: "But Texas has also had the nation's highest number of workplace fatalities - more than 400 annually - for much of the past decade. Fires and explosions at Texas' more than 1,300 chemical and industrial plants have cost as much in property damage as those in all the other states combined for the five years ending in May 2012."

      I was actually in Texas when that happened. I float back and forth between Austin and San Jose... But you're missing my point: There are multiple tech hubs, and some have significantly different lifestyles and costs of living. You can "do a startup" in Austin, or Portland, or Seattle, or even Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Austin and San Jose are kind of the opposite ends of the shelf. Austin housing is starting to catch up after 10+ years of stagnation... The Bay Area has finally recovered from the '08 crash.

      You've identified one of the problems in Texas, and assumed it's entirely regulatory in nature (hint: cows are dangerous). But you can't just ignore the glaring problem that there are no politicians in the California legislature that have more than a few years of skin in the game due to term limits. They don't care about long term solutions, because they won't be around to take credit for them, or even be around to take the blame. Hence the horrible commutes, and the CalPers mess... They just raise taxes to kick the can down the road, and you get things like $600/yr car registrations, and 13.9% income tax rates, and find yourself blowing $40 at McDonald’s for a couple Happy Meals, etc... Those things add up, but they're just money... What keeps driving me out is the traffic. Spending three to five hours a day in a car commuting keeps me from raising my kids, damages my health, and prevents me from participating in the community I live in.

    9. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by Temkin · · Score: 1

      Move to the smaller tech hubs outside California and you can save 15% right up front, and then get a damage multiplier via cheaper living.

      The frightening thing is that this is true even if your "smaller tech hub" is New York City.

      The nice thing about NYC is you can live without a car. That's a huge chunk of money right there.

    10. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to live the American Dream of having it all, Silicon Valley is very expensive. My brother and his wife make $100,000 a year. They bought a brand new house in Morgan Hill at the height of the 2007 real estate market, which now has an underwater mortgage and they can't retire until they sell the house. They buy $180 designer blue jeans and lease new cars every three years. They have it all and they're miserable.

      I gave up on the American Dream years ago. I make $50,000 a year. I live in a studio apartment for the last ten years, watching my rent go from $800 to $1,300. I pay $20 for blue jeans. The last car I had was a 20-year-old junker that I bought for $1,600 in cash and cost $100 in registration, $400 for insurance and $1,000 in repairs per year. I currently take the express bus to work in Palo Alto, one hour each way, for $170 per month. I'm happy as a clam because I'm living a very modest lifestyle.

    11. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Or you can take public transit in Silicon Valley.

    12. Re:San Francisco != Silicon Valley by Temkin · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to live the American Dream of having it all, Silicon Valley is very expensive.

      Exactly... But the other tech hubs offer choices. A lot of geeks disparage the other hubs as backwaters and diss the "bubba" factor. But... You can pick your poison. That's really all I'm saying. Greater San Jose offers two choices, the frugal but wise for the locale lifestyle you have chosen, or the tortured attempt at balancing a traditional 3bd/2ba w/kids + dog family lifestyle your brother is likely attempting in an economy built to blow bubbles and then pop. Where I call you out for your choice is that I ask if you have made an honest choice, or just been smart enough to not fight the local fight. Only you can answer that, and the answer is only correct for you. That said, you can make money off the bubbles, but you have to be "in the know", and take advantage when the time is right. Therein lies the problem...

      But at the end of the day, we're still slaves to biology in that we are finite. If we fail to thrive and produce offspring, anything we gain is lost. You can be pro-feminist, pro-diversity, pro-whatever the topic of the day is, etc... but if you fail to do these two things, you will fail and collapse society in couple generations: 1. Achieve a > 2.2 child per breeding couple reproduction rate, and: 2. Instil in those offspring at least the same work ethic that led to your own success. I loved my Mills college girlfriend, but... Fail at those and the numbers collapse pretty quickly, the barbarians are at your doorstep and they will sell her in to slavery after feeding you to the delta smelt. It sucks, and its the biology trap we haven't figured out how to escape yet. I choose to have kids and am working to (hopefully) make them productive members of an advancing society, My attempts at doing that in the SF Bay Area indicated impending failure, so I gave up.

      I come back for ageing family, and the periodic contract tech refresh. Then I get run out again. My son is starting to learn about Mindcraft mod'ing... I worry that Java will die before he finishes school...

      Oh... and I drive old cars, and buy $20 jeans at Costco and wear cheap tee-shirts. The free tradeshow ones are even better...

  40. Re:It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent t by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Define reasonable? Even cheap bedsits are over £500 a month. If you want a flat you need to be earning well over £30K if you're single just to keep up with the rent and the bills

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  41. The Biggest Problem with Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that it's an echo chamber. Full stop. London is a much better place to live, even if tech were not a consideration. Everyplace has it's pros and cons, but the UK is a far and away a better place to live all things considered. Culturally, not many places beat out London. The food, the sights, the arts, the fashion scene, the ability to travel to other, nearby countries on the cheap. None of this is really available in Silicon Valley. I lived in the UK for almost 4 years. I'd gladly return if the job situation permitted it. Again, far and away a better quality of life all things considered.

    1. Re:The Biggest Problem with Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyplace has it's pros and cons"

      So does every apostrophe. In your case though, all con, no pro. Oh, and "every place" is two words.

    2. Re:The Biggest Problem with Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People make mistakes, mate. "Everyplace" is correct, as it's the adverbial form of the word. Hoping the rest of your day is better spent than pointing out innocent mistakes.

  42. You know that round yellow thing in the sky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's one flicking thing London doesn't have.
    I lived in and around Lokdon for 7 years. I love the place, the people, the culture. But would I exchange it for the 300+ days of sunshine I get in Silicon Valley, and the year round fair weather? I am not so sure.

    1. Re:You know that round yellow thing in the sky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until the sea rises enough to shift the gulf stream. London is going to have weather similar to Nome Alaska, probably in our lifetime.

  43. Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pass living in a city with 9 months of winter. I may earn less where I live but at least I enjoy other aspects of life better.

  44. Cost of living! by jamshidsangi · · Score: 1

    majority of Tech is build on the back of startups, which often run on shoe string budget. Bay area and silicon valley is not cheap, but it is much cheaper than london! So cost of living alone makes silicon valley as a much better option.

  45. Best weather in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A famous climatologist in the early 20th century once set out to locate the place(s) with the best weather/climate in the world. After years of effort, he declared it a tie between Los Gatos, CA and Cairo, Egypt. A substantial percentage of Silicon Vally tech people live in Los Gatos, and the weather/climate of the whole area shares in the judgement. Just don't go too far east, like to Livermore...

  46. And everyone in london by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eventually moves to Los Angeles.

    Aside from the reported drought/heat, that's really the non coastal areas. There's a lot and I mean a lot of London refugees here in the west side.

  47. Infrastructure Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a huge infrastructure down here that makes life for small chip guys possible. Does that exist in London?

    For example, anyone can set up a couple of computers and design chips but what happens when the first wafers come back?

    You need a simple lab. Gott'a drop the thing on a cheap wafer prober and start debug.

    Is there a London version of Outback Equipment? https://www.outbackequipment.com/index.php/

    A0 silicon never works bug free. You're going to need to FIB occasionally and I'm going to need fast turn around. I can jump into my car and drive over to EAG and the tech will have my file open on their workstation when I walk in. Can I do that in London?

    1. Re:Infrastructure Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a pretty small niche among SV startups.

  48. Re:It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the tech is becoming centred around the Silicon Roundabout - Old Street, Shoreditch etc. Until recently a relatively low-rent area and outside of the square mile.

  49. Re:It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent t by bazorg · · Score: 2

    It's cheaper than the City, but still not the place to build machines or to have a growing team. I'd say companies need to go to the outside of Cambridge, Oxford, Northampton, Milton Keynes, any place more than 100Km from London to get a warehouse + office space that can be considered affordable. The talent pool will be different but you might get enough people who already moved away from the big city.

  50. Pretty much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    My sister and her boyfriend live in London and they love the city, but don't really like living there. Both make reasonable money, but a massive chunk of it goes to pay for their housing which is not great. They are hoping to be able to move farther away which will be a pain commute wise, but allow them to live some place nicer that doesn't eat up most of their cash.

  51. whats that yellow thing in the sky? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Wont have to worry about tthat in London.

  52. If you are going to promote a cosmopolitan city (SF is not) then there is better than London. Berlin or Paris or, if it has to be Anglophile, then Dublin. London is more expensive and difficult to work in.

  53. It's kind of nice by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    If you like a an expensive place packed with people, few of which speak actual English, where the most interesting things Culturally are literally hundreds of years old then yeah London might be the town for you. I liked it. Lot's of money there, the beer was great, the temperature was bearable, and very touristy. Other than that? I'm but it's no better than any other city.

    On the plus side it does look like you internet prices have drop substantially since I lived there last. Nice!

  54. The guide to nice cities for CEO's by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

    If you are a tech company, a nice city to do business in is one near an airport with good telecom infrastructure, good schools, and housing is inexpensive enough that your employees don't have to spend their entire paycheck to live in a cardboard box. Locating where rent is skyhigh just so it shortens your commute to 10 Downing St has nothing to do with business: its all about you.

  55. Rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a resident of the so-called "dreadful" region that is home to upwards of 4 million people and responsible for some of the greatest innovations in our era, I'll make sure to never donate to wikipedia ever again.

  56. Re Brit self-deprec: Megacities 'Londoners' book by shoor · · Score: 1

    The thing about 'megacities', based on my own admittedly limited experience, but also on what other people have said about places like New York City, is that they are composed of neighborhoods, and each neighborhood has its own flavor, its locals who are comfortable there and so on. (Of course, that may not be true of every megacity.)

    I read a book called "Londoners" (don't remember the author), in which the author had people from various walks of life talk about their experience and take on London. It started with an airline pilot talking about flying in, and ended with him talking about flying out, but there were illegal immigrants, city planners, wiccans, American tourists (the most inane of the lot), old timers, people who hated it, those who loved it, etc. A very interesting read, and yeah, it seems like London would fit in with the neighborhoods description pretty well. The big problem with London and most megacities is their high cost of living. In that Londoners book someone commented on how it might become difficult for the needed working class people to live close enough to work there.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  57. Geographically speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't Wales prefer Cardiff over London?

  58. Re:Relatively difficult to get a work visa for the by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Intra-company transfers for an existing employer (e.g. IBM), limited to a year if you are making £40,000/year; call it $63,500 at todays exchange rate; this is generally not hard for someone employed by IBM, actually

    Did I misinterpret that, or did you really mean to say that £40,000/year is a plausible amount for an IBMer to make while living in London? What would you say is a nice salary for a senior engineer?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  59. No Hablo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing there are fewer Mexicans in London than there are in Silicon Valley. They're the reason for the region becoming a cesspool of disease, poor education, bad traffic, and lack of morals. I'm happier living in Chicago than I would be in either Silicon Valley or London, still got Mexicans here, but far fewer and they speak English.

  60. Agree on London by johnwerneken · · Score: 0

    I'd think it would be obvious: London is the closest thing we have to a planetary capital, and has been such for 250 years. Here in one spot: a major government with world wide connections; one of the three and sometimes the foremost finance center on the planet; a huge and diverse population; access to some of the oldest best and most advanced centers of education, research, and technology on the planet; in relative terms, quite close to all significant places save those around the Pacific; equidistance from the west and east sides of the Pacific; and by far the largest city in one of the three world super-powers, Europe. London also has a cultural life and a history as rich/long as most any inhabited spot.

    Besides, I love it there. Parks plays museums great transit great shopping marvelous neighborhoods to explore, to walk, places to eat to drink to socialize. The real food of all the planet's peoples. And wild and solitary places within a travel time of a few hours.

    The weather...let's not talk about the English weather lol. But then the central valleys of California actually would be uninhabitable at least most of the year, but for vast amounts of imported water and energy, the weather there is imho world class awful, and so is the air.

  61. Re:It's not just a matter of taste, there's rent t by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    I'm paying $575 in suburban Cleveland, which is £362; so £500 (roughly $795) isn't that unreasonable for a place where a) salaries are much higher, b) there are many more types of job available, and c) public transit is much better. Moreover, I'm American. You Brits would freak out at having to drive 10 miles before you get to the train station and then take half-hour on the train to get to work; but that's only a 40 minute commute. State-side that's average.

    And you're exaggerating. There are quit e a few £400 spots available.

  62. Prove my points on hosts wrong then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Can adblock do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phishing
    10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
    11.) Get you past a dnsbl
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up websurfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on ANY webbound app (think stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
    16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on AdBlock doing it as well or at all!

    APK

    P.S.=> AdBlock does FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...

    AdBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    AdBlock's SLOWER than hosts: http://superuser.com/questions...

    For the BEST hosts file?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    ... apk

  63. related how exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "cultural assets make it an ideal place to do business"

    How are cultural assets in any way related to doing tech business?

  64. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who willingly used PHP loses the right to claim anything.

  65. Re:Never again.... Standard of living not great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texas?

    Outside of the Butthole Surfers, Texas is a wasteland of rednecks, meth and violence.

  66. If I write nonsense, why'd you agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    1st: See subject dimwit & this quote from you agreeing w/ my points:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Bank on this Dave420: Whenever you post next? Bank on it, I'll be there scumbag, just to SEE YOU SQUIRM vs. it - you've hassled me constantly, talked behind my back here, & when I'm done with you? You'll LEAVE /. ... apk

  67. I *know* anyone using a bs pseudonym online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS a weasel (like you) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    * How's THAT suit you?

    (Should perfectly - it's only TRUTH about online weasels that hide behind bs names & are EASILY tracked sheep online here @ /., that's certain - you did THAT to yourselves!)

    APK

    P.S.=> As far as Do-nothing Dave420 the "ne'er-do-well"troll & pot puffing clown (hey, JUST LIKE YOU too)?

    Well - LMAO:

    Dave420 (you) can "read 'em & weep" here due to HIS stupidity & it only shows how easy he is to outsmart (dullard that he is due no doubt to puffing too much pot) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ... apk

    1. Re:I *know* anyone using a bs pseudonym online by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      (Should perfectly - it's only TRUTH about online weasels that hide behind bs names & are EASILY tracked sheep online here @ /., that's certain - you did THAT to yourselves!)

      So what exactly is your point here? That's what I'm trying to delve down into. As far as I know you always post AC, so you're not against people posting anonymously. Is the argument that the "pseudononymous" nickname is not anonymous? Sure, I could agree with that, you responded to one of my posts where I said as much. I login to Slashdot for the convenience of easily tracking my posts, and I'm fine with other people doing so, as you have. You can call me an easily-tracked sheep if you want, that's certainly your prerogative, but maybe I'm fine with people tracking my posting history. I'm not ashamed of my posting history on Slashdot, whether I log in as "Rakarra Williams" or decide to just post as AC. Going through the history seems to me like it would be a waste of time, but I recognize that it's there if you want it.

  68. Corruptions are everywhere, even in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time I went to the city hall of the city of Dallas, Texas, to register an assumed-name for a company I wanted to start. Before I register I checked the list of assumed-names that have been taken, and since I had the whole day free, I also check how many assumed names were registered under the mayor of Dallas (back then)

    I stopped counting after 300, and there were several pages more (back then there was no Internet)

    It did (and still does) make me wonder why the mayor of the city of Dallas needed to register over 300 assumed-names?

    If they are for businesses, then it translated to the mayor of Dallas having over 300 businesses

  69. Oh, & by the way? No sockpuppeteer here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I'd NEVER 'lower myself' to the levels you project with your bs online name, much less do multiple instances of it either... this reply is in addition to my last one to you here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    So you can QUIT "projecting" YOUR MODUS OPERANDI onto me, & I never EVER do that - it'd make ME as LOW as those I despise doing it, & THAT is never going to happen.

    APK

    P.S.=> Period... apk

  70. If what I write is nonsense why agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    1st: See subject dimwit & this quote from you agreeing w/ my points:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM everybody, lol - evasions galore from him to ensue are almost guaranteed... apk

  71. If what I wrote's nonsense, why agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    1st: See subject & a quote of you agreeing w/ my points on hosts:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM everybody, lol - evasions galore from him to ensue are almost guaranteed... apk

  72. If what I wrote's nonsense why agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    1st: See subject & quote of you agreeing w/ me & my points on hosts:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM everybody, lol - evasions galore from him to ensue are almost guaranteed... apk

  73. If what I wrote's nonsense why agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    See subject & quote you agreeing w/ me & my points on hosts:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM everybody, lol - evasions galore from him to ensue are almost guaranteed... apk

  74. If what I wrote's nonsense why agree w/ it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    See subject: Quote of you agreeing w/ my points on hosts:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    (Since they're fact in favor of hosts doing more than so-called competitors & doing more with less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online - which is, of course, more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT, shithead? Answer that!

    If you're "so-called 'better solutions'" are BETTER, & I bother you? Use them... OBVIOUSLY, asshole, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):

    (No, instead you stalk/harass me instead!)

    * DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer that too!

    I'll be waiting (but you'll avoid every question, or lie - which only makes you look stupider than ever vs. myself)

    (You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you're TOO STUPID to EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)

    APK

    P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM everybody, lol - evasions galore from him to ensue are almost guaranteed... apk