Slashdot Mirror


A Breakdown of the Windows 10 Privacy Policy

WheezyJoe writes: The Verge has a piece on Windows 10 privacy that presents actual passages from the EULA and privacy policy that suggest what the OS is capturing and sending back to Microsoft. The piece takes a Microsoft-friendly point of view, arguing that all Microsoft is doing is either helpful or already being done either by Google or older releases of Windows, and also touches on how to shut things off (which is also explained here). But the quoted passages from the EULA and the privacy policy are interesting to review, particularly if you look out for legal weasel words that are open to Microsoft's interpretation, such as "various types (of data)", diagnostic data "vital" to the operation of Windows (cannot be turned off), sharing personal data "as necessary" and "to protect the rights or property of Microsoft". And while their explanations following the quotes may attempt an overly friendly spin, the article may be right about one thing: "In all, only a handful of these new features, and the privacy concerns they bring, are actually in fact new... Most people have just been either unaware or just did not care of their existence in past operating systems and software." Even pirates are having privacy concerns and blocking Windows 10 users.

209 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... you just don't "know" you like it? They did this promotion where they sat old people in front of vista machines asked them to derp around on it and then asked them if they liked it... they all said they did... and MS basically said "everyone saying they don't like vista is wrong/a troll/ignorant/etc"... remember that?

    Well... same thing seems to be happening again. Consumers are saying "we have problems with these features and we'd like them fixed"... and MS is again saying "I hear you saying you don't want it but I think you're just saying you want me to tell you about how great they are again until you change your mind.

    No.
    https://youtu.be/dROwEc4VyJA?t...

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by hyperar · · Score: 2

      I did like Vista, when you have drivers for it, it ran great.

    2. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by hyperar · · Score: 1

      I'm not the market, i'm me, i liked it, you don't necessarily have to, each can have it's own opinion.

    3. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I'm not the market, i'm me, i liked it, you don't necessarily have to, each can have it's own opinion.

      its own irrelevant opinion

    4. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Clippy says everything is fine!

      Trust, Clippy, your friendly computer friend, citizen!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Why would I need to do that? MS knows they shit the bed on that product.

      Vista is largely regarded as being shitty. You think this is up to some citation on a forum?

      The case is already closed on this one, chum. The gavel dropped and the judge went home. Its over.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1
      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    7. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would call this more similar to what Microsoft went through with the latest Xbox. Initially there were significant privacy concerns, some people got very upset, and they backpedaled (as they did on so many things with that system.) I'm hoping we see that with Windows 10. I'm not holding my breath, especially since they added spying to Windows 7 instead so far.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by westlake · · Score: 1

      MS basically said "everyone saying they don't like vista is wrong/a troll/ignorant/etc"... remember that?

      I am looking at an Insider build of Windows which, for all practical purposes, has restored the Aero desktop.

    9. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      The xbox one never actually recovered from that either. If you compare the sales figures with the PS4... the xbox one lost something like half its potential install base because of that fuck up.

      I think sales of the xbox one are something like 25 to 33 percent of the PS4 which is a big reversal from the Xbox 360.

      There were so many fuck ups with that release. The kinnect or whatever it was called was better evidence for MS having their heads up their asses than I've seen in awhile. And the stupidity just kept coming.

      They thought they were going to just remove the used games market and no one would notice? Drop the price in half and you might get away with that. But you want to charge 60 fucking dollars and not have resale? Think again.

      And then they put the extra DRM

      And then they said "oh yeah you have to be connected to the internet even for single player games"... the comments from active military was pretty funny... they were all saying "I don't have internet in a warzone, shithead"...

      So yeah... complete idiocy.

      The fun thing with MS is that they have two markets they have to keep happy. The consumer market which MS apparently thinks is populated entirely with retards... and the corporate market that will absolutely unscrew their head and shit down their neck if they don't get what they need.

      Which is why I stick to the corporate releases. Not perfect... but less condescendingly shitty.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      define what you're talking about? You mean as opposed to metro?

      Because that's not a giant vote of confidence.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Bathroom+Humor · · Score: 1

      True. There are a lot of things I like about Windows 10 (most of them are things that have been present in Ubuntu for a while now, though I think the new start menu is better than the current Unity Dash). But the privacy concerns.... I only use Windows as a gaming platform but it still sorta creeps me out to think about what they are gathering from me that I may not even be aware of.

    12. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      A nice thing about the windows community is that we do find these things fairly quickly and knee cap them... just Tonya Harding the shit out of them. :D

      I have this giant list of registry hacks that have to be applied to every windows OS to add features, remove features, change features...

      The ones where I'm outright just breaking something are the funniest for me though. I mean... just let me turn it off. But no... I have to go in and bust certain associations that just cause the feature to not function.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    13. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The incompatibility issues with XP software was a deal breaker for years actually.

      There were a lot of other issues but the incompatibility issues were a nightmare for corporations. And to this day, a big reason why so many systems still use XP is because of that compatibility issues.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    14. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      So you don't think the Xbox One being 100 dollars more expensive because the kinnect had anything to do with it?

      You don't think the always connected to the internet thing had anything to do with it?

      You don't think any of a dozen other massive fucking problems were relevant... just a speed difference which... probably no one will even notice?

      I'm not buying it.

      No sale.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > the Xbox 360 was faster than the PS3

      That's not entirely correct. The XBox 360 and PS3 devs I talked to basically said the same thing:

      * PS3: GPU Bound
      * XBox 360: CPU Bound

      So which game was faster depended on what you were doing.

    16. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The market expresses time at a single point at which a product is deemed to be a failure. If the market were forced to use Vista right now they would have trouble spotting the difference to Windows 7. The market suffered greatly from Vista incompatibilities at the release.

    17. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Bathroom+Humor · · Score: 1

      just Tonya Harding the shit out of them. :D

      Sir, I will have you know that this is offensive to Tonya Harding and Tonya Harding fans.
      Your ice cold humor won't spin you out of this, you can't skate around the issue at hand. The momentum of your angle while making snide comments like this will follow you, until you are judged harshly and out of breath. Also you wear tights and glitter.

      In other news, it's unfortunate that you'd have to keep such a laundry list of "things to intentionally break in order to feel secure" on the operating system you depend on. On Linux it's normally the other way around, having to fix things to hold stuff together. But at least privacy isn't usually a big concern.

    18. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by hyperar · · Score: 1

      I'm not the market, i'm me, i liked it, you don't necessarily have to, each can have it's own opinion.

      its own irrelevant opinion

      Just like yours, but that didn't stopped you.

    19. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      your pathetic belief you can psycho analyze me through some internet posts when even a professional in that field couldn't do it with less than several intensive face to face sessions confesses an ignorance on your part as to how little you know about psychology.

      In your attempt to high hat me, you basically just said "I'm ignorant"... and the funny thing is that you're so ignorant you don't even realize it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    20. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The "Vista is shitty" meme is generally confined to forums such as these. Slashdot does not represent the OS market, but a small subset of it. The sales numbers for Vista were respectable, and after its bumpy start it was a solid product. Your personal opinion might differ.

    21. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The laundry list is a script I update every couple months. On new systems I push the script to the system... it executes the registry changes... which includes settings that need to be tweaked, features that need to be added, features that need to be fixed, features that need to be removed, and where I want a feature to appear to exist to other parts of the computer but to in fact be inoperative... I knee cap the shit out of the bitch.

      Its not something I have to police very closely. I just tweak the file every so often.

      Its specific to given releases of windows. I have one for XP, 7, 2008, 2012... I was thinking about making one for windows 10 but quickly rolled my eyes and laughed when I saw what they were doing.

      the organization can happily use 7 for a long time. We'll see. We'll have a look at version 11. We see no compelling reason to upgrade at this point. MS has been saying "you CAN upgrade to 10 for free with your existing license"... and we smile and say "thanks!"... and then make a point of not doing anything of the kind.

      Some of our kiosks are still XP. I know I know... SECURITY... but we firewall the shit out of them so whatever.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    22. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You're conflating vista at launch with vista after a million patches.

      *slaps Garbz wrist*

      Don't do that.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    23. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      My personal opinion is widely held amongst IT professionals as well as the corporate and government IT establishment.

      The sales vista enjoyed beyond that was largely due to OEM manufactuers just auto installing Vista in machines people bought at wallmart.

      So... remove from your statistics OEM installations and recalculate. Its a shitty OS, MS knows it was shitty, and whatever you might think they did their best to not piss off the people that said was shitty for the next iteration of the operating system.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    24. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Even Apple who requires you to use their own premium-priced hardware for OSX outpaces the free GNU/Linux by a significant margin.

      Apple is only "premium-priced" if you value your time and frustration-index at zero.

    25. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      A nice thing about the windows community is that we do find these things fairly quickly and knee cap them... just Tonya Harding the shit out of them. :D

      Why?

    26. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      This has been explained to the linux community with some frequency. They don't listen to the problems with wider adoption of their operating system and so we run into problems.

      Even suggesting that there is any legitimacy to this position is derided which shuts down any possibility of meaningful communication.

      As such... don't ask questions you can't handle the answers to.
      https://youtu.be/9FnO3igOkOk?t... ;-D

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    27. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      This has been explained to the linux community with some frequency. They don't listen to the problems with wider adoption of their operating system and so we run into problems.

      Even suggesting that there is any legitimacy to this position is derided which shuts down any possibility of meaningful communication.

      As such... don't ask questions you can't handle the answers to. https://youtu.be/9FnO3igOkOk?t... ;-D

      You're preachin' to the choir, man!

      Take a look at my Username. Think I don't have some experience around here with the Linux Police?

    28. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No I'm not. Some patches improved performance and usability marginally, but instabilities, bluescreens, and lack of hardware support, or hardware supported but gimped in performance that Vista was widely known for were all problems brought about but a lack of preparedness by hardware vendors.

      There's no denying it got better with a million patches, but even without those patches when the drivers were all behaving themselves, USB actually running at the right speed, the chipset driver actually including all the required parts of the chipset etc. vista was okay.

    29. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What incompatibility issues? You mean the hardware manufacturers not having their drivers ready for Vista's launch?

      As a network administrator for 20 years, it is very rare that I run across something made for XP that doesn't work in Vista, 7 and 8.

    30. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to channel my inner 15 year old girl... and tell you:

      What Evvvah. :-D

      Its a dumb argument at this point. Vista is shit and I don't have to put up with it anymore.

      I am happily using very heavily modified versions of Windows 7 mostly. Quite happily. And I'll continue to do that until at least Windows 11 when MS will have another chance to not be fucking ridiculous.

      MS keeps getting upset that the enterprise users don't adopt their new OS. Buy the license... sure... actually install the shit?... *snicker*... We don't do this early adopter, fad OS, oh look at the pretty graphics, bullshit. Its not our thing. The consumer market is hostage to their ignorance and whatever the OEMs dump on them. We don't have to deal with that.

      And so we don't. End-o-fucking-story.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    31. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If people are going to switch away from Windows then they are going to go to OSX long before GNU/Linux.

      We are in complete agreement, and I'd love to subscribe to your Newsletter.

    32. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... so many legacy programs didn't work. Some databases don't work. Scripts had to be rewritten... so many things.

      Let us not pretend... there were APPLICATION compatibility problems that were pretty fucking horrible.

      When you say you haven't run into compatibility problems, was your organization only using bog standard MS office applications? Or were you running a lot of proprietary programs custom coded for your organization?

      Because THAT is what I am talking about. A lot of those programs that work just fine in XP shit the bed on Vista.

      We've shifted a lot of that over to linux just to control what is and is not compatible so we don't deal with that again. But it was a massive shit show.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    33. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Bathroom+Humor · · Score: 1

      Imagine a world where MS made enough money on selling licenses for their software so they didn't need to resort to data mining and advertising in order to make a profit. That would be grand.

      I don't blame you for not updating though, when you have such a system in place that just works. I updated to Windows 10 but I do nothing productive on it so why worry. Windows 10 is rather nice, but it might not be worth it to a lot of people, general population not withstanding.

    34. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... depends on your definition of "enough"... they earn plenty on their licenses. You can always earn more.

      Part of MS's activities are their chess games with Google.

      Google is flicking the nipples of both MS and Apple. And that kind to teasing is bound to get people excited in all the wrong places.

      I can't hold that against MS. And honestly most of their shit only effects the peasants. I'm one of those cynical shits that can't be bothered to worry about people that make no proactive effort to inform themselves.

      Everyone wants people swaddled in cotton and read lullbyes... not how the world works. Best case you get someone ethical to do that for a generation or so and then the new nurse maid turns out to be a fucking vampire or zombie and spends most of their time eating the fucking babies alive.

      Its not sustainable. People need to protect themselves or drop like chumps.

      I protect my coworkers because I'm paid to do it.

      I offer friends friendly advice because that's what friends do.

      And I have systematically secured any family member's machine that sought my council.

      Best I can do.

      The system was never designed to be kind to suckers.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    35. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering the vast majority of software is only on Windows, getting a Mac seems like it would generate a great deal of frustration. There's also the frustration of not being able to upgrade basic things like RAM because it's soldered to the fucking motherboard.

      No thanks, I'll stick with a PC that costs less, performs better and runs what I want. If I ever need to kill some time, I'll dabble with MacOS in a VM.

    36. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, people would more likely switch to ChromeOS (which is Linux based) than MacOS. The only way that wouldn't be true is if Apple started releasing MacOS as a general purpose operating system to run on any PC, not just their own hardware.

    37. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you name some of them? Just saying some random things didn't work doesn't lend any credibility to your claim.

      We ran professional applications made by various well known companies and custom written programs. We were a software development company. The transition to Vista was painless, it actually improved performance.

    38. Re:Remember when MS said you really like Vista... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And this analogy has Nancy Kerrigan being Microsoft. What did she ever do to you?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "All your data are belong to us"

  3. Re:Windows 10, it's free by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's NOT FREE damnit, stop posting this nonsense.

    Sent from Windows XP.

  4. weasel words = gaping hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Posting anon for obvious reasons.

    In a former life, there was some question about what and how far an org could go into customer data that was collected through remote telemetry or use of cloud services. A couple years ago, legal counsel informed us that we could capture, examine, and retain essentially any customer data, because any security-related review fell under the clauses about use of customer data for "enhancement of customer experience", to which the customer consented in the EULA. This is why some entities feel very free to capture any data they want from endpoint computers and effectively lie about it in marketing documents: because end-users consented to a free-for-all in the prior/overriding legal license.

    1. Re:weasel words = gaping hole by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      It's worth pointing out that laws in this sort of area vary widely. I don't know where you're based, but I don't know a lot of lawyers who'd be comfortable defending that position in much of Europe, for example. On the other hand, it wouldn't surprise me at all to find the law allowed that kind of behaviour in the US.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:weasel words = gaping hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A suburb of Seattle.

    3. Re:weasel words = gaping hole by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that the "Enterprise" version of 10, the one that you and I, of the unwashed multitudes CANNOT get, doesn't have these "features"....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    4. Re:weasel words = gaping hole by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      I was legitimately enthusiastic about moving to Windows 10. After learning more about it, I can say with certainty I will never use it on any PC I own at least in it's current form. It's really a shame. I'm not one to just hate Microsoft on principle. I had an open mind, but now that enough information has been presented I just can't allow Windows 10 on my PC and I can't support their approach to the customer relationship. Give me a "Privacy Enhanced" version and I'll be willing to spend $100. The year of Linux on the desktop may be coming, but who knew it would be sponsored by Windows 10.

      It's not too late, fix Windows 10 and the EULA now and change the conversation, else Microsoft, you deserve to fail.

  5. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows 10 Privacy = Oxymoron

  6. Vista 10 privacy policy in 7 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All your base are belong to us.

  7. Vital diagnostics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly how vital can they be if the fucking computer still works with no Internet connection?

    1. Re:Vital diagnostics by hyperar · · Score: 1

      Welcome to /.

    2. Re:Vital diagnostics by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 2

      Clearly they're not vital to enterprise customers.

    3. Re:Vital diagnostics by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Vital to Microsoft. So they can mine/sell the data. Get it now?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Vital diagnostics by westlake · · Score: 1

      Exactly how vital can they be if the fucking computer still works with no Internet connection?

      How many computers outside a secured corporate or governmental network are currently operating without at least part-time access to the Internet?

      How many computers on the corporate intranet aren't collecting similar data for internal use --- and sharing some of that data with Microsoft to improve the performance of both clients and servers?

  8. 7 and 8 too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're running automatic updates on 7 or 8 you already have the same "telemetry" components as well. Check for installation of 3035583, 2952664, 2976978, 3021917, 3044374, 2990214, 3022345, 3068708, all of which are windows 10 related components. It seems that the last two are the diagnostics/telemetry ones with the others having more questionable intent.

    Microsoft describes these updates (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3068708) as honoring the CEIP choice and only doing the spying if the user has opted in. At least at this time however the server that microsoft identifies (vortex-win.data.microsoft.com) will have active connections even on machines where the CEIP choice was set to opt-out.

    I'm sure once this gets some more media attention Microsoft will claim that they're storing the data just in case you change your mind, and that they wouldn't think of abusing it until then.

    1. Re:7 and 8 too by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Do which one of those is needed to read SD cards? One of them is.

    2. Re:7 and 8 too by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

      Not on the enterprise editions. I run win8.1 enterprise and have none of these updates installed nor an active connection with vortex (checked with netstat -b -f).

      --
      Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  9. Re:IDEA by nate_in_ME · · Score: 1

    Or, for those who didn't understand the whole issue, they would just complain about site X no longer working.

  10. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Nook updates:

    "This update makes minor changes to the Nook operating environment"

    Translation: We're not telling you what we messed around with. Oh look. It just hid all of your book files. Including the books that were explicitly licensed for them to sell without DRM.

  11. Re:Windows 10, it's free by psyko_chewbacca · · Score: 1, Interesting
    It's free for the first year only. And even after that year, I don't think you'll be able to cleanly wipe your computer and re-install Windows 10 using that Win7/8 license.

    Basically, I think Microsoft is simply trying to get as much early adopter as possible, get lots of bug reports and fix the bugs/exploits in a timely manner. That could seriously speed up the rate of companies willing to upgrade their computers from Windows 7.

    And as always, if something's free, it means you're the merchandise here. I don't blame Microsoft trying to make a buck of your back, you're free to stay on your current Windows version or look for an alternative product that suits better your needs...

  12. Closed-source operating systems by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Over twenty years ago there was a FreeBSD-hacker with the following signature: "Do not trust an operating system you don't have sources for".

    Though I was then a fresh FreeBSD convert myself, the maxim seemed a little too radical to me... Not any more.

    If you absolutely must use Windows, get a stripped-down variant via a Russian or Chinese torrent (there are reputable ones, which will not infect you). If you don't want to rob Microsoft, send them a check... But best is to just get an OS, for which sources are also available.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Closed-source operating systems by TrancePhreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you absolutely must use Windows, get a stripped-down variant via a Russian or Chinese torrent (there are reputable ones, which will not infect you).

      worst advice ever

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    2. Re:Closed-source operating systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The advice is to use a possibly compromised operating system over a guaranteed compromised operating system.

      Do you have a better suggestion for those who has to use windows?

    3. Re:Closed-source operating systems by dafradu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nice try Putin.

    4. Re:Closed-source operating systems by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Do you have a better suggestion for those who has to use windows?

      strong drink

    5. Re:Closed-source operating systems by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      Would love to use an OS I have source for on my gaming machine. Game developers should be migrating to open source OS platforms imho. For now though I'm stuck with dual booting. I have upgraded to win10 - to play games without hassle (actually converted my pirated win8.1 with kms activation lol) ... yeah can't think of that other thing. The rest of my compute is a reboot away.

    6. Re:Closed-source operating systems by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      There's "MS compromised", who will likely send you targeted advertisements. And there's "Chinese or Russian hacker compromised", who may steal your credentials and drain your bank account. Are you trying to tell me if you see no difference here? If not, I'm not sure what to tell you. Use the Russian or Chinese torrent version and go nuts.

      Some other possibilities:
      * Continue using Windows 7 until 2020.
      * Install and use Windows 10 on a virtual machine.
      * Use Windows 10 but disable all the cloud-based features. Nearly everything can be turned off, and there are some apps to disable the rest.
      * Dual boot, only using Windows 10 when you must, otherwise using Linux, BSD, or whatever you feel is more secure.
      * See if the software you require can run using Wine under Linux, or if there are free alternatives.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re:Closed-source operating systems by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Do not trust an operating system you don't have sources for".

      And audited every line of code yourself. Because this happened: 23-Year-Old X11 Server Security Vulnerability Discovered

      Corollary: Do not trust an operating system you have sources for.

      Apparently, just do not trust.

    8. Re:Closed-source operating systems by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Only use Windows computers to play computer games on.
      +1 for "See if the software you require can run using Wine under Linux, or if there are free alternatives."

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:Closed-source operating systems by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The advice is to use a guaranteed compromised operating system vs a guaranteed compromised by multiple parties operating system.

    10. Re:Closed-source operating systems by mi · · Score: 1

      Yes, open-source software may be buggy too, but you have the power to do something about it, if it affects you — and the OS-vendor has no way to stop you.

      Open-source may not be good on some absolute scale, but it certainly is better than the closed-source software. If you value your privacy over ease of use and animated file-transfers, that is.

      Apparently, just do not trust.

      Yes, that's a good idea too.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  13. Re:IDEA by coolmoe2 · · Score: 2

    I was gonna mod this but instead im going to reply. You go ahead and say whatever you want but the only user base that is going to go downward will be the webmasters sites that block windows 10. People are not going to switch to another OS just to use your site. I have never ever seen this happen once in all my years of tech support. Have a great day you gave me a much needed laugh.

  14. Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and 8 by timrod · · Score: 2

    In June, MS shipped a bunch of now-infamous "Telemetry Services" updates to Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1. I forget what the exact Knowledge Base numbers are, but you can find them pretty easily. These updates were marked as "Important" in Windows Update, and actually have the same general description of "This update fixes some bugs and improves security" that they use for all updates if viewed in the Add/Remove Programs window.

    The "Telemetry Update" has been proven to send information to MS, and cannot be controlled short of uninstalling the update and force-stopping the associated services. I was told that the "update" collects all of your keyboard input and ships it to MS for use in "improving" their Auto-Correct and Word Suggestion features, and I have no reason to believe otherwise.

    I had to turn off Windows Update entirely on both of my machines in order to stop MS trying to ship this update after I uninstalled it, because it kept trying to push the update even when I specifically said not to install it.

  15. What are you all so worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "This water is only one degree hotter now than a few minutes ago," said the frog to his companions.

    1. Re:What are you all so worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a metaphor, you brain dead insect.

  16. A significant difference between HW and SW sale by david.emery · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft, since its only product is software, has to go to great lengths to protect and extend that property base. "Extend" here is Googly data mining.

    Apple, on the other hand, makes money by selling you the hardware. The protection is the physical ownership of the device. You might not believe Apple when it says "we don't want your personal information", but you have to respect that they're not depending on either data or software to make the great majority of their revenue.

    This may not be a popular opinion, but I trust Microsoft more than Google, Apple -way more- than Microsoft, and the NSA more than any commercial company.

    1. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      The flip side of that is that Apple's long-term support can be awful to non-existent.

      Don't feel bad if that recommended and conveniently non-reversible update to iOS renders your three-year-old tablet or phone unusable. Here, try an iPad 7, that runs the new version just fine!

      Oh, and that similarly ancient business laptop? You would have been secure against the malware you just got hit by if you'd only installed OS X Jungle Gryphon. Well, maybe. Or maybe you wouldn't. You see, we're not going to give you any sort of clear indication of how long we will support our hardware or OS versions for, and certainly not any sort of binding commitment, because that sort of nonsense is for chumps. Besides, even if we did, you'd have no idea which animal versions were included anyway.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, since its only product is software, has to go to great lengths to protect and extend that property base. "Extend" here is Googly data mining.

      Nobody is making money on hardware as a commodity. Software is a much sweeter deal.

      Apple, on the other hand, makes money by selling you the hardware. The protection is the physical ownership of the device.

      Apple operating system can be installed on hardware purchased from not Apple. There are a number of howto's floating around including for install as VM guests.

      This may not be a popular opinion, but I trust Microsoft more than Google, Apple -way more- than Microsoft, and the NSA more than any commercial company.

      I trust humans to abuse power they are given like they always have throughout the entirety of recorded history. I trust the continued aggregation of power into the hands of a few mega corporations who are increasingly able to know everything about everyone and have increasing say over what can be executed on a general purpose computer will only end badly for all.

    3. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      You see, we're not going to give you any sort of clear indication of how long we will support our hardware

      no doubt you are able to supply us with a list of vendors who will do otherwise

    4. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by david.emery · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been running Macs as my primary office automation/desktop (vice development) machine for 29 of the last 30 years, and haven't had these problems. And I routinely get 5 years out of my home Macs (and between 3 and 4 years from the corporate machines.)

      Your mileage may vary.

    5. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, since its only product is software, has to go to great lengths to protect and extend that property base. "Extend" here is Googly data mining.

      Apple, on the other hand, makes money by selling you the hardware. The protection is the physical ownership of the device. You might not believe Apple when it says "we don't want your personal information", but you have to respect that they're not depending on either data or software to make the great majority of their revenue.

      This may not be a popular opinion, but I trust Microsoft more than Google, Apple -way more- than Microsoft, and the NSA more than any commercial company.

      Microsoft sells software, not advertising like Google. Apple's hardware and Microsoft's software are comparable. Both say similar things about privacy when Android talk comes up.

      Both Apple and Microsoft want to get the advertising and data mining dollars like Google.

      In the modern era, large corporations are always looking to expand and expand and expand. Both Apple and Microsoft are looking to leverage what they have to muscle into the online advertising industry. So, I think your trust is misplaced.

    6. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Apple does this kind of data collection too. When you talk to Siri, your voice recording goes direct to Apple. They use it both to provide the service and to improve the service. Their app store gathers data on what you install and use, they gather stats on the OS. How else do they know that 94% of users are on the latest version? They clearly know which devices are in active use and what OS they have.

      iTunes and Apple Music sends detailed stats on your listening habits to Apple, in order to provide you with suggestions but also to give them free marketing data and target ads at you.

      Google, Microsoft, every phone service provider, every ISP, almost every email provider, almost every search engine does it, and Apple is no exception. They try to dress it up and make out they do it less, but they do it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The Siri remote processing is for practical reasons, not business: The Siri engine is subject to constant revisions and optimisations by Apple, including even the voice recognition. It wouldn't be practical to update a very large application on a phone every two days, so they host almost all of it on their own servers. The phone part is just a minimal client.

      You're right, though: Everyone spies. Customer data is very valuable as a means to come to business decisions and as a means of optimally flogging people more products. It's pretty much inescapable online.

      See those facebook like buttons on so many sites? Those aren't just to 'like' the page. They are hot-link images, loaded from Facebook's server, with a cookie. So even when you are not using Facebook they can still determine what sites you access and when.

    8. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft sells software,"

      For now, mostly. Microsoft has a problem here: Selling software worked in the past because there was a constant upgrade cycle to drive sales. All those new computers getting replaced after two years kept a constant stream of OEM licenses shifting, and every couple of years they could bring out a new version of Windows or Office that promised and delivered revolutionary improvements* so people would be climbing over other in the rush to upgrade.

      Now? Their software reached 'good enough.' They had a nightmare of a time trying to get people to migrate away from Windows XP because it was well suited to everyone's needs, and Windows 7 was already promising to be just as hard to get rid of. Who wants to keep buying new Office versions when all they need is text editing and a spellcheck? Even the upgrade cycle for hardware slows, computers can last five years or longer now. Back in the 00s you couldn't get one home from the shop before it was halfway to obsolescence.

      So they are trying to move away from selling software now, and into selling services. See Office 365, for instance. Windows is no longer to be a product in itsself, but - in a business model pioneered to great success by Apple - a driver for may other products. Like the Windows store. It turns every Windows installation into a means for generating Windows store customers and sales.

      Microsoft aren't trying to expand. They are trying to replace their old business model with one that doesn't make them dependent on a constant upgrade cycle.

      *Except ME. That sucked.

    9. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I expect my 2011 mac mini to be viable until at least 2020. People forget we are in a massive transition period so of course some things are going to be obsoleted out quickly. The non fully 64 bit macs and pre iphone 5 designs are really where this bit hard. I don't expect that kind of attrition again.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft sells hardware, not advertising......"

      O really, than what the fuck is Bing for?

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, I'm not talking about hardware issues here. I'm talking about not issuing security patches for serious vulnerabilities in versions of OS X that would have been shipping on brand new devices at little as a year ago.

      There's really no excuse for not providing proper security fixes for the original OS supplied with a device for the useful lifetime of the device. Any security patch is by definition fixing a serious defect in the original product and clearly Apple's responsibility. I don't necessarily expect them to provide other updates and general improvements if the user isn't willing to update to the latest version of OS X as a whole, but not providing security fixes without insisting on updating other things the user might not want and didn't expect when they paid their money (and Yosemite was full of those) is a whole different thing.

      They sold a broken product, and not a cheap one at that, and they should put that right without forcing other changes in the process. In fact, in my country, general consumer protection laws would probably compel them to if anyone chose to press the issue, or to provide other compensation or ultimately a refund for the defective product if they couldn't repair it properly. Whether the latter would be the better commercial strategy for Apple would presumably depend on how many people disliked the new OS enough to decline the general update and insist on a fix for their original version.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    12. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Given that just about every PC, monitor, storage device, networking device, and other major peripheral around me as I type this has a formal warranty that indicates the minimum support period and the OS I'm running (Win7) has a published lifecycle that tells me exactly how long as a minimum I can expect security patches for, yes, I could. Short of the relevant businesses literally going under, in which case obviously no guarantee is worth much, I can count on support for these systems for several more years.

      In contrast, as I've just highlighted in another comment, if I had bought a MacBook this time last year running OS X 10.9, there would already be at least one major security vulnerability that Apple has declined to patch in its OS. Or just look at the iOS 7 and App Store policies that make iPhones around generation 4-5 or iPads around generation 3 all but useless unless you chose to risk the OS upgrade, even though these devices were state of the art gear around 3 years ago and still run perfectly well in hardware terms today.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    13. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Prove it.

    14. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      By that definition Google doesn't sell your data either, they just use it to target ads on behalf of advertisers the same way that Apple does. You don't think they just promote any random artists on iTunes, do you? You have to pay a lot of money to get your album force-downloaded onto people's devices.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:A significant difference between HW and SW sale by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly not arguing that MS are perfect when it comes to support. After all, we're having a discussion about how badly MS may be treating their customers with Windows 10.

      However, generally until the run up to Windows 10 my experience has been that they're a lot better than the likes of Apple and Google at supporting their products for extended periods. Not only do they publish much longer support periods for security fixes, in the past they've also reportedly to gone to extraordinary lengths to maintain backward compatibility in new Windows releases, so fewer customers would lose functionality following an upgrade.

      The really impressive thing is that they did this even though the problem often wasn't really Microsoft's fault at all and was instead due to other software developers relying on undocumented behaviour and unpublished APIs where they shouldn't have been. I'm not sure we can expect that level of customer support from them any more, sadly.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  17. Half the story by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article seems to only be telling half the story about previous versions of Windows and about sending data "critical" to the operation of Windows.
    A. The Customer Experience Program could be opted out of.
    B. Windows 10 only sends data "critical" to the operation of the system in the "basic" telemetry setting. It's funny how you can disable it in enterprise. I guess it must not be so critical, huh? I don't care what they do with home versions, but I take issue with not being able to do this in Pro. An individual cannot buy Enterprise.
    C. It's not fair to compare this to Google. Google provides their products free of charge. Despite Microsoft giving out a free update, Windows is not free. You can purchase a retail copy. I'm sorry to criticize your apologist article, Verge, but these are issues that affect the company I work for. I don't care what you do with your personal computer; the government doesn't regulate that.

    1. Re:Half the story by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't care what they do with home versions, but I take issue with not being able to do this in Pro. An individual cannot buy Enterprise.

      I've been wondering about that. If it's still going to be true once they've got their act together, then presumably that also affects most small businesses? That could be a very expensive strategic mistake. The hoi polloi will put up with a lot, and big businesses will do their own thing and probably not update for a long time anyway, but alienating the smaller and more agile businesses that might have updated sooner seems unwise, and alienating the geek community -- who run IT in those businesses and advise their less geeky friends -- seems downright commercially suicidal.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:Half the story by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      This is a very good point, though I'm willing to bet that many of them will not be able to afford the security expertise to have the concern anyway. I'm just waiting to see how firms that perform security audits treat it.

  18. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, I think his point is more like "Never look a gift horse in the mouth while its trying to mount you." Or something like that.

  19. Re:IDEA by Soluzar · · Score: 1

    Not if you put up an explicit message saying "This site is not available on Windows 10".

  20. Re:Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    so, it is keylogging feature. Great ...

    File this under "what could possibly go wrong"

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  21. Used by google? by shaitand · · Score: 2

    My computer is not a phone. We need to lock down phones not open up desktops. Otherwise there is no point to encryption at all.

    1. Re:Used by google? by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Sadly, we seem to be going the route of all OSs turning into mobile like OSs. I hate hate Microsoft for doing this to Windows. Why not make all the metro parts, online services and all optional? Answer: Because Ms want to turn into Google.

  22. Speaking of pirate concerns by kav2k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Swiss Pirate Party initiated an inquiry into Windows 10 privacy policy.

    The end result of which (if it does not pass Swiss scrutiny) would be an official recommendation to prohibit purchase.

    1. Re: Speaking of pirate concerns by kav2k · · Score: 2

      Inquiry is being conducted by appropriate authorities, yes; it's the Pirate Party that launched the inquiry, though.

  23. Two articles that contradict statements in the sum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two articles I found since yesterday that contradict statements in the summary:

    * previous versions of Windows now spy on you becuase of recent MS updates: http://www.hakspek.com/securit...

    * They still spy on you after you turn the "features" off: http://arstechnica.com/informa...

  24. Re:Windows 10, it's free by dafradu · · Score: 5, Informative

    No! This was explained over and over again, if you upgrade in the first year your Windows 7/8 key becomes a permanent Windows 10 key for that device. You won't have to install Windows 7/8 before installing Windows 10 again.

  25. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Alumoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    UPgrade, you moron. You upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 7!

  26. Flagpole Sitta by xenotransplant · · Score: 1

    "Paranoia, paranoia everybody's coming to get me." Well, we could all stop buying and using Microsoft products. Or we could go on slash dot and leave snarky comments about how Microsoft watches us pee and sells our keystrokes to ISIS.

    1. Re:Flagpole Sitta by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      I use Linux for all my work and Windows only for gaming, so it's surely an alternative for some of us.

  27. Or not by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're running automatic updates on 7 or 8 you already have the same "telemetry" components as well.

    No, I don't. You see, the great thing about still being on Windows 7 is that I'm not forced to install whatever user-hostile updates Microsoft deems necessary. So I didn't.

    By the way, neither did a lot of other people. Many of the professionals I know have been "security updates only" for quite a long time, even on personal use machines rather than work ones. Plenty more joined the fold recently after the Win10 nag message update.

    It frustrates me that the casual press keep repeating the dogma that the forced updates in Windows 10 are a good thing because security experts recommend applying all patches immediately or similar, as if Microsoft hasn't been pushing non-security updates for years.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Or not by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      the great thing about still being on Windows 7 is that I'm not forced to install whatever user-hostile updates Microsoft deems necessary.

      congratulations on being forced to stick with windows 7, you've installed exactly the user hostile software that Microsoft deemed necessary for you.

    2. Re:Or not by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sure, but prior to Windows 10 you could have declined that update as well or uninstalled it afterwards if you decided you didn't want it. Even in the worst case, you could presumably have reinstalled Windows and not reapplied that particular update the second time around.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  28. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, I think his point is more like "Never look a gift horse in the mouth while its trying to mount you." Or something like that.

    Maybe the point was "never play leap-frog with a unicorn".

  29. Yikes by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'It's okay, it's already being done by Google' is NOT reassuring! D:

    1. Re:Yikes by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Any time you use the internet without the type of firewall and filtering that comes with a free roll of aluminium foil it is safe to assume you are being monitored by at least a few companies, and likely everything you do is also logged by one or two government agencies for analysis.

    2. Re:Yikes by shione · · Score: 2

      Agreed. People need to stop using the logical fallacy that if somebody else is doing it its somehow alright for somebody else to. Wrong is wrong and the reason why people talk about microsoft doing the wrong is because that's what the article is about. Also google is leaps and bounds different from microsoft. There is not one google product that you have to use because there are many viable alternatives to every google product. Even android doesnt have a killer app that you can't find on another os. windows is different. youre stuck with windows for games and programs and drivers. Thats why microsoft can pull this privacy shit and all the shit theyve been pulling for decades because they know you can't easily switch to another os without you losing out in a program, game or driver that you use.

    3. Re:Yikes by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Already commented and thus can't upmod, but please someone upvote this comment!

  30. Re:The same Verge that turned off comments by nickweller · · Score: 1
  31. Linux Mint by dmt0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All this talk about Windows made me rediscover Linux. Tried out latest Mint and was really pleasantly surprised by how well polished the thing is overall. Everything worked right from Live CD. Things that I could never get to work on Ubuntu even a year ago. Bluetooth speaker just connected, Android phone didn't make any components die a quiet death. Skype. All menus are reasonably laid out. Configurations work. Started being productive on it just after two hours of installation/configuration. Breath of fresh air.

    1. Re:Linux Mint by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes Linux is looking great to escape the phone home, collect it all OS's. Even for the older non PAE hardware http://www.bodhilinux.com/w/se...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Linux Mint by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same here. Every iteration of Windows inspires me to a spasm of examining linux distros, but until now I've always gone away disappointed. Mint's current incarnation, while not quite up to the WinXP that's still my preferred Windows, is very encouraging. And while I still generally prefer the KDE desktop, Cinnamon is going in the right direction for everyday usability. I liked Mint well enough to install it on one of my frankenputers for further review. (Now if only GRUB hadn't committed suicide at age 2 days...)

      So with the advent of Windows 10, I've been looking at lots of current distros via an Easy2Boot setup running them off a USB stick (so they all have identical resources to start with, and no waiting for either a DVD to load or an install to HD) and it was interesting to compare bootup and performance times. The system is a quad-core 2.5GHz with 4GB RAM, onboard video, and no hard disk. On average, startup time is around 55 seconds from boot to desktop (worst was OpenSuSE at 105 seconds), and LibreOffice takes 8 to 14 seconds to start. Shutdown time tends to be proportional. But Mint starts in about 25 seconds, and LibreOffice on Mint takes only 4 seconds, plus shutdown is RIGHT NOW, no waiting. Big difference, far as I can tell (not being a linux guru) is that Mint doesn't load near as much crap that really isn't useful for the desktop user. At shutdown, according to an included sysinfo tool, only one module was running, not 50 or 200 like the more typical distro.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Linux Mint by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recommendation; in my latest testing adventure, I'd overlooked this one. Downloading now. :)

      One of my bugaboos from a usability standpoint is the common inability to set system colors that override individual apps, as we can do in Windows. Some KDE apps will respect system settings, but most don't... and that usual default white app background hurts my eyes after a while. And included themes tend to be not much better. So no long-term usage for me so long as a given desktop/app doesn't allow workspace colors to be set, or doesn't make theme creation stupid-easy. (Seriously, I don't know what the heck some of your widget *names* refer to; what's wrong with pick-and-click like WinXP-and-before colors does it?)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Re:Nothing New Here... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    uh... no. Dell buys Windows OEM licenses from Microsoft at five Dollars a pop, just like every other OEM. Trialware is the stuff that's bundled according to foregone deals with the likes of Symantec, McAffee, et. al., where the OEM doesn't take a cut of any license revenues but gets to use the trialware to sweeten the sale.

    Sincerely,

    A former OEM (95 O/SR2 to xp 2008 SP3).

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  33. It collects KEYSTROKES by rMortyH · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look under Settings/Privacy
    There is a switch, which reads 'Send Microsoft info about how I write to help us improve typing and writing in the future'

    This the collection of keystroke data. They can do anything they want with this. Definitely makes it even more creepy to log in to someplace else on a Windows 10 box.

    Another thing which is standard practice is to list all kinds of serious and unlikely reasons they'll use your data, followed by 'or any other legal purpose' which does not mean for some 'legal' matter, which it's meant to sound like, but for ANY purpose which is not SPECIFICALLY ILLEGAL. Which means anything.

    You can turn off the keystroke thing, but Microsoft routinely resets preferences, including privacy preferences, when you run an update. So you have to keep checking it and make sure it's off. However, I doubt very much if it matters. You're sending EVERYTHING to Microsoft and they can use it for any purpose.

    1. Re:It collects KEYSTROKES by Trogre · · Score: 1

      It looks like someone still thinks that Group Policies are reliable.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  34. All your future is belong to privacy sold by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Everytime you upgrade (or auto-patch, which you have no control of in Win10, at least for laptops and mobile) they will reset your privacy to "sell out to Microsoft all my deepest darkest info so they can monetize my life".

    Even if this is illegal in the EU and Canada, because if you can throw legions of lawyers at it, you can't stop it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:All your future is belong to privacy sold by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      The only setting I have personally seen covertly changed with Win 10 updates is my mouse pointer acceleration.

      Seriously, it has been reverted to default speed by updates 4 times now!

      Datamining settings are all as I last set them.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    2. Re:All your future is belong to privacy sold by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The only setting I have personally seen covertly changed with Win 10 updates is my mouse pointer acceleration.

      Seriously, it has been reverted to default speed by updates 4 times now!

      Datamining settings are all as I last set them.

      The mouse telemetry feedback allows us to subvert your privacy paradigm by uniquely identifying you.

      (oh, wait, I'm not supposed to admit that)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  35. Good article ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... I've been swamped with questions from the Gentle User, and articles like this help to explain stuff without placing me in a position of having an axe to grind.

    I have shared it out and people are eating it up.

    Much appreciated.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  36. There's another report and analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    of the data sent over the network, showing that Windows records from your webcam, from your microphone, _everything_ you type on the keyboard, and an index of all movie files you have on your drives, and regularly sends all of this back to Microsoft. And there's no way of disabling this. Why isn't this brought up?

  37. Re:Nothing New Here... by Nyder · · Score: 2

    Move along, nothing to see here. Microsoft has been trying to get their hooks into everybody just like Google and Facebook. If people don't care about their privacy and allow this kind of data collection in the name of "quality" and "focusing search results and ads.." "blah blah" we'll all become human centipads.

    No, don't move on, don't ignore this stuff. Doesn't matter if it's been going on before, it's wrong and is starting to get very bad. We need to be taking a firm stance against this sort of stuff.

    I guess maybe you are cool with it because they pay you a fee or something, but I, like other people, are not cool with it.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  38. Switzerland is opening a government inquiry into W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Swiss data protection agency is now investigating windows 10's data sharing.
    (Link in French) http://www.lematin.ch/economie/berne-lance-procedure-concernant-windows-10/story/29192122

  39. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, I think his point is that Windows XP and Vista users aren't eligible to upgrade to 10 for free. And now I've explained the joke and it's no longer funny.

  40. Re:Windows 10, it's free by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I've tested that theory in a VM and it turns out you can still use the old Windows 7/8 key just fine, along side the Windows 10 key. You have to use the automated phone service to re-activate your Windows 7/8 system, but it works just fine.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  41. Re:Windows 10, it's free by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft stores your hardware configuration on their servers as a hash after the free upgrade to Windows 10. After that you can clean install any time you want as long as you have the same motherboard. They call this hardware based digital entitlement. I've already done a clean install of Windows 10 and it activated within a few minutes. When installing cleanly make sure to click on "skip" then it asks for a product key or the install will be borked. Even when MS makes things simple they overly complicate them.

  42. Re:Windows 10, it's free by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I had the same thought. Apple gives away its operating system because they make money selling you the hardware to run it on. Linux is free because the developers either donate their time, or are paid by companies that make money selling support. Microsoft has always made money selling Windows. This one is essentially free (sure, new copies cost money, but who needs a new Windows license?). Why?

  43. Re:IDEA by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you've clearly never had to deal with people complaining that their Facebook doesn't work.

    Don't try explaining to them that their browser is what's broken, not the website (for various measures of "broken"), they don't give a fuck at the wire gauge used in their talking toaster. They cannot and will not even try to differentiate between hardware and software, cached content and streaming, Telepresence (the Cisco brand) and Skype (the Microsoft brand). Wilful ignorance is the bliss of the average end user for which there is no cure and keeps we nerds in work.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  44. Re:Nothing New Here... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    I recall a /. article a few years back explaining why 2 identical (hardware wise) laptops had different prices when shipping from Dell with Windows or Linux installed. The trial/crapware on the Windows system - those vendors pay Dell a couple of bucks per install to get eyeballs in front of them. No such thing on the Linux side. So the Linux laptops were $50 or so more than the same hardware with a Windows install on it.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  45. Re:Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remove the following updates (if installed already)

    KB971033 Description of the update for Windows Activation Technologies
    KB2952664 Compatibility update for upgrading Windows 7
    KB2990214 Update that enables you to upgrade from Windows 7 to a later version of Windows
    KB3021917 Update for Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program
    KB3022345 Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
    KB3035583 Update installs Get Windows 10 app in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 SP1
    KB3044374 Update that enables you to upgrade from Windows 8.1 to a later version of Windows
    KB3068708 Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
    KB3075249 Update that adds telemetry points to consent.exe in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7
    KB3080149 (update for CEIP and telemetry)

    ---

    run cmd as administrator

    sc stop Diagtrack
    sc delete Diagtrack

    *Task Scheduler Library:

    Everything under "Application Experience"
    Everything under "Autochk"
    Everything under "Customer Experience Improvement Program"
    Under "Disk Diagnostic" only the "Microsoft-Windows-DiskDiagnosticDataCollector"
    Under "Maintenance" "WinSAT"
    "Media Center" and click the "status" column, then select all non-disabled entries and disable them.

    *services.msc:

    "Remote Registry" to "Disabled" instead of "Manual".

  46. in no sane universe by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ...is the requirement of PERSONAL INFORMATION vital to the functionality of ANY user system nor is it pertinent to the intellectual property rights or protections otherwise under the Law of ANY company offering product and/or services for public consumption.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  47. Re:Nothing New Here... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    that's... interesting, but not my experience. I don't know what Dell did to fuck up their pricing model so much but when I built for Linux the hardware was pretty much the same price if not cheaper.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  48. Re:Windows 10, it's free by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You have 30 days to roll back your decision, if you regret it. The question is whether you'll still be able to activate Win7 after that. I've archived my activation but that's motherboard-locked...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Re:Windows 10, it's free by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

    They have fully integrated the MS app store (that started with Windows 8), and they are would appear to be marketing user data. They are monetizing the OS in a different way that I would rather avoid. My copies of Windows 7 are paid for, and don't include the app store at least. I am aware that some have said that some of the recommended Windows 7 updates may be pushing MS data collection. We'll see how this new model, which seems to be trying to emulate Apple in many respects, works for MS. I think they are making a mistake. But then again, the Enterprise version will probably be different, and less like adware and spyware combined. They will need to do something to get businesses to upgrade from 7, which many of them just finished upgrading to in the last couple of years.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
  50. It's pretty bad. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get a packet sniffer on Windows ten. You can't run calculator without MS knowing.

    Seriously. Try it. Every time you run any of the new-style apps, including calculator or the image preview, it opens up a brief encrypted TCP connection to a MS licensing server. I have a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Just ignore the bit about photoDNA at the end - that was a theory on my part that I've now determined is unlikely. It's not actually reporting on images, it's reporting on every time the image previewer is loaded. Or calculator, or sound recorder, or quite a few other things. I'm not sure that's much better.

    I had quite a bit of fun at the weekend with wireshark seeing just what a freshly-upgraded no-software-installed Windows 10 reports, after setting every privacy option I could find to private. The answer is pretty much everything. Even if you disable searching from the start menu, it still executes the search - it just doesn't display the results. It fetches updates for the default tiles on the start menu (weather and news) even after you remove the tiles. It establishes mysterious TLS connections frequently that I can't identify the purpose of - some of them might be checking for updates, but I doubt it check for upgrades every few minutes.

    Don't trust in my paranoia. Install wireshark and look for yourself.

    The good news is that Windows 10 firewall can be made to block almost everything with a deny rule and a list of IP ranges. The bad news is that it's quite tricky to do so without also blocking windows update, Bing, the Windows store (No great loss) and I suspect a few Azure hosts.

    1. Re:It's pretty bad. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I don't know if hosts.txt can, but Windows own firewall certainly can. Though I've not figured out which addresses I need to exclude in order to avoid breaking windows update as well. I compiled a list by monitoring traffic, whoising every address that came up and blocking any allocations assigned to Microsoft. That took out the monitoring - along with Bing, updates and the store. My list might be incomplete though, as they may use different servers depending upon geographic location.

    2. Re:It's pretty bad. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      What happens if you block the reporting-destination in HOSTS or your router? do things stop working?

      Does HOSTS even work properly? (it could be iffy in previous Windows, depending.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:It's pretty bad. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've been trying that. So far nothing catastrophic has happened - though you do lose access to most cloudy Microsoft services. No store, no bing, no Cortana. You can always remove the block if you need to use them. I'm also having difficulty allowing Windows updates through. Shared IP ranges.

    4. Re:It's pretty bad. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      IP-range-wise it's all over the place - but DNSly, if you take out everything under microsoft.com except for update.microsoft.com and subdomains, I think that might do it.

    5. Re:It's pretty bad. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Do updates come from a specific IP or subdomain, and can you allow "just one" ??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:It's pretty bad. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      A number of subdomains. Update.microsoft.com, sls.update.microsoft.com, download.windowsupdate.com. All of which CNAME to akadns domains, so the IP you get may not be the same I get. Unfortunately update.microsoft.com is in the same IP range as one of the arch-spy servers, licensing.md.mp.microsoft.com.

      If you are filtering on DNS, it's easy: Just block everything under microsoft.com except for update.microsoft.com and windowsupdate.com, and block everything under bing and msn just to be safe. But by IP range, much more difficult as addresses are subject to change and may vary by region. You could just block everything allocated to Microsoft, but then you lose updates.

    7. Re:It's pretty bad. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I've had people asking about this, and I don't use the updates myself, so I had not kept track.

      I'm thinkin' there'll have to be a different update route for corporate customers, cuz no way in hell are they going to open themselves up like that.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  51. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    No

    It creates a new unique key by fingerprinting your hardware if you do an upgrade. MS wants they key to go away to prevent piracy and have you either buy a new pc with it or use it at work via autoKMS from a licensing server.

    The work around is to use a program to extract the new key or unplug the pc during a Windows 10 start where safe mode tools will pop up. Select reset my pc and then reset all data. This will install a fresh copy from a hidden UEFI partition created during the upgrade for a fresh copy if you are so inclined. MS really did improve the upgrade process. Since 10 is so much more closer to 7/8.1 it won't recreate the same nightmare it did for XP to Vista/7 upgrades. In essences the Vista kernel and services are almost as different as Windows 9x to NT!

  52. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually Windows 10 is a lot more modern than 7.

    Power wise there is a HUGE difference between 8.1/10 vs 7 on a laptop. Like double the battery life as MS has tweaked the kernel and services to be more mobile friendly.

    Windows 7 was awesome and finally good similar to Windows 2000 in my opinion. However, it is dated now after 6 years. It's EFI mode is terrible and you need to go into the bios and disable it or put on CSM (compability support module) and emulate 1981 technology via the bios to get it to work?!

    You can't have more than 4 primary partitions without a hack and more than 2 TB due to 1981 bios technology required. Some new pcs will let you use UEFI partitions via emulated drivers.

    It boots slow due to bios limitations and CSM options. With it off on 8 and later your pc will boot in freaking seconds!

    Security is much improved. Windows 7 scrambles ram so no injections without guessing where the other .dll files are running as administrator ... however you can still guess with a workaround :-( Windows 10 uses a better algorithm. Windows 10 has secure boot to prevent rootkits. Windows 10 has a better kernel level sandbox for IE, Chrome, and other apps to use and more separation of privileges.

    With Onedrive and cloud all my settings are synced with my surface and desktop and Office defaults to save it on Onedrive which means I get all my copies on my Android phone, surface tablet, and pc.

    Only problem with 8/10 I see is I find it ugly :-) I am typing this on 8.1 as I needed Hyper-V so 7 had to go. I got used to the lack of aero. Being flat is the new thing regardless of OS as every OS on the planet is following this new thing of turning it into a cell phone. Windows 10 update 1 redstone will have the option to change colors again for the title bar thankfully which I find ridiculous.

    Other than that yes it is an upgrade and 7 feels and looks pretty dated now with its skuemorphic UI and slow speeds and bios dependencies.

    No I am not a fanboy as I do not have 10 yet due to hyper-V being too different for my exams I am studying for (server 2012) so I am waiting until the holidays to upgrade. I am just saying if you need office work done and a few win32 apps Windows 10 is certainly an upgrade over 7 even if I like the look and simplicity of its UI. I could go on too from a technical viewpoint on using dism /online /cleanup-image /restorehealth instead of doing a re-image but that is another topic

  53. Re:Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Way to jeopardize the Net as a whole by teaching people to turn off and never trust updates again.

    Go fuck yourself, Microsoft. Fucking idiots.

  54. Re:Nothing New Here... by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

    +1 Insightfully Informative.

  55. Endless parade of lame excuses by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Excuse #1 - Google, Apple..etc are doing it too. This is what 5 year old children say when they get caught doing something they know they shouldn't while their brother (Google) or sister (Apple) does not (this time). If you don't understand why this is a completely nonsensical position try following defense in court.. "yes your honor ... I was drinking and driving but everyone else I was with did it too so its ok."... Go ahead...see what happens.

    Excuse #2 - ALL of your data is necessary to provide a feature. Examples like Siri, Cortana, Google voice are often paraded around. They need to rummage through your address book to know who "Frankenstein" is before they can call ... Need to know what's in your calendar and where you are at...right? Well no... your "Intelligent Agent" needs to know. There isn't any reason said agent can't execute locally and provide the same services if user prefers not to upload a list of all of their acquaintances and agendas to Microsoft. These systems are architected the way they are because spying is profitable not because they maximize value to end users. Your phone can know your at the florist without sending your location to Microsoft. Your phone can remind you to pick up flowers when you call someone. It isn't impractical or unrealistic to implement. It just isn't profitable.

    Excuse #3 - Browser information leaks... Chrome, Firefox, IE keep thinking up new excuses with mostly negative to users to get a piece of everything you are doing with every revision. Some of this shit is offensive blatant one finger salute ...Sending your searches to bing even when you don't use bing.... Uploading your browsing history to Microsoft...there is no rational excuse for this and I can't believe anything approaching a majority of people want this to happen by "default" for any reason.

    Excuse #4 - You can turn it off - Coupled with intentional UX design blurring demarcation between local and internet promoting accidental leakage and turns the leakage spigot to 11 by default knowing most users won't know, care or understand enough to change settings which increasingly are ultimatums or don't actually stop data leakage they purport to stop. Now the pot is really starting to heat up... Now Microsoft is retroactively saying fuck you people we will collect shit and there is nothing you can do about it. That they have the gall to say this to their *customers* I personally find amazing.

    --
    "Finally, we will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails, other private communications or files in private folders), when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary."

  56. Re:Nothing New Here... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    So do like I do..Buy said Dell system, wipe Windows off it, put your distro of choice on, and if you feel the need for Windows, like a program that Wine doesn't do, make a Virtualbox VM and use the Windows key that came on your machine. You'll likely have to call the automated phone thing to get it working, but I've done it multiple times on multiple machines... Only done on Windows 7 tho... Dunno/Don't care about whether it works on 8/8.1 or 10. Yeah.. I know its against MS's precious EULA.. Don't care.. Said Vbox VM gets fired up maybe once a month just to get patches... Other than keeping the VM for *emergency* use, Windows is dead to me... AND with Windows 10 being a spy-ware nightmare, I suspect a LOT more people are gonna investigate Linux...

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  57. What is really happening by execthis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From a meta point of view, what is really happening? If nothing else, there is some kind of breakdown between reasonable expectations of people who use Windows and the actions of Microsoft. Aside from particulars of what exactly is being or not being collected, Microsoft handled this poorly by not anticipating that many people are rightfully highly sensitive to data collection/telemetry/tracking issues, and the fact that it is being disclosed only via EULA legalese doublespeak only damages the situation by orders of magnitude.

    Microsoft needs to have a press conference and set up a special page for users concerned about privacy and who want to know more about telemetry/tracking. You do not address users' concerns by blowing them off, but by engaging them.

    In this day and age it is reasonable to expect that a complex system such as an OS actually needs to communicate with central servers for reasons related to routine the operation of the system. But what are those routine things?

    All we get from EULA's is BS.

    1. Re:What is really happening by youngatheart · · Score: 1

      For people like us, who actually click on information about what the EULA means and what privacy we can expect and what we can't, I agree with you.

      99.9% of people don't care enough to even read a summary of the EULA or privacy concerns.

      • http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/04/half-of-americans-dont-know-what-a-privacy-policy-is/
      • http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/upshot/americans-say-they-want-privacy-but-act-as-if-they-dont.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0
      • http://www.people-press.org/2013/06/10/majority-views-nsa-phone-tracking-as-acceptable-anti-terror-tactic/

      The average internet user may care, but the average internet user doesn't care enough to even read about the issue.

    2. Re:What is really happening by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because of these attitudes towards privacy, I think it should be legal for the Windows 10 EULA to specify that your private data (including passwords, all your keystrokes, any and all private data they can find on your system) is subject to being copied to Microsoft's servers, and from there MS is free to do whatever they want with it, including selling it to marketers, Chinese hackers, or the Russian or North Korean government. And MS should be completely legally free to do these things, as long as it's spelled out in the EULA.

      Then, when the inevitable happens, I wonder how many people would finally stop using Windows. Probably not many.

    3. Re:What is really happening by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure, in the US at least, that is legal. Even in the few situations where you have a legal obligation to protect data (HIPAA comes to mind), I'm quite sure that the obligation falls on you, as the end user, to avoid software that leaks data.

    4. Re:What is really happening by iampiti · · Score: 1

      They should also provide a way to disable ALL communication with Microsoft's servers.
      It's bad enough that Google tracks my every move with the help of my cell phone, I don't need Microsoft doing it on my pc too

    5. Re:What is really happening by macs4all · · Score: 1

      They should also provide a way to disable ALL communication with Microsoft's servers. It's bad enough that Google tracks my every move with the help of my cell phone, I don't need Microsoft doing it on my pc too

      So why can't you install a Firewall that has some decent OUTBOUND filtering? Or do they have Windows' Networking stack trussed-up in such a way that you would literally have to have a separate box doing the firewalling?

    6. Re:What is really happening by dkman · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting if you could filter everything with the windows firewall installed on the box. Most of it you can turn off by selecting the right options at various points of the install or later in the control panel / settings. Those are at least somewhat clear on what they are going to affect.

      The tough part is figuring out what things you do or don't want and how to block the various things piecemeal. For instance I want windows update to do it's thing, but I don't want every keystroke sent to the mother ship.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    7. Re:What is really happening by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I don't want every keystroke sent to the mothership.

      The you'd better plan on migrating to OS X (or Linux if you don't have anything better to do than get your OS and applications working with your computer and all your peripherals).

    8. Re:What is really happening by execthis · · Score: 1

      They should also provide a way to disable ALL communication with Microsoft's servers.
      It's bad enough that Google tracks my every move with the help of my cell phone, I don't need Microsoft doing it on my pc too

      I disagree with that. Think of all the zillions of zombified, infested old PC's out there, which their operators never updated, as part of botnets wreaking havoc on the 'Net, attacking other computers and spewing out huge amounts of spam.

      There definitely should and in fact must be some communication between PC's and the mothership for the sake of security.

      But then Microsoft needs to explain what really is essential for security and what is not. What part of "telemetry" is just data-collecting for purposes of making profit and what is not? This needs to be made clear and in fact the appropriate government regulatory agencies need to make sure that there is a very clear distinction between these two.

      Unfortunately I think no major OS/cloud vendors have a perfect track record with respect to not leveraging in things into their products which are intended to capitalize on some niche or other that the marketing people are salivating over by tying them to "essential" or new "features" of their products.

    9. Re:What is really happening by dkman · · Score: 1

      I use Linux as my primary desktop at home. Even my 4 year old daughter uses Linux just fine.

      The times when you need to really mess with things are much much fewer than the old days.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    10. Re:What is really happening by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I use Linux as my primary desktop at home. Even my 4 year old daughter uses Linux just fine. The times when you need to really mess with things are much much fewer than the old days.

      That's really good. As an OS X user, I would hate to see Linux die; because Apple would be in a world of hurt if it took all those Open Source projects with it.

      But in your heart of hearts, you know what I mean.

  58. Is it time... by originalGMC · · Score: 1

    for a new amendment to the US constitution guaranteeing the right to privacy? Sure it's really tough to pass an amendment, really tough to enforce such a thing, but tough things need to be talked about prior to action. At least in this community I'm sure people would agree that privacy should be guaranteed - that people have the right to self-determine without undue influence - and that companies that want to sell software or that want people to use their software should agree to the users' terms, and not the other way around.

  59. Nice bit of loot for the EU to hoover from Microso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After all, this likely breaches a huge number of EU regulations. Maybe Microsoft has finally reached the stage of wanting to die, and die broke, drunk and in the gutter.

  60. Re:Windows 10, it's free by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    No I am not a fanboy..

    Come on Bill, no need to play coy with us. ;)

  61. Re:Nothing New Here... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    [sarcasm]

    If people don't care about their privacy and allow this kind of data collection in the name of "quality" and "focusing search results and ads.." "blah blah" we'll all become human centipads. [cc.com]

    [/sarcasm]

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  62. I really hate the excuse "Google Already Does It" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, google already does all this. No, that does not mean it is acceptable for my workstation (read:serious work computer) to be treated the same way as my mobile device (read: toy).

    My phone is not used for banking, doing work for my employer, nor storing sensitive data of any kind, or any other serious purpose.

    My workstation is.

  63. Microsoft-,You failed at the one job you had to do by megalon · · Score: 2

    Microsoft,

    You failed at the one job you had to do. You need to have people to trust your OS. That is all. But you couldn't resist and loaded it with spyware and possible government back-doors. There is not a corporate account who will even consider this OS now.

    I guess the even-number-windows-versions-are-crap rule continues.

  64. Re:Nothing New Here... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Buy said Dell system, wipe Windows off it, put your distro of choice on...

    ...And signal the market that everybody wants Windows and not Linux, because all it sees are the Windows laptop sales figures.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  65. any english majors out there? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

    Point 6: a whole bunch of semi-colon separated statements with no joining words. Does it mean they'll share the data when required by law, to protect themselves, security of the systems etc. Or do they connect them with ors: required by law, or "we want to" or ... ?

    I'm fairly pro-MS and yeah I found this over the top biased towards MS "It's pretty clearly laid out this time. Reiterating it would only serve to be redundant." an ~10 line sentence connected with semi-colons is pretty far from "clearly laid out" to me.

    1. Re:any english majors out there? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they try to make it look like they would do it only when required by the law but actually write that they can share it with whoever they want even when prohibited by the law. lovely.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  66. Re:Nothing New Here... by exomondo · · Score: 1

    ...And signal the market that everybody wants Windows and not Linux, because all it sees are the Windows laptop sales figures.

    If you really care what "the market" - whatever you're referring to there - thinks then pay the extra for the Linux version. Obviously it has no crapware subsidies and the cost of testing is amortized over a MUCH smaller amount of sales so naturally it is going to cost more, but cheapness shouldn't be the main sell here.

  67. Well, I am glad to see... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    ...somebody admitting that Window 10's privacy policy is having a breakdown.

  68. Re:Nothing New Here... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    I'd mod you up, but your link apparently requires JavaScript. So no ups for you. Also, no ups for most of everyone, ever.

    Google and Facebook have been effective in getting everything from everyone, ever, but I don't see any trend like you suggest other than this immediate, or in other words not trend-like, Windows 10.

    Sauce or GTFO. I vote for "recent and incompetent" rather than "habitual".

  69. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    All those under-the-hood features sound nice and all, but the OS is completely and utterly unusable simply because of its shitty Metro UI.

    Being flat is the new thing regardless of OS as every OS on the planet is following this new thing of turning it into a cell phone

    My Linux systems with KDE don't have this problem at all.

  70. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Really? You are comparing Gnome 3/kde 4.x to a modern working start menu?

    Is it crap because it is inferior? Or are you just not used to it due to muscle memory? I do not see Metro. I just see icons which dynamically change with info. Infact it is not metro enough on my surface tablet and too optimized for the desktop in my opinion if you ever owned one. But that is why 10 now has tablet mode.

    But really the tile is just an icon with updated info. Outlook and use this too. These applets you hate you do not have to use.

    Actually by next summer thanks to VS 2015 you will see ported IOS and Android apps as they can use up to 80% of the same code to be compatible with the universal API doing the other 20%. You can Dalvek and objective-C and clang to write apps.

    But I am not a fanboy as I have an earlier version of Windows right now due to needing the same version of Hyper-V as 2012 R2 which is 8.1 for the time being. It works just fine.

  71. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Really? You are comparing Gnome 3/kde 4.x to a modern working start menu?

    I'm not comparing Gnome3 to anything; Gnome3 sucks. KDE has a proper "modern" start menu, it's the way the Windows start menu should have been all along. The "menu" (which isn't a menu at all) in Metro is bullshit.

    Is it crap because it is inferior?

    Yes. It's absolute garbage. It's ugly, it's confusing, it even has two separate control panels for some stupid reason (there's a metro control panel, but it doesn't have much stuff in it, so you have to go find the hidden Win7-style control panel to actually change things). There is nothing good about it. It's obviously designed for tablets, but I'm not using a tablet. And if I were, it'd still be ugly as hell. WTF is with the ugly graphics and colors? It's like the Pontiac Aztek of UIs.

    These applets you hate you do not have to use.

    You still have to use the Metro interface any time you click on "start", unless you install some 3rd-party workaround software.

  72. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can't have more than 4 primary partitions without a hack
    Not so clear. I have primary partitions on 8 drives and that works fine...

    more than 2 TB due to 1981 bios technology required
    FUD. Those 8 drives are all 3 or 4 TB units and they all work fine (only the SSD is smaller)

    It also boots in mere seconds.

    OneDrive is a big downside of Win10. It's yet another required system tweak to eradicate that turd.

    But then again, you're the ultimate fanboy (hey, you even bought a surface!) and you're spouting that same old marketing drivel that we've been hearing for 2 decades: faster (even when it's not), more secure, whatever.

    Win8/10 adds very little of any value (unless you like built-in spyware), and instead of the "dated" Win7 looks, we get an even uglier 2D flat phone-like UI that is very much touch centric. The whole damn UI needs to be replaced, and all of that metro/modern/universal/whatever garbage has to be eradicated using powershell too.

    Nope. Win7 is still the best option so far.

  73. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Really? You are comparing Gnome 3/kde 4.x to a modern working start menu?

    I'm not comparing Gnome3 to anything; Gnome3 sucks. KDE has a proper "modern" start menu, it's the way the Windows start menu should have been all along. The "menu" (which isn't a menu at all) in Metro is bullshit.

    Is it crap because it is inferior?

    Yes. It's absolute garbage. It's ugly, it's confusing, it even has two separate control panels for some stupid reason (there's a metro control panel, but it doesn't have much stuff in it, so you have to go find the hidden Win7-style control panel to actually change things). There is nothing good about it. It's obviously designed for tablets, but I'm not using a tablet. And if I were, it'd still be ugly as hell. WTF is with the ugly graphics and colors? It's like the Pontiac Aztek of UIs.

    These applets you hate you do not have to use.

    You still have to use the Metro interface any time you click on "start", unless you install some 3rd-party workaround software.

    Actually that is not metro. The old control panel is scheduled to go away but the marketing department just couldn't wait back to school sadly so it is was only half done.

    The hamburger menus of the new is what kids and millennial prefer to use as it is what their phones and websites have been using since they were born. What we think is natural an old mac style menu's seem ugly and counter intuitive to them as a result. It is a win32 app.

    Yes colors for title bars they are reading back as it was rushed ala Vista style in October with update 1. Just drag off the tiles you want and the menu is back.

    What 8 sucked at was closed door syndrome. Things fly out at you. One app comes and everything is invisible. Stuff randomly opens and closes when you use a touchpad is another. All of them fixed.

    I am waiting and you may not like but it surely is not unusable nor designed for tablets. It functions just like 7. You hit the WIndows key and type what you want. Or use a mouse if you like the old XP way of all programs which many have not learned a way. Anyway each to their own. I could use 10 if someone put a gun to my head. On 8 I needed several paid programs to undo the damage in comparison.

  74. Re:Windows 10, it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    LOL! You? Not a fanboy? You're the worst fanboy I've ever seen! Hell, more like a hardcore shill!

  75. Re:IDEA by shione · · Score: 1

    Back in the day people ditched netscape for ie in troves because certain websites would work in ie only and nothing else. So people do pick what they use by the sites they can visit.

  76. Correction by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

    SOME are installed in the enterprise edition too :( cleansing them now. I can't express in words how fucking mad I am about this at this point. I have to run windows because my dev work runs on windows, but if that wasn't the case I'd be on another platform already.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  77. Re:Windows 10, it's free by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    It's NOT FREE damnit, stop posting this nonsense.

    You're right, it's significantly overpriced for what you're getting.

  78. Re:Windows 10, it's free by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I'll try it again later this month I guess. Right now I have both Windows 7 and the Windows 10 upgraded from it running side-by-side in VMs.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  79. Re:Nothing New Here... by BradMajors · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was charging a fixed fee for each PC sold, regardless of the OS that was installed. Hence, Linux machines had to be more expensive.

  80. Re:Windows 10, it's free by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    *Every* install of a new Windows OS is faster.

    But then you add programs and install updates and so on, and it slows down to where you started from.

  81. Re:Windows 10, it's free by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The Windows 10 start menu is great. Instead of wasting time organizing a tree of apps you just search. The ones you use frequently you pin to the start menu, like you used to have icons crapped all over the desktop. Unlikely the desktop, you can get to the start menu without disturbing other windows.

    Sod that stupid tree. I wasted enough time organizing that thing, and then re-organizing it when an app was updated and re-created its menu entries at the root again. I was already mostly searching anyway, I just needed to let go of needing that tree to be there in my mind.

    The control panel has nothing to do with the start menu. Having two is stupid, but you are conflating the two issues. Your only other criticism seems to be that you don't like the graphics... It's fine, not hideous, and it's functional. Your complaint borders on nit-picking.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  82. Re:Windows 10, it's free by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    Well, look... I tryed Windows 10 at home (using a VM), tryed hard. And my honest conclusion is that the new GUI is a fucking, steaming piece of shit!! It is even worse than the ridiculous Android lollipop GUI!! Who are the asshole in charge of the visual design department at Microsoft these days? A monkey? The code under the hood can be excellent, but the interface to interact with it is so bad that even makes my eyes bleed!

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  83. Re:Windows 10, it's free by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    It is not ugly... Is FUCKING UGLY!

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  84. Re:Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    Thanks

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  85. Re:Nothing New Here... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and Microsoft is only merging onto the limited access highway already paved by the likes of Google, Facebook, and others.

    We've already became complacent with allowing "diagnostic data" being sent back to the developers. It's going to be hard to change that attitude now that most people waited until after "the frog was boiled" before realizing that maybe we should be concerned.

    Some of us was already waving the caution flag but our concerns were downplayed because others argued that sharing information was a small price to pay for access to free software and services.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  86. Re:Nothing New Here... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    The demand for linux desktops from Dell isn't high enough to justify selling access via crapware.

    The same can't be said for Android. Look at the uninstallable crapware that comes with phones from certain manufacturers. Don't you think the software company paid said phone manufacturer for the opportunity to not only be preinstalled on the phone but also to make it not able to be uninstalled?

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  87. It's all good then by BobbyWang · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of bad things in this new product. But just a handful of them are new and the rest are in older products as well. It's just getting slightly worse. That's almost like an improvement.

  88. Re:I really hate the excuse "Google Already Does I by Slizzo · · Score: 1

    Great, then don't use Windows 10. I use my phone for banking sometimes. It also does store sensitive personal data, and I do have work email hooked to it.

  89. Sorted list by emil · · Score: 1

    KB 3035583 (primary nagware for Windows 10)

    KB 2952664
    KB 2990214 (Windows 10 upgrade)
    KB 3021917 (Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program)
    KB 3022345
    KB 3044374 (Windows 10 upgrade)
    KB 3068708 (update for CEIP and telemetry)
    KB 3075249 (telemetry)
    KB 3080149 (update for CEIP and telemetry)

  90. Re:Nothing New Here... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    So you're discounting 99% of the web over Javascript? Humm. It's not all evil, just mostly evil.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  91. Re:Nothing New Here... by dave420 · · Score: 1

    You are also paying extra for support, as the vast majority of their users will use Windows on that hardware, and you want something else. Mainstream support is always cheaper than anything specialised.

  92. Screw MS by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Diagnostic data "vital" to the operation of Windows

    M$ considers the Windows Update that nags you to upgrade to Windows 10 to be an "Important" update. Clearly they are on crack.

  93. Re:Doesn't explain the "Telemetry Update" to 7 and by WallyL · · Score: 1

    sc config "RemoteRegistry" start= disabled

  94. Re:Windows 10, it's free by macs4all · · Score: 1

    We'll see how this new model, which seems to be trying to emulate Apple in many respects, works for MS.

    But the one respect they cannot/won't emulate is changing their business model to a hardware-based monetization, where they actually sell Microsoft-branded hardware, and take steps to prevent their OS from running on Third Party hardware. By the way, Apple doesn't really prevent their software from running on compatible third-party hardware, but doing so violates the terms of the EULA. But Microsoft would have to actually use "tools" such as "Secure Boot" to "more aggressively" enforce their EULA, simply because of the sheer numbers of Windows-compatible hardware out there.

    Until they do that, Microsoft will forever be forced to pay for Windows by pimping-out the Users' personal data .

    There simply is no other way, other than to charge OEMs an exorbitant licensing fee, which kinda flies in the face of "free", don'tcha think?

  95. Re:Windows 10, it's free by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Now is the time to learn OS X

    FTFY.

  96. Re:Windows 10, it's free by exomondo · · Score: 1

    This is exactly right, I don't quite understand how people can still be so ignorant of the concept that "there is no such thing as a free lunch". How is it that people here are still surprised to find that out?

    Apple's 'device' model is good, the hardware and software are integrated rather than separate things and it means the cost of the device is then used for both the hardware and software development.

  97. Re:Windows 10, it's free by macs4all · · Score: 1

    This is exactly right, I don't quite understand how people can still be so ignorant of the concept that "there is no such thing as a free lunch". How is it that people here are still surprised to find that out?

    Apple's 'device' model is good, the hardware and software are integrated rather than separate things and it means the cost of the device is then used for both the hardware and software development.

    Right.

    And bringing it back around to the point of this Thread, that also means that Apple's business model (and I suppose Linux') is the only one that doesn't depend on eating the souls of its victims, er customers.

    But the problem with Linux is that it's Linux; which means that it is forever doomed to be relegated to the server room and the workbenches of hobbyists. It very well may "run" the Internet; but it will never be "The Year of The Linux Desktop". Never.

  98. Re:Windows 10, it's free by calc · · Score: 1

    for fuck sake when did the audience for this site become so dimwitted and unintelligent.

    Probably around the time it became overrun by Windows users.

  99. Re:Nothing New Here... by garbut · · Score: 1

    Right on. I admit I never really gave them much thought before, but simply can't agree to the new eula.

    --
    Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
  100. Re:Microsoft-,You failed at the one job you had to by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    Many people's issue is not that they will give this to their govenrment, but that they will give it to the US Government, regardless of juristriction ...

    Shoudl I mutter something about no juristriction without representation ... ?

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  101. Re:Nothing New Here... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    logo compliance kicking in there, I reckon - it was more than just a sticker, it said "I'm taking kickbacks from Microsoft to push this out with a crippled version of Office."

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel